You are on page 1of 29

Hull Optimization of Dolnetter

Ambattuparambil Gopi Nikhil (09NA1008) Banoth Mothilal (09NA3024)

Contents
Introduction Vessel Parameters & Hydrostatics Selection of Fishing Vessel Series Fairing of bulbs onto hull Freeboard Check Analysis of Vessel with bulb-3
Roll & Pitch Resistance

Productive Work Future Work References

Dolnetter - Introduction
Indian Fishing Vessel Found in coasts of Gujarat & Maharashtra Travel up to 30 km away from shore Length = 8-20m Number of dol nets vary from 1 4 Not refrigerated (fishes brought soon after catch) Lack of sophistication increases difficulty to get information for research

Previous Work
Showed reduction in resistance with addition of bulb Comparison with different kinds of bulbs Bulbs unfaired Comparison between two different positions of propeller and shaft

Original Vessel Parameters


Parameter Displacement Volume Draft to Baseline Lwl Beam wl WSA Max cross sect area Waterplane area Cp Cb Cm Cwp Value 64.533 t 62.959 m^3 1.5 m 16.497 m 5.082 m 86.131 m^2 6.067 m^2 66.372 m^2 0.629 0.501 0.797 0.792 Parameter LCB from zero pt LCF from zero pt KB KG BMt BMl GMt GMl KMt KMl Immersion (TPc) MTc Value 8.25 m 7.627 m 0.931 m 1.8 m 1.812 m 17.582 m 2.743 m 18.514 m 2.743 m 18.514 m 0.68 t/cm 0.708 t.m

Hydrostatics

Selection of Fishing Vessel series

Cb 0.501

Lwl/B 3.246

B/T 3.388

Lwl/vol^1/3 4.147

actual

Warrants use of ITU (Istanbul Technical University) Series

Need for series


Experimental values for comparing with results to be obtained from SHIPFLOW Approximate range of KG Values to go ahead with stability analysis in various loading conditions

Verification of KG Values from ITU


Deadweight requirements:
Total distance travelled (maximum) Speed Time taken Fuel Intake (Suzie 100HP) Total requirement FO Capacity LO Capacity FW Consumption FW Capacity 100 km
7 knots 8.1 hours 200g/hp/hr 113 kg 135 L 4L 20L/person 160L

Steel Weight empirical estimation (Watson & Gilligan) 19.52 tonnes

Verification of KG Values from ITU


Weight Distribution
Group OUFIT Weight (t) 2.50 VCG 2.498 LCG 5.87

ENGINE
FW LO FO

0.42
0.16 0.00 0.11

0.980
3.920 0.840 0.840

10.72
10.72 10.72 9.49

ICE
STEEL LIGHTWEIGHT CARGO TOTAL

2.50
19.52 25.22 40.00 65.22

2.100
1.540 1.693 2.240 2.028

4.95
8.25 7.75 7.98 7.89

Counter-checking
Typical Fishing Vessel Distribution [6]
Group Steel Accommodation Equipment Hatches propulsion Electrical systems Ballast system Piping Fishing Equipment Fish Processing Equipment Miscellaneous Total W% 61.4 0.3 8.8 1.1 3.0 2.7 3.6 3.4 4.1 6.7 4.8 100 VCG/D% 59 123 131 102 30 59 9 57 111 72 55 66 LCG/L% 43 35 40 64 19 30 50 24 15 32 55 40

Fairing of bulbs on to hull (bulb 1)

Fairing of bulbs on to hull (bulb 2)

Fairing of bulbs on to hull (bulb 3)

Fairing of bulbs on to hull (bulb 4)

Freeboard Check
Initial Flooding Angle (27.49 deg) Flooding angle if bulwark kept watertight (37.23 deg)

Higher flooding angle has been achieved by assuming water-tightedness of bulwark. This allows the area under GZ curve to reach minimum value as required by the safety standards of the classification societies.

Sheer Calculation
Sheer
required ordinate (mm) AP 1/6L from AP 1/3L from AP amidships 1/3L from FP 1/6L from FP FP 387.475 172.0389 43.3972 0 x 0.000 2.750 5.499 8.249

actual ordinate
632 412 13 1

facto Factor * reqd r ordinate


1 3 3 1 387.475 516.11 130.19 0 632 after half

1236 109.2771 39 1

86.7944

10.998

59

260.3832

177

forward half

344.0778 774.95

13.748 16.497

221 575

3 1

1032.233 774.95

663 575

-81.4458

Freeboard Check
Correction for deficiency in shear at forward half 61.08 mm
minimum bow height 1028.75 mm Loadline 1966 rules DNV Fishing vessel 1107.18 mm rules 1875 mm actual minimum freeboard 200 mm 50 mm 61.08 mm 311.08 mm 1300 mm loadline 1966 (L = 24 m) type B shear correction REQUIRED actual

Loading Conditions (DNV Fishing Vessel Rules)


Departure for the fishing grounds with full fuel, fresh water, stores, ice, fishing gear, etc. Departure from the fishing grounds with full catch, at maximum draught and no more than 30% fuel, fresh water and stores Arrival at home port with full catch and 10% fuel, fresh water and stores remaining Arrival at home port with 20% of full catch and 10% fuel, fresh water and stores remaining At fishing grounds with maximum catch on deck, hold empty and 50% fuel, fresh water and stores remaining (if consistent with fishing method)

Analysis of Bulb 3 (Roll & Pitch)


Using Fourier analysis Roll Restoring Coefficients were found A33 , B33 ,A44 , B44 were digitized from relevant graphs (from reference for varied sectional area coefficients (beta values)) Extracted underwater Hull section at Equilibrium State In all 5 loading conditions Using Strip Theory, MATLAB codes were generated for calculation of A33, A44, A55, A35, B33, B44, B55, B35, C33, C44, C55, C35, F33, F44, F55

Formulae for coefficients:

Equations of motion
Pitch Heave coupling equation:

Roll equation:

(m + A44)4 + B444 + C444 + C44 43 + C44 45= F44

Sample values from MATLAB codes


A33 = 88.98 t A35 = 256.84 t.m A44 = 70.71 t.m A55 = 1712.4 t.m B33 = 158.49 kNs/m B35 = 253.89 kNs B44 = 75.95 kNs B55 = 3668.5 kNs C33 = 644.42 kN/m C35 = 366.76 kN C44 = 560.84 kN C55 = 8799.5 kN k = 0.3 m-1, H = 1.2m F33 = 305.27 kN F44 = -129.60 kNm F55 = -378.82 kNm

Analysis of Bulb 3 (Resistance)

Analysis of Bulb 3 (Resistance)

SHIPFLOW

Fn 0.300869 0.301373 0.302381

V(knots) 7.463 7.475 7.500

V(m/s) 3.838 3.845 3.858

HULLSPEE D wave resistance (KN) 1.658 2.519 1.774 2.538 1.449 2.592

ITU

2.8005 2.8689 2.9372

Productive work
MATLAB codes generated for calculating added mass and damping coefficients can be used to calculate these coefficients for any vessel by inputting sectional properties (area, half-breadth and draft, and position of section w.r.t. ship). Also, the forcing codes can be used to calculate Froude-Krylov forces for respective sections. The elliptical body approximation would be more accurate for similar types of ships as sectional area coefficients are in the range of that of an ellipse (/4).

Future Work
Increase accuracy of the MATLAB code (diffraction forces can be taken into account) To reinforce results obtained before being faired, further SHIPFLOW analysis can be carried out for other bulbs too. More bulb forms can also be simulated in SHIPFLOW Design to look for better bulb shapes. In SHIPFLOW calculations, propeller position can be designed to reduce wake variation.

References
Seakeeping Aspects of Slice Hulls by Stephen B Peffers 1984, Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California (MSc Thesis) A Body Exact Strip Theory Approach To Ship Motion Computations by Piotr Jozef Bandyk 2009, University of Michigan (PhD thesis) Resistance Characteristics of Fishing Boats Series of ITU, Muhsin Aydin and Aydin Salci, Marine Technology, Vol. 45, No. 4, October 2008, pp. 194210 Loadline 1966 rules DNV Fishing Vessel Rules Ship Design & Construction Volume 2, Chapter on Fishing Vessels Analytical Approximation of GZ curve, Gabriele Bulian, Universita Degli Studi Di Trieste (PhD Thesis) Sea Loads on Ships and Offshore Structures by O Faltinsen

You might also like