## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

INFLUENCE LINES FOR STATICALLY DETERMINATE STRUCTURES

1

3. INFLUENCE LINES FOR STATICALLY DETERMINATE STRUCTURES - AN OVERVIEW

• • • • • • •

Introduction - What is an influence line? Influence lines for beams Qualitative influence lines - Muller-Breslau Principle Influence lines for floor girders Influence lines for trusses Live loads for bridges Maximum influence at a point due to a series of concentrated loads • Absolute maximum shear and moment

2

**3.1 INTRODUCTION TO INFLUENCE LINES
**

• Influence lines describe the variation of an analysis variable (reaction, shear force, bending moment, twisting moment, deflection, etc.) at a point

(say at C in Figure 6.1)

..

… … A • C B

Why do we need the influence lines? For instance, when loads pass over a structure, say a bridge, one needs to know when the maximum values of shear/reaction/bendingmoment will occur at a point so that the section may be designed

• Notations:

– Normal Forces - +ve forces cause +ve displacements in +ve directions

– Shear Forces - +ve shear forces cause clockwise rotation & - ve shear force

causes anti-clockwise rotation

3 – Bending Moments: +ve bending moments cause “cup holding water” deformed

1N. or 1 tonne) to move over beam from left to right (2) Find the values of shear force or bending moment. 1kip.2 INFLUENCE LINES FOR BEAMS • Procedure: (1) Allow a unit load (either 1b. as the unit load moves over the beam from left to right (3) Plot the values of the shear force or bending moment. at the point under consideration.3. over the length of the beam. computed for the point under consideration 4 .

3.1 Variation of Reactions RA and RB as functions of load position 1 x A C 10 ft 3 ft MA =0 (RB)(10) – (1)(x) = 0 RB = x/10 RA = 1-RB = 1-x/10 B RB = x/10 x A RA=1-x/10 C RB = x/10 B x A RA=1-x/10 1 C 5 .3.3 MOVING CONCENTRATED LOAD 3.

0 6 . RB occurs only at B 1 Influence line for RA x 1-x/10 10-x Influence line for RB x/10 x 10-x 1.RA occurs only at A.

2 Variation of Shear Force at C as a function of load position 0 < x < 3 ft (unit load to the left of C) x A 3 ft RA = 1-x/10 10 ft RB = x/10 1.3.3. VC =-x/10 7 .0 C B C x/10 Shear force at C is –ve.

3 < x < 10 ft (unit load to the right of C) x A 3 ft RA = 1-x/10 RB = x/10 C B RA = 1-x/10 C 1 0.7 -ve Shear force at C is +ve = 1-x/10 +ve 0.3 1 Influence line for shear at C 8 .

3 Variation of Bending Moment at C as a function of load position 0 < x < 3.3.0 ft (Unit load to the left of C) x A 3 ft RA = 1-x/10 10 ft RA = x/10 C B x/10 x/10 (x/10)(7) (x/10)(7) C x/10 x/10 Bending moment is +ve at C 9 .3.

1 kip-ft Influence line for bending Moment at C +ve 10 .3 < x < 10 ft (Unit load to the right of C) x ft A 3 ft RA = 1-x/10 10 ft RA = x/10 C 1 B 1-x/10 (1-x/10)(3) 1-x/10 1-x/10 (1-x/10)(3) C (1-x/10)(3) Moment at C is +ve (1-7/10)(3)=2.

bending moment. at a point. etc. – The capacity of the beam to resist that parameter. shear or bending moment). when the beam is acted upon by that parameter. is to the same scale as the deflected shape of the beam.4 QUALITATIVE INFLUENCED LINES . – Then allow the beam to deflect under that parameter – Positive directions of the forces are the same as before 11 .). the magnitudes of the influence lines also can be computed • In order to draw the shape of the influence lines properly. at that point. the capacity of the beam to resist the parameter investigated (reaction. must be removed • The principle states that:The influence line for a parameter (say. at that point.MULLERBRESLAU’S PRINCIPLE • The principle gives only a procedure to determine of the influence line of a parameter for a determinate or an indeterminate structure • But using the basic understanding of the influence lines. must be removed. reaction.3. shear force.

1 Influence Line for a Determinate Beam by Muller-Breslau’s Method Influence line for Reaction at A 12 .5.3.5 PROBLEMS .3.

2 Influence Lines for a Determinate Beam by MullerBreslau’s Method Influence Line for Shear at C Influence Line for Bending Moment at C 13 .5.3.

3 Influence Lines for an Indeterminate Beam by Muller-Breslau’s Method Influence Line for Shear at E Influence Line for Bending Moment at E 14 .3.5.

6 INFLUENCE LINE FOR FLOOR GIRDERS Floor systems are constructed as shown in figure below. 15 .3.

6 INFLUENCE LINES FOR FLOOR GIRDERS (Cont’d) 16 .3.

and (b) the moment at E.3. x A´ A B´ B C´ C D´ D E´ E F´ F 5 spaces @ 10´ each = 50 ft 17 .6.1 Force Equilibrium Method: (Cont’d) Draw the Influence Lines for: (a) Shear in panel CD of the girder.6 INFLUENCE LINES FOR FLOOR GIRDERS 3.

x/50 At x=0. ME=0 At x=10.2 Place load over region A´B´ (0 < x < 10 ft) Find the shear over panel CD VCD= . VCD = 0 At x=10. ME=+2.3. VCD = -0.6.2 C D F RF=x/50 Shear is -ve Find moment at E = +(x/50)(10)=+x/5 At x=0.0 E +ve moment F RF=x/50 18 .

for ME 19 .Continuation of the Problem x -ve 0. L. L. for VCD +ve 2.2 I.0 I.

2 At x = 20 ft VCD = -0.3 Place load over region B´C´ (10 ft < x < 20ft) VCD = -x/50 kip At x = 10 ft VCD = -0.4 C D F Shear is -ve RF = x/50 ME = +(x/50)(10) = +x/5 kip. ME = +4.Problem Continued 3.ft At x = 10 ft.6.ft E D F Moment is +ve RF = x/50 20 .0 kip.0 kip.ft At x = 20 ft. ME = +2.

L.4 I. for ME 21 .0 2.0 I. L. for VCD +ve 4.x B´ C´ -ve 0.2 0.

4 RA= (50 .4 kip When the load is at D´ (x = 30 ft) A B C RF=20/50 =0.4 Place load over region C´D´ (20 ft < x < 30 ft) When the load is at C’ (x = 20 ft) C D Shear is -ve VCD = -0.x)/50 Shear is +ve D VCD= + 20/50 = + 0.6.3.4 kip 22 .

ME = + (x/50)(10) = + x/5 x Load P E +ve moment A´ A B´ B C´ C +ve D´ RF= x/50 0.2 -ve 0. for ME 23 . L.4 D I.0 6.0 I. L.0 4. for VCD +ve 2.

0 24 .0 At x = 40 ft.3. ME = +8.ft E Moment is +ve RF= x/50 At x = 30 ft.6.5 Place load over region D´E´ (30 ft < x < 40 ft) VCD= + (1-x/50) kip A B C D E RA= (1-x/50) Shear is +ve ME= +(x/50)(10) = + x/5 kip. ME = +6.

L. for VCD 2. L.0 +ve 8. for ME 25 .0 6.0 I.0 4.2 I.Problem continued x A´ B´ C´ D´ E´ 0.4 +ve 0.

ME = 0.0 B C D E RA= 1-x/50 Shear is +ve ME= + (1-x/50)(40) = (50-x)*40/50 = +(4/5)(50-x) x A B C D E F RA=1-x/50 At x = 40 ft.0 kip.6.ft At x = 50 ft.2 At x = 50 ft.6 Place load over region E´F´ (40 ft < x < 50 ft) VCD = + 1-x/50 At x = 40 ft. ME= + 8. VCD= + 0.0 x A 1. VCD = 0.0 Moment is +ve 26 .3.

4 +ve 0.0 A´ B´ C´ D´ E´ F´ 0. L.x 1.2 -ve 0. L.2 0.0 4.4 I. for ME 27 . for VCD 2.0 +ve 8.0 I.0 6.

and (b) Force in member FC of the truss shown below in Figure below G F 20 ft E 10(3)1/3 600 A B C D 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 28 .7 INFLUENCE LINES FOR TRUSSES Draw the influence lines for: (a) Force in Member GF.3.

7.77 RD=x/60 Taking moment about B to its right.1 Place unit load over AB (i) To compute GF.(FGF)(103) = 0 FGF = (x/60)(40)(1/ 103) = x/(15 3) (-ve) 29 .x/60 At x = 0.7 continued 3. cut section (1) . FGF = 0 At x = 20 ft FGF = .Problem 3.0. (RD)(40) .(1) (1) G 1-x/20 x A B 600 F x/20 E 1 C (1) D RA= 1.

cut section (2) .7 CONTINUED (ii) To compute FFC.(2) G F (2) E x 1 x/20 300 1-x/20 reactions at nodes A B 600 C D RA =1-x/60 (2) RD=x/60 Resolving vertically over the right hand section FFC cos300 .RD = 0 FFC = RD/cos30 = (x/60)(2/3) = x/(30 3) (-ve) 30 .PROBLEM 3.

for FFC 31 . L. FFC = 0.77 I.385 I. FFC = -0.At x = 0. for FGF -ve 0.0 At x = 20 ft.385 20 ft -ve 0. L.

385 (-ve) 32 . to its left.(1) is valid for 20 < x < 40 ft] (i) To compute FGF use section (1) -(1) G (1) (40-x)/20 F E x 1 reactions at nodes (x-20)/20 A 20 ft B (1) (x-20) (40-x) C D RA=1-x/60 RD=x/60 Taking moment about B. FFG = 0. (RA)(20) .7 Continued 3.77 (-ve) At x = 40 ft. FFG = 0.2 Place unit load over BC (20 ft < x <40 ft) [Section (1) .PROBLEM 3.(FGF)(103) = 0 FGF = (20RA)/(103) = (1-x/60)(2 /3) At x = 20 ft.7.

(x/60) +(x-20)/20 = 0 FFC cos30 = x/60 . use section (2) . FFC cos30 .PROBLEM 6.(2) is valid for 20 < x < 40 ft G (40-x)/20 x 1 F (x-20)/20 FFC 300 (2) E 600 A B C D RA =1-x/60 (2) RD=x/60 Resolving force vertically.(2) Section (2) .2x)/60)(2/3) -ve 33 .x/20 +1= (1-2x)/60 (-ve) FFC = ((60 . over the right hand section.7 Continued (ii) To compute FFC.

L. FFC = (20/60)(2/ 3) = 0. FFC = ((60-80)/60)(2/ 3) = 0. for FFC 34 .385 (+ve) -ve 0. for FGF 0. L.385 I.At x = 20 ft.385 -ve I.385 (-ve) At x = 40 ft.77 0.

385 kip (-ve) At x = 60 ft.7 Continued 3.3 Place unit load over CD (40 ft < x <60 ft) (i) To compute FGF. FFG = 0. to its left.(1) G (1) x F (x-40) 1 (60-x)/20 E (60-x) (x-40)/20 A 20 ft B (1) C D RA=1-x/60 reactions at nodes RD=x/60 Take moment about B.0 35 . use section (1) .PROBLEM 3.7.(RA)(20) = 0 FFG = (1-x/60)(20/103) = (1-x/60)(2/3) -ve At x = 40 ft. (FFG)(103) . FFG = 0.

to the left of C. (RA) .FFC cos 30 = 0 FFC = RA/cos 30 = (1-x/10) (2/3) +ve 36 .PROBLEM 3.7 Continued (ii) To compute FFG. use section (2) .(2) reactions at nodes G F (60-x)/20 FFC x 300 E (x-40)/20 1 600 A B C x-40 60-x D RA =1-x/60 (2) RD=x/60 Resolving forces vertically.

770 0.0 -ve 0.385 I. L. FFC = 0. FFC = 0.At x = 40 ft. for FGF +ve -ve 0. L.385 I.385 (+ve) At x = 60 ft. for FFC 37 .

8 MAXIMUM SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT UNDER A SERIES OF CONCENTRATED LOADS P1 a1 P2 a2 P3 a3 P4 x PR= resultant load P1 P2 a1 B a2 C x C. P3 P4 a3 D A E RA L/2 L x PR= resultant load RE Taking moment about A.( x x )] RE PR ( L / 2 x x) L 38 . RE L = PR [L/2 .L.3.

R A L PR [ L / 2 ( x x)] RA PR ( L / 2 x x) L M D RA ( L / 2 x) P ( a1 a2 ) P2 a2 1 PR ( L / 2 x x)(L / 2 x) P ( a1 a2 ) P2 ( a2 ) 1 L dM D 0 dx P P 0 R ( L / 2 x x) R ( L / 2 x)(1) L L P R [(L / 2) x x ( L / 2) x] L i.. 39 .Taking moment about E. x 2 x 0 x 2x x x 2 The centerline must divide the distance between the resultant of all the loads in the moving series of loads and the load considered under which maximum bending moment occurs.e.

- Steel Fibre Concrete Composites for Special Applications
- Reinforced Concrete
- Finite Element Modeling for Stress Analysis, Robert D Cook
- SAB 2112 - L4 AGGREGATES
- concrete design Example Problem
- Concrete Roof Tile Manual
- Mtech Dissertation - Analysis of Raft Foundation Using Soil-structure Interaction
- Falling Head Permeability - 011
- Structural Analysis
- Aggregates
- The Netherlands in the Philippines
- Fibre Concrete ( Sfrc & Pfc )
- SAB 2112 - L3 TESTING OF CEMENT
- HILTI Rebar_spec_12s_1[1]
- Moment Resisting Connections With Post Installed Reinforcement
- Ec2 Bs8110 Compared
- Concrete Repair
- Understanding Structural Concepts
- Method Statement for Roadbase Construction
- Rebar Computation
- Structural Analysis
- Method Statement for Turfing Work
- Detailing of Reinforcement in Concrete Structures 28 Aug 2012
- Scaffold Guide
- Structural Aspects of Building Conservation
- Excel Macros Handout - Prospects
- 0071456325_ar007 Geotechnical
- Engineering Treatment of Soils
- Pavement Construction (MS-701)

Skip carousel

- Design and Comparison of Steel Roof Truss with Tubular Section (using SP
- Dynamic Analysis of RCC Chimney- a review
- Chassis Frame Torsional Stiffness Analysis
- Design of handling system for heavy rocket motor segments
- As 5100.6-2004 Bridge Design Steel and Composite Construction
- The Mechanical Properties of WoodIncluding a Discussion of the Factors Affecting the MechanicalProperties, and Methods of Timber Testing by Record, Samuel J.
- As NZS 4063.1-2010 Characterization of Structural Timber Test Methods
- Design and Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Shells
- Weight Optimization of Composite Beams by Finite Element Method
- As NZS 1301.431rp-2006 Methods of Test for Pulp and Paper Taber Bending Resistance of Paper and Paperboard
- tmpB4A0
- Stress Analysis of High Speed Single Helical Gear by Changing Design Parameter Using FEA Approach
- As NZS 4357.2-2006 Structural Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) Determination of Structural Properties - Test Met
- Structural Behaviour of Bubble Deck Slabs and Its Application
- Experimental behaviour on study of sandwich beams
- Experimental Investigation of Precast Horizontal Wall Panel Connection using Reinforcement by Push Off Test
- Novel Technique of Sodium Silicate in Healing of Concrete
- UT Dallas Syllabus for mech7v80.501.11s taught by Harun Khan (hrk102020)
- Retrofitting of RCC Beam in Flexure by External Cabling Method
- Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Different Mineral Admixtures as Cement Replacements
- Design Analysis of Crankshaft by Equivalent Beam Method
- As 1012.8.2-2000 Methods of Testing Concrete Method of Making and Curing Concrete - - Flexure Test Specimens
- Seismic Behaviour of Honeycomb Structure with Conventional Structure by using STAAD Pro
- tmp705.tmp
- Factors Affecting on Residual Stresses & Springback in Sheet Metal Bending
- Design and Analysis of 50 Tonne Crane Hook for optimization
- As 5100.5-2004 Bridge Design Concrete
- tmp145D
- Design Tables for Simply Supported Beams with Rolled Steel I Sections
- Design Guidelines for Strengthening of RC Structures Using FRP Materials - State of Art Review

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulRead Free for 30 Days

Cancel anytime.

Close Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading