Are you sure?
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Vlad: The Last Confession
Summary
"Trust nothing that you've heard."
Winter 1431, a son is born to the Prince of Transylvania.
His father christened him "Vlad."
His people knew him as "The Dragon's Son."
His enemies reviled him as "Tepes"-The Impaler.
He became the hero of a nation.
We know him as Dracula.
Vlad: The Last Confession is a novel about the real man behind the Bram Stoker myth. It tells of the Prince, the warrior, the lover, the torturer, the survivor and, ultimately, the hero.
"A great tale, finely woven with action, palpably real characters and terrific twists of fate." -Simon Scarrow
Read on the Scribd mobile app
Download the free Scribd mobile app to read anytime, anywhere.
Reviews
Loved it. I mean, of course the stories & specific details of impalement & other tortures were hideous & beyond reading at times, even times I wish u hadn't read the section on impalement; BUT PEOPLE MUST ALL REAF IT SO IT NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN!!
And I also understand why Clad turned out as he did. He learned impalement & various other torture measures & devices, at the hands of the Turks (today's Muslims), bc Vlad's father gave Vlad & his younger brother as tribute to Nurse, the Sultan at that time, so Vlad's father, also named Vlad, could go back home to Wallachaia & rule freely-some what. After i belive 8yrs, Vlad is allowed to leave & to back home, for his father & oldest brother are dead, he is now Prince/King of his beloved land's & people's. He was very intelligent when it came to military tactics & won many a battle, keeping the Sultan & his evil at bay just a little while longer, till betrayed twice. No wonder the man hated the Muslim Turks for what torture they'd put him & his brother through, but also his entire country of Wallachia. Felt very bad for him.
And I also understand why Clad turned out as he did. He learned impalement & various other torture measures & devices, at the hands of the Turks (today's Muslims), bc Vlad's father gave Vlad & his younger brother as tribute to Nurse, the Sultan at that time, so Vlad's father, also named Vlad, could go back home to Wallachaia & rule freely-some what. After i belive 8yrs, Vlad is allowed to leave & to back home, for his father & oldest brother are dead, he is now Prince/King of his beloved land's & people's. He was very intelligent when it came to military tactics & won many a battle, keeping the Sultan & his evil at bay just a little while longer, till betrayed twice. No wonder the man hated the Muslim Turks for what torture they'd put him & his brother through, but also his entire country of Wallachia. Felt very bad for him.
This is my new favorite book!
This book was written very well and kept me glued to the story all the way thru.I really liked the angle the author used to tell the story of Vlad.Anyone who is into Dracula would love this book.
I began this book expecting not to like it. My name and heritage are such that I know a little bit about Vlad Țepeș, and I know a few words of Romanian, and have visited some of the locations talked about in the book - always a set up to be disappointed. And my experience with historical novels that reproduce the life of a historical figure has been mixed. But I'm glad to say that I enjoyed this considerably more than I expected.The novel is a fictionalization of the life of Vlad Țepeș "the Impaler", a 15th century Wallachian prince and one of the inspirations for Stoker's Dracula. There's little known about him aside from a few major events, so maybe that's why the novel works: it gives the author room to create his own character(s) and their own motivations. And he does this pretty well. They were compelling and fairly real. Bringing 15th century Romania to life was a little less successful (compared to, for example, Sansom's success in bringing 16th century London to life in the Shardlake novels) but not a major impediment.I have a few niggly complaints: the lack of diacritical marks for all the foreign words (Romanian, Hungarian, Turkish) is distracting for those of us who expect them and know that they actually help us pronounce the words correctly. And I have not figured out what the author was doing with some of these words. For instance the major church in Tîrgovişte, where some of the action takes place, is the Biserica Domneascǎ which is consistently called the Bisierica Domnesc. Is this a mistake? If not, then what am I missing? And the fortress of Giurgiu! OMG! In three pages it's spelled three different ways (Giurgiu, Guirgui, Giurgui) and this continues throughout the book. At first I thought it was bad copy editing, but now I think the author must be foolin' with us. If so, I wish he would let us in on the joke.Anyway, minor distractions aside, it was enjoyable. Oh, by the way. If you are thinking of reading it, you better have a strong stomach. Vlad was not a nice guy and if you can't stomach descriptions of impalement and other tortures you might want to give this book a pass.
I can't point to any one thing that was "wrong" with this book, but it just failed to capture my interest. I liked the premise and the characters were reasonably interesting, but I found my attention wandering every few chapters. I suspect that another reader will read and love this novel, but it didn't click for me.
Thanks to Bram Stoker when most people hear the name Dracula they think of a vampire from Transylvania. The myth, I think has become more famous than the real man. C.C. Humphreys uses his novel to delve into the life of the real Dracula; the man who has come down through history as Vlad the Impaler. A real man with a story that is not easy to read.The period in history when Vlad was fighting for his throne in the small kingdom of Wallachia (which is now part of Romania) is not exactly noted for it's gentility. The Roman Catholic church was warring with the Greek Orthodox church and the Ottoman Empire was trying to take over them both. Sins could be eliminated by killing the "infidel." So they all went about killing as many infidels as they could.The book is set up in an interesting way; the three people who knew Vlad best are brought together in a sort of tribunal to tell his tale. To show how his life played out to see if his excesses could be somehow forgiven. To see if his reputation could be repaired. His best friend and right hand man throughout life, his love and his confessor.The tale starts with Vlad's stay as a hostage in the "care" of Murad where he is taught the way of the Koran and the Turk. It moves through his life and loves and shows the whys of his actions. The author does an excellent job of dealing with the horror of a man who reputedly impaled up to 100,000 people and yet making him still seem somewhat human. Mad, yes but human all the same.As I said at the beginning it was a hard book to read but one I found I could not put down. The story is very compelling and while I suspected the one part of the ending it still was very satisfying. Mr. Humphreys writes in a compelling way that brings the character and time to life and even though you want to turn away you also want to know more. This was an excellent book about a very disturbing man.
Three people are called to confess: his best friend, his mistress, and his confessor. These three will recount the tale of the one known as the Impaler Prince. These three, who were closest to him, will tell the tale of Vlad Dracula.C.C. Humphreys offers not the story of the monster akin to the Devil, as Vlad's very name suggests, but of the contradictory man, victim of his own life experiences. To that end, all three narratives are interwoven so fluidly that it was as if only the subject of the novel were telling the story. The reader first follows a young Vlad, a prince's son, hostage to the Turkish Sultan Murad. Under the reader's watchful eye, Vlad metamorphoses from the highly intelligent, quiet, and just youth to the ruler and legend he will become, the result of his upbringing.Conflict and betrayal are woven throughout the tale.Vlad’s inner conflict, the intimate conflict he has with his betrayers, and the broader conflict he has with those endeavouring and all too often succeeding in overthrowing him, eventually including the Church he supports, all contribute to the tale in a well-constructed, intriguing way. Vlad’s trust and faith in the integrity of others is gradually eroded completely by such betrayals. He is later betrayed by his younger brother Radu, who seeks to claim the crown under the guidance of the new Sultan Mehmet, his own nobles, Ilona and finally Ion himself. All this will shape his desire for cruelty and revenge, concluding that ruling by fear is much more effective than winning the heart and loyalty of his subjects. The reasons behind their behavior are explained as they make their confessions, but at the time of the incidents, even those are not enough to calm a man so used to betrayals, and intolerant of them in any style, shape or form.Vlad would refer to all this as his kismet, or destiny, but it is evident that his experiences and repeated betrayals lead him to a life of violence, cruelty and torture. Upon reading this novel, one cannot utterly characterize him as monster, but as an intriguing, compelling, multi-faceted man who excelled at the lessons he was taught.
My thoughts:This is the story of Vlad Dracul, prince of Wallachia, known as Vlad Tepes (the impaler), or Dracula (Dracul-a) son of the dragon/devil. And it has nothing to do with vampires.I must say that he was a fascinating man, and a crazy bastard. The author has taken liberties since while Vlad lived and afterwards rumours were spread by his enemies. So Humphreys tried to look at the facts that were known and build his story. The book does not try to make Vlad a hero, but not a madman either. It is his last confession told by those who knew him.When he was young he was sent to the Turks as a hostage, and there he suffered. So no wonder he started to do crazy things later in life. Back home again he did everything to clean up Wallachia so that people to travel and live in peace. And he also went on crusades to push back the Turks. It's not a pretty story. He and his people could not hold the land alone, so he built his might on fear. And yes he sure liked to impale people. It was to fear or be feared.It did take me some time to get into the book. I do not know what it was. I just did not connect, but it was when he started to do more crazy things that my interest grew. He was just such a fascinating man, a warrior of Christ, impaler, lawgiver. It was the last half of the book that won me over.Conclusion:Poor Vlad, Bram Stokers sure did a number on his reputation. Vlad was not the first man to use different methods and there have been far worse people around. It was a fascinating tale about who the real Dracula was. Rich in historical drama and bloody madness.Rating:If you wanna see madness, here it is
When I was pitched this book, it almost sounded to good to be, well . . . good. How many times have you bought a book (or asked for a review copy) and wanted it to be as good as the blurb, yet past let-downs jaded your hope? I’ve never been so happy to be disappointed.Historical Fiction can be a challenging genre to read if the author hasn’t take care to do their research. It also takes skill to weave that knowledge into a story seamlessly, never allowing it to detract from the overall storytelling, but to enhance it. When done well, it entertains and informs, tells a story of history with enough credibility behind the fiction to support and feed it.Humphreys does this with his main character as well. Vlad, known by other names including ‘Dracula’, is a man many think they know much about, but in reality, the truth is overshadowed by unflattering propaganda. He fictionalizes Vlad’s life using as much truth as he could gather. He uses it in a way to be as fair as possible to the man while clarifying the forces which drove him to such brutal extremes in order to do what he felt was best for his country, his people, his faith.This brutality was not innate. At least this is what the reader comes away with after reading Vlad’s story. It was learned, then reflected back at those who had used it against him as well as his enemies. This is the hardest part of the read and very disturbing.Although Humphreys does not go into a great amount of detail, still, the heinous acts perpetrated upon Vlad, and the ones he inflicted on others is shocking. As much as I was prepared for it, it still had a powerful impact. It gives a complexity to the man that forces a re-evaluation of all that you have learned previously.The most interesting aspect of this novel is the narration. It is told using the third person however, it is actually three people – those who knew Vlad best who are telling it. The writer mixes each voice to become one: Vlad, making his voice strong throughout.The story is told in a linear fashion, allowing the reader to grow in understanding as Vlad descends in depravity. Not that it is to be excused, but at least there is a basis for it – a method to this dark Prince’s madness. The reader is left to decide if Dracula deserves his infamy, is misunderstood, or in a way a bit of both.I have to warn you, this is a challenging read, not so much for some of its content, but the feelings that remain afterward. It makes you think harder about what it good, what is evil, and what happens when the two collide and combine within the soul.I love this book. One of the best historical fiction novels I’ve read. It gets my highest rating and a strong recommendation.
This historical fiction is an account of the life of Vlad The Impaler, told from the perspective of the three people closest to him: his lover, his closest friend and 2IC, and his confessor. We meet Vlad as a young Prince, being held hostage by the Turks in the early 1400s. In this period it is customary to hold the sons of a war lord hostage as a deterrent for attacking or invading your enemies. Devoutly Christian, Vlad receives tutelage in the Muslim faith with his younger brother Radu. When Vlad meets the young Sultan Mehmet their mutual hatred is born.Vlad is soon separated from his brother and suffers cruel treatment at the hands of the Turks, and is forced to learn and practice horrific torture techniques. It is at this time that Vlad learns the motto "we torture others so they cannot torture us" and we see a significant change in his attitude to torture, and the development of his view on impalement relating to the Crucifixion of Christ. The author is careful not to justify Vlad's actions, but rather reveal the nature of his upbringing and his struggles and conflicts from the perspective of the three confessors.There is much war, action, torture and conflict throughout the book, but it is surprisingly complex at the same time, with a complicated love story and heart breaking relationship with his 2IC and betrayal by his younger brother. There was also a lot of falconry which I enjoyed!At one point in the book, Vlad takes control of Wallachia and punishes every law breaker - regardless of the severity of the crime - with impalement. This punishment acts as a deterrent, and within a short time the crime in Wallachia plummets, travellers and traders begin to cross the territory again and the people flourish and grow rich. Two years prior, Vlad had voiced his desire to be able to put a golden bejeweled cup on the edge of the well, and the townspeople would not be tempted to steal it. Vlad accomplished this and said that he couldn't make his people love him, but he could make them fear him. It was this particular aspect of the book that had the most lasting impact on me. Both the nature in which he used fear to reign, but also how his people prospered under this regime, which hadn't occurred to me before.I absolutely loved this book and was enthralled by the history in the region at this time, and the ongoing struggle between the Muslims and Christians. This is definitely a book for those interested in historical fiction. Anyone interested in reading about vampires should look elsewhere. This is a serious book, with hard hitting issues and a twist at the end.
This book I bought on a whim. You know how that goes. It looks interesting for some reason and without reading any of it you just end up buying it. It must be fate (which is interesting in itself if you've read the book). ;-)This book took me totally by surprise.I am interested in the historical Dracula, Vlad Tepes, and then why not read a historical novel about the man? In the author's notes at the end of this book C.C. Humphreys explains how the process was and what the intentions were at the start. Very enlightening, I think.I have to say the book is very well written. How else can I explain the fact that I actually feel sympahty for a man who by no means was a nice person at all? At least, he's not seen as 'nice' if you look at his deeds. Of course that says nothing about his character.To cut a long story short: this is a fantastic book and I would recommend it to everyone.
The story of the true Dracula, a charismatic 15th Century warlord who fought for honour, family and Christendom. A stunningly constructed novel about Dracul-a, son of Dracul, who was also known as the Impaler Prince. Not a novel for the faint hearted and as the cover rightly says, not for reading at bedtime! A must read for historical fiction lovers, and a face paced and well researched book.
When I saw C.C. Humphreys at the 2008 Vancouver International Writers and Readers Festival he was doing a brief reading from this book. He warned the audience that sex and drugs were on the menu for the afternoon. His reading was captivating, so I decided to get the book – and his autograph on it. I haven't regretted it, the book was an engrossing read.Not for the feint of heart, Vlad the impaler did impale a lot of people, and this book about his life does give one very detailed description of an impaling. Only one was described in detail, but every subsequent impaling in the book can be vividly imagined after that one, even without the detailed description.This is a hard book to get out of your head. The characters all feel real, and the atmosphere of the crusades against the Turkish muslims in the 1400s is very convincingly described. The ending will stay with you for days.