## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

KRISHNASWAMI

Former Faculty, DEPT OF CIVIL ENGG., NIT, TRICHY

TECHNICAL MEETING ON 09-05-2009 ORGANISED BY CIVIL ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ASSOCIATION, KUMBAKONAM

INTRODUCTION Concrete is the second largest material consumed by human beings after food and water as per WHO. It is obtained by mixing cement, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate and water in required proportions. The mixture when placed in

forms and allowed to cure becomes hard like stone. The hardening is caused by chemical action between water and the cement due to which concrete grows stronger with age. The strength, durability and other characteristics of concrete depend upon the properties of its ingredients, proportion of the mix, the method of compaction and other controls during placing, compaction and curing.

Concrete possess a high compressive strength and is usually more economical than steel and is non corrosive which can be made with locally available materials. Hence concrete is used widely in all present-day constructions. The concrete is good in compression and bad in tension. Hence liable to be cracked when subjected to tensile load. In situations where tensile stresses are developed concrete is strengthened by steel bars forming a composite construction called Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC).

cement.Mix Design Design of concrete mixes involves determination of the proportions of the given constituents namely. Workability is specified as the important property of concrete in the fresh state. For hardened state compressive strength and durability will be considered . water. coarse aggregate and fine aggregate with admixtures if any.

USBR Mix design method 3. Following methods are in practice 1. including Indian standard method. charts and graphs developed from extensive experimental investigations. British Mix design method 4. Mix design method according to Indian standard Since ACI Mix design method is an originator for all other methods. wherein every table and charts are fully borrowed from ACI. ACI Mix design method 2.Methods of concrete mix design The mix design methods being followed in different countries are mostly based on empirical relationships. so we follow the ACI Mix design method in practice .

(b) Type of cement: The type of cement is important mainly through its influence on the rate of development of compressive strength of concrete as well as durability under aggressive environments ordinary Portland cement(OPC) and Portland Pozzolona cement (PPC) are permitted to use in reinforced concrete construction. .Factors to be considered in Mix design (as per SP23-1982) The design of concrete mix will be based on the following factors. (a) Grade of concrete: This gives the characteristic strength requirements of concrete. Depending upon the level of quality control available at the site. the concrete mix has to be designed for a target mean strength which is higher than the characteristic strength.

Table1 GRADES OF CONCRETE Grade Designation MIO MI5 M20 M25 M30 M35 M40 M45 M50 M55 M60 Specified Characteristic Compressive Strength In N/mm2 At 28 Days Curing 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 .

MI5 and less grades of concrete may be used for lean concrete bases and simple foundation for masonry walls. Grades of concrete lower than M20 shall not be used in reinforced concrete structure as per IS 456-2000. Grades of concrete lower than M30 shall not be used in pre stressed concrete structure .Note: In the designation of a concrete mix M refers to the mix and the number to the specified characteristic compressive strength of 15 cm cube at 28 days curing expressed in N/mm2.

e) Workability: The workability of concrete for satisfactory placing and compaction is related to the size and shape of the section to be concreted.c) Maximum nominal size of aggregate: It is found that larger the size of aggregate. . smaller is the cement requirement for a particular water cement ratio. Aggregates having a maximum nominal size of 20mm or smaller are generally considered satisfactory. d) Minimum water cement ratio: The minimum w/c ratio for a specified strength depends on the type of cement.

(b) Choose the water cement ratio for target mean strength.Out line of mix design procedure (a) Arrive at the target mean strength from the characteristic strength required. (c) Arrive at the water content for the workability required (d) Calculate the cement content (e) Choose the relative proportion of the fine and coarse aggregate (f) Arrive at the concrete mix proportions .

and is .Target mean strength: Considering the inherent variability of concrete strength during production it is necessary to design the mix to have a target mean strength which is grater than characteristic strength by a suitable margin ft = fck + k x s Where ft = Target mean strength fck= Characteristic strength k = a constant depending upon the definition of characteristic strength derived IS from the mathematics of normal distribution S = Standard deviation of the particular mix which is available in IS 456-2000 The value of k is equal to 1.65 as per IS 456-2000 where not more than 5% of the test results are expected to fall below the characteristic strength.

84 10 1.5 4.28 5 1.33 Table 3 Assumed standard deviation (S) Grade of concrete Standard deviation assumed (N/mm2) M10 MI5 M20 M25 M30 M35 M40 M50 3 3.Table 2 Values of statistical constant (K) Percentage of result below the characteristic strength Constant k 20 0.5 1.0 5.65 2.0 5.0 5.0 4.96 1 2.0 5.0 .

7 28.46 99. 4.54 0. 7. 3.06 95.6 0 0 0 0 Fineness modulus = Cumulative percentage of soil retained/100 = (36. Sieve Opening Size (mm) 1. 10.3 71.94 4.4 100 100 100 100 Percentage of fine aggregate passing (%) 0 0 63.3+71.75 2.46+99.MATERIAL TESTING RESULTS FINENESS MODULUS TEST COARSE AGGREGATE Serial No. 8.36 1. 9.15 Weight of soil retained (g) 0 0 1815 1738 1220 197 30 0 0 0 Cumulative weight of soil retained (g) 0 0 1815 3553 4773 4970 5000 5000 5000 5000 Cumulative percentage of soil retained (%) 0 0 36. 2.4+100+100+100+100)/100 = 7.3 0.02 . 5.6 0. 80 40 20 10 4. 6.06+95.18 0.

2.4+43.4+9+27.8+0)/100 = 2.6 91 72.2 0 (g) 17 28 92 81 116 154 12 (g) 17 45 137 218 334 488 500 (%) 3. 3.15 <0.6+66. 6.4 43.8 97.75 2.8 0 Fineness modulus = Cumulative percentage of soil retained/100 = (3. 5.4 33.15 Weight of soil retained Cumulative weight of soil retained Cumulative percentage of soil retained Percentage of fine aggregate passing (%) 96.6 56.36 1.FINENESS MODULUS TEST FINE AGGREGATE Serial No. 4.6 0.8+97. Sieve Openi ng Size (mm) 1.4 9 27.6 66.2 2.3 0.4 . 4. 7.18 0.

W4 (g) Specific gravity of the soil 28.5)-(87.2-28.3-55.1-28.13 3.1 Trail 2 28. 2. Observation 1 1.5 54.3 87.11 Specific gravity.SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST OF CEMENT Serial No.3 3.0 87.W2 (g) Weight of specific gravity bottle and soil and water . 3.9 3 28.13 .W3 (g) Weight of specific gravity bottle and water .06 3.5 55.2 69. 69.2 69.1)) = 3. Gs = (W2-W1)/((W4-W1)-(W3-W2)) = (55. Weight of specific gravity bottle .W1 (g) Weight of specific gravity bottle and dry soil . 87.5)/((69.2 5.4 4.5 55.

2. 2. Weight of specific gravity bottle .W1 (g) Weight of specific gravity bottle and onethird aggregate. 1718 1728 1725 4.SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST OF COARSE AGGREGATE Serial No. Observation Trail 1 1.73 2. 1477 1477 1477 5.W2 (g) Weight of specific gravity bottle and onethird aggregate and water .68 2.W3 (g) Weight of specific gravity bottle and water . Gs = (W2-W1)/((W4-W1)-(W3-W2)) = (1016-625)/((1477-625)-(1728-1021)) = 2.7 .W4 (g) Specific gravity of the soil 625 1016 2 625 1021 3 625 1019 3.69 Specific gravity.

2.W2 (g) Weight of specific gravity bottle .68 71 2.65 .SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST OF FINE AGGREGATE Serial No. Gs = (W2-W1)/((W4-W1)-(W3-W2)) = (48-21)/((71-21)-(88-48)) = 2. one-third aggregate and water . 5.W4 (g) Specific gravity of the soil 21 48 88 Trail 2 21 52 91 3 21 51 89 4. 3.62 71 2.65 Specific gravity.W3 (g) Weight of specific gravity bottle and water . Observation 1 1.W1 (g) Weight of specific gravity bottle and onethird aggregate. Weight of specific gravity bottle . 71 2.

635 g/cm3 = 1635 kg/m3 6915 Trail 2 6921 3 6918 2. 4.4 1.4 1.4 cm3 = 3030/1853.4 1.652 x18. Observation 1 1.W2 (g) Weight of coarse aggregate.BULK DENSITY OF COARSE AGGREGATE Serial No.5 = 1853. 5.636 Weight of coarse aggregate . 3885 3030 1853. Weight of the container and coarse aggregate .W1 (g) Weight of the container . 3.V (cm3) Bulk Density of coarse aggregate = 6915-3885 = 3030 kg Volume of container Bulk Density = (Π/4) x 11.638 3885 3033 1853.635 3885 3036 1853.W3 (g) Volume of the container .4 = 1.

The other method is based on calculation of the absolute volume occupied by concrete ingredients. strength and durability. step-by-step operation involved in the first method as suggested by the ACI is presented. . The ACI methods take into consideration the requirements for workability. In the following section.ACI METHOD OF MIX DESIGN The American Concrete Institute mix design method The methods suggested by the ACI Committee 211 [1969] are widely used in the USA. consistency. One method is based on the estimated weight of the concrete per unit volume.

(b) The water content is selected from table 4 for the desired workability and maximum size of aggregate (c) The cement content is calculated from the water content and W/C ratio (d) The coarse aggregate content is estimated from the table 5 for the maximum size of aggregate and fineness modulus of sand. cement. .ACI Mix design Procedure (a) The W/C ratios selected from curve for the target mean strength. (e) The fine aggregate content is determined by subtracting the sum of the absolute volume of coarse aggregate. water and air content from the unit volume of concrete.

Step 4 Determine the minimum water-cement ratio from the curve. . Step 2 Determine the maximum size of coarse aggregate that is economically available and consistent with dimensions of the structure. A concrete of the stiffest consistency (lowest slump) that can be placed efficiently should be used. This table also indicates approximate amount of entrapped air. Step 3 Determine the amount of mixing water for the given slump and maximum size of coarse aggregate from Table 4.Step 1 Determine the slump depending on the degree of workability and placing condition.

5 145 160 170 0.kg/m3 of concrete for maximum size of coarse aggregate(mm) 10 Non air entrained concrete 30-50 80-100 150-180 Approximate % of entrapped air content Air entrained concrete 30-50 80-100 150-180 Recommended average total air percent of 180 200 215 8 175 190 205 7 165 180 190 6 160 175 185 5 145 160 170 4.5 205 225 240 3 200 215 230 2.Table 4 Approximate water requirement for different slumps and maximum size of coarse aggregate Slump (mm) Water.3 125 140 0.5 185 200 210 2 180 195 205 1.5 20 25 40 50 70 150 .2 12.5 160 175 185 1 155 170 180 0.5 140 155 165 4 135 150 160 3.

Step 6 Determine the amount of coarse aggregate required for a unit volume of concrete from Table 5. The value thus obtained is multiplied by the dry rodded unit weight if the aggregate to get the required dry weight. This cement content should not be less than the cement content required based on durability or some other criterion. .Step 5 Determine the amount of cement per unit volume of concrete from steps3 and 4.

55 0.81 .78 0.81 0.79 0.75 0.4 10 12.77 0.74 0.71 0.46 0.76 0.87 2.50 0.67 0.83 3.44 0.66 0.Table 5 Bulk volume of coarse aggregate Maximum size of coarse aggregate (mm) Bulk volume of dry-rodded coarse aggregate per unit volume of concrete Fineness modulus of fine aggregate 2.85 2.57 0.48 0.53 0.72 0.74 0.62 0.72 0.5 20 25 40 50 70 150 0.70 0.59 0.76 0.64 0.8 0.6 0.60 0.69 0.65 0.0 0.

If the weight of concrete per unit volume is assumed.Step 7 Determine the amount of fine aggregate. all ingredients of the concrete have been estimated except the fine aggregate. At completion of step 6. An estimate of weight of fresh concrete can be made either by using Eq. the required weight of fine aggregate is simply the difference between the weight of fresh concrete and the total weight of all other ingredients. 1 or Table 6 .

ρA = weighted average specific gravity of combined fine and coarse aggregate ρC = specific gravity of cement (= 3:15) γc = cement requirement.Wm = 10ρA(lOO-A)+γc(1. percent . kg/m3 A = air content.1) (1) where Wm = weight of fresh concrete. kg/m3 γw = mixing water requirement. kg/n.ρA/ ρC) -γw(ρA .

5 20 25 40 50 70 2285 2315 2355 2375 2420 2445 2465 .Table 6 First estimate of weight of fresh concrete Maximum size of coarse Aggregate (mm) First estimate of concrete weight (Kg/m3) Non-air entrained concrete Air-entrained Concrete 2190 2235 2280 2315 2355 2375 2400 10 12.

Step 9 Check the calculated mix proportions by means of trial batches prepared and tested in accordance with the relevant IS specifications and make another trial.Step 8 Adjust the mixing water quantity based on the moisture content in the aggregate. . if necessary.

40 7.70 1560 kg/m3 0.CALCULATIONS AS PER ACI MIX DESIGN METHOD Specific Gravity of Cement Specific Gravity of Fine Aggregate Specific Gravity of Coarse Aggregate Dry Density of Coarse Aggregate Water Cement Ratio Volume of dry-rodded Coarse Aggregate per unit volume of concrete Fineness Modulus of Fine Aggregate Fineness Modulus of Coarse Aggregate = = 2.20 = = = = = = 3.64 .65 2.403 0.10 2.

Trail mix was prepared for.6264 x1560 977.85 to 0.92 50mm to 75mm 2% fck + k . s 35 + 1.65 x 5 43.403 200 /.25 N/mm2 200 l . Water Cement Ratio Quantity of cement per m3 of concrete = = = Quantity of coarse aggregate required for 1m3 of concrete = = 0.403 496.2 kg = Medium 0.3 kg 0. Workability Compaction Factor Slump Approximate amount of entrained air Mean Target Compressive Strength of concrete . ft = = = = = = = Water required for 50-75mm slump using 53 grade cement as per sp23-1982.

2 ------2.6 kg = 980 litres Therefore quantity of sand required for 1m3 of concrete = Quantity of materials for 1 bag of cement.65 C. W --200 ----1 C --496.Quantity of materials required for 1 m3 of concrete. 1 : 1.1l C --50 kg F.9 kg C.4kg Mix proportions by weight.7 683.A ----68.A ----98.10 F.969 .A ----sand -----2. W --20.3 ------3.A ----977.377 : 1.

3 977.7 1 1.6 977.1 50 64.5 1 1.1 50 74 101.1 95.4 1 1.4 104.281 1.03 M35 50-75 200 496.9 98.377 1.1 50 68.912 .2 20.5 740.1 50 79.2 20.2 20.4 712.6 1 1.9 977.2 20.588 2.094 25-50 194 481.3 683.969 75-100 206 511.48 2.2 655 977.MIX DESIGN REPORT AS PER ACI METHOD Grade of Concrete Slump (mm) Quantity per m3 of Concrete (kg) Quantity per Bag of Concrete (kg) Proportions by weight Water (litre) Cement Sand Aggregate Water (litre) Cement Sand Aggregate Cement Sand Aggregate 0-25 188 466.

05 19/9/05 19/9/05 19/9/05 19/9/05 150 * 150 * 150 7 M20 7 8.377:1.5 600.67 25.969 Grade Age (days) Weight of cube (Kg) Crushing load (KN) Compressive Strength (N/mm2) 1.969 7 8. Identification Date of casting Date of Receipt Date of Testing Size (mm) Area (mm2) Proportions of mix 1:1.09.377:1.5 540. BE 01 BE 02 12.5 8. BE 03 12.075 580.ACI MIX DESIGN METHOD COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST RESULTS Serial No.09.05 12.377:1.00 24 .969 3.05 19/9/05 19/9/05 1:1.09.78 22500 1:1.05 26. 2.

Hence it gives better results than other methods. . The New Method is found to be better than ACI because the limitations of the code (SP23-1982) such as the maximum cement content for 1 m3 of concrete will be limited to 530 kg has been well considered in the New method.CONCLUSION In this regard.

Curve .

- Intro to Concrete Mix Design
- Concrete Mix Design
- Concrete Mix Design Steps
- Steps of Concrete Mix Design BS
- Engineered Concrete
- Conrete Mix Lab
- Principles of Concrete Mix Design
- Mix Design
- Bs Mix Design Doe Method
- 2a-Concrete Mix Design
- Concrete Mix Design is Method
- Concrete Mix Design (ACI Method and British Method)
- Mix Design of Concrete
- Concret Mix Design (M10 to M100)
- Concrete Mix Design
- BS 5328 - Concrete, Part 2, Methods for Specifying Concrete Mixes
- Concrete Basics
- MIX DESIGN PROGRAM.xlsx
- Mix Design.ppt
- Concrete Mix Design
- Concrete Mix Design
- High Strength Concrete
- Concrete Mix Design
- IS 10262 Indian Standard code for Concrete Mix Design
- Mix Design of Concrete
- Concrete Mix Design m60
- ACI Mix Design 2
- Concrete Technology
- concrete mix design
- Concrete Mix Design Guide

- Sanctuary magazine issue 13 - Ask Our Experts - green home feature article
- BUILDING A FIRM FOUNDATION
- A Review of Analysis of Concrete Beam by Fracture Mechanics Approach
- Concrete ConstructionMethods and Costs by Gillette, Halbert Powers, 1869-
- HB 79-1996 Alkali Aggregate Reaction - Guidelines on Minimising the Risk of Damage to Concrete Structures In
- As 3600-2009 Concrete Structures
- Utilization of Quarry Fines in Cement Concrete Paver Blocks for Medium Traffic
- Effect of Coconut Shell and Plastic Waste on the Properties of Concrete
- California Paving Co. v. Schalicke, 119 U.S. 401 (1886)
- tmp3E9D.tmp
- As 1012.4.2-1999 Methods of Testing Concrete Determination of Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete - Measuri
- Houlihan Bridge Inspection Report
- Study on Effect of Steel Fibers on Impact Resistance of High Strength Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete (HSFRC) Subjected To Drop Weight Test
- The St. Louis Flounder by UIC
- Effect of strength in grade concrete with partial replacement of glass fiber
- As 3648-1993 Specification and Methods of Test for Packaged Concrete Mixes
- Structural Behaviour of Concrete Beams using Marble Dust and Hybrid Rods in Self compaction Concrete
- Analysis of Strength and Durability of Concrete by using Ceramic Waste
- tmpC1DB.tmp
- The study of effects of quarry dust on the strength of non-traffic paver block
- Springfield Canal Inspection Report
- Eugene Field School Solution
- A Study on Strength and Behaviour of Exterior Beam-Column Joint by using SCC and SFRSCC
- bls_0888-3_1947.pdf
- Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910The New York Tunnel Extension of the Pennsylvania RailroadThe Terminal Station - West by Cresson, Benjamin Franklin, 1873-1923
- Athletic Clubs
- Seismic Analysis of a Multi-Storeyed Building with Irregular Plan Configuration Using ETABS
- The United States of America for the Use of the Ardmore Concrete Material Company, Inc., a Corporation v. H. D. Williams and W. W. Collins, D/B/A Saxet Foundation Company T. C. Bateston Construction Company, a Corporation the National Surety Corporation and Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, a Corporation, 240 F.2d 561, 10th Cir. (1957)
- National Concrete Masonry Association Letter to Chairman Issa - January 7, 2011
- Dynamic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Framed Structures with Infill wall

- null
- 69197_2005-2009
- MGM 9-24-15
- Stinemire report
- null
- Sanctuary magazine issue 12 - Products - green home feature article
- 43841_1920-1924
- Radon tests memo
- 55973_1940-1944
- Metis Housing
- 43842_1920-1924
- Untitled
- ATG 2400 - 24 Inch Polymer Manhole Cover and Frame
- Proposed seclusion room requirements
- December 20 2016 Town planning commission packet
- 44839_1925-1929
- Web Crippling Test of Cold Formed Steel Channels Using CFRP under Various Load Cases
- Varying angle Diagrid Structural System
- 219 Amity Fire Inspection Report
- 53640_1940-1944
- 2008 Bond Program Repair and Renovation Projects
- 2013 Salem-Keizer Projects List
- Catalina Foothills School District Facility Improvement Plan
- 2014-01-06 Statewide Winter Heating Safety
- Squires IWPA PEFC Formaldehyde Presentation Nov 11 2013
- Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Ferro cement Lost Forms
- 46350_1920-1924
- null
- EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF ECCENTRICALLY LOADED COLD-FORMED STEEL BUILT-UP COLUMNS
- Rancho-Cucamonga-Municipal-Utility-HVAC-Tune-Up-Program

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading