This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Haitao Tang1, Petteri Pöyhönen1, Ove Strandberg1, Kostas Pentikousis2 Joachim Sachs3, Francesco Meago1, Janne Tuononen1, Ramon Aguero4
Nokia Siemens Networks, 2VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland 3 Ericsson Research, 4University of Cantabria
run out of its power quite soon, e.g. every a few hours. This would lead to terrible end user experience due to frequent recharging needs. Hence it becomes clear that this type of usage scenario will not be practical, and operating optimally a battery-powered multiaccess device without sacrificing reachability and connectivity becomes one of the key issues to be solved in this new environment. Although in this paper we consider RAT-related issues only, the problem itself is, of course, much wider including how to save power with other peripherals in a mobile device like a screen. Radio access technologies (RATs) for mobile hand-held devices are typically designed to support certain built-in power saving capabilities. Some provide more effective power saving schemes than others (cf. cellular technologies GSM and UMTS vs. WLAN; see Section II). When multiple RATs are put into a battery-powered multiaccess device, their combined energy consumption becomes a significant factor and power saving becomes an important problem that needs to be solved. The problem becomes even more interesting since the power saving solution for a multiaccess device needs to work with the holistic view for various RATs coexisting in the same device, where some of them have their own power saving functions while others do not. If we could effectively reduce the power consumption of the radio accesses without sacrificing reachability and connectivity whenever there is no data flow over their links, battery lifetime could increase significantly. Therefore, even in the sense of saving power, a multiaccess paging function is needed for the multiaccess environment . But, what constitutes multiaccess paging? How is a specific multiaccess paging scheme defined? How should a paging scheme be applied to a multiaccess environment? How much battery power would a multiaccess paging scheme save? These are the questions this work attempts to answer. There are several issues to consider for each multiaccess paging scheme, such as, for example, scalability, security, reliability and cost-efficiency. We need also to check if the scheme supports the coexistence of both radio accesses with and without their own paging functions. It should benefit radio accesses without their own paging functions thus providing further power savings in the multiaccess environment. The paper is organized as follows. Section II presents related work and Section III details paging issues in multiaccess environment. In Section IV, we propose two multiaccess pag-
Abstract- Battery-powered multiaccess devices, with their increased flexibility and reachability, are becoming common. Such devices would have to disassociate their radio accesses from the surrounding networks whenever they are left unused, in order to address battery lifetime limitations. In single-access networks, paging has been proven an effective method for minimizing power consumption. In a heterogeneous multiaccess environment, a paging function may be even more important in extending battery lifetimes. This study investigates the issues at hand, presents related work, analyzes the paging issues in multiaccess scenarios, and proposes two multiaccess paging schemes, which utilize (but do not replace) existing paging functions in access technologies as a foundation to realize multiaccess paging. We further specify how to realize multiaccess paging in Ambient Networks, and present numerical analysis results on the different degrees of battery lifetime savings under different communication, network and device use settings. Keywords- Paging, multiaccess, power management, battery lifetime
I. INTRODUCTION Today, mobile phones and other hand-held communication devices are often equipped with two or more access technologies for accessing communication networks. The access technologies may be wireless access technologies such as Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), Wireless LAN (WLAN), as well as any future wireless access technology. We refer to these devices as multiaccess devices and we expect them to be very popular due to their improved flexibility and reachability. Ideally, a multiaccess device would always have all its radio accesses actively associated with all surrounding networks. It could thus dynamically and freely use one or more of the always-available active accesses to support a given communication session according to the related communication preferences, such as, application type, access price etc. However, it is difficult to reach this ideal situation due the problem all mobile devices face: limited battery lifetime. Imagine that we have a battery-powered multiaccess device that needs to maintain multiple active radio accesses simultaneously. According to the capacities offered by modern battery technologies, the battery of a multiaccess device would
but also on the total duration of a connection. and a lot of efforts have been spent for designing energy efficient physical and MAC layer protocols. Paging Mobile cellular networks use the paging operation to request mobile devices that might be in idle mode to update their location information and to switch to the connected mode. WLAN standards (such as the IEEE 802. We survey paging-related work in the next subsection to set the stage for the solutions we are considering. a MAC layer mechanism. . B. as mentioned in the previous section. Xiao et al. due to an incoming connection request. multiaccess. HSPA. Corujo et al. Wu et al. Typically. PSV. both stationary and mobile. Unfortunately. A. A similar mechanism is introduced in  where the device’ s packet queues are used to make a power management decisions like switching on and off the display.  propose a mechanism to adjust the device working mode based on its associated network activity/load. although these papers provide great insights into the issues related to multiaccess. EDGE. RELATED WORK This section briefly surveys recent results in three distinct. we investigate the amount of battery lifetime saved by the proposed multiaccess paging schemes under a given case. and the battery recovery effects. and thus can fail to deliver energy savings while maintaining reasonable performance. We therefore argue that multiaccess paging can play a critical role in coordinating multiaccess transmission and could allow mobile devices to make the most out of their fixed-size power source.11 Power Saving Mode (PSV) is employed. we study how to realize multiaccess paging for ambient networks. paging supports additional power saving in the idle mode through a discontinuous reception of paging messages. and paging. One of the main differences between radio technologies supporting paging is how the PCH or corresponding downlink channel is implemented according to radio access frame design. PDAs and cell phones. In Section VI. Another way to save power is introduced in . they do not address energy consumption per se. In short. In effect. it is crucial to address the problem of how to make the most out of the multiaccess capability while limiting battery power consumption. many features that were meant to be power conserving prove not to be so or.  show the impact of signaling timing issues over networkcontrolled handovers when combining L2 and L3 information to improve handover execution procedures between 3G and WLAN networks. Paging is typically done based on “ paging areas”consisting of one or more access points/base stations. Nevertheless. in general. in that they may even hurt performance and lead to a less than adequate user experience. for example. Moreover. We recently investigated different handover strategies for multiaccess networks emphasizing on finding the optimal mobile terminal allocation that maximizes network resource utilization . are currently a very active research area. several power-efficient MAC layer protocols have been proposed and. the transmission patterns. Multiaccess Multiaccess networks. 3rd Generation Partnership Program (3GPP) networks (Release 7). In particular. communicating over a wireless medium consumes more battery power than CPU processing .ing schemes for different purposes. As a result. Krashinsky and Balakrishnan  demonstrate that when the IEEE 802. Sections VII-VIII conclude this paper. For example. In idle mode. a mobile device does not need to monitor all incoming paging indicators. for example. energy consumption and power saving. Energy Consumption and Power Saving Power consumption is a critical issue for battery-powered devices such as notebooks. was introduced without considering the anticipated application workloads or the transport layer mechanisms. C. such as. II. every effort is made to make the physical layer as energy efficient as possible. considering pure mobility solutions but not attempting to optimize the way of handovers. mobile devices cannot send or receive user traffic data.11 family of protocols). namely.  study mainly 3G and WLAN scenarios. the time spent with all network interfaces “ on” . thus they can only monitor downlink channel(s) such as the Paging Channel (PCH) in  over which they can be paged. even worse. we need to consider how to coordinate which interface to use and when the energy profile of a device would play a major role. the common remedies used are to adjust the transmission power and to employ power save (“ sleep” ) modes. when we consider multiaccess devices. In Section V. For batteryoperated devices. when researchers consider different ways to save power in a single-interface wireless mobile device. Given that the majority of mobile and portable devices operate using a fixed-size power source (typically rechargeable) for accessing wireless networks. the design of energy efficient MAC and physical layer protocols is not coordinated with the design of power conserving transport or application layer protocols. power consumption not only depends on the amount of data sent and received. For example. Paging also makes it possible to further reduce power consumption in mobile devices because they can switch to the idle mode  when there is no imminent need for data transmission. In other words. thus this monitoring is done periodically based on the defined cycle. but closely inter-related areas. It is important to note that energy efficiency does not depend solely on the amount of avoidable data retransmission. where radio channel allocations are ad- justed dynamically to optimize capacity and power consumption. users issuing web-like request/replies experience unjustified long delays. and CDMA2000 1xEV-DO  wide area wireless data networks employ rate adaptation to achieve the highest possible raw bit rates at the most economical power level for a specific level of interference. In mobile cellular architectures.
however. coreless RATs. like WLANs. On the other hand. The paging center represents the MN during the selective paging process when the network side selects the most appropriate access network over which the paging is then performed. A terminal will not be paged only for voice calls. PAGING IN A MULTIACCESS ENVIRONMENT Among the existing radio access technologies (RATs) paging is typically supported on those having so called core network functions. it is essential that multiaccess mobile devices maintain their device specific information like status information in the corresponding mobile cellular networks. today’ s cellular phone is mostly in the idle mode due to the fact that there are not many other things to do with the terminal except to make and receive phone calls. where paging is not tied to a specific radio access but exploits the full potential of a multiaccess environment. In Figure 1.III. It is thus independent of the type of RAT used for paging. MAP is triggered by an incoming data packet destined to the user’ s MN (message 1). the common paging center infers possible paging locations by considering the device’ s recent access of any of the associated networks (wireless or wired) under the common paging center and the device’ s latest geographical location. different radios should cooperate providing paging for each other including RATs that do not specify paging functions themselves. In this scheme. It proposes and presents two types of multiaccess paging approaches: registration-based paging and non-registration-based/registration-free paging. But even then. the device does not register and update its information to the common paging center itself. The common paging center and the multiaccess paging are not supposed to replace any RAT-specific paging. In other words. The non-registrationbased approach does not require any proactive registration of that information. Such RATs are. For example. For instance. The registration-based approach requires proactive updates of the device's paging location and capability to the common paging center in the network. Next. but also for other services such as chat and instant messaging. PAGING APPROACHES FOR MULTIACCESS This section studies what would constitute a paging approach for multiaccess. WLAN was designed to be more like a wireless extension for wired stationary nodes to help with reducing the amount of cabling and provide very short range mobility within one access point. In such an environment. there will be more diversity in the communication patterns and mobile services. A paging center resides at the core network of one or more cooperating operators and it represents the mobile node in the network side. In this scheme. efficient battery usage demands that power consumption is minimized for radio usage. Therefore a new approach for a common paging environment is required. The inclusion of heterogeneous mobility schemes into a common paging environment (where the paging is not tied to a specific radio) is missing. Figure 1 illustrates a block diagram of heterogeneous multiaccess networks. the amount of paging requests might increase further. In the multiaccess environment. In the average use case. and RAT3 is disabled. “ non-registration”means that there is no need for a multiaccess mobile device to report any of its capability and status information to the corresponding multiaccess networks for registration so that it can be paged. for example. We should not forget that once terminals start to host services. Here. Rather. Increasingly. the MN has its radio interfaces setup as follows: RAT1 is active. A. radio interfaces would very frequently use the power-saving mode and hence paging would be still required for most of the incoming service requests to the terminal. for example. do not typically support paging even though they may have power-saving modes for their radio. For instance. The paging center is aware of the MN’ s capabilities. while we would use multiaccess environment to provide possibly better end user reachability using several RATs. preferences and status. during this process the network may use the type and characteristics of an incoming traffic to select the most appropriate RAT for the paging in order to avoid unnecessary radio interface activations in a mobile device. Actually. efficient and “ battery-friendly” paging is not feasible by solely using the existing single-radio paging mechanisms independently. It is important to highlight that the common paging center fulfils the multiaccess paging by using all the available RATspecific paging schemes as its tools. In this networking environment. The reason for this is simply that coreless RATs were not designed for power-consumption critical hand-held terminals. the paging functionality is not coupled with a specific RAT. After this. MAP con- . based on registration and periodic update procedures. IV. two different concepts for multiaccess paging using existing single-radio paging functions are introduced. Another issue is that paging today is typically only incorporated for a specific mobility scheme. RAT2 is in idle mode. It is reported to the common paging center by an access network or a server over the network. The common paging center needs only very limited information on the device. In this type of approach. Usage information may include data related to node identifier  and time of discovery. the Mobile Anchor Point (MAP) provides a (global) Layer 3 reachability for a user’ s Mobile Node (MN). which does not necessarily coincide with the RAT to be enabled as a result of the paging. This new generic multiaccess paging function should be designed to take advantage of existing paging mechanisms implemented by each of the underlying RATs as a tool when making multiaccess paging. all 3GPP systems and the WiMAX system. Registration Based Selective Paging Scheme The registration-based selective paging (RBSP) scheme defines a model by which the paging can be done to support global reachability in heterogeneous multiaccess environments independently of the particular radio access network architecture. we expect that larger supply of services would turn into increased number of paging requests.
Registration-Free Paging Scheme We use Figure 2 to explain the registration-free paging (RFP) scheme for multiaccess networks and devices. and a paging center. application A can be a network function. the paging center could support multiple operators according to their business/technical agreements. Finally. and a RATx network for interfacing with the multiaccess devices. as would have been the case with the RBSP scheme. this scheme is not limited to a single operator network.g. Note that application A may actually be either a component of a certain paging function of the network. Application A starts by using the paging center (message 1). Application A can be one of the several possible entities. the network comprises three access networks. a multiaccess device B. In addition to the core network. RAT2 is discovered to be a potential candidate access for a new communication session. or an application running on behalf of another user trying to contact the communication device. the application that is trying to contact the multiaccess device B.tacts the paging center and requests the activation of one or more of the MN’ s radio accesses according to pertinent preferences. The paging center has no knowledge of the capabilities and status of multiaccess device B since it has not reported any of the information to the paging center. the MN activates its RAT2 radio interface and proceeds to switch it to the connected mode. In this example. It shows a block diagram of multiaccess networks with an application A.e. by sending a binding update in Mobile IP (message 7). it updates its address information at the MAP. As a result of this evaluation process. Additionally. and status (message 2).g. B. The multiaccess device B is a communication device that includes capabilities for communicating through all three access networks. Because the MN’ s locator (e. i. MAP can provide trigger information such as the traffic type of a received data packet destined to the MN. The MN replies back to the paging center (message 4) providing all required information. IP address) changes due to the deployment of a new RAT. Additionally. Figure 1: Registration-based selective paging example diagram. Figure 2: Registration-free paging example diagram. which has detected that someone is trying to contact the multiaccess device B and that multiaccess device B is not located in the previously known network destination anymore. e. The paging center has thus to send a paging message to multiaccess device B through the paging center’ s own pre-selected access networks using the associated RATspecific paging function. If the MN does not need its RAT1 connectivity anymore. For example. it can either disable RAT1 or move RAT1 to the idle mode. policies. The paging center is aware of MN’ s current state like active radio access (RAT1) and the “ initial”paging is done via this RAT (message 3) in order to notify the MN of the new communication session. application A is the “ calling application” . The paging center Assume now that application A initiates communication with the multiaccess device B and it has no up-to-date information on the network location of multiaccess device B. Once the MN has been paged. MAP is able to forward a received and buffered data packet to the MN over RAT2 (message 8). the MN may be asked to provide up-to-date location information. The RAT x network can be any suitable access network. a network service. Other alternatives are possible as well. a GSM network. The network-side functionality evaluates all MN’ s radio accesses and hence the paging center contacts the corresponding core network (concerning RAT3) to request its current coverage map (message 5). The paging center requests the core network to page the MN (message 6) via RAT2. including its current location information. Additionally. Messages 2a and 2b depict paging messages through the GSM network and through the RATx . resides in a core network owned by a single operator or a group of network (cooperating) operators.. a WLAN network. This map and the MN’ s up-to-date location information are then used to find whether the MN is potentially in a coverage area.
Requirements of Multiaccess Paging on the Access Sets of Ambient Networks In multiaccess networks a key function is to select the access to be used for a data session. MULTIACCESS PAGING FOR AMBIENT NETWORKS Ambient Networks (AN) defines the Ambient Control Space (ACS). the paging center may iteratively send the paging message through the remaining available access networks until multiaccess device B answers or the available access networks are exhausted. In this example the selected access network is the WLAN and message 4 depicts the response.g. which is responsible for coordinating different networks and their accesses . whereby a new connection is established between the application A and multiaccess device B. A R I A N I AN1 ACY AN2 ACY AN2 ACS AN3 ACS 2 : ARI Discovery() 3 : ACY Paging() 4 : ACY Paging Resp() 5 : ARI Advertising() 1 : ANI Discovery() 6 : ANI Advertising() Figure 3: Paging signaling in Ambient Networks. The paging center replies to application A. The ACS relies on power saving schemes (e. Optionally. which then pages AN1 through an ARI Discovery message through AN2 Ambient Connectivity (ACY). the MN determines the Detected Set (DS). paging and other mobility-related mechanisms) of specific connectivity layers. V. B. all currently in power save mode and that. The selection does not need to be an autonomous decision by either the multiaccess device B or the network. WLAN and RAT x) possibly in co-operation with the associated network as indicated by messages 3a-3c. AN2 ACY issues an ACY paging message towards AN1. has been studied extensively in [20-26]. the accesses which provide sufficient capabilities according to the service requirements are determined in the Candidate Set (CS). AN3 pages AN1. GSM.g. through ARI and ANI Advertising messages functioning as ARI and ANI paging responses. Otherwise. the connection between the communication device and the paging center may be dedicated to paging. informing how to contact multiaccess device B (message 5). access selection towards a proper connectivity layer may be triggered as explained next. This kind of access selection. Assume user AN1 has multiple access technologies. It is therefore foreseeable that when a device is in a power saving mode. certain sets (see e. in addition. which is filtered according to network and user policies. ) are used to maintain information about available accesses and evaluate them. from this the best-suited (collection of) access(es) is se- . or service data flow. Note that it is not mandatory to evaluate all available access networks. A. by sending an ANI Discovery message to AN2. Messages 2a and 2b are alternatives and both of them may be used one after the other. Multiaccess device B then activates the association with the selected access network and responds to the paging message through the selected access network. For the multi-radio resource management. In some cases only a subset of all available access networks may be evaluated. In turn. respectively. Alternatively. on a technology selected either by the AN2 ACS in the previous message. based on Multi-Radio Resource Management (MRRM). Via scanning. AN1 might reply to AN2 via a paging response through the same or another access with the required locator. which goes all the way back to AN3. while AN3 is willing to know the current AN1 locator through AN2 (see Figure 3). Multiaccess Paging Signaling in Ambient Networks The ACS has the capability to handle discovery and advertising across both Ambient Network Interface (ANI) and Am- bient Resource Interface (ARI). it is is idle under coverage of multi-access network AN2. it is possible that in some cases an actual evaluation of access networks is not performed. Assume that the multiaccess device B receives the paging message for example through the GSM network and it starts to evaluate the available access networks of various access technologies (in this case. The resulting Validated Set (VS) contains the usable accesses of the MN (without considering particular necessities from the application).network. or by the same AN2 ACY. if sufficient information is otherwise available for selecting the access network as the desired connection. These access selection approaches are based on the assumption that connectivity is established to available access networks and thus the mobile node is always reachable. Moreover. For a service data flow. the paging center may setup the operator’ s middle boxes (such Network Address Translators. Multiaccess device B and/or the associated network select the suitable access network for the desired connection (this may depend on the calling application in addition to available network resources). both of them may take a joint decision (see  for more details on a proposal on how to achieve this). If the multiaccess device cannot be reached through the first pre-selected access network. the ACS cannot by itself do much.NATs and firewalls) for the anticipated communication session allowing application A to communicate directly with the multiaccess device B. if the application A is located outside the operator network. Application A will then be able to establish communication with multiaccess device B (message 6). Figure 4 depicts these access sets for a mobile node. or only connected through a battery-saving idle mode. Multiaccess paging methods need to extend this scheme to the cases when a mobile node is disconnected from some of the available accesses. Instead.
B. The multiaccess devices in the simulation have the access capabili- ties of GSM. and not associated (idle) mode. If multiaccess paging is considered. two additional access sets are introduced. while WLAN has no corresponding mode. Thus. then these sets need to be extended with additional information to support idle and disconnected modes. paging response delay. When there is no data being sent over the WLAN radio channel. We also assume the various power-saving times that the multiaccess devices should wait before turning from the active data state into the power saving states of Case 1 and 2. while the WLAN of the device is detached from the WLAN access network. The Scanning Set (SS) is determined as a subset of the ES. only the GSM or UMTS RAT of the multiaccess device are waiting for paging. a MN can only be reached from the network via active or idle accesses. it consumes an average of 4 mA. which support RAT-specific paging methods. and paging failure rate are not dealt with in this paper. Given the limited setting and problem scope. This procedure enables the multiaccess paging function to initiate the establishment of connectivity via another access than the one which is being used for the paging commands. On the other hand. where the network RATx is UMTS. for which the MN is directed to start scanning. or on coverage maps. Since GSM is only used for paging purpose. When UMTS is in the idle mode. Results Our simulation results show that the battery lifetime is mainly affected by the call/session arrival rate and the active call/session lifetime. WLAN has the following modes: constantly awake mode. Simulation Model and Settings To investigate the gains of the battery lifetime by the proposed registration-free paging scheme (RFP). VS and CS. Multi-Access data base Scanning Hints Scanning Set User / Network Policies Expected Set User Location / Mobility Scanning Detected Set User / Network Policies Validated Set Service Data Flow 1 Requirements … Service Data Flow n Requirements Candidate Set Dynamic access characteristics Candidate Set Dynamic access characteristics Active Set Active Set Figure 4: Access sets of ambient networks. while the actual simulation results reported below were obtained using the registration free paging scheme only. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF USAGE AND TRAFFIC EFFECTS ON MULTIACCESS PAGING The results presented in this section focus on the battery lifetime saved by a multiaccess paging scheme under different device usage and traffic. but they are expected to be within its coverage area and thus would be soon detected. Other important aspects such as paging signaling costs. In this sense. In order to ease the burden for mobile nodes to scan for available accesses. the results should be applicable to both the registration based selective paging scheme and the registration free paging scheme. Different values of them bring about significantly different savings of the battery lifetime. or active. The WLAN is not part of the UMTS network. when there is no active data sent between the multiaccess devices and the multiaccess networks. when it is in power saving mode. Case 1: Whenever there is no data sent between the multiaccess device and the multiaccess networks. idle. GSM or UMTS of the multiaccess device is waiting for paging while the WLAN of the device is in the power save mode. We assume various Poisson session arrivals and their corresponding lifetimes. Concerning battery lifetime savings. A. albeit a 2G technology. Furthermore. When WLAN is in the constantly awake mode. but are part of our ongoing work. it consumes an average of 4 mA as well. In fact. this information is the connectivity state. we use the multiaccess environment similar to that shown in Figure 2. when there is no data transmission over radio links between the multiaccess device and the multiaccess networks. which describes if the access is disconnected. whenever there is no data sent between the device and the multiaccess networks. We assume the following power consumptions when there are data actively sent over the radio links: UMTS consumes an average of 170 mA when considering both dedicated channel and the shared channel. which drops to 12 mA. we compare the power consumptions of the two following cases. The results show . the most effective way to save the battery lifetime would be to detach the WLAN association between the multiaccess devices and the WLAN access network. could actually be the best candidate for delivering the paging signals due to its lower power consumption and wide coverage. The Expected Set (ES) of accesses contains accesses that a MN has not detected. and WLAN correspondingly. VI. The ES is determined based on multiaccess cell-neighbor information. UMTS. power save mode. in combination with the MN location.lected and maintained with the Active Set (AS). the results show that we could have a wide time range to wait before putting a multiaccess device into the power saving states such as the paging and detached modes. it consumes an average of 25 mA. both GSM and UMTS support the idle mode during which mobile devices could save power and still be reachable through paging. GSM. In Case 2. although being part of the multiaccess networks managed by a group of operators in cooperation. For accesses contained in the DS. the idle connectivity state is reserved for access technologies. We will refer to this waiting time as “ go-idle”time.
the savings in battery power consumption are not affected significantly by the active session duration. when the ‘ go-idle’time = 10 seconds.. when the multiaccess device is heavily used. Reachability is not only necessary to implement mobility.e. such as personal safety and freedom of movement while being always reachable. Therefore it is a safe to assume that multiaccess paging will be first introduced in a single operator multiaccess network and will then be expanded to a group of cooperating operators (for example. We should never forget that one of the critical factors that determined the success of GSM and other cellular communications was and still is reachability. drop exponentially when the active session lifetime further increases. e. As an impact to telecom operator business. Therefore. there is no new session/call coming every few minutes. One of today’ s cellular operators may hold a dominant role within a coalition of access providers including local access providers just because of its reachability service.g. so as to increase battery lifetime in the multiaccess device when the communication usage of the device is not “ heavy” . Fortunately. VII. the savings in battery lifetime decrease with the increase of the active session duration and the decrease of the session inter-arrival duration. Significant energy consumption will be saved by putting the cellular radio association into the idle mode whenever there is no data sent for a given time. where one needs to answer how to provide security and trust in said environment.the saving of battery lifetime reduces rather slowly when this “ go-idle”time increases in the range of 1 . the savings are clearly affected by the active session lifetime. and multiaccess devices should enable WLAN detachment. DISCUSSION Multiaccess paging solutions should naturally work in a heterogeneous networking environment. Right behind the security issue comes scalability and how to make a multiaccess paging system operate with reliability. i. statistics indicate that most of the multiaccess device users (let us call them “ typical users” ) have certain long session arrival intervals. our results indicate that WLAN detachment can significantly extend the battery lifetime. because the scope and security in those are still manageable. That is why reachability is a service that pays off. but it will be even more challenging problem in a multi-operator environment. These solutions must be generic and (at least in theory) work with any combination of RATs.e. Reachability services provided by cellular networks have been improving everyday life aspects. The battery consumption difference when comparing Cases 1 and 2 becomes less relevant when the data communication between the multiaccess device and the multiaccess networks occurs more frequently. low-cost. a multiaccess device should not use the WLAN detachment in the multiaccess device to increase its battery lifetime when the device is heavily used. multiaccess paging would allow operators in the future to sell a “ reachability service”per se.g. a roaming coalition) providing several RATs. Therefore. i. there is not much improvement in the battery lifetime. when “ go-idle” time reaches 300 seconds (Figure 5).10 seconds. It is obvious that paging functions for the cellular accesses must be enabled in all multiaccess devices when there is no data to send. However. larger than 5 minutes. and efficiency in a global scope. Figure 6: The extra battery life saving (mAH) by Case 1 comparing with that of Case2. much more than broadband connectivity Figure 5: The extra battery life saving (mAH) by Case 1 comparing with that of Case 2. either directly to the user or within a coalition of operators in multi-operator environment. when the ‘ go-idle’time = 300 seconds. finding a person to establish a communication session. As shown in Figures 5 and 6.. while clear drop of the saving is shown. Security is an important issue in a single-operator multiaccess environment. when the average session arrival interval is decreased.. In this heavy usage scenario. e. The savings . When the average session arrival interval is large. while there is the delay cost to re-attach to the WLAN access point. for typical users at least. for example.
Karlsson.K. X. Basu.0. Our numerical analysis results show that. “ GSM phase 2+ General Packet Radio Service GPRS: Architecture. P. L. W. 2001. Sachs. F.itself. Bekkers. even for the end users. L. Bettstetter. September 2006. “ An optimal power saving scheme for mobile handsets. Chengdu. Z. B.” IEEE Wireless Communications.304. Kinateder. we will further analyze the performance of multiaccess paging schemes.” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.. Niebert.1. E.1. D. “ Feasibility Studies and Architecture for Multi-Radio Access in Ambient Networks. Chen. R. Strandberg. P. “ Multi-radio resource management for communication networks beyond 3G. A. Eggert and J. June 2005. Lamparter. Vogel. Pettersson.0. R. Pöyhönen. 12(3):66-72. July 2001. “ Ambient Networks –An Architecture for Communication Networks Beyond 3G. G. December 2006. Walman. Das. September 2004. Dimou. It is usually necessary to turn the radio associations in the multiaccess environment into power saving modes whenever there is no data transmission or reception. an operator or group of operators with global or wide-area network coverage could provide a new service. G. Sachs. “ Reconsidering wireless systems with multiple radios. R. Antwerp. Alexandri. Koudouridis. New York. Lin. R. K. Meago.” Public Deliverable D2-C.” Proc. and air interface. Wu. Simonsson. Programming Applications with the Wireless Application Protocol: The Complete Developer’ s Guide. 12(1):15-30. Meago. 2004. Montreal. As an example. Bahl.” Proc. Blume. Rajahalme. March 2007. We expect that other multiaccess networks can also utilize a multiaccess paging scheme in a similar manner. A. . Agüero. Shi. 62nd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC). J. S. Johnsson. and J. J. J. Larsson. A.L. R. Blume. K. P. the power saving of the radio accesses without the paging functions could be further benefited from the paging functions of the other radio accesses through the multiaccess paging scheme. L.” IEEE Wireless Communications. Hammamet. H. “ Predictive dynamic channel allocation scheme for improving power saving and mobility in BWA networks. W. Boston. M. 1999. “ A Power-saving Scheme for IEEE 802. O. and J. F. Dresden. Version 7. Sachs. providing reachability. 1999.”Proc. H. 7). A. July 2007. and S. W. A. Balakrishnan. A. Agüero.”Mobile Networks and Applications. the multiaccess paging might be used to reduce the communication bill of the user’ s desktop if the price is based on communication time. Furuskär. December 2006. K. and O. H. 9th IEEE Global Internet Symposium. “ Access Selection in WCDMA and WLAN Multi-Access Networks. and I.1. Corujo. Krashinsky and H. the Ambient Networks project. April 2004.” 3GPP. 3GPP TR 25. “ Analysis of load dependency of handover strategies in mobile multiaccess Ambient Networks. Version 7. R. The authors greatly appreciate and would like to thank the CHINACOM committees for their kind invitation to present this work. C. In future work. Karla. H. R. Y. Lundsjö. Veronesi. Mann. These. Jorguseski.”Wireless Networks. Vidal. John Wiley & Sons. Rinta-aho. Abramowicz. 16th ITC Specialist Seminar on Performance Evaluation of Wireless and Mobile Systems. Karimi. For example. Alexandri. K. Second Workshop on multiMedia Applications over Wireless Networks (MediaWiN). “ Multi-Access & ARI Design and Initial Specification. E. Cedervall. Litjens. which is partially funded by the Commission of the European Union. “ A study of handover strategies for mobile multiaccess Ambient Networks. F. Yang. M. J. Tang. U. J. Karl. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their employers. Tan.”Proc. Tunisia. Haitao. D. Berggren. Aguero.”Proc. Chen. Massachusetts.11 Ad hoc Networks. G. Xiao. 1999. 34(5): 39-46.” Computer Networks 49: 427-448.” Proc. New York. and Applications.” Proc.P. 2005. Canada. J. are beyond the scope of this work. VIII. P. Ahlgren. N. P.J. July 2007. Dallas. C. on their paging response delay under a given failure rate limitation. Horn. Meago. Dec. Tang. Lundsjö. “ SIP-based vertical handoff between WWANs and WLANs. R. Barcelona. H. or the Commission of the European Union.. Karimi. R.                          D. USA. it looks that multiaccess paging has wider implications than that of saving battery lifetime. Prehofer. and H. Prytz. Lundsjö. 6th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications Proceedings. K. New York. B. 61st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC). J. Adya. O. 3GPP TR 25. A. 16th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit. we have realized a multiaccess paging function in Ambient Networks. when a multiaccess device has both the radio accesses with paging functions and the radio accesses without paging functions at the same time. Pentikousis. 2(3):2– 14. 2005. 2005. Aguiar.. Sweden. Fang. I. O. Berg. China. L. Arkko. P.-J. June 2005. “ Impact of heterogeneous network controlled handovers on multi-mode mobile device design. January 2007. Pentikousis. Hollos. Veronesi. “ On Access Selection Techniques in Always Best Connected Networks. Hungary. Budapest. T. de la Oliva. Karla. R. The comments and ideas from people involved in the project's multiaccess and mobility research are gratefully acknowledged. R.”Proc 15th Wireless World Research Forum Meeting. “ Physical channels and mapping of transport channels onto physical channels (FDD) (Rel. K. Regulation. “ Multi-Radio Access Architecture for Ambient Networking. REFERENCES  P. Aguero.”Proc. A. T. Furuskär. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work has been carried out in the framework of the Ambient Networks project (IST 027662). CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK A multiaccess paging function is needed to effectively extend the battery lifetime of mobile wireless multiaccess devices.g. R.).”3GPP.” Proc. Artech House. R. C. J. J. J. Portugal. however.. M. Mobile Telecommunications: Standard. N. Gebert. 11(1):135-148. Aveiro. Espineira. e. “ Minimizing energy for wireless web access with bounded slowdown. PRC. Soto. Bria. Ambient Networks. R. Paris. F. 6th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. H. Jorguseski. Smits. I. Furthermore. Fodor. There would be other potential economical benefits from multiaccess paging. 64th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC). F. France. Spain. Hollos. June 2006. Hong Kong. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). Jennen. Gebert. Magnusson. September 2005. Berggren. J. J. For example. H. Germany. P. Stockholm. April 2006. and I. Padhye. Jokikyyny. Malmgren.-B. “ User Equipment (UE) procedures in idle mode and procedures for cell reselection in connected mode (Release 7). May 2005.” Proc. 14th IST Mobile and Wireless Communications Summit . J. Yilmaz. 11(2):14– 21. Pöyhönen. Belgium.211. “ A Node Identity Internetworking Architecture. Schieder.”Patent Number: WO2004091246 A1 20041021. Bergstroem. C. Eberspacher. “ Multiaccess Call Setup. “ A generic IP paging architecture and protocol.”Proc. Different multiaccess paging schemes can be designed addressing different objectives. Magnusson. Wireless and Mobile Network Architectures. Liebsch. M. March 2007. Chlamtac (Eds. protocols. John Wiley & Sons. Y. A.”ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. “ Ambient Networks –A Framework for Multi-Access Control in Heterogeneous Networks. Lundsjoe. New York. Banerjee.