The Christian Science Monitor

US-Iran escalation: It’s message-sending, but the risks are high

Another day, another step in the apparently inexorable escalation of U.S.-Iran tensions that has brought the arch-adversaries to the brink of war since President Donald Trump last year withdrew from the nuclear deal.

The escalation has included a U.S. “maximum pressure” sanctions campaign that has crippled Iran’s economy and targeted its supreme leader and elite Revolutionary Guard; incremental Iranian violations of the landmark 2015 deal; Iran shooting down a $130 million U.S. intelligence drone; and Mr. Trump at the last minute calling off a retaliatory surgical strike – while planes were reportedly mid-route.

The result: the U.S. and Iran have not been this close to open conflict since the 1980s.

Which raises two very pressing questions: What is the psychology of escalation at play? And how

“Realization of danger”“Reversible steps”Rouhani under fire

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The Christian Science Monitor

The Christian Science Monitor2 min readPolitics
Hong Kong’s Countermessage To Ethnic Patriotism
The long and popular protests have helped forge a civic identity in contrast to Beijing’s imposed ‘dream’ of cultural unity around a racial stereotype of Chinese subservience.
The Christian Science Monitor5 min readPolitics
What Are Beijing's Best Options For Ending Hong Kong Protests?
As tensions rise, Beijing is signaling that it’s considering a military option to end the Hong Kong protests. Why that’s not the most-likely path.
The Christian Science Monitor5 min readPolitics
How Geopolitics Enabled India’s Gambit In Kashmir
Revoking Kashmir’s autonomy has been a Hindu nationalist dream for decades. Today’s global political atmosphere provided India the right moment.