P. 1
Kimberlin's Answer

Kimberlin's Answer

|Views: 2,970|Likes:
Published by AaronWorthing
Brett Kimberlin's answer to my Virginia complaint.
Brett Kimberlin's answer to my Virginia complaint.

More info:

Published by: AaronWorthing on Aug 02, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/11/2012

pdf

text

original

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY VIRGINIA AARON J. WALKER, PLAINTIFF, V.

BRETT KIMBERLIN, etal DEFENDANT DEFENDANT BRETT KIMBERLIN'S ANSWER Now comes Defendant Brett Kimberlin and hereby answers the Complaint filed by Aaron Walker. 1. Defendant denies the facts set forth in paragraphs 2,15,16,19,20,21,24,33,35,37,39,40,42,50,51,52,58,59,60,61,62,64,65,66,67, 68,69,70,86,87,88,89,90,91.93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,134,135,136,137,138, 140,141,142,143,144,146,147,148,149,150,190,191,192,193,194,196,197, 198,199,200.202,203,204,205,206,207,209,210,211,212,213,214,216,217, 218,219,220,221,222,252,253,254,255256,257 and 258. 2. Defendant states that Plaintiff s suit is frivolous and malicious. 3. Defendant states that Plaintiff suit fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 4. Defendant states that Defendant Aaron Walker is a publicfigurewho publishes articles and blogs, including very controversial articles and blogs on hot button issues. 5. Defendant's communications with Plaintiffs attorney do not provide any basis of which to sue Defendant for extortion and defamation. Plaintiff NO. CL12-6631

himself, not Defendant, published those communications to a worldwide audience on his blog. 6. Many of Plaintiff s Claims are based on state and federal criminal statutes that do not provide a basis for civil liability. 7. Many of Plaintiff s Claims are based on state and federal law over which this Court has no jurisdiction. 8. Plaintiff has no legal basis to secure an injunction prohibiting Defendant from identifying him as Aaron Walker, aka Aaron Worthing, the publisher of the Muslim hate blog, EveryoneDrawMohammed. Plaintiff has in fact identified himself as such in the Complaint and other court documents, which are filed in the public domain. 9. Plaintiff has no basis to show any conspiracy of Defendant with anyone, which requires an agreement and an overt act Defendant never agreed with anyone to commit the acts alleged in the Compliant. Wherefore, Defendant prays that the Plaintiff take nothing, that Defendant be awarded costs, and that sanctions be imposed against Plaintiff for filing a frivolous and malicious suit, and any other relief the Court may deem proper. Respectfully sutrrfiitted, Brett K i m b l r t i j j ^ Certificate of Service I certify that I mailed a copy of this Answer to Plaintiff this 4 day of April, 2012.
th

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->