Los Angeles Times

Editorial: The Supreme Court wrongly blesses a religious symbol on public property

If the United States aims to be a tolerant, pluralistic country that treats all its citizens with respect, the Supreme Court shouldn't be giving its blessing to the display of one faith's sacred symbols on property that belongs to the public. But that's what seven justices did Thursday when they ruled that a giant memorial cross at a highway intersection near Washington, D.C., doesn't violate the 1st Amendment.

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times5 min readPolitics
Michael Hiltzik: Shell Oil Allegedly Coerced Its Workers To Attend A Trump Rally. Blame The Supreme Court
Workers at a Royal Dutch Shell petrochemical plant outside Pittsburgh were coerced into attending a political event featuring President Trump on Aug. 13 on pain of losing overtime pay for the week. It used to be illegal for employers to dragoon their
Los Angeles Times4 min read
Commentary: Charles Manson Was A White Supremacist. Why Can't Pop Culture Seem To Admit It?
The creepy, long-haired menace of Charles Manson and his murderous hippie cult is back, thanks in large part to the blockbuster feature "Once Upon a Time ... in Hollywood" and the return of Netflix's heralded crime drama, "Mindhunter." Manson, who or
Los Angeles Times6 min read
Meet The 'Rock Star' Frog Breeder Vying To Save Southern California's Rarest Amphibian
It was happy hour at the "Frog Shack," a tiny building at the Los Angeles Zoo offering all the amenities that Southern California's rarest - and perhaps fussiest - amphibians might need to survive. Aeration and water filtration systems hummed softly