Professional Documents
Culture Documents
or senior pastors?”
Ask Culture.
Brandon Rhodes
TH 508: Theology II
Dr. Lockwood
Box # 679
April 28, 2006
In the 19th and 20th centuries, a long-enduring, slowly-fomenting movement
reached its “tipping point” all across the western world: women were beginning to stand
up and redefine their role in society. Traditional functions, norms, and mores about
cultic conduct, civics, and education all were re-evaluated. Some endured, others
ridiculed, others thrown out. To be sure, the women’s rights movement and the feminist
school of thought that came out of it have done much good for the world. Also many
One particular question that society has asked itself about women is what their
roles can be in church life. Can women become elders or ordained as senior pastors?
What about Paul’s admonitions for women to keep silent and not have authority over
their husbands? To secular society, these questions have always seemed rather ridiculous:
if a woman can be a CEO or school teacher, then of course she should be able to serve in
a leading or teaching role in a local church! Yet the Bible seems at first blush
straightforward with its answer: No, they cannot. Still, dissent against the long-held
inerrantists believe women can be pastors and elders, which seems contrary to the
To resolve the issue, this essay will first overview the key passages relating to
answering whether women can be elders or senior pastors. From there, the bigger
question of the relationship between Christ and culture will be considered, as well as
what hermeneutical decisions may sway the exegete one way or another. An answer will
then be synthesized at the end. Underlining the process of answering this question is the
2
acceptance that, because the plain reading of the scriptures have a clearly
conservative/traditionalist flavor, the burden of proof will lie on the less traditional
position of admitting women as elders and senior pastors. Further, because the question
Here, Paul reminds the Corinthians that “the head of every man is Christ, and the
head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God” (v.3). He then explains how
head covering in various contexts and depending on the gender of the wearer can either
honor or dishonor God or their spouse. Women, Paul says, should have long hair and
Traditionalists believe that Paul’s exhortations are for all believers for all time.
Their logic with this is fairly simple: because the Bible says so, thus shall we do. To
them, Paul was establishing a tradition that was not intended to pass away.1 As he
concludes the section, he tells the Corinthians that “if anyone wants to be contentious
about this, we have no other practice – nor do the churches of God” (v.16). This seems
clear proof to the traditionalist that Paul’s words not only carry apostolic authority, but
also apply verbatim today. Their position is that ““Men are to exercise authority and take
leadership in the church. Women should acknowledge that authority and support it in
every Christian way, including how they dress and adorn themselves when they attend
public worship.”2 Traditionalists imply that this passage speaks of a biblical view of
authority that has certain timeless expressions, such as head coverings and hair lengths.
1
Robert D. Culver. Let Your Women Keep Silence in Women in Ministry: Four Views. Edited by Bonnidell
Clouse and Robert G. Clouse. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1989), 26-27.
2
Ibid, 32.
3
1 Corinthians 14:34-37 – “Women should remain silent in the churches”
Paul says that “women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed
to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says” (v.34). Predictably, Traditionalists
believe Paul’s words on this are eternal law that exists regardless of cultural context. To
pick only this section of Paul’s exhortation for orderly worship to not be followed would
be like erasing the parts of the Bible that readers don’t like, they say. If distaste is the
only reason for not applying Paul’s words here verbatim, then the Traditionalists are
Yet the larger context is Paul’s exhortations for orderly worship, not gender roles
or marriage or eldership. The Corinthians had been abusing the more visible gifts of the
Spirit during corporate worship, and Paul sought to reprimand them for this by explaining
the heart and guidelines for worship. If women speaking up or asking questions caused
disorder, then it was common sense that he should encourage them to ask their questions
afterwards. Tagging this verse on to a broader issue such as authority or women elders
seems to miss Paul’s point, which he states in verse 33 and applies in verse 40: “For God
is not a God of disorder but of peace”, and “everything should be done in a fitting and
Few passages have been subject to so much scorn and lambaste as these,
particularly verse 12, in which Paul says, “I do not permit a woman to teach or have
authority over a man; she must be silent.” He does not mince words here, and cites
scripture in verses 13-15 to back up his point. Paul’s repeating such similar instructions
4
support the Traditionalist claim that he had a certain rule in mind for all Christians.
Further, his drawing on the creation-fall story is seen as further proof that these
say 1 Timothy 2:12 demands, and if elders exercise authority (1 Tim 3:2) and teach (1
There are several compelling reasons why this verse might not be as strong a
support for the Traditionalist position as it seems. Central to the controversy is Paul’s use
of an extremely rare word for authority. Only used this one time in the Bible and rarely
in secular Greek literature, Paul using authentein instead of exousia as he uses elsewhere
means he had a particular meaning in mind. One scholar, Alvera Mickelsen, has tied
unique word choice with Paul’s rather peculiar, if seemingly disjoint, formula from
“appears with the genitive in 1 Timothy 2:12. Kroeger suggests that if this was
the meaning Paul had in mind, he may have been prohibiting women in Ephesus
(influenced by Artemis worship) from teaching a Gnostic type of mythology in
which woman (Eve) was originator and enlightener of man (Adam). If this is the
case, the next verses contain Paul’s refutation of that teaching”.3
This presents a more plausible understanding of all of the unique elements in this
passage than the Traditionalist interpretation, which says that Paul invokes his maxim of
female silence because they are more naïve and easier to deceive.4 It sufficiently explains
authentein’s use and Paul’s odd citation within the bigger context of the spiritual and
3
Alvera Mickelsen, In Christ There Is Neither Male Nor Female in Women in Ministry: Four Views, 202-
203.
4
Culver, 36-37.
5
Walter Liefield also helps illumine this passage by noting that the teaching Paul
had in mind was not what contemporary American Christians might think of; that is,
teaching from the Holy Scriptures. According to Liefield, because the New Testament
did not exist, Christian doctrine was largely taught in a catechistic manner, based on
transmitting the apostolic tradition. Thus there was a peculiar and historically limited
kind of authority that dealt with oral transmission than teaching the written scriptures.5
Liefield succinctly and compellingly argues the point that “Whatever the theological or
circumstantial reasons Paul had for prohibiting women from teaching, the fact is that this
teaching depended on the authority of the teacher in a way it does not today.”6 Thus this
scripture need not be read as an unbending, categorical rule of church order for all time.
Finally, the Greek words translated as “man” and “woman” in the NIV may also
Paul gives Timothy some rules for what an elder should be like. Pertinent to this
discussion is that Paul constantly uses male pronouns and says that elders must be “the
husband of one wife” (v.2). This unquestionably lends support to the Traditionalist view.
Deacons are described next and are described as being men. However, the Bible
mentions one woman, Phoebe, as a deaconess in Romans 16:1. Therefore if Paul used
voices, then the use of gendered pronouns for other offices cannot be used as very certain
5
Walter L Liefield in A Plural Ministry View: Your Sons and Your Daughters Shall Prophecy, in Women in
Ministry: Four Views, 151.
6
Liefield, 150.
6
proofs. Traditionalists respond that deaconship is more of a function than an office (as
One final verse in Paul’s letter to the Galatian church gives readers an ear to his
essential view of women. In it, he states that “there is… neither male nor female”, which,
although primarily soteriological, also speaks to social conditions. Paul believes that all
Christians are equal before God, and that as the relationship between Jew and Greek
should be transfigured by this new position, so also should the relationship between men
and women. If this is true, then the Traditionalists who so far have a weak upper hand are
primarily social, and that although Paul believes in equality, he still recognizes gender
The case so far is favor of the Traditionalist view, but the case is weak. But three
First, whenever reading passages used as proofs for the Traditionalist perspective,
it must not be lost that Paul is writing as a missionary. Earlier in 1 Corinthians, Paul
writes that he is “all things to all men, so that by all possible means I might save some”
fitting for the culture. Liefield asks, “How can we avoid connecting this with the fact that
Paul gives social perception as a reason for the submission of both slaves and women in
Titus 2:5, 10? The situation is not that Paul’s teaching is culturally determined, but that
his evangelism is culturally directed.”7 His concerns in all his instructions on these
7
Liefield, 133.
7
matters seem to be, at their most basic, that husbands and God are honored, and that
behind Paul’s orders are to avoid shaming the Lord or husbands, and to not do things that
would keep people from Christ. His particular applications of those principles were head
coverings, quiet women, and male teachers and (debatably) elders. The contemporary
reader should look to honor these principles without necessarily legalizing the
applications Paul so prescribed 2000 years ago. Today, “by earnestly trying to make the
same application (the silence of women) rather than following the same principle
(avoiding shame and dishonor to the husband), we can actually commit the very error
Paul sought to avoid – that is, offending people’s moral sensibilities and hindering them
from accepting the gospel.”8 The church must always be vigilant to guard against this err.
The final consideration is one of church government. If women are not permitted
church governance which place authority on male and female members is unbiblical.
Because the Bible gives many instances in which entire local churches made decisions,
the Traditionalist cannot keep with the position that congregational models are wrong. If,
on the other hand, Paul’s use of authentein has in mind a different, now-defunct sort of
authority separate from today’s ecclesiastical authority, then women are indeed permitted
to vote. And if they are able to hold that kind of authority, then it is consistent to permit
8
Liefield, 141-142.
8
Conclusion: Ask Culture
So, can women be elders or senior pastors? Regrettably, the answer is not
universally a yes or a no. The answer, if we are to follow Paul’s method, lies in what
culture’s answer is on issues propriety and authority. In first century Greece, Palestine,
and Rome, the answer seemed to be a clear, No, which is just what is found in the Bible.
But in 21st century America, equality between men and women in places of leadership is
another instance in which the Bible does not have so clear an answer as some may want
or see, but gives anchoring objective principles to answers given by subjective culture.
Bibliography
Robert D. Culver, Walter L. Liefield, and Alvera Mickelsen. Women in Ministry: Four
Views. Edited by Bonnidell and Robert G. Clouse. (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity
Press, 1989)
All Scripture quotes taken from the Holy Bible: New International Version (Grand
Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1983)