Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accountability Version
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page i
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page ii
U 8
PP
A PA NS 72 73 0 0
U 38
PP 98
P 322
A 32
PA 354
NS 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0 8 U 10 20 17 7 PP A 7 0 NS 0 66 66
20 66 7
Colorado 10 17 66 7
U 12 12 10 7 7 8
Percentages PP P A PA 20 61 7 68 17 65 6 71 22 64 5 69 19 67 7 74 20 64 9 74 20 66 7 72
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 46 61 45 33 35 38
PP 78 83 102 91 104 98
NS 1 0 1 0 1 1
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
87 72 76 68 56 30 X
AmIndAK
53
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 1
PP
A PA NS 67 68 0 0
U 51
PP 122
P 332
A 17
PA 349
NS 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
U 11 14 9 6 7 10
Percentages PP P A PA 24 62 3 65 22 59 5 64 22 66 3 69 24 65 4 70 21 65 6 72 23 63 3 67
NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
U 46 57 44 28 35 51
NS 1 2 4 1 0 1
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Asian
43 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
16
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 2
U 8
PP
A PA NS 74 70 1 0
U 42
PP 89
P 329
A 44
PA 373
NS 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
18 65 9
Colorado 11 18 62 8
U 10 13 8 10 8 8
PP 20 19 17 16 18 18
Percentages P A PA 60 9 70 63 5 68 65 9 74 66 8 74 63 11 73 65 9 74
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 38 55 36 50 40 42 PP 77 81 74 81 86 89 P 230 270 274 329 297 329 A 36 21 39 40 50 44 PA 266 291 313 369 347 373 NS 0 2 1 1 0 3
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Asian
43
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 3
U PP
PA NS 1 1
U 30
PP 66
P 297
A 72
PA 369
NS 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 63 62 60 40 20 0 6 U 8 14 18 PP 15 11 1 A NS 1
14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73
U 12 6 9 7 7 6
PP 23 22 15 15 16 14
Percentages P A PA 53 12 65 59 13 72 60 15 75 64 13 78 63 14 77 63 15 79
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 50 24 40 30 37 30 PP 94 87 66 66 79 66 P 219 236 258 280 309 297 A 51 52 65 58 69 72 PA 270 288 323 338 378 369 NS 1 0 2 1 0 3
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
79
83
93 75 64 34 X
AmIndAK
60
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 4
U 9
PP
A PA NS 74 68 1 1
U 44
PP 79
P 324
A 46
PA 370
NS 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
16 65 9
Colorado 11 21 59 9
U 15 12 6 10 11 9
PP 21 19 20 19 14 16
Percentages P A PA 56 7 63 57 12 70 64 10 73 60 11 71 64 11 75 65 9 74
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 57 48 25 43 49 44 PP 81 77 78 80 62 79 P 212 235 248 257 282 324 A 26 50 37 46 48 46 PA 238 285 285 303 330 370 NS 1 0 0 0 0 6
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
87 92 74 73 76 57 52
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
11
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 5
PP
A PA NS 71 67 0 1
U 43
PP 84
P 273
A 39
PA 312
NS 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
U 10 14 9 6 11 10
PP 20 18 19 21 22 19
Percentages P A PA 61 10 70 61 7 68 63 9 72 62 11 73 59 7 66 62 9 71
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 1 0 U 39 52 38 24 49 43 PP 78 66 77 83 98 84 P 241 222 261 249 263 273 A 38 24 38 43 32 39 PA 279 246 299 292 295 312 NS 0 0 2 1 3 2
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
92 71 77 66 54 8 X
AmIndAK
88 50 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 6
U PP
A PA NS 69 68 1 1
U 32
PP 101
P 286
A 21
PA 307
NS 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 65 64 60 40 23 24 20 0 7 U 7 PP 5 A 4 1 NS 1
23 65 5 24 64 4
U 9 5 11 8 4 7
Percentages PP P A PA 31 54 5 58 25 64 3 67 22 60 3 63 21 64 5 69 22 70 2 72 23 65 5 69
NS 1 3 5 3 2 1
U 34 19 44 33 20 32
PP 116 99 91 90 98 101
NS 5 13 21 11 7 3
63
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
47
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 7
U PP
PA NS 1 2
U 20
PP 85
P 274
A 46
PA 320
NS 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 64 60 40 20 5 0 U 20 21 7 PP 11 10 1 A NS 2 59
20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70
U 9 8 10 12 6 5
PP 21 29 22 24 20 20
Percentages P A PA 60 8 69 56 5 61 57 9 66 56 5 61 62 11 73 64 11 74
NS 1 2 3 3 1 1
U 38 31 38 46 26 20
PP 87 109 86 93 83 85
NS 5 6 10 12 3 6
61
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
74
80
85 69 62 33 X
AmIndAK
57
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 8
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 0
PA NS 61 0 1
U 4
PP 3
P 11
A 0
PA NS 11 0 8
Percentage of Students
Ns
Colorado 15 20 51 13 64
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)
U 12 X X 6 15 22
PP 12 X X 19 20 17
Percentages P A PA 70 7 77 X X X X X X 63 13 75 65 0 65 61 0 61
NS 0 X X 0 0 0
U 5 X X 1 3 4
PP 5 X X 3 4 3
P 30 X X 10 13 11
Ns A 3 X X 2 0 0
PA 33 X X 12 13 11
NS 0 X X 0 0 0
80 60 40 20 0
77
75 65 61
X 2008 2009
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 18 6 12 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 3 18
% Prof. or Above 61 X X X X X 61 X X X X 61
% Below 39 X X X X X 39 X X X X 39
% NS 0 X X X X X 0 X X X X 0
80 60 40
39
39
39
61
61
61
20 0
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 9
100
100
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 35 X 0
U X
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 38 X 0
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
Colorado 31 33 31 4
34 36 34 4
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
P X X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X X
PA X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 6 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 10
100
U PP
A PA NS 50 51 0 0
U 28
PP 211
P 218
A 27
PA 245
NS 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
43 45 6 43 43 8
0 NS
U 9 8 3 6 5 6
PP 43 41 47 37 45 43
Percentages P A PA 42 7 49 42 9 51 41 8 49 46 11 57 46 4 50 45 6 50
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 33 39 15 27 29 28
NS 0 0 0 0 1 2
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
49
41 57 65
35 65 84
50
59 42 X
AmIndAK
64 35 X
Asian
35 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
16
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 11
U PP
A PA NS 51 53 0 0
U 33
PP 221
P 228
A 39
PA 267
NS 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0 6 U 7 PP 42 39 44 45
42 44 7 39 45 8
7 A
8 0 NS 0
U 8 10 7 4 4 6
PP 45 44 37 37 43 42
Percentages P A PA 40 7 48 40 5 45 45 9 55 48 11 59 47 6 53 44 7 51
NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
U 31 43 38 20 19 33
100
NS 1 1 3 1 0 2
100 80 60 40 20 0
51 61 49 39
72
28 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
10
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 12
U PP
A PA NS 58 57 1 1
U 23
PP 183
P 252
A 44
PA 296
NS 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
36 50 9 37 48 9
U 4 6 3 3 4 5
PP 34 35 37 32 36 36
Percentages P A PA 51 11 61 53 6 59 52 7 60 55 10 65 49 11 60 50 9 58
NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
U 16 25 14 17 18 23
100
NS 0 2 2 0 1 5
100 80 60 40
58 79 66 51 38 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
41
33 48 61 83 64
20 0
35 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
15
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 13
U PP
A PA NS 64 58 1 1
U 14
PP 153
P 258
A 40
PA 298
NS 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
33 55 9 38 49 9
9 A
9 1 NS 1
U 4 3 5 4 4 3
PP 36 31 31 28 35 33
Percentages P A PA 47 12 59 55 12 66 52 12 63 56 13 68 52 9 61 55 9 64
NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
U 18 13 23 16 19 14
100 66 68
NS 1 0 1 1 0 3
63
61
64
100 80 60 40
64 75 54 45 26 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
36
81 42 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 14
U PP
PA NS 1 1
U 11
PP 144
P 274
A 64
PA 338
NS 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61
U 5 4 3 4 3 2
PP 39 30 30 29 29 29
Percentages P A PA 47 9 56 48 18 66 51 17 68 53 14 67 55 13 68 55 13 68
NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
U 20 16 11 15 15 11
100 66 68 67 68 68
NS 0 0 0 0 0 6
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Asian
56
43 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
13
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 15
U PP
A PA NS 61 56 0 1
U 19
PP 151
P 240
A 30
PA 270
NS 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
34 54 7 40 47 9
7 A
9 0 NS 1
U 4 4 3 3 2 4
PP 37 39 35 37 35 34
Percentages P A PA 45 13 59 50 7 57 49 13 62 47 13 60 53 10 63 54 7 61
NS 1 0 0 0 1 0
U 15 13 13 11 7 19
100
NS 2 1 1 1 3 1
100 80 60 40
61 69 55 45 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
39
77 43 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult
3
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 16
U PP
A PA NS 59 55 1 1
U 15
PP 164
P 227
A 34
PA 261
NS 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
37 51 8 40 47 8
8 A
8 1 NS
U 8 2 6 5 3 3
PP 52 43 44 36 42 37
Percentages P A PA 36 3 40 46 6 52 39 5 45 47 9 56 48 5 53 51 8 59
NS 1 4 5 3 2 1
U 29 7 26 20 12 15
100
NS 4 14 21 13 8 3
100 80 60 40
59 65 52 39 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
40
35 47 60 88 82 59
20 0
X
Asian
40 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
10
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 17
U PP
A PA NS 49 49 2 2
U 17
PP 196
P 178
A 33
PA 211
NS 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 45 43 40 20 4 0 U 6 PP 8 A 7 41 41
45 41 8 43 41 7
2 NS
U 8 7 9 6 3 4
PP 45 49 41 47 42 45
Percentages P A PA 40 5 45 40 3 42 38 9 47 39 4 43 48 6 54 41 8 49
NS 1 2 3 3 1 2
U 35 26 35 24 14 17
NS 5 6 11 12 3 7
100 80 60 40
60 39 49 58 69 85 67 39 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
32
73
20 0
49
28 X
Asian
24 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
10
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 18
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 0
PA NS 17 0 0
U 6
PP 9
P 3
A 0
PA NS 3 0 1
Percentage of Students
Ns
Colorado 20 24 37 18 56
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)
U 14 X X 19 32 33
PP 33 X X 13 11 50
Percentages P A PA 40 14 53 X X X X X X 50 19 69 47 11 58 17 0 17
NS 0 X X 0 0 0
U 6 X X 3 6 6
PP 14 X X 2 2 9
P 17 X X 8 9 3
Ns A 6 X X 3 2 0
PA 23 X X 11 11 3
NS 0 X X 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 18 6 12 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 3 18
% Prof. or Above 17 X X X X X 17 X X X X 17
% Below 83 X X X X X 83 X X X X 83
% NS 0 X X X X X 0 X X X X 0
80 60 40 20
17 83 83 83
0
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
17
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
17
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 19
100
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 19 X 6
U X
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 20 X 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 44 40 20 0 X U X PP X 32 18 X A 1 X NS 6
Colorado 44 32 18 1
47 35 19 1
District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
P X X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X X
PA X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 20
U PP
PA NS 0 0
U 34
PP 124
P 204
A 142
PA 346
NS 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 25 20 0 7 U 7 PP A 20 0 NS 0 40 41 28 31
25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72
PP 23 23 23 17 22 25
Percentages P A PA 38 28 66 40 29 69 36 36 72 41 36 77 42 27 70 40 28 69
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 1 0 U 47 38 23 29 43 34 PP 100 119 108 84 121 124 P 163 206 173 202 232 204 A 120 146 172 174 150 142 PA 283 352 345 376 382 346 NS 0 0 0 0 3 1
100 66 69 72 70 69
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
32
83 69 68 69 54 32 X
AmIndAK
51
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 21
U PP
PA NS 0 0
U 44
PP 120
P 249
A 115
PA 364
NS 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72
PP 25 20 19 18 19 23
Percentages P A PA 45 20 66 43 27 69 40 34 74 45 33 77 43 30 73 47 22 69
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 40 43 34 23 36 44 PP 101 87 99 82 96 120 P 186 182 207 205 215 249 A 83 114 172 150 148 115 PA 269 296 379 355 363 364 NS 0 1 1 0 1 1
100 69 69
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
87 69 72 66 50 31 X
AmIndAK
48 X X
Mult IEP ELL
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 22
U PP
PA NS 0 0
U 44
PP 137
P 196
A 129
PA 325
NS 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65
PP 26 27 28 21 28 27
Percentages P A PA 40 27 67 36 26 62 35 30 64 36 35 71 39 25 64 39 25 64
Ns NS 0 1 0 0 0 0 U 27 45 30 40 37 44 PP 98 116 121 106 133 137 P 154 154 148 180 184 196 A 102 109 126 176 119 129 PA 256 263 274 356 303 325 NS 0 3 0 0 0 2
100 67 71
62
64
64
64
100 80 60 40
64 64 64 44 23 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
36
36
35 55 77 84 59
20 0
X
Asian
41 X X
Mult IEP ELL
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 23
PP
PA NS 1 0
U 45
PP 117
P 177
A 126
PA 303
NS 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
U 13 9 11 9 13 10
PP 26 24 24 27 28 25
Percentages P A PA 38 22 60 40 27 67 44 22 65 34 29 63 37 22 59 38 27 65
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 55 37 46 41 63 45 PP 109 96 102 118 138 117 P 159 159 188 150 182 177 A 92 107 94 126 111 126 PA 251 266 282 276 293 303 NS 0 0 1 0 0 3
100 67
65
63
59
65
100 80 60 40
65 84 67 62 45 34 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
35
32
37 54 64 54
20 0
X
Asian
45 X X
Mult IEP ELL
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 24
PP
PA NS 1 1
U 66
PP 128
P 151
A 147
PA 298
NS 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
U 21 12 10 11 15 13
PP 41 32 30 30 34 26
Percentages P A PA 27 11 38 29 27 56 41 19 60 35 23 58 26 25 51 30 29 60
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 78 49 40 48 64 66 PP 154 130 117 129 152 128 P 103 118 159 149 116 151 A 42 111 72 100 109 147 PA 145 229 231 249 225 298 NS 0 2 0 0 0 7
100
100 80 60
91 39 41 37 55 60
40
60 58 62 43
77 38 7 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
20 0
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 25
PP
PA NS 1 1
U 75
PP 124
P 131
A 108
PA 239
NS 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0 17 19 28 29 30 29
24 23 1 1 NS
PP
U 20 15 13 12 19 17
PP 33 28 25 24 30 28
Percentages P A PA 31 15 46 38 19 57 36 25 61 40 24 64 30 21 51 30 24 54
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 80 56 55 48 85 75 PP 132 101 106 96 133 124 P 123 138 149 161 133 131 A 59 68 106 95 94 108 PA 182 206 255 256 227 239 NS 1 0 2 1 0 3
100
100 80 60 40
54 74 50 57 34 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
45
49
42 65 92 64
20 0
8 X X
Mult IEP
35
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
HwPacIs
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 26
PP
PA NS 1 1
U 122
PP 170
P 102
A 46
PA 148
NS 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
U 35 34 29 23 26 28
PP 32 30 28 28 38 38
Percentages P A PA 24 8 32 26 9 35 30 7 37 33 14 47 26 9 35 23 10 33
NS 1 1 6 2 1 1
100
A 31 34 30 60 40 46
NS 4 4 25 10 5 3
100 80
66 64 47 69 82 94 82
60 40
52
20 0
33
36
30 X X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
17
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
4
IEP
17
ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 27
PP
A PA NS 29 34 1 2
U 112
PP 189
P 109
A 17
PA 126
NS 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
U 31 39 33 32 23 26
Percentages PP P A PA 36 29 3 32 36 21 2 23 40 23 2 25 41 23 2 25 42 30 4 34 44 25 4 29
NS 1 2 3 3 1 1
100
A 14 8 8 6 15 17
NS 5 7 11 10 3 5
100 80
58
60 40 20 0
70
72
68 84 90 84
29
28
31 X X
Asian
41 8 X
BlkAfAm
14
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult IEP
14
ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 28
PP
PA NS 0 0
U 59
PP 185
P 187
A 75
PA 262
NS 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
U 15 15 9 14 12 12
PP 40 40 40 33 37 36
Percentages P A PA 33 12 45 35 10 45 35 16 51 37 15 52 35 16 51 37 15 52
NS 0 0 0 0 1 0
U 56 64 38 71 55 59
NS 0 0 2 1 3 2
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
48
51
45 76 75 79
79 52 49 54 24 X
AmIndAK
25 X X
Mult IEP
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
20
ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 29
PP
PA NS 0 1
U 80
PP 107
P 200
A 53
PA 253
NS 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
U 21 24 21 18 20 18
PP 27 23 24 23 29 24
Percentages P A PA 45 7 52 44 9 53 49 6 55 47 12 59 45 5 50 45 12 57
NS 0 0 0 0 1 0
U 84 87 87 73 91 80
NS 0 0 1 1 4 1
100 80 60 40
57 54 60 35 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
42
46
39 65 89 79 65
20 0
X
Asian
35 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
11
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 30
PP
A PA NS 57 51 1 2
U 95
PP 83
P 222
A 26
PA 248
NS 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
U 24 32 28 30 24 22
Percentages PP P A PA 26 47 3 50 23 40 4 44 23 44 3 47 25 38 4 42 24 47 4 51 19 51 6 57
NS 0 1 2 2 1 1
PP 109 88 91 97 99 83
A 12 16 13 17 16 26
NS 1 4 7 9 3 6
44
100 80 60 40
57 56 59 38 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
41
43
39 60 87 74 63
20 0
X
Asian
34 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
11
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 31
Avon Elem
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 3 8
PP
A PA NS 72 72 73 0 0 0
U 1 38
PP 7 98
P 21 322
A 0 32
PA 21 354
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
24 72
24 72 0 20 66 7
66 66
Colorado 10 17 66 7
20
3
20 17 7 0 7 0 0 0
8 10
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 24 20 26 5 6 3
PP 21 16 32 22 21 24
Percentages P A PA 55 0 55 64 0 64 39 3 42 70 3 73 73 0 73 72 0 72
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 8 9 8 2 2 1
PP 7 7 10 8 7 7
P 18 29 12 26 24 21
Ns A 0 0 1 1 0 0
PA 18 29 13 27 24 21
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 29 17 12 1 0 1 24 3 0 0 0 25
% Prof. or Above 72 82 X X X X 71 X X X X 68
% Below 28 18 X X X X 29 X X X X 32
% NS 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
28 18 29 32
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female
72
82 71 68
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 32
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 45 67 68 0 0 0
U 5 51
PP 19 122
P 20 332
A 0 17
PA 20 349
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63 63
60
43 45 23 21
40 20 0
11 10 11 0 3
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 31 38 8 12 5 11
PP 41 22 36 23 29 43
Percentages P A PA 28 0 28 38 3 41 56 0 56 65 0 65 66 0 66 45 0 45
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 10 12 3 3 2 5
PP 13 7 14 6 12 19
Ns P A 9 0 12 1 22 0 17 0 27 0 20 0
PA 9 13 22 17 27 20
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 44 23 21 1 0 1 42 0 0 0 3 43
% Prof. or Above 45 52 38 X X X 45 X X X X 47
% Below 55 48 62 X X X 55 X X X X 53
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
55 48 62 53
55
60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
45
52 38 X
AmIndAK
45 X
Asian
47 X X
HwPacIs
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 33
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 75 74 70 0 1 0
U 5 42
PP 7 89
P 34 329
A 2 44
PA 36 373
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
10 8 11 15 18 18 4 9 8 0 1 0 71
65 62
Colorado 11 18 62 8
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 21 30 29 25 23 10
PP 33 27 17 11 20 15
Percentages P A PA 47 0 47 42 0 42 51 3 54 64 0 64 54 3 57 71 4 75
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 9 10 10 9 8 5
PP 14 9 6 4 7 7
Ns P A 20 0 14 0 18 1 23 0 19 1 34 2
PA 20 14 19 23 20 36
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 48 28 20 1 0 0 42 5 0 0 4 42
% Prof. or Above 75 79 70 X X X 74 X X X X 71
% Below 25 21 30 X X X 26 X X X X 29
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
25 21
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female
30
26
29
75
79
70
74
71
X
Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 34
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X 0
PA NS X 61 X 0 1
U X 4
PP X 3
P X 11
A X 0
PA NS X 11 X 0 8
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
61
Eagle County Re 50 22 17 61
60 40
22
51
Colorado 15 20 51 13 64
20 0
X
15 X
17 20 X X 0
13 X 0 1
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)
U 0 X X X X X
PP 19 X X X X X
Percentages P A PA 69 13 81 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS 0 X X X X X
U 0 X X X X X
PP 3 X X X X X
P 11 X X X X X
Ns A 2 X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 13 X X X X X
NS 0 X X X X X
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 15 5 10 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 3 15
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 35
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 35 X X 0
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 38 X X 0
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X X X X X X X X 4 X X 0 31 33 31
Colorado 31 33 31 4
34 36 34 4
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
P X X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X X
PA X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 36
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
A PA NS 59 50 51 0 0 0
U 0 28
PP 12 211
P 17 218
A 0 27
PA 17 245
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
41 43 43 59 45 43
41 59 0 43 45 6 43 43 8
40 20 0
0 6 6 0 6 8 0 0 0
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 18 4 7 5 3 0
PP 33 56 60 45 30 41
Percentages P A PA 45 3 48 40 0 40 30 3 33 47 3 50 64 3 67 59 0 59
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 6 2 2 2 1 0
PP 11 25 18 17 10 12
P 15 18 9 18 21 17
Ns A 1 0 1 1 1 0
PA 16 18 10 19 22 17
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 29 17 12 1 0 1 24 3 0 0 0 25
% Prof. or Above 59 76 X X X X 54 X X X X 52
% Below 41 24 X X X X 46 X X X X 48
% NS 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
24
80 60 40
41
46
48
76 59 54 52
20 0
Total Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 37
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
A PA NS 25 51 53 0 0 0
U 3 33
PP 30 221
P 11 228
A 0 39
PA 11 267
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
7 7 0 42 39 25 6 7 8 0 0 0 44 45 68
68 25 0 42 44 7 39 45 8
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 22 24 10 12 2 7
PP 69 52 49 54 49 68
Percentages P A PA 9 0 9 21 3 24 36 3 38 35 0 35 49 0 49 25 0 25
NS 0 0 3 0 0 0
U 7 8 4 3 1 3
PP 22 17 19 14 20 30
P 3 7 14 9 20 11
Ns A 0 1 1 0 0 0
PA 3 8 15 9 20 11
NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 44 23 21 1 0 1 42 0 0 0 3 43
% Prof. or Above 25 17 33 X X X 26 X X X X 26
% Below 75 83 67 X X X 74 X X X X 74
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20
25 17
Female Male
75
67 83
74
74
33 X
AmIndAK
26 X
Asian
26 X X
HwPacIs
0
Total
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 38
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
A PA NS 54 58 57 0 1 1
U 2 23
PP 20 183
P 25 252
A 1 44
PA 26 296
NS 0 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
42 52 50 48 36 37
42 52 2 36 50 9 37 48 9
40 20
4 5 5
9 2
9 0 1 1
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 7 6 11 8 6 4
PP 49 58 31 33 54 42
Percentages P A PA 33 12 44 36 0 36 51 6 57 58 0 58 37 3 40 52 2 54
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 3 2 4 3 2 2
PP 21 19 11 12 19 20
P 14 12 18 21 13 25
Ns A 5 0 2 0 1 1
PA 19 12 20 21 14 26
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 48 28 20 1 0 0 42 5 0 0 4 42
% Prof. or Above 54 71 30 X X X 52 X X X X 50
% Below 46 29 70 X X X 48 X X X X 50
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
54 71 52 30 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
29 46 70 48 50
20 0
50 X X
HwPacIs
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 39
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X 0
PA NS X 17 X 0 0
U X 6
PP X 9
P X 3
A X 0
PA NS X 3 X 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 33 20 X 24 17 X X 0 50 37 18 X 0 0
Eagle County Re 50 33 50 17
Colorado 20 24 37 18 56
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)
U 19 X X X X X
PP 38 X X X X X
Percentages P A PA 25 19 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS 0 X X X X X
U 3 X X X X X
PP 6 X X X X X
P 4 X X X X X
Ns A 3 X X X X X
PA 7 X X X X X
NS 0 X X X X X
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 15 5 10 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 3 15
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 40
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 19 X X 6
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 20 X X 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
44
Colorado 44 32 18 1
47 35 19 1
40 20 0
X X X X
32 18 X X X X 1 X X 6
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
P X X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X X
PA X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 41
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 0 0 0
U 3 34
PP 12 124
P 17 204
A 12 142
PA 29 346
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
7 7 7 0 0 0 39 40 41 27 25 31 27 28 20
27 39 27 66 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentages P A PA 45 18 63 41 33 75 27 12 39 54 22 76 43 11 53 39 27 66 Ns A 9 17 4 11 5 12
Percentage of Students P + A
U 12 2 9 10 11 7
PP 24 24 52 14 36 27
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 6 1 3 5 5 3
PP 12 12 17 7 17 12
P 22 21 9 27 20 17
PA 31 38 13 38 25 29
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 44 22 22 1 0 1 39 3 0 0 3 40 % Prof. or Above 66 64 68 X X X 62 X X X X 63 % Below 34 36 32 X X X 38 X X X X 38 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
66 64 68 34 36 32 38 38
62
63
20 0
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 42
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 7
PA NS 36 0 0 0
U 7 44
PP 22 120
P 13 249
A 3 115
PA 16 364
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
16 8 8 23 20 49 29 22 7 0 0 0 47
23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72
43 28
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentages P A PA 29 3 32 34 14 49 45 35 80 48 10 58 57 24 81 29 7 36 Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 11 8 3 3 3 7 PP 12 10 5 10 5 22 P 10 12 18 15 24 13 A 1 5 14 3 10 3 PA 11 17 32 18 34 16 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
U 32 23 8 10 7 16
PP 35 29 13 32 12 49
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 45 23 22 1 0 1 43 0 0 0 3 44 % Prof. or Above 36 26 45 X X X 37 X X X X 36 % Below 64 74 55 X X X 63 X X X X 64 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
64 55 74 63 64
60 40 20 0
Total
36
45 26 X
Female Male AmIndAK
37 X
Asian
36 X X
HwPacIs
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 43
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 5 44
PP 16 137
P 16 196
A 11 129
PA 27 325
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
10 9 9 0 0 0 33 27 25 33 39 36 29 23 25
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentages P A PA 40 7 47 30 6 36 37 14 51 36 33 69 31 3 34 33 23 56 Ns A 3 2 5 12 1 11
Percentage of Students P + A
U 19 15 20 8 20 10
PP 35 48 29 22 46 33
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 8 5 7 3 7 5
PP 15 16 10 8 16 16
P 17 10 13 13 11 16
PA 20 12 18 25 12 27
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 48 28 20 1 0 0 42 5 0 0 4 42 % Prof. or Above 56 57 55 X X X 55 X X X X 52 % Below 44 43 45 X X X 45 X X X X 48 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
56 57 55 55 52 44 43 45 45 48
20 0
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 44
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 8
PA NS 29 0 0 0
U 8 59
PP 26 185
P 10 187
A 4 75
PA 14 262
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
17 12 14 54 36 37 21 8 37 35 15 13 0 0 0
Avon Elem 17 54 21
U Avon Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 26 30 17 28 26 17
PP 56 55 46 39 66 54
Percentages P A PA 16 2 19 15 0 15 26 9 34 28 3 31 9 0 9 21 8 29
NS 0 0 3 3 0 0
U 11 10 6 10 9 8
PP 24 18 16 14 23 26
Ns P A 7 1 5 0 9 3 10 1 3 0 10 4
PA 8 5 12 11 3 14
NS 0 0 1 1 0 0
2008
2009
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 48 28 20 1 0 0 42 5 0 0 4 42
% Prof. or Above 29 29 30 X X X 24 X X X X 24
% Below 71 71 70 X X X 76 X X X X 76
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
71
71
70
76
76
29
29
30 X
AmIndAK
24 X
Asian
24 X X
HwPacIs
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 45
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 62 69 68 0 1 1
U 25 32
PP 59 101
P 128 286
A 10 21
PA 138 307
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
27 23 24 5 5 4 0 1 1 58 65 64
20 0
11
PP
NS Colorado
Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 13 5 12 8 5 11
Percentages PP P A PA 33 50 3 54 22 69 3 72 24 59 3 62 22 63 6 70 24 67 3 71 27 58 5 62
Ns NS 1 1 1 0 0 0 U 24 9 25 16 10 25 PP 61 38 49 46 50 59 P 93 117 119 132 139 128 A 6 5 6 13 7 10 PA 99 122 125 145 146 138 NS 1 1 3 1 1 0
Percentage of Students P + A
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
% Prof. or Above 62 71 51 X X X 44 86 X X 4 43
% Below 38 29 49 X X X 56 14 X X 96 57
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
14
80 60
38
29 49 56 57 96
40
62
86 71 51 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
43 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
4
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 46
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Battle Mountain High 6 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 7
PA NS 1 1 2
U 11 20
PP 42 85
P 115 274
A 23 46
PA 138 320
NS 1 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
6 5 22 20 21 7 12 11 10 1 1 2 60 64 59
22 60 12 72 20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70
PP
NS Colorado
Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 13 10 12 17 7 6
PP 20 30 20 24 19 22
Percentages P A PA 58 9 67 54 6 60 57 10 67 55 3 58 59 15 74 60 12 72
Ns NS 0 0 0 1 0 1 U 25 18 21 34 13 11 PP 38 53 34 46 37 42 P 109 95 97 107 114 115 A 17 11 17 6 29 23 PA 126 106 114 113 143 138 NS 0 0 0 2 0 1
Percentage of Students P + A
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 192 94 98 2 2 0 100 85 1 2 18 93
% Prof. or Above 72 78 66 X X X 55 92 X X 39 52
% Below 28 22 33 X X X 44 8 X X 56 47
% NS 1 0 1 X X X 1 0 X X 6 1
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60
92 28 22 33 44 56 8 47
40 20 0
72
78 66 55 39 X X
Asian
52
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult IEP ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 47
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Battle Mountain High 5 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 3
A PA NS 53 59 55 0 1 1
U 11 15
PP 94 164
P 102 227
A 15 34
PA 117 261
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
42 51 47
42 46 7 37 51 8 40 47 8
40 20
5 3 3
37 40
46
8 0 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 12 2 5 5 3 5
Percentages PP P A PA 51 34 3 37 42 46 8 54 49 40 5 45 36 48 9 57 46 45 5 50 42 46 7 53
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
% Prof. or Above 53 64 40 X X X 32 79 X X 0 33
% Below 47 36 60 X X X 68 21 X X 100 67
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
21
80 60 40
36 47 60 68 100 79 64 53 67
20 0
Total Female
40 X
Male AmIndAK
32 X
Asian
33 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
0
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 48
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Battle Mountain High 4 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 6
A PA NS 48 49 49 1 2 2
U 8 17
PP 91 196
P 78 178
A 14 33
PA 92 211
NS 1 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
4 4 6 7 8 7 1 47 45 43
47 41 7 45 41 8 43 41 7
41 41 41
PP
NS Colorado
Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 11 9 11 10 4 4
PP 37 47 36 50 37 47
Percentages P A PA 44 8 52 41 3 44 44 9 54 36 3 39 50 9 59 41 7 48
NS 0 0 0 1 0 1
U 21 16 18 19 8 8
PP 69 83 60 98 72 91
P 84 72 75 71 96 78
Ns A 15 6 16 5 17 14
PA 99 78 91 76 113 92
NS 0 0 0 2 0 1
Percentage of Students P + A
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 192 94 98 2 2 0 100 85 1 2 18 93
% Prof. or Above 48 61 36 X X X 25 75 X X 11 23
% Below 52 39 63 X X X 74 25 X X 83 76
% NS 1 0 1 X X X 1 0 X X 6 1
Percentage of Students P + A
100
25
80 60 40
39 52 63 74 83 75 61 48 36 25 23 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
76
20 0
X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult
11
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 49
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 7
PA NS 29 0 1 1
U 78 122
PP 80 170
P 48 102
A 15 46
PA 63 148
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0 U PP
35 36 38 28 30 30
22 23 24 7 10 15 0 1 1
NS Colorado
Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 34 33 34 24 30 35
PP 35 30 24 28 43 36
Percentages P A PA 24 7 31 25 12 37 35 6 42 34 13 48 23 4 27 22 7 29
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 63 56 69 50 63 78 PP 64 50 48 59 88 80 P 44 42 71 71 47 48 A 13 21 13 28 9 15 PA 57 63 84 99 56 63 NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
% Prof. or Above 29 34 22 X X X 9 53 X X 8 11
% Below 71 66 78 X X X 91 47 X X 92 89
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
53 71 66 78 91 92 89 47
20 0
29
34 22 X X
Asian
8 X
BlkAfAm
9
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult IEP
11
ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 50
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 23 29 34 1 1 2
U 54 112
PP 93 189
P 40 109
A 4 17
PA 44 126
NS 2 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
2 4 6 1 1 2 28 26 29 48
44 35 21 25 28
PP
NS Colorado
Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 29 42 34 33 26 28
PP 36 37 35 42 40 48
Percentages P A PA 32 3 35 19 3 21 29 2 32 23 1 24 30 4 34 21 2 23
NS 1 0 0 1 0 1
U 54 74 57 65 51 54
PP 68 65 59 82 77 93
Ns P A 61 5 33 5 50 4 45 2 57 8 40 4
PA 66 38 54 47 65 44
NS 1 0 0 1 0 2
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 193 94 99 2 2 0 101 85 1 2 18 94
% Prof. or Above 23 20 25 X X X 6 41 X X 11 6
% Below 76 80 73 X X X 92 59 X X 83 91
% NS 1 0 2 X X X 2 0 X X 6 2
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
59
60 40 20
76
80
73 92 83 91
41 23 20
Female
25 X
Male AmIndAK
6 X
Asian
6 X X
Mult
0
Total
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
11
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 51
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 49 57 51 1 1 2
U 51 95
PP 45 83
P 84 222
A 11 26
PA 95 248
NS 2 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
44 51 43
40
26 22 25 23
20 0 U
19 21 6 6 8 1 1 2
PP
NS Colorado
Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 24 33 31 34 25 26
PP 23 23 19 26 24 23
Percentages P A PA 48 5 53 40 4 44 45 5 50 35 5 40 47 5 51 44 6 49
NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
U 46 58 52 66 48 51
PP 43 41 33 51 46 45
P 91 71 76 69 90 84
Ns A 10 8 9 9 9 11
PA 101 79 85 78 99 95
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
Percentage of Students P + A
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 193 94 99 2 2 0 101 85 1 2 17 94
% Prof. or Above 49 49 49 X X X 27 76 X X 18 24
% Below 50 51 48 X X X 71 24 X X 76 73
% NS 1 0 2 X X X 2 0 X X 6 2
Percentage of Students P + A
100
24
80 60 40 20 0
50
51
48 71 76 76 73
49
49
49 27 X X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
18
IEP
24
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 52
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 7
PA NS 62 1 1 1
U 17 30
PP 23 66
P 58 297
A 8 72
PA 66 369
NS 1 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63 62
14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73
60 40 20 0
16 6 8 21 14 18
54
15 7
11 1 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 26 11 24 18 13 16
PP 31 36 17 26 22 21
Percentages P A PA 36 6 42 49 4 53 51 7 58 54 3 56 56 9 65 54 7 62
Ns NS 1 0 1 0 0 1 U 27 11 26 20 16 17 PP 32 37 19 30 27 23 P 37 50 56 61 69 58 A 6 4 8 3 11 8 PA 43 54 64 64 80 66 NS 1 0 1 0 0 1
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 107 51 56 0 0 0 86 21 0 0 11 83
% Below 37 31 43 X X X 47 0 X X X 47
% NS 1 2 0 X X X 1 0 X X X 1
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60
37 31 43 47
0 47
100
40
62
67
57
52
52
20 0
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 53
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 62 74 68 2 1 1
U 21 44
PP 28 79
P 74 324
A 8 46
PA 82 370
NS 2 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65
60 40 20 0
16 21 9 11 16 21
56
59
Colorado 11 21 59 9
9 2 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 32 29 14 25 20 16
PP 30 28 36 20 27 21
Percentages P A PA 36 2 38 37 6 43 48 3 50 51 4 55 51 2 53 56 6 62
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
U 32 31 14 26 22 21
PP 30 30 36 21 29 28
Ns P A 36 2 40 6 48 3 53 4 55 2 74 8
PA 38 46 51 57 57 82
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 133 72 61 0 1 1 101 28 0 2 13 95
% Prof. or Above 62 61 62 X X X 50 96 X X X 48
% Below 37 36 38 X X X 48 4 X X X 49
% NS 2 3 0 X X X 2 0 X X X 2
Percentage of Students P + A
100
4
80 60
37
36
38 48 49
96
40
62 61 62 50 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
X
Asian
48 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 54
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 48 71 67 0 0 1
U 22 43
PP 35 84
P 49 273
A 3 39
PA 52 312
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
45 62 59
40 20 0
20 10 10
32 19 23 3 9 8 0 0 1
PP
NS Colorado
Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 24 28 18 13 26 20
PP 29 24 32 32 27 32
Percentages P A PA 43 4 47 45 3 48 44 5 49 50 4 54 44 3 47 45 3 48
NS 0 0 0 1 0 0
U 23 29 18 14 29 22
PP 28 24 32 35 30 35
Ns P A 41 4 46 3 44 5 54 4 49 3 49 3
PA 45 49 49 58 52 52
NS 0 0 0 1 0 0
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 109 49 60 0 1 0 94 13 0 1 9 85
% Prof. or Above 48 55 42 X X X 43 X X X X 40
% Below 52 45 58 X X X 57 X X X X 60
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
52
45 58 57 60
48
55 42 X
AmIndAK
43 X
Asian
40 X X
HwPacIs
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 55
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Berry Creek Middle 7 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 4
A PA NS 46 64 58 1 1 1
U 8 14
PP 49 153
P 45 258
A 4 40
PA 49 298
NS 1 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
46 55 33 38 42 49
46 42 4 33 55 9 38 49 9
40 20 0
7
9 1 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 10 10 14 9 10 7
PP 51 45 43 50 43 46
Percentages P A PA 32 6 38 40 5 45 37 5 43 36 5 41 42 5 47 42 4 46
NS 1 0 1 0 0 1
U 10 10 15 10 12 8
PP 53 46 47 57 53 49
Ns P A 33 6 41 5 41 6 41 6 52 6 45 4
PA 39 46 47 47 58 49
NS 1 0 1 0 0 1
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 107 51 56 0 0 0 86 21 0 0 11 83
% Prof. or Above 46 59 34 X X X 34 95 X X X 33
% Below 53 39 66 X X X 65 5 X X X 66
% NS 1 2 0 X X X 1 0 X X X 1
Percentage of Students P + A
100
5
80
53
39 66 65 95 66
60 40
59
20 0
46 34 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
34 X
Asian
33 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 56
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Berry Creek Middle 3 Eagle County Re 50 2 Colorado 3
A 6
PA NS 50 2 1 1
U 4 11
PP 61 144
P 58 274
A 8 64
PA 66 338
NS 2 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
46 44 29 35 13 15 3 2 3 6 2 1 1 55 47
46 44
29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61
40 20 0 U
PP
NS Colorado
Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 9 12 8 10 8 3
PP 63 50 52 45 52 46
Percentages P A PA 25 3 28 31 7 38 36 4 40 37 9 45 39 1 40 44 6 50
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
U 9 13 8 10 9 4
PP 63 53 53 47 56 61
Ns P A 25 3 33 8 36 4 38 9 42 1 58 8
PA 28 41 40 47 43 66
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 133 72 61 0 1 1 101 28 0 2 13 95
% Prof. or Above 50 53 46 X X X 35 96 X X X 34
% Below 49 44 54 X X X 63 4 X X X 64
% NS 2 3 0 X X X 2 0 X X X 2
Percentage of Students P + A
100
4
80 60
49
44
54 63 96 64
40 20 0
Total Female Male
50
53
46 35 X
AmIndAK
34 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 57
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Berry Creek Middle 8 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 3
A PA NS 39 61 56 0 0 1
U 9 19
PP 58 151
P 40 240
A 2 30
PA 42 270
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
8 53 34 40 37 54 47
53 37 2 34 54 7 40 47 9
9 0 0 1
PP
NS Colorado
Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 8 11 7 7 5 8
PP 52 54 56 56 51 53
Percentages P A PA 33 6 40 33 2 35 30 7 37 32 3 35 38 5 43 37 2 39
NS 0 0 0 1 0 0
U 8 11 7 8 6 9
PP 50 55 55 61 57 58
Ns P A 32 6 34 2 30 7 35 3 42 6 40 2
PA 38 36 37 38 48 42
NS 0 0 0 1 0 0
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 109 49 60 0 1 0 94 13 0 1 9 85
% Prof. or Above 39 45 33 X X X 30 X X X X 29
% Below 61 55 67 X X X 70 X X X X 71
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
61 55 67 70 71
60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
39
45 33 X
AmIndAK
30 X
Asian
29 X X
HwPacIs
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 58
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 9
PA NS 45 2 1 0
U 21 45
PP 36 117
P 38 177
A 10 126
PA 48 303
NS 2 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
20 10 12 34 25 26 9 2 1 0 36 38 35 27 27
PP
NS Colorado
Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 26 16 25 20 17 20
PP 27 35 26 41 33 34
Percentages P A PA 30 17 47 38 11 49 36 12 48 28 11 39 30 20 50 36 9 45
Ns NS 0 0 1 0 0 2 U 27 16 27 23 21 21 PP 28 36 29 47 41 36 P 31 39 40 32 37 38 A 17 11 13 12 24 10 PA 48 50 53 44 61 48 NS 0 0 1 0 0 2
45
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 107 51 56 0 0 0 86 21 0 0 11 83
% Prof. or Above 45 55 36 X X X 34 90 X X X 34
% Below 53 43 63 X X X 64 10 X X X 64
% NS 2 2 2 X X X 2 0 X X X 2
100 80
53 43 63 64
10
60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
64
90 55 36 X
AmIndAK
45
34 X
Asian
34 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 59
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 2 1 1
U 22 66
PP 37 128
P 40 151
A 32 147
PA 72 298
NS 2 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
17 13 14 2 1 1 28 26 30 30 30 28 29 27
24
PP
NS Colorado
Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 32 32 21 25 31 17
PP 50 35 39 36 38 28
Percentages P A PA 15 3 18 20 13 33 33 8 41 23 16 39 23 8 31 30 24 54
Ns NS 0 1 0 0 0 2 U 32 34 21 26 33 22 PP 50 37 39 37 41 37 P 15 21 33 24 25 40 A 3 14 8 17 9 32 PA 18 35 41 41 34 72 NS 0 1 0 0 0 2
100 80 60 40 20 0 18 41 33 39 31 54
2008
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 133 72 61 0 1 1 101 28 0 2 13 95
% Prof. or Above 54 50 59 X X X 44 89 X X X 44
% Below 44 49 39 X X X 54 11 X X X 55
% NS 2 1 2 X X X 2 0 X X X 1
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
54 44 49 39 54
11
55
89 50 59 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
44 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 60
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 8
PA NS 30 2 1 1
U 32 75
PP 42 124
P 24 131
A 9 108
PA 33 239
NS 2 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
39 29 17 19 28 29 30 29 22 8 24 23 2 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 35 25 24 25 41 29
PP 31 31 31 30 32 39
Percentages P A PA 23 12 35 28 15 43 31 13 44 34 10 44 19 8 27 22 8 30
Ns NS 0 0 0 1 0 2 U 33 26 24 27 46 32 PP 29 32 31 33 35 42 P 22 29 31 37 21 24 A 11 15 13 11 9 9 PA 33 44 44 48 30 33 NS 0 0 0 1 0 2
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 109 49 60 0 1 0 94 13 0 1 9 85
% Prof. or Above 30 24 35 X X X 22 X X X X 24
% Below 68 73 63 X X X 76 X X X X 74
% NS 2 2 2 X X X 2 X X X X 2
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
68
63 73 76 74
30
24
35 22 X
AmIndAK
24 X X
HwPacIs
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 61
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 1
PA NS 26 0 0 1
U 45 80
PP 36 107
P 27 200
A 1 53
PA 28 253
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
41 45 43 33 18 21 24 27 25 12 9 1 0 0 1
40 20 0
PP
NS Colorado
Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 47 47 46 42 46 41
PP 24 33 27 32 32 33
Percentages P A PA 26 3 29 19 1 20 23 3 26 24 1 25 17 2 19 25 1 26
NS 0 0 0 1 3 0
U 45 48 46 45 51 45
PP 23 34 27 35 36 36
Ns P A 25 3 19 1 23 3 26 1 19 2 27 1
100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 29 20 26 26
PA 28 20 26 27 21 28
NS 0 0 0 1 3 0
25
19
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 109 49 60 0 1 0 94 13 0 1 9 85
% Prof. or Above 26 20 30 X X X 17 X X X X 16
% Below 74 80 70 X X X 83 X X X X 84
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20
26 20
Female
74
80
70 83 84
30 X
Male AmIndAK
0
Total
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
17
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
16
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 62
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 2 8
PP
A PA NS 84 72 73 0 0 0
U 2 38
PP 12 98
P 65 322
A 8 32
PA 73 354
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
2 8 10 14 20 17 9 7 7 0 0 0 75 66 66
14 75 9 20 66 7
Colorado 10 17 66 7
PP
NS
Colorado
Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 4 4 1 0 2 2
PP 4 8 9 7 5 14
Percentages P A PA 75 18 92 70 18 88 75 13 88 81 11 93 76 17 93 75 9 84
NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
U 2 3 1 0 2 2
PP 2 6 6 6 5 12
P 38 54 52 66 72 65
Ns A 9 14 9 9 16 8
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 47 68 61 75 88 73
NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 87 40 47 0 2 0 14 69 0 2 4 8
% Prof. or Above 84 93 77 X X X X 90 X X X X
% Below 16 8 23 X X X X 10 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
16 8 23
10
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
84
93 77
90
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 63
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
82
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 1
PP 9
A PA NS 90 67 68 0 0 0
U 1 51
PP 9 122
P 80 332
A 7 17
PA 87 349
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63 63
82 7
60 40
23 21
20
1
10 11
PP
NS
Colorado
Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 4 5 3 1 4 1
PP 4 15 10 7 11 9
Percentages P A PA 89 4 93 68 13 81 77 10 87 81 10 91 80 5 85 82 7 90
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 2 3 2 1 3 1
PP 2 9 8 5 8 9
P 48 42 59 57 60 80
Ns A 2 8 8 7 4 7
Percentage of Students P + A
87 91
85 90
PA 50 50 67 64 64 87
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 97 43 54 0 1 0 13 83 0 0 7 8
% Prof. or Above 90 93 87 X X X X 93 X X X X
% Below 10 7 13 X X X X 7 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
10 7
13 7
90
93
87
93
X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 64
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Percentage of Students
Percentages School, District and State Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50 U 3 8 PP 8 P A PA NS 0 1 0 U 2 42 PP 6 89 P 59
Ns A 9 44 PA 68 373 NS 0 3
100 80 60 40 20
3 8 11 18 18 8 12 9 8 0 1 0 78 65 62
78 12 89 9 8 74 70
18 65
329
Colorado 11 18 62
PP
NS
Colorado
Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A
U 6 4 5 1 0 3
PP 9 12 8 7 11 8
Percentages P A PA 66 19 85 79 5 84 73 14 87 78 14 92 69 20 89 78 12 89
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 4 2 3 1 0 2
PP 6 7 5 5 7 6
P 45 45 46 58 45 59
Ns A 13 3 9 10 13 9
87 92 89 89
PA 58 48 55 68 58 68
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 76 30 46 0 1 0 12 63 0 0 2 10
% Prof. or Above 89 90 89 X X X X 95 X X X X
% Below 11 10 11 X X X X 5 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
100 80 60 40 20 0
11
10
11
89
90
89
95
X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 65
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 1 0 0
U 3 28
PP 31 211
P 41 218
A 9 27
PA 50 245
NS 1 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
43 43 48 45 43
36 48 11 59 43 45 43 43 6 8 50 51
40 20
4 6 6
36
11
8 1 0 0
PP
NS
Colorado
Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 2 1 1 1 2 4
PP 29 31 26 21 40 36
Percentages P A PA 55 14 69 58 9 68 52 20 72 60 17 78 53 4 57 48 11 59
NS 0 0 0 0 1 1
U 1 1 1 1 2 3
PP 15 24 18 17 38 31
P 28 45 36 49 50 41
Ns A 7 7 14 14 4 9
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 35 52 50 63 54 50
NS 0 0 0 0 1 1
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 85 40 45 0 2 0 14 68 0 1 3 8
% Prof. or Above 59 73 47 X X X X 60 X X X X
% Below 40 28 51 X X X X 38 X X X X
% NS 1 0 2 X X X X 1 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
28
80 60 40
40 51
38
73 59 60 47 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 66
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 1 33
PP 30 221
P 55 228
A 11 39
PA 66 267
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
1 6 7 42 39 31 11 7 8 0 0 0 57 44 45
31 57 11 68 42 44 39 45 7 8 51 53
PP
NS
Colorado
Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 2 2 3 3 0 1
PP 26 47 32 11 36 31
Percentages P A PA 59 13 72 44 8 52 55 10 65 69 17 86 60 4 64 57 11 68
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 1 2 2 0 1
PP 14 29 25 8 27 30
P 32 27 42 48 45 55
Ns A 7 5 8 12 3 11
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 39 32 50 60 48 66
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 97 43 54 0 1 0 13 83 0 0 7 8
% Prof. or Above 68 86 54 X X X X 71 X X X X
% Below 32 14 46 X X X X 29 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total
14 32 46 29
86 68 54 71
X
Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 67
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 1 23
PP 25 183
P 40 252
A 10 44
PA 50 296
NS 0 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
1 5 5 37 33 36 13 53 50 48
33 53 13 66 36 50 37 48 9 9 58 57
9 0 1 1
PP
NS
Colorado
Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 0 4 2 1 0 1
PP 25 21 24 22 14 33
Percentages P A PA 65 10 75 65 11 75 65 10 75 64 14 77 71 15 86 53 13 66
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 0 2 1 1 0 1
PP 17 12 15 16 9 25
P 44 37 41 47 46 40
Ns A 7 6 6 10 10 10
Percentage of Students P + A
86 66
PA 51 43 47 57 56 50
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
2012
2013
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 76 30 46 0 1 0 12 63 0 0 2 10
% Prof. or Above 66 73 61 X X X X 73 X X X X
% Below 34 27 39 X X X X 27 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
66 73 61 73 34 27 39 27
20 0
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 68
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 2 34
PP 15 124
P 38 204
A 30 142
PA 68 346
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
45
18 45 35 80 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72
40
25
40 41
35
28 31
20
2
18 7 7
20 0 0 0
PP
NS
Colorado
Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A
U 4 3 3 2 4 2
PP 6 14 10 10 11 18
Percentages P A PA 39 51 90 39 44 83 29 59 87 44 43 88 43 42 85 45 35 80
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 2 2 2 2 4 2
PP 3 11 7 8 10 15
P 20 30 20 36 41 38
Ns A 26 34 41 35 40 30
87
88
85
PA 46 64 61 71 81 68
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
80
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 85 40 45 0 2 0 14 68 0 1 3 8
% Prof. or Above 80 83 78 X X X X 85 X X X X
% Below 20 18 22 X X X X 15 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
20 18 22 15
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
80
83
78
85
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 69
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 2 44
PP 15 120
P 63 249
A 17 115
PA 80 364
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65
15 65 18 82 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72
60 40 20
2 15 8 8 23 20
47
43 28 18 22 0 0 0
PP
NS
Colorado
Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 4 3 3 3 4 2
PP 9 8 5 3 12 15
Percentages P A PA 44 43 87 40 48 89 48 44 92 33 61 94 44 40 84 65 18 82
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 2 2 2 2 3 2
PP 5 5 4 2 9 15
P 24 25 37 23 33 63
Ns A 23 30 34 43 30 17
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
87 89 92
PA 47 55 71 66 63 80
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
94
84
82
2008
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 97 43 54 0 1 0 13 83 0 0 7 8
% Prof. or Above 82 86 80 X X X X 87 X X X X
% Below 18 14 20 X X X X 13 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
18
14
20
13
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
82
86
80
87
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 70
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 2 44
PP 11 137
P 40 196
A 23 129
PA 63 325
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
3 9 9 14 0 0 0 27 25 53 39 36 30
14 53 30 83 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65
25 29
PP
NS
Colorado
Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A
U 0 7 5 1 2 3
PP 15 13 16 14 11 14
Percentages P A PA 43 43 85 32 48 80 33 46 79 35 50 85 35 52 88 53 30 83
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 0 4 3 1 1 2
PP 10 7 10 10 7 11
P 29 18 21 26 23 40
Ns A 29 27 29 37 34 23
88
83
PA 58 45 50 63 57 63
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
2012
2013
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 76 30 46 0 1 0 12 63 0 0 2 10
% Prof. or Above 83 80 85 X X X X 90 X X X X
% Below 17 20 15 X X X X 10 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
100
17 20 15
10
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
83
80
85
90
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 71
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 5
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 4 59
PP 16 185
P 47 187
A 9 75
PA 56 262
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
62
21 62 12 74
60 40
21 36 37 12 14 37 35 12 15 13 0 0 0
20
5
PP
NS
Colorado
Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 6 9 6 1 3 5
PP 28 18 25 18 12 21
Percentages P A PA 50 16 66 58 16 74 46 22 68 55 26 81 48 37 85 62 12 74
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 4 5 4 1 2 4
PP 19 10 16 13 8 16
P 34 33 29 41 31 47
Ns A 11 9 14 19 24 9
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 45 42 43 60 55 56
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 76 30 46 0 1 0 12 63 0 0 2 10
% Prof. or Above 74 70 76 X X X X 81 X X X X
% Below 26 30 24 X X X X 19 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
26
80 60 40 20 0
Total
30
24
19
74
70
76
81
X
Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 72
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy Eagle County Re 50
U 3 8
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 1 38
PP 5 98
P 20 322
A 10 32
PA 30 354
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
66 66
14 56 28 83 20 66 7 7 72 73
60 40 20
3 8 10 14 20 17
56
Colorado 10 17 66
28 7 7 0 0 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
U 3 9 3 0 0 3
PP 9 3 9 6 14 14
Percentages P A PA 63 25 88 84 3 88 88 0 88 84 9 94 72 14 86 56 28 83
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 3 1 0 0 1
PP 3 1 3 2 5 5
P 20 27 30 27 26 20
Ns A 8 1 0 3 5 10
100 80 60 40 20 0
88
88 88
PA 28 28 30 30 31 30
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
94
86
83
2008
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 36 13 23 0 1 0 1 33 0 1 5 0
% Prof. or Above 83 X 87 X X X X 82 X X X X
% Below 17 X 13 X X X X 18 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
17
13
18
80 60 40 20 0
Total
83
87
82
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 73
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 77 67 68 0 0 0
U 4 51
PP 4 122
P 24 332
A 3 17
PA 27 349
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
23 21 69
63 63
20 0
11 10 11
11
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
U 0 3 0 0 0 11
PP 16 9 6 12 14 11
Percentages P A PA 81 3 84 72 16 88 91 0 91 85 3 88 83 3 86 69 9 77
NS 0 0 3 0 0 0
U 0 1 0 0 0 4
PP 5 3 2 4 5 4
Ns P A 26 1 23 5 29 0 29 1 30 1 24 3
100 84 80 60 40 20 0 2008
88 91 88
86 77
PA 27 28 29 30 31 27
NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 35 16 19 0 1 0 1 31 0 2 6 2
% Prof. or Above 77 75 79 X X X X 77 X X X X
% Below 23 25 21 X X X X 23 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
23 25 21 23
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
77
75
79
77
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 74
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
83
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy Eagle County Re 50
U 0 8
PP 6
PA NS 0 1 0
U 0 42
PP 2 89
P 30 329
A 4 44
PA 34 373
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65 62
83 11 94 9 8 74 70
18 65
60 40 20 0
0 8 11 18 18 6 11 9 8 0 1 0
Colorado 11 18 62
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
U 3 6 0 3 0 0
Percentages PP P A PA 9 59 28 88 13 75 6 81 9 71 21 91 0 94 3 97 8 72 19 92 6 83 11 94
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 2 0 1 0 0
PP 3 4 3 0 3 2
Ns P A 19 9 24 2 24 7 30 1 26 7 30 4
100 80 60 40 20 0
88
PA 28 26 31 31 33 34
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
81
91
97
92
94
2008
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 36 14 22 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 2 0
% Prof. or Above 94 X 91 X X X X 94 X X X X
% Below 6 X 9 X X X X 6 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
100
6
9 6
80 60
94
40 20 0
Total
91
94
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 75
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 1 30
PP 4 66
P 22 297
A 8 72
PA 30 369
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63 63 62
11 63 23 86 14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73
60 40 20
3 6 8 11 14 18 23 15 11 0 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
U 0 3 6 0 3 3
Percentages PP P A PA 3 78 19 97 9 59 28 88 12 73 9 82 3 59 38 97 3 74 21 94 11 63 23 86
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 0 1 2 0 1 1
PP 1 3 4 1 1 4
P 25 19 24 20 25 22
Ns A 6 9 3 13 7 8
100 97 80 60 40 20 0 2008
88
PA 31 28 27 33 32 30
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
82
97
94
86
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 35 17 18 0 0 0 3 32 0 0 4 0
% Prof. or Above 86 94 78 X X X X 84 X X X X
% Below 14 6 22 X X X X 16 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
14 6 22 16
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
86
94 78
84
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 76
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
82
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy Eagle County Re 50
U 5 9
PP 5
A PA NS 89 74 68 0 1 1
U 2 44
PP 2 79
P 31 324
A 3 46
PA 34 370
NS 0 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65
82 8
16 65 9
60 40 20
5 9 11 16 5 21
59
Colorado 11 21 59 9
9 0 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
U 0 0 0 0 3 5
PP 13 6 16 18 6 5
Percentages P A PA 78 9 88 72 22 94 65 19 84 76 6 82 66 26 91 82 8 89
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 0 0 0 0 1 2
PP 4 2 5 6 2 2
Ns P A 25 3 23 7 20 6 25 2 23 9 31 3
100 80 60 40 20 0
88
PA 28 30 26 27 32 34
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
94
84
82
91
89
2008
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 38 15 23 1 0 0 1 36 0 0 3 1
% Prof. or Above 89 X 87 X X X X 89 X X X X
% Below 11 X 13 X X X X 11 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
11
13
11
89
87
89
X
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 77
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 0
PP 5
PA NS 0 0 1
U 0 43
PP 2 84
P 27 273
A 9 39
PA 36 312
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 19 10 10 5 23 24 9 8 0 0 1 71 62 59
71 24 95 9 8 71 67
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading
U 0 3 3 0 0 0
Percentages PP P A PA 9 72 19 91 6 78 13 91 3 76 14 90 6 74 19 94 15 74 12 85 5 71 24 95
NS 0 0 3 0 0 0
U 0 1 1 0 0 0
PP 3 2 1 2 5 2
Ns P A 23 6 25 4 22 4 23 6 25 4 27 9
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 29 29 26 29 29 36
NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 38 20 18 0 1 0 2 34 0 1 2 1
% Below 5 10 0 X X X X 3 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
100
5
10
80 60
95
40 20 0
Total
90
100
97
X
Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 78
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 0 28
PP 5 211
P 27 218
A 4 27
PA 31 245
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
43 43 45 43 75
14 75 11 86 43 45 43 43 6 8 50 51
40 20 0
0 6 6 14 11 8 0 0 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
U 0 3 0 0 3 0
PP 22 16 24 13 28 14
Percentages P A PA 47 31 78 59 22 81 65 12 76 59 28 88 56 14 69 75 11 86
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 0 1 0 0 1 0
PP 7 5 8 4 10 5
P 15 19 22 19 20 27
Ns A 10 7 4 9 5 4
88 69
86
PA 25 26 26 28 25 31
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 36 13 23 0 1 0 1 33 0 1 5 0
% Prof. or Above 86 X 83 X X X X 85 X X X X
% Below 14 X 17 X X X X 15 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
14
17
15
86
83
85
X
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 79
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 0 33
PP 10 221
P 20 228
A 5 39
PA 25 267
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 6 7 42 39 29 14 7 8 0 0 0 57 44 45
29 57 14 71 42 44 39 45 7 8 51 53
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing
U 0 0 0 0 0 0
PP 25 28 16 18 19 29
Percentages P A PA 66 9 75 47 25 72 69 13 81 76 6 82 61 19 81 57 14 71
NS 0 0 3 0 0 0
U 0 0 0 0 0 0
PP 8 9 5 6 7 10
Ns P A 21 3 15 8 22 4 26 2 22 7 20 5
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 24 23 26 28 29 25
NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 35 16 19 0 1 0 1 31 0 2 6 2
% Prof. or Above 71 75 68 X X X X 71 X X X X
% Below 29 25 32 X X X X 29 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
29
25
32
29
71
75
68
71
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 80
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 0 23
PP 6 183
P 23 252
A 7 44
PA 30 296
NS 0 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
64
17 64 19 83 36 50 37 48 9 9 58 57
60 40 20 0
0 5 5 17 36 37
50 48
19 9 9 0 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
U 3 0 0 3 0 0
PP 9 19 24 6 22 17
Percentages P A PA 72 16 88 75 6 81 62 15 76 75 16 91 64 14 78 64 19 83
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 0 0 1 0 0
PP 3 6 8 2 8 6
Ns P A 23 5 24 2 21 5 24 5 23 5 23 7
100 80 60 40 20 0
88
PA 28 26 26 29 28 30
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
81
76
91
78
83
2008
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 36 14 22 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 2 0
% Prof. or Above 83 X 73 X X X X 83 X X X X
% Below 17 X 27 X X X X 17 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
17 27 17
80 60 40 20 0
Total
83
73
83
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 81
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 0 14
PP 8 153
P 21 258
A 6 40
PA 27 298
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
23 33 38 17 9 9 0 1 1 60 55 49
23 60 17 77 33 55 38 49 9 9 64 58
20 0
0 3 4
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
U 0 0 0 0 3 0
PP 13 13 24 6 21 23
Percentages P A PA 66 22 88 59 28 88 64 12 76 56 38 94 59 18 76 60 17 77
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 0 0 0 0 1 0
PP 4 4 8 2 7 8
P 21 19 21 19 20 21
Ns A 7 9 4 13 6 6
100 80 60 40 20 0
88
88 76
PA 28 28 25 32 26 27
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
94
76
77
2008
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 35 17 18 0 0 0 3 32 0 0 4 0
% Prof. or Above 77 88 67 X X X X 78 X X X X
% Below 23 12 33 X X X X 22 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
23
12 33
22
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female
88 77 67
78
X
Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 82
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP 8
PA NS 0 1 1
U 1 11
PP 3 144
P 27 274
A 7 64
PA 34 338
NS 0 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
3 2 3 8 29 35 18 13 15 0 1 1 71 55 47
71 18 89
29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing
U 0 0 0 0 0 3
PP 16 9 13 9 17 8
Percentages P A PA 72 13 84 53 38 91 58 29 87 76 15 91 46 37 83 71 18 89
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 0 0 0 0 0 1
PP 5 3 4 3 6 3
P 23 17 18 25 16 27
Ns A 4 12 9 5 13 7
Percentage of Students P + A
87 91
83
PA 27 29 27 30 29 34
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
89
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 38 15 23 1 0 0 1 36 0 0 3 1
% Prof. or Above 89 X 83 X X X X 89 X X X X
% Below 11 X 17 X X X X 11 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
11
17
11
89
83
89
X
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 83
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP 8
PA NS 0 0 1
U 0 19
PP 3 151
P 27 240
A 8 30
PA 35 270
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 4 3 8 34 40 71 54 47
71 21 92 7 9 61 56
34 54 40 47
21 7 9 0 0 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing
U 0 0 0 0 0 0
PP 22 19 10 13 24 8
Percentages P A PA 41 38 78 66 13 78 59 28 86 48 39 87 62 15 76 71 21 92
NS 0 3 3 0 0 0
U 0 0 0 0 0 0
PP 7 6 3 4 8 3
P 13 21 17 15 21 27
Ns A 12 4 8 12 5 8
Percentage of Students P + A
86
87 76 92
PA 25 25 25 27 26 35
NS 0 1 1 0 0 0
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 38 20 18 0 1 0 2 34 0 1 2 1
% Below 8 15 0 X X X X 6 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
15 8
0 6
80 60
92 100 85 94
40 20 0
Total
X
Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 84
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP 3
PA NS 0 0 0
U 1 34
PP 1 124
P 10 204
A 24 142
PA 34 346
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
25 40 41 28 20 0 0 0 28 31 67
28 67 94
25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72
20
3
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math
U 6 3 0 0 0 3
PP 9 3 3 3 11 3
Percentages P A PA 25 59 84 28 66 94 21 76 97 38 59 97 31 58 89 28 67 94
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 2 1 0 0 0 1
PP 3 1 1 1 4 1
P 8 9 7 12 11 10
Ns A 19 21 26 19 21 24
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 27 30 33 31 32 34
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 36 13 23 0 1 0 1 33 0 1 5 0
% Prof. or Above 94 X 91 X X X X 94 X X X X
% Below 6 X 9 X X X X 6 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
100
6
9 6
80 60
94
40 20 0
Total
91
94
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 85
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 1 44
PP 6 120
P 21 249
A 7 115
PA 28 364
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
3 17 8 8 0 0 0 23 20 20 22 60 47 43 28
17 60 20 80 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
U 0 0 0 0 0 3
PP 13 9 3 6 3 17
Percentages P A PA 56 31 88 28 63 91 41 53 94 58 36 94 53 44 97 60 20 80
NS 0 0 3 0 0 0
U 0 0 0 0 0 1
PP 4 3 1 2 1 6
P 18 9 13 19 19 21
Ns A 10 20 17 12 16 7
100 80 60 40 20 0
88 91
PA 28 29 30 31 35 28
NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
94
94
97
80
2008
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 35 16 19 0 1 0 1 31 0 2 6 2
% Prof. or Above 80 81 79 X X X X 81 X X X X
% Below 20 19 21 X X X X 19 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
20 19 21 19
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
80
81
79
81
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 86
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 0 44
PP 6 137
P 13 196
A 17 129
PA 30 325
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 17 9 9 0 0 0 36 39 36 27 25 25 29 47
17 36 47 83 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
U 3 0 0 3 0 0
PP 9 6 12 9 17 17
Percentages P A PA 38 50 88 50 38 88 24 65 88 50 38 88 36 47 83 36 47 83
NS 0 6 0 0 0 0
U 1 0 0 1 0 0
PP 3 2 4 3 6 6
P 12 16 8 16 13 13
Ns A 16 12 22 12 17 17
100 80 60 40 20 0
88
88 88
88
83
83
PA 28 28 30 28 30 30
NS 0 2 0 0 0 0
2008
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 36 14 22 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 2 0
% Prof. or Above 83 X 73 X X X X 83 X X X X
% Below 17 X 27 X X X X 17 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
17 27 17
80 60 40 20 0
Total
83
73
83
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 87
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 3
PP
PA NS 0 1 0
U 1 45
PP 6 117
P 14 177
A 14 126
PA 28 303
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
25 26 40 38 35 10 12 3 17 0 1 0 40 27 27
17 40 40 80
20 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
U 3 6 3 0 6 3
PP 19 6 21 18 15 17
Percentages P A PA 44 34 78 47 41 88 55 21 76 24 59 82 53 26 79 40 40 80
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 2 1 0 2 1
PP 6 2 7 6 5 6
P 14 15 18 8 18 14
Ns A 11 13 7 20 9 14
100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 78
88 76
PA 25 28 25 28 27 28
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
82
79
80
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 35 17 18 0 0 0 3 32 0 0 4 0
% Prof. or Above 80 76 83 X X X X 78 X X X X
% Below 20 24 17 X X X X 22 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
20 24 17 22
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
80
76
83
78
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 88
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 8
PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 3 66
PP 10 128
P 15 151
A 10 147
PA 25 298
NS 0 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
26 26 39 30 30 28 26 29 27
26 39 26 66
20 0
13 14 0 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math
U 6 0 3 3 0 8
PP 25 19 16 24 23 26
Percentages P A PA 44 25 69 38 44 81 52 29 81 61 12 73 17 60 77 39 26 66
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 2 0 1 1 0 3
PP 8 6 5 8 8 10
P 14 12 16 20 6 15
Ns A 8 14 9 4 21 10
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 22 26 25 24 27 25
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 38 15 23 1 0 0 1 36 0 0 3 1
% Prof. or Above 66 X 65 X X X X 64 X X X X
% Below 34 X 35 X X X X 36 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
66 65 64 34 35 36
20 0
Total
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 89
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 3
PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 1 75
PP 6 124
P 12 131
A 19 108
PA 31 239
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
3 17 19 16 0 1 1 28 29 32 30 29 50
16 32 50 82
24 23
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math
U 3 6 3 0 0 3
PP 25 22 17 23 26 16
Percentages P A PA 44 28 72 41 31 72 41 34 76 39 39 77 53 21 74 32 50 82
NS 0 0 3 0 0 0
U 1 2 1 0 0 1
PP 8 7 5 7 9 6
P 14 13 12 12 18 12
Ns A 9 10 10 12 7 19
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 23 23 22 24 25 31
NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 38 20 18 0 1 0 2 34 0 1 2 1
% Prof. or Above 82 75 89 X X X X 85 X X X X
% Below 18 25 11 X X X X 15 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
18 25
11
15
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
82
89 75
85
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 90
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 0
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 0 59
PP 6 185
P 16 187
A 14 75
PA 30 262
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
44
17 44 39 83
40 20 0
0 12 14 17
36 37
37 35
39
15 13 0 0 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science
U 3 3 3 3 0 0
PP 16 22 15 6 25 17
Percentages P A PA 56 25 81 44 31 75 32 50 82 56 34 91 47 28 75 44 39 83
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 1 1 1 0 0
PP 5 7 5 2 9 6
P 18 14 11 18 17 16
Ns A 8 10 17 11 10 14
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 26 24 28 29 27 30
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 36 14 22 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 2 0
% Prof. or Above 83 X 73 X X X X 83 X X X X
% Below 17 X 27 X X X X 17 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
17 27 17
80 60 40 20 0
Total
83
73
83
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 91
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 0
PP
PA NS 0 0 1
U 0 80
PP 4 107
P 22 200
A 12 53
PA 34 253
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 18 21 11 24 27 58 45 43 32 12 9 0 0 1
11 58 32 89
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)
Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science
U 9 6 0 6 6 0
PP 13 16 10 10 32 11
Percentages P A PA 56 22 78 63 16 78 79 7 86 61 23 84 62 0 62 58 32 89
NS 0 0 3 0 0 0
U 3 2 0 2 2 0
PP 4 5 3 3 11 4
P 18 20 23 19 21 22
Ns A 7 5 2 7 0 12
Percentage of Students P + A
86
84 89 62
PA 25 25 25 26 21 34
NS 0 0 1 0 0 0
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 38 20 18 0 1 0 2 34 0 1 2 1
% Below 11 20 0 X X X X 6 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
11
20
0 6
89
100 80
94
X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 92
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Percentage of Students
Percentages School, District and State Eagle Valley Elem Eagle County Re 50 U 9 8 PP P A PA NS 76 72 73 0 0 0 U 4 38 PP 7 98 P 35
Ns A 0 32 PA 35 354 NS 0 1
100 80 60 40 20 0
9 8 10 15 20 17 7 0 7 0 0 0 76 66 66
15 76 0 20 66 7
322
Colorado 10 17 66 7
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 7 12 16 9 3 9
PP 17 12 22 20 35 15
Percentages P A PA 71 5 76 71 5 76 60 2 62 52 20 72 59 3 62 76 0 76
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 3 5 9 4 1 4
PP 7 5 13 9 13 7
P 30 30 35 24 22 35
Ns A 2 2 1 9 1 0
PA 32 32 36 33 23 35
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 46 25 21 0 2 0 22 19 1 2 3 19
% Prof. or Above 76 76 76 X X X 68 84 X X X 68
% Below 24 24 24 X X X 32 16 X X X 32
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
24 24 24 16 32 32
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
76
76
76
84 68 68
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 93
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 71 67 68 0 0 0
U 4 51
PP 5 122
P 22 332
A 0 17
PA 22 349
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
13 10 11 16 23 21 0 3 5 0 0 0 71 63 63
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 11 7 9 5 7 13
PP 27 24 26 36 27 16
Percentages P A PA 57 5 62 61 7 67 65 0 65 56 2 58 56 11 67 71 0 71
NS 0 2 0 0 0 0
U 4 3 4 3 3 4
PP 10 11 11 20 12 5
P 21 28 28 31 25 22
Ns A 2 3 0 1 5 0
PA 23 31 28 32 30 22
NS 0 1 0 0 0 0
65
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 31 12 19 0 1 0 16 14 0 0 7 15
% Prof. or Above 71 X 63 X X X 63 X X X X X
% Below 29 X 37 X X X 38 X X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X 0 X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total
29
37
38
71
63
63
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 94
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 1 0
U 4 42
PP 13 89
P 20 329
A 4 44
PA 24 373
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65 62
60 40 20 0
10 8 11 32 18 18
49
Colorado 11 18 62
10 9
8 0 1 0
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 2 21 5 11 16 10
PP 7 13 17 11 33 32
Percentages P A PA 86 5 91 63 3 66 68 10 78 71 7 78 49 2 51 49 10 59
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 8 2 5 8 4
PP 3 5 7 5 17 13
P 37 24 28 32 25 20
Ns A 2 1 4 3 1 4
PA 39 25 32 35 26 24
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 41 19 22 0 0 0 21 18 0 2 7 18
% Prof. or Above 59 74 45 X X X 29 89 X X X 22
% Below 41 26 55 X X X 71 11 X X X 78
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
26
11 41 55 71 78 89 74 59 45 29 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
80 60 40 20 0
22 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 95
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X 0
PA NS X 61 X 0 1
U X 4
PP X 3
P X 11
A X 0
PA NS X 11 X 0 8
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
61
Eagle County Re 50 22 17 61
60 40
22
51
Colorado 15 20 51 13 64
20 0
X
15 X
17 20 X X 0
13 X 0 1
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
U X X X X X
PP X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X
U X X X X X
PP X X X X X
P X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X
PA X X X X X
NS X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 96
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Elem 4 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6
A PA NS 42 50 51 0 0 0
U 2 28
PP 24 211
P 19 218
A 0 27
PA 19 245
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
4 6 6 8 0 0 0 53 43 43 42 45 43
53 42 0 43 45 6 43 43 8
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 7 7 7 9 0 4
PP 52 40 68 41 68 53
Percentages P A PA 36 5 40 43 10 52 25 0 25 39 11 50 30 3 32 42 0 42
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 3 3 4 4 0 2
PP 22 17 39 19 25 24
P 15 18 14 18 11 19
Ns A 2 4 0 5 1 0
PA 17 22 14 23 12 19
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 45 24 21 0 2 0 22 19 1 1 3 19
% Prof. or Above 42 50 33 X X X 27 53 X X X 32
% Below 58 50 67 X X X 73 47 X X X 68
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
58 50 67 73 47 68
60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
42
50 33 X
AmIndAK
53 27 X
Asian
32 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 97
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Elem 0 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7
A PA NS 32 51 53 0 0 0
U 0 33
PP 21 221
P 8 228
A 2 39
PA 10 267
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 6 7 42 39 26 6 7 8 0 0 0 44 45 68
68 26 6 42 44 7 39 45 8
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 11 4 9 5 7 0
PP 54 59 40 49 49 68
Percentages P A PA 30 5 35 33 2 35 44 7 51 42 4 45 36 9 44 26 6 32
NS 0 2 0 0 0 0
U 4 2 4 3 3 0
PP 20 27 17 27 22 21
P 11 15 19 23 16 8
Ns A 2 1 3 2 4 2
PA 13 16 22 25 20 10
NS 0 1 0 0 0 0
45
44 32
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 31 12 19 0 1 0 16 14 0 0 7 15
% Prof. or Above 32 X 21 X X X 13 X X X X X
% Below 68 X 79 X X X 88 X X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X 0 X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
68
60 40 20 0
Total
79
88
32 X
Female
21
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
13
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 98
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Elem 5 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5
PA NS 0 1 1
U 2 23
PP 18 183
P 15 252
A 6 44
PA 21 296
NS 0 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
44 50 48 36 37 37 15 5 5 5
44 37 15 51 36 50 37 48 9 9 58 57
40 20 0 U
9 0 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 0 8 2 7 12 5
PP 16 45 37 29 51 44
Percentages P A PA 67 16 84 45 3 47 56 5 61 58 7 64 33 4 37 37 15 51
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 0 3 1 3 6 2
PP 7 17 15 13 26 18
P 29 17 23 26 17 15
Ns A 7 1 2 3 2 6
PA 36 18 25 29 19 21
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 41 19 22 0 0 0 21 18 0 2 7 18
% Prof. or Above 51 74 32 X X X 24 78 X X X 11
% Below 49 26 68 X X X 76 22 X X X 89
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
26 22
80 60 40 20 0
49 68 76 89 74 51 32 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
78
24 X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
11
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 99
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X 0
PA NS X 17 X 0 0
U X 6
PP X 9
P X 3
A X 0
PA NS X 3 X 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 33 20 X 24 17 X X 0 50 37 18 X 0 0
Eagle County Re 50 33 50 17
Colorado 20 24 37 18 56
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
U X X X X
PP X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X
U X X X X
PP X X X X
P X X X X
Ns A X X X X
PA X X X X
NS X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 100
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Elem 4 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7
PA NS 0 0 0
U 2 34
PP 10 124
P 24 204
A 10 142
PA 34 346
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
4 22 25 20 7 7 0 0 0 52 40 41 22 28 31
22 52 22 74 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
U 4 7 5 4 5 4
PP 24 24 28 21 38 22
Percentages P A PA 44 27 71 36 33 69 47 21 67 34 40 74 38 19 57 52 22 74
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 2 3 3 2 2 2
PP 11 10 16 10 14 10
P 20 15 27 16 14 24
Ns A 12 14 12 19 7 10
PA 32 29 39 35 21 34
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 46 24 22 0 2 0 23 19 1 1 3 20
% Prof. or Above 74 67 82 X X X 65 84 X X X 65
% Below 26 33 18 X X X 35 16 X X X 35
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
26 18 33 35 16 35
80 60 40 20 0
Total
74
82 67 65
84 65
X
Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 101
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Elem 0 Eagle County Re 50 8 Colorado 8
PA NS 0 0 0
U 0 44
PP 3 120
P 20 249
A 8 115
PA 28 364
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65
10 65 26 90 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72
60 40 20 0
0 23 20 8 8 10
47
43 26 28 22 0 0 0
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 15 6 7 4 9 0
PP 26 26 28 15 24 10
Percentages P A PA 41 18 59 38 28 66 23 42 65 62 20 82 36 31 67 65 26 90
NS 0 2 0 0 0 0
U 6 3 3 2 4 0
PP 10 12 12 8 11 3
P 16 18 10 34 16 20
Ns A 7 13 18 11 14 8
PA 23 31 28 45 30 28
NS 0 1 0 0 0 0
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 31 12 19 0 1 0 16 14 0 0 7 15
% Prof. or Above 90 X 89 X X X 88 X X X X X
% Below 10 X 11 X X X 13 X X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X 0 X X X X X
100 80 60 40 20 0
10
11
13
90
89
88
X
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 102
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 2 0 0
U 5 44
PP 15 137
P 11 196
A 9 129
PA 20 325
NS 1 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
12 9 9 2 0 0 37 27 25 27 39 36 29 22 25
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 2 11 7 9 10 12
PP 14 24 10 22 35 37
Percentages P A PA 44 40 84 42 24 66 39 44 83 33 37 70 45 10 55 27 22 49
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
U 1 4 3 4 5 5
PP 6 9 4 10 18 15
P 19 16 16 15 23 11
Ns A 17 9 18 17 5 9
PA 36 25 34 32 28 20
NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 41 19 22 0 0 0 21 18 0 2 7 18
% Prof. or Above 49 58 41 X X X 19 78 X X X 17
% Below 49 42 55 X X X 76 22 X X X 83
% NS 2 0 5 X X X 5 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
22
80 60 40 20 0
42 49 55 76 78 49 58 41 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
83
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
19
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
17
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 103
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 5 59
PP 17 185
P 10 187
A 9 75
PA 19 262
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
41
40 20 0
12 12 14
36 37 24
37 35 22 15 13 0 0 0
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 0 11 5 15 12 12
PP 28 37 39 26 49 41
Percentages P A PA 49 23 72 34 18 53 37 20 56 39 20 59 35 4 39 24 22 46
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 0 4 2 7 6 5
PP 12 14 16 12 25 17
P 21 13 15 18 18 10
Ns A 10 7 8 9 2 9
PA 31 20 23 27 20 19
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 41 19 22 0 0 0 21 18 0 2 7 18
% Prof. or Above 46 58 36 X X X 14 78 X X X 6
% Below 54 42 64 X X X 86 22 X X X 94
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
22
80 60 40
42 54 64 86 78 58 46 94
20 0
36 X X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
14
Hisp Wht
6 X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 104
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley High 4 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7
A PA NS 76 69 68 1 1 1
U 7 32
PP 37 101
P 138 286
A 9 21
PA 147 307
NS 2 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
4 19 7 7 23 24 5 5 4 1 1 1 72 65 64
19 72 5 23 65 5 24 64 4
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 5 3 4 6 4 4
PP 28 26 22 19 18 19
Percentages P A PA 60 6 66 67 2 70 70 3 73 71 5 75 76 2 77 72 5 76
Ns NS 0 1 1 0 1 1 U 9 7 7 11 8 7 PP 49 52 38 37 36 37 P 104 135 124 137 148 138 A 11 5 5 9 3 9 PA 115 140 129 146 151 147 NS 0 2 2 0 1 2
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
% Prof. or Above 76 77 76 X X X 64 90 X X 33 66
% Below 23 22 23 X X X 34 10 X X 63 32
% NS 1 1 1 X X X 2 0 X X 4 2
100
23 22 23 34
10 32 63 90 76 77 76 64 66 33 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
80 60 40 20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 105
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley High 4 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 7
A 9
PA NS 79 1 1 2
U 7 20
PP 30 85
P 133 274
A 17 46
PA 150 320
NS 2 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
4 5 16 7 20 21 9 11 10 1 1 2 70 64 59
16 70
20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 4 6 5 7 4 4
PP 20 25 22 22 17 16
Percentages P A PA 67 9 76 62 5 67 62 8 70 62 8 70 70 9 78 70 9 79
Ns NS 0 2 3 1 0 1 U 7 11 10 11 8 7 PP 39 46 43 33 32 30 P 130 112 120 94 130 133 A 18 9 15 12 16 17 PA 148 121 135 106 146 150 NS 0 3 5 1 0 2
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 189 91 98 4 2 0 79 102 0 2 16 65
% Prof. or Above 79 84 76 X X X 71 86 X X 31 65
% Below 20 16 22 X X X 29 12 X X 69 35
% NS 1 0 2 X X X 0 2 X X 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
20 16 12 22 29 69 35
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
79
84
86 76 71 31 X
AmIndAK
65
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 106
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley High 2 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 3
A PA NS 65 59 55 1 1 1
U 4 15
PP 62 164
P 109 227
A 16 34
PA 125 261
NS 2 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
2 3 3 32 37 40 56 51 47
32 56 8 37 51 8 40 47 8
8 1 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 3 0 2 1 2 2
PP 52 43 44 39 39 32
Percentages P A PA 40 5 45 51 5 56 46 7 53 51 9 60 52 6 58 56 8 65
NS 0 1 1 0 1 1
U 5 1 4 2 4 4
PP 90 86 77 76 77 62
Ns A 8 10 12 18 12 16
NS 0 2 2 0 1 2
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
% Prof. or Above 65 68 60 X X X 48 86 X X 21 52
% Below 34 31 38 X X X 50 14 X X 75 46
% NS 1 1 1 X X X 2 0 X X 4 2
Percentage of Students P + A
100
14
80 60 40
34
31
38 50 75 86
46
65
68
60 48 X X
Asian
52 21
IEP ELL
20 0
Total Female Male
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 107
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley High 4 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 6
A PA NS 54 49 49 2 2 2
U 8 17
PP 76 196
P 85 178
A 17 33
PA 102 211
NS 3 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
4 4 6 40 45 43 45 41 41
40 45 9 45 41 8 43 41 7
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 4 5 5 2 2 4
PP 53 49 47 42 46 40
Percentages P A PA 40 3 43 42 3 45 37 8 45 48 7 55 48 4 53 45 9 54
NS 0 2 3 1 0 2
U 8 9 9 3 3 8
PP 102 88 91 64 85 76
P 78 76 72 72 90 85
Ns A 6 5 15 11 8 17
PA 84 81 87 83 98 102
NS 0 3 6 1 0 3
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 189 91 98 4 2 0 79 102 0 2 16 65
% Prof. or Above 54 63 46 X X X 35 69 X X 13 28
% Below 44 37 51 X X X 65 28 X X 81 72
% NS 2 0 3 X X X 0 3 X X 6 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
54 63 46 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
44
37 51 65
28 72 81 69 35 X
Asian
20 0
28 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
13
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 108
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 1 1 1
U 42 122
PP 79 170
P 48 102
A 23 46
PA 71 148
NS 1 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
22 41 38 28 30 30 25 23 24 12 10 15 1 1 1
20 0 U PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 35 32 25 19 19 22
PP 29 32 35 29 38 41
Percentages P A PA 25 10 35 29 6 35 30 9 39 37 15 52 31 12 42 25 12 37
NS 0 1 1 0 1 1
U 62 64 44 36 37 42
PP 51 64 62 57 75 79
P 44 58 53 71 60 48
Ns A 18 13 16 30 23 23
PA 62 71 69 101 83 71
NS 0 2 2 0 1 1
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
% Prof. or Above 37 39 34 X X X 26 50 X X 0 27
% Below 63 60 66 X X X 73 50 X X 96 72
% NS 1 1 0 X X X 1 0 X X 4 1
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
63 60 66 50 73 96 72
60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
50 37 39 34 X
AmIndAK
26 X
Asian
27 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
0
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 109
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 34 29 34 1 1 2
U 41 112
PP 82 189
P 57 109
A 8 17
PA 65 126
NS 1 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
43 44
40
22
26 29
35
30
25 28 4 4 6 2
20
1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 27 35 28 26 17 22
PP 39 37 49 46 45 43
Percentages P A PA 29 5 34 25 2 27 18 2 20 25 3 27 34 4 38 30 4 34
NS 0 2 3 1 0 1
U 53 63 55 39 32 41
PP 75 67 94 70 83 82
Ns P A 57 9 45 3 35 3 37 4 64 7 57 8
PA 66 48 38 41 71 65
NS 0 3 6 1 0 1
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 189 91 98 4 2 0 79 102 0 2 16 65
% Prof. or Above 34 34 35 X X X 25 41 X X 6 23
% Below 65 66 64 X X X 75 58 X X 94 77
% NS 1 0 1 X X X 0 1 X X 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
65 66 64 58 75 94 77
60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
34
34
35 X
AmIndAK
41 25 X
Asian
6 X X
Mult IEP
23
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
HwPacIs
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 110
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 69 57 51 1 1 2
U 29 95
PP 28 83
P 119 222
A 12 26
PA 131 248
NS 1 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63
60 40
22 25 15
51 43 19 21 6 6 8 1 1 2
20 0
15
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 16 27 23 23 21 15
Percentages PP P A PA 31 52 1 53 25 42 4 46 28 47 1 48 27 44 5 49 22 54 3 57 15 63 6 69
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 189 91 98 4 2 0 79 102 0 2 16 65
% Prof. or Above 69 65 73 X X X 56 78 X X 6 51
% Below 30 35 26 X X X 44 21 X X 94 49
% NS 1 0 1 X X X 0 1 X X 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20
6 69 73 56 78 51 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
30
35
26 44
21 49
94
65
0
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 111
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Middle 2 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 8 9
PA NS 0 1 1
U 2 30
PP 10 66
P 69 297
A 26 72
PA 95 369
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
64 63 62
64 24 89
14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73
60 40 20
2 6 8 9 14 18 24 15 11 0 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 4 2 7 1 4 2
PP 15 13 13 5 7 9
Percentages P A PA 64 17 81 66 19 85 54 26 80 76 18 93 64 24 89 64 24 89
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 4 2 6 1 4 2
PP 13 14 12 5 7 10
P 57 71 49 69 63 69
Ns A 15 20 23 16 24 26
PA 72 91 72 85 87 95
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 107 55 52 0 1 0 35 68 0 3 13 31
% Prof. or Above 89 91 87 X X X 74 96 X X X 74
% Below 11 9 13 X X X 26 4 X X X 26
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
100 80 60 40 20 0
11
13 26
26
89
91
87 74
96 74
X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 112
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 3 9
PP
PA NS 2 1 1
U 3 44
PP 13 79
P 62 324
A 14 46
PA 76 370
NS 2 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
66 65
14 66 15 81 16 65 9 9 74 68
60 40 20
3 9 11 14 16 21
59
Colorado 11 21 59
15
9 2 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 10 8 5 5 6 3
PP 20 11 17 19 6 14
Percentages P A PA 58 11 69 65 16 81 67 11 78 56 20 76 71 17 88 66 15 81
NS 1 0 0 0 0 2
U 8 7 5 4 5 3
PP 17 10 17 17 5 13
P 49 58 66 49 60 62
Ns A 9 14 11 18 14 14
PA 58 72 77 67 74 76
NS 1 0 0 0 0 2
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 94 52 42 1 1 0 29 62 0 1 7 23
% Prof. or Above 81 77 86 X X X 52 94 X X X 43
% Below 17 21 12 X X X 45 5 X X X 52
% NS 2 2 2 X X X 3 2 X X X 4
Percentage of Students P + A
100
17 21 12 45 5 52
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
81
77
86 52
94
43 X X
Mult
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 113
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 7
PP
A PA NS 78 71 67 1 0 1
U 6 43
PP 12 84
P 59 273
A 7 39
PA 66 312
NS 1 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
7 10 10 14 19 23 8 9 8 1 0 1 69 62 59
14 69 8
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 8 14 6 3 8 7
PP 14 16 12 19 18 14
Percentages P A PA 59 19 78 62 8 70 73 9 83 64 14 78 61 13 73 69 8 78
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 1 1 U 8 10 5 3 6 6 PP 14 12 10 19 14 12 P 58 46 63 63 48 59 A 19 6 8 14 10 7 PA 77 52 71 77 58 66 NS 0 0 0 0 1 1
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 85 36 49 0 0 0 30 54 0 1 6 25
% Prof. or Above 78 78 78 X X X 50 94 X X X 52
% Below 21 19 22 X X X 47 6 X X X 44
% NS 1 3 0 X X X 3 0 X X X 4
Percentage of Students P + A
100
21 19 22 47 6 44
80 60
94
40 20 0
78
78
78 50 X X
Asian
52
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 114
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Middle 0 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 4
A PA NS 73 64 58 0 1 1
U 0 14
PP 29 153
P 70 258
A 8 40
PA 78 298
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65
27 65 7 33 55 9 38 49 9
60 40 20 0
0 3 4 27 33 38
55
49
9 0 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 1 0 6 1 0 0
PP 21 21 19 13 22 27
Percentages P A PA 62 16 78 62 17 79 50 26 76 68 18 86 65 12 78 65 7 73
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 0 5 1 0 0
PP 19 23 17 12 22 29
P 55 66 45 62 64 70
Ns A 14 18 23 16 12 8
PA 69 84 68 78 76 78
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 107 55 52 0 1 0 35 68 0 3 13 31
% Prof. or Above 73 84 62 X X X 46 85 X X X 48
% Below 27 16 38 X X X 54 15 X X X 52
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
16 27 15 38 54 52
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female
84 73 62 46 X
Male AmIndAK
85 48 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 115
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Middle 0 Eagle County Re 50 2 Colorado 3
PA NS 2 1 1
U 0 11
PP 22 144
P 52 274
A 18 64
PA 70 338
NS 2 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
23 29 35 19 13 15 2 1 1 55 55 47
23 55 19 74 29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61
20 0
0 2 3
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 6 1 1 2 5 0
PP 31 18 25 22 18 23
Percentages P A PA 57 6 63 62 19 81 52 22 74 53 23 76 67 11 77 55 19 74
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
U 5 1 1 2 4 0
PP 26 16 25 19 15 22
P 48 55 51 47 56 52
Ns A 5 17 22 20 9 18
PA 53 72 73 67 65 70
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 94 52 42 1 1 0 29 62 0 1 7 23
% Prof. or Above 74 79 69 X X X 52 85 X X X 48
% Below 23 19 29 X X X 45 13 X X X 48
% NS 2 2 2 X X X 3 2 X X X 4
Percentage of Students P + A
100
23 19 13 29 45 48
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female
74
79
85 69 52 48 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
X
Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 116
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Middle 6 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 3
A PA NS 69 61 56 0 0 1
U 5 19
PP 21 151
P 55 240
A 4 30
PA 59 270
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65
25 65 5 34 54 7 40 47 9
60 40
25 34 40
54 47
20
6 4 3 5
9 0 0 1
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 4 3 2 1 1 6
PP 25 34 20 28 23 25
Percentages P A PA 54 17 71 53 11 64 65 13 78 51 20 71 56 19 75 65 5 69
NS 0 0 0 0 1 0
U 4 2 2 1 1 5
PP 25 25 17 28 18 21
P 53 39 56 50 44 55
Ns A 17 8 11 20 15 4
PA 70 47 67 70 59 59
NS 0 0 0 0 1 0
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 85 36 49 0 0 0 30 54 0 1 6 25
% Prof. or Above 69 75 65 X X X 53 80 X X X 52
% Below 31 25 35 X X X 47 20 X X X 48
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
31
25
20 35 47 48
69
75
80 65 53 52
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 117
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 3
PP
PA NS 0 1 0
U 3 45
PP 13 117
P 44 177
A 47 126
PA 91 303
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
25 26 41 38 35 10 12 3 12 0 1 0 44 27 27
12 41 44 85
20 0
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 6 4 10 5 3 3
PP 17 14 16 7 28 12
Percentages P A PA 43 35 78 42 40 82 34 40 74 38 49 88 37 33 69 41 44 85
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 5 4 9 5 3 3
PP 15 15 14 6 27 13
P 38 45 31 35 36 44
Ns A 31 43 36 45 32 47
PA 69 88 67 80 68 91
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 107 55 52 0 1 0 35 68 0 3 13 31
% Prof. or Above 85 85 85 X X X 69 94 X X X 77
% Below 15 15 15 X X X 31 6 X X X 23
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
15 15 15 31 6 23
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
85
85
85 69
94 77
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 118
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 3 1 1
U 10 66
PP 21 128
P 28 151
A 32 147
PA 60 298
NS 3 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
22 26 30 30 30 28 34 29 27
20 0
14 11 13 3 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 18 7 7 9 11 11
PP 33 22 31 20 30 22
Percentages P A PA 32 17 49 35 36 71 42 19 62 28 42 70 31 29 60 30 34 64
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 3 U 15 6 7 8 9 10 PP 28 20 31 18 25 21 P 27 31 42 25 26 28 A 14 32 19 37 24 32 PA 41 63 61 62 50 60 NS 0 0 0 0 0 3
64
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 94 52 42 1 1 0 29 62 0 1 7 23
% Prof. or Above 64 63 64 X X X 45 73 X X X 30
% Below 33 33 33 X X X 52 24 X X X 65
% NS 3 4 2 X X X 3 3 X X X 4
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
64 63 64 45 30 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
33
33
33 52
24
65
73
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 119
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 11 75
PP 20 124
P 29 131
A 25 108
PA 54 239
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
13 17 19 24 28 29 34 30 29 29
24 23 0 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 14 16 12 10 9 13
PP 31 27 20 24 28 24
Percentages P A PA 38 15 54 36 20 57 41 28 69 37 28 66 27 37 63 34 29 64
Ns NS 1 0 0 0 0 0 U 14 12 10 10 7 11 PP 31 20 17 24 22 20 P 38 27 35 37 21 29 A 15 15 24 28 29 25 PA 53 42 59 65 50 54 NS 1 0 0 0 0 0
63
64
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 85 36 49 0 0 0 30 54 0 1 6 25
% Prof. or Above 64 61 65 X X X 40 78 X X X 40
% Below 36 39 35 X X X 60 22 X X X 60
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
22
80 60 40
36
39
35 60 60
78 64 61 65 40 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
X
Asian
40 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 120
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 0 1
U 10 80
PP 18 107
P 36 200
A 21 53
PA 57 253
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
42 45 43
40 20 0
12 18 21
27 21 24
25 12 9 0 0 1
PP
NS Colorado
Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 21 22 19 15 13 12
PP 29 26 27 15 19 21
Percentages P A PA 44 5 49 42 11 53 51 3 55 55 15 70 54 13 67 42 25 67
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 1 0 U 21 16 16 15 10 10 PP 29 19 23 15 15 18 P 44 31 44 54 43 36 A 5 8 3 15 10 21 PA 49 39 47 69 53 57 NS 0 0 0 0 1 0
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 85 36 49 0 0 0 30 54 0 1 6 25
% Prof. or Above 67 64 69 X X X 37 85 X X X 40
% Below 33 36 31 X X X 63 15 X X X 60
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
15
80 60 40 20 0
33
36
31 63 60
85 67 64 69 37 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
40 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 121
Edwards Elem
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 61 72 73 0 0 0
U 8 38
PP 11 98
P 26 322
A 4 32
PA 30 354
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
66 66
60 40 20 0
16 8 10 22 20 17
53
Colorado 10 17 66 7
7 0 0 0
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 13 12 10 10 7 16
PP 32 24 27 25 25 22
Percentages P A PA 54 2 55 56 9 65 60 3 63 54 10 64 58 9 67 53 8 61
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 7 8 6 6 5 8
PP 18 16 16 15 17 11
P 30 38 36 32 39 26
Ns A 1 6 2 6 6 4
PA 31 44 38 38 45 30
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
61
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 49 28 21 0 0 0 36 13 0 0 7 30
% Prof. or Above 61 57 67 X X X 47 X X X X 40
% Below 39 43 33 X X X 53 X X X X 60
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
61 57 67 47 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
39
43
33 53 60
20 0
X
Asian
40 X X
HwPacIs
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 122
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 65 67 68 0 0 0
U 7 51
PP 16 122
P 39 332
A 3 17
PA 42 349
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
25 23 21 60 63 63
20 0
11 10 11
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 20 20 16 4 4 11
PP 29 24 23 23 18 25
Percentages P A PA 45 6 51 55 2 56 57 3 60 64 8 72 67 12 79 60 5 65
NS 0 0 1 2 0 0
U 13 11 12 2 2 7
PP 19 13 17 12 10 16
Ns P A 29 4 30 1 43 2 34 4 38 7 39 3
PA 33 31 45 38 45 42
NS 0 0 1 1 0 0
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 65 26 39 0 0 0 28 37 0 0 7 28
% Prof. or Above 65 69 62 X X X 29 92 X X X 29
% Below 35 31 38 X X X 71 8 X X X 71
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
65 69 35 31 8 38 71 92 62 29 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
71
20 0
X
Asian
29 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 123
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 9 8
PP
PA NS 0 1 0
U 5 42
PP 8 89
P 36 329
A 7 44
PA 43 373
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
64 65 62
14 64 13 77 18 65 9 8 74 70
60 40 20 0
9 8 11 14 18 18 13 9 8 0 1 0
Colorado 11 18 62
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 18 23 9 13 5 9
PP 25 23 21 24 16 14
Percentages P A PA 51 5 56 44 8 52 65 5 70 53 10 63 70 9 79 64 13 77
NS 0 2 0 0 0 0
U 10 14 5 9 2 5
PP 14 14 12 16 7 8
Ns P A 28 3 27 5 37 3 36 7 30 4 36 7
PA 31 32 40 43 34 43
NS 0 1 0 0 0 0
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 56 28 28 0 0 0 34 21 0 1 10 31
% Prof. or Above 77 75 79 X X X 65 95 X X X 65
% Below 23 25 21 X X X 35 5 X X X 35
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
23 25 21 35 5 35
80 60
95
40 20 0
77
75
79 65 65
X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 124
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 35 X X 0
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 38 X X 0
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X X X X X X X X 4 X X 0 31 33 31
Colorado 31 33 31 4
34 36 34 4
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)
U X X X X
PP X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X
U X X X X
PP X X X X
P X X X X
Ns A X X X X
PA X X X X
NS X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 125
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
A PA NS 27 50 51 0 0 0
U 4 28
PP 32 211
P 11 218
A 2 27
PA 13 245
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65
65 22 4 43 45 6 43 43 8
60
43 43 45 43 22
40 20 0
8 8 0 0 0
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 17 13 5 16 6 8
PP 50 40 55 50 55 65
Percentages P A PA 30 4 33 38 9 47 37 3 40 24 10 34 37 1 39 22 4 27
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 9 9 3 9 4 4
PP 27 27 33 29 37 32
P 16 26 22 14 25 11
Ns A 2 6 2 6 1 2
PA 18 32 24 20 26 13
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
40
34
39 27
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 49 28 21 0 0 0 36 13 0 0 7 30
% Prof. or Above 27 32 19 X X X 19 X X X X 13
% Below 73 68 81 X X X 81 X X X X 87
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
73
68 81 81 87
27
32 19 X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
19
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
13
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 126
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 0 0 0
U 5 33
PP 27 221
P 25 228
A 8 39
PA 33 267
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
8 7 42 42 39 38 44 45
42 38 12 51 42 44 39 45 7 8 51 53
12
8 0 0 0
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 12 22 11 2 0 8
PP 60 38 40 47 46 42
Percentages P A PA 18 9 28 38 2 40 33 16 49 38 11 49 46 9 54 38 12 51
Ns NS 0 0 0 2 0 0 U 8 12 8 1 0 5 PP 39 21 30 25 26 27 P 12 21 25 20 26 25 A 6 1 12 6 5 8 PA 18 22 37 26 31 33 NS 0 0 0 1 0 0
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 65 26 39 0 0 0 28 37 0 0 7 28
% Prof. or Above 51 62 44 X X X 11 81 X X X 11
% Below 49 38 56 X X X 89 19 X X X 89
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
19
80 60 40
38 49 56 89 81 62 51 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
89
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
11
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
11
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 127
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
A PA NS 50 58 57 0 1 1
U 2 23
PP 26 183
P 25 252
A 3 44
PA 28 296
NS 0 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
46 45 36 37 50 48
46 45 5 36 50 9 37 48 9
40 20
4 5 5
9 0 1 1
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 9 16 4 4 0 4
PP 49 43 46 37 49 46
Percentages P A PA 33 9 42 38 3 41 51 0 51 43 16 59 42 9 51 45 5 50
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 5 10 2 3 0 2 PP 27 26 26 25 21 26 P 18 23 29 29 18 25 A 5 2 0 11 4 3 PA 23 25 29 40 22 28 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 56 28 28 0 0 0 34 21 0 1 10 31
% Prof. or Above 50 46 54 X X X 26 86 X X X 26
% Below 50 54 46 X X X 74 14 X X X 74
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
14
80 60 40 20 0
50
54
46 74 74
86 50 46 54 26 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
26 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 128
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 19 X X 6
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 20 X X 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
44
Colorado 44 32 18 1
47 35 19 1
40 20 0
X X X X
32 18 X X X X 1 X X 6
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)
U X X X X
PP X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X
U X X X X
PP X X X X
P X X X X
Ns A X X X X
PA X X X X
NS X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 129
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 9 34
PP 15 124
P 18 204
A 7 142
PA 25 346
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
18 7 7 0 0 0 31 37 25 20 40 41 28 31 14
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
U 26 10 8 14 15 18
PP 34 33 34 19 25 31
Percentages P A PA 26 13 39 40 17 57 33 25 57 46 22 68 35 24 58 37 14 51
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 1 0 U 20 7 5 8 11 9 PP 26 23 21 11 18 15 P 20 28 20 27 25 18 A 10 12 15 13 17 7 PA 30 40 35 40 42 25 NS 0 0 0 0 1 0
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 49 28 21 0 0 0 36 13 0 0 7 30
% Prof. or Above 51 50 52 X X X 39 X X X X 33
% Below 49 50 48 X X X 61 X X X X 67
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
49
50
48 61 67
51
50
52 39 X
AmIndAK
33 X X
HwPacIs
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 130
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 9 44
PP 11 120
P 27 249
A 20 115
PA 47 364
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
13 16 8 8 0 0 0 23 20 40 47
43 30 22 28
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 12 21 9 8 5 13
PP 38 28 25 26 21 16
Percentages P A PA 40 10 50 37 14 51 36 30 66 45 21 66 40 33 74 40 30 70
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 8 12 7 4 3 9 PP 26 16 19 14 12 11 P 27 21 27 24 23 27 A 7 8 23 11 19 20 PA 34 29 50 35 42 47 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 67 26 41 0 0 0 30 37 0 0 7 30
% Prof. or Above 70 77 66 X X X 37 97 X X X 37
% Below 30 23 34 X X X 63 3 X X X 63
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60
97 30 23 34 63 63 3
40 20 0
70
77 66 37 X X
Asian
37 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 131
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 0 0 0
U 4 44
PP 19 137
P 18 196
A 15 129
PA 33 325
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
7 9 9 0 0 0 34 27 25 32 39 36 27 25 29
34 32 27 59 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 15 30 7 12 7 7
PP 40 30 44 24 35 34
Percentages P A PA 35 11 45 26 15 41 32 18 49 24 41 65 44 14 58 32 27 59
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 8 18 4 8 3 4 PP 22 18 25 16 15 19 P 19 16 18 16 19 18 A 6 9 10 28 6 15 PA 25 25 28 44 25 33 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 56 28 28 0 0 0 34 21 0 1 10 31
% Prof. or Above 59 50 68 X X X 35 95 X X X 32
% Below 41 50 32 X X X 65 5 X X X 68
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
5
80 60
41
32 50 65 68 95
40
59
68 50 35 X X
Asian
20 0
Total
32 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
Female
Male
AmIndAK
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 132
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 8 59
PP 21 185
P 18 187
A 9 75
PA 27 262
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
14 12 14 38 36 37 32 37 35 16 15 13 0 0 0
U Edwards Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 36 34 16 24 12 14
PP 44 54 46 19 40 38
Percentages P A PA 15 5 20 7 5 11 30 9 39 38 19 57 37 12 49 32 16 48
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 20 21 9 16 5 8 PP 24 33 26 13 17 21 P 8 4 17 26 16 18 A 3 3 5 13 5 9 PA 11 7 22 39 21 27 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 56 28 28 0 0 0 34 21 0 1 10 31
% Prof. or Above 48 43 54 X X X 24 86 X X X 19
% Below 52 57 46 X X X 76 14 X X X 81
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
14
80 60 40 20 0
52
46 57 76 86 81
48
54 43 24 X X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
19
ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 133
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 3 30
PP 19 66
P 77 297
A 16 72
PA 93 369
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
3 6 8 17 14 18 14 15 11 0 1 1 67
17 67 14 81 14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73
63 62
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading
U 9 7 3 5 8 3
PP 30 21 16 17 22 17
Percentages P A PA 53 8 61 61 12 73 65 17 82 70 8 79 57 12 70 67 14 81
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 11 7 3 5 11 3 PP 36 22 19 18 31 19 P 64 65 78 75 79 77 A 9 13 20 9 17 16 PA 73 78 98 84 96 93 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 115 61 54 1 0 0 74 39 0 1 9 55
% Prof. or Above 81 89 72 X X X 72 97 X X X 65
% Below 19 11 28 X X X 28 3 X X X 35
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
19
11 28 28
3 35
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
81
89 72 72
97 65
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 134
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State Gypsum Creek Middle School Eagle County Re 50
U 9 9
PP
A PA NS 73 74 68 1 1 1
U 11 44
PP 23 79
P 82 324
A 12 46
PA 94 370
NS 1 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
64 65
18 64 9 16 65 9
60 40 20 0
9 9 11 18 16 21
59
Colorado 11 21 59 9
9 1 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading
U 10 7 5 5 11 9
PP 16 22 11 18 12 18
Percentages P A PA 64 9 74 62 9 71 75 9 84 66 11 77 73 4 76 64 9 73
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 11 8 5 6 13 11 PP 17 25 12 22 14 23 P 68 70 79 82 83 82 A 10 10 10 14 4 12 PA 78 80 89 96 87 94 NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
Percentage of Students P + A
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 129 60 69 2 3 1 87 35 0 1 13 63
% Prof. or Above 73 68 77 X X X 64 94 X X X 56
% Below 26 30 23 X X X 34 6 X X X 43
% NS 1 2 0 X X X 1 0 X X X 2
Percentage of Students P + A
100
26
80 60
30
23 34
6 43
94
40 20 0
73
68
77 64 56
X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 135
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 7
PP
A PA NS 74 71 67 0 0 1
U 8 43
PP 20 84
P 73 273
A 7 39
PA 80 312
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
19 19 7 10 10 23 6 9 8 0 0 1 68
19 68 6
62 59
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading
U 5 7 8 5 4 7
PP 24 18 19 16 28 19
Percentages P A PA 68 3 71 68 7 75 65 8 73 71 8 79 62 6 68 68 6 74
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 6 7 10 5 5 8 PP 26 18 24 16 35 20 P 75 68 83 72 78 73 A 3 7 10 8 8 7 PA 78 75 93 80 86 80 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 108 41 67 1 2 1 64 38 0 2 13 45
% Prof. or Above 74 83 69 X X X 77 71 X X X 69
% Below 26 17 31 X X X 23 29 X X X 31
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
26 17 31 23
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female
29
31
74
83 69
77
71
69
X
Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 136
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 1 14
PP 34 153
P 68 258
A 12 40
PA 80 298
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
1 3 4 30 33 38 59 55 49
30 59 10 70 33 55 38 49 9 9 64 58
10 9
9 0 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing
U 3 3 0 3 4 1
PP 41 31 32 23 41 30
Percentages P A PA 48 8 56 57 9 66 58 10 68 64 9 74 46 9 56 59 10 70
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 4 3 0 3 5 1
PP 49 33 38 25 56 34
P 57 61 70 69 64 68
Ns A 10 10 12 10 13 12
PA 67 71 82 79 77 80
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 115 61 54 1 0 0 74 39 0 1 9 55
% Prof. or Above 70 79 59 X X X 58 90 X X X 55
% Below 30 21 41 X X X 42 10 X X X 45
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
10 30 21 41 42 45
90 70 79 59 58 55
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 137
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 1 1 1
U 6 11
PP 34 144
P 75 274
A 13 64
PA 88 338
NS 1 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
5 2 3 26 29 35 15 10 13 1 1 1 58 55 47
26 58 10 68 29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing
U 3 2 1 1 2 5
PP 30 32 20 25 24 26
Percentages P A PA 49 18 67 51 15 66 60 19 79 58 16 74 61 13 75 58 10 68
NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
U 3 2 1 1 2 6
PP 32 36 21 31 27 34
P 52 58 64 72 70 75
Ns A 19 17 20 20 15 13
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 71 75 84 92 85 88
NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 129 60 69 2 3 1 87 35 0 1 13 63
% Prof. or Above 68 67 70 X X X 56 94 X X X 48
% Below 31 32 30 X X X 43 6 X X X 51
% NS 1 2 0 X X X 1 0 X X X 2
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60
94 31 32 30 43 6 51
40 20 0
68
67
70 56 48 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 138
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
A PA NS 65 61 56 0 0 1
U 2 19
PP 36 151
P 67 240
A 3 30
PA 70 270
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
62
33 62 3 34 54 7 40 47 9
60 40 20
2 4 3 33 34 40
54 47
9 0 0 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing
U 1 0 2 0 0 2
PP 46 34 35 36 29 33
Percentages P A PA 45 8 53 56 10 66 54 10 64 55 9 64 63 9 71 62 3 65
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 0 2 0 0 2
PP 51 34 44 36 36 36
P 49 56 68 56 79 67
Ns A 9 10 13 9 11 3
PA 58 66 81 65 90 70
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
64
64
65
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 108 41 67 1 2 1 64 38 0 2 13 45
% Prof. or Above 65 80 55 X X X 63 71 X X X 56
% Below 35 20 45 X X X 38 29 X X X 44
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
20
80 60 40
35
45
38
29 44
80 65 55 63
71 56
20 0
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 139
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 8
PP
PA NS 0 1 0
U 9 45
PP 33 117
P 50 177
A 23 126
PA 73 303
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
43
29 43 20 63
40 20 0
12 8 10
29
38 35 27 27 20 0 1 0
25 26
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math
U 10 11 4 7 22 8
PP 33 27 26 35 24 29
Percentages P A PA 44 13 57 38 23 62 53 18 70 36 22 59 37 17 54 43 20 63
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 12 12 5 7 31 9 PP 40 29 31 37 33 33 P 53 41 63 39 51 50 A 16 25 21 24 23 23 PA 69 66 84 63 74 73 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
63
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 115 61 54 1 0 0 74 39 0 1 9 55
% Prof. or Above 63 67 59 X X X 50 87 X X X 45
% Below 37 33 41 X X X 50 13 X X X 55
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
63 37 33 41 50
13
55
87 67 59 50 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
X
Asian
45 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 140
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 1 1 1
U 20 66
PP 34 128
P 38 151
A 36 147
PA 74 298
NS 1 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
26 26 30 29 30 28 28 29 27
20 0
16 13 14 1 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math
U 15 5 7 6 10 16
PP 39 44 26 33 37 26
Percentages P A PA 33 13 46 27 23 50 46 21 67 41 19 60 28 25 54 29 28 57
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 16 6 7 8 11 20 PP 41 50 28 41 42 34 P 35 31 49 51 32 38 A 14 26 22 24 29 36 PA 49 57 71 75 61 74 NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
Percentage of Students P + A
60
54
57
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 129 60 69 2 3 1 87 35 0 1 13 63
% Prof. or Above 57 52 62 X X X 45 86 X X X 38
% Below 42 47 38 X X X 54 14 X X X 60
% NS 1 2 0 X X X 1 0 X X X 2
Percentage of Students P + A
100
14
80 60 40
42
38 47 54 60
86 57 52 62 45 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
38 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 141
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 14 75
PP 27 124
P 35 131
A 32 108
PA 67 239
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
13 17 19 29 25 28 32 30 29 30
24 23 0 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math
U 23 10 11 6 10 13
PP 44 25 27 17 29 25
Percentages P A PA 26 7 34 42 23 65 34 27 62 50 27 77 40 21 61 32 30 62
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 25 10 14 6 13 14 PP 48 25 35 17 36 27 P 29 42 44 51 51 35 A 8 23 35 27 26 32 PA 37 65 79 78 77 67 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 108 41 67 1 2 1 64 38 0 2 13 45
% Prof. or Above 62 59 64 X X X 58 71 X X X 53
% Below 38 41 36 X X X 42 29 X X X 47
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
62 59 64 58 71 53 38 41 36 29 42 47
20 0
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 142
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 9
PA NS 67 0 0 1
U 14 80
PP 22 107
P 62 200
A 10 53
PA 72 253
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
13 18 21 20 24 27 9 12 9 0 0 1 57 45 43
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)
Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science
U 9 11 13 5 7 13
PP 33 19 21 19 29 20
Percentages P A PA 54 5 58 56 14 70 55 10 65 55 21 76 59 6 64 57 9 67
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 10 11 17 5 9 14 PP 36 19 27 19 36 22 P 59 57 70 56 74 62 A 5 14 13 21 7 10 PA 64 71 83 77 81 72 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 108 41 67 1 2 1 64 38 0 2 13 45
% Prof. or Above 67 61 70 X X X 64 71 X X X 60
% Below 33 39 30 X X X 36 29 X X X 40
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
33
39
30
36
29 40
67
61
70
64
71 60
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 143
Gypsum Elem
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 61 72 73 0 0 0
U 6 38
PP 16 98
P 30 322
A 4 32
PA 34 354
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
66 66
60 40 20 0
11 8 10 29 20 17
54
Colorado 10 17 66 7
7 0 0 0
U Gypsum Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 26 18 5 4 4 11
PP 22 24 34 14 34 29
Percentages P A PA 52 0 52 55 4 59 61 0 61 82 0 82 57 4 62 54 7 61
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 12 9 3 2 2 6
PP 10 12 19 7 16 16
Ns P A 24 0 28 2 34 0 42 0 27 2 30 4
PA 24 30 34 42 29 34
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 56 26 30 0 0 0 36 19 0 1 6 30
% Prof. or Above 61 58 63 X X X 53 74 X X X 47
% Below 39 42 37 X X X 47 26 X X X 53
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
61 58 63 53 74 47 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
39
42
37
26 47 53
20 0
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 144
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 51 67 68 0 0 0
U 5 51
PP 15 122
P 20 332
A 1 17
PA 21 349
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63 63
60 40 20 0
12 10 11 37 23 21
49
U Gypsum Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 15 15 16 4 3 12
PP 34 26 31 33 20 37
Percentages P A PA 49 0 49 57 2 59 51 0 51 63 0 63 72 5 77 49 2 51
NS 1 0 2 0 0 0
U 10 7 8 2 2 5
PP 23 12 15 17 12 15
Ns P A 33 0 26 1 25 0 32 0 43 3 20 1
PA 33 27 25 32 46 21
NS 1 0 1 0 0 0
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 41 19 22 2 0 0 33 5 0 1 5 28
% Prof. or Above 51 68 36 X X X 48 X X X X 43
% Below 49 32 64 X X X 52 X X X X 57
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
32 49 64 52 57
68 51 36 X
AmIndAK
48 X
Asian
43 X X
HwPacIs
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 145
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Percentage of Students
Ns A 2 44 PA 42 373 NS 1 3
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 8 11 17 18 18 4 9 8 2 1 0 77 65 62
17 77 4 18 65 9
329
Colorado 11 18 62 8
U Gypsum Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 2 11 4 13 4 0
PP 33 24 27 23 21 17
Percentages P A PA 57 7 64 64 2 65 67 2 69 58 4 62 74 2 75 77 4 81
NS 0 0 0 2 0 2
U 1 7 2 7 2 0
PP 14 16 12 12 12 9
P 24 42 30 30 42 40
Ns A 3 1 1 2 1 2
PA 27 43 31 32 43 42
NS 0 0 0 1 0 1
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 52 27 25 0 0 0 35 16 0 1 2 31
% Below 17 15 20 X X X 23 0 X X X 19
% NS 2 4 0 X X X 3 0 X X X 3
Percentage of Students P + A
100
17 15 20
0 23 19
80 60
100
40 20 0
81
81
80
74
77
X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 146
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
A PA NS 48 50 51 0 0 0
U 5 28
PP 24 211
P 25 218
A 2 27
PA 27 245
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
43 43 43 45 45 43
43 45 4 43 45 6 43 43 8
40 20 0
9 8 0 0 0
U Gypsum Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 13 18 0 0 9 9
PP 52 38 59 39 45 43
Percentages P A PA 33 2 35 32 12 44 38 4 41 53 8 61 47 0 47 45 4 48
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 6 9 0 0 4 5
PP 24 19 33 20 21 24
P 15 16 21 27 22 25
Ns A 1 6 2 4 0 2
PA 16 22 23 31 22 27
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 56 26 30 0 0 0 36 19 0 1 6 30
% Prof. or Above 48 62 37 X X X 47 47 X X X 43
% Below 52 38 63 X X X 53 53 X X X 57
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
62 38 52 63 53 53 57
20 0
48 37 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
47 X
Asian
47 X X
Mult
43 X
IEP ELL
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 147
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 46 51 53 0 0 0
U 6 33
PP 16 221
P 16 228
A 3 39
PA 19 267
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
15 6 7 7 7 8 0 0 0 39 42 39 39 44 45
U Gypsum Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 9 11 12 0 0 15
PP 52 43 31 49 48 39
Percentages P A PA 37 0 37 41 4 46 53 4 57 39 12 51 42 10 52 39 7 46
NS 1 0 0 0 0 0
U 6 5 6 0 0 6
PP 35 20 15 25 29 16
P 25 19 26 20 25 16
Ns A 0 2 2 6 6 3
PA 25 21 28 26 31 19
NS 1 0 0 0 0 0
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 41 19 22 2 0 0 33 5 0 1 5 28
% Prof. or Above 46 63 32 X X X 42 X X X X 36
% Below 54 37 68 X X X 58 X X X X 64
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
63 37 54 68 58 64
20 0
46 32 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
42 X
Asian
36 X X
HwPacIs
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 148
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 0 1 1
U 0 23
PP 16 183
P 30 252
A 6 44
PA 36 296
NS 0 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 5 5 31 36 37 58 50 48
31 58 12 69 36 50 37 48 9 9 58 57
12 9
9 0 1 1
U Gypsum Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 2 3 2 2 0 0
PP 36 38 49 54 40 31
Percentages P A PA 52 10 62 55 5 59 47 2 49 42 2 44 53 7 60 58 12 69
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 2 1 1 0 0
PP 15 25 22 28 23 16
P 22 36 21 22 30 30
Ns A 4 3 1 1 4 6
PA 26 39 22 23 34 36
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 52 27 25 0 0 0 35 16 0 1 2 31
% Below 31 26 36 X X X 43 0 X X X 42
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60
31 26 36 43
0 42
100
40 20 0
69
74
64
57
58
X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 149
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 0 0 0
U 2 34
PP 16 124
P 23 204
A 16 142
PA 39 346
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
4 7 7 0 0 0 40 40 41 28 25 28 28 31 20
28 40 28 68 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72
U Gypsum Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
U 11 8 0 2 11 4
PP 37 34 27 25 26 28
Percentages P A PA 33 20 52 42 16 58 46 27 73 33 40 73 45 19 64 40 28 68
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 5 4 0 1 5 2
PP 17 17 15 13 12 16
P 15 21 26 17 21 23
Ns A 9 8 15 21 9 16
PA 24 29 41 38 30 39
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 57 27 30 0 0 0 37 18 0 2 6 31
% Prof. or Above 68 74 63 X X X 68 72 X X X 61
% Below 32 26 37 X X X 32 28 X X X 39
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
32
26 37
32
28 39
68
74 63
68
72 61
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 150
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 0 0 0
U 3 44
PP 12 120
P 19 249
A 7 115
PA 26 364
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
7 8 8 0 0 0 29 23 20 17 22 46 47 43 28
29 46 17 63 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72
U Gypsum Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 10 4 8 0 3 7
PP 27 28 29 29 23 29
Percentages P A PA 48 15 63 46 22 67 39 24 63 47 24 71 48 25 73 46 17 63
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 7 2 4 0 2 3
PP 18 13 14 15 14 12
P 32 21 19 24 29 19
Ns A 10 10 12 12 15 7
PA 42 31 31 36 44 26
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
63
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 41 19 22 2 0 0 33 5 0 1 5 28
% Prof. or Above 63 63 64 X X X 61 X X X X 54
% Below 37 37 36 X X X 39 X X X X 46
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
63 63 64 61 54 37 37 36 39 46
20 0
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 151
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 0 0 0
U 2 44
PP 13 137
P 24 196
A 13 129
PA 37 325
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
46
25 46 25 71 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65
40 20
4 9 9
39 36 25 27 25 29 25 25
U Gypsum Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 2 5 2 10 0 4
PP 21 34 31 33 44 25
Percentages P A PA 50 26 76 42 20 62 42 24 67 35 23 58 39 18 56 46 25 71
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 3 1 5 0 2
PP 9 22 14 17 25 13
P 21 27 19 18 22 24
Ns A 11 13 11 12 10 13
PA 32 40 30 30 32 37
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 52 27 25 0 0 0 35 16 0 1 2 31
% Prof. or Above 71 70 72 X X X 66 88 X X X 68
% Below 29 30 28 X X X 34 13 X X X 32
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
13 29 30 28 34 32
88 71 70 72 66 68
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 152
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 4
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 2 59
PP 23 185
P 22 187
A 6 75
PA 28 262
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
43
43 42 11 53
40 20
4 12 14
36 37
42
37 35 11 15 13 0 0 0
U Gypsum Elem
PP
A Colorado
NS
Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 7 14 9 15 4 4
PP 62 42 40 52 61 43
Percentages P A PA 21 10 31 39 5 44 44 7 51 21 12 33 30 4 33 42 11 53
NS 0 0 0 0 2 0
U 3 9 4 8 2 2
PP 26 27 18 27 35 23
P 9 25 20 11 17 22
Ns A 4 3 3 6 2 6
PA 13 28 23 17 19 28
NS 0 0 0 0 1 0
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 53 27 26 0 0 0 35 17 0 1 3 31
% Prof. or Above 53 56 50 X X X 37 88 X X X 35
% Below 47 44 50 X X X 63 12 X X X 65
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
53 56 47 44 50 63
12
65
88 50 37 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
35 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 153
Homestake Peak
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
79 66 66
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 9 8
PP 9
A PA NS 82 72 73 0 0 0
U 3 38
PP 3 98
P 26 322
A 1 32
PA 27 354
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
20 17 9 8 10 9 3 7 7 0 0 0
79 3
20 66 7
Colorado 10 17 66 7
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 21 7 21 26 12 9
PP 17 32 38 39 25 9
Percentages P A PA 63 0 63 61 0 61 41 0 41 35 0 35 54 8 62 79 3 82
NS 0 0 0 0 2 0
U 5 2 7 6 6 3
PP 4 9 13 9 13 3
P 15 17 14 8 28 26
Ns A 0 0 0 0 4 1
PA 15 17 14 8 32 27
NS 0 0 0 0 1 0
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 33 15 18 1 0 1 12 19 0 0 5 7
% Prof. or Above 82 X 78 X X X X 95 X X X X
% Below 18 X 22 X X X X 5 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
18 22 5
80 60
95
40 20 0
82
78
X
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 154
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 58 67 68 0 0 0
U 9 51
PP 15 122
P 32 332
A 1 17
PA 33 349
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63 63
60 40 20 0
16 26 23 21 10 11
56
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 10 21 0 26 18 16
PP 23 31 40 30 24 26
Percentages P A PA 67 0 67 48 0 48 57 3 60 44 0 44 55 3 58 56 2 58
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 3 6 0 7 7 9
PP 7 9 12 8 9 15
P 20 14 17 12 21 32
Ns A 0 0 1 0 1 1
PA 20 14 18 12 22 33
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
60 44
58
58
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 57 33 24 1 4 1 29 22 0 0 8 31
% Prof. or Above 58 67 46 X X X 38 91 X X X 35
% Below 42 33 54 X X X 62 9 X X X 65
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
100 80 60 40
58 42 33 54 62
65
91 67 46 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
38 X
Asian
35 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 155
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 1 0
U 10 42
PP 13 89
P 16 329
A 5 44
PA 21 373
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65 62
60 40
23 36 30 8 11 18 18 11 9 8 0 1 0
Colorado 11 18 62
20 0
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 23 7 0 0 12 23
PP 41 29 28 30 17 30
Percentages P A PA 36 0 36 61 0 61 60 12 72 63 7 70 63 7 71 36 11 48
NS 0 4 0 0 0 0
U 5 2 0 0 5 10
PP 9 8 7 9 7 13
Ns P A 8 0 17 0 15 3 19 2 26 3 16 5
PA 8 17 18 21 29 21
NS 0 1 0 0 0 0
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 44 26 18 0 0 1 26 17 0 0 7 20
% Prof. or Above 48 58 33 X X X 38 65 X X X 35
% Below 52 42 67 X X X 62 35 X X X 65
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
52
42 67 62
35 65
48
58 33 X
AmIndAK
65 38 X
Asian
35 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 156
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 1 1 1
U 7 30
PP 8 66
P 54 297
A 10 72
PA 64 369
NS 1 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
9 6 8 10 14 18 13 15 11 1 1 1 68
10 68 13 80 14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73
63 62
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 5 9
PP 16 10
Percentages P A PA 70 9 79 68 13 80
NS 0 1
U 4 7
PP 13 8
P 57 54
Ns A 7 10
PA 64 64
NS 0 1
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 80 28 52 0 3 0 29 45 0 3 12 20
% Prof. or Above 80 75 83 X X X 62 89 X X X 60
% Below 19 21 17 X X X 34 11 X X X 35
% NS 1 4 0 X X X 3 0 X X X 5
Percentage of Students P + A
100
19 17 21 34
11 35
80 60 40 20 0
Total
80
75
83 62
89 60
X
Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 157
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 8 9
PP
A PA NS 78 74 68 0 1 1
U 6 44
PP 12 79
P 56 324
A 6 46
PA 62 370
NS 0 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
8 9 11 15 16 21 8 9 9 0 1 1 70
15 70 8 16 65 9
65
59
Colorado 11 21 59 9
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 9 8
PP 13 15
Percentages P A PA 58 21 79 70 8 78
NS 0 0
U 7 6
PP 10 12
P 46 56
Ns A 17 6
PA 63 62
NS 0 0
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 80 37 43 1 3 2 30 44 0 0 7 27
% Prof. or Above 78 81 74 X X X 63 89 X X X 59
% Below 23 19 26 X X X 37 11 X X X 41
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
23 19 26 37
11 41
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
78
81
89 74 63 59
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 158
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 6
PP
PA NS 1 0 1
U 4 43
PP 11 84
P 42 273
A 12 39
PA 54 312
NS 1 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
6 10 10 16 19 23 17 9 8 1 0 1 60 62 59
16 60 17 77 9 8 71 67
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 12 6
PP 17 16
Percentages P A PA 63 8 71 60 17 77
NS 1 1
U 9 4
PP 13 11
P 49 42
Ns A 6 12
PA 55 54
NS 1 1
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 70 39 31 0 1 0 25 42 0 2 8 14
% Prof. or Above 77 85 68 X X X 48 93 X X X X
% Below 21 15 29 X X X 48 7 X X X X
% NS 1 0 3 X X X 4 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
21 15 29 48 7
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female
77
85 68 48 X
Male AmIndAK
93
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 159
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X 0
PA NS X 61 X 0 1
U X 4
PP X 3
P X 11
A X 0
PA NS X 11 X 0 8
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
61
Eagle County Re 50 22 17 61
60 40
22
51
Colorado 15 20 51 13 64
20 0
X
15 X
17 20 X X 0
13 X 0 1
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)
U X X X X
PP X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X
U X X X X
PP X X X X
P X X X X
Ns A X X X X
PA X X X X
NS X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 160
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 35 X X 0
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 38 X X 0
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X X X X X X X X 4 X X 0 31 33 31
Colorado 31 33 31 4
34 36 34 4
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 161
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
A PA NS 50 50 51 3 0 0
U 2 28
PP 13 211
P 13 218
A 3 27
PA 16 245
NS 1 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
41 43 43 41 45 43
41 41 9 43 45 6 43 43 8
40 20
6 6 6 9 8
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 12 4 6 13 8 6
PP 54 56 56 63 49 41
Percentages P A PA 35 0 35 41 0 41 32 6 38 21 4 25 38 6 43 41 9 50
NS 0 0 0 0 0 3
U 3 1 2 3 4 2
PP 14 15 19 15 26 13
P 9 11 11 5 20 13
Ns A 0 0 2 1 3 3
PA 9 11 13 6 23 16
NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 32 14 18 1 0 1 12 18 0 0 5 7
% Prof. or Above 50 X 39 X X X X 61 X X X X
% Below 47 X 61 X X X X 33 X X X X
% NS 3 X 0 X X X X 6 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
61 47 33 61
20 0
50 39 X
Total Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 162
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 46 51 53 0 0 0
U 6 33
PP 25 221
P 24 228
A 2 39
PA 26 267
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
11 7 44 42 39 42 44 45
8 0 0 0
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 3 10 0 15 5 11
PP 53 52 47 48 61 44
Percentages P A PA 37 7 43 34 3 38 40 13 53 30 7 37 32 3 34 42 4 46
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 3 0 4 2 6
PP 16 15 14 13 23 25
P 11 10 12 8 12 24
Ns A 2 1 4 2 1 2
PA 13 11 16 10 13 26
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 57 33 24 1 4 1 29 22 0 0 8 31
% Prof. or Above 46 61 25 X X X 21 77 X X X 23
% Below 54 39 75 X X X 79 23 X X X 77
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
23
80
54
39 75 77
60 40
61
79
77 46 25 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
21
Hisp Wht
23 X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 163
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
A PA NS 36 58 57 0 1 1
U 4 23
PP 24 183
P 15 252
A 1 44
PA 16 296
NS 0 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
9 55 36 37 34 50 48
55 34 2 36 50 9 37 48 9
9 0 1 1
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 9 4 0 0 5 9
PP 55 21 36 37 44 55
Percentages P A PA 36 0 36 64 7 71 52 12 64 57 7 63 39 10 49 34 2 36
NS 0 4 0 0 2 0
U 2 1 0 0 2 4
PP 12 6 9 11 18 24
P 8 18 13 17 16 15
Ns A 0 2 3 2 4 1
PA 8 20 16 19 20 16
NS 0 1 0 0 1 0
64
63 49 36
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 44 26 18 0 0 1 26 17 0 0 7 20
% Prof. or Above 36 50 17 X X X 27 53 X X X 25
% Below 64 50 83 X X X 73 47 X X X 75
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
64 50 83 73 47 75
60 40 20 0
Total Female
50 36 17
Male
53 27 X
AmIndAK
25 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 164
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 1 1 1
U 5 14
PP 26 153
P 39 258
A 9 40
PA 48 298
NS 1 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
6 3 4 33 33 38 49 55 49
33 49 11 60 33 55 38 49 9 9 64 58
11 9
9 1 1 1
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 1 6
PP 38 33
Percentages P A PA 53 7 60 49 11 60
NS 0 1
U 1 5
PP 31 26
P 43 39
Ns A 6 9
PA 49 48
NS 0 1
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 80 28 52 0 3 0 29 45 0 3 12 20
% Prof. or Above 60 64 58 X X X 38 71 X X X 40
% Below 39 32 42 X X X 59 29 X X X 55
% NS 1 4 0 X X X 3 0 X X X 5
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
60 64 58 38 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
39
32
29 42 59 55
71 40 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 165
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 0 1 1
U 0 11
PP 22 144
P 45 274
A 13 64
PA 58 338
NS 0 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 2 3 28 29 35 16 13 15 0 1 1 56 55 47
28 56 16 73 29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 0 0
PP 24 28
Percentages P A PA 58 19 76 56 16 73
NS 0 0
U 0 0
PP 19 22
P 46 45
Ns A 15 13
PA 61 58
NS 0 0
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 80 37 43 1 3 2 30 44 0 0 7 27
% Prof. or Above 73 76 70 X X X 60 84 X X X 56
% Below 28 24 30 X X X 40 16 X X X 44
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
28 24 16 30 40 44
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female
73
76
84 70 60 56
X
Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 166
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 1 0 1
U 1 19
PP 19 151
P 38 240
A 11 30
PA 49 270
NS 1 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
1 4 3 34 27 16 7 9 1 0 1 40 54 54 47
27 54 16 70 34 54 40 47 7 9 61 56
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 0 1
PP 41 27
Percentages P A PA 50 8 58 54 16 70
NS 1 1
U 0 1
PP 32 19
P 39 38
Ns A 6 11
PA 45 49
NS 1 1
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 70 39 31 0 1 0 25 42 0 2 8 14
% Prof. or Above 70 72 68 X X X 52 79 X X X X
% Below 29 28 29 X X X 44 21 X X X X
% NS 1 0 3 X X X 4 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
29
28
21 29 44
70
72
79 68 52
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 167
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X 0
PA NS X 17 X 0 0
U X 6
PP X 9
P X 3
A X 0
PA NS X 3 X 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 33 20 X 24 17 X X 0 50 37 18 X 0 0
Eagle County Re 50 33 50 17
Colorado 20 24 37 18 56
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)
U X X X
PP X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X
U X X X
PP X X X
P X X X
Ns A X X X
PA X X X
NS X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 168
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 19 X X 6
U X X
PP X X
P X X
A PA NS X X X X 20 X X 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
44
Colorado 44 32 18 1
47 35 19 1
40 20 0
X X X X
32 18 X X X X 1 X X 6
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 169
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PA NS 0 0 0
U 2 34
PP 10 124
P 12 204
A 10 142
PA 22 346
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
6 7 7 0 0 0 29 35 25 20 40 41 29 28 31
29 35 29 65 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
U 14 7 15 12 9 6
PP 32 25 29 24 17 29
Percentages P A PA 29 25 54 50 18 68 32 24 56 48 16 64 47 23 70 35 29 65
NS 0 0 0 0 4 0
U 4 2 5 3 5 2
PP 9 7 10 6 9 10
P 8 14 11 12 25 12
Ns A 7 5 8 4 12 10
PA 15 19 19 16 37 22
NS 0 0 0 0 2 0
64
65
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 34 15 19 1 0 1 14 18 0 0 5 9
% Prof. or Above 65 X 63 X X X X 78 X X X X
% Below 35 X 37 X X X X 22 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
22
80 60 40
35
37
78 65 63
20 0
Total
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 170
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 9 44
PP 14 120
P 25 249
A 12 115
PA 37 364
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
42 47
43 28 20 22 0 0 0
40 20 0
15 8 8 23 23 20
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 10 17 7 22 16 15
PP 37 24 23 33 24 23
Percentages P A PA 47 7 53 45 14 59 30 40 70 15 30 44 39 18 58 42 20 62
NS 0 0 0 0 3 0
U 3 5 2 6 6 9
PP 11 7 7 9 9 14
P 14 13 9 4 15 25
Ns A 2 4 12 8 7 12
PA 16 17 21 12 22 37
NS 0 0 0 0 1 0
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 60 33 27 1 3 1 33 22 0 0 8 34
% Prof. or Above 62 79 41 X X X 45 86 X X X 47
% Below 38 21 59 X X X 55 14 X X X 53
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
21
14 53
80 60 40
38 59 55
79 62 41 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
86 47 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
20 0
45 X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 171
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 7
PA NS 48 0 0 0
U 9 44
PP 14 137
P 18 196
A 3 129
PA 21 325
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
20 9 9 32 41 39 36 27 25 7 0 25 29
27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 9 11 12 7 17 20
PP 41 29 32 17 29 32
Percentages P A PA 45 5 50 39 21 61 32 24 56 43 33 77 34 20 54 41 7 48
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 2 3 3 2 7 9
PP 9 8 8 5 12 14
P 10 11 8 13 14 18
Ns A 1 6 6 10 8 3
PA 11 17 14 23 22 21
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
48
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 44 26 18 0 0 1 26 17 0 0 7 20
% Prof. or Above 48 54 39 X X X 38 65 X X X 35
% Below 52 46 61 X X X 62 35 X X X 65
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
65 35 52 46 61 62 65
20 0
48
54 39 X X
Asian
38 X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
35 X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 172
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 1 0
U 11 45
PP 23 117
P 24 177
A 22 126
PA 46 303
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
14 10 12 0 1 0 29 30 38 35 28 27 27
25 26
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 7 14
PP 36 29
Percentages P A PA 35 22 57 30 28 58
Ns NS 0 0 U 6 11 PP 29 23 P 28 24 A 18 22 PA 46 46 NS 0 0
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 80 28 52 0 3 0 29 45 0 3 12 20
% Prof. or Above 58 39 67 X X X 28 71 X X X 40
% Below 43 61 33 X X X 72 29 X X X 60
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
58 67 39 28 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
43 61
33
29 60 72
71 40 X
Asian
20 0
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 173
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 11 66
PP 22 128
P 20 151
A 27 147
PA 47 298
NS 0 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
14 13 14 0 1 1 28 26 30 30 28 34 29 27
25
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 13 14
PP 35 28
Percentages P A PA 28 25 53 25 34 59
Ns NS 0 0 U 10 11 PP 28 22 P 22 20 A 20 27 PA 42 47 NS 0 0
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 80 37 43 1 3 2 30 44 0 0 7 27
% Prof. or Above 59 65 53 X X X 33 80 X X X 22
% Below 41 35 47 X X X 67 20 X X X 78
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
20
80 60 40
41
35 47 67 78
80 59 65 53 33 22 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 174
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 1 1 1
U 12 75
PP 20 124
P 22 131
A 15 108
PA 37 239
NS 1 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
17 17 19 29 28 29 31 30 29
21 24 23 1 1 1
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 24 17
PP 35 29
Percentages P A PA 26 15 41 31 21 53
Ns NS 0 1 U 19 12 PP 27 20 P 20 22 A 12 15 PA 32 37 NS 0 1
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 70 39 31 0 1 0 25 42 0 2 8 14
% Prof. or Above 53 49 58 X X X 16 71 X X X X
% Below 46 51 39 X X X 80 29 X X X X
% NS 1 0 3 X X X 4 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
53 29 46 51 39
80
71 49 58
20 0
Total
X
Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
16
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 175
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 5
PA NS 34 0 0 0
U 10 59
PP 19 185
P 13 187
A 2 75
PA 15 262
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
43
Homestake Peak 23 43 30
40
23
36 37 30
37 35 15 13 5 0 0 0
20 0
12 14
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 32 11 8 7 22 23
PP 50 43 40 40 37 43
Percentages P A PA 14 5 18 43 4 46 48 4 52 40 13 53 27 12 39 30 5 34
NS 0 0 0 0 2 0
U 7 3 2 2 9 10
PP 11 12 10 12 15 19
Ns P A 3 1 12 1 12 1 12 4 11 5 13 2
100 80 60 40 20 0 18 46 52 53 39 34
PA 4 13 13 16 16 15
NS 0 0 0 0 1 0
2008
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 44 26 18 0 0 1 26 17 0 0 7 20
% Prof. or Above 34 35 33 X X X 19 59 X X X 10
% Below 66 65 67 X X X 81 41 X X X 90
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
66 65 67 81 90 41
60 40
59
20 0
34
35
33 X X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
19
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
10
ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 176
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 1 0 1
U 8 80
PP 17 107
P 37 200
A 7 53
PA 44 253
NS 1 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
18 21 11 24 24 27 10 12 9 1 0 1 53 45 43
PP
Homestake Peak
NS Colorado
Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 24 11
PP 33 24
Percentages P A PA 38 4 42 53 10 63
NS 0 1
U 19 8
PP 26 17
Ns P A 30 3 37 7
PA 33 44
NS 0 1
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 70 39 31 0 1 0 25 42 0 2 8 14
% Prof. or Above 63 62 65 X X X 32 79 X X X X
% Below 36 38 32 X X X 64 21 X X X X
% NS 1 0 3 X X X 4 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
21
80 60 40
36
38
32 64
79 63 62 65 32 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 177
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 60 72 73 0 0 0
U 10 38
PP 10 98
P 28 322
A 2 32
PA 30 354
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
66 66
60 40 20 0
20 8 10 20 20 17
56
Colorado 10 17 66 7
7 0 0 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading
U 24 15 13 21 20
PP 26 27 38 19 20
Percentages P A PA 50 0 50 54 4 58 47 2 49 49 11 60 56 4 60
NS 0 0 0 0 0
U 8 4 6 10 10
PP 9 7 17 9 10
Ns P A 17 0 14 1 21 1 23 5 28 2
PA 17 15 22 28 30
NS 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 50 18 32 1 1 0 37 11 0 0 5 36
% Prof. or Above 60 44 69 X X X 54 X X X X 56
% Below 40 56 31 X X X 46 X X X X 44
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
60 69 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
40 56
31 46 44
54
56
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 178
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 48 67 68 0 0 0
U 7 51
PP 17 122
P 21 332
A 1 17
PA 22 349
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63 63
60
46
40 20 0
15 10 11
37 23 21 2 3 5 0 0 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading
U 14 13 17 21 15
Percentages PP P A PA 50 32 0 32 18 67 0 67 31 49 3 51 33 42 3 45 37 46 2 48
NS 5 3 0 0 0
U 3 5 6 7 7
PP 11 7 11 11 17
Ns P A 7 0 26 0 17 1 14 1 21 1
PA 7 26 18 15 22
NS 1 1 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 46 17 29 0 0 0 28 18 0 0 7 26
% Prof. or Above 48 41 52 X X X 29 78 X X X 27
% Below 52 59 48 X X X 71 22 X X X 73
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
22
80 60 40 20 0
52
59
48 71 73
78 48 41 52 29 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
27 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 179
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 50 74 70 3 1 0
U 8 42
PP 7 89
P 14 329
A 2 44
PA 16 373
NS 1 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65 62
60
44
Colorado 11 18 62 8
40
25 22 8 11
20 0
18 18 6 9 8 3 1 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading
U 20 19 18 21 25
Percentages PP P A PA 20 60 0 60 27 42 8 50 18 64 0 64 30 42 6 48 22 44 6 50
NS 0 4 0 0 3
U 5 5 6 7 8
PP 5 7 6 10 7
Ns P A 15 0 11 2 21 0 14 2 14 2
PA 15 13 21 16 16
NS 0 1 0 0 1
Percentage of Students P + A
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 32 11 21 2 0 0 25 5 0 0 6 25
% Prof. or Above 50 X 52 X X X 40 X X X X 40
% Below 47 X 43 X X X 56 X X X X 56
% NS 3 X 5 X X X 4 X X X X 4
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total
47
43 56 56
50 X
Female
52 40 X
Male AmIndAK
40 X X
HwPacIs
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 180
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 41 50 51 0 0 0
U 7 28
PP 22 211
P 17 218
A 3 27
PA 20 245
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
45 43 43 45 43 35 14 6 6 6 6 8 0 0 0
40 20 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing
U 20 11 14 13 14
PP 57 56 51 48 45
Percentages P A PA 20 3 23 33 0 33 35 0 35 35 4 39 35 6 41
NS 0 0 0 0 0
U 7 3 6 6 7
PP 20 15 22 22 22
P 7 9 15 16 17
Ns A 1 0 0 2 3
PA 8 9 15 18 20
NS 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 49 18 31 1 1 0 36 11 0 0 4 35
% Prof. or Above 41 39 42 X X X 36 X X X X 40
% Below 59 61 58 X X X 64 X X X X 60
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
59 61 58 64 60
60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
41
39
42 X
AmIndAK
36 X
Asian
40 X X
HwPacIs
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 181
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 5 33
PP 19 221
P 16 228
A 6 39
PA 22 267
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
11 7 41 42 39 44 45 35 13
8 0 0 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing
U 32 18 11 18 11
PP 55 54 49 45 41
Percentages P A PA 14 0 14 23 3 26 34 6 40 36 0 36 35 13 48
NS 0 3 0 0 0
U 7 7 4 6 5
PP 12 21 17 15 19
P 3 9 12 12 16
Ns A 0 1 2 0 6
PA 3 10 14 12 22
NS 0 1 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 46 17 29 0 0 0 28 18 0 0 7 26
% Prof. or Above 48 41 52 X X X 36 67 X X X 35
% Below 52 59 48 X X X 64 33 X X X 65
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
33 52 59 48 64 65
67 48 41 52 36 X
AmIndAK
35 X X
Mult
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 182
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 47 58 57 3 1 1
U 6 23
PP 10 183
P 15 252
A 0 44
PA 15 296
NS 1 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
19 5 5 9 0 9 3 1 1 31 36 37 47 50 48
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
U 16 15 6 9 19
PP 44 50 39 42 31
Percentages P A PA 36 4 40 23 4 27 52 3 55 45 3 48 47 0 47
NS 0 8 0 0 3
U 4 4 2 3 6
PP 11 13 13 14 10
P 9 6 17 15 15
Ns A 1 1 1 1 0
PA 10 7 18 16 15
NS 0 2 0 0 1
Percentage of Students P + A
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 32 11 21 2 0 0 25 5 0 0 6 25
% Prof. or Above 47 X 52 X X X 40 X X X X 40
% Below 50 X 43 X X X 56 X X X X 56
% NS 3 X 5 X X X 4 X X X X 4
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
50 43 56 56
60 40 20 0
Total
47 X
Female
52 40 X
Male AmIndAK
40 X X
HwPacIs
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 183
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 7 34
PP 14 124
P 19 204
A 9 142
PA 28 346
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
14 7 7 0 0 0 39 40 41 29 25 28 31 20 18
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math
U 17 11 19 15 14
PP 34 33 35 30 29
Percentages P A PA 34 14 49 30 26 56 26 21 47 20 35 54 39 18 57
NS 0 0 0 0 0
U 6 3 8 7 7
PP 12 9 15 14 14
P 12 8 11 9 19
Ns A 5 7 9 16 9
PA 17 15 20 25 28
NS 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 49 18 31 1 1 0 36 11 0 0 4 35
% Prof. or Above 57 50 61 X X X 53 X X X X 54
% Below 43 50 39 X X X 47 X X X X 46
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
57 61 50 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
43
39 50
47
46
53
54
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 184
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 6 44
PP 14 120
P 13 249
A 13 115
PA 26 364
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
13 8 8 0 0 0 30 23 20 28 47
43 28 22 28
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math
U 27 10 6 21 13
PP 27 26 17 29 30
Percentages P A PA 41 5 45 46 18 64 51 26 77 24 26 50 28 28 57
NS 0 0 0 0 0
U 6 4 2 7 6
PP 6 10 6 10 14
P 9 18 18 8 13
Ns A 1 7 9 9 13
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 10 25 27 17 26
NS 0 0 0 0 0
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 46 17 29 0 0 0 28 18 0 0 7 26
% Prof. or Above 57 53 59 X X X 46 72 X X X 46
% Below 43 47 41 X X X 54 28 X X X 54
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
28
80 60 40
43
47
41 54 54
72 57 53 59 46 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
X
Asian
46 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 185
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 3 0 0
U 11 44
PP 6 137
P 8 196
A 7 129
PA 15 325
NS 1 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
33 18 9 9 39 36 27 25 24 21 25 29 3
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
U 20 19 12 27 33
PP 36 46 24 15 18
Percentages P A PA 36 8 44 19 15 35 48 15 64 52 6 58 24 21 45
NS 0 0 0 0 3
U 5 5 4 9 11
PP 9 12 8 5 6
Ns P A 9 2 5 4 16 5 17 2 8 7
PA 11 9 21 19 15
NS 0 0 0 0 1
Percentage of Students P + A
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 33 12 21 2 0 0 26 5 0 0 6 26
% Prof. or Above 45 X 52 X X X 35 X X X X 35
% Below 52 X 43 X X X 62 X X X X 62
% NS 3 X 5 X X X 4 X X X X 4
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
52 43 62 62
60 40 20 0
Total
45 X
Female
52 35 X
Male AmIndAK
35 X X
HwPacIs
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Wht
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 186
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 9
PA NS 34 0 0 0
U 13 59
PP 8 185
P 8 187
A 3 75
PA 11 262
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
41
40
25
36 37 25 12 14
37 35 15 13 0 0 0
20 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science
U 32 19 27 24 41
Percentages PP P A PA 52 16 0 16 58 15 4 19 52 18 3 21 48 21 6 27 25 25 9 34
NS 0 4 0 0 0
U 8 5 9 8 13
PP 13 15 17 16 8
Ns P A 4 0 4 1 6 1 7 2 8 3
PA 4 5 7 9 11
NS 0 1 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0 16 19 21 27 34
2009
2010
2011 Year
2012
2013
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 32 11 21 2 0 0 25 5 0 0 6 25
% Prof. or Above 34 X 43 X X X 20 X X X X 20
% Below 66 X 57 X X X 80 X X X X 80
% NS 0 X 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
66 57 80 80
60 40 20 0
Total
34 X
Female
43 X
Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
20
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
20
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 187
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP New America School X Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 7 X
P X
A X
PA NS X X 1 2
U X 20
PP X 85
P X 274
A X 46
PA X 320
NS X 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
64
20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70
60 40 20 0
X 5 20 21 7 X X
59
11 10 X X 1 2
PP
NS Colorado
New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
P X X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X X
PA X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 188
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP New America School X Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 6 X
P X
A PA NS X X 49 49 X 2 2
U X 17
PP X 196
P X 178
A X 33
PA X 211
NS X 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
45 43 41 41
45 41 8 43 41 7
40 20 0
X 4 6 X X X 8 7 X
PP
NS Colorado
New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
P X X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X X
PA X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 189
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 29 34 X 1 2
U X 112
PP X 189
P X 109
A X 17
PA X 126
NS X 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
44
40 20 0
X
26 29
35 25 28 4 6 2
PP
NS Colorado
New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math (in percentages)
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
P X X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X X
PA X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 190
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 57 51 X 1 2
U X 95
PP X 83
P X 222
A X 26
PA X 248
NS X 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
22 25 51 43 19 21 X X X 6 8 X 1 2
20 0
X
PP
NS Colorado
New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science (in percentages)
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
P X X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X X
PA X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 191
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Canyon High X Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7 X
P X
A PA NS X X 69 68 X 1 1
U X 32
PP X 101
P X 286
A X 21
PA X 307
NS X 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65 64
23 65 5 24 64 4
60 40
23 24
20 0
X
7 X X X
PP
NS Colorado
Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
P X X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X X
PA X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 7 5 2 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 4
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 192
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Canyon High 0 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 7
A 0
PA NS 53 0 1 2
U 0 20
PP 9 85
P 10 274
A 0 46
PA 10 320
NS 0 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
64
47 53
20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70
60 40 20 0
0 5
59
47
53
20 21 7 0 11 10 0 1 2
PP
NS Colorado
Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U X X X 6 28 0
PP X X X 61 67 47
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X 22 6 28 6 0 6 53 0 53
NS X X X 6 0 0
U X X X 1 5 0
PP X X X 11 12 9
P X X X 4 1 10
Ns A X X X 1 0 0
PA X X X 5 1 10
NS X X X 1 0 0
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 19 6 13 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 3 5
% Prof. or Above 53 X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below 47 X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
53 47
20 0
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 193
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Canyon High X Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 3 X
P X
A PA NS X X 59 55 X 1 1
U X 15
PP X 164
P X 227
A X 34
PA X 261
NS X 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 3 3 X X X 37 40 51 47
37 51 8 40 47 8
8 X 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
P X X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X X
PA X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 7 5 2 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 4
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 194
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
School, District and State U PP Red Canyon High 0 100 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 6 45 43
P 0
A PA NS 0 0 49 49 0 2 2
U 0 17
PP 19 196
P 0 178
A 0 33
PA 0 211
NS 0 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100
80 60
45 43 41 41
41 8 41 7
40 20 0
0 4 6 0 0 8 7 0
PP
NS Colorado
Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U X X X 11 17 0
PP X X X 72 72 100
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X 11 0 11 11 0 11 0 0 0
NS X X X 6 0 0
U X X X 2 3 0
PP X X X 13 13 19
P X X X 2 2 0
Ns A X X X 0 0 0
PA X X X 2 2 0
NS X X X 1 0 0
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 19 6 13 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 3 5
% Prof. or Above 0 X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below 100 X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X
80 60
100
40 20 0
0
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 195
100
100
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X
PA NS X X 1 1
U X 122
PP X 170
P X 102
A X 46
PA X 148
NS X 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X X X X 38 28 30 30 23 24 10 15 X 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math (in percentages)
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
U X X X X X X
PP X X X X X X
P X X X X X X
Ns A X X X X X X
PA X X X X X X
NS X X X X X X
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 7 5 2 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 4
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 196
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
P 0
A PA NS 0 0 29 34 0 1 2
U 12 112
PP 7 189
P 0 109
A 0 17
PA 0 126
NS 0 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63
60
44
40 20 0
37 26 29
35 25 28 4 6 2
PP
NS Colorado
Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math (in percentages)
U X X X 78 67 63
Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 6 0 6 33 0 0 0 37 0 0 0
NS X X X 0 0 0
U X X X 14 12 12
PP X X X 3 6 7
P X X X 1 0 0
Ns A X X X 0 0 0
PA X X X 1 0 0
NS X X X 0 0 0
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 19 6 13 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 3 5
% Prof. or Above 0 X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below 100 X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60
100
40 20 0
0
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 197
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 16 57 51 0 1 2
U 10 95
PP 6 83
P 3 222
A 0 26
PA 3 248
NS 0 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
22 25 53 32 19 21 16 0 6 8 0 1 2 51 43
20 0 U
PP
NS Colorado
Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science (in percentages)
U X X X 67 72 53
PP X X X 22 28 32
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X 11 0 11 0 0 0 16 0 16
NS X X X 0 0 0
U X X X 12 13 10
PP X X X 4 5 6
P X X X 2 0 3
Ns A X X X 0 0 0
PA X X X 2 0 3
NS X X X 0 0 0
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 19 6 13 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 3 5
% Prof. or Above 16 X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below 84 X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20
16 84
0
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 198
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 5 8
PP
A PA NS 64 72 73 2 0 0
U 3 38
PP 16 98
P 34 322
A 1 32
PA 35 354
NS 1 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
62 66 66
29 62 2 20 66 7
60 40 20
5 8 10 29 20 17 2 7 7 2 0 0
Colorado 10 17 66 7
PP
NS Colorado
Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 10 14 9 5 9 5
PP 26 17 19 20 20 29
Percentages P A PA 61 2 63 63 6 69 64 8 72 72 3 75 62 9 71 62 2 64
NS 2 0 0 0 0 2
U 6 13 6 3 6 3
PP 16 15 12 13 14 16
Ns P A 38 1 57 5 41 5 47 2 43 6 34 1
PA 39 62 46 49 49 35
NS 1 0 0 0 0 1
64
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 55 28 27 0 0 0 36 18 0 1 4 28
% Prof. or Above 64 82 44 X X X 56 83 X X X 54
% Below 35 18 52 X X X 44 17 X X X 46
% NS 2 0 4 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
18 17 44 52 46
80 60 40
35
82 64 56 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
83 54
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 199
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A PA NS 62 67 68 0 0 0
U 7 51
PP 16 122
P 37 332
A 0 17
PA 37 349
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
62 63 63
60 40 20 0
12 10 11 0 3 27 23 21 5 0 0 0
PP
NS Colorado
Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 4 17 9 5 7 12
PP 23 15 18 30 28 27
Percentages P A PA 67 6 73 68 0 68 70 3 73 59 6 65 54 10 64 62 0 62
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 2 10 8 3 5 7
PP 12 9 17 19 19 16
Ns P A 35 3 41 0 64 3 37 4 36 7 37 0
PA 38 41 67 41 43 37
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 60 27 33 0 1 0 36 23 0 0 9 27
% Prof. or Above 62 74 52 X X X 50 78 X X X 48
% Below 38 26 48 X X X 50 22 X X X 52
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
26 22 48 50 52
80 60 40
38
74 62 52 50 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
78 48 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 200
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 6 8
PP
A PA NS 69 74 70 0 1 0
U 4 42
PP 17 89
P 41 329
A 5 44
PA 46 373
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
61 65 62
25 61 7 18 65 9
60 40
25
Colorado 11 18 62 8
20
6
8 11
18 18 7 9 8 0 1 0
PP
NS Colorado
Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 4 6 13 12 13 6
PP 24 19 17 18 16 25
Percentages P A PA 67 6 73 63 13 76 68 2 70 59 11 70 55 17 72 61 7 69
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 2 3 8 11 8 4 PP 12 10 10 17 10 17 P 34 34 41 54 35 41 A 3 7 1 10 11 5 PA 37 41 42 64 46 46 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 67 32 35 1 0 0 36 30 0 0 6 20
% Prof. or Above 69 78 60 X X X 64 77 X X X 50
% Below 31 22 40 X X X 36 23 X X X 50
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
31
22 40 36
23 50
69
78 60 64
77 50 X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 201
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Hill Elementary 7 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6
A PA NS 40 50 51 0 0 0
U 4 28
PP 29 211
P 21 218
A 1 27
PA 22 245
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
7 53 43 43 38 45 43
53 38 2 43 45 6 43 43 8
8 0 0 0
PP
NS Colorado
Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 6 6 0 2 9 7
PP 42 44 44 36 49 53
Percentages P A PA 52 0 52 37 13 50 47 9 56 53 9 62 43 0 43 38 2 40
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 4 5 0 1 6 4
PP 26 40 28 24 34 29
P 32 33 30 35 30 21
Ns A 0 12 6 6 0 1
PA 32 45 36 41 30 22
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 55 28 27 0 0 0 37 18 0 0 4 28
% Prof. or Above 40 43 37 X X X 30 61 X X X 32
% Below 60 57 63 X X X 70 39 X X X 68
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
60 57 63 39 70 68
60 40
61
20 0
40
43
37 X X
Asian
30 X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
32 X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 202
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Hill Elementary 8 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7
A PA NS 43 51 53 2 0 0
U 5 33
PP 28 221
P 24 228
A 2 39
PA 26 267
NS 1 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
8 7 47
47 40 3 42 44 7 39 45 8
42 39
40
44 45
PP
NS Colorado
Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 2 8 5 3 6 8
PP 33 43 36 33 48 47
Percentages P A PA 50 15 65 45 3 48 46 13 59 48 16 63 43 3 46 40 3 43
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
U 1 5 5 2 4 5
PP 17 26 33 21 32 28
P 26 27 42 30 29 24
Ns A 8 2 12 10 2 2
PA 34 29 54 40 31 26
NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 60 27 33 0 1 0 36 23 0 0 9 27
% Prof. or Above 43 59 30 X X X 33 57 X X X 33
% Below 55 41 67 X X X 67 39 X X X 67
% NS 2 0 3 X X X 0 4 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
55 41 67 67 39 67
60 40
59
57 30 X X
Asian
20 0
43 X
BlkAfAm
33 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs
33 X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Total
Female
Male
AmIndAK
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 203
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Hill Elementary 4 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5
A PA NS 55 58 57 4 1 1
U 3 23
PP 24 183
P 32 252
A 5 44
PA 37 296
NS 3 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
4 5 5 36 36 37 48 50 48
36 48 7 36 50 9 37 48 9
PP
NS Colorado
Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 4 2 2 3 6 4
PP 43 30 41 33 36 36
Percentages P A PA 43 10 53 61 6 67 51 7 57 52 12 64 39 19 58 48 7 55
NS 0 2 0 0 0 4
U 2 1 1 3 4 3
PP 22 16 25 30 23 24
P 22 33 31 48 25 32
Ns A 5 3 4 11 12 5
PA 27 36 35 59 37 37
NS 0 1 0 0 0 3
64
58
55
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 67 32 35 1 0 0 36 30 0 0 6 20
% Prof. or Above 55 63 49 X X X 39 77 X X X 20
% Below 40 31 49 X X X 58 17 X X X 80
% NS 4 6 3 X X X 3 7 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
55 63 49 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
17 40 31 49 58 80
77 39 X
Asian
20 0
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
20
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 204
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Hill Elementary 5 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7
PA NS 2 0 0
U 3 34
PP 19 124
P 26 204
A 6 142
PA 32 346
NS 1 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
5 7 7 35 25 20 11 2 0 0 47
35 47 11 58 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72
40 41 28 31
PP
NS Colorado
Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
U 10 12 3 0 6 5
PP 23 20 14 14 29 35
Percentages P A PA 52 16 68 49 19 68 48 34 83 47 39 86 50 16 66 47 11 58
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 2 U 6 11 2 0 4 3 PP 14 18 9 9 20 19 P 32 44 31 31 35 26 A 10 17 22 26 11 6 PA 42 61 53 57 46 32 NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
86 66 58
2011
2012
2013
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 55 28 27 0 0 0 37 18 0 0 4 28
% Prof. or Above 58 61 56 X X X 49 78 X X X 39
% Below 40 36 44 X X X 49 22 X X X 57
% NS 2 4 0 X X X 3 0 X X X 4
Percentage of Students P + A
100
22
80 60 40
40
36
44
49
57
78 58 61 56 49 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
X
Asian
39 X X
Mult
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
IEP ELL
HwPacIs
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 205
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 7 44
PP 13 120
P 25 249
A 15 115
PA 40 364
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
42 47
43 25 22 28 0 0 0
40 20 0
22 23 20 12 8 8
PP
NS Colorado
Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 2 8 9 6 7 12
PP 25 17 21 17 26 22
Percentages P A PA 57 17 74 60 15 75 46 25 71 49 27 76 43 24 66 42 25 67
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 5 8 4 5 7
PP 13 10 19 11 18 13
P 30 36 42 31 29 25
Ns A 9 9 23 17 16 15
PA 39 45 65 48 45 40
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 60 27 33 0 1 0 36 23 0 0 9 27
% Prof. or Above 67 78 58 X X X 53 87 X X X 52
% Below 33 22 42 X X X 47 13 X X X 48
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
22
13 42 47 48
80 60 40 20 0
33
78 67 58 53
87 52
X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 206
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Hill Elementary 6 Eagle County Re 50 9 Colorado 9
PA NS 0 0 0
U 4 44
PP 24 137
P 30 196
A 9 129
PA 39 325
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
45
36 45 13 58 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65
40 20
6 9 9
36 27 25
39 36 25 29 13 0 0 0
PP
NS Colorado
Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 10 4 7 12 8 6
PP 33 35 41 22 23 36
Percentages P A PA 33 24 57 38 22 60 39 13 52 34 33 66 42 27 69 45 13 58
Ns NS 0 2 0 0 0 0 U 5 2 4 11 5 4 PP 17 19 25 20 15 24 P 17 21 24 31 27 30 A 12 12 8 30 17 9 PA 29 33 32 61 44 39 NS 0 1 0 0 0 0
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 67 32 35 1 0 0 36 30 0 0 6 20
% Prof. or Above 58 53 63 X X X 44 77 X X X 25
% Below 42 47 37 X X X 56 23 X X X 75
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100
23
80 60 40
42
47
37 56 75
77 58 53 63 44 25 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 207
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 7
PP
PA NS 0 0 0
U 5 59
PP 32 185
P 22 187
A 8 75
PA 30 262
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
7 12 14 48 36 37 33 37 35 12 15 13 0 0 0
48 33 12 45
PP
NS Colorado
Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 8 4 7 16 22 7
PP 53 47 52 47 20 48
Percentages P A PA 29 10 39 40 9 49 33 8 42 32 5 37 38 20 58 33 12 45
Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 4 2 4 15 14 5 PP 27 26 31 43 13 32 P 15 22 20 29 24 22 A 5 5 5 5 13 8 PA 20 27 25 34 37 30 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 67 32 35 1 0 0 36 30 0 0 6 20
% Prof. or Above 45 38 51 X X X 25 70 X X X 10
% Below 55 63 49 X X X 75 30 X X X 90
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80
55 63 75 90 30 49
60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
70 45 51 38 25 X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
10
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 208
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 0 8
PP
A PA NS 78 72 73 0 0 0
U 0 38
PP 11 98
P 36 322
A 2 32
PA 38 354
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 22 20 17 8 10 4 7 7 0 0 0 73 66 66
22 73 4 20 66 7
Colorado 10 17 66 7
PP
NS Colorado
Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 5 3 0 12 2 0
PP 27 9 8 15 11 22
Percentages P A PA 54 15 68 82 6 88 82 11 92 67 6 73 80 7 87 73 4 78
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 2 1 0 4 1 0
PP 11 3 3 5 5 11
P 22 28 31 22 37 36
Ns A 6 2 4 2 3 2
Percentage of Students P + A
87 78
PA 28 30 35 24 40 38
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
2012
2013
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 49 31 18 0 1 1 14 32 0 1 1 6
% Prof. or Above 78 90 56 X X X X 91 X X X X
% Below 22 10 44 X X X X 9 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
100
22
10 44
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female
90 78 56
91
X
Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 209
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
80 63 63
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 4
PP
A PA NS 83 67 68 0 0 0
U 2 51
PP 6 122
P 37 332
A 1 17
PA 38 349
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
23 21
13 80 2
20
4
10 11
13 2 3 5 0 0 0
PP
NS Colorado
Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 6 3 6 2 10 4
PP 12 24 20 19 15 13
Percentages P A PA 82 0 82 68 5 73 71 3 74 74 5 79 68 7 76 80 2 83
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 2 1 2 1 4 2
PP 4 9 7 8 6 6
P 27 25 25 31 28 37
Ns A 0 2 1 2 3 1
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 27 27 26 33 31 38
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 46 18 28 0 2 1 16 24 0 3 3 11
% Prof. or Above 83 78 86 X X X 69 92 X X X X
% Below 17 22 14 X X X 31 8 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
17 22 14 31 8
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
83
78
86 69
92
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 210
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 9 8
PP
A PA NS 74 74 70 2 1 0
U 4 42
PP 6 89
P 31 329
A 1 44
PA 32 373
NS 1 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
9 8 11 14 18 18 2 9 8 2 1 0 72 65 62
14 72 2 18 65 9
Colorado 11 18 62 8
PP
NS Colorado
Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U 20 6 3 3 0 9
PP 8 9 13 18 6 14
Percentages P A PA 60 12 72 80 6 86 63 21 84 67 13 79 75 19 94 72 2 74
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
U 5 2 1 1 0 4
PP 2 3 5 7 2 6
P 15 28 24 26 24 31
Ns A 3 2 8 5 6 1
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 18 30 32 31 30 32
NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 43 23 20 1 0 0 14 26 0 2 6 13
% Prof. or Above 74 83 65 X X X X 85 X X X X
% Below 23 17 30 X X X X 15 X X X X
% NS 2 0 5 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
23 17 30 15
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female
74
83 65
85
X
Male AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 211
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 2 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6
A PA NS 61 50 51 0 0 0
U 1 28
PP 18 211
P 27 218
A 3 27
PA 30 245
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
2 6 6 6 6 37 43 43 55 45 43
37 55 6 43 45 6 43 43 8
8 0 0 0
PP
NS Colorado
Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 3 3 0 3 2 2
PP 48 41 31 26 28 37
Percentages P A PA 40 10 50 53 3 56 51 18 69 53 18 71 63 7 70 55 6 61
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 1 0 1 1 1
PP 19 14 12 9 13 18
P 16 18 20 18 29 27
Ns A 4 1 7 6 3 3
PA 20 19 27 24 32 30
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 49 31 18 0 1 1 14 32 0 1 1 6
% Prof. or Above 61 71 44 X X X X 78 X X X X
% Below 39 29 56 X X X X 22 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
61 71 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
39
29 56
22
78
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 212
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 4 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7
A PA NS 63 51 53 0 0 0
U 2 33
PP 15 221
P 29 228
A 0 39
PA 29 267
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63
33 63 0 42 44 7 39 45 8
60 40 20
4 6 7 0 42 39 33 44 45
8 0 0 0
PP
NS Colorado
Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 9 0 6 2 7 4
PP 24 27 31 29 32 33
Percentages P A PA 61 6 67 68 5 73 60 3 63 55 14 69 56 5 61 63 0 63
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 3 0 2 1 3 2
PP 8 10 11 12 13 15
P 20 25 21 23 23 29
Ns A 2 2 1 6 2 0
PA 22 27 22 29 25 29
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
63
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 46 18 28 0 2 1 16 24 0 3 3 11
% Prof. or Above 63 72 57 X X X 38 75 X X X X
% Below 37 28 43 X X X 63 25 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
63 72 57 38 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
37
28 43 63
25
75
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 213
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 7 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5
A PA NS 63 58 57 2 1 1
U 3 23
PP 12 183
P 24 252
A 3 44
PA 27 296
NS 1 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
7 36 37 28 5 5 7 9 9 2 1 1 56 50 48
28 56 7 36 50 9 37 48 9
PP
NS Colorado
Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U 8 0 0 0 0 7
PP 28 34 32 23 19 28
Percentages P A PA 52 12 64 51 14 66 50 18 68 67 10 77 59 22 81 56 7 63
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
U 2 0 0 0 0 3
PP 7 12 12 9 6 12
P 13 18 19 26 19 24
Ns A 3 5 7 4 7 3
PA 16 23 26 30 26 27
NS 0 0 0 0 0 1
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 43 23 20 1 0 0 14 26 0 2 6 13
% Prof. or Above 63 74 50 X X X X 88 X X X X
% Below 35 26 45 X X X X 12 X X X X
% NS 2 0 5 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
26
12 35 45
80 60 40
88 74 63 50 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
20 0
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 214
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 6 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7
PA NS 0 0 0
U 3 34
PP 12 124
P 16 204
A 18 142
PA 34 346
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
24 25 40 41 33 20 0 0 0 37 28 31
24 33 37 69 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72
20
6
PP
NS Colorado
Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
U 0 3 0 0 0 6
PP 12 24 8 12 7 24
Percentages P A PA 44 44 88 35 38 74 36 56 92 38 50 88 67 26 93 33 37 69
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 0 1 0 0 0 3
PP 5 8 3 4 3 12
P 18 12 14 13 31 16
Ns A 18 13 22 17 12 18
100 80 60 40 20 0
88 74 92 88 93 69
PA 36 25 36 30 43 34
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
2008
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 49 31 18 0 1 1 14 32 0 1 1 6
% Prof. or Above 69 68 72 X X X X 81 X X X X
% Below 31 32 28 X X X X 19 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
31
32
28
19
69
68
72
81
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 215
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 0 Eagle County Re 50 8 Colorado 8
PA NS 0 0 0
U 0 44
PP 10 120
P 23 249
A 13 115
PA 36 364
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 22 23 20 8 8 0 0 0 50 47
22 50 28 78 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72
43 28 22 28
PP
NS Colorado
Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 6 0 3 0 7 0
PP 6 14 23 12 17 22
Percentages P A PA 45 42 88 49 38 86 40 34 74 31 57 88 46 29 76 50 28 78
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 2 0 1 0 3 0
PP 2 5 8 5 7 10
P 15 18 14 13 19 23
Ns A 14 14 12 24 12 13
100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 88
86 74 88 76 78
PA 29 32 26 37 31 36
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
2009
2010 Year
2011
2012
2013
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 46 18 28 0 2 1 16 24 0 3 3 11
% Prof. or Above 78 78 79 X X X 63 88 X X X X
% Below 22 22 21 X X X 38 13 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
22 22 21 38
13
80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
78
78
79 63
88
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 216
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 5 Eagle County Re 50 9 Colorado 9
PA NS 0 0 0
U 2 44
PP 11 137
P 17 196
A 13 129
PA 30 325
NS 0 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
5 9 9 0 0 0 40 39 36 26 27 25 30 25 29
26 40 30 70 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65
PP
NS Colorado
Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
U 4 3 0 3 0 5
PP 28 18 24 23 19 26
Percentages P A PA 40 28 68 29 50 79 42 34 76 41 33 74 28 53 81 40 30 70
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
U 1 1 0 1 0 2
PP 7 6 9 9 6 11
P 10 10 16 16 9 17
Ns A 7 17 13 13 17 13
PA 17 27 29 29 26 30
NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 43 23 20 1 0 0 14 26 0 2 6 13
% Prof. or Above 70 78 60 X X X X 85 X X X X
% Below 30 22 40 X X X X 15 X X X X
% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
30
22 40
15
70
78 60
85
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 217
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 7
PP
PA NS 5 0 0
U 3 59
PP 17 185
P 15 187
A 6 75
PA 21 262
NS 2 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
7 12 14 40 36 37 35 37 35 14 15 13 5 0 0
40 35 14 49
PP
NS Colorado
Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
U 24 3 3 5 0 7
PP 24 31 39 38 24 40
Percentages P A PA 44 8 52 51 14 66 34 24 58 41 15 56 50 26 76 35 14 49
NS 0 0 0 0 0 5
U 6 1 1 2 0 3
PP 6 11 15 15 8 17
P 11 18 13 16 17 15
Ns A 2 5 9 6 9 6
Percentage of Students P + A
PA 13 23 22 22 26 21
NS 0 0 0 0 0 2
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 43 23 20 1 0 0 14 26 0 2 6 13
% Prof. or Above 49 43 55 X X X X 73 X X X X
% Below 47 57 35 X X X X 27 X X X X
% NS 5 0 10 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
27
80
47 57 35
60 40 20 0
Total Female Male
73 49 55 43 X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 218
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Eagle County Re 50
U X 8
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 74 70 X 1 0
U X 42
PP X 89
P X 329
A X 44
PA X 373
NS X 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65 62
18 65 9
60 40 20 0
X 8 11 X 18 18 9 X X 8 X 1 0
Colorado 11 18 62 8
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading
U 0 X
PP 25 X
Percentages P A PA 69 6 75 X X X
NS 0 X
U 0 X
PP 4 X
P 11 X
Ns A 1 X
PA 12 X
NS 0 X
Percentage of Students P + A
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 12 5 7 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 219
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 0 30
PP 2 66
P 15 297
A 4 72
PA 19 369
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 6 8 10 14 18 19 15 11 0 1 1 71 63 62
10 71 19 90 14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
U X 6 5 0
Percentages PP P A PA X X X X 6 69 19 88 0 80 15 95 10 71 19 90
NS X 0 0 0
U X 1 1 0
PP X 1 0 2
Ns P A X X 11 3 16 3 15 4
100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010
88
PA X 14 19 19
NS X 0 0 0
95
90
2011 Year
2012
2013
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 21 11 10 0 0 0 2 18 0 1 1 0
% Prof. or Above 90 X X X X X X 94 X X X X
% Below 10 X X X X X X 6 X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X
100 80 60 40 20 0
10 6
90
94
X
Total Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 220
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
79 65 59
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
School, District and State Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Eagle County Re 50
U 4 9
PP 4
PA NS 0 1 1
U 1 44
PP 1 79
P 19 324
A 3 46
PA 22 370
NS 0 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
4 9 11 16 4 21 13 9 9 0 1 1
79 13 92 9 9 74 68
16 65
Colorado 11 21 59
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading
U X X 0 4
Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X 11 79 11 89 4 79 13 92
NS X X 0 0
U X X 0 1
PP X X 2 1
Ns P A X X X X 15 2 19 3
Percentage of Students P + A
PA X X 17 22
NS X X 0 0
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 24 9 15 1 0 0 1 21 0 1 3 0
% Prof. or Above 92 X X X X X X 90 X X X X
% Below 8 X X X X X X 10 X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X
100
8
10
80 60 40 20 0
Total
92
90
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 221
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
Percentage of Students
Ns A 0 39 PA 22 312 NS 0 2
100 80 60 40 20 0
10 10 10 14 19 23 9 0 8 0 0 1 76 62 59
273
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
U X 0 0 10
PP X 21 6 14
Percentages P A PA X X X 63 16 79 81 6 88 76 0 76
NS X 0 6 0
U X 0 0 3
PP X 4 1 4
Ns P A X X 12 3 13 1 22 0
88 76
PA X 15 14 22
NS X 0 1 0
2012
2013
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 29 12 17 0 1 0 1 26 0 1 0 0
% Prof. or Above 76 X 65 X X X X 77 X X X X
% Below 24 X 35 X X X X 23 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
24 23 35
80 60 40 20 0
Total
76 65
77
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 222
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
83
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP 6
PA NS 0 1 1
U 0 32
PP 1 101
P 15 286
A 2 21
PA 17 307
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65 64
83 11 94 5 4 69 68
23 65 24 64
60 40
23 24
20 0
0
11
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading
U X X 0 0
Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X 17 72 3 76 6 83 11 94
NS X X 7 0
U X X 0 0
PP X X 5 1
Ns P A X X X X 21 1 15 2
Percentage of Students P + A
PA X X 22 17
NS X X 2 0
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 18 5 13 0 0 0 1 15 0 2 0 0
% Prof. or Above 94 X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below 6 X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
6
80 60
94
40 20 0
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 223
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 1 2
U 1 20
PP 3 85
P 15 274
A 6 46
PA 21 320
NS 0 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20
4 5 20 21 7 12 24 11 10 0 1 2 60 64 59
12 60 24 84 20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
U X X 0 4
Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X 13 81 6 88 12 60 24 84
NS X X 0 0
U X X 0 1
PP X X 2 3
Ns P A X X X X 13 1 15 6
88
84
PA X X 14 21
NS X X 0 0
2012
2013
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 25 10 15 0 0 0 3 21 0 1 1 2
% Prof. or Above 84 X X X X X X 86 X X X X
% Below 16 X X X X X X 14 X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
16 14
80 60 40 20 0
Total
84
86
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 224
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 58 57 X 1 1
U X 23
PP X 183
P X 252
A X 44
PA X 296
NS X 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 5 5 X X X 36 37 50 48
36 50 9 37 48 9
9 X 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
U 6 X
Percentages PP P A PA 31 56 6 63 X X X X
NS 0 X
U 1 X
PP 5 X
Ns P A 9 1 X X
PA 10 X
NS 0 X
Percentage of Students P + A
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 12 5 7 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 225
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
A PA NS 67 64 58 0 1 1
U 0 14
PP 7 153
P 13 258
A 1 40
PA 14 298
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
62
33 62 5 33 55 9 38 49 9
60 40 20 0
0 3 4 33 33 38
55
49
9 0 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing
U X 0 0 0
PP X 19 15 33
Percentages P A PA X X X 69 13 81 75 10 85 62 5 67
NS X 0 0 0
U X 0 0 0
PP X 3 3 7
Ns P A X X 11 2 15 2 13 1
Percentage of Students P + A
PA X 13 17 14
NS X 0 0 0
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 21 11 10 0 0 0 2 18 0 1 1 0
% Prof. or Above 67 X X X X X X 67 X X X X
% Below 33 X X X X X X 33 X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total
33
33
67
67
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 226
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP 8
PA NS 0 1 1
U 0 11
PP 2 144
P 17 274
A 5 64
PA 22 338
NS 0 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 2 3 8 29 35 21 13 15 0 1 1 71 55 47
71 21 92
29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing
U X X 0 0
Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X 21 63 16 79 8 71 21 92
NS X X 0 0
U X X 0 0
PP X X 4 2
Ns P A X X X X 12 3 17 5
Percentage of Students P + A
PA X X 15 22
NS X X 0 0
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 24 9 15 1 0 0 1 21 0 1 3 0
% Prof. or Above 92 X X X X X X 90 X X X X
% Below 8 X X X X X X 10 X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X
100
8
10
80 60 40 20 0
Total
92
90
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 227
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
A PA NS 48 61 56 0 0 1
U 2 19
PP 13 151
P 13 240
A 1 30
PA 14 270
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
45 54 34 40 45 47
45 45 3 34 54 7 40 47 9
40 20 0
7
9 0 0 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing
U X 0 0 7
PP X 26 13 45
Percentages P A PA X X X 68 5 74 69 13 81 45 3 48
NS X 0 6 0
U X 0 0 2
PP X 5 2 13
Ns P A X X 13 1 11 2 13 1
Percentage of Students P + A
PA X 14 13 14
NS X 0 1 0
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 29 12 17 0 1 0 1 26 0 1 0 0
% Prof. or Above 48 X 29 X X X X 46 X X X X
% Below 52 X 71 X X X X 54 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total
52 71
54
48 29 X
Female Male
46 X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 228
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 0 15
PP 2 164
P 13 227
A 3 34
PA 16 261
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 3 3 11 37 40 72 51
11 72 17 89 37 51 40 47 8 8 59 55
47
17 8 8 0 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing
U X X 3 0
Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X 24 66 0 66 11 72 17 89
NS X X 7 0
U X X 1 0
PP X X 7 2
Ns P A X X X X 19 0 13 3
Percentage of Students P + A
PA X X 19 16
NS X X 2 0
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 18 5 13 0 0 0 1 15 0 2 0 0
% Prof. or Above 89 X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below 11 X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
11
89
X
Total Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 229
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP
A PA NS 68 49 49 0 2 2
U 0 17
PP 8 196
P 15 178
A 2 33
PA 17 211
NS 0 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
45 43 60 41 41
32 60 8 45 41 8 43 41 7
40 20 0
0 4 6
32
7 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing
U X X 0 0
PP X X 31 32
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X 69 0 69 60 8 68
NS X X 0 0
U X X 0 0
PP X X 5 8
Ns P A X X X X 11 0 15 2
PA X X 11 17
NS X X 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 25 10 15 0 0 0 3 21 0 1 1 2
% Prof. or Above 68 X X X X X X 67 X X X X
% Below 32 X X X X X X 33 X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total
32
33
68
67
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 230
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U PP X
P X
A X
PA NS X X 0 0
U X 44
PP X 137
P X 196
A X 129
PA X 325
NS X 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 9 9 X X X X 0 0 39 36 27 25 25 29
27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
U 0 X
Percentages PP P A PA 50 38 13 50 X X X X
NS 0 X
U 0 X
PP 8 X
Ns P A 6 2 X X
PA 8 X
NS 0 X
Percentage of Students P + A
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 12 5 7 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 231
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 0
PP
PA NS 0 1 0
U 0 45
PP 6 117
P 5 177
A 10 126
PA 15 303
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 10 12 0 1 0 29 38 35 25 26 24 27 27 48
29 24 48 71
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math
U X 0 0 0
PP X 38 15 29
Percentages P A PA X X X 38 25 63 60 25 85 24 48 71
NS X 0 0 0
U X 0 0 0
PP X 6 3 6
P X 6 12 5
Ns A X 4 5 10
Percentage of Students P + A
PA X 10 17 15
NS X 0 0 0
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 21 11 10 0 0 0 2 18 0 1 1 0
% Prof. or Above 71 X X X X X X 72 X X X X
% Below 29 X X X X X X 28 X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total
29
28
71
72
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 232
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 0
PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 0 66
PP 4 128
P 10 151
A 10 147
PA 20 298
NS 0 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
42 42 30 28 29 27
17 42 42 83
40
26
30
20 0
0
13 14
17 0 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math
U X X 0 0
PP X X 42 17
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X 26 32 58 42 42 83
NS X X 0 0
U X X 0 0
PP X X 8 4
P X X 5 10
Ns A X X 6 10
Percentage of Students P + A
PA X X 11 20
NS X X 0 0
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 24 9 15 1 0 0 1 21 0 1 3 0
% Prof. or Above 83 X X X X X X 81 X X X X
% Below 17 X X X X X X 19 X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
17 19
80 60 40 20 0
Total
83
81
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 233
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 5 75
PP 8 124
P 9 131
A 7 108
PA 16 239
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
17 17 19 28 28 29 31 30 29
24 24 23 0 1 1
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math
U X 11 0 17
PP X 11 19 28
Percentages P A PA X X X 42 37 79 13 69 81 31 24 55
NS X 0 0 0
U X 2 0 5
PP X 2 3 8
P X 8 2 9
Ns A X 7 11 7
Percentage of Students P + A
PA X 15 13 16
NS X 0 0 0
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 29 12 17 0 1 0 1 26 0 1 0 0
% Prof. or Above 55 X 53 X X X X 54 X X X X
% Below 45 X 47 X X X X 46 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
55 53 54 45 47 46
20 0
Total
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 234
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 0
PP
PA NS 0 1 1
U 0 122
PP 5 170
P 5 102
A 8 46
PA 13 148
NS 0 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
0 38 28 30 28 30 28 23 24 10 15 0 1 1 44
28 28 44 72
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math
U X X 17 0
PP X X 21 28
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X 28 28 55 28 44 72
NS X X 7 0
U X X 5 0
PP X X 6 5
P X X 8 5
Ns A X X 8 8
PA X X 16 13
NS X X 2 0
Percentage of Students P + A
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 18 5 13 0 0 0 1 15 0 2 0 0
% Prof. or Above 72 X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below 28 X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
28
80 60 40 20 0
Total
72
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 235
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U 8
PP
PA NS 0 1 2
U 2 112
PP 6 189
P 12 109
A 5 17
PA 17 126
NS 0 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
44 48 35 24 25 28 20 4 6 0 1 2
24 48 20 68 4 6 29 34
40 20 0
8
26 29
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math
U X X 13 8
PP X X 50 24
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X 38 0 38 48 20 68
NS X X 0 0
U X X 2 2
PP X X 8 6
Ns P A X X X X 6 0 12 5
PA X X 6 17
NS X X 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 25 10 15 0 0 0 3 21 0 1 1 2
% Prof. or Above 68 X X X X X X 67 X X X X
% Below 32 X X X X X X 33 X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
Total
32
33
68
67
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 236
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X
PA NS X X 0 0
U X 59
PP X 185
P X 187
A X 75
PA X 262
NS X 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 12 14 X X X 36 37 37 35 15 13 X 0 0
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science
U 0 X
Percentages PP P A PA 50 31 13 44 X X X X
NS 6 X
U 0 X
PP 8 X
Ns P A 5 2 X X
PA 7 X
NS 1 X
Percentage of Students P + A
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 12 5 7 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 237
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
A 7
PA NS 59 0 0 1
U 3 80
PP 9 107
P 15 200
A 2 53
PA 17 253
NS 0 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
18 21 10 31 24 27 7 12 9 0 0 1 52
45 43
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A
U X 0 0 10
PP X 21 13 31
Percentages P A PA X X X 68 11 79 81 6 88 52 7 59
NS X 0 0 0
U X 0 0 3
PP X 4 2 9
Ns P A X X 13 2 13 1 15 2
88
PA X 15 14 17
NS X 0 0 0
59
2012
2013
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 29 12 17 0 1 0 1 26 0 1 0 0
% Prof. or Above 59 X 53 X X X X 58 X X X X
% Below 41 X 47 X X X X 42 X X X X
% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40
59 53 58 41 47 42
20 0
Total
X
Female Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 238
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
PP
PA NS 0 1 2
U 3 95
PP 3 83
P 16 222
A 3 26
PA 19 248
NS 0 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
64
60 40
22 25 12
51 43 19 21 12 6 8 0 1 2
20 0
12
PP
P Proficiency Levels
NS
Colorado
Eagle County Re 50
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science (in percentages)
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science
U X X 6 12
PP X X 38 12
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X 50 6 56 64 12 76
NS X X 0 0
U X X 1 3
PP X X 6 3
Ns P A X X X X 8 1 16 3
Percentage of Students P + A
PA X X 9 19
NS X X 0 0
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 25 10 15 0 0 0 3 21 0 1 1 2
% Prof. or Above 76 X X X X X X 76 X X X X
% Below 24 X X X X X X 24 X X X X
% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100
24 24
80 60 40 20 0
Total
76
76
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 239
WORLD ACADEMY
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X 8
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 72 73 X 0 0
U X 38
PP X 98
P X 322
A X 32
PA X 354
NS X 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
66 66
20 66 7
60 40 20 0
X 20 17 8 10 X X X 7 7 X 0 0
Colorado 10 17 66 7
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 240
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 67 68 X 0 0
U X 51
PP X 122
P X 332
A X 17
PA X 349
NS X 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63 63
60 40
23 21
20 0
X
10 11 X X X 3
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 241
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A X
PA NS X X 1 1
U X 30
PP X 66
P X 297
A X 72
PA X 369
NS X 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
63 62
14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73
60 40 20 0
X 6 8 X 14 18 X X 15 11 X 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 242
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X 9
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 74 68 X 1 1
U X 44
PP X 79
P X 324
A X 46
PA X 370
NS X 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65
16 65 9
60 40 20 0
X 9 11 X 16 21
59
Colorado 11 21 59 9
9 X X
9 X 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U X X
PP X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X
NS X X
U X X
PP X X
P X X
Ns A X X
PA X X
NS X X
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 243
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 71 67 X 0 1
U X 43
PP X 84
P X 273
A X 39
PA X 312
NS X 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 19 10 10 X X X 23 9 8 X 0 1 62 59
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)
U X X
PP X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X
NS X X
U X X
PP X X
P X X
Ns A X X
PA X X
NS X X
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 244
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A PA NS X X 69 68 X 1 1
U X 32
PP X 101
P X 286
A X 21
PA X 307
NS X 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
65 64
23 65 5 24 64 4
60 40
23 24
20 0
X
7 X X X
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 245
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A X
PA NS X X 1 2
U X 20
PP X 85
P X 274
A X 46
PA X 320
NS X 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80
64
20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70
60 40 20 0
X 5 20 21 7 X X
59
11 10 X X 1 2
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 246
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A PA NS X X 50 51 X 0 0
U X 28
PP X 211
P X 218
A X 27
PA X 245
NS X 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
43 43 45 43
43 45 6 43 43 8
40 20 0
X 6 6 X X X 6 8 X 0 0
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 247
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A PA NS X X 51 53 X 0 0
U X 33
PP X 221
P X 228
A X 39
PA X 267
NS X 2
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 6 7 X X X 42 39 44 45
42 44 7 39 45 8
8 X 0 0
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 248
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A PA NS X X 64 58 X 1 1
U X 14
PP X 153
P X 258
A X 40
PA X 298
NS X 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 3 4 X X X 33 38 55 49
33 55 9 38 49 9
9 X 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 249
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A X
PA NS X X 1 1
U X 11
PP X 144
P X 274
A X 64
PA X 338
NS X 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 2 3 X X X 29 35 13 15 X 1 1 55 47
29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U X X
PP X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X
NS X X
U X X
PP X X
P X X
Ns A X X
PA X X
NS X X
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 250
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A PA NS X X 61 56 X 0 1
U X 19
PP X 151
P X 240
A X 30
PA X 270
NS X 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 4 3 X X X 34 40 54 47
34 54 7 40 47 9
9 X 0 1
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)
U X X
PP X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X
NS X X
U X X
PP X X
P X X
Ns A X X
PA X X
NS X X
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 251
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A PA NS X X 59 55 X 1 1
U X 15
PP X 164
P X 227
A X 34
PA X 261
NS X 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 3 3 X X X 37 40 51 47
37 51 8 40 47 8
8 X 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 252
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A PA NS X X 49 49 X 2 2
U X 17
PP X 196
P X 178
A X 33
PA X 211
NS X 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
45 43 41 41
45 41 8 43 41 7
40 20 0
X 4 6 X X X 8 7 X
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 253
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A X
PA NS X X 0 0
U X 34
PP X 124
P X 204
A X 142
PA X 346
NS X 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
25 40 41 28 31 20 X X X 0 0
25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72
20 0
X
7 X
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 254
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
P X
A X
PA NS X X 0 0
U X 44
PP X 120
P X 249
A X 115
PA X 364
NS X 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 23 20 8 8 X X X X 0 0 22 47
23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72
43 28
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 255
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X
PA NS X X 1 0
U X 45
PP X 117
P X 177
A X 126
PA X 303
NS X 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
25 26 38 35 27 27 10 12 X X X X X 1 0
20 0
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 256
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X
PA NS X X 1 1
U X 66
PP X 128
P X 151
A X 147
PA X 298
NS X 7
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
26 30 30 28 29 27
20 0
X
13 14 X X X X 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)
U X X
PP X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X
NS X X
U X X
PP X X
P X X
Ns A X X
PA X X
NS X X
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 257
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X
PA NS X X 1 1
U X 75
PP X 124
P X 131
A X 108
PA X 239
NS X 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X 17 19 X X X 28 29 30 29
24 23 X 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)
U X X
PP X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X
NS X X
U X X
PP X X
P X X
Ns A X X
PA X X
NS X X
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 258
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X
PA NS X X 1 1
U X 122
PP X 170
P X 102
A X 46
PA X 148
NS X 3
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40 20 0
X X X X 38 28 30 30 23 24 10 15 X 1 1
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 259
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 29 34 X 1 2
U X 112
PP X 189
P X 109
A X 17
PA X 126
NS X 5
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
44
40 20 0
X
26 29
35 25 28 4 6 2
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 260
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A X
PA NS X X 0 1
U X 80
PP X 107
P X 200
A X 53
PA X 253
NS X 1
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60
45 43
40 20 0
X 18 21 X
24 27 12 9 X X X 0 1
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)
U X X
PP X X
Percentages P A PA X X X X X X
NS X X
U X X
PP X X
P X X
Ns A X X
PA X X
NS X X
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 261
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.
U X
PP X
P X
A PA NS X X 57 51 X 1 2
U X 95
PP X 83
P X 222
A X 26
PA X 248
NS X 6
Percentage of Students
Percentages
Ns
100 80 60 40
22 25 51 43 19 21 X X X 6 8 X 1 2
20 0
X
PP
NS Colorado
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL
Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1
% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X
% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X
% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X
Percentage of Students P + A
100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total
X
Female
X
Male
X
AmIndAK
X
Asian
X
BlkAfAm
X
Hisp
X
Wht
X
HwPacIs
X
Mult
X
IEP
X
ELL
Group
Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16
Page 262