This full text paper was peer reviewed at the direction of IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts

for publication in the ICC 2008 proceedings.

HSUPA Scheduling Algorithms Utilizing RoT Measurements and Interference Cancellations
Danlu Zhang, Sharad Sambhwani and Bibhu Mohanty1, Member, IEEE
significant gains in terms of capacity and robustness. In parallel to the standard enhancements, advanced receiver techniques have been adopted to provide gains without standard changes. A prominent example is the interference cancellations (IC) at the Node B receiver. It is well known that CDMA with Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) achieves the capacity of AWGN multiple access channels [5]. A direct implementation of SIC requires a pre-determined decoding orders among users whose power/rate allocations have to be configured accordingly. This poses a great challenge to the system operations. However, as shown by Hou et al in [6], the same capacity can be achieved by staggering user transmissions while keeping their control parameters the same. This technique also suits the hybrid-ARQ (HARQ) schemes. The optimality of this scheme will be proved more rigorously in this paper. Simper IC architectures with approximately the same performance will also be presented. In order for the maximum benefit of IC and maintaining system stability and link budget, the Node B uplink scheduler must be carefully designed. This paper addresses this issue in detail. Instead of using the actual RoT, the scheduler computes the effective interference seen by the decoding packets and regulates its allocation accordingly. This paper is organized as follows. The system models are presented in Section II. Our scheduling algorithms are discussed in detail in Section III, including user priorities and the utility function interpretation, scheduling with and without measured RoT, RoT measurement scheme and the scheduling using effective RoT. The simulations results are presented in Section IV. This paper concludes in Section V. II. SYSTEM MODELS A. HSUPA MAC layer There are two configurations in the HARQ on HSUPA: 2ms Transmission-Time-Interval(TTI) with 8 interlaces or 10ms TTI with 4 interlaces. Our work is equally applicable to both configurations. This paper focuses on results with 2ms TTI. To request data transmissions, the users send Scheduling Information(SI) messages containing information on the queue lengths and power headroom which can be translated into the maximum data rates. The Node B scheduling grants are sent to the users via two physical channels: Absolute Grant Channel(E-AGCH) and Relative Grant Channels(E-RGCH). The uplink serving cell sends both E-AGCH and E-RGCH, depending on the changes in the user rates and overhead considerations. The non-serving cells who are also in user’s

Abstract—This paper discusses several important aspects in the HSUPA scheduling algorithms. First, it clearly demonstrates the benefit of explicitly utilizing the directly measured Rise-overThermal(RoT) values in term of capacity and robustness improvement. This paper also briefly presents the RoT measurement schemes designed specifically for the asynchronous systems such as WCDMA/HSUPA. If pilot and traffic interference cancellation (IC) schemes are implemented at the Node B receiver, this paper presents a scheduling algorithm that attains IC benefit in such a way that the capacity enhancement is maximized while fairness and link budget are maintained. The presented algorithm defines the effective RoT by monitoring the IC performance in real time and adjusts its grants accordingly. In addition, the user priority function used here optimizes the sum utility functions and provides multi-user diversity. Index Terms — HSUPA, HSPA+, Rise-over-Thermal, Load, Interference Cancellation, Link Budget, Scheduling, Fairness, Utility Function, CRRA



CDMA is set to become the most popular choice for the Third Generation cellular systems. After its initial release in 1999[1], the air interface has been subsequently enhanced. Examples include the High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) and Enhanced Uplink (EUL, also called High Speed Uplink Packet Access, or HSUPA) which introduce fast packet switch data services in the downlink and uplink respectively[2]. Recently, HSDPA/HSUPA has been further strengthened by backward compatible HSPA+ as well as the new OFDMA-based Long Term Evolution, or LTE[3]. Each enhancement offers substantial improvements in data rates, user experience and capacity. We focus on HSUPA in this paper. One salient feature of HSUPA is the uplink scheduler at Node B which dynamically allocates data rates based on channel conditions, system loading and fairness constraints. The scheduling algorithm is critical in achieving the full potential of HSUPA. This paper discusses the scheduling algorithm which trades off system capacity and fairness among the users. Apart from the priority function and its economics and optimization interpretation, one of the main thrusts of our scheduling algorithm is utilizing direct measurement of Rise-over-Thermal(RoT)[8], which is the fundamental resource in rate allocations. As will be shown later, scheduling algorithms based on measured RoT provides

1 All the authors are with Qualcomm Inc., 5775 Morehouse Drive, San Diego, CA 92121. The correspondence author is Danlu Zhang (Phone: 8586582703, e-mail:

978-1-4244-2075-9/08/$25.00 ©2008 IEEE


Suppose user’s utility is dependent on its data rate as the traffic and overhead channels. Priority(k) = ~ (k ) r pilot SINR of finger i of user k i during time slot n . For user k ’s with request data rate rsup port ( k ) . The autonomous transmission in this case greatly reduces scheduling overhead and latency. diminishing return with a ˆ ˆ Ec / N t i . ■ With time-varying channels like in wireless systems. The detailed description of HSUPA MAC layer is in the standard specification [14]. the scheduler simply chooses the best user. However. Let’s define f cell to be the ratio of load from other cell to the load from Then this ˆ cell f cell = [ Lns . These two parameters.( n ) Lemma Assuming static channel conditions. have it must assume a fixed value of f cell and put a fixed threshold ˆ ˆ on Lcell (n) . etc. the rate allocation is ˆ ˆ Ltotal(n) = 1−1/ RoT(n) and Lout(n) = Ltotal(n) − Lcell(n) − Lns. 5034 . cp the Proportional Fair scheduler [12][13]. The scheme is shown in [7] to maximize the capacity ˆ ˆ to Lcell (n) .when α = 1 . k i are the offset power of economic theory of utility functions. it is not always measured in real time. k i ]. It then ˆ Let N 0 be the thermal noise and I 0 ( n ) = ∑ E c i . Note ~ ~ Here r (k) = (1−1/ Tthrpt)r (k) + (1/ Tthrpt)r(k) is the filtered ˆ ˆ ( N t ) i . User priority functions and the interpretation The scheduler first computes the available load based on its target with load from continuing packets subtracted. It must trade off capacity i the total interference. set: L ns .( n ) [1 + T 2 Pki ( n) + Gainoverhead. all the fingers belonging to users who are served by this Proof: It is straightforward using Lagrange multiplier. This family of utility functions has the appealing property of Constant Relative Risk Aversion load from finger i as (CRRA)[15]. cell: Lcell ( n) = N ant i∈cell When α = 0 . III. ( ) [ ] are assumed known to the scheduler. its active set can also send E-RGCH to tune the user down. The scheduler also computes the non.n constant relative slope: − rU ' ' (r ) / U ' (r ) = α . Uplink scheduler without measured RoT Without RoT measurement. The main difficulty is measuring the value of N 0 . AS ( n) and Lout (n) to smooth out the estimation with fairness and power constraints for each cell. The latter may carry VoIP traffic. traffic types. The inner loop power control maintains the received chip-level SINR to the target level set by outer-loop power control such that a certain packet error rate (PER) is achieved at the HARQ termination target. ˆ ( n) = = Li ˆ I0 1 + Ec / N t i. Let.( n ) + N 0 be allocates the available load to users. Lns . Filtering is applied next. receive antennas. the who are not served by this cell but has this cell in their active scheduler attempts to achieve equal-GoS (equal throughput) 1 ˆ ˆ (n) . This is a generalization of ˆ ˆ RoT (n) = I 0 (n) / N 0 . f cell is not a fixed is linked to system stability in terms of pole capacity and link value. Voice-over-IP is one prime example. In practice. We will revisit this issue later. It depends on network size and layout. This feature is of great importance for services which are low rate but delay sensitive.( n ) Ec i .( n) .( n ) = E cp / N t ( ( ) ) i. AS ( n) = i∉cell . Typically. Basic uplink scheduler computations transmissions. multi1 ˆ ˆ Li (n) where N ant is the number of user diversity is also achieved by the above priority function. It is linked to the where T 2 Pki ( n) and Gainoverhead. RoT is formally defined as and fairness. AS (n) formally we ˆ + Lout (n)] / Lcell (n) .( n) .Let among the users. An alternative is put a fixed threshold on Lcell (n) .This full text paper was peer reviewed at the direction of IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the ICC 2008 proceedings. A.Then throughput with time constant Tthrpt . The users are allowed to transmit autonomously up to a certain threshold rate without being scheduled. (n ) ( ( ) ) ( ) ∑ ∑ variance.AS (n) based on greedy filling. SCHEDULING ALGORITHMS ( ) scheduling priority is determined by the following: 1/ α ˆ rsup port (k ) To link RoT with user SINR. Li N ant i∈AS After sorting the users by their priorities. in other words.n = I 0 (n) − Ec i . RoT(n) = B. and function ˆ (E /N (E c / Nt ) i . I 0 (n) 1 = . the uplink scheduler has no ˆ knowledge of Lout (n) . It also assigns a margin for the dedicated channel and autonomous B. define the U (r ) = (1 − α )r . the allocation The scheduler computes the cell load as the sum of load from under the above priority function maximizes the sum utility. The available load is filled by the user with the highest priority and the remaining part will go to the as the load un-captured by the cell. The importance of RoT measurements has long been recognized[8]. let Ecp / Nt be the chip-level i . the utility function is in the log form and the serving-active-set load as the sum of load from all the users scheduler is the classic proportional fair. budget. Since it only has direct control of Lcell ( n) . ) 1−α i. stability constraints are on the tail of RoT[9]. when α → ∞ . α > 0 . ˆ The performance is very similar so we will only discuss the N0 1 − (1 + f cell ) Lcell (n) ˆ RoT is the fundamental resources in uplink scheduling since it scheme thresholding Lcell (n) .

Lemma In AWGN channel with perfect power control and enough HARQ resolution. Their equivalence is shown in the following lemma. The input to close to that of additionalMore advancedon the likelihood of possible with information the algorithm is samples before the receiver pulse-shaping decoding and latency requirements. SIC with equal data rates among UEs. residual power is close to 1/( + Np Ec / Nt ) which is inversely 1 D. realistic power control and the actual Turbo codes. On the other performance can be achieved on average under the same hand. the UEs are divided transmit power so that N 0 is measured through the total into groups based on subpacket index and successive received power. In practice. decoding grouping is N 0 measurement scheme based on this principle. The total received signal power can be similarly computed estimates where N is the processing gain. RoT measurements in asynchronous WCDMA uplink N [(1 + γ ) M − 1] / M ∑ log 2 {1 + N + N 0(M − i)[(1 + γ ) M − 1] / M } = M log 2 (1 + γ ) . putting equal power N0[( +γ)M −1]/ M and stagger their transmissions. the proportion of available for scheduling. For data channel IC. f cell is large in this scenario. Uplink scheduler with measured RoT proportional to the received SINR. Furthermore. In f cell are captured by the scheduler. the channel. we the target total load. a target can be directly With IC. Henceforth. The successive interference cancellation (SIC) is implemented by staggering user transmissions. Interference cancellation and uplink scheduling function for slot (n − i ) and n on the same HARQ interlace. With out-of-band emission strictly regulated [15]. there is typically a sideband between two WCDMA conditions in the above lemma. In WCDMA. Thus. the dynamics in Lout ( n) and 1 75 ' fairness considerations. Due to the space the re-encoded data sequences. Consequently. Hereafter we assume the measured RoT is improved channel estimation. achievable rate is M C. FFT-based histogram is based on the MMSE principle [6] where a shrinkage of computed to obtain the sideband power spectral density and (Np Ec / Nt ) /( + Np Ec / Nt ) is applied to the per-finger channel 1 N 0 . filter so that the dominant thermal noise from the RF front end After a packet is decoded. If RoT measurement is available. The interference from overhead channels can either be cancelled before or after the data processing. before data processing using pilot based channel estimations. the user’s waveform is reconstructed within the sideband is preserved. Since more interference 5035 .This full text paper was peer reviewed at the direction of IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the ICC 2008 proceedings. In our studies with fading carriers. Proof Suppose there are M UEs with common SINR target γ . Interference cancellation of the limitation. implementation of this algorithm showed very accurate RoT To improve the accuracy. our RoT measurement scheme will not be presented pilot and overhead channels can also be adjusted based on this in detail here. This post-IC interference N + N (M −i)[( +γ)M −1]/ M and the overall 1 0 0 hampers high capacity. The left portion of the target total load is define the “Effective RoT” as follows: ˆ available for scheduling. The total introduces mismatches between the computed RoT based on received power is N [(1 + γ ) M − 1] . AS (n) and Lout (n) are subtracted out from in scheduling. If we let all UEs to have 0 load and the measured actual RoT. I 0 . For this purpose. The active set management is typically based on downlink measurements. 1{[(n − i) / 3 . it receiver power in the sideband is seen as invariant to the is found that grouping by subpacket index and 2 iterations received power in the signal band. a silence i=1 Therefore the total rate achieved is the same as that of SIC. the channel estimation is based on measurement with modest complexity. The full SIC systems for the lack of system synchronization. It is also time-varying. This scheme is not applicable to WCDMA cancellation is applied within each group.n / 3 ]mod8 = 0} is the indicator E. or equivalently on total load. there are often indistinguishable multipaths. there may be strong interference from users to cells outside its active set. the load computation is tied to the Rake fingers. Its benefit will be shown later in this paper. we follow the IC architecture introduced in [6]. the original measured RoT is no longer the correct specified on the RoT itself. the uplink and downlink have different fading in a FDD system. This The ith UE decoded in SIC has ( Ec ) i = N 0γ (1 + γ ) M −i . On average. The account of the interference seen by the data packets. Interference cancellation (IC) can greatly increase the spectral efficiency of CDMA uplink. the delay in active set changes due to the messaging with equal received power achieves the same performance as and resource allocations will also cause large f cell . We have designed a within each group provides excellent IC performance very full SIC. Such interference is not only un-captured by the cell but also un-controllable since no power control feedback exists between this user and this cell. all 1 ˆ Lcell ( n ) to a fixed threshold would lead to conservative packets are decoded at Mth subpacket where subpacket i sees parameter settings in order to maintain system stability. in 1x EV-DO reverse link[8]. with our IC architecture. 0 0 To measure N 0 . The pilot interference is cancelled The cancellation buffer spans 75 slots which is the maximum packet span with termination target 4. eff ( n ) = ' where I 0 ( n − i ) is the residual interference after IC during the 12 ∑I i= 0 0 ( n − i )1{[ ( n − i ) / 3  . Therefore. the cancelled interference should be reflected in the threshold ˆ filtered values of Lns . ■ interval is introduced during which all users turn down their With finite HARQ resolution in practice.n / 3  ]mod 8 = 0} time slot ( n − i ) . Lab the effect of estimation error on the reconstructed waveform. IC with staggered user transmission addition. This is called imbalance. This is to minimize p after weighting the power spectrum by the pulse filter.

parameter reflecting the IC benefit in real time.eff ≥ Lthresh .0 GHz Inter-site Dist. the effective Lognormal Std RoT based scheduler is needed in order for maximum IC gains. the power from the traffic channel is cancelled after the decoding delay. interference from decoded users. groups: serving users not in soft handover. 3 cells/site we need to isolate the gain from Ecp/Nt reduction in order to Carrier Freq. denoted by imbalance are not shown here. the distribution for the scheduler with measured RoT is tighter. rsite.6 dB when IC is on. The seen by a packet decoded at the 4th subpacket is even less. The link budget is maintained load can be allocated among users.3.35. SIMULATION RESUTLS user throughput in Figure 4 where almost all the users show In this section.eff = Lthresh . The curve with effective Figure Model log10[d(km)] RoT scheduler was plotted against the probability of effective UE Max Output 21 dBm Shadowing 0. In Sector Antenna − min [ (θ / θ 3 dB ) 2 . Channel Type 3GPP Mix TTI Duration 2 ms In Figure 3. around.Ecp/Nt shows a parallel shift of 1. 1. The mean early termination probabilities observed in our simulation is RoT is around 5. With early terminations. Henceforth. since data packets from the cell edge users experiences the effective RoT as its interference.0 provides a gain of 27% over the baseline whereas the effective intra-site Shadowing 8. field results and simulations with ratio between I 0. using measured RoT and further gains through utilizing The average Ecp/Nt reduction is the same as the average effective RoT. Scheduling with and without measured RoT and others.35. The load thresholds are chosen amount of 1. Table I lists some of the common is seen in Figure 3 where the CCDF of each user’s mean parameters. 0. Scheduling with effective RoT ~ I 0 (n) as λ (n) = I 0 . effective interference seen by a packet is half of the total traffic This leads to higher system capacity or spectral efficiency.0.0. around {0. An easy The benefit of measured RoT is more drastic with the presence counting shows such a packet will see only 25% of traffic of downlink-uplink imbalance and delays in active set updates. we plot the throughput performance at different Gain probability of RoT>7dB for 3 different scheduling and IC BS Ant.e. In other words. The wide RoT 1% tail below 7 dB. Users in group 1 are 99% 5036 .0.05} for the 4 subpackets. difference between I 0 . As we can + (1 − λ )(1 − Lthresh . the IC blind scheduler has similar true RoT distribution with the no IC Lthresh . higher RoT CCDF with the no IC case.VA120}= distribution (CCDF) of the actual and effective RoT in {0. BS Front-Back 20.2+37. is cancelled with longer delay. The choice of the threshold is two sources: nearly all the power from pilot and overhead much harder for the scheduler without measured RoT since channels are cancelled.eff (n) / I 0 ( n) . case although the throughput is 27% higher.eff ( n) and filtered measured RoT. If all the users are decoded at 4th subpacket. α = 1 in the fairness. This can be seen from the . Coeff.3 dB with measured RoT.0 dB Path Loss 128. Let’s divide the users into 4 f cell is unknown in priori.0 dB Traffic Model Best effort RoT scheduler provides a gain of 54%.eff ( n) and I 0 ( n) . I 0' ( n'−i ' ) ≤ I 0' ( n − i ) if n'−i ' but This can also be inferred from the per-cell RoT distribution as plotted in Figure 2.6* using the effective RoT with IC on. The Ecp/Nt reduction is the result of cancelled Cell layout 19sites wrap Users per Cell 10 interference and is not dependent on the scheduler. we have Lthresh . serving-users in soft handover.0dBi .. Obviously. The Ecp/Nt reduction Our simulation follows the evaluation methodology of both 3GPP[10] and 3GPP2[11]. At 7 dB 1% tail. the other is the MAC gain from Parameter Value Parameter Value scheduling based on the effective RoT rather than the actual RoT. the scheduler has a revised When IC is present. The gains in system capacity with IC come from two sources: TABLE I one is the link gain due to the reduction in Ecp/Nt driven by the SIMULATION PARAMETERS outer-loop power control. I 0.2} different scheduling and IC scenarios.0 dB UE PA 2 dBm scheduling with the measured and actual RoT with IC on (IC Backoff Ratio ( Am ) blind scheduler) and scheduling with the measure RoT and BS Noise 9. interference. The actual RoT is higher. The RoT CCDF without RoT measurement = n − i when n' > n .0. 2. non-serving users who has this cell in the active set A. The amount of traffic cancellation depends on the The system-wide RoT distributions when RoT 1% is slightly composition in the received power from these groups and the under 7 dB are shown in Figure 1 where we see the RoT thermal noise. i.This full text paper was peer reviewed at the direction of IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the ICC 2008 proceedings. The widely adopted stability criterion is system. VA30. we plot the complimentary-accumulative{PA3. we will show the improved capacity results by throughput increase with IC.3. θ 3dB Cable Loss scenarios: scheduling with measured RoT with IC off (baseline). Defining the Due to space limitation. 500 m assess the gain solely from the effective RoT scheduling. the effective interference This gain is quantified also in Figure 1 to be nearly 10%. The scheduling with measured RoT provides nearly 10%.5 inteRoT exceeding 7dB.6 dB interference reduction can be divided into such that this criterion is met. ~ B. Am ] 12 Figure 3. the IC blind scheduler Power ) .0 deg. the stability criterion is the 1% tail of the threshold on the total load effective RoT below 7 dB. Gain & 14.2.eff (n) is a dynamic is much more spread out than those with RoT measurements. The effective RoT scheduler has the effective RoT CCDF similar to the actual Since λ ≤ 1 .

8ed. Toskala. D. 2004. Using such measurements. the HSUPA scheduling algorithm can achieve significant capacity gain and robustness improvement. Tse and P. D.9 0. vol. Lott. 2004.. Hou. E.321:. J. Cambridge University Press. 2002. J. delay for those real time and conversational traffic. in IEEE Communications Magazine. different H. pp33-7. W.896: Feasibility Study for Enahnced Uplink for UTRA FDD. Skold and P.RoT Sched:TrueRoT EffRoRSched:Eff. 2001.Black and Q. R. “Data throughput of CDMA-HDR a high efficiency-high data rate personal communication wireless system”.3 0. 2000. 3GPP2 TSG-C. With IC.7 0.4 IC-Blind Sched EffRoTSched 1 0. On Telecommunications.101: User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception (FDD).Oh and N. v7. The exact likelihood varies with simulation. X.7 0. vol. P.8.Malladi. Besides.0.D.5 Normalized thrpt 2 0 100 200 300 400 500 thrpt 600 700 800 900 1000 -26 -25 -24 -23 Ecp/Nt (dB) -22 -21 -20 Figure 1 Left: System-wide RoT distribution.4. “HSDPA/HSUPA for UMTS: Radio Access for Mobile Communications”.RoT Eff. “Charging and Rate Control for Elastic Traffic”.5.Wu. Vol.2 0.8 0. RoT Sched 0 [5] [6] [7] 10 -1 Baseline:True RoT IC-Blind:True RoT IC-Blind:Eff. spring. to appear IEEE Trans. “Introduction to WCDMA enhanced uplink”. For instance. The scheduling with IC can be further enhanced to utilize more information on the user location. “Reverse traffic channel MAC design of cdma2000 1xEV-DO revision A system”. on 3G Mobile Comm Technologies.3.1 0 -27 Baseline IC-Blind Sched EffRoTSched 10 -1 1250 1200 1150 Sched w/o Measured RoT Sched w/ Measured RoT 0. less power will come from users in other cells and the capacity gain from IC is higher. 10 0 Sched w/o Measured RoT Sched w/ Measured RoT 1400 1350 1300 CDF 1 Baseline 0. Smee. 2006. 10 2300 2200 2100 2000 Thrpt(kbps) 1900 1800 1700 1600 1500 Baseline IC-blind Sched Eff. On Wireless Comm. Parkvall. Wiley.Pankaj. Academic Press. Users in the other 3 groups are less likely to be termination targets can be specified for users at different locations. Symp.3 0.5 0. in 13th IEEE Intl.5 0. Holma and A. in European Trans. in 5th IEE Int’l Conf.pp1847-52. pp1416 -21. Right: CCDF of user mean Ecp/Nt. The priority function needs to be extended to include decoded.Willeneger. A. “WCDMA for UMTS: Radio Access for Third Generation Mobile Communications”. Beming.1 0 10 -2 1100 1050 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 0.Sindhushayana.RoT 10 -2 [8] 1400 1300 0 0. “3G Evolution: HSPA and LTE for Mobile Broadband”.1997. J. J.This full text paper was peer reviewed at the direction of IEEE Communications Society subject matter experts for publication in the ICC 2008 proceedings. IC is implemented to provide substantial capacity gains. “Optimal Resource Allocations for Data Services in CDMA Reverse Link”. These are 10 users/cell left for future studies. D.8. and M.R1002. S. 2003. Microeconomic Theory: Basic Principles and Extensions.0. 2004. 3. Kelly. 3GPP Spec TS 25. the user priority function in the scheduling in this paper maximizes a family of utility functions and provides multi-user diversity. Bhushan. F. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] In this paper. Dahlman. H.pp1854-8. Tomasin. C. “Link budget of cdma2000 1x EV-DO wireless Internet access system”. “Implementing interference Cancellation to increase the EV-DO Rev A reverse link capcity”. 3GPP Spec TS25. REFERENCES 10 Sched w/o Measured RoT 0 Sched w/ Measured RoT [1] [2] 10 -1 10 -1 [3] [4] 10 -2 -2 10 0 5 10 0 5 10 Figure 2 RoT distributions of each cell. South-Western College Pub. Nicholson. Jalali. Fan. 2007.5 1 1. Right: Throughput versus percentage of RoT above 7 dB. Right: System-wide actual and effective RoT CCDF.Medium Access Control (MAC) Specification. J. the concept of effective RoT is defined to match the post-IC interference seen by the data packets.2 0. Scheduling with the effective RoT rather than the actual RoT is necessary to rake in the maximum IC benefit. Wiley.6 0. vol.8 0. pp 58-64. R. H. V. N.5 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Figure 3 Left: Throughput versus RoT tails for different schedulers with and without IC.Zhang and S.8 site-to-site distance are around 60-70%.9 0. Holma and A. we briefly introduced the side-band power and FFT based mechanism to measure RoT in the asynchronous WCDMA systems. Ghosh. Oct.. On Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications. 5037 . 3 ed. decoded. D.6 CDF 0. in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC).Damnjanovic. “1xEV-DV Evolution Mothodology”.5 1 1. v7.4 0. Pfister and S. May 2005. Viswanath. 3GPP Spec TR 25.Zhang. 2007.5 % of RoT>7dB 2 2. 2006.Padovani and R.J. “Fundamentals of Wireless Communication”. C. Typical IC gains with 2. 10 0 Figure 4 Left: User throughput CDF. Attar. 2005. Toskala. Further notes on the setup If the cell size is larger than in our simulation. 2007. S-J. 2007. Au. in VTC.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful

Master Your Semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer: Get 4 months of Scribd and The New York Times for just $1.87 per week!

Master Your Semester with a Special Offer from Scribd & The New York Times