Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Patent Trolls: Predatory Litigation and the Smothering of Innovation
    Patent Trolls: Predatory Litigation and the Smothering of Innovation
    Patent Trolls: Predatory Litigation and the Smothering of Innovation
    Ebook124 pages1 hour

    Patent Trolls: Predatory Litigation and the Smothering of Innovation

    By William J. Watkins and William F. Shughart II

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Stiflers of innovation, patent trolls use overbroad patents based on dated technology to threaten litigation and bring infringement suits against inventors. Trolls, also known as nonpracticing entities (NPEs), typically do not produce products or services but are in the business of litigation. They lie in wait for someone to create a process or product that has some relationship to the patent held by the troll, and then they pounce with threats and lawsuits. The cost to the economy is staggering. In Patent Trolls: Predatory Litigation and the Smothering of Innovation, William J. Watkins, Jr., calls attention to this problem and the challenges it poses to maintaining a robust rate of technological progress. After describing recent trends and efforts to “tame the trolls,” Watkins focuses on ground zero in patent litigation—the Eastern District of Texas, where a combination of factors makes this the lawsuit venue of choice for strategically minded patent trolls. He also examines a more fundamental problem: an outmoded patent system that is wholly ill suited for the modern economy. Finally, he examines proposals for reforming the U.S. patent system, which was created to spur innovation but today is having the opposite effect. If legal reformers heed the analyses and proposals presented in this book, the prospects for crafting a legal environment that promotes innovation are favorable.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherIndependent Publishers Group
    Release dateApr 1, 2014
    ISBN9781598131710
    Patent Trolls: Predatory Litigation and the Smothering of Innovation

    Related to Patent Trolls

    Related ebooks

    Law For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Reimagining Legal Education

      Jun 27, 2019

      Reimagining Legal Education
      3 min read

    • Article

      Should I Go Back to School and Become a Lawyer?

      Mar 25, 2019

      Across the country there are 69 law schools accredited by the American Bar Association that offer part-time programs -- evening or weekend classes -- and normally require four years to complete. Approximately 1 in 10 graduates from ABA-approved schoo

      3 min read

    • Article

      Attorneys Accused Of Acting Like ‘Loan Sharks’

      Nov 22, 2020

      TWO seasoned legal practitioners are required to show why they should not be struck off the roll of practising attorneys, considering the allegations of unprofessional and ethical conduct against them. Operating like “loan sharks”, charging exorbitan

      2 min read

    • Article

      Could Your Trust Be Disregarded By The Courts?

      Mar 20, 2021

      THE fact that you have a written trust deed is no guarantee that your assets are secure and the trust is safe from attack. If you never intended to create a genuine trust from the outset, it may be attacked and labelled a sham trust. On the other han

      3 min read

    • Article

      Don’t Subpoena Me, Bro

      Jun 20, 2017

      Don’t Subpoena Me, Bro
      5 min read

    • Article

      No Legalization of Sharia Law

      Jul 28, 2017

      Q: Did a Muslim federal judge rule two parts of sharia law legal? A: No. That only happened in a fake story on a satirical website. FULL ANSWER Sharia is […] The post No Legalization of Sharia Law appeared first on FactCheck.org.

      2 min read

    • Article

      Innovating in Canada: Challenges and Opportunities

      May 1, 2023

      There is widespread worry that growth and innovation in Canada are slowing down. Why is that? If you think back to the early 20th century, with innovations like airplanes, electricity, automobiles and home appliances, the world was changing very quic

      6 min read

    • Article

      5 Reasons Why the Regulatory Accountability Act is Bad for Science

      May 9, 2017

      Last week, Senator Rob Portman introduced his version of the Regulatory Accountability Act (RAA), a bill that would significantly disrupt our science-based rulemaking process. A version of this inherently flawed, impractical proposal has been floatin

      7 min read

    • Article

      Invention Protection

      Feb 1, 2019

      Invention Protection
      2 min read

    • Article

      The Bias Against Radical Innovation

      Sep 30, 2022

      The Bias Against Radical Innovation
      4 min read

    • Article

      The Rise of Risk-Mitigating Technologies

      Jan 1, 2021

      You have said the global pandemic is forcing firms to rethink their innovation strategies. Why is that? A major event like the pandemic changes consumers’ priorities, their preferences and their needs. As a result of COVID-19, people care a lot more

      6 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: Reinvent Scientific Publishing With Blockchain Technology

      Dec 21, 2018

      Blockchain-based publishing can give researchers and research institutions — not for-profit publishers — full control over the life cycle of scholarly publications.

      4 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: The U.S. Government Is Asking Industry To Help Identify ‘Emerging Technologies’

      Dec 17, 2018

      If your company is working on what might be an emerging technology, answer the Bureau of Industry and Security's request to help define these. Move swiftly — and carefully.

      4 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Patent Trolls

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Patent Trolls - William J. Watkins

      Copyright © 2013 by The Independent Institute

      All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by electronic or mechanical means now known or to be invented, including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review. Nothing herein should be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of the Institute or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress.

      The Independent Institute

      100 Swan Way, Oakland, CA 94621-1428

      Telephone: 510-632-1366

      Fax: 510-568-6040

      Email: info@independent.org

      Website: www.independent.org

      Cover Design: Denise Tsui

      Cover Image: © Paulus NR / 123RF

      Interior Design and Composition: Leigh McLellan Design

      Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

      Watkins, William J., Jr., author.

      Patent trolls : predatory litigation and the smothering of innovation / William J. Watkins, Jr. ; foreword by William F. Shughart II.

      pages cm

      Includes bibliographical references and index.

      ISBN 978-1-59813-170-3 (pbk. : alk. paper)

      eBook ISBN 978-1-59813-171-0

      1. Patent suits—United States. 2. Patent licenses—Corrupt practices—United States. 3. Patent laws and legislation—Economic aspects—

      KF3155.W38 2013

      Foreword

      William F. Shughart II

      1  Recent Trends

      2  The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

      3  Patent Trolls

      4  How Trolls Work

      5  Taming the Trolls

      6  The Texas Hot Spot

      7  Learning from the Texas Docket

      8  Reformation and the Litigation Explosion

      9  Conclusion

      Notes

      Selected Bibliography

      Index

      About the Author

      Praise for Patent Trolls

      About The Independent Institute

      Independent Studies in Political Economy

      INFORMATION WANTS TO BE FREE, a phrase apparently first used in the late 1960s by the founder of the Whole Earth Catalog, is a mantra of opponents of tight legal protections for intellectual property (IP). The principal basis for that opinion is that patents, copyrights, and other restrictions on the use of new ideas, new technologies, and new production processes slow down the rates at which innovations diffuse throughout the economy and, hence, impede economic progress.

      On the other hand, to paraphrase the late economist Joan Robinson, author of The Economics of Imperfect Competition, patents (and copyrights) slow down the diffusion of new ideas for a reason: to ensure there will be more new ideas to diffuse. The argument here is that if new ideas and new products can be copied easily, the economic returns to inventive or creative activities will decline and less effort will be invested both in research leading to the discovery of new knowledge and in the development of that knowledge into commercially viable uses of it.

      Trolling for Dollars

      Both points of view essentially treat intellectual property as what most economists would call a pure public good. Once a new idea has been discovered and fixed in a medium, such as a blueprint, a chemical formula, or a list of instructions to be executed by a computer, then anyone who is trained in the art or science to which the innovation applies can free ride on the inventor’s investment of time and money. Not only does free riding lower the returns to successful research and development (R&D) projects, it also chills incentives to engage in R&D more broadly because most scientific research, whether it takes place in someone’s garage or in the laboratory of a large commercial enterprise, fails to generate any worthwhile idea or product. Investments in R&D pay off only if the returns to the proverbial home run cover the costs of that project alone plus those of the myriad strikeouts.

      Granting inventors a limited monopoly—that is, an exclusive right to commercialize their inventions on their own account or to license others to use them in return for a mutually agreeable royalty payment—has been, for the reasons just stated, an accepted public policy for centuries. Although the term of that monopoly was and is a matter of controversy, the idea is to provide the inventor with adequate time to recover the original investment in R&D plus the expenses of manufacturing and marketing the product to paying customers. If that is not so, the anticipated profitability of the entire sequence of events unravels and less potentially path-breaking research will be undertaken in the first place.

      Given that governments want to encourage invention as a way of promoting economic progress, why are patents under attack nowadays?

      First and foremost, patent policy in the United States and elsewhere in the developed world is one size fits all. If an application for a patent is granted, the patent holder’s exclusive right runs for twenty years from the date on which the patent is issued, which is not necessarily the same day that the innovation can start to be exploited commercially.

      So, patents for a new chemical entity issued to a scientist working in the lab of a pharmaceutical company, to the writer of a new computer software program or the developer of a new user interface, to the discoverer of a genetically modified disease- or herbicide-resistant food plant, or to the inventor of a new electric or hybrid automobile engine all are granted exclusive rights to their innovations for the same twenty-year term. Technological progress proceeds at very different paces in different industries. The only reason that the terms of all patents are the same is the convenience of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) bureaucrats.

      Second, alternative means of protecting innovators’ intellectual property rights exist. Applications for patents must disclose all of the information needed for copiers to duplicate an invention once the patent expires and the new knowledge goes into the public domain for anyone to use. But an inventor can choose not to apply for a patent and then, in principle, preserve his or her trade secret forever.

      Lead time over imitators also can protect the intellectual properties of the discoverers of new knowledge. It takes skill to reverse-engineer or to copy an innovative product or process. Moreover, some, perhaps much, manufacturing know-how is tacit and cannot easily be communicated to others in the form of a blueprint, formula, or design concept. A good head start therefore may be all the inventor needs profitably to exploit his or her idea. Imitators incur first-copy costs. Time, effort, and money must be invested before a knockoff of someone else’s idea can be commercialized. And, while the marginal costs of producing the second and subsequent copies usually will be very low, first-copy costs discourage imitators.

      The means of capturing the returns to investments that yield new knowledge are not necessarily limited to selling or licensing the products that embody it. In the digital age, the artists, composers, and publishers of musical compositions may not earn much income directly from selling online downloads and physical recordings of their music. But a little piracy of copyrighted material can be a good thing: it generates publicity, name recognition, and, hence, revenue from selling tickets to live performances and from sales of T-shirts, hats, and other

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1