Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies

Page 1 sur 13

Published in Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, edited by Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (1995).

Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies
Hans V. Hansen This bibliography gathers the most important research of the last twentyfive years on individual fallacies and fallacy theory, but also includes some entries from earlier in the century. Hamblin's bibliography, in Fallacies (1970, 304-16) is an excellent guide to the historical sources. For those entries below whose titles do not make clear what the subject of the entry is, we have added a short note. The criteria of inclusion are as follows: (1) articles on individual fallacies or fallacy theory that have appeared in refereed journals; (2) textbooks that have made a significant practical or theoretical contribution to the study of fallacies, or whose treatment of fallacies has been widely discussed, or that take a fallacies approach to informal logic or critical thinking; and (3) conference proceedings and other collections that contain a significant number of papers of interest. Additional references to published work on the fallacies, as well as informal logic and argumentation theory in general, may be found in H. V. Hansen, "An informal logic bibliography," Informal Logic 12 (1990): 155-84. I would like to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Peter Houtlosser (University of Amsterdam) and Mark Letteri (University of Windsor) in preparing this bibliography. Abate, Charles J. _____. 1979. Fallaciousness and invalidity. Philosophy and Rhetoric 12:262-66. Adler, Jonathan E. _____. 1993. Critique of an epistemic account of fallacies. Argumentation 7:263-72. [Criticism of Fogelin and Duggan 1987]. _____. 1994. Fallacies and alternative interpretations. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72:271-82. Back, Allan. _____. 1987. Philoponus on the fallacy of accident. Ancient Philosophy 7:131-46. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua. _____. 1964. More on the fallacy of composition. Mind 73:125-26 [Reply to Rowe 1962]. Barker, John A. _____. 1976. The fallacy of begging the question. Dialogue 15:241 -55. _____. 1978. The nature of question-begging arguments. Dialogue 17:490-98. Barth, E. M., and J. L. Martens.


Grootendorst. Informal Logic: The First International Symposium. Ermanno. (Reply to McPeck 1991). Rescuing "begging the question. On good and bad arguments. Alan. In Van Eemeren. [Reply to Massey's 1975 papers]. circularity and epistemic propriety. Ethotic argument. Blair. _____. Broad. History of Philosophy Quarterly 5:207-19. In Van Eemeren. Argumentation 8:217-26. A plea for argumentum ad misericordiam. Grootendorst. and Ralph H. _____. _____. Richard W. 1991. The current state of informal logic and critical thinking. 1985. Behling. _____. History of Philosophy Quarterly 3:245-58. and Harvey Siegel. Basu. Argumentum ad hominem: From chaos to formal dialectic. Ethotetic argument: Some uses. 1988b. _____. argumentation and an epistemic theory of fallacies. J. [Selected papers from the First International Symposium on Informal Logic]. 1984. Normativity.04. 1992. International Logic Review John. Philosophy 25:99-113. 1986. Biro. Grootendorst. _____. et al. _____. _____. 1987. _____. Some common fallacies in political thinking. J. 1989]. 1994. 65-73. C. Bencivenga. 1979. Informal Logic 9:147-51. Logique et Analyse 20:76-96. James E. _____. Pathos and the "appeal to emotion": An Aristotelian analysis. 1975. _____. I. believability and begging the question: A reply to Sanford. 1950." Metaphilosophy 8:257-71. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 1988a. 1987. 1987c. et al. _____. Anthony. Biro. [Disagrees with some conclusions in Wreen 1987b. A rhetorical view of the ad hominem. 1977. The ad baculum re-clothed. Johnson. Brinton. Appeal to the angry emotions. _____. Broyles.Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 2 sur 13 _____. [Reply to Woods and Walton 1982b]. eds. 85-103. 8:247-59. 1992. 1987. Misconceptions of informal logic: A reply to McPeck. Begging the question. Dilip K.2012 . D. 1977. 1980. Informal Logic 10:77—87. A question of begging. 1994. Teaching Philosophy 14:35-52. [Reply to Wertz 1985].ditext. The fallacies of composition and division. Informal Logic 8:19-26. Informal Logic 14:85-92. Inverness.html 10. http://www. Knowability. _____. Calif. A sketch of an epistemic theory of fallacies. 246-54.: Edgepress. Philosophy and Rhetoric 8:108-13. On the naming of formal fallacies. et al. 1988b. 1988a. _____. _____. 1986. 1987. _____. Metaphilosophy 15:239-47. Philosophia 23:25-44. _____. 1987b. _____. _____. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63:50-63. 1992. In Van Eemeren.

: Erlbaum. 1992b. A "limited" defense of the genetic fallacy. God. Anibel A. van. Cowan. _____. van. _____. 1984. _____. Capaldi. Cohen. Nicholas. 1969. Communication. Mind 74:452-33. Introduction to Logic. Jonathan. N. _____.html 10. 8 considers a code for rational discussants and its relation to the fallacies]. and the nature of predication: A historical inquiry.: Prometheus Books. 1987. [Earlier editions. A transition stage in the theory of fallacies. and Fallacies. Denying the antecedent. In Krabbe et al.ditext. 1980. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30:238-51. _____. Dordrecht: Foris. _____. 1989. 1973. The Art of Deception. Frans H. _____. Argumentation 1:283-301. N. Rob Grootendorst. _____. the Bible and circularity.Y. Frans H. _____. Burke. _____.J. and Carl Cohen. http://www. _____. Dordrecht: Foris. 1989. Metaphilosophy 24:227-40. Relevance reviewed: The case of argumentum ad hominem. Journal of Pragmatics 13:99-109. 1982. Aristotle. _____. Vol. Richard. 1992a. The history of the argumentum ad hominem since the seventeenth century. beginning with the first in 1955. Margaret A. Eemeren. 1]. New York: Macmillan. Irving M. Are people programmed to commit fallacies? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 12:251-74. On the psychology of prediction: Whose is the fallacy? Cognition 7:385-407. and Charles Willard. 8th ed. Colwell. Cognition 8:89-92.2012 . The gambler's fallacy. 1987a. 1993:49-68. J. Crouch. 1993.17. 1979. Informal Logic 11:6173. Informal Logic 16:23-30.04. were authored by Copi alone]. [chap. Michael. Copi. [Proceedings of the First International Society for Study of Argumentation Conference. Cole. Fallacies in pragma-dialectical perspective. L. _____. Hillsdale. 1986. _____. eds. A note on informal fallacies. 1991. 1965.Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 3 sur 13 Bueno. Hypatia 6:104. Whose is the fallacy: A rejoinder to Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. and Rob Grootendorst. Buffalo. Argumentation 6:141-59. the fallacy of accident. Argumentation. Joseph L. Eemeren. _____. _____. _____. 1990. 1993. 1988. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Anthony Blair. Journal of the History of Philosophy 26:5-24. _____. Feminist philosophy and the genetic fallacy. Gary. Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline. 1994.

In Sidney Hook: Philosopher of Democracy and Humanism. 1990. 1986. Ward. 1994. Vol. Understanding. Feuer. Fallacies and the evaluation of reasoning. 1986. _____. 1987. Volume IA. _____. Teaching Philosophy 10:211-17.Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 4 sur 13 _____.J. Farnside. Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches. Facione. Amsterdam: Sicsat. _____.J. 1961. 1987c. Amsterdam: Sicsat. 1986b. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation. 1991. Amsterdam: Sicsat. Englewood Cliffs. 1986a. edited by Paul Kurtz. 1980. The genetic fallacy re-examined. Wittgenstein's theory of fallacy. Englewood Cliffs. Engel. Vol.2012 ." Philosophical Review 60:533-43. Argumentation: Analysis and Practices. Philosophical Forum 5:394-404. 3] _____. Peter _____. Fair. Finocchiaro. 1989. and William B. _____. Lewis S. 1976]. 3]. 5th ed. 1959. The many faces of amphiboly. The concept of ad hominem argument in Galileo and Locke.: Prentice-Hall. Dordrecht: Foris.04. Volume IB. [Proceedings of the Second International Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference. Vol. [Proceedings of the First International Society for Study of Argumentation Conference.Y. _____. 1974. 1981. S. _____. _____. _____. _____.html 10.ditext. Analyzing Informal Fallacies. New York: St. Vol. [Proceedings of the First International Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference. 2]. _____. The fallacy of many questions: Or how to stop beating your wife. Dordrecht: Foris. 1986c. 1983. wit. N. Fallacy: The Counterfeit of Argument. Vol. Teaching about fallacies. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation. Metaphilosophy 17:19299. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy" Metaphilosophy 22:251-64. Fallacy.: Prentice-Hall. Holther. and madness. 227-46. 2]. http://www. _____. 1992. Philosophy and Rhetoric 19:224-41. Metaphilosophy 20:347-55. 1]. [Proceedings of the Second International Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference. _____. Maurice. Frank.: Prometheus Books. N. N. 1990. Argumentation Illuminated. 1987b. Morris. Buffalo. Informal Logic 8:67 -80. W. [Proceedings of the Second International Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference. _____. [lst ed. _____. 1991a. _____. 1990. finally. what it is to "Beg the Question. Explaining equivocation. Hobbes's "table of absurdity. 1991b. American Philosophical Quarterly 18:13-22. With Good Reason: An Introduction to informal Fallacies. Martin's. 1973. _____.

Informal Logic 13:99-112. 1987a. Dale. Dual coding. Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought. _____. Groarke. 1992. Rolf. Hample. Grootendorst. Fogelin. 1972-1982. Trudy. [Available from Newport News: Vale Press].. A. Robert J. Goodwin. Argumentation 1:263-82. The genetic fallacy revisited. 1970. http://www. The Personalist 55:2329. _____. David. contra Gcrbcr. _____. Goudge. Rob. reasoning and fallacies. Teaching Philosophy 6:13-24. On argumentum ad hominem. Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. _____. Lawrence. _____. Hamblin. _____. 1987. Vivarium 25:110-45. American Philosophical Quarterly 4:101-13. Leo. _____. What's wrong with slippery slope arguments? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12:303-16. Methodos 11:147-59. A Practical Study of Argument. _____. 1977. _____. 1974. _____. _____. 1983. _____. 1992. 1983. 3d ed. Good." The Personalist 58:145-46. Belmont. Gelber.2012 . 331-42. 1959. The fallacy of accident and the dictum de omni. Duggan. 1991. [Reply to Woods and Walton 1977b]. The genetic fallacy. 1987. _____. 1987. In van Eemeren. and Timothy J. Hinman. 1967. _____. Journal of the American Forensic Association 19:59-78. Fischer. A postscript on fallacies. Ad hominem: Revising the textbooks. Argumentation 1:255-62. The dialectic of second-order distinctions: The structure of arguments about fallacies. Fallacies. David H. 1982.html 10. London: Methuen. Calif. et al. Grootendorst. _____. I. Dordrecht: Foris. D. A classification of fallacious arguments and interpretations. Critical study of Woods and Walton's Fallacies: Selected Papers. Govier.Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 5 sur 13 _____.: Wadsworth.ditext.04. Charles L. [1st ed. Synthese 13:41-48. Hester Goodenough. Some fallacies about fallacies. 1985]. Fallacies. _____. Gerber. _____. Norwood R. George. Hanson. Reply to Woods and Walton's "Ad hominem. T. J. Journal of Philosophical Logic 12:319-25. 1982. _____. 1987. Six types of fallaciousness: Toward a realistic theory of logical criticism. 1961. Informal Logic 14:11-22. 1987. New York: Harper and Row.

Hooke. On begging the questions at any time. 1994. The case for ad hominem arguments. Jason. Argumentation 1:239-53. Massey on fallacy and informal logic: A reply. Hohmann. Giora. 1989. _____. 1982. A. 1989. Fallacies are common. Ralph Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 6 sur 13 _____. and ). Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65:26-36. _____. Hoffman. 776-81. Philosophy and Rhetoric 22:59-70. Grootendorst et al. _____. Are fallacies common? A look at two debates. The hidden logic of slippery slope arguments. Hintikka. 1981]. 1990. Relevance. _____.ditext. Johnson. 1987. 1991. Petitio and the purpose of arguing. Johnson. _____. Mill's classification of fallacies. Why is the ad baculum a fallacy? In Van Eemeren and Grootendorst. 1991. Informal Logic 10:169-75. E. 1975b. Hitchcock. The asymmetry thesis. Analysis 32:51. Frank. Johnson. The fallacy of fallacies. 1989. S. 1986. http://www. Iseminger. Many questions begs the question (but questions do not beg the question). 1987. Philosophy and Rhetoric 23:153-67. 1988. _____. Philosophia 17:491-99. _____. The blaze of her splendours: Suggestions about revitalizing fallacy theory. _____. 391-96. 1987. Anthony Blair. Jackson. _____. 1991. et al. [Reply to Massey 1981]. 1992. Hedging as a fallacy of language. Jacquette. 1984. _____. 1991a. Ralph H. Dialogue 6:135-50. Jaakko.. [Reply to Walton 1991d].04. _____. Hamblin on the standard treatment. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60:338-45. Hon. 1991b. Dale. Informal Logic 11:101-6. _____. Tortuous logic and tortured bodies. 1984. Informal Logic 8:81-92. A critical note on J. 1991. 1971. _____. 1989. Gary. _____.2012 . Gary. _____. Synthese 80:407-26. David. _____. Is there a case for ad hominem? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62:182-85. The Monist 72:25-59. The nature of the argumentum ad baculum. Hanns. In Van Eemeren. Philosophy and Rhetoric 24:362-66. _____. 1967-68. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42:263-68. _____. Argumentation 6:251-70. Argumentation 1:211-38. Argumentation 8:283-89. _____. Robert. Begging the question. [Discussion of Massey 1975a. [Includes section devoted to the relevance of "ad" appeals]. Fallacies and legal argumentation. _____.html 10. Oliver A. In response to Walton.

: Wadsworth [1st ed. Informal logic: The past five years. Classical Quarterly.html 10. George. The nature and classification of fallacies. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8:117-33. and Douglas N. Thomas. T. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8:117-33. Erik C. Krabbe. J. 1993. and P. 33:36374. Jim.. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson. 1979. Windsor: Informal Logic. 1962. 3d ed. 1991. Is there a fallacy of small sample? Informal Logic 8:53-56. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62:174-81. Leddy. 1978-83. 1970. Argumentation 8:265-82. 31-39. Calif. Logical Self-Defense. 6th ed. New Essays in Informal Logic. R. 1987.2012 . Criteria of fallacy and sophistry for use in the analysis of Platonic dialogues. Mackenzie. Lavine. Walton. Kahane. Begging what is at issue in the argument. _____. 1980. In Blair and Johnson 1980. _____. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric. 1984a. Begging the question in dialogue.ditext. Informal Logic 15:79-91. _____. 1985. [1st ed. Question begging in non-cumulative systems. Z. Lowell. J. 1984b.W. Belmont.Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 7 sur 13 _____. 1983. Krabbe. 1993. Howard. Social Research 29:321-36. eds. Smit.. Argumentation 6:271-83. _____. Levi. 1993. Aristotle and the so-called fallacy of equivocation. 1994. 1992. _____. 1986. So what? Profiles for relevance criticism in persuasion dialogues. 1994. Kirwan. Amsterdam: Rodopi. _____. _____. A. http://www. Klosko. Empirical Logic and Public Debate. Dalitz. _____. Southern Journal of Philosophy 8:63-65. Erik C. Philosophical Quarterly 29:35-46. 1992. _____. _____. Plato and the morality of fallacy. 1979. Macintosh. Erik C. _____.] _____. Christopher. _____. Kleiman. American Philosophical Quarterly 22:181-96. Pashman on Freud and the genetic fallacy. J. W. Dialogue 30:531-47. n. [Includes discussion of some of the fallacies of relevance.s. American Journal of Philology 108:612-26. Confirmation of a conjecture of Peter of Spain concerning begging the question. Reflections on the genetic fallacy. 1977]. 1971]. The Use of Reasoning in Everyday Life. _____. Theological question-begging. _____. [Reply to Pashman 1970].04. _____. W. It's all very well for you to talk! Situationally disqualifying ad hominem attacks. _____. _____. Don S.

1984. Formal fallacies and other invalid arguments. What is learned in informal logic courses? Teaching Philosophy 14:25-34. and the teaching of informal logic. John. Minot. 75-82. 3:169-79. Michalos. Formalism. Palmer. Oliver. Is the genetic fallacy a fallacy? Southern Journal of Philosophy 8:57-62. [Criticism of the purported value of teaching the fallacies as part of critical thinking].94. _____. Are there any good arguments that bad arguments are bad? Philosophy in Context 4:61-77. 1981. Improving Your Reasoning (2d ed. Parker. In Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 1987. Humphrey. 1986.ditext. _____. 1981. Nuchelmans. Massey. Robert. Kleiman.: Prentice-Hall. N. Philosophy in Context (Supplementary) 4:44-55 _____. 1994. 1970. Grootendorst. 1981. 1987b. Do circular arguments beg the question? Philosophy 56:387. _____. _____. Gabriel. Grootendorst.2012 . Alex C.04. John. _____. When is a fallacy not a fallacy? Metaphilosophy 19:307-12. James Willard. _____. Rhetorical Society Quarterly 11:222-35. 1987. etal. [Anticipates Massey's papers on the asymmetry thesis]. Argumentation 8:227-40. 1991. 1967. The fallacy behind fallacies. Englewood Cliffs. 1987b. _____. edited by Paul Edwards. 1970].html 10. 1975a.). Ernest. 1993. et al. In Van Eemeren. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6:489-500.Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 8 sur 13 _____. Fallacies. McMurtry. 1976. _____. _____. In Van Eemeren. Walter S. Argumentation 2:465-82.78. _____. A rhetorical view of fallacies: Ad hominem and ad populum. In Krabbe et al. Richard A. Contexts of begging the question. _____. Distinguo: The response to equivocation. Journal of the American Forensic Association 20:123-32. _____. Marshall. Joel. _____. 37-47. Reply to Mr.J. 1988. Tu quoque arguments: A rhetorical perspective. Jon. _____. Gerald. 386-93. http://www. McPeck. Cognitive development and fallacies. _____. 1993. _____. 1967. John L. _____. Informal Logic 8:27-36. Mackie. 1971. The argumentum ad adversarium. Marks. Southern Journal of Philosophy 9:93-94. On the fourfold root of argumentum ad hominem. Pashman. [Reply to Kleiman 1970]. [1st ed. Mind 76:463. 1975b. fallacies. In defense of the asymmetry. Maier.

Mind 50:140-55. Dale. How serious a fallacy is inconsistency? Argumentation 1:303-16. Arguing from ignorance. 1962. Logic. 1950. 1941. Analysis 41:65. Philosophical Quarterly 21:97-108. The argument from ignorance. begging the question and missing the point. [Reply to Barker 1976]. 1986. The fallacy of composition. Richard. Remland. _____. 1965. Rowe.Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 9 sur 13 _____. falsity. 1942. The implicit ad hominem fallacy: Nonverbal displays of status in argumentative discourse. Nicholas. _____. _____. _____. Begging the question. Schlecht. _____. Michael F. et al. 1987. 1991. Wesley. 1971a. N. _____. _____. 1987b. Analysis 31:113-17. Journal of the American Forensic Association 19:79-86. 1977. and begging the question. Begging the question. _____. [1st ed. _____. 1963]. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. International Logic Review 11:66-71. 1972. 1991. incompleteness. et al. On classification of fallacies. Pirie. 1981. 1971. _____. _____. Rohatyn. _____. Salmon. _____. _____. _____.: Prentice-Hall.html 10. Ambiguity. _____. P. Dennis. Ad verecundiam and ad hominem arguments as acceptable fallacies. Mind 51:94-114. Rescher. 1991a. The Book of Fallacy: A Training Manual for Intellectual Subversives. 1981. _____. Rajendra. 1981. Schcdler. Classifying fallacies logically. Martin.J. 3d ed. Ludwig F. George. 45-55. Darshana International 6:44-47. The fallacy of begging the question: A reply to Barker. Superfluous information. Schellens. _____. Begging the question. Some reconsiderations of the argumentum ad hominem. 1991. ]. _____.ditext. Mind 71:87-92. Plato's consciousness of fallacy. epistemic conditions of inference. 1966. 1987. Analysis 32:197-99. Philosophical Quarterly [India] 23:69-74. Informal Logic 8:57-66. When is a fallacy a fallacy? In van Eemeren. Michael. Madsen. 1982.04. Teaching Philosophy 14:53-64. Riepe. Prasad. 1971b.2012 . 1988. Englewood Cliffs. Dialogue 16:485-98. _____. http://www. Robinson. 403-10. In Van Eemeren and Grootendorst. Sanford. Grootendorst. In Van Eemeren and Grootendorst. William L. 1984. The Jaina conception of fallacies. David. et al. _____. Metaphilosophy 12:145-58. Inconsistency. 384-90. Schmidt. 1991a.

International Logic Review 8:57-68. 1989. Bentham's Book of Fallacies: Rhetorician in spite of himself. _____.: University Press of America. Marie _____. 1989a. 1985a.ditext. 195-221. The ad hominem argument as an informal fallacy. _____. _____. 1977. Question-asking fallacies. Reasoning and threatening: A reply to Yoos. et al. 1966. 1975b. Are circular arguments necessarily vicious? American Philosophical Quarterly 22:263-74. Refutation and Fallacy. Peter. 1987a. _____. _____. Petitio principii and argument analysis. 41-54. _____. _____. http://www. Criticism. Dwight van de. 233-51. 1988. _____. edited by M.: Greenwood. The appeal to force. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1975a. Douglas N. How common are fallacies? Informal Logic 9:41-48. Argumentation 1:317-31. Vate. Argumentation 1:333-49. Lanham. Why is the ad populum a fallacy? Philosophy and Rhetoric 13:264-78. Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies. 1987. 1962. Topical Relevance in Argumentation. 1989b. Meyer. Philosophy and Rhetoric 22:83-93. 209-20. 1980b. 1987. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. W. 323-30. [Response to Jason 1986]. without circularity. therefore P. Secor. _____. A. 1987b. Rosamund Kent. _____. 1980a. Begging the question. 1994. Mill and De Morgan on whether the syllogism is a petitio.04. Journal of Philosophy 88:245-66.Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 10 sur 13 _____. Sorensen. Fallacies of statistical substitution. _____. Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms. 1984. In Questions and Questioning. 1985b. Journal of the History of Ideas 27:462-63. In Blair and Johnson 1980. Jr. _____. Arguers Position: A Pragmatic Study of 'Ad Hominem' Attack. Md. The fallacy of many questions. Philosophy and Rhetoric 8:177-79. Argumentation 8:241-50. _____. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. _____. P. Question-begging under a non-foundational model of argument. 1987a. _____. _____.2012 . Berlin: De Gruyter. 1981. Slipping off the slippery slope: A reply to Professor Jacquette. 1982. Grootendorst. Sprague. What is a fallacy? In Van 1987c. Westport. Philosophy and Rhetoric 8:4360. Logique et Analyse 95 -96:291-313 Also in Woods and Walton 1989. Sparkes. _____. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. _____. Suber. Conn. Roy A. _____. Walton.html 10. _____. Plato's use of fallacy: A study of the Euthydemus and some other dialogues. Philosophy and Rhetoric 22:195-202.

Ignoring qualifications (secundum quid) as a subfallacy of hasty generalization. 1992d. Argumentation and Advocacy 28:1-22. 1988. _____. _____. Comment on Peter of Spain. 1967-68. When affirming the consequent is valid. S.ditext. 1984. 1995. Nonfallacious arguments from ignorance. Johnson. _____. 1989b. Metaphilosophy 19:38-52. Wohlrapp. Philosophy and Rhetoric 24:353-61. Question-Reply Argumentation. _____. International Logic Review 16:17-18. Commitment. Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Types of dialogue. In Van Eemeren. Logique et Analyse 27:133-64. Pragmatics and Cognition 1:125-48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1991d. _____. Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation. American Philosophical Quarterly 29:381-87. Metaphilosophy 16:20613. 1992. _____. _____. 1991b. Jim Mackenzie. and circular arguments. 1992f. A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy. 1985. Bias. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1989a. Hamblin on the standard treatment of fallacies. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 1992a. 1985. Douglas N. types of dialogue. _____. Which of the fallacies are fallacies of relevance? Argumentation 6:237-50. Slippery Slope Arguments. Stephen E. M.Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 11 sur 13 _____. Kent. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. _____. critical doubt.html 10. M. Batten. _____. Williams. Albany: State University of New York Press. Slippery slope arguments. 1993. 1990. _____. [Reply to R. 133-47.Journal of Philosophical Logic 22:323-31. Games.. Wertz. graphs. Informal Logic 14:95-103. _____. H. _____. Begging the question? Dialogue 6:567-70. 1992c. Weiss. The sorites fallacy: What difference does a peanut make? Synthese 33:253-72. 1990]. 1991a. _____. Wilson. David. Critical faults and fallacies of questioning. http://www. The Place of Emotion in Argument. New York: Greenwood. 1992e. 1992g. Walton. Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation. New York: Greenwood. Logique et Analyse 33:113-54. White. 1991c. Circular Arguments. E. Grootendorst et al. _____. and L. _____. _____. 1976. and fallacies. Harald. 1992b.. and fallacies. _____. _____. and begging the question. _____. Journal of Pragmatics 15:337-66. The speech act of presumption. K. 1993.04.2012 . dialectical shifts and fallacies. _____.

Ratio 21:31-43. 27-36.04. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. _____. Petitio and relevant many-premissed arguments. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. 57-68. Journal of Critical Analysis 4:103-11. GNP's and quarks: Are fallacies theoretical entities? Informal Logic 10:67-76. In Van Eemeren. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. _____. [Investigates the formal approach to some fallacies. 1980. 121-41. 161-73. Woods. 1978b. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. _____. Grootendorst. Woods. 1977d. Studia Logica 36:381406. _____. _____. 1986. 1977e. 1988. 1993. 343-49. Post hoc. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. John. What is informal logic? In Blair and Johnson 1980. 1976b. Ad hominem. 1974. In Van Eemeren. 1979. 143-59. 1977b. 397-402. 1977c. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. In Krabbe et al. Petitio principii. Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies.ditext. Walton. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson. Logique et Analyse 20:97-110. Communication and Cognition 24:43-54.47-53. Ad baculum. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. Julian. 1991a. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. _____. _____. Pragma-dialectics: A radical departure in fallacy theory. On fallacies. _____. _____. 11-28. 1991. 1975. Ad baculum. 1982a. 1-10. Grazer Philosophische Studien 2:13340. 87-91. Arresting circles in formal dialogues. Wolfe. especially composition and division]. Grootendorst et al. self-interest and Pascal's wager. _____.Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 12 sur 13 _____. 1977a. 221-32. _____. 1976a. Fallaciousness without invalidity? Philosophy and Rhetoric 9:52-54. 1992. Composition and division. Secundum quid as a research programme. Philosophy and Rhetoric 7:135-53. 1992. Dialectica 32:87-99. Argumentum ad verecundiam. Philosophical Forum 8:1-20. _____. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. Journal of Philosophical Logic 7:73-90. Buttercups. 1987a. 1981. _____. 55-73. Inconsistency: A fallacy? Informal Logic 8:151-52. Philosophy and Rhetoric 14:168-72. The fallacy of ad ignorantiam. 1991. 29-45. _____. Grootendorst et al. 1987.html 10. 23-48. Synthese 31:107-27. _____. John. Equivocation and practical logic. _____. _____. 93-119. 1993. ergo propter hoc. _____. Review of Metaphysics 30:569-93. Also in Woods and Walton 1989. _____. http://www. 1972. _____.2012 . Also in Woods and Walton 1989. _____. _____. and Douglas N. 1978a. Who cares about the fallacies? In Van Eemeren. Argumentum ad baculum and ideal speech situation. contra Gerber. Ad hominem. The Personalist 58:141-44. 195-207. et al. More on fallaciousness and invalidity.

et al. [Translations of most of the papers in Woods and Walton 1989. _____. Grootendorst. 1972-82. _____.html 10. Informal Logic 10:8995. Critique de l'Argumentation: Logiques des sophismes ordinaires. Fallacies: Selected Papers. What is a fallacy? In Johnson and Blair 1994. 1987a.Select Bibliography of Recent Work on the Fallacies Page 13 sur 13 _____. [On the ad ignorantiam]. A. Psychology. _____. A critique of van de Vate's "The appeal to force. R. The psychology of the 'Gambler's Fallacy' in probabilistic reasoning. 1982c. W Kelly. Michael J. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12:77-100. 1975. 1988b. Pragmatics and Cognition 2:285-306. _____. Yoos. Informal Logic 9:31-39. A bolt of fear. In Van Eemeren. 1987b. 1989a. Metaphilosophy 24:6175. Virginia. 21:55-58. _____. 1992. 1988a. from ignorance knowledge. _____. George. Light from darkness. Look Ma! No Frans. http://www. Nous 16:585-605. 1994b. Dialectica 43:289-314. _____. Admit no force but argument. When no reason is good reason. The Petitio: Aristotle's five ways. 1989. [Criticizes the standard treatment of the ad baculum fallacy]. Yackulic. 1982b. A Quarterly Journal of Human Behaviour. Paris: Editions Kime. [On the ad ignorantiam]. _____. 1987b. May the force be with you. 1989b. Dordrecht: Foris.. _____. _____.ditext. . Jump with common spirits. [On the ad baculum}. Philosophy and Rhetoric 22:131-40.04. Argumentation 2:42540. _____. 1993. Wreen. Question-begging and cumulativeness in dialectical games. _____. 93102. [On the ad baculum]. 1994a. 1984. [Critical assessment of the Pragma-Dialectical conception of fallacies]." Philosophy and Rhetoric 8:172-76. and I. [On the ad populum). _____. (On the ad baculum}. with a new introduction]. _____. there is a Santa Claus. Yes.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful