P. 1
Rubric - ETEC 510

Rubric - ETEC 510

|Views: 49|Likes:
Published by cbbay
Independent Directed Studies 11/12 Scoring Rubric for assignments and ePortfolio!
6 Excellent 86-100% Quality (E1) • is consistently of high quality 5 Strong 73-85% • is of high quality although there may be some minor inconsistencies • addresses complex ideas 4 Good 67-72% • is of high quality although there may be some minor inconsistencies • addresses complex ideas with some degree of success • is energetic but tone is somewhat lacking in confidence 3 Moderate 60-66% • is of acceptable quality
Independent Directed Studies 11/12 Scoring Rubric for assignments and ePortfolio!
6 Excellent 86-100% Quality (E1) • is consistently of high quality 5 Strong 73-85% • is of high quality although there may be some minor inconsistencies • addresses complex ideas 4 Good 67-72% • is of high quality although there may be some minor inconsistencies • addresses complex ideas with some degree of success • is energetic but tone is somewhat lacking in confidence 3 Moderate 60-66% • is of acceptable quality

More info:

Published by: cbbay on Nov 24, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/01/2014

pdf

text

original

Independent Directed Studies 11/12 Scoring Rubric for assignments and ePortfolio!

6 Excellent 86-100% Quality (E1) • is consistently of high quality 5 Strong 73-85% • is of high quality although there may be some minor inconsistencies • addresses complex ideas 4 Good 67-72% • is of high quality although there may be some minor inconsistencies • addresses complex ideas with some degree of success • is energetic but tone is somewhat lacking in confidence 3 Moderate 60-66% • is of acceptable quality however the work includes a number of inconsistencies • addresses complex ideas with some degree of success • is energetic but tone is lacking in confidence 2 Weak 50-59% • is of acceptable quality however the work includes a number of inconsistencies • addresses complex ideas with only a small degree of success • lacks enthusiasm and tone is lacking in confidence

page 1 of 2
1 Poor 0-49% • is of unacceptable quality

Ideas (A1)

• addresses complex ideas

• shows little or no evidence that complex ideas have been addressed • lacks direction and includes little evidence that ideas explored are connected • no evidence of risk taking • demonstrates a lack of original thought

Scope & Tone (E1)

• is energetic demonstrates confidence in tone

• is energetic and somewhat confident in tone

Original Thought (A1,2, B1)

• demonstrates risk taking • includes obvious evidence of original thought

• demonstrates some risk taking • includes evidence of original thought

• demonstrates some risk taking • approaches original thought but still well grounded in an existing body of work • includes references to illustrate the origin of ideas and how original thought begins to extend beyond that work • relevant sources are cited but there are one or two errors

• demonstrates hesitation in risk taking • approaches original thought but still well grounded in an existing body of work • includes references to illustrate the origin of ideas and how original thought begins to extend beyond that work • cites sources but there are occasional errors

• demonstrates hesitation in risk taking • approaches original thought but still well grounded in an existing body of work • includes references to illustrate the origin of ideas and how original thought begins to extend beyond that work however more extensive exploration is required • cites sources but there are occasional errors

Exploration (A1, B1, C1, 3, 4)

• includes references to illustrate where thought process began and how original thought is connected to an existing body of work • relevant sources are cited correctly

• includes references to illustrate where thought process began and how original thought is connected to an existing body of work • relevant sources are cited correctly

• includes only one or two references which may or may not be connected to ideas explored • attempts to cite sources but there are some errors or missing information

Independent Directed Studies 11/12 Scoring Rubric for assignments and ePortfolio!
Language (E1) • uses language conventions correctly • uses language conventions correctly with only one or two minor errors • uses language conventions correctly although there may be several minor errors that do not interfere with meaning • clear evidence of collaboration with peers and mentors to arrive at creative solutions to problems • demonstrates competency with technology for communication and presentation. • may include minor flaws but these do not interrupt the with flow of the presentation • consistently demonstrates socially appropriate behaviour • self motivated with good organizational skills • attempts to use language conventions correctly however there are occasional errors that interfere with meaning • some evidence of collaboration with peers and mentors to arrive at creative solutions to problems • satisfactory use technology for communication and presentation • includes one or two minor flaws that interrupt the flow of the presentation but content is still clear • attempts to use language conventions correctly however there are occasional errors that interfere with meaning • some evidence of collaboration with peers and mentors to arrive at creative solutions to problems • attempts to use technology for communication and presentation • several flaws interrupt the flow of the presentation brief discussion is required to clarify meaning • generally demonstrates socially appropriate behaviour but one or two reminders about netiquette were required • demonstrated inconsistent motivation and organizational skills

page 2 of 2
• language conventions have been attempted but the work needs further editing to be of an acceptable level • little evidence of collaboration with peers and mentors to arrive at creative solutions to problems • competency with technology for communication and presentation is not evident • flaws interrupt the flow of the presentation and discussion is required to clarify meaning • demonstrates socially inappropriate behaviour resulting in interruptions in work flow and a need for netiquette instruction • demonstrated inconsistent motivation and organizational skills

Collaboration (C1, 2)

• clear evidence of collaboration with peers and mentors to arrive at creative solutions to problems • demonstrates a high degree of competency with technology for communication and presentation. • presentation is flawless

• clear evidence of collaboration with peers and mentors to arrive at creative solutions to problems • demonstrates a high degree of competency with technology for communication and presentation. • presentation has one or two minor flaws which do not interfere with overall flow • consistently demonstrates socially appropriate behaviour • highly motivated with strong organizational skills

Delivery/ Presentation (B1)

Citizenship (B2, C4)

• consistently demonstrates socially appropriate behaviour • highly motivated with excellent organizational skills

• generally demonstrate socially appropriate behaviour but one or two reminders about netiquette were required • a self starter with adequate organizational skills

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->