Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Appendices
03 3
6. DESCENT
Method of Use.
1. Enter graph with OAT at cruise altitude and move vertically to cruise altitude.
2. From there move horizontally to fuel, time and distance lines.
3. Move vertically down respectively from each and read values for fuel (gallons), time (minutes)
and distance (nautical miles).
4. Repeat 1,2 and 3 for altitude of airfield.
5. Subtract results of 4 from 3 and derive fuel, time and distance for descent profile.
033-3318 A
CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY DATA SHEET
FUEL PLANNING MRJT 1
0.78 MACH CRUISE
The table below provides fuel flow Information necessary for planning holding reserve fuel requirements.
Chart is based on racetrack pattern at minimum drag airspeed - minimum speed 210KIAS.
For holding in straight and level reduce table values by 5%
Figure 4.4
FLAPS UP
Figure 4.4
FLAPS UP
Tables are provided for a range of temperature deviations from ISA -15°C to ISA +25°C
Fuel and time given in these tables are from brake release and distance from 1500 ft. with a climb
airspeed schedule 280 KIAS/0.74 Mach. The stated TAS is the average for the climb and should be used
to correct the still air distance shown.
5. ENDURANCE PROFILE
The graph at Figure 2.5 (page 1) provides a rapid method for determination of endurance for the sample
aeroplane. An example is shown on the graph.
16,000
Figure 4.4
FLAPS UP
Structural Limits: -
Maximum Taxi (Ramp) Mass 63060 Kg.
Maximum Take Off Mass 62800 Kg.
Maximum Landing Mass 54900 Kg.
Maximum Zero Fuel Mass 51300 Kg.
Maximum Fuel Load 5311 U.S. Gallons
16145 Kg. (@ 3.04 Kg./Gal.)
1.2 Constants
Fuel Density (unless otherwise notified)
3.04 Kg./US Gallon
6.7 Ibs AIS Gallon
2. OPTIMUM ALTITUDES
Actual T/O-Fuel
Taxi FUEL 200
033-9564 A
CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY DATA SHEET
FUEL PLANNING MRJT 1
Figure 4.5.1 EN - ROUTE CLIMB 280/.74 ISA +6° C TO +15° C
NOTE - OPTIMUM WEIGHT FOR PRESSURE ALTITUDE IS 58200 KG
THRUST LIMITED WEIGHT FOR ISA + 10 AND COLDER EXCEEDS STRUCTURAL LIMIT
THRUST LIMITED WEIGHT FOR ISA EXCEEDS
+ 15 STREXCEEDS STRUCTURAL LIMIT
THRUST LIMITED WEIGHT FOR ISA + 20 IS66400 KG
ADJUSTMENTS FOR OPERATION AT NON-STANDARD TEMPERATURES-
033-9572 A
The table below provides fuel flow Information necessary for planning holding reserve fuel requirements.
Chart is based on racetrack pattern at minimum drag airspeed - minimum speed 210KIAS.
For holding in straight and level reduce table values by 5%
Figure 4.4
FLAPS UP
The table below provides fuel flow Information necessary for planning holding reserve fuel requirements.
Chart is based on racetrack pattern at minimum drag airspeed - minimum speed 210KIAS.
For holding in straight and level reduce table values by 5%
Figure 4.4
FLAPS UP
The table below provides fuel flow Information necessary for planning holding reserve fuel requirements.
Chart is based on racetrack pattern at minimum drag airspeed - minimum speed 210KIAS.
For holding in straight and level reduce table values by 5%
Figure 4.4
FLAPS UP
5.4 Descent
These tables (Fig. 4.5.4) provide tabulations of time, fuel and distance for "flight idle" thrust at 0.74
mach/250 KIAS (economy) and 0.70 Mach/280 KIAS (turbulence penetration)
Allowances are made for a straight in approach with gear down.
Figure 4.5.4 Descent
.74M/250 KIAS
.70M/280/250 KIAS
BASED ON IDLE THRUST.
5.4 Descent
These tables (Fig. 4.5.4) provide tabulations of time, fuel and distance for "flight idle" thrust at 0.74
mach/250 KIAS (economy) and 0.70 Mach/280 KIAS (turbulence penetration)
Allowances are made for a straight in approach with gear down.
Figure 4.5.4 Descent
.74M/250 KIAS
.70M/280/250 KIAS
5.4 Descent
These tables (Fig. 4.5.4) provide tabulations of time, fuel and distance for "flight idle" thrust at 0.74
mach/250 KIAS (economy) and 0.70 Mach/280 KIAS (turbulence penetration)
Allowances are made for a straight in approach with gear down.
Figure 4.5.4 Descent
.74M/250 KIAS
.70M/280/250 KIAS
4. RANGE PROFILE
The graph at Figure 2.4 (page 9) provides a simple and rapid means of determining the still air range
(nautical air miles) for the sample aeroplane. An example of the use of the graph is shown.
Note that the figures make allowance for the taxi, run-up and 45 minutes reserve fuel.
Figure 2. 4 RANGE
Press.
IOAT
Man. Fuel
Air Speed
Alt. Press. Flow
Feet °C °F IN. HG PPH GPH KIAS KTAS
ISA - 20° C 0 -3 26 25.0 63.8 10.6 148 140
(ISA - 36° F) 2000 -7 19 25.0 66.4 11.1 149 145
4000 -11 12 25.0 68.9 11.5 149 150
6000 -15 5 24.3 68.3 11.4 147 152
8000 -19 -2 22.5 63.9 10.7 139 148
10,000 -23 -9 20.8 60.1 10.0 132 144
12,000 -27 -17 19.3 56.7 9.5 123 139
14,000 -31 -24 17.9 54.5 9.1 113 132
16.000 -35 -32 16.5 52.2 8.7 95 114
Standard Day 0 17 62 25.0 61.9 10.3 143 140
(ISA) 2000 13 55 25.0 64.2 11.7 143 145
4000 9 48 25.0 66.6 11.1 144 150
6000 5 41 24.3 66.1 11.0 141 152
8000 1 34 22.5 61.9 10.3 134 148
10,000 -3 27 20.8 58.5 9.8 126 143
12,000 -7 19 19.3 55.6 9.3 116 136
14,000 -11 12 17.9 53.5 8.9 103 125
16.000 - - - - - - -
NOTES: 1. Full throttle manifold pressure settings are approximate.
2. Shaded area represents operation with full throttle.
3. Fuel flows are to be used for flight planning only and will vary from aeroplane
TABLE 2.2.3
Standard Day 0 17 62 23.0 65.4 10.9 147 145
(ISA) 2000 13 56 23.0 67.4 11.2 147 149
4000 9 49 23.0 69.4 11.6 148 154
6000 5 42 23.0 71.7 12.0 148 159
8000 2 35 22.4 71.1 11.9 145 160
10,000 -3 27 20.7 66.2 11.0 137 157
12,000 -7 20 19.2 61.8 10.3 129 152
14,000 -11 13 17.8 58.5 9.8 120 146
16.000 -15 5 16.4 55.3 9.2 109 137
INTRODUCTION
The following flight planning tables allow the planner to determine trip fuel consumption and trip time
required to cover a given air distance.
These tables are established for:
- Takeoff
- Climb profile : 250kt/300kt/M.80
- Cruise mach number: M.80, M.82, M.84, LR
- Descent profile: Cruise Mach number/300kt/250kt
- Approach and landing : 240 kg - 6 minute IFR
-ISA
- CG = 37 %
- Normal air conditioning
-Anti ice OFF
Note:
1. In the tables, the asterisk (*} means that a step climb of 4000 feet must be flown to reach
the corresponding FL.
2. To obtain a flight plan at optimum cruise level, the highest flight level desired within the flight
has to be selected in the table.
3. For each degree Celsius above ISA temperature apply fuel correction 0.010 (kg/°C/NM) x
ISA(°C) x Air Distance (NM).
The fuel consumption must be corrected when the actual landing weight is different from the reference
landing weight
If it is lover (or greater) man the reference landing weight subtract (or add) the value given in the
correction part of the table per 1000 kg below (or above) the reference landing weight.
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
FLIGHT PLANNING SEQ A
GROUND DISTANCE/AIR DISTANCE
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
FLIGHT PLANNING
SEQ A
QUICK DERTERMINATION OF F-PLN
The following flight planning tables allow the planner to determine trip fuel consumption and trip time
required to cover a given air distance.
These tables are established for:
- Takeoff
- Climb profile : 250kt/300kt/M.80
- Cruise mach number: M.80, M.82, M.84, LR
- Descent profile: Cruise Mach number/300kt/250kt
- Approach and landing : 240 kg - 6 minute IFR
-ISA
- CG = 37 %
- Normal air conditioning
-Anti ice OFF
Note:
1. In the tables, the asterisk (*} means that a step climb of 4000 feet must be flown to reach the
corresponding FL.
2. To obtain a flight plan at optimum cruise level, the highest flight level desired within the flight
has to be selected in the table.
3. For each degree Celsius above ISA temperature apply fuel correction 0.010 (kg/°C/NM) x
ISA(°C) x Air Distance (NM).
The fuel consumption must be corrected when the actual landing weight is different from the reference
landing weight
If it is lover (or greater) man the reference landing weight subtract (or add) the value given in the
correction part of the table per 1000 kg below (or above) the reference landing weight.
FLIGHT PLANNING
SEQ A
GROUND DISTANCE/AIR DISTANCE
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
FLIGHT PLANNING
SEQ A
QUICK DERTERMINATION OF F-PLN
List of TAFs
TAF EDDF ISSUED AT 042200
EDDF 0524 VRE03KT CAVOK
BECMG 0609 20005KT 9999 SCT030 BKN045 =
INTRODUCTION
The following flight planning tables allow the planner to determine trip fuel consumption and trip time
required to cover a given air distance.
These tables are established for:
- Takeoff
- Climb profile : 250kt/300kt/M.80
- Cruise mach number: M.80, M.82, M.84, LR
- Descent profile: Cruise Mach number/300kt/250kt
- Approach and landing : 240 kg - 6 minute IFR
- ISA
- CG = 37 %
- Normal air conditioning
- Anti ice OFF
Note:
1. In the tables, the asterisk (*} means that a step climb of 4000 feet must be flown to reach the
corresponding FL.
2. To obtain a flight plan at optimum cruise level, the highest flight level desired within the flight
has to be selected in the table.
3. For each degree Celsius above ISA temperature apply fuel correction 0.010 (kg/°C/NM) x
ISA(°C) x Air Distance (NM).
The fuel consumption must be corrected when the actual landing weight is different from the reference
landing weight
If it is lover (or greater) man the reference landing weight subtract (or add) the value given in the
correction part of the table per 1000 kg below (or above) the reference landing weight.
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
GROUND DISTANCE/AIR DISTANCE
GENERAL
Fuel tanking graphs allow to determine the Optimum fuel quantity to be tanked as a function of the fuel
price ratio between departure and destination airports. The following pages present for one flight level
per page the Optimum aircraft takeoff weight depending on the fuel price ratio (departure fuel price
divided by destination fuel price) and on the air distance to fly.
The computed optimum takeoff weight is based on the additional fuel consumption needed for the
transport of the extra (tanked) fuel and it is the weight at which the maximum profit can be achieved. The
quantity of extra fuel that can be loaded is calculated as the difference between the Optimum takeoff
weight (including extra fuel) and the planned takeoff weight {without fuel tanking).
The graphs are established for:
- FL 290, 310, 330, 350, 370, 390
- Air distances from 500 to 5000 NM
- Flight profile :
Climb 250kt/300kt/M.80
Cruise M.80
Descent M.80/300kt/250kt
Note:
1. ff necessary, step climbs are performed to reach the indicated flight levels.
2. The crew/operator has to verify that the found aircraft weight complies with basic aircraft
limitations (e.g. max fuel capacity) as well as with mission dependent restrictions (e.g. MLW at
destination).
EXAMPLES
1. Fuel price ratio = 0.930
Cruising Altitude = FL310
Planned TOW = 200 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 2500 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 187 000 kg, which is lower than the
planned takeoff weight d no fuel tanking recommended.
2. fuel price ratio = 0.890
Cruising Altitude = FL 350
Planned TOW = 190 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 3250 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 198 000 kg, which is 8 000 kg higher than
the planned takeoff weight d optimum quantity of extra fuel is 8 000 kg.
Check :
a) new TOW less or equal MTOW from departure airport.
b) total fuel to be loaded less or equal maximum fuel capacity.
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
JAR - FCL
FLIGHT PLANNING
FUEL TANKING
033-11208 A
033-11209 A
GENERAL
Fuel tanking graphs allow to determine the Optimum fuel quantity to be tanked as a function of the fuel
price ratio between departure and destination airports. The following pages present for one flight level
per page the Optimum aircraft takeoff weight depending on the fuel price ratio (departure fuel price
divided by destination fuel price) and on the air distance to fly.
The computed optimum takeoff weight is based on the additional fuel consumption needed for the
transport of the extra (tanked) fuel and it is the weight at which the maximum profit can be achieved. The
quantity of extra fuel that can be loaded is calculated as the difference between the Optimum takeoff
weight (including extra fuel) and the planned takeoff weight {without fuel tanking).
The graphs are established for:
- FL 290, 310, 330, 350, 370, 390
- Air distances from 500 to 5000 NM
- Flight profile :
Climb 250kt/300kt/M.80
Cruise M.80
Descent M.80/300kt/250kt
Note:
1. ff necessary, step climbs are performed to reach the indicated flight levels.
2. The crew/operator has to verify that the found aircraft weight complies with basic aircraft
limitations (e.g. max fuel capacity) as well as with mission dependent restrictions (e.g. MLW at
destination).
EXAMPLES
1. Fuel price ratio = 0.930
Cruising Altitude = FL310
Planned TOW = 200 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 2500 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 187 000 kg, which is lower than the
planned take off weight d no fuel tanking recommended.
2. fuel price ratio = 0.890
Cruising Altitude = FL 350
Planned TOW = 190 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 3250 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 198 000 kg, which is 8 000 kg higher than
the planned takeoff weight optimum quantity of extra fuel is 8 000 kg.
Check :
a) new TOW less or equal MTOW from departure airport.
b) total fuel to be loaded less or equal maximum fuel capacity.
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
JAR - FCL
FLIGHT PLANNING
FUEL TANKING
FUEL TANKING
GENERAL
Fuel tanking graphs allow to determine the Optimum fuel quantity to be tanked as a function of the fuel
price ratio between departure and destination airports. The following pages present for one flight level
per page the Optimum aircraft takeoff weight depending on the fuel price ratio (departure fuel price
divided by destination fuel price) and on the air distance to fly.
The computed optimum takeoff weight is based on the additional fuel consumption needed for the
transport of the extra (tanked) fuel and it is the weight at which the maximum profit can be achieved. The
quantity of extra fuel that can be loaded is calculated as the difference between the Optimum takeoff
weight (including extra fuel) and the planned takeoff weight {without fuel tanking).
EXAMPLES
1. Fuel price ratio = 0.930
Cruising Altitude = FL310
Planned TOW = 200 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 2500 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 187 000 kg, which is lower than the
planned takeoff weight d no fuel tanking recommended.
2. fuel price ratio = 0.890
Cruising Altitude = FL 350
Planned TOW = 190 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 3250 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 198 000 kg, which is 8 000 kg higher than
the planned takeoff weight d optimum quantity of extra fuel is 8 000 kg.
Check :
a) new TOW less or equal MTOW from departure airport.
b) total fuel to be loaded less or equal maximum fuel capacity.
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
JAR - FCL
FLIGHT PLANNING
FUEL TANKING
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
QUICK DETERMINATION OF FLIGHT PLAN
INTRODUCTION
The following flight planning tables allow the planner to determine trip fuel consumption and trip time
required to cover a given air distance.
These tables are established for:
- Takeoff
- Climb profile : 250kt/300kt/M.80
- Cruise mach number: M.80, M.82, M.84, LR
- Descent profile: Cruise Mach number/300kt/250kt
- Approach and landing : 240 kg - 6 minute IFR
- ISA
- CG = 37 %
- Normal air conditioning
- Anti ice OFF
Note:
1. In the tables, the asterisk (*} means that a step climb of 4000 feet must be flown to reach the
corresponding FL.
2. To obtain a flight plan at optimum cruise level, the highest flight level desired within the flight
has to be selected in the table.
3. For each degree Celsius above ISA temperature apply fuel correction 0.010 (kg/°C/NM) x ∆
ISA(°C) x Air Distance (NM).
The fuel consumption must be corrected when the actual landing weight is different from the reference
landing weight
If it is lover (or greater) man the reference landing weight subtract (or add) the value given in the
correction part of the table per 1000 kg below (or above) the reference landing weight.
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL QUICK DETERMINATION OF FLIGHT PLAN
INTRODUCTION
The following flight planning tables allow the planner to determine trip fuel consumption and trip time
required to cover a given air distance.
These tables are established for:
- Takeoff
- Climb profile : 250kt/300kt/M.80
- Cruise mach number: M.80, M.82, M.84, LR
- Descent profile: Cruise Mach number/300kt/250kt
- Approach and landing : 240 kg - 6 minute IFR
- ISA
- CG = 37 %
- Normal air conditioning
- Anti ice OFF
Note:
1. In the tables, the asterisk (*} means that a step climb of 4000 feet must be flown to reach the
corresponding FL.
2. To obtain a flight plan at optimum cruise level, the highest flight level desired within the flight
has to be selected in the table.
3. For each degree Celsius above ISA temperature apply fuel correction 0.010 (kg/°C/NM) x ∆
ISA(°C) x Air Distance (NM).
The fuel consumption must be corrected when the actual landing weight is different from the reference
landing weight
If it is lover (or greater) man the reference landing weight subtract (or add) the value given in the
correction part of the table per 1000 kg below (or above) the reference landing weight.
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
QUICK DETERMINATION OF FLIGHT PLAN
INTRODUCTION
The following flight planning tables allow the planner to determine trip fuel consumption and trip time
required to cover a given air distance.
These tables are established for:
- Takeoff
- Climb profile : 250kt/300kt/M.80
- Cruise mach number: M.80, M.82, M.84, LR
- Descent profile: Cruise Mach number/300kt/250kt
- Approach and landing : 240 kg - 6 minute IFR
- ISA
- CG = 37 %
- Normal air conditioning
- Anti ice OFF
Note:
1. In the tables, the asterisk (*} means that a step climb of 4000 feet must be flown to reach the
corresponding FL.
2. To obtain a flight plan at optimum cruise level, the highest flight level desired within the flight
has to be selected in the table.
3. For each degree Celsius above ISA temperature apply fuel correction 0.010 (kg/°C/NM) x ∆
ISA(°C) x Air Distance (NM).
The fuel consumption must be corrected when the actual landing weight is different from the reference
landing weight
If it is lover (or greater) man the reference landing weight subtract (or add) the value given in the
correction part of the table per 1000 kg below (or above) the reference landing weight.
The following flight planning tables allow the planner to determine trip fuel consumption and trip time
required to cover a given air distance.
These tables are established for:
- Takeoff
- Climb profile : 250kt/300kt/M.80
- Cruise mach number: M.80, M.82, M.84, LR
- Descent profile: Cruise Mach number/300kt/250kt
- Approach and landing : 240 kg - 6 minute IFR
- ISA
- CG = 37 %
- Normal air conditioning
- Anti ice OFF
Note:
4. In the tables, the asterisk (*} means that a step climb of 4000 feet must be flown to reach the
corresponding FL.
5. To obtain a flight plan at optimum cruise level, the highest flight level desired within the flight
has to be selected in the table.
6. For each degree Celsius above ISA temperature apply fuel correction 0.010 (kg/°C/NM) x ∆
ISA(°C) x Air Distance (NM).
The fuel consumption must be corrected when the actual landing weight is different from the reference
landing weight
If it is lover (or greater) man the reference landing weight subtract (or add) the value given in the
correction part of the table per 1000 kg below (or above) the reference landing weight.
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
CLIMB CORRECTION
The planner must correct the values for the fuel and the time obtained from the integrated cruise tables
with the numbers given in the following tables. The tables which are established for M.80, M.82, M.84
and long range speed take into account climbing from the brake release point at 250KT/300KT/M.80.
CLIMB TO OPTIMUM FL
When the flight includes one or more step climbs (2000 feet below FL290, 4000 feet above), apply a
correction of 160 kg per step climb to the fuel consumption.
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
DESCENT CORRECTION
Correct the fuel and the time values determined in the integrated cruise tables as follows to take into
account the descent down to 1500 feet followed by 6 min IFR approach and landing.
The planner must correct the values for the fuel and the time obtained from the integrated cruise tables
with the numbers given in the following tables. The tables which are established for M.80, M.82, M.84
and long range speed take into account climbing from the brake release point at 250KT/300KT/M.80.
LONG RANGE SPEED
CLIMB TO OPTIMUM FL
When the flight includes one or more step climbs (2000 feet below FL290, 4000 feet above), apply a
correction of 160 kg per step climb to the fuel consumption.
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
DESCENT CORRECTION
Correct the fuel and the time values determined in the integrated cruise tables äs follows to take into
account the descent down to 1500 feet followed by 6 min IFR approach and landing.
FLIGHT PLA
JAR - FCL
CRUISE LEVEL
FLIGHT PL
JAR - FCL
CRUISE LEVEL
FLIGHT PLA
JAR - FCL
CRUISE LEVEL
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
JAR - FCL FLIGHT PLANNING
GROUND DISTANCE/AIR DISTANCE
GENERAL
Fuel tanking graphs allow to determine the Optimum fuel quantity to be tanked as a function of the fuel
price ratio between departure and destination airports. The following pages present for one flight level
per page the Optimum aircraft takeoff weight depending on the fuel price ratio (departure fuel price
divided by destination fuel price) and on the air distance to fly.
The computed optimum takeoff weight is based on the additional fuel consumption needed for the
transport of the extra (tanked) fuel and it is the weight at which the maximum profit can be achieved. The
quantity of extra fuel that can be loaded is calculated as the difference between the Optimum takeoff
weight (including extra fuel) and the planned takeoff weight {without fuel tanking).
The graphs are established for:
- FL 290, 310, 330, 350, 370, 390
- Air distances from 500 to 5000 NM
- Flight profile :
Climb 250kt/300kt/M.80
Cruise M.80
Descent M.80/300kt/250kt
Note:
1. ff necessary, step climbs are performed to reach the indicated flight levels.
2. The crew/operator has to verify that the found aircraft weight complies with basic aircraft
limitations (e.g. max fuel capacity) as well as with mission dependent restrictions (e.g. MLW at
destination).
EXAMPLES
1. Fuel price ratio = 0.930
Cruising Altitude = FL310
Planned TOW = 200 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 2500 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 187 000 kg, which is lower than the
planned takeoff weight d no fuel tanking recommended.
2. fuel price ratio = 0.890
Cruising Altitude = FL 350
Planned TOW = 190 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 3250 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 198 000 kg, which is 8 000 kg higher than
the planned takeoff weight d optimum quantity of extra fuel is 8 000 kg.
Check :
a) new TOW less or equal MTOW from departure airport.
b) total fuel to be loaded less or equal maximum fuel capacity.
c) MLW at destination
GENERAL
Fuel tanking graphs allow to determine the Optimum fuel quantity to be tanked as a function of the fuel
price ratio between departure and destination airports. The following pages present for one flight level
per page the Optimum aircraft takeoff weight depending on the fuel price ratio (departure fuel price
divided by destination fuel price) and on the air distance to fly.
The computed optimum takeoff weight is based on the additional fuel consumption needed for the
transport of the extra (tanked) fuel and it is the weight at which the maximum profit can be achieved. The
quantity of extra fuel that can be loaded is calculated as the difference between the Optimum takeoff
weight (including extra fuel) and the planned takeoff weight {without fuel tanking).
The graphs are established for:
- FL 290, 310, 330, 350, 370, 390
- Air distances from 500 to 5000 NM
- Flight profile :
Climb 250kt/300kt/M.80
Cruise M.80
Descent M.80/300kt/250kt
Note:
3. ff necessary, step climbs are performed to reach the indicated flight levels.
4. The crew/operator has to verify that the found aircraft weight complies with basic aircraft
limitations (e.g. max fuel capacity) as well as with mission dependent restrictions (e.g. MLW at
destination).
EXAMPLES
1. Fuel price ratio = 0.930
Cruising Altitude = FL310
Planned TOW = 200 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 2500 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 187 000 kg, which is lower than the
planned takeoff weight d no fuel tanking recommended.
2. fuel price ratio = 0.890
Cruising Altitude = FL 350
Planned TOW = 190 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 3250 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 198 000 kg, which is 8 000 kg higher than
the planned takeoff weight d optimum quantity of extra fuel is 8 000 kg.
Check :
a) new TOW less or equal MTOW from departure airport.
b) total fuel to be loaded less or equal maximum fuel capacity.
c) MLW at destination
GENERAL
Fuel tanking graphs allow to determine the Optimum fuel quantity to be tanked as a function of the fuel
price ratio between departure and destination airports. The following pages present for one flight level
per page the Optimum aircraft takeoff weight depending on the fuel price ratio (departure fuel price
divided by destination fuel price) and on the air distance to fly.
The computed optimum takeoff weight is based on the additional fuel consumption needed for the
transport of the extra (tanked) fuel and it is the weight at which the maximum profit can be achieved. The
quantity of extra fuel that can be loaded is calculated as the difference between the Optimum takeoff
weight (including extra fuel) and the planned takeoff weight {without fuel tanking).
The graphs are established for:
- FL 290, 310, 330, 350, 370, 390
- Air distances from 500 to 5000 NM
- Flight profile :
Climb 250kt/300kt/M.80
Cruise M.80
Descent M.80/300kt/250kt
Note:
5. ff necessary, step climbs are performed to reach the indicated flight levels.
6. The crew/operator has to verify that the found aircraft weight complies with basic aircraft
limitations (e.g. max fuel capacity) as well as with mission dependent restrictions (e.g. MLW at
destination).
EXAMPLES
1. Fuel price ratio = 0.930
Cruising Altitude = FL310
Planned TOW = 200 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 2500 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 187 000 kg, which is lower than the
planned takeoff weight d no fuel tanking recommended.
2. fuel price ratio = 0.890
Cruising Altitude = FL 350
Planned TOW = 190 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 3250 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 198 000 kg, which is 8 000 kg higher than
the planned takeoff weight d optimum quantity of extra fuel is 8 000 kg.
Check :
a) new TOW less or equal MTOW from departure airport.
b) total fuel to be loaded less or equal maximum fuel capacity.
c) MLW at destination
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
GENERAL
Fuel tanking graphs allow to determine the Optimum fuel quantity to be tanked as a function of the fuel
price ratio between departure and destination airports. The following pages present for one flight level
per page the Optimum aircraft takeoff weight depending on the fuel price ratio (departure fuel price
divided by destination fuel price) and on the air distance to fly.
The computed optimum takeoff weight is based on the additional fuel consumption needed for the
transport of the extra (tanked) fuel and it is the weight at which the maximum profit can be achieved. The
quantity of extra fuel that can be loaded is calculated as the difference between the Optimum takeoff
weight (including extra fuel) and the planned takeoff weight {without fuel tanking).
The graphs are established for:
- FL 290, 310, 330, 350, 370, 390
- Air distances from 500 to 5000 NM
- Flight profile :
Climb 250kt/300kt/M.80
Cruise M.80
Descent M.80/300kt/250kt
Note:
7. ff necessary, step climbs are performed to reach the indicated flight levels.
8. The crew/operator has to verify that the found aircraft weight complies with basic aircraft
limitations (e.g. max fuel capacity) as well as with mission dependent restrictions (e.g. MLW at
destination).
EXAMPLES
1. Fuel price ratio = 0.930
Cruising Altitude = FL310
Planned TOW = 200 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 2500 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 187 000 kg, which is lower than the
planned takeoff weight d no fuel tanking recommended.
2. fuel price ratio = 0.890
Cruising Altitude = FL 350
Planned TOW = 190 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 3250 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 198 000 kg, which is 8 000 kg higher than
the planned takeoff weight d optimum quantity of extra fuel is 8 000 kg.
Check :
a) new TOW less or equal MTOW from departure airport.
b) total fuel to be loaded less or equal maximum fuel capacity.
c) MLW at destination
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
GENERAL
Fuel tanking graphs allow to determine the Optimum fuel quantity to be tanked as a function of the fuel
price ratio between departure and destination airports. The following pages present for one flight level
per page the Optimum aircraft takeoff weight depending on the fuel price ratio (departure fuel price
divided by destination fuel price) and on the air distance to fly.
The computed optimum takeoff weight is based on the additional fuel consumption needed for the
transport of the extra (tanked) fuel and it is the weight at which the maximum profit can be achieved. The
quantity of extra fuel that can be loaded is calculated as the difference between the Optimum takeoff
weight (including extra fuel) and the planned takeoff weight {without fuel tanking).
The graphs are established for:
- FL 290, 310, 330, 350, 370, 390
- Air distances from 500 to 5000 NM
- Flight profile :
Climb 250kt/300kt/M.80
Cruise M.80
Descent M.80/300kt/250kt
Note:
9. ff necessary, step climbs are performed to reach the indicated flight levels.
10. The crew/operator has to verify that the found aircraft weight complies with basic aircraft
limitations (e.g. max fuel capacity) as well as with mission dependent restrictions (e.g. MLW at
destination).
EXAMPLES
1. Fuel price ratio = 0.930
Cruising Altitude = FL310
Planned TOW = 200 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 2500 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 187 000 kg, which is lower than the
planned takeoff weight d no fuel tanking recommended.
2. fuel price ratio = 0.890
Cruising Altitude = FL 350
Planned TOW = 190 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 3250 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 198 000 kg, which is 8 000 kg higher than
the planned takeoff weight d optimum quantity of extra fuel is 8 000 kg.
Check :
a) new TOW less or equal MTOW from departure airport.
b) total fuel to be loaded less or equal maximum fuel capacity.
c) MLW at destination
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
CLIMB CORRECTION
The planner must correct the values for the fuel and the time obtained from the integrated cruise tables
with the numbers given in the following tables. The tables which are established for M.80, M.82, M.84
and long range speed take into account climbing from the brake release point at 250KT/300KT/M.80.
CLIMB TO OPTIMUM FL
When the flight includes one or more step climbs (2000 feet below FL290, 4000 feet above), apply a
correction of 160 kg per step climb to the fuel consumption.
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
DESCENT CORRECTION
Correct the fuel and the time values determined in the integrated cruise tables äs follows to take into
account the descent down to 1500 feet followed by 6 min IFR approach and landing.
CLIMB CORRECTION
The planner must correct the values for the fuel and the time obtained from the integrated cruise tables
with the numbers given in the following tables. The tables which are established for M.80, M.82, M.84
and long range speed take into account climbing from the brake release point at 250KT/300KT/M.80.
CLIMB TO OPTIMUM FL
When the flight includes one or more step climbs (2000 feet below FL290, 4000 feet above), apply a
correction of 160 kg per step climb to the fuel consumption.
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
DESCENT CORRECTION
Correct the fuel and the time values determined in the integrated cruise tables äs follows to take into
account the descent down to 1500 feet followed by 6 min IFR approach and landing.
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
CLIMB CORRECTION
The planner must correct the values for the fuel and the time obtained from the integrated cruise tables
with the numbers given in the following tables. The tables which are established for M.80, M.82, M.84
and long range speed take into account climbing from the brake release point at 250KT/300KT/M.80.
CLIMB TO OPTIMUM FL
When the flight includes one or more step climbs (2000 feet below FL290, 4000 feet above), apply a
correction of 160 kg per step climb to the fuel consumption.
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
DESCENT CORRECTION
Correct the fuel and the time values determined in the integrated cruise tables äs follows to take into
account the descent down to 1500 feet followed by 6 min IFR approach and landing.
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
CLIMB CORRECTION
The planner must correct the values for the fuel and the time obtained from the integrated cruise tables
with the numbers given in the following tables. The tables which are established for M.80, M.82, M.84
and long range speed take into account climbing from the brake release point at 250KT/300KT/M.80.
CLIMB TO OPTIMUM FL
When the flight includes one or more step climbs (2000 feet below FL290, 4000 feet above), apply a
correction of 160 kg per step climb to the fuel consumption.
FLIGHT PLANNING
JAR - FCL
INTEGRATED CRUISE
DESCENT CORRECTION
Correct the fuel and the time values determined in the integrated cruise tables as follows to take into
account the descent down to 1500 feet followed by 6 min IFR approach and landing.
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
JAR - FCL
FLIGHT PLANNING
FUEL TANKING
FUEL TANKING
GENERAL
Fuel tanking graphs allow to determine the Optimum fuel quantity to be tanked as a function of the fuel
price ratio between departure and destination airports. The following pages present for one flight level
per page the Optimum aircraft takeoff weight depending on the fuel price ratio (departure fuel price
divided by destination fuel price) and on the air distance to fly.
The computed optimum takeoff weight is based on the additional fuel consumption needed for the
transport of the extra (tanked) fuel and it is the weight at which the maximum profit can be achieved. The
quantity of extra fuel that can be loaded is calculated as the difference between the Optimum takeoff
weight (including extra fuel) and the planned takeoff weight {without fuel tanking).
The graphs are established for:
- FL 290, 310, 330, 350, 370, 390
- Air distances from 500 to 5000 NM
- Flight profile :
Climb 250kt/300kt/M.80
Cruise M.80
Descent M.80/300kt/250kt
Note:
1. ff necessary, step climbs are performed to reach the indicated flight levels.
2. The crew/operator has to verify that the found aircraft weight complies with basic aircraft
limitations (e.g. max fuel capacity) as well as with mission dependent restrictions (e.g. MLW at
destination).
EXAMPLES
1. Fuel price ratio = 0.930
Cruising Altitude = FL310
Planned TOW = 200 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 2500 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 187 000 kg, which is lower than the
planned takeoff weight d no fuel tanking recommended.
2. fuel price ratio = 0.890
Cruising Altitude = FL 350
Planned TOW = 190 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 3250 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 198 000 kg, which is 8 000 kg higher than
the planned takeoff weight d optimum quantity of extra fuel is 8 000 kg.
Check :
a) new TOW less or equal MTOW from departure airport.
b) total fuel to be loaded less or equal maximum fuel capacity.
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
JAR - FCL
FLIGHT PLANNING
FUEL TANKING
FUEL TANKING
GENERAL
Fuel tanking graphs allow to determine the Optimum fuel quantity to be tanked as a function of the fuel
price ratio between departure and destination airports. The following pages present for one flight level
per page the Optimum aircraft takeoff weight depending on the fuel price ratio (departure fuel price
divided by destination fuel price) and on the air distance to fly.
The computed optimum takeoff weight is based on the additional fuel consumption needed for the
transport of the extra (tanked) fuel and it is the weight at which the maximum profit can be achieved. The
quantity of extra fuel that can be loaded is calculated as the difference between the Optimum takeoff
weight (including extra fuel) and the planned takeoff weight {without fuel tanking).
The graphs are established for:
- FL 290, 310, 330, 350, 370, 390
- Air distances from 500 to 5000 NM
- Flight profile :
Climb 250kt/300kt/M.80
Cruise M.80
Descent M.80/300kt/250kt
Note:
1. ff necessary, step climbs are performed to reach the indicated flight levels.
2. The crew/operator has to verify that the found aircraft weight complies with basic aircraft
limitations (e.g. max fuel capacity) as well as with mission dependent restrictions (e.g. MLW at
destination).
EXAMPLES
1. Fuel price ratio = 0.930
Cruising Altitude = FL310
Planned TOW = 200 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 2500 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 187 000 kg, which is lower than the
planned takeoff weight d no fuel tanking recommended.
2. fuel price ratio = 0.890
Cruising Altitude = FL 350
Planned TOW = 190 000 kg (mission weight without fuel tanking)
Air Distance = 3250 NM
Enter graph
For the given air distance, the optimum fuel tanking weight is 198 000 kg, which is 8 000 kg higher than
the planned takeoff weight d optimum quantity of extra fuel is 8 000 kg.
Check :
a) new TOW less or equal MTOW from departure airport.
b) total fuel to be loaded less or equal maximum fuel capacity.
c) MLW at destination
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
JAR - FCL
FLIGHT PLANNING
ICAO MODEL FLIGHT PLAN FORM
DATA SHEET
LRJT 1
JAR - FCL
FLIGHT PLANNING
INTERGRATED CRUISE
JAR - FCL
FLIGHT PLANNING
ICAO MODEL FLIGHT PLAN FORM
JAR - FCL
FLIGHT PLANNING
ICAO MODEL FLIGHT PLAN FORM
JAR - FCL
FLIGHT PLANNING
ICAO MODEL FLIGHT PLAN FORM
JAR - FCL
FLIGHT PLANNING
ICAO MODEL FLIGHT PLAN FORM
This graph is used for conversion of nautical ground miles to nautical air miles. (This is intended for use
in conjunction with the 'integrated range' tables). Enter graph with average TAS. Correct for wind
component. Move to ground distance at the right then vertically down to read corresponding air distance.
For longer distances than shown on the graph apply a factor of 10 to the tabulated values.
This graph is used for conversion of nautical ground miles to nautical air miles. (This is intended for use
in conjunction with the 'integrated range' tables). Enter graph with average TAS. Correct for wind
component. Move to ground distance at the right then vertically down to read corresponding air distance.
For longer distances than shown on the graph apply a factor of 10 to the tabulated values.
033-12304 A
This graph is used for conversion of nautical ground miles to nautical air miles. (This is intended for use
in conjunction with the 'integrated range' tables). Enter graph with average TAS. Correct for wind
component. Move to ground distance at the right then vertically down to read corresponding air distance.
For longer distances than shown on the graph apply a factor of 10 to the tabulated values.
This graph is used for conversion of nautical ground miles to nautical air miles. (This is intended for use
in conjunction with the 'integrated range' tables). Enter graph with average TAS. Correct for wind
component. Move to ground distance at the right then vertically down to read corresponding air distance.
For longer distances than shown on the graph apply a factor of 10 to the tabulated values.
This graph is used for conversion of nautical ground miles to nautical air miles. (This is intended for use
in conjunction with the 'integrated range' tables). Enter graph with average TAS. Correct for wind
component. Move to ground distance at the right then vertically down to read corresponding air distance.
For longer distances than shown on the graph apply a factor of 10 to the tabulated values.
The table below provides fuel flow Information necessary for planning holding reserve fuel requirements.
Chart is based on racetrack pattern at minimum drag airspeed - minimum speed 210KIAS.
For holding in straight and level reduce table values by 5%
Figure 4.4
FLAPS UP
The table below provides fuel flow Information necessary for planning holding reserve fuel requirements.
Chart is based on racetrack pattern at minimum drag airspeed - minimum speed 210KIAS.
For holding in straight and level reduce table values by 5%
Figure 4.4
FLAPS UP
ISA
BASED ON DRIFTDOWN STARTING AT OR NEAR OPTIMUM ALTITUDE
5.4 Descent
These tables (Fig. 4.5.4) provide tabulations of time, fuel and distance for "flight idle" thrust at 0.74
mach/250 KIAS (economy) and 0.70 Mach/280 KIAS (turbulence penetration)
Allowances are made for a straight in approach with gear down.
Figure 4.5.4 Descent
.74M/250 KIAS
.70M/280/250 KIAS