9.9K views

Uploaded by Ishaq Ahmad

save

- Sieve Analysis Test
- Sieve analysis
- Lab Report Sieve Analysis
- Dry Sieve Report
- Sieve Analysis
- Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate
- sieve
- C4 - Sieve Analysis (Aggregate Grading) for Fine and Coarse Aggregate
- Lab Report 1
- Sieve analysis
- Sieve Analysis
- Sieve Analysis
- Sieve analysis
- Lab Report 1
- sieve analysis
- 03 Hydrometer Analysis (1)
- Lab 1 - Particle Density Test
- compaction factor test.doc
- Concrete Mixing and Testing Lab Report
- Conclusion
- Atterburg Limits Lab Report (Lab Report 1)
- Sieve-Analysis-Lab-Report.docx
- Sieve Analysis of Fine and Course Aggregates
- Soil Comp Action Test report by yasas89
- sieve analysis
- Lab report
- Geotechnics Moisture Content Lab Report
- Civil Lab Test 1
- Soil Lab Expt 3 a and b
- Experiment Compaction Test (Standard Proctor)
- Microsoft Word - Technical Paper-no.3
- simplex
- E numbers
- Maths Symbols
- E numbers
- soo-e-hajaj
- Chatting symbols
- 02 AAITDAAL

You are on page 1of 3

comprised of an agglomeration of smaller units. Probably the most obvious example is that of concrete in which gravel, sand and cement are mixed together to form a monolithic (literally, one-stone) engineering material. The principle qualifications of aggregates for concrete are specified (ASTM C 33-55 T) as being clean, hard, tough, strong, durable and of the proper gradation. In general, a desirable gradation of aggregates is considered to be that combination of coarse and fine materials which produces maximum density, and thereby minimum voids, consistent with good workability of concrete and minimum cement requirement for the concrete of a given consistency. A uniformly sized material cannot be packed into a large container without considerable porosity. The largest packing factor possible for spheres is about 74%. This is to say that only 74% of the total space can be occupied by the spheres and the rest of the space exists as voids. For a uniformly sized material the packing factor is independent of the size. Packing factors can be increased by two methods. One is to use non-spherical particles. The packing factor for a pile of bricks, for example, can be nearly 100%. A second method for increasing the packing factor is to mix particle size. A mixture of sand and gravel has a greater packing factor than either one alone. The sand can fill the pore spaces between the gravel. The more space the engineer fills in concrete with sand and gravel, the less cement is required. This results in a decrease in the cost of the concrete.

If all the particles which are used in agglomerated materials were perfect spheres, the determination of the particle size would be a relatively simple matter. We would simply make a measurement of the diameter. In practice most particles vary considerably from perfect sphericity. However, the engineer still finds it desirable to have a measure of the particle size of sand and gravel. The gradation of an aggregate is determined by the method of sieve analysis by shaking a given quantity of the material through a series of sieves with standardized mesh openings. The mesh number is approximately the number of openings per lineal inch.

Any aggregate mixture will be comprised of a range of mesh sizes. As a result, it is generally difficult to use one number to indicate the average size of an aggregate. This is illustrated in the following figure which

Another measure used to grade aggregate is the fineness modulus. In one case the particles are very closely graded (narrowly graded) and are essentially of one size. In the other case there is a wide variation in sizes (broadly graded). For thin walls and smooth surfaces mesh 50 should retain at least 15% and mesh 100 should retain at least 3%. The Bureau of Reclamation requires a fineness modulus between 2. Procedure: .shows the percent of the aggregate which has been retained by each successively finer screen. then it follows that most of the aggregate fell to the pan and consequently is very fine. Mesh # 4 8 16 30 50 100 Cumulative % Retained 0 to 5 10 to 20 20 to 40 40 to 70 70 to 88 92 to 98 The percent retained in mesh 50 and 100 affects the workability of the concrete and the finish and surface texture of the concrete. As a result. Fineness Modulus = sum of cumulative percents 100 A fineness modulus equal to 6 would indicate that none of the aggregate fell to the pan and thus is very coarse. If the fineness modulus is less than one. the engineer generally specifies the size distribution by listing the percentages retained on more than one screen. an index of the fineness or coarseness of the aggregate. Narrowly graded Broadly graded The Bureau of Reclamation suggests the following gradation for sand to be used in mixing concrete.00 for the sand used in the construction of concrete.50 and 3.

Weigh a dried sample of aggregate and record the weight (500 g + 25 g). Concrete Sand Aggregate Distribution Cumulative Percent Concrete Sand Cumulative Distribution Weight Retained 150 Concrete Sand I 100 50 0 0 0. Address the following questions for each sample: Is the sample broadly or narrowly graded? Compare the fineness modulus to the Bureau of Reclamation standards and compare the graphs to the ideal sand grading suggested by the Bureau of Reclamation. Weigh each sieve and record the weight of the aggregate retained on each.04 0. Organize your data in the Sand Sieve Analysis Table stored in a Word document on the CD or downloaded from the website. 5. 2. 5. . Questions to be addressed in the lab report: 1. Pour the aggregate sample in the top sieve and cover. 3. In your lab report be sure to discuss the physical characteristics of each aggregate sample.1. For each sample. Arrange the sieves in order. 3. Place the nest of sieves in a sieve shaker and shake for approximately 9 minutes. Weigh each sieve. with the sieve having the least number of mesh holes per inch (largest diameter openings) at the top and the pan at the bottom. Repeat with remaining samples. 7.02 0. Examples are shown below. but specifically the sand that will be used for your concrete construction. 4. construct (a) a bar graph of percent retained aggregate weight for each mesh number and (b) a plot of cumulative percent retained aggregate versus opening size in inches. 6. 2.06 Concrete Sand II Percent Weight 40 Retained 30 20 10 0 14 20 28 35 48 65 100 Mesh Number Opening Size (in) 4. Calculate the fineness modulus for each sample--be sure to show a sample calculation.

- Sieve Analysis TestUploaded byFarihan Mail
- Sieve analysisUploaded byRendi Ahmadhusein Pohan
- Lab Report Sieve AnalysisUploaded bybennyb16368
- Dry Sieve ReportUploaded byNoor Shahirah Md Ruba'i
- Sieve AnalysisUploaded byAmmar Azmi
- Sieve Analysis of Fine AggregateUploaded byMuhammad Aimi
- sieveUploaded byAnna Katrina Cuchapin
- C4 - Sieve Analysis (Aggregate Grading) for Fine and Coarse AggregateUploaded byEdrox Wong
- Lab Report 1Uploaded byChrislene Divino Calivo
- Sieve analysisUploaded bydpndrs4282
- Sieve AnalysisUploaded byDeepak Kumar Mallick
- Sieve AnalysisUploaded bynerox87
- Sieve analysisUploaded byneutron_87
- Lab Report 1Uploaded byAtikah Erma
- sieve analysisUploaded byPavan Ps
- 03 Hydrometer Analysis (1)Uploaded byeric
- Lab 1 - Particle Density TestUploaded byeijal11
- compaction factor test.docUploaded byNitisha Rathore
- Concrete Mixing and Testing Lab ReportUploaded bySoundMan56
- ConclusionUploaded bymacs_smac
- Atterburg Limits Lab Report (Lab Report 1)Uploaded byahsannasha
- Sieve-Analysis-Lab-Report.docxUploaded byJohn Pierce Gumapac
- Sieve Analysis of Fine and Course AggregatesUploaded byPàblo Ģomes
- Soil Comp Action Test report by yasas89Uploaded byyasas89
- sieve analysisUploaded byr6Yamaha
- Lab reportUploaded byWilliam Liew
- Geotechnics Moisture Content Lab ReportUploaded byNicole Harripersad
- Civil Lab Test 1Uploaded byKalomenni
- Soil Lab Expt 3 a and bUploaded byLamberto Bancoro Marcial Jr.
- Experiment Compaction Test (Standard Proctor)Uploaded bynaveedsidhu