Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summer 2012
A leader in ensuring that every Michigan educator engages in effective professional learning every day so every student achieves
Stephen R. Hecker, Ph.D., LFM Newsletter Co-Editor and Secretary to the Board
he Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are upon us. What are they? How will we do this? Will it make any difference?
This issue of the Learning Forward Newsletter is dedicated to the CCSS. Of course, there is some controversy (isnt there always?) about this initiative. Possibly the most cogent argument is made by Diane Ravitch, who in April wrote in the The New York Review of Books that the CCSS have never been field-tested. No one knows whether these standards are good or bad, whether they will improve academic achievement or widen the achievement gap, she said. That would seem to be a pretty big problem. On the other hand, 45 states have now adopted the standards for implementation. The pretty strong face validity of the CCSS (a common list of what students should know and when they should know it) is accompanied by numerous anecdotal stories of success (one seen in USA Today on May 1). Therein, 10th grade history teacher David Riesenfeld lauds the deeper learning of his students under his implementation of the Standards. This brings us to the issue of the day, which educators have faced since time immemorial: how are we going to help make it happen? The most recent Journal of Staff Development (April 2012) provides key blueprints and examples for use of the Implementation Standard from the Standards for Professional Learning. It also includes articles on other issues surrounding change, such as the need for time and for deep learning. Our current newsletter includes articles specific to Michigan, with resources and thinking dedicated to CCSS success in our own state. On reflection of this effort, and echoing one of my takeaways from our last Newsletter on changing teacher evaluation policy, I share this thought: In times of great struggle, there is opportunity for great progress. Seizing CCSS properly, as with other broad initiatives, can be a springboard to better human relations, better labor relations, improved teaching practices, greater clarity, increased trust, improved student achievement, reduction in achievement gaps all these and more can result. We know what works, weve seen the protocols and we have the knowledge. Whats needed more than ever is the will to make this right, to implement with intelligence and fidelity. We must reach over the traditional barriers, be they fiscal or human resource-related, no matter how high they might be. Ron Edmunds (l978) said it best: Newsletter Co-Editors Cynthia Carver Steve Hecker We can whenever, and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us. We already know more than we need, in order to do this. Whether we do it must finally depend on how we feel about the fact that we havent so far.
Strategic Priorities:
To fulfill its mission, Learning Forward Michigan will engage in the following strategic priorities: Advocate for comprehensive, sustained, and intensive professional learning Contribute to the transformation of professional learning Model high quality professional learning
s outlined in recent legislation, full implementation of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) is expected by 2014-2015. To make this transition, Michigan teachers will need high quality and sustained professional learning opportunities. The newly passed Michigan Professional Learning Policy and accompanying Learning Forward (LF) Standards for Professional Learning can be a valuable tool for streamlining the professional learning needed to implement the CCSS with fidelity. With the CCSS in mind, we review the standards here. Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students occurs within learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility, and goal alignment. Culture will be a key factor for districts and schools working towards successful CCSS implementation. School improvement alignment and the development of collective responsibility will be essential for working towards continuous improvement. As stated in the LF Standards, Collective participation advances the goals of a whole school or team as well as those of individuals. Communities of caring, analytic, reflective, and inquiring educators collaborate to learn what is necessary to increase student learning. How do schools that are not yet functioning with learning communities reach this foundational level? By starting with teacher leadership! Teacher leaders can be found in all buildings. Providing them with the tools and time to influence the structure of grade/department level meetings is one step toward successful learning community work. Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students requires skillful leaders who develop capacity, advocate, and create support systems for professional learning. Sustaining the capacity of effective learning communities takes effective leadership on many levels. Leader actions model the attitudes and behavior expected of all educators. Leaders assist in setting the agenda for professional learning by aligning it to classroom, school and school system goals for student learning. Leaders use data to determine staff and student learning needs. CCSS implementation creates a need for responsiveness
by leaders at the superintendent, principal and grade levels to carefully remove barriers and allow for regular job embedded learning communities. Leaders align people, money, space and time to provide opportunities for staff to work together. The depth of knowledge necessary for college and career readiness will require deep learning by teachers. Skillful leaders provide for a system where everyone is learning. Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students requires prioritizing, monitoring and coordinating resources for educator learning. What resources are necessary for teacher learning, planning and subsequent implementation of the CCSS? Quite possibly, time is the primary one. Experience implementing CCSS reveals that teachers are voicing a need for expertise in CCSS focus areas. Thus, monetary resources need to be considered in order to provide learning time for teachers, as well as for bringing in experts to assist this understanding. As stated in the LF standards, Decisions about resources for professional learning require a thorough understanding of student and educator learning needs, clear commitment to ensure equity and in resource allocation and thoughtful consideration of priorities to achieve the intended outcomes for students and educators. Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students uses a variety of sources and types of student, educator, and systems data to plan, assess and evaluate professional learning. CCSS provides an opportunity for educators to assess students current achievement with assessment data. Using multiple data sources offers a balanced and complete picture. Through data analysis, educators can determine possible entry points for transition to the new standards. Data can be used to drive both CCSS implementation and development of a longer-term, sustained professional learning plan. Data can also lead to school-based monitoring of the professional learning plan, its effects on educator practice, and on student learning.
Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students integrates theories, research and models of human learning to achieve its intended outcomes. Implementing the CCSS may take various forms, with active engagement, modeling, reflection, metacognition, application, feedback, ongoing support and assessment that support change in knowledge, skills, dispositions, and practice. Job embedded professional learning may include coaching, action research, department or grade level meetings, during the school day or outside of student hours. Our experience with building CCSS understanding and implementation needs across the state include all of the above. Teachers need and want time to study individually, in small groups, in grade level teams, with experts, and with direction from skilled leaders. Exploring more formalized learning designs using Powerful Designs, a LF publication, can assist schools in determining how best to find a format for professional learning that best supports local CCSS implementation. Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students applies research on change and sustains support for implementation of professional learning for long-term change. CCSS implementation has the same primary goal as all professional learning; namely, changes in educator practice and increases of student learning. Those responsible must continue to apply the research on effective policy implementation and change leadership to support long-term change in practice. This requires clear goals and maintaining high expectations. Implementing the CCSS requires study, planning, timelines and a safe environment that supports risk taking and reflection for continuous improvement. As educators dig deeper to develop their depth of knowledge of the CCSS, all involved need to be aware of how the changes are affecting personal, cognitive and work environments in order to differentiate support, tap educators strengths and talents, and increase educator effectiveness and student learning.
Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students aligns its outcomes with educator performance and student curriculum standards. As stated in the LF standards, when the content of professional learning integrates student curriculum and educator performance standards, the link between educator learning and student learning becomes explicit, increasing the likelihood that professional learning contributes to increased student learning. Implementation of CCSS will demand an up-close examination of the current curriculum, which may also shift instructional practices for improved student learning. Organizing professional learning to address CCSS-needed instructional shifts will help to ensure that educator performance and effectiveness are linked with student outcomes. LFs Standards for Professional Learning can ensure that Michigan teachers are able to deliver on the promise of an effective, equitable education for every student. The time needed for teachers to grasp this new curriculum is essential. Our Michigan teachers can and will deliver this new curriculum, and they deserve the culture, leadership, resources, data, learning design, and implementation understanding to do so. Professional learning is the first step to CCSS implementation. Using the appropriate tools can streamline the professional learning process. Specifically, LF is revising its current Innovation Configuration (IC) maps, which identify and describe the major components of a new practice for each role group charged with educator and student learning. The current IC maps (www.learningforward.org/standards/ics.cfm) depict, in behavioral terms, what each group needs to look like in practice. As stated on the LF website, These tools facilitate and accelerate implementation of each standard by identifying what actions key education stakeholders take in support of each standard. The IC maps for the new standards will be available later this summer.
learningforwardmichigan.org
If we want MIs students to be career and college ready, we have to transform professional learning for Michigans educators NOW!
Presidents Message
learningforwardmichigan.org
s I sat with my colleagues listening to our opening year speaker, one comment lodged in my mind. He said, The Common Core expectations arent really that different than what most of you are already doing in your classroom each day; they are just more rigorous than we are used to. With that lens in mind I began to look more closely at the CCSS expectations for students. I began the process by reviewing resources and engaging in professional learning opportunities. As a result, I have seen promising practices emerge. There are many resources available for assisting teachers with implementing teaching practices that reflect the rigors of the CCSS. My advice to colleagues is to stop waiting for someone else to illuminate the expectations for CCSS. Go forth and find your own opportunities for meaningful professional learning so that you can move forward confidently, without hesitation. The CCSS are critically important because we are facing a unique time where the expectations have never been higher for teaching and learning, yet the path to getting there seems somehow less clear. We see and hear about these expectations, but too often wait for someone to show us exactly how to get there and by when. What teachers most need to know is that they are not alone! Teachers all over the country are embarking on the same journey: reflecting on student learning, fine-tuning instruction, and aligning practices in order to serve students better.
This spring Ive been reading Pathways to the Common Core by Lucy Calkins, Mary Ehrenworth and Christopher Lehman. This book illuminates the roots of this initiative, unpacks the standards, and highlights teaching strategies that move our students (and our teaching) forward. There are equally helpful resources in mathematics. For example, I have found excellent CCSS-aligned assessments on the site masteryconnect.com. I also joined an ISD team that is piloting and reviewing CCSS-aligned math tasks. With assessments and tasks that reflect the standards, teachers and curriculum leaders can use backwards design to support student progress towards new expectations. The CCSS initiative is a unique opportunity for teachers to look inward, reflect on their practices, and move forward with these new expectations for teaching and learning in mind. It is my belief that the Common Core can help us to realize a better future for our students. I often reflect on my favorite Corey Booker quote: The world outside of you is a reflection of what you have inside of you. If you see hope every time you open your eyes, then you can help, but if all you see are problems, thats all there will ever be. I see the CCSS initiative as a unique opportunity for teachers to come together, tighten their instructional practices, and help ensure that all students no matter where they live are prepared for success in college and the workforce.
What Do You Notice? Connecting Critical Thinking to Common Core State Standards
By Seth E. Berg, Elementary Teacher Leader, Birmingham Public Schools
y students and I have been the benefactors of an incredible Professional Learning Community (PLC) this year. Our third grade math team has been working hard to generate, share, and support one another in the purposeful execution of ideas for instruction aimed at fostering the kind of critical thinking suggested by the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). We kicked off the effort by bringing in a math workshop expert from Oakland Schools. One of the first skills we worked on was questioning. We were told that by giving students a math-related visual to examine (pictures, words, or numbers) and prompting them with the question, What do you notice? we could begin to foster the kind of abstract reasoning outlined in the CCSS. After seven months of practice, I am a believer. It was difficult at first. I was compelled to assert myself in the discussions that the question, What do you notice? generated. I wanted to tell students whether or not they were on the right track. I wanted to give them the answers. What I have since realized is that some students notice things that I dont. Some notice things that I wouldnt have thought about without their input. More importantly, when things I dont notice are brought to my attention and Im given the opportunity to examine
them critically I grow. Through this practice I have seen my students grow as well. As we work to integrate the CCSS into our instructional design, we should be engaged in the type of learning it suggests for our students. We should be collaborating, thinking critically, asking questions, taking reasonable risks, and engaging all stakeholders in authentic conversations centered on student achievement. We should be asking ourselves what we notice; and we should be eager to consider the observations and ideas of others. Change is difficult. I feel fortunate to be working in a field that encourages slow but steady growth, and in a district that supports collaborative innovation. Our third grade math PLC is just one example of the efforts were making to think critically about the shift to the CCSS. The workshop model is being explored and implemented across the curriculum at all levels. Teachers are finding success as learning coaches, facilitators, and collaborators. Interest and inquiry driven project-based learning is being used to combine content area studies and produce authentic, socially relevant outcomes. The dialogue is open and expanding.
Membership Opportunities
Learning Forward Michigan offers two separate membership plans, Individual and Institutional.
learningforwardmichigan.org
Teacher Leaders Jumpstart Common Core State Standards Implementation in Lake Orion
By Jason Larsen, Secondary Teacher Leader, Lake Orion Community Schools ake Orion Community Schools (LOCS) is addressing the implementation of Common Core State Standards (CCSS) by utilizing the resources of our ISD, Oakland Schools. Nearly all of the twenty-eight school districts comprising Oakland Schools are participating in this roll out. Oakland Schools is using a uniquely coordinated effort to use teacher-leaders as the main impetus for this conversion to the CCSS. At the district level, our Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment, Heidi Kast, has been instrumental in helping coordinate this county wide initiative as a member of the CCSS Initiatives Steering Committee at the county level with Oakland Schools. LOCS has sent teacher teams from elementary, middle and high school levels to work with Oakland Schools in developing units in ELA and Math. These select teachers pilot and review units, or write CCSS unit plans. The plan for rollout has already begun; in fact, Math departments at all levels have been assigned eight standards to incorporate into lessons this past year. In
ELA, the elementary began its rollout this Spring, while teacher-trainers will incorporate additional standards over the next school year. Administrators in our district have been involved in the scope and sequence of the CCSS implementation and will have a district-wide principals workshop in August to offer feedback and learn of professional development opportunities for educators. Oakland Schools has set a three-year plan for roll out, with full implementation of CCSS by the 2014-2015 school year. Switching from Grade Level Content Expectations to CCSS may be challenging and intimidating for many districts, administrators, and educators, but with Oakland Schools help, Oakland County schools have a common plan and a teacher leader-driven implementation model. For more information on the Oakland Schools plan for CCSS roll out, visit the Oakland Schools Learning Achievement Coalition website. Another resource for curriculum conversion is the MDE Crosswalk document, which can be found on the MDE website.
s part of Michigans transition to online testing, the Michigan Department of Education joined the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC), a state-led consortium working to develop a next-generation assessment system aligned to the Common Core State Standards. The assessment system that will result from this consortiums work will be computer-adaptive and will include innovative item types that will provide for richer measurement of content. In addition, Michigan will benefit from the economies of scale resulting from the collective capacity of the 27 states currently participating and invested in SBAC. The very first issue of SBACs Smarter News publication was released last month and is available at the following link: http://t.co/oGQzUcKW. Smarter News will be published monthly and will detail the latest SBAC developments and will outline opportunities for educators, researchers, policymakers, and community partners to share their knowledge and resources as the development and implementation on this next-generation assessment system continue. You can elect to receive Smarter News directly or sign up to follow SBAC on Twitter by visiting the Publications & Resources section of consortiums website at www.SmarterBalanced.org. SBAC technical readiness efforts began this spring, as schools and districts were contacted to complete the first in a series of technical readiness surveys. For more information on SBAC events and development efforts between now and implementation in 2014-2015, please visit the interactive timeline posted on SBACs website. If you have general questions about the work of the consortium or Michigans role in these efforts, please contact the Bureau of Assessment & Accountability at baa@michigan.gov or 877.560.8378, option 7.
learningforwardmichigan.org
10
Kentucky was selected as the Demonstration State for the initiative, Transforming Professional Learning to Prepare College- and Career-Ready Students: Implementing the Common Core, and will receive training, coaching, and support from Learning Forward and other partner organizations over the next two years as a comprehensive plan is developed that incorporates professional learning practices and Common Core State Standards. The resources developed from the initiative will be made available to all states as they implement Common Core State Standards. Kentucky strives to ensure that all students are college and career ready upon graduation and have access to effective instruction and assessments based on the Common Core, said Terry Holliday, Ph.D., Kentucky Commissioner of Education. The partnership between Learning Forward, task force members, and educators will provide us with the guidance and support we need to work toward that goal and help other states do the same. Amy Colton, LFMs Executive Director, is a member of the LF Staff working with the Kentucky initiative.
learningforwardmichigan.org
11
Mission:
Learning Forward Michigan will ensure that every Michigan educator engages in effective professional learning every day through advocacy, influence, and modeling.
Board of Directors:
Executive Director: Amy B. Colton President: John Summerhill Center Line Public Schools Past President: Dave Swierpel Carman-Ainsworth President Elect, Newsletter Co-Editor Cynthia Carver Oakland University Treasurer: Sam LoPresto Consultant Secretary: Laska Creagh Consultant Members at Large: Steve Hecker LFM Newsletter Co-Editor, Consultant Gloria Waters GJ Waters & Associates Lauren Childs Oakland Schools Naomi Norman Washtenaw ISD, Livingston ESA Richard Weigel Niles Community Schools Kimberly Hempton Clarkston School District Marcia Hudson Avondale School Distrtict Robert Martin West Bloomfield Public Schools Christopher Smith Jackson Lumen Christi High School Lisa Guzzardo-Asaro Macomb ISD Pat McNeill Michigan ASCD Donna Hamilton MDE Sarah-Kate LaVan MDE Piper Farrell-Singleton MDE
12