This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Published on openDemocracy (http://www.opendemocracy.net)
A new order in “greater west Asia”: AfPak to Palestine
Author: Arshin Adib-Moghaddam Summary: A decade of wars has produced a strategic shift very different from what Washington and its allies intended - less towards unipolar order than the complexities of multipolar disorder. This poses a challenge to policy-makers and analysts alike, says Arshin Adib-Moghaddam. When the Soviet Union was in terminal crisis in 1990 and the prospect emerged of the United States establishing long-term domination of the international political system, the influential Washington Post columnist  Charles Krauthammer sought to capture  the character of the unfolding geopolitical era. The term he used became a buzzword in then-emerging neo-conservative  circles, and subsequently far beyond: “unipolarity”. A decade on, after the terrorist attacks on New York and the Pentagon on 11 September 2001, the Pulitzer-prizewinning journalist  revisited his thesis. “When I first proposed the unipolar model in 1990”, he wrote, “I suggested that we should accept both its burdens and opportunities and that, if America did not wreck its economy, unipolarity could last thirty or forty years. That seemed bold at the time. Today, it seems rather modest. The unipolar moment has become the unipolar era.” Yet Krauthammer also concluded his essay at the time of 9/11 with a cautionary paraphrase of Benjamin Franklin: “History has given you an empire, if you will keep it” (see “The unipolar moment revisited ”, National Interest, Winter 2002). But “history” does not respect any foreseeable logic; world politics can never be managed, or channelled in a single direction. The idea of unipolarity, buttressed by the doctrine of pre-emption during the presidency  of George W Bush that was inaugurated in January 2001, represents an attitude towards reality rather than reality itself. A decade after it was reformulated for the era of “war on terror”, the strategic context of what the late Fred Halliday  called “greater west Asia” has indeed  radically shifted - but far less in accordance with the deceptive certainties of unipolar order than with the complexity of multipolar disorder.
A strategic blowback
The strongest evidence of this shift is that the United States’s early military “victory” in Iraq proved a mirage and the ongoing military campaign in Afghanistan is strategically lost (as Paul Rogers consistently and rightly has argued in his openDemocracy column ). In effect, these two wars have ended the unipolar moment. Instead, the wars have engendered a regional order which is both far from the US’s strategic preferences and presents a challenge to policy-makers and analysts alike. The US-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq - as well as Israel’s against Lebanon  (July-August 2006) and Gaza  (December 2008-January 2009) - have had damaging strategic consequences for their architects in four broad ways. First, the large-scale destruction and deaths involved in these campaigns (especially of civilians) have been a gift to Islamist movements such as Hamas and Hizbollah  (whose actions are nonetheless tempered by their “national” political ambitions in Palestine and Lebanon respectively) but also to al-Qaida-type groups divorced from any regulatory context. The growing incidence of suicide-bombing and other terrorist incidents - especially in Pakistan and Afghanistan, but also (it seems probable) in cases such as the Kampala explosions  on 11 July 2010 - is the most tangible example of how these wars have knock-on effects  and of how violence has effectively been “globalised”. Second, the extension of Afghanistan’s war into Pakistan - reflected in the escalation of US drone-attacks  on Pakistani territory - has contributed to the “hollowing out” of Pakistan’s state sovereignty, thus compromising Islamabad’s ability to subdue domestic fundamentalist (and pro-Taliban) movements. The fact that the United States overtly demands Pakistan’s support in the
Page 1 of 5
with the government seemingly unable to prevent atrocities committed against its own citizens  (for instance the twin suicide-attacks  in Yakaghund on 9 July 2010 where over 100 people were killed in an operation claimed by the Pakistani Taliban). and correspondingly to reduce  the United States’s diplomatic leverage. Fourth. and thus to attract fresh recruits. “Brazil-Turkey and Iran: a new global balance ”. not least that a conflict now approaching its tenth year has created yet another generation of victims for whom it is a way of life. which both frustrates Turkish efforts to forge even closer business links with Tehran (especially in the hydrocarbon sector) and encourages Ankara to pursue closer and more sympathetic  dialogue with its eastern neighbour. in that its regional diplomacy does not encompass popular movements such as Hamas and Hizbollah (even though they are significant factors in their respective national polities). The Turkish case is but one example of how the “greater west Asian” area has its own regional dynamics that go beyond  the unipolar logic. which has become a rallying-point of Turkey’s Islamist media. This has both strategic and analytical consequences (see A Metahistory of the Clash of Civilisations: Us and Them beyond Orientalism  Page 2 of 5 .opendemocracy. This is the constituency that in 2002 brought to power Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi (Justice & Development Party / AKP). it is Erdogan even more than Ahmadinejad who challenges Israel on the issue of Palestine. Third. in an attempt to pre-empt a further round of United Nations sanctions. in which Turkish activists were killed. * the unresolved crisis over Iran’s contested nuclear  plans. 2 June 2010). their “Tehran declaration”.net) war against the Taliban means the Pakistani government is not seen to act in its own interest. Washington has contributed to its own marginalisation here. The US’s strategic aim of neutralising-by-ignoring these groups has backfired . But three broad regional trends have also “dragged” the modern Turkish state away from its historic orientation towards US strategic interests: * the transnational threats of Kurdish separatist movements. the pursuit of the “war on terror” in Iraq and Afghanistan has over time helped to make the international politics of greater west Asia far more regionalised. The insurgents’ ability to represent their campaign as “anti-imperialist” resistance enables them to appeal  both to Afghan nationalist and pan-Islamist sentiments. Erdogan joined the presidents of Iran and Brazil. the Afghan insurgency  has now been transformed into an Islamo-nationalist resistance war against the “west”. which have provoked the Turkish armed forces  to repeated incursions into northern Iraq by in pursuit of PKK militants * the human suffering of the Palestinian population in Gaza. announced  on 17 May 2010. the reorientation  of Turkish foreign policies towards the Arab and Muslim worlds has a lot to do with domestic changes within Turkey. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. as many in their broad constituencies perceive them as agents of a muqawama (resistance) axis stretching from Gaza and Beirut to Damascus and Tehran. It is notable that prime minister Erdogan has repeatedly designated Hamas both the democratically elected government of Palestine and (as in a speech  in the traditionalist city of Konya) a “resistance movement” (see Kerem Oktem. the “blowback” effect of the US-led coalition’s own military strategy on the Afghans themselves is one of the most important. True. The spillover of the conflict to Pakistan has turned the country into one of the most volatile “quasi-states” in the world. is clearly a rebuff to the United States (see Mariano Aguirre. primarily the emergence of a new middle class that is sensitive to issues affecting the umma  (Islamic nation). A Turkish lesson Turkey’s repositioning within the greater west Asian area is the most prominent example of this emerging regional order.A new order in “greater west Asia”: AfPak to Palestine Published on openDemocracy (http://www. “ Turkey and Israel: ends and beginnings ”. is only the most high-profile incident  reinforcing Turkey’s engagement with the Palestinian cause. Today. There are many existing reasons for the war to continue. The Israeli commando-raid  on the aid-flotilla bound for Gaza on 31 May 2010. 10 December 2009).
or herbivorous power?  The guns of August: non-event with consequences  Pakistan’s American problem  A tale of three cities: Washington. 2010) Also by Arshin Adib-Moghaddam in openDemocracy: "How to make peace with Iran " (14 May 2010) Related stories: Asymmetric war: Iran and the new normal  Brazil-Turkey and Iran: a new global balance  How to make peace with Iran  Afghanistan: an impossible choice  Europe. 2010]). 2008 / Columbia University Press . 2010)   Sidebox: Arshin Adib-Moghaddam is lecturer  in the comparative and international politics of the middle east at SOAS. 2010) Long War Journal  Foreign Policy . Sideboxes'Read On' Sidebox: Arshin Adib-Moghaddam. A Metahistory of the Clash of Civilisations: Us and Them beyond Orientalism  (Columbia University Press / C Hurst .net) [Columbia University Press / C Hurst . 2008) Fred Halliday. His books include Iran in World Politics: The Question of the Islamic Republic  (C Hurst. and A Metahistory of the Clash of Civilisations: Us and Them beyond Orientalism  (Columbia University Press / C Hurst . human prospects  2010: global cracks. It is “they” who have so far won the fight for hearts and minds. In analytical terms.The AfPak Channel  Geneva Centre for Security Policy  Arshin Adib-Moghaddam.opendemocracy. 2008). it means that the United States can assert its diplomatic authority only as one player amongst many. Losing Control: Global Security in the 21st Century (Pluto Press. London. Tehran  2010: global cracks. Baghdad. The Middle East in International Relations: Power. soft. 3rd edition. Russia: the world-changing tide  Israel-Turkey-United States: Gaza’s global moment  Mercenaries and the new configuration of world violence  America and the world’s jungle  The world's choice: super. 2005) Paul Rogers. In strategic terms. So let “us” start to listen and learn more carefully. Politics and Ideology  (Cambridge University Press. movements. Iran in World Politics: The Question of the Islamic Republic  (C Hurst. America. activists and intellectuals who affect the mindset and political culture of their societies far more than those from a far distance can do or claim to do.A new order in “greater west Asia”: AfPak to Palestine Published on openDemocracy (http://www. 2008 / Columbia University Press . it requires a shift of attention to the realities “on the ground”: including the people. human prospects (part II)  Page 3 of 5 . The foreign-policy preferences of the country are not the determining factor of what is happening in the area.
net/...././.opendemocracy./article/afghanistan-limits-of-military-power  http://www./kerem-oktem/turkey-and-israel-ends-and-beginnings  http://www...pdf  http://www..opendemocracy..opendemocracy./../..com/cms/s/0/15cd24ee-73c4-11df-bc73-00144feabdc0.opendemocracy...foreignaffairs.net) Global challenges: accountability and effectiveness  America right or wrong  The greater middle east: Obama’s six problems  A world in contraflow  Crises of the middle east: 1914....././..opendemocracy...sa/eDoc/2006/159926_1.au/news/stories/2010/07/11/2950266.lb/newssite/NewsDetails.net/.npr../../......../valey-arya/afghanistan-one-conflict-three-faces  http://us.opendemocracy.com/krauthammer./.edu/publication/362/unipolar_moment_revisited./.net.././.../.htm  http://belfercenter././../.net/.....opendemocracy.macmillan./../.html  http://www./democracy/bush_3238.net/./..././.opendemocracy./..././.washingtonpost..net/././article/israel-and-gaza-rhetoric-and-reality  http://www./././article/the-hizbollah-project-last-war-next-war  http://news.net/.opendemocracy.php?storyId=112225449  http://www././..ft.././globalization-middle_east_politics/westasia_crisis_383 3...opendemocracy..org/templates/story/story./.../..language=en  http://www..net/.net/..aspx?id=140632&..opendemocracy.com./.././././.bbc./.net/.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iEWZpESBo1gSuSZQSisszskmOMhQD9GUPIJ01  http://www..htm  http://www./article/neo-conservatism-irving-kristol-s-living-legacy  http://www.net/././../..../.21:39 Links:  http://www.opendemocracy.../././../.net/./article/drone-wars  http://www.././../../.../..ksg./thomas-keenan-eyal-weizman/israel-third-strategic-th reat  http://www.././fred-halliday/son-of-bani-tanwir-work-of-fred-halliday1946-2010  http://www./.../..com/articles/46271/charles-krauthammer/the-unipolar-moment  http://www.././../.....html  http://www./.jsp  http://www././..opendemocracy././..opendemocracy./.harvard././....././..././.com/en/20100516-turkey-brazil-say-they-have-sealed-deal-iran-nuclear-fuel-swa p Page 4 of 5 ..edu../.kacst.net/arshin-adib-moghaddam/new-order-in-%E2%80%9Cgreater-west-as ia%E2%80%9D-afpak-to-palestine Created 07/14/2010 .A new order in “greater west Asia”: AfPak to Palestine Published on openDemocracy (http://www././.../..com/s/afp/20100712/wl_africa_afp/ugandablast  http://ipac./././.opendemocracy./..com/wp-dyn/content/linkset/2005/03/24/LI2005032401690.uk/news/10203726  http://www.nti..././paul-rogers/america-and-worlds-jungle  http://www././.jsp  http://www../../././globalization/umma_2904.net/.html  http://www...././...././.net/./.google./.. 1967.abc././..././katinka-barysch/turkey-and-europe-shifting-axis  http://www./././.jsp  http://www..yahoo./../....com/thelimitsofpower  http://www./../. 2003  A new world order  Country: Afghanistan Pakistan Topics: Conflict International politics Source URL: http://www./../author/paul-rogers  http://www./././...co...opendemocracy./conflict/lebanon_war_3992./.almanar./...postwritersgroup..net/.org/e_research/profiles/iran/index.jsp  http://www./../.../../.net/.html  http://www./.opendemocracy.net/../.opendemocracy.....france24../.
net/article/a_world_in_contraflow  http://www.net/article/the-greater-middle-east-obama-s-six-problems  http://www./..ch/e/index./.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.A new order in “greater west Asia”: AfPak to Palestine Published on openDemocracy (http://www.net/david-hayes/2010-global-cracks-human-prospects  http://www.net/crises_of_the_middle_east_1914_1967_2003  http://www.uk/  http://www.opendemocracy./mariano-aguirre/iran-turkey-brazil-new-global-balanc e  http://www..net/article/global_challenges_accountability_and_effectiveness  http://www.co..creativeASIN=0745329373  http://www.plutobooks.net/paul-rogers/afghanistan-impossible-choice  http://www.hurstpub.net/paul-rogers/america-and-worlds-jungle  http://www.columbia./paul-rogers/asymmetric-war-iran-and-new-normal  http://cup./.opendemocracy.aspx?BookId=467  http://cup.asp?isbn=0521597412  http://www..opendemocracy././.htm  http://www.jsp  http://www.net/article/europe-russia-america-the-world-changing-tide  http://www.net/article/pakistan-s-american-problem  http://www.opendemocracy..opendemocracy.tag=opendemocra0e-21&.opendemocracy.opendemocracy.com/display.amazon..php  http://www...opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/article_2081.cambridge./.edu/book/978-0-231-70046-7/iran-in-world-politics  http://www../../.gcsp.uk/BookDetails.opendemocracy.opendemocracy.net/paul-rogers/israel-turkey-united-states-gaza’s-global-moment  http://www.uk/gp/product/0745329373?ie=UTF8&..link Code=as2&.opendemocracy.opendemocracy.opendemocracy.opendemocracy..opendemocracy.opendemocracy.opendemocracy.  http://www.soas..camp=1634&.net/david-hayes/2010-global-cracks-human-prospects-part-ii  http://www.net/mariano-aguirre/iran-turkey-brazil-new-global-balance  http://www.opendemocracy.org/  http://www./.opendemocracy.net/.net/article/the-guns-of-august-non-event-with-consequences  http://www.net)  http://www./.asp?K=9780745329376&.co.co./../.net/arshin-adib-moghaddam/how-to-make-peace-with-iran  http://www.opendemocracy.longwarjournal.uk/staff/staff36949..opendemocracy.columbia.edu/book/978-0-231-70212-6/a-metahistory-of-the-clash-of-civilisations/reviews  http://www.creative=19450&.net/article/a-new-world-order Page 5 of 5 ./.opendemocracy.ac.net/paul-rogers/tale-of-three-cities-washington-baghdad-tehran  http://www./.net/article/mercenaries_and_the_new_configuration_of_world_violence  http://www.hurstpub.net/..net/paul-rogers/asymmetric-war-iran-and-new-normal  http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/ibsa_countries  http://www.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?