2012 6-21 Judge Goldsmith's orders continue the cover up of sexual abuse

Rating and Stats

0.0 (0)

Document Actions

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Description: These Minute Orders are from the day there was supposed to be a hearing on Damon's motion asking to be able to live with his mom and visit his father when he wants, however it was sabotaged by Judg...

These Minute Orders are from the day there was supposed to be a hearing on Damon's motion asking to be able to live with his mom and visit his father when he wants, however it was sabotaged by Judge Christine Goldsmith, who belatedly claimed that there had been no change of circumstance. Damon’s motion was first filed in early January and the first hearing was on March 7, 2012, for which Damon's attorney flew down from No. Cal. At that hearing, Judge Goldsmith accepted the motion and said that it kicked in the requirement for mediation and scheduled a mediation date for May. After all that time, energy and expense, Judge Goldsmith sabotaged all of Damon's efforts by simply declaring belatedly at the hearing that there would be no hearing. And that was after allowing Eric's attorney to argue at length about the case from the beginning and Cindy defending herself at length from all his distortions and misstatements of fact. They deliberately turned it around and staged it to attack Cindy once again. Cindy had been told by Damon's attorney that the hearing would be continued, so she was not at all prepared; and this was supposed to be Damon fighting for himself. Damon's attorney was very quiet and did not pose any objections to any of the fraud perpetrated by this court on her client. She has possibly been threatened or intimidated. In these orders, Goldsmith overrides Eric's objection to Damon's motion and deems it to be 'appropriate'. It is a mystery how it can be appropriate, but at the same time not appropriate due to no change of circumstance. Judge Goldsmith states here that she considered the mediator's report...For what?? There was no hearing to consider it for. It makes no sense. Goldsmith states that there has been 'no change of circumstance but does not explain how a child running away from his father, being in hiding for over a year, hiring his own attorney and filing his own motion is not a change of circumstance. Goldsmith reaffirms the finding that there is 'no abuse' but no judge ever made that finding. The findings about the abuse have morphed with three judges from 'insufficient evidence' to 'no credible evidence' to 'no abuse' without so much as a minimal investigation as per FC 3118 and after concealment of critical evidence. It remains a mystery as to why she has to reaffirm anything if there is no hearing. The contortions which judges go through to cover up abuse are truly amazing. This is deliberate fraud perpetrated in a continuing effort to cover up the sexual abuse of Damon by his father.

Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Flag for inappropriate content