## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

**Hydraulic Calculations: One Method for Adjusting Flows for Liquids Other Than Water
**

Scott Martorano, CFPS Senior Manager Technical Service

August, 2008

Worldwide Fire Protection

www.vikingcorp.com

Hydraulic Calculations TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION DENSITY AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY THEORETICAL FLOW FROM AN ORIFICE FLOW CONVERSIONS: WHEN ARE THEY APPROPRIATE CONCLUSION REFERENCES 3 3 4 5 8 9 Page 2 of 9 .

If we assume that the vessel holding this water measures one foot on either side the total weight of 62. The pressure is then 62.4 lbs/ft² or .433 or 1 ÷ . The converse relationship uses these fundamental principles to determine the feet of potential head. if a gauge reads 43.433 = 2.041 Sg at 60 °F Page 3 of 9 .2 °F which has a specific gravity of 1.433 psi = 13 psi. Using the reciprocal of . multiplying 43. The specific gravity (Sg) of a substance may be defined as the ratio of the weight density of a substance to the weight density of another substance.3 psi x 2.02.4 divided by 144. Various NFPA standards address these situations in different ways and provide the system designer with guidance as to whether or not a flow conversion should be considered. Another important relative measurement is specific gravity.Hydraulic Calculations INTRODUCTION When conducting hydraulic calculations of automatic sprinkler systems it’s a valid assumption that the fluid is clear water with a weight density of 62.31 = 100 ft. Head is a term that is generally describes how many feet the water column extends above the base of the column. The pressure per square inch is calculated simply by 62.31p where (p) is equal to pounds per square inch (psi).4 = 1.4 lbs is exerted on the bottom area of 1 ft² or 144 in². This means that for every elevated foot of water the pressure at the bottom of a water column will be increased by . DENSITY AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY Before addressing the specific situations it is important to review the fundamental principles used in fire protection hydraulics and where the standard flow formulas come from. For example if a water column stood 30 ft tall the pressure at the bottom would be 30 ft x .4 lbs/ft³ in all but a few situations1. We know as previously stated that one cubic foot of water clear water weighs 62. The water column is 100 ft tall.433 psi. change the weight density of the fluid medium being calculated and in some cases may require a conversion of the standard flow formula Q = K√P to calculate accurate sprinkler flow. Sg = Wa ÷ Wb Where Sg = specific gravity Wa = weight of substance lbs/ft³ Wb = weight of water 62.96 lbs/ft³ at 60 °F we can determine the specific gravity as follows: 64. typically water at 39.31 we can determine that the potential head (h) by using the formula h = 2.96 ÷ 62.4 lbs/ft³ For example if the density of a propylene glycol and water solution is 64. Applications where antifreeze solution and foam water solution are required.3 psi at the base of a water storage tank. For example.433 lbs/in².4 lbs.

2 ft/sec) h = the head in feet (2. The basic principle being that liquids with a specific gravity less that water (1. The specific gravity will also be an essential piece of information if the need to modify the flow formulas when required.31P) The theoretical flow from an orifice formula can be written as4: Q = πd² ÷ 576 √2gh Understanding that we will have to convert Q to gallons per minute the formula needs to be modified further to insert 7.0) will float on the surface of the water and liquids with a higher specific gravity than water will sink below the surface of the water.Hydraulic Calculations Understanding the concept of specific gravity becomes particularly useful when dealing with flammable and combustible liquids.48 x πd² ÷ 576 √2gh Page 4 of 9 . THEORETICAL FLOW FROM AN ORIFICE The foundation formula for flow through an orifice is Q = av where3: Q = flow in cubic feet per second a = the cross sectional area in square feet v = velocity in feet per second The formula for area in square feet is: a = πD² ÷ 4 Converted the formula to find the area in square inches the formula is modified to: A = πd² ÷ 576 Velocity can be expressed as: v = √2gh where: v = velocity g = acceleration due to gravity (32.48 gallon per cubic foot and 60 seconds in one minute: Q = 60 x 7.

22. and adjusted K-factors for fluid properties. so no adjustment is required.22. From our earlier examples we know that our potential head was calculated using 2. However.1.Hydraulic Calculations When simplified and the discharge coefficient (c) is added for the orifice the formula is written as: Q = 29. NFPA 16 Standard for the Installation of Foam-Water Sprinkler and Foam Water Spray Systems has address the procedure for the hydraulic calculation of piping carrying foam water solution by stating that the piping shall be sized as if carrying plain water. Sprinklers such as the Viking K 25.” A.5.2) (2.5.4 lbs/ft³.2. The purpose of adjusting the sprinkler K factor is Page 5 of 9 . This makes perfect sense for sprinklers that are not listed with an antifreeze solution.4. the friction loss shall also be calculated using the Darcy Weisbach equation shown in 22.4 lbs/ft³ in the calculation of velocity. Part of our equation for flow from an orifice (v= √2gh) also written as [v= √(2) (32. new language has been added to the 2007 edition of NFPA 13 Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in section 22.1 which states “For antifreeze solutions greater than 40 gal in size. FLOW CONVERSIONS: WHEN ARE THEY APPROPRIATE? As stated earlier.4.4. However.5. This was calculated using a weight density of clear water of 62. In this case no flow conversion is required for the system to ensure an accurate measurement. These can include applications where foam water solution or antifreeze solutions are required. there are a limited number of cases when the fluid medium within the sprinkler system is not solely clear water.4.4.4.3 using the Moody diagram.31P.1 and A.2 ESFR have been through extensive fire test with propylene glycol solution and the listing of this sprinkler describes the concentrations of propylene glycol allowed at specific starting pressures.4. when using sprinklers that have not been through testing with an antifreeze solution NFPA 13 now requires a K factor adjustment to the selected sprinkler. ε-factors that are represented for aged pipe. If the fluid medium is different than water than the weight density will be different which may require a conversion in the formulas for accurate flow measurement.31) (P)] uses the assumption that it is the weight density of water 62.84cd²√P This formula should be familiar to anyone who has evaluated a water supply by measuring velocity pressure from a fire hydrant. The formula can be reduced further to a single constant “K” for a given sprinkler: Q = K√P It is important to remember that a fundamental part of this formula was derived based on the weight density of water. This is because the density of antifreeze solution can increase dramatically at temperatures below freezing and we know from the information earlier that the formulas used in standard hydraulic calculations assume the fluid medium is water between 40 °F and 100 °F.1 goes on to state: “Published K factors are based upon water at ambient conditions and need to be modified to address different fluid properties”.

minimum temperature expected in the area where the sprinkler system is being used and finally the weight density or specific gravity of the antifreeze solution. Flow required is: 130 x .0 √(10. Once the specific gravity for the antifreeze solution has been determined the flow conversion can begin with the formula: The standard formula is Q = K√P Adjusting with the specific gravity of the antifreeze solution the formula becomes Q = K√(P ÷ Sg). Using the standard formula without conversion the required starting pressure is: P = (Q ÷ K)² P = (26 ÷ 8)² P = 10. The project is OH-2 with sprinklers spaced at 130 ft² and a density requirement of . It is important to keep in mind that “solution” refers to when the antifreeze is mixed with water.2 = 26 gpm. The adjustment is a change in the formulas only which results in the higher starting pressure. It is important to keep in mind that the actual K factor does not change. if the antifreeze loop was greater than 40 gallons as described in NFPA 13 in an area with sustained temperatures at -20 °F and a 50% propylene glycol and water solution is being used. The critical piece of information needed to make the adjustment is the specific gravity of the antifreeze solution being used.56 psi ÷ 1.2 gpm/ft².085 we can see what the actual flow would be of propylene glycol solution. Q = K√(P ÷ Sg) Q = 8.085) Q = 25 gpm Page 6 of 9 . K factor 8.56 psi When using the adjusted formula to calculate flow when considering the antifreeze and the starting pressure of 10.085. The specific gravity of the solution is 1. This varies with temperature so it is important to contact the manufacture of the antifreeze to get the specific information about the type of antifreeze being used.Hydraulic Calculations ultimately to achieve a higher starting pressure for the sprinkler.56 ÷ 1.0 sprinklers have been selected. This includes the concentration of antifreeze in the solution. For example. A higher starting pressure will result in higher flow rates.

The reasons and adjustments made should be noted on the hydraulic calculation to provide the AHJ with the purpose of the higher flow rate. Calculate the required flow and pressure for the sprinkler selected using the standard formula Q = K√P. the sprinkler K factor can be mathematically adjusted prior to the actual calculation to obtain a new starting pressure which should be used in the actual hydraulic calculations. For the previous example we used a specific gravity of 1.085) Page 7 of 9 . The initial sprinkler flow will be at approximately a . Use the adjusted formula to determine the adjusted K factor. The changes have occurred prior to the actual calculation and will carry through mathematically. Using the standard formula without conversion. Step 1. K = Q ÷ √(P ÷ Sg) K = 26 ÷ √(10.2 = 26 gpm. Using this method allows the designer to continue to use the manufactures published technical information and helps avoid confusion during the engineering and AHJ review process.Hydraulic Calculations We see that there is a 1 gpm difference between the water calculation and the antifreeze calculation. When the heavier liquid is not taken into consideration the actual flow will be less than expected. The flow required from the previous example is: 130 x . To account for the different density of the fluid and ensure the proper hydraulic calculations are completed with accurate flows.2 gpm/ft².56÷1. From the previous example: The sprinkler selected is a K of 8. the required starting pressure is: P = (Q ÷ K)² P = (26 ÷ 8)² P = 10. When using this method there is no reason to continue using the adjusted K factor during the actual hydraulic calculation. First determine the required flow and starting pressure under normal clear water condition.192 gpm/ft² instead of the required . Adjusting the starting pressure prior to the calculation provides the higher flow rate.0.56 psi Step 2.085 for propylene glycol at -20 °F for 50% solution.

Page 8 of 9 . Mathematically this will carry through the entire calculation. Only the adjusted starting pressure and flow rate are used. Note: The adjusted K factor is not used in the actual hydraulic calculations. Adequate flow in accordance with the required design is essential for fire control.56 The adjusted flow = 27 gpm Step 4. Step 3. Section 22. Start the actual calculation using the actual K factors selected for the system with the adjusted starting pressure and flow rates.1 of NFPA 13 also requires that the calculation be done using the Darcy-Weisbach equation for determining friction loss when the antifreeze system is over 40 gallons in size.39 psi.0 sprinkler to run the actual calculation.33. verify the adequacy of the water supply and prove the of the system using the standard flow formula. CONCLUSION Basic hydraulic principles are the foundation of automatic sprinkler design. It should be noted that The NFPA 13 Handbook also offers commentary on this subject.4. Insert the adjusted K factor into the standard flow formula using the actual required pressure. It is critically important to understand where the formulas come from and how to convert the formulas if necessary. The designer can use the adjusted starting pressure with the K 8. In this example the adjusted calculation will actually provide a density of a . Step 5.33√10.4.207 gpm/ft² when the antifreeze has been discharged and 100% water is flowing from the sprinklers. P = (Q ÷ K)² P = (27 ÷ 8)² The starting pressure that should be used to start our calculation = 11.5.Hydraulic Calculations The adjusted K factor is = 8. Using the higher starting pressure to increase the required flow actually ensures the minimum flow is achieved when the heavier antifreeze is being discharged. Q = K√P Q = 8. Recalculate using the adjusted flow and the actual K factor selected to get the new required starting pressure for use in the standard flow formula.

Second Edition. 2000.Hydraulic Calculations REFERENCES CITED 1 Hickey. 4 Wass. Harry. Stillwater OK . pg 6. Quincy. pg 45-46. Fire Hydraulics and Water Supply Analysis. 2nd Edition. Oklahoma State University. 1980. Hydraulics for Fire Protection. 3 Hickey. Page 9 of 9 .. 1980. National Fire Protection Association. Hydraulics for Fire Protection. Batterymarch Park. pg 75. National Fire Protection Association. Sprinkler hydraulics and What it’s All About. MA 02269. Bethesda. Society of Fire Protection Engineers. pg 40. Harry. Quincy. Pat D. S. 2 Brock. MD. Harold. MA 02269.. Batterymarch Park. Fire Protection Publications.. 2000.

- Pump and Hydraulic Calculation
- Sprinkler Calculation
- Pump Sizing
- Firefighting Hydraulic Calculation
- Foam System Calculations Sheet_100309
- Hydraulic -Fire Calculations
- Hydraulic Conversions + Calculations Excel
- Fire Protection Hydraulic Calculations
- Foam
- pdh engineer fire sprinkler system
- Water for Fire Fighting
- Fire Safety Manual
- Copy of sprinkler design course notes
- BRE186+(design+smoke+ventilation+shopping+centres)
- Hydraulic Calculations Fire Protection
- Acca Manual j and d Mechanical Requirements
- Hydraulics
- Abbreviations Hydraulic
- Hydraulic Symbols
- Hydraulic Design Manual
- Lecture Notes on Turbulence
- TMHP51 Hydraulic Servo Systems Rydberg 2008
- Hydraulic Symbols
- Hydraulics
- Hydraulic Power System Analysis
- Design Guide Fire Protection
- Hydraulics
- Hydraulic Hose
- Fire Sprinklers
- Fire Protection Design Manual

Skip carousel

- 2012-04-30 Statewide Automatic Fire Sprinklers Comparison
- As 4118.1.5-1996 Fire Sprinkler Systems Components - Deluge and Pre-Action Valves
- FDNY report on fatal fire, July 20, 1994
- Policies and Impact of Installing Sprinklers in Residential Buildings in San Francisco
- As 2118.1-2006 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems General Systems
- Martin Fine, William Becker and Philip Becker, Individually, and William Becker and Philip Becker D/B/A Becker & Becker, All Doing Business as 649 Broadway Equities Co., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, 725 F.2d 179, 2d Cir. (1984)
- As 4118.2.1-1995 Fire Sprinkler Systems Piping - General
- As 2118.4-1995 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Residential
- Proposed seclusion room requirements
- Breton, LLC v. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance, 4th Cir. (2011)
- As 4118.1.1-1996 Fire Sprinkler Systems Components - Sprinklers and Sprayers
- As 2118.6-1995 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Combined Sprinkler and Hydrant
- Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest v. American Automatic Sprinkler Systems, Incorporated, 201 F.3d 538, 4th Cir. (2000)
- Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension Fund Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the National Automatic Sprinkler Local 669 Ua Education Fund v. Zengel Brothers, Inc., F & J Zengel Plumbing & Heating, Inc., 911 F.2d 725, 4th Cir. (1990)
- HB 147-2000 Sprinklers Simplified
- NY B14 NYC Building Codes Fdr- Entire Contents- NYC Codes- 1st Pgs for Ref 541
- As 2118.9-1995 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Piping Support and Installation
- Civil Defense Library Program (1951)
- As 2118.2-2010 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Drencher Systems
- Memphis-Light-Gas-and-Electric-FP1
- Rocky-Mountain-Power--Agricultural-Energy-Services-Schedule-Optional-for-Qualifying-Customers
- 09-03-2015 PDF
- Stage 2 restrictions
- In Re Rafter Seven Ranches LP, 546 F.3d 1194, 10th Cir. (2008)
- Scientific American Supplement, No. 363, December 16, 1882 by Various
- Hered, LLC v. Seneca Ins Co, 3rd Cir. (2011)
- SENATE HEARING, 108TH CONGRESS - NEEDS OF THE FIRE SERVICE
- As 4118.1.8-1999 Fire Sprinkler Systems Components - Pressure-Reducing Valves
- As 2118.3-2010 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Deluge Systems
- National Archives Storage Facility

Skip carousel

- As 2148-2004 Milk and Liquid Milk Products - Density Hyrometers for Use in Products With a Surface Tension Of
- tmp9817.tmp
- tmpDFA1.tmp
- null
- As 1289.6.7.3-1999 Methods of Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes Soil Strength and Consolidation Tests
- tmp5EA
- tmp2439.tmp
- tmp5ACD
- tmpAE4D
- SAFC Biosciences Research Report - Commercially Available Serum-Free Insect Media
- As 1774.6-2001 Refractories and Refractory Materials - Physical Test Methods Determination of True Density
- Air Density Explorer Press Kit
- tmp7F75.tmp
- null
- tmpAEAE
- Time to Trash Government Intervention in Garbage Service, Cato Policy Analysis No. 331
- Army Aviation Digest - Jun 1955
- As 1289.6.1.3-1998 Methods of Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes Soil Strength and Consolidation Tests
- Phed Committee #1 June 29, 2009
- tmp8A3D
- tmpBAA5.tmp
- Untitled
- tmp9F2
- tmp71D.tmp
- null
- As 1289.5.3.2-2004 Methods of Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes Soil Comp Action and Density Tests - Dete
- Untitled
- null
- tmp25B9
- Untitled

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading