• book
    0% of The Author's Due completed

From the Publisher

The Author's Due offers an institutional and cultural history of books, the book trade, and the bibliographic ego. Joseph Loewenstein traces the emergence of possessive authorship from the establishment of a printing industry in England to the passage of the 1710 Statute of Anne, which provided the legal underpinnings for modern copyright. Along the way he demonstrates that the culture of books, including the idea of the author, is intimately tied to the practical trade of publishing those books.

As Loewenstein shows, copyright is a form of monopoly that developed alongside a range of related protections such as commercial trusts, manufacturing patents, and censorship, and cannot be understood apart from them. The regulation of the press pitted competing interests and rival monopolistic structures against one another—guildmembers and nonprofessionals, printers and booksellers, authors and publishers. These struggles, in turn, crucially shaped the literary and intellectual practices of early modern authors, as well as early capitalist economic organization.

With its probing look at the origins of modern copyright, The Author's Due will prove to be a watershed for historians, literary critics, and legal scholars alike.
Published: University of Chicago Press an imprint of UChicagoPress on
ISBN: 9780226490410
List price: $57.50
Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
Availability for The Author's Due: Printing and the Prehistory of Copyright
With a 30 day free trial you can read online for free
  1. This book can be read on up to 6 mobile devices.

Related Articles

Bloomberg Businessweek
2 min read

Europe’s Google News Tax Makes No Sense

A “digital single market,” like a single currency, is one of those grand European ideas that sounds better than it works. Take, for example, the European Commission’s clumsy attempt to use copyright law as a cudgel against U.S. interlopers such as Google and Facebook. One provision of a new bill proposed by the commission accords publishers the right to a license fee whenever a news aggregator such as Google News uses even a snippet of the publisher’s content. Currently aggregators pay no such fee. Who would it benefit? Not readers. It would only make the publishers’ work harder to find. Not
The New York Times
5 min read

Up for Grabs

THE INTERNET HAS BECOME A PLACE WHERE WE CAN SHARE OUR BEST IDEAS, BUT IT’S ALSO WHERE WE GO TO STEAL THE BEST IDEAS — A DYNAMIC WE’RE ONLY NOW STARTING TO QUESTION. In April, a photograph of Rihanna and Lupita Nyong’o taken at a Miu Miu fashion show three years ago began recirculating online. Their friendly body language and chic clothes (Rihanna wore thigh-highs, fur and leather; Nyong’o a plum jacket with a jeweled collar) caught the imagination of the internet. A Twitter user named @1800SADGAL suggested that “Rihanna looks like she scams rich white men and Lupita is the computer-smart best
3 min read

German Publishers' Lawsuit Against Google Threatens To Backfire

This was not exactly the decision VG Media had hoped for. The collective of German publishers had sued Google, arguing that the tech giant has infringed on copyright protections by offering snippets of the publishers' articles in search results. Those snippets, according to VG Media, hurt the publishers' bottom line by sating potential readers' curiosity and violated a 2013 German law that requires compensation for those snippets of text. Yet on Tuesday a Berlin court raised some concerns with the law itself often known in English as the Ancillary Copyright for Press Publishers. The judge ques