• book
    0% of The Gay Rights Question in Contemporary American Law completed

From the Publisher

The gay rights question is whether the second-class legal status of gay people should be changed. In this book Andrew Koppelman shows the powerful legal and moral case for gay equality, but argues that courts cannot and should not impose it.

The Gay Rights Question in Contemporary American Law offers an unusually nuanced analysis of the most pressing gay rights issues. Does antigay discrimination violate the Constitution? Is there any sound moral objection to homosexual conduct? Are such objections the moral and constitutional equivalent of racism? Must state laws recognizing same-sex unions be given effect in other states? Should courts take account of popular resistance to gay equality? Koppelman sheds new light on all these questions. Sure to upset purists on either side of the debate, Koppelman's book criticizes the legal arguments advanced both for and against gay rights. Just as important, it places these arguments in broader moral and social contexts, offering original, pragmatic, and workable legal solutions.
Published: University of Chicago Press an imprint of UChicagoPress on
ISBN: 9780226451039
List price: $33.00
Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
Availability for The Gay Rights Question in Contemporary American Law
With a 30 day free trial you can read online for free
  1. This book can be read on up to 6 mobile devices.

Related Articles

The Atlantic
4 min read

The Cynical Selling of Jeff Sessions as a Civil-Rights Champion

Having picked Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions for attorney general, the Trump administration might have made the case for conservative leadership at the Justice Department. Instead, it chose to portray Sessions as a stalwart defender of civil rights. This was largely a fiction, one that was as thinly supported as it was ardently asserted by the Trump administration and its allies, as they sought to deflect the 30-year-old allegations of racism that had derailed Sessions’ nomination to the federal bench in 1986. Sessions’s defenders might have simply argued that he was unfairly maligned in 1986 a
2 min read

County Clerk Calls West Virginia Lesbian Couple Getting Marriage License An "Abomination"

Discrimination is turning this beautiful union ugly.  According to the Washington Post, Samantha Brookover and Amanda Abramovich of West Virginia filed a federal lawsuit against Gilmer County, West Virginia, on Monday.  The lawsuit alleges the couple faced discrimination by deputy clerk Debbie Allen, who "launched into a tirade of harassment and disparagement," when the pair went to obtain a marriage license.  According to the lawsuit, on Feb. 3, 2016, the couple went to the Gilmer County courthouse to obtain a marriage license, which they were told they could not obtain 16 months prior becaus
2 min read

This Kentucky Judge Is Refusing To Hear Adoption Cases Involving "Practicing Homosexuals"

A Kentucky judge recently announced he would no longer hear adoption cases involving gay parents. Why, you ask? He just doesn't think a "practicing homosexual" should have children, the Courier-Journal reported. Judge W. Mitchell Nance, who serves Kentucky's Barren and Metcalfe counties, released an order Thursday saying he would recuse himself from all future adoptions involving gay adults, calling his decision "a matter of conscience." According to the Journal, Nance wrote that "under no circumstance" he would believe "the best interest of the child [would] be promoted by the adoption by a p