P. 1
TYPICAL DIFFICULTIES OF ESP

TYPICAL DIFFICULTIES OF ESP

|Views: 663|Likes:
Published by Pietro Viviani
Bibliography:
Halliday, M.A.K. & Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Routledge (solo il capitolo 4, dal titolo "Some Grammatical Problems in Scientific English").

Scarpa, F. (2001). La traduzione specializzata. Lingue speciali e mediazione linguistica. Milano: Hoepli (Capitoli 1-2)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/16929396/HALLIDAYSome-Grammatical-Problems-in-Scientific-English-c-4
Bibliography:
Halliday, M.A.K. & Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Routledge (solo il capitolo 4, dal titolo "Some Grammatical Problems in Scientific English").

Scarpa, F. (2001). La traduzione specializzata. Lingue speciali e mediazione linguistica. Milano: Hoepli (Capitoli 1-2)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/16929396/HALLIDAYSome-Grammatical-Problems-in-Scientific-English-c-4

More info:

Published by: Pietro Viviani on Apr 19, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/31/2012

pdf

text

original

...a kind of syndrome by which we recognize that something is written in the language of science...

TYPICAL DIFFICULTIES OF ESP • interlocking definitions • technical taxonomies • special expressions • lexical density  grammatical metaphor  syntactic ambiguity o semantic discontinuity Halliday, 1989 TERMINOLOGY • Until the 1970s, most scholars in the field of ESP mainly focused on terminology (the “nomenclature” of a given science or profession) • Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) has favored a more in-depth approach, taking other aspects (i.e. contextual and structural) into account TEXT IS ANALYZED AS A WHOLE Co-text

Context

When you use a particular word out of the text

The other words that surround the text

• Procedures and methods used to collect, define and present the terms belonging to one or more languages/ specialized fields Word ≠ Term General, can be used in several contexts, and meaning can change depending on context [polisemiche: le parole hanno più significati] Specialized lexical items within a particular field of specialization (aims at monorefentiality) [monoreferenzialità: a un oggetto corrisponde una parola]

In LSP (language for special purpose), terms include: • Words (monosemic) [molte parole hanno caratteristica monosemica e.g.: microphone jack; l’inglese è una delle lingue che ha più questa tendenza… (Topo=) Souris [Fra] Mouse [Eng] …l’italiano ha prestiti dall’inglese, il francese meno] • Multi-word expressions • Symbols • Chemical or mathematical formulae • Acronyms 1

• Two basic functions: 1) Representative à representing specialized concepts through univocal, unambiguous designations (NORMATIVE) 2) Communicative à describing the way in which terms are used by the discourse communities involved (DESCRIPTIVE) TERMINOLOGY ≠ LEXICOLOGY

[ci dà schemi terminologici] Onomasiologic approach: from the concepts to the terms (how is this concept defined?) [si parte dal concetto e si nomina con una definizione scegliendo I termini] Definition seen as an EQUATION Must describe the CONCEPT [uno dei termini è l’oggetto da descrivere]

[ci dà i dizionari] Semasiologic approach: from the word to its meaning (what does this word mean?) [studia il significato della parola partendo dalla parola] Definition seen as cultural and context-dependent. Must describe the USAGE [il dizionario Collins dice anche luso contestuale]

Denotational =reference meaning description of object e.g. wateràH2O Connotational e.g. Wateràpositive connotations: life, purity

Important concepts • Hyponyms à smaller category to which a given term belongs (car/ bike/ train are all hyponyms of the larger concept of “vehicle”) • Hyperonyms à larger category that includes smaller terms (e.g. vehicle is the hyperonym of bike, train, car, etc.). Collocation There are words which don’t have meaning alone but have it in a context. According to John Firth, Papers in Linguistics, 1957 à “words shall be known by the company that they keep” à notion of COLLOCATIONAL MEANING E.g. I haven’t the slightest idea Invisible to the naked eye Don’t make a mountain out of a molehill She was watching with envy (=jealousy) Collocation ≠ colligation

(proverb that means: don’t exaggerate)

Lexical words grammatical words e.g. The contractor shall furnish all necessary labor, equipment, and materials [più forte di un invito, usato come dovere nei testi di legge] GRAMMAR OF CHOICE "Context is in this kind of model a construct of cultural meanings, realised functionally in the form of acts of meaning in the various semiotic modes, of which language is one. The ongoing processes of linguistic choice, whereby a speaker is selecting within the resources of the linguistic system, are effectively cultural choices, and acts of meaning are cultural acts." (M.A.K. Halliday) TERMINOLOGICAL DEFINITION AS EQUATION (highly idealized!!!) 2

Definiendum = definiens

90°

(Definiens à a hyperonym of the definiendum + specific characteristics) e.g. a right angled triangle is a triangle that has one 90° internal angle 90°angleàcharacteristic  Connected with the idea of TERMINOLOGICAL NORMALIZATION e.g. ISO reference terminology models (main certification agency) [definisce gli standard di qualità e i nomi di standardizzazione nelle scienze, per esempio nella costruzione non posso chiamare le cose come mi pare] But not all specialized languages have standardized nomenclatures (e.g. linguistics doesn’t have one) CREATION OF NEW WORDS [C’è una serie di procedimenti nella creazione di termini] Development of a register • The development of a new register brings about the introduction of new words:  Re-interpretation of existing words (e.g. notion of “mass” in Physics; “mouse” in computer science)  Creation of new words attained by combining words of a native stock (e.g. clock+wise = clockwise) [senso orario]  Borrowing of words from other languages (e.g. the gastronomic words like spaghetti [singolare in ing “spaghetti is”])  Calquing (an “adaptation” from other languages, e.g. omnipotens à all + mighty = almighty)  Invention of brand new words (rare: e.g. “gas”)  Creation of locutions (e.g. right angled triangle)  Creation of new words attained by combining words of a non-native stock (e.g. “thermodynamic” comes from the fusion of two Ancient Greek words, but the word “thermodynamic” itself didn’t exist in Ancient Greek) The vocabulary of LSP • SOFT vs. HARD sciences (The ones with mathematics) • • “Brand new” words are more typical of “soft” sciences, where highly technical words are coined to “keep out” the non-specialists (De Mauro). Hard sciences favor the re-interpretation of existing words

Words taken from Latin and Greek • They are typical of both of soft and hard sciences, especially in affixes and affixoids, e.g  Hemo/ Haemo; -aemia à blood  Ped/ Paed à children  Hypo à low  Hyper à high  Pre à before • Latin and Greek are also used for borrowing entire words, e.g. [questi affisoidi vengono da parole piene]  clone (GR sprout[=germoglio])  phial (GR vial, urn)  ovum (LAT egg) 3

 apex (LAT tip, summit) How do you distinguish an affix from an affixoid? • Both are morphemes that are attached to a word stem • Before the stem --> prefix/ prefixoid • After the stem --> suffix/ suffixoid • Prefixoids and suffixoids come from a lexical word and have autonomous meaning (e.g. hydro = water) ACRONYMS (abbreviation which have meaning) • Acronyms are frequent in the registers of both soft and hard sciences:  LSP, ESP, EAP, EOP  HIV, CAT, REM  LASER, SONAR • But there are also words that were originally acronyms:  PRION (Proteinaceous Infectious Particle)  SCUBA (Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus EPONYMS (words which come from the name of the people) Eponyms à entities that take their name from their inventors, frequent in LSP for:  Physics à Units of measurement, e.g.  Watt: unit of power, after James Watt /wot/[UK] /wa:t/[US]  Ampere: unit of electric current, after André-Marie Ampère  Pascal: unit of pressure, after Blaise Pascal  Chemistry à Elements, e.g.  Bohrium, after Niels Bohr  Curium, after Pierre and Marie Curie  Einsteinium, after Albert Einstein  Medicine à Diseases and body parts:  Alzheimer’s (after Alois Alzheimer)  Broca’s area, after Pierre Paul Broca  Eustachian tube, after Eustachius  Other fields, e.g. avionics "aviation electronics"  the Mach number /mak/ (ratio of an object's velocity to the speed of sound, after the physicist Ernst Mach à used in aircraft speed measurement) METAPHORS • Metaphors are highly productive in ESP and often generate new technical terms:  Virus (in computer science)  Bear (for “sellers”) in Stock Exchange ↑ the bears attack up typical  Bull (for “buyers”) à optimism ↓ the bulls attack down in stocks  Mouse (in computer science)  Spam (something that’s everywhere) [nome di un tipo di carne in scatola]  Mouse-tooth forceps (surgical instrument) [pinza chirurgica] 4

 Skyscraper (in architecture) • Particularly frequent in computing, but widely used in other sectors:  “For now, the [Federal Reserve]Fed's medicine appears to be working. Stock prices fluctuated wildly Friday, but the Dow Jones industrial average...”  “A Red Cross field worker who served in many war theatres...”  “The BLU-82B/C-130 weapon system, nicknamed "daisy cutter"[nome accattivante] in Vietnam and...”  “a crewmember is in the immediate vicinity to arm the slides if required...” [armare gli scivoli su un aereo] BORROWINGS FROM LITERATURE Quark à elementary particle in Physics discovered by Murray Gell-Mann in the 1960s Taken from James Joyce. Finnegans Wake. Book 2, Episode 4, Page 383 "Three quarks for Muster Mark!/Sure he has not got much of a bark/And sure any he has it's all beside the mark." TYPICAL DIFFICULTIES OF ESP Important concept In a clause: Theme ≠ Rheme [Secondo Halliday il tema è sempre davanti]

Topic, given item, what is being talked about [non segue l’analisi logica] Examples

Comment, new item, what is being said about the topic

“Be careful…” There are various types of theme according to M.A.K. Halliday: 1) topical or experiential (the “what” of our statement – a participant, most often) What are we talking about? 2) interpersonal (speaker’s evaluation of own statement – usually with adverbials like “maybe”, “surely” etc.) connected to modality [presente nell’imperativo] 5

3) textual or structural (text organizers, conjunctions, etc.) [es. connetivi]

1) Textual theme • Continuatives (e.g., umm, yeah, ...) • Conjunctions (e.g., and, or, but) • Conjunctive adjuncts (e.g., however, therefore, because, although, ...) • Wh-relative (e.g., which, who, ...) [si collegano a qualcosa di detto] 2) Interpersonal theme • Vocatives (e.g., Henry!, Sir!, ...) • Modal adjuncts, i.e. adverbials that indicate speaker’s commitment to own statement (e.g., probably, usually, frankly, ...) [alcuni avverbi si possono parafrasare usando i modali] • Finite operators (e.g., modal auxiliaries, 'be' auxiliary, ...) • Wh-question word (e.g., who, what, where, how, why) 3) Topical theme • Participant (NP=noun phrase) • Circumstance (PP=prepositional phrase, adverbial) • Process (VP) Examples • Multiple theme

[tengono assieme il testo] RANKING CLAUSE [L’ordine è consueto]

DOWNRANKING CLAUSE [“What I want” ha funzione di soggetto]

Clause complex

Context Component Function

Type of theme 6

Field Tenor Mode

Ideational Interpersonal Textual

Topical Interpersonal Textual

• LEXICAL DENSITY Use of a higher number of lexical words as opposed to the congruent (= grammatically simpler) variant: it is a category of (grammatical) IDEATIONAL METAPHOR Lexical density = No. of lexical items No. of ranking clauses (*)

*=If a clause functions as something lower than a clause (e.g. a participant), we consider it a downranked clause (e.g. “what is you say is nonsense”. The clause “what you say” functions as a participant). “...a measure of the density of information in any passage of text, according to how tightly the lexical items (content words) have been packed into the grammatical structure. It can be measured, in English, as the number of lexical words per clause”. (Halliday) Lexical density is a result of the use of NOMINALIZATION (-ation at the end e.g. segmentation) [nomi che descrivono azioni che di solito fa il verbo] EXAMPLES OF LEXICAL DENSITY • Griffith’s energy balance approach to strength and fracture also suggested the importance of surface chemistry in the mechanical behavior of brittle [=fragile] materials. 13 • The conical space rendering of cosmic strings’ gravitational properties applies only to straight strings. 10 • The model rests on the localized gravitational attraction exerted by rapidly oscillating and extremely massive closed loops of cosmic string. 13 Extreme=most [non si conta come lexical item]
theme rheme

“If this method of control is used, trains will unquestionably be able to run more safely and faster, even when the weather conditions are most adverse”. Still not very colloquial; could be writing or very formal speech content words 12 Lexical density = = =4 ranking clauses 3 OTHER APPROACHES TO LEXICAL DENSITY • In corpus linguistics CORPUS CONCORDACE SAMPLER (DATABASE) [consultare dei frammenti di lingua vera per sapere il significato delle parole] TTR à Type / Token Ratio Types ≠ Tokens

different word forms that appear in a given text / corpus

all the forms of a given type, including identical forms of the same types, different inflected forms, paradigms of verbs etc

7

e.g. query Type [la conto una volta considerando le altre ripetizioni] Token [la conto tutte le volte che figura in corpus concordance]

Types vs. Tokens • Distinction introduced by the American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce (leading US pragmatist, 1839-1914) • The size of language corpora is usually calculated in terms of the number of tokens • John Lyons (1977) claims that linguists should be more interested in types that in tokens. However… Lyons himself, in Semantics (1977) established that whether something is counted as a token or a type is relative to one's purposes - for instance: 1. Are tokens to include words with different meanings which happen to be spelt or pronounced in the same way? 2. Does a capital letter instantiate the same type as the corresponding lower-case letter? 3. Does a word printed in italics instantiate the same type as a word printed in Roman? 4. Is a word handwritten by X ever the same as a word handwritten by Y? TTR (is a way to know how rich is a vocabulary in a text is) accounts for the degree of lexical variation à measure of vocabulary richness in a text, i.e. the relationship between the total number of words (=no. of tokens) and the number of different wordforms (=types) in the text/ corpus of texts. A high figure in the type-token ratio indicates rich and varied vocabulary. Example “If I’m right and he’s wrong we’re both in trouble” Can be seen to have 13 words, but it may even have 11 words if we consider “am”, “are” and “is” to be tokens of the same type “be” 3 token: am, is, are 1 type: be Forms and expressions Tokens of the same type are not necessarily forms of the same expression “They found it necessary to found hospitals”. In this case, “found” and “found” are tokens of the same type but not forms of the same expression. [il type è lo stesso, non importa che abbiano differenti significati] BUT... • The larger the text/ corpus, the lower the TTR (a corpus of 4 M words will probably have a type/token ratio of about 2; a 1,000- word article might have a TTR of 40) • So type/ token ratio is not always a trustworthy measure of the degree of lexical richness in a text/ corpus • It is only reliable when we compare corpora/ texts of roughly the same size  GRAMMATICAL METAPHOR 8

“This is like metaphor in the usual sense except that, instead of being a substitution of one word for another, as when we say ‘you’re talking tripe’ instead of ‘you’re talking nonsense’, it is a substitution of one grammatical class, or one grammatical structure, by another; for example, ‘his departure’ [nominalizzazione] instead of ‘he departed [deriva dal verbo]’”. (Halliday, 1989) Halliday à a metaphor where variation is essentially in the grammatical form. Meaning construed in a way different from the CONGRUENT VARIANT by means of a different grammatical construction [sviluppo lineare] Congruent ≠ [grammaticalmente più complessa] Metaphorical

e.g. “the cast (N) acted (V) brilliantly (ADV) so the audience (N) applauded (V) for a long time (PP)” “I considered the option. I didn’t take it. I was uncertain if it would benefit me”
*PP=prepositional phrase

e.g. “the cast’s brilliant acting (N) drew (V) lengthy applause (N) from the audience (PP)*” Example of “The option was a consideration that nominalization as was not taken by me because of the (grammatical) uncertainty of its benefit” metaphor MORE LEXICALLY DENSE

DOWNRANKING CLAUSE The relative clause belongs to the theme

[Un testo lessicalmente denso con troppe costruzioni grammaticalmente metaforiche indicano che l’interlocutore faccia apposta a non farsi capire] Halliday's rank scale Clause Word group Word • If a clause functions as something lower than a clause (e.g. a participant), we consider it a downranked clause. 1. Seeing Minnie in a two-piece suit was too much for Mickey. CLAUSE IS NOMINALIZED 2. What tutorials give me is a massive headache 3. The laksa seller who forgot my order thinks of nothing but cockles. RELATIVE CLAUSE IS RESTRICTIVE (OR “DEFININING”) RESTRICTIVE RELATIVE CLAUSES is downranked because it is part of the NG. à “The laksa seller who forgot my order thinks of nothing but cockles”. ≠ NON-RESTRICTIVE RELATIVE CLAUSES is NOT downranked because it is simply a gloss to the independent clause à “The laksa seller, who forgot my order, thinks of nothing but cockles”. Downranking occurs when something from a higher rank functions at a lower rank.

9

"As far their expression is concerned, non-defining relative clauses are clearly signalled both in speech and in writing. In written English, a non-defining relative clause is marked off by punctuation - usually commas, but sometimes by being introduced with a dash; whereas a defining relative clause is not separated by punctuation from its antecedent. This in turn reflects the fact that in spoken English, whereas a defining relative clause enters into a single tone group together with its antecedent, a non-defining relative [clause] forms a separate tone group." (Halliday & Matthiessen 2004: 402) Remember… The relative pronoun “that” is NOT used in non-restrictive relative clauses: e.g. John, who passed the exam, threw a party afterwards. (CORRECT) John, that passed the exam, threw a party afterwards. (WRONG) Study…

Only when the relative pronoun is the object (i.e. NOT THE SUBJECT!!!) can you drop it, as in: • The party that we had on Saturday = the party we had on Saturday • The guy that threw the party on Saturday à the relative pronoun is OBLIGATORY WHOM To whom it may concern [modo formale di iniziare una lettera] The teacher to whom I spoke = the teacher I spoke to Very important… [quando una frase è limitative si mette prima l’ausiliare] Only late have I seen him Not until this morninig did I read the news NOMINALIZATION IN ESP • Facilitates the Theme-Rheme structure à helps the flow of argumentation • Makes the language sound more impersonal and objective • The more lexically dense a text is, the more information is “packed” into it à more difficult to read, especially if the reader is a non-specialist  SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY “Lung cancer death rates are clearly associated with increased smoking”. “Lung cancer death” is ambiguous à ‘how many people die from lung cancer’, or ‘how quickly people die when they get lung cancer’? Or is it perhaps ‘people are so nervous about lung cancer that they smoke more’??? CONNECTED WITH THE USE OF COMPLEX NOUN-PHRASES WITH PRE-MODIFICATION & PASSIVES • Premodification 10

 Typical of specialized languages (especially EST) to make the language more concise (e.g. “plant safety standards committee”; “speech processing technology”, “form recognition laterality patterns”, “glass crack growth rate”, etc.) • Passives  Make language more impersonal and objective  Allow writers to keep the theme/ rheme position  is used (= normal procedure) ≠ we used (something original that we did) o SEMANTIC DISCONTINUITY “writers sometimes make semantic leaps, across which the reader is expected to follow them in order to reach a required conclusion”. (Halliday, 1989) In specialist-to-specialist communication, much information is taken for granted strong anti-pollution laws over the last twenty years have resulted in cleaner factories, cleaner countryside and an increase in the number of light-coloured pepper moths. Over the last twenty years, [the government has passed] strong laws to stop [people] polluting; so the factories [have become] cleaner, and there are more light-coloured pepper moths than before ( = moths have also become cleaner)

11

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->