This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

BooksAudiobooksComicsSheet Music### Categories

### Categories

### Categories

Editors' Picks Books

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Editors' Picks Audiobooks

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Editors' Picks Comics

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Editors' Picks Sheet Music

Hand-picked favorites from

our editors

our editors

Top Books

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Audiobooks

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Comics

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Top Sheet Music

What's trending, bestsellers,

award-winners & more

award-winners & more

Welcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out more

Vogel’s main objective was to simulate two-phase flow through a reservoir into a wellbore. By analyzing a number of different solution-gas-drive reservoirs, he established an empirical relationship which could apply to all such reservoirs. The computer program that he prepared solved the equations of flow for somewhat idealized reservoirs. For example, he assumed that the reservoir was circular, completely bounded, and with a fully penetrating well at its center; that the formation was uniform, isotropic, and had a constant water saturation; that gravity and compressibility could be neglected and that semi-steady-state flow occurred. Vogel simulated reservoirs covering a wide range of conditions. These conditions included differing reservoir relative permeability characteristics as well as the various effects of well spacings, fracturing geometry, and skin restrictions. Analysis was limited to flow conditions below the bubble point. Vogel found that as depletion occurs in a solution-gas-drive reservoir, the productivity of a typical well decreases. This occurs primarily because (1.) the reservoir pressure is reduced, and (2.) because increasing gas saturation causes greater resistance to oil flow. The result is a progressive downward shift of the IPR ( Figure 1 ).

Figure 1

When this was done for each curve. relative permeabilities. they were replotted as shown in Figure 2 . Vogel. as long as the bottomhole flowing pressure was below the bubble point. on the horizontal axis." He obtained these curves by plotting the bottomhole flowing pressures divided by the average reservoir pressure on the vertical axis and the production rate divided by the maximum flow rate. then. he developed a standard reference curve which can be used for all solution-gas-drive reservoirs. This standard curve is shown in Figure 3 .The values on the lines reflect the percentage of reserves produced. Figure 2 It is immediately apparent with this transformation that the curves now are remarkably similar throughout most of the producing life of the reservoir. took the important step of plotting each curve as "dimensionless" IPR’s or "type curves. C’’. and wellbore characteristics. After analyzing twenty-one different reservoirs with various crude oil properties. Extending this observation one step further. . Vogel found that IPR’s generally exhibited a similar shape.

and R is the average reservoir pressure or the bubble-point pressure. pwf. whichever is lower.000 0. X-q/q’ 1.Figure 3 Specific plot points for this curve are given in the table below. This reference curve is described exactly by the following equation: Note that q is the producing rate corresponding to a given bottomhole flowing pressure. The use of this curve does not imply that all reservoirs are identical.088 .95 0.00 0. but that it may be used as a reference standard for all reservoirs within a tolerable error. q’ is the well’s potential at 100 percent drawdown.

85 0.15 0. Assume that Vogel’s dimensionless standard curve describes this well’s behavior.832 0.592 0.40 0.60 0.80 0.20 0.748 0.900 0.70 0.05 0.65 0.35 0.700 0.988 1.30 0.45 0.0.468 0. .958 0.868 0.532 0.00 Example: Assume: q = 1172 BOPD pwf = 716 psi R 0.928 0.972 0.252 0.75 0.90 0.25 0.50 0.792 0.55 0.000 = 1420 psi = pb R Construct the IPR curve for this well at the average reservoir pressure.10 0.400 0.648 0.172 0.328 0.

2). This gives a value of: q’= = 1684 BOPD. . we find the dimensionless rate (see Figure 4 ).First. we calculate the dimensionless pressure. With this value and Vogel’s dimensionless standard curve (or Equation 1.696. Figure 4 = 0.

’ at the appropriate end points.The type curve can now be made into this well’s IPR curve simply by adding the values for average reservoir pressure and C. Above the bubble point the IPR curve is a straight line. Such as extrapolation is shown in Figure 6 . . Figure 5 Remember that Vogel’s results are only for the curved portion of the IPR curve which exists below the bubble point. We can obtain its shape by drawing the tangent to the curve at the bubble-point pressure and extending it to the original average reservoir pressure. The scale of the graph is now established and any desired point can now be read ( Figure 5 ). pi.

we need to know a single bottomhole flowing pressure and its corresponding flow rate at that average reservoir pressure.Figure 6 In order to determine the shape of the IPR curve at a future average reservoir pressure. unknown average reservoir pressure. The difficulty is that we do not have well test data at some future. This would yield a second curve. . Using our dimensionless curve and a known data point we would repeat what we have just done.

vogel ipr calculation method.doc

vogel ipr calculation method.doc

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

We've moved you to where you read on your other device.

Get the full title to continue

Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.

scribd