P. 1
Howard Griswold Conference CALL Thurs, July 12, 2012

Howard Griswold Conference CALL Thurs, July 12, 2012

|Views: 67|Likes:
Published by Gemini Research
Howard Griswold Conference Call—Thursday, August 16, 2012
Partial

Howard Griswold Conference calls:
conf call (talkshoe) 724-444-7444 95099# 1#
(non-talkshoe members must use the 1# after the pin number)
Thursday’s at 8 p.m., Eastern Time.
Talkshoe mutes the phone lines

Note: there is a hydrate water call 8 pm, Eastern Monday’s, 218-844-3388 966771#
Howard’s home number: 302-875-2653 (between 9:30, a.m, and 7:00, p.m.)

All correspondence to:
Gemini Investment Research Group, POB 398, Delmar, Del. 19940
(do not address mail to ‘Howard Griswold’ since Howard has not taken up residence in that mailbox and since he’s on good terms with his wife he isn’t likely to in the foreseeable future.)
Donations are accepted.


http://www.scribd.com/GeminiResearchGroup

‘I am not a public servant {officer or employee} and any claim to the contrary must be proved by payroll records and my alleged public servant {officer} title and sworn under penalty of perjury with full commercial liability for the person who swears to it.’
I’m not an officer or agent or employee of the government. I am not resident within the government and any claim to the contrary must be proved by payroll records. Prove that I’m being paid by the government to be a government employee. If you can’t then your law doesn’t apply to me.
Government has all the right in the world to make laws and rules regulating itself.
When they impose any of these rules and regulations beyond government upon any of us {private} they’re breaching their fiduciary duty {as public officers and trustees of government}.
Public means government—private means non-government.

Your acceptance of anything that government offers you at any level in any way, shape or form is a consent to cooperate with them and to put yourself under their authority and control.

***************


It is a dishonest act of enforcing a law upon a private individual that government has no right, no power, no authority whatsoever to enforce upon the private individual. That is breach of their fiduciary duty with no stupid questions asked.
When you file a breach of fiduciary duty case you are actually filing in equity. Leave out all statutory references even though that example that we send around came out of Colorado forms and it refers to a Colorado statutory representation that does put it in equity but it isn’t necessary to quote any statutory reference in order to open the court of equity which is the Article 3 courts

(unless you’re a teacher or government worker or have contracted with the government with full disclosure, etc whereby you’re not private anymore and you’re resident within the government.)
You got to party to government to enjoy government’s benefits, privileges and opportunities.

********************
Christian Walters (trusts) is on Mondays, Tuesdays and Saturdays at nine o'clock, Eastern Time. The number is 1-712-432-0075 and the pin is 149939# (9 pm EST). Wednesday’s number is 1-724-444-7444 and the pin is 41875# (8 pm, Eastern) or tune in on Wednesday at Talkshoe.com at http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=41875&cmd=tc

Often you can find a transcript or a partial one for the week’s call at the following website:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/peoplelookingforthetruth
Howard approves or disapproves all postings to this yahoo group. Send potential posting to Howard.


Note: questions to Howard are now submitted to Howard, preferably typed, to Gemini Research rather than fielded on the call live. It would be desirable to send a couple of bucks for mailing, copying and printing costs.

*********************
Extra legal help is available from the firm, Ketchum, Dewey, Cheatham and Howe.


*******************************************************************
****************

For reference:
Jersey City v. Hague, 115 Atlantic Reporter 2nd, page 8 (A 2nd )
**********
Project for all:
Howard needs information on how to write a complaint for breach of the trust.
Hit the libraries
Howard Griswold Conference Call—Thursday, August 16, 2012
Partial

Howard Griswold Conference calls:
conf call (talkshoe) 724-444-7444 95099# 1#
(non-talkshoe members must use the 1# after the pin number)
Thursday’s at 8 p.m., Eastern Time.
Talkshoe mutes the phone lines

Note: there is a hydrate water call 8 pm, Eastern Monday’s, 218-844-3388 966771#
Howard’s home number: 302-875-2653 (between 9:30, a.m, and 7:00, p.m.)

All correspondence to:
Gemini Investment Research Group, POB 398, Delmar, Del. 19940
(do not address mail to ‘Howard Griswold’ since Howard has not taken up residence in that mailbox and since he’s on good terms with his wife he isn’t likely to in the foreseeable future.)
Donations are accepted.


http://www.scribd.com/GeminiResearchGroup

‘I am not a public servant {officer or employee} and any claim to the contrary must be proved by payroll records and my alleged public servant {officer} title and sworn under penalty of perjury with full commercial liability for the person who swears to it.’
I’m not an officer or agent or employee of the government. I am not resident within the government and any claim to the contrary must be proved by payroll records. Prove that I’m being paid by the government to be a government employee. If you can’t then your law doesn’t apply to me.
Government has all the right in the world to make laws and rules regulating itself.
When they impose any of these rules and regulations beyond government upon any of us {private} they’re breaching their fiduciary duty {as public officers and trustees of government}.
Public means government—private means non-government.

Your acceptance of anything that government offers you at any level in any way, shape or form is a consent to cooperate with them and to put yourself under their authority and control.

***************


It is a dishonest act of enforcing a law upon a private individual that government has no right, no power, no authority whatsoever to enforce upon the private individual. That is breach of their fiduciary duty with no stupid questions asked.
When you file a breach of fiduciary duty case you are actually filing in equity. Leave out all statutory references even though that example that we send around came out of Colorado forms and it refers to a Colorado statutory representation that does put it in equity but it isn’t necessary to quote any statutory reference in order to open the court of equity which is the Article 3 courts

(unless you’re a teacher or government worker or have contracted with the government with full disclosure, etc whereby you’re not private anymore and you’re resident within the government.)
You got to party to government to enjoy government’s benefits, privileges and opportunities.

********************
Christian Walters (trusts) is on Mondays, Tuesdays and Saturdays at nine o'clock, Eastern Time. The number is 1-712-432-0075 and the pin is 149939# (9 pm EST). Wednesday’s number is 1-724-444-7444 and the pin is 41875# (8 pm, Eastern) or tune in on Wednesday at Talkshoe.com at http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=41875&cmd=tc

Often you can find a transcript or a partial one for the week’s call at the following website:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/peoplelookingforthetruth
Howard approves or disapproves all postings to this yahoo group. Send potential posting to Howard.


Note: questions to Howard are now submitted to Howard, preferably typed, to Gemini Research rather than fielded on the call live. It would be desirable to send a couple of bucks for mailing, copying and printing costs.

*********************
Extra legal help is available from the firm, Ketchum, Dewey, Cheatham and Howe.


*******************************************************************
****************

For reference:
Jersey City v. Hague, 115 Atlantic Reporter 2nd, page 8 (A 2nd )
**********
Project for all:
Howard needs information on how to write a complaint for breach of the trust.
Hit the libraries

More info:

Categories:Types, Business/Law
Published by: Gemini Research on Aug 21, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/31/2012

pdf

text

original

Howard Griswold Conference Call—Thursday, August 16, 2012 Partial Howard Griswold Conference calls: conf call (talkshoe) 724

-444-7444 95099# 1# (non-talkshoe members must use the 1# after the pin number) Thursday’s at 8 p.m., Eastern Time. Talkshoe mutes the phone lines Note: there is a hydrate water call 8 pm, Eastern Monday’s, 218-844-3388 966771# Howard’s home number: 302-875-2653 (between 9:30, a.m, and 7:00, p.m.) All correspondence to: Gemini Investment Research Group, POB 398, Delmar, Del. 19940 (do not address mail to ‘Howard Griswold’ since Howard has not taken up residence in that mailbox and since he’s on good terms with his wife he isn’t likely to in the foreseeable future.) Donations are accepted. http://www.scribd.com/GeminiResearchGroup ‘I am not a public servant {officer or employee} and any claim to the contrary must be proved by payroll records and my alleged public servant {officer} title and sworn under penalty of perjury with full commercial liability for the person who swears to it.’ I’m not an officer or agent or employee of the government. I am not resident within the government and any claim to the contrary must be proved by payroll records. Prove that I’m being paid by the government to be a government employee. If you can’t then your law doesn’t apply to me. Government has all the right in the world to make laws and rules regulating itself. When they impose any of these rules and regulations beyond government upon any of us {private} they’re breaching their fiduciary duty {as public officers and trustees of government}. Public means government—private means non-government. Your acceptance of anything that government offers you at any level in any way, shape or form is a consent to cooperate with them and to put yourself under their authority and control. *************** It is a dishonest act of enforcing a law upon a private individual that government has no right, no power, no authority whatsoever to enforce upon the private individual. That is breach of their fiduciary duty with no stupid questions asked.

When you file a breach of fiduciary duty case you are actually filing in equity. Leave out all statutory references even though that example that we send around came out of Colorado forms and it refers to a Colorado statutory representation that does put it in equity but it isn’t necessary to quote any statutory reference in order to open the court of equity which is the Article 3 courts (unless you’re a teacher or government worker or have contracted with the government with full disclosure, etc whereby you’re not private anymore and you’re resident within the government.) You got to party to government to enjoy government’s benefits, privileges and opportunities. ******************** Christian Walters (trusts) is on Mondays, Tuesdays and Saturdays at nine o'clock, Eastern Time. The number is 1-712-432-0075 and the pin is 149939# (9 pm EST). Wednesday’s number is 1-724-444-7444 and the pin is 41875# (8 pm, Eastern) or tune in on Wednesday at Talkshoe.com at http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp? masterId=41875&cmd=tc Often you can find a transcript or a partial one for the week’s call at the following website: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/peoplelookingforthetruth Howard approves or disapproves all postings to this yahoo group. Send potential posting to Howard. Note: questions to Howard are now submitted to Howard, preferably typed, to Gemini Research rather than fielded on the call live. It would be desirable to send a couple of bucks for mailing, copying and printing costs. ********************* Extra legal help is available from the firm, Ketchum, Dewey, Cheatham and Howe. ******************************************************************* **************** For reference: Jersey City v. Hague, 115 Atlantic Reporter 2nd, page 8 (A 2nd ) ********** Project for all: Howard needs information on how to write a complaint for breach of the trust. Hit the libraries! He would appreciate any research help. ***************************************************** Start

***************************************************** {01:32:58.733} [Howard] We’ve been talking about breach of fiduciary duty for a long time. We’ve been trying to come up with a concept or an understanding of it. I think on this Saturday’s program I will go over the complaint form. I’m not going to do that tonight. I’m going to over the reasons for one. There is a requirement in law and this happens to be universal, not only in this country but all countries have a due process of law. The lawmaking, we’ll call it body, whether it be a king or a legislative body of several people like we have here in rinky-dink United States or a dictator all by himself. The concept of law is that when this law is made it is to be enforced and adhered to. I don’t think anybody will disagree with me on that. I think even the biggest legal writers will agree with me on that. And when it is not adhered to then somebody should to be punished in some way, shape or form. There are procedures written into the law of what government officials and mostly judicial officials are supposed to do and when they don’t do them they too should be punished. Those requirements in this country are referred to as due process of law. That is defined in Blacks Law Dictionary, 5th edition, I’ll read that part to you. It can be found in many, many other dictionaries—probably not much in the 7th and 8th edition because they purposely left out all court cites, all references to any law textbooks in those two and perverted the definitions of many things that they were supposed to be defining in Blacks 7th and 8th editions on purpose because they were trying to keep the people from understanding what they were doing and having the knowledge that was available through Blacks 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th edition which still are available to be bought if you have the initiative to go buy one. They’re not in print anymore but they’re still around and can be acquired and some of them have been actually uploaded on the computer and can be referenced right on the computer. So if you don’t believe what I’m telling you and what I read to you tonight go look it up yourself in any one of the dictionaries on due process of law. Now listen closely. The law in its regular course of administration through the courts of justice… Now, what did they just tell you the courts are? Now, what’s this bullshit constantly about Article 3 courts about admiralty, common law and equity, some crap that somebody put out about what they think things are… Nobody’s explaining what’s really being done. These courts do have authority in admiralty if the complaint is filed in a proper admiralty form relating to something that happens on the high seas having nothing to do with what happens on the land. They have authority to administer the statutes on land and the statutes on land are based on commerce which comes out of admiralty, maritime, common law and equity all combined into commerce and they are administering the statutes so they’re administrative courts. They’re not equity. They’re not law, common law. They’re not admiralty law. They’re not Article 3. They are Article 1 administrative courts administering the statutory law. Look at how these lawyer punks put everything together. It’s always under a statute. All claims made in the court are in accordance with a certain statute. The jurisdiction of the court is listed in some statutory reference for the court to have jurisdiction to hear this kind of a matter. They are administrative. They are not admiralty. They are not common law. They are not equity. Now, you can put them in equity. You can put them in admiralty if you know what you’re doing but why bother unless you know what you’re doing. They are administrative. And in the process of administration there are certain rules and regulations which must be followed. Listen close. Due process of law in each particular case means

such an exercise of the powers of the government as the settled maxims of law permit and sanction and under such safeguards for the protection of the individual’s rights as those maxims proscribed for the class of cases to which the one in question belongs. A course of legal proceeding according to those rules and principles which have been established in our system of jurisprudence for the enforcement and protection of private rights to give such proceeding any validity there must be a tribunal—meaning a court—competent by its constitution that is by the law of its creation to pass upon the subject matter of the suit and if that involves merely a determination of the personal liability of the defendant he must be brought within its jurisdiction by service of process—and by the way, there are rules regulating that and they 99 times out of a 100 do not follow those rules. That’s one breach of due process but they must be brought by service of process within the state or his voluntary appearance must be acquired. See Tenneroy v. Neff 95 US Reports, p. 733. That case is well worth studying. It is about due process. Due process of law implies the right of a person affected thereby to be present before the tribunal which pronounces the judgment upon the question of life, liberty or property. Notice I’m emphasizing some of these words. In its most comprehensive sense it is to be heard by testimony or otherwise –like affidavits —and to have the right of contravening—meaning contradicting whatever the claim is—by proof. Every material fact which bears on the question of right in the matter involved. Now, these are very broad statements because we can’t tie this down and identify one thing only and expect people to understand that it applies to many things. So it has to be written very broadly like this. Now, listen closely to the next statement. If any question of fact or liability be conclusively presumed against him this is not due process of law. Ninety-nine percent of the stuff that is brought into these courts today by government against you is conclusively presumed. It is not due process of law. It is a dishonest act of enforcing a law upon a private individual that government has no right, no power, no authority whatsoever to enforce upon the private individual. That is breach of their fiduciary duty with no stupid questions asked. When you file a breach of fiduciary duty case you are actually filing in equity. Leave out all statutory references even though that example that we send around came out of Colorado forms and it refers to a Colorado statutory representation that does put it in equity but it isn’t necessary to quote any statutory reference in order to open the court of equity which is the Article 3 courts. And that Article 3 court exists from the lowest level of a state court all the way up to the United States Supreme Court and every court in between providing that the pleading is done in equity. That opens up the Article Three Court. Anyway, back to due process. An orderly proceeding wherein a person is served with notice, actual or constructive, and has an opportunity to be heard and to enforce and protect his rights before a court having the power to hear and determine the case. Having the power to hear and determine is a very important factor. It has no power to hear something that is fraudulent, that is brought by improper intent and—I looked this case many years ago—~~Crizbouski v. Crizbouski, 259 NE Reports 2nd edition, p. 282. The phrase, due process of law, means that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property or of any right granted him by statute unless the matter involved first shall have been adjudicated against him upon a trial conducted according to the established rules— pay attention to that—regulating judicial proceedings and it forbids condemnation without a hearing that Petit v. Penn, 180 Southern Rptr 2d, p. 66. The concept of due process of

law as it is embodied in the 5th Amendment demands that the law shall not be unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious and that the means selected shall have reasonable and substantial relation to the object being sought. And that’s US v. Smith at 249 Federal Supplement, p. 515. The fundamental requisite of due process is the opportunity to be heard, to be aware that a matter is pending to make an informed choice whether to acquiesce or to contest and to assert before the appropriate decision-making body— meaning the court—by reasons for such choice whatever argument the individual can produce that proves the other party wrong. That is Trinity Escapale corporation v. Romney and that 387 F. Sup., p. 1044. Aside from all else due process means fundamental fairness. See Pinkerton v. Farr and that’s 220 SE 2nd ed., p. 682. The essential elements of due process of law are notice and opportunity to be heard and to defend in orderly proceedings adopted to the nature of the case and the guarantee of due process requires that every man have protection of a day in court and a benefit of general law. In other words, you can use the law to defend yourself but these procedural courts today and procedural process lawyers don’t bring the law in and won’t argue it. So they’re in violation of due process by doing that every time they do it. See DiMaio v. Reed and that is 37 Atlantic Rptr, 2d, p. 829. Daniel Webster defined this phrase to mean a law which hears before it condemns— maybe that was true back then in Daniel Webster’s day—it isn’t true today, is it—which proceeds on injury—that’s not true today either, is it—and renders judgment only after a trial. These things are not trials, they’re hearings where you’re not allowed to bring anything in. But see Wichita Council number 120 of Security Benefit Association v. Security Benefit Association at 28 Pacific Reporter 2d, p. 976. Also AB Barnes Drilling Company v. Phillips 166 Oklahoma at p. 154. That’s the original case and 26 Pacific Reporter 2d, p. 766. That’s the appeal on it—Supreme Court appeal. This constitutional guarantee demands only that the law shall not be unreasonable. It shall not be arbitrary. It shall not be capricious and that means collected shall have real and substantial relation to the object at hand. See Nibia v. people of the State of New York and that is 291 US Reports, p. 502. By the way, that’s another case that we talk about once in a while that also says that an individual has the right to step into commerce with the government at any time and to step out of commerce with the government at any time that he wishes. They can’t require you and force you to stay involved in their commerce. They cannot keep the commercial instruments that you created with them and not return them to you and terminate the agreements but they do it all the time. That’s another breach of their fiduciary duties. Also see North American Company v. Security and Exchange Commission and that’s 133 F Rpr 2d, at 148. Due process is a very important and essential part of the functions of not only government and its agencies but of the courts and it is not being adhered to so many different ways if you’ll just look it up. Read these cases that I’ve just cited. This is all on Talkshoe’s archives. If you didn’t get it all listen to me, go back and listen to the archives. If you still don’t get it all listen to them again and again till you get a chance to write each one of them down if you have to. Go look them up. I don’t have all these cases—a bunch of them I do but I don’t have them all. Writing to me and asking for every one of those cases won’t do you any good. As I said, maybe I can find them in short order but I don’t have them all. The reference at the end of that definition says, ‘also see procedural due process.’ Now, procedural due process is really the process of the court because the courts act on procedure. They don’t act on law. They’re not there for law. They’re administrative, administrative in their nature so they have a procedure to

administer the statute law having nothing whatsoever to do with the controlling law at all and not allowing you to bring the controlling law in—again, another breach of their fiduciary duty because they’re not allowing you to be heard. But listen closely, procedural due process: If those safeguards to one’s liberty and property mandated by the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution such as the right to council appointed for one who is indigent, the right to a copy of the transcript—I don’t know where that one came from. I know that there’s a right to a copy of the charging documents but a copy of the transcript I’m not sure where that comes from—somebody just wrote that into this definition and there’s no case backing that up. It would be nice if we had a right to the damned transcript without having to pay for it. But anyway, they’re saying, a right to the transcript and the right of confrontation—in other words, the right to argue back which I don’t know if any of you people been in court lately but in the last five to ten years the judges are cutting you off and saying, ‘I’m not going to listen to that argument—shut up, I’ll put you in jail for contempt if you bring it up again.’ They’re not allowing the confrontation. They’re not allowing you to bring the arguments of law against their procedure. Well, they’re procedure is supposed to be controlled by other laws and they’re not even following those laws. Anyway, the right of confrontation all of which are specifically provided for in the 6th Amendment and made applicable to the state’s procedures by the 14th Amendment, the dictionary said. The central meaning of procedural due process is that parties whose rights are to be affected are entitled to be heard and in order that they may enjoy that right they must be notified—properly notified. Now, proper notification means that you have to be made aware of what this is all about, what it stems from, what law is actually applicable, not some stupid statute that they used to get you into court and they’re not providing that in the notices—again, breach of their fiduciary duty. See Morham v. Cortese. That’s at 107 US Reports, p. 67. Reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard and present any claim or defense are embodied in the term, procedural due process. See in re Nelson at 437Pacific Reporter 2d, p. 1008. Procedure defined: This is following procedural due process, procedure defined: The mode of proceeding by which a legal right is enforced as distinguished from the substantive law. See, they’re operating under procedure in these courts—they’re ignoring the substantive law. It is distinguished from the substantive law which gives or defines the right and which by means of the proceedings the court is to administer. The administration is the machinery as distinguished from its product that which relates the formal steps in an action or other judicial proceeding a form manner an order of conducting suits or prosecutions. The judicial process for enforcing rights and duties recognized by substantive law and for justly administering redress for infractions of those substantive laws. It’s supposed to be there for that but notice the first sentence. That’s what they’re doing. The second sentence here is not what they’re doing. See Sims v. United Pacific Insurance 51 F. Supp., p. 433 for that reference. Now, when these clowns called lawyers don’t do what they’re supposed to do, don’t properly give you notice, don’t properly serve as the rules of court require a summons along with a complaint that specifically identifies the parties involved, the injury involved, the jurisdiction of the court established and the venue of the individuals involved has to be all noted in the complaint. If that’s not all there then they have procedurally violated procedural due process. That leaves a question before the court as to how can you possibly answer. They never do this right. They never follow

the rules. They’re not supposed to. They don’t want to. It is too complicated and too expensive for them to do so. I would hit them with no warning whatsoever with a notice that they are in breach of fiduciary duty and if they don’t correct it immediately within the next three days, ten days, thirty days, whatever length of time you feel kind enough to give them that a complaint for breach of fiduciary duty will follow. That’s firing a shot right at them and a very simple little notice. It doesn’t take a lot of brains. It doesn’t take a particular form for anybody to look at. It doesn’t take a prototype letter for anybody to have to do that. It’s very simple. It’s related to each and every subject matter that you’re involved in and it has to be identified according to the subject matter that you’re involved in and what they didn’t do correctly. Now, that’s up to you to look it up. So there is no form for doing this. There is no format that we can give you other than what I just told you. But it’s not that complicated. All you have to do is look up their rules of what they were supposed to do like Rule 2 in a civil case requiring that a complaint be served along with the summons. The summons is telling you that you have to answer the complaint. Well, if they don’t serve a complaint along with the summons then they violated the rule, didn’t they? That’s a procedural due process violation. The police never serve a complaint. They always serve a summons to come to court. I don’t know what the hell I’m there for. All the summons says is, come to court. It doesn’t list the complaint. Now, some moron will try to tell you that it says that you were charged with speeding. The complaint requires that an injured party be listed. Remember what I just read to you, that it’s based on injury. What did speeding injure? Where’s the injured party? Rule 17 of the Rules of Civil Procedure require that the injured party, the party of interest, be present, be the one that makes the complaint. It can’t be somebody else. Where’s the injured party? Who made the complaint? Not the cop—the cop can’t be an injured party. You didn’t injure him. They’re not doing what they should be doing. They’re breaking laws right and left. They should be taught some hard lessons. Don’t have any reason to give a damn about them when they do the kinds of things they do to the people and stealing from us through violations of due process, breach of the duty that they have as public officials. Forget this servant crap. They are not servants. They are public officials. That is the name that is used to describe them—public officials. They are not described in law as public servants. That’s somebody’s opinion. That has nothing to do with reality. The reality is they’re public servants and employees. The information that we put out comes from 63c of the Books of American Jurisprudence on public officials and employees. That’s what they’re called, not public servants. They are in a trust position. They have a duty to act honestly. When they breach the duties of procedural due process or due process generally then they’re not being honest. I’m telling you if you people just open your eyes and your ears and pay attention to what’s done you got every one of these scum bags, lawyers, cops, judges, politicians, every one of them. You’ve got them if you want them under this procedure of law. Read some of those cases. Probably the most informative one that you could get into would be Jersey City v. Hague. That’s cited in that list of cases. I would get all those lists. All those cases are in that list and read them all but pay attention to Jersey City v. Hague because the court told you that the people don’t have to depend upon the prosecuting attorney. They don’t have to depend upon government to do anything. They have the right and the power to bring these claims for breach of fiduciary duty against any government official who acts corruptly. Wow! The court said that, not me. That’s not my opinion. The court said that. The court is letting you know. It’s not even their opinion.

They’re telling you the facts. You have the power to do these things. Get off your ass and do them. And don’t excuse me for my language—I’m getting a little disgusted with the American people… I want this spread around any way and every way you can spread it. You hear anybody talking about stupid things like, file complaints against them for violations of Title 18. Well, they better figure out what due process is before they file any complaints and they better look up what the law says and figure out what somebody’s conduct is and whether it fits what the law says or it doesn’t fit. If it fits what the criminal code says then they’re guilty of a criminal act. If it’s what they’re supposed to do and it doesn’t fit what they’ve done then they’re guilty of breach of their fiduciary duty. Either criminal or breach of their duty is still a breach of their duty if they’re in a position of government as an officer or employee. These people can all be taken down if we just go after them. There’s not an honest person in government at any level because the people in government don’t even know what due process means. They don’t even know what the law means. They don’t understand what the Constitution meant and how it established them. They don’t understand what honesty and integrity is so they all can be taken down and maybe a few will learn a lesson. "All" Howard's and GEMINI RESEARCH's information through the years, has been gathered, combined and collated into 3 "Home-Study Courses" and "Information packages" listed at www.peoples-rights.com "Mail Order" DONATIONS and/or Toll-Free 1-877-544-4718 (24 Hours F.A.Q. line) Dave DiReamer can be reached at: notaxman@dmv.com Check out: www.escapeharrassment.com www.escape-tickets-IRS-court.org Peoples-rights has a new book available from The Informer: Just Who Really Owns the United States, the International Monetary Fund, Federal Reserve, World Bank, Your House, Your Car, Everything—the Myth and the Reality. He’ll take $45 for the book to help with ads, but $40 would be ok which includes shipping ($35 barebones minimum) www.peoples-rights.com c/o 1624 Savannah Road, Lewes, Delaware 19958 ********************

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->