Are you sure?
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
35J
Aircraft Systems Engineering
Introduction to Aircraft
Performance and Static Stability
Prof. Earll Murman
September 18, 2003
Today’s Topics
• Specific fuel consumption and Breguet range
equation
• Transonic aerodynamic considerations
• Aircraft Performance
– Aircraft turning
– Energy analysis
– Operating envelope
– Deep dive of other performance topics for jet transport
aircraft in Lectures 6 and 7
• Aircraft longitudinal static stability
Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (TSFC)
• Definition:
TSFC
lb of fuel burned
(lb of thrust delivered)(hour)
• Measure of jet engine effectiveness at converting fuel to
useable thrust
• Includes installation effects such as
– bleed air for cabin, electric generator, etc..
– Inlet effects can be included (organizational dependent)
• Typical numbers are in range of 0.3 to 0.9. Can be up to 1.5
• Terminology varies with time units used, and it is not all
consistent.
– TSFC uses hours
– “c” is often used for TSFC
lb of fuel burned
– Another term used is
c
t
(lb of thrust delivered)(sec)
Breguet Range Equation
• Change in aircraft weight = fuel burned
dW =÷c
t
Tdtc
t
TSPC/3600 Tthrust
• Solve for dt and multiply by V
·=
to get ds
dsV
·
dt =÷=
V
·
dW
÷=
V
·
W
dW
÷=
V
·
L
dW
c
t
T c
t
TW c
t
D W
• Set L/D, c
t
, V
·=
constant and integrate
R
3600 L
ln
W
TO
TSFC
V
·
D W
empty
Insights from Breguet Range Equation
R
3600 L
ln
W
TO
TSFC
V
·
D W
empty
3600
TSFC
represents propulsion effects. Lower TSFC is better
L
V
·
D
represents aerodynamic effect. L/D is aerodynamic efficiency
L L L
V
·
D
a
·
M
·
D
. a
·
is constant above 36,000 ft. M
·
D
important
ln
W
TO
represents aircraft weight/structures effect on range
W
empty
Optimized L/D  Transport A/C
“Sweet spot” is in transonic range.
20
waves
1 2 3
M
a
x
(
L
/
D
)
Mach No.
Concorde
Losses
due to
10
shock
Ref: Shevell
8
8
Transonic Effects on Airfoil C
d
, C
l
C
d
Region I. II. III.
M
cr
M
drag
divergence
1.0 M
M<1
8
M<1
M>1
M<1
M>1
Separated flow
M < M I.
8cr
V
8
M < M
8
< M
drag
II.
cr
divergence
III. M > M
V
drag
divergence
Strategies for Mitigating Transonic Effects
• Wing sweep
– Developed by Germans. Discovered after WWII by Boeing
– Incorporated in B52
• Area Ruling, aka “coke bottling”
– Developed by Dick Whitcomb at NASA Langley in 1954
• Kucheman in Germany and Hayes at North American contributors
– Incorporated in F102
• Supercritical airfoils
– Developed by Dick Whitcomb at NASA Langley in 1965
• Percey at RAE had some early contributions
– Incorporated in modern military and commercial aircraft
Basic Sweep Concept
• Consider Mach Number normal to leading edge
sinµ=1/ M
·
M
·=
M
n
µ=
A=
=M
·
cosA
µ== Mach angle,
the direction
disturbances
travel in
supersonic flow
• For subsonic freestreams, M
n
< M
·=
 Lower effective “freestream”
Mach number delays onset of transonic drag rise.
• For supersonic freestreams
– M
n
< 1, A=> µ= Subsonic leading edge
– M
n
> 1, A=< µ= Supersonic leading edge
• Extensive analysis available, but this is gist of the concept
Wing Sweep Considerations M
·=
> 1
• Subsonic leading edge
– Can have rounded subsonic type wing section
• Thicker section
• Upper surface suction
• More lift and less drag
• Supersonic leading edge
– Need supersonic type wing section
• Thin section
• Sharp leading edge
Competing Needs
• Subsonic Mach number
– High Aspect Ratio for low induced drag
• Supersonic Mach number
– Want high sweep for subsonic leading edge
• Possible solutions
– Variable sweep wing  B1
– Double delta  US SST
– Blended  Concorde
– Optimize for supersonic  B58
V
8
Supercritical Airfoil
Supercritical
airfoil shape
keeps upper
surface velocity
from getting too
large.
C
p
C
p, cr
Uses aft camber
x/c
to generate lift.
Gives nose
down pitching
moment.
Today’s Performance Topics
• Turning analysis
– Critical for high performance military a/c. Applicable to all.
– Horizontal, pullup, pulldown, pullover, vertical
– Universal Me=turn rate chart , Vn diagram
• Energy analysis
– Critical for high performance military a/c. Applicable to all.
– Specific energy, specific excess power
– Mh diagram, min time to climb
• Operating envelope
• Back up charts for fighter aircraft
– Me=diagram  “Doghouse” chart
– Maneuver limits and some example
– Extensive notes from Lockheed available. Ask me.
Horizontal Turn
W = L cos, == bank angle
Level turn, no loss of altitude
F
r
= (L
2
 W
2
)
1/2
=W(n
2
1)
1/2
Where n ÷=L/W = 1/ cos=is the load
factor measured in “g’s”.
But F
r
= (W/g)(V
2
/R)
So radius of turn is
F
lig
h
t p a t h
θ
R
z
φ
R = V
2
/g(n
2
1)
1/2
And turn rate e==V
/R is
φ
R
L
F
r
z
e=g(n
2
1)
1/2
/ V
W
Want high load factor, low velocity
Pull Up Pull Over Vertical
R
L
W
θ
R
L
W
θ
R
L
W
θ
F
r
= (LW) =W(n1) F
r
= (L +W) =W(n+1)
F
r
= L =Wn
= (W/g)(V
2
/R) = (W/g)(V
2
/R)
= (W/g)(V
2
/R)
R = V
2
/g(n1) R = V
2
/g(n+1)
R = V
2
/gn
e==g(n1)/ V
e==g(n+1)/ V
e==gn/ V
Vertical Plan Turn Rates
T
u
r
n
r
a
t
e
r
a
t
i
o
,
K
θ
2.5
Pullover from inverted attitude
Vertical maneuver
Pullup from level attitude
K
θ
=
Vertical plane
turn rate
Horizontal plane
turn rate
Let u
Ý
e=
2.0
K
Pull Over
e=
=(n+1)/(n
2
1)
1/2
1.5
Vertical Maneuver
1.0
K
e=
=n/(n
2
1)
1/2
0.5
Pull Up
0 K
e=
=(n1)/(n
2
1)
1/2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Load factor, in 'g's
For large n, K
e=
» 1 and for all maneuvers e ~ = gn/ V
Similarly for turn radius, for large n, R ~=V
2
/gn.
For large e=and small R, want large n and small V
e ~ gn/ V
= gn/a
M
so e ~ 1/ M
at const h (altitude) & n
Using R ~ V
2
/gn, e ~ V
/R = a
M
/R. So e ~ M
at const h & R
For high Mach numbers, the turn radius gets large
R
min
and e
max
1/2
Using V
= (2L/µ
SC
L
)
1/2
= (2nW/µ
SC
L
)
R ~ V
2
/gn becomes R = 2(W/S)/ gµ
C
L
W/S = wing loading, an important performance parameter
And using n = L/W = µ
V
2
SC
L
/2W
e ~ gn/ V
= g µ
V
C
L
/2(W/S)
For each airplane, W/S set by range, payload, V
max
.
Then, for a given airplane
e
R
min
= 2(W/S)/ gµ
C
L,max
max
= g µ
V
C
L,max
/2(W/S)
Higher C
L,max
gives superior turning performance.
But does n
CL,max
= µ
V
2
C
L,max
/2(W/S) exceed structural limits?
Vn diagram
V*
2n W
max
0
q
>
q
m
a
x
V*
C
L
< C
Lmax
C
L
< C
Lmax
Stall area
Stall area
Structural damage
Structural damage
L
o
a
d
f
a
c
t
o
r
n
Positive limit load factor
Negative limit load factor
C
L, max
µ
·
S
Highest
possible e=
Lowest
possible R
Each airplane has a Vn diagram.
Source: Anderson
8
V
Summary on Turning
• Want large structural load factor n
• Want large C
L,MAX
• Want small V
• Shortest turn radius, maximum turn rate is
“Corner Velocity”
• Question, does the aircraft have the power
to execute these maneuvers?
Specific Energy and Excess Power
Total aircraft energy = PE + KE
E
tot
= mgh + mV
2
/2
Specific energy = (PE + KE)/W
H
e
= h + V
2
/2g “energy height”
Excess Power = (TD)V
Specific excess power*
= (TVDV)/W
= dH
e
/dt
P
s
= dh/dt + V/g dV/dt
P
s
may be used to change altitude, or accelerate, or both
* Called specific power in Lockheed Martin notes.
Excess Power
Power Required
P
R
= DV
= q
S(C
D,0
+ C
2
/tARe)V
L
= q
SC
D,0
V
+ q
SV
C
2
/tARe
L
= µ
SC
D,0
V
3
/2 + 2n
2
W
2
/µ
SV
tARe
Excess power
depends upon
velocity, altitude
and load factor
V
8
P
R
P
A
P
o
w
e
r
Excess
power
Parasite power
Induced power
required
required
Power Available
P
A
= TV
and Thrust is approximately
constant with velocity, but varies
linearly with density.
Altitude Effects on Excess Power
P
R
= DV
= (nW/L) DV
= nWV
C
D
/C
L
From L= µ
SV
2
C
L
/2 = nW, get
1/2
V
= (2nW/ µ
SC
L
)
Substitute in P
R
to get
1/2
P
R
= (2n
3
W
3
C
2
D
/ µ
SC
3
L
)
So can scale between sea level “0” and
altitude “alt” assuming C
D
,C
L
const.
1/2
V
alt
= V
0
(µ
0
/µ
alt
)
1/2
, P
R,alt
= P
R,0
(µ
0
/µ
alt
)
Thrust scales with density, so
P
A,alt
= P
A,0
(µ
alt
/µ
0
)
Summary of Power Characteristics
• H
e
= specific energy represents “state” of aircraft. Units are in
feet.
– Curves are universal
• P
s
= (T/WD/W)V= specific excess power
– Represents ability of aircraft to change energy state.
– Curves depend upon aircraft (thrust and drag)
– Maybe used to climb and/or accelerate
– Function of altitude
– Function of load factor
• “Military pilots fly with P
s
diagrams in the cockpit”,
Anderson
A/C Performance Summary
h h h h
V V V
app
V
N/A
Factor Commercial
Transport
Military
Transport
Fighter General Aviation
Liebeck Takeoff
obs
= 35’
obs
= 50’
obs
= 50’
obs
= 50’
Liebeck Landing
app
= 1.3 V
stall app
= 1.2 V
stall
= 1.2 V
stall app
= 1.3 V
stall
Climb Liebeck
Level Flight Liebeck
Range Breguet Range Radius of action*.
Uses refueling
Breguet for prop
Endurance,
Loiter
E (hrs) = R (miles)/V(mph), where R = Breguet Range
Turning,
Maneuver
Emergency handling Major
performance
factor
Emergency
handling
Supersonic
Dash
N/A Important N/A
Service
Ceiling
100 fpm climb
Lectures 6 and 7 for commercial and military transport
* Radius of action comprised of outbound leg, on target leg, and return.
Stability and Control
• Performance topics
deal with forces and
translational motion
needed to fulfill the
aircraft mission
• Stability and control
topics deal with
moments and
rotational motion
needed for the aircraft
to remain controllable.
S&C Definitions
L' • L’  rolling moment
• Lateral motion/stability
•
• Longitudinal
motion/control
M
M  pitching moment
Elevator deflection
N
Rudder deflection
• N  rolling moment
• Directional motion/control
M
Moment coefficient:
C
M
q
·
Sc
Aircraft Moments
• Aerodynamic center (ac): forces and moments can be completely
specified by the lift and drag acting through the ac plus a moment about
the ac
– C
M,ac
is the aircraft pitching moment at L = 0 around any point
• Contributions to pitching moment about cg, C
M,cg
come from
– Lift and C
M,ac
– Thrust and drag  will neglect due to small vertical separation from cg
– Lift on tail
• Airplane is “trimmed” when C
M,cg
= 0
Absolute Angle of Attack
L
i
f
t
s
l
o
p
e
=
C
α
L=0
d
C
L
d
α
L
i
f
t
s
l
o
p
e
=
C
d
C
L
d
α
α
C
L
α
a
C
L
L, max L, max
Lift coefficient vs geometric angle of attack, α Lift coefficient vs absolute angle of attack, α
a
• Stability and control analysis simplified by using
the absolute angle of attack which is 0 at C
L
= 0.
• o
a
= o=+ o
L=0
Criteria for Longitudinal Static Stability
C
M,0
α
a
C
M,cg
α
e
S
l
o
p
e
=
d
C
M
,c
g
d
α
a
( Trimmed)
C
M,0
must be positive
cC
M,cg
must be negative
co
a
Implied that o
e
is within flight range of angle of attack
for the airplane, i.e. aircraft can be trimmed
Moment Around cg
M
cg
M
ac
wb
+=L
wb
(hc÷=h c)÷=l
t
L
t ac
L
Divide by q
·
Sc and note that C
L,t
t
q
·
S
t
l S
(h ÷=h ) ÷=
t t
C
L,t
, or C
M,cg
C
M,ac
wb
+C
L
wb
ac
cS
l S
(h ÷=h ) ÷=V
H
C
L,t
, where V
H
t t
C
M,cg
C
M,ac
wb
+C
L
wb
ac
cS
(h ÷=h )÷=V
H
C
L,t
C
M,cg
C
M,ac
wb
+C
L
wb
ac
do=
a, wb
C
L
wb
dC
L
wb
o
a, wb
a
wb
o
L
i
f
t
s
l
o
p
e
=
d
C
l
d
α
C
l
C
l, max
C
l, t
a
t
o a
t
(o
wb
÷=i
t
÷c )
t
where c is the downwash at the
tail due to the lift on the wing

cc
 =
α
L=0 o c= c
0
+
= 
a, wb
\ co.
α
stall
α
 =
cc
 =
\

÷=a
t
(i
t
+c
0
) C
L, t
a
t
o
a, wb
1 ÷
co.
At this point, the
convention is drop
the wbon a
wb
+=ao (h ÷=h )÷=V
H
1÷=

( +V
H
a
t
(
i
t
+c
0
)
C
M,cg
C
M,ac
wb
=
ac
a
t
 =
cc

( =
a
=
a\ co
(
¸ =
.
¸ =
Eqs for Longitudinal Static Stability
+=ao (h ÷=h )÷=V
H
1÷=

( +V
H
a i C
M,cg
C
M,ac
wb
=
ac
a
t
 =
cc

( =
t
(
t
+c
0
)
C
M,cg
a
=
a\ co.
(
¸ ¸ =
C
M,0
÷=C
M,cg
C
M,0
α
e
S
l
o
p
e
=
d
C
M
,c
g
d
α
a
( Trimmed)
 =  =
=  i
\ .
l 0
C
M,ac
wb
+V
H
a
t
(
t
+c
0
)=
cC
M,cg
=
)÷=V
H
a
t
 =
cc

( =
a (h ÷=h
1÷=

( =
=
ac
co=
a
¸
a\ co
(
.
¸
α
a
• C
M,acwb
< 0, V
H
> 0, o
t
> 0 ¬=i
t
> 0 for C
M,0
> 0
– Tail must be angled down to generate negative lift
to trim airplane
• Major effect of cg location (h) and tail parameter V
H
=
(lS)
t
/(cs)in determining longitudinal static stability
Neutral Point and Static Margin
cC
M,cg
=
)÷=V
H
a
t
 =
cc

( =
a (h ÷=h
1÷=

( =
=
ac
co=
a
¸
a\ co
(
.
¸ =
• The slope of the moment curve will vary with h, the
location of cg.
• If the slope is zero, the aircraft has neutral longitudinal
static stability.
a
t
 =
cc
 =
• Let this location be denote by
h
n
h
ac
+V
H
1÷=
 =
a\ co.
c
( )
=÷a h ÷=h
C
M,cg
a h ÷=h
( )
=÷a× static margin
n n
• or
co=
a
• For a given airplane, the neutral point is at a fixed location.
• For longitudinal static stability, the position of the center of
gravity must always be forward of the neutral point.
• The larger the static margin, the more stable the airplane
Longitudinal Static Stability
Aerodynamic center
location moves aft for
supersonic flight
cg shifts with fuel burn,
stores separation,
configuration changes
• “Balancing” is a significant design requirement
• Amount of static stability affects handling qualities
• Flybywire controls required for statically unstable aircraft
Today’s References
• Lockheed Martin Notes on “Fighter Performance”
• John Anderson Jr. , Introduction to Flight, McGraw
Hill, 3rd ed, 1989, Particularly Chapter 6 and 7
• Shevell, Richard S., “Fundamentals of Flight”, Prentice
Hall, 2nd Edition, 1989
• Bertin, John J. and Smith, Michael L., Aerodynamics
for Engineers, Prentice Hall, 3rd edition, 1998
• Daniel Raymer, Aircraft Design: A Conceptual
Approach, AIAA Education Series, 3rd edition, 1999,
Particularly Chapter 17
– Note: There are extensive cost and weight estimation
relationships in Raymer for military aircraft.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?