Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism"
Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism"
Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism"
Ebook25 pages12 minutes

Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism"

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

In 2017, Marco Stango makes a daring claim. He presents the claim and publishes it in the Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association (volume 91, pages 145-158).
The standard interpretation of Aquinas’s philosophy of mind does not live up to its reputation. Most discussions of the intellect start with weak hylomorphic dualism. The immaterial soul is the form of the material body, working in the same way that form configures matter.
He offers strong hylomorphic dualism as an alternative. The body substantiates the soul, in the same way that matter substantiates form.
Well, it’s not exactly that, it’s actually a hylomorphism so strong that it is no longer hylomorphic, but rather this: The intellect is immaterial. The body is material. The intellect does not configure the body. Nor does the body substantiate the intellect.
Or, something like that. So, I will stick to the strong hylomorphism where the body substantiates the soul. Plus, I will start at the point where the intellect is a power (or faculty) of the soul. That is a close approximation to the beginning of Strango’s journey.
In these comments, I associate elements of Stango’s argument to two Peircean structures, the dyadic nature of actuality and the triadic category-based nested form.
For example, the term, “hylomorphic dualism” instantiates two distinctions. “Hylomorphism” matches the dyadic nature of actuality. “Dualism” points to two distinctly different nested forms. Thus, weak and strong hylomorphisms belong to two different category-based nested forms, producing the opportunity for a third category-based nested form, whose actuality weighs one against the other.
These remarkable associations bring Stango’s bold argument from its Aquinian starting point to a location just beyond the reach of Baroque scholasticism. Peirce’s categories opens new ground beneath Stango’s remarks, intimating that the bedrock beneath Thomistic traditions includes triadic relations.

LanguageEnglish
PublisherRazie Mah
Release dateJun 8, 2020
ISBN9781942824701
Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism"
Author

Razie Mah

See website for bio.

Read more from Razie Mah

Related to Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism"

Related ebooks

Philosophy For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism"

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism" - Razie Mah

    Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism

    By Razie Mah

    Published for Smashwords.com

    2020

    Notes on Text

    This work comments on an article by Marco Stango, appearing in 2017 in the Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association (volume 91, pages 145-158). The title is Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism. Hylomorphism entails matter (hylo) and form (morphism). My goal is to comment on this work using Peirce’s dyadic structure of secondness and the triadic category-based nested form.

    ‘Words that belong together’ are denoted by single quotes or italics.

    Prerequisites: A Primer on the Category-Based Nested Form, A Primer on Sensible and Social Construction

    Recommended: Comments on Matthew Minerd’s Essay (2019) Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic, Comments on Robert Verrill OP’s Essay (2017) Elementary Particles are not Substances

    Table of Contents

    What is Hylomorphism? What is Dualism?

    The Intellect, Weak and Strong Hylomorphism

    Proposing Diagrammatic Causality

    Conclusion

    What is Hylomorphism? What is Dualism?

    0001 The term hylo- (matter)

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1