You are on page 1of 10

PRESENTED BY:-

•DIWAKAR CHATURVEDI

1
CONSUMERISM IS A MOVEMENT DIRECTED
TO
PROTECT THE CONSUMER AND ENSURE
THAT
THE CONSUMER GETS BEST RETURN IN
EXCHANGE FOR THE MONEY HE SPENDS

2
 EVER INCREASING COMPLEXITY OF
LEGISTATIVE CONTROLS AND GOODS.
 ALTERED PATTERNS OF COMMUNICATION.
 VEED FOR INFORMED PARTICIPATION.
 FUNDAMENTAL INNOVATIONS.
 PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPMENT.

3
 CONSUMER INFORMATION GAP.
 PATTERN OF COMMUNICATION.
 PERFORMANCE GAP.
 ABSENCE OF INFORMED PARTICIPATION.
 BUDGET SQUEEZE AND INFLATION.
 POVERTY OF CONSUMERS.

4
 CREATION OF CRITICAL AWARENESS.
 ACTIVE CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT.
 IMBIBING SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.
 REALISING ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIBILITY.
 CONSUMER SOLIDARITY.

5
 RIGHTS TO SAFETY.
 RIGHTS TO BE INFORMED.
 RIGHTS TO CHOOSE.
 RIGHTS TO BE HEARD.
 RIGHTS TO REDRESS.
 RIGHTS TO HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT.
 RIGHTS TO CONSUMER EDUCATION.

6
THE FAKE DRIVING LICENCE RACKET IS TOO
ACTIVE IN THE COUNTRY THAT IT IS
NECESSARY TO VARIFY THE VALIDITY OF
THE LICENCE .
 THERE IS NO WAY TO RECOGNISE THE
FAKE DRIVING LICENCE.
 DIFFERENT STATES HAVE DIFFERENT WAYS
OF MAKING THE LICENCES. SOME TAG THE
LOGO, HOLOGRAMS BUT SOME DO NOT
BOTHER FOR IT.

7
 IT BECOMES MORE DIFFICULT TO KNOW
THE VALIDITY OF THE LICENCE MADE IN
OTHER STATE AND BEING USED IN OTHER.
 THE SUPREME COURT HAS ALSO
ACCEPTED THAT IT IS DIFFICULT AND
ABOUT IMPOSSIBLE TO VERIFY THE FAKE
LICENCE.
 IN SOME CASES RTO HAS RENEWED THE
FAKE LICENCE ITSELF AND THE LICENCE
WAS MADE UNDER THEIR OWN BRANCH.

8
 THE SUPREME COURT HAS DENIED
TO PAY THE CLAIM BY THE
INSURANCE COMPANY WHEN THE
D.L. IS FAKE.
 THE CONSUMER i.e. THE MOTOR
OWNER IS INNOCENT BUT HELPLESS
BECAUSE HE IS GETTING NOTHING
WHILE HIS INSTALMENTS WERE
REGULAR.
9
 THE LICENCE PORCESS SHOULD BE MADE
ONLINE SO THAT THE VERIFICATION MAY
BE MADE EASY.
 THE HOLO GRAMS AND OTHER SIGNS
MUST BE MADE SO THAT THE ORIGINAL
AND FAKE LICENCES MIGHT BE
RECOGNISED EASILY.

10