P. 1
Madhyamika and Yogacara

Madhyamika and Yogacara

|Views: 248|Likes:
Published by loquel
Teachings from GM Nagao
Teachings from GM Nagao

More info:

Published by: loquel on Jan 21, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less






  • Buddhist Subjectivity
  • The Bodhisattva Returns to this World
  • The Silence of the Buddha and its Madhyamic Interpretation
  • Logic of Convertibility
  • Ontology in Mahayana Buddhism
  • Yogacara-A Reappraisal
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
  • Index of Terms
  • Index of Tibetan Terms
  • Index of Chinese and [J]apanese Terms
  • Index of Sanskrit Terms

SUNY Series in Buddhist Studies
Kenneth K. lnada, Editor

M iidhyamika and Yogiiciira

A Study


Mahayana Philosophies

Collected Papers of G. M. Nagao

Edited, Collated, and Translated
L. S. Kawamura
in Collaboration with
G. M. Nagao

Published by
State University of New York Press, Albany

© 1991 State University of New York

All rights reserved

Printed in the United States of America

No part of this book may be used or reproduced
in any manner whatsoever without written permission
except in the case of brief quotations embodied in
critical articles and reviews.

For information, address State University of New York
Press, State University Plaza, Albany, N.Y., 12246

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Nagao, Gadjin, 1907-
Madhyamika and Yogacara.

(SUNY series in Buddhist studies)
Rev. translation of: Chiikan to yuishiki I
G. M. Nagao.
Includes index.
I. Madhyamika (Buddhism) 2. Yogacara
(Buddhism) I. Kawamura, Leslie S. II. Title.
BQ7462.N3313 1991 181'.043 89-4278
ISBN 0-7914-0186-3
ISBN 0-7914-0187-1 (pbk.)

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2


wife of Professor G. M. Nagao




Author's Preface




1. Buddhist Subjectivity


2. An Interpretation of the Term "Sal!lvrti" (Convention)
in Buddhism


3. The Bodhisattva Returns to this World


4. The Silence of the Buddha and its Madhyamic Interpretation



What Remains in Sunyatii:
A Yogacara Interpretation of Emptiness


6. The Buddhist World View as Elucidated
in the Three-nature Theory and Its Similies


7. Connotations of the Word Asraya (Basis)
in the Mahiiyiina-Siitriilal!lkiira


8. Usages and Meanings of Parit:~iimanii


9. Tranquil Flow of Mind:
An Interpretation of Upek$ii


10. On the Theory of Buddha Body (Buddha-kiiya)


II. Logic of Convertibility


12. Ontology in Mahayana Buddhism


13. From Madhyamika to Yogacara:
An Analysis of MMK, XXIV.l8 and MV. 1.1-2


14. Ascent and Descent: Two-Directional Activity
in Buddhist Thought

20 I

15. Emptiness


16. Yogacara-A Reappraisal


Appendix-Sources of Essays






Index of Terms


Index of Tibetan Terms


Index of Chinese and Japanese Terms


Index of Sanskrit Terms



When Professor G. M. Nagao's book Chukan to Yuishiki appeared in
1978, the thought of translating the text into English seemed a good idea.
Michele Martin, the then editor of the State University of New York Press
(SUNY), approached me in the Spring of 1984. She asked whether I would
be willing to undertake the task of editing and translating Professor Nagao's
work. It was known to me, of course, that without Professor Nagao's ap-
proval such an undertaking would be impossible. Professor Nagao was ap-
proached and permission to commence the work of translation was
obtained. The many occasions that gave me the opportunity to work closely
with Professor Nagao clearly impressed upon me his arduous intent to per-
fect his work. It was, therefore, obvious that without his collaboration, the
task of translation could not be accomplished. Fortunately, in the early part
of 1985, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
(SSHRCC), Division of International Programs, granted me the Grant for
Visiting Foreign Scholars and the University of Calgary research grants of-
fice responded positively to my application for travel to and joint research
in Kyoto, Japan. The project deadline was targeted for the end of 1986, but
as is evident from the publication date, the book is three years late.
The papers comprising Professor Nagao's book seemed straight for-
ward enough. However, when the work of translating the papers began,
many difficulties began to emerge. As we worked on the materials, it be-
came evident that the newly translated papers for this volume had to be
more than a simple translation. For example, the article "Logic of Convert-
ibility" has been thoroughly reworked into the present form. The article
"Buddhist Ontology," has been amended with comments that do not appear
in the original Japanese text.
This work could not have reached its conclusion without the support of
many people and the aid of various financial grants. I would like to thank
Ms. V. Lake for typing the early draft of the manuscript. Permissions to
reproduce articles are acknowledged with thanks to the following; G. M.
Nagao; John Keenan; Institut Orientaliste, Universite Catholique de Lou-



vain; the University of Hawaii Press; Hozokan, Kyoto; Iwanami Shoten,
Tokyo; Risosha, Tokyo; editors of Jimbvn, Kyoto; editors of the Eastern
Buddhist, Kyoto; and editors of Journal of International Association of Bud-
dhist Studies, Bloomington, Indiana. For detailed information regarding the
essays, please refer to "Appendix-Sources of Essays."
The financial aid given by SSHRCC and the University of Calgary is
hereby acknowledged in deepest appreciation.


Author's Preface

According to 1-ching's report from India (A.D. 691), Mahayana Bud-
dhism was divided into two schools, the Madhyamika and the Yogacara.
The Madhyamaka (middle) philosophy, founded on Nagarjuna's (A.D. sec-
ond to third century) philosophy of absolute negation (sunyatii), is really a
remarkable and probably one of the greatest achievements in the history of
Buddhism. It is my contention, however, that it was brought to completion
by the Yogacara, especially through the works of Asm'lga and Vasubandhu

(A.D. fifth century). They complemented the sunyatii philosophy with vari-
ous positive theories such as the theory of consciousness-only, the three-
nature theory, the theory of Buddha's body, and so on. The Yogacara
theories are said to be ''positive'' because by accepting the negative idea of
sunyatii as a whole, the Yogacara established the positive affirmative aspect
of sunyatii (abhiivasya bhiiva!z). During the later centuries, Indian Bud-
dhism (as well as Tibetan Buddhism) focused its attention on only the
Madhyamika school as the main stream of Buddhism while it overlooked
the Yogacara as an independent school. In spite of that, ideas and terminol-
ogies created by the Yogacara school continued to influence the develop-
ment of Buddhism in India (also in Tibet) for a long time, and it can be said
further that, without the effort and achievement of the Yogacara, which
complemented the Madhyamika, Mahayana Buddhism would not have
reached its present perfection.
My study has been focussed on these two schools for more than forty
years. Some of the papers found in this collection were written very early
in my career and consequently show certain inadequacies; however, as they
contain important aspects of the development of my thought, they have
been included here. The paper "Logic of Convertibility," for instance, ex-
plains the fundamental idea of "convertibility" that has been and still con-
tinues to be of great concern to me. The papers written later presuppose,
more or less, this idea of convertibility and it is foundational to the ideas
discussed there.



In more recent years, I discuss the two notions of "ascent and de-
scent," and show how they apply to our interpretation of the various teach-
ings found in Buddhism. The two notions have appeared, although only
vaguely, in earlier papers from time to time, but it is only in recent days
that it became evident that the two notions of ascent and descent were con-
venient ways for gaining a proper understanding of the various doctrinal
meanings. In fact, it can be said that Mahayana thought is characterized as
such when they are present, even though they are opposites and indicate
contrary directions. That is, when these two notions are found within a
certain Buddhist system, the criterion for discerning whether that system is
Mahayana or not is established.
The Madhyamika, more than the Yogacara, seems to have been studied
rather widely by western scholars. This is probably owing to the fact that
sunyatii is in sharp contrast to Western ontological ideas. However,
Yogacara thought is no less important than Madhyamika ideas, and conse-
quently, the readers will find that more attention has been paid to the
Yogacara in this book.

My study has been philological rather than philosophical. By the term
philological, I do not mean to imply a purely linguistic investigation, but
rather, I refer to the process of interpreting a text as faithful as possible.
This means that I have interpreted the purport of those treatises through the
acarya's own words, and thus, I avoided the danger of being too specula-

Many kalyiirwmitras helped me in preparing these papers by either
translating them or improving my English. My hearty thanks go to, among
others, the Reverend Yoshiaki Fujitani, Professor Norman Waddell, Profes-
sor John Keenan, Ms. Michele Martin, et al. My special gratitude is due to
Professor Leslie S. Kawamura for his tireless effort in translating and edit-
ing this book. If these papers are helpful to my readers concerning their
understanding of Buddhism, I shall be satisfied.



*(asterisk) in front of a title of a text indicates that the Sanskrit title has
been reconstructed.

AS = Abhidharmasamuccaya. Y. Y. Gokhale, "Fragments from the AS of


JA = Journal of the Bombay Branch, Royal Asiatic Society. 1947.
IsMeo = Instituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.
La theory = S. Ruegg, La Theorie du Tathagatagarbha et du Gotra (Paris:
Ecole fran<;aise d'extreme-orient, 1969).
Le traite = Etienne Lamotte, Le Traite de Ia Grande Vertu de Sagesse de
Niigiirjuna (Mahaprjiiiipiiramitiisiistra) (Louvain: Insitute Orientaliste,
1949. Reprint 1966). Three volumes.
MMK = Louis de Ia Vallee Poussin, Miilamadhyamakakiirikiis
(miidhyamikasiitras) de Nagiirjuna, avec La Prasannapadii Commen-
taire de Candrakirti, Bibliotheca Buddhica IV (St.-Petersbourg: 1903-


MSA = Sylvain Levi, ed., Mahiiyiina-siitriilaiJ1kiira (Paris: Librairie Honore
Champion, Editeur, 1907 and 1911. Kyoto: Rinsen Book Co., 1983 re-
print). Two volumes.
MSg = Etienne Lamotte, La somme du grand vehicule d' Asmiga
(Mahiiyiina-sa1J1graha). (Louvain: Bureaux du Museon, 1962).
MV = G. M. Nagao, ed., Madhyiintavibhiiga-bhii$ya (Tokyo: Suzuki Re-
search Foundation. 1964).
Mvy = R. Sakaki, ed., Mahiivyutpatti (Kyoto: 1917. Reprint Tokyo: Suzuki
Research Foundation. 1962).
MW = Sir M. Monier-Williams. Sanskrit-English Dictionary.
Nirvii(za = T. F. Stcherbatsky. The Conception ()f Buddhist Nirviifla (Lenin-
grad: The Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1927).
RGV = E. H. Johnston. ed.. Ratnagotravibhiiga Mahiiyiinottaratantra-
sclstra (Patna: Bihar Research Society, 1950).



Siddhi = Louis de Ia Vallee Poussin, Vljfiaptimatratiisiddhi-La Siddhi de
2 vols. Paris: Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner, 1928.
Sthiramati = Yamaguchi, S. ed., Sthiramati: Madhyiintavibhiiga[lka
(Nagoya: Librairie Hajinkaku, 1934; reprinted Tokyo, 1966).
SrBh = Sriivakabhumi. Alex Wayman, Analysis of the Sravaka-bhumi
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1961 ). See also,
Karunesha Shukla ed., Sriivaka-bhumi of Aciirya Aswiga (Patna: K. P
Jayaswal Research Institute, 1973).
T or Taisho = Takakusu, J. and Watanabe, K. eds. Taisho Shinshu
(Tokyo: Taisho Issai-kyo Kanko Kai, 1905-12).
Trif!lsikii = Trif!lsikiivijfiaptibhii$ya. Sylvain Levi ed., Vijfiaptimatratii-
Deux traites de Vasubandhu, ViJTisatika et TriJTisika (Paris:
Trisvabhiiva = Susumu Yamaguchi, "Trisvabhavanirdesa of Vasubandhu,
Skt. text and Japanese translation with annotation." Journal of Reli-
gious Studies,
new series No. 8, 1931, pp. 121-130, 186-207. Re-
printed in Yamaguchi Susumu Bukkyogaku Bunshu (Tokyo: Shunjusha,
1972). Louis de Ia Vallee Poussin, "Le petit traite de Vasubandhu-
Nagarjuna sur les trois natures," Melanges chinois et bouddhiques, 2e
vol., 1932-33, pp. 147, 161.
TTP = Tibetan Tripitaka Peking Edition (Tokyo-Kyoto: Suzuki Research
Foundation, 1962).
Yasomitra = Unrai Wogihara ed. Sphu{iirthii Abhidharmakosavyiikhyii-
The Work of Yasomitra.
Two volumes. (Tokyo: 1936 first edition. Re-
print, Tokyo: Sankibo Buddhist Book Store, 1971; Shunjusha, 1972).


Professor Gadjin M. Nagao has devoted his life study to the investiga-
tion of the development of Madhyamika and Yogacara Buddhism. The arti-
cles presented in this volume have one thing in common. Each one is a step
towards establishing the relational nature between Madhyamika and
Yogacara. That is, according to Professor Nagao, the two traditions are not
separate and independent but each augment the other. The Madhyamika
thought of sunyatii was extended by the Yogacara by their system of the
Three-nature theory that depended upon a logic of convertibility. Through-
out these papers, Professor Nagao's constant effort is to synthesize the two

Professor Nagao's contributions to the academic world are many, but
what becomes evident in the papers presented here is his original thought
on the logic of convertibility. This manner of thinking, which results from
understanding the Three-nature theory of Yogacara Buddhism, is soteriolog-
ically the only method by which one can argue for a "systematic develop-
ment" in Mahayana thought in India. But in what way or manner did
Professor Nagao reach such an insight? The best presentation of his
thoughts on this matter is found in his own "Introduction" to his book
Chukan to Yuishiki (Madhyamika and Yogacara). Therefore, I shall give an
interpretation of the book's contents.
Professor Nagao begins his introduction by reflecting on his papers
written during the last forty years. He humbly states that it is difficult to
reach the inner alcove of Madhyamika and Yogacara thought. He feels
somewhat pretentious in giving his book the title Miidhyamika and
Yogiiciira for that reason, but in spite of the fact that he may not have the
full capacity to argue for the synthesis between Madhyamika and Yogacara,
he still attempts to complete the task.
While he was a student, Professor Nagao was attracted to the study of
the text, The Awakening of Faith in Mahiiyiina. However, when he tried to
make that study his thesis topic, he quickly realized that such a study would
require competence in the elements of the Vijiianavada school. In haste, he



began to read Sthiramati's Sanskrit text. Tri171sika; this was his first intro-
duction to Yijfianavada thought. This led to the realization that one would
have to go back to Nagarjuna's Madhyamaka system. This was natural and
logical. Professor Nagao's claim is that he has wandered in and out of the
two schools, and he thinks that he will probably continue to do so until he
dies. Therefore he gives the title Chukan to Yuishiki (Madhyamika and
Yogacara) to his book.

In order to pursue his inquiry deeper into these schools of thought Pro-
fessor Nagao knew that a knowledge of Classical Chinese alone was insuf-
ficient. He knew that he would have to go back to the Sanskrit language;
also he saw the need to consult the Tibetan canon. Thus, he began his study
of the Mahayana-sa171graha in 1939 and brought it to a successful comple-
tion by publishing volume one of the work in 1982 and volume two in
1987. These two volumes will certainly become the definitive study of
Asanga's text in the years to come. However, in the interval, from 1939,
Nagao's interest was directed to a study of Lamaism in Mongolia, which
ultimately led him to the study of Tibetan Buddhism. Out of these studies,
he was able to acquire considerable knowledge regarding Madhyamaka phi-
losophy. He did not anticipate much with regard to Yogacara. He then
turned to a study of the Madhyantavibhaga. As a graduate student, he
joined the publication workshop of Sthiramati's Madhyantavibhaga-(ika, an
old manuscript that was deciphered and edited by ProfessorS. Yamaguchi.
Thus, he not only had the chance to study the Madhyantavibhaga exten-
sively but he also had the opportunity to compile the index to the text,
which was appended to the edition. He devoted himself for several years to
the study of the Mahayana-sutrii/aiJ1kara. He then began his research on
Asanga's Mahayana-saiJ1graha and on Tsong-kha-pa's Lam-rim-chen-mo si-
multaneously in 1939. The latter study resulted in a Japanese translation
and analysis of the "Vipasyana" chapter of the Lam-rim-chen-mo in 1954,
and as mentioned above, his former study resulted in a two-volume publi-
cation of Asanga's work. His study of the Mahayana-sutra/aiJ1kara finally
crystalized with the compilation of the Index to the Mahayiina-
sutra/aiJ1kara, part one, Sanskrit-Tibetan-Chinese in 1958 and part two,
Tibetan-Sanskrit and Chinese-Sanskrit in 1961. He began work on decipher-
ing and editing for the first time an old Sanskrit manuscript of Vasuba-
ndhu's M a d h y i i n t a v i b h a g a - b h i i ~ y a brought back from Tibet by the Reverend
Rahula Sankrityayana. which was stored in the K. P Jayaswal Research In-
stitute in Patna, India. He completed and published his edition of the text in

When watching the moves of the players in a game of chess, it is easy
to observe that the players match strength with each other at every move.
Even though one of the players may seem to have an edge on the other.



when a play takes place. the locus of power seems to shift. For Professor
Nagao. his study of the Madhyamika and Yogacara schools gave him the
same challenges. When he devoted himself to Madhyamaka studies, he was
touched by the vast scenery of the world of Enlightenment. When he ab-
sorbed himself in the texts of the Yogacara (i.e., Vijnanavadins), the same
scenery became manifest from a different perspective. One of Professor Na-
gao's mentors was the late ProfessorS. Yamaguchi (1895-1976) who pub-
lished his great work Bukkyo ni okeru U to Mu no Tairon (The Controversy
Between Existence and Non-existence in Buddhism). Upon reading this
book, Professor Nagao was agonized by the question of "existence" and
"non-existence." Which was the correct view-the "non-~xistence" stand
of the Madhyamika or the "existence" stand of the Yogacara? On what do
they take their stand? How was it possible to synthesize the tactful and
polished logic of the two schools that pressed on relentlessly. He felt that
there should be a limit to incapacitation. It seemed reasonable even from a
historical perspective that the Yogacara developed and was systematized by
succeeding and taking a stand on the Madhyamika philosophy of siinyata
(emptiness). If it is possible to synthesize "existence" and "non-
existence," then would it not follow that such a synthesis must have been
already present in its evolution and growth? However, in spite of that, there
does not seem to be an end to the conflict between existence and non-
existence; this held just as true for Bhavaviveka as it did for Dharmapala,
and Candrakirti. On the other hand, however, if there were no controversy,
might that not have been the degeneration of Buddhism? In short, it seemed
to Professor Nagao that the rivalry between the thoroughness of the middle
path, direct perception, and religiosity of the Madhyamika and the system-
atization of the cognition theory. intellect, and praxis of the Yogacara was
not only suggestive of but also disclosed the paradoxical nature of man that
follows him into eternity.
In rereading some of his old manuscripts, Professor Nagao found him-
self feeling great pains of anxiety, especially with regard to those papers he
had written prior to World War I I. The realization that his thinking had not
changed much since times of old and that the same thoughts occurred re-
peatedly in his papers made him feel that little progress had been made.
Still. he reexamined his old papers, improved on their style, updated the
language. modified them slightly. and collected them into his book. As in-
adequate as that process might have seemed, he chose to include those pa-
pers in his book because they contained the theories that were to become
the basis for his later thoughts.
The reexamination disclosed further that his discussions on
Madhyamika was referenced by Yogacara (Vijnanavada) theories. In other
words. he was unable to view the Madhyamika school with the genuineness



with which Candrakirti and Bhavaviveka did. Looking positively at this. he
understood it as his attempt to synthesize the two systems, but he also un-
derstood that this could be a point of criticism by pure Madhyamaka schol-
ars. Almost unawares, he began to see the Mahiiyiina-sutriilaiJlkdra, a text
attributed to Asanga, as a rare and towering religious and academic docu-
ment seldom found in this world. For Professor Nagao, this text, unlike
Yasubandhu's which demonstrated well-developed systematic theories,
seemed to ooze with the flavor of concrete religious experiences. In spite of
its shortcoming (it was not totally systematic), it demonstrated expressions
of penetrating wisdom. If, indeed, the author of this book was Asanga, he
would have to be one who towered high above others and one in whom
practice and wisdom were in accord. Needless to say, Asanga made com-
plete use of Nagarjuna's thoughts on sunyatii even though he may not have
accepted it in its entirety. The text examines the Bodhisattva career,
addresses questions about Buddha-body and Buddha-wisdom, deliberates
on the issue of one-vehicle versus three-vehicles, and even gives glimpses
of the Tathagatagarbha theory that later emerged. It was no wonder
that Professor Nagao's interpretation of the Madhyamika was through
Vijilanavada eyes.

In the present collection, the article "The Silence of the Buddha and
Its Madhyamic Interpretation'' relates particularly to the Madhyamika. The
article "The Logic of Convertibility" examines the fundamentals of the
Yogacara (Vijilanavada) through an understanding of the term pariivrtti
(conversion or turn about); papers written later are considered in the light of
this logic of convertibility. ''What Remains in Sunyata'' argues for sunyatii
on the basis of Yogacara (Vijilanavada) tenets regarding it and therefore it is
different from that of the Madhyamika. It probably raises many questions
among bona fide Madhyamaka scholars, and to that degree it is probable
that something still "remains." The article "On the theory of Buddha-
Body (Buddha-kaya)" resulted from a lecture given by Professor Nagao on
the occasion of his retirement from Kyoto University.
These articles brought to Professor Nagao's attention that the same old
issues-that is, convertibility of the three natures; the "ascent" from a
world of convention and language to a world of higher principles and peace
and "descent" its opposite; the revival of the conventional; and the identity
between "descent" and "ascent" with asraya-paravrtti (turn about of one's
basis) as their mediator-kept storming his mind.
The outcome of the work is presented here as the sixteen articles mak-
ing up the present volume. It should be pointed out, however, that many of
them have appeared previously in various journals and books. Seven arti-
cles, "The Bodhisattva Returns to this World," "Usage and Meanings of
Paril)amana," "Tranquil Flow of Mind: An Interpretation of Upek~a,"



"Buddhist Ontology." "From Madhyamika to Yogacara, An Analysis of
MMK, XXIV. IS and MY, 1.1-2," "Ascent and Descent: Two-Directional
Activity in Buddhist Thought," and "Yogacara-A Reappraisal" do not
appear in Chiikan to Yuishiki (Madhyamika and Yogacara). Some of these
were written after the book appeared and some were newly translated for
this volume. Many of Professor Nagao's articles have appeared in various
books and journals and many of them are now out of print; therefore, they
have been edited and compiled here together with the newly translated and
edited papers. The paper, "Yogacara-A Reappraisal," has been included
in this volume not only because it functions, in a sense, as a comprehensive
concluding chapter for the present volume, but also as it recapitulates and
reveals the ideas presented by Professor Nagao in his various essays in a
very succinct and clear manner. Consequently, rather than write a conclud-
ing chapter to this volume, this last essay has been included to serve that

Chapter 1

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->