CAPACIDAD DE MOLIENDA PARA 1500 TMSD 1.- MOLIENDA PRIMARIA Se tienen las siguientes condiciones: Tonelaje alimentado = 62.

5 TMH/Hr Densidad de Pulpa = 1870 g/Lt F80 = 6595 P80 = 879,8 2.- MOLIENDA SECUNDARIA Tonelaje alimentado = 124.5 TMH/Hr Densidad de Pulpa = 1654 g/Lt F80 = 629 P80 = 414.5 Mediante las plantillas de Molicop Tools calculamos su capacidad:
Moly-Cop Tools TM (Version 2.0) BOND'S LAW APPLICATION Estimation of a Conventional Ball Mill Grinding Capacity
Remarks
Molienda primaria 1500 TMSD

GRINDING TASK :
Ore Work Index, kWh/ton (metric) Feed Size, F80, microns Product Size, P80, microns 13,00 6595 879,8 Specific Energy, kWh/ton Net Pow er Available, kW Number of Mills for the Task 2,78 174

Total Plant Throughput, ton/hr TMSD

62,69
1504,46

Net kW / Mill
Ratio de reduccion

MILL DIMENSIONS AND OPERATING CONDITIONS :
Eff. Diameter ft 8,00 Eff. Length ft 10,00 L/D 1,250 Mill Speed % Critical 72,00 rpm Charge Filling,% 45,00 Balls Filling,% 42,00 Interstitial Slurry Filling,% 100,00 Lift Angle, (°) 35,00

1 174 7,50 Mill Power, kW
140 5 29 Balls Overfilling Slurry

174
10,0

Net Total
% Losses

19,50
73,57 2,72

194 Charge Volume,
m3

Gross Total Apparent Density
ton/m3

% Solids in the Mill Ore Density, ton/m3 Slurry Density, ton/m3 Balls Density, ton/m3

Mill Charge Weight, tons
Ball Charge Interstitial Slurry above Balls

1,87
6,00

6,42

21,56

4,48

0,80

4,183

De igual manera con la molienda secundaria

00 629 414. kWh/ton Net Pow er Available. kW Number of Mills for the Task 1.088 Se puede concluir que en los cálculos no tenemos un factor de seguridad que podría afirmar que si cumpliría con el tonelaje deseado.50 62. F80. ton/m3 Balls Density.088 . P80.00 Lift Angle.28 1.56 2989.00 Balls Filling.42 21.65 6.72 189 Charge Volume.250 Mill Speed % Critical 72. Diameter ft 8. ton/m3 Mill Charge Weight. P80.00 Eff.0) BOND'S LAW APPLICATION Estimation of a Conventional Ball Mill Grinding Capacity Remarks Molienda Secundaria GRINDING TASK : Ore Work Index.06 3409.52 62. kWh/ton Net Pow er Available.20 149 Total Plant Throughput.00 rpm 124. ton/m3 Slurry Density. ton/hr TMSD MILL DIMENSIONS AND OPERATING CONDITIONS : Eff.0 Net Total % Losses 22.00 Mill Speed % Critical 72. ton/hr TMSD MILL DIMENSIONS AND OPERATING CONDITIONS : Eff.% 45. microns Product Size. m3 Gross Total Apparent Density ton/m3 % Solids in the Mill Ore Density.Moly-Cop Tools TM (Version 2. kWh/ton (metric) Feed Size. tons Ball Charge Interstitial Slurry above Balls 1. kW 140 Balls Overfilling Slurry Charge Filling.17 7.0 Net Total % Losses 19.0) BOND'S LAW APPLICATION Estimation of a Conventional Ball Mill Grinding Capacity Remarks Molienda Secundaria GRINDING TASK : Ore Work Index.33 Net kW / Mill 1 170 Mill Power.00 Interstitial Slurry Filling. kW Number of Mills for the Task 1.00 L/D 1.% 100.71 4.5 Specific Energy.00 rpm 142.00 5 26 170 10. m3 Gross Total Apparent Density ton/m3 % Solids in the Mill Ore Density. ton/m3 Balls Density.00 Balls Filling.00 2.65 6. tons Ball Charge Interstitial Slurry above Balls 1. se considera que en la molienda secundaria se trabajaría con los 3 molinos 6x6 2DA POSIBILIDAD: Reemplazo de los 3 molinos 6 x 6 con un 8 x 10 Moly-Cop Tools TM (Version 2. microns 13.% 42. Length ft 6. F80.24 4.96 0.52 2.5 Specific Energy.47 Net kW / Mill 3 50 Mill Power.% 100.00 Interstitial Slurry Filling.00 629 414. kW 41 Balls Overfilling Slurry Charge Filling.20 170 Total Plant Throughput.52 2.56 3.% 45.72 55 Charge Volume. kWh/ton (metric) Feed Size. microns Product Size. Diameter ft 6. ton/m3 Slurry Density. Length ft 10.% 42. microns 13. (°) 35.000 Eff . ton/m3 Mill Charge Weight.00 6.00 1 8 50 10. los cálculos dan que si se puede procesar pero estaría al máximo del tonelaje.34 0.00 L/D 1. (°) 35. para ello una correcta clasificación haría posible esto.00 Lift Angle.

6 x 6 se tendría 12 % más para asegurar el tonelaje a procesar.Con el molino 8 x 10 en reemplazo de los 3. .