Yup, we’ve got that one

And more than one million more. Become a member today and read free for two weeks.

Read free for two weeks

In his final novel, which he considered his most important, Aldous Huxley transports us to the remote Pacific island of Pala, where an ideal society has flourished for 120 years.

Inevitably, this island of bliss attracts the envy and enmity of the surrounding world. A conspiracy is underway to take over Pala, and events are set in motion when an agent of the conspirators, a newspaperman named Faranby, is shipwrecked there. What Faranby doesn't expect is how his time with the people of Pala will revolutionize all his values and—to his amazement—give him hope.

Topics: Utopia, Dystopia, Politics, Democracy, Spirituality , Shipwreck, Love, Adventurous, Futuristic, Philosophical, Modernism, Existentialism, Island, Beach, South Pacific, and Speculative Fiction

Published: HarperCollins on Sep 1, 1972
ISBN: 9780061959646
List price: $10.49
Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
Availability for Island
With a 30 day free trial you can read online for free
  1. This book can be read on up to 6 mobile devices.
Clear rating

Compared to his other books, that I have read, this one seems somewhat trashy for lack of a better word, however well written it may seem next to more obviously trashy books. In some of his novels he slips in his philosophical and moral ideas subtly, with no detrimental effect to the book, yet here he pays complete disregard to elegance and tact, drenching the reader with his misplaced utopian idealising, while forgetting to to put in a story to support the fact that there is nothing else to keep the discerning reader interested. I wouldn't go as far as to say this is a terrible book, just that Huxley has done himself no credit by writing it. Not all of his notions here are wrong, (a few are very good), just the majority; this book feels self indulged, as if it was written by a child who has just found a novel toy, which is in this case Eastern religion, along with all the philosophy and ethics, or lack thereof, that it drags along with it. I don't mind reading Huxley's other books that lack plots because they make up for it in style and content, whereas here all three are either absent or insufficient. If you are determined to read this book, being a Huxley fan, or someone who thinks that they may enjoy it, I advise a large pinch of salt to be taken before reading each chapter; this was the last novel he wrote, and I don't think it would be unfair to suggest that his imagination may have overtaken his intellect in its influence on his writing. It would be far too easy to be duped by ideas in this book because it is so nicely written, aesthetically stimulating, and penned with expert sophistry; this does make it nice to read, though it is only superficially rewarding once one notices that it is only well polished wishy-washy psuedo-religion and nonsense. If you take the book at face value, as a description of an interpretation of the Utopian society then you may find it interesting. If you expect the interpretation to be accurate or well thought out, then you should be disappointed.read more
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
A quick read, this book is really less a novel and more a utopian fable. Perhaps Huxley had found Buddhism and LSD to relieve a great deal of suffering near the end of his life, but this work slips from being an enlightening critique of Western materialism and ends up an overly simple escapist fairy tale. While I as a reader was already inclined to believe there was some truth behind some of the points he was making, his thoughts were expressed in such childish thinly-veiled fashion that I couldn't take them seriously.read more
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
Huxley's last novel, 'Island', is something that I wouldn't have read except for a chance recommendation. It's also something that probably wouldn't have resonated with me, if I had read it years ago. But now I find it fascinating on multiple levels, and it addresses a number of highly relevant issues of today. It's not so much a compelling narrative as it is a series of essays couched as a novel, but I found it interesting and recommend it highly.read more
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
I have to admit that I didn't find this novel as transformative as some readers did, but I'm quite glad to have read it. Truthfully, it's not much of a story, but it sure will give you food for thought and I expect Huxley's ideas will stick with me for a long, long time. The protagonist of Island is British journalist Will Farnaby. Will isn't an entirely likeable character as the novel opens--as is so often the case in these tales of redemption. In an attempt to escape his troubles, or possibly to escape himself, Will takes a day off from a Southeast Asian business trip to go sailing. A sudden storm sweeps in, and in the novel's opening pages Will realizes he's shipwrecked and injured. Luckily, Will has washed up on the exotic and little-visited island of Pala. This island-nation is a modern (or the 1960s version of it) Utopia. Will is discovered by some children who promptly go for help. It arrives in the form of Dr. Robert MacPhail, one of the island's most respected citizens. Dr. Robert patches Will up, and he and other islanders indulge Will's curiosity about their home. Over the course of just a few days, they introduce Will to every aspect of their most extraordinary society. From family life, medicine, education, and rites of passage, Will learns about Palanese life from birth to death. He meets many islanders, including the future Raja who is about to come of age, and his mother, the Rani. These two members of the ruling class have some very different ideas about how things should be on Pala. And their agenda may just tie in with a secret agenda of Will's own... It is this loose storyline that the plot consists of, but it's actually a very minor part of the novel--just a thread that runs through a lot of philosophy and sociology. Personally, I had a very limited interest in and tolerance for a lot of Eastern religious (mostly Buddhist) philosophy. But I really loved the sociological ideas Huxley put forth in his Utopia. Really, really interesting stuff! For another reader, it might be the reverse. One way or another, I really have to believe the novel would be of interest to any thinking person.read more
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
This is less of a novel, and more of an expanded philosophical treatise on Huxley's version of a utopia.

The society of the island Pala is the inverse of, and parallel to, the society of Brave New World. Instead of a rudimentary caste system, jobs are assigned from personal interest and capability. Education is communal, in order to prevent passing of parental neuroses or flaws and ease socialization. The emphasis of sex is not solely to have a lot of it, but to enjoy it and make an experience out of it. Lots of ideas are derived from Eastern philosophy.

Such a society does not shun all technology, however. Refrigeration and hydroelectricity are essential to keep the basic necessities of society going, as well as modern medicine. However, the overproduction of consumer goods is limited, so as to prevent outside invasion but also conspicuous consumption. Genetic modification and contraception are common, but to pass on good qualities instead of enforcing superiority or inferiority.

Most notably, instead of soma being used to make the populace dumb and happy, they are used as a means of personal growth and experimentation. The most common drug is named moshka, derived from a mushroom and somewhat analogous to psilocybin or mescaline.

Compassion and faith seem to be the cornerstones of this society, not ideology or advancement.

Island's influence is very clear as an archetype of psychedelic drug fiction. However, it refrains from the sheer unbounded optimism which these thought experiments entail. At the end of the novel, the island is seized in a coup backed by dictatorial and corporate interests, and the fate of the islanders is uncertain. Huxley knows only too well what happens to the people of loving-happiness, eternal compassion and attention compared to the advance of the Other.read more
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
This reminds me a lot of Brave New World: oh let's explain our society to this stranger + yay hallucinogenic drugs + yay population control, only with even less actual plot (which surprised me, since this was published much later than BNW). Also the society is a lot less dystopian, which for me made it a little less gripping. It was an interesting and relaxing read, though.read more
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
shame this is so awful being that it's his last book. just trying way too hard to be modern. I don't know, I need to re-visit it.read more
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
I quite enjoyed this book. Written in the early 1960s, Huxley has a great grasp of our modern idea of mindfulness. Birds remind Pala's inhabitants to pay "Attention" to the "Here and Now." Instead of saying grace at meals, everyone takes an initial mindful bite, chewing very slowly until the food has disintegrated in their mouths. Mindful meditation techniques are used in healing the ill and in intimate relationships. Great description of a conscious and aware education system.read more
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
Why did Huxely have to write this as a novel? That format doesn’t work. 99% of it is conservation or more like series of monologues. It is packed with interesting ideas about what an ideal society would look like, including its education, health, economy, religions, sexual practices and so on. But the dialogue format is confusing it. It would have been a nice philosophical essay. There are so many ideas in it that it is impossible to summarize. Just a few points that were interesting enough to pick out: – Children are brought up by a community of parents. They can escape to other than their biological parents to live for a while, but they cannot escape responsibilities.read more
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
Wow!! I'm dismayed by the negative tone of the other reviews posted here. I thought this was an incredible book. It was pretty obvious to me that there was not supposed to be a strong plot as that was not the point of the book. Huxley was offering a vision, a possible solution to the question of how we might want to live on this planet. The book was a vehicle. It was a book to be judged by its ideas not its technical aspects. It was the result of a lifetime of culture-watching, experience and thought. Pala serves as a worthy template for "intentional communities", alternatives to mainstream submission to corporate overlords ideas of how we should live. I read "Walden Two" by B. F. Skinner around the same time and Huxleys' was far more engaging and beautifully written!!read more
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
I liked the descriptions and details.read more
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
Read all reviews

Reviews

Compared to his other books, that I have read, this one seems somewhat trashy for lack of a better word, however well written it may seem next to more obviously trashy books. In some of his novels he slips in his philosophical and moral ideas subtly, with no detrimental effect to the book, yet here he pays complete disregard to elegance and tact, drenching the reader with his misplaced utopian idealising, while forgetting to to put in a story to support the fact that there is nothing else to keep the discerning reader interested. I wouldn't go as far as to say this is a terrible book, just that Huxley has done himself no credit by writing it. Not all of his notions here are wrong, (a few are very good), just the majority; this book feels self indulged, as if it was written by a child who has just found a novel toy, which is in this case Eastern religion, along with all the philosophy and ethics, or lack thereof, that it drags along with it. I don't mind reading Huxley's other books that lack plots because they make up for it in style and content, whereas here all three are either absent or insufficient. If you are determined to read this book, being a Huxley fan, or someone who thinks that they may enjoy it, I advise a large pinch of salt to be taken before reading each chapter; this was the last novel he wrote, and I don't think it would be unfair to suggest that his imagination may have overtaken his intellect in its influence on his writing. It would be far too easy to be duped by ideas in this book because it is so nicely written, aesthetically stimulating, and penned with expert sophistry; this does make it nice to read, though it is only superficially rewarding once one notices that it is only well polished wishy-washy psuedo-religion and nonsense. If you take the book at face value, as a description of an interpretation of the Utopian society then you may find it interesting. If you expect the interpretation to be accurate or well thought out, then you should be disappointed.
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
A quick read, this book is really less a novel and more a utopian fable. Perhaps Huxley had found Buddhism and LSD to relieve a great deal of suffering near the end of his life, but this work slips from being an enlightening critique of Western materialism and ends up an overly simple escapist fairy tale. While I as a reader was already inclined to believe there was some truth behind some of the points he was making, his thoughts were expressed in such childish thinly-veiled fashion that I couldn't take them seriously.
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
Huxley's last novel, 'Island', is something that I wouldn't have read except for a chance recommendation. It's also something that probably wouldn't have resonated with me, if I had read it years ago. But now I find it fascinating on multiple levels, and it addresses a number of highly relevant issues of today. It's not so much a compelling narrative as it is a series of essays couched as a novel, but I found it interesting and recommend it highly.
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
I have to admit that I didn't find this novel as transformative as some readers did, but I'm quite glad to have read it. Truthfully, it's not much of a story, but it sure will give you food for thought and I expect Huxley's ideas will stick with me for a long, long time. The protagonist of Island is British journalist Will Farnaby. Will isn't an entirely likeable character as the novel opens--as is so often the case in these tales of redemption. In an attempt to escape his troubles, or possibly to escape himself, Will takes a day off from a Southeast Asian business trip to go sailing. A sudden storm sweeps in, and in the novel's opening pages Will realizes he's shipwrecked and injured. Luckily, Will has washed up on the exotic and little-visited island of Pala. This island-nation is a modern (or the 1960s version of it) Utopia. Will is discovered by some children who promptly go for help. It arrives in the form of Dr. Robert MacPhail, one of the island's most respected citizens. Dr. Robert patches Will up, and he and other islanders indulge Will's curiosity about their home. Over the course of just a few days, they introduce Will to every aspect of their most extraordinary society. From family life, medicine, education, and rites of passage, Will learns about Palanese life from birth to death. He meets many islanders, including the future Raja who is about to come of age, and his mother, the Rani. These two members of the ruling class have some very different ideas about how things should be on Pala. And their agenda may just tie in with a secret agenda of Will's own... It is this loose storyline that the plot consists of, but it's actually a very minor part of the novel--just a thread that runs through a lot of philosophy and sociology. Personally, I had a very limited interest in and tolerance for a lot of Eastern religious (mostly Buddhist) philosophy. But I really loved the sociological ideas Huxley put forth in his Utopia. Really, really interesting stuff! For another reader, it might be the reverse. One way or another, I really have to believe the novel would be of interest to any thinking person.
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
This is less of a novel, and more of an expanded philosophical treatise on Huxley's version of a utopia.

The society of the island Pala is the inverse of, and parallel to, the society of Brave New World. Instead of a rudimentary caste system, jobs are assigned from personal interest and capability. Education is communal, in order to prevent passing of parental neuroses or flaws and ease socialization. The emphasis of sex is not solely to have a lot of it, but to enjoy it and make an experience out of it. Lots of ideas are derived from Eastern philosophy.

Such a society does not shun all technology, however. Refrigeration and hydroelectricity are essential to keep the basic necessities of society going, as well as modern medicine. However, the overproduction of consumer goods is limited, so as to prevent outside invasion but also conspicuous consumption. Genetic modification and contraception are common, but to pass on good qualities instead of enforcing superiority or inferiority.

Most notably, instead of soma being used to make the populace dumb and happy, they are used as a means of personal growth and experimentation. The most common drug is named moshka, derived from a mushroom and somewhat analogous to psilocybin or mescaline.

Compassion and faith seem to be the cornerstones of this society, not ideology or advancement.

Island's influence is very clear as an archetype of psychedelic drug fiction. However, it refrains from the sheer unbounded optimism which these thought experiments entail. At the end of the novel, the island is seized in a coup backed by dictatorial and corporate interests, and the fate of the islanders is uncertain. Huxley knows only too well what happens to the people of loving-happiness, eternal compassion and attention compared to the advance of the Other.
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
This reminds me a lot of Brave New World: oh let's explain our society to this stranger + yay hallucinogenic drugs + yay population control, only with even less actual plot (which surprised me, since this was published much later than BNW). Also the society is a lot less dystopian, which for me made it a little less gripping. It was an interesting and relaxing read, though.
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
shame this is so awful being that it's his last book. just trying way too hard to be modern. I don't know, I need to re-visit it.
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
I quite enjoyed this book. Written in the early 1960s, Huxley has a great grasp of our modern idea of mindfulness. Birds remind Pala's inhabitants to pay "Attention" to the "Here and Now." Instead of saying grace at meals, everyone takes an initial mindful bite, chewing very slowly until the food has disintegrated in their mouths. Mindful meditation techniques are used in healing the ill and in intimate relationships. Great description of a conscious and aware education system.
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
Why did Huxely have to write this as a novel? That format doesn’t work. 99% of it is conservation or more like series of monologues. It is packed with interesting ideas about what an ideal society would look like, including its education, health, economy, religions, sexual practices and so on. But the dialogue format is confusing it. It would have been a nice philosophical essay. There are so many ideas in it that it is impossible to summarize. Just a few points that were interesting enough to pick out: – Children are brought up by a community of parents. They can escape to other than their biological parents to live for a while, but they cannot escape responsibilities.
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
Wow!! I'm dismayed by the negative tone of the other reviews posted here. I thought this was an incredible book. It was pretty obvious to me that there was not supposed to be a strong plot as that was not the point of the book. Huxley was offering a vision, a possible solution to the question of how we might want to live on this planet. The book was a vehicle. It was a book to be judged by its ideas not its technical aspects. It was the result of a lifetime of culture-watching, experience and thought. Pala serves as a worthy template for "intentional communities", alternatives to mainstream submission to corporate overlords ideas of how we should live. I read "Walden Two" by B. F. Skinner around the same time and Huxleys' was far more engaging and beautifully written!!
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
I liked the descriptions and details.
Is this review helpful? Yes | NoThank you for your feedback.
Load more
scribd