MUURS NATIONAL TRAVEL | Commerce Clause | United States Constitution

Apostille No.

: 2262252-1 Session: One Supreme Court Issued By ; Secretary of The Commonwealth of Virginia, a Republic; “Self-Authenticating”: Rule 902 (3), Federal Rules of Evidence; “Superior Proof of Official Record”: Rule 27, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Rule 44 (a)(2) &1991 Amendments, Federal Rules of .Civil Procedure Act of State (Immutable Autonomous Nationals Statement) Expressed Administrative Hearing (Pursuant to Title 5 U.S.C. § 551-559) Private Law Rule 301 Rebuttal (Pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 301) Mandatory Judicial Notice (Rule 201 (d), Federal Rules of Evidence) `*WRIT FOR A FREEMAN’S RIGHT TO TRAVEL* *JUDICIAL NOTICE AND COMMAND FOR AUTONOMOUS AUTOCHTHON MOORS BY AFFIRMED AFFIDAVIT* NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL AND NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENT APPLICABLE TO ALL SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS Status: Indigenous , Trust A-1; Freehold by Inheritance AA 222141...I.S.L.A.M TO ALL OFFICIALS AND PUBLIC SERVANTS OF FEDERAL, STATE AND CITY MUNICIPAL, STATUTORY AND CIVIL LAW/CODE OF THE LAND, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. + Upon Our Nobility and Private Status and Commercial Liability, We, affirm, being duly affirmed under
oath and upon the five points of light – Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom, and Justice, squarely affirm to tell the truth, the

whole truth and nothing but the truth; and having knowledge and belief of the adjudicated facts contained herein, and being competent to make this affidavit in our own writing, state and declare the following facts to be true, correct, certain, complete, complete, not misleading, and not intended for any improper purpose to wit. We are the indigenous Sundry Free and Autonomous, Private Mu’urs*, possessing freehold inheritance status to travel upon the Roadways, Byways, and Highways of America as a matter of asserted Royal Law, Common Law, Muslim Customary Law, Treaty Law, the Great Law of Peace, the Law of Nations, the Free Moorish Great Seal Zodiac Constitution and the 1791 United States Republic Constitution. True Nobles of the Al Moroccan Empire are recognized as Autonomous Autochthon and United Moorish America Aboriginal Republic, ( bearers of the names / titles Ali, Al, El, Bey, Dey, and Dun, the True Nobles of Americas, the Land of Their Moorish forefathers and mothers of Moroccan descent. Autonomous Autochthon Mu’urs have freehold inheritance and retain all substantive rights and immunities, enjoy and operate upon consummated, vested Constitutional Rights and Immunity ( ies) from TAXATION, CRIMINAL AND CIVIL JURISDICTION by, and of, the Union States Rights Republic (USA), pursuant to, but not limited to United States Supreme Court Acts of State to wit: “Every Sovereign State ( people ) is bound to respect the independence of every other Sovereign State (people) and the courts of one country ( People ) will not sit in judgment on the government of another, done

25 AM jur (1st) Highways. Bey. Al. 174. Free Moorish Zodiac Constitution. the 1854 Roman Catholic Magna Charta. the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights XV. Seq. Chapter 1.. And. the Klu Klux Klan Oath. the Knights of Columbus Code and Klu Klux Klan Oath. Coloreds and AfricanAmerican. and Dun. Peace. 137. Chicago Motor Coach v. and 781. Pennsylvania.within ( the same or) its own territory…” That the present Union States Municipal and Civil Laws and Codes of the Land are an incorporated political unit of self-government established by the political powers of the General Assembly. 3. The Right to Travel. the 1791 organic united States Constitution. the Moroccan Treaty of Seventeen-Hundred Eighty-Seven (1787 ). 169 NE 22. and ITS AGENTS AND /OR ASSIGNS legally in force under National and International Law. Ligare v. ordinances. 1933 Moorish American Society and Use of Their Names. Affiant does not consent to a public hearing. 778. That We assert Our Autonomy as Free Autochthon Mu’urs (natural beings) pursuant to wit: the Free Moorish Zodiac Constitution-The Great Seal. Right to Mode of Conveyance. codes. the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 28 USC 1602. El.125 . in light. and the principals and standards embodied in the Moorish National Flag. the US Copyright Certificate Number AA 222141 Clock of Destiny. Christians and Jews. et.. Chicago 139 ILL 46. The Right to Park or Travel is part of the Liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. and Right to Locomotion are all absolute rights and the Police can not make void the exercise of rights. the File of the House of Representatives. the Moorish Nationality Identification Card. 176. 60 s. laws. ALR 834. Amendment V – Liberty Clause. etc.S. and the United Nation Right of Indigenous People. bearers of the names / titles Ali. the 21st day of January 1958. pursuant to: the Free Moorish Zodiac Constitution Article IV and VI. State v.. Forever said Union States Rights Republic denies citizenship in the United States Republic (USA) to the descendents of the Moorish Nation in the Western Hemisphere. That the United States Supreme Court has determined that State Laws are unconstitutional should they mandate restrictions on licensing. the Convention on International Road Traffic of the 19th day of September 1949. The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege but a common and fundamental right of which the public and natural Beings can not rightfully be deprived. the United States Supreme Court Acts of State. and Amendment IX. Kent v. The True Nobles of the Al Moroccan Empire are Autonomous Autochthons. April 17. Armistead. its members. It governs “ONLY” the rights of conduct of “WHITE PEOPLE”. the Hague Netherlands. referred to and mislabeled as Negroes. Resultantly. are excluded from Union States Rights Republic (USA) jurisdiction. Love . Sandford 60 US (19 Howard 393 (1857) held that Negroes-slave or free-were not included and were not intended to be included in the category of “citizen” as the word was used in the US Constitution…” Therefore based upon these facts of the established law of the land. Whereas. Chicago 337 ILL 200. Blacks. Section 2. sec. Freedom and Justice.Reservation of the Rights of the People. Dulles 357 US 116. the 1790 Sundry Free Moors Act. the True Nobles of the Al Moroccan Empire ( Free Moors ). customs and tradition. Boone v. Truth A-1 Classified. of the eighteen sixty-three (1863) Union States Rights Republic under the Magna Charter. The True Nobles maintain a NON-OBLIGATORY respect for the Union State Rights Republic (USA). Free Moorish Zodiac Constitution. registration. Resolution Number Seventy-Five.779. Dey. NON-COMPLIANCE IS A FEDRAL OFFENSE. and Self-Governed by an ONLY obligated to the Free Moorish Zodiac Constitution. 2. and insurance requirements as follows: 1. That the organic 1791 united States Republic Constitution is the supreme law of the land and all treaties under the united States Flag of Peace pursuant to United States Code Title 4. the World Court Decision. the National Constitution of the Continental United States Article III. the United States Department of Justice Moorish Credentials. the Moorish Federal Financiers Act ( Union States Army 1861-1863). (1803). in the year eighteen fifty-four (1854). In addition. the Executive Order 13107-Implementation of Human Rights Treaties. the True Nobles of the Al Moroccan Empire ( Free Moors) “were not included and were not intended to be included in the category of “citizens” ( subjects ) of the Union States Rights Republic. the 1787 Moroccan Treaty of Peace and Friendship. and any law that is Repugnant to the Constitution is Null and Void. Truth. Marbury v. the United Nations Charter Article 55 (c). Madison 5 U. 28 HE 934. the Knights of Columbus Code. this firmly establishes a square WANT OF JURISDICTION on the part of the Union States Rights Republic (USA). Clark 214 SW 607. the Supreme Court of the United States in the Landmark case of dred scott v. of each state of the Union and initiated in Philadelphia.

California v. having equal rights to and on the roadway/highways as horses and wagons etc. 5. 404 U.e. Rpt. Taxation/eminent Domain) as a matter of Law. either by carriage or automobile. City. including but not limited to ALL members/agents of the STATE OF ________________ are hereby provided notice and opportunity and. this same right is still substantive rule. nor indirectly that which is prohibited to it directly. the citizen can engage in the right with impunity. ________________________________ COUNTY. Thompson v. US 283. Kerner. and are instrumentalities of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION whereby Government officers/commissioners/secretaries/personnel are responsible and potentially liable for the conduct of the STATE OF ________________ officials. is not a mere privilege which a City may prohibit or permit at will.” Miller v. “…if the State does convert a liberty into a privilege. duly conveyed. he has the perfect defense for willfulness. 412 U. Owen v. US and UT v. Daniels. 445 US 662 (1980). 373 U. 230 F. and it can not do by one power (eg. Whereas the STATE OF ________________. health. Whereas according to Shuttleworth v. and employees especially since ultra vires activity can result in dissolution of the charter pursuant to QUO WARRANTO and. running stop-signs. 454 U. Sentient. Whereas the public record is the highest form of evidence.” See U. The Amurican ) Moorish Nation Permanent Mission are hereby timely creating public record by declaration with this Notice of the Unalienable Right to Travel in the Nature of a Declaration of Fact and. Assert and Defend that right and. which driving and speeding are not. and thus are not arrest able offenses.. We now explicitly Reserve. 2d 946 and. he and his auto. Michigan v. Whereas The Amurican ( Moorish ) Nation Permanent Mission has internationally registered our identity as a Private Nation of . liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Whereas in Boaq v. Police Power) that which is for example. unhindered by any private or statutory law or Department of Finance and Administration regulation or so called requirement. 22 P 159.S. Cullen 481 F. 2d 486. and referenced as if incorporated herein) and. Traveling in an automobile on the public roads was not a threat to the public safety or health. Farley Ced. Fairbanks V US 181. there can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of his constitutional rights. 519 the legal determination was made. The Right of a citizen to Travel upon the public highways and to transport one’s property thereon. Birmingham. Smith 154 SE 579.S. and the owner owed no other duty to the public (eg. State). in that speeding. State Police power extends only to immediate threats to public safety. it is lawful process from any citizen…” and. prohibited expressly to any other such power (eg.S. the CITY OF ______________________________. The State is prohibited from violating substantive rights. Sherer v.S. 294. U. Whereas We have researched the organic laws of the united States of America and American case law (i. 346 and. but a common right which he/she has under the right to life. This unalienable right to travel is guaranteed by the 9th and 10th Amendments of the Constitution for the united States of America and Bill of Rights. We.S. We now declare that We have the unalienable and fundamental and unregulated right to travel upon the public highways in my private conveyance. and upheld by many court decisions at all levels in support of that right (see below). service upon the principal is service upon the agent and service upon the agent is service upon the principal. traveling without license plates. welfare. Aboriginal Americans through the Virginia Commonwealth Apostille “Reaffirmation…” (#2262252-1 attached. Whereas. Bishop. . Whereas “since the claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime. etc. “if it can be read. or registration are not threats to the public safety. 262. all necessary parties. and such a traveler or owner owed nothing more than “due care” (as regards to tort for negligence) to the public. v.. 6. 89. 20 CA3d 1032 (1971).4.S. MacDougall. common law).300. Duke 266 US at 476 Led at 449. 364 and Haines v.” and “Since the injured party has relied on prior decisions of the Supreme Court. and constituted no hazard in so to the public.

442. 885. and our state codes and laws are in compliance with United States Code. or directly or indirectly in connection with any business. § 5702 states: “Transportation” means any movement of property in commerce (including intrastate commerce) by a motor vehicle or rail vehicle and. and. Shelby County. or other undertaking intended for profit.W. Whereas When government passes an unlawful act. 136 Wis. rate charge or other consideration.Whereas Congress. the only allowable restrictions as to their use is by regulation under the Commerce Clause by the Congress of the United States of America.S. Whereas the public highways are the property of the People. Whereas there is no mention of any requirement for a state-issued identification plate for a (non-commercial) vehicle. the statutes and codification of this State are in total agreement with the fact that usage is the key. it imposes no duties. though law in form. fee. “Used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare. Whereas “Vehicle” is not defined in Title 18 USC § 31 since under the Commerce Clause only commerce is to be controlled. Definitions states in part. people need to know they have no obligation to obey it.” Chicago Motor Coach v. it affords no protection. 118 U. Whereas 18 USC § 31. Whereas 18 USC § 31. 193 (1908). Whereas the courts have uniformly upheld the unalienable Right to Travel freely upon the Public Highways. Whereas our private property is a vehicle. it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed.Vallier. “Motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers. and. but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived. 116 N. Norton v. by established definition and the wording on a document entitled “Certificate of Origin for a Vehicle”. is in fact not law at all. We are not required to register our private vehicle (not used in commerce) under any ‘Motor Vehicle’ _____________ law and. or property or cargo (emphasis mine). Whereas “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion—to go where and when one pleases--only so . and as such is not a “motor vehicle” subject to registration. Definitions states in part. Whereas “The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege. passengers and property. and. demands that only (commercial) “motor vehicles” (see 18 USC § 31) are required to be registered/licensed to include a driver’s license/registration to operate that (commercial) “motor vehicle” and. such as the licensing of a Right. as all licensing and descriptions of conveyances are strictly limited to “commerce” and “commercial vehicles” (motor vehicles) and. 425. Whereas no assessment of our “private property” vehicle (as distinguished from “personal property” which can only belong to the legislatively-created fiction represented by the all caps enumeration of the entity) is required and. It confers no rights. 169 NE 221. Chicago. the following citations are offered in affirmation of that Right and. Clause 3 of the Constitution for the united States of America. and. Whereas it is the duty of the state to administratively/ministerially report (see 23 USC §§ 303(c) & 402(a)) all such “motor vehicle” and “school bus” registration/licensing/driver license registration of those in commerce and commercial activities to the federal government for regulation by Congress and. pursuant to the authorization given it by the Commerce Clause of Article I. Section 8. because this is what is required and. either state or federal and. Whereas Title 49 USC (which is entitled “Transportation”) Subtitle III. for it is void from the time it was enacted: “An unconstitutional legislative enactment.” Bonnett v.

neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s Rights. yet it cannot be used to abrogate or limit personal liberty or property rights contrary to constitutional sanction.” Thiede v. in the future. 51 NE 907. 486. B1951). as the right is unchangeable…” Du Pont v. exists today. he will be protected. 2d 412. therefore. the very nature of which subjects the licensee to rules that can be unreasonable or a further trespass on his rights… Legislative statute or fiat cannot change the nature of a constitutional right. and. 49 N.S. travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places. 283. Whereas “We realize that the police is elastic to meet changing conditions and changing needs. 48 U. Whereas to deprive all persons of the Right to use the road in the ordinary course of life and business because one might. 17 P. privileges.E. “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved. Whereas “We find it intolerable that one Constitutional Right should have to be surrendered in order to assert . and. Whereas “This right of the people to the use of the public streets of a city is so well established and so universally recognized in this country. and. but they do not measure the rights of the governed…. 2d 724. and. the police power cannot possibly license the exercise of such a right. 674. Under this Constitutional guarantee one may. 384 U.” American Jurisprudence 1st Edition. either in whole or in part.” Willis v. Arizona. Whereas “The claim and exercise of a right cannot be converted into a crime. Whereas Licensing cannot be required of free people.” Smith v. 1075. become dangerous. wagon or automobile. 263 P. Turner. and. Railroad Commissioners. and. and. that Right does not extend to the use of the highways. but the common Right which he has under the Right to life. 141 Ohio St. 414. 535. that while a citizen has the Right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon.225. Town of Scandia Valley.” City of Chicago v. which had existed when the Constitution of Connecticut was adopted. under normal conditions. Whereas “The rights. would be a deprivation not only of the Right to travel. Whereas “Those have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they have the right to do as such license would be meaningless.” Miranda v. by horse drawn carriage. there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.S. City of Topeka. 1076. 2d 400 (1944). 230 F. 728 (Del. as freely as in their own state. as a place of business for private gain.” Miller v. 1135. not only in his person.” City of Cincinnati v. and immunities of citizens exist notwithstanding there is no specific enumeration thereof in state constitutions. and.far restrained as the Rights of others make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. and. 436.. Barney v. 491. and. 329.. but also the Right to due process. U.218. These instruments measure the powers of rulers. 489. 217 Minn. Buck. Whereas “All citizens of the United States of America have a right to pass and re-pass through every part of it without interruption. 23 Pac. that it has become a part of the alphabet of fundamental rights of the citizen.” Swift v. and we think correctly. Du Pont. and. Collins. because taking on the restrictions of a license requires the surrender of a right. 702. Cornell.2d 82. 910. is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will. liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Constitutional Law. The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon. Whereas “Heretofore the court has held. Whereas constitutional powers can never transcend constitutional rights. 85 A.S. and thereby transcend such a right and put itself in a superior position. and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner. 43 Kansas 671. and the police power is therefore subordinate to constitutional rights. p.I 982. 12 L Ed. 14 N. Sec. and. Whereas “…reasonable regulations of an inalienable right do not include compelling a citizen to waive his constitutional rights by submitting him to licensing. The right or liberty to travel freely. but in his safe conduct.W.

Whereas the state cannot lose money that it never had a right to demand from the Sovereign People in the first place and.24. and. Carter. 70. 623. and. Law. 390 U.” McCulloch v. and. 22. intentionally and voluntarily and. and. renew or accept a state-issued driver’s license because to do so would be to commit Perjury. 661.Wechsler 263 U. Kansas. Whereas in the instant matter.(2nd). Whereas “Any claim that this statute is a taxing statute would be immediately open to severe Constitutional objections.S. is not to be defeated under the name of local practice. has been uniformly denied. “No public policy of a state can be allowed to override the positive guarantees of the U. 123 U. The question herein. (2nd).S. “Economic necessity cannot justify a disregard of Constitutional guarantee. Whereas it could be argued that the licensing scheme of all persons is a matter of public policy. and. If it could be said that the state had the power to tax a Right.S. when the already established facts by Apostille are that .” Mulger v. 116 (1958). Whereas “If. Const.” Riley v.S. Whereas "The assertion of federal rights.S. 882. has deprived this free and natural person of the Right of Liberty. Law. Whereas no notice is given to people applying for driver’s licenses that they have a perfect right to use the roads in non-commercial pursuits without any permission. Milwaukee. fundamental limitations of regulations under the police power are found in the spirit of the Constitutions. 389. and.Jur. without cause and without due process of law. Maryland. 357 U. United States. Dulles. Sec.W. is one of the state taxing the Right to travel by the ordinary modes of the day. therefore.S. This occurs when any person is told that they must have a license in order to use the public roads and highways and. has no real or substantial relation to those objects or is a palpable invasion of Rights secured by the fundamental law. the state has committed a massive constructive fraud. this would enable the state to destroy Rights guaranteed by the constitution through the use of oppressive taxation. Const. Whereas “As a rule. although they are just as efficient as if expressed in the clearest language. a statute purported to have been enacted to protect… the public safety. resident of (fiduciary.” 16 Am. and." Davis v. and. Whereas the legislature does not have the power to abrogate the Citizen’s Right to travel upon the public roads. being a legal contract under which the state is empowered with policing powers. Whereas We. 81.Jur. and thereby give effect to the Constitution.” Kent v. The views advanced herein are neither novel nor unsupported by authority. 16 Am. not in the letter. by applying commercial statutes to all entities. The question of taxing power of states has been repeatedly considered by the Supreme Court. This right was emerging as early as the Magna Carta. The Right of the state to impede or embarrass the Constitutional operation of the U. Sec. it is the duty of the courts to so adjudge. Whereas the license. and whether this is a legislative object of the state taxation. Whereas it could be said that the state would suffer a monetary loss. is only valid when the licensee takes on the burdens of the contract and bargains away his or her rights knowingly.” Mehlos v. the state.another. and “The right to travel is part of the Liberty of which a citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. Government or the Rights which the citizen holds under it. 146 N. and that they surrender valuable rights by taking on the regulation system of license. by passing legislation forcing the citizen to waive his Right and convert that Right into a privilege. 79 ALR 1018. Constitution. when plainly and reasonably made. natural and artificial persons alike. surety for) the corporate STATE OF ________________. Moorish ( Muurican ) Nationals cannot in good faith apply for. attesting that we are citizens of.” Simons v. 4 Wheat 316.

and shall. Whereas “That if two or more persons shall band or conspire together. that cannot be held as justification for any member of the executive or judicial branch of government (“servants”) to continue to usurp power by the continued conversion of Rights into privileges where such conversion is manifestly contrary to the enumerated Rights of the People and. or resident (agent) of the STATE OF ________________ or the federal UNITED STATES and. and. the beneficiary of the trust.S. franchisee of. it is the duty of the citizens to make sure that the government is not in error. Whereas Judge Cooley in Constitutional Limitations. and attach a fee to it…” as stated in Murdock v. any office or place of honor. and. Whereas We seek to acquire the items necessary to pass and repass throughout __________________ and this nation without harassment or interference and. nor to surrender the lawful title of our duly conveyed property to the State as security against government indebtedness and the undeclared federal bankruptcy. 140-141.. and against any stealthy encroachments thereon. where the people have plainly expressed their will in the Constitution.S. not required to have a driver’s license. Madison. profit. Pennsylvania. although the ___________________ Motor Vehicle and Traffic Laws and State Highway Commission Regulations has been promulgated as “public law” for decades. 5 U. usurpation and tyranny. 1870). the citizen. license it. or upon the premises of another. not required to register our private property. that WE are not required to have government permission to travel freely upon the public highways. Whereas it is not the job of government to make sure that the citizens are not in error. moreover. threaten or intimidate any citizen. 319 U. since it can result in the proponents committing acts of treason. or trust created by the Constitution or Laws of the United States. thus null and void and. 16 AmJur 2nd § 97.S. 137. 273 U. writes. or to injure. proper jurisdiction of the Public Law. We will not false swear to the Public Law which seeks to make driver’s licenses and vehicle registration “mandatory” for all citizens and all vehicles through a process charitably described as “constructive fraud” and to which the unsuspecting fall prey and. or because of his having exercised the same.S. . U. “The State may not imposed a charge for the enjoyment of a right protected by the Federal Constitution nor convert a liberty into a privilege.” Bryars v. Any administrative rule/regulation or statutory act of any State legislature or judicial tribunal to the contrary is unlawful and clearly unconstitutional.S. 31. shall be fined or imprisoned. oppress. 116 U.” Boved v. with intent to violate any provision of this act (enforcement act of May 30. We have determined and hereby state the facts by declaration and by virtue of our declared autonomy and American case law. the fine not to exceed $5. Whereas therefore. 28. while recognizing the lawful. 616.. “Acquiescence for no length of time can legalize a clear usurpation of power. Whereas “The state is to protect against any encroachment of a constitutionally secured liberty and such constitutional provisions for the security of a person and property should be liberally construed. as amply demonstrated by the numerous adjudications cited herein and. because “it is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen. and since the Constitution is the supreme law of the land as stated in Marbury v. Such trespasses would be clear and gross violations of the unambiguous Rights secured by the Constitution which allow no room for construction.S. 105 and. and disabled from holding. or both. at the direction of the Court.” 16 Stat.000 and the imprisonment not to exceed ten years. such person shall be held guilty of felony. on conviction thereof. Whereas We regard it as just and necessary to give notice to the above-named proponent (see # 5) and its principals (see # 6) of the consequences of any failure to abide by the Constitution for the united States of America (1791) and the Constitution of the STATE OF ________________ (1836) and its oaths and duties in this matter. and. Therefore my right must be interpreted in favor of me. Therefore In Summary We seek to function according to and within the Private Law and to be afforded the protections of Private Law. or go in disguise upon the public highway.We are not citizens of. U. with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise and enjoyment of any rights or privilege granted or secured to him by the Constitution or Laws of the United States. be thereafter ineligible to. page 71.” In this instant matter.

the whole truth. and Local that we do not accept the liability associated with the “COMPELLED BENEFIT” of any unrevealed Commercial Agreement. sentient. sincerely. and is not empowered. WHEREAS. harm or attack on the Being’s person. and squarely affirm that the foregoing facts. to issue “tags” or “plates” for the registration or identification of the purely private property (private conveyance/vehicle not engaged in commerce) of private. Explicit Reservation To All Peace Officers : Our use of All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice UCC 1-308. and this reservation serves NOTICE upon all Administrative Agencies of Government. that there is no lawful method for government to put restrictions or limitation s on rights belonging to the people. you are authorized by this writ. contained in this Constructive and Actual Judicial Notice by Affirmed Affidavit are. true. We will nonetheless secure for ourselves a “Right to Travel /Way Notification” card. foreign driver’s license. It is reasonable to assume that these judicial decision are straight to the point. Private Autochthon Mu’urs. and not misleading. current registration. 2262252-1(Apostille #. We will secure a plate for our own identification purposes. _____________________________witness as. I. which will likewise bear my internationally unique number. freedom. pursuant to National and International Law. WHEREFORE. arrest and ticket or citation issued by a Police Officer or others for traveling with no driver’s license. the truth. civilian. a real live flesh and blood. is a penalty or sanction and is indeed converting a right into a crime’. tariffs. or mandatory insurance. and all available and appropriate measures are to be taken to prevent injustice. 1-103 . taxation. National. issued by the Commonwealth of Virginia Secretary of State) with a single-letter suffix. It will bear our internationally unique number. do solemnly. 1-103 indicates the reservation of our rights whereby we may reserve our Substantive Rights and Constitutional Immunities not to be compelled to perform under any Contract or Agreement that we have not entered into knowingly. there is no question that a bench appearance Summons. detention. are not to be arrested or held for detention under any circumstances. breathing natural non fictional being. and/or dignity. State. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1. and will be mounted and maintained in the space provided for such identification on our private conveyance. property. correct. and any hindrance or restriction of his or her freedom of movement within member or non-member states. and nothing but the truth.Whereas the STATE OF ________________ has no authority to grant. The being named herein are immune from Customs. voluntarily or intentionally. to honor all Substantial rights and Constitutional Immunities for the indigenous Sundry Free. complete. which carries a fine or jail time. absent contract entered into knowingly. in lieu of the “license”. in state “colors”. The bearers of this document are to be treated with due re- spect. You are to enlist all available and appropriate measures to ensure that all Our Substantive are not breached. photo and other identifying information. The Sovereign Beings named herein. absolute sovereign citizens. to the best of my knowledge and belief.308. Whereas We are under no obligation to contract with the STATE OF ________________ for a “driver’s license”. thus violating substantial rights.. the. intentionally and voluntarily by both parties.

are rights and privileges as guaranteed by the Constitution." . 38 L. 71 S. rather than by the cruel.S. Title 18 Section 241 (Conspiracy against Rights)." [Miranda v. 322." ". “ [Lefkowitz v. formal or informal. 241F. every man is independent of all laws. 1. or Law Enforcement Agent. 414 U. wherever this might tend to subject to criminal responsibility on him who gives it. simple expedient of compelling it form his own mouth In sum.CT. Treavant v.1984) Motorist illegally held for 23 minutes in a traffic charge was awarded $25. The above case sets the foundation for $75.Ed. 1653. Ct. please take notice of the below information: This information is being presented to you in an attempt to protect you and the presenter of this notice from breaking THE law. 17. 158 (1924)] "where the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is involved the court has always construed its protection to ensure that an individual is not compelled to produce evidence which later may be used against him as an accused in a criminal action. CT. 16. Arizona. 336 (11th CIR. as well as evidence which an individual reasonably believes could be used against him in a criminal prosecution. and anyone (including judges) who knowingly violates those rights may be civilly and criminally liable under several federal statutes. 94 S. where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings.S. 45 S.. 479. 316. 34. as stated by the Supreme Court.S. Id. 32 L. civil or criminal. 1602. The presenter of this notice has a good deal of respect for the public service job you are doing and understand how difficult it is to seek out and prosecute criminals. 341 U. to require the government to shoulder the entire load to protect the inviolability of the human personality. our accusatory system of criminal justice demands that the government seeking to punish an individual produce the evidence against him by its own independent labors. 92 S.Traffic Stop Notice Police Officer. 266 U.814. 1986 (Civil Rights) "There. Ed. City of Tampa. 406 U. administrative or judicial. . Turley. 274 (1973)] "WE have recently noted that the privilege against self-incrimination --. we recently reaffirmed the principle that the privilege against self incrimination can be asserted in any proceeding. Arnstein. United States. Ed.the essential mainstay of our adversary system is founded in a complex of values To maintain a fair state individual balance.ED. 436 (1966) ] Please also NOTE: the above. Turley. CT. 70 (1973)] "The privilege is not ordinarily dependent upon the nature of the proceeding in which the testimony is sought or is to be used.S. 18 (1951)] "in Kastigar v. Title 42 Section 1983. 69 L. 86 S. without a warrant and without having committed a crime (traffic infractions are not crimes). 384 U. However. the privilege is fulfilled only when the person is guaranteed the right to remain silent unless he chooses to speak in the unfettered exercise of his own will. United States.S. 70. 441. Damages awarded. but includes information which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence that could lead to prosecution. 212(1972). He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent. CT. 414 U. except those prescribed by nature." [Lefkowitz v. The privilege protects a mere witness as fully as it does one who is a party defendant." [McCarthy v. civil or criminal.there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege is available outside of criminal court proceedings and serves to protect persons in all settings in which their freedom of action is curtailed in any significant way from being compelled to incriminate themselves. the detention is a false arrest and false imprisonment.000 in damages.000 dollars per day. 1985. The protection does not merely encompass evidence which may lead to criminal conviction.2d. 486. Please see: United States Code. "The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself in a criminal prosecution but also privileges him not to answer official questions put to him in any other proceeding.CT.000 dollars per hour. and Section 242 (Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law). CT. 94 S. AT 1656. Sheriff. . Where a Sovereign/Muur is detained.800." [Hoffman v. 92 S. this document is presented at a traffic stop. 40.S. or $1.316. It applies alike to civil and criminal proceedings. at 444. investigatory or adjudicatory. 95L.

" [Brenninger V. state and federal that have the simple task of protecting the rights of the people instead use their offices and under color of authority to do anything but protect the rights of the people. 3. speaking for a unanimous Court in 1859. the constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery" [United States v. Peters. All codes.S. 287 U. in all its powers. and destroy the rights acquired under those judgments. Constantine. All act under color of authority and commit treason against any American who meets not only his duty as an American to inform of massive wrongdoing. in 1932. to support this Constitution.[Cruden v. Texas.C.S. said Chief Justice Hughes. 1348 (1985) (Bold added) Sheriffs ignore the fact their job is to protect the rights of the people by in fact controlling artificial entities known as county and municipal officials. the other officials and corporations created or holding contracts with the chartered corporations.72 Atl. They violate their oaths of office on a regular systematic basis by doing the unlawful bidding of other officials. . Department of Labor). VI. ] If he [the Governor] had such power. presented by American Citizens and Lawman Association) Current officials including city. annul the judgments of the courts of the United States. state) has jurisdiction over the people. would be the supreme law of the land. 1958) Why is it that they are not interested or willfully disobey the laws and continue on with the same treasonous acts. no rule made by any institution (all are fictions of man) is a law placed upon the man. 506. Thusly. often seeking retribution against those who inform them of the truth? It is sometimes just ignorant men that unknowingly commit treason and use terrorism against our people but it is flat out evil men that do so knowingly. 2d 260. cl.S. "If the legislatures of the several states may. only rights may prevail without government interference in the real America. 77. . hence. 136. This has been stated in this opinion made about 190 years after Chisholm opinion. . to use force in defending himself as he would have in repelling any other assault and battery. and to guard against resistance to or evasion of its authority. U. also for a unanimous Court. All codes. 378. (Quote copied from Cooper v Aaron. "it is manifest that the fiat of a state Governor.S. 443 US at 47] . 524. Booth. 21 How. 358 U. at will. 397-398 (My emphasis) ] Every state legislator and executive and judicial officer is solemnly committed by oath taken pursuant to Art. that is does not give his consent. said that this requirement reflected the framers' anxiety to preserve it [the Constitution] in full force.his liberty has the same right. Ableman v. county. He is only in office to protect and preserve rights of the people." [Brown v. 2 N. Not even the Sheriff of a county the only constitutional law enforcer in a county (and. rules and regulations are applicable to the government authorities only. that the restrictions of the Federal Constitution upon the exercise of state power would be but impotent phrases" [Sterling v. as it is forced upon people through armed and extremely dangerous SOBs wearing badges and the uniforms of the corporate government they serve. 2d 1344. 262 (1950)] "Uncontrolled search and seizure is one of the first and most effective weapons in the arsenal of every arbitrary government. not human/Creators in accordance with God’s laws. but also reporting that is required by Title 18." [State v. 5 Cranch 115. (THE SHERIFF Powers and Responsibilities of Elected Peace Officers.E. and only the same right. he/she does have jurisdiction (authority) over artificial entities namely. 338 US 160] "When officers detained defendant for the purpose of requiring him to identify himself.] Understand this. Robinson 145 Me. 338 (1796) 2 S. Neale. on the part of a State . they performed a "seizure" of his person subject to the requirements of the Fourth Amendment. The majority means nothing to human rights and freedom blessed upon us by our Creator. 769 F. rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking in due process Rodriques v Ray Donavan (U. Fraud vital information left out and undisclosed to the people is a criminal act by officials that is also by definition treason and usually invoking terrorism. Chief Justice Taney. and not the Constitution of the United States. 1. Sections 4 and 2382. If one the individual man.

. 2d 100. Vol. to reiterate. 2d 100.."The offense of resisting arrest. to use force in defending himself as he would have in repelling any other assault and battery. even though purpose of stop is limited and resulting detention is quite brief. 262 (1950)] "The offense of resisting arrest." Halsbury's Laws of England. which often is not grasped by zealous officers. The rule is sometimes expressed as follows: "In cases of misdemeanor." [Carrol v. Authorized Seal Without Prejudice ..S. ___________________________." [State v. 273 (1959). Respectfully submitted. In such case the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force.S. 83 S. The reason for arrest for misdemeanors without warrant at common law was promptly to suppress breaches of the peace.72 Atl." [Terry v. 392 US 1. Its protection consists in requiring that those inferences be drawn by a neutral and detached magistrate instead of being judged by the officer engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime. 83 S. 9 part III. History of Criminal Law. Kurtz v. 34 (1968)] "It must be recognized that whenever a police officer accosts an individual and restrains his freedom to walk away. both at common law and under statute. Please note: "An illegal arrest is an assault and battery.S. Robinson 145 Me. In such case the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force. as in self-defense. as in self-defense." [Terry v. It is axiomatic (self-evident) that every person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. 267 US 132. Elk v. 440 US 648] Now.E. We repeat two cite cases mentioned above. and that he may only arrest without a warrant one guilty of a misdemeanor if committed in his presence." [Delaware v. history shows they are not appropriate guardians of the privacy which the Fourth Amendment protects. presupposes a lawful arrest. 2d 260. Moffitt. 392 US 1. please do so in a respectful manner. It is axiomatic (self-evident) that every person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. 612. 257. United States 362 U." [Jones v. U.] "The point of the Fourth Amendment.. is not that it denies law enforcement the support of the usual inferences which reasonable men draw from evidence. 1 Stephen. 193." [State v." [State v. 157] "Though the police are honest and their aims worthy. 476.C.E. If there is some important information that you wish to impart the presenter of this notice. Prouse. 115 US 487.C. Mobley 240 N. and only the same right. 476.102 (1954)] "The usual rule is that a police officer may arrest without warrant one believed by the officer upon reasonable cause to have been guilty of a felony .102 (1954)] Law Enforcer. 16 (1968)] "Stopping an automobile and detaining its occupants constitute a "seizure" within meaning of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. both at common law and under statute. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right. To provide you with any information that may later be used against the presenter of this notice in a civil or criminal proceeding would not be in the best interest of the presenter. U. Ohio. 117 US 529. presupposes a lawful arrest. This includes producing documents that may or may not be in his or her possession including but not limited to the non consensual search of this conveyance. Mobley 240 N. 77. Ohio. a peace officer like a private person has at common law no power of arresting without a warrant except when a breach of the peace has been committed in his presence or there is reasonable ground for supposing that a breach of the peace is about to be committed or renewed in his presence. he has 'seized' that person.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful