The Atlantic

The Conversation

Readers respond to our January/February 2019 cover story and more.

Don’t Call Me LGBTQ

In the January/February issue, Jonathan Rauch made the case for adopting one overarching designation for sexual minorities. He proposed using a single letter: Q.


What a relief to read something about the absurdity of the “alphabet soup” designation for gay people. I totally agree with Jonathan Rauch that it has become a symbol “for the excesses of identity politics,” which have fueled animosity and intolerance toward homosexuals. I’m amazed that anyone would add more letters to this train wreck.

You will never promote more tolerance and peace in the world by diminishing individuals into ever more exclusive and reductive parts. Large, broad categories are much more efficient and easy to understand.

Patricia McAnulty


No, a thousand times, no!

Jonathan Rauch makes a valid point about the awkwardness of as a term to represent sexual minorities, but to substitute simply would be a huge error. While Rauch mentions the baggage of the word (which would inevitably reference), he gives no sense of the fact that was the primary name assigned by society to homosexuals before came into was not descriptive in a positive way. It was ugly, hateful, pejorative, demeaning, and diminishing. It is the right word with which to be labeled, if one must be labeled.

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The Atlantic

The Atlantic4 min readPolitics
Boris Johnson’s G7 Balancing Act
The summit has forced the British prime minister to navigate divided priorities: Europe and Trump.
The Atlantic3 min read
The Persistent Complexity of Tool
Back with new music after a 13-year hiatus, the legendary metal band is as precise and devastating as it has always been.
The Atlantic7 min readPolitics
Is Trump Destroying Bipartisan Consensus on Israel?
Two weeks of outrage and head-spinning news show that institutional unification on Israel has gotten much weaker under President Trump.