References 1. A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge, 2004, 3rd Edition, Project Management Institute, USA 2.

Atkinson, 1999, Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No. 6, pp 337-342, [Electronic] 3. Baguley, 1995, Managing Successful Projects: A guide for every manager, Pitman Publishing, London UK, p8 4. Belassi & Tukel, 1996, A new framework for determining critical success-failure factors in projects, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 141-151, [Electronic] 5. Cambridge University, The Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 2005, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, UK 6. Cammack, 2005, Principles of Project Management - 1st session, MSc in Project Management, Lancaster University 7. Cleland & Ireland, 2002, p210, Project Management: Strategic Design and implementation, McGraw-Hill Professional, USA 8. Cleland & Ireland, 2004, Project Manager's Portable Handbook, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, USA, page 210 9. Cooke-Davies, The "real" success factors on projects, International Journal of Project Management vol.20, pp. 185–190, [Electronic] 10. Duncan, 2004, Defining and Measuring Project Success, Project Management Partners, [Online], Available: http://www.pmpartners.com/resources/defmeas_success.html , [2005, Nov.4] 11. Evans, 2005, Overdue and over budget, over and over again, The Economist Jun 9th 2005, [Electronic] 12. Kerzner, 2001, Project Management - A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling, 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York 13. Kerzner, 2001, Strategic planning for project management using a project management maturity model, Wiley & Sons, New York, page 158 14. Lim & Mohamed, 1999, Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 243-248, [Electronic] 15. Maylor, 2005, Project Management, Third Edition with CD Microsoft Project, Prentice Hall, UK, p288

page 16 21. 2001. USA. New Directions in Project Management. [2005.htm . 2002. [Online].com/159101 . Vol. paper presented to the Southern Alberta Chapter. Journal of Operations Management. Calgary Symposium Dimitris Litsikakis is currently studying MSc Project Management in one of the top business schools in UK. 36.com/en/Legacy] . Analysis of the Characteristics of Projects in diverse industries. 2005. He has published a series of articles in Ne.6] 19. pp43-61 24. Wideman. Prentice Hall. 2002. Thomsett. 2003. USA. 2002. St.cgi?file=assess_pmsuccess. Article Source: http://EzineArticles. 2004. Project Management Institute.5] 18.O (New Technology Observer). The Advanced Project Management Office. Extreme CHAOS: The Standish Group International. page 14 22. Tukel & Rom. 1996. Critical Success factors for project performance: a study from from-end assessments of large public projects in Norway 23. Available: http://www. The official website of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games. Rad & Levin. Turner & Muller. Defining project success. Available: [http://www. Auerbach. Radical Project Management.com/cgibin/itmember/itmember.com/?expert=Dimitrios_Litsikakis Article Source: http://EzineArticles. page 18 17. Improving PM: Linking Success Criteria to Project Type. Right Track Associates. 1998. [Online]. Torp. USA. Lancaster University. Nov. No. [Electronic] 20.Lucie Press.athens2004. The Standish Group International. [2005. Project Management Institute. Austeng & Mengesha. Nov.16. Vol 16. 1. pp 49-61 25.ittoolkit. The project manager’s leadership style as a success factor on projects. Tinnirello.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful