## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Microwave Amplifiers

Design of Microwave Transistor Amplifiers Using S Parameters Microwave amplifiers combine active elements with passive transmission line circuits to provide functions critical to microwave systems and instruments. The history of microwave amplifiers begins with electron devices using resonant or slow-wave structures to match wave velocity to electron beam velocity. The design techniques used for BJT and FET amplifiers employ the full range of concepts we have developed in the study of microwave transmission lines, two-port networks and Smith chart presentation. The development of S-parameter matrix concepts grew from the need to characterize active devices and amplifiers in a form that recognized the need for matched termination rather than short- or open-circuit termination. Much of the initial work was performed at the Hewlett-Packard Company in connection with the development of instruments to measure device and amplifier parameters. We'll begin by considering microwave amplifiers that are 1) Small signal so that superposition applies, and 2) Built with microwave bipolar junction or field-effect transistors References The following books and notes are references for this material: Pozar1, D. M., Microwave Engineering Gonzalez2, G., Microwave Transistor Amplifiers Vendelin, Pavio & Rohde3, Microwave Circuit Design Using Linear and Nonlinear Techniques Review of Transmission Lines

Pozar, D., Microwave Engineering, 2nd Edition, J. Wiley, 1998, pg. 600-640 Gonzalez, G., Microwave Transistor Amplifiers, 3 Vendelin, Pavio & Rohde, Microwave Circuit Design Using Linear and Nonlinear Techniques, J. Wiley, 1990 -12

1

© 1994-99 D. B. Leeson

the output reflection coefficient Power Gain G.e. the reflection coefficient of the source s o Zin .For the purpose of characterizing microwave amplifiers. key transmission line concepts are 1) Traveling waves in both directions.Zo Γs = Z + Z . 1 b2 S21 = a for a2 = 0.e.Zo S12S21ΓL Γin = Zin + Zo = S11+ 1-S22ΓL . Definitions of ΓL. the reflection coefficient of the load L o Zs . Γin and Γout: ZL .Zo 3) Reflection coefficient Γ=Z + Z for complex load ZL L o 4) 5) 6) Standing waves resulting from Γ≠0 Transformation of ZL through line of Zo and length ßl Description of Γ and Z on the Smith chart (polar graph of Γ) Review of Scattering Matrix 1) Normalization with respect to a= Zo of wave amplitudes: 2) 3) 4) V+ Vand b = Zo Zo Relationship of bi and ai: bi = Γi ai Expressions for b1 and b2 at reference planes: b1 = S11a1 + S12a2 b2 = S21a1 + S22a2 Definitions of Sii: b1 S11 = a for a2 = 0. forward transmission ratio with Zo load. i. 1 b2 S22 = a for a1 = 0. reverse transmission ratio with Zo source. input Γ for output terminated in Zo.. i. Transducer Gain GT: 5) 6) -2- . Γs.Zo S12S21Γs Γout = Zout + Zo = S22+ 1-S11Γs . the input reflection coefficient Zout . V+ and V2) Characteristic impedance Zo and propagation constant jß ZL . i.. Available Gain GA. i. 2 b1 S21 = a for a1 = 0..Zo ΓL = Z + Z . output Γ for input terminated in Zo.e. 2 lS21l2 = Transducer power gain with Zo source and load..e.

J. 1998.86/99° 2.60/76° 2.03/-57° 0. a manufacturer of a device intended for microwave applications will provide extensive S-parameter data to permit accurate design of microwave amplifiers.03/-62° S22 0. amplifier performance is strongly affected by the so-called parasitic elements associated with the device package.0 4. including base-lead and emitter-lead inductance internal to the package.76/-41° 0. in addition to intrinsic device parameters such as base resistance and collector-base capacitance.. D.72/-68° Power Gain Equations The equations for the various power gain definitions are 4 Pozar.39/54° S12 0.03/-56° 0. or they can be measured directly.0 S11 0. pg.0 5.PL power delivered to the load G = P = power input to the network in Pavout power available from the network GA = P = power available from the source avs PL power delivered to the load GT = P = power available from the source avs Modeling of Microwave Transistors and Packages The S parameters of a given microwave transistor can be derived from transistor equivalent circuit models based on device physics. a step that has proven important on many occasions. An abridged table from Pozar4 typical of S-parameter data (Zo=50Ω) is shown here for a microwave FET: f GHz 3. and characterization over the complete range of interest is necessary. 620 -3- .80/-89° 0. 2nd Edition.72/-116° 0. Similar considerations apply to microwave field-effect transistors. Microwave Engineering. Generally. Wiley. For a bipolar junction transistor.66/-142° S21 2. This can be verified by measurement.73/-54° 0. The magnitude and phase angle of each of the S parameters typically vary with frequency.

lΓLl2 l1 .lΓinl2 l1 .ΓinΓsl2 1 .S11Γsl2 l1 .S22ΓLl2 avs 1 .ΓinΓsl2 l1 .1) PL G=P = in 1 .lΓsl2 1 2 = GA = P 2 lS21l 1 .S22ΓLl2 2) Pavout 1 .lΓ l2 l1 .lΓsl2 and l1 .lΓLl2 1 lS21l2 1 . where Go = lS21l2 Gs = 1 . S12=0 and 1) Γin = S11 if S12=0 (unilateral network) 2) Γout = S22 if S12=0 (unilateral network) The transducer gain GT can be expressed as the product of three gain contributions GT=GsGoGL.S22ΓLl2 GL = -4- .lΓLl2 GT = P = lS21l2 l1 .lΓsl2 1 .S11Γsl avs out PL 1 .ΓoutΓLl2 3) The expressions for Γin and Γout are S12S21ΓL 1) Γin = S11+ 1-S22ΓL S12S21Γs 2) Γout = S22+ 1-S11Γs For a unilateral network.lΓLl2 = lS21l2 l1 .lΓsl2 1 .

the unilateral transducer gain GTU is simplified because GsU = 1 .lΓsl2 . which is equivalent to presenting a negative resistance at the port. so that 1 . oscillations are possible if the magnitude of either the input or output reflection coefficient is greater than unity. We can maximize Gs and GL by setting Γs = S11* and ΓL = S22* so that Gsmax = GLmax = 1 and 1 . The components of GTU can also be expressed in decibel form.lS l2 1 .S11Γsl2 In practice. as it is desirable for devices to be unilateral if possible. where the subscript U indicates unilateral gain.Zo Input Matching Circuit Gs Γs Transistor [S] Go Γ in Γout Γ Output Matching Circuit GL Zo L If the device is unilateral.lS22l2 1 1 2 2 lS21l 1 .lS11l2 1 . Stability In a two-port network. This instability is characterized by -5- . l1 . which will be examined next. or sufficiently so that S12 is small enough to be ignored. if lS11l=1 or lS22l=1. GTUmax is infinite. This raises the question of stability.lS11l 22 GTUmax = Note that. so that GTU (dB) = Gs (dB) + Go (dB) + GL (dB). the difference between GT and GTU is often quite small.

which for a unilateral device implies lS11l > 1 or lS22l > 1. the determinant of the scattering matrix.lS11l2 . The example of input stability circles is shown here. where ∆.lΓinl > 1 or lΓoutl > 1.lS22l2 + l∆l2 > 1 and 2 . that delimit lΓinl = 1 and lΓLl = 1 on the Smith chart. Thus the requirements for stability are S12S21ΓL lΓinl = lS11+ l < 1 and 1-S22ΓL S12S21Γs <1 lΓoutl = lS22+ 1-S11Γs l These are defined by circles. 614 of Pozar or pg. 97 of Gonzalez. called stability circles. The radius and center of the output and input stability circles are derived from the S parameters on pg.lS12S21l l∆l < 1. The concept of instability with varying input or output matching conditions is significant. This same derivation can be accomplished analytically. The use of resistive loading or feedback can compromise the -6- .S12S21 If an amplifier is conditionally stable. is ∆ = S11S22 . The conditions for stability are K= 1 . as we would desire an amplifier to be unconditionally stable under all expected conditions of source and load impedances. it can be rendered unconditionally stable by adding resistance to the input and/or output of the amplifier so that the total loop resistance at the input and output is positive.

The derivation of the radius and center of these circles is found on pg. the noise figure of an amplifier generally varies as RN F = Fmin + G lYs . kT=-174 dBm in 1 Hz bandwidth. where S -7- . 621-626 of Pozar and pp. Constant Gain Circles Because of the form of the unilateral transducer gain. Amplifier noise can also be characterized by an equivalent noise temperature of the source resistance that would provide the same available noise power output. which produces a noise current of in2 = 2qIdcB 3) Partition noise due to recombination in the junction. Three sources of noise in transistor amplifiers are 1) 2) Thermal noise due to random motion of charge carriers due to thermal agitation: Available noise power Pav=kTB.noise performance of an amplifier unless accomplished in connection with an analysis of the amplifier noise figure.Yoptl2. values of the input reflection coefficient Γin that produce constant gain also lie on circles on the Smith chart. Thus F is a measure of the excess noise added by the amplifier. B is the bandwidth. q is the charge of the electron.1)To Because of the interaction of the various noise sources and resistances of a microwave transistor. and the other parameters are elements of the transistor equivalent circuit. The noise figure F of an amplifier is defined as the ratio of the total available noise power at the output of the amplifier to the available noise power at the output that would result only from the thermal noise in the source resistance. 102-105 of Gonzalez. Noise in Amplifiers The lower limit of amplifier signal capability is set by noise. Shot noise due to random flow of carriers across a junction. This equivalent noise temperature is given by Te=(F .αo) B e In these expressions. which 2kT produces a noise current of ip2 = r ' αo(1 .

as derived in Pozar on pg. be derived also from direct measurement of noise figure under conditions of optimum source impedance. A key issue for multi-stage amplifiers is the ability to cascade individually designed stages without a requirement for retuning or redesign to account for the characteristics of the driving or following stages. which direct reflected power to the isolated port rather than the driving stage. which require special treatment in the input matching network if wideband operation is to be achieved. and more emphasis on linearity and intermodulation. A1 where F1 and GA1 are the noise figure and available gain of the first stage. The noise figure of cascaded amplifiers is given by the numerical (not dB) relationship F2 -1 F = F1 + G . the use of balanced amplifiers permits the benefit of 3 dB coupler interstages. and F2 is the noise figure of the second stage. there are special problems of nonlinear oscillations arising from interaction between signal harmonics and modes of the output matching structure. This applies to lossy stages and networks as well. To design a power amplifier. it will come as no surprise that we can find circles of constant noise figure on the Smith chart. Γopt and RN for a given device and frequency. It is unusual for noise figure and gain circles to be concentric. however. of course. special problems associated with the very low input impedance that can be found in bipolar power devices. These parameters can. as well as efficiency and thermal considerations. in power amplifiers more emphasis tends to be on optimizing the output matching network. 629. and Gs is the real part of Ys If instead of admittance we use reflection coefficients. -8- . There are. as maximum gain conditions are not the same as minimum noise figure conditions. As we will see in later lectures. one must use large-signal S-parameters and be aware of nonlinear effects.Ys is the source admittance presented to the transistor Yopt is the optimum source admittance that results in minimum noise figure Fmin is the minimum noise figure RN is the equivalent noise resistance of the transistor. In many cases. Power Amplifiers The design of power amplifiers involves less emphasis on noise parameters. We can generally expect to be provided with Fmin. Where careful design of the input matching network is required to realize the full capabilities of low-noise amplifiers.

Recall that for a short length of transmission line of characteristic impedance Zo and velocity v. 5 Silvester and Benedek. but this will result in common-lead inductance unless the microstrip is quite thin (< 1 mm). or with the equivalent short lengths of transmission line. 511-516. Other methods include mounting the active device in a hole. Let's see how to get a series inductor or shunt capacitor using short sections of transmission line. Aug." IEEE Trans. C per unit length d is C 1 =Z v d o We need to correct for the fringing capacitance. 1972 -9- . which should be subtracted from the capacitance value desired from the transmission line5. Microwave Theory. MTT-20. "Equivalent Capacitances of Microstrip Open Circuits.Impedance Matching with Microstrip Lines Input and output circuit impedance matching can be accomplished with simple lumpedelement networks. pp. where v = c/ εeff For a capacitive line (short open line). Vol. In some cases. plated-through holes are used to carry the ground plane of the microstrip up to the common leads. The required element values can be determined by use of the Smith chart or by calculations using a computer. Bias Bias Zo L C Common Leads L C Zo Incorrect treatment of common lead grounding is a major cause of reduced gain or instability in microwave amplifiers. the inductance L per unit length (same units as v) is given by L Zo d = v . with the common leads soldered to the ground side of the board.

either because of resistive loading or by use of lossy ferrite cores to provide RF isolation. as the arrangements to introduce the biases can disturb the microwave circuit. The cure is to use inductors that are lossy. this can form a resonator for video frequency oscillations. but caution must be exercised not to create a low frequency oscillator circuit in the bias network. which can create a resonator in the MHz region that can support oscillation of the active element. . Examples of bias circuits that are prone to parasitic oscillation are shown here: + + In the circuit on the left. • The use of an inductor with bypass capacitor to isolate dc supply input to the base or gate of the active element. A common cause of trouble is the use of an inductor with a large bypass capacitor. Two examples of circuit configurations that can promote bias oscillations at low frequencies are • The use of an inductor with bypass capacitors on both sides to filter dc supply to earlier stages of an amplifier. These generally result from the use of inductors and capacitors in the bias circuit without regard to resonances or situations where 180° phase shift can occur. The circuit on the right exhibits a resonant circuit that can result in parasitic oscillation. Generally. high impedance microstrip traces can be used as decoupling inductors. Bias-circuit instabilities are a common source of problems in amplifiers and other active circuits.10 - . This is no simple problem. this can have 180° phase shift at a video frequency where the active element has substantially more gain than at microwave frequencies. It is possible to use a wire-wound resistor to accomplish both functions at the same time.Bias Circuits and Bias Circuit Instabilities Once the microwave amplifier is designed. which will have very high gain at lower frequencies. in this case. the potential for 180° phase shift across the inductor can be seen. the small current required for base or gate bias permits the use of resistance in series with the inductor. it remains to provide the dc bias voltages and currents required for the active device.

With the introduction of integrated circuits. . this concept has been superseded. In the past. Resistive or lossy elements are required to guarantee stability in the bias circuit.11 - . emphasis was placed on achieving the minimum number of components for reasons of cost and reliability.It is generally helpful to sketch the low-frequency equivalent circuit to be sure that no instabilities can exist. and active feedback bias circuits are generally used to insure the stability of device operating conditions.

- 201102171627422f589.pdf
- 57205616-Amplifier
- World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
- Sre TX Final
- RFDesign3
- 11245 Fe
- Chapter12 Power Amplifiers
- Common Base Transformer Feedback Norton Amplifiers
- SS0754 A - OPERATE SINCGARS (NON-ICOM) SINGLE CHANNEL MOS 31
- Suparco Test
- A New Planar Marchand Balun
- Elect Second Year
- pub-et_10027(1).pdf
- Questions for AAI
- PAFM600W 4.2
- Transformers
- Index
- 7499834-lesson58 - The Electret Microphone.
- Demo.
- Ntpc Papers
- 5968-0409E+AN_1147+26Jul10
- Iecep Wvc Quiz_2016
- Linear Article
- 05266441
- CD 00000877
- AN4622 Infrared
- sctevt 3rd sem electrical syllabus.pdf
- TA2022.pdf
- Making a Matching Layer for Acoustic Sensors for a Dark Matter Detector
- WAA2890DM

Skip carousel

- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3111.004.08s taught by Eric Vogel (exv061000)
- Design Of High Power Amplifier At 3.4 GHz For Satellite Transponder (IRNSS)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee6326.001.07s taught by Jin Liu (jinliu)
- Brainwave Controlled Robot
- Design of Low Noise Amplifier at 3.4GHz for Ranging Transponder (IRNSS)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ce3311.001.10s taught by Bhaskar Banerjee (bxb073000)
- DCT- SLM Technique for Peak-To-Average Power Ratio Reduction in OFCDM System
- Power Electronics III
- Applied Electronics
- Applied Electronics
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3111.002.09s taught by Gil Lee (gslee)
- WWII Radar & Comm Equipment
- Design and Analysisi of Widw Swing Folded-Cascode OTA
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee6326.501 06f taught by Jin Liu (jinliu)
- Housing Works, Inc. v. Bernard Kerik, Commissioner of the New York City Police Department and the City of New York, 283 F.3d 471, 2d Cir. (2002)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3111.5u2.08u taught by Balkan Kecicioglu (bxk022000)
- Detrola Radio & Television Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., 313 U.S. 259 (1941)
- Approach of Thought Control using Electro-Oculogram signal for different Eyeball positions
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3311.501.10f taught by Bhaskar Banerjee (bxb073000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3311.501.10s taught by Ricardo Saad (rsaad)
- Standard Coil Products Co., Inc. v. General Electric Company, 306 F.2d 319, 2d Cir. (1962)
- Design & Analysis of CMOS Telescopic Operational Transconductance Amplifier (OTA) with its Process Parameters
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ce3111.002.09s taught by Gil Lee (gslee)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3111.501.07s taught by Gil Lee (gslee)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3111.501.07f taught by Randall Lehmann (rel041000)
- Gain Analysis of Fiber Raman Amplifier at 870nm band.
- Design of Low Power, High Speed 3-Bit Pipelined ADC
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee3111.004.09s taught by Gil Lee (gslee)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee6326.501 05f taught by Jin Liu (jinliu)
- Comparative Analysis of PAPR Reduction Techniques in OFDM Using Precoding Techniques

- Design of Cmos Lc Voltage Controlled Oscillators
- Crystal Oscillator Circuits Robert j Matthys
- Thinking About Money
- 13843518 Higher Order Thinking Skills
- 120581270 Higher Order Thinking Skills
- CMOS OTA-C High-Frequency Sinusoidal Oscillators
- Thinking About Independence
- 90443067-Bridge
- Crystal Oscillator Circuits
- 42902486 What Constitutes Biological Life
- 90723852 Inquiry and Technology EDCI 323 OL1 Course Syllabus
- Thinking About Recognition
- Crystal Oscillator Design (MW Journal)
- Crystal Oscillator 2
- CMOS Analogue Switches Structure and Specifications
- Thinking About Timing
- Guide for Phds
- 104428247-“Questions-and-questioning-techniques-influence-pupils’-achievement-attitudes-and-thinking-skills-”
- CoRT-Thinking-Lessons, Edward de Bono
- Thinking About Size
- Future of the Future
- HFE0110 Spisak
- EdwardDeBono New Thinking
- HFE0710 Salleh Part2
- Thinking Big 2
- Thinking About Happiness
- Thinking About Internet
- Thinking About Aspirations
- Digitally Controlled Oscillator System
- CoRT-Thinking-Lessons, E. de Bono

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading