P. 1
The Etymology of the Word "Amazigh"

The Etymology of the Word "Amazigh"

|Views: 989|Likes:
Published by D.Messaoudi
Where does the word "Amazigh" come from? What does it mean? Is it really created in Berberist lab as some people say or is it created by the French colonialist, as other peolple think? Here is our answer.
Where does the word "Amazigh" come from? What does it mean? Is it really created in Berberist lab as some people say or is it created by the French colonialist, as other peolple think? Here is our answer.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, History
Published by: D.Messaoudi on May 07, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/29/2013

pdf

text

original

The etymology of the word “Amazigh”

By: D. Messaoudi This is an article that can be an answer to the Libyan leader Al-Kadhafi, who once declared that the word “Amazigh” is created by the colonialists to divide the North African people who, according to him, are Arabs. The term “Amazigh” is not a creation of the French colonialism as it is said or written by many Arab ’intellectuals ’ known for their Pan-Arabist opinions [1], but it is definitely the appellation of the inhabitants of North Africa from immemorial times. This term is found in the texts / inscriptions of the Pharaonic Egypt of the period of Ramsis III, under the form of Macwc [2], in ancient Greek and Latin in which it appears under various forms: Mazyes (Hécatée-6th century A.C.), Maxyes (Hérodote-5th century A.C.), Mazax, Mazaces, Mazikes (Ref. Latin dictionary: 956), and in the Arab texts of Medium Age, as those written by Ibn-Khaldoun. It is nowadays the name which identifies Tamazight speakers in several regions of Tamazgha (Berber Land), as in Sened (Tunisia), in Djebel Nefoussa (Libya), in Touat (Algeria), in the Medium Atlas (Morocco), and in Sahara (Algeria, Mali, Niger). There are several hypotheses about the ethnonym “Amazigh”, but all of them are devoid of convincing proofs, except one which is worth being mentioned here and even supported by our own argument: it is the one put forward by F. Nicolas in 1950 and taken up again by K. Prasse in 1972 and by S. Chaker in 1991. According to these authors, “amaziү / amajeү” would come from the Berber verb “jjeү” which means in the Iwelmiden’s idiom (Touareg group of dialects), “to walk boastfully”. However, as S. Chaker (see. Chaker, 1996:131) put it, an agent with the structure aMaCiC / aMaCeC is unlikely to be derived from a verb with a long initial radical phoneme, because this type of verbs gives normally agents of aMaCCaC structure, e.g: “ṭṭes - amaṭṭas (K.)”. It is then necessary to search a verbal lexeme with a short initial radical phoneme. The lexeme being discussed is that mentioned by Chaker, i.e. “jeүeү” which means « to be brave / courageous » (see. Alojali, on 1980:83); it is in fact this form which, by progressive assimilation, gave the variant “jjeү” [3] . At first glance, the terms, “amaziү / amajeү” are unlikely to be related to the verb “jeүeү”, because this lexeme will rather give “Amajeүeү” which is not certified in any existing Amazigh idiom. However, we are practically sure that it is from this agent, synchronically abnormal, that the over-mentioned ethnonym is derived. Our hypothesis is founded on a very common phenomenon in Amazigh language: the apocope. The apocope, which affects weak radicals within words (see. Taïfi, in Awal, 1990:228), can be described as the cutting off of the last sound or syllable of a word. This phenomenon is observed in a lot of pairs as in: “ḍfut / taḍfi; iүzif / teүzi; tukerḍa / aker”; etc. “(A) majeүeү”, both at the level of its constituting radicals and its schema, would be therefore the primitive form. We can explain the evolution of this form into “Amajeү” and “amaziү”, synchronically observed in Touareg and northern Berber, in the following way: at the beginning, that is to say after the fourth division when the afro-Asiatic group broke up, the Berbers became more individual and identified themselves with the name “(a) Majeүeү”, then some tribes went up northward and some others downward to Sahara. This separation had favoured the evolution of the Berber language on both sides, but in different ways, leading the original ethnonym to give birth to four variants: in the south “(a) Majeү, (a) maheү, (a) Maceү” and in the north “(a) Maziү”. ______________________________ Footnotes [1] I remember having read in an Algerian newspaper, just after October 89, an article written by an obscure doctor named Abdelkrime El-Djazaïri, in which the latter argued that the word “Amazigh” was

nothing but an invention of the Frenchmen who tried then to divide the Algerian people in order to rule them. The same ideas have since then been published, in some Arabic-speaking newspapers known for their hatred towards the Amazigh, by another even more obscure doctor whose name is Othmane Saadi. And recently, we heard the same speech from the Libyan leader Al-Kadhafi. [2] Given that the phonological system of the ancient Egyptian is devoid of phonemes / z, ү/, these were therefore replaced with their close correspondents / c, x / then, by a distant progressive assimilation, these became / c, c/; as for the letter “w” used also to transcribe vowels / u, o/, it would correspond to the Berber vowel / ə / which becomes close to / o / especially in contact with velar sounds. “Macwc” would be pronounced therefore [macoc] very close to the Touareg “Amaceү”. [3] The root JГ is attested in the Kabyle idiom spoken in Takerboust in the word “ajaүiү”, meaning the jay, perhaps so named for its nobility or its braveness in contrast with certain fearful or less attractive birds. The variant of this root is ZX also certified in the same idiom in the verb “zux”, to strut, which gave the noun “azuxzux”, the turkey, very known for its ostentatious movement.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->