Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Orgin of Geometr:
An Introduction
Jacques Derrida
TRANSLATED, WITH A PREFACE AND AFTERWORD,
BY JOHN P. LEAVEY, JR.
University of Nebraska Press
Lincoln and London
Copyright 1962 by the Presses Universitaires de France
Translation copyright 1978 by John P. Leavey, Jr.
Afterword copyright 1989 by the University of Nebraska Press
All rights reserved
Manufactured in the United States of America
First Bison Book printing: 1989
Most recent printing indicated by the frst digit below:
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Derrida, Jacques.
Edmund Husserl 's Origin of geometry: an introduction / Jacques Derrida;
translated, with a preface and afterword, by John P. Leavey, Jr.
p. cm.
"First Bison Book printing"-T.p. verso.
Reprint. Originally published: Stony Brook, N.Y.: N. Hays, 1978.
Includes index.
ISBN 0-8032-6580-8 (alk. paper)
1 . Husserl, Edmund, 1859-1938. Die Frage nach dem Ursprung der Geo
metrie als intentional-historisches Problem. 2. Phenomenology. I. Title.
QA447.D4713 1989
142' . 7-dc 19 CIP 88-38638
Reprinted by arrangement with Presses Universitaires de France and John P.
Leavey, Jr. Translated from the revised edition of Introduction a "L'Origine
de la geomerrie" de Husserl.
The paper in this book meets the minimum requirements of American National
Standard for Information Services-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library
Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.
Contents
Acknowledgments
Preface: Undecidables and Old Names, by John P. Leavey
Undecidables and Deconstruction
Derrida's Introduction to The Origin oj Geometry
Deconstruction and the Science of Old Names
Translator's Note
Introduction to The Origin ofGeometr
*1. The Sense of Sense-Investigation: Responsibility.
Consciousness. and Existence
I. The Historical Reduction and the Necessity for
Return Inquiry (RiickJrage) in Reactivation
III. The Ego as Fundament and the Reduction of
Factuality
IV. Objectivity. Historicity. and Intentionality
V. Language, the Possibility of Transcendental
Historicity
VI. The How of Ideality: the Earth and the Living
Present
VII. The How of Ideality: Writing and Unil'ocity as
the Telos of Reactivation
.
VIII. Horizon: the Absolute of History. and Imaginar
Variation
IX. The Suspension of Ideality: Scient(fc Study of
the Life- World (Lebenswel)
X. Geography, Injnitization, and the Idea in the
Kantian Sense
XI. The Historicity of the Idea: Diff erence, Delay,
Origins. and the Transcendental
Appendix: The Origin of Geometry, by Edmund Husserl,
trans. David Carr
Coda: contrpunctus and translation, by John P. Leavey
Index of Passages Cited from Husserl
Index
v
1
7
18
20
23
27
34
51
62
66
76
87
107
117
122
141
155
181
193
197
These headings, added for the convenience of the reader, do not appear in the
French edition.
Acknowledgments
The 1 974 second, revised French edition of EDMUND HUSSERL'S
L'ORIGINE DE LA GEOMETRIE. traduction et introduction par JAC
QUES DERRIDA, in Epimethee, Essais Philosophiques, Collection
fondee par Jean Hyppolite, copyright 1 962 by Presses U niversitaires
de France, 1 08, Boulevard Saint-Germain, Paris, is the source of this
English translation.
We are grateful to the PRESSES UNIVERSITAIRES DE FRANCE
for their authorization to present this text in English.
HUSSERL'S ORIGIN OF GEOMETRY is here reprinted from THE
CRISIS OF EUROPEAN SCIENCES AND TRANSCENDENTAL
PHENOMENOLOGY by EDMUND HUSSERL, translated by David
Carr. Copyright 1 970 by Northwestern University Press, Evanston.
Pp. 353-78.
We are also grateful to NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PRESS
for their authorization to reprint Husserl's text in full.
Preface
Undecidables and Old Names
UNDECIDABLES AND DECONSTRUCTION
Tympaniser-la philosophie.
Marges
Oaiae:eseair:eaea. aie||eeiaa| seeae. iaeaaveaiaaaaem.seei
si:aeia:a| . smaaveaeeeaa.eaaaiaas|eeaea||eaiae|ee| ssae:
seaa:e|,iaeiexi. 1aei:eaeaa.|eseae:aaae:.i.eaeaesDe::.aa
.ss.iaaieaaiiae] aaeia:eeiiaeie. iae|ee|aaaiaeiexi,ae:.ies
a|eaiiaee:. ,. as . ae|a,s, aaaa.ne:eaiaias aiiae.:e:ess:eaas
H. s
eiaea. siae aeeeasi:aei.eaeiiaeve:,. aeaeiwriting.
1exiseeea:ie:De::.aaea|y.a:.i.a,.a:.i.a,aaae:sieeaaei.a
iaee:a.aa:y sease.|aiasiae|aeeeime-iaea|ays .aeem|eie
e:asa:e e: se:aiea.a,eai eiwesie:ameiaays.es. 1ae |ee|as aa
I
See, for exampl e, Eugenio Donato, "Structuralism: The Afermath, " Sub-Stance,
NO. 7 (Fall 1 973) , 9-26; Phillippe Sollers, "Programme, " in his Logiques (Paris: Seuil ,
1 968), pp. 9-1 4; or Julia Kristeva, Semei6tike: Recherches pour une semanalyse (Paris:
Seuil , 1 969); as well as any number of works by Roland Barthes or Derrida hi mself.
"Like all the notions I am using, it belongs to the history of metaphysics and we can
onl y use it under erasure [sous rature ( added by tr. ) ] , " Jacques Derri da, Of
Grammatology, tf. Gayatri Spi vak (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press,
1 977) , p. 6. Since this translation, with an excellent preface by the translator, appeared
afer the present work was completed, I was unable to compare translations for consis
tency of terminology (a I did with Allison' s translation of Speech and Phenomena), nor
was I able to comment on Mrs. Spi vak' s Preface. However, I have added references in
the notes to relevant sections of her preface. Her discussion of rature occurs on pp.
xi i i-xx. I t forms the backdrop for her lengthy discussion of Drrida' s " acknowledged
' precursors' -Nietzsche, Freud, Heidegger, Husserl , " pp. xxi-liv. I n his translation of
" La ' differance, ' ' ' contained in Derrida' s Speech and Phenomena: And Other Essays on
Husserl ' s Theor of Signs (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1 973) , p. 1 43,
David Allison notes : "Derrida ofen brackets or ' crosses out ' certain key terms taken
from metaphysics and logic, and in doing this, he follows Heidegger' s usage in Zur
Seinsfrage. The terms in question no longer have their ful l meaning, they no longer have
the status of a purely signifed content of expression-no longer, that is, after the decon
struction of metaphysics. Generated out of the play of diference, they still retain a
vestigial trace of sense, however, a trace that cannot simply be gotten around
(incontourable) . "
1
2
Preface
archives of metaphysical inscriptions, as the encyclopedia of knowl
edg or the complete presence of the signifed (transcendental or not), is
foreIgn to Derrida's new "concept" of writing, l'ecriture. Derrida ex
plains: "If I distinguish the text from the book, I shall be saying that the
destruction of the book, as it is now under way in all domains, denudes
the surface of the text. That necessary violence responds to a violence
that was no less necessary." The book's own violence, its "protection
of heol
.
ogy and
.
o
.
f logocentrism against the disruption of writing,
agamst Its aphonstic energy, and . . . against diference in general,"3
forces the present-day violent distinction of the book and the text, in
order for "writing" to be understood.
Rature and the text ofDerrida wherein it occurs are themselves crossed
out or somehow suspended in his thought,- a thought seemingly too
abstract. His method of criticism, deconstruction, could be seen, as
Ricoeur says, as "consisting in laying waste to metaphysical discourse
by aporia"5-i.e., as a kind of mental gymnastics. This common, but
important, criticism of Derrida actually strikes at the heart of his enter
prise. His continual insistence on the failure of metaphysics as onto
theo-Iogy seems to support Ricoeur's criticism. Derrida still writes
"book" in the ordinary sense, and all the words of his text are, by
necesSIty, not erased. In fact, deconstruction seems to be the violent
misinterpretation of Wester thought. However, the above criticism
also misses the point, or preferably, the non-point, of Derrida's work,
all of which could be considered as outside of books, hors-livre, as
Of Grammatology. p. 1 8 .
" If there were only perception, pure permeability to frayi ng [facilitation, Bahnung J.
there would be no frayi ng. We would be written but nothing would be recorded; no
writing would be produced, retai ned, repeated as readability. But pure perception does
not exist [my emphasis] : we are written only by writing . . . by the i nstance wi thi n us
which always already governs perception, be i t i nternal or external. The ' subj ect' of
writing does not exist if we mean by that some sovereig solitude of the author. The
subject of wri ti ng is a system of relations between strata: of the Mystic Pad, of the
psyche, of society, of the world. Withi n that scene the punctual simplicity of the classical
subject is not to be found. In order to describe that structure, it is not enough to recall that
one always writes for someone; and the oppositions sender- recei ver, code-message, etc . ,
remain extremely coarse i nstruments. We would search the 'public' i n vai n for the frst
reader: i . e . , the frst author of a work. And the ' sociology of literature' i s blind to the war
and ruses-whose stakes are the origin of the work-between the author who reads and
the frst reader who dictates. The sociality of writing as drama requires an entirely
diferent discipli ne" (Jacques Derrida, "Freud et la sd:ne de I ' ecriture, " in his L' Ecriture
et la diff erence [Paris: Seuil, 1 967] , p. 335; ET: "Freud and the Scene of Writi ng, " tr.
Jefrey Mehlman, i n Yale French Studies, No. 48: French Freud [ 1972] , 1 1 3- 1 4) .
5 La Meraphore vive (Paris: Seui l, 1 975) , p. 365.
3
Preface
prefaces, as marginal comments written in the margins of other books
or texts."
The preface, Derrida says, is "a fourth text. Simulating the postface,
the recapitulation. and the recurrent anticipation, the auto-movemet of
the concept, it is an entirely other, diferent text, but t the sam:
,
tIme,
as 'discourse of assistance,' it is the 'double' of what It exceeds. Th
.
e
fourth text, as text, is "the beyond everything [which] insofar
.
a It
withstands all ontology . . . is not a primum movens. However, It Im
parts [imprime] to everything . .. a movement of fction. _ Derridafc
tionalizes Western tradition, an action, in part, of teanng down or
apart, deconstructing or demolishing.9
. .
How does Derrida fctionalize? In other words, what IS the fctIonal
motion that his prefaces impress on everything? As the fourth text, it is
dissemination, 10 deconstruction, diferance: `
"All these texts . . . no doubt are the i nterminable preface to another text that I
would one day like to have the strength to write , or again the epigraph to anothr [tet] ?f
which I would never have had the audacity to write . . . " (Positions [Pans: MlnUl t,
1 972] , p. 1 4) . On margi nality, see David Allison, "Derrid' s Citique of Husserl : The
Philosophy of Presence, " Diss. The Pennsyl vani a State Umverslty, 1 974, p. 1 77.
1ae aacee.ca||e' ia|es .aie. ise|iia. saeaeae.ee. as e||as iae
a,a:eeiiaee||. s. s De::.casays. are:maacHeaa. a,.
There is, then, probably no choice to be made between two lines of
thought; our task is rather to refect on the circularit which makes the
'` "Freud et la scene de l ' ecriture, " p. 302; ET p. 81 .
` I n L'Ecriture e t fa diference, pp. 427-28; ET: i n The Structuralist Controversy: The
Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man ( Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press,
1 970) , pp. 265-66.
I6
"The Ends of Man, " Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 30, No. 1 ( 1 969) ,
56. A French version of this article was published in Derrida' s Marges de la phiLosophie
(Paris: Mi nui t, 1 972) . The above ci tations occur on pp. 1 62-63.
I7
Sarah Kofman, " Un philosophe ' unheimlich, ' ' ' in Ecarts: Quatre Essais a propos
de Jacques Derrida (Paris: Fayard, 1 973) , p. 1 48, n. 1 . The whole essay of Kofman is
i nvaluable for "understanding" Derrida.
I
" It was necessary to analyze, to put to work, in the text of the history of philosophy
as well as in the so-called 'li terary' text . . . certain marks . . . which I called by analogy
(I emphasize this) undecidables, i . e . , simulative units, ' false' verbal, nominal or semantic
properties, which escape from inclusion in the philosophical (binary) opposition and
which nonetheless inhabit it, resist and disorganize it, but without ever constituting a third
term, without ever occasioning a solution in the form of speculative dialectics" (Po
sitions, p. 58: ET p. 36).
6
Preface
one pass into the other indefnitely. And, by strictly repeating this
circle in its own historical possibility, we allow the production ofsome
elliptical change ofsite, within the dif erence involved in repetition; this
displacement is no doubt defcient, but with a defciency that is not yet,
or is already no longer, absence, negativit, nonbeing, lack, silence.
Neither matter nor form, it is nothing that any philosopheme, that is,
any dialectic, however determinate, can capture. It is an ellipsis of
both meaning andform; it is neither plenar speech nor peiectly
circular. More and less, neither more nor less-it is perhaps an
entirely dif erent question.
1aeaacee.ca||e s |e,.e.siaaieiiaee||.s. seiiaee.:e| e. aceie:mec.
ceeeaie:ece. :e|e ~|ea,.iaiaee.:e|e.ia. s|e,.eeiiaeaacee. ca|| e.
eic.ae:aaee .aaa.a,esiaee.ai .| .ae.aacsaeeaaci.meiaemse|ves .
diferance already suggests a mode of writing (ecriture) without
presence and absence-without histor, cause, arche, or telos-which
would overturn all dialectic, theology, teleology, and ontology. This mode
ofwriting would exceed everything that the histor ofmetaphysics has
conceived in the form ofthe Aristotelian grmme: the point, the line, the
circle, as well as time and space themselves.
2
0
1a.s|e,.eeic.ae:aaee.saaiaa. maies. aaa||y.iaeea:|yiexiei
De::.cai:aas|aiecae:e .a. sIntroduction ieuasse:|
sOrigin ofGeome
tr. ia Of Grammatology, De::.casa,s aai eaa a|se|e sa.ceiia. s
Introduction: ue:e as e| seae:e. ie ese iae :e||em . aie:ms ei
eae.ee.iee|| .,ee: ie|e| .eveeaese|i e|| . ,ecie aase:.i|,ayes e:
no, ieeeaee.eeiaa:ieaaaeeasaaa| |e,.aaeee:aeaaa:teaaaeeas
|a. aseas.a,..sieeeaiaseve:,c.ne:eai|eve|s .aias .aacsi,| es
la
iae ceeeasi:aei.ea ei iae a:eae iae :eie} . eae cees aei mase a
eae.ee tveame:e. me:iaaii e:ea:a:eses. s iae| . ae]asi|eie:e
ia. s De::.casa,s. "That is why a thought ofthe trace [diff e rancej can
no more break with a transcendental phenomenology than be reduced
to it. "21
iaeiae:e:cs. De::.ca. sasmaeaaaeaemeae|e,.siasaei . . sas
"La Forme et Ie voul oi r-dire: note sur l a phenomenologie du langage, " i n Marges, p.
207: ET i n Speech and Phenomena , p. 1 28.
" "Ousia et gramme: note sur une note de Sein und Zeit, " i n Marges, p. 78; ET:
'Ousia and Gramme': A Note to a Footnote in Being and Time, " tr. Edward S. Casey,
in Phenomenology i n Perspective, ed. F. J . Smi th (The Hague: Nijhof, 1 970) , p. 93.
` P. 62.
7
Preface
maeaasi:aeia:a|.siasaei.aaaiae.siase| | asia.a|e:eiiaesae:ec.
asae.iae:. Cae.eesaeecaei|emaceae:e.. aiaei. eaaaei|emace
DERRIDA'S INTRODUCTION TO THE ORIGIN OF GEOMETRY
"To deconstruct" philosophy would. . . be to think the
structured genealogy of its concepts in the most faithful or
interior manner, but at the same time it woul be to determine
from a certain outside unqualiable or unnameable by
philosophy itself what this history could dissemble or prohibit,
becoming history through this somewhere interested
suppression.
Positions
Speech and Phenomena, De::.ca says. .s iae essay i va| ae iae
mesi iaia. se:|aeaesi.easiae:. v.|e,eeiiaeve.eeseee}
aac aeaei.e:.i.a,.a:e|ai.eaie a||eiwesie:aa. sie:y.
saeaa
i. s
aesi.ea| eis. ise|i|ece.eiec.aiaea.sie:yeimeiaays.esaacII .is
mesi mece:a. e:.i.ea| . aac v.,.|aai ie:m. uasse:| s i:aaseeaceaia|
aeaemeae|e,y iieaa|eeeas.ce:ec.De::.caiee| s. asa|ea,aei
e
ieOf Gram mato logy , |ai a aeie iaai aas iae a:si|aee .a ae|ass..
a. |esea.ea:ea.ieeia:e. O:.aesays. Speech and Phe
omena eaa|e
eeas.ce:ec as iae eiae: s.ce,i:eai e:|ae|asyea.sa,eiaaeiae:
essay. a|| . saec .a i -:. as aa iai:ecaei.ea ie uasse: s Ogin of
Geometr. 1ae:eiae:e||emseeaee:a.a,:. i.a,e:ea|:eacyII |aee
as saea aac eeaaeeiecie iae .::ecae.||e si:aeia:e ei'diferer' .a .is
:e| ai.easieeease.easaess. :eseaee. se.eaee.a. sie:yaaciaea.sie:yei
se.eaee.iaec.saea:aaeee:ce| ay. a,eiiaee:.,.a.aacseea.
2'
E. Donato in " Structuralism: The Aftermath," p. 25, sees OJ Grammatology, along
with Foucaul t's The Order oj Things, as "the only quest for ti me past and ti me regained
that a fundamentalIy atheist [my emphasis] epistemological confguration might ofer. "
Al so see on this Mi kel Dufrenne, "Pour une phil osophi e non theologique, " i n hi s Le
Poetique, 2nd revised and enlarged ed. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1 97) ,
pp. 7-57. On Derrida and the sacred, see Henri Meschonnic , Le Signe e t Ie poeme ( ParIs:
Gal l i mard, 1 975 ) , pp. 401 -92.
` Positions, p. 1 3 .
Ibid.
` Ibid. Derrida has an even earlier essay on Husserl , gi ven at a conference i n 1 959,
entitled" 'Genese et structure' et l a phenomenologi e. " It was reprinted i n L' Ecriture et
La diference i n 1 967, but frst appeared i n 1 965 i n Entretiens sur les notions de genese :t
de structure, ed. Maurice de Gandi l lac et a. (Paris: Mouton, 1 965) , pp. 243-6. ThIS,
then, is both before and after the work on the Origin, having obviousl y undergone
changes by the time of i ts reprinting in L'Ecriture (the use of the concept dif erance on p.
239 is the cl earest and si mplest exampl e of thi s change) . The article is very hel pful for
understanding Derrida's Introduction.
8
Preface
ia iaese eemmeais De::.ca :eseais as .ia aa ei.ea. ~s ae
sa,,esis, eeea|cia|eSpeech and Phenomena asiae :eve:seeia. s
Introduction, a.ea|eeemesiae e|ve:se, iae :.,ai e::ee:(recto)
s.ce.i a| .,aieiiaeeemmeaisa|eve, iaeIntroduction ea|ciaea|eiae
essayDe::.cava|aeciaemesi. O:,.iia.s. sie,eieeia: , asiae:eve:se
, e: . m:ee:, s.ce, De::.ca sIntroduction . s si.||ie |e a.,a| y:.zec
,aac. sse|yDe::.ca, , s.aee.i.siaeae|ea.eaaasva|ae ue:e
e:ve:se|y, iae . m:ee: s.ce , aiiae|.a, |y .isve:y . m:e:.eiy iae
:ee:s.ce, sa|emeaisiaeva|aeeiiaeeeacessay, Speech and
Phenomena. iaia.sei.ea,iaeIntroduction . s|eia:ee:,s. aee.ias
:.iiea a:si, .a1961, s.xyea:s |eie:e iaea||.eai.ea eiSpeech and
Phenomena) aac.m:ee:,s.aee.i.siae:eve:seeiiaeseeeacessay, .
1aea|eveeemmeais, ia|eai:emHea:.xeases.aie:v.e.iaDe:
:.ca.a1967, aaciaeei.easiaey:eseai:ev.ceia:iae:]asi.| eai.ea
ie:ae|ese:eac.a,eiDe::.casa:sima]e:a||.saecessay, a.sIntro
duction ieThe Orgin ofGeometr. ii.sa|seaa.ai:ecaei.eaieiaee:|
eiDe::.ca.a,eae:a|aacia:a.saesa|as.ea:ieiiaei:amee:|ie:a. s
|aie:, :eseaie:|.That basic framework-and ae:ei:amee:|saea|c
ess.||y|eeaaa,ec.mmec.aie| yieseiei:e||ems, ei.e,meiaec, .i
a||iaese ie:ms e:e aeia|:eacy.aaceaaie ieaaiea:e ,e.a,ie
eeas.ce:-s phenomenology. Heeve:, as .|| |eeeme e|ea:, iae
aeaemeae|e,y.aaesi.ea.saeiiaai:e] eeiec|yu.eae| reaeaa|i.a
a.s re:ee:c ie iae a,|.sa ec.i.ea ei The Order of Things, a
aeaemeae|e,y a.ea ,.vesa|se|aie:.e:.iy ie iae e|se:v.a,sa|
]eei, a.eaaii:.|aiesaeeasi.iaieai:e|eieaaaei, a.ea|aees.isea
e.aieiv.eaiiaee:.,.aeia||a.sie:.e.iy-a.ea,.asae:i ,|eacsiea
i:aaseeaceaia|eease.easaess. waaii.saiee|a.m |ysay.a,iaai
De::.ca s i:amee:|.saeaemeae|e,.ea|.saeiiaaiae.sHasse:|.aae:
He.ce,,e:.aa, e: evea .cea| .si e: ex. sieai.a| , e: iaai a. s meiaec .s
aeaemeae|e,.ea| .xaiae:,iaaiiesa,,esiiaaiDe::.caaasieaac.a
aacat the limits :ee.se|y ae:e aeaemeae|e,y ia.|s, . . e . , ae:e.i
|eeemes iae mece:a, exem|a:y :eea.ia|ai.ea ei wesie meia
ays.es, a ie:i.|e ,:eaac ie: ea|i.vai.a, aesi.eas a|eai iae aea
Derrida often refers to and summarizes the resul ts obtained in this study in his later
work. See, for example , Speech and Phenomena, pp. 80-8 1 ; or L' Ecriture et la diff er
ence, pp. 22 and 248.
` The Order of Things: An Archaeology ofthe Human Sciences (New York: Vintage
Books, 1 973) , p. xiv. I cannot resist ci ti ng Foucaul t' s statement to the " English-speaking
reader" concering his relation to the other half of the phenomenological-structural de
bate: "In France, certain half-witted 'commentators' persist i n label l i ng me a 'struc
turalist' . I have been unable to get it i nto thei r tiny minds that I have used none of the
methods, concepts, or key terms that characterize structural analysis" ( xi v) .
9
Preface
a.|esea.ea|per se ,iae | . m. is e: ma:,.as ei a.|eseay,, a|eai
:.i.a,,e:.,.asaaca.sie:y, aacc.ae:oaee.
ue:eeve:, iaeaeaemeae|e,yDe::. caexam.aesaaca:,aes.ia. s
iae aeaemeae|e,yeis.,a.| eai.ea.sa|i.i|eciai:ecaei.eaieiae
r:e||em ei s.,as .a Hasse:| s raeaemeae|e,y, Speech and
Phenomena |eacsie iae eeae| as.ea. 1ae:e aeve:as aay e:ee
i.ea. ra:iae:. ~aceeai:a:yie aaiaeaemeae|e,y-a.ea .s
a|ays aeaemeae|e,yeie:eei.ea-aasi:. ec ie ma|e as |e|.eve,
eeai:a:yi eaaiea:ces.:eeaaaeiia.|i e|eiemiec.aie|e| .ev.a,,the
thing itself always escapes.
'
Ibid., p. 1 04 and xxvi i i-xxi x.
`' "Form and Meaning, " in Marges, p. 1 88; ET in Speech and Phenomena, pp. 1 08-09.
10
Preface
Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. 1aema]e:ia:eac,a. c. a
eseeisu
s
se:| s maaae: ei:eeeec. a, iae:e.a. u. s eemmeaia:yie::eiai.ea
ie| | esiaee:ce:eiaesi.ea.a,aaciae:e||ems:a. sec|yuasse:| ,aac
.ia.a ia.s si:aeia:e De::.ca e|a|e:aies aac e|ae. caies-aac aaa|y
sa|emeaisaaiuasse:|:.ies i aaaiie||es, aeev:, i. | |
aei :eeeec se :.,e:eas| y iasieac, i . | | e|ae.caieiaea:ea.ieeia:a|
eeaeeieia.sie:.e.iy,seasea. sie:yaaciae:|
ieca:easeiaes
i.ea.a,.ieaia. | s. |aa,aa,e,:. i.a,,.cea|.iy,iaei.v.
,eseai
aa
ciae
i:aaseeaceaia| . 1aeseeemmeais.|||ea:saec. iamDe:ncas ai
ieiieaace:siaaciae. aie:|ayeiaeaemeae|e,(s
:.ae.| eeia||
:.ae.|es aac.isaaa|. asi.iai.ea. iae.aie:ay.iameeas..easaess
eiiaeceaa.ieia.a,:eseai.ae:seaaaciaeaa.iei ceaasaaa|
s
ceie::ec 1e| es. De::.caaais ie aace:siaacaeaemeae|e,y as .i . s
., stretched |eieeaiaejnitizing eease.easaessei. ispririple a
ciae
injnitizing eease.easaessei.is aaa|institution,
.
iaeE
ds
iftung c
a
a.ie| y ceie::ec .a .is eeaieai |ai a|ays ev.ceai II .is :e
a| ai.ve
va|ae 1ae c. a| eei.eei iaeseie, aeaemeaea aac i ca, .s ai
De::icaseemsieiee| . m| .e.i|,,aicecuasse:|. aa. s:eueei.easeaa. s
ie:ie.i,, aaca siac, ei De::.cas eem
a.ac.v.caa|eease.easaess .seasemasi|e:eee,a.zecaaceem
maa.eaiecasiaesameseasei:emeaememeaieiiaee,eieaaeiae:
a|se|aie|yc.ae:eai memeai eiiae same e,e. ue:ea,a.a uasse:| :e
i:asi? iaeaa.aeie:meiieme:a|.zai.ea.iaei.v.a,r:eseai. aese
c. aeei.ea|eaa:aeie:aac :. me:c.a| .iye:m.i.ai:ae:seaa|eemmaa.
ai.ea. a ease
iaea. De::.ca eeae| aces . c sa|]eei.v.iy .s r:si
lntrasa|, eeilv. iy.aiaeiiaaies|a. asuasse:| s :eve:s.eaeaeeme:eie
iae i.
ai
n: aware ofthe fact that a name does not name the punctual
slmpliClty ofa concept but the system ofpredicates defning the
concept, the conceptual structure centered on such and such a
predicate, one proceeds: (1) to the setti,!-aside (prelevement) ofa
reduced predicative trait, which is held in reserve and limited within a
given conceptual structure (limitedfor some motivations and relations
offorce which are to be analyzed) named x; (2) to the de-limitation, the
grafting, and the controlled extension ofthis predicate which was set
aside, the name x being maintained as a tool ofinterventin (levier
d'i
te
n
e
tin) in
.
order to maintain a hold on the former organization
which It IS efectively a question oftransforming. Setting-aside,
grafting, extension: you know that this is what I called, according to
the process that I have just described, writing. -:
1aese.eaeeeie|caames. s:.i.a,.aae|caame. ise|i.
ieimeae:eaea:sesemeeiiaesa| emeaiai.easiaaiDe::.caac
vaaees .a iae Introduction . ue says D.ae:eaee .s i:aaseeaceaia|-
i:aaseeaceaia| |e.a, iae :.me:c.a| D.ae:eaee eia c.ae:eai O:.,. a
1aasi:aaseeaceaia|. sea.va|eaiiec.aeaai,.iaaaa) .
Cese.easaesseiD.ae:eaee . iaai.iaeaia.eaaeia.a,ea|ca
ea:. .si:aaseeaceaia|eease.easaess. . e . . c.ae:aaieease.easaess se
eeea|csayiaaieease.easaess. sc.ae:aaee,.iaaaa) . -:l
s.m.|a:|y. iae xecaei.ea. a:e iaea,ai ei . is ea ce|ay. .s
i:aaseeaceaia| . De::.casays . 1aea:eaac. aie:m.aa||ec. sa. eiace
?iiaea,aisi:.v.a,ie :ecaeeD.ae:eaee|y,e.a,|eyeaciaeiaa|.aaa
.i iea:c iae .aaa.iy ei.is sease aacva|ae . . e . . a.|ema.aia.a.a,
D.a:eaee-iaaic. sa.eiaceea|c|ei:aaseeaceaia| ( 1 53) . 1aexe
caei.ea.iaea,ai s eac.sa.eiaceaiD.ae:eaee . eaaea| y|eac.ae:
aaixecaei.ea.
r:.me:c.a|D.ae:eaee .s i:aaseeaceaia| ~ac i:aaseeaceaia| D.ae:
eaee . . e . iaea|aysceie:cecc.ae:.a,c.ae:eaeeeiiaee:.,.a .sc.i
ie:aaee,.ia aaa) .
7
` Positions, p. 96; ET: Diacritics, 3 , No. 1 (Spring 1 973) , p. 37.
4:1 See Speech and Phenomena , ch. 5 : "Signs and t he Blink of an Eye . " pp. 60-69. as
well as Note 4 above .
20
Preface
~ac, aaa| | y. |eeaase .i . s a meiaec ie: :eaeei.a, ea a.sie:.e.iy,
Ruckfrge .s iae:e|yi:aaseeaceaia| .i.s a c.ae:aai :eeess De::.ca
says ~ac1aea,ai s a:e ee:ia.aiyea|c|ei:aaseeaceaia| . s.aee
.ieaa|ee|ie:a:cieiaea|:eacyaaaeaaeec1e| esea| y|yacvaae.a,
ea ,e: |e.a, .a acvaaee ei iae O:.,. a iaai . aceaa.ie|y :ese:ves
.ise|i saeaaee:ia.aiyaeve:aacie|ea:aiaai1aea,aiea|ca|ays
|eieeeme (ibid. ) .
1aasiaexecaei.ea,Ruckfrge, eease.easaess, aac.aieai.eaa|.iy-
a|||as.eeeaeeiseiaeaemeae| e,y-aave|eeasa|emeaiec|ydi
ferance; iaeya||a:ia|eei.is|e,.eYeiiaeya:esi.||named xecaei.ea,
Ruckfrage, aac se ea raeaemeae|e,y aas |eea sa|emeaiec, .is
meiaays.ea| iexi ceeeasi:aeiec, aac iae e|c aames :eia.aec
raeaemeae|e,y. sae|ea,e:, |aisi. | | . s, aeaemeae|e,yiis .s .siaai
eia|| meiaays.es , sous rature: .
i s iae:eaneed ieeaeeseae:e|eieeaaacee.ca|| esaace|caames :
i seaeeae.eeme:eia.iaia|ieDe::.ca s .aieaiiaaaiaeeiae:,. s eae.a
iaei c.ae:eai i:em iae eiae:: 1ae exem|a:y ease ae:e seems ie|e
diernce .ise|i,.aa.eaaacee.ca||esaace|caamesa:e|eiapresent
aacdeferred .aiaes.|eaiiem|eiiaea, .aai:a,.|e|eiie:iaai.seas. | y
e:asec, e:esseceai, e:m.s:.aiec, aa iaai .s aa:c|y :eaca||e aac
ceaa.ie|yaacee.ca||e
TRANSLATOR'S NOTE
1aei:aas|ai.eaeae:ecae:e.siaaieiiaeseeeacec.i.eaeiDe::. ca s
Intrduction, a||.saec |y r:esses ua.ve:s.ia.:esce r:aaee . a 1 974.
1aea:siec.i.eaasa||.saec.a 1 962. iaiaeiexi. ise|i,iaave.ac.
eaiec:eie:eaeesie:eseaia,|.sai:aas|ai.easeie:|siea.eaDe:
:.ca :eie:s, |ai aave mec.aec iaem ae:e aeeessa:y ie aace:see:e
De::. ca s a:,ameaiai.ea 1aesemec.aeai.easaave|eea .ac.eaiec|y
iae e:c mec.aec . ase:iec.ia.a |:ae|eis .a iae iexi 1exisaa
ava.|a||e.aa,|.sai:aas|ai.eai aavei:aas|aieci:emiaer:eaea1ae
uasse:| iexis aave |eea mec.aec .a aeee:caaee .ia maay eiiae
sa,,esi.easeiDe:.eaCa.:as Guide for Translating Husserl, a:i.ea|a:|y
aeaiaey|ea:eaae.aiiaaiDe::.ca. sar,a. a,
~|| Ce:maaie:ms.a a:eaiaesesa:e De::.ca sacc.i.eas s.m.|a:| y,
a|| ex|aaaie:y |:ae|eis iaai eeea: .ia.a aeiai.eas a:e De::.ca s
acc.i.eas i aave . ae|acecee:ia.a r:eaea aac Ce:maa ie:ms .ia.a
|:ae|eisae:eaeeessa:y.aiaeiexi
saeaie:msasde facto aacde jure aave|eeaaace:see:ecea|yae:e
De::.caaassi:esseciaema.mse|i,s. aeeiaeya:eeueai:aas|ai.easei
21
Preface
iaer:eaeaeaia.iaaceac:e.i. 1aesame. si:aeeiapriori ,ac] ee
i.va|ie:m,aaca priori ,acve:|.a|e:sa|siaai.veie:m, .i.|e.se,iaave
ie| |eecCa.ms sa,,esi.ea.ac.ae:eai.ai.a,|eieeaObjektivitit aac
Gegenstindlichkeit |yiaeea.ia|e:|ee:ease
"
0
"
:eseei.ve| y ,De:
:.ca,ie||e.a,iaer:eaeai:ac.i.ea,. ac.eaiesGegenstindlichkeit |yiae
aee|e,.smobjectite aacObjektivitit |yobjectivite. ) ueeve:, s.aeeiae
r:eaeaobjet eem:.ses |eiaiae meaa.a,eiGegenstand aaciaai ei
Objekt, aec.ae:eai.ai.ea. sess.||eie:iaee:ce|]eei , a|iaea,a.a
aeiai.easi:emuasse:|. iaas|eea:eia.aec. re:ia:iae:ceia.| seaia.s
:e||em, seeiae1:aas|aie: sr:eiaeeeiiesie: m|:eeiesazaaae
naeae|a:c s A Study of Husserl's re:ma| aac 1:aaseeaceaia| ie,.e
r.aa| | y, iaei:aas|ai.eaaas|eeaceae.a|.,aieiaac.aaeee:caaee.ia
Dav.c~||. sea sea:|.e:i:aas|ai.eaeiDe::.ca sSpeech and Phnomena.
i ea|c| .|eieiaaa|va:.eas ee|eie:iae.:.ava|aa||ea.c.a iae
:eeesseiia.s i:aas|ai.ea 1e r:eiesse:sxe|e:i Deie.|e:, w.||.am
nea:cs|ee , aac~:iaa:vaas, i exieacmys.aee:esiiaaa|sie:iae.:
|ea,ie:meaeea:a,emeai i ea|aa|se|.|eieiaaa|r:eiesse:vaas
ie:a.sai.eaieaee|.a,eiiaeeem|eiea:sic:au.iaiaer:eaeaiexi
1aesamea:ee.ai.ea. sexieacecier:eiesse:amesDa,eaa.sie:a.s
.ava|aa||esagesi.eas.a:e|ai.eaieiaea:siaa|ieiiaei:aas|ai.ea ~ac
i ama:i.ea|a:|y,:aieia| ie r:eiesse:Dav. c~| |.sea ie: a.s e:seaa|
i:.eacsa. aac ec.ie:.a| a.c, as e|| as a.s .ava|aa||e i:aas|ai.ea ei
De::.ca s eiae:ma]e:e:|eauasse:| r:eiesse:J. u.| |.su.||e:as
a| seve:yae|ia|.iaa. smaay|.|| .e,:aa.ea|a.csaac,eec.|| .~ac,
aaa| | y, iammesicee|y.ace|iecier:eiesse:De::.caa. mse|iie:a.s
e:seaa|ae| aac ai.eaiacv.ee ca:.a,ia.si.me u.s ee:c.a|.iy aac
sae:ie:e,:eai|ya:ee.aiec
iea|ca|se| .|eieiaaa|i:.eacsae|.ac|yae|ec.aiae:ea:a
i.eaeiiaeaaa|c:aii.nea:cuaii, xeaxem|e:i, aacmesia:i.ea
| a:|yna:|a:aDeCeae.a.aacCa:|asea. sse| ~| se. iewa|ie:xasse||i
aaiieexieac,:ai.iaceie:e:s.sieai,eecaame:aaci:. eacsa.ca:
.a,ia.se:.ec. r.aa||y, i ea|c | .|e ieiaaa|iae ne|,.aa ~me:.eaa
caeai.eaa|reaacai.eaie::ev.c.a, me .ia i.me ie eem|eieia.s
e:|
i .saiecec.eaieia.se:|ie iae meme:yeimyiaiae:, ae ea|y
saaa|i.iseem|ei.ea,aaciemymeiae:
Louvain-Leuven
December 1976
John P. Leavey
Introduction
to
" The Orgin of Geomet"
ny.is caie aac iaemes. ia. s mec.iai.eaei uasse:| [The Origin of
Geometr] ie|ea,sieiae|asi,:eaei :.i.a,siaaisa::eaacThe Crisi
ofEuropean Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. i i .scee| y
:eeieciae:e aacieiaaiexieai.ise:. ,.aa| .iy:aasiae:.sseiaeiie.a,
.mmec.aie|yaa:eai iiThe Origin ofGeometr .sc. s:.a,a. s aai|ei:em
iaeCrisi, .i .s aeiieeaase ei .is cese:. i.ve aeve|iy Nea:| ya| | . is
mei.i s a:e a|:eacy :eseai . a eiae: .avesi.,ai.eas. aeiae: iaey ie
|a:,e|y:.e:iee:a|mesieeaieme:a:y.ia. i i aiaei.The Origin of
Geometr s:. | | eeaee:as :ae s:aiasei:ae . cea| ei]eeis eise. eaee ei
a.ea,eemei:y.seaeexam|e, .iae.::ecaei.ea.iy.ceai.iy. a,aeis.
asiaesame . aaciaeeeasi.iai.eaei exaei.iaceia:ea,a.cea| .zai.ea
aacas sa,eieiae| . m.i-a:eeessa.easia:is.ia iae| .iee:|c s
seas.i|e . aa.ie . aac :ese.eai.ae maie:.a| s ~| se .a aesi.ea a:e iae
` Die Krisis der ellropiischen Wissenschaften und die tranzendentale Phanomenologie:
Eine Einleitllng in die phanomenologische Philosophie, ed. Walter Biemel , in HlIsser
liana, Vol . 6 (The Hague: Nijhof, 1 954); English translation [hereafer abbreviated as
ET]: The Crisis ofEuropean Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduc
tion to Phenomenological Philosophy, tr. David Carr ( Evanston: Northwestern Uni ver
sity Press , 1 970) . [Since the ET does not contain al l the appendi ces that the German
edi ti on does, it wi l l be necessary at ti mes to refer to the German pagination. ] Hereafter
the ET wi l l be ci ted as C, the German as K. The Origin ofGeometr (C, pp. 353-78) is a
text appended to 9a on "Pure Geometry" (C, pp. 24-28) . In a forewording note Derrida
says, after stating that he will translate the version presented in K: "The original manu
script dates from 1 936. Its typed transcription bears no title . The author of this transcrip
tion, Eugen Fi nk , has also publ ished an elaboration of it in Rel ' lIe Interationa!e de
Philosophie , I , No. 2 (January 1 5, 1 939) . pp. 203-25 , under the ti tle ' Die Frage nach dem
Ursprung der Geometrie al s i ntentional -hi storisches Problem: Since then, this text has
been read and frequently ci ted under this form. Its hi story, at l east , then. al ready con
ferred on i t a certain right to i ndependence. "
25
26
Jacques Derrida
.aie::e|aiecaac eeae:eie eeac.i.easie:iae ess. |. | .iy eiiaese .cea|
e|]eeis . |aa,aa,e. .aie:sa|]eei.v.iy. aac iae e:|c as iae aa.iy ei
,:eaacaac ae:.zea r.aa||y. iae ieeaa.aeseiaeaemeae|e,.ea|ce
se:. i.ea,aeia||yiaeseeiiaeva:.eas:ecaei.eas, a:ea|aysai.| . zec
iessiaaaeve:ce iae.:va|.c.iy aaci:a.iia| aessaea: .ma.:ec . a
uasse:| seyes
Ne:, .a.i.a| | ,, . s The Origin of Geometr c. si.a,a. saa|| e |, . is
cea||ee|asie:eie:.i.aesiaaia:ec. :eeiec, eaiaeeaeaaac,a,a.asia
ee:ia.aieeaa.e.siaace|]eei.v. si.::eseas. |. | .i,.a iae:aei.eeeise.
eaee aaca. |esea,, aacea iae eiae: aaac, a,a.asi a a. sie:. e. sm
|| .acec|,iaeem.:. e. si ea|ieifact aaceaasa| . si:esami.ea 1ae
a:sie:.i. e. smas iae sia:i.a,e. ai ie: Formal and Transcendental
Logic, iae Cartesian Meditations, aac iae Crisis. 1ae seeeac aac
aea:ecmaeaea:| . e:, . aiaeLogical Investigations, . a ra. |esea,
as k.,e:eas e. eaee ,. a a.ea . ias iae iaacameaia| :eeeeaa
i.ea), aac.aIdeas I. 1ae:ecaei.ea ,.iaeieeacemaai.ea ,eia. sie:. e. si
,eaei. e. sm as a|a,s .aie::e|aiec . ia iaai eis,eae,eaei. e. sm,
eveaaeaaee:ia.aa. sie:.e.i,aas |eeemeaeaemeae|e,, siaeme.
ces.ieiaea. ,a eesiei.isc. t ea|i.es , ia. s aei.eaeaaaeiess.||,|e
:ei:aeiec
naiaeve:aaciae ieceaaae.ai.easeia.sie:.e.smaace|]eei.v.sm
|eease e:,aa.ea|| yaa.iec as .aThe Origin of Geometr, ae:e iaey
:eeeeci:emiae same. ma| seaaca:e maiaa| | y.ave|vecia:ea,aeai
aa.i.ae:a:yaese|ea:.a,. ssemei.mesc.seeaee:i.a,
Neiaes.a,a
|a:.iy eiea:iexi :esis ea iae iaeiiaai iae eea]aaei.ea eiiaese ie
siaac.a,aaciesiec:eiasa| se:eaiesaaeseaeme.eaiaeeaeaaac,.i
|:.a,sie| .,aiaaeiyee::eiaac.iyeia.sie:.e.iy.eaiaeeiae:aaac.
aacee::e|ai.ve| y. .iceie:m.aesiaeaeiee|saace:. ,. aa|c.:eei.eaei
a.sie:.e:eaeei.ea1aea.sie:.e.iyei. cea|e|]eei.v.i.es .. e .iae.:origin
aactrdition ,.aiae am|.,aeasseaseeiia. se:ca.ea. ae|aces|eia
iae mevemeaieii:aasm.ss.eaaaciaee:ca:aaeeeiae:.ia,e . e|eys
c.ae:eai:a| es. a.eaa:eae.iae:iaeiaeiaa|.aie:eeaaeei.easeiem.:.
ea| a.sie:y. ae: aa .cea| aac aa.sie:.e acc.a, ea. 1ae |.:ia aac
ceve| emeaieise.eaeemasiiaea|eaeeess.||eieaaaaaea:ceisiy|e
ei a.sie:.ea| .aia.i.ea . a a.ea iae .aieai.eaa| :eaei.vai.ea eisease
saea|cc,.c~:eeeceaaceeac.i.eaiaeem.:.ea|ceie:m.aai.eaei
iaei
2 I n efect these pages of H usserl . frst written for hi mself. have t he rhythm of a thought
feel ing i ts way rather than setting i tsel f forth . But here the apparent di sconti nui ty al so
depends on an always regressive method. a method whi ch chooses i ts interruptions and
mul ti pl i es the returns toward i ts beginning in order to reach back and grasp it again each
ti me i n a recurrent l i ght .
27
Introduction to the Origin of Geometr
iaiae. :.::ecae. ||e e:.,.aa| .iy. iaea.sie:.e.iyeise.eaeeaac iae :e
aeei.ea iaai .i .av. ies, Geschichtlichkeit aac Historie, aave ee:ia.a
eemmeaa:.e:.eeac.i.eas re:uasse:| .iae.:c.se|esa:e. sess.||e.a
:.ae.|eaacia.ssaea|c| eacasie:eeeas. ce:iae:e||emseiaa.ve:sa|
a.sie:ie.iy.aia-.:|:eacesiexieas.eai aeiae:e:cs. iaeess. |. |.iyei
semeia.a, | . se a a. sie:y ei se.eaee .meses a :e:eac.a, aac a :e
aa|ea.a, ei iae sease ei a.sie:y .a ,eae:a| . a| i.maie| y. .i
aeaemeae|e,.ea|sense . ||me:,e.ia .isie|ee|e,.esense.
uasse:|i:.es ie aeeem|.saas.a,a|a::eeieiiaeseesseai.a|es
s.|.|.i.es. aeeaaeei.ea.ia,eemei:yaaciecee.ae:iae:e. aiae:e
se:.i.ea eia ,eae:a| iass 1aas . | .se mesieiuasse:| s iexis, T/c
Origin of Geometr aas|eiaa:e,:ammai.eaacaaexem|a:yva| ae
Ceaseaeai| y, ea: :eac.a, ei .i masi |e ma:|ec |y iae exem| a:y
eease.easaess:ee:iea||e. cei.eaiieai.eaaac|e,a.cec|yiaee| e
eiia. s .aaa.ie ias|. i:em a.ea aeaemeae|e,y a|eae eaamase. is
ay iaiae.ai:ecaei.eaeaeaiiemi .ea:se|eam|.i.ea. |||eie
:eee,a.zeaacs.iaaieeaesia,eeiuasse:| s iaea,ai.. ia . issee.ae
:esaes.i.easaac.isa:i.ea|a:aaaa.saeciaie1aea,aia.smemeai
eiuasse:| s :ac.ea|aess.sa|i.maieaeee:c.a,ieiaeiaeis ,.i.se:aas
aeisece]a:e uasse:|:eeaiec|yseemsiea,:ee.iaia. s 1ae:eie:e.
e. | | a|aysi:yie|e,a.cec|ya. sea. aieai.eas. eveaaeae,ei
eaa,aia.aee:ia.ac.mea|i.es
I
1ae maiaemai.ea| e|]eei seems ie |e iae :.v. |e,ec exam|e aac
mesie:maaeaiia:eac,a.c.a,uasse:| s:eaeei.ea1a.s.|eeaaseiae
maiaemai.ea| e|]eei.sideal. iis |e.a,. s iae:ea,a|y i:aasa:eai aac
exaaasiec|y.is aeaemeaa| .iy ~|se| aie| ye|]eei.ve. . e . ieia| |y:.c
eiem.:.ea|sa|]eei.v.iy. .iaeve:iae|ess. sea|yaai. iaea:sie|e
1ae:eie:e..i.sa|aysa|:eacyreduced ie. isaeaemeaa|sease .aac. is
|e.a, . s. i:em iae eaisei. ie |e aa e|]eei [etre-objet ] ie. a a:e
eease.easaess
In our translation [of The Origin of Geometry] , we wi l l i ndi cate t he di stinction be
tween Historie and Geschichte i n parentheses only when t his di sti nction correspnds to
Husserl ' s expl ici t intenti on. which i s not-i ndeed . far from it-always the case.
On the questi on of knowi ng whether. for HusserI
.
t he mathematical obj ect is the mode
of every object' s consti tution. and on the consequences of such a hypothesis
.
cf. the
di scussion i n which Walter Bi emel , Eugen Fi nk, and Roman I ngarden parti ci pated fol l ow
i ng Bi emel ' s l ecture on " Les phases deci si ves dans I e devel oppement de la phi l osophi e
de Hu sser\ . i n Husser/ ( Cahiers de Royaumont . Phil osophi e No. 3 ) ( Paris: Minui t. 1 959) .
pp. 63 -7 1 .
28
Jacques Derria
1aePhilosophy of Arithmetic, uasse:| sa:si. me:iaaie:|. eea|c
aave|eeaeai.i|ecThe Origin of Arithmetic. Des. ie asyeae|e,.si.e
. areei.eaaesee:.,.aa| .iyaaseuea aac]asi|y|eea emaas. zec. . i
a|:eacyeeaee:as . asceesThe Origin of Geometr, iae:eaei.vai.eaei
iae:.me:c.a|seaseeia:.iaei.e s . cea| aa. i. es|y :eia:a. a, ieiae
si:aeia:eeie:eei.eaaaciaeaeiseiaeeae:eiesa|]eei.v.iy uasse:|
a. mse|ia|:eacy:eesecieaeeeaaiat once ie:iaeae:mai.ve. cea| .iy
eiaam|e:,a.ea.saeve:aaem.:.ea|iaeiaeeess.||eieaa. sie:y.a
:ee.se|yia.ssamesiy| eaacie:.is,:eaac.a,.aaacia:ea,aiae| . vec
aeiei.is :ecaei.ea
i asaeaaease .aeeve:.iae,eaes. seia:.iamei.e. saeiiaea,aieias
aa.sie:yeia:.iamei.e.. e . asaea|ia:a|ie:maacacveaia:eeiaamaa
. iy ia 1 887-91 , iae e:.,. aei a:.iamei.e as cese:.|ec . a ie:ms ei
psychological genesis. ia The Origin of Geometr, arie: auy yea:s ei
mec.iai.ea. uasse:| :eeaisiae same :e]eei aace: iae see. eseia
phenomenological histor. 1a. sace| .iy.sa||iaeme:e :ema:|a||es. aee
iaeaiai:ave:sec. s. mmease iiassesa:siia:ea,aiae:ecaei.eaei
a||a. sie:.ea|e:syeae|e,.ea|,eaes. s ~rie:iaai . aeaiae,eaei.ec.
meas.eaeiaeaemeae|e,y. sc.seeve:ec.,eaes.s. ssi.||aeia. sie:yi a
ass.a,i:emsiai.ei e,eaei.eeeasi.iai.ea.as aaaeaaeec. aIdeas I aac
iaeaaeeem|.saec|eieeaiaeyea:s1 91 5 aac 1 920, uasse:|si. | | aac
aeiea,a,ecaeaemeae|e,.ea|cese:.i.ea.aiae:e||emseia. sie:.e
.iy1aeiaemai.zai.eaeii:aaseeaceaia|,eaes. sma.aia.aeciae:ece
i.eaeia.sie:y.a||iaaieea|c|e|aeecaace:iaeeaie,e:yeie|,eei.ve
: ; Cf. in particular Biemel , ibid. , pp. 35f. [ A German version of Bi emel ' s l ecture, "Di e
entscheidenden Phasen in Husserls Phi losophie , " ' appeared i n ZeitschriJt fijr phi
losophische Forschung, 1 3 ( 1 959) , pp. 1 87-2 1 3 . An ET of thi s German version, enti
tled "The Deci si ve Phases in the Development of Husseri ' s Phi l osophy, " is i n The
Phenomenology of Husser!: Selected Critical Readings, ed. and tr. R. O. El veton
(Chicago: Quadrangle, 1 970) , pp. 1 48-73. Reference above begins on p. 1 48f. The Ger
man and Engl i sh versions di fer from the French version publ i shd i n Husser; they also
do not i ncl ude the di scussi on mentioned in note 4 above. ] Despite hi s severity as regards
thi s psychologi stic tendency, Husserl conti nual l y refers to hi s frst book , especi al l y in
Formal and Transcendental Logic.
"Numbers are mental creations i nsofar as they form the resul ts of activi ti es exerci sed
upon concrete contents : what these acti viti es create, however, are not new and absol ute
contents whi ch we could fi nd again in space or in the ' external worl d' : rather are they
uni que relation-concepts which can onl y be produced again and again and which are in no
way capable of bei ng found somewhere ready-made. " This remakable asse , whch
already desi gnates the production, therefore the primordi al historiCIty, of ldealt tles whIch
no longer wil l ever belong to the time and space of empi rical hi story , i s from Con
cerning the Concept of Number ( 1 887) , whi ch is taken up again as the frst chapter of
Philosophy of Arithmetic ( 1 89 1 ) . The passage is translated in Bi emel ' s articl e , in Husserl,
p. 37 [ ET: p. 1 50] .
29
Introduction to the Origin of Geometry
s.:.iaac iaeea|ia:a|e:|cas:e:essec.ia. aiae sae:eei.ai:a
e:| c|. aess 1ae:eia :aie:e:ec.eai. eese:. eaee..aExperience and
Judgment aac.aFormal and Transcendental Logic, exieacecceaiea
:eea| ia:a|aac:ea.sie:.esi:aiaei|.vecexe:.eaee
~ac .a iae Cartesian Meditations, aea uasse:| seass a|eai iae
aa.iyeiaa.sie:y..i.saaesi.eaeiiaeaa.iyeii:aees. ei:eie:eaees .
eisyaiaei.e:es.caes within iaea:ee,e|e,.ea|sae:e uasse:|aa
ce:see:es ia. s. iae .cea| eo]eeis. iae a. ,ae: ie:s eiproducts ei
:easea. a.eaa| eae assa:e iae ess.|.| .iyeia.sie:.e.iy. . e iaea|
ays .aie:sa|]eei.ve eease.easaesseia. sie:y. ce aei|e| ea, ieiae
eidos eiiae eeae:eieego (CM, 38. 78) . ~iiae eac eiiae1a.:c
Ca:ies.aa Mec. iai.ea. iae . avesi.,ai.eas iaai a:i.ea |a:|yeeaee:a iae
"theor o eiaa. eiaaaaeeaa.iy.eiea|ia:e .aac seie:ia.
a:eceaaecasa| ie:.e:.:e,.eaa| .aacceeaceaiias|s( ibid. , 29, 63) .
~||iaese :ecaei.eas ae|c a fortiori ie:iae cese:.i.eas ei :.me:c. a|
ieme:a|.iyaac .maaeaica:ai.ea
1aas iaeaeai:a|.zai.eaeisyeae|e,.ea|,eaes. saaciaaieia. sie:y
a:e si.||ea eaa|ieei.a, .a iae iexisa.ea |aee iae i:aaseeaceaia|
ceve|emeai .aieeas naiaea. .aiae e:.ec eiiaeCrisis, a. sie:y
.ise|i|:ea|sia:ea,a.aieaeaemeae| e,y.aaesaeeeiaesi.ea.a,.s
eeaec.eaeiaai.|||ec.mea|iiema.aia.a. aiae:e,.eaa||. m. isa.ea
e:ese| ea,:ese:.|ecie:.i
wa.|e eeasiaai| ypracticed .a iae Crsis .ise|i.ia. s ae aeeessie
a. sie:y. saeve:made a problem. ~i| easiaeic.:eei|yaacassaea Oa
iae eae aaac. iae eease.ea saesseia e:.s.saaciae am:mai.ea eia
ie|ee|e,y ei :easea a:e only ae aias e: eaas ie: |e,.i. m.z.a,
i:aaseeaceaia|.cea|.smeaeea,a.aOaiaeeiae:aaac.ieaiiaeae|e
ceve|emeai ei wesie:a a. | eseay .aie e:seei. ve. ie ceaae iae
ra:eeaaeidos aaciaeaaei.aaa.ieiasss . aacie:eeeaaiiaeacvea
ia:esaac .sacveaia:es eiiae i:aaseeaceaia|mei.i.eeaeea|eceaea
i.me|yiaeve:y,esia:eiaaiaaeeve:s.ia| |ia. sea|c,. vee:ec.iiea
|.aceisyaei.e:ei:eseei.eaiaaiaee:.i.e. sm eia. sie:.e:easeaaac
ex| .e.iy]a si.aeci:eiaesia:iNe.iae:iaesi:aeia:eseia. sie:.e.iy.a
Edmund Husser! , Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, tr.
Dorion Cairns ( The Hague: Nijhof, 1 970) ' Medi tation I V, 37 and 38, pp. 75-80
-hereafter ci ted as CM.
On the probl em of hi story in Husserl ' s phi l osophy , we refer particularl y to Paul
Ricoeur' s very fne arti cl e, " Husserl and the Sense of Hi story ," in Paul Ricoeur, Husserl:
An Analysis of His Phenomenology, tr. Edward G. Ballard and Lester E. Embree
( Evanston: Northwester Uni versity Press, 1 967) . pp. 1 43-74. On what obstructs the
di rect thematization of hi story in a transcendental phenomenology which at the same time
calls for this thematizati on, cf. more part icularl y pp. 1 45-5 1 .
30
Jacques Derrida
,eae:a|,aace ceaei,ei|aeaeiae:iaea. sie:.e.i,eise. eaeeaac
iaai eia. |esea,a:eexa|ese:exeei.eas . aeiae:iae,a:eiae
a. ,aesiaacesi:eve|aie:,ess. |. | .i.es .e:.iiae,a:es. |,|e,eac
a. sie:,.ise|i) .ae:iaeeiaecseiiaeaeaeeae|e,,eia. sie:,e:e
aceiaee|]eeiseisee. ae . e:. ,.aa| aesi.eas
1a. seeaaceaeeas
sae:iec|,iaes,sieeiaec.ei.eee:ia.ai.eseiaeaeeae|e,,.i
se|i.a.eaeea|c|eeeas. ce:ecasae:.i. e. sei:easea.a,eae:a| i i
ia. sie|ee|e,.ea|:eac.a,eia. sie:,eea|caei|eeaa:aeie:.zec. auas
se:| se,es|,iaece,ai.e. :aceaee. ia a. easeaa,a. |ese
ae:s,i:eA:.siei|eieue,e|ien:aaseav.e,)e:ee. ve. aiaeasiea|,
iae|a|e:ec:eseai|eaieiiae. :eaiaea,ai.|i| s|eeaaseia. s :eac|a,
:eie::ecieiaeve:,i ceaeii:aaseeaceaia|aeaeeae|e,,-a.ea. s
aei.ise|iaa. |esea. ea|s,sie
naiia.s :eac.a, :eie::ec ie iaai iceaea|ymediately. ii as si.||
aeeessa:yiesae.aasee.ae.eeae:eie.aacc.:eeiaaae:.
i iaaia.sie:y.asem.:.ea|se.eaee. as.| .|ea||em.:.ea|se.eaees .
ceeaceaieaaeaeeae|e,y~|.eaa|eaeeea|c:evea|i e. i. isiaac
eie.cei. e :esaes.i. eas ,ia. sceeaceaee. i:eaeai|y am:mec. aac
a|ays|eeai:eaiec|y:eie:.i.ea. s.,aa|ec:aiae:iaaaex|e:ec .
2 . iaai a. sie:y-aese ea eeaieai ,eeai:a:y ie iaaieiiae eiae:
maie:.a|aacceeaceaise.eaeesas. |yv.:iaeei.isseaseei|e.a,.
a|ays a:|ec |y eaeaess aac .::eve:s. |.|.iy. . e . |y aea
exem|a:.aess-si.|||eai .ise|iie .ma,.aa:y va:.ai.eaaac ie e. cei.e
.aia.i.eas .
3. iaai . .aacc.i.ea ie iae em. :.ea| aac aeaexem|a:y eeaieai ei
a.sie:y. ee:ia.ae.cei.e eeaieai,ie:exa|e. iaai ei,eemei:y as iae
e.cei.eaaa| ys.seisai.a|aaia:eaac.ise|i|eea:ecaeece::evea|ec
.a aa. sie:ya.ea.::ecae.||y. aaa|.is. is|e.a, sease ii. asuasse:|
am:ms. iaea. sie:yeiiae,eemei:.ea|e.cei.e.sexe|a:y.iaeaa.sie:y
.a,eae:a| ae |ea,e::. s|s|e.a, ac.si.aeiaacceeaceaiseeie:eia
e:e:ac.ea|aeaemeae|e,y ny:ema.a.a,ee|eie|y.ia. aaceie:
m.aec :e|ai. v.iy. a. sie:y .a ,eae:a| ae | ess eem|eie|y ea,a,es
aeaeeae|e,y.ia a||. isess.|.|.i.esaac:eseas. |. | .i.es. .ise:.,.aa|
ieeaa.aesaacaii.iaces
That, for exampl e, was not the case wi th psychology, whose relati ons wi th
phenomenology have been most abundantly defned, notably in ldeen II [ldeen ZI einer
reinen Phinomenologie und phinomenologischen Philosophie, Vol . I I , ed. M. Biemel , in
Hllsserliana, Vol . 4 (The Hague: Nijhof, 1 952) ] . in the Cartesian Meditations, and i n the
third part of the Crisis . The recent publ ication by Walter Bi emel of the Lectures of 1 925
and of appended texts devoted to Phinomenologische Psychologie ( in Husserliana, Vol .
9 [The Hague: Nijhof, 1 962]) is a very rich testi mony to thi s.
r
31
Introduction to the Origin of Geometr
Ne cea|i:aeseia:eea|.i.eas. a. eaa:ea|sec. uea|ieaes. aa.
a:e:
i asieaceisee. a,. i
asa:e|ea,ai.eaeiiaeCrisis, em.,ai|esi:ea,|yiemiecieseeThe
Origin of Geometr ,aiie:ia|.a,.aieaeeeaaiiae|:ev.iyeiia.ss|eiea
ea|y as iae :eiaee ie a:e. ssaeeiFormal and Transcendental Logic,
aesea:eses. m| yea|c|eacaiecieamaie:.a|eaie|e,yi aa.s
i ai:ecaei.eaie iaai e:|. uasse:|e:ee.vesiae mei.iei:ac.ea| .a
vesi.,ai.easeisease .ia. aiae:eseaieeac.i.eaeira:eeaa se.
eaees naie|aeiaaiie:uasse:|iaee:.i.ea|s.,a.aeaaeeeiia.s
s.iaai.ea:esa|is|essi:esemee.siee|e,.ea|eeaa .ei. aae:eai.aiae
.aiea|ceve|emeaieiiaesese.eaeesiaaai:emac.ve:ee|eieeaa
iaeiaee:ei.ea|aac:aei.ea|aei.v.iyeiiaese.eaee.aiaeve:y:eaea
ei.is:e,:essaacsaeeess. aac|.isseaseie:| .ieaaciaeess. |. |.iyei
|e.a,:e|aiecieour ae|ee:|c
1a. si:ee.a,eise.eaee.ia:eseeiie
.is|ases.aiaeLebenswelt aac.isieaac.a,sa|]eei.veaeisaacea|iec|y
:ema. asaaeees sa:yeeac.i.eaie:.iseeaaesi s naiia. si:ee.a,a|se
.ave|vesiaeia:eaieiaae|]eei. v. sia| .eaai.ea.a.eaeeaeea| siae.a
si.iai.a,e:.,.asaac:eace:siaemsi:aa,eaac. aaeeess. ||eieas 1a. s
eeea|iai. ea.a. ea. sa| seaieeaa. e. zai.eaaacsaesesiae"naivete of
a higher level" eiaa . avesi.,aie:|eeeme .::eseas.||e. aas s.ma|ia
aeeas|y:a.aeciae ,:eai |e|.ei eiiae se.eaees aac a. |eseay .a
iaemse|ves . .iaasaceea:e:|caa.aie| |.,.||e. 1emec.iaieeae:
.avesi.,aieiaesease(besinnen) eie:.,.as.saiiaesamei.eie. ma|e
eaese|t:eseas.||e(verantworten) ie: iae sease(Sinn) eise.eaee aac
a.|eseay .|:.a,ia.sseaseieiaee|a:.iyei.isia|a|,eai} . aacai
eaese|i.a aes.i.eaeiresponsibility ie:ia. sseasesia:i.a, i:em iae
ieia|seaseeiea:ex. sieaee
1ae sae c.sa.eiace aac iae same .|| a:e aace:see:ec aac ex
:essec. a:.,e:eas| y. ceai.ea|ie:msi:emiae| :sia,eseiThe Origin
1 0 Formal and Transcendental Logic, tr. Dorion Cairns (The Hague: Nijhof, 1 969) , p.
5-hereafter ci ted as FTL. Al so cf. the commentary of Suzanne Bachelard, A Study of
Husserl' s Formal and Transcendental Logic, tf . Lester E. Embree ( Evanston: North
wester Uni versi ty Press, 1 968) , notably pp. xxxi i i-l i i i .
I I
"We must place oursel ves above thi s whol e life and all t hi s cultural tradition and, by
radical sense- investi gations, seek for oursel ves si ngly and i n common t he ul ti mate pos
si bi l i ti es and necessi ti es, on t he basis of whi ch we can take our position toward
actual i ti es in j udging, val ui ng, and acting" (FTL, pp. 5-6) . The citations are from
FTL, pp. 2, 5, and 9.
i
32
Jacques Derrida
of Geometr. ~actaeaest.eaas|ectae:eaea:sata:sts.,atte|e
ea|yasee.| eat.eaeitae,eae:a|aest.ea|e,aaaacce| aec. aFormal
and Transcendental Logic. is.taetaaest.eaae:eeia|y.a,a,eae:a|
:e]eetaese :e,:amaac a|:eacy|eeae:,aa.zectea s. a,a|a:aac
ceeaceatse.eaee:D.caetuasse:|:. te. 1aese. avest.,at.eas. eea
eeo.a,taeess.||eseaseaacess.||emetaecei,eaa.aese.eaee as
saea.a:eaata:a|yc.:eetec| :steia||teaat.sesseat.a| |yeemmeate
a|| ess.||e se.eaees 1aey saea|c|e ie| |eecseeeaca:.|y|yee::e
seac.a, sease.avest.,at.eas ie: a:t.ea|a: ,:eas ei se.eaees aac
s.a,|ese.eaees(ibid. , - :
a|c. seeve:yeiiaeaiaa:eaac
iaeiameasCae eiCeec uee} (ibid. , x.,
1aas. | .|euasse:| . kaai.s aiieai.ve ie iae a.sie:.ea| c. meas.eaei
a:.e:.ess.|.|.i.esaac ieiae e:.,.aa|,eaes. seiai:aia. aese |.:ia
,e: |.:ia ee:i.aeaie, . ase:.|es aac :ese:.|es ema. ieme:a|.iy aac
aa.ve:sa|.iy-aei ea|yie:iaeeea.a, ei.is ess.|.|.iy. |ai a|se ie:
eaea ei. is ceve|emeais aac ie: iae ieia|.iy ei . is|eeem. a, i.|e
uas se:| . aeaeai:a| .zesiaeiaeiaa|eeaieaiseiia.s :eve|ai.ea. aiae
mece eiia.a|.a, .iaiae same.ac.ae:eaee. i aeiieei. .i .s ei|. ii|e
eeaseaeaee ie: a.m iaai .is a. sie:y aas aei :eaeaec as 1ae
seaseeiiaea:sicemeasi:ai.eaeaa|e:.,e:eas| y,:asec.eveaiaea,a
e|aeaeia.a,eiiaea:siiaeiaa|exe:.eaeee:iaea:si,eemeie:.
aeiae:. as kaai see.aes. ae |e ea||ec1aa|ese:aaieve:eae
ces. :es(ibid.).
Neve:iae|ess. kaai s .ac.ae:eaeeieiaeiaeiaa|e:.,.a,ase||asie
iaeeeaieaieiiaeexam|e-iae. sesee|esi:.aa,|e-eeaee:a.a,a.ea
ae ceve|es iae .m|.eai.eas ei . is c.seeve:y, . s me:e .mmec.aie|y
|e,.i.maieiaaauasse:| s re:iae .aaa,a:a|maiai.eaa.ea.aie:esis
kaaihands over ,eemei:y:aiae:iaaae:eaies.i ..iseisi:eeaess.|.|
.iy. a.ea. saeia.a,|essiaaaa. sie:.ea| . . ae:ce:ieaaac.iieas ~i
a:siia. s:eve|ai.ea. sea|ya:eve|ai.eaie:iaea:si,eemeie:ii. s
beforehand. Because of thi s, our procedure seems not to be at al l radical , since the
genui ne sense of al l sciences . . . i s the very thi ng i n quest ion . . . . Nevertheless,
whether sciences and logic be genui ne or spurious, we do have experience of them as
cul tural formations gi ven to us beforehand and bearing withi n themsel ves their meani ng,
their ' sense. '
. .
Cf. also on thi s FTL. I ntrod . , pp. 1 3-1 4
.
and 1 02, pp. 268-69 : and
eM, 3, pp. 8-9.
We emphasize those Kantian expressions which are also among t he most frequent i n
The Origin of Geometry. [The bracketed expression "of Good Hope" i s added i n con
formi ty to the Engl i sh translation of Norman Kemp Smith. ]
40
Jacques Derrid
aei:ecaeecoya. m. ii .saace:sieecaace:acai.veeaie,e:y, aaciae
aei.v.iyeiiae,eemeie:iea.eaiaeaayiaea,aieeea::ec.sea|y
iaeem.:.ea| aaie|c.a,eia :eieaac:eeei.ea waai .s mesieriea
i:aas|aiecoy:eve|ai.ea . siaea||as.eaie a | .,aiiaai.s,.vea, ie
a| .,aicaasea . "Dem ersten . . . dem ging ein Licht auf" (ibid. ,
X
)
. 26
uaceaoiec|y, uasse:| s :ecaei.ea (Leistung)
2
7 a|se .ave|ves a
si:aiamei:eeei.ve. aia.i.eanaiaaimaiie:sae:e.siaaiia.suas se:
|.aa.aia.i.ea, as.ieeaee:asiae.cea|eo]eeiseimaiaemai.es , .saose
|aie|yeeasi.iai.veaace:eai.ve. iaeeo]eeise:eo]eei.v. i.esiaai. i.a
ieacsc.cft ex.sibefore .i. aacia.s before" eiiae. cea|eo]eei.v.iy
ma:ss me:e iaaa iae ea:eae|e,.ea| eve eia iaei. .i ma:ss a i:aas
eeaceaia| :ea. sie:y i a iae kaai.aa :eve|ai . ea. ea iae eeai:a:y.
iae |:si ,eemeie: me:e|y oeeemes eease.eas iaai .i saueesie: a. s
maiaemai.ea| aei.v.iyie :ema.a.ia.aaeeaeeiiaai .ialready pos
sesses. 1aeeeasi:aei.eaiea.eaae,.vesa. mse|i,iaea, .sea|yiae
ex|.eai.eaeiaaa|:eacyeeasi.iaieceeaeeiiaaiaeeaeeaaie:s , as.i
e:e, .a a. mse|ia cese:.i.ea a.ea ae ceaoiie: uasse:| as e||
ea|coei:aeeieve:yaeae:eai.ve,eemei:.ea|aei, aaca.eaieaeaes
as aoeai iae sease ei :eacymace ,eemei:y as saea, oaiaei aoeai
,eemei:y .a iae aei ei oe.a, . as..iaiec re:, as kaai says. ae
c.seeve:eciaaiaemasiaeiie||eiaei:aeeeiaaiaesa.aiae| ,a:e
26
Cf. for example the French translation of A. Tremesaygues and B. Pacaud, Critique
de la raison pure (Paris: Presses Uni versitaries de France, 1 950) , p. 1 7. Of course , we are
authorized to pay such attention to these Kantian expressions only by the confrmation
that all of Kant' s phi l osophy seems to give them.
Among all the translations already proposed for the notion of Leistung, so frequently
utilized i n the Origin, the word "production" seemed to overlay most properly all the
signifcations that Husserl recognizes in thi s act that he al s designates by some com
plementary notions: pro-duetion, which leads to the l ight , constitutes the "over against
us" of Objecti vity; but this bringing to l ight i s also, l ike all production (Erzeugung) in
general , a creation (Sehopfung) and an act of formation (Bildung, Gestaltung), from
which comes ideal objectivity as Gebilde, Gestalt, Erzeugnis, and so on. To be clear on
this, we have translated by "formation" the notion of Gebilde, which appears so often in
the Origin, and which up to now has been very di versely translated. The very vague
character of the word "formation" seemed to us to suit the indetermination of Husserl ' s
notion. I t also agrees with the geological metaphor which runs throughout t he text, where
all usions to sedimentation, to deposits, to stages, to strata, and to substrata of sense are
everywhere. But we were also unable to designate the act which engenders das Gebilde.
namel y, die Bildung, except by "formation. " Each time BiLdung has th i s active sense,
we wi l l insert the German word between parentheses. Do not forget, fi nally (and thi s i s
especially important here), that i n German Bildung also carries the general sense of
culture. There again, the notion of formation seemed the least foreign to thi s vi rtual
signifcation.
41
Introductin to the Origin of Geometr
e:.aiaeoa:eeeaeeieiiaaisamea,a:e kaiae:aemasioe,ei(hervor
bringen) , .iseo]eei,w.iaiaeae|eiaaiaea. mse|iai.aie.iaacaai
a priori as :e:eseaiec .a.iia:ea,a iaeeeaeei,ia:ea,a eeasi:ae
i.ea, .~actesaesemeia. a,a priori .iaeem|eie seea:.iy,aemasi
aii:.oaieieia.a,s(Sache) aeia.a,oaiaaiaeeessa:. |yie||eeci:em
aaiaeaacaiiae:ea. mse|i.aaeee:caaee.iaa. seeaeei(ibid. ) . 21
Neceaoi, eaee iae ,eemei:.ea| eeaeeiaas:evea|ec .is i:eecem
.ia :eseeiie em.:.ea| seas.o.|.iy, iae syaiaes.seiiae eeasi:ae
i.ea . s . ::ecae.o|e ~ac .aceec .i . s aa .cea| a.sie:y nai .i . siae
a.sie:y eiaa ee:ai.ea, aac aeieiaieaac.a,. iiaaie|csex|.eai.ve
,esia:es. aiaesaeeeiaess.o. |.iya|:eacyeeaieiae,eemeie:1ae
memeai ,eemei:y . sesiao|.saecassaea, iae memeai, iaai .s, seme
ia.a,eaaoesa.cei. i, iaea,eemei:ya|:eacy .||oeeaiaee.aiei
oe.a,:evea|ecieiaeeease.easaesseiiaefrst ,eemeie:,ae. saei ,as
.a iae Origin, :eie,eemeie:, iae :.ma| | y .asi.iai.a, (urstiftende)
,eemeie:.~i|easi.i. ||oe:eacyieoe:evea|ec.a.is.a. i.a|eeaeei.
iaaieeaeeiaesea:.e:.Oo] eei.v. iy.||:eseai|ysi:.seaaysao]eei
aaieve: .ia ,eemei:.ea| . as.,ai [lumiere] . ~ac s.aee kaai . s .a
ie:esiec.aiaeess.o.|.iyei,eemei:yie:asao]eei.a,eae:a|,.i.saei
ea|y |ess eeasi:.ei. a,. oai a| se ce]a:e aeeessa:y. iaai iae ce iaeie
sao]eeieisaeaa:eve|ai.eaoe aayeaeaia|| , aaciaaiiae,eemei
:.ea| exam|e se:v.a, as ,a.ce-iae cemeasi:ai.ea ei iae . sesee|es
i:.aa,|e-oe.ac.ae:eai. 1aea:.e:.aaia:eeiiaaieeaeei.ia. aa.ea
eee:aie:ee|acesa| |a. sie:.ea|.avesi.,ai.eaaaieve:aoeai.issao
]eeimaiie:Ceai:a:yie.issyaiaei.eex|.eai.ea.iaeeeaeei.ise|i,asa
si:aeia:eeia:.e:.:ese:.i.ea. eea|caei oea.sie:.ea| , oeeaase .i .s
aei , assaea .:ecaeecaac,:eaacecoyiaeaeieiaeeae:eiesao]eei
2
!1
ue:e a|| a. sie:y eaa ea| y oe em.:.ea| ~ac .i iae:e .s a o.:ia ei
,eemei:yie:kaai , .iseemsie oe ea| yiae exi:.as.ecircumstance ie:
iaeeme:,eaeeeiai:aia,a.ea.s . ise|ia|aysa|:eacyeeasi.iaiecie:
aay iaeiaa| eease.easaess, 1aas iae seaiaaeeas e.cei.e :ecaei.ea
a.eai:eesiae,eemei:.ea|esseaeei:ema||em.:.ea|:ea|.iy-iaaiei
seas. o|ea,a:ai.eaase||asi:emiae,eemeie: ssyeae|e,.ea| |.vec
exe:.eaee-.sie:kaaia|aysa|:eacyceae si:.ei|yseas.a,. iae
2
The Erdmann edition notes that hen10rbringen has no "object" i n Kant' s text.
The absence of the deci si ve notion of "material" or "contingent" a priori , such as
Husserl defned it, thus seems to uproot Kant ' s formalist apriorism from all concrete
hi story and to inhi bit the theme of a transcendental hi story.
On the notion of the contingent a priori , cf. in particular FTL. 6, pp. 29-30. The level
of geometry as a material ontology i s precisely that of such a . 'material a priori . "
Thi s seems true, furthermore, of the whole of Kant' s transcendental analysi s.
, I
42
Jacques Derrid
:ecaet.ea. saetie:e:|yasa|]eetaema|esa. mse|i:eseas.||eie:.t
. aat:aaseeaceata|acveata:e.a:ete,eemete:e:a. |eseae::ereet
.a,ea:ete,eemet:y..t.sa|aysa|:eacymacees
.||ea
caeeess
:y
|ytaeaata:eei,eemet:.ea|saeeaactae
,eemetne
|,
et .na:na,
a sea:ee| y a|te:ec eeaveat.eaa| r|atea. sm. kaats mc.ae:eaee te
em.:.ea|a.ste:y. sea|y| e,.t.mateci:emtaememe
ttaata
e:
:e
ieaac a. ste:yaas a|:eacy e:eatec aeaem.:.ea| e|,eets 1a.s a.
te:y
:ema.asa.cceaie:kaat Caaeaetsayae:etaat
ta
taee:ei. cea|
saeeaact.me|eta:ea.:esaac
a:esseste|na,m,te| .,ateiaa
.at:.as.eaacaeaem.:.ea|a.ste:.e.tyeitaes.. eaeeseisaeeaacme
t.ea: iisaeeaact.mee:et:aaseeaceata|:ea|.t.e
. a
*
yeac
|e
eeaec|etaie:aaaa.ste:.emetaays.esaacie:aa. stene. stem.ne
|
se.eaee te .ate::e|atecess.|.|.t.estaat kaat a|ays ceaeaaeecm
eaeaad taesamemevenatteave.cem.:.e.smi:emtaesta:taacat
aay:.ee .kaataacteeeaiaea. st:aaseeaceata|c.seea:s
teae:|c
ei. cea|eeast.tatece|]eets .aeseee::e|ateastae:
ie:e.tse|iaeea
st.tatec sa|]eet 1a. saet.ea eia:etea. ste:y. a.ea te
ae|e
ei
kaat.aaa.|eseayseemstema|eeeat:ac.ete:yeveaa.|emve|m,
.t |eeemesuasse:| s taeme
.ta
:eseetteem.:.ea||ae|ec,e. sme:ec.mea|tte]asti;ati:sts.,a
iaiaet eaeeace:a|eattaeseaseeitae:ecaet.ea
^
i,eemetn
ea|eeeets|eie:e aacta.ss.ceeitaekaat.aa:eve|at.ea. |eie:e
aacta.ss.ceeitaeeeast.tat.eaeiaa.cea| | ya:eaacesaetsaeeaac
t.me s.aeeeve:y.cea|e|]eet.v.ty.s:ecaeec|ytaeaeteiaeeae:ete
eease.easaess ,tae ea|y sta:t.a, e.at ie: a t:
as
eaceata|
aeaemeae|e,y, .eve:y.cea|e|]eet. v.tyaasaaste:ya.ea.sa ays
a|:eacyaaaeaaeec.ataateease.easaess. evea.ie|aeaetam,ei
.tscete:m.aeceeateat .
uteIdeas I tae metaece|e,.ea|e:eeast. tat.veaaa| yses:emmec
stn.eta:a| aac stat.e. aac a|| a.ste:y as "reduced" as iaetaa| . ty e:
` Here we fnd, locally and through a diferent approach, the i nterpretatio prosed
by Fi nk and approved by H usserl concerning the intraworldliness of te Kantlan cntl
.
que
compared wi th Husserl ' s investigation of the "origin of the world. Cf. Eug m:
"The Phenomenological Phi losophy of Edmund Husserl and Contemporary Cntlcl sm,
.
in R. O. Elveton, ed. , The Phenomenology of Husserl, pp. 73- 1 47 . [The above quote I S
found on p. 95. ]
.
'
.
"I
'
't t'
,
.
can only be measured by
Perhaps the depth of vigi lance H thIS Kantmn I ml a Ion
its difcul ty, its failure.
Husserl often stresses that the reference to a hi storical birth be i ncribed wi
.
ti n the
sense itself of every cultural ideal i ty, especiall y in Beilage XXVI I m the KnS1S, pp.
503-07.
43
Introductin to the Origin of Geomety
se.eaeeeieeast.tatecaac.at:ae:| c|yiaetaa|. ty1aas . ta.sa. ste:yei
,eemet:yaac:ema.aec.ataeca:|aacas]ac,eceicea|tia|ess. |. |
. tye:mec.ee:e.ate:estie:taeaeaemeae|e,.ste:mataemat.e.aaas
saea Ceemet:y s t:ata..tsae:mat.veva|ae. .s:ac.ea|| y.aceeaceat
ei.tsa.ste:ya.ea.atta.smemeateiuasse:|s. t.ae:a:y..seeas. ce:ec
ea|y as a iaetaa| a.ste:y ia| | .a, aace: tae st:e|e eitae saseas. ea
(Ausschaltung) . 35 uasse:| says ta. s , .a tae e:.ec ei ra.|eseay as
x.,e:eas se.eaee aacIdeas l) .a seme i:aa| a:asesa.ea. .itae
|eve|seies|.eat.eaaactaeseaseseitaee:ca. ste:yaacaet|eea
e|ea:|yc.st.a,a.saec. ea|c|e.ara,:aateeat:ac.et.ea.tataese ei
tae Origin. 1aas . Ce:ta.a|y tae mataemat.e.aa tee . | | aet ta:a te
a.ste:.ea|se.eaeete|etaa,ata|eattaet:ataeimataemat.ea|taee:. es
it. ||aeteeea:tea.mte:e|atetaea.ste:.ea|ceve|emeateimatae
mat.ea| :e:eseatat.eas tae Ce:maa aac r:eaea ec.t.eas acc aac
]ac,meats}.tataeaest.eaeit:ata , rxs. 1 26) . O:a,a.a. at
tae eac eie:.t.e.z. a, aa em.:.e.sttaee:y eitae e:. ,.aei,eemet:y
iasteac ei a. | esea.z.a, aac syeae|e,.z.a, a|eat ,eemet:.ea|
taea,ataac.ata.t.eai:emaaeats.ce staace.at .e saea|ceate:v.
ta||y.atetaeseaet.v.t.es. aacta:ea,ac.:eetaaa|ysesceie:m.aetae.:
. mmaaeatsease.itmaye|||etaateaave.aae:.tecc.ses. t.easie:
ee,a.t.eai:em tae ee,a.t.easeiast,eae:at.eas . but for the question
concering the sense and value of what we cognize, the history of this
heritage is as indif erent as is that ofour gold currency to its real value "
(Ideas 1, 25 , . 85-86 ,mec.iec} .ea:emaas.s .
` Cf. in particular Ideas I, 1 , n. I , p. 45, and p. 46, where both hi storical origin and
hi story as a human science are excluded. Conceri ng the human sciences, the question is
"provi si onally" lef open whether they are "natural sciences or . . . sciences of an
essentially new type. "
Of course, i t i s as facts and not as norms that the hi storical gIvens are pa
renthesized. I n asking hi mself, ' which sciences' " can phenomenology " ' draw from' "
i nsofar as phenomenology is itself "a science of ' origins, ' " and what sciences must i t
. . ' not depend on: " Husser! writes: "I n the frst place i t goes without saying that wi th
the suspending of the natural world, physical and psychological, all individual objecti vi
ties whi ch are constituted through the functional acti vi ti es of consciousness in valuation
and i n practice are suspended-all varieties of cultural expression, works of the technical
and of the fi ne arts, of the sciences also (so far as we accept them as cultural facts and
not as validity-systems) [our emphasi s] , aesthetic and practical values ofe very shape and
form. Natural in the same sense are al so reali ties of such kinds of state, moral custom,
law, religion. Therewith all the natural and human sciences, with the entire knowledge
they have accumulated, undergo suspension as sciences which require for their develop
ment the natural standpoint" (Ideas I, 56, p. 1 55 [modifi ed]) .
`` Cf. the defnitions of hi story as an empirical human science in "PRS , " in particular
pp. 1 24-26.
I
f
44
Jacques Derrid
1aeeeat.aa.tyaaceeae:eaeeeitaesee|se:vat.easa:et:a|y:ema:|
a||e.i:st, iaetaa|a.ste:ymast|e:eaaeec.ae:ce:te:eseetaacsae
taeae:mat.ve.aceeaceaeeeitae. cea| e|]eet.a. ts ea:.,at taea
aacea|ytaea,|ytaasave. c.a,a||a.ste:.e. ste:|e,.e.steeaias.ea, .a
e:ce:te :eseetaac sae tae aa.aea. ste:.e.ty eitae .cea| e|]eet
.tse|i.1aat. saytaesei:st:eaaet.easeiiaetaa|a.ste:y.||aeve:|e
:emevec.ataeo,-evea|esssetaaae|seae:e
1a.s .s |eeaase ra. |eseay as x.,e:eas se.eaee as eeaee:aec
.ta:eseac. a,tetae|.aceia.ste:.e.sma.ea:ecaeecae:mteiaet.
aacIdeas I, .tas. taat.a,,eemet:y. aaaesem|a:yiasa.eaamea,tae
a:e esseat.a| se.eaees s.aeeaeexistential thesis (Daseinsthesis) as
aeeessa:ye:e:m.ttec.taesese.eaeese:e. mmec.ate|yi:eeci:ema||
iaetaa|.ty. Ne seas.||ei,a:at.ea.atae:ea|e:|c,
aesyeae|e,.ea|
ese:.eaee , ae iaetaa| [ evenementiel] eeateataave, as saea, aa, . a
st.tat.a,sease1ae,eemet:.ea|eidos . s:eee,a.zec. ataat.t. tasteec
taetesteiaa||ae.aat.ea.
There are pure sciences of essences, such as pure logic, pure
mathematics, pure time-theor, space-theor, theor of movement, etc.
These, in all their thought-constructions, are free throughout from any
positings of actualfact; or, what comes to the same thing, in them no
experience qua experience, i.e. , qua consciousness that apprehends or
sets up reality or factual existence, can take over the functin of
supplying a logial grounding. Where experience functions in them, it
is not as experience. The geometer who draws his fgure s on the
blackboard produces in so doing strokes that are actually there on a
board that is actually there. But his experience of what he thus
produces, qua experience, afords just as little groundfor his seeing
and thinking of the geometrical essence as does the physical act of
production itself. Whether or not he thereby hallucinates, and whether
instead of actually drawing lines he draws his lines and fgures in a
world of phantasy, does not really matter. The scientic investigator of
Nature behaves quite diff erently. (Ideas I, 7, p. 55 [modied ]; Hus-
serl's emphasis) :n
`I
The essential usel essness or the "inadequacy" of sensibl e " i l l ustration" i s already
underscored in the Logical Investigations, tr. J. N. Findl ay, 2 vol s. (New York:
Humanities Press, I 970)-hereafter cited as L/. [ All future references wi11 l i st the vol ume
number, the i nvestigation number or Prologomena, the s ection number, and the page:
e. g. , L/, I , I , 1 8 , pp. 301 -02 means the frst volume, First Investigation,
.
etc. uss
.
erl
does this i n a passage (LI, 1, I , 1 8 , pp. 301 -02) where he recalls the Cartesian dl stmctlon
between imaginatio and intellectio concerning the chiliagon and very preci sel y an
nounces the theory of geometrical " idealization" that he wil l maintain in the Origin.
`I
Thi s autonomy of mathematical truth compared to perception and natural reality (on
which mathematical truth could not be based) is described here only in a negative way.
Non-dependence is what is stressed. The positive ground of truth is not i nvestigated for
45
Introductin to the Origin of Geometr
ue
ae?tae:aaac
taeeidos aactae.cea|e|]eetceaet:ees.steve:y
sa|]eet.veaet,asmaeeaveat.eaa|r|atea. sm, .itaeatae,aaveaa. s
e:,,tae,mast|e:e|atecte,. e ,tae,mast|e:. me:c.a||,,:eaacec
m
tae :ete. cea|. zat. eas |asec ea tae sa|st:ate eiaa aetaa| | , e:-
e. ve :ea|e:|cuattae,mastceta. sta:ea,ataee|emeateiaae:.,-
ma|a.ste:,
tself. S
.
tarting from an anal ysi s of the mathematical " phenomenon: ' or in order to better
Isolate ItS "sense, " one simpl y reduces what is i ndicated in this sense as what cannot
presently be
.
retained by vi rtue of this gound. Husserl measures the eidetic intangibil ity
of mathematIcal sense by hallucination. In the Theaetetus ( 1 90b) , Plato had recourse to
dream. Hussr\ ' s devel
.
opment is al so situated on the same plane and dons the same style
as the arteslan anal YSI S before the hypothesi s of the Evi l Demon i n the First Meditation:
"At thl
.
s rate we might be justified in concl udi ng that . . . arithmetic, geometry, and so
on, whIch treat onl y of the simplest and most general subject-matter, and are i ndiferent
whether i t exi sts i n nature or not, have an el ement of i ndubi table certainty. Whether I am
awake
.
or asle
p, two and three add up to fve, and a square has onl y four sides; and it
sees ImpOSSIble for
.
such obvious truths to fall under a suspicion of being fal se" [par. 7:
ET: In Descartes: Phi losophical Writings, tr. El i zabeth Anscombe and Peter Thomas Geach
(New York: Bobbs-Merri l l , 1 97 1 ), p. 63] .
For Descartes, only after this phenomenology of mathematical evidence and with the
hypothesi s of the Evil Demon wi l l the critical or juridical question be posed of the ground
that guarantees the truth of naive evidence. The description i tsel f and the "natural "
val i dity of tis tru
.
th , moreover, wi l l never be put i nto question on their own specific
level . The pnordlal round of these constituted truths, whose mode of appearing is thus
clearly recogmzed, WIll be delegated to a veracious God who i s al so the creator of eternal
ruts .
.
Husserl . afe an analogous descriptive stage, will investigate this in primally
mstttutmg acts ( Urstiftung) , themsel ves hi storical. In this respect, Descartes' God, like
?at of the gre
.
at assic rational i sts, woul d only be the name given to a hidden hi story and
woul funct on as the necessary reduction of empi rical hi story and the natural world . a
reductIon which pertains to the sense of these sciences.
But we wi l l see that, despite thi s extraordinary revolution which grounds the absolute
ad eteral truth without the aid of God or infnite Reason, and which seems thus to
dl sc
.
l o
.
se (and
.
eescend toward) a primordial l y i nst ituted fnitude while completel y
a:OIdmg mpl ncl sm, Husserl i s less di stant from Descartes than it seems. Thi s hidden
?Istry WIll take its sense from an i nfnite Tel os that Husserl will not hesitate to call God
m hiS
.
l ast unpb
.
l i she
.
d writings. It is true that this i nfnite, which i s always already at
work
.
I n the ongms, IS not a positive and actual i nfnite. It i s given as an I dea i n the
KantJan sense, as a r
.
egulative .. indefnite" whose negativity gives up i ts rights to history.
ot ?nl y
.
th
,
moraltty but also the historicity of truth itself woul d here prevent thi s
flslfcatton of the actual infnite i nto an indefnite or an ad infnitum, a fal sifcation of
whi ch Hegel accused Kant and Fichte.
46
Jacques Derrid
ua||ae.aat.ea. taea. .s t:ata s aeeem|.eeea|y .a a st
t.e
e:|c ei
eeast.tatecs.,a.ieat.eas 1e:eeeectetae,:eaacaacome:c.a|eea
st.tat.eaeit:ata. e mast :eta:a. sta:t.a,i:emtae :ea|e:| c.
te a
e:eat.veese:.eaee vea e:e .t aa.ae aac |a:. ec.ta. seseneaee
:ema. as. ce]a:ease||asceiaete.i:stwe:eee,a.ze.tea. tat!e:
taesae:eeisease.taet:aeeeat:a:yeia
| | ae. aat.ea
,aac.ma,ma.
a
.a,eae:a|.saetc.:eet|ye:eet.ea.|ata. ste:y:. .iyea
(
:eie:..t.s
tae eease.easaesseia.ste:.e.tyaac tae :eaa|ema,eieo,ms .
1aasea|y at tae | eve| aac e.atma:|ec |yIdeas I cee
uasse:|
:e]e.a kaat s .ac.ae:eaee te a |.ac eia.ste:y tat ea|c s.m|y |e
est:.as.e aacem.:.ea| ~| se. as seeaas uesse:|s aeeeaat|e
emes
eeaeeoec.tatae,eaes.sei,eemet:y aac ,ett.a,|eyea ta.
s :e
|. m. aa:y sta,e. e m.,at eseet te see a.m :emeve tae e.cet..
ac
t:aaseeaceata|:ecaet.easa:e|yaacs.m|y. aac:etaoteaeeast.ta
t.ve a.ste:y. aa. ste:y . aa.eatae eeas. ce:at.eaeiiaes taems| ves
ea|c|eeeme. ac.seasa||e.|eeaaseae:eie:taei:stt.me.assm,a
|a:a.ste:.ea|e:.,. a. tae. ast.tat.a,iaetea|c |e.::e|aeea||e. tae:e
ie:e invariable. 1a.s .ava:.aaeeeitae iaet,eiaateaa aeve:|ere
peated assaeaea|cce]a:ee
::y ev
e:. ts
e.cet.e ava:.aaee
aat
eaa|erepeated ve| aata:.|yaacmceimte|ymteaa.ste:yei
:
,s
u.ste:yas .ast.tat.veea|c|etae:eiea
c
a:
ae:esease. s mc. s
see. a||ei:em |e.a,. ae:e taeceiaete .smc.ssee.a||e i:emae e
]a:e 1aeaet.eaeie:.,. ae:,eaes.seea|cae|ea,e:|e:eee,mzecm
'I
The interpretation of Trfm-Duc-Thao, Phenomenologie et materialisme di
le
tique
( 1 95 1 ; rpt. New York: Gordon and Breach, 1 97 1 ) , i s strongly oriented tward thIs kmd f
a conclusion. At the end of Husser\ ' s i ti nerary, the return to the " 'technical and economic
forms of production" (namel y, i n Husserlian languge, he retur to real , factual,
.
and
extri nsi c causality outside of every reduction) seems mevI
.
table to that ator, who thmk
Husserl was himself "obscurely" resigned to thi s at the tme of The Orzgm ofG
0
m
etr.
" Moreover, this i s what Husserl was obscurely presenting when he
.
was search 109 10 the
famous fragment on The Origin of Geometr to ground geoetncal truth on humn
praxis " (p. 220). "The phenomenological explication is thus onented towards determm-
i ng the actual conditions in which truth is engendered" (p. 2 2 1 ) .
.
Husserl ' s reduction never had the sense (quite the contrary) of a negatIon-f n
ignorance or a forgetfulness that woul d ' ' leave" the real conditions of sense and factualIty
in general in order to " come back" or not, in order to "pass on"
.
or not, to th
.
real
anal ysis [of what i s] (for sense is nothing
ther thQ1
the sese of realIty o
,
of faual It).
Otherwise, his reduction mi ght seem vam and dIssembl Ing, and the rtu to
.
an
empiricist histori ci sm, fatal . That does not appear to be the case, since, WIth dl lectIcal
material ism "we fnd oursel ves on a plane subsequent {posterieur] to the reductIOn, the
latter havin suppressed the abstract conception of nature but ot
.
te
,
ctually real ature
which implies in its development the whole movement of subjectiVity (the author s em-
phasis; pp. 227-28).
47
Intrduction to the Origin of Geometry
tae a:e aeaemeae|e,.ea| sease taat uasse:| se ce,,ec|y
c.st.a,a.saeco:
neeaase. ie:uasse:| . .t aastae eaa:aete:.st.ea.eaceiaesiaet-
aame| y. s.a,a|a:aac em.:.ea|es.steaee. tae .::ecae.|.|.ty eiahere
and o-tae teta| iaet ma:|.a,,eemet:y s esta|| . sameat ea|c |e
.ava:.a||ei aceec.uasse:|saystaattaeasa:,eei,eemet:y.ate:ests
a.mae:e. aseia:as.taacta|ea|aeeeaee(dereinst), ie:taei:st
t.me(erstmalig), sta:t.a,i:ema"frst aea.s.t.ea(aus einem ersten
Erwerben) ( 1 58-59) . nat aat aatae:. zec tae esseat.a| :eac.a,of aac
within eeast.tatec,eemet:yastaeess.|.|.tyei. ma,. aat. ve| yva:y.a,
taeaata:a|here and now eitaei,a:ee:taesyeae|e,.ea|ese:.eaeeei
tae,eemete:ae. aseaaveseea.asaet.ts. ast.tate:ue:e .eatae
eeat:a:y.taehere and now eitae i:stt.me. s. ast.tat.veaace:eat. ve
i s ta.sese:.eaee ,aa.aeei. ts|.ac .aetas.a,a|a:iaet-eaeie:a.ea
esaea|caet|ea||etesa|st.tateaaetae:iaetasaaesam|e.ae:ce:
tecee.ae:.tsesseaee:
i sta. stesaytaatta.s.asea:a|.|.tyeiiaetaacsease.ataeeaeaess
eiaa.ast.tat.a,aet:ee|acesaeeessie:aeaemeae|e,ytea| |a. ste:y
aactetaea:eeidos eiaie:eve:sa|me:,ece:.,.a:
Netat a| | 1ae .ac.ssee.a|. |.ty. tse|iaas a:.,e:eas| ycete:m. aa||e
aeaemeae|e,.ea| sease 1ae .ma,.aa:y va:.at.ea ei stat.e ae
aemeae|e,y s.m|y saesec a tye ei :ecaet.ea aese sty|e .||
aavete|e:eaeec. aaa.ste:.ea|aeaemeae|e,y.1aee. cet.easeetei
ta. s:ecaet.eaastaeiteration eiaaeema s.aeetaeeidos . seeast.tatec
aace|]eet.ve. tae se:.es eiaetsa.ea.ateacec .teea|caet|at. a
ceia.te| y:este:etae. cea|.ceat.tyeiaseasea.eaasaete|sea:ec
|yaaya.ste:.ea|eae.ty,aac.tea|cea|y|eaaest.eaeie|a:.iy.a,.
. se|at.a,,aaccete:m. a.a,.tsev.ceaee..ava:.aaee.aace|]eet.ve.ace
eaceaee 1aea.ste:.ea|:ecaet.ea. a.eaa| seee:ates|yva:. at.ea.
. | | |e reactivating aacaeet.e. i asteac ei:eeat.a, tae eeast. tatec
seaseeiaa.cea|e|]eet. eae.||aavete:eaa|eataeceeaceaeeei
Opening Ideas I (Chapter 1 , l a, p. 45, passage already ci ted), this defnition of
phenomenological origin ( in disti nction to genesis in the worldly human and natural
sciences) was already clearly specifi ed i n the LI, I , Prol. , 67, pp. 237-38; i n The
Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, ed. Martin Heidegger, tf. James S.
Churchill ( Bloomington, I nd. : I ndiana University Press, 1 97 1 ) , 2, pp. 27-28; and i n
"PRS," pp. 1 1 5-1 6. This di stinction, whi ch Husserl wi l l always j udge as deci sive, wil l
sti l l be underscored qui te frequently i n Experience and Judgment: Investigations in a
Genealogy of Logic, tf. from rev. ed. of Landgebe by Jaes S. Churchi ll and Karl
Ameriks ( Evanston: Northwestern Uni versity Press, 1 973)-hereafer cited as E
paricularly 1 , p. 1 1 ; i n FTL, in parti cular 1 02, p. 269; i n the eM, 37, pp. 75-76; and of
course in the Origin.
48
Jacques Derrid
sease.ta:eseetteaa.aaa,a:a|aac. ast.tat.eaeteeaea|ec
aace:
seeeaca:y ass..t.es aac .aia.te sec. eatat.eaa ne:
c.a| et
a.ea e:eatec tae e|]eet aese eidos .s cete:.aec|y tae .te:at.e
:ecaet.ea ue:ea,a.aea:e,e.a,te seetaattae:e. saes.|e:e
seasetetaeaest.eaeitae:.e:.tyeieae:ecaet.eaee:aaetae:
aac
aae:.,.aaactaas aasaea:ecai:stt.e .i cea|,eeetnea|e|,eets
eaaaetaaetae.:e:.,.aa||aee.aseetopos ouranios. uase:|a|:eacy
eaas.zec ta.s . ataeLogical Investigations, ae:e ae
c. seasseca
||
. cea|s.,a.ieat.easaace|]eets. ' 1ae. :a.ste:..ty.
tea. .s
eaeeitae.:
e.cet.eeeeaeats. aactae:e. saeeeae:etea.steoe. ty:a.aceeset
aeeessa:.| y. |. eate. a. tse|itae:eie:eaeeteaaEr
tmaltgkelf. wesa.c.
aeeata,e.taat.tea|c|e. ess.||eteSa|sttate.anothe iaetie:
taeaa. aeiaeteitaefrst time. uacea|tec| y natea|y.iother .saat
teaa|.iy esseaee aacaet e.:.ea| es. steeeas saa. re: amae
iaeta|:eacyaas.tsesseaeeasaa.aeiaetwa..a.|yem aetm,etae:
taaataeiaet.tse|i,ta. s.staetaes. seitaeaeaiet. e.::eaaty?itae
esseaee, ..saettaeiaetaa| .tyeiiaet|attaeseaseei iaet-tattaeat
a.eataeiaeteea|c aetaea:aac,.e:.seteaaycete:mt.eae:
c.seea:se . ~| :eacy. aeauasse:|:ete. a ra.|eseayasx. ,e:es
se.eaeetaat. ie:taeaeaeeae|e,.ea|sa|sat.ea} .aes. aa| a . s
ete:aa||y taeapeiron. raeaeeae|e,y eaa:eee,a.ze w.ta ?|,eet. e
a|.c.ty ea| yesseaeesaacesseat.a|:e|at.eas , 1 1 6 ,ec!ic}, . ae
e.ceat|yaace:steec|ys.a,a|a:.tyea|ytaeeaeaesseiiaeta.tsa:e
iaetaa|.ty aac aet taat ei tae e. cet.e s.a,a| a:.t. esceiaec mIde
s I
( 1 1 , 1 4, 1 5 .62-63 aac66-69) asa|t.ateate:.a|esseaeeswa..a.
` In its substantive form, this notion does not seem to have been employed b Husserl
himself. It is found i n place of the adverbial expression erstmalig in the transcnpt of the
Origin published by Fink in Revue Internationale de Philosophie ( 1 939), pp. 203-225:
Fink, who also italicizes erstmalig (p. 207), speaks of Erstamaligketsmous [po 208] and
thus gives a thematic value to a sigifcation aimed at by a profound mtentIon of Husserl .
` Cf. in particular I , 1 , 3 1 , p. 330. There Husserl completely condems i
,
n a latonic
manner those who, like the "sons of the earth, " can "understand by ' bemg (Sem) nlY
I b "
.
e "being" in the world of natural reality, and he simultaneously rejects rea emg, . . ;
h the hypothesis of the intelligible heaven. " They [the significaton] are not for t a reasn
objects which, though existing nowhere in the world, have bemg m a top ouramos or U
a divine mind, for such metaphysical hypostatization would b absurd.
49
I ntroductin to the Origin of Geometry
as x.eeea:aetes. ese|aceea|ye. :.ea|. ac. .caa| .ty .eai y iaetaa|
.ty " (Idees I, . 239, a 1 eit: , . . e .taetode ti ei|:atees.steaee 1ae
:e||eeiceeaceaeee:.aceeaceaee. eitae a|st:aete:eeae:ete
eaa:aete:eitaesee.cet.es..,a|a:.t. es . esec. aIdeas I i:etaeaet.eas
eitae1a.:cie,.ea|i aest.,at.ea..s:ea||ye:ec.meaatese| eaea
.teeaee:asa. ste:.ea|s.a,a|a:.t.es . aesee.:.ea|).:. saee:. e
c.ate|y :eseat . it eea|c |e sa.c taat tae e.cet.e aeaeeae|e,y ei
a.ste:y. aa.a,tet:eatea|ys.a,a|a:. t.esassaea . .s.aeaeseasetae
estceeaceataactaeesta|st:aeteise.eaees . nat. ae:se| y. s. aee
ee:ta.aaeae.:.ea|s.a,a|a:.t.es. asuasse:|says. eaa|eeeas. ce:ec.a
ee:ta.a:eseetsastaeesteeae:eteaacest.aceeaceat .s.aeetae
s.a,a|a:.t.es ei e:.,.as a:e taese ei .ast.tat.a, aets ei ee:y .cea|
s.,a.ieat.ea aac. .a a:t.ea|a:. ei tae ess.|.|.t.eseise.eaee aac ei
a.|eseay. taea tae.:a. ste:y .s tae est.aceeaceat. tae esteea
e:ete.aactaei:steise. eaees
i aceec.taetaeeeie. cet.es.a,a|a:.t.es. sa|:eacyt.es| . saeaea,a. a
Ideas I. ueee:. s.aeetaee|aetae:e. stae. aaeat| .ecese:.eaee
e:taeseas.||eta.a,e:ee.ecoriginaliter, s. a,a|a:iaetaa| .ty.sa|ays
:eseat . a|taea,a :ecaeec. te ,a.ce aac eeat:e| tae .ata.t.ea eitae
a|t. ateate:.a|esseaee. nat as seea as a. ste:.ea|c. staaee .s . ate:
esec. tae . aest.,at.eaeie:.,. asae |ea,e::eeeecs .a ta.s ay ~
ceet:.aeeitradition astaeetae:eia. ste:.ea|e:eet.eataea|eeees
aeeessa:y .t. sattaeeeate:eiThe Origin of Geometr.
Oa|yaace:taeseeeac.t.easeaauasse:|:.te ea:. ate:estsaa|||e
tae. aa.:y|aes.atetae este:.,.aa| sease .a a.ea ,eeet:yeaee
a:ese.as:eseatastaet:ac.t.eaei. ||eaa.a . e.aa. :e.atetaat
sease.aa.ea.taea:ec.aa. ste:yie:taei:stt. ewhich it must
have appeared ,ea:eaas. s} .eeataea,aesaeaeta.a,eitaei:st
e:eate:saaca:eaeteeaass. a,aite:tae ( 1 58 ec.iec}, .
ue:e.tae"in which it must have appeared" e|ea:|y:eea| suasse:| s
.ateat. eaaacsasataeseaseei ee:y:ecaet. ea1a. s"must " ,aae
aea:ec,a:|staeaeeess.tyae:eee,a.zecaact.e| ess| yass.,aec
teaastiaeteiaae.cet.e:e se:.t.eaaaceiaaa:.e:.ae: i eaa
state ta.s a|ae ei aeeess.ty .aceeaceat|y ei a|| iaetaa| ee,a.t.ea .
He:eee:. ta.s .s a cea||e aeeess.ty .t .s taat ei a Quod aac a
Quomodo, aaeeess.ty eihaving had a a.ste:.ea|origin aaceiaa.a,
aacsuch aae:.,.a.saeaaseaseeie:.,. a. nataa.::ecae.||ea.ste:.e. ty
.s:eee,a. zec.ataatta.s must" .saaaeaaeecea|yafter taeiaeteitae
eeat .i eea|caetceiaetaeaeeessa:yseaseaactaeaeeess.tyeitae
Thi s notion of "must , " of apriori requi si te, concerning H past is frequently util ized i n
the Origin. It marks the possibility of a recurrent structural determination i n the absence
50
Jacques Derrid
e:.,.a|eie:e,eemet:yasin fact |eoaac|eie:e.taac.a iaet|eea
,.veateme. ~|se|ate|yi:ee.ta:eseetteaa|.t,eveos. tae|a
ia| aesseisease. saeta.a,.a.tse|i
~|se. aacsecond, aateve:in fact taei:st:ecaeece:c.seeve:ec
,eemet:.ea|. cea|.t.ese:e . .t.sa priori aeeessa:ytaattaeyie||eec
i:em ase:teiaea,eemet:y. taattaey s:aa, i:emtae se.| ei:e
,eemet:.ea|ese:.eaee~aeaemeae|e,yeitaeese:.eaee.sess.||e
taaa|stea:ecaet.eaaacteaaa:e:.atecesec. meatat.ea
Third, aac | aa| |y. aeeve:in fact tae | :st ,eemete:s e:e . aac
aateve:in fact taeem. :.ea| eeateateitae.:aetsas . .t. sa pror
aeeessa:y taat tae esta||.sa.a, ,esta:es aac a sease . saea taat
,eemet:y . ssaeci:emtaemwith the sense as we now know it. re:. ei
eea:se . tae :eaet.vat.a,:ecaet.ea saesestae.te:at.ve:ecaet.eaei
taestat.eaacst:aeta:a|aaa| ys. s.a.eateaeaesa s eaeeaacie:a||aat
tae ,eemet:.ea| aeaemeaea .s aac aea .ts ess.|.| . ty .s eeast.
tatec. 1a.smeaas-|yaaeeess.tya.ea.sae|esstaaaaaaee.ceata|
aaceste:.e:iate-taatimaststa:t.ta:eacymace,eemet:y.saeaas
.t . s ae . ae. :ea|at.ea aac a.eai eaa a|ays aeaemeae|e,.ea||y
:eac..ae:ce:te,e|ae|ta:ea,a. taacaest.eataeseaseei.tse:.,. a.
1aas . |eta taaa|s te aac ces.te tae sec.meatat.eas . i eaa:este:e
a.ste:yte.tst:ac.t.eaa|c.aaaae.ty.uasse:|ae:esea|seiRuckfrage,
aaet.eaaecea|tea::eateaea,a .|ata.eaaeta|eseaasaa:aac
:ee.se sease. weaavet:aas|atec. t|yretur inquir (question en re
tour) . i.|e. tsCe:maasyaeaym.:eta:a.aa.:y,aacquestion en retour
ase| | .sma:|ec|ytaeesta|aace.ste|a:y:eie:eaeee::eseaaaee
eiaeemmaa.eat.eai:emac. staaee i.|eRuckfrage, :eta:a. aa. :y.s
as|ec ea tae |as.s eia i:st est.a,. r:em a :eee.vec aac already
:eaca||edocument, taeess.|.|.ty.seae:ecmeeias|.a,a,a.a.aacin
return, a|eattae:. me:c.a|aaciaa| .ateat.eaeiaataas|eea,. vea
me|yt:ac.t.ea.1ae|atte:.a.ea. seo|ymec.aey.tse|iaaceeaaesste
ate|eeemmaa.eat.ea. a,eae:a| .. staea.asuasse:|says. eea. te
eeat. aaec.aa.:y ( 1 58) .
1aeseaaa|e,.es. taemetaae:.ea|ieeaseiea:test. eeai:mataat
e.at.s:ea. :ectae"zigzag" ayei:eeeec.a,-a:eeeca:etaattae
of every material determi nati on. And if thi s apriori normativity of hi story is recognized
starting from the fact , after the fact, thi s after i s not the i ndication of a dependence. The
fact does not teach us through its factual content but as an example. It i s due to thi s
qfters own specifc character, in the necessity of preserving transcendence or reduced
factuality as clue , that the parti cular hi storicity of phenomenological di scourse is
announced.
51
Introduction to the Origin ofGeometry
Crisis :eesesas ase:teiaeeessa:y "circle "":l aaca.e|.s ea|yt|e
a:eie:meieve:ya.ste:.ea|ese:.eaee
xeta:a. aa. :y. tae:eaet.eaa:yaactae:eie:e:eve| at.eaa:ymeaeat
ei ta. s .ate:|ay ( Wechselspiel) , ea|c |e . m:aet.ea|| e .i,eemet:y
e:e esseat.a||y semeta.a, a.ea eeat.aaa||y e.:ea| atec as eemmea
ee.a.ataeva|.c.tyei.cea|.ty. tacea|t-c|y.aeme:etaaatae|. ste:y
ei.tst:aasm.ss.ea,:eaacstaeva|aeei,e|c.eaaaaye:c|ya.ste:y
,.vetae seaseeita.se.:ea|at.eaaseemmeaee.a. s.aee . ea tae eea
t:a:y. a. ste:y saeses. t xatae:. taema.ateaaaeeeita.se. :ea|at.ea
e:m.tstaeaeat:a| .zat.eaeie:|c|ya.ste:y. Neat:a| . zat.eataeaeeas
taesaeeie:aa.ateat.eaa|aac. at:.as.ea.ste:yeita. sve:ye.:ea|at.ea
aace:m.tstaeeem:eaeas.eaeiaeat:act.eaeit:ata.sess. ||e.a
,eae:a| . iasae:t.aatseemste|eeiatmest. me:taaeeteuasse:|.s
asmaeaaaee:at.ea,:eaet.vat.ea.tse|iastaea|.|.tyteeeaaa.ccea
a.ste:.ea| ie|c as tae aata:e eitaat ie|c .tse|i,astae ess.|.|.ty ei
semeta.a,| .|e:eaet.vat.ea
1aas ea|yaace:taeeeve:eistat.eaeaemeae|e,y s :ecaet.easeaa
ema|eetae:.aia.te|yme:e sa|t|eaacaaza:ceas :ecaet.eas. a.ea
y.e|c |eta tae s.a,a|a: esseaees ei . ast.tat.ve aets aac. .a tae.:
esem|a:ye|.taeae|eseaseeiaaeeaa. ste:y.a,eae:a| w.taeat
taeWechselspiel eita.s cea||e:ecaet.ea. tae aeaemeae|e,y eia.s
te:.e.tyea|c|eaaese:e.se. avaa.ty.asea|c|ea||aeaemeae|e,y.
iieta|eie:,:aatectaea.|esea.ea|aeaseaseeiaa:e|yem.:.ea|
a. ste:yaactae. meteaeeeiaaaa.ste:.ea|:at.eaa| .sm.taeae:ea|.ze
taese:.easaesseiaat.satsta|e
III
~||taese:eeaat.easaavemaceasseas.t.vete taeest:emec.mea|ty
ei tae tas| 1aas uasse: aace:see:es tae :e|.m. aa:y aac ,eae:a|
eaa:aete:eita. smec.tat.ea. aaseateaeea.eaaea:s|e::eece:c
` "Thus we fnd oursel ves i n a sort of circle. The understanding of the begi nni ngs i s to
be gained ful l y onl y by starting with science as gi ven i n its present-day form, looking back
at its development. But in the absence of an understanding of the beginnings the
development i s mute as a development ofsense. Thus we have no other choice than to
proceed forward and backward in a ' zigzag' pattern . . . " (91 , p. 58 [modifed]) .
[ Derrida puts the phrase "pas plus que I ' hi storie de sa transmi ssion ne fonde la
valeur de I ' or" in quotations . I have been unable to locate thi s phrase, and Professor
Derrida himself does not remember from what i t is taken. It might simpl y be an adapta
tion of the l ast phrase quoted from Ideas I on p. 43 above. ]
I
52
Jacques Derrida
ie: e:ci:emFormal and Transcendental Logic ,i at:ecaet.ea, . 6) :
1a. s :eta:a . aa.:y aaave.ca||y :ema.as .ta.a tae sae:e ei,ea
e:a|. t.es , |at , asesaa| | seeasee,taesea:e,eae:a| . t.esa.eaeaa|e
:.ea|yes|.eatec . . . " ( 1 58 , mec.iec},
Dea|t|ess, as a:.e:. cete:m.aat.ea, aeaemeae|e,y . | | aeve: |e
a||eteea:.eataese,eae:a| .t.es , aese.ac.,eaee.sesseat.a| .~actaey
.|| |e :.ea|yes|.eatec ea|y .aa:eseet.ve, :e,.eaa| , aac, .aa
ee:ta.a sease, naive sty|eeie:|. natta. saa.vet- ea|cae |ea,e:
aave tae sease .tasecte aavebefore tae sease.avest.,at.eaeitaese
,eae:a|.t.es . asease.avest.,at.eataatuasse:|te:msae:.t.e. smaac
a.ea.||aave a:e,a| at.veaacae:mat.ve va|aeie:ta. se:|. Cea
t.aaa||yea| | . a,as|ae|tetaeaaaet.eec:esaes.t.easeieve::eea:
:.a,:e||ems, sease.avest.,at.ea. | | |eeasi:ema|e::at.ea,ie:,et
ia|aess, aac . ::eseas.|.| .ty. ii se.eaee, .ta :ac.ea| :eseas.|. | .ty,
aas :eaeaec cee.s.eas, taey eaa .m:ess ea | .ie aa|.taa| ae:ms as
ve| .t.eaa||eats,as:ece|.aeatecie:ms.ta. aa.eatae.ac.v.caa|cee.
s.easea,at. aaayeaseteeeaiaetaemse| ves, aaceaaeeaiaetaem
se| vesseia:astaeseaa.ve:sa|cee. s.easaave|eeemeaetaa| | ya:e
:.atec. re:a:at.eaa|:aet.ee, taee:ya:.e:.eaa|eea|yace| .m.t.a,
ie:m..teaaea|y|aatieaees, taee:ess.a,eia.ea. ac.eatesa|sa:c.ty
e:a|e::at.ea (FTL, . 6) .
1ae | :st ei taese :ac.ea| ,eae:a| .t.es .s :ee.se|y taat a.ea aa
tae:. zestae:eta:a.aa.:y. taeaa.tyei,eem
a:1a. s.stae
a. ste:.ea|:eet.t.eaeitaeaest.eaeiO-]eet.v.tysei:eaeat|yas|ec.a
taeive|eeta:eseiThe Idea ofPhenomenolog: aeeaasa|]eet.v.ty,e
eatei. tse|i. ae:ce:teeaeeaate:e:eeast.tatetaee-]eet:
uasse:|aas. taea. :ev.s.eaa|| ya|sta.aec-eie:e tae a.ste:.ea|eea
teat eiErstmaligkeit ea|y te as| tae aest.ea ei .ts e-]eet. ieat.ea
[objectivation], . e . ei.ts|aaaea.a,.atea. ste:yaac.tsa.ste:.e. ty re:a
seaseaaseate:ec.atea.ste:yea|y.i.taas-eeeeaaa|se|atee-]eet.
Husserl had posed thi s question i n the same terms but in i ts most inclusive extension
and with a more cri tical , but less historical, infl exion i n FTL, 1 0, pp. 263-64. There,
however, i t is l i mited to the egological sphere of Objecti vity. Here it i s focused on the
possibi l ity of objecti ve spi ri t as the condition for history and i n thi s respect takes the
opposite vi ew to Di lthey' s questi on. Di l they, in efect, starts fom the already constituted
objective spi ri t . For hi m, what matters i s knowing how the signifcations and the values of
thi s objecti ve mi l i eu can be interiorized and assumed as such by i ndi vidual subjects-first
of al l in the hi stori an' s work on the basi s of testionies which are i ndi vidual in thei r origin
or object . Moreover, this question led Di lthey to di scover, like Husserl , a non
psychological di mensi on of the subject. Di lthey writes: "Now the followi ng question
ari ses: how a nexus which i s not produced as such i n a mind [tete], which consequently i s
not di rectly experienced and can no more be l ed back t o t he l i ved experi ence of a person,
how can it be constituted as such i n the historian on the basis of the statements of thi s
person or of statements made about t hi s matter'? Thi s presupposes that some logical
SUbjects, who are not psychological subjects, can be constituted" (Part I I I : "Plan der
Fortsetzung zum Aufau der geschi chtlichen Wel t i n den Geisteswi ssenschaften. En
twiirfe zur Kritik der hi storischen Verunf" [ "Plan for the Continuation of the Forma
tion of the Hi storical World in the Human Studi es. Sketches for d Critique of Historical
Reason"] , in Di l they' s Der Aufau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaf
ten, ed. Bernard Groethuysen, 2nd ed. (Stuttgart: B . G. Teubner and Gottingen: Van
denhoeck and Ruprecht, 1 958), Vol . 7 of Gesammelte Schriften, p. 282.
Thi s question i s "turned over" i n the Origin i n formulas which are strangel y si milar to
those of Di lthey. Thi s "reverse si de" of the question concers the radical origin and the
conditions of possi bil i ty for the objecti ve spirit itself. Afer the interconnections of sense
and the evidences of a monadic ego from which we cannot not start , de facto as wel l as de
j ure, how can an objecti ve spirit i n general be constituted as the pl ace of truth, tradition,
co-responsi bi l ity, and so forth? We wi l l see that, according to Husserl, a "logical "
subject wi l l no more be able to be responsible for such a possi bi l ity than could the
psychological subject .
'
64
Jacques Derrid
. . e , aa .cea| e|]eeta.ea, a:aces.ea||y, mastaave|:esea a|| tae
mee:.a,sa.easeea:ec.ttetaeem.:.ea|,:eaaceia. ste:y.1aeeea
c.t.easeiO|]eet.v.ty+:etaeataeeeac.t.easeia.ste:.e.ty.tse|i.
waeauasse:|ia:tae:eacevetesaie| .aestetae:ecaet.eaaac
ev.ceaeeei,eemet:.ea|seaseassaeaaac.tsea:ee:eeateat, ae
.||ce se ea|yafter aav.a, cete:m.aectae ,eae:a| eeac.t.eas ei . ts
O|]eet. v.ty aac eitae O|]eet. v.ty ei.cea| e|]eet.v.t.es 1aas. ea|y
retroactively aaceatae|as.sei. ts:esa|tseaae.|i am.aatetaea:e
sease eitae sa|]eet.ve :as. sa.ea aas ea,eace:ec ,eemet:y. 1ae
seaseeitaeeeast.tat. a,aeteaaea|y|ecee.ae:ec.ataee|eitae
eeast.tatece|]eet ~ac ta.saeeess.ty .saet aa este:aa|iate, |ataa
esseat.a|aeeess.tyei. ateat.eaa|.ty 1aeprimordial seaseeieve:y. a
teat.eaa|aet.sonly . tsfnal sease, . e ,taeeeast. tat.eaeiaae|]eet,.a
tae|:eacestseaseeitaesete:ms, 1aat. sayea|yate|ee|e,yeaa
eeaaaassa,e,aay|aestea:ctae|e,. aa.a,s
ii tae sease ei,eemet:.ea| sease .s O|]eet.v.ty e:tae .ateat.eaei
O|]eet.v.ty,.i,eemet:y.sae:etaeesem|a:y. acesei|e.a,se.eat.ie ,
aac.ia.ste:y.staea.,aestaacmest:eve|ate:yess.|.| .tyie:aaa.ve:
sa|a.ste:y,taeeeaeeteia.eaea|caetes.st.taeat.t, , taeatae
seaseeisease .a,eae:a| .s ae:e cete:m.aecasobject: as seme ta.a,
taat.saeeess.||eaacava.|a||e. a,eae:a|aaci:stie:a:e,a:ce:,aze
1ae e:|c|y .ma,e eigaze ea|caet|etae aaaet.eecmece| eitae
|aee:et.ea|att.taceeia:e eease.easaess|at , eataeeeat:a:y,ea|c
|e::e.tsseasei:emtaatatt.tace1a.s. sve:ymaea.aaeee:c.tatae
. a.t.a| c.:eet.ea ei aeaemeae|e,y tae e|]eet .a,eae:a| .s tae iaa|
eate,e:y eieve:yta.a, taat eaa aea:, . e , taat eaa |e ie: a a:e
eease.easaess .a ,eae:a| O|]eets .a ,eae:a|]e.a a|| :e,.eas te eea
se.easaess, taeUr-Region. 59
~| se. aeauasse:|am:ms taat asease :ecaet.ea mastaavefrst
:eseatec. tse|iasev.ceaee.ataee:seaa|eease.easaesseitae.avea
te:, aac aea ae asss tae aest.ea ei .ts subsequent ,.a a iaetaa|
ea:eae|e,.ea|e:ce:,e|]eet. ieat.ea.aee|.e.tsas.aceiiet.eacest.aec
te mase tae eaa:aete:.st.es ei .cea| O|]eet.v.ty :e||emat.e aac te
saetaat taeya:eaeta matte:eieea:se 1:a| y, tae:e. saeti:sta
sa|]eet. ve,eemet:.ea|ev.ceaeea.eaea|c taea |eeemee|]eet.ve
Ceemet:.ea|ev.ceaeeea|ysta:tstaememeat tae:e. s ev.ceaeeeiaa
. cea|e|]eet.v.ty.1ae|atte:.s saeaea|y aue:aav.a,|eeaat. ate
. ate:sa|]eet.vee.:ea|at.eaCeemet:.ea|es.steaee.saetsyea.ees. s
teaee .tceesaetes.stassemeta.a,e:seaa|.ta. ataee:seaa|sae:e
eieease.easaess . . t.s tae es. steaee eiaat .s O|]eet.ve|ytae:eie:
Cf. Ideas I. in particular 76, pp. 1 94-97.
65
Introductin to the Origin of Geometr
eve:yeae ,ie:aetaa|aacess.||e,eemete:s, e:taeseaeaace:staac
,eemet:y, i aceec, .t aas, i:em .ts :. ma| .ast.tat.ea, aa es.steaee
a.ea. seea| .a:|ysa:ateme:a|aaca.ea-eita. sea:eee:ta.a-.s
aeeess. ||e te a|| mea, i:st ei a|| te tae aetaa| aac ess.||e matae
mat.e.aaseia|| ee|es , a||a,es. aac ta.s . st:ae eia|| .ts a:t.ea|a:
ie:ms ( 1 60 mec.iec},
neie:eaacaue:masttaea|eaeat:a| .zec. atae.:iaetaa| . tyaac
asec .a aetat.ea ma:ss nat eaa e s.m|y :e|aee taem . ta tae
t.me|ess.iaac:ev.cectaateitaeeeac.t.eaeiess. |.| .ty:
1ae |aa,aa,e ei,eaes.s eea|c e|| seemiet.ve at ta. s e.at . tae
cese:.t.eaeiaay:ea|ceve|emeat,aeat:a| .zec.a:.ae.|e,ea|caet
ea||ie:. t, |at|:.a,.a,te|.,attaeie:ma|eeac.t.easeiess.|.| .ty,tae
ce]a:e .m| .eat.eas. aace.cet.e st:at.ieat.eascees ~:eeaettaea
cea|.a,.taa.ste:y:Deesta. saet:eta:aasteae|ass.et:aaseeaceata|
:e,:ess.ea: ~ac .s aet tae . ate:eeaaeet.a, eit:aaseeaceata| aeees
s.t. es , evea .inarrated aeee:c.a, te ae. tceve|es, at|ettemtae
stat.e. st:aeta:a| ,aacae:mat.veseaemaie:taeeeac.t.easeiaa.ste:y
:atae:taaaa.ste:y. tse|i:
Qaest.easeita.ss.acm.,atse:.eas|y. ma,ataeae|ee:.,.aa|.tyei
ta.s attemt nat. t seems taey :ema.a eats.ce uasse:| s .ateat.ea
uacea|tec|ytae:e.saet.ata. saccount tae|east,:a.aeia. ste:y.ie
aace:staac|ytaattaeiaetaa|eeateateiceve|emeat. nattaeaeees
s.tyeita. s:ecaet.eaaas|eea]ast.iecattaeeatset ~actaeaaaeyec
| etceaeitaeseaeea|c eseetuasse:| tete||taemwhat really
happened, tete||taemaste:y[leur raconte une histoire], eaa|e saa:
aac eas.|y.ma,.aa||e aeeve:, ta.sc. sae.atmeat.s . ||e,.t.mate.
uasse:|ea|y.saectecee.ae:.aacvaaeetaetesta. cceaaace:eve:y
em.:.ea|ste:ya|eata.eaeea| c|eea:.eas raetaa|a.ste:yeaa
taea |e ,.vea i:ee :e. a ae matte: aat .ts sty|e, . tsmeiaec, e:.is
philosophy, .t.||a|ays me:ee:|essaa.ve|ysaesetaeess.|.|.ty
aacaeeess.tyeitae.ate:eeaaeet.eascese:.|ec|yuas:| .uacea|i
ec|y taese .ate:eeaaeet.eas a:e a|ays ma:sec |y a ]a:.c.ea| aac
t:aaseeaceata| s.,a.ieat.ea, |attaey :eie: teconcrete aetslived .a a
unique systemei. ast. tat.a,.m|.eat.eas , . e ,.aasystemtaaiaas|eea
e:.,.aa||y:ecaeecea|yo:e-taat:ema.asce iaeie c ce]a:e,ir
reversible. 1aesetaeaa:e taeinterconnections-of aat.s, . ataen||est
seaseeitaee:c,histor itsel. 1aas, eeai:eat.a,aat.sta:eaaac
ta:ea,a aa.ste:.ea|acveata:e ,tae iaeteia.ea.s .ne|aeea||ei , a
60
Cf. in particular Tran-Duc-Thao, Phenomenoiogie, p. 221 . Following this interpreter,
"the subjectivist point of view" in The Origin ofGeometr would have prohibited Hus
serl from "going beyond the level of common sense remarks. "
66
Jacques Derrid
a:.e:. aac e.cet.e:eac.a,aac c.seea:se saea|c |e ess.|| e uasse:|
c.caet.aveatsaeaaess.|.| .ty. .tass.m|yc. se|esecasaat.m
| .e.t|yaasa| ayseeac.t.eaectaees.steaeeeitae.cea|e|]eetseia
a:ese.eaeeaactaaseiaa:e t:ac.t.ea. aaceeaseaeat| yeiaa:e
a. ste:.e.ty.taemece|eia.ste:y.a,eae:a|
Pure-interconnections-of a.ste:y.apriori-thought-of a. ste:y. ceesta. s
aetmeaataattaeseess.|. | .t. esa:eaet.ataemse| vesa. ste:.ea| :Netat
a|.ie:taeya:enothing but taees s.|.|.t.esoftaeaea:aaeeofa.ste:y
as such, eats.ce a.eatae:e .s aeta.a, u.ste:y.tse|iesta||. saes tae
ess.|.| .tyei.tseaaea:.a,
v
1a.sess.|.|.ty.s| :stea||ec"language. " iieas|ea:se| vesa|eat
taemaaae:.aa.eataesa|]eet.veev. ceaeeei,eemet:.ea|sease,a.as
.ts .cea|O|]eet.v.ty.emasti:staete taat.cea|O|]eet.v.tyaetea| y
eaa:aete:.zes,eemet:.ea|aacse.eat.iet:atas . .t.staee|emeatei| aa
,aa,e. a,eae:a| it. s:ee:teaae|ee| asseis.:.taa|:ecaetsei
taeea|ta:a|e:| c. te a.ea aetea| ya| | se.eat.ie ie:mat.eas aactae
se.eaeestaemse| ves |e|ea, |at a| se. ie: esam|e. tae ie:mat.eas ei
|. te:a:ya:t , | -mec.iec} ,
1a.smevemeat. saaa|e,easteaateaaa|yzecea:| .e:. tae.cea|
O|]eet.v.tyei,eemet:y. s| :st:eseatecasaeaa:aete:.st.eeemmeate
a|ie:msei|aa,aa,eaacea|ta:e.|eie:e. ts esem|a:y :.v. |e,e.s
ceiaec ia aa . me:taat aete . uasse:| see.ies taat tae |:eacest
eeaeet ei| . te:ata:e , i -, eem:. sesa| | . cea| ie:mat. eas . s. aee. . a
e:ce:te|esaea.taeymasta|ays|eeaa||eei|e.a,es:ess.||e. a
c.seea:se aac t:aas|ata||e . c.:eet|y e:aet. i:em eae| aa,aa,e .ate
aaetae:.iaetae:e:cs. .cea|ie:mat.easa:e:eetecea| y.a|aa,aa,e.a
,eae:a| .aet. ataeiaetaa| .tyei|aa,aa,esaactae.:a:t.ea|a:| .a,a. st.e
.aea:aat.eas
i t . s ta:ea,ataesetaemes. a|:eacy:eseat. ataeLogical Investiga
tions aactaei:stseet.easeiFormal and Transcendental Logic, taattae
ve:ysa|t|eaacsee.ie eaa:aete:eitaeuasse:|.aaaest.eaaea:s
1ae.cea|e|]eet. staea|se| atemece|ie:aaye|]eetaateve: .ie:
e|]eets .a ,eae:a| . ' it. sa|aysme:ee|]eet.vetaaa tae :ea| e|]eet.
6 I
This ideality of the object, i . e . , here, of the mathematical thing itself, i s not the
non-reality of the noema described i n Ideas I (especially 88, 97f. ) . The l atter charac
terizes the type of intentional i ncl usion of every noema i n conscious l i ved experience,
whatever the intended type of exi stent may be and however i t may be intended (even if
67
Introuctin to the Origin of Geometry
taaataeaata:a|es.steat re:.itae|atte::es.stse:eesesaayta.a,..t
ea|ca|ays|eaceiaeteem.:.ea|sa|]eet.v.ty1ae:eie:e .tae:ea|
e|]eeteaaaeve:atta.ataata|se| ateO|]eet.v.tya.eaeaa|e:eesec
ie:a||sa|]eet.v.ty.a,eae:a|.atae.ataa,.||e.ceat.tyei.tssease 1ae
aest.ea"how is any object in general possible? " assames.tssaa:est
aacmestaceaateie:m. taea. .ataeOrigin, aea uas se:| eace:s
"How is ideal Objectivity possible? " ue:e tae aest.ea a| seatta.as.|s
,:eatestc.mea| ty.s.aee:eeea:setetaeaata:a|O|]eet.v.tyeiae:|c|y
es.steat.sae|ea,e:ess.|| enes.ces .eaeeaav.a,:eaeaectae| eve|ei
.cea|O|]eet.v.ty.est.||eaeeaate:seve:a|me:ece,:ees
Necea|t|aa,aa,e. s tae:ea,a|ymaceaei.cea|e|]eet.v.t.es . ie:
esam|e. tae e:cLowe ,|.ea} eeea:s ea| yeaee .a tae Ce:maa | aa
,aa,e ..t. s.ceat.ea|ta:ea,aeat.ts.aaame:a|| eatte:aaees|yaay,. vea
e:seas, | - | mec.iec} ,
1aas. taee:co } aasaa.cea|O|]eet.v.tyaac. ceat.ty.s. aee.t. s
aet .ceat.ea| .ta aay ei. ts em. :.ea| . aeaet.e . e: ,:aa.e mate
:.a|.zat.eas it.sa|aystaesame e:ca.ea.smeaataac:eee,a.zec
ta:ea,aa||ess.||e| .a,a.st.e,esta:es i aseia:asta.s.cea|e|]eeteea
i:eats|aa,aa,eas saea.tae|atte:saesesaseataaeeasaeat:a|.za
t.eaeitaeiaetaa|es.steaeeeitaesea|.a,sa|]eet. eie:cs. aacei
taeta.a,ces.,aatecseeea[La parole], taea.. sea|ytae:aet.eeeiaa
. mmec.ate e.cet.e ~ac:- ce Ha:a|t aetes ve:y :ee.se| y taat tae
we are deal i ng wi th perception of a real thing) . However, there is no doubt that thi s
non-reality of the noema (a very difcult and deci si ve notion) may be what, in the last
anal ysi s, permits the repetition of sense as the "same" and makes the idealization of
identity i n general possible. Undoubtedl y, we coul d show this in a precise way on the
basi s of 62 of FTL, devoted to ' ' The I deali ty of All Species of Objectivities Over Against
the Constituti ng Consciousness" and the "universal ideality of all intentional unities"
(pp. 1 65-66).
tI2
The l i nguistic neutralization of exi stence is an original idea only in the technical and
thematic signifcation that phenomenology gives it. Is not this idea the favorite of Mal
larme and Valery? Hegel above al l had ampl y expl ored it. In the Encyclopedia ( one of the
few Hegel i an works that Husserl seems to have read) , the l i on already testifes to thi s
neutralization as an exemplary martyr: "Confronting the nae-Lion-we no longer
have any need ei ther of an intuition of such an animal or even an image, but the nae
(when we understand i t) i s i ts simple and imageless representation; in the name we thi nk"
(462) . (Thi s passage i s ci ted by Jean Hyppolite i n hi s Logique et existence: Essai sur La
logique de Hegel [Pari s: Presses Uni versitaires de France , 1 953] , p. 39, a work which , on
a great many points, lets the profound convergence of Hegelian and Husserlian thought
appear. )
Hegel also writes: "The frst act , by which Adam i s made master of the animal s, was to
i mpose on them a name, i . e . , he anni hi l ated them i n thei r existence ( as exi stents)"
( "System of 1 803- 1 804") . Cited by Maurice Blanchot i n La Part dufeu (Pari s: Gallimard,
1 949) , p. 325.
68
Jacques Derrida
"reduction is implicitly carried o.-s. m|ye:ie:mecaac aetyetmace
es|.e.t-asseeaas|aa,aa,e. seeas.ce:ecea.tseaaeeeaat
"|i'\
ue:e e a:e eeaeeec .ta tae e.cet.e :ecaet.ea. nat. a:aces.
ea||y.ie:ta.s:easea.tseemsme:ec.mea|ttesaytaatataea,ata.ea
mevesse|e|yeatae|eve|ei |aa,aa,e. saeeessa:. |y.ataeatt.taceeitae
phenomenological reduction ea: emaas. s} . .t . s set saa:e|y . a tae
e.cet.ee:|ceis.,a.aeat.ease:a:e| .vecese:.eaees
"|1
re:.itae aeaemeae|e,.ea|:ecaet.ea.s ta|ea .a.tsia||estsease. .t
masta| seeata.|tae:ecaet.eaeieeast.tatece. cet.esaactaeaei.tsea
|aa,aa,e 1ae:eeaat.eaeiaetat.eama:|sea| ysat.s| esta.s.m
e:at.ve.aaaea. veea|iasa.ea1a.st:aaseeaceata|:ecaet.eaeie.ce
t.es. a.ea.a.tsmest:ac.ea|memeatmastst.||ta:a as|ae|tea:ca
ae aac .::ecae.||y aeeessa:y e.cet.e . taat ei a:e eease.easaess.
e:eates .a eaeet seme eeas.ce:a||e c.mea|t.es uasse:| . s ve:y eea
se.easeita.saacaeesesestaesec.mea|t.es.tatae,:eateste|a:.ty
. aIdeas i.
1ae:eie:e . te tae ve:y esteat taat |aa,aa,e .s aet aata:a| . .t
a:aces.ea||y eae:s tae mest caa,e:eas :es.staaee te tae ae
aemeae|e,.ea| :ecaet.ea. aac t:aaseeaceata| c.seea:se .|| :ema.a
B:l The Idea of Phenomenology: Husser/ian Exemplarism, tr. Garry L. Breckon
(Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1 974) , p. 1 28.
`Ibid. [modifed] .
"Meanwhile we cannot disconnect transcendents indefnitel y, transcendental purif
cation cannot mean the disconnection of all transcendents, since otherwise a pure con
sciousness might i ndeed remain over, but no possbi lity [sic 1 of a science of pure con
sciousness" (Ideas I, 59, p. 1 59) . I n thi s section, devoted to the necessary but difcult
reduction of formal ontology and fonal logic once all the transcendents of the material
ei detics have been excluded, Husserl concludes in favor of the possibility of such a
reduction, provided the "logical axioms " are maintained, axioms (li ke the principle of
contradiction) " whose uni versal and absolute val idity" the description of pure con
sciousness could "make transparent by the help of examples taken from the data of its
own domain" ( p. 1 60) . But he says nothing about the language of this ultimate science of
pure consciousness, about the language which at least seems to suppose the sphere of
fonal logic that we j ust excluded. For Husserl, the univocity of expression and certain
precautions taken within and with the help of language itself (di stinctions, quotation
marks, neologi sms, revaluation and reactivation of old words, and so on) wil l always be
sufcient guarantees of rigor and nonworl dliness.
That is why, despi te the remarkable analyses which are devoted to it , despite the
constant interest i t bears (from the Logical Investigations to the Origin) , the specific
problem of language-its origin and i ts usage i n a transcendental phenomenology-has
always been excl uded or deferred. Thi s is explicitly so in FTL (2, p. 2 1 , and 5, p. 27)
and i n the Origin, where he has written: "we shall not go i nto the general problem which
also arises here of the origin of language i n i ts ideal existence and its exi stence in the real
world" ( 1 61 ) .
69
Introuctin to the Origin of Geometry
. ::ecae.||ye||.te:atec|yaee:ta.aam|.,aease:|c|.aess ny. ma,
.a.a,taattaeOrigin .|| | :st.ac.eatetaeess.|.| .tyeia. ste:yastae
ess.|.|.tyei|aa,aa,e.ea:eea|ea| at.a,aec.mea| t. seve:yattemt
te :ecaee ,.a seme a|t. mate aac :ac.ea| t:aaseeaceata| :e,:ess.ea a
aeaemeae|e,yeia. ste:.e.ty ~acseeaeeme:ee seeaee:ta.aaea
ceeaceaeeeeaa:mec.ataat aeaemeae|e,y
Thi s is a di fculty that Fink has frequently underscored (particularly in hi s famous
article i n Kantstudien of 1 933 [ "The Phenomenological Philosophy of Edmund Husserl
and Contemporary Cri ti ci sm"] ) . For hi m, the phenomenological reduction "cannot b
presented by means of simpl e sentences of the natural attitude. It can be spoken of only
by transforming the natural function of language" ( Letter of May 1 1 , 1 936, cited by
Gaston Berger, The Cogito in Husserl's Philosophy, tr. Kathleen McLaughl in [ Evanston:
Northwestern Uni versity Press. 1 972] , p. 49).
And i n his admirable lecture on " Les concepts operatoires dans la phenomenologie de
Husserl , " he attributes a certain equi vocation in the usage of operative concepts (that of
"constitution, " for exampl e) to the fact that "Husserl does not pose the problem of a
'transcendental language. ' " He wonders if, after the reduction, one can sti l l "have at hi s
di sposal a Logos i n the same sense as before" (i n Husserl, Cahiers de Royaumont, p.
229) .
Si mi larl y, concerning the expression "intentional life, " S. Bachelard evokes the
danger of " a surreptitious return to psychologi sm. " for " language does not know the
phenomenological reduction and so holds us in the natural attitude" (A Study of HusserI' s
Logi c, p. xxxi ) .
On the basis of the problems i n t he Origin, we can thus go on t o ask oursel ves, for
example , what i s the hi dden sense, the nonthematic and dogmatically received sense of
the word "hi story" or of the word "origin"-a sense which. as the common fous of
these signifi cations, permits us to di sti nguish between factual "hi story" and intentional
"hi story, " between "origin" i n the ordinary sense and phenomenological "origin, " and
so on. What i s the uni tary ground starting from whi ch this difraction of sense is permitted
and i ntelligible? What i s history, what i s the origin, about which we can say that we must
understand them sometimes in one sense, sometimes in another? So long as the notion of
origin in general i s not criticized as such, the radical vocation i s always threatened by thi s
mythology of the absolute beginning, so remarkably denounced by Feuerbach in hi s
"Contribution to the Critique of Hegel ' s Phi losophy" ( 1 839) ( cf. Maniestes
philosophiques, tr. L. AIthusser [Pari s: Presses Uni versitaires de France . 1 960] , pp.
1 8-2 1 ) .
These questions can show the need for a certain renewed and rigorous phi lological or
"etymological" thematic, which would precede the discourse of phenomenology. A
fonidable task, because it supposes that all the problems which it would have to precede
are resolved, in particular, as a matter of fact : the i nterloutory problem of history and
that of the possibility of a hi storical philology. I n any c
a
se, this task never seems to have
appeared urgent to Husserl , even when the i dea of l i ngui stic "reactivation" takes on so
much importance for him. Unlike Heidegger, he almost never indulges in etymological
variations, and when he does so (cf. FTL, 1 , pp. 1 8-1 9) , it does not detenine but
fol l ows the orientation of the i nvestigation. For Husserl , it would be absurd for sense not
to precede--e jure (and here the de jure i s difcult to make clear rune evidence
difcile D-the act of language whose own value wi l l always b that of expression .
It is rather signifcant that every critical enterpri se, juri di cal or transcendental, is made
70
Jacques Derrid
na||ae e:c s ce,:ee ei. cea| O|]ee|.v.|y .s ea| y. e eea|c say.
primar. Oa|y.|a.aa iae|ea.s|e:.ea| |aa,aa,e . s|ae aeaa"Lowe"
i:ee. aac |ae:eie:e . cea| . eema:ec . |a . |s seas. ||e. aeae|.e . e:
,:aa.e.aea:aa|.eas . na|.|:ema. asessea|.a||y|.ec.asaCe:maae:c.
|e a :ea| sa|.e|eme:a| .|y .| :ema.as . a|e::e|a|ec .a . |s ve:y .cea|
O|]ee|.v.|y .|a |ae ce iae|e es.s|eaeeeia,.vea |aa,aa,e aac |aas
.|a|aeiae|aa|sa|]ee|.v.|yeiaee:|a.asea|.a,eemmaa. |y i|s. cea|
O|]ee|.v.|y.s|aea:e|a|.veaacc.s|. a,a. saa||eea|yasaaem. :.ea|iae|
i:em|aa|ei|ae r:eaeae:a,| .sae:c lion. "
1ae:eie:eee:ess. a|eaa.,ae:ce,:eeei. cea|O|]ee|.v.|y-|e|as
ea||. | secondar-as seeaaseassi:em|aee:c| e|aeaa.|yei|ae
sease "lion, " i:em "the expression" |e aa| uasse:| ea| | s .a |ae
Logical Investigations |ae "intentional content" e: |ae aa. |y ei . |s
s.,a.iea|.ea. 1aesame eea|ea|eaa|e. a|eacecs|a:|.a,i:emseve:a|
vulnerable by the irreducible factuality and the natural naivete of its language. We be
come conscious of this vulnerability or of this vocation to silence in a second reflection on
the possibility of the jurdico-transcendental regression itself. Despite its necessarily
speCUlative style, this refection is always focused, without having to succumb to empiri
cism, on the world of culture and history. Attentiveness to the "fact" of language in
which ajuridical thought lets itself be transcribed, in which juridicalness would like to be
completely transparent, is a retur to factuality as the de j ure character of the de jure
itself. It is a reduction of the reduction and opens the way to an infnite di scursiveness.
This explains why the retur on itself of thought which has never wanted to prescribe
anything but a turning back [rep/i]
t
oward its own proper conditions remains more dif
fcult for the "master" than for the "disciple. " Did not Herder. in his Verstand und
Erfahrung: Eine Metakritik zur Kritik der rein en Verunft [Leipzig, 1 799; rpt. Bruxelles:
Culture et Civilisation, 1 969, 2 vols. ] . already reproach Kant for not taking into consid
eration the intrinsic necessity of language and its immanence in the most apriori act of
thought? Did not the author of the Essay on the Origin of Language [tr. Alexander Gode
in On the Origin of Language (New York: Frederick Ungar, 1 966)] also conclude that
language, rooted in cultural experience and in history, made all aprioriness of s ynthetic
judgments impossible or illusory? The inability of received language to be treated themat
ically, an inability which precedes every critical regression as its shadow-is not the
unavowed dogmatism he thus denounces that geschichtlose "Naivitit" about which
Fink wonders whether it i s not the basis for "phenomenology' s methodological revolu
tion" (cf. "L' Analyse intentionnelle et Ie probleme de la pen see speculative" [French tr.
Walter Biemel and Jean Ladriere] , in Problemes actuels de La phenomenologie, ed. H. L.
Van Breda [Pari s: Desclee de Brouwer, 1 952], pp. 64-65)? That i s only one of the
numerous analogies which could be taken up between the diferent futures of Kantian and
Husserlian transcendental idealisms, such as they are already outlined. Thus, in any
case, an irreducible proximity of language to primordial thought is signified in a zone
which eludes by nature every phenomenal or thematic actuality. Is this immediacy the
nearess of thought to itself? We would have to show why that cannot be decided.
Vol . I , Introd. to Vol. I I of the German ed. , 5, and 1 , 1 1 , particularly pp. 259 and
284-85. Like those of FTL, the analyses concering linguistic ideality in the Origin
71
Introduction to the Origin of Geometry
|aa,aa,es. aac. |s .cea| .cea|.|y assa:es . |s|:aas|a|a|.|.|y 1a. s. cea|
.cea|.|yeiseasees:essec|y| .ea.leo, Lowe, aacseie:|a ..s|aeai:eec
i:ema||iae|aa| linguistic sa|]ee|.v. |y.
na| |ae "object" itsel . s ae.|ae: |ae es:ess.ea ae: |ae sease
eea|ea| 1ae resa aac ||eec |.ea. . a|eacec |a:ea,a |e s|:a|a ei
. cea|.|.es. . saaa|a:a| .aac|ae:eie:eeea|.a,ea| .:ea| .|y.as|aee:ee
|.eaei|ae. mmec.a|e| y:esea|seas.||e|a. a,,:eaacs.cea|.|.esaace:
|aesee.:eamsiaaees. se|aeeea|.a,eaeyei|ae| .ea. s,e.a,|e:eve:|e:
a|e . a |ae . cea|.|y ei|ae es:ess. ea aac .a | aa| ei . |s sease. 1ae
|:aas|a|a|.|.|yei|aee:clion, |aea. . ||ae|. a:.ae.|e|ea|se|a|e
aacaa.ve:sa| i|.|||eem. :.ea|| yeeac.|.eaec|y|aeeea|.a,ea|ea
eeaa|e:. aa:eee|.ve. a|a. | .eaeiseme|a. a,| .|e|ae| .ea.1ae|a||e:. s
ae|aae|]ee|. v. |yei|aeaace:s|aac.a,. |a|aa e|]ee|ei:eee|.v
.|y 1ae .cea| . |y ei . |s sease aac eiaa| .| eve|es .::ecae.||y
acae:es|eaaem.:.ea|sa|]ee|.v.|y.1a. sea|c|e|:aeevea.ia||mea
aac|eea a|| e|e aaceea|cin fact eaeeaa|e:aacces.,aa|e |ae |.ea.
uace:|aese e.:eams|aaees|ae | .e |eaceiae|eaa|a:ee|e,.ea| ,ea
e:a|.|yea|cae||e:ecaeecaayia:|ae:1a.s. s|eeaase|ae.cea|.|yei
sease.eeas.ce:ec. a. |se|iaac| .|e|aa|ei| aa,aa,e. .sae:ea"bound"
directly suppose the subtle as well as indispensable distinctions found in the LI (nos. 1-5) ,
especially in the first and fourth Investigations.
In the First Investigation, the notion of " intentional content" or "unity of its significa
tion" announces in the linguistic sphere the notion of "noematic sense, " or the " nuclea
tic layer" (Kernschicht) of the noema, a notion the former implies and which is fully
elaborated only in Ideas I (in particular, cf. 90, pp. 241 f. ). Just as the core unity of
noematic sense (which is not the reality of the object itself) can be intended according to
various intentional modes (the sense "tree" can be attained in a perception, a memory,
an imagining, and so on) in order fnally to constitute a "complete" noema with all its
characteristics, so the ideal identity of signifi cation is made accessible to several lan
guages and allows itself to be "translated. " In the Foreword to the 2nd edition of LI
( 1 91 3 ; p. 48 of Vol. I of ET) , Husserl recognizes that the notion of noema and of the
noetic-noematic correlation lacks completion in the First Investigation.
Husserl used a great number of examples when analyzing this distinction for the fi rst
time i n the LI (I, 1 , particularly 1 2, pp. 286-87).
The diference between these two types of Objectivity, which comes back to the
diference between ideal objectivity and real object, is amply described in E (63 , pp.
250t. ) . The objectivities of the understanding are on a "higher level" than those of
receptivity. They are not preconstituted, like the latter, in the pure passivity of sensible
receptivity, but in predicative spontaneity. "The mode of their original pregivenness is
their production in the predicative activity of the Ego . . . " [po 25 1 ] . Another diference:
that of their temporality (64). Whereas the real object has its individual place in the
objective time of the world, the irreal object i s, with respect to this latter, tot
.
lly free,
i . e. , "timeless. " But i ts timelessness (ZeitLosigkeit) or i ts supratemporality ( Uberzeit
lichkeit) is only a "mode" of temporality: omnitemporality (Allzeitlichkeit).
7
Jacques Derrid
.cea|.|yaacae|a"free" eae 1a. sc. ssee.at.ea|e|eea"free idealities"
aac"bound idealities, " a.ea.sea|y. m|.ec.ataeOrigin70 ,|a|. ac.s
easa||e ie: .ts aace:staac.a, . eaa||esas |eeem:eaeac aa| tae
a|se| a|e .cea|O|]eet.v.tyei. ie:esam|e. tae,eemet:.ea|e|]eet eaa
|eaacaatc.s|.a,a.saes.|i:em|aatei|aa,aa,eas such aaci:em|aat
ei|ae seaseeeateatas such.
1ae.cea|O|]eet.v.|yei,eemet:y.sa|se|a|eaac. |aeataay|.acei
|. m.|its.cea| . tytertia. sae|ea,e:ea| y|aa|ei|aees:ess.eae:.a
teat.eaa|eea|eat ..|. s|aa|ei|aeobject itself. ~| |acae:eaee|eaay:ea|
eea|.a,eaey.s:emevec1aeess. |. | .tyeit:aas|a|.ea. a.ea.s.ceat.
ea| .|a taateit:ac.t.ea. . seeaecad infnitum: 1ae ry|aa,e:eaa
taee:em..aceeca||ei,eeme|:y.es.s|sea|yeaee. aema||e:aeeuea
e:evea.aaa||aa,aa,e.|may|ees:esseci | .s. cea|.ea||ytaesame
.atae e:.,.aa||aa,aa,e eiae| . caac.aa|| |:aas|at.eas .aac. ta.a
eaea|aa,aa,e.t.sa,a.a|aesame. aemat|e:aemaay|. mes. | aas
|eeaseas.||yatte:ec.i:emtaee:.,.aa|es:ess.eaaac:.t.a,ceate
|ae .aaame:a||ee:a|a|te:aaeese::. ||eaaac etae:ceeameata|.eas
(Dokumentierungen) " , | -
1ae sease eiea|yeaee e:eieaee aac ie: a| | . wa.ea .s |ae
esseat.a|meceeitaee|]eet s. cea|es. s|eaeeaactaas|aata.eac.s
| .a,a.saes |ae e|]eeti:em taema| t. |.e.ty ei:e|atec aetsaac|. vec
ese:.eaees. seemsteaave|eeae|ea:|yceaaec.ataeseve:yte:ms|y
ue:|a:|(Pschologie als Wissenschaft, i i . i :. 1 75) aacta|eaa
a,a.a|yuasse:| .1ae|atte:.:eee,a.z.a,taataeeesmaea|eue:|a:t
aac:a.s.a,a.mie:aav.a,c.st. a,a. saec|e|te:taaakaat|e|eea|ae
` From the perspective of our text, this dissociation fi nds its most direct and illuminat
ing explication in E (65, p. 267). In particular, we can read there: "Thus it appears that
even cultural systems are not always completely free idealities, and this reveals the
diference between free idealities (such as logicomathematical systems and pure essential
structures of every kind) and bound idealities, which in their being-sense carry reality
with them and hence belong to the real world. All reality is here led back to spatiotempo
rality as the form of the individual . But originally, reality belongs to nature : the world as
the world of realities receives its individuality from nature as its lowest stratum. When
we speak of truths, true states of afairs in the sense of theoretical science, and of the fact
that validity 'once and for all' and 'for everyone' belongs to their sense as the telos of
j udicative stipulation, then these are free idealities. They are bound to no territory, or
rather, they have their territory in the totality of the [mundane] universe and in every
possible universe. In what concers their possible reactivation, they are omnispatial and
omnitemporal. Bound realities [the German and Derrida' s translation thereof reads:
Bound idealities] are bound to Earth, to Mars, to particular territories, etc. " (Husserl ' s
emphasis) . Husserl immediately specifes, however, that by their "occurrence, " by their
coming on the scene and their " 'being discovered' " in a historically determined territory,
free idealities are also factual and worldly. Thus he states the crucial difculty of all his phi
losophy of history: what is the sense of this last factuality?
73
Introduction to the Origin of Geometry
|e,.ea|aac|aesyeae|e,.ea| . :e:eaeaesa. m. aeaetae| ess. ie:aav.a,
eeaiasec.cea|.tyaacae:ma|.v.|y(LI, i . r:e| . 59, : | --i s
1a.s :e:eaea . s ve:y ea|.,atea.a,. s.aee a|se|a|e|y e|]ee| .ve.
|:aas|ata||e. aac t:ac.|.eaa| .cea| .ceat.|y .s ae|]as|aay,eemet:.ea|
e|]ee|.v.|y. |a|genuine e|]ee|.v.ty Oaee e ,et |eyeac |ae |eaac
.cea|.t. es aac :eaea .cea| e|]eet.v.ty .tse|i. e eaa st.|| eaeeaate: a
iae|aa| :es|:.et.ea . |aa| ei c.sva|ae . ia| seaess. e: catecaess
[eremption] . Necea|t|aee|]eet.veseaseeiaia| se] ac,mea|. sa| se
.cea| re:|a.s:easea.teaa|e.ace| a.|e|y:eeatecaac|aas|eeemes
ema.teme:a| 71 nat|ae e:.,.aaac |ae ess.|. |.|yei|a. s.cea|ema.
|eme:a|.ty:ema.ama:|ec|yaiaetaa|eea|.a,eaey.taa|eitae:ea|.|y
.a|eacec |y |ae]ac,mea| e: taat ei sa|]ee|.ve ae|s 1aas . .a ce
se:.t.ve]ac,mea| s|ea:.a,eae:|c| y:ea| .|. es. seaseeaa|ese .|sva
|.c.ty.|aea|s.ma|taaeeas|y| es.a,.|sema.teme:a|.cea| .ty re:.|e
|a|eauasse:| sesam|ea,a. a. I eaa.ace| a.|e| y:eea|.astaesame,
tae :ees.t.ea 1ae aa|eme|.|e .s |ae iastes| meaas ei t:ave| .
ae:easi|ae. || e|eia| seaaceateica|e 1aeaaaea:eayeiva|. c. ty
.aaeayaaee|stae.ateme:a|.|y[uchronie] e:aa|eme:a| .|y[an
chronie] ei .cea|.ty i.|e.se. .a tae .a|e:eeaaee|.eas ei a aea
cese:.|.vese.eaee saeaas,eemet:y. e::e:a| se aas a eeateat a.ea
eaa |eeeme .cea| aac ema. |eme:a| ,e::e: :esa||s e.tae: i:em tae
' Once again it is in Experience and Judgment that the omnitemporality of simple
ideality is scrupulously distinguished from the omnitemporality of validity : " Furthermore,
it should be noted that this omnitemporality does not simply include within itself the
omnitemporality of validity. We do not speak here of validity, of truth, but merely of
objectivities of the understanding as suppositions [Vermeinheiten] and as possible, ideal
identical, intentional poles, which can be ' realized' anew at any time in individual acts of
judgment-precisely as suppositions; whether they are realized in the self-evidence of
truth is another question. A judgment which was once true can cease to be true, like the
proposition 'The automobile is the fastest means of travel , ' which lost its validity in the
age of the airplane. Nevertheless, it can be constituted anew at any time as one and
identical by any individual in the self-evidence of distinctness: and, as a supposition, it
has its supratemporal. irreal identity" (64 C , p. 26 1 [modifed)) . Also cf. LI. I. I , I I , p .
285.
In the Origin Husserl also alludes to the ideal identity of judgments which not only
would be anachronistic in their validity but also contradictory and absurd in their sense
content. These analyses, at the same time that they announce and orient a phenomenol
ogy of the specific ideality of negative validities (of the fal se , the absurd, the evi l , the
ugly, etc. ) , assign limits to the "freedom" of those idealities which will always be, as we
wiII soon try to show, idealities "bound" to an empirical, determined temporality or to
some factuality. For what absolutely frees and completes the ideality of sense (alrady
endowed in itself with a certain degree of "freedom") is the ideality of positive validity
(by which evidence is not only distinct but clear when it reaches judgment) . It alone
causes sense to attain infi nite universality and infinite omnitemporality.
74
Jacques Derrid
|e,.eececaet.veaaac|.a,eisym|e|sa.eaa:eve.ceitae.:seaseaac
. ate a.ea. aa|aeate as. a seas.||e iaetaa|.ty . s :e.at:ecaeec. e:
i:em semesyeae|e,.ea|eeat.a,eaeyaav.a,ae sease . aeema:.sea
.ta,eemet:.ea|t:ata, 1aeeeateateie::e:eaa |eeeme saea evea
aea ,. a e::e: e: assamt.ea, . eaee tae st:ata ei a|:eacy ceiaec
. cea|.t.es . st:ave:sec. e aave aet:eaeaectaet:ataei,eemet:.ea|
Sachverhalt, 72 aaceveaaeataeve:ytaemeeitaestatemeat:ema.as
|eaacteiaetaa| .ty1ae.cea| .tyeiseasesym|e|.ea||yatsa.taa
ce| acec e: . aaataeat.ea||y sat. siec t:ata. ateat.ea7:; it ie||es.
taea.taat. itaeema.teme:a|.tyeic.sva|ae. sess.||e.. t. sa|ays. a
taeseaseeiem.:.ea| ess. |. |.ty. . e . eieeat.a,eateveataa| .ty ne
s.ces. ema.teme:a|.ty. sma.ata.aec. a. tseventualit ea|y|yasease
a.eaa|ays |ees aaee:ta.aesseat.a|:e|at.ea.tataea|seate:
eseeecect:ata.1a.s.s|eeaasei|aetaatsaeaaaeatcatec:ees.
t.eahad been true aacst.||:ema.asaa.iecaacaa. matec|yaa. ateat.ea
eit:ata. aataeat.e.ty. e:e|a:.tyk|.|e, taesete:msa:e .aee:
ta.a:eseetssyaeaymsie:uasse:|taatieaama.ata.aaac:eeattae
.cea| aa.tyei.ts sease ~aeveataa||yabsurd intention, a|sa:c .atae
seaseeiaeaseasee:eeaate:sease . te|eaat.t. s. masteeat.aa
a||ye.at,.as.teei. tse|ntea:ctaetelos eiaataeat.e.tyaac|et.tse|i
|e,a.cecsym|e|.ea||y|y.t. ataeve:y,esta:e.aa.eatae.ateat.ea
:eteacste|ec.se:.eatec.1a.s.ateat.eamast,. ataea:ye|e.aa| aa
,aa,ea.eataeStranger eitaeSophist sea|s, eaate [dire] tae
telos . ae:ce:tec.sea[de dire ] .t
1a.s t:aas,:ess.ea ei |.a,a. st.e . cea|.ty. taea. :ea||y cese:.|es a
mevemeataaa|e,easteaateea:|.e:cese:.|ec se. eaeeasaea|
to:a|ie:m. |at.ts a:eess.|.|.tyaea:ecastaea:eess.|.|.tyei
` A notion difcult to translate other than by the clumsy, strange, and l ess exact (but
for so long accepted) expression "state-of-afairs. "
`` I n the LI, I . 1 , 1 1 , pp. 285-86, these themes are already greatly explicated. For
example, Husserl writes: "What my assertion asserts, the content that the three perpen
diculars of a triangle intersect in a point, neither arises nor passes away. (The frst
German edition and the French translation continue: " Each time I (or whoever else it
may b) pronounce with the same sense this same assertion, there i s a new judgment .
. . . But what they judge, what the assertion says, is all the same thing. "] It is an identity
in the strict sense, one and the sae geometrical truth.
" It i s the same in the case of aB assertions, even if what they assert is false and absurd.
Even in such cases we distinguish their ideal content from the transient acts (of] afrming
or asserting it: it i s the sigifcation of the assertion, a unity in pluraity. . . .
"If ' possibility' or ' truth' is lacking, an assertion' s intention can only be carried out
symbolically: it cannot derive any 'fulness' from intuition or frm the categorial functions
performed on the latter, in which 'fulness' its value for knowledge consists. It then lacks,
as one says, a ' true' , a 'genuine' signifcation. Later we shall look more closely into this
distinction between intending and fulflling signifcation" (modifed] .
75
I ntroductin to the Origin ofGeometry
ea|ta:e ea| y aue: a :ecaet. ea ei eve:y ce iaete ea|ta:e se ae:e
se. aee. s. |.|e |aa,aa,es aac |aa,aa,e .a,eae:a| . eae eitae ie:ms
ei . cea|
ietei|aa,aa,e.a,eae:a| . 1aasuasse:|see.aes.aaaa|se|ate|y
ce..s.veseateaee nattae. cea|.t. esei,eemet:.ea|e:cs seateaees
taee:. eseeas. ce:ec a:e|y as |.a,a.st.e ie:mat.eas-a;e aet ta
.cea|.t
ete.wae:eve:semeta.a,.sasse:tec.eaeeaac.st.a,a.saaat. s
taemat.e . taat a|eat a.ea .t . s sa. c ,.ts sease, . i:em tae asse:t.ea
a.ea .tse|i.ca:.a,taeasse:t.a,.. saeve:aaceaaaeve:|etaemat.e
~ac tae taemeae:e .s :ee.se|y.cea|e|]eet.v.t.es. aac a.tec.ae:eat
eaes i:em taese eem.a, aace: tae eeaeet ei |aa,aa,e ,| - |
,mec.iec} ,
iet as i:staete taat .a ta. sseateaeetaeseaseeitaeasse:t.ea tae
: taeea|eata.ea , semeta.a,}.ssa.c. aactaee|]eet. tse|f a:e
.ceat.ea| .aiaeta.eaeea|caeve::esa|t.ataeeaseei:ea|e|]eetse:ei
: |eac .cea| e|]eet.v.t.es re: tae i:st t.me. . ta tae a|se|ate
. cea|.ty ei aa e|]eet-tae ,eemet:.ea| e|]eet a.ea . s ta:ea,a aac
ta:ea,aea|ytaeaa.ty ei.ts t:ae sease-e ass |eyeace::.cea:
se|veseitae. cea| .|atst.|||eaac. O|] eet.v.tyei|aa,aa,ewes.ma|
taaeeas|yeae? aO|]ee. v.tytaat. sa|se|ate|yi:ee.ta:eseettea||
iaeaa|
s|,eet.v.ty1aat.saytaeesem|a:yaest.eaeitaee:.,.aei
O|,eet.v.tyee|c
a
]a:. c.ea|aact:aaseeaceata|ceeaceaee. Necea|t,eemetnea|t:ata. s
|eyeac eve:y a:t.ea|a: aac iaetaa| | . a,a.st. e ae|cassaea. eae ie:
a.eaeve:ysa|]eetsea|.a,acete:m.aec|aa,aa,eaac|e|ea,.a,tea
77
I ntroduction to the Origin of Geometry
cete:m.aecea|ta:a|eemmaa.ty.s. araet:eseas.||e.nattaeO|]eet.v
.tyeita. st:ataeea|cnot |eeeast.tatecwithout taepure possibility eiaa
.aa.:y.ateaa:e|aa,aa,e.a,eae:a| w.taeatta. sa:eaacesseat.a|
ess.|.|.ty. tae,eemet:. ea|ie:mat.eaea|c:ema.a.aera||eaacse| .
ta:y. 1aea.t ea|c |eabsolutely bound to the psychological lie of a
factual individual, tetaateiaiaetaa|eemmaa.ty..aceecteaa:t.ea|a:
memeateitaat|.ie. itea|c|eeemeae.tae:ema.teme:a| .ae:.ate|
|.,.||e ie:a| | . .tea|c aet|eaat.t. s. waetae:,eemet:y eaa|e
seeaa|eat.saet . taea. taeext:.as.eaacaee.ceata|ess.|. |.tyeia
ia|| . ate tae |ecy eiseeea e:eia s| . .ate a a. ste:.ea| mevemeat.
seeea. sae|ea,e:s. m|ytaeex:ess.ea(Aiisserung) eiaat.w.taeat
.t. ea|calready |eaa e|]eet eaa,ata,a.a.a. ts:.me:c.a|a:.ty.
seeeaconstitutes tae e|]eetaac .s a eeae:ete]a:.c.ea| eeac.t.ea ei
t:ata.1aea:acex.staat..taeattaeaa:eatia|||ae|.ate|aa,aa,e
aactae:e|y. atea. ste:y.aia||a.eaea|ca|.eaatetae.cea|a:.tyei
sease.seaseea|c:ema.aaaem. :.ea|ie:mat.ea.m:.seaecasiaet.a
asyeae|e,.ea|sa|]eet.v.tythe inventor' s head. u.ste:.ea|.aea:aa
t.easetsi:eetaet:aaseeaceata| ..asteacei|.ac.a,. t 1a. s|astaet.ea.
taet:aaseeaceata| . masttaea|e :etaea,at
Deesta.sa|t.mate:ecaet.ea.a.eaeeaseateat:aaseeaceata||aa
,aa,e.:eve|at.ea.zeuasse:| staea,at:Dees ta. s:eta:atetaesea|
. a,sa|]eetasaateeast.tatestae.cea|e|]eet.aactaeaa|se|ateO|
]eet. v.ty. :eeeec te eeat:ac.et a :ev.eas a. |eseay ei|aa,aa,e:
He:|eaareatysea|seia st:.|.a,eeat:ast.ata.s:eseet|eteea
taeOrigin eataeeaeaaacaactaeLogical Investigations eataeetae:
73 According to the same movement, omnitemporality and universal intelligibility (al
though they may be concrete and experienced as such) are only the reduction of
f
e|]eet i:em a|
sa|
,eet. .ty aaca|| em.:.ea| |aa,aa,e. |ea e
ia
.ea
at.eas?ia
a:e
| e,.e nattae:eta:atetae:. me:c.a|.tyeitaeseasm,sa|,eet.ae
me:e . a eeat:ast .ta ta.s i:st a:eea te |aa,aa,e
taa
ta
. cea| . smeiIdeas I . s. asastaea,at. .tataeaa
:eat
|,.e. sm
e: :ea| . sm eitaeLogical Investigations. 1aeaest.ea .. |yte
a:eataes.zeeeast.tatec|aa,aa,e.a.ea.satuasse|
eeamaeste
ce .a Formal and Transcendental Logic and m tae Orzgl n, m e:ce:.
sa|seaeat| y. te |et tae e:.,.aa| .ty eieeast.tat.e |aa,aa,e eemete
|.,at
i 1econstitute aa.cea|e|]eet.steat.tattaee:maaeatc. e.t.ea ?
aa:e ,aze Ne. |eie:e |e.a, tae eeast.tatec aac eseeecc as.
|
.a:y eiaaaet a.ea :eeeecs tea:c tae t:ta ei sease. | m,a. st.
.
.cea|.ty .s tae m.|.ea .a a.ea tae .cea| e|,eet sett|es as at .
sec.meatece:cees.tecnatae:etaeaetei:. me:c.a|depositing . aet
tae:eee:c.a,eia:.ateta.a,.|attae:ecaet.eaeiacommon e|,eet .
. e .eiaaobject aesee:. ,. aa|eae:.staasc. sessesec1aas|aa
,aa,e :ese:es t:ata. se taat t:at
a ea |e:e,a:cec .a tae a
eaee
ie:ta aeaeaeme:a|. | |am. aat.eaei.t se,ea:a. |at| se setaat.teaa
|ea,taea taat stay. re: tae:e ea|c |e ae t:ata .taet taat e:c
aea:c. a, [thesaurisation] , a.ea . s aet ea
| yaat
.
deposlts aac sees
ae|ceitaet:ata.|ata|setaat.taeatwa..aaproJect eit:ataaacte
.ceaeiaa. aia.tetassea|c|eaa. ma,.aa||e 1aat.say|aa,a
a,e.
taee|emeateitae ea| yt:ac.t.ea.aa.ea,|eyeac. ac..caa|imtace
sease:eteat.eaaacsease:eseet.a,a:eess.||e
ia ta. s :eseet tae:e .s se | .tt|e c.seeat.aa.ty e:eeat:ast |eteea
uasse:| sea:| .estaac|atesttaea,attaateiaca,es.
ateLogicl
Investigations a.eaeea|c|e. ase:.|ec.taeatec.ieat.ea.
ta
.
Orz
gin ' a,eseataeesseat.a|iaaet.eaeiDokumentlerung, eatae spmtual
cororeality" ei|aa,aa,e. aaceataestateeatasta ia|i||.a,eitae
t:ata.ateat.ea 1a.s . s a|| tae me:e se .ie eeas.ce:Formal and
` Thus, for example, Husserl writes: "All theoretical research, though by no meas
solely conducted in acts of verbal expression or complete
,
stateent, none the less termi
nates i n such statement. Only in this form can truth, and 10 particular t
.
he truth of theory,
become an abiding possession of science, a documented, ever available trasure for
knowledge and advancing research. Whatever the connection of thought with speech
may be , whether or not the appearance of our fnal judgements in the form of verbal
79
Introduction to the Origin of Geometr
Transcendental Logic ,a:t.ea|a:| y 1 -5, 1 8-29) aactaeCartesian
Meditations (4, . I I ) . aeat.me .uasse:||e,. as|ya:eet.a,taea,at
i:emaat. tea|c|e se|e|y. . ataeaeteie:|a|es:ess.ea. .a
e:ce:te see.iy taea taat .teea|c aet |eeeme t:ata .taeattaat
"stating" aac"communicating . . . to others, " eia.eaaea| sesese
. ataeInvestigations (LI, i. i at:e ve| II eiCe:maac . 3, 255) .
re:..stae:eee,a.t.ea.a|aa,aa,eeiaatconstitutes a|se| ate.cea|
O|]eet..ty.asia:as. tstates ta.sO|]eet..ty. aet]astaaetae:ayei
aaaeaae.a, e: :eeat.a, taat t:aaseeaceata| .ate:sa|]eet..ty .s tae
eeac.t.eaeiO|]eet..ty:~t|ettem. tae:e||emei,eemet:y s e:.,.a
ats tae :e||em eitae eeast.tat.ea ei. ate:sa|]eet..ty ea a:.ta
taat eitaeaeaemeae|e,.ea|e:.,.aei|aa,aa,e. uasse:| . se:yeea
se.easeita. s natae.||aetattemtta.sc.mea|t:e,:ess.ea. atae
Origin, a|taea,a ae says .t a:.ses ae:e ( 1 6 1 ) . re: tae memeat .t
sameestesae..iaethow, at|eastthat |aa,aa,eaaceease.easaessei
ie||e aamaa.ty a:e . ate::e|atec ess.|. |.t.es aac a|:eacy ,.ea tae
memeattaeess. |.|.tyeise.eaee. sesta|| .saec1aeae:.zeaeiie||e
maas.acsaesestaeae:.zeaeitaee:|c..tstaacseataaca:t.ea|ates
. tsaa.ty a,a. ast[se detache et articule son unite sur] tae aa.ty eitae
e:| c. Oieea:se. tae e:|c aac ie||e maas.ac ae:e ces.,aate tae
a||.ae|as.e .|at. a| a.te|yeea. aa. tyeiess.||eese:.eaeesaacaet
ta. se:|c :.,atae:e . taeseie||emea :.,atae:e.aeseiaetaa| .tyie:
uasse:| .s aee:aayta.a, |at a a:.a||e esam|e. Cease.easaessei
|e. a,.aeemmaa.ty.aeaeaactaesamee:|cesta||.saestaeess.|.|
.tyeiaaa.e:sa||aa,aa,e Haas.ac. s| :steease.easei.tse|t asaa
. mmec.ateaac mec.ate|.a,a.st.eeemmaa.ty ( 1 62) .
iaeeaaeet.ea .ta ta. seaeecteaeteta:ee. me:taate. ats
i w.ta.ataeae:.zeaeita. seease.easaesseiie||emaas.ac. .t. s
mata:e .ae:ma| maas. actaat. s:. .|e,ec
|etaastaeae:.zea
eie. .| . zat.ea aacas tae|. a,a. st.eeemmaa.ty ( 1 62) . 1aetaeme ei
pronouncements has a necessary grounding i n essence, i t is at least plain that judgements
stemming from higher intellectual regions, and in particular from the regions of science,
could barely arise without verbal expression" (LI, I , Introd. to Vol . II of German ed. , 2,
p. 250) .
7! Already in FTL, on the subject of the "idealizing presuppositions of logic" and tying
the problem of constitution with that of expression, Husserl concluded: " The problem of
constitution is again broadened when we recall that verbal expression, which we excluded
from our considerations of logic, i s an essential presupposition for intersubjective think
ing and for an intersubjectivity of the theory accepted as ideally existing; and that accord
i ngly an ideal identifability of the expression, as expression, must likewise raise a prob
lem of constitution" (73, p. 1 88) .
80
Jacques Derrida
aca| t ae:ma|.ty, a.ea tee| a me:e aac me:e :eem .a uasse:| s
aaa|yses, . s ae:et:eatecas amatte:ei eea:se.we.||aetst:essta. s,
ces.te tae se:.eas :e||ems taat .t seems te aave e ?se e: a
t:aaseeaceata|a.|eseay.aeeaamata:.tyaacae:maaty,.ve:.sete
a:.,e:east:aaseeaceata|e.cet.ecete:m.aat.ea:Cea|caca|tae:ma|.ty
eve:|eeeas.ce:ecetae:taaaasaaem.:.ea|aaciaetaa|modifcation
eiaa.ve:sa|t:aaseeaceata|ae:ms.ataee|ass.esease,i:ema.eaeea
t.aaa||ystemtaeseetae:em.:.ea|eases, macaessaacea.|caeec:
nat ae:e tee uasse:| aas eve:ta:ea ta.s e| ass.e aet.ea ei
t:aaseeaceata| , te tae e.at ei ,.v.a, a sease te tae .cea ei
t:aaseeaceata| atae|e,y. 1ae aet.ea ei ,aca|t ae:ma|.ty s,
:.v. |e,e ceaetesae:eatelos' mecc|.a,|eie:eaaac.ataeeidos. 1e
aaveaeeesstetaeeidos eimaa|.acaacei|aa,aa,e, ee:ta.ameaaac
ee:ta.asea|.a,sa|]eets-macmeaaacea.|c:ea-a:eaetgood esam
|es .~aca:st,aecea|t, |eeaasetaeyceaetessess.atae.:ea:.,at
a a:eaac:.,e:eas|ycete:m.aa||eesseaee. nat.ita.s. sse,ceesaca| t
ae:ma|.ty,a.ea|e,.asae:eea.|caeeceacsaacstesaeamacass
sta:ts,aaveaaesseaee:neeaaseae:etaees:ess.eaeiaca| t ae:ma|.ty
.saeta,.veae.cet.ecete:m.aat.ea,|attae.aceseiaa. cea|aeat.v
.tya.ea.son the horizon eiceiaeteae:ma|aca|ts. ia:ee:t.eate
ea:acvaaeemeat. atae s.:.taa|e:|caactaea.aa.ste:y, taeeidos
eeaseste|eaaesseaee. ae:ce:te|eeemeaae:m,aactaeeeaeetei
ae:.zea.s:e,:ess.ve|ysa|st.tatecie:taateist:aeta:eaacesseaee.
2. 1ae ess.|.| .ty eia mec.ate e: .mmec.ate ae:.zea eiaa.ve:sa|
|aa,aa,e:.s|s:aaa.a,.ate esseat.a|c.mea|t.esaac|. m.t s. 1a. sess.
|.|.tya:stsaesestaattaeaaza:ceas:e||emeeaee:a.a,taeess.|.|
.tyeiaa:e,:amma:aac"a priori ae:ms ei|aa,aa,e. s:ese| vec,
aess.|.|.ty uasse:|aeve:eeasecteta|eie: ,:aatec.
i t sae ,
aest, taateve:yta.a, .saama||e.atae|:eacestsease, . . e. ,aa,mst.
80
We propose to come back to this elsewhere. [Cf. Derrida' s Speech and Phenomena:
And Other Essays on Husserl' s Theor of Signs, tf. David B. Allison (Evanston: North-
wester University Press, 1973), pp. 97-99. ]
8I
In "Philosophy and the Crisis of European Humanity" (i C), the
.
phenomenn f
crisis is presented as a "sickness" of European society and culture, a SIckness whIch s
not "natural" and gets no relief from "something like natur dotos" (p. 270). ThiS
"pathology, " moreover, has the profound ethical sense of a fall into "passivity, " of
inability to be rendered "responsible" for sense in an authentic activity or authent1
"reactivation. " Technical activity (that of science als) as such is a passivity in compan
son to sense; it is the agitation of the sick and, already, the tremors of delirium.
82
Cf. LI, J, 4. On Husserl ' s faithfulness to this theme and the philosophical option that
orients i t, cf. in particular S. Bachelard, A Study of Hussert' s Logic [part J, Ch. 1 ] , pp.
8-1 1 .
81
Introductin to the Orgin ofGeometr
ea||yes:ess.||e . eve:yeae eaa ta||a|eataat .s . ta.a tae sa:
:eaac. a, e:|c ei a.s e. v. | . zat. ea as O|] eet. ve| y es. st. a, ( 1 62
, mec.aec} ,. iaetae:e:cs, asaete:e,eaeeasastaeesseat.a|st:aeta:es
eiseve:a|eeast.tatec|aa,aa,ese:ea|ta:esmay|e,t:aas|at.ea.a:.a
e.|e .saaa|ays ess.||etas|. tenormal mea.||a|ays aavea
prioriH3 eease.easaesseitae.:|e|ea,.a,te,etae:teeae aactae same
aamaa.ty, |.v.a,.aeaeaactaesame e:|c. i.a,a. st.e c.ae:eaees-
aacaattaey .m|y-.||aea:tetaemattae|ettemeiaaa:.e:.
ae:.zeae:st:aeta:e.tae|.a,a. st.eeemmaa.ty,. . e. ,tae.mmec.ateee:
taatyei|eta |e.a, sea|.a,sa|]eetsaeeaaaeve:ces.,aate aay
tam,|ataat|e|ea,stetaeae:.zeaeitae.:e:|castae .::ecae.||y
eemmeaae:.zeaeitae.:ese:.eaee.1a. s.m|.estaattaeyeaaa|ays,
. mmea.ate|ye:aet , staacte,etae:|eie:etaesameaata:a|es. steat-
a.ea e eaa a|ays st:. ei tae ea|ta:a| sae:st:aeta:es aac
eate,e:.esieaacec(fundiert) ea.t ,aacaeseaa.tyea|ca|aysia:
a.sataea| t.matea:|.t:at.eaie:eve:ymisunderstanding. Cease.easaess
eieeai:eat.a,taesame ta.a,, aae|]eete:ee.vecas saea, .seea
se.easaesseiaa:eaac:eea|ta:a|we. ue:etae:etaote:eea|ta:e. s
aet:e,:ess.eatea:cea|ta:a|primitiveness |attae:ecaet.eaeiace
te:m.aecea|ta:e, ataee:et.ea|ee:at.ea a.ea . seae eitaea.,aest
ie:mseiea|ta:e.a,eae:a| .1a. sa:e|yaata:a|e|]eet.vees. steat. stae
es.st.a,seas.||ee:|c,a.ea|eeemestaea:st,:eaaceieemmaa.ea
t.ea,taee:maaeateaaaeeie:tae:e.aveat.eaei|aa,aa,e~staemest
aa.ve:sa| ,taemeste|]eet.ve|yesa.|.tece|emeat,.veateas, taeea:ta
.tse|i.saatia:a.saestaea:stmatte:eieve:y seas.||ee|]eet iaseia:
as .t .s taeexemplar e|emeat ,|e.a, me:e aata:a||y e|]eet.ve, me:e
e:maaeat,me:ese|.c,me:e:.,.c,aacseie:ta ,taaaa||etae:elements;
aac.aa|:eace:sease, .teem:. sestaem, , .t.sae:ma|taattaeea:ta
aasia:a. saectae,:eaacie:taea:st.cea| .t.es, taeaie:taea:sta|se
|ate|y aa. ve:sa| aac e|]eet.ve identities, taese ei ea|ea| as aac
,eemet:y.
nat:eea|ta:a||ypure Nature .s a|ays|a:.ec. se, as tae a|t.mate
` But both still have to meet. The question here, then, is only that of a material ,
therefore in a certain sense contingent, a priori (cf. above) .
H4 Jt i s the "as such" of the object' s substantial and objective unity which i s deci sive
here. In paricular i t di stinguishes human intersubjectivity from that which i s created
between animal s, men and animals, children, etc. All those finite communities al so rest
on the feel i ng of a presence to the same world whereby they confront the same things , and so
on, but in a nonobjecti ve, nontheoretical consciousness-which does not posit the object
"as such" in its independence and as the pole of infi nite determination. Those lower commu
nities can also gi ve rise to a specifc phenomenology, and Husserl devoted i mportant
unpublished fragments to them.
82
Jacques Derrida
ess.|.|.iy ie:eemmaa.eai.ea. . i. sa|.ac ei.aaeeess.||e. ai:a. cea| .
Caaeaeisay. iaea.]asiiae ees.ieeiaaiuasse:|sa.c:~:eaei
aeaeemmaa.eai.eaaacm.saace:siaac.a,iaeve:yae:.zeaeiea|ia:e
aac|aa,aa,e:uacea|iec|ym.saace:siaac.a,.sa|aysaiaeiaa|ae:.
zeaaaciaeia.ie.aceseiiae.aia.iee|eeiaseaac.aie||.,eaee.nai
a|iaea,aiae|aiie:. sa|aysaaaeaaeecseiaai|aa,aa,eeaa|e,.a. .s
aeiia.iaceiaeesseai.a|a.eaeeaaaeve::ac.ea||y,e|eyeac:
1ae a|eve seems a|| iae me:e i:ae. esee. a||y s.aee a|se|aie
i:aas|aia|.|.iyea|c |e saseacec sia:i.a, iae memeai iae s.,a.iec
eea|cae|ea,e:|e|ec|ae|. e. iae:c.:eei|ye:.ac.:eei| y.:eiaemece|ei
aa e|]eei.ve aac seas.||e es. sieai. ve:y | .a,a.si.e ceas.ea iaai
ea|ceseaeia. sa|se|aiei:aas|aia|.|.iyea|c:ema.ama:|ec|yiae
em.:.ea| sa|]eei.v.iy eiaa . ac.v.caa| e: see.eiy. re: uasse:| . iae
mece| ei|aa,aa,e.siaee|]eei.ve|aa,aa,e eise.eaee. ~ eei.e |aa
,aa,e. aese s.,a.ieai.easea|caei|eobjects, . ||aeve:aaveaay
i:aaseeaceaia| va| aeie: a. m 1aaiiaei ea|c aave ae eeaseaeaee
within uasse:| .aaiaea,ai. .ia.s iaea,aie:e aei a| seiae iae:ea,a
. avesi.,ai.ea [approfondissement ] eisa|]eei.v.iy. Ne sa|]eei.v. iy .a
,eae:a| . as maea em.:.ea|asi:aaseeaceaia| . aea:ecve:yea:| yie
uasse:| as. aaeeess.||e ie ac.:eei. aa.veea| . aac :.,e:eas |aa,aa,e.
sa|]eei.v.iy.siaacaeaia||y. aeaa||e ~|:eacy.aThe Phenomenology
ofInteral Time-Consciousness, uasse:|:eie::ecieiaea| i.maie.ceai.iy
eiiaeeeasi.iai.verasei. mmaaeaii. meaaca|se|aiesa|]eei.v.iyaac
eeae|acecre:a||ia. s. aamesa:e|ae|.a,( 36, . 100).85 ~ac. aiae
aaa||.saecaaase:.iseiC:eaCea:eieieme:a| .iy.aeeace:s
.i:ee|]eei.veiee:a| .iy.:eieme:a|.iy(Vorzeit) , .saei|eyeaca||
c.seea:se(unsagbar) ie:iae aeaemeae|e,.z.a,,e,HsC1 31 1 5 i i .
i 1. 9). 1ae:eie:e . |aa,aa,e. i:ac.i.ea. aaca. sie:y es.siea|y.a
seia:ase|]eeis|:ea|iaesa:iaee
3 . ~siae.aia.ieae:.zeaeieve:yess.||eese:.eaee. iaee:|c.s
eeaseaeai|y iae aa.ve:se ei O|]eeis a.ea .s | .a,a. si.ea| | y es
:ess.||e.a.is|e.a,aac.is|e.a,saea( 1 62) . 1aas. iaes. ,a.ieai.ea
eiiaee:|casae:.zea. se|ea:| yes| .eaiec. . . e. .asiae. aia.ie|yeea
eemea |aee ie: eve:yia.a, e eaa eaeeaaie: . ai:eai eiaac ie:
"
In the same sense, cf. al l he subtle analyses in the LI devoted to expressions
" lack[ing] an objective sense, " such as personal pronouns which " indicate" mediatel y
bl lt can never gi ve anythi ng to be seen. "The word T has not i tself di rectl y the power to
arouse the specifc I -presentation; thi s becomes fxed i n the actual pi ece of tal k. I t does
not work like the word ' l ion' which can arouse the idea of a l ion i n and by i tself. I n i ts
case, rather, an i ndicati ve function mediates, cryi ng as it were, to the hearer ' Your
vis-a-vis i ntends himself' " (I, 1 , 26, p. 3 1 6) .
83
Introduction to the Origin of Geometr
ea:se| ves . i ai:eaieiaac ie:ea:se|ves.m|.es. iaea.,. veaas aae|
]eei .1aee:|c. iae:eie:e .. sesseai.a||yceie:m.aec|yiaecai.veaac
ae:.zeaic. meas. eaei|e.a,e:ee.vec[l' etre-perqu] .aa,azeaese
e|]eeimasia|ays|ea||eie|eatheorem. Ceemei:.ea|esem|a:.aess
aacea|iec|y:esa|isi:emiaeiaeiiaai. asaaa|si:aeimaie:.a|se.
eaee .ia. sesem|a:.aessi:eaisiaesai.a| .iyei|ec. es,a.ea. sea| y
eae eiiae|ecy s e.cei.eeemeaeais, . . . e . i:eaisaaieeaie:s sease
eaiaeaei.eaeiae:.zeaaace|]eei. Des.iea||iaeaaia,ea.si.emei.is
a.eaaa.maieaeaemeae|e,y. saee s :. v. |e,eiae:e.a .s .a ee:ia.a
:eseeis:ema:|a||e. iiiesi.iesieiaai e|]eei.v.si ieaceaey a.ea
uasse:|s.ma|iaaeeas| yeesessev. ,e:eas| y. aacyeia.ea. sea|ya
period, aa esseai.a| . aac iae:eie:e .::ecae.|| e. mevemeaieiiaea,ai.
1ae :eieaac :ayiam eiia. s ieas.ea |eieea e|]eei.v.sm aac iae
i:aaseeaceaia|mei.i.aieas.ease:ema:|a|| ycese:.|ec.aiaeCrisis, .s
a| se . ma:iec ie aeaemeae|e,y. ia ia.s :eseei. iae :e||em ei
,eemei:y. s:evea|.a,.
Ceemei:y. .aeaeei. .siaese.eaeeeiaai. sa|se|aie|ye|]eei.ve-
. e. . sai.a|.iy-.aiaee|]eeisiaaiiaea:ia.our eemmea|aee. eaa
. aceaa.ie|,iao. saasea:eemmea,:eaac.iaeiae:mea
,
uai.iaa
e|]eei.vese.eaeeeiea:ia| ,ia.a,s.s ess.||e. aae|]eei.vese.eaeeei
iaeta:ia.ise|i.iae,:eaacaacieaacai.eaeiiaesee|]eeis . .sas:ac.
ea| | y .ess.||e as iaai eii:aaseeaceaia| sa|]eei.v.iy. 1ae i:aas
eeaceaia| a:ia . s aei aa e|]eei aac eaa aeve: |eeeme eae ~ac
iaeess.|.|.iyeia,eeei:ysi:.ei|yee|eeaisiae.mess.|.|.iyei
aaieea|c |e ea||eca"geo-logy, " iaee|]eei.vese.eaeeeiiaea:ia
.ise|i 1a.s .s iae sease eiiae i:a,meai a.eareduces, :aiae: iaaa
8
On the theme of "our Earth" as the "l ife-world" "i n the most comprehensive
sense" for a humanity which lives i n community and where one can be "understood" in a
communication whi ch must always say and pass through the thi ngs of our Earth , cf. E,
38, pp. 1 62-67. Thi s section efecti vely i l l uminates, especially by its degree of elabora
tion, the si mi l arly i nspired fragment on the Earth cited below. In thi s section, the uni ty of
the Earth i s grounded in the unity and oneness of temporal ity, the " fundamental form"
(Grundform), the "form of all forms" [ibid. , p. 1 6] .
8
Thi s fragment , whi ch i s entitled "Grundlegende Untersuchungen zum
Phanomenologischen Ursprung der Rauml i chkeit der Natur" [ "Fundamental Investiga
tions on the Phenomenological Origin of the Spatiality of Nature"] , dated May 1 934, was
publi shed i n 1 940 by Marvi n Farber in Philosophical Essays in Memor of Edmund
Husserl [rpt . Greenwood Press, 1 968] , pp. 307-25 . From the perspective of the science of
space, i t sketches a movement analogous to that of the Origin, but di rected toward
ki nematics . In a certain sense , it completes the Origin, although in the Origin Husserl
clearly specifi es that geometry is onl y a title for all mathematics of pure
spatiotemporali ty.
Thi s text, very spontaneous and not greatly worked out i n its wri ti ng, is presented as a
84
Jacques Derri
preface to a "science ofthe origin of spatiality, " of "corporeality, " of "Nature in the
sense of the natural sciences, " and to a "Transcendental Theor of Cognition in the
Natural Sciences" [po 307] . Husserl first wonders about the sense of the world in the
infnite openness of my surrounding world whose frontiers I can always go beyond. Over
against a determined objectivation [representation] of the world, that of the "Negroes"
or ' ' Greeks, " he sets that of the Coperican world. "We Copericans, we men of moder
time, we say: the earth is not ' the whole of Nature, ' it is one of the planets, in the infnite
space of the world. The earth is a spherical body which certainly is not perceptible as a
whol e, by a single person and all at once, but in a primordial [rimordiale] synthesis as
the unity of singular experiences bound to each other. But nonetheless it is a body!
Although for us it may be the experiential ground for all bodies i n the experiential genesis
of our world-objectivation" (p. 308).
H usserl then " reduces" the Coperican thesis by making the certainty of an Earh-as
the origin of every objective kinetic determination-appear as the transcendental presup
position of this thesis. The question is to exhume, to unearth, the Earh, to lay bare the
primordial ground buried under the sedimentary deposits of scientifc culture and
objectivism.
For the Earth cannot become a mobile body: "It is on the Earth, toward the Earh,
starting from it, but still on it that motion ocurs. The Earth itself, in confority to the
original idea of it, does not move, nor is it at rest; it is in relation to the Earh that motion
and rest fi rst have sense. But then the Eath does not 'move' nor is at rest-and it is
entirely the same for the heavenly bodies and for the earth as one of them" (p. 309) .
The Earth is the fnal ground of our co-humanity (Mitmenscheit), for it is "the same
Earth for us, on it, in it, above it, there are the same bodies existing on it-'on it, ' etc. ,
the same corporeal (leiblichen) SUbjects, subjects of bodies (Leibern), who, for all, are
bodies (Korper) in a modified sense. But for us all , the Earth is the grund and not a body
in the full sense" (p. 3 1 5) .
But toward the end of the text, the Earth takes on a more formal sense. No longer is it a
question of thi s Earth here (the primordial here whose factuality would fnally b irreduc
ible), but of a here and a ground in general for the deterination of body-objects in
general. For if I reached another planet by flying, and if, Husserl then said, I could
perceive the earth as a body, I would have "two Earths as ground-bodi es. " "But what
does two Earths signify? Two pieces of a single Earth with one humanity" (pp. 3 1 7-1 8) .
From then on the unity of all humanity determines the unity of the grund as such. This
unity of all humanity is correlative to the unity of the world as the infnite horizon of
experience, and not to the unity of this earth here. The World, which is not the factuality
of this historical world here, as Husserl ofen recalls, is the ground of gounds, the
horizon of horizons, and it is to the World that the transcendental immutability attributed
to the Earth returs, since the Earth then is only its factual index. Likewise
correlatively-humanity would then only be the facto-anthropological index of sub
jectivity and of intersubjectivity in general , starting fom which every primordial here can
appear on the foundation of the Living Present, the rest and absolute maintenance of the
origin in which, by which, and for which all temporality and all motion appea.
Just as here he reduces the Copernican "relativity" of the earth, Husserl elsewhere
reduces Einstein's "relativity": "Where is that huge piece of method subjeted to
critique and clarification-that method that leads from the intuitively given surrunding
world to the idealization of mathematics and to the interpretation of these idealizations as
Objective being? Einstein's revolutionay innovations concer the foulae thrugh
which the idealized and naively Objectified physis is dealt with. But how formulae in
general , how mathematical Objectivation in general, receive sense on the substrtum of
85
Introuctin to the Origin ofGeometry
:eiaies, iae Cee:a.eaa aa.vei- aac saesiaaiiae a:ia .a .is
:eie:.me:c.a|.iy cees aei meve. asi as eae s ea |ecy, asiae
:.me:c.a| here aac zero-point ie: eve:y objective ceie:m.aai.ea ei
saee aac sai.a|mei.ea, . saei.ise|i.amei.ea.a ia.s saee as aa
e|]eei, se-aaa|e,eas|,-iaeta:ia,as:.me:c|a||ec,,asiae,:eaac
|ec, (Bodenkorper) i:em a.ea a|eae a Ceen|eaa ceie:m|aa
i.eaeiiaeea:iaas|ec,e|]eei|eeemesess||| e, | saei|ise|ieae|ec,
amea,eiae:s.aiaemeeaaa.ea|sysiem.r:.me:c.a||y, iaea:iameves
aeme:eiaaaea:|ecymevesaac|eavesiaee:maaeaeeei.ishere,
,:eaacec.aa:eseai.1aea:iaiae:eie:e|aesiae:esieiaaa|se
|aiehere; a:esia.ea.saeiiae:esieiiaee|]eei,:esias meceei
mei.ea, , |aixesisia:i.a,i:ema.eamei.eaaac:esieaaaea:aac
|eiaea,aiassaea,iaexesieiaground aacahorzon .aiae.:eemmea
e:.,.a aac eac. 1ae a:ia . s, . a eaeei, |eia sae:i eiaac |eyeac
eve:y|ecye|]eei-.aa:i.ea|a:iaeCee:a.eaaea:ia-asiae,:eaac,
as iae ae:e ei .is :e|ai.ve aea:.a,. nai iae a:ia eseeecs eve:y
|ecye|]eeias.is.aaa.ieae:.zea, ie:.i.saeve:esaaasiec|yiaee:|
eie|]eei.aeai.eaiaai:eeeecs.ia.a.i. 1aea:ia.sawae|eaese
a:is . . . a:e |ec.es, |ai as a wae|e .i .s aei a |ecy
, C:aac|e,eace , 3 1 3] . 1ae:e. siaeaase.eaeeof saee,.aseia:as
.issia:i.a,e.ai.saeiin saee.
iiiaeess.|.|.iyei|aa,aa,e. sa|:eacygiven ieiae:.ma||y. asi.iai
.a, ,eemeie:, .i samees iaai iae |aiie:aas :ecaeec .a a.mse|iiae
.ceai.iyaaciae.cea|e:maaeaeeeiaa e|]eei .ae:ce:ie|e a||eie
eemmaa.eaie .i neie:eiae same .s:eee,a.zecaaceemmaa.eaiec
amea,seve:a| .ac.v.caa| s, .i.s:eee,a.zecaaceemmaa.eaiec.ia.a
iae. ac.v. caa|eease.easaess aiie:a.e|aaci:aas.ie:yev.ceaee,arie:
aaa. ieaacass.ve:eieai.eavaa.saes, .is seaseeaab :e:ecaeecas
iae same .a iaeaeiei:eee||eei.ea .is seaseaasaei:eia:aec ie
life and the intuitively given surrounding world-of this we lear nothing; and thus
Einstein does not reform the space and time i n wh ich our vi tal life (unser lebendiges
Leben) runs its course" ("Philosophy and the Crisis of European Humanity," in C, p.
295 [modified]) . In the Crisis (34b, pp. 1 25f. ), a similarly oriented analysis also ques
tions the objectivism of Einstein' s relativity.
88
In referring to this fragent, Trm-Dlc-Thao (Phenomenologie, p. 222) speaks of an
"undaunted refutation of the Coperican system. " However, it is a matter of course that
Husserl does not at any moment or on its own proper level contest the particular truth of
the objective Copernican science. He only recalls that Copernican science presupposes a
primordial Earth which this science will never be able to integrte into its objective
system.
l '
v
86
Jacques Derrida
ae| a. a,aess |a ta. scoincidence of identity [recouvrement d' identitf] ,
ideality . s aaaeaaeecas saea aac .a,eae:a| .aaa e,e|e,.ea| sa|]eet
Ceaseaeat| y. aatasesta. s. cea| .tyageometrical .cea|.ty. ||ea|y
.ate:estas|ate:eawe.||:eseetuasse:| se:ce:eicese:.t.eaaac
. ataeeaat.e.||ce| aetaeeeac.|.easie:.cea|.ty. aaa. ate:sa|]ee
t. eeeaa.ty
1aas. |eie:e|e. a,tae .cea| .tyeiaa .ceat.ea|e|]eetie:etae:sa|
]eets. sease. sta. s. cea|.tyie:other eeatseitaesaesa|]eet iaa
ee:ta.aay. tae:eie:e. . ate:sa|]eet. . ty .s i:s| tae aeae. :. ea| :e|a
t.eaei,e|e,e.eiy:eseat:eseatteetae::eseatsassaea .. e .
as etae:s aac as :eseats .as as| :eseats | ate:sa|]eet. .|y .s |ae
:e|at.eaeiaaa|se|atee:.,.ateetae:a|se|atee:. ,. as. a.eaa:ea|ays
y ea. ces.te tae.: :ac.ea| a|te:.ty 1aaass te ta. s e. :ea|at.ea ei
:.e:c.a|a|se|a|es. taesame ta.a,eaa|etaea,atta:ea,aa|se|ate|y
etae:eeatsaacaets wea|ayseee|aestetaeiaa|.astaaeeei
|a. s. tae aa.ae aac esseat.a| ie: ei |ee:a|.zat.ea ny . ts e:y
c.a|eet.ea|aess. taea|se|ate:.e:c.a|.tyeitaei. .a,r:eseate:.ts
tae:ecaet. ea..taeatae,at.ea.eia||a|te:.ty1aei. .a,r:eseateea
st.tates taeetae:asetae:. a.tse|iaactae sae as tae sae . atae
etae:9
0
I These processes are abundantly described in The Phenomenology of Internal Time
Consciousness, Ideas I, and in FTL. The passage from passi ve retention to memory or to
the acti vi ty of recollection, a passage which ' ' produces" ideality and pure Objectivity as
such and makes other absolute origins appear as such, i s always described by Husserl as
an already given essential possibility, as a structural abi l i ty whose source i s not made a
problem. Perhaps thi s source is not questioned by phenomenology because it is confused
wi th the possibility of phenomenology i tself. I n i ts "factual ity, " thi s passage i s also that
of the lower forms of Nature and conscious life. I t can also be the thematic site of what
today is cal led an "overcomi ng. " Here phenomenology would be "overcome" or com
pleted i n an interpretative philosophy. Thus Tran-Duc-Thiw, after a remarkable interpre
tation of phenomenology, exposes the " Dialectic of Real Movement, " starting from the
concepts of retention and reproduction and from difculties attached to them in
phenomenology, which alone. however, can give them a rigorous sense.
`The possibility of constituting, withi n the unique and irreduci bl e form of the Li ving
Present (unchangeable in itself and always other i n its ' ' content") , another now and on its
basi s another here, another absolute origin of my absol utel y absolute origin, this possibil
ity i s el sewhere presented by Husserl as the root of i ntersubjecti vi ty. I n the Cartesian
Meditations, this di alectic of temporalization is i nvoked as an analogous example of the
dialectic of i ntersubjecti vity. In order to illuminate the extraordinary constitution of
"another monad + in mi ne , " Husserl al ludes to temporalization, i n what he cal l s an
"i nstructi ve comparison" C52, p. 1 1 5) .
But i n some unpubli shed material , he seems to go much further: "Urhyl e, " i . e . ,
temporal hyl e, i s defned there as the " core of the other than the Ego' s own" (Ichfremde
Kern) . Cf. Group C 6 ( August 1 930) , p. 6. On the sense of this notion of "alien to my
87
Introduction to the Origin of Geometry
VII
A cee.s. este:ea. aste|etaseany. tse|itaeseas.a,sa|]eet. .a
tae st:.etseaseeitae te:. . s. aeaa||e eia|se|ate|y,:eaac.a,|ae
.cea| O|]eet. .ty ei sease O:a| eeaa.eat.ea , . e . :eseat . .
ec.ate.aacsya.a:ea.eeeaa.eat.eaaea,tae:ete,eeete:s. s
aet same.eatt e,. e .cea|e|]eet.. t. estae.: eeat.aa. a,t e|e aac
"persisting factual existence, " taaasstea.eataeye:ca:eeeaca:
.a,e:.ecs.aa.eatae. aeate:aaca.sie||esa:eae|ea,e:aasete
saea aa eseaaa,ee:eea. e:e aa.e:sa||y. ae|ea,e:a|.e 1e |e
a|se|ate|y .cea|. tae e|]eet ast st.|| |e i:eec eiever t.e .ta aa
aetaa||y :eseat sa|]eet. .ty .a ,eae:a| 1ae:eie:e. .t ast e:ca:e
eea aea ae eae aas aetaa|. zec .| .a e.ceaee ( 1 64 ec.iec}
seeea[langage oral] aasi:eectaee|]eeteiindividual sa|]eet. .ty|at
|eaes.t|eaacte. ts|e,.aa.a,aactetae syaea:eayeiaaeseaaa,e
.ta.ataeinstitutive communit.
1aeess.|. |. tyei writing .||assa:etaea|se|atet:ac. t. eaa| .zat. eaei
taee|]ee| . .tsa|se|ate.cea|O|]eet. .ty~. e .taea:.tyei. ts:e|at.ea
teaaa.e:sa|t:aaseeaceata|sa|]eet. .tyw:.t.a,.||ceta. s|yeaa
e.at. a,seasei:e.tsactually present e.ceaeeie:a:ea|sa|]eetaac
i:e. ts:eseate.:ea|at.ea.ta.aacete:. aeceeaa. ty 1aece
e.s. eiaaet. eaei:.tteaes:ess. ea.eies:ess.eaa.eaceeaeats..s
taat.taseseeaa.eat.eaess.||e. taeat. ec.ate e:ec.ate
acc:ess. .t . s. se te seas. eeaa. eat.ea |eeee .:taa| ( 1 64
ec. iec}
1aatvirtuality, me:eee:. .s aa a|.,aeas a|ae. .t s. a|taaeeas|y
asesass. .ty.ie:,etia|aess .aaca| |taeaeaeeaaeicrisis ess.||e
ra:i:eaa.a,teia||a,a.a.atea:ea|reale] a.ste:y.at:atataate
aae ,a.aec i:e ta. s a.ste:y-se:.ta:a| sat.etee:a|.ty ,aese
e..,. aa|.tye .||seea aeectecete:.ae-saaet.easaacee|etes
tae es.steaeeeia:et:aaseeaceata|a. ste:.e. ty w.taeat tae a|t.ate
e|]eet. ieat.ea taat:.t.a,e:.ts . a|||aa,aa,e ea|c asyet:ea.a
Ego, " "the intrinsically frst other, " or of " the frst ' non-Ego' " i n t he constitution of the
alter ego, see notably CM, 4S-49, pp. 1 05-0S.
Preobjecti ve and preexact temporali ty, which had to become the principal theme of the
transcendental aesthetics projected by Husserl (cf. notably FL, Concl usion, pp. 291 -92:
and CM, 6 1 q p. 1 46), i s then the root of transcendental intersubjecti vity. Al l the egos,
beyond al l possible diferences, can be encountered, recognized, and understood also in
the identity of the concrete and universal form of the Li vi ng Present. I n E, " tie as the
form of sensibility" i s described as the "ground" of the "necessary connection . . .
between the intentional objects of al l perceptions and positional presentifcations of an
Ego and a community of Egos" (3S, p. 1 62 [modifed)) .
88
Jacques Derrida
eai.veeiiaeceiaeieaacaeiaa|. aieai.eaa|.iyeiasea|.a,sa|]eeie:
eemmaa.iy eisea|.a,sa|]eei s. ny a|se|aie|yv.:iaa|.z.a,c.a|e,ae,
:.i.a,e:eaiesa|. aceiaaieaemeasi:aaseeaceaia|ie|ci:ema.ea
eve:y:eseaisa|]eeieaa|ea|seai
i aeeaaeei.ea.iaiae,eae:a|s.,a.ieai.eaeiiaeepoche, eaauy
e|.ie .ave|es iae ess.|.| .iyeia sa|]eei|essi:aaseeaceaia|ie|c,
eae. aa.eaiaeeeac.i.easeisa|]eei.v.iyea|caea:aacae:e
iae sa|]eei ea|c |e eeasi.iaiec sia:i.a, i:em iae i:aaseeaceaia|
ie|c w:.i.a,, as iae |aee eia|se|aie|y e:maaeai .cea| e|]ee
i. v.i.esaaciae:eie:eeia|se|aieO|]eei.v. iy,ee:ia.a|yeeasi.iaiessaea
ai:aaseeaceaia|ie| c. ~ac| .|e.se, ie|e sa:e, i:aaseeaceaia|sa|
]eei. v.iyeaa|eia||yaaaeaaeecaacaea:eaiae|as. seiia.sie|ce:
. is ess.|. |.iy. 1aas a sa|]eei|essi:aaseeaceaia| ie|c .s eae ei iae
eeac.i.eas eii:aaseeaceaia|sa|]eei.v.iy
naia|| ia. seaa |e sa.c ea|yea iae |as.seiaa .aieai.eaa|aaa|ys. s
a.ea :eia.as i:em :. i.a, aeia.a, |ai :.i.a, s a:e :e|ai.ea ie a
eease.easaessa.ea,:eaacs.i as saea, aacaei. isiaeiaa|.iya.ea,
|euie. ise|i,.sieia||y.iaeais.,a.ieai.ea[insignifante] . re:ia.s a|
seaeeeisa|]eei. v.iyi:em iae i:aaseeaceaia| ie| c, aaa|seaeeaese
ess.|.|.iy i:ees a|se|aieO|]eei.v.iy, eaa |eea|yaiaeiaa| a|seaee,
evea.i.i:emevecie:a||i.meiaeieia|.iyeiaeiaa|sa|]eeis. 1aee:.,.
aa|.iyeiiaeie|cei:.i.a, . s. isa|. | .iyiec. sease .ia,due to its
sense, eve.y :eseai :eac. a, .a ,eae:a| . nai .iiae iesi cees aei aa
aeaaee.is eaa:eceeaceaeeeaa:. ie:e::eace:.a,eae:a|,. e ,
.i.i.s aeiaaaaiec|yav. :iaa|. aieai.eaa|.iy, ,aac.iiae:e.saea:e|y
]a:.c.ea|ess. |.|.iyei.i|e.a,. aie| |.,.||eie:ai:aaseeaceaia|sa|]e
i
.a,eae:a| ,iaeaiae:e.saeme:e.aiaevaea.iyei.issea|iaaaaeaaei.e
|.ie:a|aesse:iaeseas.||eeae.iyeiaceiaaeices.,aai.ea,aces.,aai.ea
ce:.vecei.isi:aaseeaceaia|iaaei. ea.1aes.|eaeeei:ea.sie:.ea:eaaa
aac|a:.ece.v. |.zai.eas, iaeeaiem|meaiei|esi. aieai.easaac,aa:cec
see:eis, aac iae . | |e,.|.|.iy ei iae |a.ca:y .ase:.i.ea c.se|ese iae
i:aaseeaeeaia|seaseeiceaiaasaaiaa.iesiaeseia.a,sieiaea|se
|aie :.v.|e,e ei . aieai.eaa|.iy . a iae ve:y . asiaaee ei .is esseai.a|
]a:.c.ea|ia.|a:e [en ce qui l' unit a l' absolu du droit intentionnel dans
l ' instance meme de son echecl .
waeaeeas.ce:.a,iaece]a:ea:.iyei.aieai.eaa|aa. mai.ea, uas-
se:|a|ayssaysiaaitae| .a,a.si.ee:,:aa.e|ecy. saresa,a:ee:
|ecy e/,.e:as. :.iaa|ee:e:ea|.iy(geitige Leiblichkeit) (FTL, 2, .
21 ) . r:em iaea ea, :. i.a, . s ae |ea,e: ea|y iae e:|c|y aac
` We refer here to a comment by Jean Hyppolite during the discussion which followed
the lecture of Fr. Van Breda on "La Reduction phenomimologique, " in H usserl, Cahiers
de Royaumont, p. 323.
89
Introductin to the Origin of Geometry
maemeieeaa.ea|a.cieai:aiaaeseea|e. a,seaseea|cc.sease
.iaa||:.i.a,cea 1aeess.|.| .iye:aeeess.iyei|e.a,.aea:aaiec
. aa,:aa.es.,a.sae| ea,e:s.m|yesi:.as.eaaciaeiaa|.aeema:.sea
.ia.cea|O|]eei.v.iy. .i.siaesine qua non eeac.i.eaeiO|]eei.v.iy s
.aie:aa|eem|ei.ea ~s|ea,as .cea|O|]eei.v.iy. saei ,e: :aiae:,can
aei |eea,:avec.aiae e:|c-as |ea, as . cea|O|]eei.v.iy.s aei .aa
es.i.eaie|ea:iyieaa.aea:aai.ea,a.ea, .aiaea:.iyei. issease .
.s me:e iaaaasysiemeis.,aa|s[signalisation] e:aaeaie:,a:meai,-
iaea .cea| O|]eei.v.iy . s aei ia||y eeasi.iaiec 1ae:eie:e, iae aei ei
:.i. a, .s iae a.,aesi ess.|.| .iy eia| | "constitution, " a iaei a,a.asi
a.ea iae i:aaseeaceaia| ceia ei .cea| O|] eei.v.iy s a. sie:.e.iy .s
measa:ec.
waai r. a| :.ies a|eai seeea .a a. s esee| |eai i:aase:.i eiiae
Origin . sa fortiori i:aeie: :.i. a,. i a seas.||e em|ec.meai eeea:s
iae |eea|. zai.eaaaciae ieme:a|.zai.ea (Temporalisation) eiaai. s.
|y.is|e.a,sease, aa|eeaiecaacaaieme:a| , D. er:a,e, 2 1 0) .
saeaaie:ma|ai.ea:ema:|a||y saa:easiae:e|| emaacaa|eas
iaeeea|.a:v.:iaeei|aa,aa,e .iie|ea:|yi:aas|aiesuasse:|sesaei.a,
eae:iieeaieaiae. cea| .iyeiiaemai.eseaseaaceie:cs[mots] .aiae. :
:e|ai.eas.iaiae| .a,a.si.eeveai naiceesaeiia. s ie:ma|ai.eae:
This sensible embodiment has the peculiar qualities [l'errngete] of both sense' s
inhabitation of the word [mot] and the here and now use of the word' s ideality. In the first
case, embodiment is at its l i mit the inscription of an absolutely "free" and objective
ideality (that of geometrical truth, for example) within the ' 'bound" ideality of the word,
or i n general of a more free ideality within a less free ideality. In the second case,
embodiment is that of a necessarily bound ideality, that of the word' s identity within
language, in a real-sensible event. But this last embodiment is still done through another
step of mediate ideality whi(h Husserl does not directly describe, but which we think can
be located on the basi s of strictly Husserlian concepts. It is a question of ideal forms or
vague morphological types (a notion that we will have ocasion to specify farther on) ,
which are proper to the corporeality of graphic and vocal signs. The forms of graphic and
vocal signs must have a certain identity which is imposed and recognized each time in the
empirical fact of language. Without this always intended and approximate ideal identity
(that of letters and phonemes, for example), no sensible language would be possible or
intelligible as language, nor could it intend higher idealities. Naturally, this morphological
ideality is still more "bound" than the word' s ideality. The precise place of the properly
termed realizing [realisante] embodiment is ultimately therefore the union of the sensible
form with sensible material, a union traversed by the linguistic intention which always
intends, explicitly or not, the highest ideality. Linguistic incaration and the constitution
of written or scriptural space suppose, then, a closer and closer "interconnection" of ideality
and reality through a series of less and less ideal mediations and in the synthetic unity of an
intention. Thi s intentional synthesis is an unceasing movement of going and returing that
works to bind the ideality of sense and to free the reality of the sign. Each of the two opera
tions is always haunted by the sense of the other: each operation is already announced in the
other or still retained i n it . Language frees the ideality of sense, then, in the very work of its
"binding" ("interconnecting" [enchainement] ).
90
Jacques Derrida
.t| .a,a.st.eem|ec.meatte|eaace:steecasta|.a,|aeeeats.cetae
|e.a,sease ei .cea| e|]eet.v.ty: ~s eeea::.a, e: aaeseetec|y
aaea.a, .aacc.t.eatetae|e. a,sease:Deesaetta.sie:a|at.ea
,.ve tae . m:ess.eataat.cea| e|]eet. v. ty . sia||yeeast.tatec as saea
before aacindependently of .tsem|ec.eat.e::atae:.|eie:eaac.ace
eaceat|yei.tsability to be embodied?
natuasse:|.as. ststaatt:ata.saetia||ye|]eet. ve .. e ..cea| ..ate||.
,.||eie:eve:yeaeaac.aceia.te|ye:ca:a||e. as|ea,as.teaaaet|e
sa.cand :.ttea s.aee ta. s e:ca:a|.|.ty . st:ata s ve:y sease. tae
eeac.t.easie:.tssa:v. va|a:e. ae|acec. ataeseei. ts|.ie uacea|tec|y.
t:ataaeve:|eestae.cea|O|]eet.v.tye:.ceat.tyeiaayei.tsa:t.ea
|a:ceiaete| .a,a.st.e.aea:aat.eas .aaceea:ect ea|||.a,a. st.eiaeta
a|.ty.t:ema.asi:ee. natta.si:eecem.sea|yess. ||e:ee.se|yi:e
taemoment t:atacan .a,eae:a||esa.ce::.ttea.. e. .on condition taat
ta.scan |eceae.ra:aces.ea||y.taeess.|. | .tyei|e.a,:.tteafossibi
lite graphique] e:m.ts tae a| t.matei:ee.a,ei.cea| .ty. 1ae:eie:e . e
eea|ca|||at:eve:setaete:mseir.a| s ie:a|a taeability eiseasete
|e| .a,a.st.ea||ye|ec.ec.s tae ea|y eaas|ya.easease|eeees
aeasat. eteme:a|
neeaase.cea|O|]eet.v.tyeaaesseat.a||y.aie:e:saaetae|ecyei
seeeaaac:.t.a,.aacs. aee.tceeacseaaa:e|.a,a. st.e. ateat.ea.
.t .s :ac.ea||y .aceeaceateiseas.||e sat.etee:a|. ty. 1a. s eaas
taatasee.iesat.eteme:a|.ty. s:ese:. |ecie:eeaa.eat.ea. aac
tae:eie:e ie: a:e t:ac.t.ea aaca. ste:y. a sat.eteme:a|.ty taat es
eaestaea|te:aat.veeitaeseas.||eaactae.ate||.,.||e.e:taeem.:.ea|
aactaeete.:.ea| .Ceaseaeat| y. t:ata.sae|ea,e:simply es.|ec.a
tae:.e:c.a|eveatei. ts|aa,aa,e.itsa.ste:.ea|aa|.tataataeat.eates
ta.s eveat .]astas tae :eteceeameatauthenticates aetae: . t. stae
cees.ta:yeiaa.ateat.ea.aetae:.t:eie:s.taeatia|s.ieat.eateaa
e:.,. aa|aac:. e:c.a|aet iaetae:e:cs. aetae:tae|. a,a. st. eeveat
:eie:steaaauthentic aet,.ataeuasse:|.aaseaseeitaee:c .|eeaase
.testa|| . saesat:atava| ae. . smace:eseas.||eie:. t. aaceaaaea|
tetae aa.ve:sa| .tyei.ts test.eay
uasse:|taas.ac.eatestaec.:eet.eaie:aaeaeeae|e,yeitae:.t
tea ta.a,. see.iea||y. cese:.|.a,tae |ee| .a .ts aa.ty asaeaa.aei
s.,a. r eat.eas 1a.saa.tyeaa|ee:ee:| ess. cea|aacaeeessa:y.aac
tae:eie:e aa. ve:sa| . aeee:c.a,te tae|ee| s seaseeeateat
,
,
~acaet
!J:l l n the Origin, Husserl di stinguishes between literature i n the broad sense, the realm
of all written di scourse, and literature as l iterary art. The literary work i s often chosen by
Husserl as the cl ue for analyzing the ideality of cultural objecti vi ties. The ideal identity of
the work wi l l never be mistaken for i ts sensible embodi ments. It does not derive i ts i ndi
vi dual identity from the latter. The origin of identity , moreover, i s the criterion which
91
Introductin to the Origin of Geometry
ea|yeaataat.cea|aa.ty|ee:ee:|ess|eaacteiaetaa| .ty.|ata|se
aeee:c.a,teaame:easaac eem|ete|ye:.,.aa|ie:msaacmeca|.t.es
He:eeve:.tae:e|at.eaeitae ese|a:s t etae.:a:eaetya|aa. ty. s
aacea|tec|yaa.aeamea,tae:e:ecaet.easeietae:ea|ta:a|ie:a
t.eas. esee.a||y taese ei tae aea|.te:a:y a:ts r.aa||y. tae |ee| s
:ee:ve| aeaacca:at.eaa:eae.tae:a:e|yseas.||eaeaemeaa.ae:
a:e|y.ate||.,.||eaeaeaa 1ae.:see.ieeaa:aete:sees. ::ecae.||e
1a.s |e.a, eitae |ee|. ta.s .astaaee eiprinted taea,at aese
| aa,aa,e.saetaata:a| . Casteanaeae|a:cea||sa"bibliomenon.
permits us to di stinguish between the real and the ideal . Husserl writes in E (65, pp.
265-66) : "We call real i n a specifc sense all that which, i n real thi ngs i n the broader
sense. is, according to its sense, essentially individualized by its spatiotemporal position;
but we call irreal ever determination which, indeed, is founded with regard to
spatiotemporal appearance in a specifcally real thing but which can appear in dif erent
realities as identical-not merely as simil ar" ( Husserl ' s emphasis) .
Thus the relation between the ideal and the real in all cultural objectivities (and frst in
all the arts) can be expl icated. That is relati vel y easy for the literary work. Thus,
"Goethe' s Faust i s found i n any number of real books (' book' denotes here what i s
produced by men and intended to be read: it i s already a determination which i s itself not
purely material. but a determination of signifcance !) , which are termed exemplars of
Faust. This mental sense which determines the work of art. the mental structure as such,
i s certainly ' embodied' i n the real world. but i t i s not i ndi vidual ized by thi s embodiment.
Or agai n: the same geometrical proposition can be uttered as often as desi red: every real
utterance has . . . identically the same sense" (ibid. , p. 26) .
But how can we determine the ideality of a work whose proto individualization is tied to
the work' s single spatiotemporal embodiment? How can we make i ts i deality appear by
varying factual exemplars. si nce the latter can only imi tate a factuality and not express or
" indicate" an i deal sense? I s i t, i n short. the same for the ideality of the pl astic arts. of
architecture? Or of music. whose case i s even more ambiguous? Although repetition may
be of a di ferent nature here. which in each case requires an appropriate and prdent
anal ysi s. i t i s no less possible in principle and thus makes an incontestable ideality
appear: "To be sure, an ideal object like Raphael ' s Madonna can in fact have only one
mundane state (Weltlichkeit) and i n fact i s not repeatable in an adequate identity (of the com
plete ideal content). But in principle this ideal is indeed repeatabl e, as is Goethe's Faust"
(ibid. ) .
From the frst perception, then, of a work of plastic art as such (whose i deal value i s
primordially and intri nsically rooted i n an event), there i s a sort of i mmediate reduction of
factuality which permi ts, next, the neutralization of the necessary imperfection of re
production. Here is not the place to prolong these analyses of aesthetic perception and
ideality. Husserl i s content to si tuate their domain and to defne prel i mi nary, i ndispens
able distinctions . He proposes some analogous di stinctions in the cultural sphere of pol i
tics and stri ves to bring to light both the ideality of the constitution of the state (of the
national wil l . for exampl e) and the originality of its "boundness" to the factual ity of a
territory, a nation, etc . , wi thi n which this constitution can be i ndefnitely repeated as i ts
ideal validity (ibid. , pp. 266-67) .
9 L' Activite rationaliste de l a physique contemporaine (Pari s: Presses U ni versi tai res
de France, 1 95 1 ) , pp. 6-7.
92
Jacques Derrid
iataeOrigin, uasse:|.||am.aatesme:ec.:eet|ytaatm. |. eaei:.
t.a,
aesec.uea|ts.,a.ieat.eaaac. me:taaeeaeaaca|:eacy:eee,mzec
. ataeLogical Investigations . 1aec.mea|tyei. tsces:.t.ea.scaete
taeiaettaat:.t.a,ceiaes aac eem|etes tae am|.,a.tyeia|||aa
,aa,e. ~s tae:eeesseitaatesseat.a|aaceeast.ta.veea
ae.ty
ie:
em|ec.meat. |aa,aa,e.sa|se ae:eeve:ya|se|ate|y. cea|e|,eet,. . e. .
ae:et:ata,. s iaetaa||yaaceeat.a,eat|yem|ec.ec.Ceave:se| y.t:ata
aas.tse:.,.a.aaa:eaacs.m|e:.,atteseeeaaac:.t.a,
.?ateaee
eeast.tatec .teeac.t.eases:ess.ea. . a. ts ta:a. asaaem.:. ea|iaet .
1:ata ceecseatae a:e ess.|. | . ty eisea|.a,aac :.t.r,.
|at. s
.aceeaceateiaat. s se|eae::.ttea. .aseia:
eia
aataea,att:ata.weaave:ev.eas|yseeataatt:ataeae:ca:e. ta.s
ay.taeat|e. a,taea,at.aaete:.aiaetaactaat. saat:c.ea||;
emaae.atest:atai:em a||em.:.ea|sa|]eet. v. ty. a||iaetaa|| .e.
c
tae ae|e :ea| e:|c. ~t tae samet.me. maa s eemmaaa||em, . s
|. uecteaae|eve| , i -1, ..teaaaea:..aeaeet . asat:aaseeaceta|
eemmaa.ty.1aeaataeat.eaetei:. t.a,. sat:aaseeaceata|:ecaet.e
e:ie:mec|yaactea:ctaewe. nats.aee. .ae:ce:teeseaee:|
ci
aess seasemust i:stbe able te|esetcea. ataee:|caac|ecees.tec
.asas.||e sat.eteme:a|. ty. .tmastat.ts?:.ateat
ndition
of acts of objective cognition. The Origin maintains these two themes. That IS the difculty
we are striving to il l uminate here.
We take this word in the broad sense of sign-signifer or "sign-expression" (graphic
or vocal), the meaning that Husserl gives this term by opposing it to the " indcative" sig
(LI, I , 1 , 1 -5, pp. 269-75) . On the basis of this distincion, we ould Interpret the
phenomenon of crisis (which, for Husserl , alwas rfer
.
s to
.
a dl sord or I11?
,
ess of lnguae)
as a degradation of the sign-expression into a Sign-indIcatIOn, of a clear (klar) intentIon
into an empty symbol .
93
Introductin to the Origin of Geometry
aeee:asea|y.taem.:.e.smaacaeaa. | eseay.aea:s. aaa.|ese
aya.ea. s,at|east|eeaaseeiee:ta.amet.n,taeeeat:a:yeiem.:.
e.sm tae ess.|.|.ty eit:ata s diappearance. wea:ese| yase tae
am|.,aeas e:c c. saea:aaee waatc. saea:s .s aat .s aaa. a.
| atec.|ata|seaateeases..ate:m.tteat|ye:ceia.te| y. teaea:inJact
yet.taeataaeet.a,.ts|e.a,e:|e.a, sease.1ecete:m. aetaeseaseei
ta.s c. saea:aaeeeit:ata. staemestc.mea|t:e||emesec|ytae
Origin aaca||eiuasse:| sa.|eseayeia. ste:y.ra:tae:me:e.ee:e
aaa||eteiac.auasse:|aaaaea.veea|:eseaseteaaest.eaa.ea
ea|yma|estaateiaeaemeae|e,y. tse|i:eta:a.aat. staeseaseei.ts
aea:.a,:1aatea. veeat.ea.| |:eseat|y:evea||etaaemaeatae
aatae:eitae Crisis as a st:aa,e: te a. ste:y e: ae iaacameata|| y
. aeaa||eaeaseita|.a,. t se:.eas| y. aacataate.at, . ataesame
memeat, ae st:. veste :eseeta.ste:.e.ty s ea eea| .a: s.,a. | eat.ea
aacess.|.i .tyaact:a| yteeaet:atetaem.
waat taea .sta.sess. |. |.tyeic.saea:aaee:
i . iataei:st|aee.|etas:a|eeattaeayetaes. seiadeath oj sense
.a,eae:a|.ta.atae. ac. v. caa|eease.easaess uasse:|e|ea:|ysee.| es
.ataeOrigin aace|seae:e taat. eaee sease aea:ec .ae,e |e,.ea|
eease.easaess. .tsteta|aaa.a.|at.ea|eeemes. mess.|| e. ~seasetaat
.seease:vecasasec.meata:yaa|.taa|.tyaacaesece:maateteat.a|
.ty eaa ce]a:e |e :eaa.matec . saet :etaoec te aeta. a,aess|ytae
vaa.sa.a,ei:eteat.easei:eteat.eas ra:i:em|e.a,aaeaemeae|e,
.ea|aeta. a,. taeseea||ec' unconscious' " e: ' universal substratum"
ae:e sease.scees.tec.s a | .m.tmeceeieease.easaess(FTL, .
i , C|ea:|y.ata.styeeiaaa| ys. s. aeaa.eaie:m.ca||ec.mea|
t.esa|:eacye. ,a .uasse:|. sea|ye::.eca|eattaee:maaeaeeaac
v. :taa|:eseaeeeisease.ta. ataemeaac.esa|]eet.aacaeta|eattae
a|se|ate|y.cea|O|]eet.v.tyeisease,a.aecta:ea,aseeeaaac:.t.a,
i:emtaatsa|]eet. v.ty.Neta.sO|]eet. v.ty.sieaacta:eateaecast:ata
. ataee:| c. ProfoundJorgetJulness tae:eie:eesteacs.atetaesaeesei
.ate:sa|]eet.v.tyaactaec.staaee|eteeaeemmaa.t.es Forgetfulness
.s aa.ste:.ea|eate,e:y.
` I n Ideas I; in E; but above all in FTL ( i n terms which are literally taken up again in
the Origin) , cf. in particular Appendix I I , 2c, pp. 3 1 8-1 9.
08
On the naivete of the classic problems of the Unconscious and on the question of
knowing whether an intentional analysis can open a methodical access to the Uncon
scious, see " Fink' s Appendix on the Problem of the ' Unbewussten,' " i n C, pp. 385-87 .
Forgetfulness is a word that Husserl rarely employs in the Crisis; he never uses it i n
the first text of the Origin, perhaps because habit relates it very easil y t o i ndividual
consciousness or to its psychological sense: perhaps also because it can suggest an
annihilation of sense.
94
Jacques Derri
2. 1ae,:aa.es.,a,tae,aa:aateeeiO|]eet.v.ty,eaaa|sein fact |e
cest:eyec. 1a.scaa,e:. s.aae:eat.ataeiaetaa|e:|c|.aessei. ase:.
t.ea.tse|i,aacaeta.a,eaaceia.t.ve|y:eteet. ase:.t.eai:emta. s. i a
saeaacase, |eeaaseuasse:|eeas.ce:sseaseae.tae:aa.a.tse|iae:a
a:e s.:.taa| .ate:.e:.ty |at aa e|]eet ta:ea,a aac ta:ea,a, e
m.,ati:stta.a|taattaeie:,etia|aessa.eaie| |esaeataecest:ae
t. eaeiO|]eet.v.ty s eastec.a|s. ,a[signe gardien] ea| caetaaeet,as
. aa r| atea. sm e: ne:,sea. sm, tae sa:iaee eia sease .taeat
aace:m.a.a,tae sease.tse|i. saeaaie:,etia|aessea|caetea|ysa
:essta. ssease|atea|caaa. a. |ate.t.ataesee.ie|e.a,. ataee:|c
te a.ea .ts O|]eet.v.ty .s eat:astec. re: uasse:| e|ea:|y sa.c ta. s.
.aseia: as s.,aseaa|e. mmec. ate|ye:eet.||e |yeve:yeae. atae. :
corporeality; .aseia: as tae.:|ec.es aac ee:e:ea| ie:ms a:e a|ays
a|:eacy.aaa.ate:sa|]eet.veae:. zea.taeaseaseeaa|ecees.tectae:e
aaceemmaaa|.zec[mettre en communaUf] . Ce:e:ea|este:.e:.tyaa
cea|tec|yceesaetconstitute taes. ,aassaea|at,.aaseasetaate
mas|ma|ee|ea:.. sindispensable te.| .
Yet tae ayetaes. s ei saea aiaetaa| cest:aet.eacees aet . ate:est
uasse:| a| a| | . wa.|e eem|ete|y :eee,a. z. a, tae te::.iy. a,reality ei
taeea::ea|:. s|. aeea|cceay.taayta.a|a|| e. . . e. .aaya. |esea. ea|
s.,a.| eaaee. Necea|taeea|cacm.ttaataaa. ve:sa|eeara,.at. ea.
a e:|c.ce|a:a.a,ei|.|:a:. es. e:aeatast:eaeeimeaameatse:
ceeameats .a ,eae:a| ea|c. at:. as.ea| | y:ava,e |eaac ea|ta:a|
. cea|.t. es. aeseaet.eaeeve|eca|eve. nytae.:acae:eaeeteseme
iaetaa|.t,,taese. cea| .t.es, in their ver sense, ea|c|eva|ae:a||ete
taat e:|c|, aee. ceat Deata .s ess.||eie:taem a|eae aac aas tae
t:aaseeaceata|s.,a. aeat.eae]astae,:aatec.t, |atea|,.aseia:as
tae |eaac . cea| . t, .s aa. matec e: t:ave:sec |, a t:aaseeaceata|
.ateat.ea,ea|,. aseia:as.t.s,a. cec|,tae1e| eseiaaa|se|atei:ee.a,
a.eaaasaet|eeaia| |,atta. aecuat| .|etaata.eae:.eatsuasse:| s
:eueet.ea, see.aea||,,taeia||,i:eec.cea|.t,aaca|se|ateO|]eet.v.t,
eisease,ie:a.eamataemat.es. s taemece| ), taeta:eateiaa.at:. as. e
cest:aet.ea|ytae|ecyeitaes.,aeaa|e:a|eceat ~| |iaeaa|:.t.a,s.
.aa.ea|:ataeea|c|esec. meatec. . | | aeve:|eaayta.a,. ataem
se| ves|atseas.||eesem| a:s. . ac.v.caa|eveats. asaeeaac|.me
,a.ea. sea|yt:aete+ ee:ta.ace,:eeie:|eaac. cea|. |. es,. s. aee
t:ata ceesnot esseat.a| |y ceeac eaany of them, taey eea|call |e
cest:eyec .taeateve:ta|.a,the ver sense of a|se|ate. cea|.ty. ua
cea|tec|y. a|se|ate. cea|.ty ea|c|e eaaa,ec. ma|.|atec. +ac eve:
ta:eain fact; e:aas.tea|cc. s+ea:.aiaeti:emtae sa:i+eeei
taee:|c. |a| .ts seaseei|e.a,ast:ata. a.ea.s aet.ataee:|c-
ae.|ae:.aea:e:|cae:e.aeaayetae:-ea|c:ea. a.ataet.a.tse|i
95
Introductin to the Origin of Geometry
its |e. a,sease ea|c :ese:ve .ts eaintrinsic a. ste:. e.ty. . |s ea
.ate:eeaaeet. eas, aactaeeatast:eaeeie:|c|ya. ste:yea|c:ema.a
exterior te.t .
1aat .s aat uasse:| meaas aea ae eesesinternal e: .at:.as.e
(innere) a.ste:.e.tyteexternal (aussere) a.ste:y.1a. sc. st.aet.ea, a.ea
aasea|yaaeaemeae|e,.ea|sease,. scee.s.ve. itea|c|ei:a. t|ess
ie: a. mte e|]eettaat a.ste:.e.ty e:|e.a,.aa. ste:y .s :ee.se| y tae
ess.|.|.ty ei|e.a,intrinsically esesec te taeextrinsic, ie:taeatae
a. ste:.e.tya|se|ate|y:ee:teaayt:ata seaseea|c|em. ss.a,,aac
uasse:| s c. seea:seea|c|e|aa,ec. ateaeeaias.eaeis.,a.ieat.eas
aac :e,.eas . we ea|c taea |e eeaeec.a,taat aa:e.cea|.tyeaa |e
eaaa,ec|ya:ea|eaase ,a.ea.ste|esesease. ii,eemet:y.st:ae, .ts
.ate:aa|a.ste:ymast|e savec.ate,:a||yi:ema| |seas. ||ea,,:ess.ea.
s. aee,eemet:y.st.ecae.tae:teta. smemeatae:e,ae:teta.ste::.te:y
ae:e,ae:teta.se:|cae:e,|attea||taee:|c( Weltall) , aeta. a,.| |
eve:staac|eteeataee:|c|yese:.eaeesa.ea.aea:aatec,eemet:y
aacaattaeyaave|e,aaa,a. a. c.seeve:.a,ai:esa,.taeataayt:aees
aacaue:tae sa:eac.a,eita. se:|cae:e,tae atas eiaaacveata:e
|a:.ec . a aaetae: :ea| a.ste:y. i aeema:.sea . ta veritas aeterna,
aese :ee:a. ste:.e.tyuasse:|.saeste,:as aac a|ea|a.eaae
sea|sme:eaacme:eeueaasa. staea,at|eeemesa|| a:ec|ya. ste:y.
ae :ea| ceve|emeatetae: taaa taat eitae va:.a||eesam|e.ate:ests
a.m. ~eee:c.a,|y,taeayetaes.seitaee:|c.ceeatast:eaeeea|c
evease:veasa:eve|ate:y| et.ea.
1aas, esaea|c|ea||ete:eeatanalogously taeiameasaaa|ys.sei
seet.ea 49 eiIdeas i ' 1ae aaa|ys.s eeae| acectaat. ai:e: a ee:ta.a
e.cet.et:aaseeaceata| :ecaet.ea, a:e eease.easaess .s . ataa,. ||e,
evea aea tae es. st.a, e:|c .s aaa. a. | atece:iaetaa|ese:.eaeec.s
se|vec ta:ea,a.ate:aa|eear.et. . . . ate.||as.ea(Ideas I, 49, . 1 37
,mec.iec}, . uasse:|c. caetc. satetaataace:taesee.:eamstaaeesa||
eease.easaessea|cin fact |ecest:eyecaactaat.tse:|c|yes. steaee
ea|c|eea,a|iec.tataee:|c.iaacc.t.ea,taee|ea:est.ateat.eaei
The opposition between intrinsic penetration and extrinsic circumspection is al
ready announced in Ideas I, preci sel y concering the hi story of geometry. There Husserl
shows how psychologistic or hi storicist empiricism remains "outside" [ Derrida' s empha
sis] "geometrical thought and intuition, " whereas "we should enter vital ly into these
acti vi ti es and . . . determine their immanent sense " (25, p. 85 [modifi ed]). Once exter
nal hi story i s "reduced, " nothing i s opposed to the fact that thi s immanent sense may
have its own parti cular hi stori ci ty. The opposition between the two hi stories i s an expl i ci t
theme i n the Crisis ( see, for exampl e, 7, pp. 1 7-1 8, and 1 5, p. 7 1 ) , i n "Philosophy as
Mankind' s Self-Refection" (c, pp. 338-39), and above al l in the Origin.
l 0 l
P. 1 36. The movement i s taken up again i n CM, 7, pp. 1 7-1 8.
96
Jacques Derrd
ta. saaa|ys.saaciet.ea. stees|.eatea:ecaet.eaa.eamast:evea|te
tae|rkegion-t:aaseeaceata| eease.easaess-taeesseat.a|:e|at. v.ty
eitae e:|c s sease ,tae e:|c |e.a, tae teta|.tyei:e,.eas, s.aee
t:aaseeaceata|eease.easaesseaaa|aysaac.taeem|etei:eecem
mec.iye:saseactaetaes. seieach ,tae:eie:eeiall) eeat.a,eates.s
teaee aac eieach ,tae:eie:e eiall) t:aaseeaceaee. .ts ve:y sease . s
ce]a:eaaca|se|ate|y. aceeaceateitaeae|ee:|c.1aes.taat.eaei
t:ata. a:t.ea|a:|y ei ,eemet:.ea| t:ata. . s aaa|e,eas. it tae:eie:e
:eve|estaesameaest.eas .
i aiaet. ta. se.cet.e. aceeaceaee. |:ea,atte| .,at. aametaece|e,.
ea|.cea|.sm|yaiet.ea.eaa|eaest.eaecaste. tsva|ae|eyeactae
memeateiIdeas I; . e . |eyeactaememeattaee. cet.et:aaseeaceata|
:ecaet.ea aas aet yet atta.aec .ts iaa| :ac.ea|.ty aac. s :ev.s.eaa||y
. mme|.|.zec. aeae:e,.ea.i aeaeet. tae:e,.eaeia:eeease.easaess.s
tae:es. caeeia saseas.ea taatst.|| :ema.asme:ee.cet.e taaa
t:aaseeaceata|aac.sea|ytaemest:eieaaceitaee.cet.e:ecaet.eas
Yetta. ssaseas.ea.a.eateacstec|seeve:tae:ete:e,.easesseat.a|
st:aeta:es aac .s ee:ta.a|yeeast.tat.veeitaee:|c. .s eeast.tatec.t
se|i.~ac. asuasse:|.||say. . t. saettaea|t.mate t:aaseeaceata|
:e,:ess.ea(ibid. , 8 1 , .2 1 6) . 1 02 wea|cuasse:|aave]ac,ecta. siet.ea
va|.ctaememeataestac.ec,ie:esam|e..ataeCartesian Meditations)
tae,eaet.eeeast.tat.eaeitaeego . ataeaa. tyei. ts a. ste:y:
i a
aee:ta.aseaseeeaa sayyes 1a:ea,atae se| .s.st.eayetaes. s. a
a.eataeCartesian Meditations a:ei:steeaeaec. a:eeease.easaess
. sst.||eeas.ce:ecastaata.eaaee:|c|yiaetaa|.tyeaaeaet:ateas
saea. as "a selfcontained nexus of being" (Ideas I, 49, 1 39
,mec.iec} ,. uacea|tec|y. tae .at:ae,e|e,.ea|sec.meatat.ea. tae e
teat.a|ev. ceaee.tae :es. caes. aactae:eie:eaees
taatta. s a.s
te:y ma|es aeeessa:y a:eea|yaaete:|eisease . nat|ytae.::e
|aeea|. |.ty. .::eve:s.|.| .ty. aac.ava:. a|.| .tyeitae.:.ate:eeaaeet.eas.
a:etaeyaeta| se iaets e:iaetaa| st:aeta:es.ta:eseettea.ea
a:eeease.easaessea|cae|ea,e:|ei:ee:Cea|ctaesesec.meata:y
st:aeta:es ce]a:e sa:v.vetaeaaa.a. |at.ea. taeeve:ta:e. .aae:c.
tae eem|ete va:.at.ea eiiaetaa|.ty: ~s sease. ea|c taey aet|e
ma:|ec|yaee:ta.ae:ce:eitaeiaetaa|e:|ctea.eapast eease. eas
aess. st.ec-aeease.easaesst. ectae:e|y. tsea.ate:eeaaeet.easaac
st:aeta:a||y. m| .eatec.aeve:y:eseateease.easaess:
I 02
These fi rst reductions lead us to "the very threshold of phenomenology" (Ieas I,
88, p. 237) .
' `` Already cited [see note 7 above] . Al so cf. on thi s FTL. Appendi x I I , 2h .
pp. 3 1 6-1 7 .
` `` Already cited [ see note 7 above] .
97
Introductin to the Origin of Geometry
uasse:|ea|c:e|a||y:e|ytaat..asaeaaease.ea:eeeas. ce:.a,
iaetaa| st:aeta:es . atae |.ie eitaeego-i . e. , st:aeta:es |eaac te
seme :ecae.||e eeat.a,eaey-aac aetesseat.a| eaes :ecaeecte tae.:
a:e .cea|.ty. 1ae aa.ty eitaeego' s "histor" .staat eitaeeidos
"ego. " uasse:| s cese:. t.ea meaas taat tae esseat.a| ie:m eieve:y
.ate:eeaaeet.ea. eve:ysec.meatat.ea. aactae:eie:eeve:ya.ste:y ie:
eve:yego .sse|isaue.eat. w.ta.ata.s)oeia. ste:.e.tytaate.sa
teatta.aasaa.ava:.aat .a||iaetea.ste:.ea|.ate:eeaaeet.easa:eva:.
a||e at. ||
s. m.|a:|y.s. aeetae.ate:eeaaeet.easaacsec.meatat.easei,eemet
:.ea|t:ataa:ei:eeeia||iaetaa| .ty.aee:|c|yeatast:eaeeaaattruth
.tse|i.acaa,e:.~||iaetaa|e:.| .tae:eie:e.stesattaeta:esae|cei.ts
.ate:aa|a.ste:.e.ty vea. ia||,eemet:.ea|ceeameats -aacase|| .
a||aetaa|,eemete:s-aacteeemete:a.aeaecay.tesea|eita.sas
aaeveatei,eemet:yea|c|eteeemm.tave:y se:. easeeaias.ea
eiseaseaactea|c.eate:eseas.|.| .tyie:a||:.,e:easc.seea:se Oae
eaaaeteeme|ae|tea| |ta.sev.ceaee.taeatma|.a,taeseas.||etae
,:eaacei,eemet:.ea|t:ata aac. tae:eie:e. .taeataest.ea. a, eaee
me:etaeseaseei,eemet:yeeast.tatecasaae.cet.ese.eaee Neta.s
seaseasseea:e|ycee.cec.ta.ataestat.eaaa| ysestaat.asesa
a|eve. e:e tae .ac.seasa||e,aa:c :a.| s ie:a|| ,eaet.e e:a. ste:.ea|
aeaemeae|e,y
3 . weea|c|eia||yeeav.aeec..iae:e-as.a a.s stat.eaaa| yses-
uasse:|aaceeas.ce:ec:.t.a,te|ea seas.||eaeaemeaea natc.c
eaet]ast iac eat taat :.t.a,. .aasmaea as .tas ,:eaac.a, ,e:
eeat:.|at.a,tetae,:eaac.a,eit:ata s a|se|ateO|]eet.v.ty.asaet
merely aeeast.tatec seas.||e |ecy(Korper), |at as a|se a :ee:|y
eeast.tat.a,|ecye/)-tae.ateat.eaa|:.me:c.a|.tyeiaue:eaac
Neeit:ata: ii:.t.a, .sboth aiaetaa| eveataactaeasa:,.a,ei
sease. .i.t .s |etaKorper aaa Leib, ae ea|c :. t.a, :ese:ve . ts
Leiblichkeit i:emee:e:ea|c.saste::uasse:|. saet,e. a,te. mme|. |. ze
a. saaa|ys.s.ta.ata.sambiguity, a.eaie: a.m .s ea|ya:ev.s.eaa|
aaciaetaa| eeaias.eaei:e,.eas 1aeaeaemeae|e,.stmastc.sse|ve
taeam|.,a.ty. . iaeceesaetaatte|e:ecaeecte ea. veeat.ea. te
eaeese s. |eaee. e:te:ee..tateaeaemeae|e,y.atephilosophy. uas
se:| .tae:eie:e .ma.ata.asa. sc. ssee. at.veaaa| ys.saacc.sa:t.ea|atestae
am|.,a.ty iae:ce:te,:astaeaata:eeitaecaa,e:ta:eatea.a,t:ata
itsel .a.tseeast.tat.veseeeae::.t.a,. .ae:ce:aette|eave. ate:
aa| a.ste:.e. ty.ae. s,e.a,tet:ae|ceatae.ateat.eaei:.t.a,,e:ei
:eac.a,, .a.tse|iaac .a .ts a:.ty. .a a ae :ecaet.ea ae . s,e.a, te
.se|atetae.ateat.eaa|aeta.eaeeast.tatesKorper as Leib aacma.ata.a
ta.saet.a.tsLeiblichkeit, . a.ts|.v.a,t:ata sease saeaaaaaa| ys.sae
| ea,e:aasaayaeeceiKorper assaea Oa|y.atae.ateat.eaa|c. mea
98
Jacques Derrid
s.eaeia:ee:| yaa. mate|ecy, eitaegeistige Leiblichkit, me:e:e
e. se| y, .a tae Geistigkeit eitaeLeib ,te taeese|as.ea eia| | iaetaa|
ee:e:ea| .ty, , . s sease .at:.as.ea||y ta:eateaec ~|taea,a .a a word
[mot], Korper aacLeib, |ecyaacresa ,a:einfact aame:.ea| | yeaeaac
taesamees.steat ,tae.:seasesa:eceia.t.ve|yaete:e,eaeeas, aacae
ta. a,eaaeemetetae|atte:ta:ea,ataeie:me:Forgetulness eit:ata
.tse|i.||taas|eaeta.a,|attaeia.|a:eeiaaaetaactaea|c.eat.eaeia
:eseas.|. | .ty,a|aseme:etaaaaceieat-aacta.sie:,etia|aesseaa|e
maceteaea:.ae:seaea|y eatae|as. s eiaa.ateat.eaa|a. ste:y
r:emtaea ea,aetae:.t:ema.asastae c.saea:aaeeei.ate:sa|
]eet.vet:atae:,asesa.ca|eve, aa.ste:.ea|eate,e:y,forgetfulness
eaaaeve:tae|ess|ecese:.|ecasaaeaemeaeaeitaeego, aseaeei.ts
.ateat.eaa| ec.ieat.eas ~s. ateat.eaa|sease, eve:yta.a,eaaaac
saea|c|ecese:.|ecea| yasamec.ieat.eaeitaea:eego, :ev.cectae
seaseeieaeaec.| eat.ea.s :aceat| y:eseetec, asuasse:|t:.este
ce,ie:esam|e, eeaee:a.a,taec.uea|teeast.tat.eaeitaealter ego.
wea|seseetaat ,ie:taesame:easea,ie:,etia|aess. ||aeve:|e:ac.
ea| ,aeeve::eieaac.tmay|e,aacseaseeaaa|ays, .a:.ae.|eaac
ce]a:e ,|e:eaet.vatec
iaFormal and Transcendental Logic aactaea .ataeCrisis, | .a,a. st.e
e|]eet.ieat.eaaacmataemat.ea|sym|e| .zat.eae:e :eseatecastae
eeeas.ea ei tae teeaa.e. st s aac e|]eet. v. st s a|.eaat. ea, a.ea ce
,:acecse.eaee. ateas|.||e:,ame'1a.saeeasat.ea,ta|eaaa,a.a.a
taeOrigin, . sme:ea:t.ea|a:|yc. :eeteca,a. asttaemetaece|e,.ea|aac
ee:at.ve teaea. a, ei mataemat.es Oae |ea:as te ase s.,as aese
:.me:c.a| sease ,a.ea . s aet a|ays |ae |e,.ea| sease taat .s
sec. meatec aac aeeess.||e te aa explication) . s eeaeea|ec e: etea
t.a| .zecaace:sec.eatat.eas 1ae| atte:, a.eaa:eea| y.ateat. ease:
.ateat.eaa| seases mace ce:maat, a:e aet ea|ysuperimposed .a tae
.ate:aa||eeem.a,eisease,|ata:eme:ee:| essv. :taa| | yimplicated .a
tae.:teta| .ty.aeaeasta,ee:ste,iataeOrigin, taeaet.eaeiStufe aas
|etaast:aeta:a|aac,eaet.eseaseaaceaa|et:aas|atec|y ste e:
|y sta,e 1ae ,ee|e,.ea|. ma,e ei sec. meatat.ea t:aas|ates :e
a:|a||ye||taesty|e eitaat. m| .eat.ea it|:.a,ste,etae:,ie: a||
.ateats aac a:eses, tae ie| |e. a, . a,es. 1ae .ma,e eilevel e:
stratum-what .s cees.tec |y aa .a:eac e: a :e,:ess.ea aite: tae
:ac.ea|aeve|ty eiaa .::at.eae:upsurge: eve:yacvaaee, eve:y :e
es.t.ea(Satz) eiaae sease .sat the same time aleap (Satz) aac a
` `` Cf. in particular C, 9f On "meaningless signs" [signes depourvus de signifcation]
and "games-meani ng" [signifcation de jeu] , cf. LI. I , 1 , *20. pp. 304-06. On vocables
and real signs as "bearers" of signifed idealities, cf. E, 65, p. 268.
99
Introductin to the Origin of Geometr
sedimentar (satzartig) ia|||ae|eisease ~|se , tae .ma,eeitae sa|
staat.a|e:maaeaeeeiaat. staea'upposed e:situated under taesa:
iaee eiaetaa|| y:eseatev. ceaee ~ac iaa||y, tae . ma,eeitae eea
eea|ec:eseaeetaataa aet.v.tyeieseavat.eaeaaa|ays:e:ecaee
a|eve ,:eaac as tae ieaacat.ea, taat . s .tse|i,:eaacec, ei a. ,ae:
st:at.ieat.eas it|:.a,sa|| ta.s te,etae:. atae st:aeta:a|aacinternal
aa. tyeiasystem,eia:e,. ea. aa.eaa||cees.ts,.ate::e|atec|at
c.st.aet,a:ee:.,.aa||y:ese:.|ec|yaaarchi-tectonics.
Ceai:eat.a, sec.meatec sease, ea: i:st caa,e: . spassivity. ia tae
Origin, uasse:|ce|| sme:eeatae:eeet.veaeeetaaeeeis.,as-i:st
.a:eac.a,-taaaeataeseeeaca:yteeaa.ea|e:|e,.ea|aet.v.tytaat. s
aetea|yaeteeat:ac.ete:y tetaei:stass.v. ty |at, eataeeeat:a:y,
saeses. t 1ae syataes.sa.eaaa|eas tae s.,a te s.,a.ieat.ea. s
i:st, .aiaet, aeeessa:.|yass. veaacassee. at.ve 1aeess.|. | .tyei
,.v.a,ayteta.si:stexpectation eisease.sa| ast.a,caa,e: natea|y
freedom eaa|et.tse|i|eta:eateaec. ata.say.ea:ea|aysi:eete
:eaa|eaaayass. ve| y:eee.vecsease,te:eaa.matea||. tsv.:taa|.t.es,
aacte t:aasie:mtaem|ae| . atetaeee::eseac.a,aet.v.ty
1a.si:eecem. stae eaae.tyie::eaet.vat.eataat|e|ea,se:.,.aa||yte
eve:y aamaa|e.a, as a sea|.a,|e.a, ( 1 6) . nyta. s :eaet.vat.ea,
a.ea, uasse:|states , .saet.aiaet taeae:maac.taeata.eaa
ee:ta.a eem:eaeas.ea .s a|ays ess.|| e, i aet.ve| y :e:ecaee tae
:.me:c.a|ev.ceaee .ima|emyse|iia||y:eseas.|| eie:aaceease. eas
eitaesease taati ta|e a Reaktivierung . s, .a taecema.a ei.cea|
e|]eet.v.t.es , tae ve:y aeteia||Verntwortung aaceia| |Besinnung, . a
taeseasesceiaecea:|.e:Reaktivierung e:m.ts|:.a,.a,te|.ie,aace:
tae sec.meata:y sa:iaees ei | .a,a.st.e aac ea|ta:a| aea. s.t.eas, tae
seasea:.s.a,i:em. ast.tat.a,ev.ceaee1a.ssease.s:eaa. matec|ytae
iaettaat i :este:e.tte.ts ceeaceaeeeamyae|aac :e:ecaee.t .a
myse|isaea as.taac|eea:ecaeecie:taei:stt. me|yaaetae: Oi
eea:se,taeaet. v.tyei:eaet.vat.ea.sseeeacwaat.t,.ves|ae|teme
l 0
This theme of passi ve synthesis is copiousl y explicated i n EJ and eM, but once
again it is in FTL that it i s particularly focused (as in the Origin) by the problem of the
sign and of the sedi mentation of ideal objecti vities. Cf. i n parti cular Appendix I I , pp.
3 1 3-29. On the sense of acti vities and passi vities in a phenomenology of reading as
outlined in the Origin, also see FTL, 1 6, pp. 56-60.
Of course, the themes of passivity and sedimentation, i . e . , of the potentiality of sense ,
deri ve all thei r seriousness from the fact that they are imposed on a philosophy of actually
present evidence whose "pri nciple of all principles" is the immediate and actual [en acte]
presence of sense itself. If reactivation is valuable and urgent, that is because it can bring
back to present and acti ve evi dence a sense which is thus retrieved out of historical
vi rtual i ty. If, on the surface, phenomenology allows itself to be summoned outside of
itself by hi story, i t thus has found i n reactivation the medi um of its fdel i ty.
100
Jacques De"id
|staee:|,.aa||y:eseat|ve|ata| t|ea,taateitae,eemet:|ea|ie:mat|ea,
ie:esam|e,a|ea| s|etaaaaet|v|tyaacaass|v|ty.i ita| saet|v|ty|s
esee|a||y|||am|aatecae:e,|t|saecea|t|eeaasetaeev|ceaeeeeas|c
e:ec |s taateie:eatecaacesta|||saec|cea|ie:mat|eas .
xeseas||| ||t,ie::eaet|vat|ea| saee:eseas|||||t,. ttea,a,estae
eaeae:eee|ves ,|ata|seaaca:steia||taeeaeaee:eatesaactaea
es:essestaeseaseie:sec| meatat|ease|||te:ateseaseea|,|aseia:as
tae:ea:esa:iaeesava||a||eie:ta| s. 1aeequivocit eies:ess|ea|stae
eaeseaae|ceisec|meata:ycees|ts .1aat.saytae:|ma||y| ast|tat
|a,,eemete:aactaeseaeie| |eaite:a|mmast|eeeaee:aeca|eat
taeaa|vee|tyei| |a,a|st|ees:ess|eaaaca|eatseea:|a,, |yave:y
ea:eia|ee|a|a,eie:cs, :ees|t|eas,aaceem|esesei:ees|t|eas,
t ae:esa|tsa|eaa:ete|eaa. veea||yes:essec( 1 65 ,mec|aec}, .
uasse:| aeve: eeasec te aea| te tae |me:at|ve ei aa|vee|ty
a|vee|ty|staeataeia| | a||esea|ea|a|e::at|ea. i t |sa| | taeme:e
c|uea|taette|eaasty ae:e , astae sease eiea|vee|ty |a,eae:a| |s
|tse|iea|veea| . 1ae:e |sacontingent |a:|vee|ty e:ma|t|s|,a|aeaaee
aacaaessential eae. 1aese a:ea|:eacyc|st|a,a|saec|ataeInvestiga
tions (LI, i , 1 , 26, 3 1 4) . 1aea:stceeacseaaae|]eet|veeeavea
t|ea, taas taee:c ce, s|,a|aes |eta atyeeiaa|ma| aac,|a
Ce:maa,atyeeia,ea, asec| am|aes, . 1a|s|a:|vee|tyceesaet
m|s|eacaayeaeaacea:ea|aysi:eete:ecaee|t. 1aeseeeac|sei
01
To try to illuminate this point, we first would have to approach directly and fo itself
the difcult and decisive problem in phenomenology of activity and passivity in generl
on the basis of texts directly devoted to thi s (EJ, FTL, eM) . Such a study would perhaps
have to conclude that phenomenology has only argued with the arbitrary sense
[exigence du sens] of this couple of concepts, or indefnitely struggled with them, nael y,
wi th the most "irreducible" heritage (and indeed thereby perhaps the most obscuring
heritage) of Wester philosophy. In one of the fnest analyses where he works with the
concepts of passivity, activity, and passivity in activity, Husserl notes that the distinction
between these two notions cannot be "infexible, " and that in each case their sense must
be "recreated" according to "the concrete situation of the analysis, " as "for every
description of intentional phenomena" (E, 23 , p. 1 08) .
I 08
LI, I , 1 , 26, p. 3 1 4: "The class of ambiguous expressions illustrated by this last
example are what one usually has in mind when one speaks of 'equivoation' . Ambiguity
i n such cases does not tend to shake our faith in the ideality and objectivity of
signifi cations. We are free, in fact, to limit our expression to a single signification. The
ideal unity of each of the difering signifcations will not be afected by their attachment to
a common designation" [modifed] .
The purpose of univocity supposes, then, a decisive rupture with spontaneous lan
guage, with the "civil language " of which Leibniz used to speak; after that, "philo
sophical" or "scholarly [savant]" language can freely be given its own particular con
ventions. Does not the sentence just cited sound like the faithful echo of another sentence
of the Nouveaux Essais sur l' Entendement Humain, well known to Husserl and where
101
Introductin to the Origin of Geometr
sa|]eet.vee:|,.a, aac.tceeacseae:|,.aa||ateat.eas. eaa|aysae
ese:|eaeesa|eaaa.matetae.ceat.tyeie|]eet.veseaseaacmase.t
eate: .ate aaie:eseea||e eeaa,a:at.eas . 1a. s |a:. vee. ty . s aa aa
ave|ca||e:atae:taaaeaaaeeam|.,a.tyflurivocite], eaetaateaaaet|e
:emevec i:em ea: |aa,aa,e |y aa a:t|ae. a| cev.ee e: eeaveat.ea
(LI, 3 1 4) .
ueeve:.ta|s|astea.vee.ty. saatse|eaeeaaca. |eseay mast
eve:eeme. i t . s aaave.ca||e ea|y.a aata:a| |aa,aa,e. | e , |atae
iaeteea|ta:a|aeaemeaea:eeec|a,tae:ecaet.ea 1aatuasse:|. sse
aas.eas te :ecaee tae ea|veea| sease eiea|ta:a| aa.vet- :evea| s a
eeaee:ataateaeeme:eeea|c|e.ate::etec|etaasa:eiasa|eia.ste:y
aacasaceeice|.tytetaea:eseaseeia|ste:|e.tyOn the one hand, .a
eaeet . aa|vee.ty :emevest:ata eateia. ste:y s :eaea ua. veea|ex
:ess|ea eem|ete| y |:ea|s tae sa:iaee aac eae:s ae ta:a.a, |ae|
[rep/i] tetaeme:ee:| essv.:taa|s|,a|ieat|eastaattae.ateat.easeea|c
cees.ta||a|ea,taeacvaaeeseia|aa,aa,ee:ea|ta:e. 1aasuasse:| s
eeastaatassee|at|eaeiea. veea|:eeeec.a,s. ta ae:.t|e.smei pro-
fundity |saace:staaca||e neeaase.t|:|a,seve:yta|a,tev.e|ta.a
a:eseataeteiev. ceaee, |eeaase aeta|a,. sa|cceae:aaaeaaeec|a
taeeaam|:aeieteat.a||ateat|eas, |eeaase . taas maste:eca| |tae
cyaam|eseisease.aa. veea||aa,aa,e:ema|asthe same. ittaas|ees
|ts. cea| . ceat|tyta:ea,aeata| | ea|ta:a| ceve|emeat. it.staeeeac.
t.eataata| |eseemmaa|eat|eaamea,,eae:at|easei|avest.,ate:sae
matte:ae c|staat aac assa:estae esaet|tace eit:aas|at.ea aactae
Theophilus says: "i t depends upon us to fix their meanings [signifcations] , at least in any
scholarly language, and to agree to destroy this tower of Babel" (Book I I , Ch . i x, 9 [ET:
New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, tr. Alfred Gideon Langley (Chicago:
Open Court, 1 91 6), p. 373]) 7 This optimism i s only one of the afnities between Leibniz' s
and Husserl's philosophies of language: More broadly speaking, Husserl also very early
felt himself the heir to the Leibnizian conception of logic in general. Cf. notably LI, I ,
Prol . , 60, pp. 21 8f.
I09
On this, cf. above all "PRS, " p. 1 44: "Profundity [Tiefsinn] i s a mark of the chaos
that genuine science wants to transform into a cosmos, into a simple, completely clear,
lucid order. Genuine science, so far as its real doctrine extends, knows no profundity. "
Husserl then proposes t o re-strike (umprigen), as i n the case of a currency rvaluation,
"the conjectures of profundity into unequivocal [German: eindeutige; French: uni
voques] rational forms" and thus to "constitut[e] anew the rigorous sciences. " Likewise,
Husserl ' s criticisms written in the margins of [Heidegger's] Sein und Zeit attribute to a
Tiefsinnigkeit the responsibility for the Heideggerian "displacement" toward what Hus
serl defnes as a facto-anthropological plane. Husserl prefers the value of interiority to
that of profundity or depth, interiority being related to the penetration of interal, intrinsic
(inner), i . e. , essential (wesentlich), sense.
102
Jacques Derrida
a :.|y ei |:a!. |.ea | a et|e: e:!s the other hlndt| e e:y
eeataa. ee.|y:eeessease-eyeactae:eaeaeia. ste:.ea|ec.i
eat.ea..ta|eaeasesa:ea. s|e:yess. -| e.. e .astaet:aas. ss. eaaac
:eee||ee|.ea[recueillement] eisease ua. ee.tyea|y. ac. eatestae|. m
. c. |yei||e |. ste:.ea|etae: Oaeea,a. a. uasse:| s !eaa!ie: aa.
ee.ty ,|.e| |e ie:a|atec -eie:e tae:aet.ee ei|ae:ecaet. ea . s
|ae:eie:eea|ytae:ecae|. eaeie.:.ea||. ste:ytea:caa:ea. ste:y
ae| a :e!aet.ea as| -e :eeeeaee! .aceia.te| y. ie: |aa,aa,e
ae.t|e:eaaae:saea| !-ea. ata.aecaace:tae:eteet. eaeiaa. ee.ty
iia:ac.ea|ea. ee.t,:ee|aces|.ste:y..aeaeet . -y|aa,.a,.t. ate
t|eaeeta:aa|aac . | |t:aas.ss.-|e:.eaesei -eaac .cea| . t. es. a-se
| ateaa.ee.tyea|c.tse|iaaeaeetae:eeaseaeaeetaaateste:.| .ze
e: a:a|yze |.ste:y . at|e .ac.,eaee eiaa .aceia.te .te:at.ea s.aee
ea. ee.|ya|ayse.ceaeesaee:ta.acetaeicee| eeataaceeaeea|
eateiaast. aac|eaeae. saest eassaeaacinteriorize t|eee:y
eiaea|ta:e. aas. aceirecollection (Erinnerung) .at|eue,e| . aasease.
eaeaas. iae. a,t|. sea.ee.ty.|aeeae.eeeiteeaceae:s Oaeea|c
:esem-|etaateiameseyee.te:eeataactase:eseas. -.| .tyie:a| |
ea.eeat.ea.tse|i.at. | .z.a,a|aa,aa,etaateea|ceaa| .zetae,:eatest
ess.-|esyaea:eay.t|| ae,:eatesteteat.a|ie:-a:. ec. aeeaa|atec.
aac .ate:eea .ateat.eas.ta.a eaea | .a,a.st.e atem. eaeaeea-|e.
eaea e:c. eaea s.|e:ees.t.ea. .a a|| e:c| yea|ta:es aac tae. :
est .a,ea.easie:s ,ytae|e,y. :e|.,.ea. se.eaees. a:ts. | . te:ata:e.
e|.t.es. a. | eseay. aac se ie:ta ~ac. | .se eyee. ta. s eaceae:
ea|ct:ytemasetaest:aeta:a|aa.tyeia||e.:.ea|ea| ta:eaea:.a
tae,eae:a|.zecea. eeat.eaeia:. t.a,taat.ae|ea,e:t:aas|at.a,eae
| aa,aa,e . ate aaetae: ea tae -as. s eitae.: eemmea ee:eseisease.
e.:ea| atesta:ea,aeata| ||aa,aa,esateaee.aeeama|atestae. :eae:,. es.
aetaa|.zes tae.: mestsee:et eeaseaaaees. c.se|esestae.:a:tae:mest
eeea ae:.zeas , ea|t. ates tae.: assee.at.e syataeses . asteac ei
ae. c. a,taem. aac:ec.seee:staeeet.ea|aeeiass..ty i asae:t.
:atae:taaaat.teatei| ay .taaetat.eaa:ss. :atae:taaa :e
caee. t. ta. s:.t.a,:ese| ate|ysett|es. tse|iwithin taelabyrinthian ie|c
eiea| ta:e-eaac-y.tseaea.eeat.eas.. ae:ce:tet:ae| ta:ea,a
aac es| e:e tae astest ess.-|e a.ste:.ea| c.staaee taat .s ae at a||
ess.-|e
'
I
Exactitude and univocity are overlapping notions for Husserl . Moreover, the exac
titude of expression will have as its condition the exactitude of sense. Geometry, the
model of the sciences whose objects are exact, will therefore more easily attain univocity
than will the other sciences, phenomenology i n particular. We will retur to this l ater.
About the relations between exactitude and univocity in geometry, also cf. Ideas I, 73,
pp. 1 89-90.
103
Introduction to the Origin of Geometry
1aee|ae:eaceae:. suasse:| s. |e:ecaeee:. ee:.s|e.:.ea|
|aa,aa,emet|ec.ea||ytetaee.at|e:e.|saa. eea|aact:aas|ata-|e
e|eeats a:e aetaa| |y t:aasa:eat. .a e:ce: te :eae| -aesaac ,:as
a,a.aat .|s a:esea:ee aa.ste:.e.tye:t:ac.t.eaa|.tytaatae ceiaete
a.ste:.ea|teta|.ty. | | y.e|cei.tse|i1|. sa.ste:.e.tye:t:ac.t.eaa| .ty.s
a|aysa|:eacy:esaesec-yee:yOcysseaa:eet.t.eaeieyee s
tye .as -ya||philosophy ofhistor ,.ataeea::eatseaseaac-yee:y
phenomenology ofspirit. 1aeesseaeeseiaa.teteta|.t.esaactaet,e|
e,,eia,a:eseitaes. :.t. | | a|a,s-e. cea| .t.estaata:e -eaacte
e.:.ea|a. ste:,Oa| ,-,meaaseia. ste:.e. sm. s .tess. -| ete:ema.a
tae:eaaceeaiasetae. tataemevemeateit:ata
l l l
natuasse:| s :e]eet . ast|e t:aaseeaceata| a:a| |e| te eyee s.
saestaesae:e| at..tyeyee s:e]eet. a.eaa|se:eeeececi:e
aee:ta.aaat. a.ste:.e.smaaca. | |teaasei:emtaea.,|tma:e
ei |.ste:y.
* ! ! 2
a. | |teaste: taata.,atma:e.a ateta|aac:eseat
:esamt.ea. eea|c ea|y saeeeec -y a| |ett.a, .ts saa:e te aa.ee.ty.
aetae:.t.,atc:ai:ea,.eaaa. ee.tye:t:yte:ecaeeaaetae:
Otae:.se. taee:ytestei. ts:eet.t.eaea|caae-eeaaa.ate|| .,.
-| e . at |east .t ea|c |ae :ea.aec se ie:ee: aac ie:ee:yeae
i.se.se. uasse:| aac teac.taa .::ecae.-|e. ea:.ea.a,.aaca|ays
:eaaseeatea. ee.ty. atea:e|. ste:.e.tyiaeaeet .a-se|ateaa. ee. :y
.s. a,.aa-|eea|y. ate| . m.t.a,eases First: saesetaeces.,aatec
ta.a,.saetea| yaaa-se|ate|ys.a,a|a:. .mmata-|e.aacaata:a|e-]eet.
-at a| se aa es.steat aese aa.ty . . ceat.ty. aac O-]eet..ty ea|c .a
taese| es-e:.e:tea| |ea|ta:eNe.iesaeset|a|saeaat|. a,
e:e:eet.ea es. sts. |.a,a.st.e.cea|.tyaac .ts :e]eet eiaa.ee.ty-
. e . tae aet ei |aa,aa,e .|se|i. ate:eae aac i:e t|e eatset | aee
taat saes. t. ea .aaea| ta:e. .aa aete:sei| .a,a.st.e :e| at.eas aac
ees|t. eas. a.ea ea|c |eac ae:c .ta .ateat.ease:. ta |ate:a|
aac. :taa|:e. aseeaees a.ee.ty. stae eea,eat.a| a:seiee:y
ea|ta:e 1a.s i:st ayetaes.s eia aa. eea| aac aata:a| | aa,aa,e .s.
tae:eie:e. a-sa:caaceeat:ac.ete:y
Second: .saettae:esa| ttaesame.i.attaeet|e:e|eei| aa,aa,e.aa
a-se| ate| y.cea| e-]eetmast-eces.,aatec:1a.st.me. tae eaaaeeie:
'
I I
Husserl has always associated "Hegelianism" with "romantici sm" and wi th "hi s
tori ci sm, " to which romanticism is led when "belief" in its "metaphysics of history" has
been lost. (Cf. especially " PRS, " pp. 76-77. ) Was not the e xpression Weltanschauung
frst Hegelian? (Cf. on this J. Hyppol ite, Genesis and Structure ofHegel' s "Phenomenology
of Spirit, " tr. Samuel Cheriak and John Heckman [Evanston: Northwester Uni versity
Press, 1 974] , pp. 469-70. )
I I ?
James Joyce, Ulysses (New York: Random, 1 961 ) , p. 3 4 [ "Hi story, Stephen sai d, i s
a nightmare from which I am trying t o awake. "] .
104
Jacques Derrida
aa.vee.tyea|caet|eeae:ec|ya:eea|ta:a| ,|at|yat:aasea|ta:a|
e|]eet, ie: esam|e, tae ,eemet:.ea| e|]eet. ia aay ease, aa. vee.ty
ee::eseacstetaeve:y veeat.eaeise.eaee. uasse:|:. tes.ataeOri
gin: ia aeee:c .ta tae esseaee ei se.eaee, taea, . ts aaet.eaa:.es
ma.ata.a tae eeastaat e| a. m, tae e:seaa| ee:ta.aty, taat eve:yta.a,
taeyat. atese.eat.ieasse:t.easaas|eeasa.c eaeeaacie:a|| , taat. t
staacsiast, ie:eve:.ceat.ea||y:eeata||e,asa||e.aev.ceaeeaacie:
a:tae:taee:et.ea|e::aet.ea|eacs-as.aca|.ta||ya||ete|e:eaet.
vatec.tatae. ceat.tyei.ts,eaa. ae sease ( 1 65-66 mec.iec} , .
natta. s.ceat.tyeisease,tae,:eaaceiaa. vee.tyaactaeeeac.t.ea
ie::eaet.vat.ea,.sa|ays:e| at. ve, |eeaase.t.sa|ays.ase:.|ec.ta.a
ame|.|esystemei:e|at.easaacta|es. tssea:ee.a.aia.te|yeea
:e]eeteiaea.s.t.ea. vea .itaese :e| at.eas a:e, . ta. aa se. eaee,
:e|at.easeia:e. cea|.t.esaact:atas, taeyceaettae:e.a,. ve:.
aay|esstesemes.a,a|a:|ae.a,s.ae:seet.ve[mises en perspectives],
semema|t.|e.ate:eeaaeet.easeisease, aactae:eie:esememec.ate
aaceteat.a|a.ms. i i, .aiaet,ea.vee.ty. sa|ays.::ecae.||e, taat. s
|eeaasee:csaac| aa,aa,e.a,eae:a|a:eaetceaaaeve:|ea|se
|ateobjects. ' 1aeyceaetessessaay:es. staataace:maaeat.cea
t.tytaat.sa|se|ate| ytae.:ea. 1aey aavetae.:| . a,a.st.e|e.a,i:em
aa.ateat.eaa.eat:ave:sestaemasmec.at.eas.1ae same e:c.s
a|aysetae:aeee:c.a,tetaea|aysc.ae:eat.ateat.eaa|aetsa.ea
tae:e|yma|eae:cs.,a.ieat.ve [signiant] . 1ae:e . sase:teipure
ea.vee.ty ae:e, a.ea ,:es .a tae ve:y :aytam ei se.eaee. Cea
seaeat|y, uasse:| see.ies . a a aete taat tae se.eat.ie statemeat,
.taeat |e.a, aest.eaec a,a.a as te .ts t:ata, a|ays :ema.as
:ev.s.eaa| ,aactaatO|]eet.ve,a|se| ate|yi:m|ae|ec,eeit:ata. s
aa.aia.te.cea( 1 66) . ~|se|ateaa.vee.ty. s.aaeeess.|| e, |atea|yas
aaicea.a tae kaat.aaseaseeaa|e. iitae aa. vee. ty .avest.,atec|y
uasse:|aactaeea.veeat.ea,eae:a|.zec|yeyeea:e.aiaetrelative,
taeya:e, tae:eie:e, aetsesymmetrically. re:tae.:eemmeatelos, tae
es.t.ve va|ae eiaa.vee.ty, . simmediately :evea|ec ea| y .ta.a tae
:e|at.v.tytaatuasse:|ceiaec.ua. vee.ty.sa|setaea|se|ateae:.zeaei
ea. vee.ty ia,. v. a,.ttaeseaseeiaa. aia.tetas|, uasse:|ceesaet
ma|eaa|vee.ty,aseea|c|eiea:ec, taeva| aeie:a|aa,aa,e. meve:
. saecaac taas:emevec eateia. ste:y s :eaea. xatae:, aa.vee.ty .s
|etataea:.e:.aactaete|ee| e,.ea|eeac.t.eaie:a||a. ste:.e.ty..t. staat
I l3
That is why, as we noted above, Husserl could not inquire as to the absoLute ideal
Objectivity concering language itself, whose ideality is always that of a "thematic
index" and not a theme. This irreducible mediacy thus makes illusory all the safety
promised by speech or writing themseLves .
105
Introductin to the Origin of Geometry
.taeata.eataeve:yea.veeat.easeiem.:.ea|ea|ta:eaac a. ste:y
ea|caet|ees.||e .
1ae:e||emeiaa.vee.tyeeaees. mmec. ate| yaeataatei:eaet.va
t.ea.itsseaema.staesame ,ie:,.taeatam.a. ma|| .a,a. st.et:aasa:
eaey, ae :eaet.vat.eaea|c|e. ma,.aa|| e. nat.iaa. vee.ty . s.aiaet
a|ays :e|at.ve, aac .i.ta|eaee:m. tstae :ecaet.ea eia| |em.:.ea|
ea|ta:eaaceia||sec. meatat.ea, .staeess.|.| .tyeiaa:ea.ste:yei
seasete|ecea|tecce]a:e:He:ea:t.ea|a:|ys. aee, aue:aav.a,:e
seatec tae eaae.ty ie: :eaet. vat.ea, uasse:| cees aetia.|te as|tae
se:.easaest. eaof itsjnitude. iaase. eaee| . |e,eemet:y,aeseetea
t.a|.tyie:,:eta.sest:ae:c.aa:y, .t. s.mess.||eie:eve:y,eemete:.
at eve:y . astaat aac eve:yt.meae :esames a.s tas| aite: aeeessa:y
.ate::at.eas, te e:ie:m a teta| aac . mmec.ate :eaet.vat.ea ei tae
. mmease eaa. a ei ieaac.a,s |ae| te tae e:. ,.aa| :em. ses ( 1 66
,mec.iec} , . 1aeaeeess.tyeitaese. ate::at.eas.saiaetaa|eae, s|ee,
:eiess.eaa||:ea|s, aac seie:ta, ,a.ea aas aeseaseeema:ec.ta
,eemet:.ea|t:ata|at.sae| ess.::ecae.||ete. t.
~total :eaet.vat.ea,evea. itaate:eess.|| e, ea|c a:a|yzetae
.ateoa|a.ste:yei,eemet:y]astassa:e| yasea|ctae:ac.ea|.mess.
|.|.tyeia||:eaet.vat.ea.uasse:|. saete::.eca|eattaat.atta. se.at
ateta|:eeae:at.eaeie:.,.as.s st.||ea|yate|ee| e,.ea|ae:.zea. re:
aace:taeest:.as.eaeeess.tytaat,eemet:.ea|aet. v.ty|e.ate:m.tteat. s
a| sea.cceaaaesseat.a| aac.ate:aa|aeeess.ty. s.aee ae. eeeeitae
,eemet:.ea|ec.iee.sse|i same.eat,aeimmediate :eaet.vat.ea.sess.
||e, eaaay|eve| . 1aat. say , uasse:|:ema:|s, tae .ac.v.caa| aac
eveataesee.a|eaae.ty ie::eaet.vat.ea. seiaae|v.easia.tace
( 1 68) . i t . || a| ays|ecea.ec.mmec.ateteta|.ty.
1ae e|v.easaess [evidence] ei taat ia.tace aac ei taat aeeessa:y
mec.aeyeea|cstamuasse:| s ae|ea:eseasaeasease. s. aeetaat
ia. tace. s.aiaet.::ecae.|| e, saea|c.taetia:a.sataet:aesta:t.a,e.at
ie::ereet.a,eaa.ste:y:w.taeattaatesseat.a|eeaeea|meateie:.,.as
aac.ta.ataeayetaes. seiaaa| |ee:ia| :eaet.vat.ea,aatea|c
eease. easaesseia. ste:.e.ty |e: ~| se, ae cea|t, taat eease.easaess
ea|c |e aeta.a,, . i.t as :ac.ea| |y :ea.|.tec aeeess te e:.,. as .
nat, se taat a. ste:y may aave .ts :ee:ceas.ty, mastaet taea tae
ca:|aessa.eaea,a|is tae e:.,.aa| :em. ses,. teaa|e eaet:atec
|at aeve:c.ss.atec, aet ea| y a.ce tae iaet |at a|se tae . ast.tat.a,
sease:~acmastaettaee:.t.ea| ie:,etia|aesseie:.,.as|etaeia.ta
ia| saace. a t:ata s acvaaee :atae: taaa aa aee.ceata| a|e::at.ea:
1a. sc. st. aet.ea|eteeaiaetaacsease,e:taeceiaeteaactaece ]a:e
ea|c|eeaaeec.ataesease.avest.,at.eaeia:.me:c.a|ia.tace.
natie:uasse:| ,ase|ae,taatia.taceeaaappear :ee.se|y.a.ts
106
Jacques Derrida
:.me:c. a| .|yea|y,.ea|aeiceaeiaa. aia.|ea.s|e:y1aas . iaeec.|a
|aeia.|aceei:eae|.a|.ea.uasse:|ceesae|,.ea.asesasee| .|ae
i:s|c.:ee|.eaeia. s. aes|.,a|. ea uees|eaes|ae:e||emaa|.|| a|e:
aac.a.|es h, .|aas| .,at|yea.,ma|.e|:e. |y.|eae|.ee|aa||ae:e
es. stsaa.cea| . za|. ea aame| y. |ae:emea|ei|.m.tsi:emea:eaae
.ty .aaee:ta.a sease.|s .aia.t. za|.ea ( 1 68) . ~ seeeaca:y.cea| . z.a,
ee:a|.ea |aea eemes|e:e| . ee|ae:eae|.a|.ea|. | .tyei.|s ia.|ace
aac|e|s. t,e||eyeac.|se|i 1a.s meemea|.saaa|e,eas |e|aeeea
s|.ta|.ea. ie: esam|e. ei|ae aa.|yei|ae e:|c s .aia.|e ae:.zeae:
, |eyeac|aeia.|e.ate:eeaaeet.eaei:e|ea|.easaac:e|ea|.eas|e|ie
eeas|.|a|.eaeitaee. ceaeeie:a|e|a|aa.|yei|ae.mmaaeatrasasaa
icea.a|aekaa|.aasease na|a|eea|| .ta.smeemea|.saaa|e,eas
|e|ae :ecae|. eaei,eeme|:y s esae|.|ace |aeassa,e|e|ae .aia.|e
| .m.teiaia. |eaacaa| .ta|.eseas.||e.ata. t.ea st:.e||ysea|.a,.eea
ae:e .|. s,eeme|:.ea| .cea|.za|.eaa.ea e:m. |s.aia.|.z.a,|ae :eae
|. a|. e a|. | .|y we:|.a, .ataec.aaaaeasaess eia:e . cea|.|y. ta. s
a|.|.tyeas. |yaacce]a:e|:aas,:esses.|s| .m.|s.a.eaa:etaeaaeme:e
taaataeaem.aa|| . m.|seia:eiae|aa| .|y1a.s. cea|.zat.ea.a.eaaas
ie: .|s ee::e|a|e aa .aia.te icea. a|ayscee.s. e|y .a|e:eaes .atae
c.uea| | memea|s ei uasse:| s cese:.|.ea 1ae aeaemeae|e,.ea|
sta|asei.tse. ceaee:ema. as:a|ae:mys|e:.eas 1ae.mess.|.| .|yei
aceaate|yce|e:m. a.a,|aeeea|ea|ei|a. si ceaceesae|aace:m.ae.
uasse:|says.aIdeas I, |ae :a|.eaa||:aasa:eaeyei. |s.as.,a|ia|e.
ceaee(Einsichtigkeit).
ueee:.taeee:|a.atyeiaa|eaaaee:.m
mec.ate| yaacassaea:esea|. tse|i.aaa. a|a. |.ea saea|cese seme
se:.eas :e||emsie: aeaemeae|e,y ,:e||ems s.m.|a: |e |aese. ie:
esam|e .ei|aeeeast.tat.eaeitaealter ego |yaa.::ecae.||ymec.ate
.a|ea|.eaa| .|y we.||eemec.:eet|y|ae|te|a. s|a|e:.aea|ae:ec
ae|.eaei,eeme|:.ea|esaet.|ace|y.cea| .za|.ea.|||eea:eeaee:a~t
tae :eseat]aae|a:e. uasse:| :e.s.eaa| |y ae:|s ta. s c. mea| ty ue
:.|es . 1aeeea| .a:se:|eie.ceaee|e|ea,.a,|esaea. cea| .zat.eas
. ||eeaee:aas|a|e:( 1 68 mec.iec}
1aeeaae.tyei:eaet. at.eamas||aea|et:aasm. ||ec.. ae:ce:|aa|
se.eaee ae| ceeay |ate a t:ac.t.ea emt.ec eisease ~s |ea, as
! t +
Cf. Ideas I, especially 83, pp. 220-22.
I I
Ibid. , p. 221 . [ I n hi s translation of the Origin, Derrida translates Einsicht by "evi
dence rationnel le . " In this he foll ows, as he says, the j ustifcation and practice of S.
Bachelard (see A Study ofHusserI' s Logi c, p. \ 0). This helps elucidate the phrase "l a
transparence rationnelle de son evidence" as a "translation" of "Einsi chtigkeit . " I n his
Guide for Translating Husserl, Dorion Cairs suggests the fol lowing: i nsi ght, i nsightful
ness, i ntellectual seenness, apodictic evidentness, evidentness. Note adapted by Tr. ]
107
Introductin to the Origin of Geometry
se.eaeemeesaayi:em.ts|e,|aa.a,saac. |s|e,.ea|sae:s|:ae|a:es
a:eaeeama|a|ec.taeeaaaeesie:saeaat:aasm.ss.eacee:easeaat.||ae
cayaea|ae a|. |. |y aaeas|eia. |. uaie:|aaate|y |a. s.s ea:
s. |aa|.ea.aac|aa|ei|aeae|emece:aa,e ( 1 69) . 1aeacaaeemea|s
eise.eaeeeaa|ea:saec. eeaaeatae seaseei.tse:.,.aaas|eea
| es| nat|aeataee:y|e,.ea| .tyei|aese.eat.ie,esta:es. . m:.seaec.a
mec.aey. |:ea|scea .a|ea se:|eieae.:.eaac.aaamaaa|sa:c.|y
D.cae|r|atecese:.|e|a. ss.taa|.ea:wasae||aee|e:a.|yeiesseaees
ie: a.m e:aas ea|y aaetae: aame ie: a aeaem.:.ea| a.ste:.e. ty:
Ceemet:yaac|aestac. es[sciences ] |aa|aeeemaay. |a:ees.iecia:
i:em |ae.: iaacameata| .a|a.t.eas. 1aey a:e .aeaa||e ei . s.ea
(idein) aac:.e|ectetaeayetaesesae|castae. ::.ae.|es Ceaias. a,
sym|e|.tat:ata. |aey seemteas|ec:eam(oromen os oneirottousi)
(Republic vi i .e 1ae:e|a:a.aa. :y.s|ae:eie:ea:,ea||a:ea,|
asaacie:as.|.||:eaa|ease.eaee|e. ts:.me:c.a|sease.. e .ase
|ae. .tsiaa|sease
VIII
1aastaeme|aecaactaeseaseeitaeaest.eaeeaee:a.a,e:.,.asa:e
.||am.aa|eca|tae same |.meas|aeeeac.t.easie:|ae|:ac.t.eaeise.
eaee. a,eae:a| ia e|es.a,taese:e| .m. aa:y eeas.ce:at.eas. uasse:|
:eea|| stae.:esem|a:yaacia| | ya.s|e:.ea|eaa:ae|e:,.a|aeseaseei
Historie) : e:yae:e|ae:e||ems.taee|a:.iy.a,. aes|.,a|.eas. tae
. as.,a|s .ate :.ae.|esa:ehistorcal (historsch) . o wes|aac.|aea.
.ta.ataea.s|e:.ea|ae:.zea. aa. eaee:y|a.a,. sa. ste:.ea| .aeee:
|.tt|eemay |ae a|ea|ce|e:m.aecta. a,s nat|a. sae:.zeaaas .|s
essea|.a| st:ae|a:e taateaa|ec.se|esec|a:ea,a me|aec.ea|. aa.:y
( 1 7 1 -72 mec.iec}
w.ta:eseet|eetae:se. eaees. as.|a:esee|te|aee:|cei:ese.
eat.ieea||a:e. e|ae::eta:astetae.:e:.,. asa:e |ae:eie:e:ese:.|ec
1aeya:ea|aysess.||e .a|taea,aas:e||ems|aey s|.| | :ema.a aa
as|ec. 1a.sie|cei.aa.:yaasae|.m. ts. s.aeea.ste:.e.|yem|:aees
|ae .aia.|e |eta|.|y ei|e.a,aac sease. Nata:a| |y. :e||ems ei|a. s
a:t.ea|a:se:|. mmec.ate|yaa|ea|ae|eta|:e||emeitaeaa.e:sa|
a.s|e:.e.ty ei tae ee::e| at. e maaae:s ei |e.a,eraamaa.|y aac tae
ea||a:a|e:|caactaea:.e:.st:aeta:eeeata.aec. a|a.sa.ste:.e.|y
( 1 72) .
' ' Plato, The Collected Dialogues, ed. Hamilton and Cairs (Princeton: Princeton
University Press, \ 96 \ ) , p. 765. The translation is that of Paul Shorey.
108
Jacques Derrid
~rte: aav.a, eeaec a.s aest.ea a|eat ,eemet:y te .ts |:eacest
ae:.zea, |at|eie:eeem.a,|ae|tetaecete:m.aece:.,.aeitaatse.
eaee,uasse:|:eseacs,asase:teieem|emeata:ye|a:.aeat.ea,tete
c.amet:.ea||yeesecmetaece|e,.ea|e|] eet.eas.
Ce:ta.a|y, taea:stea|c:eeeeci:em astaaca:ce.steme|e,.sm
ie:a.eatae:eta:ate:.me:c.a|ev.ceaeeaacte.ts.ast.tat.a,eea
eets .s aa .ac.seasa||e tas|. nat tae:e. saeta. a,a.ste:.ea|tetaat.
1ae.||as.eaeia.ste:yeaa|e,.veateta. sa:ste|]eet.eaea|y|yve:|a|
e: sym|e|.e a| |as.eas te seme aac.seeve:a|| e [ 1 72] |at aa:c|y
myta.ea| 1aa|es . uasse:| a. mse|iaac aaac|ec ta.s e|ass.e e|]eet.ea
aea,eeaee:a.a,taee:.,.aeise.eaeeaac,eemet:y i a:t.ea|a:, ae
attae|ecem.:.e.smaacestena|a.ste:y. ue ae:e]eets.t|eeaase
.t m.seeast:aes . tsea sty|e eia.ste:.ea| .avest.,at.ea, a.ea .s as
interal aacaeaem.:.ea|asess.|| e.is. taseia|te:eea||taataeve:aas
.t|eeaaaest.eaei:eta:a.a,te1aa|ese:taeiaetaa||e,.aa.a,sei
,eemet:y:natte:eaeaaeeiaetaa|a.ste:y. saetata||teeateaese|iea
i:em a.ste:y.a,eae:a| . Oataeeeat:a:y, . t . steeeaeaese|ite tae
seaseeia. ste:.e.ty. ~ac.aaseateaeeaesest:ess, at|east, eeat:asts
.ta taateia.s ea:|y aeaemeae|e,y , |ata.eaea|y eeaa:ms aac
ceeeas, . ta aaacm.:a||eace|.ty, tae. a.t.a|c.st:ast.ta:e,a:cte
eeaveat.eaa|a.ste:y, . uasse:|see.aes( 1 72-73) :
The ruling dogma of the separation in prnciple between epistemo
logical elucidation and historical, even humanistic-psychological
explanation, between epistemological and genetic origin, is funda
mentally mistaken [is fundamentally turned upside down: Derrida 's
translation], unless one inadmissibly limits, in the usual way, the
concepts of "histor, " "historical explanation, " and "genesis. " Or
rather, what is fundamentally mistaken is the limitation through which
precisely the deepest and most genuine problems of histor are
concealed.
1e.avest.,atetaeseaseeiase.eaeeast:ac|t.eaaacasea|ta:a|ie:m
.ste.avest.,atetae seaseei. tseem|etea. ste:.e.ty. r:emta. siaet,
eve:y . at:ase.eat.ae es|.eat.ea, eve:y :eta:a te a:st as. ems, te
:.me:c.a|ev.ceaeesaac. ast.tat.a,eeaeets, .sattaesamet. me a.s
te:.ea| c. se|esa:e [ 1 73] . waateve:ea:.,ae:aaee ea tae sa|]eetei
I I 7
I n Ideas I, 25, pp. 84-86, will be found a long pissage i n which Husserl develops
on his own, and in curiously similar terms, the objection that he prtends to addrss here.
The confrontation of this text with that of the Origin can b rmarkably i l luminating as to
the sense and fdelity of Husserl ' s itinerary.
109
Introductin to the Origin of Geometry
aetaa|a.ste:y, e |aea prori taateve:yea|ta:a| :eseat,tae:eie:e
eve:yse.eat.ae:eseat ,.m|.eates.a.tsteta|.tytaeteta|.tyeitaeast
1aeaa.tyeita. saaeeas. a,teta|.zat.eaa.ea. sa|ays|:ea,ata|eat
.ataeie:meitaea.ste:.er:eseat,tae r:. me:c.a|.a.tse|i[Primordial
e soiD |eacs as, .iee::eet|y.aa.:ecei, te tae aa.ve:sa| ~:. e:. ei
a.ste:,.Ast|eA|se|ateaae|aa,ea||e.a.tse|ieitaeL. v. a,r:eseat. a
a.e.t. s,:eaacec, t|ea. ste:.er:eseat. sat a:sts.,atea| ,tae.:
:eca..||eaaca:e|aeeaacmevemeateit|atteta|.zat.eaaactaat
t:ac.t.eaa|. zat. ea.
,
1ae |. ste:.er:eseat.s taea. ste:.ea|A|se|ate~
tae v.ta| evemeat ei tae eees. steaee aac tae .ate:eav.a, (des
Miteinander und Ineinander) ei :. me:c.a| ie:mat.eas aac sec.
meatat.eas ei sease (Sinnbildllllg [lind Sinnsedimentierllng] ) " ( 1 74
,mec.aec}, .
ve:ya:t.ea|a:a.ste:.ea|. avest.,at.eamastce]a:eaete.tsme:ee:
|ess . mmec.ate ceeaceaee ea taat .as.,at . ate aec.et.e :. ae.|es
[evidence absolument principielle] . ~||aa|.taa|iaetaa|a.ste:y:ema.as
.aeem:eaeas.|| e( 1 74) as|ea,astaesea :. e:.aaveaet|eeaes| .
eatecaacas|ea,asiaetaa|a. ste:yaasaetacatec. tsmetaectetae
aet.eaei.at:.as.e a.ste:y, te tae aet.eaeitae .ateat.eaa| a.ste:y ei
sease.
1a.s|eacsastetaeseeeac:.este, ta. st.mec.:eeteca,a.asta.ste:.
e.sm:atae:taaaem.:.ea|a.ste:y.1aeseaemaeita.se:. t.e. sm. saaa|
e,eastetaata.eaaace:|.esra. |eseayask.,e:easse.eaee. nat
tae a.ste:.e.smuasse:|aeattae|s, ces.teama.t.eseeaaeet.a,.tte
D.|taey s taee:yeitaeWeltanschauung, seemsteaave ame:eetaae
see.e|e,.ea| , a me:emodern sty|e. ~ac ae:e aat uasse:| aats te
:esti:ema.ste:.ea|:e|at. v. sm.s| esstaet:atae:.cea|ae:mseise.
eaeeaaca.|eseaytaaataea:.e:.eia.ste:.ea|se. eaee.tse|i.
ia eaeet, etaae|e,. smsetstae a|aacaatma|t.| .e.tyeitest.mea.es
attest.a,taateaeaee|e,eaeat:.|e, eaeaaamaa,:eaaas. tse:|c,
.tsa:.e:. , .ts e:ce:,.ts|e,.e , .tsa.ste:y, eve:a,a.asttaeaa.ve:sa|a
:.e:. , tae aaeeac.t.eaecaacaec.et.est:aeta:es , tae aa.ta:y,:eaac
eia.ste:y, saeaasuasse:|meaastecese:.|etaem.
Ne, on the one hand, taeseaa.meaeaa||etest.mea. esceaet|e
| .e |at, ea tae eeat:a:y, :esaese tae st:aeta:e eitae aa. ve:sa|
ae:.zeaaactae a:.e:.eia.ste:y taat uasse:| ces.,aates . taese:e
` Naturally, it is a question, as Husserl clearly states, of the hi storic Present in
general as the ultimate universal form of every possible historical experience, an experi
ence which itself is grounded in the Living Present of egological consciousness.
Moreover, Husserl emphasi zes i n a footnote [ 1 74] that all of intrinsic hi story passes
through the intrinsic history of the totality of individual persons.
+
i
!
,
110
Jacques Derrid
saes.t.easea|yeaases.a,a|a:aaccete:m. aeca:.e:.te |ea:t.ea
|atec tae:e. a itsauees. taea. te :eseet taesea:t.ea|at.eas aac tae
eem|.eateca.e:a:eaya.easa|m.tsme:ee:|esscete:m.aecmate:.a|
a:.e:.tetaea:.e:|ie:meiaa.ve:sa|a. ste:|e.ty.On the other hand,
taeiaets. a.eaa:etaas. ave|ectesae:tta. s:e|at. v. sm.eaa|e
cete:m.aec asee:ta.aa.ste:.ea|iaetsea|y .isemeta.a,| . |e a. ste:.ea|
t:ata . s cete:m.aa||e . a,eae:a| . xaa|e s ae .t :ea||y as
, | :-} . tae a|t.mate:eie:eaeeie:a| |iaetaa|a. ste:y.:esaesesas. ts
ae:.zea a a.ste:.ea| cete:m.aa|.| .ty taateve:y em.:.ea| se.eaee. |y
.tse|ia|eaeaacassaea.. see:|esste,:eaac. ~eee:c.a,|y. eaeec
aeti:steate:.ateseme|.aceie:.t.ea|c.seass.eaeitaeiaetsseteat|y
a.ste:.e. sm. .t. seaea,ataattaee|a.meitae. :iaetaa|.tya|:eacy:e
saesestaea. ste:.ea|a:.e:..ita. se|a.m.steaaveaaysease, | :-
,mec.iec} ,
iae:ce:te|ea||eteesta|| . saiaetsasiaetsof a.ste:y. emast
a|ays a|:eacy |ae aat a. ste:y . s aac aace: aat eeac.t.eas-
eeae:eteeeac.t.eas-.t|s ess.|| e. we masta|:eacy|e ea,a,ec .a a
:eeem:eaeas.eaeia. ste:.e.ty. . . e. . eitae .ava:.aatseia.ste:y taat
|aa,aa,e. t:ac.t.ea. eemmaa. ty. aac se ie:ta a:e. ia e:ce: ie: tae
etaae|e,.ea| iaet te aea:. etaae|e,.ea| eemmaa.eat.ea masta|
:eacy|esta:tec.ta.ataeae:.zeaeiaa.ve:sa|aamaa.ty.temeae:
te,:easeimeamastaave|eeaa||ete|eaace:steecsta:t.a,i:em
taeess.|.|.t. es. aeeve:ee:.eiaaa.ve:sa|| aa,aa,e.1aeetaae|e,.st
mast|esa:e .aec.et.ea||y. taatother meaa|seaeeessa:.|y| .ve.ta.aa
eemmaa.tyei|aa,aa,eaact:ac.t.ea..ta.ataeae:.zeaeiaa.ste:y.
sa:e.a|se. eiaata||taatmeaas.a,eae:a| tataea|t. mate:eeea:se..t
. saeeessa:,te|aetaattaea. ste:.er:eseat.a,eae:a|-tae.::eaae.
|| eie:meieve:,a.ste:.ea|ese:.eaee-. stae,:eaaceia| | a. ste:.e.t,.
aactaatt eea|c a|a,seemetete:ms .a ta. s r:eseat. ta tae mest
c.staat.taemestc. ne:eatetae: ueeve:st:aa,eteeaeaetae:te
mea ma, |e. tae, a| a,s a:e aaae:staaca||e-at tae | . m.t-.a tae
eemmeaa| . t, eitae. :i. v. a, r:eseat. aa. eataea. ste:.e r:eseat . s
:eetec 1aat eaea eitae.: iaacameata| r:eseats . s. also, mate:.a||y
cete:m.aec |y .ts .ase:t.ea.ta.atae iaetaa|eeateateia t:ac.t.ea.
see.a|st:aeta:e. |aa,aa,e. aacseie:ta. taateaeacees aetaavetae
same seaseeeateat. ta. s .a ae ay aaeets tae eemmeaa|ty eitae.:
ie:m 1a.s aa.ve:sa|ie:m. a.ea. stae mestprmordial aacconcrete
|.vec ese:.eaee. .s saesec |y a|| |e.a,te,etae:. 1a. s ie:m a| se
seemste|etaeiaa|:et:eaeameat.tae:eie:etaemestresponsible seea
I I !I
Some analogous developments will be found in the Vienna Lecture, "Phi losophy
and the Crisis of European Humanity, " i n C, p. 296.
1 11
Introductin to the Origin of Geomet
:.ty. eieve:y aeaemeae|e,.ea| :ecaet.ea ia ta. s a|t. matejurdical
instant [instance] .s aaaeaaeectaemest:ac.ea|aa.tyeitaee:|c.
1aas eve:y:e||emeia.ste:.ea|iaets .ave|vesa.ste:.ea|.ava:.aats
tae ve:y memeattae :e||emaatae:.zes aee:ta.arelativism. 1 20 1ae
|atte::eta.asa||.tsva|ae.:ev.cec.ts|eve|eimateriality aac.tsa:.e:|
eeac.t.eas a:e a:e:.ate|y cete:m. aec. 1ae a:t cevetec te :e
| at.v. sm.a tae ee|e|:ateciette:te i-vyn:aa| eaa|e .ate::etec. a
ta. say r:emtaat|ette:.:.tteaayea:ea:|.e:taaataeOrigin, e
m.,att
lgm, a,nta,taa
steeamae:emaastaemetaecaeee:c.a,tea.eaee|ta.a a
a. e:sa|aaca| seiseca:.e:.eitaea. ste:. ea|e:|ca.ea. s a| ays
en,ma| |y,eaa. ae( 1 77) .
ra:ae:ea. ae says. e a|seaave . aac |ae taat e aave . tae
eaa..tyeie?metei:ecemtet:aasie:m. .ataea,ataacaaatasy.
ea:aaa a.stene|ex.staee. . . . ~ac:ee. se|y.ata. saet.v.tyei
i:eevanauea.aaca:aama,ta:ea,ataeeeaee.va||eess.|.| .t.esie:
tae|.iee:|c.tae:ea:.se..taaec.et.ese|iev.ceaee. aaesseat. a||y
,eae:a|seteie|emeats,ea,ta:ea,aa||taeva:.aats . 1ae:e|ye
aave :emeveceve:y|eacte taeiaetaa| |y va| .c a. ste:.ea| e:|c aac
a :e,
.
:cecta. se:|c .tse|ime:e|yaseae eitae eeaeetaa| es
s.|.|.t.es ( 1 77) .
ue:e,a. a. ecea?t. .
ma,.aa:yva:.at.eaaactae:ecaet.eade facto
ta|e
Ibid. [37], pp. 1 42-43 . On the structural permanence of the presci entifc l ife-world,
also cf. [9h] , p. 5 1 .
.-j
120
Jacques Derrid
aet:e|atetaemtetae. :a.ste:.ea|,:eaac.atae|.iee:|c.1aeyae.tae:
e::ya|eattae. :earesponsibility ae:as|taemse|ves . what
m I in the
process of doing? Nor: from where does that come? nattae
eIS, aaetae:
aa.vet-]astasse:.eas, |at.taame:e mece:asty|e. aa.veteei
e
iaac.tye: ceta aac aet eisae:ie.a|.ty, .teeas. st s.a :eceseeacm,
tea:c tae :ese.eat.ie e:eet.ea .taeat ma|.a, :e||emat.e tae
t:aas,:ess. ea ( Uberschreitung) (ibid. , 36, 1 39 1. sa:ass
. a,} , eitae|.iee:|c s t:atatea:ctae e:|ceit:atas. a taem
se|ves 1ae:eta:otetaest:aeta:esei:ese.eat.ieese:.eaee mast
eeat.aaa||y|ee a|.vetaequestin: How can the a priori of scientic
Objectivity be constituted staring from those of the lie-world? w.taeat
ta. saest.ea,aay:eta:a,aeeve:eaet:at.a,,:.s|sa|c.eat.a,a||se.
eat. ie aa|.tyin general aaca||a.|esea.ea|c. ,a.ty,evea.i.tm. ,at
aavet:.ec:ee..tat.a,a|e,.t. mate:eaet.eateaatuasse:|ea|| s .ate|
|eetaa| . st.e aye:t:eay (ibid. , 34f, . 1 33) . ii e eeas.ce: ta. s
aest.eate|eat once a.ste:.ea|aact:aaseeaceata|,eseeteaat.::e
seas.||eem.:. e. sma||tae aeaemeae| e,. es ei:ese.eat.iee:ee
t.eaa:eeeacemaec, aeaemeae|e,.esa.eaea|caet|ettaemse|ves
|e|eset|ytaataest.ea
we mast a|se |ea:e ei ie:,ett.a, taat tae :ese.eat.ie e:|c-
a.ea tae :ete,eemete: aas at a. s c. sesa| aac a.ea e taas
:eeeve:-cees aet aave tae :ac.ea|.ty ei tae :e:ec.eat.ve e:|c
te a.ea uasse:| t:.es te :eta:a, a|evea|| , . aExperience and Judg
ment. 1 33 1ae :ese.eat.iee:|c . s aea|ta:a|e:|c a|:eacy .aie:mec
|y :ec.eat.ea, va|aes, em.:.ea| teeaa. aes, aac tae :aet.ee ei
measa:emeat aac .acaet.veaess a. ea taemse|ves aave tae. : ea
sty|eeiee:ta.aty
1ae a|eve eaa||es as te e.at eat a,a.a tae ceeaceat statas ei
uasse:| stest, taestataseieve:ysta:t.a,e.ataaceve:ye|ae,a. c. a,
:ereet.eaeaaa.ve:sa|a. ste:.e.ty.Ce:ta. a|y, taeesseat.a|st:aeta:esei
tae:ese.eat.iee:|ca:ec.seeve:ec|yacea||e:ecaet.ea. taateia| |
cete:m.aec iaetaa| ea|ta:e aac taat eitae se. eat.ie sae:st:aeta:es
a.eaesteac|eyeaca:t.ea|a:ea|ta:a| a:eas. ae:ce:te |ei:ee ei
taem natta.s saea|caetma|easie:,ettaattae:ese.eat.ieea|ta:a|
e:|ceaa|e:ecaeec,.a. tstan, . aa:ac.ea|"epoche" a.eaaatste
eataatatea:caat . sa|:eacy saesec. taet:aaseeaceata|eea
st.tat.eaeitaee|]eet. a,eae:a|,|eie:etae. cea|e|]eeta.ease:ves,
aeeve:, as esam|eaacmece|ie: O|]eet.v.ty, , tae :e:ec.eat.ve
st:atameiese:.eaee,taestat.eaac,eaet.eeeast.tat.eaeitaeego aac
This work does not attain the prepredicative world i n its frst radicality. It supposes,
like Ideas I, an already constituted temporality. Cf. on this Ideas [, notably 81 , p.
2 16-1 7, and EJ, 14, p. 68.
121
Introductin to the Origin of Geometry
alter ego, :. me:c.a| teme:a| .ty, aac se ie:ta 1aese :ecaet.eas.
me:eeve:, a:e ceae .a tests ea:| .e: taaa taeCrisis . i aIdeas I, tae
|:eacea.a,eitaet:aaseeaceata|:ecaet.eaa|:eacyesteacsby anticipa
tion asia:astaee.cet.eeia.ste:y,a.eauasse:|taea,atst.||:ema.aec
te|eceae . ~rte:aav.a,]ast.ieca.ssaseas.eaeia||t:aaseeaceat
e.cet.ecema.as, aetaa|ays.ea|Nata:e, aactaeem.:.ea|e:e.ce
t.e se.eaees eiNata:e ,,eemet:y, |.aemat.es. a:e ays.es. aac se
ie:ta, , uasse:|:ete .
Si
:
nilarly, just as we ave suspended all experiential sciences dealing
With the nature ofammate beings and all empirical human sciences
concer
ing pers
d proper grounding, at any rate none that i pure and free from
all obJectIOn. (Ideas I, 60, p. 162 [modied]; our emphasis)
weeea|ctaeasaytaatuasse:|.aacvaaeesa|]eeteca.ste:y s e. cet.e
te
taeaataet.etaaseeaceata|:ecaet.ea-aae.cet.eae. ||t:yteeea
st.tate sta:ta, a tae Crisis. 1aat .s ay, ae cea|t, tae e:c
t:aaseeaceata| , a.eauasse:|aea:|ya|ays:ese:vesie:taeego ' s
a:e eeast.tat.a, aet.v.ty, . s aeve:at.|.zec .ataeOrigin. iii myse|i
aavese|eaeit:aaseeaceata|a. ste:.e.ty ,icese.ae:ce:tec.st.a,a.sa
ateaeeem.:.ea|a. ste:yaacas.m|ee.cet.eeia.ste:ya:a||e|tetae
etae:e. cet.es eiNata:e aac s.:. t. 1aeeidos eia. ste:.e.ty, as es|.
eatec aue: taeCrisis, seems te eseeec tae | . m. tsass.,aec te .t |e
ie:eaaac|yIdeas I. itsse.eaee.sae |ea,e:merely eaeaamaase.eaee
amea,etae:s it. staateiaaaet. v.tyeeast.tat.a,taeae|esae:eei
a|se|ate .cea| O|]eet. v.tyaaca||taee.cet.e se.eaees 1aatta. seea
st.tat.a,a. ste:ymay|eme:eieaac| yeeast.tatec.tse|i.saea.s,ae
cea|t .eaeeitaemeste:maaeatmet.iseiuasse:| s taea,at . a| se,eae
eitaemestc.mea|t ,ie:. taeee:cs|ac| y. tataateiaa.ste:.e.tya.ea
,asuasse:|sa.cme:eaacme:eertea,t:ave:seseve:yta.a,ta:ea,aaac
ta:ea,a ,aaci:steia||taeego .tse|i
II4
AI these difculties seem concentrated to us in the sense that Husserl gives to the
expresslo "transcendental histor, " which he utilizes (to our knowledge) only once, in
an unpublIshed manuscript of Group C (C 8 II, October 29, p. 3) : thus, the question
concers the intermonadic relation (always considered in itself, of course , as an inten
tional modifcation of the monad in general in its primordial temporality) , a relation
thanks to which the constitution of a common world becomes possible. This relation
sructurally implies the horizon of the history of the spirit, past and future; the latter
discovers for us what perception cannot give us.
122
Jacques De"ida
x
waat .taea.a:etaeesseat.a|aac,eae:a|eeeaeatseitae:ese.ea
t.ieea|ta:a| e:|c: O::atae:.aat a:e. . ataate:|c. tae. ava:. aat
st:aeta:esa.eaaaveeeac.t.eaectaeacveatei,eeet:y:ueeve:
:e|eaac ea: . ,ae:aaeeeeaee:a. a,a. ste:.ea|iaets . e sae .ta aa
. ec.ateaacaec.et.esae|ec,e-taeseaseeia.eaeaaa|ays|e
.avest.,a|ec-taeie||e.a,
i 1aatta. s:e,eeet:.ea|e:|c as ae:|ceithings c. sesecei
aeee:c.ateaaaaesaet saee aact.e
I . I:
2. 1aattaeseta.a,sastaave|eeaee:e:ea| Ce:e:ea| .ty. sa
a:t.ea|a:cete:.aat.eaeita.a, aeec(Dinglichkeit) .a,eae:a|.|ats.aee
ea| |a:ea|:eacyaacteaave| eu. tsa:seataee:|c,|eeaase|aa,aa,e
aac .ate:sa|]eet. v.ty ast aave :eeecec ,eeet:y, . ee:e:ea|.ty
cees aet esaaast. ve|y eve:|a ta.a,aeec. s. aee tae aeeessa:.| y
eees.st.a, aaaa |e.a,s a:e aet ta. asa||e as e:e |ec. es aac. | .se
eveataeea|ta:a|O|]eetsa. ea|e|ea,.tataest:aeta:a||y.a:eaet
esaaastec. aee:e:ea||e.a, ( 1 77) .
3. 1aat taese a:e |ec.es aac te aave sat.a| saaes. saaes ei
et.ea. aac a|te:at.easeiceie:at.ea [ 1 77] .
4. 1aat ate:.a| aa|.t.es ,ee|e:. e.,at. aa:caess. aac se ie:ta,
astaeeessa:. | y|e:e|atectetaese:e,eeet:.ea| .sat.etee:a|
saaes|yasa|eeata:ye.cet..cete:.aat.ea
i aIdeas I, a.|ees|.eat.a,tae:.ae. |esei:e,.eaa|a:t.ea|at. eaaac
.ate:aa| st:aeta:e. uasse:|t:eatec taesee. cet.e eaa:aete:. st.es as aa
.aces. ae:eastaeya:eac.:eettaee. ataeOrigin: 1aeeeast:aet.ea
eitaea.,aesteeae:ete,eaas,tae:e,.ea,eatei,eae:ataata:ea:t|y
c. s]aaet.ve .a:t|yieaacec.aeaeaaetae:,aac.ata. s ataa||y. ae|
s.ve, . ee::eseacstetaeeeast:aet.eaeitaeeeae:etataat|e|ea,te
. t
eatei|eestc.ae:eaeestaata:ea:t|yc.s]aaet.ve.a:t|yieaacecm
eaeaaetae:.as obtains with temporl, spatial, and material determina
tions, for instance, in the case ofthe thing " ,;72. i s-mec.iec} .ea:
eaas.s, . '
ra:e,eeet:y aac s.aeat.es,aaca| | tae assee. atec se. eaeesie:
!
` This idea, already developed in 9a of the Crisis, is more directly i nscribed within
an anal ysi s of the Lebenswelt . in 36 , p. 1 39, an analysi s identical to that in the Origin.
Thi s j ustifes (at least on a specifc point) the anteriority of the Origin ' s anal yses
concerning language and being-in-community.
! l
s
tique] se.eaeeeisaee.ieaaaaie:eseea||eaac .ae:,aa.e:e|.ie:ai.
e
eie:ae|e,.ea|tyes iataaiease.eeea|caeiau:.ase|e,.i.
aie| yaac. taee|eteseea:. tyc.c.taai eaavenot two but
,
nlY
one universalform of the world: aeiie|aiea| yone geometr . . . (C,
9 c ,
1,.
. . ,
1a.s seas.||e aac. te a ee:ta.a ce,:ee. e.:.ea| aai.e.ai.ea a|
iaea,a .a eea:.sea .ta iaeis sa|.itec ie va:.at.ea. . a?..at.v
e
.cea|.tyeiiaee:ae|e,.ea|iyeeaaae|ea,e:|ee:e| e.:..a|,.s
t:ae aetea|yie:,eeei:.ea|forms |ata| seie:,eeet:.ea|easa:e
eat 1ae|atie:eeesietaeie:e. aaacia:ea,a:ax. s ie:exa|e .
ae:e] astc. st:.|at.ea.s .ateacec, | :s, ~aem.:. ea| teeaa. aeei
easa:eeat,.asa:vey.a,..aea.ieeta:e.aacseie:ta,astaeees
sa:. |y|e|ea,ieeve:y:ese.eai.ieea|ia:e uasse:|
ceesae |a|e:aie
eataai.ataeOrigin. iaiaeCrsis aeseesieeeas. ce:e.:.ea|ea
sa:e asa sia,e ia:iae:taaa seas.||ee:ae|e,yeatae atatea:cs
a:e,eeet:.ea|. cea|.ty.Heasa:e. a.i.atesaa
acv
asa
ae :eve|at.ea.ta.a,eeet:y. ueeve:. iae en,meiia.s s..eaee
.|| ea|y|ee:ecee|y|a:.ec.aac.ts sease et.ec
I 42
These few pages are very i mportant, here in parti cular, for determi ni ng
.
the
.
rchitec
tonic situation of the Origin . On the sense of thi s "transcendental aesthetICS , al so cf.
CM, 6 1 . p. 1 46.
! 1'I
"So fami l iar to us i s the shift between a priori theory ad empi rical i nqui ry i n
everyday life that we usual l y tend not to separate the space ad te spatia
.
l shape
.
s
geometry talks about from the space and spatial shapes of expenentIal actualIty, as If
they were one and the same" (C, 9a, p. 24).
`` On surveying, see notably 9a, pp. 27-28. On surveying as "pregeometrical
achi evement, " which i s also "a meaning-fundament for geometry, " see 9h, p. 49.
Cf. C. 9f. pp. 44-45. Husserl speaks there of an "arithmetizaton of eometry: :
which "leads al most automatical l y, i n a certain way, t o the emptymg of Its sense
127
Introductin to the Orgin ofGeometry
wesae. iaea. a priori taatiaeays.ea|ta.a,. tae|ecy. taeva,ae
e:ae|e,.ea|aacae:eae.etyes. iaea:ieieasa:e.iaeess.|. |.ty
ei.a,.aa:yva:.at. ea.aac:eexaetsat.eiee:a|.tya|:eacyaacte
|e| eeatec.ataeea|ia:a|ae|ctaataseae:ecieiaea. |eseae:ae
c.caeiyetsae,eeet:y|aiaesaea|c|eeeae-. va||eas.ts. avea
te: , | :s,
1aastae . asi.tai.eaei,eeet:yeea|cea|y|eaphilosophical aei
uasse:| . ae eriea seasseir| aiea.z.a,,eeei:y (FTL, Ceae|a
s. ea. ::, .a|aysass.,aecteia. s . ast.tat.a,aeiaeeatee:aae.t,
eisense .tataeseaee|eir|ate(Ideas I, ;. . s,. r|atea. s(C,
9, :, . iaeC:eess,a.cec|yiaer|aiea.eceet:.aeeii ceas (ibid. ,
;s. . : i , . ' r|aiea.e. cea|.s. aacseie:ia.1aea.|eseae:.sa
aa ae .aaa,a:aies iae iaee:ei.ea| aii.iace . iae |atte: .s ea|y tae
s.:.t s :ac.ea|i:eece.a.eaaatae:.zesaeve|eyeacia.taceaac
eeas tae ae:.zea ei sae|ec,e as taat ei a :eaav.a,. . . e . eiaa
.aaa.ie :e]eei e: tass( Vorhaben) . 1ae:e|y. iae iaee:et.ea| att.iace
ases.cea| .zat.ea s cee. s. veassa,etetae| . .tess.||e.ase||as
tae eeast.tat.ea eitae ataeat.ea| ae|c .a ,eae:a| Nata:a| | y. ia.s
assa,eietae|..t. sea|ytae,e.a,|eyeaceve:yseas. || eaaciaeiaa|
| .. i. it eeaee:as iae .cea| | . .i eiaa .aaa.ie t:aas,:ess. ea. aettae
iaetaa||..ieiiaet:aas,:essecia. tace
sta:i.a,i:eta. s. aaa,a:a|.aaa.t.zat.ea.ataeat.esee,a.zesae
.aaa.i. zat.eas a.ea a:e se aay .aie:.e: :eve|ai.eas . re:. .i tae
:.e:c.a|.aaa.t.zai.eaeeasiaeataeat.ea|ae|cie.aaa.teieeaa
c.i.es ie: iaeC:eess. .tae| essfrst | ..tsiaea:.e:. systeeitaat
:ecaet.v.ty1aeve:yeeaieateiaa.aaa.ie:ecaet.ea.|||eeeaiaec
.ta.aaaa:.e:.sysiea.ea.ie:taeC:eess. . | | a|ays|eclosed.
[modifi ed] . Formal algebrization was already presented as a threat for primordial sense
and the "clari ty" of geometry i n Ideas I. where the " ' pure' geometer" was defned as
the one "who dispenses with the methods of algebra" (70, p. 1 82) .
1 41; As Husserl often remarked, the al lusion to Greece , to the Greek origin of phi loso
phy and mathemati cs, has no external hi storico-empirical sense. It i s the factual
[ h' cncmentief] i ndex of an i nteral sense of origi n . Cf. on thi s parti cul arl y "Phi losophy
and the Cri si s of European Humanity" ( in C, pp. 279-80) . Of course, the whole problem
of a phenomenology of hi story supposes that the " indicati ve" character of such language
is resol ved.
"Idealization and the Science of Reali ty-The Mathematization of Nature" ( Before
1 928) , Abhandlung in Krisis, p. 29 1 ; Appendi x I I in Crisis. p. 3 1 3. In addition to thi s text.
one of the most specifc sketches from the h istorical perspective concerning the relation
between Plato' s philosophy and the advent of pure mathematics by ideal ization and
passage to the limit has been publ i shed by R. Boehm in Bei l age VI I of Erste Philosophie
( 1 923124) . Vol . 1 (in Husserliana. Vol . 7 [The Hague: Nijhof, 1 956] , pp. 327-28) .
128
Jacques Derid
1|e ,a.ce|e:e .s ae|.ceaa,eemei:y. e: :aiae: i|e " ideal Euclid, "
aeee:c.a, ie uasse:| s ex:ess.ea. |.e| .s :esi:.eiec ie sease. aei
a.sie:.ea|iaei. iaie:.aii|ecaaeimece:ai.mes. i|ea:.e:.sysiem
. | | . ise|i|eeve:i|:ea|yaae. aaa.i.zai.ea. naii|e|aiie:. | | ea|y
iase|aeewithin .aaa.iyasi|eess.|.|.iyeiaaai|emai.ea|a:.e:.. a
,eae:a| . re:|as . i|ea. eaeeci ec.si.a,a. s| |eieea. eai|e eae
aaac. . aaa.i.zai.ea asi|e. asi.iai.a,aeieimai|emai.es. . e. . asi|e
c.se|esa:e ei mai|emai.ea| a:.e:.aess .ise|i-i|e ess.|.|.iy ei
mai|emai.zai.ea.a,eae:a|-aac. eaiae ei|e:|aac. . aaa.i.zai.easas
i|eea|a:,emeaiseia:.e:.sysiems . 1|ese|aiie:ea|cea|yaave|ac
ieaccc. meas.easei. aaa.iyieiaea:.e:. .|aiiaeyea|caeieeaee:a
a:.e:.aess. ise|i.iai|eOrigin, uasse:|. s.aie:esiec.a.aaa.i.zai.ea.a
i|ea:sisease.1|ai.sayaereduced a||iaea:.e:.sysiemseiasie:
:eseai,eeei:y..ae:ce:ie:eaea|aesaac,:asa,a.aiaee:.,.aei
a:.e:.aess.ise|iai.issea:ee. . . e. .i|e. asi.iai.ve.aaa.i.zai.ea
re:aassae|ac.si.aei.eaaeeeaaisie:aeeai:ac.ei.ea.e.aieceai
|yraa|x.eeea: . |eieea iaev.eaaaieeia:e, ra.|eseayaaciae
C:.s.seia:eeaa uamaa.iy, aac i|eCrisi .ise|i.|.e|. x.eeea:
aeies. ,ees |aes ie C:eesiaea,aiaac .a a:i.ea|a:ie ae| .ceaa
,eeei:y.ieass.,ai|e,|e:yeiaav. a,eeaee. veceiaa.aaa.ieiassei
sae.a,. . .
.
stemlcally
ohe
:
ent deductive theor, aimed at a most broadly and
highly conceived Ideal goal, resting on "axiomatic" fundamental
concepts and prnciples, proceeding according to apodictic
argume
!
s- totality formed ofpure rationality, a totality whose
uncondltloned truth i available to insight and which consists
exclusively ofunconditioned truths recognized through immediate and
mediate insight. But Euclidean geometr, and ancient mathematics in
general, knows only fnite tasks, a fnitely closed prior. Aristotelian
syl/ogistics belongs here also, as an a prior which takes precedence
over all others. Antiquity goes this far, but never far enough to grsp
the possi
te
c:a,ta
I
3Z
nat.ieaea. aia.t.zat.ea.saae|.:ta ei,eemet:y .a. tsaataeat.e
:. me:c.a|. ateat.ea,a.eaeaet.eest.||:ema.aeca.cceateaee:ta.a
I.I
On thi s cf. the Crisis. notably 8, p. 22, and 9h, pp. 5 1 -52, and 71 , pp. 245-46.
I 2
The text taken from the Crisis, which does not seem to put into question ever again
the "Greek" origin of mathematics as an i nfnite t ask, poses thus the difcult intra
mathematical problem of closure, a notion which can have mul ti pl e senses according to
the contexts i n which it i s employed. On all these questions, we refer particularly to S.
Bachelard. A Study of Husserf ' s Logic. Part 1 . Ch. 3 . pp. 43-63 . Moreover, there i s al so a
closure of the mathematical domain in general in i ts ideal unity as mathematical sense, a
closure wi thi n which al l i nfnitization will have to be maintained, simpl y because thi s
infnitization sti l l concerns ideal-mathematical objecti vities. About the mathematical sys
tem in genera\
'
Husserl speaks of "an i nfnite and yet self-enclosed world of ideal objec
ti vities as a feld for study" (C, 9a. p. 26 [modifed] ) .
131
!ntroductin to the Origin of Geometr
exteat|ytaee|esa:eeitae:ev. eassystem, . emay eace: .i.t.s
st. | | |e,.t.mate te sea| eian e:.,.a ei,eemet:y Deesaet,eemet:y
aaveaa. aia.teaam|e:ei|.:tas,e:|.:taee:t. | eates.a a.ea.eaea
t.me.aaetae:|.:ta. saaaeaaeec. a.|est. | ||e.a,eeaeeai ec:Haste
aetsaytaat,eemet:y.seataeaytea:c.tse:.,.a.. asteacei:e
eeec.a,i:em. t:
uasse:|aacea|tec|yea|ca,:ee1e|e|e,.ea|seaseaactaeseaseei
e:.,.a e:e a| aysmataa| | y.m| .eatecie:a. m ne.a,aaaeaaeec .a
eaeaetae:.taey .|||e:evea| ecia||yea|yta:ea,aeaeaetae:attae
. a| a.tee|eeia.ste:ynat. taea.ayaave,eemet:y|e,. a.taa:e
.cea| .zat.eaaacexaet.tace:wayaetaave. t|e,.a.ta . ma,.aat.ve
seas.||e .cea|.zat.ea aacme:ae|e,.ea| tye|e,y. s.aee exaet.tace . s
already aat.e. atectae:e: O:. eeave:se|y. aystill ea| | tae systems
a.eae:eteta|| y:.c eieeae:ete,eemet:y,eemet:.ea| :1a. styeei
aest.ea.a,aacea|tec|yrelativizes taesee.ie.tyei,eemet:.ea|sease
as saea |atceesaetaest.ea.t. a.tse|i 1ae,eemet:.ea|telos . sae
cea|t ea| y tae i:a,meat e: a:t.ea|a: se,meat eia aa.ve:sa| 1e|es
a.eat:ave:ses. :eeeces. aac,ees|eyeactae,eemet:.ea|eae. |at
,eemet:y s acveata:e. s:.,e:eas|ya:t.ea|atece:ce|eyec. a[s' articule
en] taat1e|es taeacveata:ec. caet|e,.aas such |eie:etaeeme:,eaee
eia|se|ate|ya:eaacaeaseas.||e.cea|.ty..t:ema.astaeacveata:eo)
,eemet:yas|ea,asa:e.cea|e|]eet.v.t. esa:eeea| aec.ta.ataeie|c
eia:.e:.aesseeaec|ytaeC:ee|s 1aeauasse:|eaaat one and the
same time sea|eiaa:eseaseaacaa.ate:aa|a. ste:.e.tyei,eemet:y
aaceaasay.asaeeiteacees. taataaa.ve:sa|te|ee|e,yeixeaseaas
at e:|.aaamaaa. ste:y|eie:etaeC:eeea:eeaaeem. a,teeea
se.easaess [prise de conscience ] , taat a:e . cea|.ty .s aaaeaaeec .a
|eaac.cea| .ty. aacseea 1aas. attaesamet.meae savestaeabso
lutely e:.,.aa|seasee:internal a.ste:.e.tyeieaeat:ac.t.eaa|| .aeaac.ts
:e|at. v.ty.ta.aaa.ve:sa|a.ste:.e.tyi ata.smaaae:ae.sassa:ecei
eaet:at.a, aa. ve:sa| a.ste:.e.ty ea|y i:em .ta. a. esee.a| | y .i. |y
:eie:eaee .aeta:asa.s:e,a:cteat:ac.t.eaasexem|a:yastaatei
mat|emat.es
ra:i:em|e.a,taeaeeesste semeess.|.| . tytaat. s .tse|iaa. ste:.e
yetc. seeve:ec. ta.aaa. ste:y,|.e|ea|c.ata:a|et:aasi,a:ec|y
.t, .taeeeaaesseitae. a| a.te.sea|y.eataeeeat:a:y.taeeeaaessei
a.ste:yitself, .atae atmestcetas aaca:.tyei.ts esseaee w.t|eat
l .\
Thi s i s true, of course, onl y i nsofar as these objectivities are related, immediatel y or
not . to spatiality in genera\ , if geometry is considered in i tsel f and in the strict sense ; to
movement i n general . if kinematics i s considered in itself and in the strict sense. (But
Husser! ofen says that "geometry" i s an "abbreviation" for al l the objective and exact
sciences of pure spatiotemporal i ty. ) But i f geometry i s considered in i ts exemplariness.
thi s i s generally true for every absolutel y pure and "free" i deal objecti vity.
132
Jacques Deric
ia.s:.u.a iae aa.ie, a.sie:.ea|aamaa.iy, e::aiae:a.sie:.ea|e.v.|.za
i.eas, ea|cea| ye|a.maaem.:.ea|iyeeisee.eia:ee|e,.ea|aa
.i,nai,aseaavee|ea:|,seea.em.:.ea|a.sie:,. sesseai.a||,.ac.s
i.a,a. saa||ei:emaeaa.sie:,
~|se, uasse:|]ac,es.iaeme:eaeeessa:y.aiaeOrigin iaaa. aiae
v.eaaa ieeia:e e:iaeCrisi ie aeeeaai,historcaly, ie:iae |.:iaei
a.|eseaya.eaaaseeac.i.eaeciaaiei,eemei:y.1a.swasiae|.:ia
eia:ea.sie:y.1aee:.,.aeia.sie:.e.iy(Geschichtlichkeit) .||aeve:|e
ceeaceaieaaa.sie:y(Historie) . ~|iaea,aiaeiaee:ei.ea|aii.iacemay
|eseeeaca:yaac.aie:m.iieaieaiaee:ce:eiiaeiaa|.iy, .iea|c |e
i:a.i|essiecese:.|eiaeaeaemeae|e,.ea|aac. ai:. as.e,eaes.seiaai
:ee. se|yesia|| .saes iaeess.|.| .iyie:saea acese:.i.ea. 1a. scees
aeimeaa,me:eeve:,iaai.i.s. mess.||ee:ase|essiei:yaaesi:.as.e
aaca:a||e|a.sie:.ea|a:eaeaieia. ssa|]eei,ai.|.z. a,a||iaees
s.||e iaeiaa| ,.veas ,,ee,:aa.ea|, eeeaem.e, ea|ia:a| , see.e|e,.ea| ,
syeae|e,.ea| , aac se ie:ia .ia iae aaesi eemeieaee, iae aimesi
meiaece|e,.ea|seea:.iy, aac.iaeaiy.e|c.a,ieeaasa|.sm,aiem.sm,
aacseea. i.|e.se ,aiaeie,eaei.ecese:.i.eaeiiaemesiam|.i.eas
i:aaseeaceaia| :ecaei.ea eaa|ei:.ec, .ia iaeae| eia|| ava.|a||e
em.:.ea|iee| s . saeaaiiemisea|caaveiae.:ia| | va|aeea|y.aseia:
asiaeyea|c|eeeacaeiec.iaiaeee:ia.aiyiaaieve:yia.a,.sse|ea
eiiaeaexcept iae:ecaei.eaitsel, except iaee:.,.aeia.|eseayaac
a.sie:ythemselves aacassaea.iaiae|esieieases, esea|eiaai.s
si:.ei|ya:a||e|ieiaem.
r:em iae memeai uasse:| .s ,.vea |eia iae :ese.eai.ae ea|ia:a|
e:|cand iaea.|eseae:aseeac.i.easie:,eemei:y s e:.,. a, iaea|
seaeeeia||eeae:eiecese:.i.eaeiiae.asi.iaie: saeis saea|c aei|e
sa::.s.a, Ne: c. sae.ai.a,. 1aese eeac.i.eas e:e .ac.seasa|| e,
|aia| sesame.eai .~|se,. asemeve:ya| |as.ve|.aesa. eaaccaeia.a,
ieiae:ev.eassiai.ecese:.i.eas,iaeseaseeiiae.aaa,a:a|ee:ai.ea
. sesaaasiec. 1aeaa.iaces, a.eaiae:eie,eemeie:a.|eseae:aas
aia. sc.sesa|,amea,iaea.,aesia:e|eaac.cea|.i. esaaca.eaae
e:ee.veseaaa.aaa.ieae:.zea, asie:mai.easceve|eeceaiei:as.s
aaciaea,aiei.aie:mseie:ieei.ea,e|ea:|yse:veea|yas|asesie:a
aese:iei:as. seaieia.eas.m.|a:|yaamecaeieai.eas,:e.
ii. sev.ceai.aacvaaeeiaaiia. saese:ieiie:mai.ea. | | |ea:ecaei
a:.s.a,eaieiaa.cea|.z.a,,s. :.iaa|aei, eaeei a:eia.a|.a,,a.ea
aas .is maie:.a|s .a iae ces.,aaiecaa.ve:sa|:e,.veas eiia.siaeiaa|
aamaa.iyaacaamaasa::eaac.r,e:|caace:eaies . cea|e|]eei. v.i. es
eaieiiaem , i :mec.aec} .
!
` On this cf. notably EJ, 1 4, p. 65.
133
Introductin to the Origin of Geometry
ue:ee a:e ,iaea,as a|asi:eeea:se, |eie:eaa .cea|.z.a,ee:ai.ea
aeseaei.v.iyaasaeve:|eeasiac.ecie:.ise| iaacaeseeeac.i.eas
a:eaeve:ie|esesiac.ec,s.aeeea:ecea| .a,.iaa:ac.ea||y.asi.ia
i.veee:ai.ea1a. s.cea|.zai.ea. siaaia.ea ,eaiae|as. seiaseas.||e
.cea|.iy,iaeme:ae|e,.ea|iyeei:eancaess, ie:esam|e ,ma|esa
a.,ae:,a|se|aie|ye|]eei.ve,esaei ,aacaeaseas.||e.cea|.iyeeea:-iae
e. :e|e , a s.m.|a:| yaamec,|ai}aeie:mai.eai ae:ce:ie:eaea
|ae|aac,:asa,a.aiaespecies , . e. , iae e:.,.aa| aseei eiseas.||e
me:ae|e,.ea|.cea| .iy ,emasieeasiaai|y,eii:eei:em,eemei:.ea|
habits a.eaieaciee|iaseaie.i. iaThe Poetics of Space, eeaee:a.a,
iae eaaie: eai.i|ec 1|e raeaemeae|e,y ei xeaacaess, Casiea
naeae|a:ceve|esia.si:ea||eseme|aiaeeessa:ydeception: 1aec.m
ea|iyiaaiaacie |eeve:eeme .a:.i.a,ia. seaaie:asieave.ca| |
,eemei:.ea|ev.ceaee.
ua| .|e me:ae|e,.ea| .cea| .iy, esaei .cea|.iy aas |eea :ecaeec
.iaeaiiaeesseai.a|a.ceiseas.|.|.iye:.ma,.aai.ea,.i|:e|eaay|y
a|eai:emeve:ycese:.i. vemee:.a,. uacea|iec| yia.s| eac:e.is
sae:i e: aea| i:em seas.||e .cea|.iy. uas:| a|ays sea|s ei
,eemei:y s seas.||e sae:i, sa|si:aie, e:|as.s(Ideas I, ;:.
i s . naiiaese ieaacai.eas a:e aei iae iaacameaia| s eaes, a|
' ` The same principle and notion of substructive idealization, but without substantial
supplementary explication, is found again and again from one end to the other of Hus
sert ' s work. In particular: a) in the LI, I , 1 , 1 8 , p. 302. There we read among others those
lines devoted to idealization and to which the Origin will add nothing: "The image . . .
provides only a foothold for intellectio. It ofers no genuine instance of our intended
pattern, only an instance of the sort of sensuous form which is the natural starting-point
for geometrical ' idealization' . In these intellectual thought-processes of geometry, the
ideal of a geometrical figure i s constituted, which is then expressed in the fixed meaning
of the defnitory expression. Actually to perform this intellectual process may be presup
posed by our frst formation of primitive geometrical expressions and by our application
of them in knowledge, but not for their revived understanding and their continued
sigifcant use" ; b) in Ideas I, 74, pp. 1 90-91 ; c) in "Idealization and the Science of
Reality-The Mathematization of Nature" (Before 1 928), Appendix I I , in C, pp. 301 -1 4;
d) i nEl, to, pp. 41 -46; e) inFTLy 96c, and Conclusion, pp. 243 and 291 -93; f) in C, 9a
naturally, but also in 36, where in summary is said: "These categorical features of the
life-world have the same names but are not concered, M to speak, with the theoretical
idealizations and the hypothetical substructions of the geometrician and the physicist"
(p. 1 40; our emphasis); and g) in Appendix V: "Objectivity and the World of Experi
ence, " in C, pp. 343-5 1 .
'
The Poetics of Space, tf. Maria Iolas (Boston: Beacon, 1 964) , p. xxxv.
` All these formulas are also encountered in the texts we just cited. The sensible type
serves as the foundation for geometry in the process of being constituted. Next, it will
only serve as an illustrative "auxiliary" or "adjunct" to a geometrical activity which
goes through it toward pure ideality.
134
Jacques Derrida
taea,atae|atte:ea,ataetteasetaeie:e:|eie:,ettea| t .s a:e
ta.as.a,taat. s:eseas.||eie:tae|ea.a,acvaaeeei. cea|.zat.eaaac
ie:,eeet:.ea|t:ataassaea1ae. aaa,a:a|eaa:aete:eitae.cea| . z.a,
aet.tae:ac.ea|aac. ::at.vei:eecea.eataataetaa.iests. aactae
cee.s.vec. seeat.aa.tya..aa:eetstaeaeti:e. tsasteeac.t. eas. a||
ta.sa.cestae.cea|.z.a,aeti:ea,eaea|e,.ea|cese:. t.ea
,
oea|
..t.
eaa||,
aeaaeae:aeaaa||eta.a,.tae:eie:etaefnzte tam, ,1aeet. i?iaa
.taaeaase:aasme:eaua.t,.tatae
.
|atte . | .eat.eat?a .ta
sees te aave .ta aeaeeae|e,y s nae. |e ei nae. | es
raeaeeae|e,y ea|a taas |estretched |eteea taejnitizing eea
se.easaessei.tsprinciple aaataeinjnitizing eease.easaessei.tsaaa|
institution, taeEndstiftung .aaeaa.te|yaeie::ea[differee] .a .tseeateat
|ata|aysev.aeat.a.ts:e,a|at.veva|ae. ,
i t . saet|yeaaaeetaattae:e.saeaeaeeae|e,yeitaei aea. e
|atte:eaaaet|e,.vea.ae:sea.ae:aete:.aea.aaaev. aeaee. ie:.tI S
ea|ytaeess.|.|.tyeiev.aeaeeaaataeeeaaesei
seea,.tse|i..t. s
ea|ydeterminability as tae ae:.zea ie:eve:y mta.t.ea. a,eae:| . tae
. av.s.||e.|.eaeisee. a,aaa|e,eastetaea. aaaae.tyeitae~nstete
|. aaD. aaaaeas. aae|eeata|ta.:a.|attaeeaesea:eeeitaesaaa
taev.s.||e |ya.aaaaeasieaaaat.sv. s.||e.aaayetaetv. s. ||em
.tse|i.|at:atae:e.a,.tsv.s.|.| .tytetaeee|ea:eiseeta.a,e| se. i t
. staaasst eta. sa|eae taattaeee|ea:eiata.a,. sseea(De Anima,
1i s|,. iitae:e. s aeta.a,tesaya|eattaeiaea se(. .t.s|eeaasetae
l 64
An essential fni tude can appear i n phenomenology i n another sense: to recognie
that the transcendental reduction must remain an eidetic reduction in order to avo d
empirical ideali sm is to recognize that transcend
.
ental ideali s does nO
,
t proc
.
eed, e,en 1 0
the Kantian tradition itself, without the afrmatIon of the phI losopher s radIcal fmtude.
This necessi ty for the transcendental reduction to remai n so i s th necess
.
ity to make he
absolute and primordial ground of the sense of being appear 10 regIon (the rglOn
" consciousness" unifed by an ego and an Idea) , i . e. , i n a region whIch, even were It
.
the
Ur-Region, i s no l ess a domain of determined existents . The uni tary ground of all egl Ons
can onl y appear i n one region; it can onl y then be concealed undr a typ of bemgess
[itance] determined the very moment it appars
.
as
.
the round. Wlthout thIs
.
oculttI?,
philosophical di scourse woul d renounce all
.
eldetIc r
.
1gor,
.
I . e. , all sense. Te eIdetIc l
,
l m1ta
tion i s then indispensable, and the reductIOn receIves 1ts true sene ,h1Ch, cntrary to
appearances, is that of prudence and critical hum!l i t. it
.
hout hl d1sappenng f the
ground necessary for appearing itself, wi thout th1S hmltatlon w1thm a
.
certm reglonal
ness, without this reduction that Heidegger impl i citly reproaches h1m w1th, us
.
serl
thinks that philosophy even more surel y fal l s back i nto regionalness; better st1l1, mto
empirical regionalness-here, for exampl e, under the form of anthropological factul ity,
Husserl thi nks, that of Dasein . On thi s poi nt, the dialogue between Husserl and Heldeg
ger could go on indefnitel y, except considering that the reduction i s alwys already
supposed as the essential possibility of Dasein, and that, conversIY, consc10u
.
sness as
transcendental source i s not a "region" in the strict sense, even If the neceSSI ty of n
eidetic language has to consider it as such. For both Husserl and Heidegger, the cohc
ity of appearing and of concealing seems i n any case primordial, essential , and defmtlve.
I 6^
[ET: On the Soul, t r. J. A. Smith, i n The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. Richard
McKeon (New York: Random House, 1 941 ) , p. 568 (modifed) . ]
139
Introductin to the Origin ofGeometry
i aea. staatsta:t.a,i:ea.easeeta.a,.a,eae:a|eaa |e sa.a. i ts
ea a:t.ea|a::eseaee . taea. eaaaetaeeaaeaaaeaeeae|e,.ea|
ty,eeiev.aeaee . Des.tetaea|t.|.e.tyei:eie:eaeestetae i aea.a
uasse:| s |ast:.t.a,s. tae est :ee. se texteeaee:a.a, .tstye ei
ev.aeaee .s ieaaa. .tsees. .atae eaate:eiIdeas I aeveteatetae
aeaemeae|e,yeixeasea,; | 1 .---:, .Ceaee:a.a,taeaaeaate
,.veaaesseitaet:aaseeaaeatta.a,.eaaatae:ea:e||eaaa|e,eas
tetaateitaeteta|aa.tyeitae. aaeataax.aa.ea. ta. st.e .eaea
|. veaexe:.eaee.s aaeaate|y,. vea. ~|taea,ataet:aaseeaaeatta.a,
|e|ea,.a,teNata:eeaaaet|e,.vea.taee|eteaete:.aaaeyaaa
.ta s..|a:|y ee|ete . ata.ta|.|.ty .a aay |..tea | a.te eease. eas
aess. "as Idea ,. ataekaat.aasease,. [its] complete givenness is . . .
prescribed . . . " (ibid. , . --, .
1a. siaeaeitae. aaa.teaete:. aa|.|.tyeitaesaex-e:eeve:. as
e| | . taateitae e:|a .a ,eae:a|-aes. ,aat,es}ta:ea,a. tsesseat.a|
aata:eatpe ofevidence that is its own" (ibid. , -:,ea.aea} , . '
.
nat
ta. sev.aeaeeeitae iaeaas :e,a|at.veess.|. |.ty.s a|se|ate|yexee
t.eaa| . aaeaeeae|e,y. .taasae:ee:eeateat. e::atae:. t. saet
ev.aeaeeeitaei aea seeateat it.sev.aeaeeea|y. aseiaras.ti sjnite,
. . e . . ae:e.formal, s.aeetaeeeateateitae. aaa.tei aea. s a|seataaa. s
aea.eat eeve:y. ata.t.ea.1ae.aeaeiaa. aaa.tyesseat.a||yet.vatea
.s aet .tse|i aa . aaa.ty. tae ev.aeaee taatta. s .aaa.ty . s . at:. as.ea||y
.aeaa||e ei|e.a, ,.vea aees aet exe|aae |at :atae: aeaaas tae
t:aasa:eat,.veaaesseitaeIdea eita. s. aaa.ty (ibid. ,ea.aea}, .
i ataei aeaei.aaa.ty.tae:e .saete:. aeaev. aeaeeea|yeitaei aea.
|ataeteitaateia.ea.t. staeiaea. 1aeiaea. staee|eeiaa:e
.ateat.ea.etyeieve:yaete:m.aeae|]eet ita|eae:evea|s.taea.tae
|e.a,eitae.ateat.eaintentionality .tse|i.
1aas . ie:eaee. aeta.a, aea:s .aa see.ae ev. aeaee. waataees
aea: . s ea|ytae :e,a|at.ve ess. |.|.ty ei aea:.a, aaa tae aa.te
ee:ta.atyei. aaa.teaeaeeae|e,.ea|aete:.aa|.|.ty. . . e. .aee:ta.aty
.taeataee::eseaa.a,ev.aeaee. nyaeaa.t.ea.aeta.a,eaa|eaaaea
teta.sie:a|aete:.aat.eaeitaeiaea 1ae|atte:. astae. aaa.teaete:
.aa|.|.tyeix. . s ea|yrelation with an object. it .s. . atae |:eaaest
sease.Objectivit . tse|i.
ia a.s a:t.e|e ea kaat aaa uasse:| . raa| x.eeea: :.tes tae
I66
In FTL, Husserl also evokes "thi s phenomenologically cl arifable i nfi nite anticipa
tion (which, as an i nfnite anticipation, has an evidence of its own) " ( 1 6c, n. I , p . 62).
But, at that poi nt , Husserl no longer goes beyond the promise or suggestion made i n the
passage. Moreover, at the end of thi s note he refers to Ideas I.
140
Jacques Derrid
c.si.aei.ea,iaacameaia|.a kaai. . . |eiweeaintention cintuition "
.s ieia||yaa|aewa.aHasse:| .
!7
i aiaei,s aeaac.si.aei.ea. saeve:
iaemai.e. auasse:| . Necea|i,aa. aieai.ea.awa.eaaeia.a,. s,.vea
eaaaeiaave, assaea, aaeaemeae|o,.ea|eaa:aeie:,aacuasse:|eaa
aeieeae:eie|ycese:.|e. i, ai|easiaei.a. iseeaieai, ie:iae. aieai.ea s
ie:m. saeeae:eieaac| .vecev.ceaee, wa.ea. saeiiaeease. akaai.
~eee:a.a,|y,phenomenology eaaaei|e,:eaacecassaea. a. ise|i,ae:
eaa .iitsel .ac.eaie .is ewa :ee: | .m.is . nai . s aei iae ee:ia.aiy
,w.iaeaiamaie:.a||yceie:m.aecev.ceaee,eiiae. aaa.ieceie:m.aa|.|
.iyeixe:eiiaee|]eei.a,eae:a|aa .aieai.eaw.iaeai.aia. i.ea, aa
emiy.aieai.eawa.ea|eia,:eaacs aac.s c.si.a,a. saeci:emeve:y
ceie:m.aecaeaemeae|e,.ea|.aia.i.ea: is aeiiae samei:aeie:aay
eease. easaesseiiae.aaa.ieias|aacie:ie|ee|e,.ea|ee:ia.aiyaace:a||
.isie:ms :~ssa:ec|y, iaea,ia.s.aieai.eaa|a:esease[sens pur d'inten
tion], ia.sintentionality, .a. ise|i.siae|asiia.a,iaaiaaeaemeae|e,y
eaac. :eei|ycese:.|eeiae:w.seiaaa.a.isaa. ieaeis ,.aia.i.eas,:esa|is ,
e:e|]eeis , |ai , w.iaeaiwaai.a,e:|e.a,a||eie cese:.|e.i, Hasse:|
aeve:iae|ess:eee,a.zes, c.si.a,a.saes, aacposits ia. s.aieai.eaa|.iyas
iaea.,aesisea:eeeiva|ae .He|eeaiesiaespace wae:eeease.easaess
aei.aes .ise|i ei iae i cea s :ese:. i.ea aac iaas .s :eee,a.zec as
i:aaseeaceaia|eease.easaessia:ea,aiaes.,aeiiae.aaa.ie.ia. ssaee
.siaeinteral |eiweeaiaei ceaei. aaa.iy.a.isie:ma|aacaa.ie,yei
eeae:eie,ev. ceaeeaaciae.aaa.iy. ise|ieiwa.eaiae:e. siaeicea.ii.s
eaiae|as.seiia. sae:.zeaee:ia.aiyiaaiiaea.sie:.e.iyeiseaseaaciae
ceve|emeaieixeaseaa:eseii:ee.
I 67
"Kant and Husserl , " in Husserl: An Analysis, pp. 1 75-201 . In this very dense
article, Ricoeur defi nes Husserlianism as the completion of a latent phenomenology and
the reduction of an ontological disquietude, both of which aimate Kantianism; of these
he has said that "Husserl did phenomenology, but Kant limited andfounded it" (p. 201 ) .
I n thi s way the formidable and decisive problems of the Fifth Cartesian Medi tation are
taken up again in a Kantian reading: the practical detenination of the person by respect
must precede and condition a theoretical constitution which, by itself alone, cannot have
access to the alter ego as such. Also cf. on this Fallible Man, tr. Charles Kelbley
(Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1 965), pp. 1 05-2 1 . As for the relation with an object which
preoccupies us here, Ricoeur writes more particularly: "The key to the problem is the
distinction, fundamental in Kant but totally unknown in Husserl, between intention and
intuition . Kant radically separates from one another the relation to something and the
intuition of something. An object " X is an intention without intition. This distinction
subtends that of thinking and knowing and maintains the ageement as well as the tension
between them" (p. 1 89).
Here we naturally leave aside those various possibilities, so often invoked by Husserl ,
of empty intentions, like the symbolic intentions that are deceived or not fulflled, and so
on. They could not b said to be deprived of intuition in general . Their emptiness is
circumscribed, in that they always bear reference to a determined but absent intuition.
141
Introductin to the Origin ofGeomet
re:aas ia. s ae|s as ieeem:eaeacwayiae icea.a i~ kaai.aa
seaseaac, ae:e,iaemaiaemai.ea|. cea| .zai.eawa.easaeses. ieea|c
ea|y|eoperative aacnot thematic eeaeeis.
!B
1a. saeaemeae|e,.ea|
aeaiaemai.zai.eae|eysa:eieaacaac.::ecae. ||eaeeess.iy.1aeicea
.siae|as.seawa.eaaaeaemeae|e,y.sseia.ae:ce:ieaea.eveiae
aaa|.aieai.eaeia.|eseay.1aaiaaeaemeae|e,.ea|ceie:m.aai.eaei
iae icea . ise|i may |e :ac.ea||y . mess.||e i:em iaea ea s.,a.aes
e:aasiaaiaeaemeae|e,yeaaaei|e:eaeeiec.aaaeaemeae|e,yei
aeaemeae|e,y,aaciaai. isLogos eaaaeve:aea:assaea.eaaaeve:
|e ,.vea.a aa.|eseayeisee.a,, |ai ,|.|e a|| seeea, eaa ea|y |e
aea:c e: aace:sieec ia:ea,a iae v.s.||e. 1ae Endstitung ei
aeaemeae|e,y ,aeaemeae|e,y s a|i.maie e:.i.ea| |e,.i. mai.ea. . . e . ,
waai . issease , va|ae , aac:.,aiie||as a|eai.i, , iaea, aeve:c.:eei|y
measa:es aie aaeaemeae|e,y. ~i|easi ia.sEndstitung eaa,.ve
aeeessie.ise|i.aaa.|eseay,.aseia:as.i.sannounced .aaeeae:eie
aeaemeae| e,.ea|ev.ceaee..aaeeae:eieconsciousness wa.ea. smace
responsible ie:.ices.ieiaeaa.iaceeiiaaieease.easaess,aac. aseia:
as .i ,:eaacs i:aaseeaceaia| a. sie:. e.iy aac i:aaseeaceaia| .aie:sa|
]eei.v.iy. Hasse:| s aeaemeae|e,ysia:isi:em ia. slived anticipation
asa:ac.ea|:eseas.|.|.iy,semeia.a,wa. ea, waeaeeas.ce:ec|.ie:a| |y.
ceesaeiseemie|eiaeeasew.iaiaekaai.aae:.i.ae,
X
1a:eseaeeeiiaeiceaa|eae, iae:eie:e,aaiae:.zesiae|eaiea:e
.cea| |iy|yiaea,a:e|.m.iaaciaeacveaieimaiaemai.es , aiaeiiaai
eea|c,.ve:.seiecea|isa|eaiiaaie:.,.a s see.aea.sie:.e.iy. ~:ewe
aeieeai:eaiecw.iaaaaa.sie:.ea|iceaeaiaeeaeaaacaac.is.ase:i.ea
.aiaeeveaie:a.sie:.ea|iaeieaiaeeiae:: ia wa.ea ease, wewea|c
si:.|eiae saa,siaai Hasse:|:ee.se|ywaaisieave.caacwea|cm.ss
ea:ia:,ei-aeaemeae|e,.ea|a.sie:y.waaiwei:a|yaeec.sie.aves
i.,aieiaeseaseeiiaeicea s:eieaaca.sie:.e. iy.
uacea|iec| yiaeiceaaaciaexeaseaa. ccea.aa.sie:yaac.amaaas
: 'animal rationale" a:eeie:aa| .uasse:|eueasaysia. s naiia.seie:a.iy
IS only a a.sie:.e.iy. ii . s iae possibilt of a.sie:y .ise|i. iis
sa:aieme:a|.iy-eema:ec w. ia em. :.ea| ieme:a|.iy-.s ea|y aa
ema.ieme:a|.iy.1aeicea, |.|exeasea, .snothing eais.ceiae a.sie:y
I68
We refer here to the very enlightening distinction proposed by Fink in his lecture,
already cited, on " Les Concepts operatoires dans la phenomenologie de Husser\ . " [See
note 66 above. ]
1 '
142
Jacques Derrid
.aa.ea.tdispLays .tse|i.. e. . .aa.ea,.aeaeaactaesaemeveeat,
.tc.se|esesaac|ets. tse|i|eta:eateaec
s. aeetaetcea. saeta.a,eats.cea. ste:,|attaesense ofa||a.ste:,.
ea|,aa. ste:.eet:aaseeaceata|sa|] eet.v.t,eaa|emace:eseas.||eie:
.t 1aas. .ataeCartesian Meditations , i .;1, , uasse:|seasseic.se|es
.a,taeiaa|sease(Zwecksinn) eise.eaeeasa"noematic phenomenon. "
i at:aaseeaceata|sa|]eet. v.ty s c.se|esa:eei taei cea. progressiveness
.saetaaext:.as.eeeat.a,eaeytaataaeetstaeicea|attae. e:at.ve
:ese:.t.ea ei .ts esseaee. 1ae icea .s aet aa ~|se|ate taatfrst
ex. sts.atae|ea.taceei.tsesseaeeaactaeaceseeacs.atea.ste:ye:
|eeeesc. se|esec.aa sa|]eet.v. ty aese aets ea|c aet|e.at:. as.
ea||y.ac.seasa||ete.t iitaate:et:ae. a||t:aaseeaceata|a.ste:.e
.tyeea|c|esa.cte|eea|yaae.:.ea|a. ste:y. . . at.|. zecasaat
:evea|sesseat.a|.ate:eeaaeet.eas nattaeseesat. a|.ate:eeaaee
t.eas ea|c |e . ess.||e . taey ea|c |e aeta.a, .taeat a
t:aaseeaceata|sa|]eet. v.tyaac.tst:aaseeaceata|a.ste:.e.ty. 1ae ~|
se|ate ei tae icea as tae 1e|es ei aa .aia.te cete:.aa|.|.ty . s tae
~|se|ateof .ateat.eaa|a.ste:.e.ty 1aeof ces.,aates ae.tae:ae:e| y
e|]eet.veae:ae:e|ysa|]eet.ve,ea. t.ve tae eieeaee:asae.tae:
aa .aceeaceat . e|]eet.ve ~|se|ate taat .sc.se|esec .a aa .ateat.ea
a.ea.s:e|at. vetetaat~|se|ate. a.tsie:.t.aaceeaie:ste. t. ae:
ceestaeeieeaee:aasa|]eet. ve~|se|atea.eae:eatesaacass. .
|ates sease . ate .ts ea .ate:.e:.ty. xatae:. ta. s ei eeaee:as tae
.ateat.eaa|~|se|ateeiObjectivity, taea:e:e|at.ea. taaae|]eeta
:e|at.ea .a a.easa|]eet aace|]eet a:e :ee.:eea||yea,eace:ec aac
,eve:aec iitae of aaaeaaees ae. tae: aa e|]eet.ve ae:a sa|]eet.ve
,ea.t.ve.taat.s|eeaase.teeaee:astae~|se|ateofgenitivity .tse|ias
i!i
That the Idea may not be i mmediately graspable in its evidence i s, i n any case, the
sign of its profound hi storicity. The expanded title of "Philosophy as Mankind' s Self
Refl ection" i s: "Phil osophy as Manki nd' s Self-Refl ection: the Self-Realization of Reason
through Stages of Development Requires as its Own Function the Stages of Development
of this Self- Refection" ( see ' ' La Philosophie comme prise de conscience de I ' humanite, "
tr. Paul Ri coeur, i nDeucafion, 3 : Verite e t Liberte [Cahiers de Phi l osophi e] , ed. Jean Wahl
[Neuchatel : Edition de la Baconniere, October 1 950] , p. 1 1 6) .
t
Husserl rigorously distingui shes Idea from eidos (cf. Ideas I, Introd. , p. 42) . The
I dea, then, is not essence. From which the difculty, already indicated, of an intuitive
grasp or evidence of what is neither an existent nor an essence. But it is als necessary to
say of the Idea that it has no essence, for it is only the openness of the horizon for the
emergence and determination of every essence. As the i nvi sible condition of nidence, by
preserving the seen, it loses any reference to seeing indicated i n eidos, a notion from
which it nevertheless results in its mysterious Platonic fous. The I dea can only be
understood [or heard: entendre J .
t !
Jean Cavail l es, Sur fa Logique, p. 77.
143
Introductin to the Origin of Geometr
taea:eess.|.| .tyeia,eaet.e:e|at.ea taeof eaaa:staesa|]eet s.
as well as taee|]eet s. ,eaea|e,.ea||yseeeaca:yaacceeaceatstatas .
taea.ta:ea,ataeve:yeeaaessei . ts.acete:.aat.ea.. t eaaa:stae.:
:.e:c.a|.ate:ceeaceaee iitaat. se|ea:|ytaeease. aysaea|ce
eaeese. as Cava.||es taea,at. |eteea aa a|se|ate |e,.e aac a
t:aaseeaceata| |e,.e (Sur La Logique, ::, . e: |eteea aeea
se.easaessei:e,:ess aaca :e,:esseieease.easaess (ibid. ,
:s, :~| |taee:ese.s.aeetaedialectical ,eaes. staatCava. |i-seeses
te tae aet.v.ty eiuasse:|.aa eease. easaess .s cese:.|ec :ee.|y
aacee.eas|y|yuasse:|eava:.eas|eve| s. a|taea,ataee:c.saeve:
meat.eaec weaave seeaaeaeata.saet.v.tyeieease.easaess
as|eta aate:.e:aaceste:.e:te ass.v.ty. taattaeeveeat ei
:.me:c. aiteme:a| .zat.ea,taea|t.mate,:eaaceia| | eeast.tat.ea,as
c. a|eet.ea|ta:ea,aaacta:ea,a,aactaat,aseve:,aataeat.ec.a|eet. e.t,
aats,ta. smevemeatasea|,taec. a|eet.e|eteeataec. a|eet.ea|,tae
.aceaa.temataa|aac.::ecae.||e.m|.eat. eaei:eteat.easaac:etea
t.eas,aactaeaeac. a|eet.ea|,taea|se|ateaaceeae:ete. ceat.t,eitae
i. v.a,r:eseat.taeaa. ve:sa|ie:meia| |eease.easaess, titaeA|se|ate
eit:aaseeaceata|a.ste:, .s .aceec. asuasse:| sa,s .ataeOrigin, tae
v. ta|mevemeateitaeeeex.steaeeaactae.ate:eav.a,(des Mitein
ander und Ineinander) ei :.me:c. a| ie:mat.eas aac sec. meatat.eas
eisease(Sinnbildung und Sinnsedimentierung) " ,e.tec. 1 09 a|eve,.
taeatae e:eat. ve aet. v.ty eisease . |.es . a .tse|ia ass.v.ty :e
,a:c.a, eeast.tatec aac sec.eatec seasea sease a. ea aea:s
aacaetsassaeaea|y.ta.atae:e]eet eia aee:eat. v. ty. aacse
ie:ta waat Cava.||es ]ac,es . ess.||e e: c.mea|t te ac.t ie:
aeaeeae|e,y-ae:etaeet.veie::esea:eaaactae,:eaaceie|
]eet.v.t.esa:e:.,at|ytaeeeaaeet.eateae:eat.vesa|]eet.v.ty(Sur La
Logique, . -, . s :ee. se|yaat uasse:|cese:.|es .a taeOrigin,
eaeat.etaetaeeeisec.eatat.ea.staeieeaseia.s:eaeet.ea.1e
a,a.a tase a Cava.||es te:s. uasse:| saes exaet| y taat a sa|
]eet.v.ty ae:ec .a .ts r:eseat |y a eeast.tatec e|]eet.ve sease
,a.ea .s tae:eie:e .ts a|se|ate|e,.e iasteas . ts ae:s te a
a.,ae:sa|]eet.v. ty. . e .teitsel .ataee:eat.veeveeat|ya.ea
.t,ees|eyeac.tse|iaac :ecaeesaaesease. aac seea 1a.sae
sease.||a|se|etaeeeateiahigher sease. avest.,at.ea.aa.ea
tae ast sease. sec. eatec aac :eta. aec i:st . a a se:: eie|]eet.v.st
att.tace. .|| |e :eaaseaec .a .ts ceeaceat :e|at.ea te |.v.a, sa|
Cavai l l es, who then referred above al l to Ideas I and to FTL, moreover added: "Per
haps the later phenomenological investigations at least permit such a bluntly posed di lemma
to be contested" (p. 65) .
144
Jacques Derrid
]eei. v.iy. uasse:|aeve:seemsieaaveiaea,aiiaaiia.sasiea|ase
iae s.a,a|a:.iy eiiae a|se|aie-ie :ese:ve ie: .i iae ee.ae.ceaee|e
ieeaiaeeeasi.iai.a,aaciaeeeasi.iaiecmemeais(ibid. ) . re:a.m
ia.s ee.ae.ceaee . s s.m|y aeia.a, |ai iae a|se|aie aa.iy eisease s
movement, . . e. , iaeaa.iyei iaeaeaee.ae.ceaeeaacei iae .aceaa.ie
ee.m|.eai.eaeiiaeeeasi.iaiecaaceeasi.iai.a,memeaisin the abso
lute identit eiai.v.a,r:eseaiiaaic.a| eei.ea||y:e]eeisaacma.aia.as
itsel
Oieea:se,a| |ia.s:ema.asa:acex.ea|aaceeai:ac.eie:yas| ea,as
eeeai.aaeieeeas.ce:-. m|.e.i|ye:aei-iaeiceaassome thing aac
xeaseaasaaabilit. wemasieeasiaai|y:eia:a, iaea.
1 . 1euas.e:| s eeae:eiecese:.i.easeeaee:a.a,iaeaeema s|e.a,
aea:ea||y.ae|acec. aeease.easaess, eeaee:a.a,iae.cea|.iyeiaeema
i.esease,aa.ae|acecaessa.ea. sae.iae:asa|]eeiae:aae|]eei,aac
iae:eie:eis nothing but iaee|]eei sO|]eei.v. iy,iaeaea:.a,ei. is as
saeafor aeease.easaess: ,aaceeaee:a.a,iaeaea.ma,.aa:y[nonfan
tastique] .::ea|.iyeiiaeeidos , aa.::ea|.iya.ea. snothing other than
iaeseaseaacess.|.|.tyofiaeiaa|:ea|.iyiea.ea.i. sa|ays:e|aiec,
.mmec.aie| ye:aei, asiae:.,e:eas:ese:. i.eaeiiaeeidos' esseai.a|
meceeiaea:.a,, . iieacm.iie:]asieae. asiaai, eveae:e. iaa
.::ecae.||e :esami.ea, iaaiiae:e .s .a uasse:|aai e:aasiae:e
as aei evea .a r|aie ,exeei .a iae |.ie:a|aess ei a.s myias aac
eca,e,y)-aame|y,a r|aiea. sm eiiaeeidos e:iaeicea-iaeaiae
ae|e aeaemeae|e,.ea| eaie::.se, esee.a| | y aea .ieeaee:as a.s
ie:y,|eeemesanovel. 1aeicea. ssi.|||essaaex. sieaiiaaaiaeeidos, .i
iaai . s ess.||e , ie: iaeeidos . s aa e|]eei iaai. sceie:m.aa||e aac
aeeess.||eiea ia.ie .aia.i.ea 1ae | cea.saei . |i.sa| ays|eyeac
|e.a, (epekeina tes ousias) . ~s iae 1e|es eiiae .aaa.ie ceie:m.aa
|.|.iy ei|e.a,, .i.s |ai|e.a, seeaaessieiae|. ,aiei.iseaae
aemeaa|.iy, .i . s iae | . ,ai ei |.,ai, iae saa ei iae v.s.|| e saa. a
a.cceasaaa. easaes.iaeai|e.a,saea. ~ac.i.saecea|iaai
ar|aiemaiec|yr|aiea. sie| | sas a|eai.
:. 1e uasse:| s aei.ea ei xeasea. vea .i ee:ia.a ex:ess.eas ai
i|mesm.,aisa,,esiia.s,a.cceaxeasea.saeiaaa|.|.iyeeaeea|ec.a
iae saaces eia a. sie:.ea| sa|]eei.v.iy e: .aiae sa|e:|c [arrere
monde] ei|eeem.a, xeasea.saeisemeeie:a.iyaie:s.aa. sie:y.
` Li kewi se, the transcendental Ego in the phenomenological sense has no other con
tent but the empirical ego and, further, no real content of its own, although i t is not the
abstractform of a content either, as indeed might some falsel y psed problems about thi s
suggest. I n its most radical moment, every transcendental reduction gi ves access to a
145
Introuctin to the Origin ofGeometr
a:si|eeaaseiae:e.saea.sie:y.iaeaixeasea, . . e. ,aea:ei:aasm.s
s.eaeiseaseasiaei:ac.i.eaeii:aia,iaea|eeaase,:ee.:eea||y,iae:e
.saexeasea.iaeaia. sie:y, . . e. ,.iaeaiiaeeeae:eieaac.asi.iai.a,
aeis ei i:aaseeaceaia| sa|]eei.v.iy, .iaeai .is e|] eei.aeai.eas aac
sec.meaiai.eas . Neaeae sea|eixeaseaa.ccea.aaamaas.ac,
.i.sc.mea|iie,ei:. ceiiaesyeae|e,.ea|aaaiemeiiaea|iye:a|.|.iy,
aeaesea|eixeaseaa.ccea.aa.sie:y,iae. ma,|aai.veseaemaei
aeameaa|sa|siaaee.s aa:cieeaaee. iieeeaaaeea:se|vesieiaese
seca|ai.ve:e]ac.ees , e. iae:a. sie:yea|cea|yaaveaaem.:.ea|aac
exi:.as.es.,a.aeai.ea,e:e| sexeaseaea|cea|y|eamyia.Oaeeme:e
e ea|c aave ie eaeese |eieea xeasea aac u. sie:y. Yei ve:y
ea:| y, .aa.se:.i.e. smeisyeae|e,.smaac.aiae :eia:aieiaeia.a,s
iaemse|vesasiaeacveaieii:aees.i.v. sm, uasse:|a:,ec,eii. a,
:.ceiiaeseei:ameiiaesea| siaea|i. esaaca| |iaevesi.,eseie|ass..
sa|siaai.a|.sms .
i i xeasea. s|aiiaeesseai.a|si:aeia:eei iaei:aaseeaceata|ego aac
iaei:aaseeaceaia|we, .i is ,|.seiaem, a. sie:.ea|ia:ea,aaacia:ea,a
Ceave:se| y, a.sie:.e.iy, as saea,is :ai.eaa|ia:ea,a aacia:ea,a. nai
being, a.eaa:i.ea|aiesxeaseaaacu. siecy.a:e|ai.eaieeaeaeiae:,.s
a"sense, " aie|ee|e,.ea|ea,ai ie|ea.eaeeasi.iaies|e.a,asmeve
meai .1ae|asia,eseiiaeOrigin a:eea,a,ec.aia.s:e||em Dee
aeisiaacae:e|eie:eiae,:eaiaac:eieaac:e||emae:.zeaeixea
sea,iaesamexeaseaiaaiiaaei.eas.aeve:ymaa,iaeanimal rationale,
aemaiie:ae:.m.i.veae. s:, i s,ec.iec}, .
aeaiyeeiiaeiaa|aamaa.iy aasia.sesseaeeeianimal rationale.
aeaiye, uasse:|eeai.aaes, aas a :eei.aiaeesseai.a|si:aeta:eei
aai .s aa.ve:sa||yaamaa, ia:ea,aa.eaaie|ee|e,.ea|xeasea :aa
a.a,ia:ea,aeaia||a.sie:.e.iyaaaeaaees.ise|i.w.iaia. s.s:evea|eca
seiei:e||ems.a.is ea:.,ai:e|aiecieiaeieia|.iyeia. sie:yaacie
iae ieia| sease a.ea a|i. maie|y ,.ves .i .is aa.iy , | s ,mec.iec}
thoroughly historical SUbjecti vi ty. In a letter of November 1 6, 1 930, Husserl writes:
" For, with the transcendental reduction, I attained, I am convinced, concrete and real
subjectivity in the ultimate sense in al l the fullness of i ts being and life, and in thi s
subjecti vity, uni versal constituting life (and not si mpl y theoretical constituting life) :
absolute subjecti vi ty i n its hi storicity" (letter published by A. Diemer, French tf.
Al exandre Lowit and Henri Colombie, i n "La Phenomenologie de Husserl comme
metaphysique, " Les Etudes Philosophiques, NS 9 [ 1 954] , p. 3hereafter cited as
Diemer) .
` "Reason is not an accidental de facto ability, not a title for possible accidental
matters of fact, but rather a title for an all-embracing essentially necessar structural
form belonging to all transcendental subjectivity" (eM, 23, p. 57) .
|
146
Jacques Derrid
i. |eiaei:si,eeei:.ea|aeia.easaeses.i.iaei:siphilosophical
aei.s ea|yiae sease. aesi.,ai.eaeiia. sa.sie:.ea|:ai.eaa|.iy 'in the
constant movement of selelucidation. " 1e|ee|e,.ea| xeaseaa|:eacy
eeea.ec e. v.| . zai.eas [l'humanite dans ses tpes empirques] |eie:e
iae a. |esea.ea| sease.avesi.,ai.ea ,a sease.avesi.,ai.ea a.ea
awa|eaecxeaseaie.ise|i,aacaaaeaaeeciaea:easeeia. sie:.e.iy.
. e . iae ve:y seaseof xeasea. ie a.sie:y 1ae sease. avesi.,ai.eaei
aaiasa|:eacy iae:e a:|sa:aia:eaac. eeaseaeai|y. a:ac.ea|
aac e:eai.ve e:.,. a
t 8 |
"Die urzeitliche, iiberzeitliche ' Zeitlichkei t, ' " Husserl says, speaking of "my Liv
ing Present" (C 2 I I I , 1 932, pp. 8-9) .
149
Introductn to the Origin of Geometry
1aea.cceaieme:a|aa.iyeic.a , sa:a , e:.a ieme:a|.iyea
iaeeaeaaacaaceiomniieme:a|.iyeaiaeeiae:.siaeaa.ia:y,:eaac
eia||iaes.,a.aeai.easUnstances] c. ssee.aiec|yiaeva:.eas:ecaei.eas.
aeia
!
1 62
Edmund H usserl
eaeaea:exiena|ae:.zea.aeaeaeaseaseiae:s ..aeaeaeasei
aeease.easeiiaeas yeiae:s. as iaese.iaaeieaaeaie:
.aieaeiaa|aaceieai.a|.. ec.aieaacec.aie:e|ai.easeieaiay.
,ia. s .ave|ves} a :ee.:eea| ,eii.a, a|ea, .ia eiae:s . aaceaiae
|as.seiiaese:e|ai.easieaacea|.iaiae.eaie:.aiea:i.ea|a:eces
eieeaa.iy. iaiae. aaciaea |ae. .a a aa|.iaa| ay. eiy
|e.a,se:e|aiec i. |ee. eve:yaaaa|e.a,-aacta.s. saeae. s
aace:sieec|yeaaceve:yeaee|se-aasa.sie||eeaaac. a| ays
eeaai.a,a.se|i.e.v. |.zai.ea.a,eae:a| ..aa.eaae|aesa. se|iie
|e|.v.a,.
ii. s:ee.se|yie ia.sae:.zeaeie.v.|.zai.eaiaaieeea|aa,aa,e
|e|ea,s Oae.seease.easeie.v.|.zai.eai:eiaesia:iasaa.ec.aie
aac ec.aie| .a,a.si.eeeaa.iy. C|ea:| y.i.sea|yia:ea,a|aa,aa,e
aac.isia::eaea.a,ceeaeaiai.eas. asess.||eeeaa.eai.eas.iaai
aeae:.zeaeie.v.| .zai.eaeaa|eaaeeaaaceac|esseae .as.ia|ays
.sie:ea. waai.s:.v.|e,ec.aeease.easaessasiaeae:.zeaeie.v.|.
zai.ea aac as iae |.a,a. si.e eeaa.iy .s aia:e ae:a| e.v.| .zai.ea
,ia|.a,aay iaea|ae:a| aac iae e:|c eiea.|c:ea, . ia ia.s sease
e.v.| .zai.ea. s. ie:eve:yaaaeseeae:.zea.i.s. aeeaa.iyei
iaese ae eaa :ee.:eea||y ex:ess iaese|ves. ae:a||y. .a a ia||y
aace:siaaca||eiasa.ea.aac.ia.aia.seeaa.iyeve:yeaeeaaia|s
a|eaiaai.s.ia.aiaesa::eaac.a,e:|ceia.se.v.|.zai.eaase|]ee
i.ve|yex.si.a,ve:yia.a,aas.isaae.e:.saaa||e.aiae|:eacesi
sease. . e. . | .a,a.si.ea||yex:ess.||e.1aee|]eei.vee:|c. si:eiae
sia:i iae e:|c ie: a|| . iae e:|c a.ea eve:yeae aas as e:|c
ae:.zeai ise|]eei.ve|e.a,:esaesesea.aace:steecasea.ia
aeeea|aa,aa,e . iaa,aa,e.ie:.isa:i.asiaaei.eaaacexe:e.sec
eaae.iy. .s:e|aiecee::e|ai.ve|yieiaee:|c. iaeaa.ve:seeie|]eeis
a.ea. s|.a,a. si.ea||yex:ess.||e.a.is|e.a,aac.is|e.a, saea1aas
eaasea.ie||eea.e:|c-iaee:|ceia.eaea.eia.eae.
a| ays ia|| aac eaa ia||-aac. ea iae eiae: aaac. |aa,aa,e. a:e .a
sea:a||y.aie:i.aec. aac eae.sa|ays ee:ia.a eiiae.: .asea:a||e
:e|ai.eaa| aa.iy. iaea,a asaa||y ea| y . | .e.i| y. .a iae aaae: eia
ae:.zea
1a.s|e.a,:esaesec. iae:.a||yesia||.sa.a,,eeeie:eaae|
v.eas| y a|se ex:ess a.s .aie:aa| si:aeia:e nai iae aesi.ea a:.ses
,a.a. uecees iae |aiie:. .a .is.cea|.iy. iae:e|y |eeeee|]ee
i.ve:1e|esa:e.seeia.a,syea.ea.eaeaa|eaace:sieec|yeiae:s
[nachverstehbar] aac.seeaa.ea||e.asseeia.a,syea.e|e|ea,.a,
ieia. saa.. seo ipso e|]eei. ve. ]asiasaea.se|i.aseeae:eieaa..s
exe:.eaeea||eaacaaa||e|yeve:yeaeasa:ea|ia.a,.aiaee:|cei
163
The Origin of Geometry
ia. a,s.a ,eae:a| ree|eeaaa,:eea|eaisaeaia.a,s. eaaa|eee
ea ve:.aa||easse:i.easeaiae|as.seieeeaexe:.eaee.eie nat
aeceestae.ai:asyea.ea||yeeasi.iaiecsi:aeia:ea::. veataa.aie:
sa|]eei.ve|e.a,ei.iseaasaa.cea|e|]eeia.ea.as,eeei:.ea| .
. s aayia.a,|aia:ea|syea.e e|]eei. evea iaea,a. i aas a:.sea sy
ea.ea||y:ieias:eaeei 1aee:.,.aa||e.a,.ise|iiae:e. .aiae. ec.
aey[Aktualitit ] ei.isi:si:ecaei.ea.. e ..ae:.,.aa|se|iev.ceaee.
:esa|is . a ae e:s. si.a, aea. s.i.ea ai a|| iaai eea|c aave e|]eei. ve
ex. sieaee v. v. cse|i ev.ceaeeasses-iaea,a. asaeaaayiaaiiae
aei.v.iy.ec.aie|yians.aieiaeass.v.iyeiiaeae.a,|yiac.a,eea
se.easaesseiaaiaas]asiae|eea. r. aa||yia. s:eieai.ea c.sa,
ea:s. |aiiae c.saea:ec ass.a,aac|e.a,astaasaei|eeee
aeia.a,ie:iaesa|]eei.aaesi.ea..ieaa|e:eaa|eaec 1eiaeass.v
.iyeiaai .sai| :sie|sea:e| yaa|eaecaacaai e:aasee:,es
.ia,:eaie:aac,:eaie:e|a:.iyiae:e|e|ea,siaeess.||eaei.v.iyeia
:eee||eei.ea.aa.eaiaeasiexe:.eae.a,[Erleben] .s|.vecia:ea,a.a
a aas.ae aac aas.aei.veay. Ne .iiae e:.,. aa||yse|iev. ceai
:ecaei.ea. asiae a:eia| i|| eaiei. is .aieai.ea. . saai.s:eaeec
,:eee||eeiec, .iae:eaeeessa:. |yeeea:s. aeeeaay.a,taeaei. ve:eee|
|eei.eaeiaai. sasi.aaaei.v.iyeieeaea::eaiaeiaa|:ecaet.ea.aac
iae:e a:.ses iae:e|y. .a e:.,.aa| ee.ae. ceaee. iae se|iev.ceaee ei
.ceai.iy aaiaasae|eea:ea|.zec.ae:.,.aa|iasa.ea.siaesaeas
aai as :ev.eas|yse|iev.ceai ~|seeeesia||. saec.s iae eaae.iy
ie::eei.i.eaai.||.iaiaese|iev.ceaeeeiiae.ceai.iy,ee.ae.ceaee
ei.ceai.iy, eiiae si:aeia:e ia:ea,aeaiiae eaa.a ei:eei.i.eas Yei
evea.iaia.s.eaavesi.||aei,eae|eyeaciaesa|]eeiaaca.s sa|
]eei.ve.ev. ceaieaae.i.es. iaai.s.esi.||aaveae e|]eei. v.iy,.vea
itceesa:.se.aeeve:-.aa:e|. .aa:ysia,e-.aaace:siaaca||eiasa
.eaasseeaaseia|e.aieeeas.ce:ai.eaiaeiaaei.eaeieaiayaac
ie| |e aa|.acas a eeaa.tyeieaiay aacei| aa,aa,e. ia iae
eeaiaei ei:ee.:eea|| .a,a.si.e aace:siaac.a,. tae e:.,.aa| :ecaei.ea
aaciae:ecaeieieaesa|]eeieaa|eactively aace:sieec|yiaeeiae:s
ia ia. sia||aace:siaac.a,eiaai .s :ecaeec|yiae eiae:. as .a iae
easeei:eee||eei. ea. a:eseaieeaeee|.saeaieaeae seaa:iei
iae:eseai.iecaei.v.iyaeeessa:.|yia|es|aee.|aiaiiae saei.e
iae:e.sa|seiaese|iev.ceaieease.easaesseiiae.ceai.tyeiiaeeaia|
si:aeia:e.aiae:ecaei.easei|eiatae:eee.ve:eiiaeeeaa.eai.ea
aaciaeeeaa.eaie:. aac ia.s eeea:s :ee.:eea||y 1ae :ecaet.eas
eaa:e:ecaeeiae.:|.|eaessesi:ee:seaiee:sea.aac.aiaeeaa.a
eiiaeaace:siaac.a,eiiaese:eei.i.easaai.sse|iev.ceaiia:asaas
iaesae.aiaeeease.easaesseiiaeeiae: |ataeaa.iyeiiaeeea
164
Edmund Husserl
a.iyeieemmaa.eai.eaamea,seve:a|e:seasiae:eeaiec|y:ecaeec
si:aeia:e|eeemesaae|]eeieieease.easaess, aeiasa|.|eaess, |aias
iaeeaesi:aeia:eeemmeaiea|| .
Neemasiaeieiaaiiaee|]eei.v.iyei iae.cea|si:aeia:eaas aei
yei|eeaia| | yeeasi.iaiecia:ea,asaeaaeiaa|i:aasie::.a,eiaaiaas
|eeae:.,.aa||y:ecaeec.aeaeieeiae:saee:.,.aa||y:e:ecaee.i
waai .s | ae|.a,. siaepersisting existence eiiae .cea|e|]eeis evea
ca:.a, e:.ecs .a a.ea iae .aveaie: aac a.s ie||esa:e ae |ea,e:
a|eia||yse:e|aiece:eveaa:eae|ea,e:a|.ve.waai.s|ae|.a,.siae.:
eeai.aa.a,ie|eeveaaeaaeeaeaas,eease.eas| y}:ea|.zeciaem.a
se|iev.ceaee.
1ae.me:iaaiiaaei.eaei:.iiea,ceeameai.a,|.a,a.si.eex:ess.ea
. siaai.ima|eseemmaa.eai.easess.||e.iaeai.mmec.aiee:mec.aie
e:seaa| acc:ess , .i .s, se ie sea|, eemmaa.eai.ea|eeeme v.:iaa| .
1a:ea,a ia.s , iae eemmaaa| .zai.ea ei maa .s |.uec ie a ae |eve| .
w:.iiea s.,asa:e , aea eeas.ce:eci:em aa:e|yee:e:ea|e.aiei
v. e, si:a.,aiie:a:c|y,seas.||yexe:.eaeea||e,aac.i. sa|ayses
s.||eiaaiiaey|e.aie:sa|]eei.ve|yexe:.eaeea||e. aeemmea. naias
| .a,a.si.e s.,as iaey aa|ea, as ce | .a,a. si.e seaacs, iae.: iam.|.a
s.,a.aeai.eas . 1ae aa|ea.a, .s semeia.a, ass.ve. iae aa|eaec
s.,a.aeai.ea. siaas ,.veaass.ve|y,s.m. |a:|yieiaeay.aa.eaaay
eiae: aei.v.iy a.ea aas saa| .aie e|sea:. iy, eaee assee.ai.ve|y
aa|eaec,eme:,esaia:sipassively asame:ee:|esse|ea:meme:y.i a
iaeass.v.iy. aaesi.eaae:e,as. aiaeeaseeimeme:y, aai. sas
s.ve|yaa|eaeceaa|ei:aasie:mec|ae|,seiesea|,.aieiaeee::e
seac.a,aei.v.iy.ia. s.siaeeaae.iyie::eaei.vai.eaiaai|e|ea,se:.,
.aa||yieeve:yaamaa|e. a,asasea|.a,|e.a,.~eee:c. a,| y, iaea.iae
:.i.a,ceaeaeeisai:aasie:mai.eaeiiaee:.,.aa|meceei|e.a,ei
iae meaa.a, si:aeia:e, ,e. ,. ,] .ia.a iae ,eemei:.ea| sae:e ei se|i
ev.ceaee, eiiae,eemei:.ea|si:aeia:ea.ea .s ai. aiee:cs . ii |e
eemessec.meaiec, seiesea|.naiiae:eace:eaama|e.ise|iev.ceai
a,a. a, eaa:eaei.vaieiaese|iev.ceaee.t
1ae:e .s a c.si.aei.ea, iaea, |eieea ass.ve|y aace:siaac.a, iae
ex:ess.eaaacma|.a,.ise|iev.ceai|y:eaei.vai.a,.ismeaa.a,.nai
iae:ea|seex.siess.|.|.i.eseia|.aceiaei.v.iy,aia.a|.a,.aie:msei
This is a transformation of which one is consci ous a being i n i tself patterned afer
[what is passi vel y awakened].
t But this is by no means necessary or even factuall y normal . Even without this he can
understand; he can concur " as a matter of course" in the validity of what is understood
wi thout any acti vity of his own. In this case he comports hi msl f purel y passivel y and
recepti vel y.
165
The Orgin of Geometry
ia.a,siaaiaave |eeaia|ea ame:e|y :eeei.ve|y, ass.ve|y, a.ea
cea|s .ia s.,a.aeai.eas ea|y ass.ve|y aace:sieec aac ia|ea eve:,
.iaeaiaayeiiaese|iev.ceaeeeie:.,.aa|aei.v.iy.rass.v.iy.a,eae:a|
.siae:ea|meiia.a,siaaia:e|eaacie,eiae:aacme|i.aieeaeaaeiae:
assee.ai.ve|y, ae:e a||meaa.a,iaaia:.ses .s aiie,eiae:ass. ve|y.
waaieiieaaaeasae:e .siaaiameaa.a,a:. sesa.ea.saa:eai|y
ess.||easaaa. iy-. . e. ,eaaaa:eai|y|emacese|iev.ceaeeia:ea,a
aess.||e:eaei.vai.ea-ae:easiaeaiiemiaiaeiaa|:eaei.vai.eaeaa
:eaei.vaieea|yiae.ac.v.caa|mem|e:seiiaeeem|.aai.ea, a.|eiae
.aieai.eaieaa.iyiaem.aieaae| e, .asieacei|e.a,a|a||ec, eemesie
aeia.a,. iaai . s, iae eai.e va|.c.iy .s cesi:eyec ia:ea,a iae e:.,.aa|
eease.easaesseiaa||.iy.
ii.seasyiesee iaai evea .a ,e:c.aa:y}aamaa|.ie, aac a:sieia||.a
eve:y.ac.v.caa||.iei:emea.|caeecaiemaia:.iy,iaee:.,.aa||y.aia.
i.ve| .iea.eae:eaies.ise:.,.aa||yse|iev.ceaisi:aeia:esia:ea,aae
i.v.i.eseaiae|as.seiseaseexe:.eaeeve:ya.e|| yaac.a.ae:eas.a,
measa:eia||sv.ei.mieiaeseduction oflanguage. C:eaie:aac,:eaie:
se,meais eiia.s|.ie |ase .aie a |.ac eiia||.a,aac :eac.a, iaai . s
cem.aaieca:e|y|y assee.ai.ea,aaceriea eaea,a, .a:eseeiieiae
va|.c.i. es a::.vec ai .a ia.s ay, .i .s c.sae.aiec |y sa|seaeai
exe:.eaee .
Neeae .|| say iaai .aiae sae:eiaai.aie:esis as ae:e-iaaiei
se.eaee, eiia.a|.a,c.:eeieciea:ciae aiia.ameaieii:aias aac iae
ave.caaeeeiia|seaeec-eae .s e|v.eas|y,:eai|yeeaee:aeci:emiae
sia:iieaiasieieiaei:ee|ayeiassee.ai.veeeasi:aei.eas . iav.e
eiiaeaaave.ca||e sec.meaiai.ea eimeaia|:ecaeis .aiaeie:m ei
e:s.si.a,| .a,a.si.eaea.s.i.eas,a.eaeaa|eia|eaaa,a.aaia:si
me:e|yass.ve|yaac|eia|eaeve:|yaayeaee|se,saeaeeas::aei.eas
:ema.a a eeasiaaicaa,e:. 1a.scaa,e:. s ave.cec .ieae aeime:e|y
eeav.aeeseaese|iexesiiaeieiaaiiaea:i.ea|a:eeasi:aei.eaeaa|e
:eaei.vaiec |ai assa:eseaese|ii:emiae sia:i , arie: iae seaev.ceai
:.ma|esia|| .sameai, ei.iseaae.iyie|e:eaei.vaiecaaceaca:.a,|y
ma.aia.aec. 1a. seeea:saeaeaeaasav.eieiaeaa.vee.iyei| .a
,a.si.eex:ess.eaaacieseea:.a,, |ymeaaseiiaemesia.asia|.a,
ie:mai.eaeiiae:e|evaaie:cs, :ees.i.eas, aaceem|exesei:ee
s.i.eas , iae:esa|isa.eaa:eie|eaa.veea||yex:essec1a. smasi|e
ceae|yiae .ac.v.caa|se.eai.si , aacaeiea|y|yiae .aveaie:|ai|y
eve:y se.eai.siasamem|e:eiiae se.eai.aeeemmaa.iyaue:aeaas
ia|eaeve:i:emiaeeiae:saai.sie|eia|eaeve:.1a. s|e|ea,s, iaea,
ie iae a:i.ea|a:s eiiae se.eai.ae i:ac.i.ea .ia.a iae eeaeseac.a,
eemmaa. iy eise.eai.sis as a eemmaa.iy ei|ae|ec,e | . v.a, .a iae
aa.iyeiaeemmea:eseas.|.|.iy.iaaeee:c.iaiaeesseaeeeise.eaee,
166
Edmund Husserl
iaea. .is iaaei.eaa:.es a.aia.a iae eeasiaaie|a. . iae e:seaa| ee
ia.aiy.iaaieve:yia.a,iaeyai.aie se.eai.ieasse:i.e?saas |eea sa.c
eaeeaacie:a| | . iaai.i siaacsiasi . ie:eve:.ceai.ea||y:eeaia||e
.ia se|iev.ceaee aac asa||e ie: ia:iae: iaee:ei.ea| e: :aei.ea|
eacs-as .aca|.ia||y :eaei.vaia||e .ia iae .ceai.iy ei .is aeiaa|
eaa. a,
ueeve:.iee:eia. a,sa:e.e:iaaiae:er.:si eaaveaeiyei
iasea.aieaeeeaaiiaeiaeiiaaise.eai.ieia. as.a,aiia.asae:esa|isea
iae |as.s eiiaese a|:eacy aiia.aec. iaai iae ae eaes se:ve as iae
ieaacai.eaie:si. | | eiae:s. eie-.aiaeaa.iyeia:ea,ai.ve:eeesei
i:aasie::eceaa.a,
| aiaeiaa||y. ease:e|.te:ai.eaeiase.eaee|.se,eeei:y.aai
aas|eeeeeiiaee|a.aaciaeeaae.iyie::eaei.vai.ea:waeaeve:y
:esea:eae:e:ss ea a.s a:i eiiae |a.|c.a,. aai eiiae veeai.eaa|
.aie::ai.easaaci.eeaiie::esi .a.eaeaaaei|eeve:|eesecae:e:
waea ae:eia:asieiae aeiaa|eeai.aaai.eaeie:s. asiaei:si:aa
ia:ea,a iae ae|e . ease eaa.a ei,:eaac.,s |aes ie ia e:.,.a|
:e.sesaacaeiaa||y:eaei.vaieiaeae|eiam,:
|ise. as..eaeeis
ea:ece:a,eeei:yea|ce|v.eas|yaei|eess.||eaia|| ~acyei.i
.s eiiae esseaeeeiiae :esa|iseieaea sia,e aeiea|yiaai iae.:.cea|
eai.eeaa.a,.aiaeieees|aie:iaaaiaaieiea:|.e::esa|is}
|aii?ai .
s.aee eaa.a, .s ,:eaacec aea eaa.a,. iae ea:|.e: eaam,
,.ves
seeia.a,ei. isva| .c.iyieiae|aie:eae..aceec|eeeesa:iei. iie
a
ee:ia.a esieai 1aasae |a. |c.a,||ees. ia. aiae eaia| si:aeia:e . s
se|i same.eai . aac aeae. iaea. eaa |e .ec.aie| y :eaei.vaiec |y
.ise|i}
a.
eae: aac
e:e. cea| .i.esaia. ,ae:|eve|sa:e:ecaeec |i.sa.iec.ae:eai.aiae
seea||eccese:.i.ve se.eaees. ae:eiaeiaee:ei.ea|.aie:esi. e|ass.iy
.a,aaccese:.|. a,.:ea.as.ia.aiaesae:eeisease .aia.i.ea.a.ea
ie: .i :e:eseais se|iev.ceaee ue:e. ai |easi. a,eae:a| . eve:y ae
:ees.i.eaeaa|y. ise|i|eeasaec.a ie:se|iev. ceaee
ue. |y eeai:asi . .s a se.eaee| .se,eeei:yess||e: Je. as
sysieai.e. eac|ess|y,:e.a, si:ai.iec si:aeia:eei.eaai.e
ea
.i
a.aia.a. ise:.,.aa|eaa.a,ia| aessia:ea,a|. v. a,:eaei.vaia|.|iy.i.is
At frst, of course, i t is a matter of a frm direction of the wi l l , which the scientist
establishes i n hi mself, aimed at the certain capacity for reactivation. If the goal of reac
tivatability can be onl y relatively fulflled, then the cla
.
i m whih
.
stems fro the n
sciousness of being able to acquire something also has Its relatvlt ; and thI S relatIVIty
also makes itself noticeable and is driven out. Ultimatel y, obJectIve, absolutely frm
knowledge of truth is an infnite idea.
167
The Origin of Geometr
ee,a.i.veia.as.a,.ssaesecie:ecaeeseeia.a,ae.iaeai|e.a,
ae|e ie :eaei.vaieiae:ev.eas|eve|s eisae| ec,e |aesie iaei:si:
vea . i ia. s eea|c aave saeeeecec ai a e:e :. .i.ve sia,e ei
,eeei:y..iseae:,yea|ca|i. aie| yaave|eeaieeaeaseai.aiae
eae:iei:eea:.a,se|iev.ceaeeaacea|caeiaave|eeaava.|a||eie:
aa.,ae::ecaei.v.iy
ue:e easiiase.aieeeas.ce:ai.eaiaeeea|.a: |e,.ea| aei.v.iy
a.ea. si.ecsee.iea||yie|aa,aa,e. ase||asieiae.cea|ee,a.i.ve
si:aeia:esiaaia:.se see.iea||y.ia.a. i 1e aayseaieaee si:aeia:es
iaaiee:,e. ia.aae:e| yass.veaace:siaac.a,iae:e|e|ea,sessea
i.a||ya eea| .a:se:ieiaei.v.iy|esicese:. |ec |yiaee:c es| .ea
i.ea~ass.ve|yee:,.a,seaieaee,e , ..aee:y .e:eaeaea:c
aac ass.ve|y aace:sieec. . s ai i:si e:e|y :eee.vec .ia a ass.ve
e,ea:i.e.ai.ea.iaseaaasva|.c.aac.aia.sie: .i. sa|:eacyea:
eaa.a, r:eia.sec.si.a,a. saiaeeea| . a:aac.e:iaaiaei.v.iy
ei es|.eai.a, ea: eaa.a, wae:eas .a .is i:si ie: .i as a
si:a.,aiie:a:c|y va|.c eaa.a,. iasea a as aa.ia:y aac aac.i
ie:eai.aiec-eeae:eie|y seas. a,. a si:a.,aiie:a:c|y va| . c cee| a:a
i.ve seaieaee~ae aai .a .ise|i .s va,ae aac aac.ae:eai.aiec . s
aei. ve| yes|.eaiecCeas.ce:.ie:esa| e. i|eay. aa.eaeaace:
siaac. aea sae:ie.a||y:eac.a,iae aesae:. aac s.|y :eee.ve
iaeaes . ae:eiae:e .saass.veias.a,eve:eieai.eva|.c.iysaea
iaaiaai.s:eacsi:a.,aiay|eeeesea:e.a.ea
nai.i.sseeia.a,see.a|.aseaave sa. c. ieaave iae. aieai.eaie
es|.eaie .ieea,a,e.aiaeaei.v.iya.eaa:i.ea|aiesaaiaas|eea:eac
,e:aa.aie:esi.a,seaieaeei:e.i .esi:aei.a,eae|yeae..asea:ai.ea
i:e aai aas |eea va,ae| y. ass.ve|y :eee.vecas a aa.iy. iae e|e
eaiseieaa. a,. iaas|:.a,.a,iaeieia|va|.c.iyieaei.vee:ie:aaee
.a a ae ay ea iae |as.s eiiae .ac.v.caa| va|. c.i.es waai as a
ass.veeaa.a,aiie:aaasae|eeeeeaeeeasi:aeiecia:ea,aae
i.ve:ecaei.ea 1a. saei.v.iy. iaea. .saeea|.a:se:ieise|iev.ceaee .
iae si:aeia:ea:.s. a,eaiei.i.s.aiae eceeiaav.a,|eea e:.,.aa||y
:ecaeec ~ac .a eeaaeei.ea .ia ia. s se|iev.ceaee . iee. iae:e .s
eeaaa|.zai.ea 1ae es|.eaiec]ac,eai |eeees aa . cea| e|]eei
eaa||eei|e.a,assecea|i.sia. se|]eeiese|as.ve|yiaai.seaai|y
|e,.eaea.iseasseiseaieaeese:]ac,eais ~aciaasiaedomain of
logic . saa.ve:sa||yces.,aaiec.ia. s. saa. ve:sa||yiaesae:eei|e.a,ie
a.ea |e,.e e:ia.as .aseia: as .i .s iae iaee:y ei iae seaieaees e:
:ees.i.eas}.a,eae:a|
1a:ea,aia. saei. v. iy. ae.ia:iae:aei. v.i.es|eeeeess. ||e-se|i
Verdeutlichung, i . e. , maki ng explicit.
168
Edmund H usserl
ev.ceaieeasi:aei.easeiae]ac,meaisea iae |as.seiiaesea|:eacy
va|.cie:as . 1a.s . siaeeea||a:ieaia:eei|e,.ea|ia.a|. a,aacei.is
a:e|y|e,.ea|se|i ev.ceaees . ~|| ia.s :ema.as. aiaeieveaaea] ac,
meaisa:e i:aasie:mec .aie assami.eas, ae:e, . asieac eiea:se|ves
asse:i.a,e:]ac,.a,,eia.a|ea:se|ves.aieiaees.i.eaeiasse:i.a,e:
]ac,.a,.
ue:eesaa||eeaeeai:aieeaiaeseaieaeesei| aa,aa,easiaeyeeme
ieasass.ve|yaaca:eme:e|y:eee.vec. iaia.seeaaeei.ea.imasia|se
|eaeieciaaiseaieaees,. veiaemse|ves.aeease. easaessas:e:ecae
i.vei:aasie:mai.easeiaae:.,.aa|meaa. a,:ecaeeceaieiaaaeiaa| ,
e:.,.aa|aei.v.iy . iaai. s, .aiaemse|vesiaey:eie:iesaeaa,eaes.s . i a
iaesae:eei|e,.ea|se|i ev.ceaee,cecaei.ea,e:.aie:eaee. aiemsei
eeaseaeaee, |ays aeeasiaaiaacesseai.a|:e|e. Oaiaeeiae:aaac,
eaemasia|seia|eaeieeiiaeeeasi:aei.veaei.v.i.esiaaiee:aie. ia
,eemei:.ea| .cea| .i.esa.ea aave|eea ex|.eaiec|ai aei|:ea,aiie
e:.,.aa| se|iev.ceaee. ,O:.,.aa| se|iev.ceaee masi aei b eeaiasec
.iaiaese|iev. ceaeeei ax.ems .ie:ax.emsa:e. a:.ae.|ea|:eacy
iae:esa|iseie:.,.aa|meaa.a,eeasi:aei.eaaaca|aysaaveia. s|e
a.aciaem. ,
Neaaia|eaiiaeess.|.| .iyeieem|eieaac,eaa.ae:eaei.vai.ea
.aia| | e:.,.aa|.iy, ia:ea,a,e.a,|ae|ieiae :.ma|se|iev.ceaees, .a
iaeeaseei,eemei:yaaciaeseea||eccecaei.vese.eaees,seea||ec,
a|iaea,aiaey|yaemeaasme:e| ycecaee, :ue:eiaeiaacameaia||a,
.ia aaeeac.i.eaa||y,eae:a|se|iev.aeaee, .s . .iiae :em.seseaaae
iaa||y|e:eaei.vaiec|ae|ieiaemesie:.,.aa|se|iev.ceaee,iaeaiae.:
se|iev.ceai eeaseaeaees eaa |e a|se ~eee:c.a,|y . iaea:s iaai,
|e,.aa.a,.iaiae:.ma|se|iev. ceaees , iaee:.,.aa|,eaa.aeaessmasi
:ea,aie.ise|iia:ea,aiaeeaa.aei|e,.ea|.aie:eaee, aemaiie:ae
|ea,.i. s ueeve:,.ieeeas.ce:iaee|v.easaa.iaceeiiae.ac.v.caa|
aac evea iae see. a| eaae.iy iei:aasie:m iae|e,.ea|eaa. aseieea
ia:.es, i:a| y. aiaeaa.iyeieaeaeeem|.sameai,.aiee:.,.aa||y,eaa. ae
eaa. aseise|iev.ceaee,eaei.eeiaaiiie,a|eve}| aeeaia. as.ia.a
.ise|iaa. cea|.zai.ea. aame|y,iae:emeva|ei| .m.isi:emea:eaae.iy,
.aaee:ia.a sease. is.aaa.i.zai.ea. 1aeeea|.a: se:i eise|iev.ceaee
|e|ea,.a,i esaea.cea|.zai.eas.||eeaee:aas | aie:.
1aesea:e, iaea, iae ,eae:a| esseai.a|.as.,ais a.eae|ae.caieiae
ae|emeiaec.ea|ceve|emeaieiiae cecaei.ve se.eaeesaac. ia.i
iaemaaae:ei|e.a,a.ea. sesai.a|ieiaem.
1aesese.eaeesa:eaeiaaaceccea:eacymace.aiaeie:meicee
ameaiecseaieaees ,iaey.ave|vea| .ve| y, :ecaei. ve|yacvaae.a,ie:
mai.eaeimeaa.a,, a.eaa|aysaasiaeceeameaiec,asasec.meaiei
ea:|.e::ecaei.ea, ai.iscsesa| .aiaai.icea|s.ia.i|e,.ea||y. nai
1 69
The Origin of Geometr
eai eiseaieaees.ia sec. meaiec s.,a.aeai.ea, |e,.ea| cea|.a, eaa
:ecaee ea|yeiae:seaieaeeseiiaesameeaa:aeie:. 1aaia||aeae
a. s.i.easex:essaaaeiaa|,eemei:.ea|i:aia.see:ia.aa:. e:. aace:
iae:esaes.i.eaiaaiiaeieaacai.easeiiaeaecaei.vesi:aeia:eaave
i:a|y|eea:ecaeecaace|]eei.aec. ae:.,.aa|seaev.ceaee ,. . e ,aave
|eeemeaa.ve:sa||yaeeess.||eaea.s.i.eas. ~eeai.aa.iyi:emeaee:
se
(
ieaaeae:,i:emeae i.me ieaaeiae:,masiaave |eeaeaa||eei
oem
1ae:e,:esseicecaei.eaie||esiema||e,.ea|se|iev.ceaee, |ai
w. i|a
xieacm,|eyeaciae|e,.ea|meiaec sease|iev.ceaee,|aiiae:ae
i.ea| saeeesseseia|.ec ,eemei:y, .is .mmease , iaea,a aei aace:
sieec, :aei.ea|aseia|aess. 1e ia.s emasiacc semeia.a, iaai.||
170
Edmund Husser
|eeeme v. s.||e ia:iae:ea .a iae i:eaimeaieia. sie:.ea| maiaemai.es.
aame| y. iaecaa,e:seiase.eai.ie| .ieiaai. seem|eie|y,. veaeve:ie
|e,.ea| aei.v.i. es 1aese caa,e:s | . e .a ee:ia.a :e,:ess. ve i:aasie:
mai.easeimeaa.a,iea.eaia.sse:ieise. eai.iei:eaimeaic:. veseae
nyexa.|.i.a,iaeesseai.a|:esaes.i.easaeaa.ea:esisiaea.s
ie:.ea|ess.|. |.iyeia,eaa.aei:ac.i.ea.i:aeie.ise:.,. as. eise.eaees
| . se ,eemei:y. e eaa aace:siaac ae saea se. eaees eaa v.ia||y
ceve|e ia:ea,aeai iae eeaia:. es aac si.|| aei |e ,eaa.ae 1ae . a
ae:.iaaee ei:ees.i.eas aac eiiae meiaecei|e,.ea||y eeasi:aei.a,
ae:ees.i.easaac.cea| .i.eseaaeeai.aae. iaeai.aie::ai.eai:em
eaee:.ecieiae aexi. a.|eiaeeaae.iyie::eaei.vai.a, iae:. ma|
|e,.aa.a,s. . e . iaesea:eeseimeaa. a,ie:eve:yia.a,iaaieemes|aie:.
aas aei |eeaaaacec cea .ia .i waai.s| aes.a, .s iaas:ee.se|y
aai aac ,.vea aac aac ie ,.ve meaa.a, ie a|| :ees.i.eas aac
iaee:.es, ameaa.a,a:.s.a,i:emiae:.ma|sea:eesa.eaeaa|emace
se|iev.ceaia,a.aaaca,a.a
Oieea:se, ,:ammai.ea||yeeae:eai:ees.i.easaac eeaeaieaai.eas
ei:ees.i.eas. ae maiie: ae iaey aavea:.sea aac aave aea.evec
va|.c.iy-vea .i. i. s ia:ea,a me:eassee.ai.ea-aae .a a|| e.:eam
siaaeesiae. :ea|e,.ea|meaa.a,.. e ,iae.:meaa.a,iaaieaa|emace
se|iev.ceaiia:ea,aex|.eai.ea. ia. seaaiaea|e. ceai.aeca,a.aaac
a,a.a as iae same :ees.i.ea. a.ea .s e.iae: |e,.ea||y eeae:eai e:
.aeeae:eai.ae:e.aiae|aiie:ease.ieaaaei|eexeeaiec.aiaeaa. iyei
aa aeiaa|]ac,meai i a:ees.i.easa.ea|e|ea,ie,eiae:.a eaece
ma.aaac.aiaececaei.vesysiemsiaaieaa|emaceeaieiiaeme
aavea:ea|mei. cea| .ceai.i.es . aacie:iaeseiae:eex.sieas.|yaace:
siaaca|| eess.|. | .i.es ei| asi.a, i:ac.i.eaa|.zai.ea nai :ees. i.eas.
| .seeiae:ea|ia:a|si:aeia:es . aea:eaiaeseeae.aiaeie:meii:ac.
i.ea.iaeye|a. m. seieseas. ie|esec.meaiai.easeiai:aiameaa.a,
iaaieaa |e mace e:.,.aa||y se|iev.ceai. ae:eas .i .s |y ae meaas
aeeessa:yiaaiiaey ,aeiaa||y}aavesaeaameaa.a,. as.aiaeeaseei
assee. ai.ve|yce:.vecia|s.aeai.eas 1aasiaeae| e:e,.veacecaei.ve
se.eaee,iaeieia|sysiemei:ees.i.eas.aiaeaa.iyeiiae.:va| .c.i.es.
.si:siea|yae| a. ma.eaeaa|e]asi.aecasaaex:ess.eaeiiaea||e,ec
i:aiameaa.a,ea| yia:ea,aiaeaeiaa|eaae.iyie::eaei.vai.ea
1a:ea,aia.ssiaieeiaaa.:seeaaaace:siaaciaeceee::easeaie:
iae cemaac.a.eaaass:eacia:ea,aeaiiaemece:ae:. ec aac aas
aaa||y |eea ,eae:a||y aceeiec. ie: a seea||ec e.sieme|e,.ea|
These work to the beneft of logical method, but they remove one further and further
from the origins and make one i nsensitive to the problem of origi n and thus to the actual
ontic and truth-meaning of all these sciences.
171
The Orgin ofGeomety
,:eaac.a, ei iae se.eaees. iaea,a e| a:.iy aas aeve: |eea aea. evec
a|eaiaaiiaemaeaacm.:ecse.eaeesa:eaeiaa||y|aes.a,
~s
ca||y|aes.a,ie:aaexaeiix.a,eicese:.i.easeiiae:ese.
eai.ie nma| maie:.a|aaceiiaeays.a a.ea. .a :e|ai.ea ie ia.s
maie:.a| . ,eemei:.ea|.cea|.i.esa:eseie,eiae:.iaiae| :siax.ema
i.e
aaac.iaeess.|.|.iyeiiae:aei.ea|a| .eai.eaeiiae
cenvec| as. a.eaasaeiaa||ye|v.eas.aeeaaeei.ea.iaiaee:.,.
a|cve|emeais
aace:siaaca||y|eca.es| y. .aiae:ea|mei:ax. s. ie
aaa|.iaa||y:aei.eecmeiaeceias.a,maiaemai.es. . iaeec|e.ie|:.a,
a|eaiaseia|ia.a,s 1a. smeiaeceea|caaia:a||y|eaaacecceaevea
.iaeai iae a|.|.iy ie: e:.,.aa| se|iev.ceaee 1aa s maiaemai.es
emi.ecei
eaa.a,.eea|c,eae:a||y:ea,aie. ise|i.eeasiaai|y|e.a
accec ie|?,.ea| | y, as eea|ciae meiaec.eseiieeaa.ea|a|.eai.eaea
iaeeiae:s.ce1aeexi:ae:c.aa:. |yia::eaea.a,:aei.ea|aseia|aess|e
eameei
. ise|iama]e:mei.veie:iaeacvaaeemeaiaaca:ee.ai.eaei
iaese s..eaes 1aas
mvesi.,ai.e
ie:a||se.eaees re:a||eiiaemaaveiaeme|.|.iyei
sec!eaiec i:ac.i.asiaai a:e e:sec aea. a,a.a aac a,a.a. |yaa
aei. v.iy e
:eaea
mia.say.iaeyexieaceaca:.a,|yia:ea,ai.me.s. aee
a
||aeaea.s.i.easa:e. aiansec.meaiecaac|eeemee:s.a,maie
:a| s ve:
eacsesseai.a||yiaeeaeea|ia:a|e:|casiaesa::eaac.a,
|.iee:|c .ia .is ,eea| . a:} maaae:ei|e.a,. ia.s e:|c. ie: eve:y
What oes Hume
.
do but endeavor to i nquire back into the primal impressions of
developed Ideas and, I n genera, scientifc ideas?
1 72
Edmund Husserl
a. sie:.ea|e:.ecaace.v. |.zai.ea, aas. isa:i.ea|a:eai:esaac
.s:
e.se|y iae i:ac.i.ea. we siaac, iaea, .ia.a iae a.sienea| aenze m
a|eaeve:yia.a, .s a.sie:.ea| , eveaiaea,ae may |ae ve:y |. ii|e
a|eat.i. aaceaa.ieay. nai. i aas.isesseai.a|si:aeia:e
iaaieaa|e
:evea|ec ia:ea,a meiaec.ea|. aa.:y. 1a. s.aa.:y :es
en|es a||ie
ess.||esee.a|.zecaesi.eas, iaas .ae|aa.a,,ie:iae
s..aees, iae.
a.:.es|ae| .aie e:.,.aa.eaa:e eea||a:ie iaem m .:iaeeiie.:
a. sie:.ea|maaae:ei|e.a,. ue:eea:e|ec|ae|ieiaenma|matena|s
eiiae a:si ie:mai.ea eimeaa. a,, iae :.ma|:em.ses, se
te sea|,
a.ea| . e .a iae :ese.eai.ae ea|ia:a|e:|c. Oieea:se, ia.sea|ia:|
e:|c aas .a ia:a.is ea aesi.eas eie:.,. a, a.ea ai a:si:ema
aaas|ec.
Naia:a||y, :e||emseiia. sa:i.ea|a:se:i .mmec. ai| yaa|eaiae
ieia|:e||emeiiaeaa.ve:sa|a.sie:.e.iyeiiaeee::e|ai.v aaae:sei
|e.a, eiaamaa. iy aac iaeea|ta:a|?:|c aciaea nen s:aei:e
eeaia.aec. aia.sa.sie:.e.iy.si.||, aesi.eas|||eiaaieiiaee|anaeai.ea
eiiaee:.,.aei,eemei:yaaveae|eseceaaeie:, saeaiaaieaeaeec
aei.aa.:e|eyeaciaese:ese.eai.aemaie:.a|s
.
ra:iae:e|a:.aeai.eas. |||emace.aeeaaeei.eaw.iaiee|,eei.eas
a.eaa:eiam.|. a:ieea:eaa.|esea.ea|a. sie:.ea|s.iaai.ea.
a:si
asaease|iev.ceaie.a.ea,|aiaeve:iae|essasi:ae:ees.i.eas
.
w.iaa
meaai|aisi.||a.cceai:aiaa.eae eaae|v.eas|y|:.a,iea,ai|y
:eace:.a,iae:ees.i.easiaemse|vesse|iev.ceai.
Oa:aase:. sasie||es . Ce:ia.a|ytaea.sie:.ea||ae|c:eie:eaee
aasaeieeea::ecieaayeae,ee:ia.a|yiaee:yei|ae|ec,eaasaeve:
|eeaseeaasaeea| . a:|ya. sie:.ea|ias|. naiia. s. s:e
.
e.se
.
|yai
e
e|]eeiie. aiaeasi. 1ae:a|.a,e,maeiaeea:ai.eam na.| e
|eieeae.sieme|e,.ea|e|ae.cai.eaaaca.sienea|, eveaaUaaie
syeae|e,.ea|ex|aaat.ea,|eieeae.iemee.ea|a ,eet.een,m,
.siaacameaia||ym.sia|ea, aa|esseaemacm. ss.||y||m.is,iaeasaa|
ay, iae eeaeeis ei a. sie:y, a. sie:.ea| ex|aaai.ea, aac
1 73
The Origin ofGeomet
,eaes.s . O::aiae:, aai.siaaceaia||ym.sia|ea.stae| . m. iai.ea
ia:ea,a a.ea :ee.se|y iae ceeesiaac mesi,eaa. ae:e||emsei
a. sie:ya:eeeaeea|ec.iieaeia.a|seve:ea:exes.i.eas,a.eaa:eei
eea:sesi.||:ea,a aac. |||aie:eiaeeess.iy| eac as .aie ae ceia
c.meas.easi , aai iaey ma|e e|v. eas . s :ee.se|y iaai aai e
|ae-aame|y,taatiae:eseai|yv. ia|ea|ia:a|eeaa,a:ai.ea ,eem
ei:y .s a i:ac.t.ea aac . s si. || ee.a, aaacec cea-. s aei |ae|
ec,e eeaee:a.a,aaexie:aa|eaasa| . iy a.eaeaeeisiaesaeeess.eaei
a. sie:.ea|eeaa,a:ai.eas, as.i.ie:e|ae|ec,e|asecea.acaei.ea,
iae:esaes.i.eaeiwa.eaea|cameaaiieaaa|sa:c.iyae:e ,:aiae:,
i eaace:siaac,eemei:ye:aay,.veaea|ta:a|iaei. sieb eease.easei
.is a. sie:.e.iy, a||e.i .m|.e.i|y. 1a. s, aeeve: , .s aei aa emiy
e|a. m,ie:a.ie,eae:a||y.i.si:aeie:eve:yiaei,.veaaace:iaeaeac
.a,eiea|ia:e, aeiae:.i. samaiie:eiiae|e|.esiea|ia:eeiaeees
s.i.ese:iaea.,aestea|ia:e, se. eaee, siaie. eaa:ea , eeeaem.ee:,aa.
zai.ea, eie. i , iaai eve:y si:a.,atie:a:c aace:siaac.a, ei .t as aa
exe:.eai. a|iaei.ave|vesiae eeeease. easaess taai. t. ssemeta. a,
eeasi:aeiecia:ea,aaamaaaei. v.iy.Nemaiie:aea. ccea,aemaiie:
aeme:e|y .m|.e.i|y ee.m|.ecta. s meaa.a,. s. tae:e|e|ea,sie.t
taese|iev. ceatess.|.|.tyeiex|.eai.ea, ei ma|.a,.tex|.e.t aac
e|a:.iy.a, .i. ve:y ex| .eai.ea aac eve:y i:aas.i.ea i:em ma|.a,
ex|.e.iiema|.a,se|iev. ceai,eveae:aas.aeasesae:eeaesies
maeaieeseeai . s aeia.a,eiae:iaaaa. sie:.ea| c.se|esa:e, . a.ise|i,
esseai.a|| y,.i. ssemeia.a,a.sie:.ea|, aacassaea.i|ea:s, .iaesseai.a|
aeeess.iy,taeae:.zeaei. isa. sie:y.ia. a. ise|i1a.s. seieea:sea|se
tesayiaaiiaeae|eeiiaeea|ia:a|:eseai,aace:sieecasaieia|.iy,
.m|. esiaeae|eeiiaeea|ia:a|asi.aaaaacete:m. aec|aisi:ae
ia:a||yceie:m.aec ,eae:a|.iy. 1e ai .ime:e :ee.se| y, . i.m| .es a
eeai.aa.iyeiasisa.ea.m|yeaeaaeiae:,eaea.a. ise|i|e.a,aasi
ea|ia:a|:eseai . ~acia.sae|eeeai.aa. iy .saunit eii:ac.i.eaa|.za
t.ea e ie iae :eseai, a.ea .s ea: :eseai ,a :eeess ei}
i:ac.i.eaa|. z.a,.ise|i. are.a,siai.ev.ia| .iy.1a. s . s, asaas|eeasa.c,
aaaaceie:m.aec,eae:a|.iy, |ai.iaas.a:.ae.|east:aeia:ea.eaeaa
|emaeame:e.ce|yex|.eaiec|y:eeeec.a,i:emiaese.ac.eat.eas ,
a si:aeta:ea.eaa|se,:eaacs, .m| .es, iaeess.|.|.i.esie:eve:y
sea:eaie:aacceie:m.aai.eaeieeae:eie,iaeiaa|siaieseiaaa.:s
Ha|.a,,eemei:yse|ie.ceai,iaea,aeiae:eae.se|ea:a|eaiia. s
e:aei ,.siaec.se|esa:eei. isa.sie:.ea|i:ac.t.ea.natta. s|ae|ec,e. . i
.t. saeite:ema.aemiyia||e:aac.ae:eat.aiec,eae:a| . ty. :ea.:estae
metaec.ea|:ecaei.ea,:eeeec.a,i:emiae:eseaiaacea::.eceatas
:esea:ea.aiae:eseai. eic.ae:eai.aiecse|iev. ceaeeseitaeiyec. s
eeve:eca|eve,. aseve:a|i:a,meata:y. avest.,ai.easeiaai|e|ea,s
iesaea|ae|ec,esae:ae. a||y, as.ie:e, .Ca::.eceaisysiemai.ea||y.
1 74
Edmund Husserl
saea se|iev.ceaees :esa|i .a aeia.a,eiae: aac aeia.a,| ess iaaa iae
aa.ve:sa| a :.e:. eia.sie:y .ia a|| .is a.,a|y a|aacaaieemeaeai
e|emeais.
weeaaa|sesayaeiaaia.sie:y.si:emiaesia:iaeia.a,eiae:iaaa
iaev.ia|mevemeaieiiaeeeex.sieaeeaaciae. aie:eav.a,eie:.,.aa|
ie:mai.easaacsec.meaiai.easeimeaa.a,
~ayia.a,iaai.ssaeaie|eaa.sie:.ea|iaei , e.iae:.aiae:eseai
ia:ea,aexe:.eaeee:|yaa. sie:.aaasaiaei.aiaeasi, aeeessa:.|y
aas.isinner structure ofmeaning; |aiesee.a||yiaemei.vai.eaa|.aie:
eeaaeei.eas esia||. saec a|eai.i.aie:ms eieve:ycay aace:siaac.a,
aave cee, ia:iae: aac ia:iae::eaea.a, . m|.eai.eas a.ea masi |e
.aie::e,aiec, c. se|esec ~|| me:e|y} iaeiaa| a. sie:y :ema. as .aeem
:eaeas.||e |eeaase, a|ays me:e|y c:a.a, .is eeae|as.eas aaive|y
aacsi:a.,aiieoa:c|yi:emiaeis, .iaeve:
_
a|esiaemai.eiae ,eae:a|
,:eaac eimeaa.a, aea a.ea a|| saea eeae|as.eas :esi, aas aeve:
.avesi.,aieciae. mmeasesi:aeia:a|a:.e:.a.ea.s:ee:ie. i Oa| y
iaec.se|esa:eeiiaeesseai.a||y,eae:a|si:aeia:e| y. a,.aea::eseai
aac iaea .a eve:y asi e:iaia:e a.sie:.ea| :eseai as saea , aac, .a
ieia| .iy,ea| yiaec.se|esa:eeiiaeeeae:eie,a.sie:.ea|i.me.aa.eae
| . ve ,.aa.eaea:ieia|aamaa.iy|.ves.a:eseeiie.isieia| ,esseai.a||y
,eae:a|si:aeia:e-ea|yia. sc.se|esa:eeaama|eess.||ea. sie:.ea|.a
a.:y [Historie] a.ea . s i:a|y aace:siaac.a,, .as.,aiia| , aac .a iae
,eaa.aeseasese.eai.ae 1a.s.siaeeeae:eie, a.sie:.ea|a:.e:.a.ea
eaeemasseseve:yia.a,iaaiex. sisasa.sie:.ea||eeem.a,aacaav. a,
|eeemee:ex.sis.a.isesseai.a||e.a,asi:ac.i.eaaacaaac.a,cea.
waaiaas|eeasa.cas:e|aiecieiaeieia|ie:m a.sie:.ea|:eseai.a
,eae:a| , a.sie:.ea|i.me,eae:a||y.naiiaea:i.ea|a:eeaa,a:ai.easei
ea|ia:e, a.ea aac iae.:|aee.ia.a .is eeae:eai a.sie:.ea||e.a,as
i:ac.i.ea aac as v.ia||y aaac.a, iaemse|ves cea, aave .ia.a ia.s
ieia|.iy ea|y :e|ai. ve|y se|i same. eai |e.a, .a i:ac.i.eaa|.iy, ea|y iae
|e.a, ei aease|i same.eai eemeaeais Ce::e| ai. ve|y, ae. aeeeaai
ea|caaveie|eia|eaeiiaesae] eeiseia.sie:.e.iy,iaee:seasae
e:eaie ea|ia:a| ie:mai.eas, iaaei.ea.a, .a ieia|.iy e:eai.ve e:seaa|
e. v.|.zai.ea
The superfcial structure of the exteral l y " " ready-made" men wi thi n the social
hi storical , essential structure of humanity, but also the deeper [structures] which disclose the
inner hi storicities of the persons taking part . [ "Structures" is Biemel 's interpolation. ]
t The hi storical world i s, t o be sure, frst pregiven as a social-hi storical world . But i t is
historical only through the i nner historici ty of the i ndi vidual s, who are i ndi vi dual s in thei r
i nner historicity, together wi th that of other communal i zed persons . Recall what was said
i n a few meager begi nni ng exposi ti ons about memories and the constant historicity to be
found i n them [pp. 1 62[ above] .
1 75
The Origin ofGeometry
i a:eseeiie,eemei:yeae:eee,a.zes, aeiaaieaavee.aieceai
iae a.cceaaessei. isiaacameaia|eeaeeis, a.eaaave|eeeme.aae
eess.||e, aac aave mace iaem aace:siaaca||e as saea .a a:si|as.e
eai|.aes, iaaiea| yiaeeease.eas| yseiias|ei,c.seeve:.a,}iaea. sie:.
ea|e:.,.aei,eemei:y,.ia.aiaeieia|:e||emeiiaea:.e:.eia.s
ie:.e.iy. a,eae:a|,eaa:ev.ceiaemeiaecie:a,eemei:ya.ea.si:ae
ie.ise:.,.asaacaiiaesamei.me.sie|eaace:sieec.aaaa.ve:sa|
a. sie:.ea|ay.aaciaesame.si:aeie:a| |se.eaees, ie:a. |eseay. ia
:.ae.| e, iaea,aa.sie:yeia.|eseay,aa.sie:yeiiaea:i.ea|a:se.
eaees.aiaesiy|eeiiaeasaa|iaeiaa|a. sie:y,eaaaeiaa||y:eace:aeia
.a,eiiae.:sa|]eeimaiie:eem:eaeas.||e re:a ,eaa.aea. sie:y ei
a.|eseay,a,eaa.aea. sie:yeiiaea:i.ea|a:se.eaees, .saeia. a,eiae:
iaaaiaei:ae.a,eiiaea. sie:.ea|meaa.a,si:aeia:es ,.vea.aiae :e
seai ,e:iae.:se|iev.ceaees, a|ea,iaeceeameaieceaa.aeia. sie:.ea|
|ae|:eie:eaees.aieiaea.cceac.eas.eaeiiae:. a|se|iev.ceaees
a.eaaace:|.eiaem veaiaeve:y:e||emae:eeaa|emaceaace:
siaaca||eea|yia:ea,a:eeea:seieiaea. sie:.ea|a:.e:.asiaeaa.ve:
sa|sea:eeeia||eeaee.va||e:e||emseiaace:siaac.a,. 1ae:e||em
ei,eaa.ae a.sie:.ea| ex|aaai.ea eemes ie,eiae: , .a iae ease eiiae
se.eaees , .iae. sieme|e,.ea|,:eaac.a,e:e|a:.| eai.ea
we masiexeeiyeiaseeeacaacve:ye.,aiye|]eei.ear:emiae
a.sie:.e. sma.ea:eva.|sexieas.ve|y .ac.ae:eaiie:ms ,iecay} i ex
eei| .ii|e:eeei.v.iyie:aceia.aa.:ya.ea,ees|eyeaciaeasaa|
iaeiaa|a.sie:y,asceesiaeeaeeai| .aec.aia. se:|,esee.a| | ys.aee .
asiaeex:ess.eaa:.e:. .ac.eaies, .i|ayse|a.mieasi:.ei|yaaeea
c.i.eaecaaci:a|yaec.ei.ese|iev. ceaeeexieac.a,|eyeaca||a. sie:.
ea|iaei.e.i.es . Oae. | | e|]eei aaiaaivei-,iesee|iec.s|ay, aacie
e|a. m ie aave c. s|ayec, a a.sie:.ea| a:.e:. , aa a|se|aie, sae:iem
e:a|va|.c.iy,aue:eaavee|ia.aecsaeaa|aacaaiiesi.meayie:iae
:e|ai.v.iyeieve:yia.a,a.sie:.ea|,eia| |a. sie:.ea||yceve|eece:|c
ae:eei.eas, :.,ai|ae| ie iaese eiiae :. m.i.ve i:.|es ve:y
ee|e, |a:,e e:sma|| , aas.is e:|c.aa.ea ,ie:iaai ee|e ,eve:y
ia.a, ais e||ie,eiae:, aeiae:.amyia.ea|ma,.ea|e:.a a:eeaa
:ai.eaa| ie:ms , aac .a a.ea eve:yia.a, eaa |e ex| a.aec e:ieei| y.
ve:yee|eaas. is| e,.eaac,aeee:c.a,| y, .iia.s|e,.e. sex|.eaiec
.a:ees.i.eas, .isa:.e:. .
ueeve:, |ei as eeas.ce:iaemeiaece|e,yeiesia||. sa.a,a. sie:.ea|
But what counts as primal self-evidence for the sciences is determined by an edu
cated person or a sphere of such persons who pose new questions, new historical ques
tions, questi ons concerni ng the i nner depth-dimension as well as those concering an
external hi storicity in the social-hi storical worl d.
1 76
Edmund Husserl
iaeis.a,eae:a|. iaas .ae|ac.a,iaai eiiae iaeis sae:i.a,iaee|]ee
i.ea, aac|eiasceia. s.a:e,a:cieaaisaeameiaece|e,y:esa
eses Deesaeiiae aace:ia|.a, eia aamaa. si.e se.eaeeeiae . i
:ea||y as eeaia.a a :esaes. i.ea ia|ea ie: ,:aaiec. a va|.c.iy
,:eaacaeve:e|se:vec. aeve:maceiaemai.e.eiasi:.ei|yaaassa.|a||e
,iyeen se|iev. ceaee. .iaeaia.ea a.sie:.ea| .aa.:y ea|c |e a
meaa.a,|esseaie::. se:~||aesi.ea.a,aaccemeasi:ai.a,a.ea. s . a
iaeasaa|seasea.sie:.ea|:esaesesa. sie:y [Geschichte] asiaeaa.
ve:sa|ae:.zeaeiaesi.ea.a,. aetex|.e.i|y. |aisi.||as a ae:.zeaei
.m|.e.i ee:ta|a|y. a.ea. .a s.te ei a|| va,ae |ae|eaac. aceie:
m.aaey. .siae:esaes.t. eaeia||ceie:m. aa|.|.ty.e:eia||. aieai.ea
iesee|aacieesia|| . sacete:m. aeciaeis.
waai. sa. sie:.ea||y:.ma:y. a.ise|t. sea::eseai. we a|aysa|
:eacy |aeeiea::eseaie:|c aac iaaie|. ve.a .i. a|ays sa:
:eaacec |y aa eea|y eac|ess ae:.zea eiaa|aea aeiaa|.i. es . 1a. s
|ae.a,.asae:.zeaee:ia.aiy.. s aeisemeia.a,|ea:aec. aei|ae|ec,e
a.eaaseaeeaeiaa|aacaasme:e| ysaa||ae|ie|eeemea:ieiiae
|ae|,:eaac,iaeae:.zeaee:ia.aiyaacie|ea|:eacyiae:e.ae:ce:ie|e
eaa||e ei|e.a, | a.c eaiiaemai.ea| | y, .i . s a|:eacy :esaesec .a
e:ce:iaaieeaasee|ie|aeaaieceaei|ae. ~||aei|ae.a,
eeaee:astae aa|aea e:| c. a.ea yeiex.sis . aacvaaeeie:asas
e:|c. asiaeae:.zeaeia||aesi.easeiiae:eseaiaaciaas a|sea||
aesi.eas a.ea a:e see.ea||y a.sie:.ea|. 1aese a:e iae aesi.eas
a.eaeeaeenmea. asiaeseaeaeiaace:eaie. aiae. :eemmaaa|.zec
eeex.sieaee. aiaee:|caaci:aasie:miaeeeasiaaiea|ia:a|iaeeeiiae
e:|c. De e aei |ae ia:iae:-e aave a|:eacy aac eeeas.ea ie
sea|eiia.s-iaaiia. sa.sie:.ea|:eseaiaas.isa. sie:.ea|asis|ea.ac
. i. iaai. iaasceve|eeceaieiiaem.iaaia.sie:.ea|asi. saeeai.aa.iy
eiasisa.ea:eeeeci:emeaeaaeiae:.eaea. asaasi:eseai.|e.a,
ai:ac.i.ea:ecae.a,i:ac.i.eaeaiei. ise|i:Deeaei|aeiaaiiae
:eseaiaaciaeae|eeia. sie:.ea|i.me. m|.ec. a. i. siaaieiaa. sie:.
ea||yeeae:eaiaacaa.ece.v.| .zai.ea. eeae:eaiia:ea,a. is,eae:ai.ve
|eacaaceeasiaai eemmaaa| .zai.ea . aea|i.vai.a, aai aasa|:eacy
|eeaea|i.vaiec |eie:e. aeiae:.a eeee:at.ve e:| e: .a :ee.:eea|
. aie:aei.ea.eie. :Deesa||ia.saeiaaaeaaeeaaa.ve:sa||ae.a,ei
taeae:.zea. aa . m|.e.i |ae.a,taaieaa|e maceex|.e.isysiemai
.ea|| y.a. isesseai.a|si:aeia:e:i s aeiiae:esa|t.a,,:eai:e||emae:e
taeae:.zeaiea:ca.eaa||aesi.easteac.aactaas taeae:.zeaa.ea
.s:esaesec.aa||eiiaem:~eee:c.a,|y. eaeecaei:sieaie:.aie
seme|.aceie:.i.ea|c. seass. eaeiiaeiaeis seieai|ya.sie:.e.sm, .t. s
eaea,ataateveataee|a. meiiae.:iaetaa|aess:esaesestaea. ste:.
ea|a:.e:..iia. se|a.m.sieaaveameaa.a,
1 77
The Origin of Geomety
naiacea|ia:.sesa||iaesame. 1aeae:.zeaexes.i.eaiea.eae
:eea::ec masiaei|e,cea . ava,ae. sae:e.a|ia| |, . imasi.tse|t
a::. veai.tsease:ieise.eai.ec.se.|.ae.1aeseaieaees. aa.ea.i. s
ex:essecmasi|execaaceaa||eei|e.a,macese|iev. ceaia,a.a
aaca,a.a. 1a:ea,a aai meiaecce ee|ta.a a aa.ve:sa| aaca|se
xeca:.e:.eiiaea. sie:.ea|e:|ca.ea. sa|ayse:.,.aa||y,eaa. ae:
waeaeve:eeeas.ce:. i. weacea:se|ves. ia iaese|i ev.ceaiea
ae. iyie:ereet-ieia:aieiaeae:.zeaaacieeaet:aie.i. aaaexe
s.ie:yay. naiea| seaave .aac|aeiaaieaave. iaeeaae.iyei
eem|eiei:eecemiei:aasie:m. .aiaea,aiaacaaaiasy. ea:aamaa
a.sie:.ea| ex. sieaee aac aai .s iae:e exesec as .is |.iee:|c. ~ac
:ee.se|y.aia.saei.v.iyeii:eeva:.ai.ea. aac.a:aaa.a,ia:ea,aiae
eeaee. va||eess.|.|.i.esie:iae|.tee:|c.iae:ea:.ses. .iaaec.ei.e
se|iev.ceaee. aaesseat.a||y,eae:a|seieie|emeais,e.a,ia:ea,aa||
iaeva:.aais , aaceiia.seeaaeeav.aeeea:se|ves.iai:a|yaec.ei.e
ee:ia.aiy.1ae:e|yeaave:emeveceve:y|eacieiaeiaeiaa||yva| .c
a. sie:.ea|e:|caacaave:e,a:cecia.se:|c. ise|i,me:e|y}aseaeei
iaeeeaeeiaa|ess.|.|.t.es. 1a. si:eecem. aaciaec.:eet.eaeiea:,aze
aeataeaec.ei.ea||y. ava:.aai. :esa|is.aiae|aiie:a,a.aaaca,a.a-
.iaiaese|iev.ceaeeei|e.a,a||eie:eeaiiae. ava:.aaisi:aeia:eat
.||-asaai.s. ceai.ea| .aaieaa|emacese|iev.ceaiorgin aliter ai
aayi.me. eaa|exec.aaa. veea||aa,aa,easiaeesseaeeeeastaai|y
. m|.ec.ataere.a,.v.ia|ae:.zea
1a:ea,aia.smetaec.,e.a,|eyeaciaeie:ma|,eae:a|. i. eseexa.|
.iecea:|.e:. eeaaa|sema|eiaemai.eiaaiaec.ei.e,aseei}eiiae
:ese.eai.e e:|c iaai iae e:.,.aa| ieaace: ei,eemet:y aac ai a. s
c. sesa| . iaai a. ea mast aave se:vec as tae maie:.a| ie: a.s
.cea|.zai.eas.
Oeemei:yaaciaese. eaeesmesie|ese|y:e|aiecte. iaaveiece. ia
saeei. meaaciaesaaes. ,a:es. a|sesaaeseimet.ea. a|te:ai.easei
ceie:mai.ea. eie . . iaaia:e ess.||e.ia.asaeet.me. a:i.ea|a:|yas
measa:a||ema,a.iaces. ii. saee|ea:iaatevea.ie|aea| mest
aeia.a,a|eatiaea.sie:.ea| sa::eaac.a,e:|ceitae:si,eemete:s.
ta.smaea. see:ia.aasaa.ava:.aat. e sseai.a|si:aeia:e. taat. sasa
e:|ceiia.a,s ,.ae|ac. a,iaeaamaa|e.a,staemse|vesassa|]eets
ei ia.s e:|c, , taai a|| ia.a,s aeeessa:.|; aac ie aave a |ec.|y
eaa:aeie:-a|taea,a aei a|| ia.a,s eea|c |e me:e |ec.es. s.aee tae
aeeessa:.|yeeex. si.a,aamaa|e.a,sa:eaeiia.a|a||easme:e|ec. es
aac. | .|eeveaiaeea|ta:a|e|]eetsa.ea|e|ea,. tataemsi:aeta:a||y.
a:eaeiexaaasiec . aee:e:ea| |e.a,. waat. sa|see|ea:. aaceaa|e
seea:ecai|east.a. tsesseai.a|aae|easia:ea,aea:eia|a:.e:.ex|.ea
t.ea. . staattaesea:e |ec. esaacsai.eteme:a| saaesaac mate
1 78
Edmund H usserl
:.a| [stoiiche] aa|.t.es,ee|e:.a:mta.e.,at.aa:caess.ete. :e|atec
tetaem. ra:tae:. . t.se|ea:taat.a tae|.ieei:aet.ea|aeecsee:ta.a
a:t.ea|a:.zat.easeisaaesteeceataactaatateeaa.ea|:ax.sa|ays
a.mec at} tae:ecaet.eaeia:t.ea|a::eie::ec saaes aactae . m
:evemeateitaemaeee:c.a,teee:ta.ac.:eet.easei,:acaa|aess.
r.:stte|es.a,|eceati:emtaeta.a,saaesa:esa:iaees-me:ee:
|esssmeeta. me:ee:|esse:ieetsa:iaees .ec,es. me:ee:|ess:ea,a
e:ia.:|yevea .. aetae:e:cs. me:ee:|essa:e|. aes. aa,|es. me:e
e: | ess eneet e.ats . taea. a,a.a. amea, tae |. aes. ie: exam|e.
st:a.,at| .aesa:eesee.a||y:eie::ec.aacamea,taesa:iaeestaeevea
sa:iaees . ie:exam| e. ie: :aet.ea| a:eses |ea:cs| .m.tec|y evea
sa:iaees. st:a.,at |.aes. aac e. ats a:e :eie::ec. ae:easteta||y e:
a:t.a||yea:vec sa:iaeesa:e aaces.:a||eie:maay |.acsei:aet.ea|
.ate:ests. 1aas tae :ecaet.ea eieveasa:iaeesaac tae.:e:ieet.ea
,e| .sa.a,a|ays|ays.ts:e|e. a:ax. s. sea|se. aeasesae:e]ast
c.st:.|at.ea .s .ateacec. ue:e tae :ea,a est.mate ei ma,a. taces .s
t:aasiemec. atetaemeasa:emeateima,a. taces|yeeaat.a,taeeaa|
a:ts . ,ue:e. tee. :eeeec.a,i:em taeiaetaa| . aaesseat.a|ie:m|e
eemes:eee,a.za||eta:ea,aametaeceiva:.at.ea. Heasa:.a,|e|ea,s
te eve:y ea|ta:e. va:y.a,ea|y aeee:c.a, te sta,esi:em:.m.t.vete
a.,ae:e:ieet.eas. weeaa a|ays:esaese sememeasa:.a,teea
a.ae. aetae: ei a |ee: e: a.,ae: tye. .a tae esseat.a| ie:a:c
ceve|emeateiea|ta:e. ,as e|| as} tae,:etaeisaeaateeaa.ae.
taasa|se .ae|ac.a,tae a:teices.ie:|a. |c.a,s.eisa:vey.a,ae|cs.
ataays. ete . saea a teeaa.ae .s a|ays a|:eacy tae:e. a|:eacy
a|aacaat| yceve|eecaac:e,.veatetaea.|eseae:aec.caetyet
|ae,eemet:y|ataesaea| c|e eeaee. va||e as .ts.aveate:. ~sa
a.|eseae::eeeec.a,i:emtae:aet.ea| . a.tesa::eaac.a,e:|c,ei
tae:eem. tae e.ty. tae|aacseae. ete . aac teme:a||y tae e:|c ei
e:.ec.ea|eeea::eaees . cay.meata.ete tetaetaee:et.ea|e:|cv.e
aace:|c|ae|ec,e . aeaastae a.te|y|aeaaacaa|aeasaees
aact.mesasia. tee|emeats.ta.ataeae:.zeaeiaaeea.aaa.ty nat
.tata.saeceesaetyetaave,eemet:.ea|saee. mataemat.ea|t.me.
aacaateve:e|se.s te |eeemeaaeve| s.:.taa|:ecaeteateitaese
a.te e|emeats a.ea se:ve as mate:.a| . aac .ta a.s maa.ie|c ia.te
saaes.atae.:saeet.meaeceesaetyetaave,eemet:.ea|saaes . tae
ae:eaem.esaaes. ,a.ssaaes. as}ie:mat.easceve|eeceatei:ax. s
aactaea,atei.a te:msei,:acaa|},e:ieet.ea. e|ea:|y se:ve ea|y as
`' Bi emei ' s interpolation.
"I have reverted to the original version of this sentence as given in the critica ap
paratus; I can make no sense of the emended version given in the text . "-D. Carr.
1 79
The Origin ofGeomety
|ases
ie:aae se:tei:ax.seateia.eas.m.|a:|yaamecaeeea
st:aet|eas,:e.
it .sev.ceat .aacvaaee taat ta.sae se:teieeast:aet.ea.|||ea
:ecaet
a:.s.a,
.tsmatena|s.ataeces.,aatec,eae:a|:e,.veaseita. s
aeta
.
|aamaa.tyaacaamaasa::eaac.a,e:|caace:eates.cea|e|
,eets eateitaem.
Netae:e||emea|c|etec.seeve:.ta:ea,a:eeea:seteaat. s
esseat.a|
ei:tea|a:. me:taaeeaete|:.a,.ateieeasaacesta||.satae
ie||ea,as.,at. Oa|y .itae aec.et.ea||y ,eae:a| eeateat. .ava:.aat
ta:ea,a
eata||e
aaes
.sta|
a,et.v
.tyeiase.eat.stte.at:ecaeesemeta.a,t.me|eaac.a
a. staa|a,.. . e. . semeta.a,|eaacteaat.sme:e|yiaetaa|a|eata.s
:eseat 0: semeta.a,va|.cie: a. mas ame:e|yiaetaa| t:ac.t.ea. a.s
ee
ast:aet.aea|c| . |e.seaaveae:e|yt.me|eaaceat.emeaa.a,.
ta.smeaaa,ea|c|eaace:staaca||eea|y|ytaeseea aesaa:ec
taesmeme:e|yiaetaa|:esaes.t.easeiaace:staac.a,
it.s a,ea
||a. stene||y
iaetaa|eaes|atie:a||eeaee.va||eeaes 1ae
:esaes.t.eas einae. |e ie:ta.s eeav.et.ea aave aeve: |eea ex
|e:ec|eeaasetaeyaaveaeve:|eease:.eas| ymacea:e||e nat.t
aas
diat
and naive knowledge to that ofrefective self-understandmg lS not ldentlcal
to the way in which the object (as real object, rather than object ofkn
wl
edge) came about historically and materially. History does not recap
tulate
the methodology ofknowledge. Philosophy is, however, pushed to thls ob
vious error because any contingency or materiality threatens the suprem
acy ofthe ideal. ( "Husserl, " p. 20)
He goes on to concl ude that Husserl 's "efort to save te theortica atti
tude involves [him] in the perennial oppositions of reahty
.
and Ideal Ity
.
or
necessity and contingency. In each case, while his anal YSI S shows an m
separable connection, Husserl onl y ' values' ideal ity; and thus the mate
rial , the diferent , and the contingent are denied or removed from te d?
main of knowledge" (p. 22). D' Amico punctuates Husserl ' s valuaton m
quotation marks and highl ights the evaluaton. Yet in c?unterpo
.
mt to
thi s punctuation, there is a counterpunctuatIOn. Husserl I
.
nvokes Ideal
ity, but that ideality i s al ways caught in Babel ' s double bmd, such that
the material the diferent, and the contingent are removed from the do
main of kno
'
wledge (ideality) only insofar as they are the conditions of
possibil ity of that ideal ity and thus empower the domain of knowledg.
In other words , Babel , as the "primordial Diference of the absolut <n
gin, " as "the beyond or the this-side which gives sense to al l empincal
genius and al l factual profusion, " punctuates the transcendenta
.
l as the
double bind of thought , the double bind of "the strange processIOn of a
' Ruckrage' " (p. 1 53 above) . Or perhaps , untime
.
ly, te tanscendental
i s the punctuati on, the punctuation of the double bmd, m hI story .
[ ]
Coda: Have I abandoned prematurely meaning in favor of the signa
ture? As my responsibil ity i s the transl ator' s, i s the signature to be trans
lated? Can it be? From deja to da to j' accepte, signatures punctuate
1 92
John P. Leavey
Derrida's COrpUS . In the Introduction, one such signature is the signature
of horizon, a "decisive" notion: "Horizon is the always-already-there
[Ie toujours-deja-la] of a future which keeps the indetermination of its
infnite openness intact . . . . a horizon is always virtually present in ev
ery experience; for it is at once the unity and the incompletion for that
experience-the anticipated unity in every incompletion" (p. 1 1 7
above; L' origine, p. 1 23). Always already there, on the horizon, punctu
ated, the signature of a corpus incomplete .
John P. Leavey, Jr.
September 1 988
Index ofPassages
Cited from Husserl
[Page numbers refer to the present book. ]
Cartesian Meditations
3: 3 3 , 39
4: 79, 1 42
7: 95
23 : 1 45
29: 29
37: 29, 47, 96
38: 29, 96
39: 1 52
4 1 : 1 36
48-49: 86-87
52: 86
6 1 : 87, 1 26
The Crisis ofEuropean Sciences and
Transcendental Phenomenology
7: 95 , 1 46
8: 1 27, 1 29, 1 30
9: 1 27
9a : 35, 1 22 , 1 24, 1 26, 1 30, 1 33 , 1 34
9b : 34-35, 36-37
9c : 1 26
,: 98, 1 26
9h : 35, 36, 57, 1 1 8, 1 1 9, 1 26 , 1 30
91 : 3 5 , 5 1
1 5 : 95
2 1 : 3 3
33-39: 1 1 9
33 : 1 1 9
34b : 85
34e : 1 1 9
34f: 1 20
36: 1 1 9, 1 20, 1 22, 1 33
37: 1 1 9
7 1 : 1 30
Appendi x I : . ' Phi losophy and the Cri si sof
European Humanity" (Abhandlung
C in Krisis, the German edition) : 36,
80, 84-85, 1 1 0, 1 1 5 , 1 27, 1 28-29, 1 46
Appendix I I (Abhandlung A in Krisis) :
1 27, 1 33
Appendix IV (73-Schl usswort i n
Krisis) : 95, 1 36, 142 , 1 46
Appendix V (Bei lage I I in Krisis) : 1 33
Appendix I X (Bei lage XXVI I I i n Krisis) :
1 1 6
" Fi nk' s Appendi x on the Problem of the
' Unconscious' : 93
Die Krisis der europiischen
Wissenschaften und die
tranzendentale Phinomenologie
Bei lage XI I I : 1 49
Bei lage XXV: 1 1 6
Bei l age XXVI : 1 1 5
Beilage XXVI I : 42 , 1 1 5
Experience and Judgment
I : 47
I O: 1 1 8, 1 33
1 4: 1 20, 1 32
23 : 1 00
38: 83 , 87
63 : 7 1
64: 7 1
64c: 73 , 1 48
65: 72, 91 , 98
Erste Philosophie ( 1 923124) , Vol . I
Bei lage VI I : 1 27
Formal and Transcendental Logic
I ntroduction: 3 1 , 32, 33, 38-39, 52
1 -5: 79
I : 69
2: 68, 88
5: 68 , 75
6: 4 1
194
Index ofPassages Cited from Husser!
Formal and Transcendental Logic
( continued)
9: 53
1 6: 55, 99, 1 39
1 7: 55
3 1 : 53 , 54
59: 62
62 : 67
71 : 32
73 : 79
74: 1 35
96c: 1 33
1 00: 63
1 02: 39, 47
Conclusion: 87, 1 26, 1 27 , 1 33
Appendi x I I : 55, 99
2b : 96
2c : 93
The Idea ofPhenomenology
Lecture I [po 23 of German] : 1 49
Ideas I
I ntroduction: 1 42
I : 43 , 47
7: 44, 54
8: 32
9: 32, 1 27
1 0: 32
I I : 48
1 4: 48
1 5 : 48
1 7: 32
24: 62
25: 32, 43 , 95, 1 08
44: 1 47
49: 95 , 96
56: 43
58: 1 47
59: 68
60: 1 2 1
70: 45 , 1 27 , 1 33
72: 33, 53 , 56, 1 22
73 : 3 3 , 1 02
74: 33, 1 23 , 1 33 , 1 34 , 1 35
75 : 33, 1 24
76: 64
79: 1 47
8 1 : 96, 1 20
83 : 1 06, 1 36
88: 66, 96
90: 7 1
97f. : 6
1 43 : 1 39
1 49: 1 22 , 1 35
Logical Investigations
Foreword to 2nd Ed. : 7 1
Prologomena
6: 92
59: 73
60: 1 02
67: 47
70: 53
I ntroduction to Vol . II of German Ed.
2: 78-79
3: 79
5: 70
First I nvestigation
1 -5: 92
I I : 70, 73 , 74
1 2 : 7 1
1 8: 44, 1 33
20: 98
26: 82, 1 00
3 1 : 48
32: 59
Fourth I nvestigation: 80
I nvestigations 1 -5: 7 1
The Origin of Geometry: passim
The Phenomenology of Internal
Time-Consciousne ss
2: 47
36: 82
Concering the Concept ofNl mber ( 1 887)
p. 37: 28
"Die Frage nach dem Ursprung der
Geometrie al s intentional-hi stori sches
Probl em. " Ed. E. Fink
p. 207: 48
p. 208: 48
p. 2 1 0: 89
p. 2 1 5 : 55
"Grundlegende Untersuchungen zum
Phanomeno\ogischen Ursprung der
i
I
|
1
195
Index ofPassages Cited from Hussert
Raumli chkei t der Natur" ( May 1 934)
pp. 307, 308, 309, 3 1 5, 3 1 7, 3 1 8: 83-85
"Phi l osophy as Rigorous Science": 33 , 43 ,
47, 48, 58-59, 1 01 , 1 03 , I I I , 1 5 1
Letter of March I I , 1 935, to Levy- Bruhl :
I I I , 1 1 4
Letter of November 1 6, 1 930: 1 45
Unpubl i shed Transcripts
C 2 I I : S, 7: 1 49
C 2 I I I , 1 932, pp. 8-9: 1 48
C 6, August 1 930, p. 5: 87
C 8 I I , October 29, p. 3: 1 2 1
C 1 3/ 1 5 I I , 1 934, p. 9 : 80
E I I I 4, p. 60: . 1 46, 1 47
F 1 24, p. 68: 1 48
K I I I , p. 1 06: 1 47
1
Index
Absolute 1 7, 58, 86, 1 09, 1 1 6, 1 36-37,
1 43-44, 1 46n, 1 47-50. 1 52-53
of intentional hi storicity 1 7, 1 42
Act
primally i nstituting act ( Urstiftung) 45n,
48, 49, 1 27, 1 28, 1 45 , 1 60 (primal
establi shment) , 1 65 , 1 80
Aesthetics
transcendental aestheti cs 87n, 1 26, 1 26n
"again and again" (toujours encore,
Immer-wieder) 1 34n, 1 35-36, 1 35n
Algebrization 1 27n
Al l i son, David B. I n, 3n-4n, 2 1
Alter ego 87n, 98, 1 06, 1 2 1 , 1 40n
Alterity 1 7 , 86, 1 53
"and so forth" (et ainsi de suite, und so
weiter) 1 35 , 1 35n
Anexactitude 1 22-23
Anni hi lation (of sense) 93 , 93n, 95 , 96
apeiron 1 7 , 48, 1 5 1 n
a priori, Apriori 62, 8 1 , 1 09- 1 3 , 1 1 6- 1 20,
1 1 9n, 1 28-3 1 , 1 52n, 1 74-77, 1 79, 1 80
of hi story 1 5, 1 09, 1 74
contingent 4 1 n
arche 6 , 1 1 9
Ari stotle 30, 1 29, 1 38, 1 46n
Arithmetization 1 26, 1 26n-27n
Attitude
eidetic 1 1 4
natural 69n
phenomenological 1 48
theoretical 55n, 1 27, 1 32
Authentici ty 74, 1 47, 1 53
Axi oms: axiomati cs 33n, 52-55 , 56, 68n,
1 08, 1 29, 1 68, 1 7 1
Bachelard, Gaston 60, 9 1 , 1 33
Bachelard, Suzanne 3 1 n, 53n, 55n, 69n,
80n, 1 06n, 1 30n, 1 35 n
Bass, Al an 1 8n
Bei ng 1 7, 46, 48n, 93 , 96, 1 04, 1 07, 1 1 8,
1 22 , 1 36n, 1 38n, 1 45 , 1 45n, 1 47-53 ,
1 7 1
of the book 9 1
of the mathematical object 27
Objecti ve 84n, 1 60n
speaking 1 49, 1 64
Bergsoni sm 94
Biemel , Walter 27n, 1 1 6, 1 1 6n
Berger, Gaston 69n, 1 36n
Body
Korper 84n, 85 , 88, 94, 97-98, 1 22-24,
1 27, 1 60, 1 77
Leib 84n, 88, 97-98
Bol zano 1 1 9
Book 1 -3 , 90-9 1 , 9 1 n
Brunschi vcg 30
Cairns, Dorion 1 3n, 20-2 1 , 33n
Calcul us 8 1
Carr, David I On
Cavai l l es, Jean 53n, 1 42n, 1 43 , 1 43n, 1 44
Clarifi cation; clarity 55n, 74 , 1 25 , 1 27n,
1 35n, 1 63 , 1 7 1 , 1 72, 1 73 , 1 75
cog ito 33n
Communi cation 82, 83n, 87, 90, 1 0 1 , 1 1 0,
1 64
Communi ty 93 , 1 1 0, 1 1 4-1 5 , 1 62 , 1 63-64
i nstitutive 87
transcendental 1 1 4, 1 47n
Consciousness 7, 1 0, 1 1 , 1 8-20, 27, 42 , 57,
63 , 68, 68n, 8 1 , 8 1 n, 93n, 95 , 96, 1 09,
1 35-3 8, 1 36n, 1 38n, 1 40, 1 43-44,
1 49-5 1 , 1 53 , 1 59, 1 6{, 1 62 , 1 63 , 1 64,
1 65 , 1 68
constituting 67
di vine 1 47
exemplary 27, 1 1 2
factual 4 1 , 1 47
i ndi vidual 1 5 , 57, 85 , 93
self-consciousness 9
transcendental 8, 1 9, 96, 1 46, 1 47n
as Or-Region 64, 96, 1 38n
of origin 38
of fel l ow humanity 79
of hi storicity 1 05
198
Index
Consti tution 1 3 , 25 , 27n, 28, 32-33, 46, 62 ,
63 , 64, 7 1 n, 77-79, 77n, 79n, 86, 86n,
87n, 88, 89. 94, 98, 1 06, 1 1 7, 1 1 8,
1 1 8n. 1 20, 1 20n, 1 2 1 , 1 2 1 n. 1 24, 1 25 ,
1 35, 1 40n, 1 4 1 , 1 43-44, 1 4S, 1 45n,
1 46n, 1 47. 1 48
Copernicani sm 84n. 85 , 85n
Corporeality ( corporeite, Leihlichkeit) 84n ,
88. 89n. 94. 97-98. 1 22. 1 23 . 1 77
(bodi l y character)
Cri si s 33. 80n. 87. 92n
textual 5
Cul ture 57-59. 75 . 76, 8 1 . 82. 1 0 1 -03 . 1 05 .
I I I . 1 1 2 . 1 1 5 . 1 2 1 . 1 22 . 1 73 . 1 74
Eu ropean I 1 5
pre scientifc 1 07. 1 26
sci enti fc 84n
Dasein 1 38n
Death 1 37
of sense 93-94
transcendental sense of 88. 94
Deconstruction 1 -3 , 3n-4n. 6. 1 8
Deduct i vity 33n. 53-56
Defni teness (defnitude) 53-54
De lure 37n. 46. 1 05, 1 37, 1 53
Delay (retard) 1 7. 1 52-53
Descartes 33n. 44n. 45n, 1 24. 1 25 n
De-sedi mentation 50. 1 1 9
Dialect i c 4. 6, 1 2. 1 6. 86. 86n. 1 43-44, 1 52
of protention and retenti on 58
Diaphanei ty 50. 1 06, 1 38
Diferance 3 . 4n. 5 , 6. 9. 1 8-20
Diference 2. 4n. 5. 6. 1 7-1 8 . 1 9. 1 1 3-1 4.
1 22 . 1 53
Di lthey. Wi lhelm 57. 63n. 1 09
Di sappearance of truth 93-98
Discourse 97. 1 1 6. 1 49, I S2-53
phenomenological 50n. 69n
phi l osophical 1 38n. 1 50. 1 52n
transcendental 68. 77n
Di ssemi nation 3. 3n. 4. 5
Dokumentierung 72 . 78. 1 60. 1 6 1 . 1 62 . 1 64,
1 68
doxa 1 1 9
Earth 1 4-1 5 . 8 1 . 83 . 83n-85n. 85
Ego 6 1 , 7 1 n. 86, 86n-87n. 1 44n. 1 47. 1 67
phenomenologi zi ng 82
ego 29, 6 1 , 63 . 87n, 96-97. 98. 1 20-2 1 ,
1 38n. 1 45
Eidetic 67-68. 68n. 1 2 1 , 1 23 . 1 25n. 1 35
of hi story 1 1 2. 1 2 1
eidos 29. 4S . 47-49. 58, 80. 1 42n. 1 44
European 29, 57. 1 1 4-1 5
geometrical 44
ego 6 1 . 97
of hi storicity 1 1 5
Ei nstei n. Albert 84n-85n
Embodi ment (incorporation,
Verkorperung) 9 1 n. 92 , 1 60
l i ngui sti c 90n
sensible 89. 89n. 90n. 1 6 1
Embree. Lester E. 2 1
Empathy (Einjihlung) 1 1 I n. 1 1 4. 1 62 , 1 63
empeiria 1 49
Empi ri ci sm 42, 59. 62 . 93 . 95n. 1 08 . 1 20.
l S I . 1 52n
Entelechy 1 48. 1 48n
epekeina tes ousias 1 44
episteme 1 1 9
Epi stemologism 1 08
epoche 88. 1 1 9-20
Equi voci ty 1 00-04. l OOn
Erasure (rature) 1 -2 . I n. 5 . 1 8 . 20
Error 73-74
Essence 47, 48. 80. 1 07, 1 1 5-1 6. 1 23 . 1 3 1 ,
1 34n. 1 35 . 1 42 . 1 42n. 1 47, 1 65 . 1 66.
1 80
irreal 1 35
non-fi cti ve irreali ty of 48
Essence-of-the-frst-time (Erstmaligkeit)
1 1 , 48. 48n. 62
Essentiality 1 49
Ethi cs 1 36n
Eucl i d 54n. 72, 1 28-29. 1 58, 1 60
Evidence 1 3n. 47. 56. 62 , 63n. 64, 73 n, 87,
96, 99. 99n. 1 00. 1 04. 1 06. 1 1 3 , 1 1 7.
1 35n. 1 37-4 1 . 1 42n. 1 58, 1 59. 1 60.
1 64. 1 66. 1 67. 1 68 . 1 70, 1 73 . 1 75. 1 76
primordial (originaire) 54-55 , 62 , 1 08 ,
1 63 (origi nal sel f-evi dence) , 1 68 , 1 69.
1 7 1 , 1 72
Exacti tude 25, 1 0 1 -02 , 1 02n, 1 1 8 , 1 1 8n.
1 23 , 1 3 1 . 1 36
geometrical 33n. 1 06
Exi stence 48, 49. 66. 67n. 87, 95 . I I I . 1 1 3 .
1 1 5 , 1 58, 1 60, 1 62 , 1 64
Exi stent 66n. 67. 67n, 8 1 . 82 , 1 38n, 1 44.
1 60 (enti ty)
Exi stent ial thesi s ( these d' existence,
Daseinsthesis) 44, 96
\
1
Experience. l i ved ( \CI I , Erlehnis ) 29, 33n.
35 . 4 1 . 49, 63n. 65 , 66n. 68 . 72 . 1 1 0.
1 1 2 . 1 1 3 . 1 1 7, 1 25n, 1 36, 1 37. 1 39. 1 40
Expli cation ( elucidation, Verdelltlic/wng)
55n, 61 . 98. 1 67. 1 73 , 1 77
Expression 69n. 70-72 . 77. 79, 79n. 1 00.
l OOn. 1 02 . 1 33n, 1 64
Exteriority 92n
corporeal 94
Fact : Factual i ty (jait, jacticite) 26. 37n.
38. 40, 42-44, 43n. 46-49. 46n. 50n,
56. 59, 63 , 64. 66. 70, 70n. 72n. 74.
84n. 86. 88, 9 1 . 91 n. 92 , 94, 96. 1 05 .
1 06, 1 1 0-1 3 . 1 1 6. 1 22 , 1 23 . 1 25n,
1 27n, 1 28, 1 32 . 1 37. 1 38n, 1 47-5 1 .
1 5 I n-52n. 1 73 , 1 74. 1 75 , 1 76, 1 79 1 80
i nsti tuti ng 46
.
Feuerbach, Ludwig 69n
Fichte, Johann G. 45n, 1 36n
Fiction 3. 5. 45. 64. 95 . 96, 1 25n
Fictional i ze 3
Fi ni tude (fnite, fnitude) 37, 45n. 82.
1 05-06. 1 1 5 , 1 27. 1 30. 1 32, 1 38, 1 38n.
1 4 1 , 1 68
Fi nk. Eugen 25n. 27n. 42n . 55n. 69n-70n
75n. 77n. 89. 90. 1 4 1 n, 1 57n
.
First t i me. eidetic fund of 48-S0
Forgetfulness (oublij 33. 36n. 46n , 52. 87.
93 . 93n, 94. 98. l OS , 1 1 9
Form 5-6. 55n. 83n, 87n . 1 1 0. 1 23 . 1 26.
1 37, 1 43 . 1 44n. 1 45n. 1 48 . 1 53 . 1 58 .
1 74
corporeal 94
cul tural 1 08
ideal 89n
of hi storicity 97
Foucaul t . Michel 7n. 8. 8n
Freud I n
Gadamer. Hans-Georg l I n
Gali leo 35-37. 35n. 36n, 1 24n. 1 29n, 1 57.
1 58n
Gaze (regard) 64. 78. 83 , 1 57. 1 77. 1 80
Genesi s 28 . 47n. 57, 62 . 63 . 65 . 84n, 1 08 .
1 32 . 1 43 . 1 73
psychological 28. 29
transcendental 28
of geometry 46
Geneticism 26
199
Index
Geni ti vity 1 42-43
Geography 1 23 , 1 25
Geology 1 4, 83
Geometry I I , 1 4, 1 5 . 25. 27, 32. 32n. 33n.
34-41 , 35n. 44, 47-53 , 56, 58, 60-62 ,
64-66, 72-73 , 8 1 . 83 , 95 , 97, 1 02n,
1 05-08, 1 1 7- 1 8 , 1 2 1 -23 , 1 24n-25n,
1 25-30. 1 26n, l 27n, 1 30n, 1 32 , 1 33n,
1 35 , 1 46, 1 57, 1 59, 1 60, 1 66 , 1 68, 1 72 ,
1 73 . 1 75 . 1 77, 1 78, 1 80
God 45n. 1 47-8, 1 47n, 1 48n
Godel 53 , 54
Ground, grounding (t"ondement , folld(/ tioll ,
sol) 26, 33n, 37n, 44-46. 45n, 52 ,
54-55 , 58. 61 , 64, 8 1 , 83 , 84n, 85 , 87,
87n , 97, 99, 1 04, 1 09. 1 1 0. 1 1 9, 1 20,
1 2 1 . 1 25n, 1 3 3 , 1 33n, 1 38n , 1 43 , 1 49.
1 50, 1 5 1 . 1 73 , 1 74. 1 75, 1 80
Hal l ucinat ion 44-46, 45n
Hegel , G. W. F. 45n, 57, 67n, 1 02
Heidegger, Mart i n I n, 4n, 5 . 8, I On- l i n,
69n, l O I n, 1 38n
Herbart. J . F. 72
Herder. J . G. 70n
Hi storici sm 26. 44, 46n, 1 03 , 1 03n. 1 09- 1 0.
1 75-76, 1 80
Hi stori ci ty (Geschichtlichkeit) 8, 1 0-1 8 ,
26-29, 28n. 34, 42 . 44, 46. 48, 49. 50n,
59. 6 1 , 63-64, 66, 89, 93 . 97, 1 0 L
1 03-04. 1 07 , 1 08, 1 1 0, 1 1 2-1 8. 1 1 5n,
1 20, 1 30, 1 32 . 1 40, 1 4 1 . 1 42n, 1 45 ,
1 45n, 1 49-53 . 1 72 , 1 73 . 1 74. 1 74n,
1 75n. 1 80
i ntent ional 1 42
i ntrinsic 94-95 , 95n. 97. 1 3 1
transcendental 75. 87, 1 2 1 , 1 4 1 . 1 42, 1 48
Hi story 1 0, 1 4. 27, 29. 29n, 30, 34. 35 , 36n.
38. 39. 42-47. 43n. 49-52 , 50n. 59,
6 1 -66, 63n. 69. 69n. 70. 76, 82 , 90. 93 .
95-97. 95n. 99. 1 01 . 1 02. 1 04. 1 05 ,
1 08-1 2 . 1 1 5- 1 8, 1 1 6n, 1 20, 1 3 1 . 1 32 ,
1 37 , 1 4 1 , 1 42 . 1 44-46. 1 48-53 .
1 72-73 . 1 74. 1 75 . 1 79. 1 80
external 95 . 95n. 1 08
i nfnite 1 06. 1 35
i ntent ional 34. 98. 1 09
i nternal 1 05 . 1 09. 1 25 . 1 80
natural 57
phenomenological 28, 1 4 1
real (reale) 87
200
Index
Hi story (continued)
real (reel/e) 59, 95, 1 09
transcendental 41 n. 1 2 1 n, 1 47
Horizon 1 5 , 1 6, 26, 34, 53 , 55, 55n. 56, 60,
79. 80-83 , 84n, 85, 94, 1 02 , 1 04-1 0,
1 1 4-1 6, 1 25n, 1 27. 1 32, 1 34n, 1 35,
1 38, 1 40, 1 42n, 1 45, 1 48, 1 49, 1 59,
1 6 1 , 1 62 , 1 7 1 -72, 1 73. 1 76, 1 77, 1 78,
1 80
H ors-/ivre 2
Hume, David 1 7 1 n
Hyppolite, Jean 88, 88n, 1 03n
Idea ( i n t he Kantian sense) 1 0, 1 6-1 7 , 1 04,
l OS , 1 34n, 1 35-2, 1 36n, 1 38n, 1 42n,
1 44, 1 46n, 1 47n
European 1 1 4-1 5
I dealism 96, 1 38n, 1 47
transcendental 29, 70n, 78, 1 38n, 1 47,
I SO
Ideality 1 0, 1 3 , 1 4, 27n, 5 1 , 55, 59, 59n, 61 ,
66n-67n, 7 1 , 73 , 75 , 76, 86, 86n, 89,
89n, 90, 90n, 9 I n, 92 , 92n, 95 , 97, 98n,
l OOn, 1 04, 1 04n, 1 06, 1 1 7-1 8, 1 24-26,
1 25n, 1 3 1 , 1 33, 1 33n, 1 34, 1 4 1 ,
1 48-49, 1 6 1 , 1 62 , 1 66, 1 69, 1 70, 1 7 1
bound 7 1 -73 , 72n, 76, 89n, 94, 1 02, 1 3 1 ,
1 32
cultural 42n, 94
free 1 4, 7 1 -72, 72n, 89n, 94
l i ngui stic 70n-7 I n, 74-76, 78, 1 03
sensible 1 24, 1 25, 1 33
I dealization 25 , 36, 44n, 67n, 84n, 1 06, 1 1 8 ,
1 27n, 1 28, 1 3 1 , 1 32-35, 1 33n, 1 35n,
1 37, 1 68, 1 77, 1 79, 1 80
imaginat i ve-sensible 1 25
mathematical 1 6, 1 35, 1 41
substructi ve 1 33, 1 33n
Ideation 1 34n, 1 35, 1 35n
I dentity 47, 67, 67n, 7 1 , 73 , 81 , 85 , 86, 87n,
89n, 90, 90n-9 I n, 1 04, 1 43 , 1 44, 1 5 3 ,
1 63 , 1 66, 1 70
lmaginatio 44n
I magination; i maginary 3n, 1 6, 46, 7 1 n,
I I I , 1 1 3 , 1 24, 1 24n- 1 25n, 1 26, 1 33 ,
1 33n, 1 3 5, 1 45
Incarnation ( Verleiblichung) 6, 76, 89,
89n, 90, 1 1 5 , 1 5 1 , 1 6 1 (embodiment)
hi storical 77
I ndefni teness 1 37
I nducti vity 1 24n
I nexact itude 1 23
Infi nite 45n. 1 28, 1 3 1 , 1 34, 1 39n, 1 40, 1 42 ,
1 48, 1 50
I nfni tization 1 6, 1 1 6, 1 27-30, 1 30n, 1 68
creati ve 1 6, 1 28-30
formali zing 37, 1 28
I nfnity 1 28-30, 1 37, 1 39, 1 40, 1 47-48, 1 53,
1 78
Ingarden, Roman 27n
Intel/ectio 44n, 1 33n
I ntellectuali sm 1 24
I ntemporality see Timel essness
Intention: intentionality 1 3 , 1 5- 1 7, 64, 88,
89n, 97-98, 1 04, 1 06, 1 1 6, 1 24, 1 30,
1 34, 1 35 , 1 39, 1 40, 1 40n, 1 46, 1 46n,
1 50, 1 63
transcendental 94
intentional content 70, 7 1 n, 72
I nterconnection 26, 56, 59, 60, 63n, 65 , 66,
73 , 89n, 95, 96, 97, 1 04, 1 05, 1 30,
1 34n, 1 42, 1 63 (chain) , 1 74
I nteriority l O I n, 1 08, 1 42
I ntersubjective ; intersubjecti vity 1 5 , 25 ,
33, 64-65 , 76, 79, 79n, 8 1 n, 86, 86n,
87n, 93 , 1 1 8, 1 26, 1 4 1 , 1 52 , 1 63 , 1 79
I ntrasubjecti vi ty 1 5 , 76, 1 63
I ntuition 62, 67n, 1 06, 1 07, 1 1 4, 1 1 8 , 1 23 ,
1 34n, 1 35 , 1 35n, 1 38, 1 39, 1 40, 1 40n,
1 42 , 1 44
eidetic 30, 38, 1 1 2
geometrical 43
originally presentive 1 00
recepti ve 40, 7 1
of an essence ( Wesensschau) 1 35
I nvariant , historical I I I , 1 1 3 , 1 1 6, 1 1 8,
1 22 , 1 34, 1 34n, 1 77 , 1 79
I rrationalism 1 52n
I rreality 1 44
I rresponsbi l i ty 52
Joyce, James 1 02-04, 1 03n
Kant : Kanti ani sm 39-42, 45n, 70n, 72 ,
1 1 7 , 1 24n-25n, 1 36n, 1 38n, 1 40, 1 40n,
1 4 1 , 1 46n
Kinematics 1 30n
Kofman, Sarah 5
201
Index
Language (/angage+ langlle) 1 0, 1 2 , 1 4-1 5 .
26. 59, 66-72 , 68n, 70n, 75 , 76, 77n,
78-82 , 85 , 87, 89, 89n, 9 1 , 92 ,
1 00n-0 I n, 1 01 -03 , 1 04, 1 04n, 1 1 0,
1 1 2 , 1 1 8, 1 22 , 1 22n, l 27n, 1 47, 1 48,
1 49, 1 5 1 , 1 60, 1 60n, 1 6 1 -62 , 1 65 .
1 67
transcendental 69n, 77, 77n
Leibni z, G. W. 1 00n-0 I n
Levi nas, Emmanuel 1 36n
Levy-Bruhl , Luci en I I I , 1 1 4
Life 3 1 n. 69n, 77, 86n, 1 1 5n, 1 23 , 1 45n,
1 57, 1 6 1 , 1 65 , 1 70
Life-world (monde de la ie. Lebenswelt)
1 6, 25, 3 1 , 60, 1 1 3 , 1 1 8-20, 1 1 8n,
1 1 9n, l 22n, 1 33n, 1 7 1 , 1 77
Li vi ng Present 1 0-1 2 , 1 5-1 7 , 57, 84n, 86,
87n, 1 09. 1 09n, 1 1 0, 1 36-37. 1 43 , 1 44,
1 48, 1 48n, 1 50, 1 52-53
Logic 32, 32n, 33 , 33n, 35n, 38n . 68n, 73 ,
78 , 79n, l OI n, 1 1 9, 1 1 9n, 1 43 , 1 46n,
1 67-68, 1 69, 1 70, 1 7 1 , 1 75
of diferance 5-7, 9, 1 8-20
pure logical grammar 80
Logi ci sm 78
Logocentri ci sm 2
Logos 69n, 1 41 , 1 46-8, 1 47n, 1 49
Mallarme , Stephane 67n
Material i sm, dialectical 46n
Mathemati cs 1 3n, 33n, 37, 39, 53 , 54. 56.
83n, 84n, 94, 98, 1 24, 1 27, l 27n, 1 30n,
1 3 1 , 1 36, 1 4 \ , 1 59. 1 70. 1 7 1 , 1 80
Greek 1 28-30, 1 30n
Meaning (vollioir-dire) 3n, 6. See Sense .
Memory 86n, 1 02 , 1 64. 1 67
rational 60
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 77 , 1 1 1 -1 3 , I I I n ,
1 1 3n, 1 1 6
Metaphysical ; metaphysi cs I , I n. 2 , 4n,
6-8, 20, 6 1 , 1 47, 1 50
of hi story 1 03n
Method 38, 84n, 1 07, 1 09. 1 1 3 , 1 1 4, 1 1 8.
1 25n, 1 49, 1 49n, 1 52 , 1 57 , 1 69, 1 70n,
1 7 1 , 1 75 , 1 77
Mi sunderstanding 8 1 -82
Morphological types 1 26
pure 1 24
vague 89n, 1 23 , 1 27
Mul ti pl i ci ty 53. 54. 54n. 56, 1 1 2 , 1 24. 1 52
de Mural t, Andre 67-68
Myth 59. 1 44. 1 45
Name 67n. 80, 82 . 1 33n. 1 62
Nature 33n. 46n. 72n. 8 1 , 84n . 86n, 1 2 1 .
1 26. 1 47
Neutral i zation 29. 5 1 , 65, 67. 67n. 9 1 n.
1 1 9. 1 29
Ni etzsche. Friedrich I n. 4n
Noema 47. 66n-67n. 7 1 n. 1 35n. 1 42 , 1 44
Nonbei ng I SO
Nonhi stori ci ty (Geschichtlosigkeit) 1 1 4-1 5
Nonhi story 1 32 . 1 50
Nonphi l osophy 93 . 1 5 I
Nonworl dl i ness 1 49
Norm: normat i vity 43n, 44. 49. SOn. 52 . 59.
59n. 63 . 73 . 80. 1 09, 1 43
Normality 80, 80n, 1 62 . 1 64n
Novel 1 44
Object 27n, 64. 66, 67, 7 1 n. 72. 77. 8 1 -83 .
87. 94 , 1 m. 1 04, 1 20. 1 22, 1 23 . 1 35 .
1 39. 1 40, 1 42-45 . 1 62 . 1 77
absolute 63 . 1 04
common 78
geometrical 48. 75 , 1 04 . 1 3 5 , 1 6 1
ideal 1 0-1 2 . 25-26. 29. 40. 44. 45 , 47 .
62-6, 66. 77. 78. 85. 9 1 n. 92 , 1 03 .
1 1 8 . 1 20, 1 35 . 1 64
mathematical 27, 27n
real (real) 66, 67. 7 1 n, 75 . 1 61
of recepti vi ty 7 1 . 7 1 n
Objecti fcation (objectil'ation) 87. 98. 1 1 8 .
1 45
Objecti vati on (representation) 84n
Objecti vi sm 26, 83 . 84n, 85n, 98. 143
Objecti vity (objectivite, Objektivitdt)
1 3-1 4. 1 5 , 2 1 . 32 , 32n-33n, 34, 41 . 63 ,
63n. 64. 66, 67. 70, 7 1 n, 72 , 75 , 76. 79.
86n. 87. 88, 89, 93 , 94, 97. l OOn , 1 04n .
1 1 7- 1 8, 1 20, 1 2 1 , 1 39, 1 44, 1 60, 1 61 ,
1 63 , 1 79
objecti vi ty (objectite. Gegenstiindlichkeit)
I I , 2 1 , 26. 32 . 32n-33n, 40. 6. 67,
7 1 n, 73 , 75 . 76, 87, 88. 90, 94, 99. 99n.
1 1 7-1 8 , 1 2 1 , 1 30n, 1 3 1 , 1 3 l n , 1 32 .
1 43 , 1 61 (i deal object) , 1 63 . 1 67, 1 79
of understanding 7 \ , 7 1 n , 73n
cultural 90n-9 1 n
202
Index
Old names, science of (paleonymy) 1 8-20
Omnitemporality 39, 7 1 n, 73 , 73n, 74 , 77n,
1 4 1 , 1 48-49
Ontology 3 , 6, 1 7, 1 40n, 1 50-5 1 , 1 5 1 n,
1 52n
formal 32n, 68n
material 3 1
Onto-theo-Iogy 2, 4
Origin 3n, 5, 7, 9-1 2 , 1 6, 3 1 , 34, 35n, 37,
39, 46-47, 48, 49, 53 , 55 , 62 , 63 n, 68n,
69n, 75 , 76, 84n, 1 0 1 , 1 05 , 1 07, 1 1 7,
1 25 , 1 25n, 1 28 , 1 32 . 1 34. 1 34n. 1 41 ,
1 46, 1 49. 1 50, 1 5 1 , 1 6 1 , 1 70, 1 75
of geometry 36-37, 48. 79. 1 08, 1 1 7, 1 25 .
1 26, 1 3 1 , 1 58, 1 72 , 1 75
absolute 1 7-1 8, 86, 86n, 1 37. 1 52-53
phenomenological 38, 47n, 69n, 79
sense of 35, 35n, 38, 49, 1 07, 1 27n, 1 3 1 .
1 79 (original meaning)
Ought-to-be 1 36n. 1 45
Ownness 86n-87n
Passage 1 1 9, 1 49
Passage to the l i mit 25 . 1 06. 1 27, 1 27n,
1 34-35
Passi vi ty 87, 99, 99n, 1 00, l OOn, 1 02, 1 43 ,
1 63-65 , 1 67
Perception 9, 27, 44n, 46, 49, 67n, 7 1 n, 83 ,
84n, 87n, 9 1 , 1 2 1 n, 1 24
pre scienti fc 1 20
Phenomenality 27, 1 44, 1 48
Phenomenology 8, 9, 1 7, 20, 27, 29n, 30,
30n, 35, 43n, 4
5
. 45n, 47, 50, 5 1 , 52 ,
67n, 73n, 8 1 n, 83 , 86, 93 , 96n, 97,
l OOn, 1 06, 1 08 , I I I , I l l n, 1 1 2 , 1 1 4,
1 1 5 , 1 20, 1 25n, 1 38-4 1 , 1 38n, 1 40n,
1 43 , 1 49-52 , 1 49n, 1 5 1 n, 1 52n
of hi storicity 5 1 , 69
of hi story 49, 1 27n
of reading 99n
of the spi ri t 1 03
of the written thing 90
transcendental 6, 7, 42 , 48 , 68n, I I I n,
1 47
Phil osophy 9, I I , 1 7, 25 , 26, 29, 3 1 , 33n,
37, 38 , 49, 55n, 57, 86n, 93 , 97, 99,
l OOn. 1 0 1 , 1 02 , 1 09, 1 1 2 , 1 1 3n, 1 1 5 ,
1 1 6n, 1 27, 1 27n, 1 28 , 1 29, 1 32 , 1 38n,
1 4 1 , 1 42n, 1 46, 1 46n, 1 50, 1 52-53 ,
1 57, 1 75
of hi story 65 , 72n, 93 , 1 03
of language 77, 10 I n
cri tical 1 1 7
transcendental 80
physis 84n
Plato; Platonism 42, 45 , 45n, 48n, 59, 62 ,
94, 1 07, 1 27, 1 27n. 1 29, 1 42n, 1 44
Pl urivocity 1 00-0 I
Polysemy 4, 5
"Positi vi sm, true" 1 45
Preface 3 , 1 49
Prepredi cati ve experience 29
Presence 7, 9, 1 35 , 1 37, 1 39
Present 57-58, 60, 86, 86n, 1 09, 1 1 0, 1 37,
1 43 , 1 53 , 1 73, 1 74, 1 76, 1 79
hi storic 1 5 , 58, 1 09, 1 09n, 1 1 0, 1 74, 1 76
Pretemporality ( Vorzeit) 82
Primi ti veness, cul tural 8 1
Primordial in Itself 1 09. 1 76 (what i s
hi storically primary i n i tself)
Primordiality (originarite) 37, 58, 78, 86,
1 06
"Princi ple of all princi pl es" 1 0, 1 4, 1 6, 62 ,
99n, 1 37-38
Production 40, 40n, 46n, 56-57, 58, 6,
7 1 n, 78, 86n, 1 06, 1 63 , 1 78
Profundity 26, 1 0 1 , l O i n, 1 20, 1 58 (depths)
Project 58, 78, 1 04, 1 1 5 , 1 1 6, 1 27, 1 37, 1 43 ,
1 44, 1 59
theoretical 1 36n
Protention 1 2 , 58, 1 06, 1 35-37, 1 43
Protogeometer (primally instituting
geometer) 4 1 , 42 , 85 , 87, 1 00, 1 20,
1 32 , 1 62 , 1 77
Protohi story 42
Protoideality I 1 7 , 1 1 8
Protoprimordiality (archi-originaritej 85
Prototemporality (proto-temporalite) 82
Psychologism 69n, 78, 1 45
Psychology 30n, 73 , 1 2 1
Pythagorean theorem 72 , 1 60
Ranke, L. von 1 1 0, 1 76
Rational i sm 5 1 . 1 46n
Rationality 1 29, 1 45 , 1 46
Reactivation 1 2-1 3 , 26, 28 , 5 1 , 55n, 68n,
69n, 72n, 80n, 98, 99-1 00, 99n, 1 04,
1 05-06, 1 1 8, 1 64-67, 1 69, 1 70
Reali sm 78
203
Index
Reality 46n , 7 1 n, 72n, 73 , 89n, 9 1 n, 94, 1 44,
1 49
natural 48n, 59, 62 , 7 1
Reason 1 6-1 7 , 29, 30, 45n, 1 36n, 1 39, 1 40,
1 4 1 , 1 42n, 1 44-46, 1 45n, 1 80
events of 60
teleol ogy of 29, 36n, 1 3 1 , 1 80
hi storic 29
Recollection 85, 86n, 1 02n, 1 1 5, 1 63
Reduction 1 7, 1 9-20, 26, 37n, 38 , 42, 45n,
46n, 48, 49, 50, 5 1 , 56, 59, 65 , 70n, 75 ,
76-77, 8 1 , 83 , 86, 9 1 n , 95 , 97, 1 02 ,
1 05 , 1 1 3-1 4. 1 1 8-20, 1 28 , 1 29, 1 32 ,
1 38n, 1 40n, 1 47, 1 49, 1 52-53 , 1 52n
eidetic 4 1 , 46, 47, 68, 1 38n
ei detic-transcendental 95 , 96
hi storical 1 2 . 47
iterati ve 47-48
phenomenological 1 6, 68, 69n
reactivati ng 47. 50
transcendental 1 5 , 46, 68, 69, 92, 1 2 1 ,
1 3 2 , 1 38n, 1 49n
Regression 69. 70. 96, 1 25
Relation wi th an object 1 39, 1 40n, 1 42
Relati vi sm 1 1 0, I l l , I l l n , 1 1 2 , 1 1 4
Relati vity 84n-85n, 1 04, 1 3 1 , 1 75
Representation 67n
Responsi bi l i ty ( Verantt'ortung) I I , 1 2 , 3 1 ,
36n, 52 , 60, 80n, 97- 1 00, 1 20, 1 4 1 ,
1 42 , 1 49, 1 65
co-responsi bi l ity 6 1 , 63n, 1 00
Retenti on 1 2 , 57-58, 78, 85, 86n, 93 , 1 06,
1 37. 1 43 , 1 63
Return I nqui ry (question en retollr,
Riickfrage) 1 2 , 20, 49, 50-52 , 55n,
1 07, 1 53 , 1 57-59 ( i nqu ire back) , 1 7 1
(regressi ve i nqui ry) , 1 72 , 1 79
" Return to the thi ngs themsel ves" 1 45
Ricoeur, Paul 2 . 9n, 1 28, 1 37, 1 39-40, 1 40n
Romanti ci sm 38, 1 03n, 1 80
Sameness 25, 67, 67n, 70, 73 , 8 1 , 85, 86,
1 01 , 1 63
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1 25n, 1 36
Science 7, I I , 25-27, 3 1 -34, 33n, 38-39,
38n-39n, 45n, 49, 52, 53 , 54, 56-58,
60, 66, 68n, 72n, 73 , 74-75 , 78n, 79,
79n, 82 , 83 , 84n, 85 , 92n, 97, 98, 1 01 ,
l O i n, 1 02 , 1 02n, 1 04-1 \ , 1 1 8 , 1 1 8n,
1 1 9, 1 2 1 -23, 1 23n, 1 28, 1 29, 1 3 1 , 1 42,
1 57 , 1 59, 1 60, 1 60n, 1 6 1 , 1 65 , 1 66, 1 70,
1 7 1 , 1 72, 1 75 , 1 77, 1 79
nomological 53 , 54n, 55 , 55n
Sedimentation 1 2 . 36, 36n, 48, 50, 55 , 56,
57, 59, 78, 84n, 96, 97, 98-99, 99n,
1 00, 1 05 , 1 09, 1 1 8n, 1 43 , 1 45 , 1 64,
1 65 , 1 68-69, 1 70, 1 7 I
sense-sedi mentation 59, 1 09, 1 43 , 1 74
( sedi mentations of meaning)
Self 1 46-47, 1 46n, 1 47n
Sense (sens, Sinn) 9, 1 0, I I , 1 3-1 5 , 1 3n,
1 7, 26, 27, 3 1 , 34, 37n, 39n, 43 , 46-47,
46n, 49. 50, 5 1 n, 52 , 53n, 55, 63 , 63n,
6, 69n, 73 , 74, 78 , 83 . 85-86, 87, 88 ,
89, 89n, 9 I n, 92 , 92n, 93 , 93n, 94, 95n,
96, 97-1 00, 99n, l OOn, 1 02, 1 04-07,
1 07-1 0, 1 1 2-1 6, 1 1 8, 1 1 8n, 1 1 9, 1 22 ,
1 25 . 1 25n, 1 26, 1 26n, 1 27n, 1 30-32,
1 30n, 1 37, 1 38n, 1 40, 1 42-53 , 1 46n,
1 52n, 1 57 (meani ng) , 1 58, 1 59, 1 60n,
1 66, 1 67, 1 69, 1 70, 1 7 1 , 1 74, 1 76,
1 80
sense-content 7 1 , 72, 73n, 90, 1 1 0
sense-formation (Sinnbildung) 1 5 , 55 ,
55n, 62 , 1 09, 1 43 , 1 59 (formation of
meani ng) . 1 68 (meani ng-construc
tion), 1 69, 1 72 , 1 74, 1 80 (meani ng
structure)
sense-uni ty 52, 54, 56
of being (seils d' etre, Seinssinn,
being-sense) 30, 72n, 89, 90, 94, 1 59
(ontic meani ng), 1 66, 1 70n, 1 79
of geometry 37, 52, 64, 66, 1 25
i nsti tuting 37, 44, 1 05
phenomenal 27
phenomenological 95 , 1 37, 1 44n, 1 50
teleological 1 3 1
Sense-i nvestigation (prise de conscience ,
Besinnung) I I , l i n, 1 2 , 3 1 -33 , 3 1 n,
52 , 99, 1 05 , 1 1 6, 1 4 1 , 1 43 , 1 46, 1 49,
1 57 (sel f-refl ections)
Sensibi l i ty 1 24, 1 25n, 1 33 , 1 33n
Sign 89n, 92 , 92n, 94, 98n, 99, 99n, 1 64
custodial 94
graphic 89, 94, 1 64 ( written signs)
Signi fcation 46, 48, 48n, 57, 59, 63n, 64,
67n, 68, 7 1 n, 74n, 78, 82 , 92 , 92n, 93 ,
94, 95 , 99, l OOn, 1 0 1 , 1 1 4, 1 45 , 1 47,
1 50, 1 60n, 1 64, 1 65 , 1 69
subjecti ve-relati ve 1 1 9
204
Index
Signifcation (continued)
unity of 70, 7 1 n
Soci ality 2n, 1 1 4-1 5
Space; spatiality 6, 77n, 83 , 83n-85n, 85,
1 22-24, 1 26, 1 26n, 1 30n, 1 35-36
scriptural 89n
Space and ti me 1 34n
anexact 1 22
i deal 42
Spatiotemporality 70, 72n, 83n, 90, 92 ,
1 25 , 1 27 , 1 30n, 1 58, 1 77
scriptural 87
Speech (parole) 67, 77, 78n-79n, 87, 9 1 ,
92 , 97. 1 04n, 1 4 1 , 1 49, 1 52
Spirit , objecti ve 63n
State of af airs (Sachverhalt) 74, 74n, 75 ,
76, 1 6 1 , 1 73
Stei ner, George l i n
Structurali sm I , 5 , 8n
Subject 2n, 8, 42 , 88, 1 42 , 1 43, 1 44, 1 60,
1 63 . 1 74, 1 77
of writing 2n
egological 63n
l ogical 63n
monadic 93
psychological 63n
real (reel) 87
speaki ng 67, 76, 77, 78, 80, 87, 88
theoretical 1 36n
Subjecti vi ty 46n, 6 1 . 63 , 67, 7 1 , 78, 82, 87,
88, 92 , 1 36n, 1 43-44, 1 45n, 1 48
communal 60
ego logical 60
factual 70, 75
hi storico-transcendental 1 42 , 1 47 , 1 48
psychological 77
total 6 1
transcendental 1 4, 75 , 82, 83 , 87, 88 ,
1 42 , 1 45 , 1 45n, 1 46, 1 46n, 1 47 , 1 52
Substruct ion 1 24, 1 3 3 , 1 33n
Subsumpti on, phenomenological 48, 1 1 4,
1 59
Supplement ; supplementarity 3 n, 8 , 1 0,
1 8-20
Supratemporality 58, 7 1 n, 77n, 1 4 1 ,
1 48-49, 1 48n, 1 60, 1 75
Suspension (Ausschaltung) 43 , 43n, 96,
96n, 1 2 1
Symbol ; symbolic 74, 74n , 92n, 1 40n
Synthesi s 99, 99n, 1 02 , 1 07, 1 59
Task, i nfi nite 78; 1 1 5 , 1 27, 1 28, 1 29, 1 30n,
1 36 , 1 36n, 1 37, 1 40
Telecommuni cat ion 50
Telos ; teleology 20, 45n , 64, 72n, 74, 80,
94, 1 04, 1 1 7, 1 1 9 , 1 3 1 , 1 37 . 1 40, 1 42 ,
1 44, 1 45 , 1 47, 1 49, 1 5 1 , 1 53
Temporality 60. 7 1 n , 77n, 83 n, 84n, 86n .
87n, 1 20n, 1 41 , 1 48. 1 48n, 1 49
primordial (primordiale) 29, 58, 1 2 1 ,
1 2 1 n, 1 36, 1 37
Temporalization 1 6, 86, 89, 1 37 , 1 43 , 1 50
Text 1 -2 . 65 . 88, 1 03
real (reel) text of hi storic experience 76
Thales 39, 1 08, 1 72
Thing 9, 32n, 4 1 , 1 22-23 , 1 26 , 1 27, 1 35n,
1 38, 1 61 , 1 62 , 1 63 , 1 77
belonging to Nature 32 , 33n, 1 39
designated 67
transcendent 1 39
Thinghood (choseile, Dinglichkeit) 3 2n,
1 22
Thi nki ng, pure 1 6, 1 7, 1 9, 1 32 . 1 34, 1 34n,
1 53 , 1 79
Time 6, 87n, 1 23 , 1 37 , 1 48, 1 52
phenomenalization of 1 37
Time-consci ousness, i nternal 1 2 , 57
Ti melessness 7 1 n, 73 , 77n, 1 48-49
lode Ii 49
topos ouranios 1 2 , 1 4, 48 , 48n, 75
Trace 6, 95
Tradi ti on; tradi tionality 1 0, 1 2 , 1 7 , 36n, 49,
50, 52 , 53n, 55n, 56, 57, 59, 63n, 66,
78 , 82 . 87 , 90, 1 02-03 , 1 06-1 2 , 1 1 5 ,
1 1 7-1 8 , 1 3 1 , 1 49, 1 50, 1 58, 1 59 , 1 65 ,
1 69 , 1 70, 1 7 1 , 1 72 , 1 73 , 1 74 , 1 80
of truth 5 1 , 59, 1 45
Transcendence; transcendental 1 0, 1 4,
1 5- 1 8, 1 9-20 , 29, 37n, 50n, 68n, 76,
77, 77n, 80, 82, 83 , 84n, 88 , 96, 1 1 7 ,
1 20, 1 2 1 , 1 36, 1 46n, 1 47, 1 47n, 1 49,
1 53
Translation; translatabi lity 1 4 , 7 1 , 7 1 n, 72 ,
8 1 , 82 , 1 0 1 -03 , 1 60, 1 60n, 1 69
Transphenomenal i ty 1 36
Tri vial i ty 57
Truth 5 , 1 1 , 38 , 39, 4 1 , 44, 45n , 46, 46n, 5 1 ,
58-60, 6 1 , 63n , 72n, 73n, 78, 79, 85n,
87, 90, 92 , 93 , 94, 96, 97, 98., 1 03 , 1 04,
l OS , 1 07 , 1 09, 1 1 0, 1 1 2 , 1 35 , 1 46n,
1 47, 1 48 , 1 6 1 , 1 65 , 1 66n, 1 79
205
Index
truth-i ntention 74, 78
truth- sense 56, 92 , 95, 97, 1 69
(truth-meani ng) , 1 70, 1 70n, 1 79
truths in themsel ves 1 1 9 , 1 20, 1 25n
geometrical 35, 66, 74, 74n, 75 , 76-77 ,
96, 1 05 , 1 34, 1 69
Unconscious 93 , 93n
Undecidabl es 5-6, 5n, 1 8 , 20, 53 , 53n , 56
Understandi ng 1 6, 5 1 n, 1 24, 1 75
Uni vocity 68n, 1 00, l OOn, 1 02-05 , 1 02n,
1 26, 1 65 , 1 77
Valery , Paul 67n
Val i di ty 59, 59n, 60, 63 , 68n, 72n, 73 , 73n,
75 . 1 59, 1 6 1 , l 64n, 1 65 , 1 66, 1 70,
1 75
Van Breda, H. L. 88n
Variation, imaginary 1 2 , 30, 47, 96,
1 1 1 -1 4, 1 23-24, 1 26, 1 27 , 1 77, 1 78,
1 79
Veritas aeterna 95 , 1 79
Voice (voix) 7
We
precultural 8 1
transcendental 6 1 , 1 45
WeltansclwlIlInR 57-59, 1 03n, 1 09
Wrd (mot) 67, 68n, 75 , 89, 89n, 98, 1 02 ,
1 04, 1 49, 1 6 1 , 1 65
World 26, 3 1 , 52 , 79, 8 1 n, 82 , 83 , 84n. 92 ,
94, 95 , 96, 1 06, I I I , 1 1 3 , 1 1 8, 1 2 1 n,
1 22 , 1 26 , 1 29, 1 39, 1 46n, 1 47n, 1 62
communal 57
cul tural 56, 60. 70, 1 1 7, 1 20. 1 58. 1 60.
1 69, 1 7 1 , I 72
prepredi cati ve 1 20, 1 20n
pre sci enti fc 1 1 8. 1 20. 1 22 , 1 3 2 , 1 77
real (real) 44 , 45 , 46, 68n, 72n, 91 n, 92 ,
1 6 1
all the world ( Weltall) 95
Worl dl i ness 69, 92, 94, 1 49
Wri ti ng I , 2 , 5 , 6, 9, 1 0, 1 2 , 1 5 . 1 9, 87-93 ,
92n, 97, 1 02 , 1 04n, 1 1 8