2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report for Eagle County Re 50 School District

Accountability Version

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. 9635 Maroon Circle, Suite 120 Englewood, Colorado 80112 Phone: 720-963-9200 Fax: 720-963-9700 Email: info@alpineachievement.com

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Executive Summary Report
Overview of this Document This report includes graphic and tabular representations of your 2013 TCAP test results for the district and for schools. It is designed with the following audiences in mind: · School Board · Press / Public · District and School Accountability Committees · District and School Administrative Leadership Team The Executive Summary Report is available immediately after the test scores are released to districts, at a time when the most important questions to answer are: · How does our performance compare to that of the state? · How did our performance change this year compared with our performance in prior years? · Are the students from various disaggregated groups performing equally well? If not, where are the gaps? The Executive Summary Report addresses these questions directly. More extensive reports for the district and schools are generated after the state releases additional information in the weeks that follow the initial press conference. Various accountability mandates require data to be reported in several different ways. The data in this report are presented for all students including students who eventually will be excluded from the School Accountability Reports and/or No Child Left Behind reports. Separate reports are produced by Alpine based on the specific inclusion and exclusion rules for each of these accountability mandates. The minimum number of students in any given group necessary to generate a graph appears in the lower right corner of each page of this report. This number is set by the district or by the end user directly. If you print a report with a minimum of fewer than 10 students, we strongly suggest that you not share it publicly to protect the privacy rights of students. The accuracy of the information in this report depends upon the accuracy of information in the TCAP/CSAP files and in other documents downloaded from the Colorado Department of Education (CDE) website. Historic achievement data were updated where necessary to reflect the state's rescaling of reading prior to 2001 and writing and math prior to 2002. The records are spot checked before reports are released, but if any school does not appear on this report (e.g., a new school this year), or if any result does not make sense, please contact Alpine and we will make any corrections necessary.

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page i

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Overall Guiding Questions
This report contains a great deal of information. It is a report you probably will return to regularly as you share your results with many different audiences in the months ahead. Look for patterns and trends throughout the report and consider the most important issues facing your district/school. You should be able to summarize the results for the district or for any school in 3-5 descriptive statements. This report is focused on the big picture, not on the details. Below are some questions to keep in mind as you review your results. Additional questions that are specific to the interpretation of a particular graph format are shown below sample graphs on the next several pages. The questions below are just a starter list. You will have many more to add. · How well did students in the district/schools perform on the tests overall? Were you pleased overall with student performance this year? · Which grade levels did you think would do well? Did they perform as well as they should have? · In which content areas did you expect the highest performance? What do the data suggest? · In what ways are these data similar to other achievement data you have collected about students? In what ways are they different? · Which schools showed the most improvement? Which showed the least improvement? Why do you think this occurred? · What is the good news story from these results? · What was a surprise? · What concerns do you have after reviewing these results? · Did you target specific areas for improvement this year? Was there a relationship between your focus area and performance? Were there trade offs in other areas? · How might this information guide curriculum and instructional planning decisions in the district? · What factors do you think are related to your performance? · What targets will you set for achievement and/or improvement for next year's tests? · What will you do now?

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page ii

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

All Students Totals
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State Eagle County Re 50

U 8

PP

P

A PA NS 72 73 0 0

U 38

PP 98

P 322

A 32

PA 354

NS 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0 8 U 10 20 17 7 PP A 7 0 NS 0 66 66

20 66 7

Colorado 10 17 66 7

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading
74
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 12 12 10 7 7 8

Percentages PP P A PA 20 61 7 68 17 65 6 71 22 64 5 69 19 67 7 74 20 64 9 74 20 66 7 72

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 46 61 45 33 35 38

PP 78 83 102 91 104 98

Ns P A 235 27 325 32 299 23 315 33 341 48 322 32

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 68 71 69 74 72

PA 262 357 322 348 389 354

NS 1 0 1 0 1 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 491 241 250 3 7 3 232 237 1 8 40 189 % Prof. or Above 72 76 68 X X X 56 87 X X 30 53 % Below 28 24 31 X X X 44 13 X X 68 47 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 3 0

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
13 28 24 31 44 68 47
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

87 72 76 68 56 30 X
AmIndAK

53

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 1

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 67 68 0 0

U 51

PP 122

P 332

A 17

PA 349

NS 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 63 63 60 40 23 21 20 0 10 11 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado U PP 3 A 5 0 NS 0

Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 11 14 9 6 7 10

Percentages PP P A PA 24 62 3 65 22 59 5 64 22 66 3 69 24 65 4 70 21 65 6 72 23 63 3 67

NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

U 46 57 44 28 35 51

PP 95 93 110 110 104 122

Ns P A 248 12 248 21 338 15 297 20 322 32 332 17

100 80 65 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 64 69 70 72 67

PA 260 269 353 317 354 349

NS 1 2 4 1 0 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 523 234 289 4 10 3 243 257 0 6 62 219 % Prof. or Above 67 72 63 X X X 46 88 X X 16 43 % Below 33 28 37 X X X 54 12 X X 84 57 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 0 0

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
12 33 28 37 54 57 84 88 67 72 63 46 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Asian

43 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

16
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 2

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State Eagle County Re 50

U 8

PP

P

A PA NS 74 70 1 0

U 42

PP 89

P 329

A 44

PA 373

NS 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 65 62 60 40 20 0 8 U 11 18 18 9 PP A 8 1 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado NS 0

18 65 9

Colorado 11 18 62 8

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading
74
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 13 8 10 8 8

PP 20 19 17 16 18 18

Percentages P A PA 60 9 70 63 5 68 65 9 74 66 8 74 63 11 73 65 9 74

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 38 55 36 50 40 42 PP 77 81 74 81 86 89 P 230 270 274 329 297 329 A 36 21 39 40 50 44 PA 266 291 313 369 347 373 NS 0 2 1 1 0 3

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 70 68 74 73 74

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 507 243 264 5 1 1 245 249 0 6 52 210 % Prof. or Above 74 77 70 X X X 58 90 X X 27 56 % Below 26 22 29 X X X 41 10 X X 71 43 % NS 1 0 1 X X X 1 0 X X 2 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
10 26 22 29 41 71 90 74 77 70 58 56 27 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Asian

43

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 3

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 1 1

U 30

PP 66

P 297

A 72

PA 369

NS 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 63 62 60 40 20 0 6 U 8 14 18 PP 15 11 1 A NS 1

Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 8

14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73

4938 11309 38862 7097 45959 845

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading
75 78 77 79
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 12 6 9 7 7 6

PP 23 22 15 15 16 14

Percentages P A PA 53 12 65 59 13 72 60 15 75 64 13 78 63 14 77 63 15 79

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 50 24 40 30 37 30 PP 94 87 66 66 79 66 P 219 236 258 280 309 297 A 51 52 65 58 69 72 PA 270 288 323 338 378 369 NS 1 0 2 1 0 3

100 80 65 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 72

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 468 224 244 1 4 0 230 225 0 8 50 189 % Prof. or Above 79 83 75 X X X 64 93 X X 34 60 % Below 21 16 25 X X X 35 7 X X 66 39 % NS 1 1 0 X X X 1 0 X X 0 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
21 16 25 35 66 7 39
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

79

83

93 75 64 34 X
AmIndAK

60

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 4

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State Eagle County Re 50

U 9

PP

P

A PA NS 74 68 1 1

U 44

PP 79

P 324

A 46

PA 370

NS 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 65 60 40 20 0 9 U 11 16 21 9 A 9 1 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado PP NS 1 59

16 65 9

Colorado 11 21 59 9

6815 13070 36650 5501 42151 359

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading
75 74
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 15 12 6 10 11 9

PP 21 19 20 19 14 16

Percentages P A PA 56 7 63 57 12 70 64 10 73 60 11 71 64 11 75 65 9 74

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 57 48 25 43 49 44 PP 81 77 78 80 62 79 P 212 235 248 257 282 324 A 26 50 37 46 48 46 PA 238 285 285 303 330 370 NS 1 0 0 0 0 6

100 80 63 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 70 73 71

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 499 245 254 6 8 4 249 227 0 5 46 209 % Prof. or Above 74 73 76 X X X 57 92 X X 11 52 % Below 25 26 24 X X X 41 7 X X 87 46 % NS 1 2 1 X X X 2 1 X X 2 2

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
25 26 24 41 7 46
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

87 92 74 73 76 57 52

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

11
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 5

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 71 67 0 1

U 43

PP 84

P 273

A 39

PA 312

NS 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0 19 23 10 10 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado U PP 9 A 8 0 NS 1 62 59

Eagle County Re 50 10 19 62 9 Colorado 10 23 59 8

5882 13891 35960 4891 40851 450

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 14 9 6 11 10

PP 20 18 19 21 22 19

Percentages P A PA 61 10 70 61 7 68 63 9 72 62 11 73 59 7 66 62 9 71

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 1 0 U 39 52 38 24 49 43 PP 78 66 77 83 98 84 P 241 222 261 249 263 273 A 38 24 38 43 32 39 PA 279 246 299 292 295 312 NS 0 0 2 1 3 2

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 70 68 72 73 66 71

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 441 199 242 1 6 1 217 208 0 8 38 171 % Prof. or Above 71 77 66 X X X 54 88 X X 8 50 % Below 29 23 34 X X X 45 13 X X 92 49 % NS 0 1 0 X X X 1 0 X X 0 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
13 29 23 34 45 49
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

92 71 77 66 54 8 X
AmIndAK

88 50 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 6

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 69 68 1 1

U 32

PP 101

P 286

A 21

PA 307

NS 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 65 64 60 40 23 24 20 0 7 U 7 PP 5 A 4 1 NS 1

Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

23 65 5 24 64 4

4258 14768 39370 2272 41642 879

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 5 11 8 4 7

Percentages PP P A PA 31 54 5 58 25 64 3 67 22 60 3 63 21 64 5 69 22 70 2 72 23 65 5 69

NS 1 3 5 3 2 1

U 34 19 44 33 20 32

PP 116 99 91 90 98 101

Ns P A 200 17 255 10 250 11 278 23 313 11 286 21

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 58 67 69 72 69

PA 217 265 261 301 324 307

NS 5 13 21 11 7 3

63

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 443 239 204 2 6 4 231 195 0 5 50 208 % Prof. or Above 69 74 64 X X X 53 88 X X 18 52 % Below 30 26 35 X X X 46 11 X X 80 47 % NS 1 0 1 X X X 1 1 X X 2 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
11 30 26 35 46 80 88 69 74 64 53 52 18
IEP ELL
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

47

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 7

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 1 2

U 20

PP 85

P 274

A 46

PA 320

NS 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 64 60 40 20 5 0 U 20 21 7 PP 11 10 1 A NS 2 59

Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 7

20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70

4132 12301 34821 6048 40869 1384

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading
74
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 8 10 12 6 5

PP 21 29 22 24 20 20

Percentages P A PA 60 8 69 56 5 61 57 9 66 56 5 61 62 11 73 64 11 74

NS 1 2 3 3 1 1

U 38 31 38 46 26 20

PP 87 109 86 93 83 85

Ns P A 248 35 213 20 225 34 213 19 259 46 274 46

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 69 66 73 61

PA 283 233 259 232 305 320

NS 5 6 10 12 3 6

61

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 431 203 228 6 4 0 193 221 1 6 39 168 % Prof. or Above 74 80 69 X X X 62 85 X X 33 57 % Below 24 20 29 X X X 36 14 X X 64 40 % NS 1 0 2 X X X 2 1 X X 3 2

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
24 20 29 36 64 14 40
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

74

80

85 69 62 33 X
AmIndAK

57

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 8

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A 0

PA NS 61 0 1

U 4

PP 3

P 11

A 0

PA NS 11 0 8

Percentage of Students

Percentages Eagle County Re 50 22 17 61

Ns

100 80 61 60 40 22 20 0 U 15 17 20 0 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado PP A 13 0 NS 1 51

Colorado 15 20 51 13 64

181 234 601 151 752

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 12 X X 6 15 22

PP 12 X X 19 20 17

Percentages P A PA 70 7 77 X X X X X X 63 13 75 65 0 65 61 0 61

NS 0 X X 0 0 0

U 5 X X 1 3 4

PP 5 X X 3 4 3

P 30 X X 10 13 11

Ns A 3 X X 2 0 0

PA 33 X X 12 13 11

NS 0 X X 0 0 0

80 60 40 20 0

77

75 65 61

X 2008 2009

X 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 18 6 12 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 3 18

% Prof. or Above 61 X X X X X 61 X X X X 61

% Below 39 X X X X X 39 X X X X 39

% NS 0 X X X X X 0 X X X X 0

80 60 40

39

39

39

61

61

61

20 0
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 9

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State Eagle County Re 50

U X

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 35 X 0

U X

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 38 X 0

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0 X U X PP X X A 4 X NS 0 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 31 33 31

Colorado 31 33 31 4

34 36 34 4

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Percentage of Students P + A
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

P X X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

PA X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 6 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 10

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 50 51 0 0

U 28

PP 211

P 218

A 27

PA 245

NS 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 43 43 40 20 6 0 U 6 PP 6 A P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 8 45 43

Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6

43 45 6 43 43 8

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

0 NS

0

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 8 3 6 5 6

PP 43 41 47 37 45 43

Percentages P A PA 42 7 49 42 9 51 41 8 49 46 11 57 46 4 50 45 6 50

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 33 39 15 27 29 28

PP 165 206 223 176 236 211

Ns P A 161 27 211 44 194 38 218 52 244 20 218 27

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 49 51 57 49 50 50

PA 188 255 232 270 264 245

NS 0 0 0 0 1 2

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 486 239 247 3 7 3 232 235 1 5 38 188 % Prof. or Above 50 59 42 X X X 35 64 X X 16 35 % Below 49 41 57 X X X 65 35 X X 84 65 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 1 X X 0 0

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

49

41 57 65

35 65 84

50

59 42 X
AmIndAK

64 35 X
Asian

35 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

16
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 11

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 51 53 0 0

U 33

PP 221

P 228

A 39

PA 267

NS 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0 6 U 7 PP 42 39 44 45

Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7

42 44 7 39 45 8

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

7 A

8 0 NS 0

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 48 55 45 59 53 51
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 8 10 7 4 4 6

PP 45 44 37 37 43 42

Percentages P A PA 40 7 48 40 5 45 45 9 55 48 11 59 47 6 53 44 7 51

NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

U 31 43 38 20 19 33

PP 179 186 190 168 214 221

Ns P A 161 30 169 23 232 48 219 48 230 30 228 39

100

PA 191 192 280 267 260 267

NS 1 1 3 1 0 2

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 523 234 289 4 10 3 243 257 0 6 62 219 % Prof. or Above 51 61 43 X X X 29 71 X X 10 28 % Below 49 39 56 X X X 70 28 X X 90 72 % NS 0 0 1 X X X 0 0 X X 0 0

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
28 56 70 90 71 43 29 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
51 61 49 39

72

28 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

10
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 12

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 58 57 1 1

U 23

PP 183

P 252

A 44

PA 296

NS 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 5 0 U 5 PP P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 36 37 9 A 9 1 NS 1 50 48

Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5

36 50 9 37 48 9

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
80 61 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 59 60 65 60 58
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 6 3 3 4 5

PP 34 35 37 32 36 36

Percentages P A PA 51 11 61 53 6 59 52 7 60 55 10 65 49 11 60 50 9 58

NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

U 16 25 14 17 18 23

PP 131 150 156 159 172 183

Ns P A 193 41 227 25 222 31 277 48 231 51 252 44

100

PA 234 252 253 325 282 296

NS 0 2 2 0 1 5

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 507 243 264 5 1 1 245 249 0 6 52 210 % Prof. or Above 58 66 51 X X X 38 79 X X 15 35 % Below 41 33 48 X X X 61 20 X X 83 64 % NS 1 1 1 X X X 1 1 X X 2 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
20
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40
58 79 66 51 38 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

41

33 48 61 83 64

20 0

35 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

15
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 13

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 64 58 1 1

U 14

PP 153

P 258

A 40

PA 298

NS 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 3 0 U 4 PP P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 33 38 55 49

Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 4

33 55 9 38 49 9

2629 23740 30751 5578 36329 355

9 A

9 1 NS 1

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 59
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 3 5 4 4 3

PP 36 31 31 28 35 33

Percentages P A PA 47 12 59 55 12 66 52 12 63 56 13 68 52 9 61 55 9 64

NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

U 18 13 23 16 19 14

PP 151 122 134 121 172 153

Ns P A 195 50 218 46 223 50 242 55 258 45 258 40

100 66 68

PA 245 264 273 297 303 298

NS 1 0 1 1 0 3

63

61

64

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 468 224 244 1 4 0 230 225 0 8 50 189 % Prof. or Above 64 75 54 X X X 45 81 X X 26 42 % Below 36 25 46 X X X 54 18 X X 74 57 % NS 1 1 0 X X X 1 0 X X 0 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
25 46 54 74 18 57
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40
64 75 54 45 26 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

36

81 42 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

20 0
X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 14

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 1 1

U 11

PP 144

P 274

A 64

PA 338

NS 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 2 0 U 3 PP A P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 29 35 13 15 1 NS 1 55 47

Eagle County Re 50 2 Colorado 3

29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61

1739 21930 29033 9265 38298 431

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 56
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 5 4 3 4 3 2

PP 39 30 30 29 29 29

Percentages P A PA 47 9 56 48 18 66 51 17 68 53 14 67 55 13 68 55 13 68

NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

U 20 16 11 15 15 11

PP 147 123 115 125 128 144

Ns P A 177 33 197 74 196 66 225 61 242 56 274 64

100 66 68 67 68 68

PA 210 271 262 286 298 338

NS 0 0 0 0 0 6

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 499 245 254 6 8 4 249 227 0 5 46 209 % Prof. or Above 68 70 66 X X X 48 89 X X 13 43 % Below 31 29 33 X X X 51 11 X X 85 56 % NS 1 2 1 X X X 2 1 X X 2 2

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
11 31 29 33 51 85 89 68 70 66 48 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Asian

56

43 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

13
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 15

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 61 56 0 1

U 19

PP 151

P 240

A 30

PA 270

NS 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 4 0 U 3 PP P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 34 40 54 47

Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 3

34 54 7 40 47 9

1836 24683 28434 5641 34075 485

7 A

9 0 NS 1

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 59 57 62 60 63 61
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 4 3 3 2 4

PP 37 39 35 37 35 34

Percentages P A PA 45 13 59 50 7 57 49 13 62 47 13 60 53 10 63 54 7 61

NS 1 0 0 0 1 0

U 15 13 13 11 7 19

PP 147 143 144 149 154 151

Ns P A 180 52 182 25 205 53 188 51 236 45 240 30

100

PA 232 207 258 239 281 270

NS 2 1 1 1 3 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 441 199 242 1 6 1 217 208 0 8 38 171 % Prof. or Above 61 69 55 X X X 45 77 X X 3 43 % Below 39 31 45 X X X 54 23 X X 97 57 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 0 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
31 45 54 23 57 97
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40
61 69 55 45 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

39

77 43 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

20 0
X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult

3
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 16

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 59 55 1 1

U 15

PP 164

P 227

A 34

PA 261

NS 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 3 0 U 3 PP P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 37 40 51 47

Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 3

37 51 8 40 47 8

1969 24862 28738 5144 33882 840

8 A

8 1 NS

1

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 40 52 56 45 53 59
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 8 2 6 5 3 3

PP 52 43 44 36 42 37

Percentages P A PA 36 3 40 46 6 52 39 5 45 47 9 56 48 5 53 51 8 59

NS 1 4 5 3 2 1

U 29 7 26 20 12 15

PP 192 169 183 158 189 164

Ns P A 134 13 183 23 164 22 206 38 217 23 227 34

100

PA 147 206 186 244 240 261

NS 4 14 21 13 8 3

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 443 239 204 2 6 4 231 195 0 5 50 208 % Prof. or Above 59 65 52 X X X 39 82 X X 10 40 % Below 40 35 47 X X X 60 17 X X 88 59 % NS 1 0 1 X X X 1 1 X X 2 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
17
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40
59 65 52 39 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

40

35 47 60 88 82 59

20 0
X
Asian

40 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

10
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 17

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 49 49 2 2

U 17

PP 196

P 178

A 33

PA 211

NS 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 45 43 40 20 4 0 U 6 PP 8 A 7 41 41

Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 6

45 41 8 43 41 7

3790 24972 24307 4316 28623 1311

2 NS

2

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 8 7 9 6 3 4

PP 45 49 41 47 42 45

Percentages P A PA 40 5 45 40 3 42 38 9 47 39 4 43 48 6 54 41 8 49

NS 1 2 3 3 1 2

U 35 26 35 24 14 17

PP 186 186 163 181 175 196

Ns P A 166 21 150 11 150 34 149 17 200 25 178 33

100 80 60 45 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 42 47 54 43 49

PA 187 161 184 166 225 211

NS 5 6 11 12 3 7

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 431 203 228 6 4 0 193 221 1 6 39 168 % Prof. or Above 49 60 39 X X X 28 67 X X 10 24 % Below 49 39 58 X X X 69 32 X X 85 73 % NS 2 0 3 X X X 2 1 X X 5 2

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40
60 39 49 58 69 85 67 39 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

32

73

20 0

49

28 X
Asian

24 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

10
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 18

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A 0

PA NS 17 0 0

U 6

PP 9

P 3

A 0

PA NS 3 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages Eagle County Re 50 33 50 17

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0 U 33 20 24 17 0 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado PP A 50 37 18 0 NS 0

Colorado 20 24 37 18 56

236 282 442 218 660

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Percentage of Students P + A
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 14 X X 19 32 33

PP 33 X X 13 11 50

Percentages P A PA 40 14 53 X X X X X X 50 19 69 47 11 58 17 0 17

NS 0 X X 0 0 0

U 6 X X 3 6 6

PP 14 X X 2 2 9

P 17 X X 8 9 3

Ns A 6 X X 3 2 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 2009 X 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 17 53 69 58

PA 23 X X 11 11 3

NS 0 X X 0 0 0

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 18 6 12 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 3 18

% Prof. or Above 17 X X X X X 17 X X X X 17

% Below 83 X X X X X 83 X X X X 83

% NS 0 X X X X X 0 X X X X 0

80 60 40 20
17 83 83 83

0
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

17
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

17
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 19

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State Eagle County Re 50

U X

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 19 X 6

U X

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 20 X 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 44 40 20 0 X U X PP X 32 18 X A 1 X NS 6

Colorado 44 32 18 1

47 35 19 1

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Percentage of Students P + A
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

P X X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

PA X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 6 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 % Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X % Below X X X X X X X X X X X X % NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 20

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0

U 34

PP 124

P 204

A 142

PA 346

NS 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 25 20 0 7 U 7 PP A 20 0 NS 0 40 41 28 31

Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 77
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years U 2008 11 2009 7 2010 5 2011 6 2012 8 2013 7

PP 23 23 23 17 22 25

Percentages P A PA 38 28 66 40 29 69 36 36 72 41 36 77 42 27 70 40 28 69

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 1 0 U 47 38 23 29 43 34 PP 100 119 108 84 121 124 P 163 206 173 202 232 204 A 120 146 172 174 150 142 PA 283 352 345 376 382 346 NS 0 0 0 0 3 1

100 66 69 72 70 69

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 505 246 259 3 7 3 251 234 1 6 41 207 % Prof. or Above 69 68 69 X X X 54 83 X X 32 51 % Below 31 32 31 X X X 45 17 X X 68 48 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 0 0

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
17 31 31 45 68 48
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

32

83 69 68 69 54 32 X
AmIndAK

51

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 21

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0

U 44

PP 120

P 249

A 115

PA 364

NS 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0 23 20 8 U 8 0 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado PP A NS 0 22 47 43 28

Eagle County Re 50 8 Colorado 8

23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math
80 66 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 74 77 73
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years U 2008 10 2009 10 2010 7 2011 5 2012 7 2013 8

PP 25 20 19 18 19 23

Percentages P A PA 45 20 66 43 27 69 40 34 74 45 33 77 43 30 73 47 22 69

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 40 43 34 23 36 44 PP 101 87 99 82 96 120 P 186 182 207 205 215 249 A 83 114 172 150 148 115 PA 269 296 379 355 363 364 NS 0 1 1 0 1 1

100 69 69

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 529 234 295 4 9 3 250 257 0 6 62 225 % Prof. or Above 69 72 66 X X X 50 87 X X 31 48 % Below 31 28 34 X X X 49 13 X X 69 52 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 0 0

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
13 31 28 34 49 69 52
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

87 69 72 66 50 31 X
AmIndAK

48 X X
Mult IEP ELL

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 22

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0

U 44

PP 137

P 196

A 129

PA 325

NS 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0 9 U 9 0 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado PP A NS 0 39 36 27 25 25 29

Eagle County Re 50 9 Colorado 9

27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years U 2008 7 2009 11 2010 7 2011 8 2012 8 2013 9

PP 26 27 28 21 28 27

Percentages P A PA 40 27 67 36 26 62 35 30 64 36 35 71 39 25 64 39 25 64

Ns NS 0 1 0 0 0 0 U 27 45 30 40 37 44 PP 98 116 121 106 133 137 P 154 154 148 180 184 196 A 102 109 126 176 119 129 PA 256 263 274 356 303 325 NS 0 3 0 0 0 2

100 67 71

62

64

64

64

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 508 244 264 5 1 1 246 249 0 6 52 211 % Prof. or Above 64 64 64 X X X 44 84 X X 23 41 % Below 36 36 35 X X X 55 16 X X 77 59 % NS 0 0 1 X X X 1 0 X X 0 0

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
16
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40
64 64 64 44 23 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

36

36

35 55 77 84 59

20 0
X
Asian

41 X X
Mult IEP ELL

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 23

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 1 0

U 45

PP 117

P 177

A 126

PA 303

NS 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 25 26 20 0 10 12 1 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado U PP A NS 0 38 35 27 27

Eagle County Re 50 10 25 38 27 65 Colorado 12 26 35 27 62

7457 16200 22056 17049 39105 288

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 60
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 13 9 11 9 13 10

PP 26 24 24 27 28 25

Percentages P A PA 38 22 60 40 27 67 44 22 65 34 29 63 37 22 59 38 27 65

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 55 37 46 41 63 45 PP 109 96 102 118 138 117 P 159 159 188 150 182 177 A 92 107 94 126 111 126 PA 251 266 282 276 293 303 NS 0 0 1 0 0 3

100 67

65

63

59

65

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 468 224 244 1 4 0 230 225 0 8 50 189 % Prof. or Above 65 67 62 X X X 45 84 X X 34 45 % Below 35 32 37 X X X 54 16 X X 64 54 % NS 1 0 1 X X X 1 0 X X 2 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
16
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40
65 84 67 62 45 34 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

35

32

37 54 64 54

20 0
X
Asian

45 X X
Mult IEP ELL

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 24

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 1 1

U 66

PP 128

P 151

A 147

PA 298

NS 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 26 20 0 13 14 1 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado U PP A NS 1 30 30 28 29 27

Eagle County Re 50 13 26 30 29 60 Colorado 14 30 28 27 55

8842 18935 17406 16893 34299 327

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 38 56 60 58 60 51
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 21 12 10 11 15 13

PP 41 32 30 30 34 26

Percentages P A PA 27 11 38 29 27 56 41 19 60 35 23 58 26 25 51 30 29 60

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 78 49 40 48 64 66 PP 154 130 117 129 152 128 P 103 118 159 149 116 151 A 42 111 72 100 109 147 PA 145 229 231 249 225 298 NS 0 2 0 0 0 7

100

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 499 245 254 6 8 4 249 227 0 5 46 209 % Prof. or Above 60 58 62 X X X 43 77 X X 7 38 % Below 39 41 37 X X X 55 22 X X 91 60 % NS 1 2 1 X X X 2 1 X X 2 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
22
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60
91 39 41 37 55 60

40
60 58 62 43

77 38 7 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

20 0
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 25

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 1 1

U 75

PP 124

P 131

A 108

PA 239

NS 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0 17 19 28 29 30 29

Eagle County Re 50 17 28 30 24 54 Colorado 19 29 29 23 51

11577 17668 17463 13977 31440 385

24 23 1 1 NS

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado

U

PP

A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 57 46 61 64 51 54
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 20 15 13 12 19 17

PP 33 28 25 24 30 28

Percentages P A PA 31 15 46 38 19 57 36 25 61 40 24 64 30 21 51 30 24 54

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 80 56 55 48 85 75 PP 132 101 106 96 133 124 P 123 138 149 161 133 131 A 59 68 106 95 94 108 PA 182 206 255 256 227 239 NS 1 0 2 1 0 3

100

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 441 199 242 1 6 1 217 208 0 8 38 171 % Prof. or Above 54 50 57 X X X 34 74 X X 8 35 % Below 45 49 42 X X X 65 26 X X 92 64 % NS 1 1 1 X X X 1 0 X X 0 2

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
26
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40
54 74 50 57 34 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

45

49

42 65 92 64

20 0

8 X X
Mult IEP

35

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

HwPacIs

ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 26

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 1 1

U 122

PP 170

P 102

A 46

PA 148

NS 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado U PP 38 28 30 30 23 24 10 A 15 1 NS 1

Eagle County Re 50 28 38 23 10 33 Colorado 30 30 24 15 39

18263 18670 14741 9176 23917 692

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 32 35 37 47 35 33
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 35 34 29 23 26 28

PP 32 30 28 28 38 38

Percentages P A PA 24 8 32 26 9 35 30 7 37 33 14 47 26 9 35 23 10 33

NS 1 1 6 2 1 1

U 132 133 123 98 117 122

PP 118 115 116 122 172 170

Ns P 88 101 124 145 115 102

100

A 31 34 30 60 40 46

PA 119 135 154 205 155 148

NS 4 4 25 10 5 3

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 443 239 204 2 6 4 231 195 0 5 50 208 % Prof. or Above 33 36 30 X X X 17 52 X X 4 17 % Below 66 64 69 X X X 82 47 X X 94 82 % NS 1 0 1 X X X 1 1 X X 2 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80
66 64 47 69 82 94 82

60 40

52

20 0

33

36

30 X X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

17
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

4
IEP

17
ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 27

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 29 34 1 2

U 112

PP 189

P 109

A 17

PA 126

NS 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 44 40 20 4 0 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado U PP A 26 29 35 25 28 6 1 NS 2

Eagle County Re 50 26 44 25 4 Colorado 29 35 28 6

17148 20459 16191 3725 19916 1162

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math
80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 32 23 34 25 25 29
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 31 39 33 32 23 26

Percentages PP P A PA 36 29 3 32 36 21 2 23 40 23 2 25 41 23 2 25 42 30 4 34 44 25 4 29

NS 1 2 3 3 1 1

U 126 150 129 121 97 112

PP 150 137 156 158 175 189

Ns P 118 78 90 88 127 109

100

A 14 8 8 6 15 17

PA 132 86 98 94 142 126

NS 5 7 11 10 3 5

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 432 203 229 6 4 0 194 221 1 6 39 169 % Prof. or Above 29 28 31 X X X 14 41 X X 8 14 % Below 70 72 68 X X X 84 58 X X 90 84 % NS 1 0 2 X X X 2 0 X X 3 2

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80
58

60 40 20 0

70

72

68 84 90 84

29

28

31 X X
Asian

41 8 X
BlkAfAm

14
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult IEP

14
ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 28

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0

U 59

PP 185

P 187

A 75

PA 262

NS 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0 12 14 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado U PP 36 37 37 35 15 13 0 A NS 0

Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 15 15 9 14 12 12

PP 40 40 40 33 37 36

Percentages P A PA 33 12 45 35 10 45 35 16 51 37 15 52 35 16 51 37 15 52

NS 0 0 0 0 1 0

U 56 64 38 71 55 59

PP 154 171 168 168 177 185

Ns P A 126 45 150 43 150 66 187 75 166 74 187 75

100 80 60 45 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 45 51 52 51 52

PA 171 193 216 262 240 262

NS 0 0 2 1 3 2

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 508 243 265 5 1 1 245 250 0 6 53 210 % Prof. or Above 52 49 54 X X X 24 79 X X 25 20 % Below 48 51 45 X X X 76 21 X X 75 79 % NS 0 0 1 X X X 1 0 X X 0 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
21
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

48

51

45 76 75 79

79 52 49 54 24 X
AmIndAK

25 X X
Mult IEP

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

20
ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 29

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1

U 80

PP 107

P 200

A 53

PA 253

NS 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 45 43 40 20 0 18 21 24 27 12 PP A 9 0 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado U NS 1

Eagle County Re 50 18 24 45 12 57 Colorado 21 27 43 9 52

12703 16350 26331 5232 31563 458

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 21 24 21 18 20 18

PP 27 23 24 23 29 24

Percentages P A PA 45 7 52 44 9 53 49 6 55 47 12 59 45 5 50 45 12 57

NS 0 0 0 0 1 0

U 84 87 87 73 91 80

PP 106 84 99 90 127 107

Ns P A 180 26 161 33 204 25 187 49 200 23 200 53

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 52 53 55 59 50 57

PA 206 194 229 236 223 253

NS 0 0 1 1 4 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 441 199 242 1 6 1 217 208 0 8 38 171 % Prof. or Above 57 54 60 X X X 35 79 X X 11 35 % Below 42 46 39 X X X 65 21 X X 89 65 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 0 1

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
21
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40
57 54 60 35 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

42

46

39 65 89 79 65

20 0
X
Asian

35 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

11
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 30

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 57 51 1 2

U 95

PP 83

P 222

A 26

PA 248

NS 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 22 25 20 0 U 19 21 6 P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50 Colorado PP A 8 1 NS 2 51 43

Eagle County Re 50 22 19 51 6 Colorado 25 21 43 8

14953 12366 25278 4824 30102 1239

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science (in percentages)
Percentage of Students P + A

District Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 24 32 28 30 24 22

Percentages PP P A PA 26 47 3 50 23 40 4 44 23 44 3 47 25 38 4 42 24 47 4 51 19 51 6 57

NS 0 1 2 2 1 1

U 98 120 111 116 101 95

PP 109 88 91 97 99 83

Ns P 193 152 172 144 198 222

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 50 47 51 42 57

A 12 16 13 17 16 26

PA 205 168 185 161 214 248

NS 1 4 7 9 3 6

44

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 432 203 229 6 4 0 194 221 1 6 38 169 % Prof. or Above 57 56 59 X X X 38 74 X X 11 34 % Below 41 43 39 X X X 60 25 X X 87 63 % NS 1 0 2 X X X 3 0 X X 3 3

Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
25
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100 80 60 40
57 56 59 38 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

41

43

39 60 87 74 63

20 0
X
Asian

34 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

11
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 31

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Avon Elem
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Avon Elem Eagle County Re 50

U 3 8

PP

P

A PA NS 72 72 73 0 0 0

U 1 38

PP 7 98

P 21 322

A 0 32

PA 21 354

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
24 72

24 72 0 20 66 7

66 66

Colorado 10 17 66 7

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

20
3

20 17 7 0 7 0 0 0

8 10

0

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 24 20 26 5 6 3

PP 21 16 32 22 21 24

Percentages P A PA 55 0 55 64 0 64 39 3 42 70 3 73 73 0 73 72 0 72

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 8 9 8 2 2 1

PP 7 7 10 8 7 7

P 18 29 12 26 24 21

Ns A 0 0 1 1 0 0

100 80 64 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 55 42 73 73 72

PA 18 29 13 27 24 21

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 29 17 12 1 0 1 24 3 0 0 0 25

% Prof. or Above 72 82 X X X X 71 X X X X 68

% Below 28 18 X X X X 29 X X X X 32

% NS 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
28 18 29 32

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female

72

82 71 68

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 32

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 45 67 68 0 0 0

U 5 51

PP 19 122

P 20 332

A 0 17

PA 20 349

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63 63

Avon Elem 11 43 45 0 Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

60
43 45 23 21

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

40 20 0
11 10 11 0 3

5

0

0

0

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 31 38 8 12 5 11

PP 41 22 36 23 29 43

Percentages P A PA 28 0 28 38 3 41 56 0 56 65 0 65 66 0 66 45 0 45

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 10 12 3 3 2 5

PP 13 7 14 6 12 19

Ns P A 9 0 12 1 22 0 17 0 27 0 20 0

100 80 65 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 41 28 56 45 66

PA 9 13 22 17 27 20

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 44 23 21 1 0 1 42 0 0 0 3 43

% Prof. or Above 45 52 38 X X X 45 X X X X 47

% Below 55 48 62 X X X 55 X X X X 53

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
55 48 62 53

55

60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

45

52 38 X
AmIndAK

45 X
Asian

47 X X
HwPacIs

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 33

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 75 74 70 0 1 0

U 5 42

PP 7 89

P 34 329

A 2 44

PA 36 373

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
10 8 11 15 18 18 4 9 8 0 1 0 71

Avon Elem 10 15 71 4 Eagle County Re 50 8 18 65 9

65 62

Colorado 11 18 62 8

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 21 30 29 25 23 10

PP 33 27 17 11 20 15

Percentages P A PA 47 0 47 42 0 42 51 3 54 64 0 64 54 3 57 71 4 75

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 9 10 10 9 8 5

PP 14 9 6 4 7 7

Ns P A 20 0 14 0 18 1 23 0 19 1 34 2

100 80 64 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 54 47 42 57 75

PA 20 14 19 23 20 36

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 48 28 20 1 0 0 42 5 0 0 4 42

% Prof. or Above 75 79 70 X X X 74 X X X X 71

% Below 25 21 30 X X X 26 X X X X 29

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
25 21

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female

30

26

29

75

79

70

74

71

X
Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 34

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Avon Elem

U X

PP X

P X

A X 0

PA NS X 61 X 0 1

U X 4

PP X 3

P X 11

A X 0

PA NS X 11 X 0 8

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
61

Eagle County Re 50 22 17 61

60 40
22

51

Colorado 15 20 51 13 64

181 234 601 151 752

20 0
X

15 X

17 20 X X 0

13 X 0 1

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 X X X X X

PP 19 X X X X X

Percentages P A PA 69 13 81 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS 0 X X X X X

U 0 X X X X X

PP 3 X X X X X

P 11 X X X X X

Ns A 2 X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 81 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

PA 13 X X X X X

NS 0 X X X X X

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 15 5 10 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 3 15

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 35

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Avon Elem Eagle County Re 50

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 35 X X 0

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 38 X X 0

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X X X X X X X X 4 X X 0 31 33 31

Colorado 31 33 31 4

34 36 34 4

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

P X X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X X

PA X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 36

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Avon Elem 0 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6

P

A PA NS 59 50 51 0 0 0

U 0 28

PP 12 211

P 17 218

A 0 27

PA 17 245

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
41 43 43 59 45 43

41 59 0 43 45 6 43 43 8

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

40 20 0
0 6 6 0 6 8 0 0 0

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 18 4 7 5 3 0

PP 33 56 60 45 30 41

Percentages P A PA 45 3 48 40 0 40 30 3 33 47 3 50 64 3 67 59 0 59

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 6 2 2 2 1 0

PP 11 25 18 17 10 12

P 15 18 9 18 21 17

Ns A 1 0 1 1 1 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 48 40 33 50 67 59

PA 16 18 10 19 22 17

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 29 17 12 1 0 1 24 3 0 0 0 25

% Prof. or Above 59 76 X X X X 54 X X X X 52

% Below 41 24 X X X X 46 X X X X 48

% NS 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
24

80 60 40

41

46

48

76 59 54 52

20 0
Total Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 37

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Avon Elem 7 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7

P

A PA NS 25 51 53 0 0 0

U 3 33

PP 30 221

P 11 228

A 0 39

PA 11 267

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
7 7 0 42 39 25 6 7 8 0 0 0 44 45 68

68 25 0 42 44 7 39 45 8

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 22 24 10 12 2 7

PP 69 52 49 54 49 68

Percentages P A PA 9 0 9 21 3 24 36 3 38 35 0 35 49 0 49 25 0 25

NS 0 0 3 0 0 0

U 7 8 4 3 1 3

PP 22 17 19 14 20 30

P 3 7 14 9 20 11

Ns A 0 1 1 0 0 0

100 80 60 40 24 20 0 9 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 38 35 25 49

PA 3 8 15 9 20 11

NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 44 23 21 1 0 1 42 0 0 0 3 43

% Prof. or Above 25 17 33 X X X 26 X X X X 26

% Below 75 83 67 X X X 74 X X X X 74

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20
25 17
Female Male

75

67 83

74

74

33 X
AmIndAK

26 X
Asian

26 X X
HwPacIs

0
Total

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 38

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Avon Elem 4 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5

P

A PA NS 54 58 57 0 1 1

U 2 23

PP 20 183

P 25 252

A 1 44

PA 26 296

NS 0 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
42 52 50 48 36 37

42 52 2 36 50 9 37 48 9

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

40 20
4 5 5

9 2

9 0 1 1

0

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 7 6 11 8 6 4

PP 49 58 31 33 54 42

Percentages P A PA 33 12 44 36 0 36 51 6 57 58 0 58 37 3 40 52 2 54

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 3 2 4 3 2 2

PP 21 19 11 12 19 20

P 14 12 18 21 13 25

Ns A 5 0 2 0 1 1

100 80 60 44 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 36 57 58 40 54

PA 19 12 20 21 14 26

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 48 28 20 1 0 0 42 5 0 0 4 42

% Prof. or Above 54 71 30 X X X 52 X X X X 50

% Below 46 29 70 X X X 48 X X X X 50

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
54 71 52 30 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

29 46 70 48 50

20 0

50 X X
HwPacIs

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 39

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Avon Elem

U X

PP X

P X

A X 0

PA NS X 17 X 0 0

U X 6

PP X 9

P X 3

A X 0

PA NS X 3 X 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 33 20 X 24 17 X X 0 50 37 18 X 0 0

Eagle County Re 50 33 50 17

Colorado 20 24 37 18 56

236 282 442 218 660

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 19 X X X X X

PP 38 X X X X X

Percentages P A PA 25 19 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS 0 X X X X X

U 3 X X X X X

PP 6 X X X X X

P 4 X X X X X

Ns A 3 X X X X X

100 80 60 44 40 20 0 X 2008 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

PA 7 X X X X X

NS 0 X X X X X

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 15 5 10 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 3 15

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 40

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Avon Elem Eagle County Re 50

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 19 X X 6

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 20 X X 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
44

Colorado 44 32 18 1

47 35 19 1

40 20 0
X X X X

32 18 X X X X 1 X X 6

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

P X X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

PA X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 41

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Avon Elem 7 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 3 34

PP 12 124

P 17 204

A 12 142

PA 29 346

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
7 7 7 0 0 0 39 40 41 27 25 31 27 28 20

27 39 27 66 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentages P A PA 45 18 63 41 33 75 27 12 39 54 22 76 43 11 53 39 27 66 Ns A 9 17 4 11 5 12
Percentage of Students P + A

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math
100 80 63 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 39 53 75 76 66

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 12 2 9 10 11 7

PP 24 24 52 14 36 27

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 6 1 3 5 5 3

PP 12 12 17 7 17 12

P 22 21 9 27 20 17

PA 31 38 13 38 25 29

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 44 22 22 1 0 1 39 3 0 0 3 40 % Prof. or Above 66 64 68 X X X 62 X X X X 63 % Below 34 36 32 X X X 38 X X X X 38 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
66 64 68 34 36 32 38 38

62

63

20 0
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 42

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 7

PA NS 36 0 0 0

U 7 44

PP 22 120

P 13 249

A 3 115

PA 16 364

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
16 8 8 23 20 49 29 22 7 0 0 0 47

Avon Elem 16 49 29 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 8 8

23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

43 28

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentages P A PA 29 3 32 34 14 49 45 35 80 48 10 58 57 24 81 29 7 36 Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 11 8 3 3 3 7 PP 12 10 5 10 5 22 P 10 12 18 15 24 13 A 1 5 14 3 10 3 PA 11 17 32 18 34 16 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0
Percentage of Students P + A

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math
100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 32 49 36 80 58 81

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 32 23 8 10 7 16

PP 35 29 13 32 12 49

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 45 23 22 1 0 1 43 0 0 0 3 44 % Prof. or Above 36 26 45 X X X 37 X X X X 36 % Below 64 74 55 X X X 63 X X X X 64 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
64 55 74 63 64

60 40 20 0
Total

36

45 26 X
Female Male AmIndAK

37 X
Asian

36 X X
HwPacIs

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 43

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 5 44

PP 16 137

P 16 196

A 11 129

PA 27 325

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
10 9 9 0 0 0 33 27 25 33 39 36 29 23 25

Avon Elem 10 33 33 23 56 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 9 9 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)
Percentages P A PA 40 7 47 30 6 36 37 14 51 36 33 69 31 3 34 33 23 56 Ns A 3 2 5 12 1 11
Percentage of Students P + A

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 47 36 51 34 69 56

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 19 15 20 8 20 10

PP 35 48 29 22 46 33

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 8 5 7 3 7 5

PP 15 16 10 8 16 16

P 17 10 13 13 11 16

PA 20 12 18 25 12 27

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL Ns 48 28 20 1 0 0 42 5 0 0 4 42 % Prof. or Above 56 57 55 X X X 55 X X X X 52 % Below 44 43 45 X X X 45 X X X X 48 % NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
56 57 55 55 52 44 43 45 45 48

20 0
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 44

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 8

PA NS 29 0 0 0

U 8 59

PP 26 185

P 10 187

A 4 75

PA 14 262

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
17 12 14 54 36 37 21 8 37 35 15 13 0 0 0

Avon Elem 17 54 21

Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

U Avon Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

Avon Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 26 30 17 28 26 17

PP 56 55 46 39 66 54

Percentages P A PA 16 2 19 15 0 15 26 9 34 28 3 31 9 0 9 21 8 29

NS 0 0 3 3 0 0

U 11 10 6 10 9 8

PP 24 18 16 14 23 26

Ns P A 7 1 5 0 9 3 10 1 3 0 10 4

100 80 60 40 20 0 19 15 34 31 9 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 29

PA 8 5 12 11 3 14

NS 0 0 1 1 0 0

2008

2009

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Avon Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 48 28 20 1 0 0 42 5 0 0 4 42

% Prof. or Above 29 29 30 X X X 24 X X X X 24

% Below 71 71 70 X X X 76 X X X X 76

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

71

71

70

76

76

29

29

30 X
AmIndAK

24 X
Asian

24 X X
HwPacIs

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 45

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Battle Mountain High
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 62 69 68 0 1 1

U 25 32

PP 59 101

P 128 286

A 10 21

PA 138 307

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
27 23 24 5 5 4 0 1 1 58 65 64

Battle Mountain High 11 27 58 5 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 7 7 23 65 5 24 64 4

4258 14768 39370 2272 41642 879

20 0

11

7

7

P A Proficiency Levels Battle Mountain High Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 13 5 12 8 5 11

Percentages PP P A PA 33 50 3 54 22 69 3 72 24 59 3 62 22 63 6 70 24 67 3 71 27 58 5 62

Ns NS 1 1 1 0 0 0 U 24 9 25 16 10 25 PP 61 38 49 46 50 59 P 93 117 119 132 139 128 A 6 5 6 13 7 10 PA 99 122 125 145 146 138 NS 1 1 3 1 1 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 54 72 62 70 71 62

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 222 121 101 1 4 4 120 92 0 1 26 119

% Prof. or Above 62 71 51 X X X 44 86 X X 4 43

% Below 38 29 49 X X X 56 14 X X 96 57

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
14

80 60

38

29 49 56 57 96

40
62

86 71 51 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0

43 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

4
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 46

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Battle Mountain High 6 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 7

P

A

PA NS 1 1 2

U 11 20

PP 42 85

P 115 274

A 23 46

PA 138 320

NS 1 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
6 5 22 20 21 7 12 11 10 1 1 2 60 64 59

22 60 12 72 20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70

4132 12301 34821 6048 40869 1384

0

P A Proficiency Levels Battle Mountain High Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 13 10 12 17 7 6

PP 20 30 20 24 19 22

Percentages P A PA 58 9 67 54 6 60 57 10 67 55 3 58 59 15 74 60 12 72

Ns NS 0 0 0 1 0 1 U 25 18 21 34 13 11 PP 38 53 34 46 37 42 P 109 95 97 107 114 115 A 17 11 17 6 29 23 PA 126 106 114 113 143 138 NS 0 0 0 2 0 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 67 67 60 58 74 72

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 192 94 98 2 2 0 100 85 1 2 18 93

% Prof. or Above 72 78 66 X X X 55 92 X X 39 52

% Below 28 22 33 X X X 44 8 X X 56 47

% NS 1 0 1 X X X 1 0 X X 6 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60
92 28 22 33 44 56 8 47

40 20 0

72

78 66 55 39 X X
Asian

52

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult IEP ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 47

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Battle Mountain High 5 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 3

P

A PA NS 53 59 55 0 1 1

U 11 15

PP 94 164

P 102 227

A 15 34

PA 117 261

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
42 51 47

42 46 7 37 51 8 40 47 8

1969 24862 28738 5144 33882 840

40 20
5 3 3

37 40

46

7

8

8 0 1 1

0

P A Proficiency Levels Battle Mountain High Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 12 2 5 5 3 5

Percentages PP P A PA 51 34 3 37 42 46 8 54 49 40 5 45 36 48 9 57 46 45 5 50 42 46 7 53

Ns NS 0 1 1 1 0 0 U 22 4 11 11 7 11 PP 95 72 98 75 95 94 P 63 79 81 100 93 102 A 5 13 10 19 11 15 PA 68 92 91 119 104 117 NS 0 2 2 3 1 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 37 54 45 57 50 53

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 222 121 101 1 4 4 120 92 0 1 26 119

% Prof. or Above 53 64 40 X X X 32 79 X X 0 33

% Below 47 36 60 X X X 68 21 X X 100 67

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
21

80 60 40

36 47 60 68 100 79 64 53 67

20 0
Total Female

40 X
Male AmIndAK

32 X
Asian

33 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

0
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 48

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Battle Mountain High 4 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 6

P

A PA NS 48 49 49 1 2 2

U 8 17

PP 91 196

P 78 178

A 14 33

PA 92 211

NS 1 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
4 4 6 7 8 7 1 47 45 43

47 41 7 45 41 8 43 41 7

3790 24972 24307 4316 28623 1311

41 41 41

2

2

0

P A Proficiency Levels Battle Mountain High Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 11 9 11 10 4 4

PP 37 47 36 50 37 47

Percentages P A PA 44 8 52 41 3 44 44 9 54 36 3 39 50 9 59 41 7 48

NS 0 0 0 1 0 1

U 21 16 18 19 8 8

PP 69 83 60 98 72 91

P 84 72 75 71 96 78

Ns A 15 6 16 5 17 14

PA 99 78 91 76 113 92

NS 0 0 0 2 0 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 52 44 54 39 59 48

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 192 94 98 2 2 0 100 85 1 2 18 93

% Prof. or Above 48 61 36 X X X 25 75 X X 11 23

% Below 52 39 63 X X X 74 25 X X 83 76

% NS 1 0 1 X X X 1 0 X X 6 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100
25

80 60 40

39 52 63 74 83 75 61 48 36 25 23 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

76

20 0

X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult

11
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 49

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 7

PA NS 29 0 1 1

U 78 122

PP 80 170

P 48 102

A 15 46

PA 63 148

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0 U PP
35 36 38 28 30 30

Battle Mountain High 35 36 22

Eagle County Re 50 28 38 23 10 33 Colorado 30 30 24 15 39

18263 18670 14741 9176 23917 692

22 23 24 7 10 15 0 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels Battle Mountain High Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math (in percentages)

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 34 33 34 24 30 35

PP 35 30 24 28 43 36

Percentages P A PA 24 7 31 25 12 37 35 6 42 34 13 48 23 4 27 22 7 29

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 63 56 69 50 63 78 PP 64 50 48 59 88 80 P 44 42 71 71 47 48 A 13 21 13 28 9 15 PA 57 63 84 99 56 63 NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 31 37 42 48 27 29

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 221 121 100 1 4 4 119 92 0 1 26 118

% Prof. or Above 29 34 22 X X X 9 53 X X 8 11

% Below 71 66 78 X X X 91 47 X X 92 89

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
53 71 66 78 91 92 89 47

20 0

29

34 22 X X
Asian

8 X
BlkAfAm

9
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult IEP

11
ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 50

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 23 29 34 1 1 2

U 54 112

PP 93 189

P 40 109

A 4 17

PA 44 126

NS 2 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
2 4 6 1 1 2 28 26 29 48

Battle Mountain High 28 48 21 2 Eagle County Re 50 26 44 25 4 Colorado 29 35 28 6

17148 20459 16191 3725 19916 1162

44 35 21 25 28

0

P A Proficiency Levels Battle Mountain High Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 29 42 34 33 26 28

PP 36 37 35 42 40 48

Percentages P A PA 32 3 35 19 3 21 29 2 32 23 1 24 30 4 34 21 2 23

NS 1 0 0 1 0 1

U 54 74 57 65 51 54

PP 68 65 59 82 77 93

Ns P A 61 5 33 5 50 4 45 2 57 8 40 4

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 35 21 32 24 34 23

PA 66 38 54 47 65 44

NS 1 0 0 1 0 2

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 193 94 99 2 2 0 101 85 1 2 18 94

% Prof. or Above 23 20 25 X X X 6 41 X X 11 6

% Below 76 80 73 X X X 92 59 X X 83 91

% NS 1 0 2 X X X 2 0 X X 6 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
59

60 40 20

76

80

73 92 83 91

41 23 20
Female

25 X
Male AmIndAK

6 X
Asian

6 X X
Mult

0
Total

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

11
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 51

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 49 57 51 1 1 2

U 51 95

PP 45 83

P 84 222

A 11 26

PA 95 248

NS 2 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
44 51 43

Battle Mountain High 26 23 44 6 Eagle County Re 50 22 19 51 6 Colorado 25 21 43 8

14953 12366 25278 4824 30102 1239

40
26 22 25 23

20 0 U

19 21 6 6 8 1 1 2

P A Proficiency Levels Battle Mountain High Eagle County Re 50

PP

NS Colorado

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

Battle Mountain High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 24 33 31 34 25 26

PP 23 23 19 26 24 23

Percentages P A PA 48 5 53 40 4 44 45 5 50 35 5 40 47 5 51 44 6 49

NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

U 46 58 52 66 48 51

PP 43 41 33 51 46 45

P 91 71 76 69 90 84

Ns A 10 8 9 9 9 11

PA 101 79 85 78 99 95

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 53 44 50 40 51 49

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

Battle Mountain High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 193 94 99 2 2 0 101 85 1 2 17 94

% Prof. or Above 49 49 49 X X X 27 76 X X 18 24

% Below 50 51 48 X X X 71 24 X X 76 73

% NS 1 0 2 X X X 2 0 X X 6 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100
24

80 60 40 20 0

50

51

48 71 76 76 73

49

49

49 27 X X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

18
IEP

24

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 52

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Berry Creek Middle
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 7

PA NS 62 1 1 1

U 17 30

PP 23 66

P 58 297

A 8 72

PA 66 369

NS 1 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63 62

Berry Creek Middle 16 21 54 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 6 8

14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73

60 40 20 0
16 6 8 21 14 18

54

4938 11309 38862 7097 45959 845

15 7

11 1 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels Berry Creek Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 26 11 24 18 13 16

PP 31 36 17 26 22 21

Percentages P A PA 36 6 42 49 4 53 51 7 58 54 3 56 56 9 65 54 7 62

Ns NS 1 0 1 0 0 1 U 27 11 26 20 16 17 PP 32 37 19 30 27 23 P 37 50 56 61 69 58 A 6 4 8 3 11 8 PA 43 54 64 64 80 66 NS 1 0 1 0 0 1

100 80 60 42 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 53 58 65 56 62

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 107 51 56 0 0 0 86 21 0 0 11 83

% Prof. or Above 62 67 57 X X X 52 100 X X X 52

% Below 37 31 43 X X X 47 0 X X X 47

% NS 1 2 0 X X X 1 0 X X X 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60
37 31 43 47

0 47

100

40
62

67

57

52

52

20 0
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 53

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 62 74 68 2 1 1

U 21 44

PP 28 79

P 74 324

A 8 46

PA 82 370

NS 2 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65

Berry Creek Middle 16 21 56 6 Eagle County Re 50 9 16 65 9

60 40 20 0
16 21 9 11 16 21

56

59

Colorado 11 21 59 9

6815 13070 36650 5501 42151 359

6

9

9 2 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels Berry Creek Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 32 29 14 25 20 16

PP 30 28 36 20 27 21

Percentages P A PA 36 2 38 37 6 43 48 3 50 51 4 55 51 2 53 56 6 62

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

U 32 31 14 26 22 21

PP 30 30 36 21 29 28

Ns P A 36 2 40 6 48 3 53 4 55 2 74 8

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 38 43 50 55 62 53

PA 38 46 51 57 57 82

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 133 72 61 0 1 1 101 28 0 2 13 95

% Prof. or Above 62 61 62 X X X 50 96 X X X 48

% Below 37 36 38 X X X 48 4 X X X 49

% NS 2 3 0 X X X 2 0 X X X 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100
4

80 60

37

36

38 48 49

96

40
62 61 62 50 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0
X
Asian

48 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 54

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 48 71 67 0 0 1

U 22 43

PP 35 84

P 49 273

A 3 39

PA 52 312

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
45 62 59

Berry Creek Middle 20 32 45 3 Eagle County Re 50 10 19 62 9 Colorado 10 23 59 8

5882 13891 35960 4891 40851 450

40 20 0
20 10 10

32 19 23 3 9 8 0 0 1

P A Proficiency Levels Berry Creek Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 24 28 18 13 26 20

PP 29 24 32 32 27 32

Percentages P A PA 43 4 47 45 3 48 44 5 49 50 4 54 44 3 47 45 3 48

NS 0 0 0 1 0 0

U 23 29 18 14 29 22

PP 28 24 32 35 30 35

Ns P A 41 4 46 3 44 5 54 4 49 3 49 3

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 47 48 49 54 47 48

PA 45 49 49 58 52 52

NS 0 0 0 1 0 0

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 109 49 60 0 1 0 94 13 0 1 9 85

% Prof. or Above 48 55 42 X X X 43 X X X X 40

% Below 52 45 58 X X X 57 X X X X 60

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

52

45 58 57 60

48

55 42 X
AmIndAK

43 X
Asian

40 X X
HwPacIs

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 55

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Berry Creek Middle 7 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 4

P

A PA NS 46 64 58 1 1 1

U 8 14

PP 49 153

P 45 258

A 4 40

PA 49 298

NS 1 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
46 55 33 38 42 49

46 42 4 33 55 9 38 49 9

2629 23740 30751 5578 36329 355

40 20 0
7

3

4

4

9

9 1 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels Berry Creek Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 10 14 9 10 7

PP 51 45 43 50 43 46

Percentages P A PA 32 6 38 40 5 45 37 5 43 36 5 41 42 5 47 42 4 46

NS 1 0 1 0 0 1

U 10 10 15 10 12 8

PP 53 46 47 57 53 49

Ns P A 33 6 41 5 41 6 41 6 52 6 45 4

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 38 45 43 41 47 46

PA 39 46 47 47 58 49

NS 1 0 1 0 0 1

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 107 51 56 0 0 0 86 21 0 0 11 83

% Prof. or Above 46 59 34 X X X 34 95 X X X 33

% Below 53 39 66 X X X 65 5 X X X 66

% NS 1 2 0 X X X 1 0 X X X 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100
5

80
53

39 66 65 95 66

60 40
59

20 0

46 34 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

34 X
Asian

33 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 56

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Berry Creek Middle 3 Eagle County Re 50 2 Colorado 3

P

A 6

PA NS 50 2 1 1

U 4 11

PP 61 144

P 58 274

A 8 64

PA 66 338

NS 2 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
46 44 29 35 13 15 3 2 3 6 2 1 1 55 47

46 44

29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61

1739 21930 29033 9265 38298 431

40 20 0 U

P A Proficiency Levels Berry Creek Middle Eagle County Re 50

PP

NS Colorado

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 12 8 10 8 3

PP 63 50 52 45 52 46

Percentages P A PA 25 3 28 31 7 38 36 4 40 37 9 45 39 1 40 44 6 50

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

U 9 13 8 10 9 4

PP 63 53 53 47 56 61

Ns P A 25 3 33 8 36 4 38 9 42 1 58 8

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 38 28 40 45 40 50

PA 28 41 40 47 43 66

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 133 72 61 0 1 1 101 28 0 2 13 95

% Prof. or Above 50 53 46 X X X 35 96 X X X 34

% Below 49 44 54 X X X 63 4 X X X 64

% NS 2 3 0 X X X 2 0 X X X 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100
4

80 60

49

44

54 63 96 64

40 20 0
Total Female Male

50

53

46 35 X
AmIndAK

34 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 57

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Berry Creek Middle 8 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 3

P

A PA NS 39 61 56 0 0 1

U 9 19

PP 58 151

P 40 240

A 2 30

PA 42 270

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
8 53 34 40 37 54 47

53 37 2 34 54 7 40 47 9

1836 24683 28434 5641 34075 485

4

3

2

7

9 0 0 1

P A Proficiency Levels Berry Creek Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 8 11 7 7 5 8

PP 52 54 56 56 51 53

Percentages P A PA 33 6 40 33 2 35 30 7 37 32 3 35 38 5 43 37 2 39

NS 0 0 0 1 0 0

U 8 11 7 8 6 9

PP 50 55 55 61 57 58

Ns P A 32 6 34 2 30 7 35 3 42 6 40 2

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 40 35 37 43 35 39

PA 38 36 37 38 48 42

NS 0 0 0 1 0 0

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 109 49 60 0 1 0 94 13 0 1 9 85

% Prof. or Above 39 45 33 X X X 30 X X X X 29

% Below 61 55 67 X X X 70 X X X X 71

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
61 55 67 70 71

60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

39

45 33 X
AmIndAK

30 X
Asian

29 X X
HwPacIs

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 58

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 9

PA NS 45 2 1 0

U 21 45

PP 36 117

P 38 177

A 10 126

PA 48 303

NS 2 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
20 10 12 34 25 26 9 2 1 0 36 38 35 27 27

Berry Creek Middle 20 34 36

Eagle County Re 50 10 25 38 27 65 Colorado 12 26 35 27 62

7457 16200 22056 17049 39105 288

P A Proficiency Levels Berry Creek Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 26 16 25 20 17 20

PP 27 35 26 41 33 34

Percentages P A PA 30 17 47 38 11 49 36 12 48 28 11 39 30 20 50 36 9 45

Ns NS 0 0 1 0 0 2 U 27 16 27 23 21 21 PP 28 36 29 47 41 36 P 31 39 40 32 37 38 A 17 11 13 12 24 10 PA 48 50 53 44 61 48 NS 0 0 1 0 0 2

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 47 49 48 39 50

45

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 107 51 56 0 0 0 86 21 0 0 11 83

% Prof. or Above 45 55 36 X X X 34 90 X X X 34

% Below 53 43 63 X X X 64 10 X X X 64

% NS 2 2 2 X X X 2 0 X X X 2

100 80
53 43 63 64

10

60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

64

90 55 36 X
AmIndAK

45

34 X
Asian

34 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 59

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 2 1 1

U 22 66

PP 37 128

P 40 151

A 32 147

PA 72 298

NS 2 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
17 13 14 2 1 1 28 26 30 30 30 28 29 27

Berry Creek Middle 17 28 30 24 54 Eagle County Re 50 13 26 30 29 60 Colorado 14 30 28 27 55

8842 18935 17406 16893 34299 327

24

P A Proficiency Levels Berry Creek Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 32 32 21 25 31 17

PP 50 35 39 36 38 28

Percentages P A PA 15 3 18 20 13 33 33 8 41 23 16 39 23 8 31 30 24 54

Ns NS 0 1 0 0 0 2 U 32 34 21 26 33 22 PP 50 37 39 37 41 37 P 15 21 33 24 25 40 A 3 14 8 17 9 32 PA 18 35 41 41 34 72 NS 0 1 0 0 0 2

100 80 60 40 20 0 18 41 33 39 31 54

2008

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 133 72 61 0 1 1 101 28 0 2 13 95

% Prof. or Above 54 50 59 X X X 44 89 X X X 44

% Below 44 49 39 X X X 54 11 X X X 55

% NS 2 1 2 X X X 2 0 X X X 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
54 44 49 39 54

11

55

89 50 59 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0

44 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 60

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 8

PA NS 30 2 1 1

U 32 75

PP 42 124

P 24 131

A 9 108

PA 33 239

NS 2 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
39 29 17 19 28 29 30 29 22 8 24 23 2 1 1

Berry Creek Middle 29 39 22

Eagle County Re 50 17 28 30 24 54 Colorado 19 29 29 23 51

11577 17668 17463 13977 31440 385

P A Proficiency Levels Berry Creek Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 35 25 24 25 41 29

PP 31 31 31 30 32 39

Percentages P A PA 23 12 35 28 15 43 31 13 44 34 10 44 19 8 27 22 8 30

Ns NS 0 0 0 1 0 2 U 33 26 24 27 46 32 PP 29 32 31 33 35 42 P 22 29 31 37 21 24 A 11 15 13 11 9 9 PA 33 44 44 48 30 33 NS 0 0 0 1 0 2

100 80 60 43 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 35 27 44 44 30

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 109 49 60 0 1 0 94 13 0 1 9 85

% Prof. or Above 30 24 35 X X X 22 X X X X 24

% Below 68 73 63 X X X 76 X X X X 74

% NS 2 2 2 X X X 2 X X X X 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

68

63 73 76 74

30

24

35 22 X
AmIndAK

24 X X
HwPacIs

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 61

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 1

PA NS 26 0 0 1

U 45 80

PP 36 107

P 27 200

A 1 53

PA 28 253

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
41 45 43 33 18 21 24 27 25 12 9 1 0 0 1

Berry Creek Middle 41 33 25

Eagle County Re 50 18 24 45 12 57 Colorado 21 27 43 9 52

12703 16350 26331 5232 31563 458

40 20 0

P A Proficiency Levels Berry Creek Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

Berry Creek Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 47 47 46 42 46 41

PP 24 33 27 32 32 33

Percentages P A PA 26 3 29 19 1 20 23 3 26 24 1 25 17 2 19 25 1 26

NS 0 0 0 1 3 0

U 45 48 46 45 51 45

PP 23 34 27 35 36 36

Ns P A 25 3 19 1 23 3 26 1 19 2 27 1

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 29 20 26 26

PA 28 20 26 27 21 28

NS 0 0 0 1 3 0

25

19

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Berry Creek Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 109 49 60 0 1 0 94 13 0 1 9 85

% Prof. or Above 26 20 30 X X X 17 X X X X 16

% Below 74 80 70 X X X 83 X X X X 84

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20
26 20
Female

74

80

70 83 84

30 X
Male AmIndAK

0
Total

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

17
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

16
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 62

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Brush Creek Elementary
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U 2 8

PP

P

A PA NS 84 72 73 0 0 0

U 2 38

PP 12 98

P 65 322

A 8 32

PA 73 354

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
2 8 10 14 20 17 9 7 7 0 0 0 75 66 66

14 75 9 20 66 7

Colorado 10 17 66 7

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

0

P A Proficiency Levels Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS
Colorado

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 4 1 0 2 2

PP 4 8 9 7 5 14

Percentages P A PA 75 18 92 70 18 88 75 13 88 81 11 93 76 17 93 75 9 84

NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

U 2 3 1 0 2 2

PP 2 6 6 6 5 12

P 38 54 52 66 72 65

Ns A 9 14 9 9 16 8

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 92 88 88 93 93 84

PA 47 68 61 75 88 73

NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 87 40 47 0 2 0 14 69 0 2 4 8

% Prof. or Above 84 93 77 X X X X 90 X X X X

% Below 16 8 23 X X X X 10 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
16 8 23

10

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

84

93 77

90

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 63

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
82
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Brush Creek Elementary

U 1

PP 9

P

A PA NS 90 67 68 0 0 0

U 1 51

PP 9 122

P 80 332

A 7 17

PA 87 349

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63 63

82 7

Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

60 40
23 21

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

20
1

10 11

9

7

3

5

0

0

0

0

P A Proficiency Levels Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS
Colorado

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 5 3 1 4 1

PP 4 15 10 7 11 9

Percentages P A PA 89 4 93 68 13 81 77 10 87 81 10 91 80 5 85 82 7 90

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 2 3 2 1 3 1

PP 2 9 8 5 8 9

P 48 42 59 57 60 80

Ns A 2 8 8 7 4 7

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 93 81

87 91

85 90

PA 50 50 67 64 64 87

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 97 43 54 0 1 0 13 83 0 0 7 8

% Prof. or Above 90 93 87 X X X X 93 X X X X

% Below 10 7 13 X X X X 7 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0

10 7

13 7

90

93

87

93

X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 64

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Percentage of Students

Percentages School, District and State Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50 U 3 8 PP 8 P A PA NS 0 1 0 U 2 42 PP 6 89 P 59

Ns A 9 44 PA 68 373 NS 0 3

100 80 60 40 20
3 8 11 18 18 8 12 9 8 0 1 0 78 65 62

78 12 89 9 8 74 70

18 65

329

Colorado 11 18 62

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

0

P A Proficiency Levels Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS
Colorado

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 6 4 5 1 0 3

PP 9 12 8 7 11 8

Percentages P A PA 66 19 85 79 5 84 73 14 87 78 14 92 69 20 89 78 12 89

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 4 2 3 1 0 2

PP 6 7 5 5 7 6

P 45 45 46 58 45 59

Ns A 13 3 9 10 13 9

100 85 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 84

87 92 89 89

PA 58 48 55 68 58 68

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 76 30 46 0 1 0 12 63 0 0 2 10

% Prof. or Above 89 90 89 X X X X 95 X X X X

% Below 11 10 11 X X X X 5 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

100 80 60 40 20 0

11

10

11

5

89

90

89

95

X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 65

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 1 0 0

U 3 28

PP 31 211

P 41 218

A 9 27

PA 50 245

NS 1 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
43 43 48 45 43

Brush Creek Elementary 4 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6

36 48 11 59 43 45 43 43 6 8 50 51

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

40 20
4 6 6

36

11

6

8 1 0 0

0

P A Proficiency Levels Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS
Colorado

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 2 1 1 1 2 4

PP 29 31 26 21 40 36

Percentages P A PA 55 14 69 58 9 68 52 20 72 60 17 78 53 4 57 48 11 59

NS 0 0 0 0 1 1

U 1 1 1 1 2 3

PP 15 24 18 17 38 31

P 28 45 36 49 50 41

Ns A 7 7 14 14 4 9

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 69 68 72 78 57 59

PA 35 52 50 63 54 50

NS 0 0 0 0 1 1

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 85 40 45 0 2 0 14 68 0 1 3 8

% Prof. or Above 59 73 47 X X X X 60 X X X X

% Below 40 28 51 X X X X 38 X X X X

% NS 1 0 2 X X X X 1 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
28

80 60 40

40 51

38

73 59 60 47 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 66

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 1 33

PP 30 221

P 55 228

A 11 39

PA 66 267

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
1 6 7 42 39 31 11 7 8 0 0 0 57 44 45

Brush Creek Elementary 1 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7

31 57 11 68 42 44 39 45 7 8 51 53

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

0

P A Proficiency Levels Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS
Colorado

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 2 2 3 3 0 1

PP 26 47 32 11 36 31

Percentages P A PA 59 13 72 44 8 52 55 10 65 69 17 86 60 4 64 57 11 68

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 1 2 2 0 1

PP 14 29 25 8 27 30

P 32 27 42 48 45 55

Ns A 7 5 8 12 3 11

Percentage of Students P + A

100 86 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 72 52 65 64 68

PA 39 32 50 60 48 66

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 97 43 54 0 1 0 13 83 0 0 7 8

% Prof. or Above 68 86 54 X X X X 71 X X X X

% Below 32 14 46 X X X X 29 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total

14 32 46 29

86 68 54 71

X
Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 67

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 1 23

PP 25 183

P 40 252

A 10 44

PA 50 296

NS 0 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
1 5 5 37 33 36 13 53 50 48

Brush Creek Elementary 1 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5

33 53 13 66 36 50 37 48 9 9 58 57

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

9

9 0 1 1

0

P A Proficiency Levels Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS
Colorado

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 4 2 1 0 1

PP 25 21 24 22 14 33

Percentages P A PA 65 10 75 65 11 75 65 10 75 64 14 77 71 15 86 53 13 66

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 0 2 1 1 0 1

PP 17 12 15 16 9 25

P 44 37 41 47 46 40

Ns A 7 6 6 10 10 10

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 75 75 75 77

86 66

PA 51 43 47 57 56 50

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

2012

2013

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 76 30 46 0 1 0 12 63 0 0 2 10

% Prof. or Above 66 73 61 X X X X 73 X X X X

% Below 34 27 39 X X X X 27 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
66 73 61 73 34 27 39 27

20 0
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 68

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 2 34

PP 15 124

P 38 204

A 30 142

PA 68 346

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
45

Brush Creek Elementary 2 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

18 45 35 80 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

40
25

40 41

35

28 31

20
2

18 7 7

20 0 0 0

0

P A Proficiency Levels Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS
Colorado

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 3 3 2 4 2

PP 6 14 10 10 11 18

Percentages P A PA 39 51 90 39 44 83 29 59 87 44 43 88 43 42 85 45 35 80

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 2 2 2 2 4 2

PP 3 11 7 8 10 15

P 20 30 20 36 41 38

Ns A 26 34 41 35 40 30

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 90 83

87

88

85

PA 46 64 61 71 81 68

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

80

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 85 40 45 0 2 0 14 68 0 1 3 8

% Prof. or Above 80 83 78 X X X X 85 X X X X

% Below 20 18 22 X X X X 15 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
20 18 22 15

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

80

83

78

85

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 69

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 2 44

PP 15 120

P 63 249

A 17 115

PA 80 364

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65

Brush Creek Elementary 2 Eagle County Re 50 8 Colorado 8

15 65 18 82 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

60 40 20
2 15 8 8 23 20

47

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

43 28 18 22 0 0 0

0

P A Proficiency Levels Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS
Colorado

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 3 3 3 4 2

PP 9 8 5 3 12 15

Percentages P A PA 44 43 87 40 48 89 48 44 92 33 61 94 44 40 84 65 18 82

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 2 2 2 2 3 2

PP 5 5 4 2 9 15

P 24 25 37 23 33 63

Ns A 23 30 34 43 30 17

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0

87 89 92

PA 47 55 71 66 63 80

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

94

84

82

2008

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 97 43 54 0 1 0 13 83 0 0 7 8

% Prof. or Above 82 86 80 X X X X 87 X X X X

% Below 18 14 20 X X X X 13 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
18

14

20

13

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

82

86

80

87

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 70

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 2 44

PP 11 137

P 40 196

A 23 129

PA 63 325

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
3 9 9 14 0 0 0 27 25 53 39 36 30

Brush Creek Elementary 3 Eagle County Re 50 9 Colorado 9

14 53 30 83 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

25 29

0

P A Proficiency Levels Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS
Colorado

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 7 5 1 2 3

PP 15 13 16 14 11 14

Percentages P A PA 43 43 85 32 48 80 33 46 79 35 50 85 35 52 88 53 30 83

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 0 4 3 1 1 2

PP 10 7 10 10 7 11

P 29 18 21 26 23 40

Ns A 29 27 29 37 34 23

100 85 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 80 79 85

88

83

PA 58 45 50 63 57 63

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

2012

2013

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 76 30 46 0 1 0 12 63 0 0 2 10

% Prof. or Above 83 80 85 X X X X 90 X X X X

% Below 17 20 15 X X X X 10 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

100
17 20 15

10

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

83

80

85

90

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 71

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Brush Creek Elementary

U 5

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 4 59

PP 16 185

P 47 187

A 9 75

PA 56 262

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
62

21 62 12 74

Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

60 40
21 36 37 12 14 37 35 12 15 13 0 0 0

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

20
5

0

P A Proficiency Levels Brush Creek Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS
Colorado

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

Brush Creek Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 6 9 6 1 3 5

PP 28 18 25 18 12 21

Percentages P A PA 50 16 66 58 16 74 46 22 68 55 26 81 48 37 85 62 12 74

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 4 5 4 1 2 4

PP 19 10 16 13 8 16

P 34 33 29 41 31 47

Ns A 11 9 14 19 24 9

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 74 66 81 68 85 74

PA 45 42 43 60 55 56

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Brush Creek Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 76 30 46 0 1 0 12 63 0 0 2 10

% Prof. or Above 74 70 76 X X X X 81 X X X X

% Below 26 30 24 X X X X 19 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
26

80 60 40 20 0
Total

30

24

19

74

70

76

81

X
Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 72

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Eagle County Charter Academy
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy Eagle County Re 50

U 3 8

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 1 38

PP 5 98

P 20 322

A 10 32

PA 30 354

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
66 66

14 56 28 83 20 66 7 7 72 73

60 40 20
3 8 10 14 20 17

56

Colorado 10 17 66

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

28 7 7 0 0 0

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 9 3 0 0 3

PP 9 3 9 6 14 14

Percentages P A PA 63 25 88 84 3 88 88 0 88 84 9 94 72 14 86 56 28 83

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 3 1 0 0 1

PP 3 1 3 2 5 5

P 20 27 30 27 26 20

Ns A 8 1 0 3 5 10

100 80 60 40 20 0

88

88 88

PA 28 28 30 30 31 30

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

94

86

83

2008

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 36 13 23 0 1 0 1 33 0 1 5 0

% Prof. or Above 83 X 87 X X X X 82 X X X X

% Below 17 X 13 X X X X 18 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
17

13

18

80 60 40 20 0
Total

83

87

82

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 73

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 77 67 68 0 0 0

U 4 51

PP 4 122

P 24 332

A 3 17

PA 27 349

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
23 21 69

Eagle County Charter Academy 11 11 69 9 Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

63 63

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

20 0

11 10 11

11

9

3

5

0

0

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 3 0 0 0 11

PP 16 9 6 12 14 11

Percentages P A PA 81 3 84 72 16 88 91 0 91 85 3 88 83 3 86 69 9 77

NS 0 0 3 0 0 0

U 0 1 0 0 0 4

PP 5 3 2 4 5 4

Ns P A 26 1 23 5 29 0 29 1 30 1 24 3

100 84 80 60 40 20 0 2008

88 91 88

86 77

PA 27 28 29 30 31 27

NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 35 16 19 0 1 0 1 31 0 2 6 2

% Prof. or Above 77 75 79 X X X X 77 X X X X

% Below 23 25 21 X X X X 23 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
23 25 21 23

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

77

75

79

77

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 74

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
83
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy Eagle County Re 50

U 0 8

PP 6

P

A

PA NS 0 1 0

U 0 42

PP 2 89

P 30 329

A 4 44

PA 34 373

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65 62

83 11 94 9 8 74 70

18 65

60 40 20 0
0 8 11 18 18 6 11 9 8 0 1 0

Colorado 11 18 62

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 6 0 3 0 0

Percentages PP P A PA 9 59 28 88 13 75 6 81 9 71 21 91 0 94 3 97 8 72 19 92 6 83 11 94

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 2 0 1 0 0

PP 3 4 3 0 3 2

Ns P A 19 9 24 2 24 7 30 1 26 7 30 4

100 80 60 40 20 0

88

PA 28 26 31 31 33 34

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

81

91

97

92

94

2008

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 36 14 22 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 2 0

% Prof. or Above 94 X 91 X X X X 94 X X X X

% Below 6 X 9 X X X X 6 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

100
6

9 6

80 60
94

40 20 0
Total

91

94

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 75

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 1 30

PP 4 66

P 22 297

A 8 72

PA 30 369

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63 63 62

Eagle County Charter Academy 3 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 8

11 63 23 86 14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73

60 40 20
3 6 8 11 14 18 23 15 11 0 1 1

4938 11309 38862 7097 45959 845

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 3 6 0 3 3

Percentages PP P A PA 3 78 19 97 9 59 28 88 12 73 9 82 3 59 38 97 3 74 21 94 11 63 23 86

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 0 1 2 0 1 1

PP 1 3 4 1 1 4

P 25 19 24 20 25 22

Ns A 6 9 3 13 7 8

100 97 80 60 40 20 0 2008

88

PA 31 28 27 33 32 30

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

82

97

94

86

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 35 17 18 0 0 0 3 32 0 0 4 0

% Prof. or Above 86 94 78 X X X X 84 X X X X

% Below 14 6 22 X X X X 16 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
14 6 22 16

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

86

94 78

84

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 76

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
82
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy Eagle County Re 50

U 5 9

PP 5

P

A PA NS 89 74 68 0 1 1

U 2 44

PP 2 79

P 31 324

A 3 46

PA 34 370

NS 0 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65

82 8

16 65 9

60 40 20
5 9 11 16 5 21

59

Colorado 11 21 59 9

6815 13070 36650 5501 42151 359

8

9

9 0 1 1

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 0 0 0 3 5

PP 13 6 16 18 6 5

Percentages P A PA 78 9 88 72 22 94 65 19 84 76 6 82 66 26 91 82 8 89

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 0 0 0 0 1 2

PP 4 2 5 6 2 2

Ns P A 25 3 23 7 20 6 25 2 23 9 31 3

100 80 60 40 20 0

88

PA 28 30 26 27 32 34

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

94

84

82

91

89

2008

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 38 15 23 1 0 0 1 36 0 0 3 1

% Prof. or Above 89 X 87 X X X X 89 X X X X

% Below 11 X 13 X X X X 11 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0

11

13

11

89

87

89

X
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 77

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy

U 0

PP 5

P

A

PA NS 0 0 1

U 0 43

PP 2 84

P 27 273

A 9 39

PA 36 312

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 19 10 10 5 23 24 9 8 0 0 1 71 62 59

71 24 95 9 8 71 67

Eagle County Re 50 10 19 62 Colorado 10 23 59

5882 13891 35960 4891 40851 450

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 3 3 0 0 0

Percentages PP P A PA 9 72 19 91 6 78 13 91 3 76 14 90 6 74 19 94 15 74 12 85 5 71 24 95

NS 0 0 3 0 0 0

U 0 1 1 0 0 0

PP 3 2 1 2 5 2

Ns P A 23 6 25 4 22 4 23 6 25 4 27 9

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 91 91 90 94 85 95

PA 29 29 26 29 29 36

NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 38 20 18 0 1 0 2 34 0 1 2 1

% Prof. or Above 95 90 100 X X X X 97 X X X X

% Below 5 10 0 X X X X 3 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

100
5

10

0

3

80 60
95

40 20 0
Total

90

100

97

X
Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 78

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 0 28

PP 5 211

P 27 218

A 4 27

PA 31 245

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
43 43 45 43 75

Eagle County Charter Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6

14 75 11 86 43 45 43 43 6 8 50 51

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

40 20 0
0 6 6 14 11 8 0 0 0

6

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 3 0 0 3 0

PP 22 16 24 13 28 14

Percentages P A PA 47 31 78 59 22 81 65 12 76 59 28 88 56 14 69 75 11 86

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 0 1 0 0 1 0

PP 7 5 8 4 10 5

P 15 19 22 19 20 27

Ns A 10 7 4 9 5 4

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 78 81 76

88 69

86

PA 25 26 26 28 25 31

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 36 13 23 0 1 0 1 33 0 1 5 0

% Prof. or Above 86 X 83 X X X X 85 X X X X

% Below 14 X 17 X X X X 15 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0

14

17

15

86

83

85

X
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 79

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 0 33

PP 10 221

P 20 228

A 5 39

PA 25 267

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 6 7 42 39 29 14 7 8 0 0 0 57 44 45

Eagle County Charter Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7

29 57 14 71 42 44 39 45 7 8 51 53

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 0 0 0 0 0

PP 25 28 16 18 19 29

Percentages P A PA 66 9 75 47 25 72 69 13 81 76 6 82 61 19 81 57 14 71

NS 0 0 3 0 0 0

U 0 0 0 0 0 0

PP 8 9 5 6 7 10

Ns P A 21 3 15 8 22 4 26 2 22 7 20 5

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 75 81 72 82 81 71

PA 24 23 26 28 29 25

NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 35 16 19 0 1 0 1 31 0 2 6 2

% Prof. or Above 71 75 68 X X X X 71 X X X X

% Below 29 25 32 X X X X 29 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

29

25

32

29

71

75

68

71

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 80

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 0 23

PP 6 183

P 23 252

A 7 44

PA 30 296

NS 0 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
64

Eagle County Charter Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5

17 64 19 83 36 50 37 48 9 9 58 57

60 40 20 0
0 5 5 17 36 37

50 48

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

19 9 9 0 1 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 0 0 3 0 0

PP 9 19 24 6 22 17

Percentages P A PA 72 16 88 75 6 81 62 15 76 75 16 91 64 14 78 64 19 83

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 0 0 1 0 0

PP 3 6 8 2 8 6

Ns P A 23 5 24 2 21 5 24 5 23 5 23 7

100 80 60 40 20 0

88

PA 28 26 26 29 28 30

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

81

76

91

78

83

2008

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 36 14 22 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 2 0

% Prof. or Above 83 X 73 X X X X 83 X X X X

% Below 17 X 27 X X X X 17 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
17 27 17

80 60 40 20 0
Total

83

73

83

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 81

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 0 14

PP 8 153

P 21 258

A 6 40

PA 27 298

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
23 33 38 17 9 9 0 1 1 60 55 49

Eagle County Charter Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 4

23 60 17 77 33 55 38 49 9 9 64 58

2629 23740 30751 5578 36329 355

20 0
0 3 4

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 0 0 0 3 0

PP 13 13 24 6 21 23

Percentages P A PA 66 22 88 59 28 88 64 12 76 56 38 94 59 18 76 60 17 77

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 0 0 0 0 1 0

PP 4 4 8 2 7 8

P 21 19 21 19 20 21

Ns A 7 9 4 13 6 6

100 80 60 40 20 0

88

88 76

PA 28 28 25 32 26 27

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

94

76

77

2008

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 35 17 18 0 0 0 3 32 0 0 4 0

% Prof. or Above 77 88 67 X X X X 78 X X X X

% Below 23 12 33 X X X X 22 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
23

12 33

22

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female

88 77 67

78

X
Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 82

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP 8

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 1 11

PP 3 144

P 27 274

A 7 64

PA 34 338

NS 0 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
3 2 3 8 29 35 18 13 15 0 1 1 71 55 47

Eagle County Charter Academy 3 Eagle County Re 50 2 Colorado 3

71 18 89

29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61

1739 21930 29033 9265 38298 431

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 0 0 0 0 3

PP 16 9 13 9 17 8

Percentages P A PA 72 13 84 53 38 91 58 29 87 76 15 91 46 37 83 71 18 89

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 0 0 0 0 0 1

PP 5 3 4 3 6 3

P 23 17 18 25 16 27

Ns A 4 12 9 5 13 7

Percentage of Students P + A

100 84 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 91

87 91

83

PA 27 29 27 30 29 34

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

89

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 38 15 23 1 0 0 1 36 0 0 3 1

% Prof. or Above 89 X 83 X X X X 89 X X X X

% Below 11 X 17 X X X X 11 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0

11

17

11

89

83

89

X
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 83

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP 8

P

A

PA NS 0 0 1

U 0 19

PP 3 151

P 27 240

A 8 30

PA 35 270

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 4 3 8 34 40 71 54 47

Eagle County Charter Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 3

71 21 92 7 9 61 56

34 54 40 47

1836 24683 28434 5641 34075 485

21 7 9 0 0 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 0 0 0 0 0

PP 22 19 10 13 24 8

Percentages P A PA 41 38 78 66 13 78 59 28 86 48 39 87 62 15 76 71 21 92

NS 0 3 3 0 0 0

U 0 0 0 0 0 0

PP 7 6 3 4 8 3

P 13 21 17 15 21 27

Ns A 12 4 8 12 5 8

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 78 78

86

87 76 92

PA 25 25 25 27 26 35

NS 0 1 1 0 0 0

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 38 20 18 0 1 0 2 34 0 1 2 1

% Prof. or Above 92 85 100 X X X X 94 X X X X

% Below 8 15 0 X X X X 6 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
15 8

0 6

80 60
92 100 85 94

40 20 0
Total

X
Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 84

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP 3

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 1 34

PP 1 124

P 10 204

A 24 142

PA 34 346

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
25 40 41 28 20 0 0 0 28 31 67

Eagle County Charter Academy 3 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

28 67 94

25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

20
3

7

7

3

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 6 3 0 0 0 3

PP 9 3 3 3 11 3

Percentages P A PA 25 59 84 28 66 94 21 76 97 38 59 97 31 58 89 28 67 94

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 2 1 0 0 0 1

PP 3 1 1 1 4 1

P 8 9 7 12 11 10

Ns A 19 21 26 19 21 24

Percentage of Students P + A

100 84 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 94 97 97 89 94

PA 27 30 33 31 32 34

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 36 13 23 0 1 0 1 33 0 1 5 0

% Prof. or Above 94 X 91 X X X X 94 X X X X

% Below 6 X 9 X X X X 6 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

100
6

9 6

80 60
94

40 20 0
Total

91

94

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 85

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 1 44

PP 6 120

P 21 249

A 7 115

PA 28 364

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
3 17 8 8 0 0 0 23 20 20 22 60 47 43 28

Eagle County Charter Academy 3 Eagle County Re 50 8 Colorado 8

17 60 20 80 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 0 0 0 0 3

PP 13 9 3 6 3 17

Percentages P A PA 56 31 88 28 63 91 41 53 94 58 36 94 53 44 97 60 20 80

NS 0 0 3 0 0 0

U 0 0 0 0 0 1

PP 4 3 1 2 1 6

P 18 9 13 19 19 21

Ns A 10 20 17 12 16 7

100 80 60 40 20 0

88 91

PA 28 29 30 31 35 28

NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

94

94

97

80

2008

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 35 16 19 0 1 0 1 31 0 2 6 2

% Prof. or Above 80 81 79 X X X X 81 X X X X

% Below 20 19 21 X X X X 19 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
20 19 21 19

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

80

81

79

81

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 86

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 0 44

PP 6 137

P 13 196

A 17 129

PA 30 325

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 17 9 9 0 0 0 36 39 36 27 25 25 29 47

Eagle County Charter Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 9 Colorado 9

17 36 47 83 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 0 0 3 0 0

PP 9 6 12 9 17 17

Percentages P A PA 38 50 88 50 38 88 24 65 88 50 38 88 36 47 83 36 47 83

NS 0 6 0 0 0 0

U 1 0 0 1 0 0

PP 3 2 4 3 6 6

P 12 16 8 16 13 13

Ns A 16 12 22 12 17 17

100 80 60 40 20 0

88

88 88

88

83

83

PA 28 28 30 28 30 30

NS 0 2 0 0 0 0

2008

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 36 14 22 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 2 0

% Prof. or Above 83 X 73 X X X X 83 X X X X

% Below 17 X 27 X X X X 17 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
17 27 17

80 60 40 20 0
Total

83

73

83

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 87

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy

U 3

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 0

U 1 45

PP 6 117

P 14 177

A 14 126

PA 28 303

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
25 26 40 38 35 10 12 3 17 0 1 0 40 27 27

17 40 40 80

Eagle County Re 50 10 25 38 27 65 Colorado 12 26 35 27 62

7457 16200 22056 17049 39105 288

20 0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 6 3 0 6 3

PP 19 6 21 18 15 17

Percentages P A PA 44 34 78 47 41 88 55 21 76 24 59 82 53 26 79 40 40 80

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 2 1 0 2 1

PP 6 2 7 6 5 6

P 14 15 18 8 18 14

Ns A 11 13 7 20 9 14

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 78

88 76

PA 25 28 25 28 27 28

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

82

79

80

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 35 17 18 0 0 0 3 32 0 0 4 0

% Prof. or Above 80 76 83 X X X X 78 X X X X

% Below 20 24 17 X X X X 22 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
20 24 17 22

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

80

76

83

78

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 88

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy

U 8

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 3 66

PP 10 128

P 15 151

A 10 147

PA 25 298

NS 0 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
26 26 39 30 30 28 26 29 27

26 39 26 66

Eagle County Re 50 13 26 30 29 60 Colorado 14 30 28 27 55

8842 18935 17406 16893 34299 327

20 0

8

13 14 0 1 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 6 0 3 3 0 8

PP 25 19 16 24 23 26

Percentages P A PA 44 25 69 38 44 81 52 29 81 61 12 73 17 60 77 39 26 66

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 2 0 1 1 0 3

PP 8 6 5 8 8 10

P 14 12 16 20 6 15

Ns A 8 14 9 4 21 10

Percentage of Students P + A

100 81 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 69 81 73 77 66

PA 22 26 25 24 27 25

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 38 15 23 1 0 0 1 36 0 0 3 1

% Prof. or Above 66 X 65 X X X X 64 X X X X

% Below 34 X 35 X X X X 36 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
66 65 64 34 35 36

20 0
Total

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 89

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy

U 3

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 1 75

PP 6 124

P 12 131

A 19 108

PA 31 239

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
3 17 19 16 0 1 1 28 29 32 30 29 50

16 32 50 82

Eagle County Re 50 17 28 30 24 54 Colorado 19 29 29 23 51

11577 17668 17463 13977 31440 385

24 23

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 6 3 0 0 3

PP 25 22 17 23 26 16

Percentages P A PA 44 28 72 41 31 72 41 34 76 39 39 77 53 21 74 32 50 82

NS 0 0 3 0 0 0

U 1 2 1 0 0 1

PP 8 7 5 7 9 6

P 14 13 12 12 18 12

Ns A 9 10 10 12 7 19

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 72 72 76 77 82 74

PA 23 23 22 24 25 31

NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 38 20 18 0 1 0 2 34 0 1 2 1

% Prof. or Above 82 75 89 X X X X 85 X X X X

% Below 18 25 11 X X X X 15 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
18 25

11

15

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

82

89 75

85

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 90

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy

U 0

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 0 59

PP 6 185

P 16 187

A 14 75

PA 30 262

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
44

17 44 39 83

Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

40 20 0
0 12 14 17

36 37

37 35

39

15 13 0 0 0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 3 3 3 0 0

PP 16 22 15 6 25 17

Percentages P A PA 56 25 81 44 31 75 32 50 82 56 34 91 47 28 75 44 39 83

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 1 1 1 0 0

PP 5 7 5 2 9 6

P 18 14 11 18 17 16

Ns A 8 10 17 11 10 14

Percentage of Students P + A

100 81 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 75 82 91 83 75

PA 26 24 28 29 27 30

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 36 14 22 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 2 0

% Prof. or Above 83 X 73 X X X X 83 X X X X

% Below 17 X 27 X X X X 17 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
17 27 17

80 60 40 20 0
Total

83

73

83

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 91

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle County Charter Academy

U 0

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 1

U 0 80

PP 4 107

P 22 200

A 12 53

PA 34 253

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 18 21 11 24 27 58 45 43 32 12 9 0 0 1

11 58 32 89

Eagle County Re 50 18 24 45 12 57 Colorado 21 27 43 9 52

12703 16350 26331 5232 31563 458

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Eagle County Charter Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

Eagle County Charter Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 6 0 6 6 0

PP 13 16 10 10 32 11

Percentages P A PA 56 22 78 63 16 78 79 7 86 61 23 84 62 0 62 58 32 89

NS 0 0 3 0 0 0

U 3 2 0 2 2 0

PP 4 5 3 3 11 4

P 18 20 23 19 21 22

Ns A 7 5 2 7 0 12

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 78 78

86

84 89 62

PA 25 25 25 26 21 34

NS 0 0 1 0 0 0

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Eagle County Charter Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 38 20 18 0 1 0 2 34 0 1 2 1

% Prof. or Above 89 80 100 X X X X 94 X X X X

% Below 11 20 0 X X X X 6 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0

11

20

0 6

89

100 80

94

X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 92

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Eagle Valley Elem
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Percentage of Students

Percentages School, District and State Eagle Valley Elem Eagle County Re 50 U 9 8 PP P A PA NS 76 72 73 0 0 0 U 4 38 PP 7 98 P 35

Ns A 0 32 PA 35 354 NS 0 1

100 80 60 40 20 0
9 8 10 15 20 17 7 0 7 0 0 0 76 66 66

15 76 0 20 66 7

322

Colorado 10 17 66 7

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

U

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 7 12 16 9 3 9

PP 17 12 22 20 35 15

Percentages P A PA 71 5 76 71 5 76 60 2 62 52 20 72 59 3 62 76 0 76

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 3 5 9 4 1 4

PP 7 5 13 9 13 7

P 30 30 35 24 22 35

Ns A 2 2 1 9 1 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 76 76 62 72 62 76

PA 32 32 36 33 23 35

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 46 25 21 0 2 0 22 19 1 2 3 19

% Prof. or Above 76 76 76 X X X 68 84 X X X 68

% Below 24 24 24 X X X 32 16 X X X 32

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
24 24 24 16 32 32

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

76

76

76

84 68 68

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 93

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 71 67 68 0 0 0

U 4 51

PP 5 122

P 22 332

A 0 17

PA 22 349

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
13 10 11 16 23 21 0 3 5 0 0 0 71 63 63

Eagle Valley Elem 13 16 71 0 Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

U

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 11 7 9 5 7 13

PP 27 24 26 36 27 16

Percentages P A PA 57 5 62 61 7 67 65 0 65 56 2 58 56 11 67 71 0 71

NS 0 2 0 0 0 0

U 4 3 4 3 3 4

PP 10 11 11 20 12 5

P 21 28 28 31 25 22

Ns A 2 3 0 1 5 0

100 80 62 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 67 67 58 71

PA 23 31 28 32 30 22

NS 0 1 0 0 0 0

65

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 31 12 19 0 1 0 16 14 0 0 7 15

% Prof. or Above 71 X 63 X X X 63 X X X X X

% Below 29 X 37 X X X 38 X X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X 0 X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total

29

37

38

71

63

63

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 94

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 0

U 4 42

PP 13 89

P 20 329

A 4 44

PA 24 373

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65 62

Eagle Valley Elem 10 32 49 10 59 Eagle County Re 50 8 18 65 9 8 74 70

60 40 20 0
10 8 11 32 18 18

49

Colorado 11 18 62

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

10 9

8 0 1 0

U

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 2 21 5 11 16 10

PP 7 13 17 11 33 32

Percentages P A PA 86 5 91 63 3 66 68 10 78 71 7 78 49 2 51 49 10 59

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 8 2 5 8 4

PP 3 5 7 5 17 13

P 37 24 28 32 25 20

Ns A 2 1 4 3 1 4

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 91 66 51 78 78 59

PA 39 25 32 35 26 24

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 41 19 22 0 0 0 21 18 0 2 7 18

% Prof. or Above 59 74 45 X X X 29 89 X X X 22

% Below 41 26 55 X X X 71 11 X X X 78

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
26

11 41 55 71 78 89 74 59 45 29 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

80 60 40 20 0

22 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 95

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle Valley Elem

U X

PP X

P X

A X 0

PA NS X 61 X 0 1

U X 4

PP X 3

P X 11

A X 0

PA NS X 11 X 0 8

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
61

Eagle County Re 50 22 17 61

60 40
22

51

Colorado 15 20 51 13 64

181 234 601 151 752

20 0
X

15 X

17 20 X X 0

13 X 0 1

U

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2013

U X X X X X

PP X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X

U X X X X X

PP X X X X X

P X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X

PA X X X X X

NS X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2013

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 96

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Elem 4 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6

P

A PA NS 42 50 51 0 0 0

U 2 28

PP 24 211

P 19 218

A 0 27

PA 19 245

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
4 6 6 8 0 0 0 53 43 43 42 45 43

53 42 0 43 45 6 43 43 8

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

0

0

6

U

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 7 7 7 9 0 4

PP 52 40 68 41 68 53

Percentages P A PA 36 5 40 43 10 52 25 0 25 39 11 50 30 3 32 42 0 42

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 3 3 4 4 0 2

PP 22 17 39 19 25 24

P 15 18 14 18 11 19

Ns A 2 4 0 5 1 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 40 32 25 52 50 42

PA 17 22 14 23 12 19

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 45 24 21 0 2 0 22 19 1 1 3 19

% Prof. or Above 42 50 33 X X X 27 53 X X X 32

% Below 58 50 67 X X X 73 47 X X X 68

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
58 50 67 73 47 68

60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

42

50 33 X
AmIndAK

53 27 X
Asian

32 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 97

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Elem 0 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7

P

A PA NS 32 51 53 0 0 0

U 0 33

PP 21 221

P 8 228

A 2 39

PA 10 267

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 6 7 42 39 26 6 7 8 0 0 0 44 45 68

68 26 6 42 44 7 39 45 8

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

U

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 11 4 9 5 7 0

PP 54 59 40 49 49 68

Percentages P A PA 30 5 35 33 2 35 44 7 51 42 4 45 36 9 44 26 6 32

NS 0 2 0 0 0 0

U 4 2 4 3 3 0

PP 20 27 17 27 22 21

P 11 15 19 23 16 8

Ns A 2 1 3 2 4 2

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 35 35 51

PA 13 16 22 25 20 10

NS 0 1 0 0 0 0

45

44 32

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 31 12 19 0 1 0 16 14 0 0 7 15

% Prof. or Above 32 X 21 X X X 13 X X X X X

% Below 68 X 79 X X X 88 X X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X 0 X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
68

60 40 20 0
Total

79

88

32 X
Female

21
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

13
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 98

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Elem 5 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 2 23

PP 18 183

P 15 252

A 6 44

PA 21 296

NS 0 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
44 50 48 36 37 37 15 5 5 5

44 37 15 51 36 50 37 48 9 9 58 57

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

40 20 0 U

9

9 0 1 1

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 8 2 7 12 5

PP 16 45 37 29 51 44

Percentages P A PA 67 16 84 45 3 47 56 5 61 58 7 64 33 4 37 37 15 51

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 0 3 1 3 6 2

PP 7 17 15 13 26 18

P 29 17 23 26 17 15

Ns A 7 1 2 3 2 6

100 84 80 61 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 47 37 64 51

PA 36 18 25 29 19 21

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 41 19 22 0 0 0 21 18 0 2 7 18

% Prof. or Above 51 74 32 X X X 24 78 X X X 11

% Below 49 26 68 X X X 76 22 X X X 89

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
26 22

80 60 40 20 0

49 68 76 89 74 51 32 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

78

24 X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

11
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 99

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle Valley Elem

U X

PP X

P X

A X 0

PA NS X 17 X 0 0

U X 6

PP X 9

P X 3

A X 0

PA NS X 3 X 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 33 20 X 24 17 X X 0 50 37 18 X 0 0

Eagle County Re 50 33 50 17

Colorado 20 24 37 18 56

236 282 442 218 660

U

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)

Years 2008 2010 2011 2013

U X X X X

PP X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X

U X X X X

PP X X X X

P X X X X

Ns A X X X X

PA X X X X

NS X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2013

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 100

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Elem 4 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 2 34

PP 10 124

P 24 204

A 10 142

PA 34 346

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
4 22 25 20 7 7 0 0 0 52 40 41 22 28 31

22 52 22 74 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

0

U

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 7 5 4 5 4

PP 24 24 28 21 38 22

Percentages P A PA 44 27 71 36 33 69 47 21 67 34 40 74 38 19 57 52 22 74

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 2 3 3 2 2 2

PP 11 10 16 10 14 10

P 20 15 27 16 14 24

Ns A 12 14 12 19 7 10

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 71 69 67 74 57 74

PA 32 29 39 35 21 34

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 46 24 22 0 2 0 23 19 1 1 3 20

% Prof. or Above 74 67 82 X X X 65 84 X X X 65

% Below 26 33 18 X X X 35 16 X X X 35

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
26 18 33 35 16 35

80 60 40 20 0
Total

74

82 67 65

84 65

X
Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 101

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Elem 0 Eagle County Re 50 8 Colorado 8

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 0 44

PP 3 120

P 20 249

A 8 115

PA 28 364

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65

10 65 26 90 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

60 40 20 0
0 23 20 8 8 10

47

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

43 26 28 22 0 0 0

U

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 15 6 7 4 9 0

PP 26 26 28 15 24 10

Percentages P A PA 41 18 59 38 28 66 23 42 65 62 20 82 36 31 67 65 26 90

NS 0 2 0 0 0 0

U 6 3 3 2 4 0

PP 10 12 12 8 11 3

P 16 18 10 34 16 20

Ns A 7 13 18 11 14 8

100 82 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 59 66 65 67 90

PA 23 31 28 45 30 28

NS 0 1 0 0 0 0

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 31 12 19 0 1 0 16 14 0 0 7 15

% Prof. or Above 90 X 89 X X X 88 X X X X X

% Below 10 X 11 X X X 13 X X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X 0 X X X X X

100 80 60 40 20 0

10

11

13

90

89

88

X
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 102

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 2 0 0

U 5 44

PP 15 137

P 11 196

A 9 129

PA 20 325

NS 1 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
12 9 9 2 0 0 37 27 25 27 39 36 29 22 25

Eagle Valley Elem 12 37 27 22 49 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 9 9 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

U

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 2 11 7 9 10 12

PP 14 24 10 22 35 37

Percentages P A PA 44 40 84 42 24 66 39 44 83 33 37 70 45 10 55 27 22 49

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

U 1 4 3 4 5 5

PP 6 9 4 10 18 15

P 19 16 16 15 23 11

Ns A 17 9 18 17 5 9

100 84 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 66 83 70 55 49

PA 36 25 34 32 28 20

NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 41 19 22 0 0 0 21 18 0 2 7 18

% Prof. or Above 49 58 41 X X X 19 78 X X X 17

% Below 49 42 55 X X X 76 22 X X X 83

% NS 2 0 5 X X X 5 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
22

80 60 40 20 0

42 49 55 76 78 49 58 41 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

83

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

19
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

17
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 103

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 5 59

PP 17 185

P 10 187

A 9 75

PA 19 262

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
41

Eagle Valley Elem 12 41 24 22 46 Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

40 20 0
12 12 14

36 37 24

37 35 22 15 13 0 0 0

U

PP

Eagle Valley Elem

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 11 5 15 12 12

PP 28 37 39 26 49 41

Percentages P A PA 49 23 72 34 18 53 37 20 56 39 20 59 35 4 39 24 22 46

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 0 4 2 7 6 5

PP 12 14 16 12 25 17

P 21 13 15 18 18 10

Ns A 10 7 8 9 2 9

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 72 53 56 59 39 46

PA 31 20 23 27 20 19

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Eagle Valley Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 41 19 22 0 0 0 21 18 0 2 7 18

% Prof. or Above 46 58 36 X X X 14 78 X X X 6

% Below 54 42 64 X X X 86 22 X X X 94

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
22

80 60 40

42 54 64 86 78 58 46 94

20 0

36 X X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

14
Hisp Wht

6 X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 104

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Eagle Valley High
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley High 4 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

P

A PA NS 76 69 68 1 1 1

U 7 32

PP 37 101

P 138 286

A 9 21

PA 147 307

NS 2 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
4 19 7 7 23 24 5 5 4 1 1 1 72 65 64

19 72 5 23 65 5 24 64 4

4258 14768 39370 2272 41642 879

0

U

PP

Eagle Valley High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 5 3 4 6 4 4

PP 28 26 22 19 18 19

Percentages P A PA 60 6 66 67 2 70 70 3 73 71 5 75 76 2 77 72 5 76

Ns NS 0 1 1 0 1 1 U 9 7 7 11 8 7 PP 49 52 38 37 36 37 P 104 135 124 137 148 138 A 11 5 5 9 3 9 PA 115 140 129 146 151 147 NS 0 2 2 0 1 2

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 66 70 73 75 77 76

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 193 107 86 1 2 0 104 84 0 2 24 85

% Prof. or Above 76 77 76 X X X 64 90 X X 33 66

% Below 23 22 23 X X X 34 10 X X 63 32

% NS 1 1 1 X X X 2 0 X X 4 2

100
23 22 23 34

10 32 63 90 76 77 76 64 66 33 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

80 60 40 20 0
X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 105

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley High 4 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 7

P

A 9

PA NS 79 1 1 2

U 7 20

PP 30 85

P 133 274

A 17 46

PA 150 320

NS 2 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
4 5 16 7 20 21 9 11 10 1 1 2 70 64 59

16 70

20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70

4132 12301 34821 6048 40869 1384

0

U

PP

Eagle Valley High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 6 5 7 4 4

PP 20 25 22 22 17 16

Percentages P A PA 67 9 76 62 5 67 62 8 70 62 8 70 70 9 78 70 9 79

Ns NS 0 2 3 1 0 1 U 7 11 10 11 8 7 PP 39 46 43 33 32 30 P 130 112 120 94 130 133 A 18 9 15 12 16 17 PA 148 121 135 106 146 150 NS 0 3 5 1 0 2

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 76 67 78 70 70 79

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 189 91 98 4 2 0 79 102 0 2 16 65

% Prof. or Above 79 84 76 X X X 71 86 X X 31 65

% Below 20 16 22 X X X 29 12 X X 69 35

% NS 1 0 2 X X X 0 2 X X 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
20 16 12 22 29 69 35

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

79

84

86 76 71 31 X
AmIndAK

65

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 106

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley High 2 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 3

P

A PA NS 65 59 55 1 1 1

U 4 15

PP 62 164

P 109 227

A 16 34

PA 125 261

NS 2 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
2 3 3 32 37 40 56 51 47

32 56 8 37 51 8 40 47 8

1969 24862 28738 5144 33882 840

8

8

8 1 1 1

0

U

PP

Eagle Valley High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 0 2 1 2 2

PP 52 43 44 39 39 32

Percentages P A PA 40 5 45 51 5 56 46 7 53 51 9 60 52 6 58 56 8 65

NS 0 1 1 0 1 1

U 5 1 4 2 4 4

PP 90 86 77 76 77 62

P 70 102 81 98 102 109

Ns A 8 10 12 18 12 16

100 80 60 45 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 56 53 60 58 65

PA 78 112 93 116 114 125

NS 0 2 2 0 1 2

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 193 107 86 1 2 0 104 84 0 2 24 85

% Prof. or Above 65 68 60 X X X 48 86 X X 21 52

% Below 34 31 38 X X X 50 14 X X 75 46

% NS 1 1 1 X X X 2 0 X X 4 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100
14

80 60 40

34

31

38 50 75 86

46

65

68

60 48 X X
Asian

52 21
IEP ELL

20 0
Total Female Male

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 107

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley High 4 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 6

P

A PA NS 54 49 49 2 2 2

U 8 17

PP 76 196

P 85 178

A 17 33

PA 102 211

NS 3 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
4 4 6 40 45 43 45 41 41

40 45 9 45 41 8 43 41 7

3790 24972 24307 4316 28623 1311

9

8

7

2

2

2

0

U

PP

Eagle Valley High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 5 5 2 2 4

PP 53 49 47 42 46 40

Percentages P A PA 40 3 43 42 3 45 37 8 45 48 7 55 48 4 53 45 9 54

NS 0 2 3 1 0 2

U 8 9 9 3 3 8

PP 102 88 91 64 85 76

P 78 76 72 72 90 85

Ns A 6 5 15 11 8 17

100 80 60 43 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 45 45 55 53 54

PA 84 81 87 83 98 102

NS 0 3 6 1 0 3

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 189 91 98 4 2 0 79 102 0 2 16 65

% Prof. or Above 54 63 46 X X X 35 69 X X 13 28

% Below 44 37 51 X X X 65 28 X X 81 72

% NS 2 0 3 X X X 0 3 X X 6 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
54 63 46 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

44

37 51 65

28 72 81 69 35 X
Asian

20 0

28 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

13
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 108

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 1 1 1

U 42 122

PP 79 170

P 48 102

A 23 46

PA 71 148

NS 1 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
22 41 38 28 30 30 25 23 24 12 10 15 1 1 1

Eagle Valley High 22 41 25 12 37 Eagle County Re 50 28 38 23 10 33 Colorado 30 30 24 15 39

18263 18670 14741 9176 23917 692

20 0 U PP

Eagle Valley High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 35 32 25 19 19 22

PP 29 32 35 29 38 41

Percentages P A PA 25 10 35 29 6 35 30 9 39 37 15 52 31 12 42 25 12 37

NS 0 1 1 0 1 1

U 62 64 44 36 37 42

PP 51 64 62 57 75 79

P 44 58 53 71 60 48

Ns A 18 13 16 30 23 23

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 35 35 39 52 42 37

PA 62 71 69 101 83 71

NS 0 2 2 0 1 1

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 193 107 86 1 2 0 104 84 0 2 24 85

% Prof. or Above 37 39 34 X X X 26 50 X X 0 27

% Below 63 60 66 X X X 73 50 X X 96 72

% NS 1 1 0 X X X 1 0 X X 4 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
63 60 66 50 73 96 72

60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

50 37 39 34 X
AmIndAK

26 X
Asian

27 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

0
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 109

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 34 29 34 1 1 2

U 41 112

PP 82 189

P 57 109

A 8 17

PA 65 126

NS 1 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
43 44

Eagle Valley High 22 43 30 4 Eagle County Re 50 26 44 25 4 Colorado 29 35 28 6

17148 20459 16191 3725 19916 1162

40
22

26 29

35

30

25 28 4 4 6 2

20
1 1

0

U

PP

Eagle Valley High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 27 35 28 26 17 22

PP 39 37 49 46 45 43

Percentages P A PA 29 5 34 25 2 27 18 2 20 25 3 27 34 4 38 30 4 34

NS 0 2 3 1 0 1

U 53 63 55 39 32 41

PP 75 67 94 70 83 82

Ns P A 57 9 45 3 35 3 37 4 64 7 57 8

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 34 27 20 38 27 34

PA 66 48 38 41 71 65

NS 0 3 6 1 0 1

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 189 91 98 4 2 0 79 102 0 2 16 65

% Prof. or Above 34 34 35 X X X 25 41 X X 6 23

% Below 65 66 64 X X X 75 58 X X 94 77

% NS 1 0 1 X X X 0 1 X X 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
65 66 64 58 75 94 77

60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

34

34

35 X
AmIndAK

41 25 X
Asian

6 X X
Mult IEP

23

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

HwPacIs

ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 110

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 69 57 51 1 1 2

U 29 95

PP 28 83

P 119 222

A 12 26

PA 131 248

NS 1 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63

Eagle Valley High 15 15 63 6 Eagle County Re 50 22 19 51 6 Colorado 25 21 43 8

60 40
22 25 15

51 43 19 21 6 6 8 1 1 2

14953 12366 25278 4824 30102 1239

20 0

15

U

PP

Eagle Valley High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

Eagle Valley High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 16 27 23 23 21 15

Percentages PP P A PA 31 52 1 53 25 42 4 46 28 47 1 48 27 44 5 49 22 54 3 57 15 63 6 69

Ns NS 0 2 1 1 0 1 U 31 48 45 35 39 29 PP 60 46 54 41 41 28 P 100 76 90 66 100 119 A 2 8 2 8 6 12 PA 102 84 92 74 106 131 NS 0 3 2 1 0 1

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 53 57 46 48 49 69

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

Eagle Valley High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 189 91 98 4 2 0 79 102 0 2 16 65

% Prof. or Above 69 65 73 X X X 56 78 X X 6 51

% Below 30 35 26 X X X 44 21 X X 94 49

% NS 1 0 1 X X X 0 1 X X 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20
6 69 73 56 78 51 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

30

35

26 44

21 49

94

65

0
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 111

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Eagle Valley Middle
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Middle 2 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 8 9

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 2 30

PP 10 66

P 69 297

A 26 72

PA 95 369

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
64 63 62

64 24 89

14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73

60 40 20
2 6 8 9 14 18 24 15 11 0 1 1

4938 11309 38862 7097 45959 845

0

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle Valley Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 2 7 1 4 2

PP 15 13 13 5 7 9

Percentages P A PA 64 17 81 66 19 85 54 26 80 76 18 93 64 24 89 64 24 89

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 4 2 6 1 4 2

PP 13 14 12 5 7 10

P 57 71 49 69 63 69

Ns A 15 20 23 16 24 26

100 81 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 85 80 93 89 89

PA 72 91 72 85 87 95

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 107 55 52 0 1 0 35 68 0 3 13 31

% Prof. or Above 89 91 87 X X X 74 96 X X X 74

% Below 11 9 13 X X X 26 4 X X X 26

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

100 80 60 40 20 0

11

9

13 26

4

26

89

91

87 74

96 74

X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 112

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle Valley Middle Eagle County Re 50

U 3 9

PP

P

A

PA NS 2 1 1

U 3 44

PP 13 79

P 62 324

A 14 46

PA 76 370

NS 2 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
66 65

14 66 15 81 16 65 9 9 74 68

60 40 20
3 9 11 14 16 21

59

Colorado 11 21 59

6815 13070 36650 5501 42151 359

15

9

9 2 1 1

0

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle Valley Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 8 5 5 6 3

PP 20 11 17 19 6 14

Percentages P A PA 58 11 69 65 16 81 67 11 78 56 20 76 71 17 88 66 15 81

NS 1 0 0 0 0 2

U 8 7 5 4 5 3

PP 17 10 17 17 5 13

P 49 58 66 49 60 62

Ns A 9 14 11 18 14 14

100 81 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 69 78 76 88 81

PA 58 72 77 67 74 76

NS 1 0 0 0 0 2

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 94 52 42 1 1 0 29 62 0 1 7 23

% Prof. or Above 81 77 86 X X X 52 94 X X X 43

% Below 17 21 12 X X X 45 5 X X X 52

% NS 2 2 2 X X X 3 2 X X X 4

Percentage of Students P + A

100
17 21 12 45 5 52

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

81

77

86 52

94

43 X X
Mult

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 113

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle Valley Middle

U 7

PP

P

A PA NS 78 71 67 1 0 1

U 6 43

PP 12 84

P 59 273

A 7 39

PA 66 312

NS 1 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
7 10 10 14 19 23 8 9 8 1 0 1 69 62 59

14 69 8

Eagle County Re 50 10 19 62 9 Colorado 10 23 59 8

5882 13891 35960 4891 40851 450

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle Valley Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 8 14 6 3 8 7

PP 14 16 12 19 18 14

Percentages P A PA 59 19 78 62 8 70 73 9 83 64 14 78 61 13 73 69 8 78

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 1 1 U 8 10 5 3 6 6 PP 14 12 10 19 14 12 P 58 46 63 63 48 59 A 19 6 8 14 10 7 PA 77 52 71 77 58 66 NS 0 0 0 0 1 1

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 78 70 83 78 73 78

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 85 36 49 0 0 0 30 54 0 1 6 25

% Prof. or Above 78 78 78 X X X 50 94 X X X 52

% Below 21 19 22 X X X 47 6 X X X 44

% NS 1 3 0 X X X 3 0 X X X 4

Percentage of Students P + A

100
21 19 22 47 6 44

80 60

94

40 20 0

78

78

78 50 X X
Asian

52

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 114

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Middle 0 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 4

P

A PA NS 73 64 58 0 1 1

U 0 14

PP 29 153

P 70 258

A 8 40

PA 78 298

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65

27 65 7 33 55 9 38 49 9

60 40 20 0
0 3 4 27 33 38

55

49

2629 23740 30751 5578 36329 355

7

9

9 0 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle Valley Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 1 0 6 1 0 0

PP 21 21 19 13 22 27

Percentages P A PA 62 16 78 62 17 79 50 26 76 68 18 86 65 12 78 65 7 73

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 0 5 1 0 0

PP 19 23 17 12 22 29

P 55 66 45 62 64 70

Ns A 14 18 23 16 12 8

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 78 79 86 76 78 73

PA 69 84 68 78 76 78

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 107 55 52 0 1 0 35 68 0 3 13 31

% Prof. or Above 73 84 62 X X X 46 85 X X X 48

% Below 27 16 38 X X X 54 15 X X X 52

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
16 27 15 38 54 52

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female

84 73 62 46 X
Male AmIndAK

85 48 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 115

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Middle 0 Eagle County Re 50 2 Colorado 3

P

A

PA NS 2 1 1

U 0 11

PP 22 144

P 52 274

A 18 64

PA 70 338

NS 2 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
23 29 35 19 13 15 2 1 1 55 55 47

23 55 19 74 29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61

1739 21930 29033 9265 38298 431

20 0
0 2 3

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle Valley Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 6 1 1 2 5 0

PP 31 18 25 22 18 23

Percentages P A PA 57 6 63 62 19 81 52 22 74 53 23 76 67 11 77 55 19 74

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

U 5 1 1 2 4 0

PP 26 16 25 19 15 22

P 48 55 51 47 56 52

Ns A 5 17 22 20 9 18

100 81 80 63 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 74 76 77 74

PA 53 72 73 67 65 70

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 94 52 42 1 1 0 29 62 0 1 7 23

% Prof. or Above 74 79 69 X X X 52 85 X X X 48

% Below 23 19 29 X X X 45 13 X X X 48

% NS 2 2 2 X X X 3 2 X X X 4

Percentage of Students P + A

100
23 19 13 29 45 48

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female

74

79

85 69 52 48 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

X
Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 116

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Eagle Valley Middle 6 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 3

P

A PA NS 69 61 56 0 0 1

U 5 19

PP 21 151

P 55 240

A 4 30

PA 59 270

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65

25 65 5 34 54 7 40 47 9

60 40
25 34 40

54 47

1836 24683 28434 5641 34075 485

20
6 4 3 5

7

9 0 0 1

0

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle Valley Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 3 2 1 1 6

PP 25 34 20 28 23 25

Percentages P A PA 54 17 71 53 11 64 65 13 78 51 20 71 56 19 75 65 5 69

NS 0 0 0 0 1 0

U 4 2 2 1 1 5

PP 25 25 17 28 18 21

P 53 39 56 50 44 55

Ns A 17 8 11 20 15 4

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 71 78 64 71 75 69

PA 70 47 67 70 59 59

NS 0 0 0 0 1 0

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 85 36 49 0 0 0 30 54 0 1 6 25

% Prof. or Above 69 75 65 X X X 53 80 X X X 52

% Below 31 25 35 X X X 47 20 X X X 48

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

31

25

20 35 47 48

69

75

80 65 53 52

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 117

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Eagle Valley Middle

U 3

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 0

U 3 45

PP 13 117

P 44 177

A 47 126

PA 91 303

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
25 26 41 38 35 10 12 3 12 0 1 0 44 27 27

12 41 44 85

Eagle County Re 50 10 25 38 27 65 Colorado 12 26 35 27 62

7457 16200 22056 17049 39105 288

20 0

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle Valley Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 6 4 10 5 3 3

PP 17 14 16 7 28 12

Percentages P A PA 43 35 78 42 40 82 34 40 74 38 49 88 37 33 69 41 44 85

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 5 4 9 5 3 3

PP 15 15 14 6 27 13

P 38 45 31 35 36 44

Ns A 31 43 36 45 32 47

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 78 82 74 88 69 85

PA 69 88 67 80 68 91

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 107 55 52 0 1 0 35 68 0 3 13 31

% Prof. or Above 85 85 85 X X X 69 94 X X X 77

% Below 15 15 15 X X X 31 6 X X X 23

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
15 15 15 31 6 23

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

85

85

85 69

94 77

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 118

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 3 1 1

U 10 66

PP 21 128

P 28 151

A 32 147

PA 60 298

NS 3 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
22 26 30 30 30 28 34 29 27

Eagle Valley Middle 11 22 30 34 64 Eagle County Re 50 13 26 30 29 60 Colorado 14 30 28 27 55

8842 18935 17406 16893 34299 327

20 0

14 11 13 3 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle Valley Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 18 7 7 9 11 11

PP 33 22 31 20 30 22

Percentages P A PA 32 17 49 35 36 71 42 19 62 28 42 70 31 29 60 30 34 64

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 3 U 15 6 7 8 9 10 PP 28 20 31 18 25 21 P 27 31 42 25 26 28 A 14 32 19 37 24 32 PA 41 63 61 62 50 60 NS 0 0 0 0 0 3

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 49 71 62 70 60

64

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 94 52 42 1 1 0 29 62 0 1 7 23

% Prof. or Above 64 63 64 X X X 45 73 X X X 30

% Below 33 33 33 X X X 52 24 X X X 65

% NS 3 4 2 X X X 3 3 X X X 4

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
64 63 64 45 30 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

33

33

33 52

24

65

73

20 0
X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 119

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 11 75

PP 20 124

P 29 131

A 25 108

PA 54 239

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
13 17 19 24 28 29 34 30 29 29

Eagle Valley Middle 13 24 34 29 64 Eagle County Re 50 17 28 30 24 54 Colorado 19 29 29 23 51

11577 17668 17463 13977 31440 385

24 23 0 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle Valley Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 14 16 12 10 9 13

PP 31 27 20 24 28 24

Percentages P A PA 38 15 54 36 20 57 41 28 69 37 28 66 27 37 63 34 29 64

Ns NS 1 0 0 0 0 0 U 14 12 10 10 7 11 PP 31 20 17 24 22 20 P 38 27 35 37 21 29 A 15 15 24 28 29 25 PA 53 42 59 65 50 54 NS 1 0 0 0 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 54 57 69 66

63

64

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 85 36 49 0 0 0 30 54 0 1 6 25

% Prof. or Above 64 61 65 X X X 40 78 X X X 40

% Below 36 39 35 X X X 60 22 X X X 60

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
22

80 60 40

36

39

35 60 60

78 64 61 65 40 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0
X
Asian

40 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 120

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 1

U 10 80

PP 18 107

P 36 200

A 21 53

PA 57 253

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
42 45 43

Eagle Valley Middle 12 21 42 25 67 Eagle County Re 50 18 24 45 12 57 Colorado 21 27 43 9 52

12703 16350 26331 5232 31563 458

40 20 0
12 18 21

27 21 24

25 12 9 0 0 1

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle Valley Middle Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

Eagle Valley Middle Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 21 22 19 15 13 12

PP 29 26 27 15 19 21

Percentages P A PA 44 5 49 42 11 53 51 3 55 55 15 70 54 13 67 42 25 67

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 1 0 U 21 16 16 15 10 10 PP 29 19 23 15 15 18 P 44 31 44 54 43 36 A 5 8 3 15 10 21 PA 49 39 47 69 53 57 NS 0 0 0 0 1 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 49 53 55 70 67 67

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Eagle Valley Middle Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 85 36 49 0 0 0 30 54 0 1 6 25

% Prof. or Above 67 64 69 X X X 37 85 X X X 40

% Below 33 36 31 X X X 63 15 X X X 60

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
15

80 60 40 20 0

33

36

31 63 60

85 67 64 69 37 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

40 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 121

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Edwards Elem
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 61 72 73 0 0 0

U 8 38

PP 11 98

P 26 322

A 4 32

PA 30 354

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
66 66

Edwards Elem 16 22 53 8 Eagle County Re 50 8 20 66 7

60 40 20 0
16 8 10 22 20 17

53

Colorado 10 17 66 7

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

8

7

7 0 0 0

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 13 12 10 10 7 16

PP 32 24 27 25 25 22

Percentages P A PA 54 2 55 56 9 65 60 3 63 54 10 64 58 9 67 53 8 61

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 7 8 6 6 5 8

PP 18 16 16 15 17 11

P 30 38 36 32 39 26

Ns A 1 6 2 6 6 4

100 80 65 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 55 63 64 67

PA 31 44 38 38 45 30

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

61

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 49 28 21 0 0 0 36 13 0 0 7 30

% Prof. or Above 61 57 67 X X X 47 X X X X 40

% Below 39 43 33 X X X 53 X X X X 60

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
61 57 67 47 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

39

43

33 53 60

20 0
X
Asian

40 X X
HwPacIs

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 122

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 65 67 68 0 0 0

U 7 51

PP 16 122

P 39 332

A 3 17

PA 42 349

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
25 23 21 60 63 63

Edwards Elem 11 25 60 5 Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

20 0

11 10 11

5

3

5

0

0

0

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 20 20 16 4 4 11

PP 29 24 23 23 18 25

Percentages P A PA 45 6 51 55 2 56 57 3 60 64 8 72 67 12 79 60 5 65

NS 0 0 1 2 0 0

U 13 11 12 2 2 7

PP 19 13 17 12 10 16

Ns P A 29 4 30 1 43 2 34 4 38 7 39 3

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 51 56 60 72 79 65

PA 33 31 45 38 45 42

NS 0 0 1 1 0 0

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 65 26 39 0 0 0 28 37 0 0 7 28

% Prof. or Above 65 69 62 X X X 29 92 X X X 29

% Below 35 31 38 X X X 71 8 X X X 71

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
65 69 35 31 8 38 71 92 62 29 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

71

20 0
X
Asian

29 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 123

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Edwards Elem Eagle County Re 50

U 9 8

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 0

U 5 42

PP 8 89

P 36 329

A 7 44

PA 43 373

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
64 65 62

14 64 13 77 18 65 9 8 74 70

60 40 20 0
9 8 11 14 18 18 13 9 8 0 1 0

Colorado 11 18 62

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 18 23 9 13 5 9

PP 25 23 21 24 16 14

Percentages P A PA 51 5 56 44 8 52 65 5 70 53 10 63 70 9 79 64 13 77

NS 0 2 0 0 0 0

U 10 14 5 9 2 5

PP 14 14 12 16 7 8

Ns P A 28 3 27 5 37 3 36 7 30 4 36 7

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 56 52 79 70 63 77

PA 31 32 40 43 34 43

NS 0 1 0 0 0 0

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 56 28 28 0 0 0 34 21 0 1 10 31

% Prof. or Above 77 75 79 X X X 65 95 X X X 65

% Below 23 25 21 X X X 35 5 X X X 35

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
23 25 21 35 5 35

80 60

95

40 20 0

77

75

79 65 65

X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 124

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Edwards Elem Eagle County Re 50

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 35 X X 0

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 38 X X 0

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X X X X X X X X 4 X X 0 31 33 31

Colorado 31 33 31 4

34 36 34 4

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)

Years 2008 2009 2010 2013

U X X X X

PP X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X

U X X X X

PP X X X X

P X X X X

Ns A X X X X

PA X X X X

NS X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 Year X 2010 X 2013

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 125

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Edwards Elem 8 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6

P

A PA NS 27 50 51 0 0 0

U 4 28

PP 32 211

P 11 218

A 2 27

PA 13 245

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65

65 22 4 43 45 6 43 43 8

60
43 43 45 43 22

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

40 20 0
8 8 0 0 0

6

6

4

6

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 17 13 5 16 6 8

PP 50 40 55 50 55 65

Percentages P A PA 30 4 33 38 9 47 37 3 40 24 10 34 37 1 39 22 4 27

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 9 9 3 9 4 4

PP 27 27 33 29 37 32

P 16 26 22 14 25 11

Ns A 2 6 2 6 1 2

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 33 47

PA 18 32 24 20 26 13

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

40

34

39 27

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 49 28 21 0 0 0 36 13 0 0 7 30

% Prof. or Above 27 32 19 X X X 19 X X X X 13

% Below 73 68 81 X X X 81 X X X X 87

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

73

68 81 81 87

27

32 19 X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

19
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

13
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 126

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Edwards Elem 8 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 5 33

PP 27 221

P 25 228

A 8 39

PA 33 267

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
8 7 42 42 39 38 44 45

42 38 12 51 42 44 39 45 7 8 51 53

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

6

12

7

8 0 0 0

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 12 22 11 2 0 8

PP 60 38 40 47 46 42

Percentages P A PA 18 9 28 38 2 40 33 16 49 38 11 49 46 9 54 38 12 51

Ns NS 0 0 0 2 0 0 U 8 12 8 1 0 5 PP 39 21 30 25 26 27 P 12 21 25 20 26 25 A 6 1 12 6 5 8 PA 18 22 37 26 31 33 NS 0 0 0 1 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 40 28 49 49 54 51

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 65 26 39 0 0 0 28 37 0 0 7 28

% Prof. or Above 51 62 44 X X X 11 81 X X X 11

% Below 49 38 56 X X X 89 19 X X X 89

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
19

80 60 40

38 49 56 89 81 62 51 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

89

20 0

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

11
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

11
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 127

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Edwards Elem 4 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5

P

A PA NS 50 58 57 0 1 1

U 2 23

PP 26 183

P 25 252

A 3 44

PA 28 296

NS 0 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
46 45 36 37 50 48

46 45 5 36 50 9 37 48 9

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

40 20
4 5 5

5

9

9 0 1 1

0

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 16 4 4 0 4

PP 49 43 46 37 49 46

Percentages P A PA 33 9 42 38 3 41 51 0 51 43 16 59 42 9 51 45 5 50

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 5 10 2 3 0 2 PP 27 26 26 25 21 26 P 18 23 29 29 18 25 A 5 2 0 11 4 3 PA 23 25 29 40 22 28 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 80 60 42 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 41 59 51 51 50

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 56 28 28 0 0 0 34 21 0 1 10 31

% Prof. or Above 50 46 54 X X X 26 86 X X X 26

% Below 50 54 46 X X X 74 14 X X X 74

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
14

80 60 40 20 0

50

54

46 74 74

86 50 46 54 26 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

26 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 128

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Edwards Elem Eagle County Re 50

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 19 X X 6

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 20 X X 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
44

Colorado 44 32 18 1

47 35 19 1

40 20 0
X X X X

32 18 X X X X 1 X X 6

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)

Years 2008 2009 2010 2013

U X X X X

PP X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X

U X X X X

PP X X X X

P X X X X

Ns A X X X X

PA X X X X

NS X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 Year X 2010 X 2013

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 129

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 9 34

PP 15 124

P 18 204

A 7 142

PA 25 346

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
18 7 7 0 0 0 31 37 25 20 40 41 28 31 14

Edwards Elem 18 31 37 14 51 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 7 7 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 26 10 8 14 15 18

PP 34 33 34 19 25 31

Percentages P A PA 26 13 39 40 17 57 33 25 57 46 22 68 35 24 58 37 14 51

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 1 0 U 20 7 5 8 11 9 PP 26 23 21 11 18 15 P 20 28 20 27 25 18 A 10 12 15 13 17 7 PA 30 40 35 40 42 25 NS 0 0 0 0 1 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 39 57 57 68 58 51

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 49 28 21 0 0 0 36 13 0 0 7 30

% Prof. or Above 51 50 52 X X X 39 X X X X 33

% Below 49 50 48 X X X 61 X X X X 67

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

49

50

48 61 67

51

50

52 39 X
AmIndAK

33 X X
HwPacIs

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 130

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 9 44

PP 11 120

P 27 249

A 20 115

PA 47 364

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
13 16 8 8 0 0 0 23 20 40 47

Edwards Elem 13 16 40 30 70 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 8 8 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

43 30 22 28

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 12 21 9 8 5 13

PP 38 28 25 26 21 16

Percentages P A PA 40 10 50 37 14 51 36 30 66 45 21 66 40 33 74 40 30 70

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 8 12 7 4 3 9 PP 26 16 19 14 12 11 P 27 21 27 24 23 27 A 7 8 23 11 19 20 PA 34 29 50 35 42 47 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 50 51 74 66 66 70

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 67 26 41 0 0 0 30 37 0 0 7 30

% Prof. or Above 70 77 66 X X X 37 97 X X X 37

% Below 30 23 34 X X X 63 3 X X X 63

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60
97 30 23 34 63 63 3

40 20 0

70

77 66 37 X X
Asian

37 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 131

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Edwards Elem 7 Eagle County Re 50 9 Colorado 9

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 4 44

PP 19 137

P 18 196

A 15 129

PA 33 325

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
7 9 9 0 0 0 34 27 25 32 39 36 27 25 29

34 32 27 59 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 15 30 7 12 7 7

PP 40 30 44 24 35 34

Percentages P A PA 35 11 45 26 15 41 32 18 49 24 41 65 44 14 58 32 27 59

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 8 18 4 8 3 4 PP 22 18 25 16 15 19 P 19 16 18 16 19 18 A 6 9 10 28 6 15 PA 25 25 28 44 25 33 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 80 65 60 45 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 41 49 58 59

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 56 28 28 0 0 0 34 21 0 1 10 31

% Prof. or Above 59 50 68 X X X 35 95 X X X 32

% Below 41 50 32 X X X 65 5 X X X 68

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
5

80 60

41

32 50 65 68 95

40
59

68 50 35 X X
Asian

20 0
Total

32 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

Female

Male

AmIndAK

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 132

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 8 59

PP 21 185

P 18 187

A 9 75

PA 27 262

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
14 12 14 38 36 37 32 37 35 16 15 13 0 0 0

Edwards Elem 14 38 32 16 48 Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

U Edwards Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

Edwards Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 36 34 16 24 12 14

PP 44 54 46 19 40 38

Percentages P A PA 15 5 20 7 5 11 30 9 39 38 19 57 37 12 49 32 16 48

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 20 21 9 16 5 8 PP 24 33 26 13 17 21 P 8 4 17 26 16 18 A 3 3 5 13 5 9 PA 11 7 22 39 21 27 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 20 11 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 39 57 49 48

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Edwards Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 56 28 28 0 0 0 34 21 0 1 10 31

% Prof. or Above 48 43 54 X X X 24 86 X X X 19

% Below 52 57 46 X X X 76 14 X X X 81

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
14

80 60 40 20 0

52

46 57 76 86 81

48

54 43 24 X X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

19
ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 133

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Gypsum Creek Middle School
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 3 30

PP 19 66

P 77 297

A 16 72

PA 93 369

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
3 6 8 17 14 18 14 15 11 0 1 1 67

Gypsum Creek Middle School 3 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 8

17 67 14 81 14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73

63 62

4938 11309 38862 7097 45959 845

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Gypsum Creek Middle School

Eagle County Re 50

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 7 3 5 8 3

PP 30 21 16 17 22 17

Percentages P A PA 53 8 61 61 12 73 65 17 82 70 8 79 57 12 70 67 14 81

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 11 7 3 5 11 3 PP 36 22 19 18 31 19 P 64 65 78 75 79 77 A 9 13 20 9 17 16 PA 73 78 98 84 96 93 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 82 80 61 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 73 79 70 81

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 115 61 54 1 0 0 74 39 0 1 9 55

% Prof. or Above 81 89 72 X X X 72 97 X X X 65

% Below 19 11 28 X X X 28 3 X X X 35

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
19

11 28 28

3 35

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

81

89 72 72

97 65

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 134

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Gypsum Creek Middle School Eagle County Re 50

U 9 9

PP

P

A PA NS 73 74 68 1 1 1

U 11 44

PP 23 79

P 82 324

A 12 46

PA 94 370

NS 1 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
64 65

18 64 9 16 65 9

60 40 20 0
9 9 11 18 16 21

59

Colorado 11 21 59 9

6815 13070 36650 5501 42151 359

9

9

9 1 1 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Gypsum Creek Middle School

Eagle County Re 50

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 7 5 5 11 9

PP 16 22 11 18 12 18

Percentages P A PA 64 9 74 62 9 71 75 9 84 66 11 77 73 4 76 64 9 73

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 11 8 5 6 13 11 PP 17 25 12 22 14 23 P 68 70 79 82 83 82 A 10 10 10 14 4 12 PA 78 80 89 96 87 94 NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 84 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 74 71 77 76 73

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 129 60 69 2 3 1 87 35 0 1 13 63

% Prof. or Above 73 68 77 X X X 64 94 X X X 56

% Below 26 30 23 X X X 34 6 X X X 43

% NS 1 2 0 X X X 1 0 X X X 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100
26

80 60

30

23 34

6 43

94

40 20 0

73

68

77 64 56

X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 135

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Gypsum Creek Middle School

U 7

PP

P

A PA NS 74 71 67 0 0 1

U 8 43

PP 20 84

P 73 273

A 7 39

PA 80 312

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
19 19 7 10 10 23 6 9 8 0 0 1 68

19 68 6

62 59

Eagle County Re 50 10 19 62 9 Colorado 10 23 59 8

5882 13891 35960 4891 40851 450

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Gypsum Creek Middle School

Eagle County Re 50

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 5 7 8 5 4 7

PP 24 18 19 16 28 19

Percentages P A PA 68 3 71 68 7 75 65 8 73 71 8 79 62 6 68 68 6 74

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 6 7 10 5 5 8 PP 26 18 24 16 35 20 P 75 68 83 72 78 73 A 3 7 10 8 8 7 PA 78 75 93 80 86 80 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 71 75 73 79 68 74

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 108 41 67 1 2 1 64 38 0 2 13 45

% Prof. or Above 74 83 69 X X X 77 71 X X X 69

% Below 26 17 31 X X X 23 29 X X X 31

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
26 17 31 23

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female

29

31

74

83 69

77

71

69

X
Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 136

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 1 14

PP 34 153

P 68 258

A 12 40

PA 80 298

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
1 3 4 30 33 38 59 55 49

Gypsum Creek Middle School 1 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 4

30 59 10 70 33 55 38 49 9 9 64 58

2629 23740 30751 5578 36329 355

10 9

9 0 1 1

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Gypsum Creek Middle School

Eagle County Re 50

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 3 0 3 4 1

PP 41 31 32 23 41 30

Percentages P A PA 48 8 56 57 9 66 58 10 68 64 9 74 46 9 56 59 10 70

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 4 3 0 3 5 1

PP 49 33 38 25 56 34

P 57 61 70 69 64 68

Ns A 10 10 12 10 13 12

PA 67 71 82 79 77 80

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 56 66 68 74 56 70

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 115 61 54 1 0 0 74 39 0 1 9 55

% Prof. or Above 70 79 59 X X X 58 90 X X X 55

% Below 30 21 41 X X X 42 10 X X X 45

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

10 30 21 41 42 45

90 70 79 59 58 55

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 137

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 1 1 1

U 6 11

PP 34 144

P 75 274

A 13 64

PA 88 338

NS 1 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
5 2 3 26 29 35 15 10 13 1 1 1 58 55 47

Gypsum Creek Middle School 5 Eagle County Re 50 2 Colorado 3

26 58 10 68 29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61

1739 21930 29033 9265 38298 431

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Gypsum Creek Middle School

Eagle County Re 50

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 2 1 1 2 5

PP 30 32 20 25 24 26

Percentages P A PA 49 18 67 51 15 66 60 19 79 58 16 74 61 13 75 58 10 68

NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

U 3 2 1 1 2 6

PP 32 36 21 31 27 34

P 52 58 64 72 70 75

Ns A 19 17 20 20 15 13

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 79 67 66 74 75 68

PA 71 75 84 92 85 88

NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 129 60 69 2 3 1 87 35 0 1 13 63

% Prof. or Above 68 67 70 X X X 56 94 X X X 48

% Below 31 32 30 X X X 43 6 X X X 51

% NS 1 2 0 X X X 1 0 X X X 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60
94 31 32 30 43 6 51

40 20 0

68

67

70 56 48 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 138

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 65 61 56 0 0 1

U 2 19

PP 36 151

P 67 240

A 3 30

PA 70 270

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
62

Gypsum Creek Middle School 2 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 3

33 62 3 34 54 7 40 47 9

60 40 20
2 4 3 33 34 40

54 47

1836 24683 28434 5641 34075 485

3

7

9 0 0 1

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Gypsum Creek Middle School

Eagle County Re 50

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 1 0 2 0 0 2

PP 46 34 35 36 29 33

Percentages P A PA 45 8 53 56 10 66 54 10 64 55 9 64 63 9 71 62 3 65

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 0 2 0 0 2

PP 51 34 44 36 36 36

P 49 56 68 56 79 67

Ns A 9 10 13 9 11 3

PA 58 66 81 65 90 70

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 53 66 71

64

64

65

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 108 41 67 1 2 1 64 38 0 2 13 45

% Prof. or Above 65 80 55 X X X 63 71 X X X 56

% Below 35 20 45 X X X 38 29 X X X 44

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
20

80 60 40

35

45

38

29 44

80 65 55 63

71 56

20 0
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 139

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Gypsum Creek Middle School

U 8

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 0

U 9 45

PP 33 117

P 50 177

A 23 126

PA 73 303

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
43

29 43 20 63

Eagle County Re 50 10 25 38 27 65 Colorado 12 26 35 27 62

7457 16200 22056 17049 39105 288

40 20 0
12 8 10

29

38 35 27 27 20 0 1 0

25 26

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Gypsum Creek Middle School

Eagle County Re 50

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 11 4 7 22 8

PP 33 27 26 35 24 29

Percentages P A PA 44 13 57 38 23 62 53 18 70 36 22 59 37 17 54 43 20 63

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 12 12 5 7 31 9 PP 40 29 31 37 33 33 P 53 41 63 39 51 50 A 16 25 21 24 23 23 PA 69 66 84 63 74 73 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 57 62 70 59 54

63

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 115 61 54 1 0 0 74 39 0 1 9 55

% Prof. or Above 63 67 59 X X X 50 87 X X X 45

% Below 37 33 41 X X X 50 13 X X X 55

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
63 37 33 41 50

13

55

87 67 59 50 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0
X
Asian

45 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 140

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 1 1 1

U 20 66

PP 34 128

P 38 151

A 36 147

PA 74 298

NS 1 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
26 26 30 29 30 28 28 29 27

Gypsum Creek Middle School 16 26 29 28 57 Eagle County Re 50 13 26 30 29 60 Colorado 14 30 28 27 55

8842 18935 17406 16893 34299 327

20 0

16 13 14 1 1 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Gypsum Creek Middle School

Eagle County Re 50

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 15 5 7 6 10 16

PP 39 44 26 33 37 26

Percentages P A PA 33 13 46 27 23 50 46 21 67 41 19 60 28 25 54 29 28 57

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 1 U 16 6 7 8 11 20 PP 41 50 28 41 42 34 P 35 31 49 51 32 38 A 14 26 22 24 29 36 PA 49 57 71 75 61 74 NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 46 50 67

60

54

57

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 129 60 69 2 3 1 87 35 0 1 13 63

% Prof. or Above 57 52 62 X X X 45 86 X X X 38

% Below 42 47 38 X X X 54 14 X X X 60

% NS 1 2 0 X X X 1 0 X X X 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100
14

80 60 40

42

38 47 54 60

86 57 52 62 45 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0

38 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 141

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 14 75

PP 27 124

P 35 131

A 32 108

PA 67 239

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
13 17 19 29 25 28 32 30 29 30

Gypsum Creek Middle School 13 25 32 30 62 Eagle County Re 50 17 28 30 24 54 Colorado 19 29 29 23 51

11577 17668 17463 13977 31440 385

24 23 0 1 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Gypsum Creek Middle School

Eagle County Re 50

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 23 10 11 6 10 13

PP 44 25 27 17 29 25

Percentages P A PA 26 7 34 42 23 65 34 27 62 50 27 77 40 21 61 32 30 62

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 25 10 14 6 13 14 PP 48 25 35 17 36 27 P 29 42 44 51 51 35 A 8 23 35 27 26 32 PA 37 65 79 78 77 67 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 65 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 34 62 77 61 62

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 108 41 67 1 2 1 64 38 0 2 13 45

% Prof. or Above 62 59 64 X X X 58 71 X X X 53

% Below 38 41 36 X X X 42 29 X X X 47

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
62 59 64 58 71 53 38 41 36 29 42 47

20 0
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 142

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 9

PA NS 67 0 0 1

U 14 80

PP 22 107

P 62 200

A 10 53

PA 72 253

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
13 18 21 20 24 27 9 12 9 0 0 1 57 45 43

Gypsum Creek Middle School 13 20 57

Eagle County Re 50 18 24 45 12 57 Colorado 21 27 43 9 52

12703 16350 26331 5232 31563 458

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Gypsum Creek Middle School

Eagle County Re 50

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

Gypsum Creek Middle School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 11 13 5 7 13

PP 33 19 21 19 29 20

Percentages P A PA 54 5 58 56 14 70 55 10 65 55 21 76 59 6 64 57 9 67

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 10 11 17 5 9 14 PP 36 19 27 19 36 22 P 59 57 70 56 74 62 A 5 14 13 21 7 10 PA 64 71 83 77 81 72 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 58 70 76 65 64 67

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Gypsum Creek Middle School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 108 41 67 1 2 1 64 38 0 2 13 45

% Prof. or Above 67 61 70 X X X 64 71 X X X 60

% Below 33 39 30 X X X 36 29 X X X 40

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

33

39

30

36

29 40

67

61

70

64

71 60

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 143

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Gypsum Elem
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 61 72 73 0 0 0

U 6 38

PP 16 98

P 30 322

A 4 32

PA 34 354

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
66 66

Gypsum Elem 11 29 54 7 Eagle County Re 50 8 20 66 7

60 40 20 0
11 8 10 29 20 17

54

Colorado 10 17 66 7

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

7

7

7 0 0 0

U Gypsum Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 26 18 5 4 4 11

PP 22 24 34 14 34 29

Percentages P A PA 52 0 52 55 4 59 61 0 61 82 0 82 57 4 62 54 7 61

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 12 9 3 2 2 6

PP 10 12 19 7 16 16

Ns P A 24 0 28 2 34 0 42 0 27 2 30 4

100 82 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 52 59 61 62 61

PA 24 30 34 42 29 34

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 56 26 30 0 0 0 36 19 0 1 6 30

% Prof. or Above 61 58 63 X X X 53 74 X X X 47

% Below 39 42 37 X X X 47 26 X X X 53

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
61 58 63 53 74 47 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

39

42

37

26 47 53

20 0
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 144

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 51 67 68 0 0 0

U 5 51

PP 15 122

P 20 332

A 1 17

PA 21 349

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63 63

Gypsum Elem 12 37 49 2 Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

60 40 20 0
12 10 11 37 23 21

49

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

2

3

5

0

0

0

U Gypsum Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 15 15 16 4 3 12

PP 34 26 31 33 20 37

Percentages P A PA 49 0 49 57 2 59 51 0 51 63 0 63 72 5 77 49 2 51

NS 1 0 2 0 0 0

U 10 7 8 2 2 5

PP 23 12 15 17 12 15

Ns P A 33 0 26 1 25 0 32 0 43 3 20 1

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 59 49 51 63 51 77

PA 33 27 25 32 46 21

NS 1 0 1 0 0 0

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 41 19 22 2 0 0 33 5 0 1 5 28

% Prof. or Above 51 68 36 X X X 48 X X X X 43

% Below 49 32 64 X X X 52 X X X X 57

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

32 49 64 52 57

68 51 36 X
AmIndAK

48 X
Asian

43 X X
HwPacIs

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 145

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Percentage of Students

Percentages School, District and State Gypsum Elem Eagle County Re 50 U 0 8 PP P A PA NS 81 74 70 2 1 0 U 0 42 PP 9 89 P 40

Ns A 2 44 PA 42 373 NS 1 3

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 8 11 17 18 18 4 9 8 2 1 0 77 65 62

17 77 4 18 65 9

329

Colorado 11 18 62 8

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

U Gypsum Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 2 11 4 13 4 0

PP 33 24 27 23 21 17

Percentages P A PA 57 7 64 64 2 65 67 2 69 58 4 62 74 2 75 77 4 81

NS 0 0 0 2 0 2

U 1 7 2 7 2 0

PP 14 16 12 12 12 9

P 24 42 30 30 42 40

Ns A 3 1 1 2 1 2

100 80 64 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 65 69 75 62 81

PA 27 43 31 32 43 42

NS 0 0 0 1 0 1

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 52 27 25 0 0 0 35 16 0 1 2 31

% Prof. or Above 81 81 80 X X X 74 100 X X X 77

% Below 17 15 20 X X X 23 0 X X X 19

% NS 2 4 0 X X X 3 0 X X X 3

Percentage of Students P + A

100
17 15 20

0 23 19

80 60

100

40 20 0

81

81

80

74

77

X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 146

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Gypsum Elem 9 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6

P

A PA NS 48 50 51 0 0 0

U 5 28

PP 24 211

P 25 218

A 2 27

PA 27 245

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
43 43 43 45 45 43

43 45 4 43 45 6 43 43 8

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

40 20 0
9 8 0 0 0

6

6

4

6

U Gypsum Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 13 18 0 0 9 9

PP 52 38 59 39 45 43

Percentages P A PA 33 2 35 32 12 44 38 4 41 53 8 61 47 0 47 45 4 48

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 6 9 0 0 4 5

PP 24 19 33 20 21 24

P 15 16 21 27 22 25

Ns A 1 6 2 4 0 2

100 80 61 60 44 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 35 41 47 48

PA 16 22 23 31 22 27

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 56 26 30 0 0 0 36 19 0 1 6 30

% Prof. or Above 48 62 37 X X X 47 47 X X X 43

% Below 52 38 63 X X X 53 53 X X X 57

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
62 38 52 63 53 53 57

20 0

48 37 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

47 X
Asian

47 X X
Mult

43 X
IEP ELL

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 147

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 46 51 53 0 0 0

U 6 33

PP 16 221

P 16 228

A 3 39

PA 19 267

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
15 6 7 7 7 8 0 0 0 39 42 39 39 44 45

Gypsum Elem 15 39 39 7 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 6 7 42 44 7 39 45 8

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

U Gypsum Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 11 12 0 0 15

PP 52 43 31 49 48 39

Percentages P A PA 37 0 37 41 4 46 53 4 57 39 12 51 42 10 52 39 7 46

NS 1 0 0 0 0 0

U 6 5 6 0 0 6

PP 35 20 15 25 29 16

P 25 19 26 20 25 16

Ns A 0 2 2 6 6 3

100 80 60 46 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 37 57 51 52 46

PA 25 21 28 26 31 19

NS 1 0 0 0 0 0

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 41 19 22 2 0 0 33 5 0 1 5 28

% Prof. or Above 46 63 32 X X X 42 X X X X 36

% Below 54 37 68 X X X 58 X X X X 64

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
63 37 54 68 58 64

20 0

46 32 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

42 X
Asian

36 X X
HwPacIs

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 148

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Gypsum Elem 0 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 0 23

PP 16 183

P 30 252

A 6 44

PA 36 296

NS 0 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 5 5 31 36 37 58 50 48

31 58 12 69 36 50 37 48 9 9 58 57

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

12 9

9 0 1 1

U Gypsum Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 2 3 2 2 0 0

PP 36 38 49 54 40 31

Percentages P A PA 52 10 62 55 5 59 47 2 49 42 2 44 53 7 60 58 12 69

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 2 1 1 0 0

PP 15 25 22 28 23 16

P 22 36 21 22 30 30

Ns A 4 3 1 1 4 6

100 80 62 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 59 49 44 60 69

PA 26 39 22 23 34 36

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 52 27 25 0 0 0 35 16 0 1 2 31

% Prof. or Above 69 74 64 X X X 57 100 X X X 58

% Below 31 26 36 X X X 43 0 X X X 42

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60
31 26 36 43

0 42

100

40 20 0

69

74

64

57

58

X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 149

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Gypsum Elem 4 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 2 34

PP 16 124

P 23 204

A 16 142

PA 39 346

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
4 7 7 0 0 0 40 40 41 28 25 28 28 31 20

28 40 28 68 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

0

U Gypsum Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 11 8 0 2 11 4

PP 37 34 27 25 26 28

Percentages P A PA 33 20 52 42 16 58 46 27 73 33 40 73 45 19 64 40 28 68

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 5 4 0 1 5 2

PP 17 17 15 13 12 16

P 15 21 26 17 21 23

Ns A 9 8 15 21 9 16

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 52 58 73 73 64 68

PA 24 29 41 38 30 39

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 57 27 30 0 0 0 37 18 0 2 6 31

% Prof. or Above 68 74 63 X X X 68 72 X X X 61

% Below 32 26 37 X X X 32 28 X X X 39

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

32

26 37

32

28 39

68

74 63

68

72 61

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 150

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Gypsum Elem 7 Eagle County Re 50 8 Colorado 8

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 3 44

PP 12 120

P 19 249

A 7 115

PA 26 364

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
7 8 8 0 0 0 29 23 20 17 22 46 47 43 28

29 46 17 63 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

U Gypsum Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 4 8 0 3 7

PP 27 28 29 29 23 29

Percentages P A PA 48 15 63 46 22 67 39 24 63 47 24 71 48 25 73 46 17 63

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 7 2 4 0 2 3

PP 18 13 14 15 14 12

P 32 21 19 24 29 19

Ns A 10 10 12 12 15 7

100 80 63 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 67 71 73 63

PA 42 31 31 36 44 26

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

63

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 41 19 22 2 0 0 33 5 0 1 5 28

% Prof. or Above 63 63 64 X X X 61 X X X X 54

% Below 37 37 36 X X X 39 X X X X 46

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
63 63 64 61 54 37 37 36 39 46

20 0
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 151

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Gypsum Elem 4 Eagle County Re 50 9 Colorado 9

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 2 44

PP 13 137

P 24 196

A 13 129

PA 37 325

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
46

25 46 25 71 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

40 20
4 9 9

39 36 25 27 25 29 25 25

0

0

0

0

U Gypsum Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 2 5 2 10 0 4

PP 21 34 31 33 44 25

Percentages P A PA 50 26 76 42 20 62 42 24 67 35 23 58 39 18 56 46 25 71

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 3 1 5 0 2

PP 9 22 14 17 25 13

P 21 27 19 18 22 24

Ns A 11 13 11 12 10 13

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 76 62 67 58 56 71

PA 32 40 30 30 32 37

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 52 27 25 0 0 0 35 16 0 1 2 31

% Prof. or Above 71 70 72 X X X 66 88 X X X 68

% Below 29 30 28 X X X 34 13 X X X 32

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

13 29 30 28 34 32

88 71 70 72 66 68

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 152

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Gypsum Elem

U 4

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 2 59

PP 23 185

P 22 187

A 6 75

PA 28 262

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
43

43 42 11 53

Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

40 20
4 12 14

36 37

42

37 35 11 15 13 0 0 0

0

U Gypsum Elem

PP

P Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

A Colorado

NS

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

Gypsum Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 7 14 9 15 4 4

PP 62 42 40 52 61 43

Percentages P A PA 21 10 31 39 5 44 44 7 51 21 12 33 30 4 33 42 11 53

NS 0 0 0 0 2 0

U 3 9 4 8 2 2

PP 26 27 18 27 35 23

P 9 25 20 11 17 22

Ns A 4 3 3 6 2 6

100 80 60 44 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 31 51 33 33 53

PA 13 28 23 17 19 28

NS 0 0 0 0 1 0

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Gypsum Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 53 27 26 0 0 0 35 17 0 1 3 31

% Prof. or Above 53 56 50 X X X 37 88 X X X 35

% Below 47 44 50 X X X 63 12 X X X 65

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
53 56 47 44 50 63

12

65

88 50 37 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0

35 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 153

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Homestake Peak
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
79 66 66
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Homestake Peak Eagle County Re 50

U 9 8

PP 9

P

A PA NS 82 72 73 0 0 0

U 3 38

PP 3 98

P 26 322

A 1 32

PA 27 354

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
20 17 9 8 10 9 3 7 7 0 0 0

79 3

20 66 7

Colorado 10 17 66 7

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 21 7 21 26 12 9

PP 17 32 38 39 25 9

Percentages P A PA 63 0 63 61 0 61 41 0 41 35 0 35 54 8 62 79 3 82

NS 0 0 0 0 2 0

U 5 2 7 6 6 3

PP 4 9 13 9 13 3

P 15 17 14 8 28 26

Ns A 0 0 0 0 4 1

100 82 80 63 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 61 41 35 62

PA 15 17 14 8 32 27

NS 0 0 0 0 1 0

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 33 15 18 1 0 1 12 19 0 0 5 7

% Prof. or Above 82 X 78 X X X X 95 X X X X

% Below 18 X 22 X X X X 5 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
18 22 5

80 60
95

40 20 0

82

78

X
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 154

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 58 67 68 0 0 0

U 9 51

PP 15 122

P 32 332

A 1 17

PA 33 349

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63 63

Homestake Peak 16 26 56 2 Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

60 40 20 0
16 26 23 21 10 11

56

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

2

3

5

0

0

0

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 21 0 26 18 16

PP 23 31 40 30 24 26

Percentages P A PA 67 0 67 48 0 48 57 3 60 44 0 44 55 3 58 56 2 58

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 3 6 0 7 7 9

PP 7 9 12 8 9 15

P 20 14 17 12 21 32

Ns A 0 0 1 0 1 1

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 67 48

PA 20 14 18 12 22 33

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

60 44

58

58

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 57 33 24 1 4 1 29 22 0 0 8 31

% Prof. or Above 58 67 46 X X X 38 91 X X X 35

% Below 42 33 54 X X X 62 9 X X X 65

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

100 80 60 40
58 42 33 54 62

9

65

91 67 46 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0

38 X
Asian

35 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 155

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 0

U 10 42

PP 13 89

P 16 329

A 5 44

PA 21 373

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65 62

Homestake Peak 23 30 36 11 48 Eagle County Re 50 8 18 65 9 8 74 70

60 40
23 36 30 8 11 18 18 11 9 8 0 1 0

Colorado 11 18 62

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

20 0

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 23 7 0 0 12 23

PP 41 29 28 30 17 30

Percentages P A PA 36 0 36 61 0 61 60 12 72 63 7 70 63 7 71 36 11 48

NS 0 4 0 0 0 0

U 5 2 0 0 5 10

PP 9 8 7 9 7 13

Ns P A 8 0 17 0 15 3 19 2 26 3 16 5

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 36 61 48 72 70 71

PA 8 17 18 21 29 21

NS 0 1 0 0 0 0

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 44 26 18 0 0 1 26 17 0 0 7 20

% Prof. or Above 48 58 33 X X X 38 65 X X X 35

% Below 52 42 67 X X X 62 35 X X X 65

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

52

42 67 62

35 65

48

58 33 X
AmIndAK

65 38 X
Asian

35 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 156

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Homestake Peak 9 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 8

P

A

PA NS 1 1 1

U 7 30

PP 8 66

P 54 297

A 10 72

PA 64 369

NS 1 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
9 6 8 10 14 18 13 15 11 1 1 1 68

10 68 13 80 14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73

63 62

4938 11309 38862 7097 45959 845

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U 5 9

PP 16 10

Percentages P A PA 70 9 79 68 13 80

NS 0 1

U 4 7

PP 13 8

P 57 54

Ns A 7 10

100 80 60 40 20 0 2012 Year 2013 79 80

PA 64 64

NS 0 1

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 80 28 52 0 3 0 29 45 0 3 12 20

% Prof. or Above 80 75 83 X X X 62 89 X X X 60

% Below 19 21 17 X X X 34 11 X X X 35

% NS 1 4 0 X X X 3 0 X X X 5

Percentage of Students P + A

100
19 17 21 34

11 35

80 60 40 20 0
Total

80

75

83 62

89 60

X
Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 157

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Homestake Peak Eagle County Re 50

U 8 9

PP

P

A PA NS 78 74 68 0 1 1

U 6 44

PP 12 79

P 56 324

A 6 46

PA 62 370

NS 0 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
8 9 11 15 16 21 8 9 9 0 1 1 70

15 70 8 16 65 9

65

59

Colorado 11 21 59 9

6815 13070 36650 5501 42151 359

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U 9 8

PP 13 15

Percentages P A PA 58 21 79 70 8 78

NS 0 0

U 7 6

PP 10 12

P 46 56

Ns A 17 6

100 80 60 40 20 0 2012 Year 2013 79 78

PA 63 62

NS 0 0

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 80 37 43 1 3 2 30 44 0 0 7 27

% Prof. or Above 78 81 74 X X X 63 89 X X X 59

% Below 23 19 26 X X X 37 11 X X X 41

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
23 19 26 37

11 41

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

78

81

89 74 63 59

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 158

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Homestake Peak

U 6

PP

P

A

PA NS 1 0 1

U 4 43

PP 11 84

P 42 273

A 12 39

PA 54 312

NS 1 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
6 10 10 16 19 23 17 9 8 1 0 1 60 62 59

16 60 17 77 9 8 71 67

Eagle County Re 50 10 19 62 Colorado 10 23 59

5882 13891 35960 4891 40851 450

0

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U 12 6

PP 17 16

Percentages P A PA 63 8 71 60 17 77

NS 1 1

U 9 4

PP 13 11

P 49 42

Ns A 6 12

100 80 60 40 20 0 2012 Year 2013 71 77

PA 55 54

NS 1 1

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 70 39 31 0 1 0 25 42 0 2 8 14

% Prof. or Above 77 85 68 X X X 48 93 X X X X

% Below 21 15 29 X X X 48 7 X X X X

% NS 1 0 3 X X X 4 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
21 15 29 48 7

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female

77

85 68 48 X
Male AmIndAK

93

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 159

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Homestake Peak

U X

PP X

P X

A X 0

PA NS X 61 X 0 1

U X 4

PP X 3

P X 11

A X 0

PA NS X 11 X 0 8

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
61

Eagle County Re 50 22 17 61

60 40
22

51

Colorado 15 20 51 13 64

181 234 601 151 752

20 0
X

15 X

17 20 X X 0

13 X 0 1

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Years 2008 2009 2011 2013

U X X X X

PP X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X

U X X X X

PP X X X X

P X X X X

Ns A X X X X

PA X X X X

NS X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 Year X 2011 X 2013

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 160

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Homestake Peak Eagle County Re 50

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 35 X X 0

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 38 X X 0

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X X X X X X X X 4 X X 0 31 33 31

Colorado 31 33 31 4

34 36 34 4

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 161

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Homestake Peak 6 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6

P

A PA NS 50 50 51 3 0 0

U 2 28

PP 13 211

P 13 218

A 3 27

PA 16 245

NS 1 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
41 43 43 41 45 43

41 41 9 43 45 6 43 43 8

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

40 20
6 6 6 9 8

6

3

0

0

0

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 12 4 6 13 8 6

PP 54 56 56 63 49 41

Percentages P A PA 35 0 35 41 0 41 32 6 38 21 4 25 38 6 43 41 9 50

NS 0 0 0 0 0 3

U 3 1 2 3 4 2

PP 14 15 19 15 26 13

P 9 11 11 5 20 13

Ns A 0 0 2 1 3 3

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 35 41 38 25 43 50

PA 9 11 13 6 23 16

NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 32 14 18 1 0 1 12 18 0 0 5 7

% Prof. or Above 50 X 39 X X X X 61 X X X X

% Below 47 X 61 X X X X 33 X X X X

% NS 3 X 0 X X X X 6 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
61 47 33 61

20 0

50 39 X
Total Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 162

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 46 51 53 0 0 0

U 6 33

PP 25 221

P 24 228

A 2 39

PA 26 267

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
11 7 44 42 39 42 44 45

Homestake Peak 11 44 42 4 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 6 7 42 44 7 39 45 8

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

6

4

7

8 0 0 0

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 10 0 15 5 11

PP 53 52 47 48 61 44

Percentages P A PA 37 7 43 34 3 38 40 13 53 30 7 37 32 3 34 42 4 46

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 3 0 4 2 6

PP 16 15 14 13 23 25

P 11 10 12 8 12 24

Ns A 2 1 4 2 1 2

100 80 60 43 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 38 53 46 37 34

PA 13 11 16 10 13 26

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 57 33 24 1 4 1 29 22 0 0 8 31

% Prof. or Above 46 61 25 X X X 21 77 X X X 23

% Below 54 39 75 X X X 79 23 X X X 77

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
23

80
54

39 75 77

60 40
61

79

77 46 25 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

21
Hisp Wht

23 X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 163

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Homestake Peak 9 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5

P

A PA NS 36 58 57 0 1 1

U 4 23

PP 24 183

P 15 252

A 1 44

PA 16 296

NS 0 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
9 55 36 37 34 50 48

55 34 2 36 50 9 37 48 9

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

5

5

2

9

9 0 1 1

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 4 0 0 5 9

PP 55 21 36 37 44 55

Percentages P A PA 36 0 36 64 7 71 52 12 64 57 7 63 39 10 49 34 2 36

NS 0 4 0 0 2 0

U 2 1 0 0 2 4

PP 12 6 9 11 18 24

P 8 18 13 17 16 15

Ns A 0 2 3 2 4 1

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 36 71

PA 8 20 16 19 20 16

NS 0 1 0 0 1 0

64

63 49 36

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 44 26 18 0 0 1 26 17 0 0 7 20

% Prof. or Above 36 50 17 X X X 27 53 X X X 25

% Below 64 50 83 X X X 73 47 X X X 75

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
64 50 83 73 47 75

60 40 20 0
Total Female

50 36 17
Male

53 27 X
AmIndAK

25 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 164

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Homestake Peak 6 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 4

P

A

PA NS 1 1 1

U 5 14

PP 26 153

P 39 258

A 9 40

PA 48 298

NS 1 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
6 3 4 33 33 38 49 55 49

33 49 11 60 33 55 38 49 9 9 64 58

2629 23740 30751 5578 36329 355

11 9

9 1 1 1

0

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U 1 6

PP 38 33

Percentages P A PA 53 7 60 49 11 60

NS 0 1

U 1 5

PP 31 26

P 43 39

Ns A 6 9

100 80 60 40 20 0 2012 Year 2013 60 60

PA 49 48

NS 0 1

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 80 28 52 0 3 0 29 45 0 3 12 20

% Prof. or Above 60 64 58 X X X 38 71 X X X 40

% Below 39 32 42 X X X 59 29 X X X 55

% NS 1 4 0 X X X 3 0 X X X 5

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
60 64 58 38 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

39

32

29 42 59 55

71 40 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

20 0
X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 165

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Homestake Peak 0 Eagle County Re 50 2 Colorado 3

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 0 11

PP 22 144

P 45 274

A 13 64

PA 58 338

NS 0 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 2 3 28 29 35 16 13 15 0 1 1 56 55 47

28 56 16 73 29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61

1739 21930 29033 9265 38298 431

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U 0 0

PP 24 28

Percentages P A PA 58 19 76 56 16 73

NS 0 0

U 0 0

PP 19 22

P 46 45

Ns A 15 13

100 80 60 40 20 0 2012 Year 2013 76 73

PA 61 58

NS 0 0

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 80 37 43 1 3 2 30 44 0 0 7 27

% Prof. or Above 73 76 70 X X X 60 84 X X X 56

% Below 28 24 30 X X X 40 16 X X X 44

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
28 24 16 30 40 44

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female

73

76

84 70 60 56

X
Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 166

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Homestake Peak 1 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 3

P

A

PA NS 1 0 1

U 1 19

PP 19 151

P 38 240

A 11 30

PA 49 270

NS 1 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
1 4 3 34 27 16 7 9 1 0 1 40 54 54 47

27 54 16 70 34 54 40 47 7 9 61 56

1836 24683 28434 5641 34075 485

0

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U 0 1

PP 41 27

Percentages P A PA 50 8 58 54 16 70

NS 1 1

U 0 1

PP 32 19

P 39 38

Ns A 6 11

100 80 60 40 20 0 2012 Year 2013 58 70

PA 45 49

NS 1 1

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 70 39 31 0 1 0 25 42 0 2 8 14

% Prof. or Above 70 72 68 X X X 52 79 X X X X

% Below 29 28 29 X X X 44 21 X X X X

% NS 1 0 3 X X X 4 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

29

28

21 29 44

70

72

79 68 52

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 167

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Homestake Peak

U X

PP X

P X

A X 0

PA NS X 17 X 0 0

U X 6

PP X 9

P X 3

A X 0

PA NS X 3 X 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 33 20 X 24 17 X X 0 50 37 18 X 0 0

Eagle County Re 50 33 50 17

Colorado 20 24 37 18 56

236 282 442 218 660

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)

Years 2008 2011 2013

U X X X

PP X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X

U X X X

PP X X X

P X X X

Ns A X X X

PA X X X

NS X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2011 Year X 2013

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 168

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish) (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Homestake Peak Eagle County Re 50

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 19 X X 6

U X X

PP X X

P X X

A PA NS X X X X 20 X X 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
44

Colorado 44 32 18 1

47 35 19 1

40 20 0
X X X X

32 18 X X X X 1 X X 6

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (Spanish)

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 169

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Homestake Peak 6 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 2 34

PP 10 124

P 12 204

A 10 142

PA 22 346

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
6 7 7 0 0 0 29 35 25 20 40 41 29 28 31

29 35 29 65 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

0

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 14 7 15 12 9 6

PP 32 25 29 24 17 29

Percentages P A PA 29 25 54 50 18 68 32 24 56 48 16 64 47 23 70 35 29 65

NS 0 0 0 0 4 0

U 4 2 5 3 5 2

PP 9 7 10 6 9 10

P 8 14 11 12 25 12

Ns A 7 5 8 4 12 10

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 54 68 56 70

PA 15 19 19 16 37 22

NS 0 0 0 0 2 0

64

65

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 34 15 19 1 0 1 14 18 0 0 5 9

% Prof. or Above 65 X 63 X X X X 78 X X X X

% Below 35 X 37 X X X X 22 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
22

80 60 40

35

37

78 65 63

20 0
Total

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 170

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 9 44

PP 14 120

P 25 249

A 12 115

PA 37 364

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
42 47

Homestake Peak 15 23 42 20 62 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 8 8 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

43 28 20 22 0 0 0

40 20 0
15 8 8 23 23 20

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 17 7 22 16 15

PP 37 24 23 33 24 23

Percentages P A PA 47 7 53 45 14 59 30 40 70 15 30 44 39 18 58 42 20 62

NS 0 0 0 0 3 0

U 3 5 2 6 6 9

PP 11 7 7 9 9 14

P 14 13 9 4 15 25

Ns A 2 4 12 8 7 12

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 53 59 44 70 58 62

PA 16 17 21 12 22 37

NS 0 0 0 0 1 0

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 60 33 27 1 3 1 33 22 0 0 8 34

% Prof. or Above 62 79 41 X X X 45 86 X X X 47

% Below 38 21 59 X X X 55 14 X X X 53

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
21

14 53

80 60 40

38 59 55

79 62 41 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

86 47 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

20 0

45 X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 171

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 7

PA NS 48 0 0 0

U 9 44

PP 14 137

P 18 196

A 3 129

PA 21 325

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
20 9 9 32 41 39 36 27 25 7 0 25 29

Homestake Peak 20 32 41 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 9 9

27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

0

0

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 11 12 7 17 20

PP 41 29 32 17 29 32

Percentages P A PA 45 5 50 39 21 61 32 24 56 43 33 77 34 20 54 41 7 48

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 2 3 3 2 7 9

PP 9 8 8 5 12 14

P 10 11 8 13 14 18

Ns A 1 6 6 10 8 3

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 61 50 56 77 54

PA 11 17 14 23 22 21

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

48

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 44 26 18 0 0 1 26 17 0 0 7 20

% Prof. or Above 48 54 39 X X X 38 65 X X X 35

% Below 52 46 61 X X X 62 35 X X X 65

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
65 35 52 46 61 62 65

20 0

48

54 39 X X
Asian

38 X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

35 X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 172

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 0

U 11 45

PP 23 117

P 24 177

A 22 126

PA 46 303

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
14 10 12 0 1 0 29 30 38 35 28 27 27

Homestake Peak 14 29 30 28 58 Eagle County Re 50 10 25 38 27 65 Colorado 12 26 35 27 62

7457 16200 22056 17049 39105 288

25 26

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U 7 14

PP 36 29

Percentages P A PA 35 22 57 30 28 58

Ns NS 0 0 U 6 11 PP 29 23 P 28 24 A 18 22 PA 46 46 NS 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2012 Year 2013 57 58

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 80 28 52 0 3 0 29 45 0 3 12 20

% Prof. or Above 58 39 67 X X X 28 71 X X X 40

% Below 43 61 33 X X X 72 29 X X X 60

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
58 67 39 28 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

43 61

33

29 60 72

71 40 X
Asian

20 0

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 173

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 11 66

PP 22 128

P 20 151

A 27 147

PA 47 298

NS 0 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
14 13 14 0 1 1 28 26 30 30 28 34 29 27

Homestake Peak 14 28 25 34 59 Eagle County Re 50 13 26 30 29 60 Colorado 14 30 28 27 55

8842 18935 17406 16893 34299 327

25

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U 13 14

PP 35 28

Percentages P A PA 28 25 53 25 34 59

Ns NS 0 0 U 10 11 PP 28 22 P 22 20 A 20 27 PA 42 47 NS 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2012 Year 2013 53 59

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 80 37 43 1 3 2 30 44 0 0 7 27

% Prof. or Above 59 65 53 X X X 33 80 X X X 22

% Below 41 35 47 X X X 67 20 X X X 78

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
20

80 60 40

41

35 47 67 78

80 59 65 53 33 22 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0
X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 174

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 1 1 1

U 12 75

PP 20 124

P 22 131

A 15 108

PA 37 239

NS 1 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
17 17 19 29 28 29 31 30 29

Homestake Peak 17 29 31 21 53 Eagle County Re 50 17 28 30 24 54 Colorado 19 29 29 23 51

11577 17668 17463 13977 31440 385

21 24 23 1 1 1

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U 24 17

PP 35 29

Percentages P A PA 26 15 41 31 21 53

Ns NS 0 1 U 19 12 PP 27 20 P 20 22 A 12 15 PA 32 37 NS 0 1

100 80 60 41 40 20 0 2012 Year 2013 53

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 70 39 31 0 1 0 25 42 0 2 8 14

% Prof. or Above 53 49 58 X X X 16 71 X X X X

% Below 46 51 39 X X X 80 29 X X X X

% NS 1 0 3 X X X 4 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
53 29 46 51 39

80

71 49 58

20 0
Total

X
Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

16
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 175

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 5

PA NS 34 0 0 0

U 10 59

PP 19 185

P 13 187

A 2 75

PA 15 262

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
43

Homestake Peak 23 43 30

Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

40
23

36 37 30

37 35 15 13 5 0 0 0

20 0

12 14

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 32 11 8 7 22 23

PP 50 43 40 40 37 43

Percentages P A PA 14 5 18 43 4 46 48 4 52 40 13 53 27 12 39 30 5 34

NS 0 0 0 0 2 0

U 7 3 2 2 9 10

PP 11 12 10 12 15 19

Ns P A 3 1 12 1 12 1 12 4 11 5 13 2

100 80 60 40 20 0 18 46 52 53 39 34

PA 4 13 13 16 16 15

NS 0 0 0 0 1 0

2008

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 44 26 18 0 0 1 26 17 0 0 7 20

% Prof. or Above 34 35 33 X X X 19 59 X X X 10

% Below 66 65 67 X X X 81 41 X X X 90

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
66 65 67 81 90 41

60 40

59

20 0

34

35

33 X X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

19
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

10
ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 176

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 1 0 1

U 8 80

PP 17 107

P 37 200

A 7 53

PA 44 253

NS 1 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
18 21 11 24 24 27 10 12 9 1 0 1 53 45 43

Homestake Peak 11 24 53 10 63 Eagle County Re 50 18 24 45 12 57 Colorado 21 27 43 9 52

12703 16350 26331 5232 31563 458

U

PP

Homestake Peak

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

Homestake Peak Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U 24 11

PP 33 24

Percentages P A PA 38 4 42 53 10 63

NS 0 1

U 19 8

PP 26 17

Ns P A 30 3 37 7

100 80 63 60 42 40 20 0 2012 Year 2013

PA 33 44

NS 0 1

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Homestake Peak Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 70 39 31 0 1 0 25 42 0 2 8 14

% Prof. or Above 63 62 65 X X X 32 79 X X X X

% Below 36 38 32 X X X 64 21 X X X X

% NS 1 0 3 X X X 4 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
21

80 60 40

36

38

32 64

79 63 62 65 32 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0
X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 177

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

June Creek Elementary School
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 60 72 73 0 0 0

U 10 38

PP 10 98

P 28 322

A 2 32

PA 30 354

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
66 66

June Creek Elementary School 20 20 56 4 Eagle County Re 50 8 20 66 7

60 40 20 0
20 8 10 20 20 17

56

Colorado 10 17 66 7

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

4

7

7 0 0 0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

June Creek Elementary School

Eagle County Re 50

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading

Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 24 15 13 21 20

PP 26 27 38 19 20

Percentages P A PA 50 0 50 54 4 58 47 2 49 49 11 60 56 4 60

NS 0 0 0 0 0

U 8 4 6 10 10

PP 9 7 17 9 10

Ns P A 17 0 14 1 21 1 23 5 28 2

PA 17 15 22 28 30

NS 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2009 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 58 50 49 60 60

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 50 18 32 1 1 0 37 11 0 0 5 36

% Prof. or Above 60 44 69 X X X 54 X X X X 56

% Below 40 56 31 X X X 46 X X X X 44

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
60 69 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

40 56

31 46 44

54

56

20 0

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 178

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 48 67 68 0 0 0

U 7 51

PP 17 122

P 21 332

A 1 17

PA 22 349

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63 63

June Creek Elementary School 15 37 46 2 Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

60
46

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

40 20 0
15 10 11

37 23 21 2 3 5 0 0 0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

June Creek Elementary School

Eagle County Re 50

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading

Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 14 13 17 21 15

Percentages PP P A PA 50 32 0 32 18 67 0 67 31 49 3 51 33 42 3 45 37 46 2 48

NS 5 3 0 0 0

U 3 5 6 7 7

PP 11 7 11 11 17

Ns P A 7 0 26 0 17 1 14 1 21 1

PA 7 26 18 15 22

NS 1 1 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2009 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 32 67 51 45 48

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 46 17 29 0 0 0 28 18 0 0 7 26

% Prof. or Above 48 41 52 X X X 29 78 X X X 27

% Below 52 59 48 X X X 71 22 X X X 73

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
22

80 60 40 20 0

52

59

48 71 73

78 48 41 52 29 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

27 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 179

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 50 74 70 3 1 0

U 8 42

PP 7 89

P 14 329

A 2 44

PA 16 373

NS 1 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65 62

June Creek Elementary School 25 22 44 6 Eagle County Re 50 8 18 65 9

60
44

Colorado 11 18 62 8

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

40
25 22 8 11

20 0

18 18 6 9 8 3 1 0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

June Creek Elementary School

Eagle County Re 50

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading

Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 20 19 18 21 25

Percentages PP P A PA 20 60 0 60 27 42 8 50 18 64 0 64 30 42 6 48 22 44 6 50

NS 0 4 0 0 3

U 5 5 6 7 8

PP 5 7 6 10 7

Ns P A 15 0 11 2 21 0 14 2 14 2

PA 15 13 21 16 16

NS 0 1 0 0 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2009 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 60 50 64 48 50

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 32 11 21 2 0 0 25 5 0 0 6 25

% Prof. or Above 50 X 52 X X X 40 X X X X 40

% Below 47 X 43 X X X 56 X X X X 56

% NS 3 X 5 X X X 4 X X X X 4

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total

47

43 56 56

50 X
Female

52 40 X
Male AmIndAK

40 X X
HwPacIs

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 180

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 41 50 51 0 0 0

U 7 28

PP 22 211

P 17 218

A 3 27

PA 20 245

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
45 43 43 45 43 35 14 6 6 6 6 8 0 0 0

June Creek Elementary School 14 45 35 6 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 6 6 43 45 6 43 43 8

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

40 20 0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

June Creek Elementary School

Eagle County Re 50

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing

Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 20 11 14 13 14

PP 57 56 51 48 45

Percentages P A PA 20 3 23 33 0 33 35 0 35 35 4 39 35 6 41

NS 0 0 0 0 0

U 7 3 6 6 7

PP 20 15 22 22 22

P 7 9 15 16 17

Ns A 1 0 0 2 3

PA 8 9 15 18 20

NS 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 23 20 0 2009 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 33 35 39 41

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 49 18 31 1 1 0 36 11 0 0 4 35

% Prof. or Above 41 39 42 X X X 36 X X X X 40

% Below 59 61 58 X X X 64 X X X X 60

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
59 61 58 64 60

60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

41

39

42 X
AmIndAK

36 X
Asian

40 X X
HwPacIs

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 181

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 5 33

PP 19 221

P 16 228

A 6 39

PA 22 267

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
11 7 41 42 39 44 45 35 13

June Creek Elementary School 11 41 35 13 48 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 6 7 42 44 39 45 7 8 51 53

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

6

7

8 0 0 0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

June Creek Elementary School

Eagle County Re 50

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing

Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 32 18 11 18 11

PP 55 54 49 45 41

Percentages P A PA 14 0 14 23 3 26 34 6 40 36 0 36 35 13 48

NS 0 3 0 0 0

U 7 7 4 6 5

PP 12 21 17 15 19

P 3 9 12 12 16

Ns A 0 1 2 0 6

PA 3 10 14 12 22

NS 0 1 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 26 20 0 14 2009 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 40 36 48

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 46 17 29 0 0 0 28 18 0 0 7 26

% Prof. or Above 48 41 52 X X X 36 67 X X X 35

% Below 52 59 48 X X X 64 33 X X X 65

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

33 52 59 48 64 65

67 48 41 52 36 X
AmIndAK

35 X X
Mult

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 182

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 47 58 57 3 1 1

U 6 23

PP 10 183

P 15 252

A 0 44

PA 15 296

NS 1 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
19 5 5 9 0 9 3 1 1 31 36 37 47 50 48

June Creek Elementary School 19 31 47 0 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 5 5 36 50 9 37 48 9

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

June Creek Elementary School

Eagle County Re 50

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing

Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 16 15 6 9 19

PP 44 50 39 42 31

Percentages P A PA 36 4 40 23 4 27 52 3 55 45 3 48 47 0 47

NS 0 8 0 0 3

U 4 4 2 3 6

PP 11 13 13 14 10

P 9 6 17 15 15

Ns A 1 1 1 1 0

PA 10 7 18 16 15

NS 0 2 0 0 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2009 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 40 27 55 48 47

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 32 11 21 2 0 0 25 5 0 0 6 25

% Prof. or Above 47 X 52 X X X 40 X X X X 40

% Below 50 X 43 X X X 56 X X X X 56

% NS 3 X 5 X X X 4 X X X X 4

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
50 43 56 56

60 40 20 0
Total

47 X
Female

52 40 X
Male AmIndAK

40 X X
HwPacIs

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 183

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 7 34

PP 14 124

P 19 204

A 9 142

PA 28 346

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
14 7 7 0 0 0 39 40 41 29 25 28 31 20 18

June Creek Elementary School 14 29 39 18 57 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 7 7 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

June Creek Elementary School

Eagle County Re 50

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math

Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 17 11 19 15 14

PP 34 33 35 30 29

Percentages P A PA 34 14 49 30 26 56 26 21 47 20 35 54 39 18 57

NS 0 0 0 0 0

U 6 3 8 7 7

PP 12 9 15 14 14

P 12 8 11 9 19

Ns A 5 7 9 16 9

PA 17 15 20 25 28

NS 0 0 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2009 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 49 56 47 54 57

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 49 18 31 1 1 0 36 11 0 0 4 35

% Prof. or Above 57 50 61 X X X 53 X X X X 54

% Below 43 50 39 X X X 47 X X X X 46

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
57 61 50 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

43

39 50

47

46

53

54

20 0

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 184

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 6 44

PP 14 120

P 13 249

A 13 115

PA 26 364

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
13 8 8 0 0 0 30 23 20 28 47

June Creek Elementary School 13 30 28 28 57 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 8 8 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

43 28 22 28

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

June Creek Elementary School

Eagle County Re 50

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math

Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 27 10 6 21 13

PP 27 26 17 29 30

Percentages P A PA 41 5 45 46 18 64 51 26 77 24 26 50 28 28 57

NS 0 0 0 0 0

U 6 4 2 7 6

PP 6 10 6 10 14

P 9 18 18 8 13

Ns A 1 7 9 9 13

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 64 60 45 40 20 0 2009 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 50 57 77

PA 10 25 27 17 26

NS 0 0 0 0 0

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 46 17 29 0 0 0 28 18 0 0 7 26

% Prof. or Above 57 53 59 X X X 46 72 X X X 46

% Below 43 47 41 X X X 54 28 X X X 54

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
28

80 60 40

43

47

41 54 54

72 57 53 59 46 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0
X
Asian

46 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 185

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 3 0 0

U 11 44

PP 6 137

P 8 196

A 7 129

PA 15 325

NS 1 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
33 18 9 9 39 36 27 25 24 21 25 29 3

June Creek Elementary School 33 18 24 21 45 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 9 9 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

0

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

June Creek Elementary School

Eagle County Re 50

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math

Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 20 19 12 27 33

PP 36 46 24 15 18

Percentages P A PA 36 8 44 19 15 35 48 15 64 52 6 58 24 21 45

NS 0 0 0 0 3

U 5 5 4 9 11

PP 9 12 8 5 6

Ns P A 9 2 5 4 16 5 17 2 8 7

PA 11 9 21 19 15

NS 0 0 0 0 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 64 60 44 40 20 0 2009 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 35 58 45

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 33 12 21 2 0 0 26 5 0 0 6 26

% Prof. or Above 45 X 52 X X X 35 X X X X 35

% Below 52 X 43 X X X 62 X X X X 62

% NS 3 X 5 X X X 4 X X X X 4

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
52 43 62 62

60 40 20 0
Total

45 X
Female

52 35 X
Male AmIndAK

35 X X
HwPacIs

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Wht

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 186

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 9

PA NS 34 0 0 0

U 13 59

PP 8 185

P 8 187

A 3 75

PA 11 262

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
41

June Creek Elementary School 41 25 25

Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

40
25

36 37 25 12 14

37 35 15 13 0 0 0

20 0

9

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

June Creek Elementary School

Eagle County Re 50

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

June Creek Elementary School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science

Years 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 32 19 27 24 41

Percentages PP P A PA 52 16 0 16 58 15 4 19 52 18 3 21 48 21 6 27 25 25 9 34

NS 0 4 0 0 0

U 8 5 9 8 13

PP 13 15 17 16 8

Ns P A 4 0 4 1 6 1 7 2 8 3

PA 4 5 7 9 11

NS 0 1 0 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 16 19 21 27 34

2009

2010

2011 Year

2012

2013

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

June Creek Elementary School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 32 11 21 2 0 0 25 5 0 0 6 25

% Prof. or Above 34 X 43 X X X 20 X X X X 20

% Below 66 X 57 X X X 80 X X X X 80

% NS 0 X 0 X X X 0 X X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
66 57 80 80

60 40 20 0
Total

34 X
Female

43 X
Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

20
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

20
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 187

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

New America School
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP New America School X Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 7 X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 1 2

U X 20

PP X 85

P X 274

A X 46

PA X 320

NS X 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
64

20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70

60 40 20 0
X 5 20 21 7 X X

59

4132 12301 34821 6048 40869 1384

11 10 X X 1 2

P A Proficiency Levels New America School Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

P X X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X X

PA X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 188

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP New America School X Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 6 X

P X

A PA NS X X 49 49 X 2 2

U X 17

PP X 196

P X 178

A X 33

PA X 211

NS X 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
45 43 41 41

45 41 8 43 41 7

3790 24972 24307 4316 28623 1311

40 20 0
X 4 6 X X X 8 7 X

2

2

P A Proficiency Levels New America School Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

P X X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X X

PA X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 189

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State New America School

U X

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 29 34 X 1 2

U X 112

PP X 189

P X 109

A X 17

PA X 126

NS X 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
44

Eagle County Re 50 26 44 25 4 Colorado 29 35 28 6

17148 20459 16191 3725 19916 1162

40 20 0
X

26 29

35 25 28 4 6 2

X

X

X

X

1

P A Proficiency Levels New America School Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

P X X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

PA X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 190

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State New America School

U X

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 57 51 X 1 2

U X 95

PP X 83

P X 222

A X 26

PA X 248

NS X 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
22 25 51 43 19 21 X X X 6 8 X 1 2

Eagle County Re 50 22 19 51 6 Colorado 25 21 43 8

14953 12366 25278 4824 30102 1239

20 0
X

P A Proficiency Levels New America School Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

New America School Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

P X X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X X

PA X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

New America School Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 191

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Red Canyon High
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Canyon High X Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7 X

P X

A PA NS X X 69 68 X 1 1

U X 32

PP X 101

P X 286

A X 21

PA X 307

NS X 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65 64

23 65 5 24 64 4

60 40
23 24

4258 14768 39370 2272 41642 879

20 0
X

7

7 X X X

5

4

X

1

1

U

PP

Red Canyon High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

P X X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

PA X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 7 5 2 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 4

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 192

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Canyon High 0 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 7

P

A 0

PA NS 53 0 1 2

U 0 20

PP 9 85

P 10 274

A 0 46

PA 10 320

NS 0 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
64

47 53

20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70

60 40 20 0
0 5

59

47

53

4132 12301 34821 6048 40869 1384

20 21 7 0 11 10 0 1 2

U

PP

Red Canyon High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X 6 28 0

PP X X X 61 67 47

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X 22 6 28 6 0 6 53 0 53

NS X X X 6 0 0

U X X X 1 5 0

PP X X X 11 12 9

P X X X 4 1 10

Ns A X X X 1 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year 2011 6 2012 2013 28 53

PA X X X 5 1 10

NS X X X 1 0 0

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 19 6 13 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 3 5

% Prof. or Above 53 X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below 47 X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
53 47

20 0
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 193

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Canyon High X Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 3 X

P X

A PA NS X X 59 55 X 1 1

U X 15

PP X 164

P X 227

A X 34

PA X 261

NS X 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 3 3 X X X 37 40 51 47

37 51 8 40 47 8

1969 24862 28738 5144 33882 840

8

8 X 1 1

U

PP

Red Canyon High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

P X X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

PA X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 7 5 2 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 4

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 194

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

School, District and State U PP Red Canyon High 0 100 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 6 45 43

P 0

A PA NS 0 0 49 49 0 2 2

U 0 17

PP 19 196

P 0 178

A 0 33

PA 0 211

NS 0 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100

80 60
45 43 41 41

41 8 41 7

3790 24972 24307 4316 28623 1311

40 20 0
0 4 6 0 0 8 7 0

2

2

U

PP

Red Canyon High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X 11 17 0

PP X X X 72 72 100

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X 11 0 11 11 0 11 0 0 0

NS X X X 6 0 0

U X X X 2 3 0

PP X X X 13 13 19

P X X X 2 2 0

Ns A X X X 0 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year 2011 2012 11 11 0 2013

PA X X X 2 2 0

NS X X X 1 0 0

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 19 6 13 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 3 5

% Prof. or Above 0 X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below 100 X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X

80 60
100

40 20 0
0
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 195

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

100

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Red Canyon High

U X

PP X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 1 1

U X 122

PP X 170

P X 102

A X 46

PA X 148

NS X 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X X X X 38 28 30 30 23 24 10 15 X 1 1

Eagle County Re 50 28 38 23 10 33 Colorado 30 30 24 15 39

18263 18670 14741 9176 23917 692

U

PP

Red Canyon High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math (in percentages)

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

U X X X X X X

PP X X X X X X

P X X X X X X

Ns A X X X X X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year X 2011 X 2012 X 2013

PA X X X X X X

NS X X X X X X

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 7 5 2 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 4

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 196

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P 0

A PA NS 0 0 29 34 0 1 2

U 12 112

PP 7 189

P 0 109

A 0 17

PA 0 126

NS 0 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63

Red Canyon High 63 37

Eagle County Re 50 26 44 25 4 Colorado 29 35 28 6

60
44

17148 20459 16191 3725 19916 1162

40 20 0

37 26 29

35 25 28 4 6 2

0

0

0

1

U

PP

Red Canyon High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X 78 67 63

Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 6 0 6 33 0 0 0 37 0 0 0

NS X X X 0 0 0

U X X X 14 12 12

PP X X X 3 6 7

P X X X 1 0 0

Ns A X X X 0 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year 6 2011 0 2012 0 2013

PA X X X 1 0 0

NS X X X 0 0 0

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 19 6 13 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 3 5

% Prof. or Above 0 X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below 100 X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60
100

40 20 0
0
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 197

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 16 57 51 0 1 2

U 10 95

PP 6 83

P 3 222

A 0 26

PA 3 248

NS 0 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
22 25 53 32 19 21 16 0 6 8 0 1 2 51 43

Red Canyon High 53 32 16 0 Eagle County Re 50 22 19 51 6 Colorado 25 21 43 8

14953 12366 25278 4824 30102 1239

20 0 U

PP

Red Canyon High

P A Proficiency Levels Eagle County Re 50

NS Colorado

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

Red Canyon High Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X X 67 72 53

PP X X X 22 28 32

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X X X X 11 0 11 0 0 0 16 0 16

NS X X X 0 0 0

U X X X 12 13 10

PP X X X 4 5 6

P X X X 2 0 3

Ns A X X X 0 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2008 X 2009 X 2010 Year 2011 11 0 2012 2013 16

PA X X X 2 0 3

NS X X X 0 0 0

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

Red Canyon High Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 19 6 13 0 0 0 8 11 0 0 3 5

% Prof. or Above 16 X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below 84 X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20
16 84

0
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 198

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Red Hill Elementary
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U 5 8

PP

P

A PA NS 64 72 73 2 0 0

U 3 38

PP 16 98

P 34 322

A 1 32

PA 35 354

NS 1 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
62 66 66

29 62 2 20 66 7

60 40 20
5 8 10 29 20 17 2 7 7 2 0 0

Colorado 10 17 66 7

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 14 9 5 9 5

PP 26 17 19 20 20 29

Percentages P A PA 61 2 63 63 6 69 64 8 72 72 3 75 62 9 71 62 2 64

NS 2 0 0 0 0 2

U 6 13 6 3 6 3

PP 16 15 12 13 14 16

Ns P A 38 1 57 5 41 5 47 2 43 6 34 1

100 80 63 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 69 72 75 71

PA 39 62 46 49 49 35

NS 1 0 0 0 0 1

64

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 55 28 27 0 0 0 36 18 0 1 4 28

% Prof. or Above 64 82 44 X X X 56 83 X X X 54

% Below 35 18 52 X X X 44 17 X X X 46

% NS 2 0 4 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
18 17 44 52 46

80 60 40

35

82 64 56 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

83 54

20 0

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 199

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A PA NS 62 67 68 0 0 0

U 7 51

PP 16 122

P 37 332

A 0 17

PA 37 349

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
62 63 63

Red Hill Elementary 12 27 62 0 Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

60 40 20 0
12 10 11 0 3 27 23 21 5 0 0 0

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

P A Proficiency Levels Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 17 9 5 7 12

PP 23 15 18 30 28 27

Percentages P A PA 67 6 73 68 0 68 70 3 73 59 6 65 54 10 64 62 0 62

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 2 10 8 3 5 7

PP 12 9 17 19 19 16

Ns P A 35 3 41 0 64 3 37 4 36 7 37 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 73 68 73 65 64 62

PA 38 41 67 41 43 37

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 60 27 33 0 1 0 36 23 0 0 9 27

% Prof. or Above 62 74 52 X X X 50 78 X X X 48

% Below 38 26 48 X X X 50 22 X X X 52

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
26 22 48 50 52

80 60 40

38

74 62 52 50 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

78 48 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

20 0

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 200

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U 6 8

PP

P

A PA NS 69 74 70 0 1 0

U 4 42

PP 17 89

P 41 329

A 5 44

PA 46 373

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
61 65 62

25 61 7 18 65 9

60 40
25

Colorado 11 18 62 8

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

20
6

8 11

18 18 7 9 8 0 1 0

0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 6 13 12 13 6

PP 24 19 17 18 16 25

Percentages P A PA 67 6 73 63 13 76 68 2 70 59 11 70 55 17 72 61 7 69

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 2 3 8 11 8 4 PP 12 10 10 17 10 17 P 34 34 41 54 35 41 A 3 7 1 10 11 5 PA 37 41 42 64 46 46 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 73 76 70 70 72 69

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 67 32 35 1 0 0 36 30 0 0 6 20

% Prof. or Above 69 78 60 X X X 64 77 X X X 50

% Below 31 22 40 X X X 36 23 X X X 50

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

31

22 40 36

23 50

69

78 60 64

77 50 X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 201

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Hill Elementary 7 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6

P

A PA NS 40 50 51 0 0 0

U 4 28

PP 29 211

P 21 218

A 1 27

PA 22 245

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
7 53 43 43 38 45 43

53 38 2 43 45 6 43 43 8

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

6

6

2

6

8 0 0 0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 6 6 0 2 9 7

PP 42 44 44 36 49 53

Percentages P A PA 52 0 52 37 13 50 47 9 56 53 9 62 43 0 43 38 2 40

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 4 5 0 1 6 4

PP 26 40 28 24 34 29

P 32 33 30 35 30 21

Ns A 0 12 6 6 0 1

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 52 50 56 62 43 40

PA 32 45 36 41 30 22

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 55 28 27 0 0 0 37 18 0 0 4 28

% Prof. or Above 40 43 37 X X X 30 61 X X X 32

% Below 60 57 63 X X X 70 39 X X X 68

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
60 57 63 39 70 68

60 40

61

20 0

40

43

37 X X
Asian

30 X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

32 X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 202

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Hill Elementary 8 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7

P

A PA NS 43 51 53 2 0 0

U 5 33

PP 28 221

P 24 228

A 2 39

PA 26 267

NS 1 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
8 7 47

47 40 3 42 44 7 39 45 8

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

42 39

40

44 45

6

3

7

8

2

0

0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 2 8 5 3 6 8

PP 33 43 36 33 48 47

Percentages P A PA 50 15 65 45 3 48 46 13 59 48 16 63 43 3 46 40 3 43

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

U 1 5 5 2 4 5

PP 17 26 33 21 32 28

P 26 27 42 30 29 24

Ns A 8 2 12 10 2 2

100 80 65 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 48 59 63 46 43

PA 34 29 54 40 31 26

NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 60 27 33 0 1 0 36 23 0 0 9 27

% Prof. or Above 43 59 30 X X X 33 57 X X X 33

% Below 55 41 67 X X X 67 39 X X X 67

% NS 2 0 3 X X X 0 4 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
55 41 67 67 39 67

60 40
59

57 30 X X
Asian

20 0

43 X
BlkAfAm

33 X
Hisp Wht HwPacIs

33 X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Total

Female

Male

AmIndAK

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 203

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Hill Elementary 4 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5

P

A PA NS 55 58 57 4 1 1

U 3 23

PP 24 183

P 32 252

A 5 44

PA 37 296

NS 3 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
4 5 5 36 36 37 48 50 48

36 48 7 36 50 9 37 48 9

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

7

9

9

4

1

1

0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 2 2 3 6 4

PP 43 30 41 33 36 36

Percentages P A PA 43 10 53 61 6 67 51 7 57 52 12 64 39 19 58 48 7 55

NS 0 2 0 0 0 4

U 2 1 1 3 4 3

PP 22 16 25 30 23 24

P 22 33 31 48 25 32

Ns A 5 3 4 11 12 5

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 53 67 57

PA 27 36 35 59 37 37

NS 0 1 0 0 0 3

64

58

55

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 67 32 35 1 0 0 36 30 0 0 6 20

% Prof. or Above 55 63 49 X X X 39 77 X X X 20

% Below 40 31 49 X X X 58 17 X X X 80

% NS 4 6 3 X X X 3 7 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
55 63 49 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

17 40 31 49 58 80

77 39 X
Asian

20 0

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

20
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 204

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Hill Elementary 5 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

P

A

PA NS 2 0 0

U 3 34

PP 19 124

P 26 204

A 6 142

PA 32 346

NS 1 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
5 7 7 35 25 20 11 2 0 0 47

35 47 11 58 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

40 41 28 31

0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 12 3 0 6 5

PP 23 20 14 14 29 35

Percentages P A PA 52 16 68 49 19 68 48 34 83 47 39 86 50 16 66 47 11 58

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 2 U 6 11 2 0 4 3 PP 14 18 9 9 20 19 P 32 44 31 31 35 26 A 10 17 22 26 11 6 PA 42 61 53 57 46 32 NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

100 83 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 68 68

86 66 58

2011

2012

2013

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 55 28 27 0 0 0 37 18 0 0 4 28

% Prof. or Above 58 61 56 X X X 49 78 X X X 39

% Below 40 36 44 X X X 49 22 X X X 57

% NS 2 4 0 X X X 3 0 X X X 4

Percentage of Students P + A

100
22

80 60 40

40

36

44

49

57

78 58 61 56 49 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0
X
Asian

39 X X
Mult

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
IEP ELL

HwPacIs

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 205

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 7 44

PP 13 120

P 25 249

A 15 115

PA 40 364

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
42 47

Red Hill Elementary 12 22 42 25 67 Eagle County Re 50 Colorado 8 8 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

43 25 22 28 0 0 0

40 20 0
22 23 20 12 8 8

P A Proficiency Levels Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 2 8 9 6 7 12

PP 25 17 21 17 26 22

Percentages P A PA 57 17 74 60 15 75 46 25 71 49 27 76 43 24 66 42 25 67

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 5 8 4 5 7

PP 13 10 19 11 18 13

P 30 36 42 31 29 25

Ns A 9 9 23 17 16 15

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 74 75 71 76 66 67

PA 39 45 65 48 45 40

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 60 27 33 0 1 0 36 23 0 0 9 27

% Prof. or Above 67 78 58 X X X 53 87 X X X 52

% Below 33 22 42 X X X 47 13 X X X 48

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
22

13 42 47 48

80 60 40 20 0

33

78 67 58 53

87 52

X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 206

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Hill Elementary 6 Eagle County Re 50 9 Colorado 9

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 4 44

PP 24 137

P 30 196

A 9 129

PA 39 325

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
45

36 45 13 58 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

40 20
6 9 9

36 27 25

39 36 25 29 13 0 0 0

0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 10 4 7 12 8 6

PP 33 35 41 22 23 36

Percentages P A PA 33 24 57 38 22 60 39 13 52 34 33 66 42 27 69 45 13 58

Ns NS 0 2 0 0 0 0 U 5 2 4 11 5 4 PP 17 19 25 20 15 24 P 17 21 24 31 27 30 A 12 12 8 30 17 9 PA 29 33 32 61 44 39 NS 0 1 0 0 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 57 60 52 66 69 58

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 67 32 35 1 0 0 36 30 0 0 6 20

% Prof. or Above 58 53 63 X X X 44 77 X X X 25

% Below 42 47 37 X X X 56 23 X X X 75

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100
23

80 60 40

42

47

37 56 75

77 58 53 63 44 25 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0
X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 207

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Red Hill Elementary

U 7

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 5 59

PP 32 185

P 22 187

A 8 75

PA 30 262

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
7 12 14 48 36 37 33 37 35 12 15 13 0 0 0

48 33 12 45

Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

P A Proficiency Levels Red Hill Elementary Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

Red Hill Elementary Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 8 4 7 16 22 7

PP 53 47 52 47 20 48

Percentages P A PA 29 10 39 40 9 49 33 8 42 32 5 37 38 20 58 33 12 45

Ns NS 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 4 2 4 15 14 5 PP 27 26 31 43 13 32 P 15 22 20 29 24 22 A 5 5 5 5 13 8 PA 20 27 25 34 37 30 NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 39 58 49 42 45 37

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Red Hill Elementary Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 67 32 35 1 0 0 36 30 0 0 6 20

% Prof. or Above 45 38 51 X X X 25 70 X X X 10

% Below 55 63 49 X X X 75 30 X X X 90

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80
55 63 75 90 30 49

60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

70 45 51 38 25 X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

10
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 208

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Red Sandstone Elem
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U 0 8

PP

P

A PA NS 78 72 73 0 0 0

U 0 38

PP 11 98

P 36 322

A 2 32

PA 38 354

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 22 20 17 8 10 4 7 7 0 0 0 73 66 66

22 73 4 20 66 7

Colorado 10 17 66 7

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

P A Proficiency Levels Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 5 3 0 12 2 0

PP 27 9 8 15 11 22

Percentages P A PA 54 15 68 82 6 88 82 11 92 67 6 73 80 7 87 73 4 78

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 2 1 0 4 1 0

PP 11 3 3 5 5 11

P 22 28 31 22 37 36

Ns A 6 2 4 2 3 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 68 88 92 73

87 78

PA 28 30 35 24 40 38

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

2012

2013

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 49 31 18 0 1 1 14 32 0 1 1 6

% Prof. or Above 78 90 56 X X X X 91 X X X X

% Below 22 10 44 X X X X 9 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

100
22

10 44

9

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female

90 78 56

91

X
Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 209

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
80 63 63
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Red Sandstone Elem

U 4

PP

P

A PA NS 83 67 68 0 0 0

U 2 51

PP 6 122

P 37 332

A 1 17

PA 38 349

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
23 21

13 80 2

Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

20
4

10 11

13 2 3 5 0 0 0

0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 6 3 6 2 10 4

PP 12 24 20 19 15 13

Percentages P A PA 82 0 82 68 5 73 71 3 74 74 5 79 68 7 76 80 2 83

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 2 1 2 1 4 2

PP 4 9 7 8 6 6

P 27 25 25 31 28 37

Ns A 0 2 1 2 3 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 82 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 73 74 79 76 83

PA 27 27 26 33 31 38

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 46 18 28 0 2 1 16 24 0 3 3 11

% Prof. or Above 83 78 86 X X X 69 92 X X X X

% Below 17 22 14 X X X 31 8 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
17 22 14 31 8

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

83

78

86 69

92

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 210

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U 9 8

PP

P

A PA NS 74 74 70 2 1 0

U 4 42

PP 6 89

P 31 329

A 1 44

PA 32 373

NS 1 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
9 8 11 14 18 18 2 9 8 2 1 0 72 65 62

14 72 2 18 65 9

Colorado 11 18 62 8

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

P A Proficiency Levels Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 20 6 3 3 0 9

PP 8 9 13 18 6 14

Percentages P A PA 60 12 72 80 6 86 63 21 84 67 13 79 75 19 94 72 2 74

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

U 5 2 1 1 0 4

PP 2 3 5 7 2 6

P 15 28 24 26 24 31

Ns A 3 2 8 5 6 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 86 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 72 84 79 94 74

PA 18 30 32 31 30 32

NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 43 23 20 1 0 0 14 26 0 2 6 13

% Prof. or Above 74 83 65 X X X X 85 X X X X

% Below 23 17 30 X X X X 15 X X X X

% NS 2 0 5 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
23 17 30 15

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female

74

83 65

85

X
Male AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 211

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 2 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6

P

A PA NS 61 50 51 0 0 0

U 1 28

PP 18 211

P 27 218

A 3 27

PA 30 245

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
2 6 6 6 6 37 43 43 55 45 43

37 55 6 43 45 6 43 43 8

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

8 0 0 0

0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 3 3 0 3 2 2

PP 48 41 31 26 28 37

Percentages P A PA 40 10 50 53 3 56 51 18 69 53 18 71 63 7 70 55 6 61

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 1 0 1 1 1

PP 19 14 12 9 13 18

P 16 18 20 18 29 27

Ns A 4 1 7 6 3 3

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 50 56 69 71 70 61

PA 20 19 27 24 32 30

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 49 31 18 0 1 1 14 32 0 1 1 6

% Prof. or Above 61 71 44 X X X X 78 X X X X

% Below 39 29 56 X X X X 22 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
61 71 44 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

39

29 56

22

78

20 0

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 212

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 4 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7

P

A PA NS 63 51 53 0 0 0

U 2 33

PP 15 221

P 29 228

A 0 39

PA 29 267

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63

33 63 0 42 44 7 39 45 8

60 40 20
4 6 7 0 42 39 33 44 45

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

7

8 0 0 0

0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 9 0 6 2 7 4

PP 24 27 31 29 32 33

Percentages P A PA 61 6 67 68 5 73 60 3 63 55 14 69 56 5 61 63 0 63

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 3 0 2 1 3 2

PP 8 10 11 12 13 15

P 20 25 21 23 23 29

Ns A 2 2 1 6 2 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 67 73 63 69 61

PA 22 27 22 29 25 29

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

63

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 46 18 28 0 2 1 16 24 0 3 3 11

% Prof. or Above 63 72 57 X X X 38 75 X X X X

% Below 37 28 43 X X X 63 25 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
63 72 57 38 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

37

28 43 63

25

75

20 0
X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 213

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 7 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5

P

A PA NS 63 58 57 2 1 1

U 3 23

PP 12 183

P 24 252

A 3 44

PA 27 296

NS 1 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
7 36 37 28 5 5 7 9 9 2 1 1 56 50 48

28 56 7 36 50 9 37 48 9

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

P A Proficiency Levels Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 8 0 0 0 0 7

PP 28 34 32 23 19 28

Percentages P A PA 52 12 64 51 14 66 50 18 68 67 10 77 59 22 81 56 7 63

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

U 2 0 0 0 0 3

PP 7 12 12 9 6 12

P 13 18 19 26 19 24

Ns A 3 5 7 4 7 3

100 80 64 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 66 77 68 81 63

PA 16 23 26 30 26 27

NS 0 0 0 0 0 1

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 43 23 20 1 0 0 14 26 0 2 6 13

% Prof. or Above 63 74 50 X X X X 88 X X X X

% Below 35 26 45 X X X X 12 X X X X

% NS 2 0 5 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
26

12 35 45

80 60 40

88 74 63 50 X
Total Female Male AmIndAK

20 0

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 214

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 6 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 3 34

PP 12 124

P 16 204

A 18 142

PA 34 346

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
24 25 40 41 33 20 0 0 0 37 28 31

24 33 37 69 25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

20
6

7

7

0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 3rd Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 0 3 0 0 0 6

PP 12 24 8 12 7 24

Percentages P A PA 44 44 88 35 38 74 36 56 92 38 50 88 67 26 93 33 37 69

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 0 1 0 0 0 3

PP 5 8 3 4 3 12

P 18 12 14 13 31 16

Ns A 18 13 22 17 12 18

100 80 60 40 20 0

88 74 92 88 93 69

PA 36 25 36 30 43 34

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

2008

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 49 31 18 0 1 1 14 32 0 1 1 6

% Prof. or Above 69 68 72 X X X X 81 X X X X

% Below 31 32 28 X X X X 19 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

31

32

28

19

69

68

72

81

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 215

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 0 Eagle County Re 50 8 Colorado 8

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 0 44

PP 10 120

P 23 249

A 13 115

PA 36 364

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 22 23 20 8 8 0 0 0 50 47

22 50 28 78 23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

43 28 22 28

P A Proficiency Levels Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 4th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 6 0 3 0 7 0

PP 6 14 23 12 17 22

Percentages P A PA 45 42 88 49 38 86 40 34 74 31 57 88 46 29 76 50 28 78

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 2 0 1 0 3 0

PP 2 5 8 5 7 10

P 15 18 14 13 19 23

Ns A 14 14 12 24 12 13

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 88

86 74 88 76 78

PA 29 32 26 37 31 36

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

2009

2010 Year

2011

2012

2013

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 46 18 28 0 2 1 16 24 0 3 3 11

% Prof. or Above 78 78 79 X X X 63 88 X X X X

% Below 22 22 21 X X X 38 13 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X 0 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
22 22 21 38

13

80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

78

78

79 63

88

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 216

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP Red Sandstone Elem 5 Eagle County Re 50 9 Colorado 9

P

A

PA NS 0 0 0

U 2 44

PP 11 137

P 17 196

A 13 129

PA 30 325

NS 0 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
5 9 9 0 0 0 40 39 36 26 27 25 30 25 29

26 40 30 70 27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

0

P A Proficiency Levels Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 4 3 0 3 0 5

PP 28 18 24 23 19 26

Percentages P A PA 40 28 68 29 50 79 42 34 76 41 33 74 28 53 81 40 30 70

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

U 1 1 0 1 0 2

PP 7 6 9 9 6 11

P 10 10 16 16 9 17

Ns A 7 17 13 13 17 13

100 80 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 79 68 76 74 81 70

PA 17 27 29 29 26 30

NS 0 0 0 0 0 0

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 43 23 20 1 0 0 14 26 0 2 6 13

% Prof. or Above 70 78 60 X X X X 85 X X X X

% Below 30 22 40 X X X X 15 X X X X

% NS 0 0 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

30

22 40

15

70

78 60

85

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 217

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Red Sandstone Elem

U 7

PP

P

A

PA NS 5 0 0

U 3 59

PP 17 185

P 15 187

A 6 75

PA 21 262

NS 2 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
7 12 14 40 36 37 35 37 35 14 15 13 5 0 0

40 35 14 49

Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

P A Proficiency Levels Red Sandstone Elem Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

Red Sandstone Elem Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science

Years 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

U 24 3 3 5 0 7

PP 24 31 39 38 24 40

Percentages P A PA 44 8 52 51 14 66 34 24 58 41 15 56 50 26 76 35 14 49

NS 0 0 0 0 0 5

U 6 1 1 2 0 3

PP 6 11 15 15 8 17

P 11 18 13 16 17 15

Ns A 2 5 9 6 9 6

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 66 60 40 20 0 2008 2009 2010 Year 2011 2012 2013 52 58 56 49 76

PA 13 23 22 22 26 21

NS 0 0 0 0 0 2

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Red Sandstone Elem Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 43 23 20 1 0 0 14 26 0 2 6 13

% Prof. or Above 49 43 55 X X X X 73 X X X X

% Below 47 57 35 X X X X 27 X X X X

% NS 5 0 10 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
27

80
47 57 35

60 40 20 0
Total Female Male

73 49 55 43 X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 218

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Eagle County Re 50

U X 8

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 74 70 X 1 0

U X 42

PP X 89

P X 329

A X 44

PA X 373

NS X 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65 62

18 65 9

60 40 20 0
X 8 11 X 18 18 9 X X 8 X 1 0

Colorado 11 18 62 8

7294 11260 39428 5206 44634 278

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Reading

Years 2012 2013

U 0 X

PP 25 X

Percentages P A PA 69 6 75 X X X

NS 0 X

U 0 X

PP 4 X

P 11 X

Ns A 1 X

PA 12 X

NS 0 X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2012 Year 2013 75

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 12 5 7 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 219

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 0 30

PP 2 66

P 15 297

A 4 72

PA 19 369

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 6 8 10 14 18 19 15 11 0 1 1 71 63 62

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 8

10 71 19 90 14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73

4938 11309 38862 7097 45959 845

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X 6 5 0

Percentages PP P A PA X X X X 6 69 19 88 0 80 15 95 10 71 19 90

NS X 0 0 0

U X 1 1 0

PP X 1 0 2

Ns P A X X 11 3 16 3 15 4

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010

88

PA X 14 19 19

NS X 0 0 0

95

90

2011 Year

2012

2013

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 21 11 10 0 0 0 2 18 0 1 1 0

% Prof. or Above 90 X X X X X X 94 X X X X

% Below 10 X X X X X X 6 X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X

100 80 60 40 20 0

10 6

90

94

X
Total Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 220

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
79 65 59
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Eagle County Re 50

U 4 9

PP 4

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 1 44

PP 1 79

P 19 324

A 3 46

PA 22 370

NS 0 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
4 9 11 16 4 21 13 9 9 0 1 1

79 13 92 9 9 74 68

16 65

Colorado 11 21 59

6815 13070 36650 5501 42151 359

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X 0 4

Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X 11 79 11 89 4 79 13 92

NS X X 0 0

U X X 0 1

PP X X 2 1

Ns P A X X X X 15 2 19 3

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 X 2011 Year 2012 2013 89 92

PA X X 17 22

NS X X 0 0

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 24 9 15 1 0 0 1 21 0 1 3 0

% Prof. or Above 92 X X X X X X 90 X X X X

% Below 8 X X X X X X 10 X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X

100
8

10

80 60 40 20 0
Total

92

90

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 221

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Percentage of Students

Percentages School, District and State U PP P A PA NS 76 71 67 0 0 1 U 3 43 PP 4 84 P 22

Ns A 0 39 PA 22 312 NS 0 2

100 80 60 40 20 0
10 10 10 14 19 23 9 0 8 0 0 1 76 62 59

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 10 14 76 0 Eagle County Re 50 10 19 62 9 Colorado 10 23 59 8

273

5882 13891 35960 4891 40851 450

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X 0 0 10

PP X 21 6 14

Percentages P A PA X X X 63 16 79 81 6 88 76 0 76

NS X 0 6 0

U X 0 0 3

PP X 4 1 4

Ns P A X X 12 3 13 1 22 0

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 2011 Year 79

88 76

PA X 15 14 22

NS X 0 1 0

2012

2013

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 29 12 17 0 1 0 1 26 0 1 0 0

% Prof. or Above 76 X 65 X X X X 77 X X X X

% Below 24 X 35 X X X X 23 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
24 23 35

80 60 40 20 0
Total

76 65

77

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 222

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
83
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP 6

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 0 32

PP 1 101

P 15 286

A 2 21

PA 17 307

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65 64

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7

83 11 94 5 4 69 68

23 65 24 64

60 40
23 24

4258 14768 39370 2272 41642 879

20 0
0

7

7

6

11

5

4

0

1

1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Reading

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X 0 0

Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X 17 72 3 76 6 83 11 94

NS X X 7 0

U X X 0 0

PP X X 5 1

Ns P A X X X X 21 1 15 2

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 X 2011 Year 2012 2013 76 94

PA X X 22 17

NS X X 2 0

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 18 5 13 0 0 0 1 15 0 2 0 0

% Prof. or Above 94 X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below 6 X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
6

80 60
94

40 20 0
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 223

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 2

U 1 20

PP 3 85

P 15 274

A 6 46

PA 21 320

NS 0 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20
4 5 20 21 7 12 24 11 10 0 1 2 60 64 59

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 4 Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 7

12 60 24 84 20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70

4132 12301 34821 6048 40869 1384

0

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Reading

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X 0 4

Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X 13 81 6 88 12 60 24 84

NS X X 0 0

U X X 0 1

PP X X 2 3

Ns P A X X X X 13 1 15 6

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 X 2011 Year

88

84

PA X X 14 21

NS X X 0 0

2012

2013

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 25 10 15 0 0 0 3 21 0 1 1 2

% Prof. or Above 84 X X X X X X 86 X X X X

% Below 16 X X X X X X 14 X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
16 14

80 60 40 20 0
Total

84

86

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 224

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 58 57 X 1 1

U X 23

PP X 183

P X 252

A X 44

PA X 296

NS X 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 5 5 X X X 36 37 50 48

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy X Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 5

36 50 9 37 48 9

3144 23555 30583 5713 36296 473

9

9 X 1 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Writing

Years 2012 2013

U 6 X

Percentages PP P A PA 31 56 6 63 X X X X

NS 0 X

U 1 X

PP 5 X

Ns P A 9 1 X X

PA 10 X

NS 0 X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 63 60 40 20 0 X 2012 Year 2013

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 12 5 7 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 225

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 67 64 58 0 1 1

U 0 14

PP 7 153

P 13 258

A 1 40

PA 14 298

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
62

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 4

33 62 5 33 55 9 38 49 9

60 40 20 0
0 3 4 33 33 38

55

49

2629 23740 30751 5578 36329 355

5

9

9 0 1 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Writing

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X 0 0 0

PP X 19 15 33

Percentages P A PA X X X 69 13 81 75 10 85 62 5 67

NS X 0 0 0

U X 0 0 0

PP X 3 3 7

Ns P A X X 11 2 15 2 13 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 81 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 85 67

PA X 13 17 14

NS X 0 0 0

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 21 11 10 0 0 0 2 18 0 1 1 0

% Prof. or Above 67 X X X X X X 67 X X X X

% Below 33 X X X X X X 33 X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total

33

33

67

67

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 226

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP 8

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 0 11

PP 2 144

P 17 274

A 5 64

PA 22 338

NS 0 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 2 3 8 29 35 21 13 15 0 1 1 71 55 47

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 2 Colorado 3

71 21 92

29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61

1739 21930 29033 9265 38298 431

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X 0 0

Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X 21 63 16 79 8 71 21 92

NS X X 0 0

U X X 0 0

PP X X 4 2

Ns P A X X X X 12 3 17 5

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 X 2011 Year 2012 2013 79 92

PA X X 15 22

NS X X 0 0

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Percentage of Students P + A

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 24 9 15 1 0 0 1 21 0 1 3 0

% Prof. or Above 92 X X X X X X 90 X X X X

% Below 8 X X X X X X 10 X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X

100
8

10

80 60 40 20 0
Total

92

90

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 227

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 48 61 56 0 0 1

U 2 19

PP 13 151

P 13 240

A 1 30

PA 14 270

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
45 54 34 40 45 47

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 7 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 3

45 45 3 34 54 7 40 47 9

1836 24683 28434 5641 34075 485

40 20 0
7

4

3

3

7

9 0 0 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X 0 0 7

PP X 26 13 45

Percentages P A PA X X X 68 5 74 69 13 81 45 3 48

NS X 0 6 0

U X 0 0 2

PP X 5 2 13

Ns P A X X 13 1 11 2 13 1

Percentage of Students P + A

100 81 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 74 48

PA X 14 13 14

NS X 0 1 0

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 29 12 17 0 1 0 1 26 0 1 0 0

% Prof. or Above 48 X 29 X X X X 46 X X X X

% Below 52 X 71 X X X X 54 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total

52 71

54

48 29 X
Female Male

46 X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 228

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 0 15

PP 2 164

P 13 227

A 3 34

PA 16 261

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 3 3 11 37 40 72 51

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 3

11 72 17 89 37 51 40 47 8 8 59 55

47

1969 24862 28738 5144 33882 840

17 8 8 0 1 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Writing

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X 3 0

Percentages PP P A PA X X X X X X X X 24 66 0 66 11 72 17 89

NS X X 7 0

U X X 1 0

PP X X 7 2

Ns P A X X X X 19 0 13 3

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 66 60 40 20 0 X 2010 X 2011 Year 2012 2013 89

PA X X 19 16

NS X X 2 0

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 18 5 13 0 0 0 1 15 0 2 0 0

% Prof. or Above 89 X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below 11 X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0

11

89

X
Total Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 229

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP

P

A PA NS 68 49 49 0 2 2

U 0 17

PP 8 196

P 15 178

A 2 33

PA 17 211

NS 0 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
45 43 60 41 41

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 0 Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 6

32 60 8 45 41 8 43 41 7

3790 24972 24307 4316 28623 1311

40 20 0
0 4 6

32

8

8

7 0

2

2

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Writing

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X 0 0

PP X X 31 32

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X 69 0 69 60 8 68

NS X X 0 0

U X X 0 0

PP X X 5 8

Ns P A X X X X 11 0 15 2

PA X X 11 17

NS X X 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 X 2011 Year 2012 2013 69 68

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 25 10 15 0 0 0 3 21 0 1 1 2

% Prof. or Above 68 X X X X X X 67 X X X X

% Below 32 X X X X X X 33 X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total

32

33

68

67

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 230

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U PP X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 0 0

U X 44

PP X 137

P X 196

A X 129

PA X 325

NS X 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 9 9 X X X X 0 0 39 36 27 25 25 29

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy X Eagle County Re 50 9 Colorado 9

27 39 25 64 25 36 29 65

5816 16015 23147 18283 41430 202

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Math

Years 2012 2013

U 0 X

Percentages PP P A PA 50 38 13 50 X X X X

NS 0 X

U 0 X

PP 8 X

Ns P A 6 2 X X

PA 8 X

NS 0 X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2012 Year 2013 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 12 5 7 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 231

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

U 0

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 0

U 0 45

PP 6 117

P 5 177

A 10 126

PA 15 303

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 10 12 0 1 0 29 38 35 25 26 24 27 27 48

29 24 48 71

Eagle County Re 50 10 25 38 27 65 Colorado 12 26 35 27 62

7457 16200 22056 17049 39105 288

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 6th Grade Math

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X 0 0 0

PP X 38 15 29

Percentages P A PA X X X 38 25 63 60 25 85 24 48 71

NS X 0 0 0

U X 0 0 0

PP X 6 3 6

P X 6 12 5

Ns A X 4 5 10

Percentage of Students P + A

100 85 80 63 60 40 20 0 X 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 71

PA X 10 17 15

NS X 0 0 0

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 21 11 10 0 0 0 2 18 0 1 1 0

% Prof. or Above 71 X X X X X X 72 X X X X

% Below 29 X X X X X X 28 X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total

29

28

71

72

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 232

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

U 0

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 0 66

PP 4 128

P 10 151

A 10 147

PA 20 298

NS 0 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
42 42 30 28 29 27

17 42 42 83

Eagle County Re 50 13 26 30 29 60 Colorado 14 30 28 27 55

8842 18935 17406 16893 34299 327

40
26

30

20 0
0

13 14

17 0 1 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X 0 0

PP X X 42 17

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X 26 32 58 42 42 83

NS X X 0 0

U X X 0 0

PP X X 8 4

P X X 5 10

Ns A X X 6 10

Percentage of Students P + A

100 83 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 X 2011 Year 2012 2013 58

PA X X 11 20

NS X X 0 0

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 24 9 15 1 0 0 1 21 0 1 3 0

% Prof. or Above 83 X X X X X X 81 X X X X

% Below 17 X X X X X X 19 X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
17 19

80 60 40 20 0
Total

83

81

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 233

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 5 75

PP 8 124

P 9 131

A 7 108

PA 16 239

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
17 17 19 28 28 29 31 30 29

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 17 28 31 24 55 Eagle County Re 50 17 28 30 24 54 Colorado 19 29 29 23 51

11577 17668 17463 13977 31440 385

24 24 23 0 1 1

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X 11 0 17

PP X 11 19 28

Percentages P A PA X X X 42 37 79 13 69 81 31 24 55

NS X 0 0 0

U X 2 0 5

PP X 2 3 8

P X 8 2 9

Ns A X 7 11 7

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 2011 Year 2012 2013 79 81 55

PA X 15 13 16

NS X 0 0 0

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 29 12 17 0 1 0 1 26 0 1 0 0

% Prof. or Above 55 X 53 X X X X 54 X X X X

% Below 45 X 47 X X X X 46 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
55 53 54 45 47 46

20 0
Total

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 234

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

U 0

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 1

U 0 122

PP 5 170

P 5 102

A 8 46

PA 13 148

NS 0 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
0 38 28 30 28 30 28 23 24 10 15 0 1 1 44

28 28 44 72

Eagle County Re 50 28 38 23 10 33 Colorado 30 30 24 15 39

18263 18670 14741 9176 23917 692

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 9th Grade Math

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X 17 0

PP X X 21 28

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X 28 28 55 28 44 72

NS X X 7 0

U X X 5 0

PP X X 6 5

P X X 8 5

Ns A X X 8 8

PA X X 16 13

NS X X 2 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 X 2011 Year 2012 2013 55 72

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 18 5 13 0 0 0 1 15 0 2 0 0

% Prof. or Above 72 X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below 28 X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
28

80 60 40 20 0
Total

72

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 235

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

U 8

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 2

U 2 112

PP 6 189

P 12 109

A 5 17

PA 17 126

NS 0 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
44 48 35 24 25 28 20 4 6 0 1 2

24 48 20 68 4 6 29 34

Eagle County Re 50 26 44 25 Colorado 29 35 28

17148 20459 16191 3725 19916 1162

40 20 0
8

26 29

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Math

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X 13 8

PP X X 50 24

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X 38 0 38 48 20 68

NS X X 0 0

U X X 2 2

PP X X 8 6

Ns P A X X X X 6 0 12 5

PA X X 6 17

NS X X 0 0

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 X 2011 Year 2012 2013 38 68

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 25 10 15 0 0 0 3 21 0 1 1 2

% Prof. or Above 68 X X X X X X 67 X X X X

% Below 32 X X X X X X 33 X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
Total

32

33

68

67

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 236

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

U X

PP X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 0 0

U X 59

PP X 185

P X 187

A X 75

PA X 262

NS X 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 12 14 X X X 36 37 37 35 15 13 X 0 0

Eagle County Re 50 12 36 37 15 52 Colorado 14 37 35 13 48

8842 23664 22449 8285 30734 219

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 5th Grade Science

Years 2012 2013

U 0 X

Percentages PP P A PA 50 31 13 44 X X X X

NS 6 X

U 0 X

PP 8 X

Ns P A 5 2 X X

PA 7 X

NS 1 X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 44 40 20 0 X 2012 Year 2013

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 5th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 12 5 7 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 237

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A 7

PA NS 59 0 0 1

U 3 80

PP 9 107

P 15 200

A 2 53

PA 17 253

NS 0 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
18 21 10 31 24 27 7 12 9 0 0 1 52

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 10 31 52

Eagle County Re 50 18 24 45 12 57 Colorado 21 27 43 9 52

12703 16350 26331 5232 31563 458

45 43

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science

Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X 0 0 10

PP X 21 13 31

Percentages P A PA X X X 68 11 79 81 6 88 52 7 59

NS X 0 0 0

U X 0 0 3

PP X 4 2 9

Ns P A X X 13 2 13 1 15 2

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 2011 Year 79

88

PA X 15 14 17

NS X 0 0 0

59

2012

2013

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 29 12 17 0 1 0 1 26 0 1 0 0

% Prof. or Above 59 X 53 X X X X 58 X X X X

% Below 41 X 47 X X X X 42 X X X X

% NS 0 X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40
59 53 58 41 47 42

20 0
Total

X
Female Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 238

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State

U

PP

P

A

PA NS 0 1 2

U 3 95

PP 3 83

P 16 222

A 3 26

PA 19 248

NS 0 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
64

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy 12 12 64 12 76 Eagle County Re 50 22 19 51 Colorado 25 21 43 6 8 57 51

60 40
22 25 12

51 43 19 21 12 6 8 0 1 2

14953 12366 25278 4824 30102 1239

20 0

12

U

PP

P Proficiency Levels

A

NS
Colorado

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy

Eagle County Re 50

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 10th Grade Science

Years 2010 2011 2012 2013

U X X 6 12

PP X X 38 12

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X 50 6 56 64 12 76

NS X X 0 0

U X X 1 3

PP X X 6 3

Ns P A X X X X 8 1 16 3

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2010 X 2011 Year 2012 2013 56 76

PA X X 9 19

NS X X 0 0

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

Vail Ski and Snowboard Academy Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 25 10 15 0 0 0 3 21 0 1 1 2

% Prof. or Above 76 X X X X X X 76 X X X X

% Below 24 X X X X X X 24 X X X X

% NS 0 X X X X X X 0 X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100
24 24

80 60 40 20 0
Total

76

76

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 239

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District

WORLD ACADEMY
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U X 8

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 72 73 X 0 0

U X 38

PP X 98

P X 322

A X 32

PA X 354

NS X 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
66 66

20 66 7

60 40 20 0
X 20 17 8 10 X X X 7 7 X 0 0

Colorado 10 17 66 7

6047 10585 41962 4365 46327 281

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 240

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State WORLD ACADEMY

U X

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 67 68 X 0 0

U X 51

PP X 122

P X 332

A X 17

PA X 349

NS X 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63 63

Eagle County Re 50 10 23 63 3 Colorado 11 21 63 5

60 40
23 21

6773 13716 40827 2947 43774 221

20 0
X

10 11 X X X 3

5

X

0

0

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 241

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 8 X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 1 1

U X 30

PP X 66

P X 297

A X 72

PA X 369

NS X 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
63 62

14 63 15 79 18 62 11 73

60 40 20 0
X 6 8 X 14 18 X X 15 11 X 1 1

4938 11309 38862 7097 45959 845

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 242

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U X 9

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 74 68 X 1 1

U X 44

PP X 79

P X 324

A X 46

PA X 370

NS X 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65

16 65 9

60 40 20 0
X 9 11 X 16 21

59

Colorado 11 21 59 9

6815 13070 36650 5501 42151 359

9 X X

9 X 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading (in percentages)

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U X X

PP X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X

NS X X

U X X

PP X X

P X X

Ns A X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2012 Year X 2013

PA X X

NS X X

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 243

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State WORLD ACADEMY

U X

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 71 67 X 0 1

U X 43

PP X 84

P X 273

A X 39

PA X 312

NS X 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 19 10 10 X X X 23 9 8 X 0 1 62 59

Eagle County Re 50 10 19 62 9 Colorado 10 23 59 8

5882 13891 35960 4891 40851 450

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading (in percentages)

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Reading
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U X X

PP X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X

NS X X

U X X

PP X X

P X X

Ns A X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2012 Year X 2013

PA X X

NS X X

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 244

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7 X

P X

A PA NS X X 69 68 X 1 1

U X 32

PP X 101

P X 286

A X 21

PA X 307

NS X 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
65 64

23 65 5 24 64 4

60 40
23 24

4258 14768 39370 2272 41642 879

20 0
X

7

7 X X X

5

4

X

1

1

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 245

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 5 Colorado 7 X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 1 2

U X 20

PP X 85

P X 274

A X 46

PA X 320

NS X 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80
64

20 64 11 74 21 59 10 70

60 40 20 0
X 5 20 21 7 X X

59

4132 12301 34821 6048 40869 1384

11 10 X X 1 2

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Reading

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 246

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 6 X

P X

A PA NS X X 50 51 X 0 0

U X 28

PP X 211

P X 218

A X 27

PA X 245

NS X 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
43 43 45 43

43 45 6 43 43 8

3569 27269 27344 4894 32238 202

40 20 0
X 6 6 X X X 6 8 X 0 0

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 247

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 6 Colorado 7 X

P X

A PA NS X X 51 53 X 0 0

U X 33

PP X 221

P X 228

A X 39

PA X 267

NS X 2

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 6 7 X X X 42 39 44 45

42 44 7 39 45 8

4429 25437 29114 5186 34300 321

7

8 X 0 0

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 248

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 4 X

P X

A PA NS X X 64 58 X 1 1

U X 14

PP X 153

P X 258

A X 40

PA X 298

NS X 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 3 4 X X X 33 38 55 49

33 55 9 38 49 9

2629 23740 30751 5578 36329 355

9

9 X 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 249

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 2 Colorado 3 X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 1 1

U X 11

PP X 144

P X 274

A X 64

PA X 338

NS X 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 2 3 X X X 29 35 13 15 X 1 1 55 47

29 55 13 68 35 47 15 61

1739 21930 29033 9265 38298 431

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing (in percentages)

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U X X

PP X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X

NS X X

U X X

PP X X

P X X

Ns A X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2012 Year X 2013

PA X X

NS X X

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 250

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 3 X

P X

A PA NS X X 61 56 X 0 1

U X 19

PP X 151

P X 240

A X 30

PA X 270

NS X 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 4 3 X X X 34 40 54 47

34 54 7 40 47 9

1836 24683 28434 5641 34075 485

7

9 X 0 1

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing (in percentages)

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Writing
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U X X

PP X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X

NS X X

U X X

PP X X

P X X

Ns A X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2012 Year X 2013

PA X X

NS X X

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 251

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 3 Colorado 3 X

P X

A PA NS X X 59 55 X 1 1

U X 15

PP X 164

P X 227

A X 34

PA X 261

NS X 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 3 3 X X X 37 40 51 47

37 51 8 40 47 8

1969 24862 28738 5144 33882 840

8

8 X 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 252

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 4 Colorado 6 X

P X

A PA NS X X 49 49 X 2 2

U X 17

PP X 196

P X 178

A X 33

PA X 211

NS X 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
45 43 41 41

45 41 8 43 41 7

3790 24972 24307 4316 28623 1311

40 20 0
X 4 6 X X X 8 7 X

2

2

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Writing

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 253

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 7 Colorado 7 X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 0 0

U X 34

PP X 124

P X 204

A X 142

PA X 346

NS X 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
25 40 41 28 31 20 X X X 0 0

25 40 28 69 20 41 31 72

4614 13073 26342 20248 46590 167

20 0
X

7

7 X

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 3rd Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 254

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State U PP WORLD ACADEMY X Eagle County Re 50 8 Colorado 8 X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 0 0

U X 44

PP X 120

P X 249

A X 115

PA X 364

NS X 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 23 20 8 8 X X X X 0 0 22 47

23 47 22 69 20 43 28 72

5354 12670 28032 18310 46342 224

43 28

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 4th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 255

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State WORLD ACADEMY

U X

PP X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 1 0

U X 45

PP X 117

P X 177

A X 126

PA X 303

NS X 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
25 26 38 35 27 27 10 12 X X X X X 1 0

Eagle County Re 50 10 25 38 27 65 Colorado 12 26 35 27 62

7457 16200 22056 17049 39105 288

20 0

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 6th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 256

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State WORLD ACADEMY

U X

PP X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 1 1

U X 66

PP X 128

P X 151

A X 147

PA X 298

NS X 7

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
26 30 30 28 29 27

Eagle County Re 50 13 26 30 29 60 Colorado 14 30 28 27 55

8842 18935 17406 16893 34299 327

20 0
X

13 14 X X X X 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math (in percentages)

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 7th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U X X

PP X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X

NS X X

U X X

PP X X

P X X

Ns A X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2012 Year X 2013

PA X X

NS X X

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 7th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 257

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State WORLD ACADEMY

U X

PP X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 1 1

U X 75

PP X 124

P X 131

A X 108

PA X 239

NS X 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X 17 19 X X X 28 29 30 29

Eagle County Re 50 17 28 30 24 54 Colorado 19 29 29 23 51

11577 17668 17463 13977 31440 385

24 23 X 1 1

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math (in percentages)

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Math
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U X X

PP X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X

NS X X

U X X

PP X X

P X X

Ns A X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2012 Year X 2013

PA X X

NS X X

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 258

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State WORLD ACADEMY

U X

PP X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 1 1

U X 122

PP X 170

P X 102

A X 46

PA X 148

NS X 3

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40 20 0
X X X X 38 28 30 30 23 24 10 15 X 1 1

Eagle County Re 50 28 38 23 10 33 Colorado 30 30 24 15 39

18263 18670 14741 9176 23917 692

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 9th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 259

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State WORLD ACADEMY

U X

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 29 34 X 1 2

U X 112

PP X 189

P X 109

A X 17

PA X 126

NS X 5

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
44

Eagle County Re 50 26 44 25 4 Colorado 29 35 28 6

17148 20459 16191 3725 19916 1162

40 20 0
X

26 29

35 25 28 4 6 2

X

X

X

X

1

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Math

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 260

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State WORLD ACADEMY

U X

PP X

P X

A X

PA NS X X 0 1

U X 80

PP X 107

P X 200

A X 53

PA X 253

NS X 1

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60
45 43

Eagle County Re 50 18 24 45 12 57 Colorado 21 27 43 9 52

12703 16350 26331 5232 31563 458

40 20 0
X 18 21 X

24 27 12 9 X X X 0 1

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science (in percentages)

WORLD ACADEMY Historic Trends on TCAP/CSAP 8th Grade Science
Percentage of Students P + A

Years 2012 2013

U X X

PP X X

Percentages P A PA X X X X X X

NS X X

U X X

PP X X

P X X

Ns A X X

100 80 60 40 20 0 X 2012 Year X 2013

PA X X

NS X X

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 8th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 261

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

2013 TCAP Executive Summary Report Eagle County Re 50 School District
School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science (in percentages)

School, District and State Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science
Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc. Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

School, District and State WORLD ACADEMY

U X

PP X

P X

A PA NS X X 57 51 X 1 2

U X 95

PP X 83

P X 222

A X 26

PA X 248

NS X 6

Percentage of Students

Percentages

Ns

100 80 60 40
22 25 51 43 19 21 X X X 6 8 X 1 2

Eagle County Re 50 22 19 51 6 Colorado 25 21 43 8

14953 12366 25278 4824 30102 1239

20 0
X

P A Proficiency Levels WORLD ACADEMY Eagle County Re 50

U

PP

NS Colorado

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

WORLD ACADEMY Disaggregation Summary Performance on TCAP 2013 10th Grade Science

Groups Total Female Male AmIndAK Asian BlkAfAm Hisp Wht HwPacIs Mult IEP ELL

Ns 3 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1

% Prof. or Above X X X X X X X X X X X X

% Below X X X X X X X X X X X X

% NS X X X X X X X X X X X X

Percentage of Students P + A

100 80 60 40 20 0
X
Total

X
Female

X
Male

X
AmIndAK

X
Asian

X
BlkAfAm

X
Hisp

X
Wht

X
HwPacIs

X
Mult

X
IEP

X
ELL

Group

Legend: U=Unsatisfactory; PP=Partially Proficient; P=Proficient; A=Advanced; PA=Proficient + Advanced; NS=No Score Notes: Results are reported in percentages. Percentages may not sum due to rounding. Minimum # of students required for summary reporting: 16

Report generated: Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Page 262

Copyright 2001-2013 Alpine Achievement Systems, Inc.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful