P. 1
Fourth Amendment Flowchart

Fourth Amendment Flowchart

|Views: 280|Likes:
Published by masskonfuzion

More info:

Published by: masskonfuzion on Oct 06, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/30/2014

pdf

text

original

FOURTH AMENDMENT FLOWCHART

Fourth Amendment Flowchart
Search or Seizure?

NO NO

STOP
4A Does Not Apply

Yipee! Book ‗em Danno.


NO NO

Yes State Actor? Yes

Probable Cause

 HAS STANDING?
The Fourth Amendment (4A) protects privacy, possessory, and liberty interests and may be challenged only by those whose rights have been impaired. Standing is addressed within the context of 4A by asking whether the person claiming the protection of 4A has a legitimate expectation of privacy (LEOP) or a substantial property interest (SPI) in the invaded space. (Rakas). In the absence of the owner/lessor (O/L), social guests with “complete dominion and control” (D&C) have a LEOP but temporary or business guests do not. (Carter) A guest’s status may be determined from the nature of their activity, time on premises, and the extent of any previous connections with the O/L. (Carter) When an O/L is present, overnight guests without D&C may have a LEOP. (Olson). A guest may not attain standing by simply asserting ownership of the property seized, (Rawlings) and in the absence of standing, may not invoke the exclusionary rule to suppress introduction of such evidence against him (Alderman), regardless of the legality of the search yielding the evidence. (Payner)

YES

WARRANT REQUIRED?

NO

YES

WHAT KIND OF WARRANT?
Why are warrants required? 4A Protects 3 Constitutional Interests: I. Liberty II. Property III. Possessory 4A is a legislative measure, not constitutional. Therefore, it may be limited. (Calandra). Watch for states giving more protection. (Hempele) I. Highest protection of individual rights. II. Required anywhere suspect has REOP (Katz Test). I. Only time required in public place is for past misdemeanors (Watson). II. Warrant normally required for non-emergency arrest where REOP (home) (Payton) Warrant Obtained? YES - WARRANT OBTAINED Is the Warrant VALID? I. PROB ABLE CAUSE to support warrant application? A. Defined: Is the state agent’s knowledge reasonably trustworthy such that a reasonable person would believe that items subject to seizure or persons subject to arrest will be found at the time and place specified? B. Test: 1. Case specific - totality of circumstances; balance all indicia of reliability. (Gates) 2. Validity of information (basis of knowledge) a. Firsthand observation or hearsay? 3. Veracity of Information a. Police assumed truthful due to oath b. If tipster, track record,& ulterior motives c. Corroboration? C. Stale: PC to search may go stale b/c drugs used or sold, or criminals move on. But other items like files in a realtor’s office won’t go stale. (Andresen) II. PARTICULARITY as to place to be searched and items to be seized? III. NEUTRAL and DETACHED magistrate? IV. OATH or AFFIRMATION of affiant? A. Defeating the Affirmation – 3 Requirement (Franks): 1. False statement of affiant; and 2. Made knowlingly or w/ reckless disregard; and 3. False statement relied upon by magistrate NO – WARRANT NOT OBTAINED Is there a WARRANT EXCEPTION? I. Warrantless searches are per se unreasonable. (Katz).

What is the Controlling Authority? SEARCH Warrant ARREST Warrant

II. SILA: An arrestee, and the area within his immediate reach when arrested (wingspan), is subject to a warrantless search, so long as done contemporaneous in time and place with the arrest. (Chimel) As arrestee moves around, officer may follow and search “roving wingspan.” (Chrisman). When arrested in or at a vehicle, the entire passenger area of the vehicle may normally be searched without a warrant. (Belton). Closed containers giving no indication of their contents found during a valid car search incident to a lawful arrest may not be opened absent some exigency. In-other-words, Belton does not apply if the police wait too long after taking the suspect into custody. (Chadwick) III. VEHICLES: If cops have PC to believe a car may contain fruits/instrumentalities/evidence of a crime, a warrantless search of the car is permissible (Carroll); Pretext stop OK w/o racial profiling. (Whren) but citation stop alone ≠ PC to search. (Knowles). If cops are justified in making a warrantless search of a car at the time of stopping, they may tow it to the station and perform the search at a later time (Chambers) Closed containers giving no indication of their contents found during a valid car search may not be opened absent some exigency (Chadwick) … unless cops have PC to believe evidence is w/in container (Acevedo), even if the container doesn’t belong to the suspect. (Houghton). IV. EXIGENCY: Cops in hot pursuit of fleeing felon may make warrantless search and seizure, the scope of which may be as broad as reasonably necessary to prevent suspect from escaping, or injuring cops or public (Warden). Cops may seize w/o a warrant evidence likely to disappear before a warrant can be obtained (such as marijuana inside D’s home (McArthur), blood sample containing alcohol (Schmerber), fingernail scrapings (Cupp). OK to check house for officers’ safety, but if suspect arrested on front lawn, can’t then go in house and search the whole place. (Vale). V. CONSENT: A valid consent is a substitute for both a search warrant and probable cause. (Matlock). But police can’t just flash a badge and enter, interpreting the occupant’s stunned silence as consent. (Johnson, Warden).

Document1

More Free Outlines: http://c.finamore.home.comcast.net or http://finamore.net

Page 1 of 3

Inventory searches with no procedures or with procedures vesting too much discretion in the officers are not valid. a warrantless search of the car is permissible (Carroll).net Page 2 of 3 . Warden). even if the container doesn‘t belong to the suspect.FOURTH AMENDMENT FLOWCHART YES . SILA: An arrestee. so long as done contemporaneous in time and place with the arrest. In-other-words. is subject to a warrantless search. YES . XI. the entire passenger area of the vehicle may normally be searched without a warrant. PROB ABLE CAUSE to support warrant application? A. are reasonable (Opperman). NEUTRAL and DETACHED magistrate? VIII. track record. balance all indicia of reliability. (Wells). CONSENT: A valid consent is a substitute for both a search warrant and probable cause. ADMINISTRATIVE rd XV. But other items like files in a realtor‘s office won‘t go stale. (Whren) but citation stop alone ≠ PC to search. Pretext stop OK w/o racial profiling.finamore.home. Closed containers giving no indication of their contents found during a valid car search incident to a lawful arrest may not be opened absent some exigency. XII. VII. (Andresen) VI. Test: 1. (Houghton). EXIGENCY: Cops in hot pursuit of fleeing felon may make warrantless search and seizure. even in the absence of PC. blood sample containing alcohol (Schmerber). (Vale). OK to check house for officers‘ safety. If tipster. (Johnson. Cops may seize w/o a warrant evidence likely to disappear before a warrant can be obtained (such as marijuana inside D‘s home (McArthur). and 2. can‘t then go in house and search the whole place. Stale: PC to search may go stale b/c drugs used or sold.PLAIN VIEW XIV.& ulterior motives c. Veracity of Information a. (Belton). safeguard other prisoners. Warrantless searches are per se unreasonable. Validity of information (basis of knowledge) a. if done according to standard police procedures (Bertine). Made knowlingly or w/ reckless disregard. they may tow it to the station and perform the search at a later time (Chambers) Closed containers giving no indication of their contents found during a valid car search may not be opened absent some exigency (Chadwick) … unless cops have PC to believe evidence is w/in container (Acevedo). (Chadwick) VIII. X. (Gates) 2. STOP & FRISK XVI. officer may follow and search ―roving wingspan. OTHER Document1 More Free Outlines: http://c. VEHICLES: If cops have PC to believe a car may contain fruits/instrumentalities/evidence of a crime. Defeating the Affirmation – 3 Requirement (Franks): 1. INVENTORY: Booking searches are justified to safeguard ‘s property. But police can‘t just flash a badge and enter. If cops are justified in making a warrantless search of a car at the time of stopping. Defined: Is the state agent‘s knowledge reasonably trustworthy such that a reasonable person would believe that items subject to seizure or persons subject to arrest will be found at the time and place specified? B. unless the officer also first obtains a search warrant for the third person‘ s home or is already and otherwise lawfully in the third person‘s home (Steagald). Cops may search an entire vehicle—including closed containers found therein— that has been impounded. interpreting the occupant‘s stunned silence as consent. (Katz).net or http://finamore. OATH or AFFIRMATION of affiant? A. or criminals move on. fingernail scrapings (Cupp).WARRANT OBTAINED Is the Warrant VALID? V. (Matlock). Case specific . Police assumed truthful due to oath b.comcast.totality of circumstances. XIII. Firsthand observation or hearsay? 3. and the area within his immediate reach when arrested (wingspan – ―Chimel Shuffel‖). False statement relied upon by magistrate NO – WARRANT NOT OBTAINED Is there a WARRANT EXCEPTION? VI.‖ (Chrisman). the scope of which may be as broad as reasonably necessary to prevent suspect from escaping. Corroboration? C. PARTICULARITY as to place to be searched and items to be seized? VII.WARRANT OBTAINED Is the Warrant VALID? NO – WARRANT NOT OBTAINED Is there a WARRANT EXCEPTION? IX. False statement of affiant. and reduce risk of false claims against police. Car inventory ―searches‖ performed pursuant to standard police procedures. When arrested in or at a vehicle. 3 PARTY ISSUES: Cannot make a felony warrant arrest or misdemeanor warrant arrest within a third person‘s home. (Knowles). but if suspect arrested on front lawn. Belton does not apply if the police wait too long after taking the suspect into custody. or injuring cops or public (Warden). (Chimel) As arrestee moves around. and 3.

Physical scope – area & places in house (can‘t look in a shoebox for a refrigerator) 3. can‘t spend all day looking for a houseboat in a small back yard. 3. Officer could not possibly have harbored an objectively reasonable belief in the existence of probable cause. is admissible even if the warrant turns out to be invalid (Leon).home.finamore. 4. Officer lied on warrant application or recklessly disregarded truth in warrant application. (Wilson) 5.FOURTH AMENDMENT FLOWCHART No Invalid Warrant = No Warrant No No Warrant Exception Yes Valid Warrant Exception 4A VIOLATION 4A VIOLATION EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE IF VALID WARRANT.net Page 3 of 3 . Officer could not possibly have harbored an objectively reasonable belief ithat the warrant was valid. No Yes Good Faith Exception? The Rule: Evidence seized by police. CHECK FOR VALID EXECUTION 1. Magistrate not neutral and detached 2. Is K&A required? 2. Steagald: A valid arrest warrant as to a third person will NOT be sufficient if the police find evidence the government wants to use against a person who is not named in the warrant and who has standing in the place searched. reasonably relying on a warrant as measured by an objective standard. No Yes NO Exclusionary Rule Applies: Yes Good Faith Exception Saves EVIDENCE INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE Document1 More Free Outlines: http://c.depends on items. Time .comcast. Cannot have good faith exception if: 1. A warrant protects only the privacy interests of the person named on the warrant. Can develop additional PC during search and apply for new warrants. but it does not protect the privacy interests of those not named. 4.net or http://finamore.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->