P. 1
Foreclosure Pilot Program

Foreclosure Pilot Program

|Views: 737|Likes:
Published by Foreclosure Fraud

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Foreclosure Fraud on Aug 20, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





In the initial stages of the development of the program, much effort was devoted to

researching the way in which other state court systems were addressing the foreclosure crisis.

First the states hardest hit by the crisis were reviewed. This included Nevada, with 10% of its

home loans in foreclosure, New Jersey (7.3%), Illinois (6.5%) and Arizona (4.5%). Various

publications from the internet and the library were consulted. However, this was new territory.

None of the court systems had weathered a real estate crisis of this magnitude. In starting this

research it became apparent that Florida, although deluged by foreclosure cases, was just a small

part of a growing national problem.

In developing a business plan for foreclosure management, the approach of other

metropolitan areas was studied. To make a fair comparison, it is essential to examine how

different states manage foreclosures. Much research was conducted to determine how other state

courts were controlling the progress of caseloads. First, an important distinction needs to be

recognized. Unlike Florida, not all states are judicial foreclosure states. In fact, two states hit

hard by the foreclosure crisis, California and Nevada, are non-judicial foreclosure states. This

means that lenders in non-judicial foreclosure states do not need to file a court case to foreclose

on real property. The judicial foreclosure requires court intervention, while the non-judicial

foreclosure is without court process. In a typical non-judicial foreclosure, upon loan default, the

bank sends the borrower a notice of default which is then recorded. If the borrower fails to cure

the default, a notice of sale is mailed to the borrower, published and recorded. Then the public

auction is held. Even among the non-judicial states, there are different procedures ranging from

initiating the process with a notice of sale, to not requiring notice to the owner.


Although Florida was heavily impacted by the foreclosure crisis, this state was a small

part of a much greater national problem. Many states, including Pennsylvania, Connecticut,

Florida, California, Nevada, Ohio and New Jersey, both judicial and non-judicial, were among

the first to launch mediation programs. The variations extended from mandatory mediation to

voluntary programs and informal negotiations. The mediation program implemented in

Philadelphia was heavily studied, as it was reported for having a “massively effective foreclosure

rescue program.”

Only the judicial foreclosure states needed to define how they address court management

of foreclosure filings. A survey of various judicial foreclosure states revealed surprising

statistics. Below is a snapshot of the foreclosure statics in several different states from 2006-


Florida, as a judicial foreclosure state experienced some of the highest rates of

foreclosure in the entire country. Table 3 below shows a 731% spike in foreclosures from the

third quarter of 2006 through the first quarter of 2010.


You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->