Dialogue in Democracy
By Kai Alhanen
()
About this ebook
Dialogue is crucial for enhancing communication and for cultivating democratic coexistence in our multi-cultural world. Aiming for a better understanding of the world’s phenomena, of other people and ourselves, dialogue helps communities to sustain one of democracy’s most important requirements: people’s ability to learn from one another.
Combining perspectives from political philosophy and the author’s extensive practical work with dialogue, this book affirms the power of dialogue for defending, revitalising, and developing democratic societies. It aims to clarify the meaning of democracy not only as a system of government but also as a moral way of life.
Dialogue in Democracy highlights the vital significance of dialogue for strengthening and maintaining democracy, not just as a political goal but essentially as an ideal to be realised on an everyday basis. The book appeals to a broad diversity of citizens working in different areas of society: in education, business, politics and public services, as well as religious communities, scientists, athletes, and artists.
Kai Alhanen
Kai Alhanen is a philosopher and director of Dialogue Academy, Helsinki, Finland.
Read more from Kai Alhanen
Practices and Thought in Michel Foucault's Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJohn Dewey's Ecology of Experience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDialogical Supervision: Creating A Work Culture Where Everybody Learns Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Dialogue in Democracy
Related ebooks
Notes on Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocracy: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCivil Society, Conflict Resolution, and Democracy in Nigeria Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResolving Community Conflicts and Problems: Public Deliberation and Sustained Dialogue Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSustainable Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Hypothetical Govermment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVoices of Democracy Unveiling the Tapestry of Governance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitics & the Struggle for Democracy in Ghana: An Introduction to Political Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Paradox of Democracy: Free Speech, Open Media, and Perilous Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Irreconcilable Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Little Book of Big Questions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProperly Understood: If Citizens Are To Be Free Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEveryday Politics: Reconnecting Citizens and Public Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Demarchy Manifesto: For Better Public Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Genocide Paradox: Democracy and Generational Time Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGale Researcher Guide for: Public Opinion and Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunication Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVoice and Judgment: The Practice of Public Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe A, B & C of Democracy: Or Cats in the Sack Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReinventing Journalism to Strengthen Democracy: Insights from Innovators Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCancel Wars: How Universities Can Foster Free Speech, Promote Inclusion, and Renew Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Priority of Democracy: Political Consequences of Pragmatism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocratizing Deliberation: A Political Theory Anthology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSchooling, Democracy, and the Quest for Wisdom: Partnerships and the Moral Dimensions of Teaching Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCivic Education & The Americans Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConservatism: An Invitation to the Great Tradition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Democratic Objectivecracy: Objectivecracy, a New truly democratic political and economical system, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Of "Essay About The Democratic Transition In Argentina" By José Nun & Juan C. Portantiero: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFRACTURED DEMOCRACY Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDemocracy's Leadership Deficit Can Democracy Deliver Good Leadership? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
Questions for Deep Thinkers: 200+ of the Most Challenging Questions You (Probably) Never Thought to Ask Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Living: Peace and Freedom in the Here and Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Letters from a Stoic: All Three Volumes Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Allegory of the Cave Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bhagavad Gita (in English): The Authentic English Translation for Accurate and Unbiased Understanding Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lessons of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ryan Holiday's The Obstacle Is the Way: The Timeless Art of Turning Trials into Triumph Summary Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bhagavad Gita - The Song of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Dialogue in Democracy
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Dialogue in Democracy - Kai Alhanen
Dedicated to my colleagues
Anne, Jarkko, Katriina, Marko, Olli-Pekka & Tiina
CONTENTS
Introduction
COEXISTENCE
1. Dialogue
Learning in Communication
Entering Dialogue
Meanings and Experiences
Differences and Connections
Creative Experiments
The Ideal of Dialogue as a Tool
2. Democracy
The Dangers of Equality and Freedom
The Demands of Popular Rule and the Virtues of Citizens
New Issues in the Current Situation
3. Speech
Shared Meanings
Individual Experiences
Here and Now
4. Action
Uncertainties in Cooperation
Shared Responsibility
The Development of Bonds
Power Relations in Dialogue
The Stream of Meanings
CAPABILITIES
5. Attuning
Sensitivity
The Dynamics of Presence
Gestures, Facial Expressions, and Human Voice
Gestures of Empathy
6. Imagining
The Universe of Imagination
Imagining the Experiences of Others
Possibilities
7. Deliberating
Web of Causalities
Training Fields for Deliberation
Communal Deliberation
8. Playing
A World Favourable to Experiments
Imagined State of Things
Playing in Discussion
9. Believing
Perception of Reality
Will and Belief
Concretising Faith
The Vitality of Ideals
CIVIC VIRTUE
10. Participatory Sense
The Public
The Private
Solitude
Notes
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
Index
INTRODUCTION
We have to make a choice. It concerns the future of democracy, perhaps even its entire existence. As a way of life that pursues equality and freedom for all people, democracy ultimately relies on citizens promoting its central values within everyday situations. Choices to promote these values must be made in every kind of community and group: in families, neighbourhoods, schools, work places, leisure activities, businesses, associations, and governmental institutions. These choices become crucial when tensions in society escalate and crises intensify. We must decide between persistent effort and cynical inaction.
Right now, the state of democracies is strained to an unprecedented extent. The issues that require solutions are more complicated than ever before. Political communities all over the world are struggling with inter-connected political, economical, social, and ecological crises. At the same time, people living in these communities have increasingly differing experiences of the world; being separated by many different factors, such as ethnic background, religion, profession, wealth, social class, gender and sexual orientation. Sharing knowledge and skills has become difficult at a time when citizens would greatly benefit from doing so. Instability, bred by complex issues and the disagreements between different groups of people, offers a matrix for many anti-democratic forces. Extremist ideologies are rising, authoritarian governments are gaining power, and solutions to conflicts are sought through violence. Under the pressure of these difficult times it seems that democracy has lost its vigour as an ideal for communal life.
What then is a vigorous democracy? Many consider the following characteristics to be illustrative: Citizens actively influence local and national issues important to them and have a voice in addressing global questions. Public discussion is lively and supported by knowledge that is reliable, understandable and easily available. Differences in opinion are managed peacefully and solved through discussion and negotiation. The politicians and civil servants chosen to tend to common affairs are competent and feel responsible for their use of power. With clear boundaries to the use of public power, citizens can freely pursue diverse private lives. Every individual – including those belonging to minorities – can trust that their encompassing basic rights are ensured and they are able to lead a good life based on their own decision-making. When wrongdoings and conflicts are serious, they are processed through a fair and efficient legal system. In times of crisis, citizens can combine their strengths in creative cooperation and are able to recognise mutual interests. Fighting for societal justice, a thriving civilisation, and an ecologically sustainable way of life are considered important goals for political action.
These aspects are still apparent to an extent in certain democratic societies, but they are seriously threatened in an increasing number of others. In some countries, however, they have entirely disappeared and in others they have never even existed. It is impossible for a strong democracy to emerge in any community without the efforts of a great number of people over generations. Should these efforts cease, democracy will not survive. If we wish to ensure the existence of democracy and pass it on to forthcoming generations, we must alter the current destructive trends.
Powerful tools are required to defend, revitalise, and develop democracy. This book discusses one such tool: dialogue. The main idea is that dialogical discussions help communities sustain one of democracy’s most important requirements: people’s ability to learn from one another. The kind of learning that occurs in dialogue is a constantly developing understanding of the world’s phenomena, other people, and oneself. This sort of shared learning is able to generate the mutual trust between people that is crucial for the functioning of democracy. Dialogue is also a creative way to develop the new ideas required to solve the complex issues that beset modern societies. Moreover, dialogical discussions uphold the ideals of equality and freedom. In this book I wish to show how dialogue renews democracy and how it can help solve its current problems.
When we examine the significance of dialogue for democracy, it is important to note that democracy has many meanings. The most well-known of these being democracy as a system of government by which citizens govern themselves. However, comprehensive democracy has never yet been realised entirely anywhere in the world. Citizens have not, in fact, governed themselves fully. Instead, rule by the people has always been mixed with other elements: efforts of a powerful elite to govern, political pressure from various interest groups, the repression of politics to the demands of financial actors, and the interference of other countries in national affairs. Nevertheless, despite their imperfections, many democratic states have proven to be relatively stable and capable of thriving. They have been able to guarantee their citizens broad individual rights and to lay the grounds for many types of free cooperation. In such cases, even the imperfect implementation of democratic government has benefitted citizens greatly. Even so, this is not a state of affairs we should be content with. When decision-making becomes more difficult and opportunities to affect change become fewer for citizens, it is increasingly tempting to resort to political means outside of democracy. The events of the twentieth century revealed that the road from democratic government to dictatorship and ultimately to totalitarianism is shorter than imagined. There is no reason to assume that democracy should be in a significantly safer state in this century than it was in the last.
Since its origins, democracy has meant something more than merely a political system. It has meant a moral way of life. This notion of democracy, however, is much broader and more difficult to define than the notion of democracy as a system of government. While also being less well known, it has nonetheless been a part of the long history of democracy since antiquity. Primarily, democracy as a way of life has meant cultivating opportunities provided by the equality and freedom in people’s lives. This means that democracy is seen as a key to communities thriving in culture, prosperity, and well-being. In modern times it has become increasingly common to view this way of life as within the reach of everyone, no matter her background and situation in society. A way of life that embraces equality and freedom has long been recognised as a solution to one of the biggest challenges of democracy, namely, how people can set aside their own selfish interests in pursuit of the common good. According to this notion, the desire to promote a highly valued shared way of life leads individuals to seek the common good.
The realisation of democracy as both a political system and as a way of life is achieved through discussion. When people want to decide with equanimity upon common concerns, they must be able to converse such matters collectively. Accordingly, democracy cherishes different forms of rhetoric and discussion, such as giving speeches, persuading, debating, and negotiating. Finding out people’s opinion, seeking the best solutions, persuading individuals with varying opinions, and making diverse interests compatible are constant touchstones for democratic discussions. When discussions in democratic societies reach a dead end, the crucial connections between the governmental system and democracy as a way of life reveal themselves. Resolving challenging discussions is only possible between citizens who are well versed in the ways of equal and free coexistence. Such people appreciate this kind of cooperation despite its demands and do not strive to manipulate others to achieve their own desired goals.
It must be clarified that dialogue does not simply mean any type of discussion. While the term dialogue is often used vaguely to describe simple conversation, it is also used to refer to argumentative debate. In this book, however, the term dialogue refers to a discussion in which people examine what kinds of meanings they give to the issues at hand. People interpret their experiences constantly, and because of this they inevitably give some sort of meaning to the phenomena they encounter in the world: events, physical circumstances, objects, and other living beings. This designation of meanings happens as a matter of course within our every experience of the world.
The meanings we give to things are shaped within our mutual interactions. Meanings established in a community are transferred as cultural heritage from generation to generation. Despite the shared nature of meanings, each individual sees the world in their own way, and thus frames their community’s meanings with their own individual experiences. Because of this, meanings are simultaneously both shared and individual. The aim of dialogue is to discover what those experiences are via which individuals give meaning to the world.
Dialogical discussions have integral significance in democracy because they have profound effects on the lives of communities and individuals. When we discuss together how we experience our shared world, we obtain a broader and more versatile picture of the issues at hand. Dialogue also enables us to notice and to respect each other’s differences and helps us to realise how differences in experience can enrich our shared life. Thus, dialogues bind individuals and communities together without seeking to remove the differences that shape individuality. In addition, dialogue helps human communities to transfer the intellectual and cultural heritage of previous generations in a significant way. The cultural heritage of humanity can be renewed sustainably only by people fixing, enhancing, and developing the meanings that steer their life and by trying to employ as vast an experiential understanding of the world as possible. By examining beliefs, values, and conceptions through different individuals’ experiences, communities can evaluate which meanings are still pertinent and which need to be renewed.
Dialogue becomes crucial in situations where the discussed issues are complex or emotionally charged and where individuals’ experiences of them are very different. When citizens become distanced from one another, trust diminishes and misunderstandings grow. Whenever this occurs, it becomes difficult to hold on to democratic values and to efficiently solve societal issues. Furthermore, the world’s current crises are so broad, complex and unpredictable, that solving them comprehensively cannot be done without a form of broad civic action that would entirely reshape politics. Dialogue is needed, therefore, on all levels of society, from local communities to global political decision-making
***
I examine the role of dialogue in democracy by combining different views from philosophical and scientific discussions and from my own practical work with dialogue. The most central premise comes from the tradition of Western political philosophy. This tradition includes many important insights about the relations between a democratic system of government, a democratic way of life, and dialogue. The significance of dialogue in modern democracies has been profoundly examined by the American philosopher John Dewey and the German-born political theorist Hannah Arendt. Dewey was concerned with the crumbling of democracy in the United States at the turn of the twentieth century, a time when citizens were politically apathetic and the capitalist economy was gaining power. Arendt, on the other hand, who had fled from Europe to the United States, witnessed the collapse of many European democracies and the rise of totalitarian systems between the world wars. Events on both continents palpably demonstrated how fundamentally democratic nations rely on the equal cooperation of ordinary citizens. As this kind of action fades or is destroyed, democratic government withers and is exposed to the threat of ruthless economic actors or political extremists.
Dewey and Arendt’s philosophies have important roles in this book because their views offer conceptual tools for analysing the relations between dialogue and a democratic way of life. Both of these philosophers argue that, at its core, dialogue is a discussion which ideally is strengthened by the different experiences of individuals. Both also emphasise the significance of the free cooperation of citizens as a basis for democratic government. According to Dewey and Arendt, democracy cannot properly function if citizens do not practice their abilities and skills in cooperation and discussion. However, these two thinkers did not describe the nature of dialogical discussion in any detail. We must, therefore, try to follow the road they have paved and aim to develop a comprehensive description of the features of a dialogical discussion. We must also examine how dialogue responds to those issues that are still current in modern democracies that Dewey and Arendt addressed.
In analysing democratic coexistence and the abilities required for dialogue, I rely on the capabilities approach advanced by the economist Amartya Sen and the philosopher Martha Nussbaum. Sen and Nussbaum place the maximisation of citizens’ capabilities at the centre of democracy and thus continue to expand the central themes of what constitutes a democratic way of life. Their theory helps to focus on how the living environment of citizens affects their opportunities to develop and to use their different capabilities.
The notion of dialogue presented in this book has also been influenced by various thinkers from the twentieth century who conceptualised dialogue: especially Austrian-born theologist Martin Buber, Russian literary critic Mikhail Bakhtin, and American physicist David Bohm. Each developed in their own way a conception of human reality which at its core relies on the interaction of different views. Though these thinkers did not directly connect their notions of dialogue to thoughts about the nature of democracy, each one of them emphasised the radical significance of dialogue for people’s mutual relationships. Central to each view is a conviction in the ultimate equality between people and the individual’s freedom to express her own experience. These writers thus help us to deepen our understanding of the meaning of dialogue within a democratic way of life.
The views on dialogue of the three aforementioned thinkers have generated many practical applications in recent decades. Dialogue that respects equality and individual differences has been developed for instance in civic activism, international peacemaking, business, and education. The projects of Peter Senge and William Isaacs, which introduced dialogue to businesses and organisational leadership, are especially significant. Harold Saunders, on the other hand, has developed a model of peacemaking based on dialogue that has successfully been adapted to many international and national conflicts. Daniel Yankelovich has used dialogue to deepen public discussions between citizens. Also, in Finland there has been significant work and research on dialogue. The model of open dialogue created by Jaakko Seikkula’s working group has introduced new practices to psychiatric care, and the anticipation dialogues developed by Tom Arnkil’s research group have renewed practices in social work in particular. Both dialogical practices have received wide international attention and have taken root in various countries.
The views presented in this work about the role of dialogue in democracy draw on the aforementioned foundations: the tradition of Western political philosophy, the works of thinkers who have developed a dialogical world-view, and the practical adaptations of their ideas. These strands have been combined in my own work over the course of many years. I have studied the Western philosophy of politics and the position of democracy within it. I have also been developing dialogical practices in the context of work communities and professional networks and in the fields of education and social work, in the civic action of associations, and in academic research. In these contexts, I have participated in numerous dialogues with professionals from different areas of life and with ordinary citizens.1
My understanding of dialogue is thus based on both theoretical research and the systematic development of dialogical practices. The home base for my developmental work has been the company Aretai, which I run with my colleagues and where we have worked with questions related to dialogue and democracy since 2001. It is now time to bring our work’s results into the public domain. Because a lot of my practical work with dialogue demands confidentiality – such as organisational development, professional work-supervision and coaching – I do not present examples from my own work in this book. Instead, I concretise the different aspects of dialogue with the help of case examples from literature and fictional examples based on my own work and experience.
This book consists of three parts. The first section, Coexistence, starts by describing the main features of dialogue through concrete case examples. After this, I address dialogue as a discussion about meanings that is linked to a democratic way of life, specifying the role of individual experiences in dialogue. From there, I move on to examine the broader use of dialogue in people’s equal cooperation. These fundamentals bind dialogue to a democratic way of life, which grows within local communities: neighbourhoods, schools, work places and leisure activities.
In the second part of the book, Capabilities, I discuss the significance of five different capabilities for dialogue and democracy: attuning, imagining, deliberating, playing, and believing. Each chapter brings its own point of view on dialogue and through that also on democracy. The focus is still on a democratic way of life, especially on how the capabilities required in dialogue can be developed in people’s everyday environments and local communities.
In the third section, Civic Virtue, I gather together the budding ideas from the previous chapters about citizenship shaped by dialogue. I propose that contemporary democratic communities need