Silver Spooned: Feeble Right Wing Fallasies
By Thomas Clark
()
About this ebook
In this book the author demolishes some of the facile and often completely counter-factual myths that get used over and again to justify the implementation of right-wing economic policies.
If you follow politics at all, or you've ever picked up a tabloid newspaper, you'll be familiar with some of the most egregious examples such as the "Labour caused the financial crisis" lie, the "unemployed are all lazy scroungers" narrative, the "private is always more efficient than public" fallacy and the ludicrous "trickle down" theory of economics.
The problem is that these (often absurdly inaccurate) right-wing fallacies are far more pervasive than most people think. The reason that they are so pervasive is that they are usually based in the form of simplistic justification narratives. This book will open your eyes to some of the biggest fallacies and manipulations used today by the right wing politicians in British politics today.
Thomas Clark
I began writing the blog "Another Angry Voice" in 2010 in order to express my opinions about current political, social and economic issues. I chose the name Another Angry Voice on the spur of the moment because I thought it sounded good at the time and I had to call it something. I don't believe it is a particularly acurate descriptor, given that I strive to to base my arguments on facts and analysis, and to include reliable sources, rather than simply writing emotionally fueled rants. I particularly enjoy demolishing pathetic arguments. My book "Silver Spooned- Feeble Right-Wing Fallacies" is definitely worth checking out if you need some instant ammunition to comprehensively defeat an entrenched right-wing reactionary that is simply regurgitating the kind of asinine nonsense that they read in the Daily Mail, in lieu of actually engaging in political discourse. The next time you see someone blathering about how "the state is less efficient than the private sector", comparing the national debt to "a maxed out credit card" or deriding anyone to the left of Genghis Kahn as a "loonie leftie" you can refute their claims with good hard core facts and sound logic.
Read more from Thomas Clark
Digital Photography Composition For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDigital Macro and Close-Up Photography For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNo Fighting Chance-Ireland's Lady of the Lake Disaster of 1833 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Silver Spooned
Related ebooks
Econobabble: How to Decode Political Spin and Economic Nonsense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Truth, Errors, and Lies: Politics and Economics in a Volatile World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIt's The Economy, Stupid: Economics for Voters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLearning Economics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPsychopath Economics: Part 1 – The Bull & The Bewildered Herd Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Capitalism, Socialism, and the Promise of Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeltdown: The Classic Free-Market Analysis of the 2008 Financial Crisis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Choice: Cooperation, Enterprise, and Human Action Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Everyday Economics: A User's Guide to the Modern Economy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Unconscious Civilization Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Eric Lonergan & Mark Blyth's Angrynomics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMysteries of State in the Renaissance: Neoplatonism, Reformation and Political Cosmology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEconomic Policy for Future Presidents Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBanking on Confidence: A Guidebook to Financial Literacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFdr’s “New Deal”: Acclamation or Condemnation? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIf Only Politicians Had Brains Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Street Economist: 15 Economics Lessons Everyone Should Know Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bullshit Time: The Myths and Nonsense of Panel Show Economics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Great Reversal: How America Gave Up on Free Markets Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In Defence of Conspiracy Theories: With Examples from Irish and International History and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSelfishness, Greed and Capitalism: Debunking Myths about the Free Market Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical economy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Return of the Public: Democracy, Power and the Case for Media Reform Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Robert J. Shiller's Narrative Economics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBad News: What the Headlines Don't Tell Us Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Power of Being Human Beyond Equality and Equity: An Academic Study into Our Warped and Twisted Life Today Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommon Misconceptions of Economic Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Freedom to Fascism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
American Government For You
Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Corruptible: Who Gets Power and How It Changes Us Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/563 Documents the Government Doesn't Want You to Read Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Room Where It Happened: A White House Memoir Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dear America: Notes of an Undocumented Citizen Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Introduction to Legal Reasoning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings25 Lies: Exposing Democrats’ Most Dangerous, Seductive, Damnable, Destructive Lies and How to Refute Them Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unwoke: How to Defeat Cultural Marxism in America Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Lemon Tree: An Arab, a Jew, and the Heart of the Middle East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 9/11 Report: The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why We're Polarized Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Laptop from Hell: Hunter Biden, Big Tech, and the Dirty Secrets the President Tried to Hide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Enough Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The January 6th Report Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Government Gangsters: The Deep State, the Truth, and the Battle for Our Democracy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Profiles in Ignorance: How America's Politicians Got Dumb and Dumber Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Treating People Well: The Extraordinary Power of Civility at Work and in Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Get Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5American Marxism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Science of Coercion: Communication Research & Psychological Warfare, 1945–1960 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Silver Spooned
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Silver Spooned - Thomas Clark
Silver Spooned
Feeble Right Wing Fallacies
by
Thomas G. Clark
Copyright © 2013 by Thomas G. Clark
All rights reserved. Smashwords edition. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permissionFirst Edition: February,2013
ISBN: 9781301872039
Table of Contents
Introduction
Chapter 1. The Mensch fallacy
Chapter 2. The evil state
and virtuous private
sector false duality
Chapter 3. The Golden Hammer
of neoliberalism
Chapter 4. The political spectrum shift
fallacy
Chapter 5. The fallacy of Nordic Apples and Anglo-American Oranges
Chapter 6. The inefficient state
fallacy
Chapter 7. The maxed out national credit card
fallacy
Chapter 8. The blame the victim
fallacy
Chapter 9. The fallacy of diminished importance
Chapter 10. The sentient concept
fallacy
Chapter 11. The unpatriotic left
fallacy
Chapter 12. Osborne's market confidence
fallacy
Chapter 13. The no cuts
fallacy
Chapter 14 What is confirmation Bias?
Chapter 15 What is a justification narrative?
Chapter 16 What is quantitative easing
Chapter 17 The great neo-liberal lie
Chapter 18 The case against tax dodging.
Chapter 19. George Osborne’s economic extremism
About the Author-
Introduction
The objective of this book is to demolish some of the facile and often completely counter-factual myths that get used over and again to justify the implementation of right-wing economic policies.
If you follow politics at all, or you've ever picked up a tabloid newspaper, you'll be familiar with some of the most egregious examples such as the Labour caused the financial crisis
lie, the unemployed are all lazy scroungers
narrative, the private is always more efficient than public
fallacy and the ludicrous trickle down
theory of economics.
The problem is that these (often absurdly inaccurate) right-wing fallacies are far more pervasive than most people think. The reason that they are so pervasive is that they are usually based in the form of simplistic justification narratives. In brief, the use of the justification narrative technique is a propaganda methodology based on the concept that simple narrative structures (stories) are much more effective tools for spreading ideas than reams of statistics and rigorous analysis. In essence it is the idea that it doesn't matter how weak your own evidence is, or how brilliant your opponents' facts and analysis are, you'll win the debate in the mind of the man on the street
as long as you're the better story-teller.
The use of simplistic justification narratives to sell the right-wing neoliberal ideology relies upon the fact that the vast majority of people in the United Kingdom are functional illiterates in economic terms. There are many reasons for this, the main one being that basic economics is just not taught at all in the vast majority of state schools. Since 93% of British kids attend state schools, the vast majority of kids end up leaving school and entering the work environment as functional economic illiterates. (I'll leave it to you to form your own opinion about whether this failure to provide a basic economic education to the vast majority of people is a deliberate ploy by the establishment or not).
I really don't want to come across as mean, smug or superior when I describe the majority of people as economic illiterates, but it happens to be true. I always thought of myself as very intelligent and well informed, but it wasn't until I began actively studying economics in my late 20s that I realised that I'd been living with an distorted ad-hoc understanding of economic issues, despite being an intelligent university graduate with a high IQ, I too had been suffering from basic economic illiteracy
Now most people don't like to think of themselves as ignorant or illiterate (I certainly wouldn't have easily accepted the accusation when I was in my mid-20s) and this is where right-wing justification narratives come in. If a person that knows very little about the actual structure of the economy is presented with a simple and concise narrative that seems to explain a particular economic trend, they are likely to accept it at face value. People don't want to feel that they are ignorant or economically illiterate and these right-wing narratives give them a nice simple framework in which they can create the illusion that they actually understand the economy.
The reality is that most people just don't understand the economy properly because most people don't even understand some of the really fundamental ideas, without which economic literacy is impossible. Without knowing the answer to the majority of the following questions, obtaining a nuanced and reasonably accurate understanding of the modern post-credit crunch economy would be absolutely impossible.
What is a fiat currency?
How is money created?
What is the difference between a debt and a deficit?
What is the difference between fiscal and monetary policy?
What are capital controls?
What is a transfer pricing strategy?
What does fiscal multiplication mean?
What is a derivative?
What is a naked
trade?
What is Quantitative Easing?
I can tell you now that significantly less than 5% of the UK population could give adequate answers to four of the preceding questions, let alone all ten of them. However without understanding at least the majority of these concepts the individual is never going to have a full understanding of fundamentally important issues like what actually caused of the 2007-08 neoliberal economic meltdown, who is winning the race to the bottom
, the size and structure of the financial sector shadow economy
, consolidated depreciation or taxation asymmetry.
The problem of course is that the economy
is important to a lot of people. Polls and surveys show that the economy
comes out as the number one priority when the public are asked about which area of public policy is most important to them. That the majority of people demonstrably don't understand the economic basics, yet they feel that good management of the economy is the most vital function of government tells us that people have the capacity to fill in the gaps in their knowledge to create a framework by which they grasp the economic complex issues. The right-wing justification narrative is designed to fill in these gaps in the public consciousness with the right kind of stories to make people support economic ideas that go against their own best interests. Within a limited frame of understanding these justification narratives for extremist right-wing economic policies make sense, however the greater the level of economic literacy the individual attains, the less likely they are to be taken in by simplistic and misleading right-wing propaganda stories.
Now consider that the right-wing press have been peddling these simplistic economic myths for decades, over and over and over again. These myths have become so well established that they are taken at face value, not only by traditionally conservative thinkers, but relied upon as fact by supposedly left-wing politicians of the Labour party and printed, without a hint of critical analysis, in supposedly left-wing publications like the Guardian newspaper.
It doesn't matter that these simplistic narratives are economically incoherent; the majority of the population don't have the training to carefully deconstruct these right-wing stories from an economic perspective. It's like the Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels said:
If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it
And these justification narratives, which are used in order to justify the implementation of ideologically driven neoliberal pseudo-economic policies, have been repeated so often that they have actually worked their way into common sense
. If you pick them apart, so many of these right-wing narratives are based on scant evidence, or even rely on a complete reversal of reality. However, the fact that they are widely held to be self-evident by so many people makes them appear as if they are common sense
.
One of the biggest problems in confronting these right-wing myths is that people actually become fond of their simplistic narratives. They are fond of them because it allows them to maintain the illusion that they are not fundamentally ignorant about economics. It is easy to understand how someone prefers to stick with the simple narrative that makes sense to them, rather than accept the counter-claim which is often complex and awfully difficult for them to even understand, because, economics, just like the economy itself is in reality an awfully complex subject.
Another factor that allows the persistence of fallacious economic reasoning is the human tendency towards confirmation bias. In short, this is the perfectly natural tendency to favour arguments with which we agree and reject out-of-hand those with which we disagree. The human tendency to cherry-pick evidence and ignore or dismiss inconvenient data is one of the main reason that the fallacious reasoning and discredited beliefs that underpin so many right-wing economic strategies persist on for decades and decades.
The objective of the Feeble Right-Wing Fallacies series is to, using relatively simple language, demolish some of these ludicrous right-wing myths that have wormed their way into the common sense
worldview of so many millions of people
Chapter 1:
The Mensch fallacy
The ideologically driven neoliberal dogma that has been the foundation of Conservative party policy for over three decades is defunct. It was holed beneath the water line when the evil state sector
stepped in with the biggest state subsidies in human history (bailouts at above 90% of GDP by the government's own estimates and the near complete nationalisation of debt stricken banks) to rescue the financial sector temples of neoliberalism from the consequences of their own reckless gambling. Yet the political and economic establishment continue hawking exactly the same ideologically driven neoliberal clap trap under the new name of austerity
.
The best that Tories like Louise Mensch can offer in defence of their adherence to defunct ideologically driven pseudo-economic gibberish is to trot out truly pathetic arguments against those that would complain about the defunct neoliberal model, excessive corporate greed, financial sector corruption and growing inequality, using the straw man argument that anyone that opposes neoliberal economics, must be a raving anti-capitalist tree-hugger who opposes all forms of trade. Thus if these protesters have ever bought any commodity under the capitalist system (coffee and tents are her cited examples) they must be complete hypocrites.
Louise Mensch made this utterly lame point during an appearance on the long running BBC topical news comedy panel show Have I Got News For You and was immediately set upon by the other panellists for having made such a stunningly fallacious argument. That she tried to pull off a spectacularly lame right-wing fallacy in such a public setting gives her the unusual distinction of getting a feeble right-wing fallacy named after her.
The Mensch fallacy is so lame it hardly needs further deconstruction, but I'll go on anyway. Opposing the excesses of the deregulated financial sector does not equate to hating capitalism and all forms of trade and living within a particular economic system does not disbar a