PENYERAHAN DAN PENILAIAN TUGASAN ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION AND ASSESSMENT _________________________________________________________________________ OUMM3203 PROFESSIONAL ETHICS MAY 2013 _________________________________________________________________________

ARAHAN KEPADA PELAJAR / INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS
1. Tugasan ini mengandungi SATU (1) soalan sahaja yang disediakan dalam bahasa modul bercetak kursus ini. / This assignment contains only ONE (1) question that is set in the language of the printed module for the course. 2. Jawab dalam Bahasa Melayu atau Bahasa Inggeris. / Answer in Malay or English. 3. Muat turunkan templat tugasan versi bahasa yang berkenaan daripada MyVLE untuk penyediaan dan penyerahan tugasan anda . Tugasan anda hendaklah ditaip dengan menggunakan saiz fon 12 Times New Roman dan langkau baris 1.5. / Download the language version of the assignment template concerned from the MyVLE for preparation and submission of your assignment. Your assignment should be typed using 12 point Times New Roman font and 1.5 line spacing. 4. Tugasan anda hendaklah antara 2500 hingga 3000 patah perkataan tidak termasuk rujukan. Bilangan perkataan hendaklah ditunjukkan di hujung tugasan anda. Jangan menyalin soalan dan arahan tugasan dalam jawapan anda. / Your assignment should be between 2500 to 3000 words excluding references. The number of words should be shown at the end of your assignment. Do not copy the assignment question and instructions to your answer. 5. Anda dikehendaki menghantar tugasan SECARA ON-LINE melalui MyVLE. Sila rujuk kepada portal untuk arahan mengenai prosedur menghantar tugasan anda secara on-line. Anda dinasihatkan menyimpan senaskah tugasan yang diserahkan untuk rujukan sendiri. / You must submit your assignment ONLINE via the MyVLE. Refer to the portal for instructions on the procedures to submit your assignment on-line. You are advised to keep a copy of your submitted assignment for personal reference. 6. Anda hanya boleh menghantar tugasan SEKALI sahaja dalam SATU fail. / You can submit your assignment ONCE only in a SINGLE file. 7. Tugasan anda hendaklah diserahkan antara 9hb Julai 2013 hingga 17hb Julai 2013. Serahan selepas 17hb Julai 2013 TIDAK akan diterima. / Your assignment must be submitted between 9th July 2013 until 17th July 2013. Submission after 17th July 2013 will NOT be accepted. 8. Tugasan hendaklah disiapkan secara individu. Anda dilarang meniru tugasan orang lain. Anda juga dilarang sama sekali memplagiat kerja orang lain sebagai kerja sendiri. /

Assignments with more than 50% overlap with others: Zero mark would be given. You should not copy another person’s assignment.30 % overlap with others: 20% deduction from the total marks scored. Pakistani cricketers were found guilty of accepting bribes in . If plagiarism is detected. Assignments with 31 . Spiro Agnew. akan disemak untuk menentukan kadar pertindihan. / This assignment accounts for 40% of the total marks for the course and shall be assessed based on the Rubrics attached . REQUIREMENT Bribery has been and continues to be a part of the social structure of many cultures.50%: potongan 40% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. For example. the American Vice President. Anda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan Akhir Semester bermula. In sports. / You would be given feedback on the assignment before the Final Semester Examination commences. You should also not plagiarise another person’s work as your own.Your assignment should be prepared individually. Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 31 . Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan lebih daripada 50%: Markah sifar akan diberikan. marks would be deducted as follows:    • • • Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 10 . PENILAIAN / EVALUATION Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 40% daripada jumlah markah kursus berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik yang dilampirkan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan. ASSIGNMENT QUESTION PURPOSE The assignment is aimed at providing learners with the opportunity to use analytical methods of reasoning to reach a decision on an ethical problem. secara automatik.50 % overlap with others: 40% deduction from the total marks scored. Assignments with 10 . PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan.30%: potongan 20% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. markah akan dipotong seperti berikut: / Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. resigned from office after it was discovered that he took bribes while serving as Governor of Maryland.

legal and ethical approaches. share options or career promotions. Using the economic. analyse the issue of bribery to conclusively demonstrate its position from the moral point of view. kickbacks. _________________________________________________________________________ MUKA SURAT TAMAT / END OF PAGE . Bribery can be in many forms. Define the act of bribery. contributions. such as gifts.certain matches against England. donations.

Arguments based on TWO ethical theories were soundly presented.ATTACHMENT ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS OUMM3203/ PROFESSIONAL ETHICS /MAY 2013 Criteria Weig ht Low 0 1 Fair 2 Above average 3 Excellent 4 Max Mark s Introduction – Definition. Arguments were based on microeconomic theories and market forces and were adequate and clear. unclear and lacks depth. Legal analysis on the act of bribery 2. The write-up was brief. Arguments were based on microeconomic theories and market forces and were very clear and detailed. but without any reference to reputable sources. Arguments were not based on the legal framework and social forces. Arguments based on THREE ethical theories were soundly presented. The write-up was brief and clear but without reference to any reputable source. Arguments were based on the legal framework and social forces and were adequate and clear. Arguments were based on microeconomic theories and market forces but incomplete and/or irrelevant.5 No ethical analysis was carried out. Arguments based on ONE ethical theory were soundly presented. Economic analysis on the act of bribery No economic analysis was carried out. 2.5 No legal analysis was carried out. The write-up was adequate and clear. The write-up was detailed and clear with adequate references from reputable sources. Arguments based on FOUR ethical theories were soundly presented. 4 10 10 10 . history and practice of bribery 1 A write-up on bribery was not provided. Some cost/benefit data illustrations were given.5 Arguments were not based on microeconomic theories and market forces. Ethical analysis on the act of bribery 2. Arguments based on the legal framework and social forces were clear and detailed. Arguments were based on the legal framework and social forces but incomplete/ irrelevant.

The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was vague and/or irrelevant. The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was detailed and complete.Conclusion 1. The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was partially complete. The conclusion on the outcome of the analysis was adequate. 6 Total points 10 40 .5 No conclusion was provided on the outcome of the analysis.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful