EOR is a generic term for techniques for increasing the amount of crude oil that can be extracted from an oil field. Using EOR, 30 to 60 percent or more of the reservoir's original oil can be extracted, compared with 20 to 40 percent using primary and secondary recovery. Enhanced oil recovery is also called improved oil recovery or tertiary recovery (as opposed to primary and secondary recovery).[1] Enhanced oil recovery is achieved by 1.Gas injection 2.Chemical injection 3.Microbial injection 4.Thermal recovery (which includes cyclic or continuous steam, steam flooding, and fire flooding)

Normally only 30% of the oil in a reservoir can be extracted. the primary objective is to fill the voidage created by the produced oil fractions thus avoiding the reservoir pressure to decrease with the increased production. water injection was done in the later phase of the reservoir life but now it is carried out in the earlier phase so that voidage and the secondary gas cap in the reservoir are not created. Such kind of operation is known as water flooding/Water injection. based on the type of production and nature of reservoir the following patters are followed an injection well.1. When the water is injected in the reservoir. The water injection is generally carried out when solution gas drive is present or .  Water injection: In water injection operation. the injected water is discharged in the aquifer through several injection wells surrounding the production well. WATER INJECTION AND WATER FLOODING Conventionally. it tends to push the oil towards upwards thus increasing the life and the ultimate recovery of the reservoir. In this process.TYPES OF EOR STRATEGIES 2. Using water injection in earlier phase helps in improving the production as once secondary gas cap is formed the injected water initially tends to compress free gas cap and later on pushes the oil thus the amount of injection water required is much more.2. but water injection increases that percentage (known as the recovery factor) and maintains the production rate of a reservoir over a longer period. In such condition the pressure maintenance can be done by injecting water into the reservoir which is compatible to the formation water present in the reservoir through several water injection wells. Once the primary energy of the reservoir tends to deplete it becomes necessary to maintain the pressure inside the reservoir to achieve optimum production and maximise ultimate recovery. The injected water creates a bottom water drive on the oil zone pushing the oil upwards. In earlier practices. Water injection and water flooding are quite similar terms the only difference being the level at which injection water is being discharged and the displacement phenomena.

Water flooding is generally more effective than water injection when no voidage is being . displacing fluid is injected in the oil zone through the surrounding water injection wells creating an edge water drive flooding oil towards the production well. The selection of injection water {displacing fluid} depends upon the mobility rate between the displacing fluid {injection water} and the displaced fluid {oil} DISADVANTAGE OF WATER INJECTION • Reaction of injected water with the formation water can cause formation damage. Thus for better economy the water injection is carried out when the reservoir pressure is more than saturation pressure. • Corrosion of surface and sub-surface equipment.water drive is weak.  Water flooding: In this operation. For better efficiency. the pressure of the reservoir should be such that no secondary gas cap is formed.

created.GAS INJECTION Gas injection is presently the most-commonly used approach in enhanced oil recovery. and possibly also with a reduction in the surface tension with the reservoir rock. Gases used include CO2. In the case of low pressure reservoirs or heavy oils. while in the case of former we inject the water in the water zone of the reservoir. this method sometimes aids recovery by reducing the viscosity of the crude oil as the gas mixes with it. in practice the above patterns are not necessarily followed It is to be noted that water injection and water flooding are essentially the same process. In addition to the beneficial effect of the pressure. Oil displacement by carbon dioxide injection relies on the phase behaviour of the mixtures of that gas and the crude. In high pressure applications with lighter oils. with resultant swelling of the oil. CO2 is miscible with the oil. in the latter we inject it directly into the hydrocarbon zone 2. However. however. Water flooding in other regards is similar to water injection including selection parameters of the displacing fluid. CO2 will . natural gas or nitrogen. the only difference being the displacing phenomenon. which are strongly dependent on reservoir temperature.2. pressure and crude oil composition. and reduction in viscosity.

This method not only . Application of these methods is usually limited by the cost of the chemicals and their adsorption and loss onto the rock of the oil containing formation. The remainder is trapped in the oil reservoir by various means. It mixes with the remaining oil. 2. usually as dilute solutions. water and surfactant. and oil viscosity can still be significantly reduced. between one-half and two-thirds of the injected CO2 returns with the produced oil and is usually re-injected into the reservoir to minimize operating costs. forming a “miscible zone. or will only partially mix with the oil. Chemical EOR is the addition of chemical agents to the injected water to aid mobility and the reduction in surface tension. can be particularly effective in this.form an immiscible fluid. Polymer flooding is a means of injecting long chain polymer molecules in an effort to increase the injected water viscosity. In all of these methods the chemicals are injected into several wells and the production occurs in other nearby wells. Special formulations of oil.” The pressure from the CO2 and expanding oil pushes an oil bank toward the production well. have been used to improve oil recovery. at low velocities it is resistant to flow. A side effect of enhanced oil recovery is that the CO2 that was used to force oil out of the formation is now sequestered. microemulsions. Some oil swelling may occur. where it rises to the surface. Injection of a dilute solution of a water soluble polymer to increase the viscosity of the injected water can increase the amount of oil recovered in some formations. The addition of these chemicals means that the fluid would behave like a non-Newtonian fluid. Then the CO2 is separated from the oil and may be added to the stream of CO2 going into the injection well. Injection of alkaline or caustic solutions into reservoirs with oil that has organic acids naturally occurring in the oil will result in the production of soap that may lower the interfacial tension enough to increase production.CHEMICAL INJECTION The injection of various chemicals. Dilute solutions of surfactants such as petroleum sulfonates or bio surfactants such as rhamnolipids may be injected to lower the interfacial tension or capillary pressure that impedes oil droplets from moving through a reservoir. CO2 is pumped into the reservoir through an injection well. In these applications.3.

Surfactant Polymer flooding these are surface active agents that help to break down the surface tension between the oil and water. their exteriors become hydrophilic.improves the mobility ratio (by lowering it) but also the vertical and areal sweep efficiency. the microbes go into near-shutdown mode. and they migrate to the oil-water interface area. Strains of microbes have been both discovered and developed (using gene mutation) which function either by generating biosurfactants. In the second approach. making the droplets more likely to migrate to the wellhead. nutrients are injected into the ground to nurture existing microbial bodies. Since the Earth's surface is considerably cooler than the petroleum deposits (a temperature drop of 13-14 degree F per thousand feet of depth is usual). Three approaches have been used to achieve microbial injection. This lowers flow velocity and increases the sweep area. the paraffin's higher melting point causes it to solidify as it is cooled during the . It also improves the mobility of the fluids and reverses the rock wettablity. which tend to separate from the crude as it flows to the surface. used since 1985. these nutrients cause the bacteria to increase production of the natural surfactants they normally use to metabolize crude oil underground. where they cause oil droplets to form from the larger oil mass. After the injected nutrients are consumed. both because of its higher cost and because the developments in this field are more recent than other techniques. This allows for the oil and water to separate. In the first approach. The polymer causes a reduction in the permeability and allows the preferential filling of the high permeable zones in the reservoir.MICROBIAL INJECTION Microbial injection is part of microbial enhanced oil recovery and is presently rarely used. In low concentrations the rate is gradual but in higher concentrations the rate is increased until such time that the surfactant is diluted by the formation fluids. bacterial cultures mixed with a food source (a carbohydrate such as molasses is commonly used) are injected into the oil field. or by emitting carbon dioxide. Co-solvents added to them to improve stability of the formulation. The third approach is used to address the problem of paraffin components of the crude oil. Primary surfactants usually have Co-surfactants. The effect of the surfactant depends on the concentration.4. activity boosters. 2.

upward flow. Bacteria capable of breaking these paraffin chains into smaller chains (which would then flow more easily) are injected into the wellhead. then produced out of the same well. either near the point of first congealment or in the rock stratum itself. and rarely in an in-situ combustion project. cyclic production where the steam is injected and allowed to “soak”. These techniques include conventional steam floods with injectors and producers drilled in tight spacing patterns. .5.000 cp and does not flow unless diluted with a solvent or heated.000 feet) very viscous heavy oil (generally defined as oil with API gravity between 10 and 20 degrees). 2.THERMAL ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY METHOD Thermal enhanced oil recovery techniques are generally applied to relatively shallow (less than 3. steam assisted gravity drainage where the steam is injected in one horizontal well and produced from another lower horizontal well. Heavy oil typically has a viscosity between 100 and 10.

ARI has identified 100 billion barrels of heavy oil in place in the U. there are still sizeable reserves. The conventional steam flood is usually found in large fields. The thermal EOR projects not only suffer the same effects of volatile oil prices over time as all oil producers. Obviously. and Texas.000 feet and the more shallow. Although the daily production from thermal methods. subsidence of the surface may have major effect on surface infrastructure. where economics of scale apply. producing facility and flow lines. The other economic issue relates to the price of oil.S. . competing with human use for the quantities. for the steam projects. The challenges of thermal EOR are economics and environmental. North and South Dakota. mainly in California has been in decline for the last few years. but also Alaska. Environmental concerns present a considerable obstacle to current producing fields and because of tighter regulatory requirements of new development. which results in less higher end products when refined. even more difficult for new projects. most steam generators are fired with natural gas. but environmentally-sensitive Arctic resources. not only California. For environmental reasons. In California in particular where much of the production is from unconsolidated sand reservoirs. Several successful in-situ combustion projects have been established in South Dakota. historically have been priced at a $10 to $15 discount to West Texas Intermediate. New technology will be required to address resources deeper than 3. with 42 billion in California and 25 billion barrels in Alaska and that technically possible production could be increased from the current level of 225 thousand barrels/day to as high as 500 thousand barrels/day. with wells drilled on 2 acre spacing. expensive steam generation and production facilities and insulated flow lines. The upfront capital costs are considerable. The first issue is the surface use. some or all of the water will be supplied by the municipalities. particularly if a fuel other than natural gas is used.Thermal EOR has its own set of opportunities and obstacles. there is little else that the surface can be used for. a development of this sort would not be allowed where the surface is residential or developed for other high end purposes. In a study performed for the DOE. Clean air can be an issue with the combustion products of the steam generators. With the tight spacing and considerable steam generator. The current production is based on current best practices and economics. Also. Wyoming. but the heavy oil. making the operating expenses considerably higher than convention production.

.Other specialized technologies present other challenges. while the production techniques are technicall capable of developing the thermal projects. The in-situ projects require special equipment to deal with the corrosion of sub-surface and surface equipment and also require careful process of the produced combustion gas. And in Alaska. new approaches are needed to allow production of the shallow Alaska North Slope resources while protecting the permafrost.

SELECTION BETWEEN ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES The criteria for selection of a particular EOR process depends upon the various factors like reservoir conditions. . crude properties and economics feasibility.3. CO2 injection and surfactant flooding are considered best technically and economically but CO2 injection is preferred because of the following reasons: a) The amount of surfactant required for flooding is high therefore the cost increases b) CO2 injection gives higher oil recovery and cost is less as compared to surfactant flooding.

. The brine may contain toxic metals and radioactive substances. This can be very damaging to drinking water sources and the environment generally if not properly controlled.  CO2 is a major environmental pollutant therefore extra care to be taken while CO2 reinjection. as well as being very salty.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF EOR  Enhanced oil recovery wells typically produce large quantities of brine at the surface.

M.htm 4.Wikiversity.com 3.K. Fahim .ijastnet.wikipedia.org/wiki/enhanced_oil_recovery 2. Petroleum and gas field processing by H.Mohamed. A. Enhanced oil recovery . Abdel Aal. www.A.BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. www.