Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Court Reporter: a tough and fearless memoir of the cases that have shocked, moved and never left us.
Court Reporter: a tough and fearless memoir of the cases that have shocked, moved and never left us.
Court Reporter: a tough and fearless memoir of the cases that have shocked, moved and never left us.
Ebook303 pages4 hours

Court Reporter: a tough and fearless memoir of the cases that have shocked, moved and never left us.

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

From true crime to petty crime - this is the memoir of one of Australia's most experienced court reporters.

Longlisted in the True Crime category for the 2019 Davitt and Ned Kelly Awards.


As a seasoned court reporter, the ABC's Jamelle Wells has filed thousands of stories on murderers, sex offenders, thieves, bad drivers, family feuds and business deals gone wrong. In more than 10 years, Jamelle has witnessed many of Australia's most notorious and high-profile court cases. In the line of duty, she has sat next to criminals and their families, been chased, spat on, stalked and carted off by ambulance for emergency surgery after an accident outside ICAC.

Every day in courts across Australia the evidence, facts and theories are played out in a kind of theatre, with their own characters, costumes and traditions. But ever-present is the human tragedy of ordinary people's lives disrupted, destroyed and forever altered. The judges, the lawyers and barristers, the witnesses and the victims -- all striving to play their part in the quest for fairness, justice and always, the truth of what really happened.

From the calculated and cruel, to the unfair and unlucky, from pure evil to plain stupid -- Jamelle Wells has seen it all.

The Court Reporter is a tough and fearless journalist's memoir that looks at the cases that have shocked, moved and never left us.

Praise for Jamelle Wells:

'Jamelle Wells has put justice in the dock. The Court Reporter raises important questions about the administration of the criminal justice system, not only in NSW but nationwide.' Michael Sexton, The Australian

'Frank reporting.' Steven Carroll, The Sydney Morning Herald

'Vivid and gripping. I had to read it in one go.' Richard Glover, ABC Drive

'The Court Reporter is a great read and will be quickly devoured by anyone with an interest in journalism and true crime.' Dr Rachel Franks, Academia Review

'A brilliant book with amazing stories.' Sarah Harris, Studio Ten

LanguageEnglish
Release dateMar 1, 2018
ISBN9780733337888
Court Reporter: a tough and fearless memoir of the cases that have shocked, moved and never left us.
Author

Jamelle Wells

Jamelle Wells is an ABC television and radio Newsreader and the Senior Court Reporter for New South Wales. Over almost two decades she has covered some of Australia's highest profile cases including the criminal trials of schoolteacher Chris Dawson, the inquiries into the convictions of Kathleen Folbigg for killing her four children, the criminal trials of former Labor Ministers Eddie Obeid and Ian Macdonald, the murder trials Keli Lane and Gordon Wood, Australia's longest running terrorism trial, the Sydney Siege inquest, and inquest into the disappearance of William Tyrrell. Jamelle is a television and radio commentator on courts and legal affairs for programs including Australian Story for ABC Television. Jamelle's first ABC book about her career covering city courts, The Court Reporter (2018) was longlisted for the prestigious Ned Kelly Australian Crime Writing Award and the Davitt Australian Women Writers Award.

Related to Court Reporter

Related ebooks

True Crime For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Court Reporter

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Court Reporter - Jamelle Wells

    Dedication

    For my mother, Cecilia, who died on

    12 September 2016.

    Contents

    Dedication

    Introduction

    1    Judgment Day

    2    Growing up

    3    Journey to the ABC

    4    Getting the job

    5    Life on the road

    6    ICAC: you couldn’t make it up

    7    Stalkers

    8    The ICAC fall

    9    Justice on trial

    10  Local courts

    11  Looking for love

    12  What happens in public galleries

    13  Court officers and court sheriffs

    14  Juries

    15  Foyers

    16  Staying awake

    17  Court watchers

    18  Crimes against children

    19  The famous and the infamous

    20  How much detail?

    21  Cars as weapons

    22  The Sydney siege inquest

    Acknowledgements

    Endnotes

    Copyright

    Introduction

    IN JANUARY 2016 MY mother, Cecilia, found out that she had terminal cancer and came from her home in country New South Wales to stay with me for a while in Sydney for treatment, while my father Allan stayed at home.

    I was covering the Sydney siege inquest. She spent long days on her own watching me standing in the gutter outside the John Maddison Tower court building in Goulburn Street in the CBD doing live television crosses on the ABC News Channel and listening to my radio news stories and live program crosses on ABC Radio Sydney.

    Her palliative care drugs made her anxious and she was petrified of dying. One night when I got home, she was so worked up that she was pacing back and forth in my house.

    ‘Mum, I don’t think you are going to die tonight,’ I said to her and got her into the car to go out for a drive to try to take her mind off things.

    As we pulled out of the car park she settled a bit.

    ‘I’m proud of you,’ she said, ‘but I’ve never seen where you work — can you show me some of the courts in the city?’

    So we spent hours driving around the CBD, past the ABC at Ultimo, past the John Maddison Tower court complex, past the Downing Centre Courts and Central Local Court in Liverpool Street, past the Law Courts building in Queens Square, the St James Road Court, the King Street Courthouse and Darlinghurst Courthouse, past Glebe Coroner’s Court on Parramatta Road and past the new ICAC building on Elizabeth Street and the old one on Castlereagh Street.

    I explained to her that these were just a few of the courts I’d been hanging around for almost a decade and we didn’t have time to go out to all the other courts in the suburbs.

    We were on our way back to my inner west house when she said, ‘Where does Eddie Obeid live?’ She had seen photos of the former Labor minister’s Hunters Hill home in the news for many years.

    So we went past there too and ate a choc-top ice cream in a park overlooking the water near Hunters Hill.

    Mum had calmed right down by now.

    ‘You might be sad when I die so you need to keep busy,’ she said. ‘You could write a book about some of your adventures in the courts and all the people you’ve seen and talked to.’

    So that is what I’ve done.

    Over the last decade I have covered hundreds of different court cases and I have filed more than 10,000 radio news stories alone. That figure does not include thousands of live radio and television crosses. I have been closely involved with the ABC News Channel since it started in 2010 doing live television crosses on major court cases and have worked with ABC Online from the very start covering court stories.

    I have covered so many cases I actually forget I’ve covered some of them and am only reminded of them when I come across videos and recordings of my work or stories online. Not always remembering some of the detail of the more confronting things I’ve covered is probably a good thing, because like a doctor or police officer you can’t carry it all around with you and you need to switch off sometimes and keep a certain distance and objectivity to get the job done.

    I have had moments in court when the public gallery has erupted into fits of laughter, fights have broken out or people have collapsed with grief.

    I’ve done stories about horrific stabbing, shooting and beheading murders. I’ve covered a case involving a member of the Milat family, another involving bush fugitive Malcolm Naden, and the murder trials of former water-polo champion Keli Lane, ex-chauffeur Gordon Wood and Sydney man Jeffrey Gilham who was jailed for life after being convicted of murdering his parents Helen and Stephen Gilham in their Woronora home in Sydney’s south, but was later acquitted on appeal when new evidence was found.

    I have covered cases involving politicians, including the court case between former speaker Peter Slipper and his ex-staffer James Ashby, and cases involving the Health Services Union, and senior police, including former New South Wales Crime Commission investigator Mark Standen, who was jailed for conspiring to import drugs.

    One Federal Court case I covered involved a public servant who sued for compensation after injuring herself having sex in a motel her employer had booked for a work trip in country New South Wales. The woman claimed that a glass light fitting that came away from the wall, hit her in the face, injuring her nose and mouth and causing a psychiatric adjustment disorder. She won the Federal Court case but then the government’s workplace safety body, Comcare, appealed to the High Court and won, so the compensation she thought she was entitled to never eventuated.

    The round has taken me into court for cases involving celebrities such as the late Leonard Cohen, Gina Rinehart and her family, and ex-Hey Dad! television star Robert Hughes.

    I’ve covered grubby, horrible cases involving sex offenders, husband killers, wife killers, child killers, petty thieves and very bad drivers.

    There are cases I’ve followed in and out of several court jurisdictions and appeals that have resulted in acquittals or shorter jail sentences.

    Inquests into the death and disappearance of people whose families still grieve have been part of my job, including the long-running Sydney siege inquest and inquests into the cruise-ship death of Dianne Brimble, television newsreader Charmaine Dragun, tasered Brazilian student Laudisio Curti and the Quakers Hill nursing home mass murders.

    I’ve covered terrorism trials, bikie trials, sexual harassment and animal cruelty cases and a case involving a woman who killed her children with rat poison and another who jumped to her death after doing a self-help course.

    The long-running Church Sex Abuse inquiries, ICAC inquiries, copyright matters, Industrial Court matters, Land and Environment Court matters, defamation and copyright cases and committal hearings have all been part of my job.

    I’ve been chased, spat on, threatened with physical violence, stopped from entering a court and injured on the job, but have, on the flipside of all that, had the incredible reward of connecting with audiences and being in court for some of the biggest moments in New South Wales politics.

    A courtroom presents life in all its complexities and it can provide the most amazing and addictive theatre. The case itself is often a subplot for all the dynamics and relationships in a public gallery.

    I wrote this book to fulfil my promise to my mum and it is dedicated to her memory. I hope that you find the courts and all the colourful stories and characters as interesting to read about as I did to witness.

    1

    Judgment Day

    ON 13 FEBRUARY 2017 Robert Xie was given five life sentences for murdering five members of his wife’s family by bashing them to death as they lay sleeping in their beds in the quiet, leafy, middle-class Sydney suburb of North Epping. Just a month earlier a jury found him guilty in a majority eleven to one verdict when it couldn’t reach a unanimous one. The case was intriguing and frustrating at the same time for me because it had dragged on for so long. I had been following it since Xie’s arrest in 2011 and his subsequent committal hearing and the aftermath.

    This short and rather frail man always had a calm demeanour in court. He looked no different than the other suited professionals on their way to work in the CBD each day. He was a trained ear, nose and throat surgeon who was born in China and came to Australia in 1999. Xie owned a restaurant in Melbourne before moving to Sydney where he was mostly not working.

    In 2011 he was charged with murdering his wife’s brother Min ‘Norman’ Lin (forty-five); Mr Lin’s wife, Yun Li ‘Lily’ (forty-three); their two sons Henry (twelve) and Terry (nine); and Lily’s sister Yun Bi ‘Irene’ (thirty-nine). Their bodies were found early on Saturday 18 July 2009 in their home after Norman Lin didn’t show up to open his newsagency.

    Hours earlier they had been at their usual Friday night family dinner with Norman Lin’s parents at Merrylands in Sydney’s west.

    According to police, Norman Lin was well-liked and he had no known enemies. At first police thought the murders might have resulted from some sort of gang rivalry or from an unpaid debt. The murders had shocked Sydney because they were so violent and gruesome and at first it was assumed they had been committed by a number of people. Bloody footprints were found at the crime scene house, with blood spattered over the walls, ceiling and furniture.

    Robert Xie was questioned by police soon after the murders. Two years later, following a secret police operation that included months of video surveillance in his home and the questioning of his wife, Kathy Lin, by the New South Wales Crime Commission, he was charged.

    The Crown case was that Robert Xie crept into Norman Lin’s home in Boundary Road (which was only about 300 metres from Xie’s own home in Beck Street) late at night, let himself in with a key, turned the power off and bashed the family to death in their beds with a hammer-like object. The prosecution alleged Robert Xie drugged Kathy Lin that night (but in sentencing him Justice Fullerton said she could not be totally sure of that and Kathy Lin may have just remained asleep when he snuck out).¹

    The prosecutor argued that Xie was motivated by jealousy and bitterness because he thought his wife’s parents favoured Norman Lin and that he wanted the family out of the way because of his sexual motive involving Brenda Lin, the oldest child who had been overseas at the time of the murders.

    Xie denied committing the murders and his defence case was that he had no motive to kill the family because he got on with them.²

    After Xie was found guilty in January 2017 the Supreme Court released some of the exhibits that had been shown to the trial jury.

    They included horrific and graphic photos of the crime scene that included blood on walls, power points, door handles and even on ceiling light fittings. There were photos of the children’s room with their blood all over the walls.

    Prosecutors had also argued that a stain found on Robert Xie’s garage floor labelled ‘stain 91’ contained the DNA of four of his victims and the jury saw police surveillance footage of Xie destroying shoe boxes in his house after officers found bloody footprints at the crime scene.

    The jury was told that when Xie and Kathy arrived at the Lin family home on the morning of 18 July 2009. Xie told his wife not to look at one body that he couldn’t possibly have seen from where he was standing and that he must have known beforehand where that body was.

    The court also released the frightening triple 0 emergency call Kathy Lin made after finding the bodies. Xie had driven off and left her at the Lin house on her own, probably so he could get rid of the murder weapon and pick Kathy’s parents up from the nearby suburb of Merrylands and tell them about the deaths.

    Norman Lin’s body wasn’t found by police first for some time because it was hidden under a doona, yet Xie told some of the first police officers at the scene that there were five bodies in the house not the four that they first thought were there.

    The jury was told about a phone call that Xie later made to tell a detective he really meant ‘four or five’ bodies to try to cover his tracks.³ Xie stood trial four times, with the first trial starting in 2014. That first trial was aborted after new evidence was found and the second trial was aborted after the judge, Justice Peter Johnson, became unwell. A third trial that ran for a massive nine months and was presided over by Justice Elizabeth Fullerton ended in a hung jury. Senior Crown prosecutor Mark Tedeschi QC led the first three trials.

    The fourth, which was led by prosecutor Tanya Smith, ran for over six months.

    Xie did not give evidence at any of them.

    I was covering Xie’s sentence in February 2017 for the ABC News Channel. Knowing it would be a big story for the day our senior chief of staff in the Sydney newsroom, Simon Santow had sent other reporters with me to cover it for other ABC news services. I got to the Supreme Court building in King Street an hour early to suss things out and check in with my camera crew who arrived a few minutes after me. We found a good position on the footpath to set up for my live television crosses. It was not too close to the building so as not to get ‘moved on’ by the court officers, but close enough to see it in the background. We tried our best to set up out of the wind. Other media outlets were staking out their own positions. One cameraman had a fold-up camping chair to sit on. Two women, one with shopping bags and the other, with a big white envelope under her arm, stopped and asked me what everyone was there for.

    ‘The sentence for Robert Xie,’ I told them. ‘The guy found guilty of murdering the Lin family.’

    ‘I remember that — it’s terrible,’ said one. ‘Sydney is getting worse.’

    They moved off towards Macquarie Street.

    As all the lawyers, family members and court watchers started trickling towards the court foyer, the television crews got footage of all the Lin family members and the prosecutor and the legal teams coming in. A car came past us down King Street and slowed down as someone shouted out the window at the media pack.

    ‘You fucking parasitic vermin!’

    We are accustomed to these types of greetings from some members of the public. No one from the media pack even batted an eyelid or turned around to see who it was — we were too busy working.

    Kathy Lin arrived wearing a cardigan and with a female Salvation Army court volunteer. Then the very emotional Lin family grandparents arrived carrying photos of their slain loved ones.

    One of the last people to arrive, with some of her friends, was the surviving and oldest Lin child Brenda, who had been fifteen at the time of the murders and was now a tertiary student in her twenties. She was the witness whose identity and evidence had been supressed throughout Robert Xie’s trials.

    In sentencing Xie, Justice Fullerton referred to Brenda as ‘Ms AB’.⁵ Disturbing evidence had been presented at his trial about how Xie had sexually abused Brenda before the murders, then after them when she went to live with him but we couldn’t report it.

    Brenda had been overseas on a high school language excursion in New Caledonia when Xie murdered her family and he applied for guardianship and took her in to live with him and his wife after the deaths. It was about half way through his first trial in 2014 that she came forward with the sexual abuse evidence.

    Earlier that morning I had gone over the main points of the case in my head and decided that if I talked about the sexual abuse evidence in my live cross, the safest thing to say was ‘Xie’s motive for the murders included a sexual one’ as I had done when reporting on his trials.

    Some of the other reporters getting anxious about this were in a huddle asking each other, ‘Can we name Brenda . . . can we talk about the sex abuse?’

    I suggested leaving her name out if they were not sure and to talk about what they were sure of. I also knew from experience that when a case ends, victims sometimes give permission to be identified and I wondered if Brenda had already agreed to do an exclusive interview with a network to tell her story. Who could blame someone for doing that after everything she had been through: losing her entire family because of this man and being subjected to sexual abuse by him.

    As the Lin family members sat in the foyer and waited to be let into court they were surrounded by court watchers waiting for exactly the same thing.

    ‘Angela’s not here,’ someone else commented. ‘She’ll be so angry about this.’

    They were referring to long-time court watcher Angela Thomas who had patiently sat through all of Xie’s trials from the start but couldn’t be at the jury’s verdict or Xie’s sentence because she was visiting family in London. She had tweeted that the guilty verdict in his trial a month earlier was a ‘huge miscarriage of justice’ because Xie was innocent. She was contacting others in court via Twitter to find out what his sentence was.

    ‘Do you think he’ll get a life sentence?’ I asked the waiting court watchers.

    ‘Ooooh, yes,’ they chorused.

    A man sitting with them added, ‘I hope the judge doesn’t go soft and give him thirty years.’

    The legal teams started drifting in and the court officers opened the door to the courtroom to let them inside first and everyone else had to wait. I was towards the head of a long queue of reporters waiting at the courtroom door to get into the public gallery. There was nervous chatter and gossip as we waited in the line. Reporters texted their crews outside and phoned their newsrooms. The court watchers talked to each other and swapped tips about which cases they were going to check out after this one.

    I knew that in an hour or so, or maybe even less, I’d be talking to a camera outside relaying what the judge had to say.

    When the court door finally opened, people were pushing and shoving as if they were at the start of the department store Boxing Day sales.

    This sentence was not in the same court where Robert Xie’s trial was held but in a smaller King Street Courthouse court that usually hears bail applications for people whose bail has been refused in a local court by a magistrate, or bail applications for people facing out-of-the-ordinary difficult circumstances in custody.

    Usually for bail applications in this court, judges don’t wear their wig and red robe, but I knew that Justice Elizabeth Fullerton, who was sentencing Robert Xie, would wear the full formal judge’s costume.

    I also wondered if she would be nervous because the sentence was being filmed by the media, which was something first introduced in courts in New South Wales around 2014. There is usually only one television camera or pool camera allowed in court to film a sentence and the vision is shared with all the other media outlets. The camera only focuses on the sentencing judge and the rest of the courtroom is not shown. Permission still has to be granted by the court to film and it’s nothing like the trials that are shown live on US television.

    We jostled with court watchers to try to get through the door.

    ‘Please move . . . move move. Come on . . . MOVE . . . Do as you are instructed. MOVE ASIDE AND GET AWAY FROM THE DOOR!’ a court sheriff yelled.

    Two other sheriffs came to his aid and they asked to see our media identification as we filed through one by one and herded us into the jury box to make room in the public gallery for everyone else. I feared this would spell disaster because I needed to be near the court door to get outside quickly to file after the sentence was handed down. With broadcast filing deadlines sometimes less than five minutes after a court matter has ended, I have learned over the years that the best court seat is the one closest to the door. I stake out every court I work in this way. A fast exit is one of a court reporter’s tools of the trade and every extra minute wasted getting outside to meet a deadline counts.

    So while I couldn’t sit near the court door I did claim the seat at the exit end of the jury box and assessed the path I would need to take down the jury-box stairs, past the judge, past the bar table of prosecutors and lawyers and through the public gallery to the court hallway to get outside. Then I looked up and could see why we had been herded into the jury box. The upstairs level of the gallery was already completely full of court watchers as well as the watchers in the public gallery downstairs with me.

    The low-level chatter that had quickly spread throughout both galleries turned to complete silence when Robert Xie was led into the dock with an interpreter.

    ‘All rise,’ a court official said before Justice Elizabeth Fullerton’s entrance.

    We sat down after the judge took her seat. She politely asked the reporters sitting in the jury box to ‘not type loudly’ and to make sure their mobile phones were on silent. Almost on cue a mobile phone in the pocket of a man in the public gallery rang. Red-faced he fumbled around, then turned if off just as a court sheriff headed towards him.

    Robert Xie was sitting directly opposite me. He stared straight ahead during the judge’s sentencing remarks. I was face-to-face with a convicted murderer in a navy suit who looked straight through me.

    He didn’t blink, didn’t flinch and didn’t cry, just stared. It was as though he had mentally put himself somewhere else to get through this ordeal. I wondered if he was meditating. Reporters next to me tweeted that his stare was disconcerting and that it was evil. I stared straight back at him trying to work him out and he made no effort to move or look down or turn his head away.

    He didn’t seem angry. He did none of the things I have seen people do when they are sentenced.

    Kathy Lin, who had come to his trial almost

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1