References 1. A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge, 2004, 3rd Edition, Project Management Institute, USA 2.

Atkinson, 1999, Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No. 6, pp 337-342, [Electronic] 3. Baguley, 1995, Managing Successful Projects: A guide for every manager, Pitman Publishing, London UK, p8 4. Belassi & Tukel, 1996, A new framework for determining critical success-failure factors in projects, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 141-151, [Electronic] 5. Cambridge University, The Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 2005, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, UK 6. Cammack, 2005, Principles of Project Management - 1st session, MSc in Project Management, Lancaster University 7. Cleland & Ireland, 2002, p210, Project Management: Strategic Design and implementation, McGraw-Hill Professional, USA 8. Cleland & Ireland, 2004, Project Manager's Portable Handbook, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, USA, page 210 9. Cooke-Davies, The "real" success factors on projects, International Journal of Project Management vol.20, pp. 185–190, [Electronic] 10. Duncan, 2004, Defining and Measuring Project Success, Project Management Partners, [Online], Available: , [2005, Nov.4] 11. Evans, 2005, Overdue and over budget, over and over again, The Economist Jun 9th 2005, [Electronic] 12. Kerzner, 2001, Project Management - A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling, 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York 13. Kerzner, 2001, Strategic planning for project management using a project management maturity model, Wiley & Sons, New York, page 158 14. Lim & Mohamed, 1999, Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination, International Journal of Project Management Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 243-248, [Electronic] 15. Maylor, 2005, Project Management, Third Edition with CD Microsoft Project, Prentice Hall, UK, p288

page 16 21. 2001. USA. New Directions in Project Management. [2005.htm . 2002. [Online].com/159101 . Vol. paper presented to the Southern Alberta Chapter. Journal of Operations Management. Calgary Symposium Dimitris Litsikakis is currently studying MSc Project Management in one of the top business schools in UK.] . Analysis of the Characteristics of Projects in diverse industries. 2005. He has published a series of articles in Ne.6] 19. pp43-61 24. Wideman. Prentice Hall. 2002. Thomsett. 2003. USA. 2002. St.cgi?file=assess_pmsuccess. Article Source: http://EzineArticles. 2004. Project Management Institute.5] 18.O (New Technology Observer). The Advanced Project Management Office. Extreme CHAOS: The Standish Group International. page 14 22. Tukel & Rom. 1996. Critical Success factors for project performance: a study from from-end assessments of large public projects in Norway 23. Available: http://www. The official website of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games. Rad & Levin. Turner & Muller. Defining project success. Available: [http://www. Auerbach. Radical Project Article Source: http://EzineArticles. page 18 17. Improving PM: Linking Success Criteria to Project Type. Right Track Associates. 1998. [Online]. Torp. USA. Lancaster University. Nov. No. [Electronic] 20.Lucie Press.athens2004. The Standish Group International. [2005. Project Management Institute. Austeng & Mengesha. Nov.16. Vol 16. 1. pp 49-61 25.ittoolkit. The project manager’s leadership style as a success factor on projects. Tinnirello.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful