P. 1
IABMAS-BMC-BMS-Report-20100806[1].pdf

IABMAS-BMC-BMS-Report-20100806[1].pdf

|Views: 33|Likes:
Published by Jose Alonso Murillo

More info:

Published by: Jose Alonso Murillo on Apr 22, 2013
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/04/2013

pdf

text

original

Name (version)

APT-BMS (2008)

Aspect

description

Owner (webpage)

Provincia Autonoma di Trento (Autonomous Province of Trento)
(http://bms.heidi.it/ - guest access: user: guest; passwd: dims425)

Date implemented (current / first
version)

2008 / 2004

Developer(s) (webpage)

University of Trento, Department of Mechanical and Structural
Engineering
(http://www.ing.unitn.it/dims)

References and Manuals (available
at - languages)

3 User manuals and 11 procedures
(http://bms.heidi.it/ – available at the front page; in Italian)

Basic information

Users (Principal / Other)

Provincia Autonoma di Trento (Autonomous Province of Trento) /
None

Aspect

description

Platform

Microsoft SQL

Architecture

Client, Application Server, Database, Data Anlysis Server

Data collection capabilities

800 Gb (can be expanded)

Reporting capabilities

Reports, graphical, tabular, GIS

IT information

Web access

Yes

Structure types

No.

Structure types

No.

Structure types

No.

Bored tunnels

Locks and sluices

Weirs

Bridges

1011

Retaining Walls

Quays

Culverts

Storm surge
barriers

Piers

Cut and cover tunnels

Support structures

Galleries

Protection
structures

Archives

description

Construction data

Any digital design document can be uploaded into the database;
reference to hard paper archives is also included

Inspection reports

Current and past inspection report are generated on demand

Inventory information

(of principal user)

Intervention history

Past intervention are listed, design document can be uploaded

Adey, Klatter, Kong

IABMAS 2010

63

Name (version)

APT-BMS (2008)

Data collection level

description

Element level

Each SU and C (see below) includes a set of Standard Elements (SE),
which are specified in terms of quantity and Condition State.

Structure level

Inspection report and summary. In addition, the bridge is broken
down into Structural Units (SU), such as deck, piles, abutments, which
are defined as conceptual entities characterized by common attributes
(such as length, material, typology, spatial location…). The spatial
arrangement of SUs is defined through logical entities labeled
connections (C).

Assessment on element level

description

Condition

Evaluated at the element level on the basis of a procedure that
acknowledges AASHTO Commonly Recognized (CoRe) Standard
Element System (3 to 5 possibly conditions identified based on visual
inspection.

Safety, vulnerability, risk

Safety evaluated at the structural unit level, based on formal safety
evaluation procedures.

Load carrying capacity

Recorded at the structure level.

Assessment on structure level

description

Condition

Different condition indices (overall CS, apparent age) computed from
the condition of the single elements.

Safety

Risk computed from unit level

Load carrying capacity

Recorded into the database when formally assessed for sub-standard
bridges.

Inspection information

Additional

No

Element level

description

Predefined standard

User can define the effect of interventions

User defined/custom

Effect of standard interventions are predefined, can be customized by
user

Intervention strategy

User define the routine maintenance policy

Structure level

description

User defined/custom

No

Predefined standard

No

Intervention strategies

No

Project level

description

User defined/custom

Yes

Predefined standard

No

Intervention strategies

Yes

Costs

description

Inspection cost

Yes

Intervention cost

Yes

Traffic delay cost

No (will be implemented in 2010 version)

Indirect user cost

No (will be implemented in 2010 version)

Life-cycle costing

Yes for repair and replacement scenarios.

Prioritization

description

Intervention information

Performance measures

Automatic evaluation of two priority indices for replacement and
repair scenarios. On-demand cumulative-time risk and cost analysis of
specific MR&M scenarios.

Adey, Klatter, Kong

IABMAS 2010

64

Name (version)

APT-BMS (2008)

Aspect

description

Deterioration

Based on Markovian models

Improvement (e.g. repair,
rehabilitation, reconstruction)

Based on Markovian models

Cost

LCC evaluated based on intervention scenario and maintenance
strategy.

Planning time-frame

5-year time span for short term intervention scenarios and 50- year
time span for strategic planning.

Use

description

For budget preparation

Yes

For setting of performance
standards

Available, but not exploited so far.

For matching funding sources

Yes

Prediction information

Additional

For performing risk analysis under specific scenarios, including
earthquake and natural disasters.

Data collection

data collecting group

Inventory

Assigned to professional engineers.

Inspection/assessment

Owner (APT) for 1-year routine inspection. Assigned to professional
engineers for 3-year principal inspections and formal safety
evaluation.

Intervention/planning

Owner (APT)

Additional

Quality assurance

description

Education for inspectors

Mandatory training course offered by university. On-site support at
the first inspection.

Certification of inspectors

No

Education for users

Yes

Certification for users

No

Operational information

Other …

Posterior quality control of inspectors activity.

Add-

itional

Adey, Klatter, Kong

IABMAS 2010

65

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->