At a 'Ierm of the AppelJ-ate Divi sion of the Supreme Court heÌcl in and for the First Judiciaf

Department in the County of New York on June 6t 2013.
Present
Hon

Luis A. GonzaIez, John lrl . Sweeny/ Jr Rosalyn H. Richter Darcel D. Clark,

Presíding Justice,
Justices

Black Car Assist-ance Cor:poration, et aJ-. , Pet itioners-Appel lants, For a Judgment Pursuant to Article 78 of the CPLR'
-agains tThe City of New York, et al.
,

14-2 4 66

Index No. 100321/13

M-251

4

Respondents -Re spondent s,
T'

Metropolitan T'axi<:ab I3oard of
eL d-1 . I

rade,

Intervenors -Res;¡ronden

t-

s

.

An appeal havinq been taken from the order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about

Apri1 26, 2013,

And petitioners-appel-Lants having moved for reÌief in the nature of a preliminary appellat-e injunctj-on enjoining respondents from proceeding wibh t-he t.Ìre implemenl-at-ion of the so-caIled "e-hail pilot program" by responcJenL New York Cjty Taxi and Limousine Commission, pending hearing ancJ deterrninat-ic>n of the aforesa Ld appeal, and for other refief (M-2466), And Flailo Network USA, Inc, having moved for leave to intervene in connection with the aforesaid appeal, and for other ref ief (M-2514) , Now, upon reading and filinq the papers with respect to the motions, and due detjberation having been had thereon,

It is o¡clered t.hat- the mo1-.ions are denì ed, and l-he interim relief granted by an order of a Justice of t-his court- dated May 1, 20I3t is vacated.
EN'IER
t

CLERK

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful