Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism"
By Razie Mah
()
About this ebook
In 2017, Marco Stango makes a daring claim. He presents the claim and publishes it in the Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association (volume 91, pages 145-158).
The standard interpretation of Aquinas’s philosophy of mind does not live up to its reputation. Most discussions of the intellect start with weak hylomorphic dualism. The immaterial soul is the form of the material body, working in the same way that form configures matter.
He offers strong hylomorphic dualism as an alternative. The body substantiates the soul, in the same way that matter substantiates form.
Well, it’s not exactly that, it’s actually a hylomorphism so strong that it is no longer hylomorphic, but rather this: The intellect is immaterial. The body is material. The intellect does not configure the body. Nor does the body substantiate the intellect.
Or, something like that. So, I will stick to the strong hylomorphism where the body substantiates the soul. Plus, I will start at the point where the intellect is a power (or faculty) of the soul. That is a close approximation to the beginning of Strango’s journey.
In these comments, I associate elements of Stango’s argument to two Peircean structures, the dyadic nature of actuality and the triadic category-based nested form.
For example, the term, “hylomorphic dualism” instantiates two distinctions. “Hylomorphism” matches the dyadic nature of actuality. “Dualism” points to two distinctly different nested forms. Thus, weak and strong hylomorphisms belong to two different category-based nested forms, producing the opportunity for a third category-based nested form, whose actuality weighs one against the other.
These remarkable associations bring Stango’s bold argument from its Aquinian starting point to a location just beyond the reach of Baroque scholasticism. Peirce’s categories opens new ground beneath Stango’s remarks, intimating that the bedrock beneath Thomistic traditions includes triadic relations.
Razie Mah
See website for bio.
Read more from Razie Mah
Comments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Father Reniero Cantalamessa’s (2016) Fourth Advent Sermon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Massimo Leone’s Article (2019) "Semiotics of Religion: A Map" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on the Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mansoureh Tajik’s Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Natural Signs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeculations on Thomism and Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight’s Book (2017) Adam and the Genome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Essay on Causality in the Empirical and Social Sciences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Peter Burfeind’s Book (2014) Gnostic America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Lacan’s (1960) Discourse to Catholics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky's Book (2016) Why Only Us? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Clive Gamble, John Gowlett and Robin Dunbar’s Book (2014) Thinking Big Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Five Views in the Book (2020) "Original Sin and the Fall" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12-19 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Sensible and Social Construction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Matthew Minerd’s Essay (2019) "Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Tyler Paytas' Essay (2019) "Divine Hiddenness as Kantian Theodicy" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism"
Related ebooks
Comments on William Jaworski’s Essay (2018) "Psychology Without A Mental-Physical Dichotomy" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Maritain's Book (1935) Philosophy of Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Marc Champagne’s Lecture (2019) "Consciousness and the Philosophy of Signs" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Christopher Austin’s Essay (2018) "A Biologically Informed Hylomorphism" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Giovanni Maddalena's Essay (2017) "Jung and Peirce" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Sasha Newell's Article (2018) "The Affectiveness of Symbols" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Donna West’s Essay (2019) "Thirdness along the Intuitional Path" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Massimo Leone’s Article (2019) "Semiotics of Religion: A Map" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Principles of Psychology, Vol. II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Daniel Novotny’s Book (2013) Ens Rationis from Suarez to Caramuel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTheory of Conciousness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Comments on Daniel De Haan’s Essay (2018) "Hylomorphism and the New Mechanist Philosophy" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Lacan’s (1960) Discourse to Catholics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Ahmed Badawi’s Essay (2018) "Conflicted Rules Theory" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAI and The Humanities: Battle or Symbiosis? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Foundations of Phenomenological Psychotherapy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Comments on Janice Breidenbach’s Essay (2018) "Action, Agency, and Substance Causation" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Roger Teichmann’s Article (2016) The Identity of a Word Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Christy Hemphill’s Essay (2019) "All in a Week’s Work" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) "Explanation and the Study of Religion" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSemiotics: The Key Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsZen and the Art of Funk Capitalism: A General Theory of Fallibility Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Reverie on Mark Spencer’s Essay (2021) "The Many Phenomenological Reductions" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeta: On God, the Big Questions, and the Just City (An Uncommon Exchange) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Richard Colledge’s Essay (2021) "Thomism and Contemporary Phenomenological Realism" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Plato's Republic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Bhagavad Gita Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The City of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5History of Western Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism"
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism" - Razie Mah
Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism
By Razie Mah
Published for Smashwords.com
2020
Notes on Text
This work comments on an article by Marco Stango, appearing in 2017 in the Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association (volume 91, pages 145-158). The title is Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism
. Hylomorphism entails matter (hylo) and form (morphism). My goal is to comment on this work using Peirce’s dyadic structure of secondness and the triadic category-based nested form.
‘Words that belong together’ are denoted by single quotes or italics.
Prerequisites: A Primer on the Category-Based Nested Form, A Primer on Sensible and Social Construction
Recommended: Comments on Matthew Minerd’s Essay (2019) Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic
, Comments on Robert Verrill OP’s Essay (2017) Elementary Particles are not Substances
Table of Contents
What is Hylomorphism? What is Dualism?
The Intellect, Weak and Strong Hylomorphism
Proposing Diagrammatic Causality
Conclusion
What is Hylomorphism? What is Dualism?
0001 The term hylo-
(matter)