Into the Silent Land

Paul B r o k s trained as a clinical p s y c h o l o g i s t at O x f o r d

U n i v e r s i t y and went on to specialize in n e u r o p s y c h o l o g y .
He has p u r s u e d a career c o m b i n i n g b o t h clinical p r a c t i c e
and fundamental b r a i n r e s e a r c h . H e lives i n C o r n w a l l a n d
is currently a S e n i o r Clinical L e c t u r e r in N e u r o p s y c h o l o g y
at P l y m o u t h University. He w r i t e s a r e g u l a r c o l u m n for
Prospect m a g a z i n e a n d his w o r k h a s a p p e a r e d in the Sunday
Times, Sunday Telegraph, Guardian, Daily Telegraph a n d
Granta. Into the Silent Land w a s shortlisted for the G u a r d i a n
First B o o k A w a r d 2003.

F r o m the r e v i e w s :

'Into the Silent Land is a s m a l l , s t r a n g e , beautiful g e m . . . B r o k s

i s a s m u c h p o e t a s s c i e n t i s t . . . Indelible.' A t u l G a w a n d e ,
author of Complications

'Beautifully written a n d beautifully t h o u g h t t h r o u g h . '

P r o f e s s o r S t e v e n R o s e , a u t h o r of The Making of Memory

'Into the Silent Land is a s t o n i s h i n g - a m i x of real-life

n e u r o l o g i c a l c a s e s , science f i c t i o n , r a n d o m q u i p s a n d d e e p l y
p e r s o n a l r e v e l a t i o n s . . . T h e b o o k h a s n o right t o h a n g
together, but s o m e h o w it d o e s , quite beautifully.'
S i m o n H a t t e n s t o n e , Guardian
' R i v e t i n g . ' T o n y G u i l d , Independent

' I m p r e s s i v e . . . B r o k s ' s b e s t s t o r i e s . . . p r o v e that all h u m a n

b e i n g s a r e , a s h e p u t s it, ' s t o r y - t e l l i n g m a c h i n e s ' . F a c e d with
the material reality of the b r a i n a n d the infinite configurations
o f the m i n d , w e realize that w e are "at o n e level, n o m o r e
than m e a t ; a n d , o n another, n o m o r e than f i c t i o n " . '
G a b y W o o d , Observer

' A d e b u t o f c o n s i d e r a b l e quality.' R o b e r t M a c f a r l a n e ,
Sunday Times

' B r o k s h a s e x p r e s s e d w h a t will s u r e l y b e the twenty-first

c e n t u r y ' s central a n g s t with sensitivity and e l e g a n c e . '
Jeffrey G r a y , TLS

'Into the Silent Land s h o w s h o w p e o p l e a d a p t to

extraordinary circumstances... Fascinating.'
K a t h M u r p h y , Scotland on Sunday

' B r o k s enters the silent land with arc lights b l a z i n g . . .

C o n f r o n t e d with b r a i n s a n d relationships that are fragile
a n d p r o v i s i o n a l , B r o k s kindles c o m p a s s i o n a n d inspires.'
Clive Coen, Times Educational Supplement
'Into the Silent Land outlines what c a n h a p p e n after
s e v e r e brain-injury — a n d I am n o w i n c r e a s i n g l y fascinated
b y what the b r a i n i s c a p a b l e o f a n d w h y ' S h e e n a M c D o n a l d ,
Sunday Herald B o o k s of the Y e a r

' A rare b o o k o f s t a g g e r i n g brilliance, l e a v i n g r e a d e r s with

m u c h to c o n s i d e r a b o u t their o w n l i v e s . ' Good Books Guide

' S t u d d e d with dazzling insights a n d a g r e a t deal of f o o d for

thought.' T e s s T a y l o r , San Francisco Chronicle

' B r o k s is a gifted w r i t e r . . . H i s d e p i c t i o n s of patients is

heart-wrenching.' B e t h G r e e n b e r g , Boston Globe

'Writing beautifully a b o u t o u r m o s t unbeautiful c o g n i t i v e

a p p a r a t u s , B r o k s d e s c r i b e s its r u m p l e d s u r f a c e s , its n e t w o r k
of neurons, its d e e p , secret s p a c e s with s u c h c a r e that the act
itself powerfully illuminates the b r a i n ' s creative c a p a c i t i e s . '
L a u r e n Slater, Elle
Into the Silent Land
Travels in Neuropsychology

PAUL B R O K S

Atlantic B o o k s
London
F i r s t published in h a r d b a c k in G r e a t Britain in 2003
b y Atlantic B o o k s , a n imprint o f G r o v e Atlantic L t d

T h i s p a p e r b a c k edition published by Atlantic B o o k s in 2004

C o p y r i g h t © Paul B r o k s 2003

T h e m o r a l right o f Paul B r o k s t o b e identified a s the author o f

this w o r k has been asserted in a c c o r d a n c e with the C o p y r i g h t ,
D e s i g n s and Patents A c t of 1988.

T h e author and publisher wish to thank the following for

p e r m i s s i o n to q u o t e f r o m copyrighted material:

D a n n i e A b s e for 'In the T h e a t r e ' from Collected Poems,

1948-1976(London: Hutchinson 1977); the Estate of Gilbert Ryle
for The concept of mind ( L o n d o n : H u t c h i n s o n 1949).

All rights reserved. N o part o f this publication m a y b e

r e p r o d u c e d , stored in a retrieval s y s t e m , or transmitted in a n y
f o r m o r b y a n y m e a n s , electronic, mechanical, p h o t o c o p y i n g ,
r e c o r d i n g or otherwise, without the prior p e r m i s s i o n of both
the c o p y r i g h t o w n e r and the a b o v e publisher of this b o o k .

E a r l i e r drafts of a n u m b e r of chapters have a p p e a r e d in Prospect m a g a z i n e .

' T h e S e a h o r s e a n d the A l m o n d ' w a s published in earlier f o r m in Granta m a g a z i n e .

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

A C 1 P c a t a l o g u e record for this b o o k is available from the British Library.

I S B N 184354 0 3 4 7

Printed in G r e a t Britain by M a c k a y s of C h a t h a m pic, C h a t h a m , Kent

Atlantic B o o k s
A n imprint o f G r o v e Atlantic L t d
Ormond House
2 6 - 2 7 Boswell Street
London
W C 1 N 3JZ
For Sonja, Daniel and Jonathan
The brain is wider than the sky,
For, put them side by side,
The one the other will include
With ease, and you beside.

Emily Dickinson
C O N T E N T S

ONE Swallowing the Dark

Different Lives 3

The Space behind the Face 17

The Seahorse and the Almond 22

The Sword of the Sun 39

Soul in a Bucket 42

In the Theatre 57

A-Z 65

The Mirror 67

The Visible Man 71

TWO The Spark in the Stone

I Think Therefore I Am Dead 89

Vodka and Saliva 105

Body Art 114

The Story of Einstein's Brain 117

 Articles of Faith 123

Right This Way, Smiles a Mermaid 132

THREE No Water, No Moon

The Ghost Tree (1) 147

The Ghost Tree (2) 158

The Dreams of Robert Louis Stevenson 171

Voodoo Child (Slight Return) 181

Mr Barrington's Quandary 196

Out of Darkness Cometh Light 200

To Be Two or Not to Be 204

Gulls 226

Further Reading 237

Acknowledgements 246
 ONE

Swallowing the Dark

Different Lives

'Why does raw meat give me a hard-on?'

T h i s i s Michael, c h o p p i n g sirloin r e a d y for the stir-fry. T y p i -
cally, he is g o i n g to the trouble of p r e p a r i n g a g o o d lunch: b e e f
i n hoi-sin s a u c e . H e ' s b o u g h t s o m e beer, too. W e ' r e d r i n k i n g
straight from the c a n . A m y , his girlfriend, sits at the kitchen
table r e a d i n g a m a g a z i n e .

'Michael,' s h e s a y s , w i t h o u t l o o k i n g u p .

Michael slides the d i c e d b e e f into the w o k w h e r e it sizzles in

the hot oil.
' E a s y , A m y . O n l y a twitch.' H e w i n k s a t m e , then d r o p s w h a t
he is d o i n g and strides o u t of the r o o m . ' H a v e a listen to this,' he
calls o v e r his s h o u l d e r and s o o n the p l a c e is a w a s h with c a s c a d e s
o f s o u n d - brittle a r p e g g i o s , t u m b l i n g f r a g m e n t s o f m e l o d y . I t
is v e r y l o u d .

Michael returns, fingertips to t e m p l e s , h e a d tilted b a c k .

'Koto,' he says. 'Japanese. Astonishing.'

F r o m this a n g l e the dent i n his h e a d , a b o u t three inches u p

from the right e y e b r o w , is m o r e n o t i c e a b l e .

3
PAUL B R O K S

N e x t d a y I ' m o v e r at S t u a r t ' s . We sit in his stuffy front r o o m .

A n o r n a t e b l a c k c l o c k (his early-retirement p r e s e n t ) c l i n g s t o
the wall like a h u g e fly. As I s t r u g g l e with milky tea, Stuart locks
me in his g a z e . He is a b o u t to s a y s o m e t h i n g , b u t d o e s n ' t . It is a
long pause. Eventually he speaks.

'I don't love you any more, do I, love?'

T h e w o r d s a r e intended for his w i f e , H e l e n , w h o sits b e s i d e
h i m . ' N o , l o v e , ' she replies. ' S o y o u say.'
T h e r e is silence a g a i n , except for the tick of the insectoid
c l o c k . T h e dent in S t u a r t ' s h e a d is a b o v e the left eyebrow.

Michael h a d c l i m b e d a tree to retrieve an entangled kite. He

n e e d n ' t h a v e b o t h e r e d b e c a u s e the w i n d g u s t e d and the kite
drifted d o w n o f its o w n a c c o r d , b u t h e w a s h i g h u p b y then. H e
w a s c a l l i n g s o m e t h i n g t o A m y , but s h e c o u l d n ' t m a k e i t out.
H e r d r e a m s recall h o w a b r u p t l y his v o i c e w a s stifled b y the
c r e a k a n d c r a c k o f a b r a n c h , a n d the w i n d - w h i p p e d silence o f
the free fall as his b o d y cleared the b o u g h s . C o n c e a l e d within
thick tufts o f m e a d o w g r a s s w a s a s p u r o f r o c k . A m y ' s d r e a m s
a l s o r e c o r d the c r a c k o f h e a d hitting s t o n e . T h a t ' s what w a k e s
her.

T h e fall fractured M i c h a e l ' s skull a n d released a flash flood of

b l e e d i n g into the right frontal l o b e . 'I t h o u g h t his n u m b e r w a s
u p , ' the s u r g e o n told m e , a n d h a d s a i d a s m u c h t o A m y a s she
kept v i g i l o v e r M i c h a e l ' s c o m a t o s e b o d y . ' N o point b e a t i n g
a b o u t the b u s h , ' s a i d the d o c t o r . B u t , after three d a y s and nights,
Michael c a m e b a c k to life — with a different n u m b e r .

S t u a r t ' s twist of fate w a s a m o t o r w a y pile-up. A b o l t s n a p p e d

a n d b l a s t e d like a bullet from the vehicle in front. It c a m e

4
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

t h r o u g h the w i n d s c r e e n , t h r o u g h his forehead a n d t o r e d e e p

into the left frontal l o b e .
D e s p i t e the i m m e d i a t e d i s p l a c e m e n t o f s o m e b r a i n matter,
l o s s o f c o n s c i o u s n e s s w a s brief, a s i s s o m e t i m e s the c a s e with
penetrating m i s s i l e w o u n d s . H e told the p a r a m e d i c s h e w a s fine
and h a d better get h o m e now, b u t they s a w the b r a i n stuff
gelling his hair and put h i m in the a m b u l a n c e . S o o n the s u r g e o n s
w e r e w o r k i n g t o extract the foreign b o d y from the interior
o f S t u a r t ' s h e a d , a p r o c e s s that a l s o m e a n t d i s p o s i n g o f s o m e
adjacent brain tissue. Part o f S t u a r t w e n t w i t h it.

B y these m e a n s , Providence has created mirror-image

lesions o f the b r a i n . A s a n e u r o p s y c h o l o g i s t , m y r o l e i s t o c o m -
p a r e the c o n s e q u e n c e s . S t u a r t n o w h a s t r o u b l e g e t t i n g started.
Helen e n c o u r a g e s him out o f b e d i n the m o r n i n g , p o i n t s him i n
the direction of the b a t h r o o m , h a s his c l o t h e s ready, a n d g e t s
him breakfast b e f o r e g o i n g t o w o r k . S h e l e a v e s h i m lists o f
things t o d o a r o u n d the h o u s e , and m a g a z i n e s and p u z z l e b o o k s
to fill the h o u r s . B u t w h e n s h e returns she often finds him w h e r e
she left him, sitting i n silence. S h e ' l l g o o v e r a n d h u g h i m a n d
h e ' l l return the e m b r a c e , b u t i t ' s perfunctory.

H e d o e s n ' t l o v e her a n y m o r e . I t ' s the plain truth a n d s h e

a c c e p t s it. Stuart is not to b l a m e . W h a t he feels t o w a r d s H e l e n is
what he feels t o w a r d s all other p e o p l e , i n c l u d i n g himself: indif-
ference. T h i s a b s e n c e of e m o t i o n frees him to tell the truth:
'Helen, I don't love you any more.'

Stuart can read p e o p l e ' s m o o d s a n d m o t i v a t i o n s , b u t l a c k s

the e m o t i o n a l c h a r g e of empathy. I a s k w h a t he feels a b o u t the
little girl w h o w a s a b d u c t e d a n d m u r d e r e d last y e a r . H e k n o w s i t
w a s a dreadful thing t o h a p p e n . T h e y s h o u l d h a n g the m u r d e r e r

5
PAUL B R O K S

or c h o p his b a l l s o f f b u t , no, it d o e s n ' t m a k e him feel anything

v e r y m u c h . T h e n , h e s a y s , i t ' s funny but h e never u s e d t o
b e l i e v e in capital p u n i s h m e n t .

Michael, o n the other h a n d , h a s trouble s t o p p i n g . A m y h a s t o

rein h i m in. H e ' l l talk to s t r a n g e r s in the street, he'll tell them
t h e y ' r e beautiful, or their children a r e , or their pets. He wants to
t o u c h . H e w a n t s t o c e l e b r a t e . B e g g a r s b r i n g a tear t o his e y e . H e
o n c e g a v e a m a n his c o a t a n d a £10 n o t e . P e o p l e take a d v a n t a g e .

M i c h a e l ' s e m p a t h i c r e s p o n s e i s hair t r i g g e r e d , but m o r e

complex social calculations befuddle him. W h e n he first came
h o m e f r o m the rehab centre his tastes w e r e plain. A m y said h e
lived on fish fingers a n d L e d Z e p p e l i n . Michael said it w a s like
g o i n g b a c k i n t i m e . H e ' d a l w a y s liked these things and n o w h e
d i d n ' t feel h e s h o u l d p r e t e n d o t h e r w i s e . F i n e , s a i d A m y . B u t she
w o u l d n o t tolerate the p o r n v i d e o s . L i k e Stuart, Michael n o
l o n g e r feels the n e e d to d i s s i m u l a t e .

' H o w d o y o u feel i n y o u r s e l f , S t u a r t ? ' I a s k .

'All right.'
'Are you miserable?'
'No.'
'Are you happy?'
' I d o n ' t think s o . ' H e t u r n s t o H e l e n . ' A m I h a p p y ? '
H e l e n l o o k s a t m e . I l o o k a t Stuart. T h e q u e s t i o n g o e s r o u n d
in a circle.

Michael s a w m e o f f a t the front d o o r . H e w a s c l o s e t o tears.

H e p u l l e d m e t o him a n d k i s s e d m e o n the cheek. F o r a n instant
I thought he w a s g o i n g to say he loved me.

***

6
 I N T O T H E S I L E N T L A N D

T h e b a l d head s w i v e l s . T h e v o i c e h o n k s like a k l a x o n a c r o s s the

senior c o m m o n r o o m : ' I n e v e r m a k e m i s t a k e s . ' T h e r e i s a
rustling o f n e w s p a p e r s a n d c l e a r i n g o f t h r o a t s .

Martin has s u p e r i o r intelligence - my tests confirm it, a n d

he h o l d s a m a s t e r ' s d e g r e e in m e c h a n i c a l e n g i n e e r i n g — b u t he
h a p p e n s to be autistic a n d h a s a p r o b l e m with v o l u m e c o n t r o l . Is
that a r e a s o n t o b a r him from the S C R ? N o . W e ' l l enjoy o u r
coffee.

H e ' s b e e n d o i n g o n e o f his p a r t y p i e c e s : c a l e n d a r c a l c u l a t i o n .
Martin can g i v e y o u the d a y o f the w e e k for a n y d a t e y o u c a r e t o
mention, a n d h e ' s s p o t o n e v e r y t i m e , s e l d o m t a k i n g m o r e than
a couple of seconds. H e ' s happy to oblige and seems d i s a p -
pointed w h e n I s o o n run o u t of d a t e s I can v o u c h for.

' H o w d o y o u d o it, Martin? Y o u d i d n ' t e v e n think a b o u t the

last o n e . '
T h e target d a t e w a s 1 8 M a r c h 1988 ( m y s o n ' s b i r t h d a y ) .
' F r i d a y ' w a s the instant r e s p o n s e .
' T h a t w a s easy,' h e s a y s , ' I w e n t t o the dentist the d a y b e f o r e . '
H e g r i n s with satisfaction.

I t ' s hard t o tell his a g e . T h e f a c e i s lined b u t u n w e a t h e r e d .

H e ' s w e a r i n g a silver puffa jacket, s t a - p r e s s e d t r o u s e r s at half-
m a s t , and trainers. F o r t y - e i g h t g o i n g o n fourteen. T h a t s h o u l d
be 'trainer' in the singular. I t ' s on his right foot.

'I s e e y o u ' r e w e a r i n g o d d s h o e s , ' I say.

' Y e s , ' he replies. ' I t ' s W e d n e s d a y . ' I w a i t for further e x p l a n a -

tion, but n o n e is f o r t h c o m i n g .
W h e n I first s a w Martin, for clinical a s s e s s m e n t s , he t u r n e d
up with his p a r e n t s a n d t h e y ' d p u t him in a suit. H i s s h o e s w e r e
polished, a n d m a t c h e d . He h a r d l y s a i d a w o r d . T o d a y , in his

7
PAUL B R O K S

c a s u a l attire, h e i s v o l u b l e . B e f o r e l o n g , inevitably, h e d r o p s
into the g r o o v e o f his special interests. T h e r e are s e v e r a l . O n e i s
the B e a t l e s . H e k n o w s the r e c o r d i n g a n d release d a t e s o f e v e r y
r e c o r d . A n o t h e r i s the r a i l w a y s . H e h a s m e m o r i z e d the regional
t i m e t a b l e , o f c o u r s e , b u t w h a t really fascinates him i s the m o v e -
m e n t o f c o a l freight w a g o n s . T h e n there i s a s t r o n o m y , which,
currently, is his m a i n p r e o c c u p a t i o n .

' D o y o u k n o w h o w m a n y stars there are i n the u n i v e r s e ? ' h e

a s k s . ' T e n t o the p o w e r o f t w e n t y - t w o . '
I m a k e a little b l o w i n g s o u n d a n d s h a k e my h e a d . He l o o k s
pleased.
'Actually,' I say, 'I r e a d s o m e w h e r e that if y o u think of each
star as a g r a i n of s a n d it w o u l d take all the b e a c h e s a n d deserts
on the planet to m a t c h the n u m b e r of s t a r s in the u n i v e r s e . '

I t h o u g h t this w o u l d i m p r e s s h i m , but h e i g n o r e s m e . H e
b e c o m e s a g i t a t e d , starts r o c k i n g b a c k a n d forth o n the e d g e o f
his s e a t . W h e n h e s t o p s h e s a y s , ' I d o n ' t think s o . '
I a s k h i m if he thinks there is intelligent life o u t there a m o n g
all t h o s e g r a i n s o f s a n d . H e l o o k s p u z z l e d a n d I realize h e ' s
taken the q u e s t i o n literally, so I clarify. A g a i n , the grin.

' Y e s , ' h e s a y s , 'there i s . ' T h e s m i l e i s s u s t a i n e d . I t i s evidently

a consoling thought.
B e t h j o i n s u s . S h e ' s o n e o f o u r r e s e a r c h assistants. I t ' s time t o
g o t o the lab for the testing s e s s i o n . M a r t i n ' s face lights up. H e
h a s taken a shine to B e t h .
'And what have you been up t o ? ' she asks him.
' I ' v e b e e n m a s t u r b a t i n g quite a lot,' he replies, as if t h r o u g h
a tannoy. I p r e s s m o u t h a g a i n s t k n u c k l e s to b l o c k the laughter.
I t ' s n o g o o d . I s n o r t and c o u g h .

8
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

' E x c u s e m e , ' I s a y a n d c o u g h a g a i n for g o o d m e a s u r e . I t ' s

u n p r o f e s s i o n a l , I k n o w , b u t he c r a c k s me up. I ' m o n l y h u m a n .
I'm not trying to m a k e Martin l o o k r i d i c u l o u s . He is r i d i c u l o u s .
L o o k a t him i n his daft clothes, b o o m i n g o n a b o u t m a s t u r b a t i o n
and coal freight w a g o n s a n d the n u m b e r o f s t a r s i n the u n i v e r s e .
I t ' s undeniable. A n d I reckon i t ' s a s n u b if y o u don't a c k n o w l -
e d g e his absurdity. I f y o u are t o e n g a g e with Martin y o u m u s t ,
to s o m e extent, enter his w o r l d .

'Martin,' I say. ' T h i s is funny. Do y o u m i n d if I l a u g h ? '

'No,' he says. 'Please laugh.'
But, g i v e n p e r m i s s i o n , I find the h u m o u r s o o n d i s s o l v e s , a n d
I'm left sitting r e d - f a c e d with tears o n m y cheeks a n d e v e r y o n e
l o o k i n g a t m e instead o f h i m . I even f i n d m y s e l f p o n d e r i n g
Martin's confident assertion o f the existence o f extraterrestrial
life. We are alone in the universe or we are not, I think. Either way,
how astonishing. We g r i n at each other.

H i s head is a b n o r m a l l y l a r g e , as is the b r a i n that fills it. My

c o l l e a g u e s and I h a v e taken m e a s u r e m e n t s . We are profiling his
c o g n i t i v e strengths a n d limitations a n d setting these a g a i n s t
detailed m a g n e t i c r e s o n a n c e o b s e r v a t i o n s o f his b r a i n . H e i s a n
enthusiastic research participant a n d h a s c o m e t o s e e h i m s e l f a s
a neuro-engineering problem.

He has a theory. In his v i e w a u t i s m is all a b o u t flow d y n a m -

ics. M o s t of the time his t h o u g h t p r o c e s s e s are stuck in the left
hemisphere o f his brain. C o n s e q u e n t l y , his thinking i s r i g i d ,
categorical, and analytic. I f h e c o u l d u n b l o c k the channel o f
the c o r p u s c a l l o s u m , which links the t w o s i d e s , then the s t r e a m s
o f the left and right b r a i n w o u l d m e r g e a n d h e w o u l d b e
whole. Ordinary consciousness would flourish. T h i s happens

9
PAUL B R O K S

s o m e t i m e s , h e b e l i e v e s . F o r b r i e f p e r i o d s the w o r l d takes o n
a different a p p e a r a n c e . He is m o r e relaxed and it is less of an
effort t o c o n n e c t with p e o p l e . T h i s i s w h e r e masturbation
c o m e s in: o r g a s m d e t o n a t e s a d a m - b u s t i n g e x p l o s i o n in the
right h e m i s p h e r e .

As B e t h s e e s Martin to the d o o r , I catch a f r a g m e n t of their

conversation.
'But if your boyfriend leaves you . . . " he says.
'We'll see,' says Beth.
M a r t i n ' s g r i n h a s a n u n w o r l d l y beauty.

* * *

It w a s her s e v e n t h birthday, E l l i e ' s father is telling m e , a clear

m o r n i n g in A p r i l . T h e y h a d s t o p p e d to chat to a neighbour.
E l l i e w a s l o s i n g p a t i e n c e . S h e w a n t e d t o ride her n e w b i c y c l e .
He c a n s e e it now, b l u e and silver c h r o m e , d a z z l i n g in the s u n -
light. A n d then, ' S h e w a s l y i n g i n the m i d d l e o f the r o a d , d e a d
still. It w a s like the w o r l d h a d s t o p p e d , except for m e . W h e n I
g o t c l o s e the rest c a u g h t u p ; the screech o f tyres, the bicycle
s c r a p i n g a c r o s s the r o a d . S o m e o n e s a i d , " O h m y g o o d L o r d ! ' "
H i s m i n d held a c o n t r a d i c t i o n as he l o o k e d d o w n on his
d a u g h t e r ' s b o d y : She's not badly injured a n d , at the s a m e time,
She's dead. N e i t h e r w a s the c a s e . N o t the latter b e c a u s e , of
c o u r s e , s h e i s h e r e , a y o u n g w o m a n now, s q u e e z i n g his elbow;
a n d n o t the former. H e r a r m s w e r e g r a z e d , n o t h i n g s e r i o u s , and
her f a c e w a s u n b l e m i s h e d . B u t w h a t her father c o u l d not s e e w a s
the fractured parietal b o n e a n d the s l o w s e e p a g e o f b l o o d into
the right h e m i s p h e r e o f E l l i e ' s b r a i n .

10
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

It w o u l d be a w e e k b e f o r e s h e o p e n e d her e y e s . B u t s h e w a s
not d e a d . A n d t h r o u g h the tunnel of intensive c a r e — s h e in
c o m a , he c o n s c i o u s n e s s flayed — E l l i e ' s father f o u n d the
strength not t o pray. H i s p r a y e r l e s s v i g i l w a s r e w a r d e d . E l l i e
r e c o v e r e d a n d , m o n t h s later, returned t o s c h o o l . H e d r o p p e d
her o f f a t the g a t e a n d s a y s h e b l u b b e r e d s o m u c h o n the d r i v e t o
w o r k h e h a d t o stop the car. J o y c a n b e s o p r o f o u n d i t b o r d e r s
on grief.

Ellie n e v e r r e g a i n e d the full s t r e n g t h of her left a r m a n d l e g ,

and she tired easily, b u t it d i d n ' t s t o p her j o i n i n g in with the
other children. S h e s t r u g g l e d t o c o n c e n t r a t e a n d k e e p p a c e i n
s o m e l e s s o n s , but that w a s t o b e e x p e c t e d . N o o n e p u s h e d her;
she p u s h e d herself. S h e found a talent for l a n g u a g e s a n d is n o w
p r e p a r i n g t o g o t o university. S o w h a t ' s the p r o b l e m ?

'Parallel p a r k i n g , ' s a y s E l l i e , ' a n d o v e r t a k i n g . '

S h e has difficulty j u d g i n g s p e e d s a n d d i s t a n c e s . S h e ' s t w i c e
failed the d r i v i n g test. Is it a n y t h i n g to do with her b r a i n injury
and, if s o , can I help?
I finish my a s s e s s m e n t s at the next a p p o i n t m e n t . E l l i e h a s
w o r k e d h a r d a t tests o f spatial a w a r e n e s s , m o t o r c o - o r d i n a t i o n ,
concentration, and reaction t i m e . T h e results s h o w p r o b l e m s
consistent with her b r a i n injury. S h e s e n s e s this a n d , with a kind
of d e s p e r a t i o n , offers to take me for a d r i v e . I a c c e p t .

' D o y o u w a n t m e t o c o m e ? ' a s k s her father.

' N o , ' I tell h i m , ' g o a n d h a v e a c u p of tea.'
A t f i r s t E l l i e s e e m s u n s u r e w h e r e the car i s p a r k e d . I t ' s a n o l d
C i t r o e n , the c o l o u r o f t o m a t o s o u p .
' W h e r e shall I g o ? ' s h e s a y s .
' A n y w h e r e . J u s t d r i v e a r o u n d . G o left h e r e , then next right.'

11
PAUL B R O K S

A n d s o w e g o , m e g i v i n g directions. I h a v e t o admit s h e ' s

pretty g o o d . T e n m i n u t e s into the d r i v e n o t h i n g u n t o w a r d has
h a p p e n e d a n d I ' m b e g i n n i n g t o q u e s t i o n the v a l u e o f m y tests.
T h e r e ' s n o d o u b t s h e h a d p r o b l e m s , b u t here w e are i n the real
w o r l d a n d s h e ' s d o i n g fine.
E l l i e h a s s t e e r e d the car into the m i d d l e of the r o a d ready to
turn a c r o s s the o n c o m i n g traffic b a c k into the hospital car p a r k .
T h e indicator clicks as we wait. I t ' s a c o m f o r t i n g s o u n d . Tick,
tick, tick. A l m o s t h y p n o t i c . T h e r e ' s a s t e a d y flow of traffic, so
E l l i e w a i t s . Tick, tick, tick. T h e n a g a p ; n o t h i n g for fifty y a r d s ,
s p a c e e n o u g h to g e t a c r o s s . B u t we d o n ' t m o v e . Tick, tick, tick.
A n o t h e r line of traffic d r a w s t o w a r d s u s , h e a d e d by a white
r e m o v a l s v a n with Y O U R M O V E ! s p l a s h e d a c r o s s the front. Tick,
tick, tick, Y O U R M O V E !

T h e i m a g e o f the v a n n o w filling m y retina and flashing into

m y b r a i n takes the q u i c k - a n d - d i r t y r o u t e via the thalamus and
s t r a i g h t to the s e c u r i t y m o n i t o r s of the a m y g d a l a , d e e p in the
t e m p o r a l l o b e . Action stations! No n e e d to trouble the higher
cortical centres just yet, b e c a u s e s o m e t h i n g h a s impelled Ellie to
turn a c r o s s the traffic a n d we are g o i n g to hit the v a n . C o n s c i o u s
deliberation would be a hindrance. T h i s is basic survival. My
a r m s fly u p a n d m y h e a d j e r k s s i d e w a y s . T h e a m y g d a l a s c r e a m s
i n s t r u c t i o n s t o the b r a i n s t e m , s i g n a l l i n g the release o f c h e m i -
c a l s into the b l o o d s t r e a m a n d , t h r o u g h a clatter of synaptic
activity, g a l v a n i z i n g the a u t o n o m i c n e r v o u s s y s t e m . T h i s is red
alert!

T h e n I b e c o m e a w a r e o f the p i g s q u e a l o f tyres — the v a n ' s ,

n o t o u r s . M y cortex i s c o m i n g b a c k on-line; reflective c o n -
s c i o u s n e s s r e s t o r e s itself. We roll serenely on a n d I g l a n c e b a c k

12
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

to see the v a n p u l l i n g away. Ellie r e m a i n s u n p e r t u r b e d .

We are b a c k in my office. 'It w a s a c l o s e call,' I say.
'Oh?'

' I thought that v a n w a s g o i n g t o hit u s . '

'What van?'

I tell her that we c o u l d a r r a n g e for a m o r e a d v a n c e d a s s e s s -

ment of her d r i v i n g skills, and that s h e is o b l i g e d to i n f o r m the
d r i v i n g licence authority o f her c o n d i t i o n .
'I already have,' she says.

But I can't e n c o u r a g e her to drive. I s e e a d a m a g e d brain

encased in a tonne of metal c r u i s i n g d o w n the m o t o r w a y , t h r o u g h
rush-hour traffic, t h r o u g h residential a r e a s w h e r e children are
riding their birthday bicycles. T h e d a m a g e i s b e y o n d repair.

' I c a m e t o y o u for help,' s a y s E l l i e . H e r father g i v e s m e a n

e m p t y ' T h a n k y o u ' a s they l e a v e .
A few m o n t h s later I g e t a call from E l l i e . S h e h a s taken her
d r i v i n g test for a third time a n d p a s s e d . 'I t h o u g h t y o u ' d like to
know,' she s a y s .
I picture her father s t a n d i n g b e s i d e her. W h a t ' s that on his
face? A b s o l u t i o n ?

* * *

M r s O ' G r a d y i s s h o w i n g m e p h o t o g r a p h s . T h e r e a r e three
a l b u m s o p e n e d out o n the coffee table. T h e r e s h e i s a t K a t i e ' s
w e d d i n g ; small, n e r v o u s , and neat in a p a l e g r e e n suit. T w o
m o n t h s on, there s h e is at S t e p h a n i e ' s . B e i g e this time.
' I feel guilty,' s h e confides. ' I still h a v e n ' t told S t e p h . D o y o u
think I s h o u l d ? '

13
PAUL B R O K S

' Y e s , ' I say. ' S h e ' l l u n d e r s t a n d . '

I d e c l i n e a s e c o n d cup of coffee a n d g a t h e r my stuff to leave,
b u t I ' m n o t g o i n g yet b e c a u s e M r s O ' G r a d y h a s g r a b b e d m y
a r m . S h e l e a d s m e t o a c o r n e r o f the r o o m a n d s t a n d s b a c k with
a n air o f curiosity. S h e s t a r e s , s t e p s f o r w a r d , s t a n d s b a c k a g a i n .
S h e c a n ' t m a k e m e out. T h e facial m u s c u l a t u r e s h a p e s a p p r e -
hension, building to dread. T h e n she g o e s blank.

S h e w a l k s t o the other s i d e o f the r o o m , s m a c k i n g her lips

a n d t u g g i n g her collar. I follow her to the kitchen w h e r e she
s t a n d s b y the s t o v e p i c k i n g her n o s e . T h e n she f i l l s the kettle, but
d o e s n ' t switch it o n . S h e fetches m u g s from the c u p b o a r d and
p l a c e s t h e m on a tray. F r o m time to t i m e s h e s e e m s to be a w a r e
that there is s o m e o n e else in the r o o m . S h e l o o k s at m e , but I am
t o o m u c h to f a t h o m . I feel s e m i - t r a n s p a r e n t . I s p e a k , but there is
n o r e s p o n s e . A m I really here?

S h e fills the m u g s with c o l d w a t e r f r o m the kettle and carries

the t r a y into the l i v i n g r o o m . We sit in silence. I ' m thankful this
h a s n ' t d e v e l o p e d into a thrashing, f o a m i n g , full-blown fit. After
a while s h e r e a c h e s for the third a l b u m .

' T h i s o n e ' s the h o l i d a y s , ' s h e s a y s . ' T e n e r i f e . ' B u t s h e k n o w s

s o m e t h i n g i s w r o n g w h e n s h e s e e s plain w a t e r i n the m u g s .

M r s O ' G r a d y takes b r i e f e x c u r s i o n s from c o n s c i o u s n e s s .

T h e s e a r e k n o w n a s a u t o m a t i s m s , a feature o f her epilepsy. T h e
c o n s c i o u s m i n d s w i t c h e s off, but the b o d i l y a p p a r a t u s carries
on in a m o r e or l e s s p u r p o s e f u l fashion: f e e d i n g the cat, w a l k i n g
r o u n d the s u p e r m a r k e t , b o a r d i n g a b u s . H a d she reached for
the b r e a d knife a n d p l u n g e d it t h r o u g h my heart I d o u b t she
w o u l d b e c o n v i c t e d o f m u r d e r . T h e law m a k e s p r o v i s i o n for
automatisms.

14
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

Watching M r s O ' G r a d y ' s u n o c c u p i e d b o d y scuttling a b o u t

I thought of her as a z o m b i e . S t u d e n t s of c o n s c i o u s n e s s are fond
o f z o m b i e s . N o t the H a i t i a n l i v i n g d e a d o r s h a m b l i n g g h o u l s
of the Twilight Zone, but far s t r a n g e r inhabitants of the w o r l d of
philosophical conjecture. T h e s e creatures l o o k and act like o r d i -
nary p e o p l e ; they w a l k , talk, s i n g , l a u g h , a n d w e e p , h a v e l o v e
affairs, raise families, g e t d r u n k , a r g u e a b o u t politics. T h e y a r e ,
in fact, like us in e v e r y w a y b u t o n e : they l a c k c o n s c i o u s a w a r e -
ness. T h e i r b r a i n s r e g u l a t e internal states o f the b o d y a n d
control o u t w a r d b e h a v i o u r , but that's all. W h i l e the rest o f u s
m o v e a b o u t i n a bright p o d o f c o n s c i o u s n e s s , z o m b i e s just m o v e
about. T h e i r p h i l o s o p h i c a l p u r p o s e i s t o crystallize the m i n d -
b o d y p r o b l e m . Is it l o g i c a l l y p o s s i b l e to s u b t r a c t mental life
from the w o r k i n g brain, in which c a s e there w o u l d be s c o p e for
z o m b i e s ( d u a l i s m ) ? O r are b r a i n activity a n d c o n s c i o u s n e s s o n e
and the s a m e thing ( m a t e r i a l i s m ) ? N o d o u b t M r s O ' G r a d y
w o u l d h a v e s o m e t h i n g t o s a y o n the matter.

T h e trouble i s , not all o f her e x c u r s i o n s are s o brief; h e n c e

M r s O ' G r a d y ' s guilt o v e r S t e p h a n i e ' s w e d d i n g . H e r m e m o r y
h o l d s n o trace o f the o c c a s i o n . P h y s i c a l l y s h e w a s there. Y o u
can see her in the p h o t o s . B u t s h e w a s not there mentally, at least
not in full. It w a s t o o p r o t r a c t e d an e p i s o d e to fit the c o n v e n -
tional s c h e m e o f a n epileptic a u t o m a t i s m . M o r e likely her b r a i n
had settled into a stable pattern of d y s f u n c t i o n with l o w - l e v e l
epileptic d i s c h a r g e s j a m m i n g the t r a n s m i s s i o n o f s e n s o r y infor-
m a t i o n into m e m o r y . H e r a w a r e n e s s w o u l d h a v e b e e n a fragile
membrane of impressions floating between 'now' and 'then',
but never quite connecting.

T h e r e are other c i r c u m s t a n c e s i n which h u m a n b e i n g s a p p e a r

15
PAUL B R O K S

t o act p u r p o s e f u l l y w i t h o u t the benefit o f s e l f - a w a r e n e s s . S l e e p -

w a l k i n g is a g o o d e x a m p l e . I w a s in the C o m b i n e d C a d e t F o r c e
in my teens. O n e night, at c a m p , I s o m n a m b u l a t e d t h r o u g h the
b a r r a c k s a n d m i s t o o k the N C O s ' q u a r t e r s for the lavatory. I
shuffled in a n d urinated o v e r o n e of the officers as he slept.
Unfortunately, the f o l l o w i n g m o r n i n g I w a s fully c o n s c i o u s .

H o w c o n v e n i e n t i t w o u l d b e s o m e t i m e s t o turn off c o n -
s c i o u s n e s s a n d c a r r y o n with o r d i n a r y b e h a v i o u r . I m a g i n e
flicking a switch on difficult d a y s a n d flipping into oblivion,
k n o w i n g that y o u r b o d y will c o n t i n u e g o i n g a b o u t its n o r m a l
b u s i n e s s . N o o n e w o u l d notice. A p r e - p r o g r a m m e d w a k e - u p
call w o u l d return y o u to sentience in time for a film or the
football. C o n t r o l l e d a u t o m a t i s m m i g h t b e preferable t o p e r i o d s
o f p h y s i c a l o r e m o t i o n a l d i s c o m f o r t , o r sheer b o r e d o m . I f
e v e r y o n e h a d a c o n s c i o u s n e s s switch then the w o r l d , m o s t of
the t i m e , w o u l d b e t e e m i n g with z o m b i e s . P e r h a p s i t a l r e a d y is.

W h a t t r o u b l e s M r s O ' G r a d y i s that s h e r e m e m b e r s o n e
w e d d i n g and n o t the other: K a t i e ' s , but not S t e p h ' s . I t s e e m s
unfair. I n truth, s h e s a y s , i t ' s not s o m u c h that s h e can't r e m e m -
b e r as the feeling that s h e w a s n ' t actually there. L i k e she didn't
b o t h e r to turn up. I ' m not g o i n g to d e b a t e it with her a n d , for
her o w n p e a c e of m i n d , I think s h e s h o u l d talk it t h r o u g h with
her d a u g h t e r s . B u t if they c o u l d n ' t tell, what difference d o e s
it m a k e ?

L a t e r , l y i n g in b e d , I c o n f e s s to my wife that I am a z o m b i e .
We h a d a malfunction with the transcranial m a g n e t i c s t i m u l a -
tor. It z a p p e d my a w a r e n e s s m o d u l e . I t h o u g h t she s h o u l d know,
b u t b e s t not b r e a k it to the k i d s just yet. I s a y I h o p e it w o n ' t
c h a n g e the w a y s h e feels a b o u t m e . S h e i s a l r e a d y asleep.

16
 The Space behind the Face

T h e illusion is irresistible. B e h i n d e v e r y face there is a self. We

see the signal of c o n s c i o u s n e s s in a g l e a m i n g e y e a n d i m a g i n e
s o m e ethereal s p a c e b e n e a t h the vault of the skull, lit by shifting
patterns o f feeling a n d t h o u g h t , c h a r g e d with intention. A n
essence. B u t what do we find in that s p a c e b e h i n d the f a c e , w h e n
we look?

T h e brute fact is there is n o t h i n g b u t material s u b s t a n c e : flesh

and b l o o d a n d b o n e a n d b r a i n . I k n o w , I ' v e s e e n . Y o u l o o k
d o w n into a n o p e n h e a d , w a t c h i n g the b r a i n p u l s a t e , w a t c h i n g
the s u r g e o n t u g a n d p r o b e , a n d y o u u n d e r s t a n d with a b s o l u t e
conviction that there is n o t h i n g m o r e to it. T h e r e ' s no o n e there.
I t ' s a kind of liberation.

T h e illusion i s irresistible, but not i n d i s s o l u b l e . I t i s m o r e

than twenty y e a r s since I b e g a n my clinical t r a i n i n g at a rehabil-
itation hospital for p e o p l e with n e u r o l o g i c a l d i s o r d e r s . I w a s a
student o f clinical p s y c h o l o g y , b u t w a s d r a w n m o s t l y t o n e u r o l -
ogy. F o r as l o n g as I c o u l d r e m e m b e r I h a d b e e n interested in the
w o r k i n g s o f the b r a i n a n d , o n e w a y o r another, a s clinician o r

17
PAUL B R O K S

scientist, I e x p e c t e d to m a k e a career in n e u r o p s y c h o l o g y , the

science of brain and mind. Neuro-rehab was a g o o d place to
start.

O n e o f the patients w a s a s e v e n t e e n - y e a r - o l d b o y w h o h a d
s t e p p e d into an e m p t y lift shaft t h r o u g h which he fell three
f l o o r s , a l m o s t t o his d e a t h . T h e s u r g e o n s h a d d o n e their b e s t t o
p i e c e him t o g e t h e r a g a i n , b u t n o w the d o m e o f his s h a v e n head
w a s a s y m m e t r i c a l : c o n v e x on the right, c o n c a v e on the left, with
a d e e p o v a l d e p r e s s i o n like the shell of a h a r d - b o i l e d e g g
c r a c k e d with a s p o o n .

H i s f a c e w o r k e d relentlessly, writhing with a n g e r a n d d r e a d .

Mostly anger. He would growl and grunt, and sometimes
h o w l , b u t , a p a r t f r o m o c c a s i o n a l v o l l e y s o f obscenity, h e w a s
i n c a p a b l e o f s p e e c h . T h i s i s n o t u n c o m m o n . P e o p l e without
o r d i n a r y s p e e c h d u e t o b r a i n injury s o m e t i m e s h a v e the c a p a -
city to s u m m o n up the vilest g o b s of a b u s e . I d i d n ' t k n o w that at
the t i m e . It c a m e as a s h o c k . S o m e t i m e s they can a l s o s i n g , but
this b o y n e v e r s a n g . H e sat c o n t o r t e d i n his wheelchair, head
t u r n e d s i d e w a y s a n d b a c k a t a n u n c o m f o r t a b l e a n g l e , limbs
b u c k l e d with spasticity, a s t r e a m of s a l i v a dribbling from the
c o r n e r o f his m o u t h .

T h e p r i a p i s m w a s a f i n a l , h u m i l i a t i n g twist. D u e t o a quirk o f
the d a m a g e t o his n e r v o u s s y s t e m h e w a s continually troubled
by a painful erection. T h e y o u n g w o m e n t e n d i n g h i m — n u r s e s ,
p h y s i o s , a n d o c c u p a t i o n a l therapists — p r e t e n d e d not to notice.

I felt pity for h i m , b u t a l s o r e v u l s i o n . As a r a w trainee not yet

a c c l i m a t i z e d , I f o u n d him g r o t e s q u e . W h a t d i s t u r b e d m e m o s t
w a s the f l i c k e r i n g screen o f his face: b l e a k i m a g e s o f a soul i n
t o r m e n t . Or so I i m a g i n e d . T h e n I b e g a n to c o n s i d e r what

18
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

m i g h t remain of a ' s o u l ' or a ' s e l f ' . I b e g a n to d o u b t there w a s

a n y t h i n g at all g o i n g on b e h i n d that f a c e . He should be allowed to
die, I thought, a n d not just for his o w n s a k e . H o w d i d he l o o k to
his m o t h e r ? C o u l d s h e e v e n b e a r t o l o o k ?

T h e c h a o s o f his face d r a i n e d m y s y m p a t h y . I t b r o k e the

rules. A face s h o u l d a l l o w public a c c e s s to the p r i v a t e self. I t ' s an
ancient c o n v e n t i o n of the h u m a n r a c e . T h e r e is a u n i v e r s a l
s y s t e m o f s i g n a l s . B u t this y o u n g m a n ' s facial d i s p l a y s w o r k e d
like a s u b t e r f u g e , d e n y i n g k n o w l e d g e of w h a t l a y b e h i n d .
Perhaps nothing lay behind.

T h e n , o n e day, I h a p p e n e d t o b e a r o u n d w h e n the b o y ' s

mother c a m e to visit. I w a t c h e d as s h e c r a d l e d his b r o k e n h e a d
in her a r m s . F o r the time that she w a s with h i m , b u t not m u c h
longer, an e x t r a o r d i n a r y t r a n s f o r m a t i o n c a m e o v e r his f a c e . It
b e c a m e still. T h e r a g e s u b s i d e d . H e s e e m e d t o r e g a i n his
humanity. H e r e w e r e t w o s e l v e s , not just a m o t h e r a n d a b r o k e n
shell o f a s o n . T h e w h o l e w a s g r e a t e r than the s u m o f its p a r t s .

M a y b e it w a s a failure of i m a g i n a t i o n that led me to s e n s e a

s e e p i n g a w a y o f the b o y ' s s e l f o n c e his m o t h e r h a d g o n e , b u t the
capacity I d i s c o v e r e d in m y s e l f to s e e a fellow h u m a n b e i n g as
less than a p e r s o n w a s an a p p a l l i n g revelation. In s u c h c i r c u m -
stances h o w are w e t o d i s t i n g u i s h failure o f e m p a t h y f r o m v a l i d
o b s e r v a t i o n ? P e r h a p s they a m o u n t t o the s a m e thing.

N o w m y o w n s o n h a s t u r n e d s e v e n t e e n , the s a m e a g e a s the
eggshell boy. H e w a s i n the v o i d o f pre-birth w h e n o u r friend
m a d e his lonely d e s c e n t t h r o u g h the lift shaft. T o disturb s o m e -
o n e from a state of n o n - e x i s t e n c e is a terrible responsibility.
L o o k a t w h a t can h a p p e n .

I h a v e a m e m o r y o f b e i n g with m y s o n w h e n h e w a s four

19
PAUL B R O K S

y e a r s o l d . I t i s d e e p winter. W e h a v e t o g o out, s o w e leave the

w a r m t h o f o u r h o u s e for the freezing night air. T h e r e are few
lights in the v i l l a g e a n d the s k y is full of stars. We are hardly
b e y o n d the front d o o r w h e n h e starts c o u g h i n g .
' A r e y o u all r i g h t ? '

' I t ' s o k a y , ' he s a y s , 'I think I just s w a l l o w e d s o m e d a r k . '

He h a s the n o t i o n that d a r k n e s s is a s u b s t a n c e . It will m a k e
y o u c h o k e i f y o u s w a l l o w t o o m u c h i n o n e g o . I c o u l d h a v e put
h i m s t r a i g h t with s o m e p r o s a i c a c c o u n t o f the c o u g h i n g reflex
b e i n g t r i g g e r e d by the s h o c k of the c o l d air rather than a m o u t h -
ful of d a r k n e s s , b u t I d i d n ' t . I s t a s h e d a w a y the treasured i m a g e
a n d left h i m with the v e r s i o n of reality fashioned by his infant
brain.

R e a l i t y is u n d e r constant review. T w e n t y - t h r e e centuries

a g o , A r i s t o t l e b e l i e v e d that the heart m u s t b e the s o u r c e o f
mental life b e c a u s e o f its d y n a m i c action a n d its w a r m t h . T h e
function o f the b r a i n , h e t h o u g h t , w a s t o c o o l the b l o o d . H e
built his c o s m o l o g y o n the b e l i e f that the E a r t h s t a n d s m o t i o n -
l e s s at the centre of the u n i v e r s e , a fixed point a b o u t which the
s u n a n d the m o o n a n d the s t a r s r e v o l v e . A r i s t o t l e w a s w r o n g o n
e v e r y c o u n t , b u t his e r r o n e o u s beliefs - the p r o d u c t of intuition
a n d illusion — s e r v e d h i m well e n o u g h . A n d t h o u g h w e n o w
k n o w i m m e a s u r a b l y m o r e than A r i s t o t l e a b o u t the w o r k i n g s
o f the h u m a n b o d y a n d the s t r u c t u r e o f the c o s m o s , w e s h o u l d
n o t d e l u d e o u r s e l v e s b y thinking that w e h a v e arrived a t s o m e
p r i v i l e g e d e n d - p o i n t o f intellectual e v o l u t i o n .

We still live by intuitions a n d illusions, especially w h e n our

t h o u g h t s t u r n i n w a r d s . T h e b r i g h t , intangible qualities o f s u b -
j e c t i v e e x p e r i e n c e h a v e yet t o b e reconciled with the d a r k

20
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

s u b s t a n c e of the b r a i n , but that s p a c e b e h i n d the f a c e is still lit

b y the m i n d ' s e y e . Irresistibly, w e still s e e the v i s i o n o f m i n d s i n
the light o f other p e o p l e ' s e y e s . C o s m o l o g i e s c o m e a n d g o , b u t
i f this illusion b e g i n s t o f a d e then s o d o e s the o b s e r v e r .

* * *

I ' v e b e e n t r y i n g t o think o f the e g g s h e l l b o y ' s n a m e . I c o u l d

have g i v e n him a n a m e . A l l the others h a v e p s e u d o n y m s . It
w a s n ' t deliberate. I d i d n ' t c h o o s e to d e n y h i m a n a m e . B u t w h e n
the story w a s finished, I s a w he didn't h a v e o n e . A n a m e w o u l d
humanize him,' s o m e o n e said. 'Call him John or Steven or
Richard...'

On reflection, I t h o u g h t it m i g h t do just the o p p o s i t e .

21
The Seahorse and the Almond

W h i s k y o n t o p o f w i n e w a s a m i s t a k e . T h i s m o r n i n g i t h a s left
m e feeling fractionally t o o e m b o d i e d ; t o o a w a r e o f the w e i g h t
a n d m o v e m e n t o f m y h e a d , the b u l k o f m y t o n g u e .

I w o k e l a t e , b r e a k i n g f r o m a thick crust of sleep not m u c h

b e f o r e eight. H a l f a n h o u r later, I ' m w a l k i n g t o w o r k , without
hurry, b u t k e e p i n g p a c e with the traffic. I t ' s a c o u p l e of miles. It
will d o m e g o o d . D o w n p a s t the p a r a d e o f s h o p s , p a s t the o d d
j u x t a p o s i t i o n o f c a s i n o a n d funeral p a r l o u r , p a s t the terraced
h o u s e s a t the fringe o f the p a r k , and o n u p the other s i d e o f the
u r b a n v a l l e y t o w a r d s the d r a b m o n o l i t h o n the b r o w o f the hill.
T h e D i s t r i c t G e n e r a l H o s p i t a l i s v i s i b l e from m o s t o f the city.
T o d a y i t i s f r a m e d b y a s k y the c o l o u r o f c e m e n t .

N a o m i i s d e e p i n s i d e . I t i s her nineteenth birthday. S h e i s o n

a b e d b e i n g p u s h e d by a p o r t e r a l o n g s h i n y floors, into lifts and
o u t a c r o s s m o r e s h i n y f l o o r s . S h e i s tired, h a v i n g b e e n a w a k e
since the b r e a k o f day, well b e f o r e the n e u r o p h y s i o l o g y techni-
c i a n s c a m e to g l u e e l e c t r o d e s to her scalp. T h e y left her with a
M e d u s a ' s head of a n g r y serpents.

22
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

A r r i v i n g at nine, I go s t r a i g h t to the a n g i o g r a p h y suite w h e r e

p r e p a r a t i o n s are i n hand for N a o m i ' s o r d e a l . T h e central c h a m -
ber is small, a b o u t the size of a s u b u r b a n l i v i n g r o o m . It is
brightly lit and c r a m m e d with X - r a y e q u i p m e n t , m o n i t o r s , a n d
control p a n e l s . T h e centrepiece i s the n a r r o w b e d u p o n w h i c h
the patient, w h e n s h e arrives, will b e l a i d . T h e w a y i t t a p e r s a t
one end r e m i n d s me of an i r o n i n g b o a r d . In the c o r n e r a quiet
m a n from Medical Illustrations i s setting u p his v i d e o c a m e r a
r e a d y for the show. E E G technicians i n white a n d r a d i o g r a p h e r s
in blue filter in and l o o k b u s y .

W e are g o i n g t o interfere with the w o r k i n g s o f N a o m i ' s

brain, anaesthetizing each h e m i s p h e r e in turn with injections
o f A m y t a l , a f a s t - a c t i n g s e d a t i v e . O u r a i m i s t o i s o l a t e a n d inter-
r o g a t e o n e s i d e o f her h e a d a n d then the other. Strictly,
' a n a e s t h e t i z e ' i s incorrect since the b r a i n h a s n o s e n s o r y r e c e p -
tors. It is a l w a y s in a state of a n a e s t h e s i a .

T h e radiologist appears. ' D o we have a patient?' We do.

N a o m i i s sitting u p i n her m o b i l e b e d , w h i c h h a s b e e n p a r k e d
just d o w n the corridor, n o w h e r e in particular. It h a s a r r i v e d as
if by time-lapse photography m o v i n g from one indeterminate
station t o the next, a n d n o w here s h e i s . S h e l o o k s lonely, s o I g o
and chat with her for a while. I w i s h her h a p p y birthday.

I like N a o m i . I ' v e g o t to k n o w her well these p a s t few

m o n t h s , w a t c h i n g her p r o g r e s s t h r o u g h a n o b s t a c l e c o u r s e o f
investigations ( E E G , M R I , v i d e o telemetry, n e u r o p s y c h o l o g y )
that will l e a d , s h e h o p e s , to the s u r g e o n ' s list, to the o p e r a t i n g
theatre and to the c a r v i n g a w a y of a small s t r e a k of s c a r r e d
brain tissue - the s o u r c e of her epilepsy.

H e r faith i n the d o c t o r s a n d s u r g e o n s i s a b s o l u t e . T h e f i t s will

23
PAUL B R O K S

c e a s e . A l l will b e well. A n d w h e n s h e i s seizure-free she will

go to university. P e r h a p s s h e will take a g a p - y e a r and travel to
A u s t r a l i a . In t i m e , s h e will a p p l y for a d r i v e r ' s licence. A n d so
o n . S h e is i n c o r r i g i b l y o p t i m i s t i c . It m a y be a feature of her
brain pathology.

H e r b o y f r i e n d , w h o s e n a m e I h a v e forgotten, is less s a n -
g u i n e . U n l i k e N a o m i , h e can s e e the possibility o f failure. H e
u n d e r s t a n d s that the o p e r a t i o n m i g h t not w o r k . ' Y o u ' r e such a
p e s s i m i s t , ' N a o m i told h i m w h e n I s a w them b o t h in the clinic.
I ' d be the s a m e . Be troubled, Naomi. A little. The surgeon, if he
gets his hands on you, is going to open your head and take a piece
of you away. Too much faith and expectation can be counter-
productive. I think these things, but this is not the time to v o i c e
my c o n c e r n s . It is a time for unconditional r e a s s u r a n c e - not my
s t r o n g e s t suit, b u t a n e c e s s a r y part of the repertoire, and well
practised.

M e a n w h i l e , the r a d i o l o g i s t is sifting t h r o u g h his tray of p a r a -

p h e r n a l i a a n d realizes s o m e t h i n g i s m i s s i n g . ' D o w e have any
A m y t a l ? ' N o , not yet. O u r b a t c h o f the stuff l o o k e d s u s p i -
c i o u s l y c l o u d y , p o s s i b l y c o n t a m i n a t e d . No p r o b l e m . A call to
P h a r m a c y and we a r e a s s u r e d that a s u p p l y of the d r u g is
a l r e a d y on its w a y f r o m the R a d c l i f f e Infirmary. W h y it h a s to
c o m e all the w a y f r o m O x f o r d I ' v e no i d e a . I d o n ' t enquire.

T h i s m o r n i n g ' s p r o c e d u r e — a W a d a test — is the final hurdle.

I f N a o m i p a s s e s the test s h e a d v a n c e s t o the s u r g e o n ' s list. S h e i s
p r e p a r e d . Y e s t e r d a y she r e h e a r s e d the p r o t o c o l with o n e o f m y
c o l l e a g u e s f r o m the N e u r o p s y c h o l o g y Unit. S h e lay o n her
b a c k , r a i s e d b o t h a r m s to the vertical, counted up to twenty,
i m a g i n e d (at a r o u n d t e n ) that her left a r m had b e c o m e limp and

24
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

let it d r o p to her s i d e . T h i s is w h a t h a p p e n s w h e n the d r u g hits

the right side o f the b r a i n . T h e n they w e n t t h r o u g h the m o t i o n s
o f testing. N a o m i p e r f o r m e d s o m e s i m p l e a c t i o n s ( ' T o u c h
y o u r n o s e . . . c l o s e y o u r e y e s . . . b l o w . . . ' ) ; recited the d a y s
o f the w e e k and c o u n t e d b a c k w a r d s f r o m ten. S h e d e s c r i b e d
a picture ('A m a n up a ladder, a b o y with a ball, a girl, a kite,
a d o g and a cat, a p o n d , d u c k s . . . ' ) ; n a m e d o b j e c t s ; r e a d s e n -
tences; did mental arithmetic. T h e instructions a n d q u e s t i o n s
w e r e rapid-fire. A m y t a l is fast a c t i n g , b u t its effects are s h o r t -
lived. In the test p r o p e r the injected half-brain will sleep for j u s t
two or three m i n u t e s — while we c o n d u c t o u r b u s i n e s s with its
wakeful twin.

My c o l l e a g u e a r r i v e s c a r r y i n g a c l i p b o a r d , a s t o p w a t c h , a n d
two b l a c k r i n g - b i n d e r s . O n her w a y into the a n g i o suite s h e
e x c h a n g e s s m i l e s a n d w o r d s with N a o m i , w h o s e b e d h a s n o w
m o v e d c l o s e r t o the m a i n d o o r . T h e r e ' s a s m i l e for m e t o o . S h e
already k n o w s a b o u t the d e l a y with the A m y t a l . T i m e for a
coffee. We sit next to the m a c h i n e that spills o u t the X - r a y n e g -
atives and flip t h r o u g h N a o m i ' s c a s e n o t e s . H e r h i s t o r y i s
u n r e m a r k a b l e . It all started with a fever w h e n s h e w a s s m a l l .
S h e ' d b e e n o f f c o l o u r for a c o u p l e o f d a y s , then s e e m e d t o p i c k
up. H e r m o t h e r w a s n ' t s u r e , b u t in the end d r o p p e d her o f f at
n u r s e r y school o n the w a y t o w o r k .

M i d w a y t h r o u g h the m o r n i n g N a o m i fell a s l e e p in the s a n d -

pit, o r s o the teachers t h o u g h t . W h e n s h e c o u l d n ' t b e r o u s e d
they called an a m b u l a n c e . S h e started s h a k i n g b e f o r e s h e fell
asleep, the other children s a i d . T h e d o c t o r t h o u g h t i t w a s p r o b -
ably a febrile c o n v u l s i o n : not to w o r r y , a lot of k i d s are p r o n e to
seizures i f their t e m p e r a t u r e c l i m b s t o o h i g h . T h e y m o s t l y g r o w

25
PAUL B R O K S

o u t of it. A n d s o , it s e e m e d , s h e did. B u t the fits returned on the

first tides o f m e n s t r u a t i o n .
T h e y w e r e s h a d o w y figures with a p u n g e n t smell o f electric-
ity, a s e n s e d p r e s e n c e , but no o n e there. O d d to identify the
s m e l l of a s e i z u r e with electricity, which is o d o u r l e s s , but apt for
an electrical s t o r m in the b r a i n .

T h e ethereal v i s i t o r s a r e part o f the epileptic a u r a , a state o f

altered a w a r e n e s s that s e r v e s t o f o r e w a r n o f a n a p p r o a c h i n g
s e i z u r e . It a l s o h a s another, m o r e v i s c e r a l , feature. N a o m i s a y s it
feels like a s p a r r o w fluttering its w i n g s in the pit of her s t o m a c h .
T h e bird a s c e n d s t o her throat, b e c o m e s t r a p p e d , and s t r u g g l e s
t o e s c a p e . U p t o this point, u n d e r the g a t h e r i n g g l o o m o f the
b r a i n s t o r m , i n the c o m p a n y o f the e m p t y s h a d o w s and the s p a r -
row, s h e is fully c o n s c i o u s a n d can articulate her experiences.
T h e n the s t o r m b r e a k s and s h e i s s w e p t b e y o n d reflection. H e r
e y e s b e c o m e g l a z e d and empty. S h e t u g s a t her clothes, s m a c k s
her lips, a n d k e e p s w i p i n g her n o s e with the b a c k o f her hand.
I ' v e s e e n her in this state. S h e h a s g o n e with the wraiths. T h e y
h a v e left an a u t o m a t o n , acting out a p u r p o s e l e s s , robotic routine.

After the t o n e p o e m of the a u r a — the u n f o r m e d i m a g e s , the

u n n a m e a b l e scents — a n d after the rhythmic a u t o m a t i s m s , there
s o m e t i m e s f o l l o w s a third, c a t a s t r o p h i c , m o v e m e n t . A b o u t o n e
in five of her attacks turns into a g e n e r a l i z e d seizure, what
w o u l d o n c e h a v e b e e n called a g r a n d m a l . F i r s t , her m u s c l e s
contract a n d s h e falls t o the g r o u n d , s o m e t i m e s s p u r t i n g b l o o d
as her j a w c l a m p s shut a n d her teeth sink into her t o n g u e . S h e
s t o p s b r e a t h i n g a n d , u n c o n s c i o u s , s h e urinates. T h e n c o m e the
c o n v u l s i o n s — l i m b s j e r k i n g m e c h a n i c a l l y for several minutes —
f o l l o w e d by r e l e a s e into a d e e p sleep.

26
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

D e s p i t e inventive c o c k t a i l s o f anti-epileptic m e d i c a t i o n , w i t h
d o s a g e s a l m o s t t o toxic levels, the f r e q u e n c y o f N a o m i ' s
seizures h a s steadily i n c r e a s e d . N o w she g e t s t h e m a l m o s t e v e r y
day. S h e is d e s p e r a t e for a c u r e a n d w i l l i n g to take risks.

T h e planned operation has an ungainly n a m e : a m y g d a l o -

h i p p o c a m p e c t o m y , s o called b e c a u s e i t i n v o l v e s r e m o v a l o f the
a m y g d a l a (from the G r e e k for ' a l m o n d ' ) a n d p a r t o f the a d j a -
cent structure, the h i p p o c a m p u s ( ' s e a h o r s e ' ) . E a c h h a l f o f the
brain contains a n a l m o n d a n d a s e a h o r s e . T h e p u r p o s e o f the
W a d a test is to clear a w a y for the o p e r a t i o n . We k n o w it is the
right side o f N a o m i ' s b r a i n that b e a r s the scar t i s s u e a n d d r i v e s
the seizures b e c a u s e w e ' v e s e e n the b r a i n s c a n s a n d w e ' v e
l o g g e d the clinical s i g n s . B u t w e a r e a l s o m a k i n g a n a s s u m p t i o n ,
p o s s i b l y u n w a r r a n t e d , that her left h e m i s p h e r e , w h i c h l o o k s
n o r m a l , is functioning n o r m a l l y . O u r test will help d e t e r m i n e
whether this i s true. (It i s ' W a d a ' , b y the w a y , not ' W A D A ' a s
I ' v e just b e e n r e a d i n g i n the c a s e n o t e s ; a c o m m o n error. T h e
p r o c e d u r e i s n a m e d after J u h n W a d a , the J a p a n e s e - C a n a d i a n
n e u r o l o g i s t w h o f i r s t p r o p o s e d its u s e . I t m u s t b e d i s a p p o i n t i n g
t o b e elevated t o the status o f a n e p o n y m o n l y t o b e m i s t a k e n for
a n a c r o n y m . ) W e n e e d t o b e a s s u r e a s p o s s i b l e that there i s n o
'silent l e s i o n ' on that healthy s i d e ; in other w o r d s , a m a l f u n c t i o n
that h a s n ' t s h o w n u p o n the b r a i n s c a n s . A p p e a r a n c e s c a n b e
deceptive. B r a i n tissue can l o o k clean a n d p l u m p , b u t w i t h o u t
putting it to the test o n e c a n ' t be s u r e of its integrity.

O n e of the t a r g e t s for s u r g e r y , the h i p p o c a m p u s , is a vital

c o m p o n e n t o f the b r a i n ' s m e m o r y circuitry, essential for l a y i n g
d o w n n e w traces. We n e e d to k n o w , a b o v e all, whether the left
h e m i s p h e r e o f N a o m i ' s b r a i n i s u p t o the t a s k o f s u s t a i n i n g b a s i c

27
PAUL B R O K S

m e m o r y functions. T o the extent that each o f u s i s the s u m o f

o u r m e m o r i e s , the h i p p o c a m p u s i s the instrument b y m e a n s
o f w h i c h w e a s s e m b l e o u r s e l v e s . E v e r y t h i n g accessible t o
c o n s c i o u s recall h a s b e e n r e g i s t e r e d and r e c o r d e d t h r o u g h its
channels.

W h a t w e r e y o u d o i n g ten m i n u t e s a g o ? W h o w a s the last

p e r s o n y o u s p o k e t o ? W h a t did y o u h a v e for b r e a k f a s t ? W h a t
d i d y o u d o yesterday, last w e e k e n d ? W h e n w a s the last time y o u
w e p t , a n d w h y ? C o n j u r e a n i m a g e o f y o u r f i r s t s c h o o l , the face
o f y o u r teacher, y o u r b e s t friend. R e m e m b e r y o u r f i r s t kiss.
A n d then, stretching to the mental horizon, rising t h r o u g h the
s q u a l l s and s u n s h i n e o f p e r s o n a l e x p e r i e n c e , picture the tower-
i n g s t a c k s of i n f o r m a t i o n in the public d o m a i n ; the raw
m a t e r i a l s o f culture. W h a t d o e s the w o r d ' e n t r o p y ' m e a n ( o r
' t h e ' o r ' w o r d ' o r ' m e a n ' ) ? H o w d o y o u u s e a telephone? W h o
i s the p r e s i d e n t o f the U n i t e d S t a t e s ? A t what temperature d o e s
w a t e r freeze? W h o w r o t e King L e a r ? W h a t is the function of the
liver? All this i n f o r m a t i o n , p e r s o n a l and p u b l i c , finds its w a y
into m e m o r y b y w a y o f the h i p p o c a m p u s .

A s a n aid t o recall, m e d i e v a l scholastics d e v e l o p e d elaborate,

architectural systems of mental imagery — 'Theatres of
M e m o r y ' o r ' M e m o r y P a l a c e s ' - t h r o u g h which they w o u l d
take i m a g i n a r y strolls, d e p o s i t i n g o r retrieving n u g g e t s o f
i n f o r m a t i o n at s t r a t e g i c l o c a t i o n s . I like the idea that the K e e p e r
of the G a t e s is as fragile a creature as the s e a h o r s e . It d o e s n ' t
take m u c h — a stroke of the s u r g e o n ' s knife — to finish it off and
c l o s e the entrance for g o o d . T h e f l o w o f information s t o p s .

If, as p l a n n e d , the s u r g e o n w e r e to r e m o v e the right h i p p o -

c a m p u s , b u t it t u r n e d out that N a o m i had no s p a r e capacity in

28
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

the left, then the o p e r a t i o n w o u l d , in a s e n s e , c a u s e N a o m i her-

self t o stop. S h e w o u l d f o r m n o n e w m e m o r i e s o f e v e n t s o r facts
b e y o n d her present a g e o f nineteen. I t w o u l d not p r e v e n t her
from g r o w i n g o l d , but her a g e i n g b o d y w o u l d f o r e v e r h o u s e the
m i n d of a nineteen-year-old girl.

S u c h things h a p p e n e d in the e a r l y d a y s of e p i l e p s y s u r g e r y . A
handful o f p e o p l e , m o s t f a m o u s l y a y o u n g m e c h a n i c k n o w n a s
patient ' H M ' , e n d e d u p with d e n s e a n d i r r e v e r s i b l e a m n e s i a ,
unable to retain n e w i n f o r m a t i o n for m o r e than a few m i n u t e s at
a time, and s o u n a b l e t o establish m e m o r i e s . Y o u c o u l d visit H M
e v e r y d a y for a y e a r and each time he w o u l d g r e e t y o u as a
stranger. L e a v e the r o o m for ten m i n u t e s a n d o n y o u r return h e
w o u l d h a v e n o idea w h o y o u w e r e .

Since then s u r g e o n s h a v e restricted their interventions to just

o n e side o f the b r a i n , but e v e n s o there h a v e b e e n s i m i l a r d i s a s -
ters w h e r e it w a s not established p r i o r to s u r g e r y that the other
side w a s i n g o o d w o r k i n g order. T h a t ' s the r e a s o n w e ' r e h e r e
today, I remind myself, g o i n g t h r o u g h these a r c a n e rituals. We
want N a o m i t o continue i n m i n d a s well a s b o d y .

I f the h i p p o c a m p u s i s the g a t e w a y t o m e m o r y , o n e c a n p i c -
ture the a m y g d a l a as h o u s i n g the l e v e r s of e m o t i o n . It links the
i n f o r m a t i o n - p r o c e s s i n g activities o f the higher, cortical a r e a s o f
the brain — the m a c h i n e r i e s of l a n g u a g e , p e r c e p t i o n , a n d
rational t h o u g h t — to d e e p e r , o l d e r structures c o n c e r n e d with
the regulation of e m o t i o n and m o t i v a t i o n . In short, it tells us
h o w t o feel a b o u t what w e are thinking a n d p e r c e i v i n g , a n d h o w
to act on those feelings. Patients with d a m a g e to the a m y g d a l a
on both sides of the b r a i n inhabit a w o r l d d e v o i d of e m o t i o n a l
contour and colour. D i m i n i s h e d insight into their o w n feelings

29
PAUL B R O K S

a n d b e h a v i o u r is m i r r o r e d by a distorted p e r c e p t i o n of the e m o -
tional lives o f o t h e r s .
S o the s t a k e s are h i g h for N a o m i : m e m o r y and e m o t i o n . W e
n e e d to g e t this right.
T h e A m y t a l a r r i v e s , d e l i v e r e d b y m o t o r c y c l e courier. H e
h a n d s o v e r a Jiffy b a g that a n u r s e o p e n s to find two phials
c o n t a i n i n g a plain liquid, the stuff that will shortly w o r k its spell
o n N a o m i ' s b r a i n . O u r patient i s n o w stretched o u t o n the s p e -
cial b e d , at the centre of things, w a i t i n g . H e r head rests on a
s m a l l s q u a r e c u s h i o n . S h e is c o v e r e d to the neck with a g r e e n
s u r g i c a l sheet e x c e p t for an e x p o s e d patch a r o u n d her g r o i n ,
w h e r e , h a v i n g a d m i n i s t e r e d a local anaesthetic and m a d e a small
incision, the r a d i o l o g i s t is w o r k i n g to g a i n a c c e s s to the femoral
artery. N a o m i ' s face at the top of the sheet a n d this framed
e x p a n s e o f p a l e f l e s h and p u b i c hair ( a n d n o w b l o o d from the
c u t ) s e e m quite unrelated. M a n y p e o p l e are s u r p r i s e d t o learn
that the m o s t feasible r o u t e to the brain for these p u r p o s e s is by
w a y o f the g r o i n .

T h e catheter, a l e n g t h of ultra-fine plastic t u b i n g , is inserted

a n d p u s h e d , inch b y inch, a l o n g the f e m o r a l artery, u p t h r o u g h
the a b d o m e n a n d into the chest. Its j o u r n e y is v i s i b l e , magnified
g r a i n i l y in spectral s h a d e s of g r e y , on the X - r a y m o n i t o r s . I
w a t c h as it finds its w a y to N a o m i ' s heart a n d from there to the
j u n c t i o n with the internal c a r o t i d . S h e , too, is w a t c h i n g . S h e can
s e e her i n s i d e s o n the m o n i t o r s s u s p e n d e d o v e r h e a d which, with
e x q u i s i t e i n t e g r a t i o n o f hand and e y e , the r a d i o l o g i s t u s e s t o
find his w a y f r o m g r o i n to g u t to heart to b r a i n . N e x t , a r a d i o -
o p a q u e d y e i s p u m p e d t h r o u g h the n e w l y installed plastic p i p i n g
t o f l o o d the b l o o d v e s s e l s o f the b r a i n .

30
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

T h e r a d i o l o g i s t takes a few X - r a y s n a p s t o confirm that w e

have reached o u r intended destination o n the c e r e b r o v a s c u l a r
m a p . Stationed a t N a o m i ' s midriff, h e offers a n o c c a s i o n a l w o r d
o f r e a s s u r a n c e , and g l a n c e s n o w a n d then i n her direction. H e
m e a n s well, but the e x c h a n g e s b e t w e e n t h e m are perfunctory.
S h e , for her part, is b e i n g a g o o d patient. H e r b o d y is p a s s i v e ,
receptive. H e r face s h o w s b a r e l y a trace o f e m o t i o n , b u t w h e n
the n u r s e b r u s h e s a strand of hair f r o m her f o r e h e a d , N a o m i ' s
eyes moisten.

W e h a v e here N a o m i the b o d y , N a o m i the m i n d , a n d N a o m i

the p e r s o n . T h e s e , a t least, are the differences o f e m p h a s i s
a c r o s s the p r o f e s s i o n a l d i v i s i o n s o f l a b o u r . T h e r a d i o l o g i s t
w o r k s i n the realm o f the flesh. H e k n o w s the intricacies o f
the v a s c u l a r s y s t e m a n d i s o n g o o d t e r m s with the g h o s t s o f his
X - r a y m a c h i n e . I, the n e u r o p s y c h o l o g i s t , will s h o r t l y s i g n a l a
pharmacological invasion and deconstruction of N a o m i ' s mind.
T h e n u r s e , for now, i s with N a o m i the p e r s o n .

We are all set to start. N a o m i h a s her a r m s r a i s e d a n d b e g i n s

to count. I l o o k to my c o l l e a g u e s t a n d i n g o p p o s i t e with her
black folders, s t o p w a t c h , and c l i p b o a r d , r e a d y to a s s i s t with test
materials and r e c o r d r e s p o n s e s . T h e n e u r o p h y s i o l o g i s t s a r e a
few feet b a c k m o n i t o r i n g e v e r y s q u i g g l e o f b r a i n w a v e activity
siphoned t h r o u g h the l o n g bridal veil o f m u l t i - c o l o u r e d l e a d s
attached t o N a o m i ' s h e a d .

After a n o d from m e , the r a d i o l o g i s t starts to inject the

A m y t a l . It takes effect in a few s e c o n d s a n d I g r a b N a o m i ' s a r m
as it s w o o n s , g u i d i n g it to rest at her s i d e . At that m o m e n t of c o l -
l a p s e , the catching o f the lifeless a r m , s o m e t h i n g c o l l a p s e s
inside me t o o a n d I catch m y s e l f thinking, What am I doing here f

31
PAUL B R O K S

I ' d rather b e s o m e w h e r e e l s e , well a w a y from this u n w h o l e s o m e

m i n d m e d d l i n g . B u t here lies N a o m i . T h e r e i s w o r k t o d o and,
after all, better to be d o i n g this to a relative stranger than to
someone you love. T h a t would be unbearable. She looks
r e m a r k a b l y c a l m a n d o r d i n a r y g i v e n that her right cerebral
h e m i s p h e r e , h a l f her b r a i n , i s n o w t e m p o r a r i l y defunct. H o w
ordinary she l o o k s .

I am clear a b o u t the p u r p o s e of the test, but c u r i o u s to k n o w

w h a t is h a p p e n i n g to ' N a o m i the p e r s o n ' , a question entirely
p e r i p h e r a l t o the i m m e d i a t e m e d i c a l c o n c e r n s . O u r p r o c e d u r e i s
p h a r m a c o l o g i c a l , not s u r g i c a l ; the altered state is transient. But
while the d r u g w o r k s its influence w e h a v e , effectively, a m p u -
tated o n e s i d e of her b r a i n . I w o n d e r if, with half of the brain
c l o s e d d o w n , w e a r e e n g a g i n g with just o n e h a l f o f the p e r s o n .

P s y c h o l o g i s t s u s e d t o b e o b s e s s e d b y the duality o f the brain.

' F u n c t i o n a l a s y m m e t r y ' w a s a hot topic w h e n I w a s an u n d e r -
g r a d u a t e i n the 1970s. T h e b e l i e f w a s that the t w o halves o f the
b r a i n p e r f o r m distinct, t h o u g h c o m p l e m e n t a r y , functions: left
h e m i s p h e r e for l a n g u a g e , right for spatial a w a r e n e s s ; left for
rhythm, right for melody; rationality / intuition; analysis /
synthesis, and so on.

A t the centre o f attention a t that time, scientifically and i m a g -

inatively, w e r e the s o - c a l l e d ' s p l i t - b r a i n ' studies. Split-brain
s u r g e r y w a s a radical m e t h o d o f treating p e o p l e w h o suffered
f r o m s e v e r e a n d intractable e p i l e p s y — patients t o r m e n t e d by
frequent, debilitating s e i z u r e s that c o u l d not be controlled by
a n y other f o r m o f treatment.

E p i l e p t i c s e i z u r e s a r e c a u s e d b y a b n o r m a l b u r s t s o f electrical
activity in the b r a i n . T h e r a t i o n a l e for split-brain s u r g e r y -

32
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

c o m m i s s u r o t o m y — w a s that cutting the c o r p u s c a l l o s u m , the

main channel o f c o m m u n i c a t i o n b e t w e e n the t w o h e m i s p h e r e s ,
w o u l d confine the a b n o r m a l electrical activity to o n e s i d e of the
brain and s o prevent the d e v e l o p m e n t o f m a j o r s e i z u r e s .

I w a s not m u c h c o n c e r n e d with the clinical a s p e c t s of this

operation. I had no particular interest in epilepsy. What
intrigued me w a s that the split-brain patients w e r e thought
experiments made flesh. T h e y fell into the c a t e g o r y of p h i l o -
sophical c o n u n d r u m that a l s o i n c l u d e s the ' b r a i n in the v a t ' , the
'brain t r a n s p l a n t ' , and science fiction fantasies a b o u t t e l e p o r t a -
tion and mind duplication.

T h o u g h t e x p e r i m e n t s are ' I m a g i n e i f . . . ' s c e n a r i o s d e s i g n e d

to challenge our o r d i n a r y intuitions. In the seventeenth c e n t u r y
J o h n L o c k e e x p l o r e d the c o n c e p t o f p e r s o n a l identity b y i m a g -
ining an e x c h a n g e of b r a i n s b e t w e e n a prince a n d a cobbler. It is
p s y c h o l o g i c a l continuity that c o u n t s , h e c o n c l u d e d . T h e p r i n c e
' g o e s with' his b r a i n and n o w f i n d s ' h i m s e l f i n the b o d y o f the
cobbler (and v i c e v e r s a ) . M o r e recent v a r i a t i o n s o n the t h e m e ,
s o m e inspired directly b y the split-brain c a s e s , a r e less s t r a i g h t -
forward.

W h a t i f s o m e o n e ' s cerebral h e m i s p h e r e s are d i v i d e d a n d

transferred s e p a r a t e l y ( m e m o r i e s , character traits a n d all) to the
heads o f t w o different p e o p l e ? W h a t i f y o u s w a p a h e m i s p h e r e
with y o u r best friend, o r y o u r w o r s t e n e m y ? W h i c h o f y o u i s
which? T h e r e w o u l d b e s o m e continuity i n these c a s e s , b u t
not unity. C o n v e n t i o n a l n o t i o n s o f p e r s o n a l identity w o u l d b e
seriously challenged.

B u t the split-brain c a s e s w e r e not flights o f p h i l o s o p h i c a l

fancy. T h e y w e r e real p e o p l e with a real a n d irreversible s u r g i -

33
PAUL B R O K S

cal d i v i s i o n o f the brain. Inevitably they p r o v o k e d a s m u c h

p h i l o s o p h i c a l interest a s scientific. L i k e m a n y others, m y o w n
i m a g i n a t i o n w a s c a p t u r e d by the s u g g e s t i o n that, in d i v i d i n g the
b r a i n , the s u r g e o n ' s knife w a s a l s o d i v i d i n g c o n s c i o u s n e s s and
therefore d i v i d i n g the p e r s o n . T h e v e r y idea o f bisecting the
l i v i n g , c o n s c i o u s b r a i n clean d o w n the m i d d l e w a s bizarre and
a b s u r d . It h a d a t o u c h of the m a c a b r e , a whiff of the c h a m b e r of
h o r r o r s . T h e r e are m a n y w e i r d creatures i n the m e n a g e r i e
o f n e u r o l o g i c a l d i s o r d e r , but the split-brain patients w e r e o f
the p u r e s t s t r a n g e n e s s . I w a s d r a w n in.

' S t r a n g e c a s e s ' , c l o s e l y o b s e r v e d , h a v e a n important p l a c e i n

the n e u r o l o g i c a l literature. A l e x a n d e r L u r i a , a m a j o r figure in
the h i s t o r y o f n e u r o p s y c h o l o g y , w a s a m a s t e r o f case d e s c r i p -
tion a n d a p e r s u a s i v e a d v o c a t e o f ' r o m a n t i c s c i e n c e ' .

' W h e n done properly,' he said, 'observation accomplishes

the c l a s s i c a l a i m o f e x p l a i n i n g facts, while not l o s i n g sight o f
the r o m a n t i c a i m o f p r e s e r v i n g the manifold richness o f the
subject.'

I d o n ' t hesitate to r e c o m m e n d the p o p u l a r writings of L u r i a ,

O l i v e r S a c k s , a n d o t h e r s t o students a s a w a y o f i n t r o d u c i n g
t h e m to the field, b u t I r e c o g n i z e that part of the a p p e a l , part of
that ' m a n i f o l d richness of the s u b j e c t ' , h a s little to do with s c i -
e n c e or p h i l o s o p h y . It h a s m o r e to do with the intrinsic
f a s c i n a t i o n of the a b e r r a n t and the b i z a r r e . Morbid fascination
w o u l d n o t b e t o o w i d e o f the m a r k .

In this light, n e u r o l o g i c a l c a s e histories h a v e a certain G o t h i c

a p p e a l . R e p l a c e the d a r k forests, the c r a g g y m o u n t a i n s , the
ruined a b b e y s , a n d the elemental s t o r m s o f the traditional
G o t h i c tale with a d e s o l a t e u r b a n l a n d s c a p e . L e t a dilapidated

34
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

m o d e r n hospital stand for the c r u m b l i n g m e d i e v a l castle with its

labyrinthine p a s s a g e s , g l o o m y d u n g e o n s , a n d torture c h a m b e r s .
T h e w h i t e - c o a t e d , m a d scientist i n his c o b w e b b e d l a b o r a t o r y ,
a m i d v a n d e G r a a f g e n e r a t o r s , l i g h t n i n g c o n d u c t o r s , a n d the
p a r a p h e r n a l i a o f alchemy, b e c o m e s the g r e e n - g o w n e d s u r g e o n
in the sterile g l e a m of the o p e r a t i n g theatre, knife in h a n d , r e a d y
to r e w o r k the b r a i n ' s s l i m y fabric. At the centre of it all is the
monster, w a i t i n g for the life force f r o m the h e a v e n s to jolt its
d e a d limbs, and the patient, b r a i n e x p o s e d to the air, w a i t i n g for
the b l a d e .

A n d here I a m now, i n the s h a d o w o f D r F r a n k e n s t e i n ,

h a v i n g isolated o n e half o f N a o m i ' s b r a i n , a b o u t t o e n g a g e i n a
d i a l o g u e w i t h . . . what? A p e r s o n ? A h a l f - p e r s o n ? H a l f a b r a i n ?
It d o e s n ' t feel as if I ' m d e a l i n g with s o m e f r a g m e n t of a m u t i -
lated self. N a o m i ' s spirits s e e m to lift. S h e a n s w e r s my q u e s t i o n s
o b l i g i n g l y and follows instructions with h a r d l y a m o m e n t ' s
hesitation. T h o s e three short m i n u t e s f l y by. ' Y o u ' v e d o n e v e r y
well,' I tell her.

T h e d r u g w e a r s off. T h e left a r m h a s returned t o life a n d the

E E G trace i s b a c k t o n o r m a l . H e r e y e s are c l o s e d a n d N a o m i
l o o k s a s i f she i s asleep. W e k n o w she isn't from the r h y t h m s o f
the E E G - her b r a i n is idling in a c o m f o r t a b l e alpha r h y t h m ,
indicating relaxed wakefulness. It is time for the next s t a g e of
the p r o c e d u r e , t o s e e whether s h e r e m e m b e r s a n y t h i n g f r o m
the d r u g p h a s e . F o r N a o m i , this element o f the ritual i s crucial.
Failure here w o u l d o u t w e i g h s u c c e s s a t a n y other s t a g e . I f s h e i s
t o p r o c e e d t o s u r g e r y s h e m u s t p a s s m y m e m o r y tests.

S h e ' s not d o i n g so well. Come on, Naomi, come on, I ' m think-
i n g . ' T h e picture, N a o m i , w h a t can y o u r e m e m b e r ? '

35
PAUL B R O K S

Perplexity, then a b u r s t of information: 'A m a n on a ladder,

a d o g c h a s i n g a cat, a p o n d with s o m e d u c k s on it, a girl with a
kite, a b o y with a b a l l . ' A l l , unfortunately, from the picture she
w a s s h o w n a t y e s t e r d a y ' s rehearsal.
F o r m a l testing c o m p l e t e d , I a s k N a o m i h o w s h e found the
experience.
' N o p r o b l e m , ' s h e s a y s . 'It w a s a b r e e z e . '
T h e b r a i n ' s l a n g u a g e circuits are u s u a l l y located o n the left
s i d e , s o d i s t u r b a n c e o r c o m p l e t e l o s s o f s p e e c h i s the typical
r e s p o n s e to injection of the left h e m i s p h e r e . In other w a y s the
effects a r e less p r e d i c t a b l e . S o m e patients a p p e a r confused and
d i s o r i e n t e d , s o m e b e c o m e a g i t a t e d , s o m e disinhibited. O t h e r s ,
like N a o m i , just l o o k d e s o l a t e .

H e r h e a d is still, but her e y e s flash left and right. S h e will not

respond to my simple commands: 'Touch your nose, Naomi,
t o u c h y o u r n o s e . ' N o t h i n g . W h e n w e g e t t o D a y s o f the W e e k
s h e tries v e r y h a r d , b u t all we g e t is ' F a - f a - f a - f a - f a . . .' On
C o u n t i n g B a c k from T e n s h e a p p r o x i m a t e s the n u m b e r w o r d s ,
b u t g e t s l o c k e d in a p e r s e v e r a t i v e l o o p : 'Tern, nipe, a p e , a p e ,
a p e , a p e . . . ' S h e l o o k s a t the picture and h a s a n u r g e t o point a t
things: ' D a , da.'

F o r a while s h e s e e m s to be w a r m i n g to the task, a p p e a r s

e n g a g e d , b u t her c o n c e n t r a t i o n s u d d e n l y fades. A t o n e point she
l o o k s m e i n the e y e a n d c h u c k l e s wickedly, then another w a v e o f
e m o t i o n s e n d s her in a different direction. H e r e y e s dart left and
right a g a i n . S h e l o o k s terrified; s h e l o o k s feral.

' F i n e , N a o m i , just f i n e , ' I s a y a s w e c o m p l e t e the routine.

' R e l a x , w e ' r e n e a r l y there now.' We retire to a side r o o m
l e a v i n g N a o m i t o rest a n d r e c o v e r from the d r u g .

36
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

The speech disturbance confirms for u s that Naomi's

l a n g u a g e control centres are l o c a t e d p r i m a r i l y in the left h e m i -
sphere. T h i s i s i m p o r t a n t for the s u r g e o n t o k n o w , g i v i n g h i m
greater licence for e x c u r s i o n s into the right t e m p o r a l cortex if
necessary, with m i n i m a l risk o f d i s r u p t i n g l a n g u a g e functions.
A n d w h e n i t c o m e s t o m e m o r y testing there are n o s u r p r i s e s .
H e r failure to recall or r e c o g n i z e m o s t of the test i t e m s confirms
that w e w e r e p l a c i n g u n r e a s o n a b l e d e m a n d s o n the d a m a g e d
right h i p p o c a m p u s : taunting the crippled s e a h o r s e .

T h e o n e exception is her a c c u r a t e recall of the mental arith-

metic task. U n d e r the d r u g she h a d s t a r e d at the s u m printed
on the test card and s a i d , ' S e b b e r , seffen, fife, fife, five.' N o w ,
correctly, she recalls, ' F o u r p l u s f i v e e q u a l s n i n e . ' I ' v e s e e n this
b e f o r e . S o m e h o w , I think, numerical i n f o r m a t i o n m u s t g a i n
b a c k - d o o r a c c e s s to the left h e m i s p h e r e in a w a y that verbal
information cannot.

Recall of the experience of left h e m i s p h e r e s u p p r e s s i o n is a l s o

less predictable than for shutting d o w n the right h e m i s p h e r e .
S o m e patients h a v e no recollection of events at all, at least n o t h -
i n g they can put into w o r d s . O t h e r s h a v e at least partial insight
into the frustrations o f their t e m p o r a r y l o s s o f s p e e c h . S o m e ,
like N a o m i , just tell tales. ' O h , it w a s o k a y , ' she s a y s . Well,
p e r h a p s she did h a v e s o m e slight p r o b l e m s with her s p e e c h at
first, but after that she w a s fine. M a y b e it w a s a bit different to the
f i r s t time a r o u n d , but not m u c h , not really. Q u i t e enjoyable. T h i s
is the left h e m i s p h e r e c o n f a b u l a t i n g . It d o e s this for all of u s ,
every w a k i n g m o m e n t . It edits o u r c o n s c i o u s e x p e r i e n c e s , m a k e s
them c o m p r e h e n s i b l e and palatable. It is the b r a i n ' s s p i n - d o c t o r .

***

37
PAUL B R O K S

T w o t h i n g s disturb me d u r i n g the night. O n e is the h o a r s e , sotto

voce b a r k of an u r b a n fox, r e c e d i n g in triplets d o w n the street.
T h e other is a f r a g m e n t of d r e a m , s h a r p e n o u g h to w a k e m e . I
s t a g g e r , g i d d y f r o m b e i n g s p u n in a l a r g e m a c h i n e they called an
A c c e l l o t r o n . It h a s m a d e me invisible, temporarily. I s e e my
d a u g h t e r sitting in the g a r d e n and a p p r o a c h her. I s p e a k . S h e
l o o k s at m e , but her e y e s c o n t i n u e s e a r c h i n g . I h a v e , truly,
b e c o m e invisible. T h e r e ' s no w a y I can r e a s s u r e her. S h e is
terrified w h e n I t o u c h her h a n d . I ' m terrified.

N e x t day, first thing, I ' m sitting in my office w a t c h i n g the

v i d e o o f N a o m i ' s W a d a test. I t ' s e a s y t o m i s s important details
i n the p a t i e n t ' s r e s p o n s e s s o w e a l w a y s check the v i d e o . T h e r e
w a s s o m e t h i n g I failed to catch. T h e left h e m i s p h e r e is s u p -
p r e s s e d a n d the o r i g i n o f N a o m i ' s f r a g m e n t e d , m u m b l i n g
s p e e c h is uncertain. It c o u l d be the left h e m i s p h e r e running on
e m p t y or p e r h a p s it is c o m i n g from the other side of the brain.
Either w a y it's hard to make out what s h e ' s saying. For a
m o m e n t , her c o n f u s i o n s e e m s to s u b s i d e a n d there is a l o o k of
a c c u s a t i o n in her e y e s .

'Watafam,' she says, 'dooneer.'

I listen c l o s e l y a s e c o n d a n d third time a n d realize it's a
q u e s t i o n : ' W h a t the fuck am I d o i n g h e r e ? '

38
 The Sword of the Sun

I had never b e e n m u c h a w a r e of my father's g l a s s e y e , just as I

had never really noticed his foreign accent. We w e r e s w i m m i n g
s o m e distance from the s h o r e . F o u r t e e n y e a r s o l d , I w a s w a y
ahead. He called and I turned to find him t r e a d i n g water, right
hand c o v e r i n g the e m p t y c a v e o f his e y e - s o c k e t , g o o d e y e
exploring the g l i m m e r i n g depths. T h e fugitive e y e stared u p a t
us from the s e a b e d . I p l u n g e d like a pearl diver, f o l l o w i n g its g a z e
all the w a y d o w n , and snatched it up with a handful of s a n d .

T h a t e v e n i n g , s k i m m i n g s t o n e s into the s u n s e t , I returned in

i m a g i n a t i o n to the o c e a n floor. It w a s a c o l d a n d lonely p l a c e .
T h e n i t o c c u r r e d t o m e that, d e p r i v e d o f a n o b s e r v i n g e y e , the
ocean w a s nothing. S u c h p o w e r ! I c l o s e d m y e y e s a n d i t w a s
gone.

Y e a r s later I read Italo C a l v i n o ' s Mr Palomar. It stirred m e m -

ories. T h e e p o n y m o u s h e r o g o e s for a n e v e n i n g s w i m . A s the
sun g o e s d o w n it s e n d s a d a z z l i n g b a n d of light a c r o s s the s e a .
L o o k i n g b a c k t o the s h o r e , M r P a l o m a r s e e s the s u n ' s reflection
as a shining s w o r d in the water. He s w i m s t o w a r d s it, b u t the

39
PAUL B R O K S

s w o r d retreats with e v e r y s t r o k e a n d he is n e v e r able to overtake

it. W h e r e v e r he m o v e s he r e m a i n s at the s w o r d ' s tip. It follows
h i m , ' p o i n t i n g h i m o u t like the h a n d of a w a t c h w h o s e p i v o t is
the s u n ' . H e realizes that e v e r y bather e x p e r i e n c e s the s a m e
effects of the light. S a i l b o a r d s c h a n g e their a p p e a r a n c e as they
c r o s s the reflection, c o l o u r s a r e m u t e d , b o d i e s silhouetted.
W h a t if all the s w i m m e r s a n d s a i l b o a r d e r s return to the s h o r e ,
h e w o n d e r s , w h e r e w o u l d the s w o r d e n d ?

Mr P a l o m a r u n d e r s t a n d s that n o t h i n g he s e e s exists in nature.

N a t u r e is a b u n d l e of a b s t r a c t i o n s — particles in fields of force.
T h e s u n , the s e a , the s w o r d , a n d the s a i l b o a r d e r s are inside his
head. He floats a m o n g phantoms.
T h e s w o r d o f the s u n c l e a v e s the u n i v e r s e i n t w o : there i s
o b j e c t i v e reality — r e m o t e a b s t r a c t i o n s w i t h o u t point of v i e w —
a n d there i s P a l o m a r ' s p r i v a t e u n i v e r s e , the m i r a g e o f h u m a n
p e r c e p t i o n . ' I a m s w i m m i n g i n m y m i n d ; this s w o r d o f light
e x i s t s o n l y there.' B u t w h a t kind o f thing i s M r P a l o m a r , the
P e r c e i v e r ? No d o u b t he w o u l d s e e himself, as I s e e myself, as a
s i n g u l a r , unified b e i n g , c o n t i n u o u s with his child s e l f as I am
c o n t i n u o u s w i t h the b o y d i v i n g for his father's e y e , m o v i n g
f r o m fixed p a s t to uncertain future. L i k e the s u n ' s reflection, this
is an illusion.

In the a n g i o g r a p h y suite, p e r f o r m i n g a W a d a test, I w a s the

illusionist. O u r b r a i n d r u g cleft the y o u n g w o m a n i n two. T h e
left-brain v e r s i o n o f N a o m i w a s different from the right. M s
L e f t - b r a i n w a s talkative and cheerful. M s R i g h t - b r a i n w a s
unsettled, mute, morose. When the words finally broke
t h r o u g h , she h a d n ' t a clue w h e r e she w a s . ' W h a t the fuck am I
d o i n g h e r e ? ' I ' v e n e v e r h e a r d M s L e f t - b r a i n swear. A f t e r w a r d s ,

40
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

when the d r u g w o r e off, Ms L e f t - b r a i n s p o k e for the w h o l e

p e r s o n . 'It w a s a b r e e z e , ' s h e s a i d . T h e r e w a s n o recollection o f
M s R i g h t - b r a i n ' s d i s c o m f o r t . I t h a d b e e n edited out o f the story.
O n e m i g h t think that the s e l f is d i v i d e d in s u c h c i r c u m -
stances, but this w o u l d be to s w a l l o w the illusion of unity; to
i m a g i n e in the first p l a c e that there is s o m e ' w h o l e t h i n g ' to be
fractionated. T h e r e isn't. F r o m a n e u r o s c i e n c e p e r s p e c t i v e w e
are all d i v i d e d a n d d i s c o n t i n u o u s . T h e mental p r o c e s s e s u n d e r -
lying our sense of s e l f — feelings, t h o u g h t s , m e m o r i e s — are
scattered t h r o u g h different z o n e s o f the b r a i n . T h e r e i s n o
special point o f c o n v e r g e n c e . N o cockpit o f the s o u l . N o s o u l -
pilot. T h e y c o m e together in a w o r k of fiction. A h u m a n b e i n g
is a story-telling m a c h i n e . T h e s e l f is a story.

T h i s i s not t o s a y that o u r lives a r e f i c t i o n s . U n l i k e R o b i n s o n

C r u s o e o r E m m a B o v a r y w e are e m b e d d e d i n a u n i v e r s e with
physical and m o r a l d i m e n s i o n s w h e r e e v e r y t h o u g h t a n d action
splinters into a million c o n s e q u e n c e s . R e a d e r s of F l a u b e r t ' s
Madame Bovary will v a r y in their reactions to its h e r o i n e as s h e
m a k e s her w a y t h r o u g h the n o v e l , b u t her life and t h o u g h t s are
f i x e d . S h e will a l w a y s m a r r y C h a r l e s , fall p r e y t o the a b o m -
inable R o d o l p h e , a n d d i e her horrible death. I t ' s different for us
meat p u p p e t s . We d o n ' t k n o w w h e r e o u r lives are g o i n g . What
the fuck am I doing here? I often w o n d e r .

W h o tells the s t o r y o f the s e l f ? T h a t ' s like a s k i n g w h o thun-

ders the thunder or rains the rain. It is not so m u c h a q u e s t i o n of
us telling the s t o r y as the s t o r y telling u s .
N o t so l o n g a g o I a s k e d my d a d if he r e m e m b e r e d the time I
rescued his eye from the b o t t o m of the s e a .
' N o , ' he said.

41
Soul in a Bucket

I o n c e m e t a y o u n g m a n w h o w a s c o n v i n c e d his head w a s full of

w a t e r a n d c o n t a i n e d a fish rather than a b r a i n . It w a s quite a
l a r g e fish, s o m e t h i n g like a trout, a n d it unsettled him to think
o f i t l i v i n g i n s u c h c r a m p e d c o n d i t i o n s . H e n o l o n g e r had need
of a b r a i n since all his t h o u g h t s and b e h a v i o u r w e r e under the
c o n t r o l o f the C I A .

M o s t of us b e l i e v e that the h e a d contains a p e r s o n : a self.

H e r e ' s o n e , at the front of a lecture hall, spilling w o r d s that
s e e m t o c o m e from n o w h e r e . T h e r e , i n the a u d i t o r i u m , are 200
other s e l v e s . R o w s o f h e a d s . F o r each head t o represent the
l o c a t i o n of a c o n s c i o u s s e l f r e q u i r e s a further, inferential, step, a
m e n t a l p r o c e s s I am p o w e r l e s s to resist.

T h e s a m e a p p l i e s w h e n w e reflect o n o u r o w n identity. W e
create o u r s e l v e s by inference: a u t o m a t i c a l l y and irresistibly. In
d o i n g s o w e ride the rails o f the d e e p e s t h u m a n c o n v e n t i o n , but,
at r o o t , it is just that: a c o n v e n t i o n . T h e s e l f is not an intrinsic
feature of the b r a i n a n d it is p o s s i b l e to b e c o m e derailed —
t h r o u g h p s y c h o s i s , like the m a n with the fish in his h e a d , or as

42
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

a result o f b r a i n d a m a g e . T h e d e g r a d a t i o n o f p e r s o n a l i t y i s a
neurological commonplace.
M a r y h a d suffered a b r a i n h a e m o r r h a g e ; to be p r e c i s e , a
ruptured anterior c o m m u n i c a t i n g a r t e r y a n e u r y s m . T h e arterial
wall had a l w a y s b e e n defective ( t h o u g h s h e w a s n o t t o k n o w )
and now, in her fiftieth year, the s a c h a d b u r s t , p o u r i n g b l o o d
into the frontal l o b e s . T h e s u r g e o n s o p e n e d u p her h e a d a n d
fixed a clip to s t e m the flow. S h e h a d b e e n c l o s e to d e a t h . T h r e e
w e e k s later, sitting in my office, it w a s difficult to s t e m the flow
of words.

' I ' v e g o t a p o e m I w r o t e it y e s t e r d a y well I h a v e n ' t written it

d o w n it just c a m e to me w h e n I w a s sitting l o o k i n g o u t the
w i n d o w a t the lawn and these m a g p i e s c a m e v i c i o u s t h i n g s y o u
w o u l d n ' t w a n t to l e a v e a b a b y o u t s i d e t h e y ' d p e c k its e y e s o u t
like they do the sheep they attack in p a i r s they s w o o p d o w n a n d
confuse the sheep o n e then the other we h a d a kitten c l i m b e d an
apple tree it did they flapped a r o u n d her p o o r t h i n g w a s terrified
I threw a stone we s h o o k the biscuit b o x to g e t her d o w n . '

S h e p a u s e d . S h e h a d forgotten the p o e m .
' W h e r e w a s I ? ' she s a i d .
I d i d n ' t s a y a w o r d as I r e a c h e d for the b l a c k c a s e c o n t a i n i n g
my test e q u i p m e n t , a n d a v o i d e d e y e contact. If I d i d n ' t s p e a k
and I didn't l o o k , M a r y w o u l d s t a y silent. W i t h o u t the t r i g g e r of
a w o r d or a g l a n c e she sat, if not exactly still ( s h e w a s a l w a y s
fidgeting with the b u t t o n s on her b l o u s e ) then at least quiet. B u t
to let slip a c a r e l e s s w o r d or g l a n c e w a s to o p e n the s l u i c e . I
quickly released the c l a s p s o n the c a s e a n d t o o k s o m e c l e a n h i s -
tory sheets from a tray on my d e s k . M a r y d i d n ' t m o v e a m u s c l e .
S h e w a s not e v e n fiddling with her b u t t o n s . I w o n d e r e d h o w

43
PAUL B R O K S

l o n g w e c o u l d sit there like this, m o t i o n l e s s and quiet. T h e

silence d i d n ' t t r o u b l e her.
S h e s e e m e d a b s o r b e d by a picture p o s t c a r d pinned to the
b o a r d b e h i n d my d e s k . It s h o w e d a M e d i t e r r a n e a n s c e n e , a s e a -
s i d e t o w n with a pine-fringed g o l d e n b e a c h and blue s e a , and a
seafront p r o m e n a d e with colourful s h o p s and restaurants.
M A J O R C A b l a z e d d i a g o n a l l y , u p p e r left, in curly y e l l o w letters. It
h a d b e e n there since the s u m m e r and n o w l o o k e d i n c o n g r u o u s
b e n e a t h the s e a s o n a l tinsel and plastic holly my secretary had
s t u c k a b o u t the p l a c e . A little C h r i s t m a s tree sat on the filing
cabinet in a clutter of c a r d s .

W e b e g a n with q u e s t i o n s a b o u t orientation. T i m e , p l a c e , and

p e r s o n : the w h e n , w h e r e , and w h o c o - o r d i n a t e s o f p e r s o n a l
a w a r e n e s s . I t ' s i m p o r t a n t t o e x e r c i s e discretion. O n e d o e s n ' t
w a n t to insult the patient by a s k i n g o v e r l y simplistic questions.
B u t , with M a r y , it w a s a p p r o p r i a t e to start with the b a s i c s .
P e r s o n a l orientation w a s o n e o f her p r o b l e m s .

'What day is it?'

'Wednesday'
' G o o d . A n d the d a t e ? '
' I s it the t w e n t y - f o u r t h ? '
' A c t u a l l y i t ' s the sixteenth. W h a t m o n t h i s i t ? '

'July'
' W h a t m a k e s y o u think i t ' s J u l y ? '
' I t ' s w a r m in h e r e . ' S h e u n d o e s a b u t t o n , then another.
'I s h o u l d k e e p y o u r b l o u s e o n , M a r y , ' I tell her. We m o v e on.
' W h e r e are w e n o w ? '
'At the hotel.'
' A n d w h a t i s the n a m e o f the t o w n w e are i n ? '

44
 INTO T H E S I L E N T LAND

' I d o n ' t know,' she s a y s . ' M a j o r c a , s o m e w h e r e . '

I a s k her n a m e . S h e g i v e s me a p i t y i n g l o o k .
' M e ? I ' m M a r y M a g p i e . W h o d i d y o u think I w a s ? '

* * *

I ' v e b e e n p r o j e c t i n g i m a g e s o f the b r a i n o n t o a l a r g e s c r e e n . A t
f i r s t they w e r e hyper-real 3 - D i m a g e s , labelled a n d c o l o u r -
c o d e d t o illustrate the a n a t o m i c a l l a n d m a r k s . T h e cerebral
h e m i s p h e r e s l o o k e d like they w e r e m a d e o f shiny plastic. B u t
n o w I am w o r k i n g on a m o r e s c h e m a t i c picture. A l a r g e b l o c k of
c o l o u r — hot m u s t a r d y e l l o w — slides d o w n b e h i n d m e , c a s t i n g a
trompe l'oeil s h a d o w a g a i n s t the p a l e screen. It b e a r s the l e g e n d
CEREBRAL CORTEX and signifies the a p p a r a t u s o f the c o n s c i o u s
self.

T h e hall is full a n d the students are attentive. T h e y s e e m to

have enjoyed w a t c h i n g the s h a p e s and w o r d s g l i d e a c r o s s the
screen, falling into p l a c e with PowerPoint p r e c i s i o n as the b r a i n
a s s e m b l e s itself. I am p l e a s e d with my picture. It is like a w o r k of
art. T h e lecture hall as gallery.

In the s h a d o w s , on a table next to the illuminated s c r e e n there

is another exhibit. It is h i d d e n from view, b u t in a few m i n u t e s I
shall take it from its container a n d h o l d it aloft for the a u d i e n c e
to a d m i r e . F o r now, we c o n t e m p l a t e the d i a g r a m . It p r o v i d e s a
standard representation o f the major anatomical divisions
(hindbrain, m i d b r a i n , forebrain) a n d s o m e o f the c o m p o n e n t
structures ( c e r e b e l l u m , t h a l a m u s , b a s a l g a n g l i a , n e o c o r t e x ) .

T h i s is an i n t r o d u c t o r y lecture. I k e e p it s i m p l e , b u t m o v e
swiftly t h r o u g h the lower structures like a child a s c e n d i n g a

45
PAUL B R O K S

c l i m b i n g f r a m e , e a g e r to reach the top. I am m o s t interested in

w h a t g o e s on in the higher reaches, the z o n e s containing the
interlinked s y s t e m s o f p e r c e p t i o n a n d thought, m e m o r y and
e m o t i o n . C o n s e q u e n t l y , m y a c c o u n t o f the hindbrain and m i d -
b r a i n s t r u c t u r e s is crisp. I e n c o u r a g e the students to i m a g i n e that
w e a r e c r a w l i n g t h r o u g h the b a s e o f a g a r g a n t u a n skull and
c l a m b e r i n g u p the b r a i n s t e m . I t h a s the girth o f a n o a k . W e p r o -
c e e d u n d e r the s h a d o w o f the g r e a t l o b e s o f the cerebral
h e m i s p h e r e s that l o o m like t h u n d e r c l o u d s . I t ' s the higher
b r a n c h e s we a s p i r e to, w a y up in the g l o o m . I a s k them what
they think they w o u l d s e e .

' N o t h i n g , ' o n e o f them a n s w e r s correctly, ' i t ' s pitch b l a c k . '

' S h i n e a light,' I say.

' H o w old a r e y o u , M a r y ? '

'Twenty-four.'
' A n d y o u r children, h o w old are t h e y ? '
' E m m a ' s t w e n t y - t w o , T o m ' s nineteen.'
I e x p l a i n e d to M a r y that we w e r e in a hospital. D i d she k n o w
w h y s h e w a s there? Y e s , she told m e . S h e ' d h a d a n a n e u r y s m ,
b u t t h e y ' d put i t right. S h e w o u l d b e g o i n g h o m e s o o n . I n fact
she w o u l d l e a v e as s o o n as we h a d finished. It w a s a pity her
sister h a d t o s t a y b e h i n d . H e r sister? Y e s , s h e ' d had a n a n e u r y s m
t o o , b u t s h e w a s n ' t d o i n g s o well. S h e w o u l d h a v e t o stay o n the
w a r d a little l o n g e r .

M a r y w a s b e c o m i n g agitated now. S h e s t o o d u p and m a d e for

the d o o r .
' G o t t o g o , ' s h e s a i d . ' I left the b a b y '
'What baby?'

46
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

' M y baby,' she s a i d . 'I left it in the g a r d e n . T h o s e m a g p i e s will

h a v e its e y e s out.'
T h e b a b y w a s b o r n last m o n t h . T h e y o p e n e d M a r y ' s h e a d ,
and then they delivered her baby. It w a s a beautiful little girl, b u t
there w a s a p r o b l e m with her b r a i n . It c o u l d be an a n e u r y s m .
P e r h a p s they'll o p e n her h e a d as well.

Shine that light at the g l o s s y u n d e r s i d e of the t e m p o r a l l o b e ,

directly a b o v e , and y o u will s e e that the outer s u r f a c e is
w r a p p e d in a sheet w o v e n from an e x q u i s i t e material. N e x t
slide: T h i s i s the ' g r e y matter'. I t c o v e r s all o f the m a j o r l o b e s .
In reality the c o l o u r w o u l d be a dull, g r e y - b r o w n , b u t here w e ' l l
g i v e it a silver sheen. D i s s o l v e into the fibres of this material.
Picture an exotic, illuminated g a r d e n . S e e w h a t m a k e s it glisten.
T h e objects all a r o u n d ( ' n e u r o n s ' ) a r e certainly plant-like —
r o u g h l y spherical p o d s with slender, b r a n c h i n g tendrils (the
' d e n d r i t e s ' ) and a l o n g e r p r o c e s s (the ' a x o n ' ) e x t e n d i n g f r o m
o n e end. T h e a x o n s , too, c a n b e s e e n t o b r a n c h into a n u m b e r o f
finer s t r a n d s , each with a b u t t o n - s h a p e d e n d f o o t that attaches to
a dendrite, or to the cell b o d y , of another n e u r o n .

It is a dense matrix of interconnection. A b o v e and below, near

and far, the neurons p u l s e and g l o w in a silent, iridescent f u g u e as
electrochemical signals traverse the l o n g a x o n s and influence the
target cell. N e x t slide: H e r e , for o u r benefit, packets of light s h o o t
a l o n g the axons and c a u s e the cells to which they are linked to
g l o w either red or blue. R e d s i g n a l s a state of excitement. T h e
target cell itself is n o w e n c o u r a g e d to fire p u l s e s a l o n g its o w n
axon to cells further a l o n g in the network. B l u e s i g n a l s inhibition
and the target cell s t o p s firing. In effect, each n e u r o n is either ' o n '

47
PAUL B R O K S

o r ' o f f ' , g e n e r a t i n g p u l s e s o r c e a s i n g t o generate pulses. N e u r o n s

are the b a s i c functional units of the brain and that is their task: to
fire or not to fire. I t ' s all they do. W h i c h e v e r region of the cortex
y o u p l u n g e into, the scene is the s a m e .

W h e r e i s the m i n d i n this t a n g l e d w o o d o f n e u r o n s and nerve

fibres? It i s n ' t a n y w h e r e . A n d the s e l f ? W h a t did y o u expect? A
g e n i e in a b o t t l e ?
G o t t f r i e d L e i b n i z , the eighteenth-century p h i l o s o p h e r and
m a t h e m a t i c i a n , p e r f o r m e d a similar t h o u g h t experiment. He
i m a g i n e d ' a m a c h i n e w h o s e c o n s t r u c t i o n w o u l d enable i t t o
think, to s e n s e , a n d to h a v e p e r c e p t i o n ' a n d , further, that the
m a c h i n e i s ' e n l a r g e d while retaining the s a m e p r o p o r t i o n s , s o
that o n e c o u l d enter into it, j u s t like into a w i n d m i l l ' . W h a t d o e s
he find in the interior of the m i n d - m a k i n g m a c h i n e ? '. . . only
p a r t s p u s h i n g o n e another, a n d n e v e r a n y t h i n g b y which t o
explain a perception'.

T h e e n i g m a o f p e r s o n a l identity m a y h a v e a d a r k s i d e . I n his
e s s a y ' S o r r y , but Y o u r S o u l J u s t D i e d ' T o m Wolfe i m a g i n e s a n
a p o c a l y p t i c near future w h e r e a d v a n c e d m e t h o d s o f brain
i m a g i n g will strip a w a y the illusion of self. P e o p l e will realize
that all they a r e l o o k i n g at is a p i e c e of machinery, d e v o i d of
self, m i n d , o r s o u l . A t this point, h e s a y s , ' s o m e n e w N i e t z s c h e '
will step f o r w a r d to a n n o u n c e the d e a t h of the s o u l and 'the
lurid c a r n i v a l that will e n s u e m a y m a k e the p h r a s e "the total
e c l i p s e o f all v a l u e s " s e e m t a m e . '

It is true. N e u r o s c i e n c e is fast d e v e l o p i n g the technical and

c o n c e p t u a l wherewithal to reveal in fine, b a r e detail the n e u r o -
b i o l o g i c a l s u b s t r a t e s of the m i n d . P e r h a p s it will despoil a
s a c r e d m y t h — the m y t h of selfhood and s o u l s . A n d , if s o ,

48
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

w e m a y b e w a n d e r i n g innocently into the o p e n i n g p h a s e o f a

d a n g e r o u s g a m e . O u r ethics and s y s t e m s o f j u s t i c e , o u r entire
m o r a l order, are f o u n d e d on the n o t i o n of s o c i e t y as a collective
of individual s e l v e s — a u t o n o m o u s , i n t r o s p e c t i v e , a c c o u n t a b l e
agents. If this self-reflective, m o r a l a g e n t is r e v e a l e d to be
illusory, what then?

Values m a y h a v e m o r e to do with primitive i d e a s a b o u t ghosts

in machines than we care to think, a n d p e r h a p s by u s i n g the t o o l s
o f n e u r o s c i e n c e t o d e c o n s t r u c t the s e l f w e run the risk o f split-
ting a social a t o m and r e l e a s i n g forces b e y o n d o u r p r e s e n t
c o m p r e h e n s i o n . C o u l d 'the century o f n e u r o s c i e n c e ' really
signify the death of the s e l f and the c o l l a p s e of all v a l u e s ? I
think Wolfe h o n o u r s n e u r o s c i e n c e unduly. H e i s s e d u c e d b y the
g a d g e t r y and the g a u d y i m a g e s . Y o u d o n ' t n e e d futuristic n e w
t e c h n o l o g i e s to e x p o s e the b r u t e fact that t h e r e ' s n o t h i n g b u t
meat inside o u r h e a d s . W e ' v e k n o w n this d o w n the a g e s .

I t d a w n e d o n m e s o m e time a g o that I w a s n o l o n g e r e s p e -
cially interested in the brain. Or rather, that my interest w a s
e x p a n d i n g o u t w a r d s from the b r a i n itself. It w a s as if I h a d b e e n
in a c o n g e s t e d city, g a w p i n g at the c r o w d s and the architecture
and the traffic from g r o u n d level. A n d n o w I w a s r i s i n g a b o v e
the b u i l d i n g s and the streets to take in a different p e r s p e c t i v e . I
could see s u b u r b s and fields and rivers b e y o n d a n d , in the d i s -
tance, other t o w n s and cities. C i t i e s d o n ' t float in a v a c u u m , a n d
neither d o b r a i n s .

W h a t b e c a m e clear w a s that the b r a i n c o u l d not be fully

u n d e r s t o o d if y o u treated it as an isolated object. I h a d u n d e r e s -
timated h o w tightly the b r a i n ' s functions are b o u n d to the rest of
the b o d y and, a t the s a m e t i m e , h o w d e e p l y they a r e e m b e d d e d

49
PAUL B R O K S

i n the w i d e r p h y s i c a l a n d social l a n d s c a p e . N o b r a i n i s a n island.

W h e n M a r y ' s h u s b a n d c a m e to visit he had a c a l m i n g effect.
T h e y s e e m e d t o function a s a unit. M a r y ' s b e h a v i o u r m e s h e d
into the n e t w o r k s o f p a r t n e r s h i p a n d s o b e c a m e m o r e coherent
a n d c o n s i s t e n t . In a n y relationship e a c h p e r s o n is partly defined
i n t e r m s o f the other. S o , for M a r y , her h u s b a n d ' s p r e s e n c e w a s
a g u i d e to self-definition. He p r o v i d e d a t e m p l a t e . He d r e w
f r o m her a b e h a v i o u r a l repertoire a n d a mental structure to
c o m p l e m e n t his o w n , a n d the centre o f g r a v i t y l a y between
t h e m . T h e r e w a s stability, a kind o f e q u i l i b r i u m . T h i s effect w a s
not o f his d e l i b e r a t e d o i n g . T h a t ' s j u s t the w a y i t h a p p e n s .

I f M a r y ' s heart o r l u n g s o r liver h a d b e e n the p r i m a r y site o f

p a t h o l o g y , rather than her b r a i n , it w o u l d be p o s s i b l e to d e s c r i b e
the d i s e a s e in t e r m s of its effects on that particular o r g a n s y s t e m
in relation to the o v e r a l l functioning of the rest of her b o d y .
T h e function o f the heart i s t o p u m p b l o o d , the liver secretes
b i l e , the l u n g s e n a b l e the s u p p l y o f o x y g e n t o the b l o o d , and i n
e a c h c a s e the f r a m e of reference for a description of function is
the i n d i v i d u a l o r g a n i s m . In defining b r a i n function we h a v e to
g o b e y o n d this, e x t e n d i n g the f r a m e o f reference b e y o n d the
s y s t e m s o f the b o d y .

T h e brain evolved as a means of orchestrating adaptive

interaction b e t w e e n the o r g a n i s m a n d the w o r l d . T o a c h i e v e this
it m u s t m a i n t a i n b o t h an i n w a r d a n d an o u t w a r d orientation,
m o n i t o r i n g a n d r e g u l a t i n g the state o f v a r i o u s internal s y s t e m s ,
while at the s a m e t i m e r e s p o n d i n g to the flow of events in the
external w o r l d . In fact, as well as p l a y i n g its part in m o n i t o r i n g
the b o d y ' s internal milieu, the b r a i n m u s t control interactions
with t w o k i n d s o f external e n v i r o n m e n t .

50
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

A c c o r d i n g t o W e s t e r n intellectual tradition, w h i c h distin-

guishes between Nature and Culture, we have a curious, duplex
kind o f existence. W e m o v e i n a natural r e a l m o f t i m e , s p a c e ,
and matter a n d , concurrently, t h r o u g h a s o c i o - c u l t u r a l d i m e n -
sion of p e o p l e and i d e a s , a w o r l d s a t u r a t e d with c u s t o m s and
beliefs, rituals, traditions, l a w s , c o n v e n t i o n s , f a s h i o n s , l a n -
g u a g e , arts, and s c i e n c e . I n the f i r s t w o r l d w e are s u b j e c t ,
ultimately, to the l a w s of p h y s i c s a n d , in the s e c o n d , to the influ-
ence o f c u s t o m s , beliefs, rituals, traditions, etc.

A n e m e r g i n g t h e m e i n n e u r o p s y c h o l o g y i s that, j u s t a s i t h a s
functional s y s t e m s d e v o t e d to p e r c e p t i o n of, a n d interaction
with, the physical e n v i r o n m e n t , s o the b r a i n h a s e v o l v e d s y s -
t e m s dedicated to social c o g n i t i o n a n d action. It c o n s t r u c t s a
m o d e l of the o r g a n i s m of w h i c h it is a p a r t a n d , b e y o n d this,
a representation of that o r g a n i s m ' s p l a c e in relation to other,
similar, o r g a n i s m s : p e o p l e . A s part o f this p r o c e s s i t a s s e m b l e s a
' s e l f ' , which can b e t h o u g h t o f a s the d e v i c e w e h u m a n s e m p l o y
as a m e a n s of n e g o t i a t i n g the social e n v i r o n m e n t .

T i g h t l y b o u n d t o l a n g u a g e , these b r a i n m e c h a n i s m s are the

channels t h r o u g h w h i c h b i o l o g y finds e x p r e s s i o n as culture, a
m e a n s o f distributing m i n d b e y o n d b i o l o g i c a l b o u n d a r i e s . B u t i f
culture is in this w a y an extension of b i o l o g y , an i m p o r t a n t
question arises: m u s t w e a l s o accept that n e u r o s c i e n c e h a s
b o u n d a r i e s which d e n y full a c c e s s t o a n u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f b r a i n
function? In other w o r d s , is n e u r o s c i e n c e a d e q u a t e to its p r i -
m a r y task — u n d e r s t a n d i n g the b r a i n — or, to tackle the ' b i g '
questions (relating t o s e l f - a w a r e n e s s a n d p e r s o n a l i d e n t i t y )
m u s t w e turn t o other f o r m s o f s c i e n c e a n d s c h o l a r s h i p ?

T o achieve s o m e u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f M a r y ' s c o n d i t i o n w e are

51
PAUL B R O K S

o b l i g e d t o skirt these fuzzy b o u n d a r i e s o f b i o l o g y a n d society.

B e y o n d a c c o u n t i n g for her illness in t e r m s of physical pathol-
o g y a n d a p p r e c i a t i n g its c o n s e q u e n c e s a t the p e r s o n a l level, w e
m u s t try t o u n d e r s t a n d w h a t m e c h a n i s m s m i g h t b e o p e r a t i n g a t
the intersection of the b i o l o g i c a l (the b r a i n ) a n d the social (the
s e l f ) . A m a j o r c h a l l e n g e for n e u r o s c i e n c e in the twenty-first
century will be to try to figure o u t h o w b r a i n s and selves go
together.

We build a s t o r y of o u r s e l v e s from the r a w materials of lan-

g u a g e , m e m o r y , a n d e x p e r i e n c e . T h e idea o f the 'narrative s e l f
h a s a l o n g history, with r o o t s in B u d d h i s t teaching. A c c o r d i n g
to the d o c t r i n e of Anattavada, the s e l f is no m o r e than the
a g g r e g a t e o f a n i n d i v i d u a l ' s t h o u g h t s , feelings, p e r c e p t i o n s and
actions. T h e r e i s n o central c o r e o r ' e g o ' . D a v i d H u m e , i n the
eighteenth century, t o o k a strikingly similar line. F o r him, the
e x t e n s i o n o f the s e l f b e y o n d s u c h m o m e n t a r y i m p r e s s i o n s w a s
a fiction. D a n i e l D e n n e t t h a s offered a c o n t e m p o r a r y v e r s i o n ,
e m p h a s i z i n g the p o w e r o f l a n g u a g e i n g i v i n g coherence t o our
e x p e r i e n c e o v e r e x t e n d e d p e r i o d s . A c c o r d i n g t o D e n n e t t , the
s e l f i s b e s t u n d e r s t o o d a s a n abstract 'centre o f narrative
gravity'.

C o n f a b u l a t i o n is the inadvertent construction of an e r r o -

n e o u s self-story, s i g n i f y i n g the n e u r o l o g i c a l b r e a k d o w n o f the
storyteller. I t takes different f o r m s , s o m e t i m e s m u n d a n e , s o m e -
t i m e s fantastic. As in M a r y ' s c a s e , it is typically a s s o c i a t e d with
d a m a g e to the frontal l o b e s and is p r o b a b l y d u e to a c o m b i n a -
tion o f t h i n g s . M e m o r y d i s o r d e r i s o n e ingredient. I n particular,
c o n f a b u l a t o r s h a v e p r o b l e m s with contextual m e m o r y . T h e y
m a y retain the kernel o f s o m e a u t o b i o g r a p h i c a l event o r

52
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

e p i s o d e , but fail to a n c h o r it in a specific t i m e or p l a c e . M e m o r i e s

drift l o o s e , i m a g e s c o l l i d e .
T h e n there i s disinhibition o f a s s o c i a t i o n s . W o r d s , t h o u g h t s ,
and m e m o r i e s reach c o n s c i o u s n e s s t h r o u g h a p r o c e s s o f natural
selection. F o r e v e r y item o f a w a r e n e s s there i s a m u l t i t u d e o f
s u p p r e s s e d alternatives r e v e r b e r a t i n g t h r o u g h the neural nets.
T h e c o n f a b u l a t o r ' s theatre o f c o n s c i o u s n e s s i s c r o w d e d with
g a t e c r a s h e r s ( i m a g i n a r y b a b i e s , m a g p i e s , the n u m b e r t w e n t y -
four). The reduplication of relatives or the creation of
i m a g i n a r y children is a c o m m o n t h e m e .

Finally, there is a d i s t u r b a n c e of the n e u r o p s y c h o l o g i c a l

m e c h a n i s m s r e s p o n s i b l e for m a i n t a i n i n g a distinction b e t w e e n
the external w o r l d and internally g e n e r a t e d t h o u g h t s and
actions (falling into the frame of a s e a s i d e p o s t c a r d , y o u a r e
transported t o the island o f M a j o r c a ) .

I reach into the s h a d o w s b e h i n d the s c r e e n a n d retrieve a s m a l l ,

semi-transparent plastic bucket. I dip into the b u c k e t a n d fish
out a h u m a n b r a i n . I h a v e no idea to w h o m the b r a i n b e l o n g e d .
I can't tell if i t ' s m a l e or f e m a l e , b l a c k or white, or, with a n y reli-
ability, its a g e . I m a y e v e n h a v e p a s s e d this p e r s o n on the street.
In its natural state, e n c a s e d within the skull, b r a i n matter is
g e l a t i n o u s . T h i s b r a i n , fixed in f o r m a l i n , h a s a s o l i d , r u b b e r y
feel and w o u l d c a r v e like a v e r y tender t u n a s t e a k .

It l o o k s small and lacklustre after the b r i g h t pictures on the

screen, but i t h o l d s the interest o f m y a u d i e n c e . T h e end-of-
lecture rustling o f p a p e r s s t o p s . A l l e y e s turn t o w a r d s the g r e y -
b r o w n object as I p o i n t o u t the m a j o r l a n d m a r k s . In t e r m s of
i m p a r t i n g factual k n o w l e d g e a b o u t the structure a n d functions

53
PAUL B R O K S

o f the b r a i n , the m a i n p u r p o s e o f m y lecture, this little c o d a

a d d s n o t h i n g . Yet the students l e a v e with s o m e t h i n g they
w o u l d n ' t o t h e r w i s e h a v e h a d : a clearer s e n s e of the brain as a
b i o l o g i c a l object; a p h y s i c a l m a s s as well as a t e x t b o o k c o n c o c -
tion of c o l o u r s a n d neat abstractions. It will help them
a p p r e c i a t e the distinction b e t w e e n the b r a i n and the self.

W h e n the A p o l l o a s t r o n a u t s w e n t t o the m o o n a n d b r o u g h t
b a c k p i c t u r e s o f o u r planet o f o c e a n s a n d c l o u d s h a n g i n g over a
g r e y m o o n s c a p e in the m i d d l e of a b l a c k n o w h e r e , it c h a n g e d
the w a y w e s a w o u r s e l v e s . W e k n e w a l r e a d y that w e inhabited
the s u r f a c e of a s m a l l , s p i n n i n g s p h e r e that rolled a r o u n d an
o r d i n a r y star, a t the e d g e o f a n u n r e m a r k a b l e g a l a x y , just o n e o f
i n d e t e r m i n a t e billions in a v a s t , indifferent c o s m o s . B u t now,
o c c u p y i n g a few d e g r e e s o f retinal s p a c e , c o m f o r t a b l y a b s o r b e d
in the f o l d s of the v i s u a l cortex, a m e r e p o r t i o n of the visual
f i e l d , w e s a w o u r h o m e i n its true c o l o u r s . I t w a s p r e c i o u s and
v u l n e r a b l e , a s m a l l fragile object, a thing we s h o u l d take care of.
I t w a s , i n d e e d , o u r h o m e . W e m i g h t h a v e e x t r a p o l a t e d these
s e n t i m e n t s from the k n o w l e d g e w e a l r e a d y p o s s e s s e d , but the
i m a g e s set o f f a n interplay o f intellect a n d i m a g i n a t i o n that
m a d e the n e w p e r s p e c t i v e irresistible.

S o m e t h i n g similar h a p p e n s w h e n y o u s e e a b r a i n . I m a g i n a -
tion infiltrates intellect. Y o u g e t a s e n s e of location and
vulnerability. O u r h o m e .

T h e hall e m p t i e s , b u t a few s t u d e n t s stay behind for a c l o s e r

l o o k . T h e y w a n t t o t o u c h it. A y o u n g w o m a n a s k s i f she m i g h t
h o l d the b r a i n . S h e d o n s r u b b e r g l o v e s a n d takes the s p e c i m e n i n
her c u p p e d h a n d s . T h e r e i s w o n d e r a n d a p p r e h e n s i o n o n her
f a c e . Y o u s e e this l o o k o n the faces o f small children h o l d i n g

54
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

caterpillars. A y o u n g m a n turns the b r a i n o v e r to e x a m i n e its

u n d e r s i d e . He p i c k s at the s t u m p of a s e v e r e d artery. A n o t h e r
tests the w e i g h t , feeling the d r o p of the object first in the left
hand then the right. H e s a y s it's o d d , b u t y o u r h e a d d o e s n ' t feel
this heavy.

Six m o n t h s later M a r y c a m e t o the o u t p a t i e n t s ' clinic. I t w a s

a routine follow-up. S h e d i d not r e m e m b e r me but, a l t h o u g h her
m e m o r y w a s still p o o r , s h e h a d m a d e g o o d p r o g r e s s i n other
areas. T h e r e w a s n o l o n g e r the p r o l i x i t y o f s p e e c h o r the f r a g -
mented attention that h a d characterized her b e h a v i o u r b e f o r e .
I n particular, o v e r a p e r i o d o f t w o h o u r s o f i n t e r v i e w i n g a n d
n e u r o p s y c h o l o g i c a l testing, I d e t e c t e d no s i g n s of c o n f a b u l a -
tion. T h e n , w o r k d o n e , idly chatting a s w e w a i t e d for her
h u s b a n d to collect her, I a s k e d w h a t p l a n s s h e h a d for the w e e k -
end.

' O h , ' she s a i d . ' I ' d like t o w a t c h the b a d g e r s a g a i n . '

'Really?'
' Y e s , in the field o v e r the b a c k w a l l . Y o u can s e e t h e m f r o m
the g a r d e n s h e d . ' S h e w a s l o o k i n g a t m y n a m e - t a g . ' B r o c k the
b a d g e r , ' she s a i d .
M a r y ' s h u s b a n d arrived a n d they left together. I n e v e r s a w
them a g a i n and I d i d n ' t a s k h i m a b o u t the b a d g e r s at the b o t t o m
o f the g a r d e n .

L i k e the s u r f a c e o f the E a r t h , the b r a i n i s pretty m u c h

m a p p e d . T h e r e are n o secret c o m p a r t m e n t s i n a c c e s s i b l e t o the
s u r g e o n ' s knife o r the m a g n e t i c g a z e o f the b r a i n s c a n n e r ; n o
m y s t e r i o u s h u m o u r s p e r v a d i n g the cerebral ventricles, n o s o u l
in the pineal g l a n d , no vital s p a r k , no spirits in the t a n g l e d

55
PAUL B R O K S

w o o d . T h e r e i s n o t h i n g y o u can't t o u c h o r s q u e e z e , w e i g h and
m e a s u r e , a s w e m i g h t the p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s o f other objects.
So y o u will s e a r c h in v a i n for a n y s e m b l a n c e of a s e l f within the
s t r u c t u r e s of the b r a i n : there is no g h o s t in the m a c h i n e . It is
time t o g r o w u p a n d a c c e p t this fact. B u t , s o m e h o w , w e are the
p r o d u c t o f the o p e r a t i o n o f this m a c h i n e r y a n d its p r o g r e s s
t h r o u g h the p h y s i c a l a n d social w o r l d .

M i n d s e m e r g e from p r o c e s s and interaction, not substance.

In a s e n s e , we inhabit the s p a c e s b e t w e e n things. We subsist in
e m p t i n e s s . A beautiful, liberating, t h o u g h t and nothing to be
afraid of. T h e n o t i o n of a tethered s o u l is c r u d e by c o m p a r i s o n .
S h i n e a light, i t ' s o b v i o u s .

56
In the Theatre

In the d a y s b e f o r e b r a i n s c a n s it w a s i m p o s s i b l e to l o c a t e
t u m o u r s beneath the s u r f a c e o f the b r a i n with a n y p r e c i s i o n .
S u r g e o n s blindly p o k e d a r o u n d in the soft t i s s u e s , c a u s i n g
untold d a m a g e in the p r o c e s s .
T h e p o e t - p h y s i c i a n D a n n i e A b s e w r o t e a p o e m , ' I n the
Theatre', in which he recounts a harrowing experience
described by his father, Dr Wilfred A b s e . I first r e a d this p o e m
when I w a s a student and it raised the h a i r s on the b a c k of my
neck. It c o n c e r n s an e p i s o d e that o c c u r r e d in 1918 while A b s e
senior w a s a s s i s t i n g at a b r a i n o p e r a t i o n .

H i s v o i c e i n t r o d u c e s the p o e m . T h e patient, h e tells u s , i s

fully awake t h r o u g h o u t the o p e r a t i o n u n d e r a local anaesthetic,
while the fingers of L a m b e r t R o g e r s , the s u r g e o n - ' r a s h as a
blind m a n ' s ' — crudely s e a r c h for the t u m o u r in the b r a i n t i s s u e s
- 'all s o m e w h a t hit a n d m i s s ' . T h i s , s a y s D r A b s e , i s o n e o p e r a -
tion h e will never forget. T h e p o e m , a n d the o p e r a t i o n , o p e n s
with r e a s s u r i n g w o r d s for the patient:

57
PAUL B R O K S

Sister saying — 'Soon y o u ' l l be back on the ward,'

sister thinking — 'Only two more on the list,'
the patient saying — 'Thank you, I feel fine';
small voices, small lies, nothing untoward,
though, soon, he would blink again and again
because of the fingers of Lambert Rogers,
rash as a blind man's, inside his soft brain.

If items of horror can make a man laugh

then laugh at this: one hour later, the growth
still undiscovered, ticking its own wild time;
more brain mashed because of the probe's braille path;
Lambert Rogers desperate, fingering still;
his dresser thinking, 'Christ! Two more on the list,
a cisternal puncture and a neural cyst.'

Then, suddenly, the cracked record in the brain,

a ventriloquist voice that cried, 'You sod,
leave my soul alone, leave my soul alone,' -
the patient's dummy lips moving to that refrain,
the patient's eyes too wide. And, shocked,
Lambert Rogers drawing out the probe
with nurses, students, sister, petrified.

'Leave my soul alone, leave my soul alone,'

that voice so arctic and that cry so odd
had nowhere else to go — till the antique
gramophone wound down and the words began
to blur and slow, '.. . leave .. . my... soul... alone ...'
to cease at last when something other died.

And silence matched the silence under snow.

58
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

T h e p o e m n o l o n g e r chills m e . W h y ? P e r h a p s I a m a m o r e
sophisticated reader o f p o e t r y n o w a n d s e e t o o c l e a r l y the
b o a r d s and b a c k d r o p of a m e l o d r a m a . B u t I d o n ' t think s o . It is
o b v i o u s l y m e a n t t o b e theatrical a n d , t o m y m i n d , c o n v e y s
authentic d r a m a . It is a fine p o e m . It still p a c k s a p u n c h . B u t it
d o e s n ' t unsettle me as it o n c e d i d .

Perhaps my e x p e r i e n c e s as a clinician o v e r the y e a r s h a v e left

me desensitized to h u m a n suffering or l a c k i n g a p p e t i t e for the
bizarre and extraordinary. I h o p e not, a n d d o n ' t think s o .
Inevitably, one develops strategies for self-preservation.
A n y o n e w h o h a s w o r k e d with patients o n a c u t e hospital w a r d s
will tell y o u that y o u cannot r e s o n a t e with e v e r y t r e m o r of feel-
ing, and that s o m e t i m e s there are v i s i o n s o f h o r r o r a n d r a w fear
that can only be o b s e r v e d obliquely.

Perfect, constant e m p a t h y i n s u c h c i r c u m s t a n c e s w o u l d b e
suicidal. B u t it is less a p r o c e s s of desensitization than o n e of
b e c o m i n g acclimatized. T h e r e i s a difference. T h e f o r m e r s u g -
g e s t s a n a t r o p h y o f feeling, the latter i s m e r e l y t o b e c o m e
a c c u s t o m e d to different c o n d i t i o n s . W h e n the p r o f e s s i o n a l
f a c a d e slips in the p r e s e n c e of p e r s o n a l suffering, as it d o e s f r o m
time to time, the p a i n still penetrates. A n d as for indifference to
the bizarre and extraordinary, the v e r y o p p o s i t e i s true. F r o m
where I stand, in early m i d d l e a g e , the u n i v e r s e l o o k s as
m y s t e r i o u s a n d a b s u r d a s ever - h u m a n b e i n g s especially. T h e
older I g e t the m o r e a s t o n i s h e d I am by the plain fact of my o w n
existence and c o n s c i o u s n e s s , let a l o n e s t r a n g e a n d d i s t u r b i n g
neurological cases.

T h e r e a s o n the p o e m h a s lost its p o w e r t o g i v e m e g o o s e p i m -

ples c o m e s d o w n , I think, to that w o r d ' s o u l ' . F o r full effect it

59
PAUL B R O K S

r e q u i r e s an a c c e p t a n c e , at s o m e level, that s o u l s exist. C o n s i d e r

the p i v o t a l m o m e n t w h e n , defenceless a g a i n s t the s u r g e o n ' s
frantic fingers, the d y i n g b r a i n a s s e r t s itself: Leave my soul alone,
leave my soul alone. T h i s feels like the intrusion of a s u p e r n a t u -
ral force. S o m e t h i n g other than the brain, and s o m e t h i n g other
than the patient e v e n , s e e m s to h a v e entered the scene. It is hard
to identify the v o i c e with the soft m a s s of the inert brain, and it
is d i s t a n c e d from the patient, w h o s e b o d y n o w b e c o m e s a v e n -
t r i l o q u i s t ' s d u m m y , m o u t h i n g w o r d s as if to the s o u n d of a
c r a c k e d r e c o r d . T h e y are w o r d s o f despair. T h e eerie intruder
w a s reluctant to manifest itself, o n e feels, b u t h a d no choice.

N o w , i f y o u h a d a s k e d m e t w e n t y - o d d y e a r s a g o whether I
t h o u g h t there w e r e such things as s o u l s I w o u l d h a v e said that of
c o u r s e there w e r e not. U n d e r g o i n g training in clinical and s c i -
entific disciplines, I w o u l d h a v e c o n s i d e r e d such talk to be
p r i m i t i v e a n d pre-scientific. ' S o u l ' implied a spiritual substance
of s o m e kind, a mental e s s e n c e or e g o acting behind the material
s c e n e s o f b r a i n structure a n d function, g u i d i n g and controlling
a n d , if y o u c h o s e to b e l i e v e it, s u r v i v i n g the death of the body.
It carried c o n n o t a t i o n s of the s u p e r n a t u r a l , representing ideas
that I f o u n d at b e s t m i s g u i d e d or intellectually inelegant, at
w o r s t sinister and r e t r o g r e s s i v e .

I t o o k the v i e w that the mind w a s the p r o d u c t of the brain in

its interactions with the physical and social w o r l d . I still hold
that view. T h e difference i n m y e m o t i o n a l r e s p o n s e t o the p o e m
then a n d n o w r e q u i r e s a m o r e subtle explanation.
I think it h a s to do with a c h a n g e in b a c k g r o u n d intuitions, as
o p p o s e d to f o r e g r o u n d beliefs. W h e n I first encountered the
p o e m I explicitly d e n i e d the existence of s o u l s , but there w a s a

60
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

part o f m e still b e g u i l e d b y the i m a g i n a t i v e p o w e r o f the t e r m .

It feels natural to b e l i e v e that s o m e t h i n g like a s o u l exists. It m a y
indeed be natural in the s e n s e that e v o l u t i o n h a s s h a p e d o u r c o g -
nitive architecture in w a y s that p r e d i s p o s e us to b e l i e v e in the
separation o f mind a n d brain.
We live in a social as well as a p h y s i c a l w o r l d , a n d n e g o t i a t i o n
o f our c o m p l e x social e n v i r o n m e n t r e q u i r e s the attribution o f
mental states (feelings, beliefs, d e s i r e s , intentions) to o u r s e l v e s
and others, p e r h a p s inevitably inclining us to b e l i e v e that the
w o r l d contains t w o sorts o f stuff, material a n d i m m a t e r i a l .
D u a l i s m m a y h a v e d e e p e v o l u t i o n a r y r o o t s . W e all feel that, a s
well as a brain, s o m e t h i n g else o c c u p i e s the interior of o u r h e a d
and the h e a d s of other p e o p l e — an irreducible mental c o r e , the
origin of t h o u g h t s and actions. It is a p r i m i t i v e belief, b u t it is
compelling.

It m a y follow that a b e l i e f in s o u l s ( o r implicit b e l i e f or half-

belief or q u a s i - b e l i e f ) is a n e c e s s a r y c o n d i t i o n for o r d i n a r y
h u m a n interaction. W e v i e w o u r s e l v e s a s i n t e g r a t e d mental
entities with a n a g e n d a o f intentions a n d actions, a u t h o r s o f o u r
o w n destiny. In a m o r a l u n i v e r s e , p e r h a p s that is the o n l y c o n -
ceivable w a y t o v i e w other p e o p l e too.

A l l I can s a y is that now, w h e n the b r a i n / s o u l / p a t i e n t p l e a d s

Leave my soul alone, it s e e m s to me less like the intrusion of a
supernatural force. N o t h i n g h a s entered the s c e n e . T h e r e is still
a desperation for s u r v i v a l , b u t this, I n o w s e e , e m a n a t e s f r o m a
stark n o m a n ' s land b e t w e e n the m u t i l a t e d tissues o f the b r a i n ,
the s o u n d w a v e s o f 'that v o i c e s o a r c t i c ' , a n d the horrified
r e s p o n s e o f the o n l o o k e r s . T h e r e i s h o r r o r still, b u t n o t s u p e r -
natural horror.

61
PAUL B R O K S

P e r h a p s , o v e r the y e a r s , my i m m e r s i o n in the rationalism of

clinical science h a s rusted t h o s e machineries o f i m a g i n a t i o n
that g e n e r a t e b e l i e f in s u p e r n a t u r a l s o u l s — or half-belief or
quasi-belief. P e r h a p s this s h o u l d w o r r y m e ; I m a y h a v e lost
s o m e t h i n g . B u t I prefer to think that the screen between the t w o
d o m a i n s — scientific u n d e r s t a n d i n g and primitive i m a g i n a t i o n —
h a s b e c o m e m o r e transparent, a l l o w i n g a clearer v i e w in both
directions.

Certainly, I feel better able to c o p e with ambiguity. T h e r e is

scientific rationality a n d there is i m a g i n a t i o n . S o m e t i m e s they
c o i n c i d e , a n d all p e o p l e h a v e elements o f both. T h e p o e m
b e t r a y s a n a m b i g u i t y a b o u t the reality o f s o u l s . T h e fearful
w o r d s c r a n k o u t t h r o u g h the a n t i q u e g r a m o p h o n e o f the v o c a l
a p p a r a t u s , b l u r r i n g a n d s l o w i n g , ' . . . leave . . . my . . . soul. . .
alone...' - an i m a g e of a s o u l l e s s m e c h a n i s m - but they are said
to c e a s e at last o n l y 'when something other died'.

S o , it d o e s n ' t chill me as it u s e d to, but I feel another r e s p o n s e .

B e h i n d the h o r r o r I s e e m o r e clearly n o w there is a l s o pity. T h e
b r a i n thinks i t ' s a s o u l . T h e r e is real p a t h o s in that.
I m a y not b e l i e v e in s o u l s , b u t I still find brain s u r g e r y d i s c o n -
certing, and this i s partly w h y A b s e ' s p o e m retains s o m e o f its
original p o w e r . T h e experience o f w i t n e s s i n g a n operation o n
the b r a i n is, in certain respects, quite different from other kinds
o f surgery. A l l s u r g i c a l p r o c e d u r e s are i n v a s i v e , but n e u r o -
s u r g e r y s e e m s like the ultimate intrusion. In a b d o m i n a l and
c a r d i o t h o r a c i c o p e r a t i o n s y o u s e e the s u r g e o n b u r r o w into the
p a t i e n t ' s b o d y , e x p o s i n g the inner w o r k i n g s - the p u m p s , the fil-
ters, the p i p e s , the v a l v e s . It c a n be s h o c k i n g , but we h a v e this
w a y o f s e p a r a t i n g i d e a s o f 'the p e r s o n ' from what i s h a p p e n i n g

62
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

t o 'the p e r s o n ' s b o d y ' . T h e p e r s o n , o n e t e n d s t o i m a g i n e , i s

elsewhere d u r i n g the i n v a s i o n o f her i n n a r d s ; s h e h a s w i t h -
d r a w n to a s a f e , anaesthetized p l a c e ( s o m e w h e r e in the h e a d ,
o u r intuitions tell u s ) .

It is a different matter w h e n the contents of the skull a r e o p e n

for inspection a n d p r e y t o the s u r g e o n ' s knife. T h e r e c a n b e n o
question o f a n y ' r e l o c a t i o n ' t o another p a r t o f the b o d y . I t
w o u l d b e a b s u r d t o think o f the g h o s t l y s e l f retreating t o s o m e
other o r g a n o r limb. A t the s a m e instant o n e u n d e r s t a n d s that
there is, o f c o u r s e , n o g h o s t l y s e l f i n the first p l a c e . W h e n w e
see the b r a i n w e realize that w e a r e , a t o n e level, n o m o r e than
meat; a n d , o n another, n o m o r e than fiction.

T h e s a m e insight — at o n c e m u n d a n e and m y s t e r i o u s — is a
potent element o f the f a m o u s Z a p r u d e r f o o t a g e o f the K e n n e d y
a s s a s s i n a t i o n . Recall the i m a g e s a n d y o u will k n o w w h a t I m e a n .
J a c k i e K e n n e d y in the D a l l a s s u n s h i n e , in her pretty p i n k , pill-
b o x hat, s c r a m b l i n g t o retrieve the d e b r i s o f her h u s b a n d ' s
shattered head from the b a c k of the l i m o u s i n e . S h e finds a p i e c e
o f s o m e t h i n g and tries t o replace it. O r s o i t a p p e a r s . W h a t g r i m
d e s p e r a t i o n ; what a p p a l l i n g intimacy.

T h o s e g l i m p s e s o f n a k e d b r a i n are a n epiphany. T h e M o s t
Powerful M a n in the W o r l d , s m i l i n g i m m o r t a l l y a n d w a v i n g to
the c r o w d s just now, h a s h a d the top of his h e a d b l o w n a w a y . It
is not just that h e , like all of u s , is v u l n e r a b l e , or that his p h y s i -
cality is so brittle. N o r is it e v e n the s u d d e n n e s s of his transition
from h u m a n b e i n g t o inert s u b s t a n c e . W h a t l o c k s these i m a g e s
into place i s the e x p o s u r e o f the g r e y - p i n k b r a i n . I f that i s w h a t
T h e M o s t Powerful M a n i n the W o r l d c a n b e r e d u c e d to, i f that
is what he is, then there is no h o p e for the rest of u s . We k n e w it

63
PAUL B R O K S

a n y w a y , b u t o u r a w a r e n e s s of the fact is intensified by the d r a m a

a n d the m y t h i c status o f the a c t o r s . T h a t i s the h o r r o r o f the
f i l m . A n d w h e n y o u w a t c h , d o y o u not s e n s e a f l i c k e r o f self-
p i t y ? D e s p i t e myself, I fear for my s o u l .

64
A-Z

A former n e u r o s u r g e o n c o l l e a g u e , r e c a l l i n g his training d a y s ,

has a s t o r y a b o u t w a l k i n g t h r o u g h the streets of L o n d o n with a
fellow student o f s u r g e r y . H i s friend s t o p p e d , m i d - c o n v e r s a -
tion, evidently troubled. T h e y h a d r e a c h e d a s m a l l s i d e street.
T h e m a n w a s b e c o m i n g a g i t a t e d a n d kept l o o k i n g u p a t the
street n a m e .

' T h i s street,' h e s a i d , 'is not i n the A - Z . '

A n d it wasn't. T h e y checked. T h e would-be surgeon had a
remarkable visual m e m o r y . F o r n o particular r e a s o n h e h a d set
h i m s e l f the task, successfully a c c o m p l i s h e d , o f m e m o r i z i n g the
entire A - Z street m a p o f L o n d o n . A n d n o w h e h a d s t u m b l e d
u p o n a m i s m a t c h . T h e m a p o f his i m a g i n a t i o n w o u l d h a v e t o b e
a m e n d e d in o n e small detail, e n o u g h to m a k e it s u p e r i o r to the
published v e r s i o n .

H i s p r o b l e m t h o u g h ( a n d ultimately w h a t b a r r e d his w a y to a
career i n n e u r o s u r g e r y ) w a s that his exceptional p o w e r s o f v i s -
ual i m a g e r y w e r e exceptional o n l y i n two d i m e n s i o n s . A m o n g
other attributes o f intellect a n d t e m p e r a m e n t , the p r a c t i c e o f

65
PAUL B R O K S

n e u r o s u r g e r y d e m a n d s an ability to think in three d i m e n s i o n s .

T h i s m a n w a s like M r S q u a r e , the lowly, t w o - d i m e n s i o n a l
c h a r a c t e r in E d w i n A b b o t ' s nineteenth-century satirical tale
Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions. Mr S q u a r e h a s no
i n k l i n g of a g e o m e t r y b e y o n d the p l a n e of Flatland until, one
night, he is visited by L o r d S p h e r e , a b e i n g from the land
of three d i m e n s i o n s ( a p p e a r i n g to h i m as a circle, m a g i c a l l y
c h a n g i n g s h a p e ) . F a i l i n g t o c o n v i n c e b y explanation, L o r d
S p h e r e p e e l s his h u m b l e a c q u a i n t a n c e from Flatland and f l i n g s
h i m into S p a c e l a n d , p r o v i n g that there is, indeed, a w o r l d of
t h r e e - d i m e n s i o n a l o b j e c t s . It is a revelatory, life-transforming
e x p e r i e n c e . B u t , of c o u r s e , on his return, he fails m i s e r a b l y to
p e r s u a d e his fellow F l a t l a n d e r s o f the existence o f this other
w o r l d a n d the H i g h P r i e s t s ( w h o are circular) c o n d e m n him as a
d a n g e r o u s heretic.

T h e trainee s u r g e o n ' s A—Z o f the b r a i n lacked the n e c e s s a r y

third d i m e n s i o n . H e w a s n ' t able t o inhabit the m e t r o p o l i s o f the
b r a i n in the w a y a n e u r o s u r g e o n m u s t .
N e u r o p s y c h o l o g y r e q u i r e s four d i m e n s i o n s . A t least.

66
The Mirror

J u d y g e t s h o m e from w o r k . S h e p o u r s h e r s e l f a m a r t i n i , p u t s a
record on the hi-fi a n d d r o p s into a soft leather chair. God s h e ' s
t i r e d . . . S h e s l e e p s . A n d y can read the b e d t i m e s t o r i e s . T h e little
girl k i s s e s her s l e e p i n g m o t h e r a n d , reluctantly, g o e s t o b e d .

W h e n J u d y w a k e s , the r o o m i s s e m i - d a r k . S h e sits b o l t
upright and flinches from the p a i n in her h e a d . T h e r e is no
m u s i c . S h e tries to fix her p o s i t i o n . I m a g e s of the d a i l y routine
tumble together: get u p , g o t o w o r k , c o m e h o m e . A cat stretches
o n the b a c k o f a chair b y the w i n d o w . T h e r e i s e n o u g h o f the
f a d i n g light to b r i n g its g i n g e r fur to life. B u t J u d y ' s cat is a
tabby.

A n unfamiliar m a n enters the r o o m : late m i d d l e - a g e d , g r e y

hair. He g l i d e s by, g l a n c i n g briefly in her direction, a n d s w i t c h e s
on a l a m p in the corner. It c a s t s a c o n e of light u p w a r d s to the
ceiling.

' D i d you say something, J u d e ? '

N o w that the light i s o n s h e s e e s that the r o o m i s a l s o
unfamiliar.

67
PAUL B R O K S

Where am I? Who is this?

J u d y h a s a habit of twisting and p u l l i n g at her w e d d i n g ring
when s h e ' s stressed. T h e ring has gone.
' J u d e , ' the m a n s a y s , ' I d o n ' t k n o w what y o u ' r e o n a b o u t . '
S h e i s a s k i n g for her d a u g h t e r and h u s b a n d . T h e m a n leaves and
a w o m a n enters. S h e k n e e l s by the s i d e of the chair and takes
J u d y ' s hand. It's a gentle interrogation.
' I ' m J u d y J e n k i n s . I ' m thirty-nine — and I d o n ' t k n o w where
the b l o o d y hell I a m ! '
B u t s h e k n o w s the y e a r : 1976.
T h e P r i m e Minister? ' H a r o l d W i l s o n . '
T h e m a n ' s v o i c e b r e a k s in, but J u d y cuts him short.
' D o n ' t tell m e I ' m g e t t i n g m i x e d u p ! ' s h e s n a p s . ' I k n o w what
y e a r it i s . '
N o w h e ' s i n front o f her h o l d i n g u p a n e w s p a p e r , pointing t o
the d a t e at the top of the p a g e : S a t u r d a y , 10 April 1999. A shaft
o f l o g i c b r e a k s the frame.
' F e t c h me a m i r r o r . '

* * *

1999
' A n d then I s a i d , " F e t c h me a m i r r o r . " I s a i d I'd be an old w o m a n
i n 1 9 9 9 . . . ' S h e ' s telling m e the s t o r y a g a i n . I t m u s t b e the fourth
or fifth t i m e . I ' m not really listening. I d o n ' t need to. I t ' s the
s a m e story.
T h e n e u r o s c i e n t i s t Michael G a z z a n i g a q u o t e s J o h n U p d i k e
a n d R a l p h W a l d o E m e r s o n : 'A thread r u n s t h r o u g h all things:
all w o r l d s are s t r u n g on it, as b e a d s : and m e n , and events, and
life c o m e t o u s , o n l y b e c a u s e o f that thread.' I n other w o r d s

68
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

( s a y s U p d i k e ) o u r subjectivity d o m i n a t e s outer reality, ' a n d the

u n i v e r s e has a p e r s o n a l structure'.
A c c o r d i n g to G a z z a n i g a , the b r a i n h a s a d e d i c a t e d s y s t e m for
b i n d i n g the s t r a n d s o f a multitude o f specialized b r a i n m o d u l e s
into a single thread of p e r s o n a l e x p e r i e n c e . He calls it 'the Inter-
preter' and locates it in the left cerebral h e m i s p h e r e . T h e
Interpreter identifies patterns o f c o n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n d i s p a r a t e
brain s y s t e m s and correlates these with e v e n t s in the external
w o r l d . T h i s g i v e s unity a n d continuity a n d e n a b l e s each o f u s t o
create a p e r s o n a l life story.
J u d y ' s m i r r o r arrives. S h e s e e s that her face i s w r i n k l e d a n d
g a u n t , her hair short a n d grey. It must be a dream, s h e thinks. I t ' s
too m u c h to take in all at o n c e . S h e p a n i c s a n d tries to s t a n d , b u t
her left l e g is p a r a l y s e d by the s t r o k e . S h e l o s e s c o n s c i o u s n e s s .
W h e n she w a k e s there is a m a n l e a n i n g o v e r her, p r e s s i n g a
m a s k to her face; a soldier p e r h a p s , t h o u g h his u n i f o r m is t o o
g a u d y for the military. S h e s e n s e s m o v e m e n t a n d v i b r a t i o n a n d
r e c o g n i z e s the s o u n d s o f a n e n g i n e g o i n g t h r o u g h the g e a r s . S h e
is in s o m e kind of vehicle.
' T a k e i t easy, J u d y , ' s a y s the m a n i n u n i f o r m , ' y o u ' r e g o i n g t o
be just fine.'
T h e r e are red and g r e y blankets a n d c y l i n d e r s , t u b e s a n d
l e a d s , plastic b o x e s , instruments with d i a l s , a n d other i t e m s o f
equipment. A n d there, sitting o p p o s i t e , i s the g r e y - h a i r e d m a n .
He leans in c l o s e r to her. ' W h a t ' s t h a t ? ' he a s k s .
' H a s a n y o n e told A n d y ? ' s h e m u m b l e s .
T h e e r a s u r e o f twenty-three y e a r s i s r e m a r k a b l e e n o u g h .
J u d y ' s p e r s o n a l life o v e r that p e r i o d is a c o m p l e t e b l a n k . S h e c a n
only c o m p r e h e n d the bitterness o f her d i v o r c e f r o m A n d y i n the
abstract, and the g r e y - h a i r e d m a n , with w h o m she h a s b e e n

69
PAUL B R O K S

l i v i n g for the p a s t e i g h t e e n y e a r s , is a stranger. T h e s a m e g o e s

for p u b l i c events. ( ' M a r g a r e t T h a t c h e r ? ' ) B u t e q u a l l y striking i s
the w o r k o f J u d y ' s Interpreter, her teller o f tales. Its s t r u g g l e for
continuity is h e r o i c . W i t h n o t h i n g else to h a n d , it reaches b a c k
m o r e than t w o d e c a d e s to find material for a story. It b r i d g e s
the twenty-three y e a r s a s i f they w e r e twenty-three minutes.

* * *

2002
' A n d then I s a i d , " F e t c h m e a m i r r o r " . . . '
B e a t e n into s u b m i s s i o n b y the l o g i c o f a n u n k n o w n present,
p l u s the irrefutable e v i d e n c e in the mirror, J u d y ' s Interpreter
h a s reset the c l o c k a n d set a b o u t the b u s i n e s s of r e g u l a t i n g a
different life. V e r y little m e m o r y h a s returned, but things are
g o i n g fine with the g r e y - h a i r e d m a n , a n d J u d y is a g r a n d m o t h e r
now.

T h i s kind o f a m n e s i a i s e x t r e m e l y r a r e . I h a v e c o m e a c r o s s
o n l y o n e other c a s e that b e a r s c o m p a r i s o n t o J u d y ' s . T h a t
patient, t o o , m a d e a n a s t o n i s h i n g l y s m o o t h adjustment t o her
n e w c i r c u m s t a n c e s . H o w resilient p e o p l e are. I f o n e d a y y o u
w o k e up to find that y o u h a d b e e n t r a n s f o r m e d into a g i g a n t i c
insect, the c h a n c e s a r e y o u w o u l d j u s t g e t u p a n d c a r r y o n with
y o u r n e w life.

* **

2003
' A n d then I s a i d , " F e t c h m e a m i r r o r " . . . '

70
 The Visible Man

A s J a m e s M o o n a w o k e o n e m o r n i n g after d i s t u r b i n g d r e a m s , h e
found h i m s e l f t r a n s f o r m e d into a n a n a t o m i c a l illustration. H e
r o s e from his b e d thinking all w a s as it s h o u l d be a n d h e a d e d for
the b a t h r o o m , the first routine act of a n o t h e r r o u t i n e day. B u t ,
l o o k i n g in the mirror, he noticed that the d o m e of his h e a d h a d
b e c o m e transparent.

T h e r e , b a t h e d in a g l o s s y light, w a s his b r a i n , l o o k i n g like a

vivid picture from the p a g e s of a t e x t b o o k or a h i g h - r e s o l u t i o n
c o m p u t e r g r a p h i c . T h e outer s u r f a c e s , the g r e a t c o n v o l u t e d
l o b e s o f the cerebral h e m i s p h e r e s , w e r e r e n d e r e d i n pastel
s h a d e s with sculptural clarity: c o m p a c t , r o u n d e d , s o l i d , with
sharp c o n t o u r s defining the m a j o r a n a t o m i c a l d i v i s i o n s .

T h e frontal l o b e s ( p a l e m a u v e ) w e r e p a c k e d just b e h i n d the

forehead. T h e t e m p o r a l l o b e s ( p o w d e r b l u e ) w e r e t o either s i d e
a t the level o f the e a r s . A b o v e and s o m e w h a t b e h i n d these w e r e
the parietal l o b e s ( c h a m p a g n e ) a n d , at the b a c k , the occipital
l o b e s ( j a d e ) . T h e n , a s y o u w o u l d e x p e c t , there w e r e c u t a w a y
v i e w s from the s i d e , from a b o v e , a n d f a c e - o n , r e v e a l i n g s t r u c -

71
PAUL B R O K S

tures d e e p b e n e a t h the s u r f a c e . T h e s e w e r e c o d e d with b o l d e r

c o l o u r s : c o b a l t b l u e , l e m o n , cherry red, o r a n g e , p u r p l e .
T h e c l o s e r h e l o o k e d , the m o r e J a m e s saw. N o t just the b u l b -
o u s , fruit-like f o r m s o f the p u t a m e n and the g l o b u s pallidus, and
the flat-topped o v a l of the t h a l a m u s at the centre, or the
s w e e p i n g , o v e r a r c h i n g c u r v e s o f the fornix and the caudate. But
there, like b r i g h t clusters o f j e l l y b e a n s , w e r e the s u b c o m p o -
nents of these structures: the pulvinar, the lateral geniculate
b o d y , the d o r s o m e d i a l n u c l e u s . H e d i d not yet k n o w the n a m e s
of these things, but he would.

Of course, it's a dream, he t h o u g h t , I'm still asleep. B u t the

m u n d a n e objects o f the b a t h r o o m s t o o d i n their usual places
a n d on the sill w a s a c o p y of y e s t e r d a y ' s n e w s p a p e r , just as he
h a d left it, a picture of a w o m a n s m i l i n g on the front p a g e . W i n d
a n d rain b e a t a g a i n s t the w i n d o w p a n e . H e w o u l d seek a d v i c e
w i t h o u t delay.

S o , littering c r u m b s o f b r e a k f a s t toast a s h e went, J a m e s

g r a b b e d his hat ( a g r e e n c a n v a s o n e like a n g l e r s w e a r ) , s l a m m e d
the front d o o r b e h i n d h i m , a n d set o f f for the medical centre.
O n e c o r n e r o f the w a i t i n g r o o m w a s partitioned a s a chil-
d r e n ' s p l a y a r e a . It w a s strewn with soft t o y s and plastic bricks in
p r i m a r y c o l o u r s . A s m a l l child sat in the m i d d l e , t u g g i n g a string
f r o m the b a c k of a p i n k doll.

' I ' m s o h a p p y , ' s a i d the doll. T h e child chuckled a s the string

slid b a c k i n s i d e .
All the while G r e g k n e w that, b e n e a t h the hat, his head w a s
still g l o w i n g like the a u r o r a b o r e a l i s . And wouldn't that amuse the
child, he t h o u g h t . He resisted the temptation, however, and w a s
s o o n called t h r o u g h .

72 •
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

' H o w can I h e l p ? ' said D r V e s a l i u s .

J a m e s r e m o v e d his hat. ' W e l l ? ' h e a s k e d . ' H a v e y o u e v e r s e e n
anything like i t ? '
T h e m u l t i c o l o u r e d r a d i a n c e s e e m e d b r i g h t e r than b e f o r e . I t
shone like a halo. If Dr V e s a l i u s w a s s h o c k e d he d i d n ' t s h o w it.
A true p r o f e s s i o n a l , he just leaned f o r w a r d , p r e s s i n g t o g e t h e r
the tips of his fingers.
' Y e s t e r d a y all w a s well,' J a m e s e x p l a i n e d . ' T h e n this m o r n -
i n g I w a k e up to find my h e a d transparent a n d my b r a i n a
firework display'

' I s e e , ' said D r V e s a l i u s . H e s a i d h e w o u l d m a k e a r r a n g e -

ments for J a m e s to m e e t a specialist.
O n the w a y out there w a s another child p l a y i n g with the d o l l .
S h e pulled g r i m l y a t the string. ' I ' m s o happy. I ' m s o h a p p y . . . '
the doll kept s a y i n g , t h o u g h the child w a s n o t a m u s e d . J a m e s
lifted his hat briefly, b u t it m a d e no difference.

***

W h a t had c a u s e d those n i g h t m a r e s ? T h e p r e v i o u s e v e n i n g ,
J a m e s had eaten a light s u p p e r a n d d r u n k no m o r e than a finger
of whisky. B o r e d with T V , he had searched for s o m e t h i n g to read
and found an old illustrated e n c y c l o p a e d i a , which he t o o k to b e d .
Idly turning the p a g e s , he c a m e a c r o s s a picture of a r o c k
p o o l . H e r e m e m b e r e d i t well from his c h i l d h o o d . T h e w a t e r w a s
clear a s g l a s s . B l u e - g r e y r o c k s thrust u p t h r o u g h a b e d o f
s m o o t h p e b b l e s and s a n d t o w a r d s a s u m m e r sky. A b o v e the
water-line there w e r e b a r n a c l e s b a k i n g in the s u n s h i n e , a few
limpets and whelks — snail-like things with curly shells.

73
PAUL B R O K S

M u s s e l s clustered and t u m b l e d t h r o u g h the f i l m y surface o f

the w a t e r a n d into the p s y c h e d e l i c w o r l d below, which w a s
b r i m m i n g with all k i n d s o f life: c r a b s and s h r i m p s , s l u g s and
starfish, s e a a n e m o n e s , s p i n d l y p r a w n s , and g r i m - f a c e d little
fishes d a r t i n g t h r o u g h the b l a d d e r w r a c k and b r o w n s e a w e e d . It
still f a s c i n a t e d h i m , still d r e w him into the s c e n e , but not quite
t h r o u g h the p a g e a n d into the w a t e r a s b e f o r e .
L o o k i n g a t the picture now, t h r o u g h adult e y e s , w a s o d d l y
d i s i l l u s i o n i n g . H e h a d often w a l k e d a l o n g the b e a c h a t l o w tide
a n d h a d yet to find a r o c k p o o l so stuffed with life and colour.
B u t i t w a s n ' t j u s t d i s i l l u s i o n m e n t . T h e r e w a s s o m e t h i n g else
e q u a l l y unsettling. H e c l o s e d the b o o k and w a s s o o n asleep.
I n o n e d r e a m h e found h i m s e l f tightly b o u n d , head t o toe,
s c a r c e l y a b l e to b r e a t h e . A w a r e of a slight s w a y i n g m o t i o n , he
h a d the s e n s e that he w a s l o d g e d h i g h in the b r a n c h e s of a tree or
s u s p e n d e d in a net of s o m e kind. T h e r e w a s a n a u s e a t i n g jolt,
a n d another, as if he w e r e b e i n g d r a g g e d a l o n g like coal in a
s a c k . O n e particularly violent jerk p u l l e d the b i n d i n g from his
e y e s a n d w h a t h e s a w w r e n c h e d his g u t .
W h a t h a d a p p e a r e d t o b e the s h a d o w o f a black a w n i n g
t u r n e d o u t to be the b e l l y of a m o n s t r o u s spider. He tried to
b r e a k free, b u t i t w a s u s e l e s s a n d h e w a s s o o n e m b r a c e d b y the
b e a s t ' s s l a v e r i n g m a w . T h e r e w a s n o pain, just w a r m t h and
m o i s t u r e . A s the b o n d s b r o k e h e s a w his o w n disintegrating
b o d y : his s e g m e n t e d b r o w n belly, his six trembling l e g s , the
m e m b r a n e s o f his b u c k l e d w i n g s . H e called out, but his v o i c e
w a s a twittering s q u e a k .
A n d n o w this. J a m e s s t a r e d , without e x p r e s s i o n , a t the
m i r r o r , then s a n k into an armchair. He felt inordinately weary.

***

74
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

It w a s d a r k w h e n the d o o r b e l l r a n g . A pastel g l o w f o l l o w e d
J a m e s d o w n the d i n g y hallway, r e m i n d i n g him o f the state o f
his skull. He t o o k the f i s h e r m a n ' s hat f r o m the c o a t - h o o k a n d
p l a c e d i t o n his head b e f o r e o p e n i n g the d o o r . T h e r e s t o o d
Millie, in a swirl of rain a n d a u t u m n l e a v e s .

S h e had b r o u g h t with her t w o b a g s full o f b o o k s , which s h e

w a s n o w stacking u p o n the kitchen table.
' T h e s e are from the library,' s h e s a i d , ' a s r e q u e s t e d . ' A m o n g
others, there w a s a m e d i c a l t e x t b o o k , an atlas of n e u r o a n a t o m y ,
and a m a s s i v e t o m e called Elements of Cognitive Neuroscience.
' A n d this o n e I b o u g h t . ' S h e h a n d e d o v e r a s l i m p a p e r b a c k :
Neuroscience for the Brainless.

T h e y sat a t o p p o s i t e e n d s o f the s o f a , Millie with a r m s

folded, J a m e s g r i p p i n g the b r i m o f his hat. S h e w a s l o o k i n g
a w a y a s s h e s p o k e : ' A l l right, k e e p i t o n . ' H e r c h e e k s w e r e red.
After u n p a c k i n g the b o o k s she h a d c h a s e d J a m e s a r o u n d the flat,
snatching at his hat. It w a s a g a m e at first, s h e t h o u g h t , b u t then
he s h o u t e d at her to l e a v e h i m a l o n e . T h e y s a t in silence.

' O k a y , ' he s a i d , 'I'll take it off.'

T h e delicate s p r a y o f light d a n c e d a b o u t his h e a d a n d h e
w o n d e r e d w h y h e s h o u l d h a v e b e e n s o c o y with Millie. W h y
should s h e not s e e this m o s t enchanted part o f h i m , this m a g i c a l
w e l l s p r i n g - the s o u r c e of his t h o u g h t s , his h o p e s a n d beliefs,
and of his l o v e for her?

'Well,' she s a i d , 'what w a s all the fuss a b o u t ? '

H e m i g h t h a v e b e e n c o m p a r i n g fossil s p e c i m e n s o r s e m i -
p r e c i o u s s t o n e s . ' T h e c o l o u r s are different,' h e n o t e d , 'but the
s h a p e s are the s a m e . '

75
PAUL B R O K S

Elements of Cognitive Neuroscience was propped up on the

kitchen table next to a shaving mirror. A picture of the brain
filled most of one page. Millie stood behind him, her eyes roving
from the picture to the face in the mirror to the top of James's
head. He watched her reflection looking down on to the shim-
mering surface of his cerebrum, her eyes wide, transfixed,
confused.
'I can see it's going to take me a while to find my bearings,'
said James, staring at his hand, but Millie had already left the
room.

Make a fist with fingers wrapped around thumb. This is the

brain. Palm upwards, the outer ridge of the forearm becomes
the spinal cord. It turns into the brainstem at the wrist. Now look
at the fleshy part leading up to the base joint of the thumb. This
is the hindbrain. The protruding base joint itself represents the
cerebellum, which is the most prominent feature of the hind-
brain. In reality it looks like a kind of vegetable outgrowth at
the brain's rear underside.
Moving upwards and into the tunnel of fingers, the shaft of
the lower thumb bone represents the top end of the brainstem.
This is known as the midbrain. Finally, there is the forebrain —
the upper thumb bone, hidden under the fingers, and the fingers
themselves. Each finger stands for a division of the topmost part
of the brain — the cerebral cortex. Starting with the index finger,
we have the occipital lobe (ok-SIP-itul), the parietal (puh-RYE-
etul), the temporal and the frontal lobe. The upper thumb bone
represents various forebrain structures that lie beneath the
cerebral cortex (the amygdala and hippocampus, for example).

76
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

There you have it. The gross anatomy of the brain — or half
of it. The brain is a double organ with two mirror image sides.
Put both fists together to get the full picture.
Bruno Aldaris, Neuroscience for the Brainless

T h o u g h it w a s plain to s e e that his b r a i n w a s a p h y s i c a l m a s s ,

like a hand or a foot, J a m e s found the c o m p a r i s o n of b r a i n a n d
fist mildly d i s c o n c e r t i n g and s o o n returned to o b s e r v i n g the real
thing.
I t w a s M i l l i e ' s idea t o g o t o the C h i n e s e restaurant. J a m e s
w o r e a baseball c a p .
' Y o u need t o g e t y o u r s e l f out o f yourself,' s h e s a i d .
T h e y d r a n k white w i n e a n d J a m e s b e g a n t o u n w i n d . H e e v e n
s q u e e z e d her k n e e u n d e r the table.
' I t ' s g o i n g t o b e all right,' h e s a i d o n the w a y h o m e . ' Y o u ' l l
see.'
T h i s b e i n g a Friday, Millie s t a y e d the night, but w a s t o o tired
to m a k e l o v e .

* * *

T h e d a w n light s e e m e d t o g r o w i n s t e p s a s i f the E a r t h ' s rotation

had d e v e l o p e d a fault. J a m e s lay listening to the rain, d i p p i n g in
and out o f sleep. Millie lay b e s i d e him. H e w a t c h e d her d r e a m -
i n g t h r o u g h the blind s a c c a d e s o f her l i d d e d e y e s . H e r b r a i n w a s
i n d a r k n e s s , but the d r e a m s , n o d o u b t , w e r e a s b r i g h t a s day.
H e m u s t h a v e drifted o f f a g a i n b e c a u s e , next, h e w a s a w a r e
of the smell of fresh coffee. Millie h a d b e e n o u t for c r o i s s a n t s
and n e w s p a p e r s . J a m e s d i d n ' t think his b r a i n w a s a sight for

77
PAUL B R O K S

the b r e a k f a s t table a n d r e m e m b e r e d to put on his hat before

g o i n g t h r o u g h to the kitchen, but Millie, t h r o u g h a mouthful of
c r o i s s a n t , told him instantly to take it off.
S h e returned t o her n e w s p a p e r . H e picked u p the medical
t e x t b o o k , s c a n n i n g the list of contents as if r e a d i n g from a
menu: Dementia; Cerebrovascular Disease; Hydrocephalus;
Epilepsy; Extrapyramidal Disease; Cerebral Tumours; Demyeli-
nating Diseases; Diseases of the Spinal Cord; Motor Neurone
Disease. T h a t ' s just N e u r o l o g y . N o t even half o f N e u r o l o g y .
T h e n there's Cardiovascular Disease; Endocrine Disease; Haema-
tological Disease; Gastrointestinal Disease; and Cancer.

H e w a s i m p r e s s e d b y the m y r i a d f o r m s o f d e m i s e . G o d w a s
an inventive d e s t r o y e r as well as an artful creator. It had never
o c c u r r e d t o J a m e s that the w o r k i n g s o f the b o d y c o u l d b r e a k
d o w n i n s o m a n y w a y s . B u t his condition w a s n a m e l e s s .

He h a d t w o m i r r o r s now, u s i n g them in c o m b i n a t i o n for the

difficult s i d e a n d rear v i e w s , and w a s t r y i n g to match the text-
b o o k d i a g r a m s with the p o l y c h r o m a t i c c o n t o u r s o f the object
filling his h e a d .
' I t ' s a beautiful m a c h i n e , ' he said a l o u d , t h o u g h there w a s no
o n e else a r o u n d . Millie h a d left him to it. ' O r is it a p l a c e ? '
T h e b o o k s differed i n e m p h a s i s . S o m e w e r e concerned with
s y s t e m s a n d functions, o t h e r s , especially the atlas o f n e u r o -
anatomy, concentrated more on the brain's geography,
c o n j u r i n g s t r a n g e u n d u l a t i n g l a n d s c a p e s . C o m b i n i n g the differ-
ent i m a g e s , J a m e s pictured a m e t r o p o l i s , at o n c e futuristic (full
o f m y s t e r i o u s m a c h i n e s ) and ancient (the G r e e k and L a t i n
n a m e s e v o k e d classical t i m e s ) . S e e n this w a y , his brain b e c a m e a
labyrinthine structure with vaults and c h a m b e r s , floors and

78
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

screens, c o l u m n s , p a t h w a y s , b r i d g e s , c a n a l s and a q u e d u c t s , with

streams of information flowing in e v e r y direction. Am I in there
or out here? he w o n d e r e d .
' A m I out here or in t h e r e ? '

First the thought, then the words. Thought. Speech.

T h o u g h t . S p e e c h . A l t e r n a t i n g b e t w e e n the two, e y e s fixed on
the i m a g e in the mirror, he noticed a pattern, an e b b i n g a n d
flowing of activity on the outer s u r f a c e of the left frontal l o b e .
A s h e s p o k e , the soft m a u v e l u m i n e s c e n c e s e e m e d t o h a r d e n
m o m e n t a r i l y into a brighter g l a z e that d i s s o l v e d as the u t t e r a n c e
s t o p p e d . L o o k i n g closer, h e s a w s t r a n d s o f light c a s t i n g b a c k
and forth between the frontal a r e a a n d the b l u e r e c e s s e s of the
temporal l o b e . A n d w a s that a fainter p u l s e , d e e p d o w n ? Prob-
ably the thalamus, he thought, c o n s u l t i n g the atlas.

Am I in there or out here? T h e m o r e J a m e s stared into the

mirror, the m o r e p e r p l e x e d h e b e c a m e . H e b e g a n t o feel
detached from his brain — a r e m o t e o b s e r v e r . It a c q u i r e d the
aura o f s o m e t h i n g alien, a n object quite s e p a r a t e from h i m . H e
w o u l d concentrate on a patch of c o l o u r or listen to a s o u n d
or p e r f o r m an action or think a t h o u g h t — Elephants are large
mammals. Six sevens are forty-two. Democracy is a good thing. I
love Millie — and there, plain to s e e , w e r e the c o r r e l a t e d b r a i n
patterns.

But the activity a s s o c i a t e d with t h o u g h t s a n d actions w a s not

the s a m e a s his c o n s c i o u s a w a r e n e s s o f t h o s e t h o u g h t s a n d
events. H o w c o u l d i t b e ? H e w a s l o o k i n g i n from the o u t s i d e ,
like w a t c h i n g goldfish in a b o w l . G o l d f i s h a n d o n e ' s p e r c e p t i o n
o f them are not the s a m e thing. T h e m o r e h e g a z e d u p o n it, the
m o r e J a m e s felt that he w a s s o m e t h i n g other than his b r a i n .

79
PAUL B R O K S

A n d w h e r e do t h o u g h t s a n d feelings c o m e f r o m ? Not me, he

t h o u g h t , b e c a u s e he s a w that e v e r y fluctuation in the flow of
e x p e r i e n c e , e v e r y intention a n d action, w a s anticipated by d i s -
tinct t r e m o r s of activity a c r o s s the b r a i n ' s s u r f a c e . It w a s not a
c a s e o f thinking o r d o i n g s o m e t h i n g and w a t c h i n g the brain
follow step o r d a n c e i n synchrony. H i s brain w a s ahead o f him.
I d e a s w e r e b u b b l i n g up in the n e u r o n a l c a u l d r o n a g o o d half-
s e c o n d b e f o r e they a p p e a r e d in c o n s c i o u s n e s s , even thoughts
a b o u t thinking t h o u g h t s , and t h o u g h t s a b o u t thoughts about
thinking t h o u g h t s . S o w h o w a s stirring the mental b r o t h ? A n d i f
he w e r e a m e r e spectator, w h a t exactly w a s his v a n t a g e point?

B u t then, just as a d r a w i n g of a c u b e s e e m s to c h a n g e per-

s p e c t i v e , continually j u m p i n g i n w a r d s a n d o u t w a r d s , h e w o u l d
switch to a different view. T h e object in his h e a d w o u l d a b s o r b
a n d b e g u i l e h i m , a n d h e w o u l d identify m o r e c l o s e l y than ever
with its w o r k i n g s . That's it, he thought. That's what I amount to.
This is my sum total. There is no one stirring the broth. The func-
tions of the brain have a life and logic of their own. Thoughts,
feelings, and intentions produce me, not the other way around.

He c a m e to the c o n c l u s i o n that he w a s neither in there nor out

here. B o t h p e r s p e c t i v e s w e r e false. H e w a s n ' t a n y w h e r e .
I n the e v e n i n g J a m e s a n d Millie w e n t t o the c i n e m a . J a m e s
kept his hat p u l l e d firmly d o w n . It w a s hardly the p l a c e to h a v e
o n e ' s h e a d b l a z i n g like a b e a c o n .

* * *

A v a g u e curiosity d r e w him b a c k to the e n c y c l o p a e d i a . T h e r e

w a s s o m e t h i n g w r o n g with the r o c k p o o l , h e w a s s u r e . T h e

80
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

plants, p e b b l e s , and fishes w e r e d i s p l a y e d as t r e a s u r e d o b j e c t s in

a g l a s s c a s e , the exhibits s e p a r a t e d e v e n l y o n e from another in a
perfectly illuminated t h r e e - d i m e n s i o n a l s p a c e . T h e artistry w a s
calculated. T h o s e beautiful things w e r e intended t o b e m e m o -
rable. He k n e w he w o u l d h a v e no difficulty r e c o g n i z i n g a rock
goby if ever he s a w o n e , or a cushion starlet or a chameleon shrimp.

Yet, a l t h o u g h the picture w a s c r a m m e d with i n f o r m a t i o n ,

h e c o u l d appreciate what w a s l a c k i n g . T h e r e w a s n o s e n s e o f
p r o c e s s or b e h a v i o u r , n o t h i n g of the s t r u g g l e for existence in the
w o r l d - b e t w e e n - t i d e s . O n e d i d not see the m o n s t r o u s d o g w h e l k
d e v o u r i n g the b a r n a c l e s or b o r i n g into the shell of a m u s s e l to
suck out its innards, or the invisible a l c h e m y of the s e a w e e d s ,
a b s o r b i n g sunshine, s y n t h e s i z i n g f o o d s from w a t e r a n d c a r b o n
d i o x i d e , releasing life-sustaining o x y g e n into the water.

T h e scene w a s altogether t o o b e n i g n . A r o c k p o o l i s , i n
reality, a p r e c a r i o u s p l a c e . To s u r v i v e is to m e s h with c o m p l e x
networks o f b e h a v i o u r a n d intricate p a t t e r n s o f p h y s i c s and
chemistry, all s h a p e d minutely by the e b b a n d flow of the tides
and the rotation of the E a r t h . T h e life of the r o c k p o o l is a
fragile p r o d u c t of the m i c r o s c o p i c a l l y small and the a s t r o n o m i -
cally l a r g e .

But that w a s not it. Illustrations o n l y e v e r g i v e a s n a p s h o t .

He reached for o n e of the shiny n e w t e x t b o o k s a n d set it
a l o n g s i d e the e n c y c l o p a e d i a . T h e b r a i n p i c t u r e s w e r e b r i g h t l y
c o l o u r e d like the r o c k p o o l a n d , in the s a m e w a y , w e r e c o n -
cerned with categorical clarity: this little fishy is the hippo-
campus, this the medulla, this the cerebellum. T h e creatures
floated in s u s p e n s i o n beneath the rippling s u r f a c e of the cortex.
T h e f l o w o f time h a d s t o p p e d . T h e r e w a s n o hint o f d y n a m i c s

81
PAUL B R O K S

at the m i c r o s c o p i c level or of forces in the w o r l d b e y o n d

the b o u n d a r y o f the skull, b o t h o f which s h a p e d the activity o f
the b r a i n , just a s the life o f the r o c k p o o l w a s s h a p e d b y p h o t o -
s y n t h e s i s a n d the g r a v i t a t i o n a l influence o f the m o o n .
I t w a s then that a n u n s t e a d y i n g t h o u g h t s w u n g into J a m e s ' s
h e a d . He w a t c h e d it d r o p f r o m the frontal cortex and circle the
l i m b i c l o b e . A b r a i n , like a r o c k p o o l , he realized, is a l s o a m o s t
p r e c a r i o u s habitat. T h e life o f the s e l f d e p e n d s absolutely o n
the integrity o f b r a i n function.

A n d then he s a w w h a t it w a s a b o u t the r o c k p o o l that really

t r o u b l e d h i m . T h e r e w a s a creature he h a d n ' t noticed b e f o r e , a
s q u a t , s p i d e r y thing, d u l l - g r e y a n d u g l y c o m p a r e d t o the rest.
It l a y b e n e a t h a brittle star, part h i d d e n by a curtain of brown-
weed a n d the c l a w s of a shore crab. T h i s little fellow didn't figure
in the key. It d i d n ' t h a v e a n u m b e r . P e r h a p s it had crawled
from b e h i n d a r o c k . P e r h a p s the picture h a d other d i m e n s i o n s
after all.

He l o o k e d at the mirror, into his b r a i n . A n d there it w a s , the

s p i d e r y thing.

***

D r S t r o o p ' s office o n the fourteenth f l o o r o f the District G e n -

eral w a s a s h a m b l e s . T h e r e w e r e b o x f i l e s , c a s e notes, b o o k s
piled all o v e r the p l a c e , a n d c a r d b o a r d b o x e s full of other stuff.
On t o p of the filing cabinet, c a u g h t in a shaft of late afternoon
s u n l i g h t , w a s a p l a s t i c m o d e l of the b r a i n , s o m e w h a t larger than
life-size. Its c o l o u r s s e e m e d t o f i l l the r o o m and J a m e s felt
u n e a s y sitting n e a r to it.

82
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

'I find that m o s t p e o p l e try to i g n o r e it,' he s a i d , r o l l i n g his

eyes u p w a r d s , 'but i t m u s t b e o f s o m e p r o f e s s i o n a l interest t o
you.'
' O h , what's that?' asked Dr Stroop.
' T h e c o l o u r c o d i n g i s m u c h the s a m e a s y o u r s . D o y o u
m i n d ? ' J a m e s lifted the plastic brain from its stand a n d ran his
f i n g e r s o v e r the s u r f a c e . ' T h e frontal l o b e s are quite similar, a n d
the parietal, but my t e m p o r a l l o b e s are b l u e and these occipital
l o b e s are a darker s h a d e of g r e e n . '

He leaned forward for Dr S t r o o p to g e t a better view, b u t the

d o c t o r didn't s e e m v e r y interested. R a i s i n g his e y e s , J a m e s
caught him l o o k i n g a t his w a t c h . H e w o u l d h a v e a s k e d h i m
a b o u t the s p i d e r y thing — p e r h a p s he w o u l d be able to identify it
— but c o u l d s e e that he w a s well b e h i n d with his clinic a n d d i d n ' t
want to c a u s e further delay. B r i n g i n g the c o n s u l t a t i o n to a c l o s e ,
D r S t r o o p muttered s o m e t h i n g a b o u t ' d i a g n o s t i c i n v e s t i g a -
tions' and said that a r r a n g e m e n t s w o u l d be m a d e for a b r a i n
scan. Hardly necessary in my case, t h o u g h t J a m e s .

T h e next time they m e t , D r S t r o o p h a d a s o m b r e l o o k , b u t h e

s p o k e kindly.
' D o y o u h a v e a n y o n e with y o u ? '
' N o , ' said J a m e s . T h e d o c t o r a s k e d him t o sit d o w n .
' W e h a v e y o u r pictures,' h e said with a n uncertain s m i l e . H e
slid a l a r g e s q u a r e film u n d e r the clip of a w a l l - m o u n t e d light
b o x and flicked the switch. T h e i m a g e o f J a m e s ' s b r a i n w a s
m o n o c h r o m e and murky, except for o n e feature. C o u l d that b e
the spider, sitting p l u m p a n d b r i g h t in the m i d d l e ? If s o , it h a d
b e e n busy. Skeins o f c o b w e b s p r e a d like the w i n g s o f a n a n g e l ,
o n e into the right h e m i s p h e r e , and o n e into the left.

83
PAUL B R O K S

'What is it?' said J a m e s .

' A butterfly g l i o m a . '
T h a t s o u n d e d rather beautiful.
'A tumour.'

T h a t e v e n i n g a s h e s p l a s h e d w a t e r o n his face, J a m e s noticed

s o m e t h i n g i n the p a l m o f his c u p p e d h a n d , o r rather s o m e t h i n g
about it. It w a s the left h a n d . T h e skin w a s paler, like g r e a s e p r o o f
p a p e r . T h e r e w e r e s h a p e s beneath: t r a c i n g s o f t e n d o n s , b o n e s ,
a n d b l o o d v e s s e l s . H e i n s p e c t e d the rest o f his b o d y . H i s a r m s
a n d l e g s l o o k e d f i n e , a s d i d his chest a n d a b d o m e n . H e turned
his p e n i s left a n d right a n d lifted it to s e e the u n d e r s i d e . He c a r e -
fully checked the s o l e s of his feet. E v e r y t h i n g s e e m e d n o r m a l .
T u r n i n g a w a y f r o m the mirror, h e l o o k e d a c r o s s his shoulder
a n d s a w that his l o w e r b a c k w a s translucent. Spinal c o l u m n ,
p e l v i c b o n e s , a n d ribs w e r e clear t o s e e . A n d p a r t s o f the inter-
nal o r g a n s : s t o m a c h , liver, intestines.

H e w a s s t r u c k b y h o w d e n s e l y p a c k e d they w e r e , not f l o a t i n g
l o o s e like o d d - s h a p e d b a l l o o n s a s they s o m e t i m e s a p p e a r i n
t e x t b o o k s . B u t the c o l o u r s ! T h a t c o u l d n ' t b e right: ice-blue
s t o m a c h , c r i m s o n liver, o r a n g e intestines, and the b o n e s w e r e
white as a g h o s t - t r a i n s k e l e t o n ' s .

I t d i d n ' t s t o p there. T h e f o l l o w i n g m o r n i n g h e sat o n c e m o r e

with his m i r r o r s a n d b o o k s . It w a s o d d that he h a d n ' t noticed the
butterfly w i n g s b e f o r e , b u t h a v i n g seen t h e m o n the brain scan
picture a n d k n o w i n g exactly w h e r e t o l o o k , h e c o u l d n o w trace
their outline.

Butterfly glioma c a m e u n d e r Cerebral Tumours in the medical

t e x t b o o k . T h e p r o g n o s i s w a s p o o r , b u t h o w fortunate h e w a s

84
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

to h a v e b e e n s p a r e d the psychiatric s y m p t o m s that, a c c o r d i n g

to the b o o k , w e r e often a s s o c i a t e d with s u c h g r o w t h s . H i s
thoughts turned t o Millie. A n i m a g e o f her f a c e s h o n e a s b r i g h t
a s stained g l a s s i n his m i n d ' s e y e . W h e r e w a s that, e x a c t l y ?
Neither in there nor out here. A n d w h e r e exactly w a s Millie? W a s
it d a y s or w e e k s since he h a d seen her?
'Millie, w h e r e are y o u ? ' h e called out.

' I ' m right here, J a m e s , ' c a m e the familiar v o i c e . H e c o u l d s e e

her now, in the mirror. ' L o o k , ' s h e s a i d . He s a w b e n e a t h her
naked breast a b e a t i n g heart, all bright c o l o u r s .
Millie faded. H i s reflection w a s all that r e m a i n e d . S t a r i n g
hard into the mirror, his face s o m e t i m e s a s s u m e d a sinister
aspect. With no discernible c h a n g e in e x p r e s s i o n , it s u d d e n l y
f i l l e d with m e n a c e and c o n t e m p t . H e w o u l d c o v e r his e y e s a n d
shake his head to b r e a k the spell. B u t this time he w a s s l o w to
react. T h e malice s u r g e d from the m i r r o r a n d p o u r e d t h r o u g h
his helpless e y e s . It b r e a c h e d the wall of the retina a n d hurtled
d o w n the visual p a t h w a y s d e e p into his b r a i n . H e felt it. H e
watched it all the w a y .

T o o late. H e w a s g o n e . N o w there w a s n o f a c e i n the m i r r o r ,

or rather there w e r e r e m n a n t s of a f a c e . T h e r e w a s n e r v e a n d
m u s c l e , b o n e and cartilage, lidless e y e s a n d skinless lips.
A b s t r a c t s h a p e s . L i g h t and s h a d e .
He had searched in vain for a scintillating r o c k p o o l . T h e
o n e s he found w e r e bleak p u d d l e s c o m p a r e d to the picture in the
e n c y c l o p a e d i a . N o w J a m e s s t o o d naked a t the e d g e o f the s e a ,
the b o n e s o f his skeletal t o e s s u b m e r g e d i n d a m p s a n d , his s k e l e -
tal hand outstretched a g a i n s t white w a v e s a n d g r e y c l o u d , salt
s p r a y fresh in his transparent nostrils. T h e chill of the w a t e r

85
PAUL B R O K S

l a p p i n g at his a n k l e s s h o t n e u r o n a l n e e d l e s to his testicles, half

p l e a s u r e , h a l f p a i n . He s p r e a d his fingers for inspection — white
b o n e , skin, m u s c l e , v e i n s — then b u n c h e d them into fists.
'I am J a m e s M o o n , the V i s i b l e M a n ! ' he said in a half-shout
that w a s s w e p t a w a y b y the o c e a n w i n d the m o m e n t the breath
left his t r a n s p a r e n t lips. ' T h i s is w h a t I a m ! '
H i s t h o u g h t s leapt a n d curled within the folds o f his brain.
S h a r p a s l a s e r s , they w e r e c a s t i n g s h a d o w s a c r o s s the sky.

86
 TWO

The Spark in the Stone

I Think Therefore I Am Dead

I am sitting a l o n e in the small s e m i n a r r o o m on the tenth floor.

T h i s i s k n o w n a s ' H a r r y ' s r o o m ' . I a m a t the h e a d o f a l o n g o a k
table, w o r k i n g a t a l a p t o p c o m p u t e r . T h e d o o r i s a t m y b a c k a n d
the single w i n d o w at the other end of the r o o m s h e d s a thin,
early e v e n i n g light. T h e r e are g l a s s - f r o n t e d o a k cabinets a l o n g
the walls, left and right. O n the s h e l v e s are r o w s o f d i s p l a y j a r s
containing s p e c i m e n s of h u m a n b r a i n , each s u s p e n d e d in a
liquid the c o l o u r o f w a t e r y p i s s . T h i s i s H a r r y ' s collection. T h e
s p e c i m e n s are a r r a n g e d a c c o r d i n g t o p a t h o l o g y : t u m o u r s , c e r e -
brovascular disease, degenerative disorders, and so on. T h e r e
are w h o l e b r a i n s , h a l f b r a i n s , a n d p a r t s o f b r a i n , sliced a n d s e g -
mented. C l o s e to my right shoulder, there s w i m s a c e r e b e l l u m .

T h e r o o m i s ineffably still. A m o n g the relics o f natural

d i s e a s e and d e g e n e r a t i o n sit three v i c t i m s o f u n n a t u r a l v i o -
lence. T h e i r stories intertwine. T h e f i r s t b r a i n w a s c a u g h t with
the s e c o n d b r a i n ' s wife and w a s d i s p a t c h e d with a pistol s h o t to
the b a c k of the h e a d . After p u t t i n g an end to its w i f e , the s e c o n d
brain f i n a l l y dispatched itself. T h e w o m a n ' s b r a i n , third i n line,

89
PAUL B R O K S

c o m p l e t e s the set. H e r s is perfectly intact. S h e g o t it in the heart,

a c c o r d i n g to H a r r y . I o n c e told him I t h o u g h t she m i g h t h a v e
b e e n better p l a c e d b e t w e e n the other two, to keep the rivals
apart.
' E v e n in d e a t h , ' I s a i d , ' y o u can s e n s e their c o n t e m p t for one
another.'
It d i d n ' t s e e m to w o r r y h i m . A n d , a n y w a y , I w o n d e r e d , what
w a s she d o i n g here? H e r b r a i n d i d n ' t illustrate a p a t h o l o g y o f
a n y k i n d . H a r r y ' s r e s p o n s e w a s that she exemplified the n o r m a l ,
intact b r a i n . H e w o u l d n ' t c o n c e d e that i n d i s p l a y i n g the s p e c i -
m e n s in this w a y he h a d a l s o created a tableau, s h o w c a s i n g the
fickle heart as m u c h as the fragile b r a i n . A l l the s a m e , it w a s a
tale h e s e e m e d fond o f telling.

T h e material s u b s t a n c e o f the b r a i n w a s b r e a d and butter t o

H a r r y , a n e u r o p a t h o l o g i s t , but not to m e . I r e m e m b e r the
a m b i v a l e n c e I felt w h e n I first held a h u m a n brain in the p a l m of
my h a n d , the fascination b u t a l s o the distaste. I w a s surprised,
a n d m o v e d , b y h o w h e a v y i t w a s . P e r h a p s a part o f m e had
e x p e c t e d it to be w e i g h t l e s s , like a mental i m a g e or a train of
t h o u g h t . I w a s e a g e r to confirm for m y s e l f that the internal
s t r u c t u r e s m a t c h e d the familiar t e x t b o o k pictures but, s o m e -
how, felt disinclined to start cutting. I i m a g i n e d the w o r l d s it had
created: sky, c l o u d s , p e o p l e , p l e a s u r e , a n d pain. E v e r y t h i n g . I t ' s
all in there.

'I c o u l d be b o u n d e d in a nutshell and count m y s e l f a k i n g of

infinite s p a c e , ' s a i d H a m l e t , ' w e r e it not that I h a v e b a d d r e a m s . '
T h e infinite s p a c e w a s within the shell o f his h e a d . A n d so,
i n e s c a p a b l y , w e r e the d r e a m s . B u t l o o k i n g a r o u n d n o w a t these
d e a d still, g r e y - b e i g e objects it is h a r d to s e e them as erstwhile

90
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

p r o g e n i t o r s o f infinite s p a c e . T h e y each represent the o p p o s i t e :

a singularity. A point at which the u n i v e r s e h a s c o l l a p s e d . I l o v e
the stillness of this p l a c e and the h u m of the v o i d — the s e n s e of
w o r l d s d i s s o l v e d and d i s s i p a t e d p a s s i o n s . It fills me with a s e n s e
of b e i n g . I am not yet p i c k l e d m e a t .

T h e light i s f a d i n g a n d the p a l e a m b e r s k y a t the h o r i z o n

a l m o s t m a t c h e s the c o l o u r of the liquid in the j a r s . T h e r e is a
s i n g l e , bright star.

M y a r e a o f s u p p o s e d e x p e r t i s e , n e u r o p s y c h o l o g y , i s the s u b -
ject a b o u t which I feel the m o s t p r o f o u n d i g n o r a n c e . I am
i g n o r a n t o f m a n y things. F o r i n s t a n c e , I k n o w n o t h i n g o f the
Russian language. Quantum physics is beyond me. Keynesian
e c o n o m i c s ? T h e w o r k i n g s o f the internal c o m b u s t i o n e n g i n e ?
Irish political h i s t o r y ? M y k n o w l e d g e c o n s i s t s o f v a g u e n o t i o n s
poorly understood, loosely grasped general principles, and col-
lections of disjointed facts. B u t I c o u l d take l e s s o n s in R u s s i a n
and m u g up on Irish h i s t o r y a n d the other things. I will n e v e r
m a s t e r the m a t h e m a t i c s required for a p r o p e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g of
q u a n t u m m e c h a n i c s , b u t I can a p p r e c i a t e s o m e t h i n g of the
f l a v o u r o f the subject from the p o p u l a r w r i t i n g s o f e x p e r t s i n the
field, and take c o m f o r t from the fact that, fundamentally, it
s e e m s t o b e b e y o n d t h e m , too. B u t w h e n i t c o m e s t o u n d e r -
s t a n d i n g the relationship b e t w e e n the b r a i n a n d the c o n s c i o u s
m i n d , m y i g n o r a n c e i s d e e p a n d there i s n o w h e r e t o turn.

A n o c e a n o f i n c o m p r e h e n s i o n h e a v e s b e n e a t h the t e x t b o o k -
confident surface of plain facts a n d technicalities that I p r e s e n t
to my c o l l e a g u e s and patients. I h a v e a clear p i c t u r e of the m a t e -
rial c o m p o n e n t s of the b r a i n a n d am p r e p a r e d to ad lib at l e n g t h
a b o u t features of its functional architecture — the i n t e r l o c k i n g

91
PAUL B R O K S

s y s t e m s a n d s u b s y s t e m s o f p e r c e p t i o n , m e m o r y , a n d action. B u t
quite h o w o u r b r a i n s create that p r i v a t e s e n s e o f self-awareness
we all float a r o u n d in is a mystery. I h a v e no idea h o w the trick is
achieved.

W o u l d n ' t it be a b s u r d for an airline pilot to d e n y k n o w l e d g e

of the p r i n c i p l e s of flight, or for a p h y s i c i a n to claim i g n o r a n c e
o f the b a s i c s o f h u m a n p h y s i o l o g y a n d a n a t o m y ? Yet I , a n e u r o -
p s y c h o l o g i s t , c a n g i v e n o s a t i s f a c t o r y a c c o u n t o f h o w the brain
g e n e r a t e s c o n s c i o u s a w a r e n e s s . W o r s e still, I find m y s e l f e d g i n g
t o w a r d s a d o u b t that it m e a n s a n y t h i n g at all to s a y that the brain
generates consciousness.

H a r d l y a n y o n e visits H a r r y ' s r o o m these d a y s . T h e r e are

s m a l l c o m m i t t e e m e e t i n g s o n c e a m o n t h a n d an o c c a s i o n a l j o u r -
nal club. O t h e r w i s e , it is u s e d as I am u s i n g it now, as a quiet
s p a c e for c a t c h i n g up with d i s c h a r g e letters and clinical reports.
I t w a s n e v e r u s e d m u c h for s e m i n a r s and H a r r y , o f c o u r s e ,
doesn't c o m e here any more.

I ' v e b e e n t r y i n g to finish a report. T h e patient, J e a n i e , has a

d e m e n t i n g illness a n d s e e m s t o b e r a p i d l y f a d i n g away. S h e i s
o n l y f i f t y - t h r e e . I t ' s n o t A l z h e i m e r ' s , I ' m pretty s u r e o f that, but
we h a v e yet to c o m e up with a firm d i a g n o s i s . I s a w her this
m o r n i n g in a s i d e r o o m . S h e h a d b e e n s h a r i n g a b a y with five
other b e d s on the m a i n n e u r o l o g y w a r d until a c o u p l e of nights
a g o w h e n s h e b e c a m e a g i t a t e d and b e g a n t o d e v e l o p delusional
i d e a s a b o u t the other patients. A n u r s e found her at three in the
m o r n i n g p a c k i n g a c a s e a n d p r e p a r i n g to l e a v e .

'I d o n ' t w a n t to c a u s e t r o u b l e , ' J e a n i e h a d s a i d in a whisper,

'but I ' m n o t like the rest of t h e m . I s h o u l d n ' t be here. T h e y ' r e all
lesbians.'

92
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

T h i s m o r n i n g s h e w a s cheerful. A n o r d e r l y h a d j u s t b r o u g h t
her a cup o f tea. H e r d a u g h t e r , L i s a , w a s f e e d i n g her b a b y o n the
other side o f the b e d . L i s a visited e v e r y day. W e sat a n d chatted
with sunshine s t r e a m i n g t h r o u g h the u n c u r t a i n e d w i n d o w .
Jeanie was happy, though increasingly preoccupied with
t h o u g h t s o f death.

' I ' v e often w o n d e r e d , ' she s a i d , ' w h a t h a p p e n s , m e d i c a l l y

s p e a k i n g , w h e n y o u d i e . ' S h e w a n t e d t o k n o w the p r o c e d u r e
when a patient died o n the w a r d . H o w c o u l d the d o c t o r s b e s u r e
s o m e o n e w a s d e a d ? W h e r e d i d the b o d y g o ? W h o t o o k it?

' W e h a v e w o r k t o d o , ' I s a i d , 'shall w e p r e s s o n ? '

F i r s t , I checked her orientation for t i m e , p l a c e , a n d p e r s o n .
F i n e . S h e k n e w w h o I w a s , w h e r e w e w e r e , the d a y o f the w e e k ,
and the m o n t h . S h e w a s q u i c k t o s u p p l y a u t o b i o g r a p h i c a l infor-
m a t i o n and s e e m e d fully a w a r e o f her current c i r c u m s t a n c e s .
N e x t , I b e g a n to p r o b e different a s p e c t s of mental function with
s o m e s t a n d a r d b e d s i d e tests. O n e o f these w a s a v e r b a l fluency
task in which she h a d to g e n e r a t e w o r d s with a d e s i g n a t e d initial
letter. T h e first letter w a s 'F'.

' F i r e , flag, funeral,' she s a i d . 'Will that d o ? '

'Tell m e s o m e m o r e — a s m a n y a s y o u c a n , ' I u r g e d her, b u t
the allotted sixty s e c o n d s ran d r y with n o t h i n g m o r e t o show.
S h e m a n a g e d just o n e w o r d for ' A ' a n d another three for ' S ' .
F r o m letter fluency, w e m o v e d o n t o c a t e g o r i e s .

' L e t ' s see h o w m a n y different k i n d s o f f o u r - l e g g e d animal

y o u can think of,' I s a i d , and J e a n i e p i n c h e d the b r i d g e of her
n o s e . H a l f a m i n u t e went b y with n o r e s p o n s e . T h e b a b y , n o w
asleep in her c a r r y c o t , b e g a n to stir, then settled. I r e m i n d e d
J e a n i e o f her task.

93
PAUL B R O K S

' Y o u k n o w , ' s h e told m e , ' I s e e m t o b e h a v i n g p r o b l e m s with

this o n e . F o u r - l e g g e d a n i m a l s ? F o r s o m e r e a s o n I can only think
of t h r e e - l e g g e d a n i m a l s . ' I noticed the trace of a smile on L i s a ' s
lips, but her e y e s w e r e as dull as lead.

I realize that it m i g h t s e e m m a d to q u e s t i o n the role of the

b r a i n i n c o n s c i o u s n e s s . T h e r e can b e n o d o u b t that brains and
s e l f - a w a r e n e s s are in c l o s e a l i g n m e n t . My brain a n d I are never
far a p a r t , a n d I a c c e p t that I am sitting here, in H a r r y ' s r o o m ,
with m y l i v i n g b r a i n , c o n s c i o u s a n d s e l f - a w a r e , w h e r e a s those
lifeless s p e c i m e n s in the o a k cabinets are not. I am thinking
t h o u g h t s , listening, and l o o k i n g . I can hear o c c a s i o n a l s o u n d s of
traffic from the street far b e l o w a n d , unexpectedly, faint ripples
o f h a r p s i c h o r d m u s i c from s o m e w h e r e a l o n g the corridor. T h e
taste of coffee is still in my m o u t h and I feel the contact between
e l b o w a n d table, k n u c k l e s and chin, as I lean f o r w a r d to read the
text on the c o m p u t e r screen.

W i t h c o n s c i o u s deliberation I h a v e b e e n s t r i n g i n g w o r d s
t o g e t h e r o n the s c r e e n i n front o f m e t h r o u g h the p l a y o f f i n g e r s
o n k e y b o a r d , intermittently c a t c h i n g and t u r n i n g over u n s o -
licited, idle t h o u g h t s a n d i m a g e s . ( A t o n e point, I find m y s e l f
h u m m i n g a B o b M a r l e y tune. It drifts in from n o w h e r e . ) A n d
there, t h r o u g h the w i n d o w , I s e e a star, a h u n d r e d million miles
away, but s i m u l t a n e o u s l y a l s o in my h e a d . Its i m a g e enters my
e y e a n d f l o w - c h a r t s t h r o u g h the visual s y s t e m s o f m y brain,
finds a link with m e m o r y a n d l a n g u a g e a n d , from outer s p a c e ,
g a i n s a n a m e and a l o c a t i o n in s e m a n t i c s p a c e : ' V e n u s ' .

S o , d o e s c o n s c i o u s a w a r e n e s s h a v e a p h y s i c a l location: m i n e ,
here a n d now, i n H a r r y ' s r o o m , p r e c i s e l y s o m e w h e r e between
my e a r s ? Self-evidently, it s e e m s . B u t then, go into the skull;

94
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

visit the b r a i n ' s interior w o r k i n g s a n d y o u will find that there is

nothing m u c h t o s e e . N o t a s p a r k o f c o l o u r o r w h i s p e r o f s o u n d
and n o s i g n s o f intelligent life. A s y o u w a n d e r t h r o u g h this
silent land y o u can d e s c r i b e its g e o g r a p h y a d e q u a t e l y e n o u g h in
the third p e r s o n , but, quite o b v i o u s l y , not the first.

F r o m this v a n t a g e point it s e e m s self-evidently true that c o n -

s c i o u s n e s s d o e s not h a v e a particular l o c a t i o n . It is no m o r e to be
found in the hills a n d d a l e s of the frontal l o b e s or on the s l o p e s
o f the R o l a n d i c f i s s u r e than i n the chair y o u are sitting o n . T h e
m o r e y o u search the terrain, the c l o s e r y o u r a n a l y s i s o f s u b -
stance and structure, the faster the w i l l - o ' - t h e - w i s p r e c e d e s . We
are e m b o d i e d , but n o w h e r e traceable within the physical s t r u c -
tures of the b o d y . I d o n ' t b e l i e v e in i m m a t e r i a l m i n d stuff or
s o u l s detachable from b o d i e s , a n d I ' m n o t s a y i n g that the b r a i n
isn't n e c e s s a r y for c o n s c i o u s n e s s . W h e t h e r it is sufficient is
another matter.

J e a n i e g r e w tired o f m y tests. S h e w a s l o s i n g c o n c e n t r a t i o n .
In the m i d d l e of s o m e mental arithmetic, she s l o w e d to a s t o p
and I let her sit and stare for a while. L i s a w a s sitting b a c k in her
chair, h e a d resting a g a i n s t the wall, e y e s c l o s e d . T h e b a b y w a s
fast asleep. H o s p i t a l s are never quiet, b u t y o u f i n d p o c k e t s o f
resignation a n d w e a r i n e s s w h e r e time itself s e e m s b e c a l m e d .
T h e s o u n d s o f the o u t s i d e w o r l d are distant a n d abstract. W e
each w i t h d r e w into our p r i v a t e w o r l d s . J e a n i e , I a l l o w e d m y s e l f
t o i m a g i n e , w a s r o a m i n g s o m e high p l a t e a u o f b e w i l d e r m e n t i n
pursuit o f t h r e e - l e g g e d a n i m a l s ; the b a b y w a s drifting content-
edly on a p o n d of m o t h e r ' s m i l k . B u t I d i d not p r e s u m e to
i m a g i n e w h a t L i s a w a s thinking.

C o n s c i o u s n e s s is a p u z z l e . F r o m o n e p e r s p e c t i v e it s e e m s that

95
PAUL B R O K S

it m u s t h a v e a p h y s i c a l location ( p e o p l e ' s p a i n s and p l e a s u r e s go

w h e r e p e o p l e g o ) , yet, from another, the s a m e s u g g e s t i o n s e e m s
faintly a b s u r d . O n c e inside the head it b e c o m e s clear that c o n -
s c i o u s n e s s is not a 'thing' to be l o c a t e d . A n d even if we think of
it as a 'function' or a ' p r o c e s s ' rather than a 'thing', what sense
d o e s it m a k e to s a y that the crucial elements reside in this or that
r e g i o n o f the b r a i n ? N o r d o e s c o n s c i o u s n e s s d e p e n d i n s o m e
m y s t e r i o u s w a y o n the integrated functioning o f the w h o l e
b r a i n . I h a v e s e e n m a n y patients w h o , as a result of surgery,
injury, or d i s e a s e h a v e h a d m u c h less than w h o l e brains and they
s e e m e d perfectly c o n s c i o u s as far as I c o u l d tell. I ' m s u r e t h e y ' d
tell y o u they w e r e .

F o r W i t t g e n s t e i n , p h i l o s o p h y w a s not s o m u c h a b o u t finding
s o l u t i o n s t o p u z z l e s a s a b o u t c o r r e c t i n g fundamental m i s u n d e r -
s t a n d i n g s . T h e p h i l o s o p h e r ' s treatment of a question, he s a i d , is
like the treatment o f a n illness. O u r m i n d s are knotted with m i s -
c o n c e p t i o n s a b o u t the w o r l d and the j o b o f p h i l o s o p h y i s t o
u n r a v e l the k n o t , or, as he s a i d , to s h o w the fly the w a y out of
the fly-bottle.

T h e r e w a s a time — b e f o r e the b r a s h intrusion of c o g n i t i v e

s c i e n c e - w h e n the ' m i n d - b o d y p r o b l e m ' lived quietly in the
c l o i s t e r s o f a c a d e m i c p h i l o s o p h y , n o trouble t o a n y o n e . T h e s e
d a y s , the redefined f i e l d o f ' c o n s c i o u s n e s s s t u d i e s ' i s a g a r d e n o f
d e l i g h t s , s w a r m i n g with p h i l o s o p h e r s and scientists o f every
stripe. D e b a t e is lively, s o m e t i m e s strident, and with the n e u r o -
scientists s h o u t i n g l o u d e s t of all a b o v e their n o i s y brain
s c a n n e r s , m o s t d o n o t notice the f l y b u z z i n g frantically t o e s c a p e
the fly-bottle. T h e y a r e e n g r o s s e d . H o w does the mental arise
f r o m the m a t e r i a l ? H o w can subjective e x p e r i e n c e be reconciled

96
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

with that s o g g y m a s s o c c u p y i n g the skull? T h e y a r e full o f c o n -

f i d e n c e , too. M o s t o f t h e m expect a s o l u t i o n . T h e c h i m e r a o f
c o n s c i o u s n e s s rises like a v a p o u r a n d entices them to b e l i e v e
that it really is just a matter of time b e f o r e a w a y is found of
a c c o u n t i n g for s u b j e c t i v e , first-person p h e n o m e n a in o b j e c t i v e ,
third-person t e r m s . D e s p i t e the p r o d i g i o u s a m o u n t o f intellec-
tual e n e r g y that h a s b e e n driven into this enterprise in recent
y e a r s , philosophical a n d scientific, it s e e m s to me that the fly is
still stuck in the bottle.

Eventually, J e a n i e s a i d , ' A m I d e a d ? '

I d i d n ' t r e s p o n d immediately. L i s a ' s e y e s r e m a i n e d c l o s e d
and I let the silence flow. J e a n i e s m i l e d . H e r face w a s lit with a
b e n i g n perplexity.
' I ' m just w o n d e r i n g , ' s h e s a i d . ' H a v e I d i e d ? ' T h e r e w a s a
s m e a r o f t o o t h p a s t e a r o u n d the c o r n e r o f her m o u t h . S h e d i d n ' t
s e e m t o notice the d r o p l e t s o f tea spilling o n t o her d r e s s i n g -
g o w n . B u t there w a s a glint in her e y e . S h e w a s d e v e l o p i n g her
t h e m e . 'In the m i d d l e of the night I w a s c o n v i n c e d , ' s h e s a i d . 'I
thought they w o u l d c o m e t o take m e a w a y . N o , I w a s n ' t afraid.
I w a i t e d t o see w h a t w o u l d h a p p e n . A n d then s o m e o n e d i d
c o m e . It w a s a tall m a n . He j u s t w a t c h e d , a n d I tried to s a y s o m e -
thing, but m y lips w o u l d n ' t m o v e . T h e n the tall m a n left. H e
d i d n ' t s a y a w o r d either.'

L i s a s p o k e . ' W e ' v e b e e n t h r o u g h this b e f o r e , M u m . Y o u g e t

confused s o m e t i m e s . Y o u ' r e n o t g o i n g t o d i e . N o t for a l o n g
time.'

G i v e n the uncertainty o f her m o t h e r ' s d i a g n o s i s this w a s , o f

c o u r s e , not necessarily the c a s e . J e a n i e g a v e n o indication that
she w a s listening.

97
PAUL B R O K S

'I c a n ' t s a y for sure that I am d e a d , ' s h e continued, 'but things

a r e n o t the s a m e . I d o n ' t feel real. It s e e m s to me I might be d e a d . '
H e r e x p r e s s i o n d i m m e d . ' H o w w o u l d I k n o w if I w a s d e a d ? '
Jeanie w a s well oriented for t i m e , p l a c e , and p e r s o n . S h e
k n e w the d a y a n d the m o n t h , the n a m e of the town we w e r e in
a n d the hospital, and s h e w a s clear a b o u t her n a m e , a g e , and
a d d r e s s . As for b e i n g d e a d or alive, s h e w a s all at s e a . I w r o t e on
my n o t e p a d : Cotard's?

I o n c e s a w a n old w o m a n w h o w a s p r o f o u n d l y d e p r e s s e d .
' B u r y m e , ' s h e s a i d . ' Y o u m i g h t a s well, I ' v e been d e a d for
s o m e time.'
S h e b e l i e v e d her insides h a d rotted away. I tried to r e a s o n
with her, b u t it w a s u s e l e s s . ' L o o k , ' I s a i d , ' y o u ' r e here talking to
m e . H o w can you b e d e a d ? '

' J u s t w o r d s , ' s h e replied. A w o r l d o f s h a d o w s f l i c k e r e d

a r o u n d her, h u m a n figures c a m e a n d went, the curtains bil-
l o w e d , n i g h t s fell, d a y s b r o k e . B u t s h e felt no connection with
a n y of this. T i m e h o l l o w e d her c a r c a s s and w o r d s fell d e a d at
her feet. J u s t w o r d s . T h a t w a s the f i r s t time I'd c o m e a c r o s s
C o t a r d ' s s y n d r o m e , which i s u s u a l l y a s s o c i a t e d with s e v e r e
d e p r e s s i o n , b u t i s s o m e t i m e s seen i n c a s e s o f n e u r o l o g i c a l d i s -
e a s e . T h e p e r s o n sinks into a nihilistic d e l u s i o n a l state, often, as
in this c a s e , to the extent that they b e l i e v e they no l o n g e r exist.

T h e condition takes its n a m e from the French psychiatrist

J u l e s C o t a r d w h o , in 1882, published a series of c a s e studies
of p e o p l e suffering w h a t he referred to as le delire de negation.
T h e clinical p r e s e n t a t i o n differed s o m e w h a t from patient to
patient, b u t d e l u s i o n s o f s e l f - n e g a t i o n w e r e c o m m o n . T h e s e
r a n g e d f r o m the b e l i e f that p a r t s o f the b o d y w e r e m i s s i n g o r

98
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

had putrefied, t o the c o m p l e t e denial o f b o d i l y e x i s t e n c e . T h e

e x p r e s s e d belief that o n e is d e a d is not a defining feature of the
s y n d r o m e . I n fact, o f the eight ' p u r e ' c a s e s r e p o r t e d b y C o t a r d
( e x c l u d i n g a further three with c o n c o m i t a n t p e r s e c u t o r y d e l u -
sions o r other debilitating illness) o n l y o n e e m b r a c e d d e a t h a s
an explanation of her condition. O t h e r s s l i p p e d into n o n - e x i s t -
ence, or skirted the a b y s s , s o m e h o w d e f y i n g the c o n v e n t i o n a l
u n d e r s t a n d i n g that c e a s i n g t o exist m u s t b e t a n t a m o u n t t o
death. T h e r e w e r e even s o m e patients l o c k e d i n the p a r a d o x i c a l
state of d e n y i n g their b o d i l y existence yet at the s a m e t i m e
believing themselves to be immortal.

W h a t d r i v e s such s t r a n g e d e l u s i o n s ? D e p r e s s i o n is u s u a l l y a
factor, but is not a l w a y s present. J e a n i e , p e e r i n g quizzically into
the v o i d , is not d e p r e s s e d . H e r c a s e , at least, calls for a n e u r o -
b i o l o g i c a l e x p l a n a t i o n . O n e possibility is that the e x p e r i e n c e s
arise from a disturbance of b r a i n m e c h a n i s m s w h i c h o r d i n a r i l y
bind sensation and t h o u g h t to the neural s y s t e m s u n d e r l y i n g
emotion. T h i s ancient d u t y i s p e r f o r m e d b y the l i m b i c s y s t e m ,
d e e p inside the cerebral h e m i s p h e r e s . A p r i m e function of this
s y s t e m , an e v o l u t i o n a r y raison d'etre, is to create states of r e a d i -
ness for action. It d o e s this t h r o u g h the i m p l e m e n t a t i o n of
s o - c a l l e d 'affect p r o g r a m s ' .

If y o u r s e n s o r y s y s t e m s i n f o r m y o u that there is a c r a z e d -
l o o k i n g m a n fast a p p r o a c h i n g with a n a x e , y o u r b o d y will enlist
the affect p r o g r a m identified with fear. B e f o r e y o u h a v e t i m e
even to experience terror, b e f o r e the e y e - b u l g i n g , v o l t a g e s u r g e
o f a w a r e n e s s , v a r i o u s p h y s i o l o g i c a l s y s t e m s will h a v e r e c o n f i g -
u r e d t h e m s e l v e s in p r e p a r a t i o n for a r e s p o n s e . Y o u will turn a n d
run. T h e t h o u g h t ' I a m terrified' will follow hot o n y o u r h e e l s ,

99
PAUL B R O K S

t h o u g h , m o s t likely, will h a v e entered the p a s t tense by the time

it catches u p . 'I w a s terrified,' y o u will later recall.
B u t w h a t is this 'I' that c l a i m s the terror, and what is the ' y o u '
that reflects u p o n the e x p e r i e n c e ? It is not a s i n g l e thing, or a
thing at all. It is, in its m o s t primitive f o r m , a principle of b i o -
l o g i c a l o r g a n i z a t i o n . T h e affect p r o g r a m s , s o this story g o e s ,
n o t o n l y g u i d e a d a p t i v e interaction with the external w o r l d but,
as a b y - p r o d u c t of this p r o c e s s , they a l s o f o r m the b i o l o g i c a l
p o i n t o f o r i g i n o f the self. B y i m b u i n g p e r c e p t i o n s , thoughts,
a n d a c t i o n s with a n e m o t i o n a l h u e ( h o w e v e r p a l e ) they g i v e
c o h e s i o n to e x p e r i e n c e .

F e e l i n g s a r e g e n e r a t e d which f o r m the b a s i s o f o u r sense o f

identity, c r e a t i n g the c o n d i t i o n s for o w n e r s h i p of t h o u g h t s and
for a g e n c y i n the control of actions. T h e s e perceptions,
t h o u g h t s , w i s h e s , beliefs, utterances, a n d actions are mine. I feel
it. T h e i r c o m m o n c a u s e i s centred u p o n m y n e e d s and m o t i v a -
tions, m a d e manifest t h r o u g h the affect p r o g r a m s o f m y limbic
b r a i n . I feel I think, therefore I a m . N o t e that this is merely a
functional d e s c r i p t i o n o f the b i o l o g i c a l r o o t s o f the self. D o n ' t
a s k w h e r e the feeling of the feeling c o m e s from; or the feeling of
the feeling of the feeling. S u c h q u e s t i o n s tighten the knot.

B e y o n d this u n e l a b o r a t e d , b i o l o g i c a l c o r e there a r e , o f
c o u r s e , d i m e n s i o n s of the s e l f with a p a s t a n d a future as well as
a r a w present: in n a r r a t i v e t e r m s , the a u t o b i o g r a p h i c a l self. In
C o t a r d ' s s y n d r o m e , h o w e v e r , the c o r e h a s d i s s o l v e d . C o g n i t i o n
is d e c o u p l e d f r o m feeling a n d , consequently, t h o u g h t s and
a c t i o n s h a v e no fixed m o o r i n g s . T h e r e is no 'I' left to claim o w n -
ership. It d i s i n t e g r a t e s ; the f r a g m e n t s drift apart. O n e patient
b e l i e v e d s h e h a d b e c o m e little m o r e than fresh air: ' J u s t a v o i c e ,

100
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

and if that g o e s , I w o n ' t be a n y t h i n g . ' If the v o i c e w e n t s h e

w o u l d b e lost and w o u l d n ' t k n o w w h e r e s h e h a d g o n e , s h e s a i d .
J e a n i e b e c a m e fascinated with her t e a c u p .
' L o o k at this,' she s a i d . ' I s it real? H o w can I tell? It d o e s n ' t
l o o k real.' S h e c o n t e m p l a t e d the object as if it h a d just m a t e r i a l -
ized out of thin air, then her g a z e t u r n e d to m e . ' A n d w h a t a b o u t
y o u ? ' she said. ' A r e y o u r e a l ? '
I had s t o p p e d taking n o t e s a n d s a t , h a n d s c l a s p e d o v e r m y
head, p o n d e r i n g the innocent q u e s t i o n . ' B e l i e v e m e , ' I s a i d , ' I ' m
real and s o are y o u . T a k e m y w o r d for it.'

'I think I can trust y o u , ' s h e s a i d , but s h e w a s n ' t s u r e .

S o m e p h i l o s o p h e r s ( d i s m i s s e d b y others a s ' M y s t e r i a n s ' )
a r g u e that the ' p r o b l e m o f c o n s c i o u s n e s s ' e x c e e d s h u m a n mental
capacity in the w a y that differential calculus or the c o n c e p t of
d e m o c r a c y are b e y o n d the intellectual s c o p e of a rabbit or a
p i g e o n . I find this v i e w curiously c o m f o r t i n g , but then I ' m m o r e
of a clinician than a scientist. In my t r a d e , unlike science, i n c o r -
rigible o p t i m i s m can b e c o u n t e r - p r o d u c t i v e . S o m e p r o b l e m s
have no solution. But if there is a w a y to untie this k n o t of k n o t s
perhaps the first m o v e is to a c k n o w l e d g e that we are not o n l y
physically embodied, but a l s o embedded in the w o r l d a b o u t u s .
T h e mind m a y be local to the b o d y and the b r a i n , but it is a l s o , in
different w a y s , distributed b e y o n d b i o l o g i c a l b o u n d a r i e s .

T h e notion o f 'the extended m i n d ' h a s b e e n g a i n i n g c u r r e n c y

i n c o g n i t i v e science, but similar i d e a s w e r e d e v e l o p e d m o r e than
f i f t y y e a r s a g o b y the R u s s i a n n e u r o p s y c h o l o g i s t A l e x a n d e r
L u r i a . F o r L u r i a , p s y c h o l o g i c a l p h e n o m e n a w e r e part o f the
natural w o r l d and s o subject t o the l a w s o f n a t u r e , b u t h e a l s o
r e c o g n i z e d that the structure o f the m i n d h a s social d i m e n s i o n s .

101
PAUL B R O K S

He t h o u g h t that scientific p s y c h o l o g y s h o u l d be a l i g n e d with the

b i o l o g i c a l s c i e n c e s , b u t b e l i e v e d that o n e c o u l d never fully
u n d e r s t a n d the relationship b e t w e e n the brain and the mind by
t r e a t i n g the b r a i n a s a c l o s e d b i o l o g i c a l s y s t e m . T h e w o r k i n g
b r a i n h a s to be u n d e r s t o o d not o n l y as part of a larger b i o l o g i c a l
s y s t e m (the rest o f the b o d y ) , b u t a l s o a s a c o m p o n e n t o f the
w i d e r social s y s t e m . W h a t we refer to as the ' s e l f ' is a p r o d u c t of
b i o l o g i c a l a n d social forces a r i s i n g f r o m the interaction of indi-
v i d u a l , i s o l a t e d , b r a i n s . T h e r e is no s p a r k in a s i n g l e stone but,
s t r u c k together, t w o s t o n e s c a n start a b l a z e .

T h e c h a l l e n g e for n e u r o s c i e n c e will be to fit the brain (a b i o -

l o g i c a l o b j e c t ) and the s e l f (a social c o n s t r u c t ) within a c o m m o n
f r a m e w o r k o f u n d e r s t a n d i n g . T h e b r a i n sciences m a y h a v e t o
o p e n u p t o a ' s o c i a l p a r a d i g m ' . F a r from b e i n g the H o l y G r a i l o f
n e u r o s c i e n c e , the s e a r c h for c o n s c i o u s n e s s within the circuitry
o f a n individual b r a i n can lead o n l y t o fool's g o l d . S a n t i a g o
R a m o n y C a j a l (joint w i n n e r of the 1906 N o b e l Prize for his
w o r k o n the structure o f the n e u r o n and o n e o f the f o u n d i n g
fathers o f m o d e r n n e u r o s c i e n c e ) o n c e s a i d : ' A s l o n g a s our
b r a i n is a m y s t e r y , the u n i v e r s e , the reflection of the structure of
the b r a i n , will a l s o be a m y s t e r y ' We a n d the w o r l d are tightly
intertwined. T h o u g h we m a y n o t h a v e a special p l a c e in the uni-
v e r s e , the u n i v e r s e , as far as we can e v e r u n d e r s t a n d it, has a
special p l a c e i n u s .

'I think I c a n trust y o u . I think. I think . . .' J e a n i e ' s w o r d s

w e r e s t r u g g l i n g for life. H e r g a z e drifted o v e r the pale-blue
paint on the w a l l . 'I think I c a n . ' M o v i n g with a m o t h e r ' s g r a c e ,
L i s a lifted the s l e e p i n g b a b y f r o m the cot and p l a c e d the b u n d l e
o f b l a n k e t s a n d p i n k f l e s h i n J e a n i e ' s a r m s . J e a n i e kissed her

102
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

g r a n d d a u g h t e r a n d b e g a n t o w e e p . I t w a s time for m e t o g o .
' M u m ' s m o r e h e r s e l f after a g o o d cry,' s a i d L i s a .
' T h a t m a k e s s e n s e , ' I told her.
J u l e s C o t a r d died a t the a g e o f forty-nine. H e s u c c u m b e d t o
diphtheria after n u r s i n g o n e of his children to r e c o v e r y . I recall
this fossilized fact o f b i o g r a p h y a s I s t a c k m y c a s e n o t e s . T h e
g l o w o f the c o m p u t e r screen i s n o w b r i g h t e r than the s k y a n d ,
when the m a c h i n e shuts d o w n , H a r r y ' s r o o m i s a l m o s t d a r k .
Paradoxically, a s the g l o o m d e s c e n d s , the j a r s a l o n g the w a l l s
g a i n a kind o f l u m i n e s c e n c e , a s i f they h a v e a b s o r b e d s o m e o f
the r e c e d i n g light. M y report i s finished. T h e l a p t o p lid c l o s e s
with a satisfying click a n d I go a c r o s s to take a c l o s e r l o o k at o n e
of the brain s p e c i m e n s . I lean c l o s e to r e a d the printed label:
Subarachnoid haemorrhage.

' H o w ' s it g o i n g , H a r r y ? ' I say.

How's it going, Paul?

Me?

There's no one else.

I w a s lost in thought.

What were you thinking about?

Nothing much.

The immensity of the universe, the mystery of

consciousness, and the finality of death, no doubt.

Yes.

Fetch me a Gauloise!

103
It w o u l d be g o o d to c a u s e a stink.

I'd love a cigarette.

I t m u s t b e torture.

Tell me more about the woman who thought she was

dead.

I've nothing to add.

There's plenty more you could say.

B u t I ' m n o t g o i n g to.

Why not?

L e t the s t o r y s t a n d . I t ' s truer to life. I d o n ' t

a l w a y s k n o w the final o u t c o m e — and that applies
to Jeanie.

The diagnosis, at least. The prognosis.

Hashimoto's disease. Uncertain.

So there was hope?

I t ' s a n inflammation o f the b r a i n .

 Vodka and Saliva

T h i s afternoon I d r o v e to the b e a c h . T h e r e w e r e no takers so I

went a l o n e , or rather, it w a s me and the d o g . A d o g is c o m p a n y
if y o u d o n ' t think a b o u t it t o o h a r d , which m o s t l y I d o n ' t .

It had b l o w n up chilly by the time we g o t there, b u t I s t r i p p e d

to my shorts and went in, c a u t i o u s l y at first. T h e w a t e r w a s
a g g r e s s i v e l y c o l d . T h e o n l y w a y t o p r o c e e d w a s n o t t o think b u t
to act, so I instructed my b o d y to trot f o r w a r d a n d d i v e into the
next w a v e . Dutifully, it d i d , a l t h o u g h I w a t c h e d the a p p r o a c h i n g
w a v e with trepidation. U n d e r the w a t e r there is actually a
dulling o f sensation, a s i f c o n s c i o u s n e s s itself i s m o m e n t a r i l y
s u b m e r g e d in the thrum of the o c e a n , then it r e t u r n s with full
force. I surfaced a n d rolled on to my b a c k , g a s p i n g with the
cold, a r m s and l e g s d r i v i n g the water, intensely a w a r e o f e v e r y
startled n e u r o n . I w a s e n v e l o p e d by s e a and sky, b u t n o w felt
detached from b o t h . T h e d o g p a d d l e d b e s i d e m e s h o w i n g n o
signs o f d i s c o m f o r t .

D e s c a r t e s b e l i e v e d that d o g s , i n d e e d all a n i m a l s , are u n c o n -

scious a u t o m a t a . A n animal s c r e a m i n g i n pain i s like the c h i m i n g

105
PAUL B R O K S

of a c l o c k . My faithful friend is a m a c h i n e . Its fidelity is merely

reflexive. It d o e s n ' t feel the c o l d . I n t r i g u i n g , then, to learn that
the g r e a t m a n h i m s e l f kept a pet d o g , Mister S c r a t c h , of which
h e w a s v e r y fond.

'I k n o w that I e x i s t , ' s a i d D e s c a r t e s , 'the q u e s t i o n is, what is

this " I " that I k n o w ? ' H e w a s quite s u r e the ' I ' that h e k n e w w a s
n o t his b o d y . ' I a m n o t this a s s e m b l a g e o f l i m b s , ' h e s a i d , but o f
c o u r s e h e k n e w h e w a s . J u s t a s , a t o n e level, h e m u s t have
b e l i e v e d that Mister S c r a t c h h a d s o m e d e g r e e o f c o n s c i o u s
a w a r e n e s s . He w a s far t o o clever to feel affection for an a u t o m a -
ton, surely.

I m i g h t not be as clever as D e s c a r t e s , b u t I trust my intuitions,

and i t s e e m s t o m e that m y b o d y i s a n i m p o r t a n t part o f the ' I '
that I k n o w . It is the p h y s i c a l a p p a r a t u s o v e r which I h a v e direct
c o n t r o l , the t h i n g I u r g e to d i v e into i c y w a t e r s , the thing that
g o e s to w o r k a n d s e e s patients a n d g i v e s lectures. I n e v e r leave
h o m e w i t h o u t it.

M y b o d y h a s certain b o u n d a r i e s ( r o u g h l y defined b y m y
s k i n ) , w h i c h g i v e it a characteristic s h a p e ; and as I steer it from
o n e p l a c e t o a n o t h e r m y t h o u g h t s and e x p e r i e n c e s g o with it. I f
y o u are h a v i n g a b a d time for s o m e r e a s o n and I s a y ' M y
t h o u g h t s are with y o u , ' d o n ' t b e l i e v e m e . M y t h o u g h t s are v e r y
m u c h with me. A l w a y s . B e l i e v i n g that t h o u g h t s are displaced
f r o m y o u r b o d y o r that other p e o p l e ' s t h o u g h t s can b e inserted
into y o u r h e a d , is a s i g n of mental illness.

My b o d y is, w i t h o u t d o u b t , a part of what I think of as my

' s e l f . I t ' s the p a r t o f m y s e l f that can b e w e i g h e d a n d m e a s u r e d ;
it c a s t s s h a d o w s , a n d it h a s p r o p e r t i e s in c o m m o n with other
p h y s i c a l o b j e c t s like trees a n d filing cabinets, c a r s , and planets.

106
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

' B o d y i s a p o r t i o n o f the soul d i s c e r n ' d b y the f i v e s e n s e s , ' s a i d

William B l a k e .
I h a v e a s t r o n g s e n s e that I am l o c a t e d in my b o d y . I d r i v e my
car to the b e a c h and I d r i v e my b o d y into the c o l d s h o c k of the
w a v e s . On the w a y to the b e a c h I s e e h e d g e r o w s a n d trees flash
by t h r o u g h the w i n d s c r e e n of the car a n d , trotting into the
water, I s e e the w a v e s a n d the s k y as if f r o m b e h i n d the w i n d -
screen of my e y e s . I feel l o c a t e d in my b o d y a n d I identify with
it in other w a y s , too. F o r e x a m p l e , if I s e e it a m o n g other b o d i e s
pictured in a p h o t o g r a p h I m i g h t s a y s o m e t h i n g like ' T h a t ' s m e '
or ' T h e r e I a m . ' I ' d s a y s o m e t h i n g similar e v e n a b o u t an o l d
p h o t o g r a p h s h o w i n g me as a baby, d e s p i t e the fact that the b o d y
b e a r s no r e s e m b l a n c e to the o n e I currently h a v e .

I f s o m e o n e p a s s e s m y b o d y i n the street they m i g h t , i f they

r e c o g n i z e it, offer a g r e e t i n g , u s i n g my n a m e . A n a m e is a n o t h e r
w a y we h a v e of thinking a b o u t o u r s e l v e s - a label to identify
our b o d i e s and m a r k their actions. ' T h a t ' s P a u l o v e r there, r u n -
ning into the s e a . ' O n e c a n c h a n g e o n e ' s n a m e , b u t not o n e ' s
body.

S o , I feel I o c c u p y my b o d y (there is no s t r o n g e r intuition)

and, with that, c o m e s a s e n s e of ownership a n d agency. I t ' s
my b o d y and I control it. I m a k e it do things. My b o d y a l s o
contributes to my s e n s e of continuity — the feeling that I am the
s a m e p e r s o n from o n e d a y to the next. W h e n I l o o k in the m i r r o r
each d a y I expect to s e e the s a m e thing, m o r e or l e s s . I ' d be
surprised if o n e d a y I l o o k e d in the m i r r o r a n d s a w N e l s o n
Mandela or a w o m a n or a g i a n t m o t h . I ' d be rattled.

Identifying the s e l f with the b o d y s e e m s r e a s o n a b l e e n o u g h ,

but there are s o m e p r o b l e m s . F o r e x a m p l e , the b o u n d a r i e s o f

107
PAUL B R O K S

the b o d y are n o t s o e a s y t o define. H o w m u c h a part o f u s are our

hair o r o u r f i n g e r n a i l s ? W h a t a b o u t b o d i l y f l u i d s ? W h a t a b o u t
f o o d ? I p i c k a s t r a w b e r r y from a b a s k e t , I s w a l l o w it and
i t b e c o m e s i n c o r p o r a t e d into m y b o d y . A t what point d o e s i t
b e c o m e a p a r t o f m y b o d y a n d s o a part o f m e ?
As a student I h a d tutorials with the f a m o u s psychiatrist
A n t h o n y Storr. H e w a s a relaxed teacher, v e r y c h a r m i n g , and
I ' m s u r e I l e a r n e d s o m e t h i n g a b o u t p s y c h o t h e r a p y . B u t all I can
recall i s o n e o f his t h o u g h t e x p e r i m e n t s .

H e a s k e d u s t o c o n s i d e r h o w often w e s w a l l o w o u r o w n
s a l i v a . W e d o i t all the t i m e , o f c o u r s e , w i t h o u t thinking. T h e n
h e invited u s t o i m a g i n e that, instead o f s w a l l o w i n g , w e spat
into a tumbler. H o w w o u l d we n o w feel a b o u t s i p p i n g from a
t u m b l e r full of o u r o w n spit? I t ' s the s a m e stuff, b u t no thanks!
N o t e v e n with i c e , l e m o n , a n d a l a r g e d a s h o f v o d k a . W h a t ' s
the difference? A b o u n d a r y h a s b e e n c r o s s e d . A s the p h i l o s o -
p h e r D a n i e l D e n n e t t p u t s it, o n c e s o m e t h i n g i s o u t s i d e our
b o d i e s i t b e c o m e s alien a n d s u s p i c i o u s , not quite part o f u s ,
something to be rejected. The spit in the tumbler has
' r e n o u n c e d its c i t i z e n s h i p ' . B o u n d a r i e s a n d b o r d e r c o n t r o l s are
important.

D e n n e t t a l s o r e m i n d s u s that the s o c i e t y o f the h u m a n b o d y

h a s m a n y interlopers — b a c t e r i a , v i r u s e s , m i c r o s c o p i c mites —
not all ' e n e m i e s within' or e v e n tolerated p a r a s i t e s . S o m e , like
the b a c t e r i a in o u r g u t , are vital to s u r v i v a l . I identify with my
b o d y , b u t n o t with a n y o f these b u g s , o r i t e m s o f food p a s s i n g
t h r o u g h my d i g e s t i v e s y s t e m or, i n d e e d , with a n y particular part
o f m y b o d y o n a l a r g e r s c a l e — m y k n e e s , m y k n u c k l e s , the b l o o d
c o u r s i n g t h r o u g h my veins. I c o u l d l o s e an a r m or a l e g or a pint

108
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

of b l o o d and I w o u l d still be m e . P e r h a p s i t ' s the idea of h a v i n g

a b o d y that really matters.
I m a y feel that I inhabit a n d control a b o d y a n d that s u c h feel-
i n g s are fundamental t o m y s e n s e o f self, b u t there a r e m a n y
features of my b o d y o v e r which I h a v e no direct c o n t r o l . I c a n ' t
stop the a g e i n g p r o c e s s . I c a n ' t s t o p it d e v e l o p i n g a t u m o u r or a
d e g e n e r a t i v e b r a i n d i s e a s e , i f that's what the g e n e s dictate. A n d
there are millions o f p h y s i o l o g i c a l p r o c e s s e s g o i n g o n inside m e
that I scarcely k n o w a b o u t , let a l o n e c o n t r o l .

A l t h o u g h I can c l a i m a better than a v e r a g e k n o w l e d g e of

h u m a n b i o l o g y , I h a v e o n l y a g e n e r a l n o t i o n of w h a t my inter-
nal c o m p o n e n t s are. M a n y intelligent p e o p l e with a perfectly
functional s e n s e of s e l f h a v e n ' t a clue a b o u t w h a t g o e s on inside
them. It is l a r g e l y irrelevant to the e v e r y d a y b u s i n e s s of b e i n g a
p e r s o n . J u s t as when y o u d r i v e a car y o u d o n ' t really n e e d to
k n o w h o w the e n g i n e w o r k s .

E v e n when y o u c o n s i d e r t h o s e t h i n g s that w e directly take

c h a r g e of, the activities o f the b o d y t h r o u g h which w e e x e r c i s e
our free will ( v o l u n t a r y m o v e m e n t s of the l i m b s , fingers, h e a d ,
vocal a p p a r a t u s , e t c . ) , even here, the d e g r e e o f control i s s o m e -
times so p o o r that we achieve effects in the w o r l d quite o p p o s i t e
to those we intend. T h e practice of d e c e p t i o n is a c a s e in point.
W h e n p e o p l e d i s p l a y e x p r e s s i o n s for e m o t i o n s they are not feel-
i n g , or s a y things inconsistent with their actual state of m i n d
or their true beliefs, there are often c o u n t e r - s i g n a l s that g i v e
them away. T h i s a p p l i e s whether w e are l y i n g or, for the b e s t o f
r e a s o n s , s i m p l y t r y i n g to g i v e a false i m p r e s s i o n to d i s g u i s e the
true state of affairs.

Paul E k m a n , a p i o n e e r in the s t u d y of e m o t i o n a l e x p r e s s i o n s ,

109
PAUL B R O K S

lists s o m e o f these tell-tale s i g n s : ' a m o v e m e n t o f the b o d y ,

an inflection to the v o i c e , a s w a l l o w i n g in the throat, a d e e p or
s h a l l o w b r e a t h , l o n g p a u s e s b e t w e e n w o r d s , a slip of the t o n g u e ,
a m i c r o f a c i a l e x p r e s s i o n , a gestural slip . . .' L i e s can be per-
f o r m e d beautifully, s a y s E k m a n , but u s u a l l y they are not. A n d
then there a r e o c c a s i o n s w h e n w e b e h a v e with perfect control o f
o u r a c t i o n s , but our b e h a v i o u r i s , a t s o m e level, not what w e
w i s h o r intend. W e act a g a i n s t o u r better j u d g e m e n t ; w e yield t o
temptation.

W h e n I finished that last p a r a g r a p h I g o t up and went to the

lavatory. I h a v e a b s o l u t e l y no idea h o w I did it. I b e c a m e aware
o f a n ' u r g e ' t o g o , I s t o o d a n d found m y s e l f w a l k i n g t o the b a t h -
r o o m w h e r e , m a g i c a l l y , effortlessly, I h o s e d urine into the toilet
b o w l . D o n ' t a s k me how. I take it for g r a n t e d that I can just
'think i t a n d d o i t ' . T h e c o - o r d i n a t e d neural, musculo-skeletal
a n d u r o g e n i t a l activities i n v o l v e d in the enterprise of getting up
a n d g o i n g to the l a v a t o r y are incredibly c o m p l e x . I just m a d e it
happen. I have phenomenal control over neurobiological
p r o c e s s e s that no o n e in the w o r l d fully c o m p r e h e n d s , and I
d o n ' t e v e n h a v e to think a b o u t it.

I t r e m i n d e d m e t o m a k e the point that e v e n w h e n w e h a v e

excellent control o v e r o u r v o l u n t a r y a c t i o n s , and at e v e r y level
intend t o p e r f o r m t h e m , w e still d o n ' t u n d e r s t a n d precisely h o w
an act of will g e t s translated into a c o m p l e x s e q u e n c e of b i o l o g -
ical activity ( o r v i c e v e r s a ) .

S o , w e can s e e that the b o d y i s a n important feature o f the

w a y we think a b o u t o u r s e l v e s - it s e e m s natural to believe that
each o f u s o w n s a b o d y a n d that w e h a v e control over it. But w e
c a n a l s o s e e that it is difficult to identify the ' s e l f with the ' b o d y '

110
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

as a w h o l e ( b e c a u s e the b o u n d a r i e s are f u z z y ) , or with a n y

particular part o f the b o d y . F u r t h e r m o r e , o u r control o v e r o u r
b o d i e s , and our u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f the p r o c e s s e s i n v o l v e d , i s
variable. P e r h a p s , as I say, i t ' s the idea of h a v i n g a b o d y that
really matters.

O n e m i g h t think that the face h a s s o m e special a l i g n m e n t

with the self. N o other object p r o j e c t s s u c h a n a u r a o f vitality,
and this vitality s e e m s t o c o m e from within. F a c e s are p o i n t s o f
c o n v e r g e n c e b e t w e e n p e o p l e ; w h e r e w e s e e m t o l o c a t e the
essence of another p e r s o n , a n d w h e r e we tend to l o c a t e our-
selves: s o m e w h e r e b e h i n d the e y e s . In his n o v e l Immortality,
Milan K u n d e r a writes: ' W i t h o u t the faith that o u r f a c e e x p r e s s e s
our self, without that b a s i c illusion, that arch-illusion, we
cannot live or at least we cannot take life seriously.'

Imagine if someone you know were suddenly to undergo a

radical transformation of his or her facial features. T h e y still
h a v e a face, a regular o n e , b u t a different o n e . Is it p o s s i b l e to
believe it's the s a m e p e r s o n ? W h a t i f they n o w l o o k just like
s o m e o n e else y o u k n o w ? O r w h a t i f they r e s e m b l e y o u ? N o w
i m a g i n e that p e r s o n with n o face a t all. C a n y o u e v e n think o f
them as a person? W h a t is it y o u are thinking a b o u t ?

We treat the face as an e m b l e m of the self. It g e n e r a t e s p o t e n t

illusions. K u n d e r a m i g h t be right to s a y it w o u l d be hard to
function as a h u m a n b e i n g without e m b r a c i n g the e m b l e m a n d
s e e i n g the illusion. B u t it w o u l d be a m i s t a k e to identify f a c e s
with selves. T h e face i s just another b o d y part. P e o p l e with h o r -
r e n d o u s facial disfigurements h a v e no less a s e n s e of s e l f than
p e o p l e w h o h a v e lost an a r m or a l e g . In s o m e r e s p e c t s , p e r h a p s ,
their sense of s e l f is intensified.

111
PAUL B R O K S

T h e face is just a fleshy structure animated by m u s c l e s

attached to the b o n y structures of the skull. It contains i n f o r m a -
tion a b o u t o u r identity ( w h o w e a r e ) , our sex and our a g e (which
are i m p o r t a n t facets o f the 'public s e l f ) , w h o and what w e are
in t e r m s of the o b j e c t i v e , social facts of the matter. Y o u can
think of these as 'static' features of the s e l f in so far as they are
relatively f i x e d a n d e n d u r i n g .

T h e n , t h r o u g h c h a n g e s i n patterns o f m u s c u l a r activity
( ' e x p r e s s i o n s ' , ' g a z e ' ) , the face transmits s i g n a l s a b o u t other,
m o r e d y n a m i c , features s u c h a s o u r e m o t i o n a l state, our focus o f
interest, a n d o u r i m m e d i a t e intentions. T h e s e h a v e a d o u b l e
a s p e c t ; part p u b l i c , part p r i v a t e . Y o u can u s e facial information
t o m a k e inferences a b o u t m y mental state a n d b e h a v i o u r a l d i s -
p o s i t i o n s . To that extent the i n f o r m a t i o n is ' p u b l i c ' b e c a u s e it is
there for a n y o n e t o s e e . B u t y o u c a n ' t k n o w m y thoughts and
feelings directly. Y o u c a n ' t e x p e r i e n c e them.

W e s e e a n d hear a n d s p e a k t h r o u g h the face, creating the

i m p r e s s i o n that c o n s c i o u s n e s s , 'the stuff of the s e l f ' , is c o n c e n -
trated there, e v e n t h o u g h there are no g r o u n d s for b e l i e v i n g it
is really a n y m o r e ' t h e r e ' than in the right e l b o w or the small
o f the b a c k . T h i s i s b e c a u s e there i s n o ' s e l f s t u f f ' t o b e located.
T h e r e is n o t h i n g in, or b e h i n d , the face except for o r g a n i c
matter, a n d n o t h i n g to s u g g e s t that the b i o l o g i c a l material of the
h e a d , as o r g a n i c matter, h a s a g r e a t e r p r o p e n s i t y for 'self-
h o o d ' than the material stuff o f other r e g i o n s o f the body.
T h e r e just isn't.

T r a v e l l i n g i n t h o u g h t f r o m the p o s i t i o n o f participant-
o b s e r v e r in the p h y s i c a l a n d social w o r l d ' t h r o u g h ' the face and
into the m a c h i n e r y that lies b e h i n d we are transported, like

112
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

A l i c e t h r o u g h the l o o k i n g g l a s s , to a v e r y different w o r l d . We
g o from a b r i g h t p l a c e o f p e r s o n s , s e l v e s , a n d s u b j e c t i v e e x p e r i -
ence, to a d a r k , silent, e n c l o s e d , w o r l d of p h y s i c s , chemistry,
and b i o l o g y . It is a m y s t e r i o u s j o u r n e y .

113
Body Art

T h e r e ' s s o m e o n e here t o s e e m e . S h e ' s c o m e t o talk a b o u t her

r e s e a r c h p r o j e c t . S h e ' s l o o k i n g for a P h D s u p e r v i s o r .
' H i , I ' m K a r a , ' s h e s a y s , drifting i n like scented s m o k e .
' I ' m m o r e o f a n e u r o m a n , ' I'd told her o v e r the p h o n e . ' I ' m
not s u r e I c a n help.' I tried to put her off. I said I k n e w s o m e -
thing a b o u t b o d y - i m a g e c h a n g e s c a u s e d b y brain d a m a g e , and
self-mutilation in the m e n t a l l y d i s t u r b e d , but n o t h i n g about the
cult o f e x t r e m e b o d y modification. S h e w o u l d n ' t b e deterred,
a n d h e r e s h e i s , o p e n i n g a folder to s h o w me s o m e s a m p l e s .

T h e thing that first catches my e y e is a c l o s e - u p c o l o u r p h o t o -

g r a p h o f a m a n with his t o n g u e h a n g i n g out. T o n g u e s , a l m o s t .
It is split f r o m the b a s e , g i v i n g it a w i c k e d , reptilian l o o k . Y o u
can a l m o s t s e e it flicker. K a r a h a s a g l i s t e n i n g stud in the m i d d l e
o f her o w n t o n g u e . I t ' s difficult t o i g n o r e o n c e y o u notice.

T h e t o n e o f the I n f o r m a t i o n S h e e t i s r e a s s u r i n g . I t c o u l d b e
f r o m a p r i v a t e hospital b r o c h u r e . I learn that The most popular
method of tongue splitting is surgical. I m a g e s of D I Y enthusiasts
with razor b l a d e s a n d s c i s s o r s r a p i d l y f a d e . N o t h i n g o f the sort.

114
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

T h e operation is q u i c k and h i g h - t e c h , performed by an oral-

maxiofacial ( s i c ) surgeon using an argon laser. T h e t o n g u e is slit
in a single s w e e p , the laser cauterizing as it cuts. L o n g - t e r m s i d e
effects are p l a y e d d o w n . T h e r e m a y b e m i n o r c h a n g e s i n s o m e
speech s o u n d s , i t s a y s , a n d , p h y s i o l o g i c a l l y , the n u m b e r o f taste
b u d s increases to c o v e r the extra s u r f a c e a r e a . E l s e w h e r e , a
w o m a n reveals it t o o k a b o u t three w e e k s b e f o r e s h e c o u l d eat
comfortably and control both tongues. No c l a i m s are m a d e for
the g a s t r o n o m i c or s e x u a l a d v a n t a g e s of the split t o n g u e , b u t I
b e g i n to w o n d e r .

T h e r e are m a n y other i m a g e s . S o m e are relatively m u n d a n e

(tattooed p e n i s e s , nipple p i e r c i n g s , scarification, b r a n d i n g ) a n d
s o m e bizarre, like t r a n s d e r m a l implantation. K a r a s h o w s m e
pictures of m e n with objects inserted into the forehead or scalp.
T h e y l o o k like Star Wars characters. I cast my e y e o v e r a r e p o r t
on non-psychotic self-cannibalism (autophagy), and another on
apotemnophilia, which, I learn, refers to a c r a v i n g for a m p u -
tation, s o m e t i m e s satisfied t h r o u g h the s e r v i c e s o f qualified
surgeons.

B o d y art has filtered into the m a i n s t r e a m . A l m o s t e v e r y b o d y

has a tattoo or a p i e r c i n g these d a y s . T h e s a m e g o e s for b o d y
modification: b r e a s t implants, n o s e j o b s , l i p o s u c t i o n , anorectic
dieting, b o d y - b u i l d i n g . K a r a c o n d e m n s it all as a h o p e l e s s striv-
i n g for u n o b t a i n a b l e ideals o f conventional b e a u t y a n d eternal
youth (the w o m e n in Vogue, the m e n on the c o v e r of Men's
Health), culturally sanctioned a n d c o m m e r c i a l l y d r i v e n . S h e ' s
right, o f c o u r s e . E x t r e m e b o d y modification, h o w e v e r , i s the
antithesis. I t ' s a b o u t redefining the aesthetic, even the b o u n d -
aries, o f the b o d y .

115
PAUL B R O K S

' A n d w h a t a b o u t c i r c u m c i s i o n ? ' s h e s a y s a s a n afterthought.

K a r a , b y the w a y , i s distractingly beautiful.
S e a r c h i n g for c o m m o n g r o u n d , w e s k i m a c r o s s b o d y - i m a g e
d i s t o r t i o n s in n e u r o l o g i c a l d i s o r d e r s s u c h as e p i l e p s y and
s t r o k e . W e d i s c u s s hysterical p a r a l y s i s , p h a n t o m l i m b s , and
t r a n s s e x u a l i s m . I tell her a b o u t a n o s o g n o s i a , which m e a n s 'lack
o f k n o w l e d g e o f i l l n e s s ' . P e o p l e with s e v e r e n e u r o l o g i c a l d i s -
abilities — q u a d r i p l e g i a , s a y — s o m e t i m e s s h o w a c o m p l e t e lack
o f a w a r e n e s s o f their condition. ( I r e m e m b e r o n c e chatting
with a m a n w h o w a s p a r a l y s e d from the neck d o w n . H e w a s
telling me a b o u t his p l a n s to go r o c k c l i m b i n g at the w e e k e n d . ) I
a g r e e that ' b o d y i m a g e ' is a fascinating area for research, but
c a n ' t i m m e d i a t e l y s e e a point o f connection b e t w e e n K a r a ' s
interests a n d my o w n . I tell her I'll think a b o u t it.

A t h o m e , I stand n a k e d i n front o f the b a t h r o o m mirror. N o t

e x a c t l y Men's Health, I think. W h a t m i g h t a little b o d y art do for
m e ? I tell m y wife I ' m thinking o f h a v i n g m y penis tattooed.
'What do you have in m i n d ? '
'Wolverhampton Wanderers'
S h e l o o k s a t m e . ' O r m a y b e just Wolves'

116
 The Story of Einstein's Brain

Einstein: s h o c k - h a i r e d a n d s o c k l e s s g e n i u s , a v u n c u l a r s y m b o l
of p u r e intellect, h e a d in a whirlwind of e q u a t i o n s a n d s p i r a l l i n g
2
g a l a x i e s , cultural icon. L o g o : E = m c . Scientist, s a g e , h u m a n i -
tarian, a m b i g u o u s pacifist, l o u s y h u s b a n d , n e g l i g e n t father, a n d
now, w h a t ' s left of h i m , f r a g m e n t s of b r a i n in a jar.

N o t l o n g after E i n s t e i n ' s death in 1955, R o l a n d B a r t h e s called

his brain a mythical object, a p a r a d o x i c a l conflation of m a n ,
m a g i c , and m a c h i n e . N e a r l y fifty y e a r s o n , the m y t h r e m a i n s
potent. To l o o k at a n y b r a i n is to confront a d e e p m y s t e r y . Y o u
fall into the frame of an i m p o s s i b l e p i c t u r e , an E s c h e r stairway,
a s c e n d i n g and d e s c e n d i n g a t the s a m e time. T h e b r a i n c a n ' t b e
the theatre of c o n s c i o u s n e s s — i t ' s a solid o b j e c t — a n d yet it m u s t
b e b e c a u s e y o u are c o n t e m p l a t i n g the s c e n e o n the f l o o d l i t s t a g e
in your own head. But, looking at photographs of Einstein's
brain - s n a p p e d in the interlude b e t w e e n extraction from
the c r a n i u m and d e c i m a t i o n a t the h a n d s o f P r i n c e t o n H o s p i -
tal's d u t y p a t h o l o g i s t , T h o m a s H a r v e y — y o u feel the pull of
myth as well as mystery. It is difficult n o t to s e e the o b j e c t

117
PAUL B R O K S

as a s a c r e d relic. T h i s is the thing that bent the u n i v e r s e and

humbled time.
T h e r e w a s r u m o u r a n d s p e c u l a t i o n a b o u t the b r a i n from the
start: it w a s h u g e a n d s t r a n g e , a n d then a g a i n it w a s m y s t e r i -
o u s l y tiny, the size of a walnut. In fact, it l o o k e d o r d i n a r y and
w e i g h e d 2.7 p o u n d s . A b o u t a v e r a g e . I t w a s r e m o v e d within
s e v e n h o u r s o f death, w e i g h e d fresh, then f i x e d i n formalin.
After it h a d b e e n p h o t o g r a p h e d from all s i d e s , and m e a s u r e d
with callipers, the cerebral h e m i s p h e r e s w e r e s e p a r a t e d and
d i c e d into 240 b l o c k s . T h e n the b r a i n d i s a p p e a r e d . It followed
H a r v e y into obscurity.

S o o n after the a u t o p s y , H a r v e y h a d a n n o u n c e d that E i n -

stein's b r a i n w o u l d b e u s e d for scientific research and there w a s
a tussle for p o s s e s s i o n b e t w e e n P r i n c e t o n and N e w Y o r k ' s
Montefiore Medical Center. T h e y b o t h lost out. H a r v e y simply
t o o k the p i e c e s h o m e with him a n d s t o r e d them i n c o o k i e j a r s .
N e v e r m i n d his l a c k of qualifications for the j o b (he w a s a clini-
cal p a t h o l o g i s t , n o t a n e u r o s c i e n t i s t ) , he w o u l d be the o n e to
u n l o c k the secret o f E i n s t e i n ' s b r a i n .

T h e p a t h o l o g i s t w a s a c c u s e d o f a s m a s h - a n d - g r a b exercise
a n d , t h o u g h H a r v e y a l w a y s maintained h e had acted o n the
authority of Einstein's executor, Otto Nathan, not many
b e l i e v e d h i m . N a t h a n called him a thief a n d a liar and H a r v e y
e v e n t u a l l y left P r i n c e t o n u n d e r a c l o u d , a l l e g e d l y fired for not
r e l i n q u i s h i n g the b r a i n . He v a n i s h e d from the scene — but he
h u n g o n t o his c o o k i e j a r s . I n 1978 H a r v e y w a s tracked d o w n b y
S t e v e n L e v y , a j o u r n a l i s t w o r k i n g for the New Jersey Monthly.
L e v y found h i m l i v i n g i n W i c h i t a , K a n s a s . T h e remnants o f
E i n s t e i n ' s b r a i n w e r e in a b o x m a r k e d Costa Cider.

118
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

T w o d e c a d e s later another j o u r n a l i s t t u r n e d u p : Michael

Paterniti. T h e K e e p e r o f the B r a i n w a s then well into his e i g h t -
ies and l i v i n g in a b a s e m e n t b a c k in P r i n c e t o n . T o g e t h e r they set
off for C a l i f o r n i a in a rented B u i c k S k y l a r k w i t h E i n s t e i n ' s
brain stashed in the trunk, floating in a T u p p e r w a r e container.
Paterniti w a n t e d to e x p l o r e r u m o u r s that it m i g h t be c l o n e d , or
s o l d t o Michael J a c k s o n for m i l l i o n s o f d o l l a r s , b u t H a r v e y
wasn't saying very much.

T h e y ended u p a t the h o m e o f E i n s t e i n ' s g r a n d d a u g h t e r ,

E v e l y n , w h o s e e m e d less i n a w e o f the relic than a n y o n e e l s e .
Paterniti's o w n reactions w e r e c o m p l e x . ' I n e v e r t h o u g h t that,
h o l d i n g E i n s t e i n ' s b r a i n , I'd s o m e h o w i m a g i n e e a t i n g it,' h e s a i d
at o n e point. T h e n , at a s e e d y motel on the w a y h o m e , he s l e p t
with it: 'I go to b e d . I put E i n s t e i n ' s b r a i n on o n e p i l l o w a n d rest
my o w n head on the other next to it, six inches a w a y '

W h a t a b o u t the science? W a s E i n s t e i n ' s b r a i n i n a n y w a y

extraordinary? Despite H a r v e y ' s pledge, no study w a s con-
ducted for three d e c a d e s after the c o n t e n t i o u s a u t o p s y . B y n o w
h e had b e g u n t o mail bits o f b r a i n t o p r o m i n e n t n e u r o s c i e n t i s t s ,
p e o p l e better p l a c e d than he to e x a m i n e the material.

Four sugar cube-sized pieces arrived at Marian D i a m o n d ' s

Berkeley office in a m a y o n n a i s e jar. S h e e x a m i n e d the cellular
structure o f the s p e c i m e n s m i c r o s c o p i c a l l y , finding a n u n u s u -
ally high ratio of glial cells to n e u r o n s in the inferior parietal
l o b e , a n a r e a k n o w n t o b e a s s o c i a t e d with m a t h e m a t i c a l a n d
spatial r e a s o n i n g . N e u r o n s are the b a s i c functional units o f the
brain and the glia p r o v i d e the m e t a b o l i c a n d structural s u p p o r t
required for them to do their w o r k .

As for overall a n a t o m y , the first s t u d y a p p e a r e d in 1999.

119
PAUL B R O K S

S a n d r a W i t e l s o n o f M c M a s t e r University, O n t a r i o , h a d r e -
c e i v e d , u n s o l i c i t e d , a p a c k a g e of b r a i n p i e c e s which she and her
c o l l e a g u e s set a b o u t w e i g h i n g , m e a s u r i n g , a n d c o m p a r i n g with
other b r a i n s . A g a i n , the inferior parietal l o b e s t o o d out as
u n u s u a l , b e i n g 15 p e r cent larger than n o r m a l ; and the S y l v i a n
fissure, which m a r k s the t e m p o r a l - p a r i e t a l b o u n d a r y , t o o k an
o d d u p w a r d turn.

S u c h o b s e r v a t i o n s h a v e b e e n d i s m i s s e d i n s o m e quarters a s
little m o r e than primitive, b u m p - f o n d l i n g p h r e n o l o g y . Einstein,
they say, w o u l d h a v e b e e n a p p a l l e d by the crudity of the science.
I am not so s u r e . T h e r e is a picture of the G r e a t M a n u n d e r g o i n g
E E G b r a i n w a v e r e c o r d i n g — his h e a d a n e x p l o s i o n o f wild hair
a n d e l e c t r o d e l e a d s — while he is b e i n g a s k e d to 'think of relativ-
i t y ' . H e w a s clearly g a m e for a l a u g h . A n d the b u m p a t least has
a p l a u s i b l e location g i v e n E i n s t e i n ' s mathematical p r o w e s s and
w h a t w e a l r e a d y k n o w a b o u t the o r g a n i z a t i o n o f brain func-
tions. It is s o m e t h i n g .

S o m e y e a r s a g o my y o u n g s o n a n d I w e r e in a s h o e s h o p in
C a m b r i d g e w h e n in c a m e S t e p h e n H a w k i n g in his m o t o r i z e d
wheelchair. No present-day scientist matches Einstein's
celebrity, b u t H a w k i n g c o m e s c l o s e s t . L i k e Einstein h e s y m b o l -
izes p u r e intelligence. T h e shining m i n d i n the shrivelled b o d y
h a s entered the p o p u l a r i m a g i n a t i o n . I ' v e yet to s e e his w a s t e d
s h a p e on a T - s h i r t or his m u g on a m u g , but he h a s a p p e a r e d in
e p i s o d e s of Star Trek ( r u b b i n g s h o u l d e r s with Einstein and
N e w t o n ) a n d The Simpsons. As R o l a n d B a r t h e s remarks, b e i n g
t u r n e d into a c a r t o o n is a s i g n that o n e h a s b e c o m e a legend.

T h e r e w a s a w o m a n h e l p i n g h i m and they w e r e l o o k i n g at a
r a c k o f c h e a p trainers. H a w k i n g d i d n ' t s e e m v e r y interested,

120
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

t h o u g h i t w a s hard t o tell. M y s o n went c l o s e u p a n d s t a r e d a n d

I expected him to s a y s o m e t h i n g indiscreet, b u t he lost interest.
T h e trainers h e w a s e y e i n g w e r e a cut a b o v e H a w k i n g ' s . H e w a s
not i m p r e s s e d , t h o u g h I felt p e c u l i a r l y t o u c h e d . T h i s w a s the
m a n w h o visited b l a c k h o l e s from his wheelchair a n d surfed
event horizons. A n d h e did s o i n T r u - F o r m trainers. B a r t h e s
w o u l d h a v e liked that. It w o u l d h a v e signified s o m e t h i n g .

A n d now Einstein's brain is back at Princeton Hospital.

Actually, not as s u c h . It h a s a n e w o w n e r , o n e Elliot K r a u s s ,
p a t h o l o g i s t . He k e e p s it in a jar s o m e w h e r e secret.

They're perpetuating the myth.

Harry?

I didn't mean to startle you. But they are, don't you

think?

T h e p a r a d o x i c a l conflation o f m a n , m a g i c , a n d
machine?

Quite.

N e u r o s c i e n c e thrives o n p a r a d o x i c a l conflations.
Conflating m i n d and matter s e e m s p a r a d o x i c a l t o
most people.

Yes. It's hard to equate mental life with the sludgy

stuff of the brain. We should never lose sight of the
fact that the brain is a dollop of mush. I should
know.

O k a y - man, magic, machine, and mush.

121
PAUL B R O K S

But trying to explain the genius of Einstein by

measuring his bumps with callipers! It's phrenology.

T h e r e ' s o n l y s o m u c h y o u can d o . H e ' s b e e n

d e a d h a l f a century. H i s b r a i n is all in bits.

I am thankful for small mercies.

122
Articles of Faith

neuropsychology: noun [mass noun] the study of the relationship

between behaviour, emotion, and cognition on the one hand, and
brain function on the other.

The New Oxford Dictionary of English

A r t i c l e s o f faith:
1. T h e b r a i n is the o r g a n of the m i n d .
2. T h e mind is modular.
3 . T h e m o d u l a r i t y o f m i n d i s reflected i n the w o r k i n g s o f
the brain.

The brain is the organ of the mind. No o n e d o u b t s that the b r a i n

is the r o o t of all b e h a v i o u r and e x p e r i e n c e . If y o u b l o w out the
contents of a p e r s o n ' s h e a d — as s c h o o l b o y s u s e d to b l o w o u t the
contents of b i r d s ' e g g s — y o u a r e , likewise, left with an e m p t y
shell.

The mind is modular. Mental life is d i v e r s e a n d d i v i s i b l e . T h e

mind is not a m o n o l i t h . We d i s t i n g u i s h the c o l o u r of an a p p l e

123
PAUL B R O K S

f r o m its s h a p e , w e i g h t , and texture as we lift it from the fruit

b o w l ; a n d a s w e take a bite w e s e p a r a t e the s n a p p i n g , crunching
s o u n d f r o m the taste o f the j u i c e . T h e n , l o o k i n g b a c k o n the
e x p e r i e n c e , w e s e g r e g a t e r a w sensation from the i m a g e s w e
h o l d in m e m o r y .

P e r c e p t i o n a n d m e m o r y are just t w o d o m a i n s . T h e mind i s a

much broader confederation. T h e r e is also reason, emotion,
l a n g u a g e , m o t i v a t i o n , a n d action. T h e s e facets o f mind func-
tion independently, at least to s o m e d e g r e e . It is p o s s i b l e to find
malfunction in o n e d o m a i n a l o n g s i d e n o r m a l operation in
o t h e r s . A n a m n e s i a c a p p r e c i a t e s all o f the s e n s o r y d i m e n s i o n s
o f e a t i n g a n a p p l e , b u t h a s n o recollection o f the experience a n
h o u r later. T h e n a g a i n , s o m e o n e with diminished s e n s e s but
m e m o r y intact — a blind p e r s o n , s a y — h a s no difficulty r e m e m -
b e r i n g . N o n e o f this offends c o m m o n s e n s e .

The modularity of mind is reflected in the workings of the brain.

Mental functions a r e b i o l o g i c a l l y c o m p a r t m e n t a l i z e d . Different
b r a i n s y s t e m s s u b s e r v e different p s y c h o l o g i c a l functions. It
f o l l o w s that specified d a m a g e to the b r a i n h a s predictable func-
tional c o n s e q u e n c e s .

* * *

mind: noun 1 the element of a person that enables them to be

aware of the world and their experiences, to think, and to feel;
the faculty of consciousness and t h o u g h t . . .

brain: noun 1 an organ of soft nervous tissue contained in the

skull of vertebrates, functioning as the coordinating centre of
sensation and intellectual and nervous activity . . .

124
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

self: noun (pl. selves) a person's essential being that

distinguishes them from others, especially considered as
the object of introspection . . .

The New Oxford Dictionary of English

A foreigner visiting Oxford or Cambridge for the first time is

shown a number of colleges, libraries, playing fields, museums,
scientific departments and administrative offices. He then asks
'But where is the University? I have seen where the members of
the Colleges live, where the Registrar works, where the scien-
tists experiment and the rest. But I have not yet seen the
University in which reside and work the members of your Uni-
versity.' It has then to be explained to him that the University is
not another collateral institution, some ulterior counterpart to
the colleges, laboratories and offices which he has seen. The
University is just the way in which all that he has already seen is
organized.

Gilbert Ryle, The Concept of Mind

T h e self has n o l o c a t i o n , h o w e v e r natural i t s e e m s for u s t o

believe o t h e r w i s e . R y l e w a s r e c o n f i g u r i n g the ' m i n d - b o d y
p r o b l e m ' , the ancient m y s t e r y : h o w d o mental e v e n t s a r i s e from
physical s u b s t a n c e ? H i s s u g g e s t i o n w a s that, c o n t r a r y t o the
assumptions of many philosophers and psychologists, it w a s a
mistake to put m i n d a n d b o d y on the s a m e p l a n e of a n a l y s i s — a
' c a t e g o r y m i s t a k e ' . J u s t as the s t r a n g e r c o u l d not find 'the
university' b e y o n d the l a b s , offices, and p l a y i n g fields, so we are
hard put to d i s c o v e r a n y trace of a c o n s c i o u s m i n d , or self, in the

125
PAUL B R O K S

b r a i n . T h e r e is no g h o s t in the m a c h i n e . M i n d s are the p r o d u c t

o f b r a i n s , a n d s e l v e s d e p e n d u p o n m i n d s , but they require dif-
ferent f o r m s o f u n d e r s t a n d i n g .
I am u s i n g a p e r s o n a l c o m p u t e r to t y p e these w o r d s . T h e y
a p p e a r o n the s c r e e n b y virtue o f the w o r d p r o c e s s i n g software,
essentially a set of instructions installed in the c o m p u t e r . T h e
o p e r a t i o n s o f the s o f t w a r e are realized t h r o u g h the h a r d w a r e o f
the c o m p u t e r ' s electronic microcircuitry. D e t a i l e d k n o w l e d g e
of the h a r d w a r e is of little help in u n d e r s t a n d i n g the software,
a n d v i c e v e r s a . B o t h h a r d w a r e and software are irrelevant to the
content of the text. I h a p p e n to be writing a b o u t m i n d s , brains,
a n d s e l v e s , b u t it c o u l d be a n y t h i n g — a g u i d e to sea fishing, a
s u i c i d e n o t e or a J a p a n e s e haiku. T h i n k of the brain as the h a r d -
w a r e , the m i n d as the s o f t w a r e , a n d the s e l f as the text on the
screen.

In fact, w h y n o t a h a i k u ?

A true enigma:
The self looks inward and finds
Nothing hut neurons.

No m o r e haikus, I p r o m i s e .

* * *

L i k e the s y m b o l on a d o l l a r bill, my e y e floats a b o v e a p y r a m i d .

T h e four s i d e s o f the p y r a m i d represent the p e r s o n , the mind,
the b r a i n , a n d the w o r l d .
W h e n I ' m with a patient I ' m a w a r e , at different times, of each

126
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

side of the p y r a m i d . Mostly, my attention is d r a w n to the person.

It is a person who has come to see me or who is visited by me on
a hospital w a r d . It is a p e r s o n w h o r e p o r t s a s y m p t o m of s o m e
kind ( ' I ' m h a v i n g p r o b l e m s with m y m e m o r y ' ; ' I c a n ' t c o n c e n -
trate on anything'; 'I b r e a k d o w n in tears if s o m e o n e s a y s a kind
w o r d ' ) . T h e r e is a l w a y s an 'I'. A n d e v e n w h e n — e s p e c i a l l y
w h e n — the 'I' is d e f o r m e d by injury or d i s e a s e , w h e n it is s u b -
m e r g e d or d i s p e r s e d a n d h a s no v o i c e , I strive to m a k e it visible
and coherent. T h i s is as m u c h for my benefit as theirs.

A n d then I g l a n c e a c r o s s the p l a n e of the mind. ' Y o u ' r e

h a v i n g p r o b l e m s with y o u r m e m o r y ? ' I say. ' T e l l m e , i n w h a t
w a y d o e s y o u r m e m o r y let y o u d o w n ? ' I q u e s t i o n a n d p r o b e ,
seeking clues to the n a t u r e of the p r o b l e m . I k n o w that m e m o r y ,
and therefore m e m o r y d i s o r d e r , takes m a n y f o r m s . I c a n u s e
special tests to help define and quantify the d i s o r d e r . It is a l s o
important t o k n o w whether other c o m p o n e n t s o f the p a t i e n t ' s
mental a p p a r a t u s are s h o w i n g s i g n s o f w e a r a n d tear.

T h e confederation o f mental p r o c e s s e s w e call 'the m i n d ' c a n

b r e a k d o w n i n w a y s not a l w a y s evident t o the p e r s o n w h o s e
mind i t is. T h e y m i g h t c o m p l a i n o f m e m o r y i m p a i r m e n t , b u t
u n k n o w n t o them there c o u l d b e other p r o b l e m s : subtle c h a n g e s
in perception, say, or r e a s o n i n g or e m o t i o n . I take n o t e of their
s y m p t o m s , but all the while I am l o o k i n g for other s i g n s .

N e x t , m y g a z e shifts t o the third s u r f a c e o f the p y r a m i d . T h i s

is w h e n I c o n s i d e r s i g n s a n d s y m p t o m s in relation to the w o r k -
ings of the brain. I m i g h t , for e x a m p l e , take certain failures of
m e m o r y t o indicate a particular f o r m o f b r a i n d i s e a s e . O r , c o n -
versely, I m i g h t u s e k n o w l e d g e of a p a t i e n t ' s b r a i n d i s o r d e r to
g u i d e m y u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f their p s y c h o l o g i c a l c o n d i t i o n . M y

127
PAUL B R O K S

o b s e r v a t i o n s are set a l o n g s i d e other f o r m s o f e v i d e n c e , includ-

i n g the p h y s i c a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n s o f n e u r o l o g i s t s and s u r g e o n s ,
a n d the i m a g e s m a d e a v a i l a b l e v i a b r a i n - s c a n n i n g m a c h i n e s .
T h e fourth s i d e of the p y r a m i d represents the world. H e r e , I
a m c o n c e r n e d with h o w the p e r s o n , g i v e n their brain d i s o r d e r
a n d mental profile, can b e s t adjust to the w o r l d a r o u n d them.
H o w will they g e t b y ? F o r the p e r s o n c o n c e r n e d this is, o f
c o u r s e , the o n l y q u e s t i o n that matters.

You sound like an expert.

I am.

So you didn't mean what you said before:

that neuropsychology was what you felt most
profoundly ignorant about. It was a rhetorical
shimmy.

N o t entirely. I t ' s e a s y e n o u g h t o clip definitions

a n d b a s i c a s s u m p t i o n s together. L i k e I s a i d , I
c o u l d ad lib a b o u t the structure and functions of
the b r a i n - no p r o b l e m . A n d , true, t h o s e A r t i c l e s
o f Faith g e t m e t h r o u g h the w o r k i n g day.

But?

T h e r e ' s s o m e t h i n g q u i r k y a t the philosophical

centre o f n e u r o p s y c h o l o g y . A n i n c o m p l e t e n e s s .
T h e A r t i c l e s o f F a i t h s u g g e s t a n integrity that,
I fear, d o e s n ' t actually apply.

No science is whole. Physics hasn't got a Theory of

128
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

Everything. Einstein died intellectually frustrated.

If any science arrived at a state of completion,
the scientists would lay down their tools. Job
done. And there are definitely strange things
at the philosophical heart of modern physics.
Why should you wrestle with doubt?

F o r all I k n o w , p h y s i c i s t s will o n e d a y f o r m u l a t e
their T h e o r y o f E v e r y t h i n g . B u t I ' m inclined
to think that o u r g o a l of d e s c r i b i n g mental life
in t e r m s of b r a i n activity is not entirely feasible.
I w o n d e r if the enterprise is q u i x o t i c .

Why?

B e c a u s e . . . O h , I d o n ' t k n o w . W h a t w a s that
description o f D o n Q u i x o t e ? A m u d d l e - h e a d e d
fool with frequent lucid intervals? G e t b a c k to
m e when I ' m lucid.

But does it stop you doing your job?

No.

Then why play The Knight of the Doleful

Countenance?

H a v e you read Cervantes?

No.

Me neither.

Are you saying that the Articles of Faith are fine

as far as they go—but they don't go far enough?
Something is lacking?

M y c o n c e r n i s that the A r t i c l e s o f F a i t h d i s r e g a r d
s o m e i m p o r t a n t features o f mental life, w h i c h ,
if we are ever to a c h i e v e a coherent s c i e n c e of

129
PAUL B R O K S

m i n d a n d b r a i n , will either h a v e t o b e b r o u g h t
into the frame of n e u r o s c i e n c e — or thrown out.

Such as?

T h e things that matter m o s t t o u s : c o n s c i o u s

e x p e r i e n c e a n d o u r s e n s e o f self.

Is neuropsychology concerned with such things?

O f c o u r s e . I ' v e m a d e a l i v i n g b y virtue o f the

fact that the b r a i n is a v e r y flimsy construction.
Its functions are easily w a r p e d by d i s e a s e and
injury. T h e r e ' s n o s h o r t a g e o f tales t o tell o f
fragile b r a i n s a n d shattered s e l v e s .

Indeed.

T h e q u e s t i o n is, h o w b e s t to tell them: as the

science o f the b r a i n o r the art o f b e i n g h u m a n ?
T h e h i d d e n c o n t r a p t i o n s o f the illusionist o r the
illusion itself?

Surely, for a clinical practitioner, both perspectives

are necessary. Sometimes you are talking about the
brain, and sometimes about the person, the self,
consciousness and all.

O n e h a s t o b e b i l i n g u a l , s w i t c h i n g from the
l a n g u a g e o f n e u r o s c i e n c e t o the l a n g u a g e o f
e x p e r i e n c e ; from talk o f ' b r a i n s y s t e m s ' and
' p a t h o l o g y ' t o talk o f ' h o p e ' , ' d r e a d ' , ' p a i n ' ,
' j o y ' , ' l o v e ' , ' l o s s ' , a n d all the other a n i m a l s ,
fierce a n d t a m e , i n the z o o o f h u m a n
consciousness.

Then you seem to have tied the package: brain and

person complete. Where's the strange philosophical
centre?
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

I h a v e c o m e to realize h o w d e e p l y o d d it is to
a s s u m e that b r a i n s a n d s e l v e s c o n v e r g e .

You think they don't go together?

I think they d o n ' t go together in w a y s that

contemporary neuroscience would recognize.

But they go together?

W h a t d o y o u take m e for?

131
Right This Way, Smiles a
Mermaid

M i d t o w n M a n h a t t a n . T h e p o w e r w a s out. I s t o o d a t the w i n d o w
a s v e i n s o f l i g h t n i n g c r a c k l e d o v e r the G e n e r a l Electric b u i l d i n g
a b l o c k a w a y . Its giant, g a l v a n i c t h r o e s w e r e startling. T h e thun-
d e r r o l l e d t h r o u g h my g u t as it rattled the w i n d o w s and humbled
the m o n u m e n t a l architecture. A n d then, a n o c e a n o f rain. N e w
Y o r k w a s A t l a n t i s . I c o u l d s e e f i s h e s a n d w h a l e s and m e r m a i d s .
W h e n the s t o r m d i e d the p o w e r w a s still out.

I l a y on the b e d , drifted into a s l u m b e r and w o k e to find a girl

s t a n d i n g at the w i n d o w , l o o k i n g o u t as I h a d l o o k e d out u p o n the
storm.

' D o n ' t b e afraid,' she s a i d , still w a t c h i n g the rain, which w a s

g e n t l e now. ' C o m e with m e . '

We left by a d o o r I h a d n ' t noticed b e f o r e . I followed her

d o w n dim-lit c o r r i d o r s a n d v e r t i g i n o u s stairwells, then out into
the s w i r l i n g street w h e r e a car w a s w a i t i n g .
' R i g h t this w a y , ' s h e s m i l e d .
W e w e r e s o m e w h e r e o n the U p p e r E a s t S i d e . I r e c o g n i z e d

132
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

her at o n c e , even in the g l o o m : C o l l i c u l a B r o d m a n n , P r e s i d e n t

o f the A c a d e m y .
' N e u r o s c i e n c e is a b r o a d church,' she s a i d , ' b u t there is c o n -
cern that y o u m a y b e drifting t o w a r d s M y s t e r i a n i s m . ' O u t the
w i n d o w a blue w h a l e d i p p e d majestically o v e r C e n t r a l P a r k .
'Oh?'
' T h e Disciplinary Council has received a complaint.'
I t o o k the e n v e l o p e a n d read the letter. It a c c u s e d me of
b r i n g i n g my p r o f e s s i o n and the broad church of neuroscience into
disrepute (the s a m e p h r a s e ) o n a c c o u n t o f m y anti-scientific
posture and espousal of Mysterian philosophy.
' D o e s this constitute a c h a r g e of s o m e k i n d ? ' I a s k e d .
' N o , ' s a i d C o l l i c u l a , 'but there are p r o c e d u r e s . '
' A m I to be c h a r g e d ? '
' T h a t ' s a matter for the I n v e s t i g a t o r y P a n e l . T h e y will first
consider y o u r r e s p o n s e . '
T h r e e s o l e m n f i g u r e s entered the r o o m .
'Now?' I s a i d .
' Y e s , i f y o u are willing.'
I t w a s hard t o tell w h o w a s s p e a k i n g . T h e three w e r e s e a t e d
in s h a d o w s o m e distance away. T h e n the m a n on the left —
N u m b e r 1 — d r e w a c a n d l e to h i m a n d started to r e a d f r o m a file.
I r e c o g n i z e d my o w n w o r d s : My area of supposed expertise,
neuropsychology, is the subject about which I feel the most profound
ignorance.

H e l o o k e d u p from the f i l e . ' I g n o r a n c e ? '

' P r o f o u n d i g n o r a n c e , ' I confirmed.
' I f I w e r e a patient of y o u r s , w o u l d I be c o m f o r t e d to hear
your proclamations of ignorance?'

133
PAUL B R O K S

' P r o f e s s i o n a l s s h o u l d a c k n o w l e d g e their limitations,' I s a i d .

T h e candle passed to N u m b e r 2, a w o m a n . She began reading
f r o m her file. My w o r d s a g a i n : I find myself edging towards a
doubt that it means anything at all to say that the brain generates
consciousness.

T h e r e w a s a l o n g p a u s e which, p e r h a p s , I w a s expected to fill.

'You are a professional neuropsychologist?'
'Yes.'
' H a v e y o u e v e r b e e n certified i n s a n e ? '
N u m b e r 3 w a s a m a n : Far from being the Holy Grail of neuro-
science, the search for consciousness within the circuitry of an
individual brain can lead only to fool's gold.
H e w a s direct. ' Y o u b e l i e v e that the relationship between
m i n d a n d matter is u n f a t h o m a b l e . In other w o r d s , y o u are a
Mysterian.'
' N o . I wouldn't be so bold.'
' A n d yet y o u find c o m f o r t in M y s t e r i a n i s m . '
'I am a clinician. I h a v e it i n g r a i n e d in me that s o m e p r o b l e m s
h a v e no s o l u t i o n a n d that there are times w h e n it is w i s e to
a c c e p t the fact. A s W i t t g e n s t e i n s a i d , the p h i l o s o p h e r ' s treat-
m e n t of a q u e s t i o n is like the treatment of an illness. But if the
d i s e a s e is i n c u r a b l e , then so be it. I ' m c o m f o r t a b l e with the idea
of not h a v i n g s o l u t i o n s to e v e r y p r o b l e m . I g u e s s t h e r e ' s a l s o a
part o f m e that likes m y s t e r y for m y s t e r y ' s s a k e . O m n i s c i e n c e
w o u l d b e insufferably t e d i o u s . '

' A n d as far as c o n s c i o u s n e s s is c o n c e r n e d , the d i s e a s e is

incurable?'
' C o u l d b e . I d o n ' t k n o w . I ' m indifferent to the m i n d - b o d y
p r o b l e m . ' T h i s w a s n o t true; o r rather i t w a s not the w h o l e truth.

134
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

' B u t d o y o u , o r d o n ' t y o u , b e l i e v e that n e u r o s c i e n c e can find

the s o l u t i o n ? '
' I ' m not s u r e n e u r o s c i e n c e h a s e v e n found the p r o b l e m , ' I
s a i d . ' T h e fly is still stuck in the b o t t l e . '
C o l l i c u l a offered m e a g l a s s o f w i n e . ' W h a t d o y o u b e l i e v e ? '
she asked.
' N o t h i n g , ' I replied. ' S o m e t i m e s I w o n d e r " H o w d o e s m e a t
b e c o m e m i n d ? " and i t s e e m s a b s u r d . '
'Indeed.'
' T h e n , other times, I s e e it as a p s e u d o - p r o b l e m , a screen of
c o n f u s i o n . . . ' — I realized we w e r e sitting at a table, e a t i n g dinner.
I had food in my m o u t h . I c h e w e d and s w a l l o w e d b e f o r e finish-
i n g the sentence — ' . . . behind which there i s a n e m p t y s p a c e . '

T h e food w a s g o o d . T h e w i n e w a s g o o d . C o l l i c u l a , I n o w
noticed, w a s n a k e d . S o w a s I a n d , b e f o r e l o n g , w e w e r e m a k i n g
love; she writhed w a r m l y b e n e a t h m e o n the g l a s s y f l o o r . T h e r e
w a s a n a q u a r i u m b e l o w with s h a r k s g l i d i n g and s m a l l e r f i s h e s
darting. How do I know this isn't a dream? I w o n d e r e d .

N o w I w a s s t a n d i n g , n a k e d , b e f o r e the three s o l e m n figures.

I s e e m e d to be g i v i n g a presentation. I l o o k e d at N u m b e r 1 a n d
said: ' S o m e p e o p l e b e l i e v e that the u n i v e r s e and e v e r y t h i n g in it,
including h u m a n m i n d s , i s m a d e o f physical stuff.'
'Materialism,' he s a i d .
I turned to N u m b e r 2: ' T h e o p p o s i t e v i e w is that reality is
non-material; physical objects a n d events are m a n i f e s t a t i o n s o f
mental a c t i v i t y '
' I d e a l i s m , ' she s a i d .
' T h e y b e l i e v e the physical w o r l d is a figment. T h e u n i v e r s e
exists entirely on a mental or spiritual p l a n e . '

135
PAUL B R O K S

'Hmm.'
' S o m e v e r s i o n s o f i d e a l i s m d o n ' t d e n y the physical w o r l d ,
b u t s a y w e c a n ' t h a v e direct k n o w l e d g e o f it. O b j e c t s and events
a r e mental c o n s t r u c t i o n s b e c a u s e they c o m e to life o n l y in the
a r e n a o f the m i n d . '
' T h e u n o b s e r v e d tree falling i n the forest m a k e s n o s o u n d ? '

' Y e s . A n d there are n o g r e e n l e a v e s o n the b r a n c h e s o r d a p -

p l e d s u n l i g h t o n the forest f l o o r . T h e c r e a k i n g , c r a s h i n g s o u n d s
o f a falling tree, the i m a g e o f l e a v e s a n d g r e e n n e s s , a n d notions
o f s u n l i g h t a n d d a p p l i n g are all c o n s t r u c t i o n s o f the m i n d . '

N u m b e r 3 w a s a b o u t to s p e a k , but I cut h i m short. I h a d to

p r e s s o n : ' T h e third o p t i o n i s d u a l i s m . D u a l i s t s b e l i e v e that the
w o r l d i s c o m p o s e d o f b o t h p h y s i c a l a n d mental stuff.'
' D u a l i s m is d e a d in the water,' s a i d N u m b e r 1. ' M o d e r n
s c i e n c e h a s n o p l a c e for d u a l i s m . '

' B u t intuitively it feels right,' I a d d e d . ' E v e n to materialists

a n d i d e a l i s t s w h o reject the i d e a intellectually. E v e n t o y o u ,
perhaps.' He did not dissent. ' E v e r y normal person believes
they h a v e a b o d y a n d m o s t tend to think there is m o r e to them
than that. T h e y feel they h a v e mental qualities distinct from
their flesh-and-blood physical apparatus. Many people -
p r o b a b l y m o s t — b e l i e v e they h a v e s o u l s that will s u r v i v e the
d e a t h o f the b o d y . '

'I h o p e y o u are n o t g o i n g to defend a b e l i e f in s o u l s and

spirits,' s a i d N u m b e r 2 .
' C e r t a i n l y not.'
Number 1 r e t u r n e d to his earlier q u e s t i o n : ' A r e y o u a
Mysterian?'
'No.'

136
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

' T h e n y o u accept that science will s o l v e the p u z z l e o f c o n -

s c i o u s n e s s ; it is m e r e l y a matter of t i m e ? '

'And research funding,' interjected N u m b e r 3, to the a m u s e -

ment of the others.
' N o , ' I said.
N u m b e r 2 told me I w a s c o n f u s e d . N u m b e r 1 w o n d e r e d
whether I had m i s h e a r d his q u e s t i o n s . I told h i m I ' d h e a r d
him perfectly well but that, with respect, his q u e s t i o n s w e r e s i m -
plistic.

I k n e w what I w a n t e d to say. I w a n t e d to s a y s o m e t h i n g a b o u t
the p r o b l e m o f c o n s c i o u s n e s s b e i n g built into s c i e n c e itself, b u t
I hadn't thought i t t h r o u g h a n d , s u d d e n l y a w a r e o f m y n a k e d -
ness, w a s l o s i n g the thread o f m y a r g u m e n t .

' L e t ' s go back to Descartes,' I said, as much to myself as to

the others. I w a s l o o k i n g for a w a y t h r o u g h .
'Must w e ? ' T h i s w a s N u m b e r 2.
' Y e s we m u s t , ' I s a i d . ' W e m u s t . '
I s t r o d e o v e r to w h e r e the three w e r e s e a t e d , leaned f o r w a r d ,
and rested my e l b o w s on the table directly in front of N u m b e r 2.
' H e has a lot to a n s w e r for.' S h e s m i l e d , rather sweetly I t h o u g h t .
I reminded them that the m i n d - b o d y p r o b l e m , the b e a s t we
g r a p p l e with today, is a l e g a c y of the dualist i d e a s f o r m u l a t e d
b y R e n e D e s c a r t e s i n the seventeenth century. H e w a s not the
first p h i l o s o p h e r to d i s t i n g u i s h b e t w e e n m i n d a n d b o d y , b u t he
crystallized that distinction and so set the t e r m s of all s u b s e -
quent d e b a t e a b o u t their relationship. In the p r o c e s s he r e l e a s e d
a p a c k o f t r o u b l e s o m e d i c h o t o m i e s into the W e s t e r n w a y o f
thinking: m i n d v e r s u s matter; subjective v e r s u s o b j e c t i v e ;
observer versus observed.

137
PAUL B R O K S

' Y o u c a n ' t b l a m e it all on D e s c a r t e s , ' said N u m b e r 3.

' O f c o u r s e not,' I s a i d . ' D u a l i s t i c thinking runs t h r o u g h
e v e r y m a j o r r e l i g i o n - they all p r o m o t e the fallacious idea that
b o d y a n d s o u l are s e p a r a t e entities.'
N u m b e r 1 p o i n t e d o u t , correctly, that the i d e a a l m o s t cer-
tainly p r e d a t e s o r g a n i z e d r e l i g i o n b y m a n y t h o u s a n d s o f y e a r s .
He s a i d it w e n t b a c k to the d a w n of h u m a n history. I a g r e e d . In
fact, I b e l i e v e d it w a s p a r t of o u r b i o l o g i c a l m a k e - u p . I said that,
quite p r o b a b l y , w e w e r e innately p r e d i s p o s e d t o think i n t e r m s
o f the s e p a r a t i o n o f m i n d s a n d b o d i e s . T h e idea w a s built into
the h a r d w a r e o f the h u m a n central n e r v o u s s y s t e m .

E v o l u t i o n h a s e n d o w e d u s with b r a i n s that are naturally

inclined t o certain w a y s o f thinking a b o u t p e o p l e , especially
w h e n it c o m e s to interpreting their mental states. It w a s a c o n s e -
q u e n c e o f l i v i n g i n c o m p l e x social g r o u p s , a n d a b y - p r o d u c t o f
the e v o l u t i o n o f l a n g u a g e . W e continually, a n d effortlessly, p i c -
ture e a c h o t h e r ' s t h o u g h t s a n d intentions. W e f o r m a s s e s s m e n t s
of w h a t p e o p l e ' h a v e in m i n d ' - p r e s u p p o s i n g that there are
s u c h t h i n g s a s m i n d s . W e are all m i n d - r e a d e r s . A n d the s a m e
mental m a c h i n e r y e n a b l e s u s t o f o r m a n i d e a o f o u r s e l v e s a s
unified a n d c o n t i n u o u s b e i n g s - to m a k e s e n s e of what is g o i n g
o n with r e g a r d t o o u r o w n mental states. P e o p l e with i m p o v e r -
i s h e d m i n d - r e a d i n g skills ( s u c h as autistic p e o p l e ) , or with rich
b u t unreliable interpretations o f their o w n a n d o t h e r s ' mental
activities (like s c h i z o p h r e n i c s ) are s e v e r e l y d i s a d v a n t a g e d .

W h a t D e s c a r t e s d i d , in effect, w a s to take this primordial

intuition — the s e p a r a t e n e s s of b o d y a n d m i n d — and b u i l d a
s y s t e m o f p h i l o s o p h y a r o u n d it. A n d the i d e a s h e formulated
h a v e b e c o m e i n g r a i n e d i n o u r w a y o f thinking. H i s d i v i s i o n o f

138
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

mind and matter, and the d e m a r c a t i o n of s u b j e c t i v e a n d o b j e c -

tive r e a l m s o f k n o w l e d g e , laid the f o u n d a t i o n s o f the m o d e r n
scientific a g e .
T h e m i n d - b o d y p r o b l e m and science itself s t e m f r o m the
s a m e split in the fabric of reality. T h i s creates fundamental
p r o b l e m s for a science of c o n s c i o u s n e s s . S c i e n c e p r o c e e d s by
systematic o b s e r v a t i o n a n d e x p e r i m e n t a t i o n . T h e w h o l e p o i n t
is to p r o v i d e factual, p u b l i c , k n o w l e d g e a b o u t the w o r l d as it is,
independent o f p e r s o n a l feelings and o p i n i o n s , s t r i p p e d o f s u b -
jectivity — in other w o r d s , to p r o v i d e objective knowledge. B u t
c o n s c i o u s n e s s , in e s s e n c e , is s u b j e c t i v e a n d p r i v a t e . I can i m a g -
ine y o u r experiences, b u t I d o n ' t h a v e t h e m , a n d y o u c a n n e v e r
have mine. E x p e r i e n c e is a first-person b u s i n e s s . S c i e n c e o p e r -
ates in the third p e r s o n .

' S o , ' I s a i d , ' c o n s c i o u s n e s s p o s e s a f o r b i d d i n g c h a l l e n g e for

science. W h a t m a k e s science s t r o n g a s a m e a n s o f u n d e r s t a n d -
ing the outer, material w o r l d — o b j e c t i v e , t h i r d - p e r s o n o b s e r -
vation — is precisely w h a t m a k e s it ineffectual w h e n it c o m e s to
u n d e r s t a n d i n g the "inner w o r l d " o f c o n s c i o u s n e s s . '

' W e can s t u d y b r a i n states a n d functions,' said N u m b e r 3.

' S i m p l y r e c o g n i z e that brain activity a n d c o n s c i o u s n e s s a r e o n e
and the s a m e thing and the p r o b l e m g o e s a w a y . '
' S o m e t i m e s I s e e it that w a y , a n d s o m e t i m e s I d o n ' t . '
'Because you can't make up your m i n d ? '
' N o , b e c a u s e t h e r e ' s m o r e than o n e w a y o f s e e i n g . I a g r e e that
every c o n s c i o u s mental event, each and e v e r y t h o u g h t a n d e m o -
tion, is g r o u n d e d in s o m e physical state of the brain. B u t there
are objective, third-person descriptions of the b r a i n a n d its func-
tions; and then there are subjective, first-person e x p e r i e n c e s . '

139
PAUL B R O K S

' A n d n e v e r the twain shall m e e t ? I s that w h a t y o u ' r e s a y i n g ? '

' W h a t I think I ' m s a y i n g is that p h e n o m e n a l c o n s c i o u s n e s s -
the r a w feel of e x p e r i e n c e — is invisible to conventional scientific
scrutiny a n d will forever r e m a i n s o . It is, by definition, s u b -
jective — w h e r e a s s c i e n c e , by definition, a d o p t s an objective
s t a n c e . Y o u c a n ' t b e i n t w o p l a c e s a t o n c e . Y o u either experience
c o n s c i o u s n e s s " f r o m the i n s i d e " ( a p a n g o f hunger, the blueness
of the sky, the chill of an a u t u m n b r e e z e , sunlight d a p p l i n g the
forest floor) or y o u v i e w it " f r o m the o u t s i d e " ( v a r i o u s configu-
r a t i o n s o f neural activity a n d p a t t e r n s o f b e h a v i o u r associated
with different b o d i l y states a n d c o n d i t i o n s in the external envi-
r o n m e n t ) . S c i e n c e c a n s t u d y the neural activity, the b o d i l y
states, the e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o n d i t i o n s , and the o u t w a r d b e h a v -
i o u r s — i n c l u d i n g v e r b a l b e h a v i o u r s that stand for different
states o f a w a r e n e s s ( " T h a t h u r t s " ; " T h i s tastes like c h o c o l a t e " ;
" M y heart l e a p s up w h e n I b e h o l d / A r a i n b o w in the s k y . . . " ) ,
b u t the quality — the feel — of o u r e x p e r i e n c e s remains forever
p r i v a t e a n d therefore o u t of b o u n d s to scientific a n a l y s i s . I can't
s e e a w a y r o u n d this. P r i v a t e n e s s is a fundamental constituent of
consciousness.'

N u m b e r 2 s i g h e d wearily. S u d d e n l y , and uncharacteristically,

I felt a s u r g e of anger.
' A n d d o n ' t try to define it a w a y ! ' I s h o u t e d . ' D o n ' t tell me
c o n s c i o u s n e s s s i m p l y d o e s n ' t exist in the material u n i v e r s e —
that there is just the b r a i n a n d its functions — b e c a u s e , from
w h e r e I stand, it fucking d o e s ! A n d , u n l e s s y o u ' r e a z o m b i e or a
r o o t v e g e t a b l e , it d o e s for y o u , t o o . '

I instantly r e g r e t t e d m y o u t b u r s t . A w a r e a g a i n o f m y n a k e d -
n e s s , I felt r i d i c u l o u s . ( N e v e r g e t a n g r y with y o u r clothes off.)

140
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

B u t , I thought, that's p r e c i s e l y the point. From where I stand.

Only I occupy my position. Only you occupy yours.
' M i g h t there be a c o n v e r g e n c e of the s u b j e c t i v e a n d the
objective if we had a detailed k n o w l e d g e of o u r b r a i n states,
plus a m o r e refined technical v o c a b u l a r y to d e s c r i b e t h e m ? ' It
was Collicula speaking.
' N o , ' I s a i d . ' W o r d s w o r t h c o u l d recast the d e s c r i p t i o n of his
heart l e a p i n g up at the sight of a r a i n b o w in t e r m s of p h o t o n s of
refracted sunlight s t i m u l a t i n g the cells of his retina, in turn
g e n e r a t i n g specific patterns o f electrochemical activity t h r o u g h
his brain, in turn l e a d i n g to stimulation of the adrenal g l a n d , in
turn c a u s i n g a fluctuation in the rhythm of his heart. I am not
convinced this takes us a n y further. It is still " h i s " e y e , " h i s "
brain, and " h i s " heart that are the f o c u s o f interest, n o t t h o s e o f
K e a t s o r C o l e r i d g e . I t i s the v i e w from w h e r e h e s t a n d s . H e i s ,
essentially, irreducibly, d e s c r i b i n g a p e r s o n a l point of view, n o t
a pattern of neural s i g n a l s . '

'I fail to s e e the r e l e v a n c e of poetry,' s a i d N u m b e r 2. So I

q u o t e d another poet.
' R o b e r t F r o s t said that " P o e t r y is w h a t is lost in translation. It
is also what is lost in interpretation." L i k e w i s e , c o n s c i o u s n e s s is
lost in translating from first-person e x p e r i e n c e to t h i r d - p e r s o n
description of brain states. O n e can a c c e p t , as I d o , that all
p s y c h o l o g i c a l activity d e p e n d s o n n e u r o n a l activity, a n d o n e
can chart the neural s u b s t r a t e s of this or that p s y c h o l o g i c a l
p r o c e s s , but the p o e t r y of c o n s c i o u s n e s s h a s b e e n lost in the
interpretation.'

' B r a i n activity and c o n s c i o u s n e s s are o n e a n d the s a m e

thing,' said N u m b e r 3.

141
PAUL B R O K S

' Y e s , t h e r e ' s truth in that statement.'

' T h e r e f o r e , since n e u r o s c i e n c e is b e s t p l a c e d to describe the
w o r k i n g s of the b r a i n , it is clearly b e s t p l a c e d to g i v e an a c c o u n t
of consciousness?'
' N o . I t d o e s n ' t follow.'
'I d e s p a i r , ' s a i d N u m b e r 2 u n d e r her breath.
' S o m e p e o p l e h a v e a r g u e d that c o n s c i o u s n e s s i s d o u b l e
a s p e c t , ' I s a i d . 'It h a s an o b j e c t i v e a n d a subjective s i d e . It is
u n i q u e in that r e s p e c t a n d so can't be treated in quite the s a m e
w a y a s other natural p h e n o m e n a like c l o u d s o r flowers o r
p e b b l e s , w h i c h c a n be u n d e r s t o o d from a p u r e l y objective
s t a n d p o i n t . T h e r e is n o t h i n g mystical a b o u t subjective reality; it
is j u s t different f r o m the o b j e c t i v e , science-friendly variety. It is
just as real, j u s t as material, a n d h a s n o t h i n g to do with the kind
of i m m a t e r i a l mental stuff that D e s c a r t e s b e l i e v e d in. Mental
e v e n t s a r e b a s e d in p h y s i c a l events — the t w o coincide perfectly.
T h e s u b j e c t i v e a n d the o b j e c t i v e are different takes o n the s a m e
u n d e r l y i n g reality. B u t the subjective realm is out of b o u n d s to
science.'

' A r e these y o u r b e l i e f s ? ' N u m b e r 1 a s k e d .

C o m e to think of it, I really w a s n ' t s u r e , and the w o r d s
spilled o u t in the thinking: ' I ' m really not s u r e . '

' S o , w h a t d o y o u b e l i e v e ? ' C o l l i c u l a d e m a n d e d for a s e c o n d

time.
I w a s a b o u t to r e p e a t ' N o t h i n g ' , w h i c h w a s , in fact, as c l o s e to
the truth as a n y t h i n g else I m i g h t h a v e s a i d , but I d i d n ' t want
t h e m to think I w a s b e i n g p e r v e r s e ; a n d I d i d n ' t w a n t to be there
all night. So I t o o k the e a s y o p t i o n . I p l a y e d it straight d o w n the
line.

142
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

'I am a materialist,' I s a i d . 'I b e l i e v e that the w o r l d a n d e v e r y -

thing in it is m a d e of p h y s i c a l stuff a n d , w h a t e v e r the o r i g i n s of
the u n i v e r s e , we are a natural p r o d u c t of its material e v o l u t i o n :
sentience, intellect, e m o t i o n s , m o r a l c o d e s a n d all. A l l b e h a v -
iour and e x p e r i e n c e , all k n o w l e d g e a n d u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f the
w o r l d and o u r s e l v e s , d e p e n d u p o n the w o r k i n g s o f a p h y s i c a l
d e v i c e : the b r a i n . '

There was a murmur of approval.

' G o o d . P e r h a p s , after all, y o u are not a M y s t e r i a n . '
T h i s w a s a non sequitur. M y s t e r i a n i s m and m a t e r i a l i s m a r e
not mutually e x c l u s i v e . B u t I let it p a s s . P e r h a p s I w a s , p e r h a p s
I w a s n ' t . W h o c a r e s ? At a n y r a t e , the three figures s e e m e d
h a p p y with m y p r o n o u n c e m e n t . T h e y g a t h e r e d their p a p e r s a n d
w e r e g o n e ; oddly, t h o u g h , I d i d n ' t s e e them l e a v e .

T h a t c o u l d h a v e b e e n that; except n o w I found C o l l i c u l a sit-

ting astride m e , her face lit b y the j a d e w a t e r s o f the a q u a r i u m
below.
' W h a t d o y o u really b e l i e v e ? ' s h e a s k e d .
'I m e a n t w h a t I said a b o u t m a t e r i a l i s m , a n d I m e a n t w h a t
I said a b o u t subjective e x p e r i e n c e b e i n g b e y o n d the reach of
science. B u t , in truth, I really d o n ' t h a v e firm beliefs on the
matter. I l o o k at the m i n d - b o d y p r o b l e m o n e w a y a n d it s e e m s
to e v a p o r a t e . I l o o k at it another a n d I ' m tantalized.'

' P e r h a p s t h e r e ' s m o r e than o n e p r o b l e m , ' s h e s a i d . ' O r p e r -

h a p s y o u are m o r e than o n e p e r s o n . '

I w a s d e e p inside her n o w and c o u l d n ' t c a r e l e s s .

143
 THREE

No Water, No Moon
 The Ghost Tree ( l )

I drive a c r o s s t o w n to the infirmary. J a k e is on o n e of the

o r t h o p a e d i c w a r d s . T h e b e d s are p a c k e d i n r o w s a l o n g the w a l l s .
W h e n I arrive his wife is at his b e d s i d e . S h e l o o k s a b o u t s e v e n -
teen, a year or t w o y o u n g e r than J a k e . T h e r e is no talk b e t w e e n
them - a b u b b l e of silence. I get the i m p r e s s i o n there h a s b e e n
no conversation for s o m e time.

H e i s the i m a g e o f C h r i s t o n the C r o s s . M a t t e d curls o f b l a c k

hair d r o p over sunken c h e e k s . H i s forehead is b r u i s e d and
s c a b b e d w h e r e a c r o w n of t h o r n s m i g h t h a v e b e e n a n d a b e d
sheet, c r u m p l e d at his h o l l o w midriff, s e r v e s as a loincloth. H i s
lean, p a l e , u p p e r b o d y b e a r s other s c a r s o f the s m a s h : b r o a d
purple g r a z e s and y e l l o w i n g c o n t u s i o n s . B u t a t the b o t t o m o f
the b e d there i s n o t h i n g . T h e i m p l o d i n g metal o f the car s e v e r e d
o n e l e g a t the m o m e n t o f collision. T h e other, m a n g l e d b e y o n d
redemption, w a s s u r g i c a l l y r e m o v e d in the h o u r s that f o l l o w e d .
If he is a car thief, then J a k e h a s p a i d a h i g h p r i c e for his m i s -
d e m e a n o u r s . O n l y now, a s the b a n d a g e d s t u m p a p p e a r s from
under the sheet, do I notice that his right h a n d is a l s o m i s s i n g .

147
PAUL B R O K S

He g i v e s a h a n d l e s s w a v e to an old m a n in a wheelchair.
W h e n I p i c k up the m e d i c a l file from the n u r s i n g station the
c h a r g e n u r s e tells m e o f J a k e ' s disturbed b e h a v i o u r . Yesterday
he w a s incontinent a n d s m e a r e d his faeces into his w o u n d s . I am
n o t l o o k i n g f o r w a r d to this. I feel cowardly. I want to turn and
g o . B u t w h e n w e s p e a k h e i s perfectly pleasant. H e s e e m s c o m -
p o s e d , e v e n tranquil. H e puts m e a t m y e a s e . T h e pain i s
tolerable now, he tells m e . Y e s t e r d a y it d r o v e him m a d .

' W h e r e d o e s it h u r t ? ' I a s k .
' L e f t foot,' h e s a y s .
I run t h r o u g h s o m e routine q u e s t i o n s a b o u t levels of c o n -
s c i o u s n e s s a n d recall o f e v e n t s i n the h o u r s immediately
f o l l o w i n g the accident. J a k e can't r e m e m b e r .
' H e was c o n s c i o u s , ' s a y s the child b r i d e .
' H o w can y o u be so s u r e ? ' I ask.
S h e k n o w s b e c a u s e J a k e h a d activated the d i a l - h o m e function
on his m o b i l e p h o n e , p e r h a p s adventitiously as a result of the
i m p a c t o r i n a m o m e n t o f lucidity. T h e r e w a s n o o n e h o m e when
the p h o n e r a n g . T h e a n s w e r i n g m a c h i n e t o o k the m e s s a g e and
s t o r e d it until s h e returned next m o r n i n g from her night shift at
the filling station. J a k e w a s calling for her, w a i l i n g like a baby.

I do my stuff a n d l e a v e . I ' v e h a d e n o u g h . It is only four in the

afternoon a n d I ' m d u e to attend a m e e t i n g later o n , but I p h o n e
in with an e x c u s e a n d h e a d for h o m e .
It is a s u m m e r ' s e v e n i n g , g r e y and o v e r c a s t , perfectly still
e x c e p t for a tiny p l a n e d r o n i n g t h r o u g h l o w c l o u d , in and out of
visibility. There are people in there, I think, b u t o n l y with an effort
o f i m a g i n a t i o n . F r o m this d i s t a n c e , w h o w o u l d care i f i t fell
f r o m the s k y ?

148
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

I am sitting out in the g a r d e n a n d I m u s t h a v e d o z e d o f f

b e c a u s e the student dissertation I w a s r e a d i n g h a s fallen to the
g r o u n d , face d o w n . M y coffee i s s t o n e c o l d . E v i d e n t l y , I ' v e b e e n
asleep for s o m e time.
I pick up the dissertation, which o p e n s at a p a g e c o n t a i n i n g
i m a g e s of a series of b r a i n s c a n s . I k n o w the p e r s o n w h o s e b r a i n
this is. MJ17 says the c a p t i o n , p r e s e r v i n g a n o n y m i t y , b u t I k n o w
her as M a g g i e . S h e is o n e of my research patients. I recall the last
time I s a w her. It m u s t be a c o u p l e of m o n t h s a g o . S h e g r e e t e d
m e , a s usual, like a n o l d friend, t a k i n g b o t h o f m y h a n d s i n h e r s
and g r i p p i n g them w a r m l y for a g o o d m i n u t e . S h e t o o k m y a r m
a s w e walked d o w n the h a l l w a y a n d into her l i v i n g r o o m . T h e n ,
while I ' m e x c h a n g i n g pleasantries with her h u s b a n d , D o n ,
M a g g i e touches m y cheek. S h e really h a s n o i d e a w h o I a m . H e r
m e m o r y is a v o i d . T h i s , and the lack of inhibition, is a result of
the disfigurement of her b r a i n .

T h e r e are b l a d e s o f g r a s s o n the p a g e f r o m the freshly m o w n

lawn and the pictures of the b r a i n h a v e a kind of v e g e t a b l e
quality. Figure 1, I read, Coronal T1-weighted magnetic resonance
images through the amygdaloid complex and hippocampal regions.
I a m l o o k i n g inside M a g g i e ' s h e a d . S h e w a s p r o b a b l y h u m m i n g
a tune to herself as these pictures w e r e b e i n g taken. W h e n s h e is
not talking she i s h u m m i n g o r s i n g i n g . D o n d o e s n ' t c o m p l a i n .

T h e pictures are m o s t l y grey. D e n s e material, like b o n e ,

s h o w s u p white. D a r k e r r e g i o n s signify l o w e r d e n s i t y : the b l a c k
butterfly of the lateral ventricles, filled with fluid rather than
brain tissue; the s h a d o w y r e c e s s e s o f the outer c o n v o l u t i o n s .
L i k e a cauliflower. L a r g e a r e a s of the anterior t e m p o r a l l o b e s
have b e e n eaten a w a y b y the v i r u s . T h e s e , too, s h o w a s b l a c k .

149
PAUL B R O K S

M a g g i e w a s unlucky. T h e b u g — h e r p e s simplex — is v e r y like the

c o m m o n c o l d s o r e v i r u s , but it found a w a y into her brain. T h e n
a g a i n , s h e ' s lucky, t o o . L u c k y t o h a v e s u r v i v e d . D o n thinks so.
W h o am I to say she isn't?
Little white a r r o w s h a v e b e e n s u p e r i m p o s e d o n either side o f
each picture t o identify the r e g i o n s o f d a r k s p a c e n o r m a l l y
o c c u p i e d b y the a m y g d a l a a n d the h i p p o c a m p u s : the a l m o n d
a n d the s e a h o r s e , vital c o m p o n e n t s o f the machineries o f
m e m o r y a n d e m o t i o n . T h e i r l o s s i s w h a t m a k e s M a g g i e inter-
e s t i n g for s c i e n c e .

As a clinician I h a v e a d u t y to be scientifically informed and

inquisitive. S o m e o n e sits b e f o r e me in the clinic. T h e y h a v e a
fault with their neural m a c h i n e r y a n d I n e e d to appreciate its
characteristics. T h e y s p e a k of s y m p t o m s , I listen and l o o k for
s i g n s . I h y p o t h e s i z e . I test a n d d e d u c e . I refer, as n e e d s b e , to the
scientific literature. B u t I fail if, as part of this p r o c e s s , I do not
a l s o e n g a g e with the patient in an ordinary, h u m a n way. O n e has
t o a b s o r b s o m e o n e ' s p e r s o n a l c o n c e r n s t o understand their
p r e d i c a m e n t . It is, after all, the person w h o is ill, not the neural
machine.

T h i s a f t e r n o o n , with J a k e , I h a d found it difficult to maintain

the n e c e s s a r y b a l a n c e b e t w e e n d e t a c h m e n t and a b s o r p t i o n . D i s -
p a s s i o n a t e a n a l y s i s h a d g i v e n w a y t o e m o t i o n a l synthesis. T h e
mutilated y o u n g m a n with the p h a n t o m limb, his calm civility,
the d e v o t i o n o f his y o u n g w i f e , the cutting d e s p e r a t i o n o f the
m e s s a g e on the a n s w e r i n g m a c h i n e : it w a s t o o potent a mix and
I w a s caught off-guard.

A n d n o w I s e e k s a n c t u a r y in the s o l i t u d e of my g a r d e n and a
retreat into sleep, s c i e n c e , a n d abstraction — the dissertation: the

150
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

s o o t h i n g i c o n s of a b u g - e a t e n b r a i n . I t ' s an effective r e m e d y .
H o w c o m f o r t i n g t o l o s e sight o f M a g g i e a n d c o n t e m p l a t e
instead M J 1 7 .

It is g e t t i n g d a r k now. T h e c l o u d s h a v e thinned a n d a c r e s c e n t
m o o n i s visible. A t the b o t t o m o f the g a r d e n there i s a n a p p l e
tree. It l o o k s tired a n d forlorn. T h i s , instantly, is h o w I s e e it. It
is an old tree, b e a r i n g fruit for the last t i m e . I s e e n o t just the
f a d i n g s h a p e of the trunk, the t w i s t i n g b r a n c h e s , the l e a v e s
d a r k e n i n g in the g l o o m and the p a l e , h a l f - g r o w n a p p l e s ; I s e e
the a g e of the tree a n d its w e a r i n e s s . I h a v e in m i n d the s h a r p
taste o f the fruit. T h i s i s h o w i t a p p e a r s t o m e . A n d h o w d o I
k n o w it is b e a r i n g fruit for the last time? B e c a u s e I realize it is
not there at all. My b r a i n h a s c o n s p i r e d with the failing light to
conjure a fleeting illusion of the tree f r o m m e m o r i e s of similar
g r e y e v e n i n g s a y e a r a g o , b e f o r e it w a s felled by a F e b r u a r y g a l e .
It is a g h o s t tree, r o o t e d o n l y in t h o u g h t .

* * *

I am in a church. It w a s o n c e a church, a n y w a y . N o w i t ' s a u n i -

versity b u i l d i n g . I ' m here for a s y m p o s i u m a n d p e o p l e are
milling a r o u n d drinking coffee b e f o r e the final m o r n i n g s e s s i o n .
I keep an eye on the time b e c a u s e I ' m p r e s e n t i n g a p a p e r .

T h e p r o g r a m m e h a s reunited m e with t w o c o l l e a g u e s from

my p o s t g r a d u a t e d a y s . I h a v e n ' t s e e n t h e m for twenty y e a r s . We
stand in a triangle. M u n d a n e facts of b i o g r a p h y s l o t t o g e t h e r as
p l a n k s in the c o n v e r s a t i o n a l p l a t f o r m . We all h a v e w i v e s , a n d
children, a n d d o g s . R i c k affects e m b a r r a s s m e n t . So b o u r g e o i s .
W h y h a v e n ' t w e h a d m o r e interesting l i v e s ?

151
PAUL B R O K S

' Y o u d o n ' t like c o m m i t m e n t , y o u g e t m a r r i e d . Y o u d o n ' t

w a n t k i d s , they take o v e r y o u r life. Y o u g e t a d o g , y o u ' r e forever
s c o o p i n g shit into plastic b a g s . '
S t e v e a n d I concur, but we d o n ' t m e a n it either.
S t e v e h a s b e e n in the U n i t e d S t a t e s for ten y e a r s and his voice
f o l l o w s m i d - A t l a n t i c c o n t o u r s . ' I g u e s s the m y t h o f romantic
l o v e is w h e r e the rot sets in,' he s a y s , ' i f y o u let it.' L i f e and rela-
t i o n s h i p s are m o r e r a n d o m than we think but, in the end, m o s t
of us fall into a pattern. With w h o m , it d o e s n ' t m u c h matter. I t ' s
the pattern that c o u n t s . ' I f y o u d o n ' t relinquish the myth, y o u ' r e
b o u n d to be d i s a p p o i n t e d . B u t if y o u d o n ' t b e l i e v e it in the first
place...'

I c l i m b the spiral s t a i r w a y to the u p p e r lecture theatre. T h e

sun-filled, s t a i n e d - g l a s s w i n d o w s e n d s c u r v e s o f p u r p l e , yellow,
a n d red a l o n g the steel handrails. T h e hall itself is c o o l and
d a r k . I t f i l l s the h i g h e r r e a c h e s o f the n a v e . M y audience trickles
in. T h e r e aren't m a n y a n d they scatter a b o u t the p l a c e like a
congregation.

With a click of the m o u s e , a q u o t a t i o n rolls a c r o s s the screen

b e h i n d m e : We should take care not to make the intellect our god.
It has, of course, powerful muscles, hut no personality. T h a t w a s
E i n s t e i n . It sets the tone of my talk, which is a b o u t h o w the
b r a i n g e n e r a t e s e m o t i o n s a n d h o w e m o t i o n s regulate social
behaviour.

T h e r e are structures for a n a l y s i n g the g e o m e t r y o f the face,

a n d o t h e r s for interpreting the m e a n i n g o f e x p r e s s i o n s . T h e s e
feed into s y s t e m s for d e c o d i n g p e o p l e ' s intentions and d i s p o s i -
tions, c a l c u l a t i n g their d e s i r e s a n d beliefs. T h e n there are
m e c h a n i s m s for s e l e c t i n g p r o g r a m s o f action, for shifting g e a r

152
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

and m a n o e u v r i n g the v e h i c l e o f the ' s e l f ' t h r o u g h the s o c i a l

landscape.
T h e a m y g d a l a is a crucial c o m p o n e n t of the s o c i a l b r a i n . It
acts as a control centre linking h i g h e r cortical p r o c e s s e s , i n c l u d -
i n g rational t h o u g h t , to the m o r e ancient e m o t i o n a l m a c h i n e r i e s
lower d o w n . In particular, it is b e l i e v e d to be i n v o l v e d in the
p r o d u c t i o n o f fear and anger.

O n the screen n o w i s a l a r g e , m o v i n g , t a l k i n g , g e s t u r i n g
i m a g e o f M a g g i e ( a k a M J 1 7 ) . S h e i s h a v i n g a g o o d l a u g h with a
research assistant. T w o g i r l s together. I t ' s M a g g i e b a c k i n her
twenties telling r i s q u e stories a b o u t her b o s s . He w a s a one.
S o m e w h e r e , o f f - c a m e r a , D o n ' s g e n t l e v o i c e c o a x e s her b a c k o n
t o safer g r o u n d . H e d o e s n ' t w a n t t o c a u s e e m b a r r a s s m e n t . I ' v e
set the v i d e o in the w r o n g p l a c e . I intended to s h o w M a g g i e a n d
D o n talking a b o u t their S p a n i s h holiday. B u t a t least the a u d i -
ence can see she is not a c a b b a g e . S h e is u p b e a t a n d a n i m a t e d ,
e a g e r for c o m p a n y . I'll h a v e to tell the s t o r y m y s e l f .

T h e y ' d b e e n o u t for a m e a l . T h e t w o b o y s l e a p t f r o m
nowhere. T h e r e was shouting and pushing. T h e y g r a b b e d
Maggie. D o n w a s thrown back against a wall. O n e hand gripped
his throat, the other t o o k his wallet. B u t D o n i s a b i g m a n . H e
fought b a c k . H e g a v e the b o y a p o u n d i n g . A n d all the t i m e , with
D o n ' s a m y g d a l a e trilling like fire b e l l s , j o l t i n g his b o d y f r o m
visceral fear to t h r a s h i n g , m e c h a n i c a l a n g e r , p u p i l s d i l a t e d , c a r -
d i o v a s c u l a r s y s t e m i n o v e r d r i v e , b l o o d d r a i n i n g from g u t t o
straining m u s c l e s , fists like h a m m e r s - all the t i m e M a g g i e
smiles benignly. T h e fluid-filled s p a c e s i n her h e a d w h e r e the
a m y g d a l a e u s e d t o nestle are p o o l s o f tranquillity.

B a c k a t the hotel, D o n w a s still s h a k i n g . M a g g i e c o u l d n ' t

153
PAUL B R O K S

f a t h o m it. S h e t h o u g h t the b o y s w e r e just larking a r o u n d .

S o far, s o g o o d . N o a m y g d a l a , n o fear. I t ' s a nice a n e c d o t e t o

c o l o u r the s t a n d a r d e x p l a n a t i o n o f fear p r o d u c t i o n : the cortex
p e r c e i v e s , the a m y g d a l a interprets a n d t r i g g e r s a r e s p o n s e . But
then, b a c k h o m e , M a g g i e sits w a t c h i n g T V . I t ' s a s o a p o p e r a .
T h e r e ' s a s p a r k o f a g g r e s s i o n b e t w e e n t w o female characters,
n o t h i n g e x t r e m e or o u t of the ordinary. It g e t s to her, t h o u g h ,
e n o u g h to s w i p e her b r e a t h , a n d start her heart t h u m p i n g .
' N o , d o n ' t , ' s h e s a y s . ' P l e a s e , no!'

F e a r rises until the flesh of her face is pulled taut in a rictus of

terror. T h e a n e c d o t e n o w b e c o m e s a w i n d o w o f insight into the
true functions o f the a m y g d a l a . A t a n y rate, that's the w a y I
p r e s e n t it. E v i d e n t l y , fear can be t r i g g e r e d without involvement
o f the a m y g d a l a . Its function i s t o p e r f o r m a p p r a i s a l s o f danger.
M a g g i e , m i n u s a m y g d a l a , is o b l i v i o u s to the real threat of the
m u g g i n g , but s h o w s e x c e s s i v e fear i n r e s p o n s e t o a n i n n o c u o u s
T V programme.

' I n t e r e s t i n g , ' s o m e o n e s a y s , 'but o n l y a n e c d o t a l . '

I h a v e to a g r e e . B u t I ' m all for a n e c d o t e s .
In his presentation S t e v e talks about his d o g . He g r a n t s the
animal a r u d i m e n t a r y s e n s o r y a w a r e n e s s , but nothing like human
c o n s c i o u s n e s s . H i s wife and kids d i s a g r e e . T h e y value emotion
o v e r intellect. T h e y are convinced the d o g h a s feelings — primi-
tive and unarticulated but, at root, like o u r s . W h a t perplexes
S t e v e is that he can't help b e h a v i n g as if he believes this too.

' I g u e s s i t ' s m y social b r a i n , ' h e s a y s .

' I t ' s a s i g n that y o u ' r e h u m a n , ' I tell h i m .

* * *

154
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

M a g g i e ' s story a p p e a r e d in an article I w r o t e for a m a g a z i n e .

T h e m u g g i n g a n e c d o t e can a l s o b e found i n the d i s c u s s i o n s e c -
tion of a scientific p a p e r I c o - a u t h o r e d a few y e a r s a g o , w h e r e
M a g g i e is referred to as ' Y W ' . A l t h o u g h I think it g i v e s an
insight into the functions of the a m y g d a l a , as my critic in the
audience s a i d , the e v i d e n c e is o n l y a n e c d o t a l . B u t e v i d e n c e like
this w o u l d be hard to c o m e by experimentally, for practical a n d
ethical r e a s o n s . Clinical a n e c d o t e s are n o t o n l y an i n v a l u a b l e
s o u r c e o f inspiration for m o r e s y s t e m a t i c theoretical a n d e x p e r i -
mental studies, they are s o m e t i m e s i m p o r t a n t in their o w n right.

Shortly after the s t o r y a p p e a r e d in the m a g a z i n e I r e c e i v e d a

letter from a reader w h o , like M a g g i e , h a d quite recently suf-
fered herpes s i m p l e x encephalitis. I'll call h i m A n t h o n y . It w a s a
remarkable letter. With A n t h o n y ' s p e r m i s s i o n , here are s o m e
extracts:

I continue to experience the two effects that you write about.

I have both the reduced sense of personal danger, and the
physical reaction to argument or conflict. On the one hand I
have become a risk-taker, e.g. dangerous jay-walking (and I
had a period of shoplifting), while on the other hand, I have to
leave a room (escape) if anyone raises their voice, even mildly.
I no longer watch TV because I cannot stand the 'tension' that
stories create . . .

Anthony's combination of 'fearlessness' (or 'recklessness')

on the o n e h a n d , and o v e r - s e n s i t i v i t y to m i l d conflict a n d d r a -
matic tension o n the other clearly r e s e m b l e s s o m e features o f
M a g g i e ' s b e h a v i o u r . Q u i t e likely there is a d e g r e e of o v e r l a p in

155
PAUL B R O K S

their patterns of brain pathology. This would not be surprising

since herpes simplex has a predilection for certain areas of the
brain (the temporal and orbitofrontal regions in particular). But
what distinguishes Anthony's account is how insightful and
articulate it is. Maggie would have had difficulty expressing her
thoughts in this way.
Then he went on to describe somewhat different symptoms
of a kind I hadn't come across before.

Thankfully, some earlier symptoms that directly linked words

and emotions have subsided. I used to 'feel' words. Whenever I
heard or spoke a word or phrase indicating a physical state, I
would automatically feel the state as well. So I know exactly what
is meant by 'gut-wrenching' or 'toe-curling'. It was very discon-
certing whenever people asked me whether I ever felt sad or hurt
or afraid. Not only had I felt these things - who wouldn't when a
virus starts invading your brain! — but I felt them equally
strongly every time I was asked.

A third set of symptoms concerned Anthony's ability to

communicate in face-to-face interactions with others. These
symptoms are reminiscent of those reported by people with
Asperger's syndrome or high-functioning autism. They are
intriguing in the light of current theories about the brain disor-
der that may underlie autism. A number of influential scientists
have implicated the amygdala.

I can no longer 'read between the lines' either, and I take

people's language literally - I get little clue from their

156
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

expressions. This can be hilarious, but is also very frustrating.

Luckily, I am currently living with Australian friends, who
value straight talking, so I have less trouble 'reading' them than
I do the typical contorted English relation between words and
feelings.

He elaborated on this in a subsequent communication:

Nowadays, finding it hard to distinguish levels of meaning

in people's words, I am very concerned that everything be
straight and true and meaningful - otherwise I do not under-
stand. Linked to this, I will tell anybody anything - what my
parents don't know about my previous sex life isn't worth
knowing!
. . . The virus ate my shame.

157
 The Ghost Tree (2)

C h a r l e s c o u l d hear the s u r g e o n s talking. O n e o f them w a s

a n g r y . T h e y w e r e g o i n g t o start cutting. T h e r e w e r e fingers a t
his a b d o m e n . N e x t , there w o u l d b e a knife. T h i s c o u l d n ' t b e . H e
m u s t tell them: Don't cut! I'm still awake! Please, not yet!

T h e w o r d s f o r m e d i n his b r a i n , b u t their p a s s a g e t o the v o c a l

a p p a r a t u s w a s b l o c k e d . H e lay m o t i o n l e s s a n d m u t e a s the b l a d e
sliced his f l e s h . T h e pain f l u n g him from his b o d y . L o o k i n g
d o w n on the s c e n e from the ceiling, he s a w that the a n g r y
s u r g e o n w a s still c o m p l a i n i n g a b o u t s o m e t h i n g . C h a r l e s felt
p r o f o u n d u n e a s e , not tranquillity o r indifference, a s s o m e h a v e
described. H o w w a s he to get back?

T h e e x p e r i e n c e left him with a p o s t - t r a u m a t i c stress d i s o r d e r

— flashbacks, n i g h t m a r e s , p a n i c attacks. N o w he w a s s e e k i n g
c o m p e n s a t i o n . I n t r a - o p e r a t i v e a w a r e n e s s is an a c k n o w l e d g e d
p r o b l e m . Effective a n a e s t h e s i a r e q u i r e s the j u d i c i o u s m i x i n g
a n d m a t c h i n g of d r u g s to patients a n d c o n d i t i o n s . It is not all
or n o t h i n g , like flicking a light switch. Different o p e r a t i v e p r o -
c e d u r e s d e m a n d different d e p t h s o f a n a e s t h e s i a , and patients

158
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

v a r y i n t e r m s o f their r e s p o n s e . Currently, there i s n o w h o l l y

reliable m e t h o d o f d e t e c t i n g a w a r e n e s s . T h e r e are b o u n d t o b e
mistakes.
P e r h a p s o n e o r t w o patients p e r t h o u s a n d o p e r a t i o n s are able
t o recall events o c c u r r i n g d u r i n g s u r g e r y . T h e figures a r e h i g h e r
for obstetric and c a r d i a c p r o c e d u r e s , w h i c h r e q u i r e lighter
anaesthesia. ( T h i s d o e s not include t h o s e w h o m a y b e a w a r e a t
the time, but w h o s u b s e q u e n t l y fail to recall.) B u t while intra-
operative a w a r e n e s s is a r e c o g n i z e d c o m p l i c a t i o n of s u r g e r y ,
the o u t - o f - b o d y e x p e r i e n c e ( O O B E ) i s not.

I didn't think it w o u l d help C h a r l e s ' s c a s e . H e ' d be labelled

a fantasist, which w o u l d b e unfair b e c a u s e O O B E s , too, are
relatively c o m m o n — a r o u n d fifteen p e r cent of the g e n e r a l p o p u -
lation admit to h a v i n g e x p e r i e n c e d o n e . I d i d n ' t think that
C h a r l e s ' s soul left his b o d y — b e c a u s e I d o n ' t b e l i e v e in d e t a c h -
able s o u l s — but I c o u l d fully accept that he h a d e x p e r i e n c e d a
frightening hallucination. T h e r e are m a n y f o r m s o f intermit-
tent p s y c h o s i s .

I spent my first t e r m at u n i v e r s i t y l o d g i n g w i t h a rather d o u r

w o r k i n g - c l a s s family on the outskirts of Sheffield. I'll call them
the F a n c y s , t h o u g h their real n a m e w a s less p l a u s i b l e . M r s F a n c y
fed m e p o r r i d g e for b r e a k f a s t . S o m e t i m e s I ' d g e t b a c k late, the
w o r s e for wear, a n d s o m e t i m e s I d i d n ' t c o m e b a c k at all. I think
she found m e difficult. B r e a k f a s t s w e r e b l e a k . W e d i d n ' t h a v e
m u c h to talk a b o u t .

T h e n o n e m o r n i n g s h e started telling m e a b o u t A u n t J u d i t h ,
h o w she w a s a l w a y s w e l c o m e t o d r o p in, o f c o u r s e , b u t , d e a r o h
dear, h o w she picked her times. S h e h a d t u r n e d up in the m i d d l e
o f the night a g a i n . T h r e e i n the m o r n i n g . T h i r d time this w e e k .

159
PAUL B R O K S

It w a s tiring, e s p e c i a l l y for Mr F a n c y w h o w a s on the early shift.

A u n t J u d i t h w a s lonely. S h e w o u l d chat for a n h o u r o r s o , and
then s h e w o u l d go h o m e . I s a i d I h a d n ' t b e e n d i s t u r b e d , which
w a s true. I h a d n ' t h e a r d the d o o r b e l l — or p e r h a p s she had her
o w n k e y ? A u n t J u d i t h h a d n o need o f d o o r b e l l o r k e y I w a s told.
S h e h a d a gift. S h e c o u l d p r o j e c t her spirit. A n d three times that
w e e k s h e h a d p r o j e c t e d h e r s e l f t h r o u g h the night air to the foot
o f M r a n d M r s F a n c y ' s b e d . S h e lived i n S c o t l a n d .

A d a y or t w o later Mr F a n c y raised the matter a g a i n . (I

w o u l d n ' t h a v e d a r e d . ) He k n e w I w a s in on the story.
' Y o u ' v e h e a r d all a b o u t o u r J u d i t h , I gather. I t ' s a bit of a
n u i s a n c e , ' he s a i d , a n d then carried on a s s e m b l i n g his s o n ' s train
set on the flowery c a r p e t in front of the g a s fire. T h e four-year-
old lay supine. N o t h i n g m o r e w a s said.
J u s t b e f o r e I left the F a n c y s I h a d an unsettling experience. I
w o k e i n the early h o u r s , a w a r e o f s o m e t h i n g g l o w i n g faintly i n
the c o r n e r o f the r o o m . M y heart t h u m p e d a n offbeat. W h e n
I t u r n e d to l o o k , it w a s n ' t A u n t J u d i t h I s a w but a C h r i s t m a s
tree. I ' d g o t b a c k late, let m y s e l f in, helped m y s e l f to a s n a c k ,
then g o n e s t r a i g h t to b e d . I h a d n ' t noticed a tree. H o w c o u l d I
not h a v e n o t i c e d ? I g o t up for a c l o s e r l o o k . I b r u s h e d a b r a n c h
a n d c a u g h t the scent o f the p i n e n e e d l e s .

R e t u r n i n g t o b e d I w a s s o o n a s l e e p , but s o m e t h i n g else d i s -
turbed m e . P e r h a p s it w a s v o i c e s in the street. I can't remember.
B u t I do r e m e m b e r g e t t i n g up to shut the w i n d o w and noticing
that the tree h a d g o n e . It a p p e a r e d from n o w h e r e , then, silently,
it d i s a p p e a r e d . It w a s there. I t o u c h e d it. I c o u l d smell it.

I slept in. W i n t e r s u n s h i n e filled the r o o m . T h e C h r i s t m a s

tree l o o k e d s p l e n d i d , red b a u b l e s and silver tinsel splintering

160
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

the light. So there was a tree. I tried to g e t u p , b u t found I w a s

p a r a l y s e d . I l o o k e d at my right a r m a n d willed it to m o v e . I c o m -
m a n d e d it to m o v e . It s t a y e d put. W h e n I tried to sit up or roll
over nothing h a p p e n e d . I p a n i c k e d . On the i n s i d e I w a s a twist-
i n g fury, but the shell o f m y b o d y r e m a i n e d m o t i o n l e s s . I g a v e
up the s t r u g g l e , o v e r w h e l m e d by an intuition that if I tried a n y
harder I w o u l d b r e a k t h r o u g h the shell a n d float away.

I c l o s e d m y e y e s . T h e r o o m w a s still a b l o c k o f s u n l i g h t w h e n
I o p e n e d them a g a i n , but there w a s no tree.

I n o w r e c o g n i z e this as a lucid d r e a m , an h a l l u c i n a t o r y state

in the hinterlands of s l u m b e r w h e r e the m i n d is alert, b u t the
b o d y remains b o u n d by the p a r a l y s i s of s l e e p — the intersection
o f d r e a m life a n d reality. P e r h a p s i n t r a - o p e r a t i v e a w a r e n e s s i s
like this. I t ' s h a p p e n e d s e v e r a l t i m e s s i n c e , a n d e a c h time I found
m y s e l f restrained b y the s a m e f o r c e f u l intuition. N e x t time I'll
grit my teeth a n d let g o .

* * *

N o t l o n g a g o I w a s renting a c o t t a g e o n the e d g e o f D a r t m o o r .
It w a s a S u n d a y afternoon a n d I'd b e e n w o r k i n g at a g l a s s -
t o p p e d table by the w i n d o w . I w a s tired. I h a d n ' t slept well the
p r e v i o u s night. N o w I s t o p p e d , transfixed b y m u s i c .

I often w o r k to m u s i c — u s u a l l y B a c h or M o z a r t . T h i s w a s
B a c h ; a partita for s o l o flute, e n d l e s s l y circling a n d c l i m b i n g ,
falling and rising, b r i g h t lines of s o u n d filling the air. G r e a t
m u s i c cancels the distinction b e t w e e n the external w o r l d a n d
o u r inner life. I w a s a b s o r b e d , but, a l s o , it w a s me w h o w a s

161
PAUL B R O K S

a b s o r b i n g . I w a s at the centre of a m a c h i n e of s o u n d , but the

m a c h i n e w a s a l s o within m e .
I first s a w the g e e s e in reflection, t h r o u g h the s m o k e d g l a s s
s u r f a c e o f the table, s w i m m i n g i n a b r o n z e p o o l o f sky. T h e r e
w e r e three. I l o o k e d up at the w i n d o w to w a t c h them s p e e d i n g
s o u t h - w e s t u n d e r c l o u d s that n o w l o o k e d unnaturally white and
p a t c h e s of s k y u n n a t u r a l l y b l u e . I felt d i s e m b o d i e d . It w a s as if
I w e r e i n s i d e the c o t t a g e , sitting at the table by the w i n d o w a n d ,
a t the s a m e t i m e , f l y i n g with the g e e s e , h i g h o v e r the D e v o n -
shire w o o d s a n d fields. I w a s d i s l o c a t e d and distributed, just as
the g e e s e w e r e s i m u l t a n e o u s l y i n o n e p l a c e a n d another: out
there, a n d h e r e in the w o r l d b e n e a t h the g l a s s - t o p p e d table.

T h i s w a s not a n o u t - o f - b o d y e x p e r i e n c e . I t w a s not u n p l e a s -
ant o r d i s t u r b i n g i n a n y w a y . S u b d u e d b y f a t i g u e , introverted b y
s o l i t u d e , e l e v a t e d b y the e x t r e m e b e a u t y o f the m u s i c , m y per-
c e p t i o n s a n d s e n s e o f s e l f h a d b e e n m o m e n t a r i l y reconfigured.

O u r b o d y schema is surprisingly malleable. V. S. Ramachan-

d r a n a n d his c o l l e a g u e s h a v e d e v i s e d s o m e s i m p l e exercises t o
illustrate this fact. I s o m e t i m e s u s e them to enliven dull lectures.
Here's an example.

F i r s t , put on a blindfold a n d h a v e s o m e o n e sit in front of y o u ,

f a c i n g in the s a m e direction. T h e n let another p e r s o n take y o u r
right h a n d a n d start t a p p i n g a n d s t r o k i n g the n o s e o f the p e r s o n
in front of y o u with y o u r index finger, while at the s a m e time
u s i n g their o w n left h a n d t o tap and s t r o k e y o u r n o s e . I t ' s best i f
the t a p p i n g a n d s t r o k i n g alternate i n r a n d o m s e q u e n c e s , and
they m u s t be s y n c h r o n o u s — that is, a t a p / s t r o k e on the other
person's nose must be matched by a t a p / s t r o k e on your own
n o s e . A f t e r a while, thirty s e c o n d s or s o , y o u m a y b e g i n to feel

162
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

that y o u are t a p p i n g y o u r o w n n o s e at a r m ' s length, as if, like

P i n o c c h i o ' s , it has g r o w n e n o r m o u s or is floating o u t there in
front o f y o u .
I t ' s even p o s s i b l e to project s e n s a t i o n s on to i n a n i m a t e
objects. T r y this. Y o u n e e d a table and a friend. Sit with a h a n d
under the table, hidden from view, while y o u r friend t a p s /
strokes the surface of the table a n d s i m u l t a n e o u s l y t a p s / s t r o k e s
y o u r hidden hand. I t ' s crucially i m p o r t a n t that y o u d o n ' t s e e
w h a t ' s g o i n g on u n d e r the table — that w o u l d ruin the effect, b u t
a s y o u watch y o u r friend's other h a n d y o u s h o u l d g r a d u a l l y feel
the t a p p i n g and s t r o k i n g s e n s a t i o n s a r i s i n g from the table itself.
W h e n it w o r k s (which isn't a l w a y s ) , the effect is c o m p e l l i n g .
Y o u k n o w at a rational level that the s u r f a c e of the table is
b e y o n d the b o u n d a r i e s o f y o u r b o d y , but t h a t ' s n o t the w a y i t
feels. T h e p h e n o m e n a l experience o v e r r i d e s the rational a n a l y -
sis. T h e table h a s b e e n t e m p o r a r i l y i n c o r p o r a t e d into y o u r b o d y
s c h e m a . I t h a s b e c o m e part o f ' y o u ' .

S o , even on as fundamental a matter as w h e r e ' y o u ' are in

relation to y o u r b o d y , the c o n s c i o u s , reflective s e l f is e a s i l y
deceived.

I liked the story of the Christmas tree, s h e s a i d .

Thanks.

Why do you call it a lucid dream? Perhaps it was

some other kind of vision.

' W h a t other k i n d ? '

Hypnagogic imagery.

163
PAUL B R O K S

Oh.

Or do I mean hypnopompic?

T h e y ' r e both forms of dream-like imagery at

the e d g e s o f s l e e p , w h e n y o u ' r e d r o p p i n g o f f o r
waking up. H y p n a g o g i c is when you're dropping
off. B u t , a n y w a y , no, it w a s n ' t either of those.

Don't most people fall asleep with random thoughts

and pictures floating through their mind?

I s u p p o s e they do

So what's special?

H y p n a g o g i c i m a g e s are m o r e v i v i d . T h e r e ' s
m o r e clarity and detail. T h e y s e e m m o r e
a u t o n o m o u s as well. T h e y h a v e a life of their
o w n . I u s e d to g e t beautiful, w e i r d s c e n e s g o i n g
t h r o u g h my s l e e p y h e a d as a child — later, too,
on into my teens and early twenties. It rarely
h a p p e n s now. I t ' s a pity. I m i s s them.

What did you see?

I t u s u a l l y started with faces. T h e y l o o m e d u p

f r o m n o w h e r e . T h e first o n e a l w a y s t o o k m e b y
s u r p r i s e . T h e y w e r e quite ordinary, a n o n y m o u s
f a c e s mostly, b u t s o m e t i m e s they w o u l d m o r p h
into g a r g o y l e s o r g o b l i n s . T h e y s e e m e d real.
A s b r i g h t a s television.

Just faces?

N o . Sometimes it w a s m o r e elaborate — parades

of little p e o p l e , all b r i g h t c o l o u r s like a m e d i e v a l
p a g e a n t . T h e y s e e m e d to h a v e a life of their
o w n . I t w a s fascinating, a n d totally b e y o n d m y
c o n t r o l . I u s e d to w a t c h the little p e o p l e strolling

164
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

by. T h e y a l w a y s s e e m e d t o b e g o i n g s o m e w h e r e .
S o m e o f them w o u l d b e c a r r y i n g p a c k s o r
p u s h i n g carts. I w a s a spectator, on the sidelines,
w a t c h i n g from a d i s t a n c e . I k n e w they w o u l d n ' t
bother m e . I w a s n ' t really part of it. I c o u l d n ' t
enter the s c e n e . A l t h o u g h s o m e t i m e s it d i d s e e m
like t h e y ' d s e n s e d m y p r e s e n c e . O n e o r t w o
w o u l d step o u t s i d e the f l o w , c o m e c l o s e a n d
l o o k directly t o w a r d s m e . B u t their e y e s w e r e
u n s e e i n g , like I w a s b e h i n d a o n e - w a y s c r e e n .
I c o u l d see t h e m , b u t they c o u l d n ' t s e e m e . Yet
for a m o m e n t they s e n s e d I w a s there. I h a d no
influence o v e r the b e h a v i o u r a n d a p p e a r a n c e
o f these creatures, o r the w o r l d they inhabited.

Where did they come from?

M y brain, o f c o u r s e . S o m e h i d d e n c o r n e r o f
m y mind.

Ah, hut which undiscovered territory?

T h e fascination for me w a s — still is — that this

s t r a n g e , nocturnal w o r l d w a s the p r o d u c t o f m y
brain a n d yet I h a d no c o n s c i o u s control o v e r the
s h a p e it t o o k . I r e m e m b e r o n c e l o o k i n g c l o s e l y at
a b a n n e r s o m e of the little fellows w e r e c a r r y i n g .
It w a s beautifully e m b r o i d e r e d , fantastic c o l o u r s
— m o s t l y reds and g o l d s . A n d I t h o u g h t I
c o u l d n ' t p o s s i b l y create s o m e t h i n g s o beautiful.
I w a s s o m e t i m e s a m a z e d by w h a t I saw.
It c o n v i n c e d me that I w a s just o n e p r o d u c t
of my b r a i n ' s activity — a w a v e of c o n s c i o u s ,
s e l f - a w a r e n e s s o n the s u r f a c e o f a n o c e a n .

You needed convincing? I thought you were a

psychologist.

165
PAUL B R O K S

Well, o b v i o u s l y , I k n e w that a lot of mental life

g o e s o n b e l o w the level o f a w a r e n e s s . T h a t ' s
o r t h o d o x c o g n i t i v e p s y c h o l o g y . A n d I k n o w the
F r e u d i a n stuff, a n d J u n g . B u t these pictures put
abstract t h e o r y in the s h a d e . I s p r a n g from the
s a m e s o u r c e a s the g a r g o y l e s , the g o b l i n s and the
colourful p a g e a n t s — the s a m e brain — but I felt
no c o n n e c t i o n with them.

Do you think their little lives went on when you

weren't looking?

N o w , that w o u l d be eerie. I'd prefer to think

they d i d n ' t . I ' m sure they n e e d e d an o b s e r v e r
to b r i n g them to life.

Perhaps we all do.

My b r a i n conjured them up, and they required

a solitary s p e c t a t o r — me — but o n c e the s p o o l s
w e r e rolling I p l a y e d no part. R o b e r t L o u i s
S t e v e n s o n h a d similar experiences. H e put them
to g o o d u s e . A lot of his stories w e r e b a s e d on
dreams or hypnagogic imagery.

Which?

J e k y l l a n d H y d e , for o n e .

No, which: dreams or hypnagogic imagery?

S o m e t i m e s h e s e e m s t o b e talking a b o u t o n e ,
a n d s o m e t i m e s the other. F r o m what h e s a y s
about Jekyll and H y d e it was probably based
on a true n i g h t m a r e . B u t at other times he s e e m s
t o b e d e s c r i b i n g h y p n a g o g i c stuff. H e had this
technique for g e t t i n g into h y p n a g o g i c states.
S o m e t i m e s he w o u l d lie in b e d resting his e l b o w s
on the sheets with his a r m s p o i n t i n g u p w a r d s ,

166
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

p o i s e d t o d r o p i f h e n o d d e d off. T h a t w a y
he c o u l d drift into the h y p n a g o g i c w o r l d a n d
stay alert e n o u g h to w a t c h the s h o w without
d r o p p i n g o f f completely. He talks a lot a b o u t
little p e o p l e , t o o - the little p e o p l e w h o run
the d r e a m theatre.

Did they wear medieval clothes?

N o , their c o s t u m e s w e r e G e o r g i a n .

And all this is different from lucid dreams?

I can't s p e a k for others, but in my e x p e r i e n c e

lucid d r e a m s and h y p n a g o g i c i m a g e r y a r e v e r y
different. H y p n a g o g i c i m a g e s are realistic in the
w a y that v i d e o i m a g e s a r e realistic. Y o u can
o b s e r v e them minutely, like w h e n I l o o k e d c l o s e -
up at the banner. T h e c o l o u r s w e r e v i v i d . I c o u l d
see the thread. B u t also, like a v i d e o , y o u realize
y o u ' r e not part o f it.

And in a lucid dream you are?

F o r m e , lucid d r e a m s s e e m a b s o l u t e l y real.
Y o u ' r e right there in the thick of it, a n d even
t h o u g h y o u t w i g a t s o m e s t a g e a n d start t o
a p p r e c i a t e that i t ' s a d r e a m or hallucination,
and y o u b e g i n to think it t h r o u g h rationally -
even s o , it still s e e m s real. T h a t C h r i s t m a s tree
w a s there i n the c o r n e r o f the r o o m a s far a s
I c o u l d tell. I went up c l o s e and t o u c h e d it.

Had you been overdoing the jazz cigarettes or

anything?

N o . Or anything.

Were you scared?

167
PAUL B R O K S

M o r e p e r p l e x e d than s c a r e d . E x c e p t for the

feeling o f p a r a l y s i s a t the end. T h a t w a s
frightening. Y o u ' r e stuck there p o w e r l e s s and
y o u start t o think a n y t h i n g c o u l d h a p p e n . T h e n
t h e r e ' s the feeling that y o u m i g h t just p o p out
of y o u r skin a n d fly o u t the window. I ' v e talked
t o p e o p l e w h o ' v e h a d full-blown o u t - o f - b o d y
e x p e r i e n c e s a n d s o m e o f them d e s c r i b e a
w h o o s h i n g , v i b r a t i n g sensation just at the point
o f d e p a r t u r e . I ' v e h a d the s a m e , but that's where
I s t r u g g l e h a r d to s t a y put. I t ' s a l o n g time since
I h a d o n e of t h o s e d r e a m s , but next time I really
m i g h t try to let g o . I d o u b t it, t h o u g h . I ' m a
c o w a r d . I ' m a l w a y s t o o terrified b y the thought
o f n o t g e t t i n g b a c k . D i s c r e t i o n i s the better part
of valour.

But you don't really think it's possible?

I f y o u m e a n s o m e t h i n g s u p e r n a t u r a l like m y
soul s l i p p i n g o u t o f m y skin a n d flying a r o u n d ,
n o , I d o n ' t think i t ' s p o s s i b l e . B u t the thought is
still terrifying. I d o n ' t b e l i e v e in g h o s t s , but, on
b a l a n c e , I ' d rather pitch my tent on a c a m p s i t e
than in a g r a v e y a r d .

So you think it's possible in a different sense?

I think o u t - o f - b o d y e x p e r i e n c e s are real

e x p e r i e n c e s , just like the p h a n t o m C h r i s t m a s tree
w a s real to m e . A lot of p e o p l e s a y they have
t h e m . B u t t h e r e ' s a natural explanation, like
there is for other illusions a n d hallucinations.

What is it?

I don't know.

168
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

Where would you start to look for an explanation?

Y o u c o u l d start with the p h y s i o l o g y . T h e r e ' s

a pattern. It s e e m s to h a p p e n either in states of
l o w a r o u s a l o r v e r y h i g h a r o u s a l . I t can h a p p e n
— p r o b a b l y m o s t often d o e s h a p p e n — just l y i n g
in b e d . B u t it can a l s o h a p p e n w h e n the p e r s o n is
in mortal d a n g e r — h a n g i n g o v e r a p r e c i p i c e , say.
B u t , for m e , the first p l a c e to start l o o k i n g for
e x p l a n a t i o n s w o u l d b e a t the n e u r o p s y c h o l o g i c a l
level — a n a l y s e which b r a i n s y s t e m s m i g h t be
involved.

So, what do you think?

I think it's s o m e t h i n g to do with d i s t o r t i o n s

of b o d y schema.

You mean body image?

N o t quite. B o d y i m a g e i s h o w y o u a s a p e r s o n s e e
yourself. I t ' s like a mental picture y o u h a v e of
y o u r o w n b o d y a n d i t ' s tied u p t o y o u r f e e l i n g s
a b o u t it; y o u r attitude t o w a r d s it. B o d y s c h e m a is
m o r e like the b r a i n ' s w o r k i n g m o d e l o f the b o d y .

And this can go wrong?

I t can g o w r o n g i n all sorts o f w a y s . O b v i o u s l y ,

t h e r e ' s n o r m a l l y a tight relationship b e t w e e n the
b o d y a n d the self. Y o u d o n ' t g e t o n e w i t h o u t the
other. B u t in s o m e w a y s the relationship is l o o s e r
than we tend to think. I t ' s quite s u b t l e . It i s n ' t
that difficult to trick y o u r b r a i n a n d twist its b o d y
s c h e m a out o f s h a p e .

So when someone is having an out-of-body

experience the conscious, thinking part of them is
somehow dislocated from their body schema. The

169
PAUL B R O K S

different brain systems have got temporarily

decoupled.

S o m e t h i n g like that. T h e b o d y s c h e m a and the

c o n s c i o u s s e l f are u s u a l l y in s y n c h . B u t at the
b r a i n s y s t e m s level they can b e s e p a r a t e d t o s o m e
degree. T h e y ' r e dissociable.

It's plausible, I suppose. But a little prosaic, don't

you think? Much more exciting to imagine
disembodied sprits whizzing off to adventures on
the astral plane.

E x c i t i n g , but b a r m y .

By the w a y , I s a i d , w h o are y o u ?

B u t s h e w a s a l r e a d y f a d i n g b a c k into the lush d a r k n e s s behind

my eyelids.

170
 The Dreams of
Robert Louis Stevenson

The past is all of one texture - whether feigned or suffered -

whether acted out in three dimensions, or only witnessed in that
small theatre of the brain which we keep brightly lighted all night
long, after the jets are down, and darkness and sleep reign
undisturbed in the remainder of the body.

Robert Louis Stevenson, 'A Chapter on Dreams'

I stood already committed to a profound duplicity of life . . .

both sides of me were in dead earnest. . .

Dr Jekyll

The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde ( 1 8 8 6 ) , the classic

tale of a d i v i d e d self, reflects s o m e of the m o r a l a n d intellectual
p r e o c c u p a t i o n s o f the V i c t o r i a n e r a : g o o d v e r s u s evil; r e a s o n
v e r s u s p a s s i o n ; religion v e r s u s s c i e n c e ; civilization v e r s u s
s a v a g e r y ; o r d e r v e r s u s c h a o s — b u t w a s a l s o b o r n o f the d o u b l e -
ness within its author, R o b e r t L o u i s S t e v e n s o n .
A w o r l d traveller a n d adventurer, S t e v e n s o n w r o t e the s t o r y
i n the s e d a t e E n g l i s h s e a s i d e t o w n o f B o u r n e m o u t h . T o all

171
PAUL B R O K S

a p p e a r a n c e s h e w a s l e a d i n g the s o r t o f life h e w o u l d p r e v i o u s l y
have despised: 'Respectability, dullness, a n d similar villas
e n c o m p a s s e d h i m for miles in e v e r y direction,' w r o t e his s t e p -
s o n . B u t the o u t w a r d i m a g e o f b l a n d respectability m a s k e d the
s u b v e r s i v e m a c h i n a t i o n s of his inner w o r l d ; and here we have a
template for Jekyll and Hyde.

T h e s t o r y i s prefigured i n S t e v e n s o n ' s earlier life and w o r k .

A s a child h e h a d b e e n fascinated b y the s t o r y o f D e a c o n
B r o d i e . W i l l i a m B r o d i e ( a c c o r d e d the title ' D e a c o n ' a s head o f
a g u i l d ) w a s a r e s p e c t a b l e E d i n b u r g h cabinet-maker by day, but
b y night w a s the l e a d e r o f a g a n g o f thieves. H e w a s h a n g e d for
his c r i m e s i n 1788. T h e s t o r y s o intrigued y o u n g L o u i s that, a t
the a g e of fourteen, he drafted a p l a y a b o u t B r o d i e . A later ver-
s i o n , Deacon Brodie, or the double life, w a s published in 1879, and
p e r f o r m e d in B r a d f o r d three y e a r s later. Its themes w e r e d a y
a n d night, g o o d a n d evil, a n d the duality o f h u m a n personality:
e x p o s i n g the d e p r a v i t y that m i g h t lurk beneath a veneer of
civility. B o l t i n g the d o o r a n d d i s c a r d i n g his d a y t i m e g a r b ,
B r o d i e d e c l a r e s : ' . . . b y night w e are our naked s e l v e s . . . the d a y
for t h e m , the night for m e . '

A s a y o u n g m a n e a g e r t o slip the g r i p o f C a l v i n i s t i c c o n v e n -
tion in b o u r g e o i s E d i n b u r g h , S t e v e n s o n cultivated his own,
m o r e b e n i g n , duality o f character. H e and his friend, C h a r l e s
B a x t e r , ' a s s u m e d the liberating r o l e s o f J o h n s o n and T h o m s o n ,
heavy-drinking, convivial, blasphemous iconoclasts, whose
s e n s e of h u m o u r w o u l d h a v e b e e n a little t o o s t r o n g for the
S t e v e n s o n s ' H e r i o t R o w d r a w i n g - r o o m ' ; i n which g u i s e , 'they
c o u l d f u l l - b l o o d e d l y enjoy t h o s e p l e a s u r e s denied to S t e v e n s o n
a n d B a x t e r , a n d t o D r J e k y l l ' . ( I q u o t e from E m m a L e t l e y ' s

172
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

introduction to the O x f o r d W o r l d ' s C l a s s i c s edition of Dr Jekyll

and Mr Hyde.)
B u t there w a s a d e e p e r d i v i s i o n in S t e v e n s o n ' s p s y c h e than is
revealed b y g l i m p s e s o f his c h i l d h o o d o b s e s s i o n s , the student
r o l e - p l a y i n g , and the s u b v e r s i v e i m a g i n a t i o n . It t o o k the f o r m
of a dissociation. D i s s o c i a t i o n is a psychiatric t e r m that refers to
the splitting o f mental p r o c e s s e s from m a i n s t r e a m c o n s c i o u s -
ness. T h e s e p a r a t e d part o f the m i n d s e e m s t o maintain a life o f
its o w n . In S t e v e n s o n ' s c a s e the d i s s o c i a t i o n w a s e v i d e n t in his
d r e a m life, and in the i m p o r t a n t part that d r e a m s p l a y e d in the
creative p r o c e s s . H e g i v e s a v i v i d a c c o u n t o f this i n the e s s a y ' A
C h a p t e r on D r e a m s ' , in which he writes a b o u t h i m s e l f in the
third p e r s o n . In c h i l d h o o d he h a d b e e n ' a n ardent a n d u n c o m -
fortable dreamer. W h e n he h a d a t o u c h of fever at night, a n d the
r o o m swelled and s h r a n k , and his clothes, h a n g i n g on a nail,
n o w l o o m e d u p instant t o the b i g n e s s o f a church, a n d n o w d r e w
a w a y into a h o r r o r of infinite d i s t a n c e a n d infinite littleness, the
p o o r soul w a s v e r y well a w a r e o f w h a t m u s t f o l l o w . . . s o o n e r o r
later the n i g h t - h a g w o u l d h a v e h i m by the throat, a n d p l u c k
him, s t r a n g l i n g and s c r e a m i n g , f r o m his s l e e p . '

T h e swelling a n d shrinking, l o o m i n g and r e c e d i n g , a r e

examples of micropsia and macropsia, pathological distortions
i n the perception o f the size o r s h a p e o f objects w h i c h c o m e
under the g e n e r i c h e a d i n g o f ' m e t a m o r p h o p s i a s ' . M i c r o p s i a
refers to an illusory reduction in an o b j e c t ' s size, m a c r o p s i a
to the o p p o s i t e . Illusions of this sort are often r e p o r t e d in
temporal l o b e epilepsy, b u t m a y b e e x p e r i e n c e d i n other
n e u r o l o g i c a l conditions, i n c l u d i n g m i g r a i n e . T h e y can a l s o b e
c a u s e d b y fever, a s S t e v e n s o n ' s a c c o u n t s u g g e s t s , a n d m a y

173
PAUL B R O K S

be quite c o m m o n in c h i l d h o o d in the a b s e n c e of illness. I cer-

tainly r e m e m b e r h a v i n g s u c h e p i s o d e s a s a y o u n g child. T h e
d e s c r i p t i o n o f things l o o m i n g u p 'to the b i g n e s s o f a church'
a n d then d r a w i n g a w a y 'into a h o r r o r of infinite distance and
infinite littleness' c a p t u r e s the feeling quite brilliantly.

M a n y o f S t e v e n s o n ' s c h i l d h o o d d r e a m s w e r e far from fearful

o r d i s t u r b i n g . ' H e w o u l d take l o n g , uneventful j o u r n e y s and see
s t r a n g e t o w n s a n d beautiful p l a c e s as he lay in b e d . ' T h e dreamer
(that is, S t e v e n s o n ) h a d 'an o d d t a s t e ' for the G e o r g i a n period —
consistent with his interest in D e a c o n B r o d i e — and this ' b e g a n to
rule the features o f his d r e a m s . . . ' T h e n , a s a student, h e b e g a n
to d r e a m in s e q u e n c e , ' a n d thus to lead a d o u b l e life — o n e of the
day, o n e of the night—one that he h a d e v e r y reason to believe w a s
the true o n e , another that h e had n o m e a n s o f p r o v i n g false.'

O n e e x h a u s t i n g s e q u e n c e o f recurrent d r e a m s w a s ' e n o u g h
to s e n d h i m , t r e m b l i n g for his r e a s o n , to the d o o r s of a certain
d o c t o r ' . T h e d r e a m h a d him in a s u r g i c a l theatre, 'his heart in his
m o u t h , his teeth o n e d g e , s e e i n g m o n s t r o u s m a l f o r m a t i o n s and
the a b h o r r e d dexterity o f s u r g e o n s ' . T h e n h e w o u l d return t o
his l o d g i n g s at the top of a tall b u i l d i n g on the H i g h Street. At
least, he tried to return. I n s t e a d he found h i m s e l f endlessly
c l i m b i n g stairs to reach the top floor, his clothes wet, all manner
o f p e o p l e b r u s h i n g p a s t him o n their w a y d o w n : ' b e g g a r l y
w o m e n o f the street, g r e a t , w e a r y , m u d d y l a b o u r e r s , p o o r
scarecrows of men, pale parodies of women . . . ' When, finally,
h e s a w the light o f d a w n b r e a k i n g t h r o u g h the w i n d o w s h e
w o u l d g i v e u p the ascent, turn, a n d g o b a c k d o w n t o the street
'in his w e t c l o t h e s , in the w e t , h a g g a r d d a w n , t r u d g i n g to
another day of monstrosities and operations'.

174
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

A n d then there c a m e a t u r n i n g point. He ' h a d l o n g b e e n in

the c u s t o m o f setting h i m s e l f t o s l e e p with t a l e s ' , b u t , h e s a y s ,
these w e r e ' i r r e s p o n s i b l e i n v e n t i o n s ' ; tales told for the teller's
p l e a s u r e that w o u l d not s t a n d the scrutiny of a critical reader.
T h e y lacked all the i m p o r t a n t e l e m e n t s o f g o o d s t o r y t e l l i n g ,
such as plausible characters, a consistent s t r u c t u r e , a n d a c o m -
pelling plot.

H i s d r e a m s , like m o s t p e o p l e ' s , w e r e 'tales w h e r e a thread

m i g h t b e d r o p p e d , o r o n e a d v e n t u r e quitted for another, o n
f a n c y ' s least s u g g e s t i o n . S o that the little p e o p l e w h o m a n a g e
m a n ' s internal theatre h a d not as yet r e c e i v e d a v e r y r i g o r o u s
t r a i n i n g . . . ' T h i s i s his first m e n t i o n o f 'the little p e o p l e ' .

S t e v e n s o n ' s d r e a m s m a d e w o n d e r f u l r a w material for his

narratives and c a m e to p l a y an i n c r e a s i n g l y i m p o r t a n t r o l e in his
creative life. T h e tales b e g a n t o sell a n d , ' H e r e w a s h e , a n d here
w e r e the little p e o p l e w h o did that p a r t of his b u s i n e s s , in quite
n e w c o n d i t i o n s . ' A g r e a t e r discipline w a s r e q u i r e d . ' T h e stories
m u s t n o w b e t r i m m e d a n d p a r e d a n d set u p o n a l l - f o u r s , they
m u s t run from a b e g i n n i n g to an end a n d fit (after a m a n n e r )
with the l a w s o f l i f e . . . '

Storytelling h a d b e c o m e a b u s i n e s s , n o t o n l y for S t e v e n s o n ,
but a l s o for the little p e o p l e w h o r a n the d r e a m theatre. B u t , he
s a y s , they u n d e r s t o o d the c h a n g e a s well a s he. ' W h e n h e l a y
d o w n t o p r e p a r e h i m s e l f for s l e e p , h e n o l o n g e r s o u g h t a m u s e -
ment, but printable and profitable tales; a n d after he h a d d o z e d
off in his b o x - s e a t , his little p e o p l e c o n t i n u e d their e v o l u t i o n s
with the s a m e mercantile d e s i g n s . '

O n e such d r e a m s t o r y is d e s c r i b e d at l e n g t h . It is w o r t h
r e c o u n t i n g i n detail b e f o r e h e a r i n g S t e v e n s o n ' s a p p r a i s a l . H e

175
PAUL B R O K S

tells it ' e x a c t l y as it c a m e to h i m ' . T h e d r e a m casts him as 'the

s o n of a v e r y rich a n d w i c k e d m a n ' , a l a n d o w n e r , w h o m he has
a v o i d e d b y l i v i n g a b r o a d m u c h o f the time. O n his return t o
E n g l a n d he finds that his father h a s taken a y o u n g wife, w h o is
treated cruelly. F o r r e a s o n s not entirely clear to the dreamer,
father a n d s o n a g r e e that they s h o u l d meet, but, t h r o u g h pride
a n d a n g e r , neither will c o n d e s c e n d to visit the other; so they
m e e t o n neutral g r o u n d , ' a d e s o l a t e , s a n d y country b y the s e a ' .
T h e y quarrel a n d , ' s t u n g b y s o m e intolerable insult', the
y o u n g e r m a n strikes the other d e a d .

A b o v e s u s p i c i o n for the m u r d e r , he inherits his father's

estates a n d finds h i m s e l f installed under the s a m e r o o f as the
w i d o w . T h e t w o o f them ' l i v e d v e r y m u c h a l o n e , a s p e o p l e m a y
after a b e r e a v e m e n t ' , b u t s h a r e d m e a l s , spent e v e n i n g s together,
a n d g r a d u a l l y d e v e l o p e d a friendship. T h e n the a t m o s p h e r e
c h a n g e s . T h e d r e a m e r s e n s e s that the w o m a n h a r b o u r s s u s p i -
c i o n s a b o u t his guilt. H e d r a w s b a c k from her c o m p a n y ' a s
m e n d r a w b a c k f r o m a p r e c i p i c e s u d d e n l y d i s c o v e r e d ' . But the
attraction w a s n o w s o s t r o n g that 'he w o u l d drift a g a i n and
a g a i n into the old intimacy, a n d a g a i n and a g a i n be startled b a c k
b y s o m e s u g g e s t i v e q u e s t i o n o r s o m e inexplicable m e a n i n g i n
her e y e . So they lived at c r o s s p u r p o s e s , a life full of broken
dialogue, challenging glances, and suppressed passion.'

T h e n o n e day, h e s e e s the w o m a n s l i p p i n g out o f the h o u s e .

He p u r s u e s her to the station a n d on to the train, which takes
t h e m to the s e a s i d e , w h e r e he f o l l o w s her out over the sandhills,
t o the v e r y site o f the m u r d e r .

' T h e r e s h e b e g a n t o g r o p e a m o n g the bents, h e w a t c h i n g her,

flat u p o n his f a c e ; a n d p r e s e n t l y s h e had s o m e t h i n g in her hand

176
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

— I cannot r e m e m b e r w h a t it w a s , b u t it w a s d e a d l y e v i d e n c e
a g a i n s t the d r e a m e r — and as she held it up to l o o k at it, p e r h a p s
from the s h o c k o f the d i s c o v e r y , her foot s l i p p e d , a n d s h e h u n g
a t s o m e peril o n the brink o f the tall s a n d - w r e a t h s . H e h a d n o
thought but t o s p r i n g u p a n d r e s c u e her; a n d there they s t o o d
face to face, she with that d e a d l y matter o p e n l y in her h a n d — his
v e r y p r e s e n c e o n the s p o t another link o f p r o o f . '

T h e y return to the train a r m in a r m , j o u r n e y h o m e a n d settle

to an o r d i n a r y e v e n i n g . C o n v e r s a t i o n h a s b e e n kept to the triv-
ial. A l t h o u g h the w o m a n w a s a b o u t to s a y s o m e t h i n g after her
rescue, he had cut her short. N o w , e x p e c t i n g her to d e n o u n c e
him at any m o m e n t , ' s u s p e n s e and fear d r u m m e d in the
d r e a m e r ' s b o s o m ' . B u t she d o e s not d e n o u n c e h i m . N o r d o e s s h e
in the d a y s to follow. In fact, her d i s p o s i t i o n g r o w s m o r e kindly.
In contrast, the dreamer, b u r d e n e d with s u s p e n s e , ' w a s t e d a w a y
like a m a n with a d i s e a s e ' . U n a b l e to b e a r it a n y l o n g e r he
ransacks the w o m a n ' s r o o m while she i s out. H e d i s c o v e r s the
d a m n i n g e v i d e n c e a m o n g her jewels. A n d , a s h e s t a n d s h o l d i n g
the object ('which w a s his l i f e ' ) in the p a l m of his h a n d , t r y i n g to
fathom w h y she s h o u l d h a v e s o u g h t it, kept it, b u t n e v e r u s e d it,
the d o o r o p e n s and the w o m a n enters the r o o m .

' S o , o n c e m o r e , they s t o o d , e y e t o e y e , with the e v i d e n c e

between them; and o n c e m o r e s h e raised to him a f a c e b r i m m i n g
with s o m e c o m m u n i c a t i o n ; a n d o n c e m o r e h e shied a w a y f r o m
speech and cut her off. But b e f o r e he left the r o o m , w h i c h he h a d
turned u p s i d e d o w n , h e laid b a c k his d e a t h - w a r r a n t w h e r e h e
had found it; and at that, her face lighted u p . T h e next thing he
heard, she w a s e x p l a i n i n g t o her m a i d , with s o m e i n g e n i o u s
f a l s e h o o d , the d i s o r d e r of her things.'

177
PAUL B R O K S

T h e d r e a m s t o r y r e a c h e s its c l i m a x the f o l l o w i n g m o r n i n g a t
b r e a k f a s t . T h r o u g h o u t the m e a l s h e h a d 'tortured him with sly
a l l u s i o n s ' b u t now, with the s e r v a n t s g o n e , he b u r s t s from his
r e s e r v e a n d confronts her. W h y w a s s h e treating him s o ? S h e
k n e w e v e r y t h i n g . W h y d i d s h e not s i m p l y d e n o u n c e h i m ? W h y
m u s t s h e torture h i m ? H e a s k s o v e r a n d over. S h e , too, has
s p r u n g to her feet, p a l e f a c e d .

' A n d w h e n h e h a d d o n e , s h e fell u p o n her k n e e s , and with

o u t s t r e t c h e d h a n d s : " D o y o u not u n d e r s t a n d ? " she cried. " I
l o v e y o u ! ' " A t this point, 'with a p a n g o f w o n d e r and mercantile
d e l i g h t , the d r e a m e r a w o k e ' . T h e story, h e s u b s e q u e n t l y real-
i z e d , h a d ' u n m a r k e t a b l e e l e m e n t s ' , w h i c h is w h y he presents it to
us in this b r i e f f o r m a n d d i d n ' t m a k e m o r e of it. B u t it s e r v e s to
illustrate his point that the little p e o p l e are 'substantive inven-
tors and performers'.

' T o the end they h a d kept their secret. [ T h e d r e a m e r ] h a d n o

g u e s s w h a t e v e r at the m o t i v e of the w o m a n — the hinge of the
w h o l e w e l l - i n v e n t e d p l o t — until the instant of that highly d r a -
m a t i c d e c l a r a t i o n . It w a s not his tale; it w a s the little p e o p l e ' s !
A n d o b s e r v e : not o n l y w a s the secret kept, the story w a s told
w i t h really guileful craftsmanship. T h e c o n d u c t o f both actors i s
(in the cant p h r a s e ) p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y correct, and the e m o t i o n
a p t l y g r a d u a t e d up to the s u r p r i s i n g c l i m a x . I am a w a k e now,
a n d I k n o w this t r a d e ; a n d yet I c a n n o t better it. I am a w a k e , and
I live by this b u s i n e s s ; a n d yet I c o u l d not o u t d o — c o u l d not per-
h a p s e q u a l — that crafty artifice . . . b y w h i c h the s a m e situation
is twice p r e s e n t e d a n d the t w o a c t o r s twice b r o u g h t face to face
o v e r the e v i d e n c e , o n l y o n c e it is in her h a n d , o n c e in his - and
t h e s e in their d u e order, the least d r a m a t i c first. T h e m o r e I think

178
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

of it, the m o r e I am m o v e d to p r e s s u p o n the w o r l d my question:

W h o are the Little People? T h e y are near connections of the
d r e a m e r ' s , b e y o n d d o u b t ; they . . . s h a r e plainly in his training;
they h a v e plainly learned like h i m to b u i l d the s c h e m e of a c o n -
siderate story and t o a r r a n g e e m o t i o n i n p r o g r e s s i v e o r d e r ; o n l y
I think they h a v e m o r e talent; a n d o n e t h i n g is b e y o n d d o u b t ,
they can tell him a s t o r y p i e c e by p i e c e , like a serial, a n d k e e p
him all the while in i g n o r a n c e of w h e r e they a i m . '

S t e v e n s o n c o n c e d e s that the Little P e o p l e ( o r ' m y B r o w n i e s ' )

d o half his w o r k for him while h e s l e e p s . H e a l s o s p e c u l a t e s
that they m i g h t well do the rest for h i m as w e l l , w h e n he is
w i d e a w a k e . T h i s is a c u r i o u s l y m o d e r n insight, in line w i t h
current v i e w s o n the i m p o r t a n c e o f u n c o n s c i o u s p r o c e s s e s i n
cognition.

' F o r m y s e l f — what I call I, my c o n s c i o u s e g o , the d e n i z e n of

the pineal g l a n d u n l e s s he h a s c h a n g e d his r e s i d e n c e since
D e s c a r t e s , the m a n with the c o n s c i e n c e a n d the v a r i a b l e b a n k -
account, the m a n with the hat a n d the b o o t s , a n d the p r i v i l e g e of
v o t i n g and not c a r r y i n g his c a n d i d a t e at the g e n e r a l e l e c t i o n s —
I am s o m e t i m e s t e m p t e d to s u p p o s e he is no story-teller at all,
but a creature as matter of fact as a n y c h e e s e m o n g e r or a n y
cheese, and a realist b e m i r e d up to the e a r s in actuality; so that,
by that account, the w h o l e of my p u b l i s h e d fiction s h o u l d be the
single-handed product of s o m e Brownie, s o m e Familiar, s o m e
unseen c o l l a b o r a t o r . . . '

S t e v e n s o n w o n d e r s whether his r o l e m i g h t b e s t b e u n d e r -
s t o o d as an a d v i s e r a n d enabler; he edits the s t o r i e s ; he d r e s s e s
them in his finest p r o s e ; he p e r f o r m s the l a b o r i o u s task of sitting
at the table and writing the w o r d s d o w n ; a n d he p r e p a r e s a n d

179
PAUL B R O K S

d e l i v e r s the m a n u s c r i p t . B u t can h e , he w o n d e r s , actually claim

to be the a u t h o r of the s t o r i e s ?
T h e s t o r y of J e k y l l and H y d e a l s o h a s its o r i g i n s in a d r e a m .
S t e v e n s o n h a d for s o m e time b e e n t r y i n g to find a vehicle to
e x p l o r e 'that s t r o n g s e n s e o f m a n ' s d o u b l e b e i n g ' . A s well a s the
p l a y a b o u t D e a c o n B r o d i e , he h a d a l r e a d y written a s t o r y with
that theme, The Travelling Companion, but this had been
r e t u r n e d by an editor on the a m b i g u o u s g r o u n d s that it w a s a
' w o r k o f g e n i u s a n d i n d e c e n t ' . S t e v e n s o n w a s not h a p p y with i t
either — he d i s a g r e e d that it w a s a w o r k of g e n i u s — and
d e s t r o y e d the m a n u s c r i p t .

T h e n , he s a y s , he hit certain 'financial fluctuations', which for

t w o d a y s forced h i m to rack his b r a i n s 'for a plot of a n y s o r t ' for
a s a l e a b l e story. A n d then, on the s e c o n d night, he h a d a night-
m a r e , s c r e a m i n g s o l o u d l y his wife felt she h a d t o w a k e him. H e
w a s not b e s t p l e a s e d . 'I w a s d r e a m i n g a fine b o g e y tale,' he told
her. N e v e r t h e l e s s , h e h a d m a n a g e d t o s e c u r e s o m e key elements
of the s t o r y : 'I d r e a m e d the s c e n e at the w i n d o w , and a scene
afterward split in two, in which H y d e , p u r s u e d for s o m e crime,
t o o k the p o w d e r a n d u n d e r w e n t the c h a n g e in the p r e s e n c e of
his p u r s u e r s . ' T h e rest o f the story, h e s a y s , ' w a s m a d e awake,
a n d c o n s c i o u s l y , a l t h o u g h I think I can trace in m u c h of it the
m a n n e r of my B r o w n i e s ' , a d d i n g that they ' h a v e not a rudiment
of w h a t we call a c o n s c i e n c e ' .

C o n s c i e n c e m a k e s c o w a r d s o f u s all.

180
 Voodoo Child (Slight Return)

T e n minutes to g o . I ' m g o i n g to r o u n d o f f my lecture with a

story. I scan the a u d i t o r i u m . T h e s t u d e n t s a r e still attentive,
p e n s and n o t e p a d s at the ready. A p a l e girl in the front r o w h a s
a small tape r e c o r d e r a n d r e a c h e s into her b a g for a r e p l a c e m e n t
cassette. A p i g e o n settles on the sill o u t s i d e o n e of the h i g h
w i n d o w s a n d , w a t c h i n g it, I forget m o m e n t a r i l y w h a t I w a s
about t o say. T h e n i t c o m e s b a c k t o m e : R o b e r t ' s story.

O n e day, i n the foothills o f m i d d l e a g e , R o b e r t t o o k a l o n g

l o o k at h i m s e l f in the mirror. T h e reflection sent an u n e q u i v o c a l
message. Life was running out and he w a s g o i n g nowhere. He
w a s stale: b o r e d with his j o b , o u t o f l o v e with his w i f e , stifled b y
his family, disenchanted with himself. B u t w h a t s t r u c k h i m
m u c h harder, g r i p p e d him and s h o o k him t o the c o r e o f his
b e i n g , w a s the t h o u g h t that a t the end o f this d r e a r y line o f d a y s ,
there w a s o b l i v i o n . It w a s time for a c h a n g e .

T h a t d a y o n his w a y t o w o r k h e s t o p p e d a t the n e w s a g e n t s , a s
u s u a l , to b u y a n e w s p a p e r . He p a i d for it b u t , on the w a y out,

181
PAUL B R O K S

w h e n the s h o p k e e p e r w a s n ' t l o o k i n g , R o b e r t t o o k a chocolate

b a r f r o m a s h e l f a n d s l i p p e d it into his p o c k e t . T h i s little act of
theft w a s c u r i o u s l y e n e r g i z i n g . H i s s e n s e s felt stripped and raw
a n d he ran b a c k to his car in a whorl of elation. He d r o v e faster
than h e s h o u l d , but, instead o f g o i n g t o w o r k , h e travelled 320
m i l e s f r o m Y o r k s h i r e t o C o r n w a l l . B y early e v e n i n g , h e found
h i m s e l f sitting on a b e a c h , in the face of a w a r m sea breeze.
R o b e r t w a s p r o f o u n d l y happy.

T h e sun set, it g r e w d a r k and chilly, but he s t a y e d there all

night, c o n c e d i n g to sleep o n l y as the sun r o s e in another part of
the sky. C o u l d h e b e s u r e i t w a s the s a m e sun? h e w o n d e r e d . H e
r e t u r n e d h o m e late in the d a y with no explanation except the
truth a n d spent another s l e e p l e s s night p l a c a t i n g his distressed
w i f e . S h e d e m a n d e d a m o r e p l a u s i b l e v e r s i o n o f events.

'Robert, w h a t w e r e y o u thinking o f ? ' she s a i d .

He s a i d h e ' d b e e n thinking a b o u t e v e r y t h i n g and had put a
few t h i n g s straight in his m i n d .
L i f e reverted to routine for a c o u p l e of w e e k s . T h e n , d r i v i n g
h o m e f r o m w o r k o n e F r i d a y e v e n i n g , R o b e r t switches o n the
car r a d i o a n d h e a r s an interview with J u l i a n B r e a m , the classical
guitarist. A t o n e point the interviewer a s k s B r e a m what h e
thinks o f 'electrically amplified g u i t a r s ' . ' T h e electric b a s s i s
fine,' h e s a y s , b u t o t h e r w i s e h e ' s not i m p r e s s e d . W h a t d o e s h e
think of J i m i H e n d r i x as a p l a y e r ? R o b e r t detects a note of c o n -
d e s c e n s i o n in the interviewer's v o i c e at the m e n t i o n of H e n d r i x ,
b u t thinks i t ' s a g o o d q u e s t i o n , o n e he h i m s e l f w o u l d h a v e
w a n t e d to put. He w a i t s for the reply. Don't let me down, Julian,
h e thinks. T h e r e i s n o l e t - d o w n . ' H e w a s brilliant,' s a y s B r e a m ,
l e a v i n g the interviewer m o m e n t a r i l y f l u m m o x e d . R o b e r t gets

182
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

another b u r s t of e n e r g y like the o n e he h a d w h e n he stole the

chocolate bar.
H e turns r o u n d the car, h e a d s b a c k into t o w n a t s p e e d a n d
pulls up on the p a v e m e n t o u t s i d e a m u s i c a l i n s t r u m e n t s s t o r e .
T h e s h o p is set to c l o s e in five m i n u t e s a n d the s a l e s staff are
c a s h i n g up. He tells them he m u s t h a v e a F e n d e r S t r a t o c a s t e r ,
the guitar H e n d r i x p l a y e d . T h e y o b l i g e . R o b e r t b u y s a n a m p l i -
fier to go with it and a book containing note-by-note
transcriptions o f H e n d r i x s o n g s . T h i s c o m e s t o n e a r l y a t h o u -
sand p o u n d s .

' B u t R o b e r t , ' s a y s his w i f e w h e n h e g e t s h o m e , ' y o u c a n ' t

even p l a y the guitar.'
He tells her he is g o i n g to learn.
But that night all elation h a s d r a i n e d away. He lies a w a k e
until the early h o u r s in a state of a g i t a t i o n , t o r m e n t e d by
thoughts o f f a d i n g into n o t h i n g n e s s , a c c o m p a n i e d b y g u t -
c h u r n i n g feelings of the p r o x i m i t y of d e a t h . Tonight, tomorrow,
just around the corner. It's coming, it's coming. He is c l o s e to p a n i c .
It's coming, it's coming. T h e next day, o u t of n o w h e r e , he
a n n o u n c e s to his wife that their m a r r i a g e is o v e r a n d he l e a v e s
her, the h o u s e , the children, a n d his n e w guitar, n e v e r to return.

R o b e r t g o e s b a c k to C o r n w a l l , w h e r e he finds a b a r j o b ,
g r o w s his hair, cultivates a tanned a n d w e a t h e r e d l o o k a n d
b e c o m e s , in effect, s o m e o n e e l s e .
T w o y e a r s later, l i v i n g a l o n e in a t h r e a d b a r e b e d - s i t in the
s u b u r b s of a northern city, R o b e r t can s c a r c e l y recollect the
C o r n i s h interlude. T h e r e are f r a g m e n t s , i m a g e s f r o m s o m e o n e
e l s e ' s m e m o r y , b u t they d o n ' t c o h e r e — a b l u e l a m p s h a d e , a
rainy night, the shiny, stainless-steel s u r f a c e s of a hotel kitchen,

183
PAUL B R O K S

a w o m a n ( J a c k i e ? J e n n y ? ) , a fistfight, the s e a . It is hard to pull

t o g e t h e r t h o u g h t s from o n e m i n u t e to the next.
H e feels n a u s e o u s . S o m e t h i n g rises s q u i r m i n g from the pit o f
his s t o m a c h to his gullet. In the b a t h r o o m mirror, his reflected
f a c e s e e m s d r a i n e d o f a n y m e a n i n g , a l m o s t the a b s e n c e o f a
reflection. He s t a n d s s t a r i n g for a while, then turns on the w a s h -
b a s i n tap, turns it off, turns it on a g a i n , off, o n , before c r a s h i n g
to the floor. H i s l i m b s stiffen, then jerk fiercely for several
m i n u t e s , as a s p r e a d i n g p a t c h of urine d a r k e n s his trouser l e g .
He sleeps.

T h i s i s R o b e r t ' s third o r fourth seizure this w e e k . T h e next

h a p p e n s in the m i d d l e of a s u p e r m a r k e t a n d , afterwards, h e ' s
taken t o hospital. T h e d o c t o r s are c o n c e r n e d that, despite
r e c o v e r i n g f r o m the fit, he h a s r e m a i n e d inert and disoriented.
T h e y i n v e s t i g a t e with h e a d s c a n s a n d find a l a r g e m a s s in the
orbitofrontal r e g i o n of the b r a i n . It turns out to be a menin-
g i o m a . T h i s is a t u m o u r , intrinsically b e n i g n , which has i n v a d e d
the outer c o v e r i n g s of the b r a i n . It h a s b e e n g r o w i n g for several
y e a r s . B y d i s t o r t i n g the frontal l o b e s o f R o b e r t ' s brain, i t w a s
r e s h a p i n g the v e r y p e r s o n h e felt h i m s e l f t o b e . T h e y o p e r a t e .
T u m o u r e x c i s e d , R o b e r t e n q u i r e s o f his n u r s e s m o s t d a y s :
' W h e n are m y children c o m i n g ? ' a n d ' C a n I g o h o m e n o w ? '

T h e lecture s e e m s t o h a v e g o n e well e n o u g h . T h e s e n e u r o -
g o t h i c tales g e n e r a l l y d o . I tell them ' R o b e r t ' s s t o r y ' is a
s o m e w h a t e m b e l l i s h e d a c c o u n t of a real c a s e . I ' v e tinkered with
s o m e o f the b i o g r a p h i c a l i n f o r m a t i o n a n d , o f c o u r s e , the
p a t i e n t ' s n a m e w a s not really R o b e r t , but the clinical details a r e ,
in e s s e n c e , faithful. T h i s m a n really did l e a v e his family on an
impulse following several episodes o f uncharacteristically

184
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

eccentric b e h a v i o u r , i n c l u d i n g acts o f petty theft a n d s p o n t a -

n e o u s trips t o s e a s i d e t o w n s a n d other p l a c e s . H e really d i d
spend s u m s o f m o n e y h e c o u l d ill afford o n l u x u r y g o o d s like
musical instruments (which h e c o u l d not p l a y ) a n d e x p e n s i v e
clothes (which h e m i g h t , o r m i g h t not, w e a r ) .

H e w a s a J i m i H e n d r i x fan, t o o . A l a r g e , i c o n i c i m a g e o f the
g r e a t m a n stared from his b e d r o o m wall at the rehab unit. H e n -
drix, at least, r e m a i n e d c o n s t a n t in his life. W h e t h e r or n o t he
s t o o d in conference with the m i r r o r in the w a y I d e s c r i b e at the
b e g i n n i n g a n d the end, I ' v e no i d e a . I threw that in. P e r h a p s ,
s o m e w h e r e , I h a d in m i n d the i m a g e of J e k y l l s t a n d i n g b e f o r e
the m i r r o r a s h e w a t c h e s his t r a n s f o r m a t i o n into H y d e , a n d
then, a t the end, p e r h a p s i t w a s D r a c u l a , bereft o f s o u l , bereft o f
reflection. I d o n ' t k n o w . I t ' s o n l y just o c c u r r e d to m e . After the
operation h e really did expect t o return t o the b o s o m o f his
family, u n a w a r e that they h a d l o n g since m o v e d o n .

W h e n did the s l o w t u m o u r take r o o t ? H o w l o n g h a d i t b e e n

g r o w i n g and h e a v i n g its b u l k into his frontal l o b e s , i n s i d i o u s l y
recalibrating his p e r s o n a l i t y ? A m e n i n g i o m a like R o b e r t ' s c a n
take y e a r s to d e v e l o p , eventually b e c o m i n g a stable feature of
the intracranial l a n d s c a p e . T h e b r a i n c a n , u p t o a point, a c c o m -
m o d a t e a s l o w - g r o w i n g m a s s w i t h o u t b e t r a y i n g m a j o r clinical
s i g n s o r s y m p t o m s . I t d e p e n d s o n the rate o f g r o w t h a n d w h e r e
i t ' s l o c a t e d . S o m e p e o p l e g r o w old and d i e n e v e r k n o w i n g that
for h a l f their life or m o r e they w e r e h a r b o u r i n g a b e n i g n b r a i n
tumour. P e r h a p s they n e v e r k n o w w h o they m i g h t h a v e b e e n .

I o n c e s a w a m a n in his s e v e n t i e s a d m i t t e d to hospital for

investigation of a s t r o k e . He t u r n e d o u t to h a v e a t u m o u r the
size o f a n o r a n g e nestling i n the parietal l o b e o f his b r a i n . I t h a d

185
PAUL B R O K S

n o t h i n g to do with the s t r o k e , h a d p r o b a b l y been there for

d e c a d e s a n d w a s n ' t , apparently, g i v i n g him a n y trouble. It had
b e c o m e a part of him.
Perhaps Robert would h a v e left his wife and children
a n y w a y . P e r h a p s he w a s restless and b o r e d , or d e p r e s s e d . A
m i d - l i f e crisis. It c o u l d be that the t u m o u r just hastened the
p r o c e s s or even h a d n o t h i n g at all to do with his i m p u l s i v e d e c i -
s i o n to p a c k his b a g s a n d g o . We can't rule this out entirely, but
I think not. I m p a i r m e n t s of social j u d g e m e n t , i m p u l s i v e b e h a v -
iour, a n d all the rest that e m e r g e d t h r o u g h R o b e r t ' s personality
c h a n g e are a c o m m o n c o n s e q u e n c e of d a m a g e to the frontal
lobes.

U n l i k e the m a n with the s t r o k e , R o b e r t ' s t u m o u r was c a u s i n g

him t r o u b l e . H e d e v e l o p e d epilepsy. B u t s u p p o s e h e hadn't.
S u p p o s e there h a d b e e n n o o b v i o u s m e d i c a l c o m p l i c a t i o n s , that
the t u m o u r w a s just there, n u d g i n g a n d n i g g l i n g , resetting the
d i a l s o f R o b e r t ' s personality. W o u l d there h a v e b e e n g r o u n d s
for s a y i n g that his b e h a v i o u r w a s p a t h o l o g i c a l ? N o . Y o u w o u l d
s a y it w a s a mid-life crisis.

D e s p i t e my u n d i s g u i s e d haste to d r a w the p r o c e e d i n g s to a
c l o s e (I h a v e a train to catch) there a r e several q u e s t i o n s . S o m e
a r e technical, but they a r e m o s t l y a b o u t the story, as a story. Fair
enough.

' H a v e y o u e v e r c o n s i d e r e d all this from a Christian p e r s p e c -

t i v e ? ' a s k s the p a l e girl at the front a s , finally, I gather my notes.
' N o , not really,' I s a y rather briskly. ' P e r h a p s we can d i s c u s s
it next w e e k ? '
' B u t w h a t h a p p e n e d t o R o b e r t i n the e n d ? '
' H e became profoundly depressed.'

186
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

I s p a r e her the i n f o r m a t i o n that after b e i n g d i s c h a r g e d f r o m

his rehab hospital, there w e r e t w o b o t c h e d s u i c i d e a t t e m p t s
before he finally s u c c e e d e d in killing himself. T h i r d t i m e lucky.
I h a v e this u n n e c e s s a r y i m a g e of R o b e r t h a n g i n g h i m s e l f with
H e n d r i x s i n g i n g ' V o o d o o C h i l d ' in the b a c k g r o u n d : And if I
don't meet you no more in this world / I'll meet you in the next one.
/And don't he late . . . It didn't h a p p e n that w a y .

My train is m o r e than h a l f an h o u r late a n d I kill time in a

b o o k s h o p . I n o w regret not a l l o w i n g the p a l e girl m o r e t i m e . S h e
s e e m e d g e n u i n e l y d i s t r e s s e d . I r e s o l v e to s e e k her o u t after the
next lecture and m a k e a m e n d s . B u t n o w I ' m on the train. I h a v e
a beer in o n e hand a n d , in the other, the p a p e r b a c k I ' v e just
bought. It's about c o s m o l o g y and I'm trying to get s o m e i m a g -
inative p u r c h a s e on the i m m e n s i t y of it all. I t ' s the kind of t h i n g
I s o m e t i m e s read a s a w a y o f w i n d i n g d o w n . T h e g r a n d i l o q u e n t
p r o s e (velvet mantle of the night... cosmic symphony of the heav-
ens), and the b i g , r o u n d n u m b e r s (four hundred billion galaxies)
h a v e a s o o t h i n g effect.

Cosmology and neuropsychology have absurdity in

c o m m o n . T h e r a w facts are s t r a n g e b e y o n d i m a g i n a t i o n .
It sets me thinking a b o u t h o w the p h y s i c a l forces that twist
the g a l a x i e s and roll the train a l o n g the t r a c k c o n n e c t with the
social and p s y c h o l o g i c a l forces that a n i m a t e the p a s s e n g e r s .
T h a t recalcitrant child a n d his w e a r y m o t h e r , the old c o u p l e
sitting i n silence, the w o m a n o p p o s i t e w h o catches m y e y e , d i s -
p l a y s a m i c r o m o m e n t a r y flicker of an e y e b r o w a n d s m i l e s as the
y o u n g m a n with a n o b s c e n e m e s s a g e printed o n his T - s h i r t takes
the seat b e s i d e her. Fleetingly, she a n d I w e r e complicit. I entered
her mind and s h e entered m i n e . W e can p l o t the m o t i o n s o f the

187
PAUL B R O K S

p l a n e t s , but h o w d o y o u m e a s u r e the force o f a g l a n c e , o r the

w e i g h t of a s m i l e ?
T h i n k i n g these t h o u g h t s a n d l o o k i n g a t the p e o p l e a r o u n d
me I entertain m y s e l f by s e e i n g them for what, at o n e level of
d e s c r i p t i o n , they certainly a r e : c o m p l e x b i o l o g i c a l machines.
P h y s i c a l o b j e c t s . I take a little t h o u g h t j o u r n e y behind their e y e s
a n d all I s e e is d a r k n e s s ; then, l o o k i n g to the w i n d o w , a g a i n s t the
d a r k , I s e e m y s e l f l o o k i n g b a c k at m e , lost in a confusion of first
a n d third p e r s o n . T h e i m a g e in the w i n d o w r e s e m b l e s a machine
like the o t h e r s on the train, but with an involuntary flip from
third p e r s o n t o f i r s t , I ' m b a c k n o w o n this s i d e o f the reflection,
sitting in my o w n clear c a p s u l e of c o n s c i o u s n e s s . I b u y the illu-
s i o n that other p e o p l e inhabit similar c a p s u l e s , but o b v i o u s l y
they d o n ' t . A n d f r o m their p e r s p e c t i v e neither d o I .

I g e t a n o t h e r beer. I l o o k a g a i n at my reflection. It chuckles.

W h e n finally I g e t h o m e , I feel p r o f o u n d l y content, i m m e r s e d in
m y family. S e c u r e , i m m u t a b l e , invulnerable, i m m o r t a l . A s
R o b e r t o n c e felt, p e r h a p s .

***

T h e p a l e girl i s not here today. N o t i n the front row, a n y w a y . I ' m

e a r l y and I w a t c h the students as they file in. T h e r o w s fill up, but
s h e i s not here. S o m e l a t e c o m e r s arrive f i v e , ten minutes into m y
lecture, but she is not a m o n g them.

I p i c k up w h e r e we left o f f last w e e k , p o i n t i n g out that illness

o f v a r i o u s k i n d s m a y indirectly affect the w a y w e s e e o u r s e l v e s ,
b u t that n e u r o l o g i c a l d i s e a s e s o m e t i m e s g o e s straight t o the c o r e
a n d d i s t o r t s the p e r s o n i n e s s e n c e . L i k e parasitic w a s p larvae

188
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

d e v o u r i n g a living caterpillar from the i n s i d e , a d i s e a s e can

penetrate the s u b s t r u c t u r e s of the s e l f — the neural s y s t e m s c o n -
trolling l o n g - t e r m m e m o r y o r t h o s e that r e g u l a t e e m o t i o n o r
the hatching of intentions or the s h a p i n g of beliefs. I r e m i n d
them o f R o b e r t ' s s l o w - g r o w i n g t u m o u r a n d h o w h e c a m e t o s e e
the w o r l d in a different way. He t h o u g h t differently, b e h a v e d
differently, felt differently a b o u t the p e o p l e a r o u n d him. W a s
the R o b e r t w h o i m p u l s i v e l y b o u g h t e x p e n s i v e c l o t h e s a n d e l e c -
tric g u i t a r s , w h o stole c h o c o l a t e b a r s , m a d e i m p r o m p t u trips t o
s e a s i d e t o w n s , and finally w a l k e d out on his wife a n d children —
w a s h e the s a m e R o b e r t w h o , p r e v i o u s l y , h a d b e e n s o d e v o t e d t o
his family, w o r k e d hard to p a y the bills, w h o w o u l d n e v e r h a v e
d r e a m t o f stealing anything, a n d d i d n ' t take risks o r g e t into
fights? If not, w h e n did J e k y l l b e c o m e H y d e ? W a s there a s i n g l e
incident or a s i n g l e d a y that m i g h t be s a i d to m a r k the t r a n s i -
tion? Is it p o s s i b l e to pin it d o w n to a s i n g l e m o m e n t ? D o n ' t we
all d o rash a n d stupid things from time t o time? H o w m a n y a d d
up to a p e r s o n a l i t y c h a n g e ?

T h e n the return journey. R o b e r t ' s t u m o u r w a s r e m o v e d a n d

he w a s b a c k to s o m e t h i n g like his f o r m e r self. Something like.
H e y e a r n e d for his wife a n d k i d s . H e w a n t e d them b a c k . B u t i n
other w a y s he w a s irretrievably different, intellectually a n d
emotionally. H i s mental p o w e r s w e r e d i m i n i s h e d . H e b e c a m e
forgetful a n d c o u l d n ' t c o n c e n t r a t e . H e c o u l d n ' t p l a n t h i n g s
from o n e d a y t o the next; his v i e w o f the future w a s f o r e s h o r t -
ened. H i s face w a s p r e s s e d a g a i n s t the wall o f the p r e s e n t , b u t
the past w a s at his shoulder. It w a s w h e r e he felt he b e l o n g e d ; in
the g o l d e n valley of the time b e f o r e the t u m o u r . M o r e than that,
it w a s where he often b e l i e v e d h i m s e l f to b e .

189
PAUL B R O K S

T h i s w a s n o t a wistful d w e l l i n g on the past. S o m e t i m e s he

w a s c o n f u s e d to the extent that he b e l i e v e d nothing had
c h a n g e d . H i s w i f e w o u l d c o m e t o collect him. S h e would. S h e ' d
b e here s o o n . T h e y w o u l d p i c k u p the children from school
together. T h e y w o u l d g o h o m e . T h e p a s t w a s like a radio jingle;
not m u c h tone or m e l o d y , b u t it w a s in his h e a d and w o u l d not
l e a v e h i m a l o n e . T h e n there w a s the d e p r e s s i o n - and in o n e of
these b l a c k t r o u g h s h e t o o k his o w n life. W h a t relationship did
p o s t - o p e r a t i v e R o b e r t h a v e t o his f o r m e r s e l v e s ? W h a t w a s his
' r e a l ' s e l f ? W h a t w a s his identity?

I realize I ' m waffling. S o m e of the students are shuffling in

their s e a t s . T h e y h a v e c o m e t o d e p e n d o n lectures structured
like s e l f - a s s e m b l y furniture m a n u a l s , with h a n d o u t s and w e b
p a g e s full of d i a g r a m s and flow charts, bullet points and refer-
e n c e s . Y o u g i v e t h e m L e g o bricks o f fact and o p i n i o n and y o u
tell t h e m p r e c i s e l y h o w they fit together. I ' m thinking a l o u d . It
disturbs them.

' D o n ' t w o r r y a b o u t the p r e c i s e m e a n i n g s o f t e r m s like self

a n d personal identity,' I say. O r d i n a r y l a n g u a g e notions will do
for now. A c t u a l l y , I ' m inclined to think that o r d i n a r y l a n g u a g e
n o t i o n s are a b o u t as g o o d as it g e t s when it c o m e s to talking
a b o u t ' p e r s o n a l identity' a n d the ' s e l f ' , but I d o n ' t mention this.
' T h i n k of your self. Y o u k n o w , that which y o u think r o u g h l y
defines you, the c o n s c i o u s b e i n g sitting here in this lecture
theatre; that which d i s t i n g u i s h e s y o u from the p e r s o n sitting
next t o y o u o r s o m e o n e s o m e w h e r e else d o i n g s o m e t h i n g differ-
ent. Or a c o r p s e . '

A c o r p s e ? W h e r e d i d that c o m e f r o m ? B u t then an i m a g e of
last n i g h t ' s s t r a n g e d r e a m f l o a t s b e f o r e m e . Matilda, o n e o f the

190
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

junior d o c t o r s , w a s there. W e h a d the top h a l f o f a m a n ' s b o d y

ready for dissection. N e x t thing I k n o w , the h e a d is s e p a r a t e d
from the torso. T h e r e ' s Mattie, m e , a n d s o m e other m a l e , I d o n ' t
k n o w who. I feel s q u e a m i s h , b u t try n o t to let it show. R e l u c -
tantly, but deftly, Mattie g e t s started with a cranial saw.

At s o m e level I k n e w it w a s a d r e a m b e c a u s e s a w i n g t h r o u g h
the skull of a c a d a v e r invariably r e l e a s e s the smell of b u r n i n g
b o n e - think of that acrid smell of the d e n t i s t ' s drill b o r i n g
into y o u r teeth. B u t t h e r e ' s n o o d o u r . N o s o u n d e v e n . S o o n
the top of the skull is r e m o v e d a n d we are l o o k i n g inside at the
remnants of the brain, except it l o o k s m o r e like a m a s s of m e l t e d
candle w a x than a brain. I c a n s e n s e M a t t i e ' s d i s g u s t . She's going
to be sick, I think. A n d s h e is - just a little, in the efficient, m e a s -
ured w a y that cats are sick — straight into the o p e n e d h e a d a n d
over the w a x y brain.

T h i s j o b i s g e t t i n g t o m e . P e r h a p s t h e r e ' s a part o f m e t r y i n g
t o tell m e s o m e t h i n g . A s i f r e p u l s e d b y m y p r i v a t e t h o u g h t s ( a r e
they h o v e r i n g like a p o l l u t e d mist a b o v e my h e a d ? ) , a w o m a n at
the b a c k of the hall stands up and m a k e s her w a y to the exit.
T h e d r e a m r e p l a y s itself like a s c e n e f r o m a film. I m e r e l y
o b s e r v e . T h e m a c a b r e narrative h a s n o t h i n g t o d o with m e .
I didn't plan or construct it. It a p p e a r e d fully f o r m e d in my
d r e a m . If s o m e o n e had told me this s t o r y y e s t e r d a y , as a d r e a m
vignette o f their o w n , I w o u l d not h a v e c l a i m e d rights o f o w n -
ership. It w o u l d h a v e s e e m e d novel a n d unfamiliar. If o v e r
breakfast this m o r n i n g I h a d b e e n a s k e d a b o u t my d r e a m last
night, I m i g h t well h a v e b e e n u n a b l e to r e m e m b e r . I u s u a l l y
can't.

T h e scene u n f o l d e d while the c o n s c i o u s , reflecting, d e l i b e r -

191
PAUL B R O K S

a t i n g 'I' was d o r m a n t a n d , by the time 'I' returned to wakeful-

n e s s , i t h a d retreated into s o m e secret c o m p a r t m e n t o f m y brain,
like a hermit c r a b f o l d i n g b a c k into its shell. S y n a p t i c a l l y
e n c r y p t e d to s u r v i v e the transition b e t w e e n sleep and w a k e -
fulness, the virtual shell then travels with me to the university. I
b r i n g it to the lecture. A n d then at s o m e u n c o n s c i o u s signal, or
p e r h a p s for no r e a s o n at all, the c r a b e m e r g e s and the d r e a m
s t o r y u n r a v e l s in the m i d d l e of my talk. It h a s nothing to do
with m e .

T h e a u d i e n c e settles d o w n w h e n I s h o w them d i a g r a m s o f
the b r a i n a n d tabulate s o m e o f the clinical s y n d r o m e s associated
with d a m a g e to the frontal l o b e s :

1. Dysexecutive type ( d o r s o l a t e r a l d a m a g e ) ; impaired j u d g e -

m e n t a n d difficulties with p l a n n i n g a n d p r o b l e m - s o l v i n g .
L a c k p e r s i s t e n c e or, the o p p o s i t e , persist in p e r f o r m i n g an
action well b e y o n d the point o f usefulness o r a p p r o p r i a t e -
ness ('perseveration').

2. Disinhibited type (orbitofrontal d a m a g e ) ; b e h a v i o u r is s t i m -

ulus-driven. The balance between internally generated
a c t i o n s a n d t h o s e t r i g g e r e d by external objects and events is
lost. T e n d t o b e distractible. S h o w i m p o v e r i s h e d social
insight.

3. Apathetic type ( m e d i o f r o n t a l d a m a g e ) ; a p a t h y and indiffer-

e n c e , l o s s o f initiative, lack o f spontaneity; i m p o v e r i s h m e n t
o f s p e e c h and t h o u g h t ; r e d u c e d b e h a v i o u r a l output.

I a s k them whether R o b e r t ' s b e h a v i o u r fits any of these schemes,

w h i l e reflecting, privately, that my t e a c h i n g style t o d a y has per-

192
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

h a p s d i s p l a y e d elements o f the first a n d s e c o n d s y n d r o m e , i f n o t

the third.
In c o n c l u s i o n , I q u i c k l y r e v i e w the m a i n t h e m e s of the l e c -
ture and we finish ten m i n u t e s early. T h e r e are no q u e s t i o n s .
T h e p a l e girl is not here to a s k whether I h a v e c o n s i d e r e d it all
from a Christian p e r s p e c t i v e . I w i s h s h e w e r e .

T h i s train's o n time, m o r e o r l e s s . I t ' s s e v e n o ' c l o c k and

darker than it s h o u l d be for the time of year. S u d d e n l y I feel
tired. P e r h a p s I ' m b r e w i n g a c o l d . O n e of the s t u d e n t s p r e s s e d a
b o o k a b o u t B u d d h i s m into m y h a n d s a s I w a s l e a v i n g the lecture
hall. T h e r e ' s s o m e stuff a b o u t suffering a n d d e a t h setting the
c o - o r d i n a t e s for life. I ' m not in the m o o d . I m u s t h a v e b e e n
twenty minutes o n the s a m e p a g e .

At the station, as p e o p l e are b o a r d i n g the train, I w a t c h a m a n

and a w o m a n on the p l a t f o r m . T h e y a r e e m b r a c i n g p a s s i o n a t e l y ,
s a y i n g their g o o d b y e s . I ' m r e m i n d e d o f w h a t s o m e o n e o n c e
said a b o u t p a r t i n g s : h o w the instant t h e y ' r e g o n e the p e r s o n y o u
w e r e with s e e m s m o r e powerfully p r e s e n t than e v e r b e f o r e .
A b s e n c e i s tangible. T h e m a n g e t s o n the train, the w o m a n
r e m a i n s on the p l a t f o r m . He l o o k s red e y e d a n d quite shaken. I
watch the face o f his g i r l f r i e n d / w i f e / m i s t r e s s a s w e pull a w a y .
It has a chilling c o m p o s u r e . It is a b l o c k i n g f a c e , d e n y i n g entry
and exit. H e w o n ' t see her a g a i n .

He sits just a c r o s s the aisle from me a n d I feel an irrational

u r g e to g i v e him the b o o k a b o u t B u d d h i s m . I p u t it a s i d e a n d
turn to the b u n d l e of p a p e r s I p i c k e d up at the university. I still
h a v e a p i g e o n h o l e , e v e n t h o u g h it's a y e a r since I left. T h e
D e p a r t m e n t a l C o m m i t t e e m i n u t e s are a t the t o p o f the pile
but, beneath this, s o m e t h i n g catches my e y e : a n o t e a b o u t the

193
PAUL B R O K S

s u i c i d e of an u n d e r g r a d u a t e . A w o m a n , a final-year student. It
is n o t a n a m e I r e c o g n i z e . T h e train clatters a c r o s s s o m e points,
c l a c k e t y - c l a c k , a n d m y s t o m a c h turns.
' T h a t girl w h o killed herself. W h a t did she l o o k l i k e ? '
I ' m h o m e . A t last I ' v e found m y old a d d r e s s b o o k and I ' m
p h o n i n g a f o r m e r c o l l e a g u e at the university, the o n e w h o per-
s u a d e d me to do the lectures. He is s l u g g i s h . It is well past
midnight.

' I ' m s o r r y , ' I say. ' I t ' s l a t e . '

' N o , it's o k a y . '
' W h a t d i d she l o o k l i k e ? '
'I don't know. I've no idea.'
I t takes p r e s e n c e o f m i n d t o put a n end t o o n e ' s o w n life.
S u i c i d e m a y be the bitter fruit of h o p e l e s s n e s s a n d despair, but it
i s a l s o the e n d point o f a d e c i s i o n - m a k i n g p r o c e s s . T h e r e s e e m s
to be a 'letting g o ' , an a c c e p t a n c e of the idea of death that
i n d u c e s clarity o f t h o u g h t and p e a c e o f m i n d . T h o s e c l o s e t o a
s u i c i d e often r e p o r t that the p e r s o n s e e m e d h a p p i e r o r m o r e
tranquil than u s u a l in their final h o u r s . T h e r e ' s s o m e t h i n g I read
s o m e w h e r e — I c a n ' t p l a c e it — a b o u t the c a u s e s of suicide and
h o w they are n o t a l w a y s o b v i o u s o r predictable and how, i f
s o m e o n e is in a particular frame of m i n d , it d o e s n ' t take m u c h to
tip t h e m o v e r — an innocent r e m a r k misinterpreted; a g e s t u r e
misperceived.

I ' v e t h o u g h t a b o u t the p a l e girl a lot this p a s t w e e k , but

h a v e n ' t f o l l o w e d it u p . I d o n ' t w a n t to a p p e a r m o r b i d or o b s e s -
s i v e . I c o u l d h a v e m a d e discreet enquiries, found s o m e pretext.
It w o u l d h a v e b e e n a n o r m a l thing to do. B u t I didn't, for my
o w n s a k e . I d i d not w a n t to s e e myself b e h a v i n g in that way,

194
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

b e t r a y i n g s i g n s o f culpability. I ' m not c u l p a b l e . Yet m o r e than

o n c e I have pictured a counter-factual w o r l d w h e r e I ' m the p e r -
fect, patient teacher. ' H a v e y o u e v e r c o n s i d e r e d all this f r o m a
Christian p e r s p e c t i v e ? ' s h e a s k s , and I s a y : ' T e l l m e w h a t y o u
m e a n , e x a c t l y ' T h e n we h a v e a c o n v e r s a t i o n for five, ten,
twenty minutes; h o w e v e r l o n g it takes for me to listen to her
c o n c e r n s and put m y o w n point o f v i e w g e n t l y and c o n s i d e r -
ately, without c r u s h i n g her. A n d then I w o u l d h a v e c a u g h t my
train, b e c a u s e it w a s h a l f an h o u r late a n y w a y a n d in my wry,
atheistic w a y I w o u l d h a v e c o n s t r u e d this as a beneficent n o d
from the C r e a t o r , a little t h a n k s - f o r - t a k i n g - t h e - t r o u b l e g e s t u r e .

I think a b o u t her n o w as I rush to my lecture. T h e train w a s

late. T h e hall i s full. T h e y ' r e w a i t i n g . S h e ' s w a i t i n g . T h e r e s h e
is in the front r o w with her mini cassette recorder. W h e r e h a v e
y o u been? I w a n t to a s k her. W h e r e were y o u ?

195
Mr Barrington's Quandary

I t ' s C l a r a , m y trainee, o n the p h o n e , a s k i n g m e t o c o m e and see

Mr B a r r i n g t o n . I ' m f o r m i n g a picture as I m a k e my w a y d o w n
the c o r r i d o r to the outpatient clinic. Mid-fifties, light g r e y suit,
w e t , b l u e e y e s , s a n d y hair, m o i s t h a n d s h a k e , the hint of a s t a m -
mer. I s a w h i m a c o u p l e of w e e k s a g o . T h e r e before me as I enter
the r o o m is a m i d d l e - a g e d m a n , the s a m e suit, the s a m e e y e s . But
this m a n is c o m p l e t e l y b a l d . H i s h e a d glistens u n d e r the strip
l i g h t i n g . T h e r e are tears filling his e y e s and he is s w e a t i n g
profusely. He l o o k s g l o b u l a r , d r i p p i n g w e t to his b o n e s . I t ' s a
feature o f his m e d i c a l condition.

T h e y h a d started their a s s e s s m e n t s , C l a r a explains, but M r

B a r r i n g t o n q u i c k l y b e c a m e d i s t r e s s e d and felt u n a b l e to c o n -
tinue. S h e tells me this in just t h o s e t e r m s , as if r e a d i n g from a
set of n o t e s . I m a k e a pretence of j o t t i n g d o w n s o m e notes of
my o w n , but w h a t I h a v e written, a n d am n o w tilting t o w a r d s
C l a r a is: What happened to his hair?

Mr Barrington is ahead of me. 'You're probably wondering

w h a t h a p p e n e d t o m y hair.'

196
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

A p p a r e n t l y it fell o u t at the w e e k e n d , m o s t l y d u r i n g S a t u r d a y
night while he lay in b e d t r y i n g to sleep. It c a m e o u t in c l u m p s as
his h e a d t o s s e d a n d turned on the pillow, c o v e r i n g the sheets a n d
sticking to his p e r s p i r i n g skin. He tried to b r u s h it a w a y , b u t the
sheets w e r e d a m p a n d h e w a s afraid o f w a k i n g his w i f e . S e v e r a l
times h e went t o the b a t h r o o m t o d i s p o s e o f the hair h e h a d
g a t h e r e d , each time n o t i c i n g in the mirror, w i t h o u t p a r t i c u l a r
d i s m a y , the v i r g i n p a t c h e s o f skin a d v a n c i n g a c r o s s his h e a d .

'You weren't concerned?' I ask.

' N o . I t ' s the least o f m y w o r r i e s . '
A n y w a y , he h a d lost a few c l u m p s o v e r the w e e k , so it w a s n ' t
that m u c h of a s h o c k w h e n the w h o l e lot fell out. H e ' s b e e n
u n d e r a terrible strain, he e x p l a i n s , a n d t h i n g s s e e m to h a v e
c o m e to a h e a d . I note the u n i n t e n d e d p u n . L a n g u a g e h a s a life
o f its o w n . H e ' s h a d these things p l a y i n g o n his m i n d , h e s a y s ,
this thing in particular.

' W o u l d y o u like t o talk a b o u t i t ? ' I a s k . ' A r e y o u able t o ? '

M r B a r r i n g t o n d r o p s his f a c e i n his h a n d s a n d s o b s . B e t w e e n
b u b b l i n g sniffs a n d q u i v e r i n g e x h a l a t i o n s he a s k s p e r m i s s i o n to
r e m o v e his jacket. H e a l s o r e m o v e s his tie. H i s c r e a m shirt i s
m a r k e d with a bib of s w e a t d o w n to the fourth b u t t o n a n d there
are l a r g e o v a l s o f d a m p n e s s u n d e r the a r m p i t s . H e r e g a i n s his
c o m p o s u r e and i s s t e e l i n g h i m s e l f t o s a y s o m e t h i n g , b u t i s not
quite ready.

' W h y d o n ' t y o u take a b r e a k , ' I say, ' g e t a b r e a t h of fresh air.

T h e n , i f y o u like, y o u c a n c o m e b a c k a n d we'll chat. We'll l e a v e
the tests for now.'

M r B a r r i n g t o n just stares a t the floor b e t w e e n u s . N o , h e s a y s ,

h e m u s t talk. I t ' s d r i v i n g him m a d . B u t h e r e m a i n s hesitant. H i s

197
PAUL B R O K S

g a z e retreats to his feet. T h e n , l o o k i n g in C l a r a ' s direction, he

s a y s i f w e d o n ' t m i n d h e thinks h e ' d find i t easier i f . . .
C l a r a u n d e r s t a n d s . 'I'll s e e y o u later,' she s a y s , a n d leaves.
M r B a r r i n g t o n g a z e s o u t o f the w i n d o w a c r o s s the s u b u r b s
t o w a r d s the distant hills, his wet, b l u e e y e s unblinking. He isn't
a d m i r i n g the view. He is adrift s o m e w h e r e in a v a s t , inner s p a c e ,
the e x h a u s t e d p r e y of a relentless e m o t i o n a l p r e d a t o r : guilt. I
s h a k e his s o g g y h a n d a t the end o f the s e s s i o n . H e i s v e r y g r a t e -
ful. I listened. I a d v i s e d . O u t s i d e it h a s started to rain.

Clinical s u p e r v i s i o n . W h i l e C l a r a fills the kettle, I think b a c k

to Mr B a r r i n g t o n . I s e e his a r m s s w i n g d o w n at his sides, his
h e a d roll b a c k . I hear the s u s t a i n e d , oscillating g r o a n like a child
e x h a u s t e d by a b o u t of c r y i n g . T h e n the c o n f e s s i o n : a single,
w e e d y act of marital infidelity, a l o n g time a g o . H i s wife never
knew. H e ' d a l m o s t forgotten.

' B u t n o w i t ' s p l a y i n g o n y o u r c o n s c i e n c e ? ' I'd s a i d , which

w a s feeble in the c i r c u m s t a n c e s . T h i s w a s not a w a s p at a picnic.
It w a s a s k e w e r i n g t o r m e n t .

H i s hair h a d fallen out. T h e s t o r m t r o o p e r s o f the s u p e r - e g o

w e r e d o i n g their w o r s t , c o m m a n d i n g him t o put the record
s t r a i g h t with his w i f e . B u t it w o u l d b r e a k her heart, w o u l d n ' t it?
What was he to do?

'Tell me what to do,' he said. 'Please.'

I w o n d e r if we can d i s e n t a n g l e the d i l e m m a from the d i s e a s e .
T h e p r o v i s i o n a l d i a g n o s i s i s m u l t i s y s t e m atrophy, a d e g e n e r a -
tive c o n d i t i o n . It c a r r i e s a p o o r p r o g n o s i s . P e r h a p s h e ' s clearing
the d e c k s . B u t the d i s e a s e is affecting his b r a i n , so the u r g e to
c o m e c l e a n , a n d the inability to d e c i d e what to do a b o u t it might
also be understood in neurological terms.

198
 I N T O T H E S I L E N T L A N D

I o n c e m a d e a h o m e visit to s e e a h e a d - i n j u r e d patient. S o m e -
o n e h a d s w u n g a b a s e b a l l b a t t h r o u g h the front of his skull. A
year o n a n d h e w a s d o i n g a s well a s c o u l d b e e x p e c t e d . H e c a m e
to g r e e t me at the front d o o r , b u t as he put his h a n d f o r w a r d he
noticed a milk bottle on the d o o r s t e p . B e f o r e his h a n d c o n n e c t e d
with mine h e w a s b e n d i n g t o p i c k u p the bottle. H e h a d a l m o s t
reached it when he b e g a n to straighten a g a i n a n d turn t o w a r d s
m e , only t o c h a n g e tack and b e n d t o the d o o r s t e p . H e s t r a i g h t -
ened a g a i n . H e bent. H e s t r a i g h t e n e d . H e bent. H e shifted his
weight and shuffled, s t r u g g l i n g t o e x e c u t e o n e o r other o f the
action p l a n s h o p e l e s s l y misfiring in the mutilated circuitry of his
frontal l o b e s : motor dysexecutive syndrome. Finally, I p i c k e d up
the bottle and g a v e it to him. We w o u l d h a v e b e e n there all d a y
otherwise. P e r h a p s M r B a r r i n g t o n ' s q u a n d a r y i s a c a s e o f m o r a l
dysexecutive syndrome.

C l a r a returns with m u g s of tea. I feel inclined to k e e p Mr

B a r r i n g t o n ' s secret. He w a s n a k e d e n o u g h . I w o n ' t tell her, not
yet anyway. P e r h a p s not at all, p e r h a p s I'll take c h a r g e of the
c a s e , and then s h e n e e d never know.

199
 Out of Darkness Cometh Light

Molineux. T h e h o m e of Wolverhampton Wanderers. It's a long

w a y t o c o m e for a football m a t c h . T w o h u n d r e d miles and m o r e
f r o m h o m e . I still c a n ' t g e t u s e d to the n e w s t a d i u m , all pale
b r i c k a n d m u s t a r d - c o l o u r e d steel. W h e n we arrive I feel I
s h o u l d b e s o m e w h e r e else. T h e Molineux o f old w a s j a g g e d and
d a r k — a p l a c e of w r o u g h t iron, r o u g h c o n c r e t e , and foul smells.
N o w e v e n the l a v a t o r i e s a r e s p r u c e a n d well lit. A fan stands at
the urinal with a pie in his free hand.

I r e m e m b e r the club m o t t o —Out of darkness cometh light—as

my s o n s a n d I a s c e n d the s t e p s to the S t a n C u l l i s stand, formerly
the N o r t h B a n k . B y the s t a n d a r d s o f A n f i e l d ' s S p i o n K o p o r the
H o l t e E n d a t Villa P a r k , the N o r t h B a n k w a s small. F r o m other
p a r t s o f the g r o u n d i t l o o k e d h u n c h e d a n d h o o d e d , especially o n
floodlit, rainy n i g h t s . B u t the a c o u s t i c s w e r e d e m o n i c . T h e
n o i s e of the c r o w d w a s a b e a s t . It s u r g e d up to the rafters and
b e l t e d the r o o f like B e e l z e b u b . A t such times the N o r t h B a n k
w a s a s i n g l e v o c a l a p p a r a t u s , the c r o w d a s t e a m i n g t o n g u e in a
b l a c k throat.

200
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

B u t the terraces are g o n e . T h e s w i r l i n g m a s s o f f l e s h i s n o

m o r e . S i n g i n g and chanting are m o r e s p o r a d i c a n d u s u a l l y fizzle
out. N o w w e sit o n plastic s e a t s , listen t o a n o d y n e p o p o v e r the
P A , watch m e n d r e s s e d a s c a r t o o n a n i m a l s w a n d e r i n g the
touchline, careful not to s t r a y into o p p o s i t i o n territory for fear
of inciting the c r o w d . ( T h e r e is hostility e n o u g h in the v o i c e s
a r o u n d us — this is W o l v e s v. West B r o m w i c h A l b i o n ; an acrid
d o m e s t i c s q u a b b l e . ) A n d then J e f f B e c k c o m e s o v e r the P A :
' H i - H o Silver L i n i n g ' . T h e c r o w d g a l v a n i z e s . I t ' s a n a n t h e m . I
find m y s e l f s i n g i n g a l o n g to the c h o r u s : ' . . . a n d i t ' s H i - H o
W O L V E R H A M P T O N ! ' My sons look at me uncomfortably. I
s i n g the next c h o r u s , but with less g u s t o . T h i r d t i m e r o u n d I ' m
silent. I l o o k a b o u t me a n d am visited by d o u b t . Is this
Molineux? Is it m e ?

T h e other d a y I s h o w e d my students a v i d e o . T h e s c e n e is a
clinic r o o m . A y o u n g m a n a n d an old m a n sit f a c i n g each other.
T h e y o u n g m a n is taking a history, p u t t i n g q u e s t i o n s , carefully
p r o b i n g the old m a n ' s o b s e r v a t i o n s and recollections. T h e old
m a n concentrates, g i v i n g each q u e s t i o n careful t h o u g h t , b u t it is
clear from his r e s p o n s e s that, d e s p i t e a p p e a r a n c e s ( h e s m i l e s
readily, s e e m s fully e n g a g e d a n d h a s put on a suit for the o c c a -
s i o n ) , there are g r e a t v o i d s b e t w e e n the s p a r s e c o n s t e l l a t i o n s o f
recollection.

He has a brain disease and can hardly carry memories from

o n e d a y to the next. I m a d e the v i d e o m o r e than t w e l v e y e a r s
a g o . T h e old m a n and m y y o u n g e r s e l f are p e r f o r m i n g a f a m i l -
iar routine. H e i s d e a d n o w a n d i t o c c u r s t o m e that e v e r y
m o l e c u l e o f m y y o u n g e r s e l f h a s b e e n r e p l a c e d with the p a s s a g e
o f time. I n a s e n s e , neither o f t h o s e b o d i e s h a s s u r v i v e d .

201
PAUL B R O K S

Similarly, n o t h i n g r e m a i n s o f the b o y w h o s t o o d o n the terraces.

S o , w h a t s u r v i v e s ? W h a t m a k e s u s the s a m e p e r s o n from o n e
y e a r to the next, o n e w e e k , o n e day, o n e minute to the next?
S o m e p h i l o s o p h e r s h a v e e m p h a s i z e d c o n s c i o u s recollection.
C o n t i n u i t y of the p e r s o n is d o w n to continuity of m e m o r y . If I
c a n r e c l a i m the t h o u g h t s and e x p e r i e n c e s o f the y o u n g clinician
in the v i d e o or, further b a c k , the b o y on the terraces, then we are
the s a m e p e r s o n . T h a t ' s not difficult. I h a v e clear m e m o r i e s o f
m a k i n g the film a n d c a n picture the p a t i e n t ' s wife o f f - c a m e r a .

My i m p r e s s i o n s of the old s t a d i u m a l s o r e m a i n v i v i d . I see

m y s e l f a r r i v i n g , a s u s u a l , a n h o u r b e f o r e k i c k - o f f and taking m y
p l a c e halfway up the t e r r a c e s or, w h e n I w a s s m a l l , at the trench
wall right b e h i n d the g o a l . I recall the o r a n g e g r a v e l s u r r o u n d -
i n g the pitch a n d the lurid g r e e n o f the g r a s s , the smells o f
c i g a r e t t e s m o k e a n d O x o . I h a v e a mental i m a g e of the a s y m -
m e t r i c outline of the s t a n d s , so clear I c o u l d d r a w y o u a picture.
A n d , a l t h o u g h m u c h is a blur, I can conjure s n a p s h o t s of certain
g a m e s a n d g o a l s . I s a w these things from a particular p e r s p e c -
tive. Mine. I w a s there. It w a s m e .

B u t t h e r e ' s a p r o b l e m with this line of r e a s o n i n g : a m n e s i a .

W h a t if I couldn't r e m e m b e r these t h i n g s ? W o u l d disruption of
m e m o r y d e c o u p l e me from the child I o n c e w a s ? S u p p o s e I
retained a m e m o r y link with the y o u n g clinician and that he, in
turn, c o u l d recall the b o y ( w h e r e a s I c a n ' t ) . It w o u l d lead to the
c o n c l u s i o n that the y o u n g e r m a n a n d m y s e l f w e r e the s a m e
p e r s o n , that h e a n d the b o y w e r e the s a m e , b u t that the b o y and
I w e r e not.

A n d then t h e r e ' s m y patient. H i s p r o b l e m w a s with recent

m e m o r y , n o t r e m o t e . In all likelihood he f o r g o t the v i d e o after a

202
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

few d a y s , but w o u l d h a v e h a d n o t r o u b l e r e m i n i s c i n g a b o u t his

childhood. W a s the old m a n fused with his child-self, b u t d i s l o -
cated from the p e r s o n he h a d b e e n a w e e k a g o ?

A n o t h e r v i e w is that we s h o u l d a b a n d o n the i d e a of a p e r s i s t -
i n g e g o . A p e r s o n is m o r e like a club — a football club, s a y -
existing b y c o n s e n s u s , c a p a b l e o f d i s s o l u t i o n a n d r e c o n s t i t u -
tion. W o l v e r h a m p t o n W a n d e r e r s twice w e n t into liquidation in
the 1980s; the current p l a y e r s w e r e n ' t e v e n b o r n w h e n I started
c o m i n g t o matches; the s t a d i u m w a s d e m o l i s h e d a n d rebuilt.
N o t h i n g tangible s u r v i v e s , yet here we a r e still — me a n d the
Wolves.

T h e image of my ten-year-old self brings a churning to my

chest. I feel an u r g e to h u g my s o n s , b u t resist. T h e y ' r e t o o
b i g and w o u l d n ' t thank m e . W e settle i n t o the m a t c h . W e l o s e
one-nil. T h e exit from W o l v e r h a m p t o n i s d r e a r y a n d slow, b u t
spirits are lifting by the time we reach the m o t o r w a y . We m a d e
the trip for the s a m e fixture last s e a s o n . T h e m a t c h v i d e o is
advertised for sale on the club w e b s i t e . I ' v e d e c i d e d to b u y it.
W e ' l l l o o k for o u r s e l v e s b e h i n d the g o a l , halfway up in the S t a n
Cullis stand. I ' m g o i n g t o w a t c h m e a n d m y k i d s not g e t t i n g a n y
older in a u n i v e r s e w h e r e the s c o r e will a l w a y s be W o l v e s 3,
A l b i o n 1. I t ' s a restricted u n i v e r s e , b u t reliable.

203
 To Be Two or Not to Be

He h a d a w i l d l o o k a b o u t h i m . C o f f e e stained the front of his

white lab c o a t , t h o u g h n o w h e w a s s w i g g i n g w a t e r from a milk
bottle.

'Call me Derek,' he said.

T h i s w a s , I r e c k o n e d , the thirteenth time I'd b e e n here. He

never remembered me.
D e r e k w a s from l o n g a g o . H e a p p e a r e d t o function n o w a s a
technician, b u t in the o l d d a y s he w a s a p h i l o s o p h e r , hauled in to
a d v i s e o n the m e t a p h y s i c s a n d m o r a l s o f the n e w technology.
H e g a v e u p p h i l o s o p h y , h a v i n g s o l v e d all the p r o b l e m s that
interested h i m , a n d n o w e n j o y e d p u s h i n g b u t t o n s for a living.
A s i t t u r n e d out, the m e t a p h y s i c a l i m p l i c a t i o n s o f teleportation
s e e m e d t o b e n o m o r e p r o f o u n d than the m e t a p h y s i c a l implica-
tions o f T V . I n a n y event, p e o p l e s o o n g o t u s e d t o the idea. Y o u
s t e p p e d into the b o o t h , y o u s t e p p e d o u t s o m e w h e r e else: a c r o s s
the street o r a c r o s s the s o l a r s y s t e m .

T e l e p o r t a t i o n i s s p e e d - o f - l i g h t swift. T h e j o u r n e y t o M a r s ,
w h i c h o n c e t o o k s e v e r a l w e e k s b y c o n v e n t i o n a l spacecraft, can

204
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

n o w be a c c o m p l i s h e d in a matter of m i n u t e s . Y o u enter the

b o o t h a n d , b e f o r e y o u k n o w it, the d o o r s l i d e s o p e n a n d y o u ' v e
arrived; d e l i v e r e d , b r i s k as a b l a d e of light, to the M a r t i a n
plains. Subjectively, i t ' s i n s t a n t a n e o u s . B u t , e v e n now, m a n y
p e o p l e m i s u n d e r s t a n d the b a s i c principles. I t ' s a l w a y s b e e n the
way. H o w m a n y u n d e r s t o o d the p h y s i c s o f T V ? I t ' s the m e s -
s a g e that matters, not the m e d i u m . S o , too, w i t h t e l e p o r t a t i o n .

I t d o e s not, a s s o m e still i m a g i n e , i n v o l v e b r e a k i n g d o w n the

b o d y t o its constituent a t o m s a n d w h i z z i n g t h e m o f f for
r e a s s e m b l y at the destination point. W h a t travels b e t w e e n the
transceivers is not a s t r e a m of a t o m s but a s t r e a m of d a t a . D e r e k
p u s h e s the g r e e n button a n d the s c a n n e r s p l o t the exact c o - o r d i -
nates o f e v e r y a t o m i n y o u r b o d y . ( T h e r e are r o u g h l y ten billion
billion billion of them; the devil is in the detail.) T h e i n f o r m a -
tion is e n c o d e d and transmitted from this end a n d r e c e i v e d a n d
d e c o d e d a t the other, w h e r e the p r o c e s s o f r e c o n s t r u c t i o n takes
p l a c e u s i n g locally a v a i l a b l e material. A n a t o m i s a n a t o m i s a n
a t o m , after all. T h e r e ' s n o t h i n g special a b o u t m y a t o m s o r
y o u r s . T h e y d o n ' t c a r r y I D labels.

O n e other detail: o n c e the a t o m i c c o - o r d i n a t e s h a v e b e e n

plotted, the b o d y is annihilated. It is instant a n d p a i n l e s s ; a f o r m
of v a p o r i z a t i o n - or ' d i s c o r p o r a t i o n ' , as they call it. T h i s h a p -
p e n s precisely a t the point o f t r a n s m i s s i o n . I t m u s t . T h e event
and its t i m i n g are d e t e r m i n e d b y d e c r e e o f the S u b c o m m i t t e e o n
Personal Identity.

W h y ? W h y d e s t r o y the b o d y while the i n f o r m a t i o n i s i n

transit, before the replica h a s b e e n c o n s t r u c t e d ? S u r e l y , it w o u l d
be better to wait t h o s e few m i n u t e s to m a k e s u r e that the
r e a s s e m b l y instructions arrive i n g o o d s h a p e ? Y o u m i g h t think

205
PAUL B R O K S

s o , a n d the S u b c o m m i t t e e c o n s i d e r e d the matter carefully

b e f o r e a r r i v i n g at a different view.
After m u c h d e b a t e i t w a s d e c i d e d that even b r i e f p e r i o d s o f
' a s y n c h r o n o u s parallel e x i s t e n c e ' w e r e u n a c c e p t a b l e . I n law,
b i o l o g i c a l p e r s o n s take p r e c e d e n c e o v e r their digital f o r m .
D e s t r u c t i o n of a l i v i n g b o d y is d e e m e d acceptable only if the
digital c o p y r e p r e s e n t s the 'latest v e r s i o n ' . If a p e r s o n continued
in b i o l o g i c a l f o r m until his or her c o p y arrived on M a r s (or
w h e r e v e r ) then the replica w o u l d be 'existentially a s y m m e t r i c '
with the o r i g i n a l . As the d a t a s t r e a m traversed the inter-
p l a n e t a r y v o i d , the p s y c h o l o g i c a l life o f the original w o u l d have
c o n t i n u e d t o e v o l v e . T h e replica w o u l d , therefore, not strictly
be a replica. It w o u l d be a c l o s e m a t c h , but not exact.

To cut a l o n g s t o r y short, it w a s d e c r e e d that destruction of

the o r i g i n a l in s u c h c i r c u m s t a n c e s w o u l d be tantamount to
m u r d e r . T h e p e r s o n c o p i e d m u s t b e precisely the p e r s o n w h o
a r r i v e s , d o w n t o the last a t o m o f the last m o l e c u l e o f every
m u s c l e a n d m e m b r a n e , a n d e v e r y last n u a n c e o f the neural nets.

My thirteenth trip. S t e p p i n g into the cubicle still g a v e me a

tickle of excitement. I w a s , after all, a b o u t to be obliterated. T h e
s u s p e n s i o n o f existence i s brief. B u t i t ' s real. F o r the duration o f
the t r a n s m i s s i o n I w o u l d be d e a d , n o t h i n g and n o w h e r e , every
a t o m o f m y b o d y returned t o c h a o s . M y heart quickened a t the
t h o u g h t . To s t e p into the b o o t h w a s to m a k e a leap of faith that
the t e c h n o l o g y w o u l d h o l d g o o d , that I w o u l d be resurrected at
the o t h e r e n d .

S o m e time a g o D e r e k p l a c e d a s i g n a b o v e the entrance, a

f r a g m e n t of an old p o e m : Do not go gentle into that good night.
I n o t i c e d it as I s t e p p e d a c r o s s the threshold.

206
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

D e r e k ' s s m i l i n g face a p p e a r e d o n a screen. ' R e a d y ? '

I w a s ready. I t o o k a d e e p breath. Y o u s e n s e a feeble, m y o -
clonic jolt, like s t u m b l i n g on the b r i n k of sleep, a n d t h e r e ' s a
m o m e n t a r y b l a c k n e s s . A n d that's it. J o u r n e y ' s end. B u t this
time, when the d o o r slid o p e n , I realized I h a d n ' t m o v e d a m i l -
limetre.
'Problems, D e r e k ? ' I said.
He w a s n ' t s m i l i n g now. 'Shit, shit, shit,' he m u m b l e d .
It w a s s o m e kind of malfunction. At least I'm still here in one
piece, I t h o u g h t to myself. My atoms haven't been scattered to the
ether. Apparently, t h o u g h , it w a s a c l o s e call (the b a c k - u p c o p y
p r o c e s s had a l s o f a i l e d ) , and I h a d to a d m i t that I w a s s h a k e n .
T e m p o r a r y oblivion w a s fine, but I w a s n ' t p r e p a r e d for the p e r -
manent option. T h e y t o o k m e t o the on-site m e d i c a l facility
where I strolled t h r o u g h a b o d y scanner a n d g o t an u n s m i l i n g
t h u m b s - u p from the o p e r a t i v e w h o then sent m e o n t o P s y c h o l -
o g y . Psych? T h e o p e r a t i v e s h r u g g e d : s e a r c h m e . Routine, I
thought.

I read the mental h y g i e n e p o s t e r s as I sat w a i t i n g for the

p s y c h o l o g i s t . S h e h a d a p p e a r e d briefly to i n t r o d u c e herself,
then left. S h e s e e m e d f l u s t e r e d . T h e r e w e r e r a i s e d v o i c e s s o m e -
where. O n e o f them w a s D e r e k ' s . I c o u l d n ' t catch m o s t o f w h a t
they w e r e s a y i n g , b u t the female v o i c e , the p s y c h o l o g i s t ' s
I a s s u m e d , said s o m e t h i n g a b o u t this or that b e i n g a matter for
the S u b c o m m i t t e e . D e r e k s a i d s o m e t h i n g i n d e c i p h e r a b l e t o
which a third, m a s c u l i n e , v o i c e r e s p o n d e d : ' O u t of the q u e s -
tion!' W h a t followed s o u n d e d like a scuffle. N e x t , the d o o r b u r s t
open and there w a s D e r e k .

' S o m e t h i n g e x t r a o r d i n a r y h a s h a p p e n e d , ' h e s a i d . ' I think

207
PAUL B R O K S

y o u ' r e entitled t o k n o w - ' but that w a s all h e h a d time t o say. H e

w a s set u p o n b y three security g u a r d s and d r a g g e d away.
I d o n ' t trust p s y c h o l o g i s t s . Y o u get the hmms and the uh-huhs,
the n o d s , the d o g g y - f a c e e x p r e s s i o n s o f c o n c e r n , the u n c o n d i -
tional p o s i t i v e r e g a r d , the w h o l e p r o f e s s i o n a l s i m u l a c r u m o f
e m p a t h y , a n d then y o u r h o u r ' s up a n d t h e y ' r e on to the next
client. It m u s t take a certain thickness of skin or thinness of soul
t o d o that kind o f stuff d a y in, d a y out. B u t this p s y c h o l o g i s t w a s
flustered, which put m e a t m y e a s e immediately. S h e didn't
k n o w quite h o w to p l a y it, so I helped her out.

"What y o u ' r e telling m e , ' I s a i d , 'is that I w a s s c a n n e d and d i s -

p a t c h e d but — o b v i o u s l y , since I ' m here talking to y o u — not
v a p o r i z e d at the point of d e p a r t u r e . ' S h e n o d d e d . ' A n d at the
other e n d , m e a n w h i l e , m y replica w a s a s s e m b l e d and i s n o w
fulfilling m y duties o n M a r s ? '

' T h a t is correct.'
' W e l l , ' I s a i d . 'Well, fuck m e . W h a t went w r o n g ? '
A c t u a l l y , I w a s less taken a b a c k than y o u m i g h t i m a g i n e .
H u m a n e v o l u t i o n h a s e q u i p p e d the b r a i n with a n i m p r e s s i v e
r a n g e o f a d a p t i v e r e s p o n s e s for c o p i n g with all sorts o f situa-
tions. It g e a r s up the b o d y for fight or flight in the face of
p h y s i c a l threat, to recoil from c o n t a m i n a t i o n , to affiliate with its
f e l l o w s , t o m a t e a n d r e p r o d u c e , a n d t o c o m e t o t e r m s with loss.
B u t s e l f - d u p l i c a t i o n w a s not a feature o f H o m o s a p i e n s ' envi-
ronment of evolutionary adaptedness out there on the
s a v a n n a h . It takes a while to f o r m u l a t e a r e s p o n s e .

I s o o n b e g a n to r e g a r d my replica as a kind of rival and w o n -

d e r e d w h a t i t w a s g e t t i n g u p t o o n m y behalf. I n h u m a n relations
similarity is often the fulcrum a b o u t which p o i n t s of difference

208
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

w o r k the g r e a t e s t l e v e r a g e . I t ' s w h a t g i v e s a p e r s o n a l r i v a l r y its

edge in many cases.
A n d what w a s m y r e p l i c a ' s v i e w o f events, I w a n t e d t o k n o w .
H a d it e x p r e s s e d an o p i n i o n ? At this, the p s y c h o l o g i s t ' s face
b e c a m e g r a v e . H e r m o d e switched from e m p a t h i c therapist t o
p u r v e y o r - o f - t h e - p a r t y - l i n e . T h i s w a s a n e x c e p t i o n a l event, s h e
said. T h e S u b c o m m i t t e e o n P e r s o n a l Identity w a s m e e t i n g i n
e m e r g e n c y s e s s i o n at that v e r y m o m e n t to d e c i d e the i s s u e .
W h a t had h a p p e n e d w a s i n c o n t r a v e n t i o n o f the P r o l i f e r a t i o n
of P e r s o n s A c t . It w a s a s e r i o u s matter. S h e w a s at liberty o n l y
to present me with the b a r e facts a n d regretted that s h e c o u l d not
enter into speculation a b o u t future d e v e l o p m e n t s . N o , I w o u l d
not at this s t a g e be p e r m i t t e d to contact my wife or a n y other
m e m b e r s o f m y family, o r friends, o r c o l l e a g u e s . O r a n y o n e .
T h e S u b c o m m i t t e e w a s e x p e c t e d to deliver a s t a t e m e n t within a
d a y or two and until then I w o u l d be their g u e s t . W h a t e x a c t l y
w a s the issue that the S u b c o m m i t t e e w a s in s e s s i o n to d e c i d e ?
S h e w a s not at liberty to say.

T h e y t o o k me to a s m a l l r o o m that l o o k e d o u t u p o n a q u a d -
r a n g l e . A solitary c o p p e r b e e c h o c c u p i e d the centre of the lawn,
its p u r p l i s h - b r o w n leaves s h i m m e r i n g in the e v e n i n g s u n s h i n e . I
lay on my b u n k and stared at the ceiling. It g r e w d a r k . I l o n g e d
to s p e a k to my wife and children, b u t c o m m u n i c a t i o n with the
outside w o r l d w a s forbidden. I w a n t e d to r e a s s u r e t h e m that I
w a s okay. I w o u l d h a v e called them by n o w in o r d i n a r y c i r c u m -
stances. T h e y ' d b e w o r r i e d sick. W h a t h a d they b e e n t o l d ? A n d
then, d r o p p i n g like a f o r g e h a m m e r from my h e a d to my g u t ,
this thought: The call has already been made.

In time, miraculously, I slept. It w a s a heavy, d r e a m l e s s sleep,

209
PAUL B R O K S

as if I ' d b e e n d r u g g e d . P e r h a p s I h a d . B u t in the m i d d l e of the

night I w o k e to find a tall figure s t a n d i n g at the foot of the bed.
It r e m a i n e d m o t i o n l e s s , its f a c e in s h a d o w . I w o u l d have been
first to s p e a k , h a d the w o r d s not lost their tired w a y t h r o u g h the
s o m n o l e n t circuitry o f m y b r a i n .
' L i s t e n , ' s a i d the figure. ' L i s t e n . I think y o u are entitled to
know.'

I t w a s D e r e k . H e e x p l a i n e d , without preliminary. T h e S u b -
c o m m i t t e e ' s q u a n d a r y — my mortal p r o b l e m — w a s this: given
the u n f o r t u n a t e turn o f e v e n t s , they w e r e n o w d e b a t i n g whether
to a l l o w me a n d my replica to continue to exist in parallel, and
thereby c o n t r a v e n e the P r o l i f e r a t i o n o f P e r s o n s A c t , o r t o h a v e
o n e o f u s , e v e n a t this late s t a g e , v a p o r i z e d . T o b e two, o r not t o
b e . It w a s a hard o n e to call, he s a i d . In law, the creation of sur-
p l u s i n d i v i d u a l s w a s a s e r i o u s c r i m e ; the m i r r o r i m a g e o f
m u r d e r . T o D e r e k ' s k n o w l e d g e , m y replica h a d not i m m e d i -
ately b e e n i n f o r m e d o f the c i r c u m s t a n c e s , s o had carried o n a s i f
n o t h i n g u n t o w a r d h a d h a p p e n e d . H e c o u l d not s a y for sure that
it h a d b e e n i n f o r m e d e v e n now. T h i s c o u l d be an influential
factor i f the S u b c o m m i t t e e d e c i d e d that o n e o f u s h a d t o g o .

If the r e p l i c a ' s relationship with my wife h a d e v o l v e d even to

the m e r e s t extent of a b r i e f televisual c o m m u n i c a t i o n then that
c o u l d w e i g h t the d e c i s i o n in f a v o u r of a l l o w i n g the replica to
s u r v i v e rather than m e . D i s c o r p o r a t i o n w a s not m y preferred
o p t i o n . B u t surely, I t h o u g h t , the p r o p o s a l w o u l d not be carried
a n y w a y . T h e y couldn't. I t w a s p r e p o s t e r o u s . H a v i n g presented
itself, the d r e a d p r o p o s i t i o n h a d to c r a n k t h r o u g h the archaic,
c l o c k w o r k l o g i c of the c o m m i t t e e p r o c e s s , b u t then, surely, it
w o u l d b e t h r o w n out.

210
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

'I d o n ' t want to d i e , ' I told D e r e k .

' I t w o u l d n ' t b e the end o f the w o r l d , ' h e r e p l i e d , w h i c h s t r u c k
me as an o d d thing to say.
D e r e k sat in the e a s y chair at the far end of the r o o m , still in
shadow. ' W h a t ' s the d i f f e r e n c e ? ' h e s a i d . ' S u p p o s e i t h a d g o n e
a c c o r d i n g t o plan. Y o u w o u l d h a v e s t e p p e d into the b o o t h , the
scanners w o u l d h a v e d o n e their stuff, y o u r b o d y w o u l d h a v e
been z a p p e d t o zero, and y o u r replica w o u l d h a v e a p p e a r e d o n
M a r s , w a l k i n g y o u r w a l k a n d talking y o u r talk. A n d that i s w h a t
has h a p p e n e d — that is w h a t a l w a y s h a p p e n s — e x c e p t this time
the z a p p i n g m a y h a v e b e e n a little d e l a y e d . '

T h e difference, D e r e k , I m i g h t h a v e s a i d , is that I ' m still

here, now, and, h a v i n g h a d time to reflect, I d o n ' t think I w a n t
to be z a p p e d to zero, e v e n t h o u g h , t w e l v e t i m e s b e f o r e , this is
precisely what has h a p p e n e d .

N e v e r t h e l e s s , D e r e k h a d a point. E a c h o f the p r e v i o u s t i m e s
I'd b e e n teleported to M a r s the e x p e r i e n c e w a s the s a m e . I
walked out o f the b o o t h with perfect recollection o f the d a y ' s
events up to the point of s t a n d i n g in the t r a n s c e i v e r on E a r t h
and experiencing that familiar little jolt a n d the b r i e f b l a c k n e s s ,
and then there I w a s t a k i n g in the Martian l a n d s c a p e . T h e r e w a s
perfect continuity. T h e twelfth time I r e m e m b e r e d the eleventh,
the eleventh time the tenth, a n d so o n . A n d each time I c o u l d
reflect b a c k not just o n that d a y ' s events, but o n e v e n t s o f the
p r e v i o u s day, too, the p r e v i o u s w e e k s a n d m o n t h s a n d all the
y e a r s o f m y sentient, s e l f - c o n s c i o u s life.

On arrival, I a l w a y s called my w i f e , told her I w a s o k a y , that

I m i s s e d her already, and c h e c k e d on the k i d s . T h e n I w e n t a b o u t
m y b u s i n e s s . A n d w h e n I slept I k n e w m y d r e a m s h a d m a d e

211
PAUL B R O K S

their digital w a y a c r o s s the v o i d with the rest o f m e . T h e y had

their familiar fabric, the u s u a l b l e n d of the m u n d a n e and the
m y s t e r i o u s . I d r e a m t o f h o m e , o f w o r k , o f o r d i n a r y things.
A n d then it w a s no s u r p r i s e to m e e t the lost and the d e a d and run
unfettered b y l o g i c a n d time t h r o u g h the streets o f m y child-
h o o d or take w i n g o v e r o c e a n s a n d s t r a n g e cities; I d r e a m t secret
d r e a m s . T h i s i s w h a t h a d a l w a y s i m p r e s s e d m e m o s t a b o u t tele-
p o r t a t i o n . N o t o n l y w a s the b o d y reconstructed i n perfect
replica, a n d the c o n s c i o u s m i n d , but the u n c o n s c i o u s m i n d , too:
t h o s e t h i n g s h i d d e n from the o b s e r v i n g ' I ' .

N o w m y replica w a s d r e a m i n g those d r e a m s , and before i t

slept it h a d called my wife, told her it m i s s e d her already, checked
on the kids, a n d g o n e a b o u t its b u s i n e s s . It had d o n e those things,
not I. We w e r e not the s a m e . I w a s flowing in a different stream
o f c o n s c i o u s n e s s . B u t i f the replica w a s n ' t m e now, h o w could i t
h a v e b e e n m e o n the p r e v i o u s twelve o c c a s i o n s ? W h a t did the
e x p e r i e n c e of perfect continuity a m o u n t to? W a s it no m o r e than
the illusion of life d i s g u i s i n g a d o z e n deaths?

It w a s just three w e e k s since I ' d last m a d e the trip. D i d that

m e a n that, as a sentient, s e l f - c o n s c i o u s b e i n g , I w a s less than a
m o n t h o l d , e x q u i s i t e l y c o n f i g u r e d from the c h a o s of a billion
billion billion a t o m s a n d artificially e q u i p p e d with the m e m o r y
b a n k s a n d d i s p o s i t i o n s o f a m i d d l e - a g e d m a n ? I f s o , m y identity
w a s a fiction.

' T h e problem,' s a i d D e r e k , 'is that m o s t o f u s h a v e false

beliefs about our own nature. People expect determinate
a n s w e r s to q u e s t i o n s a b o u t p e r s o n a l identity: " Y e s , it is the s a m e
p e r s o n " or " N o , it isn't." T h a t ' s one great misconception. T h e
other is that p e r s o n a l identity m a t t e r s in the first p l a c e . '

212
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

I experienced a s l o w infusion of a n g e r , r i s i n g in my chest,

diffusing to my face and fists.
' I t ' s fine for y o u , D e r e k , ' I s a i d , 'to d e n y the i m p o r t a n c e of
p e r s o n a l identity and pontificate o n the c o n c e p t u a l c o n f u s i o n o f
a n y o n e else o n the planet w h o h a p p e n s t o b e l i e v e o t h e r w i s e . B u t
put y o u r s e l f in my p o s i t i o n . T h e r e ' s a distinct p o s s i b i l i t y that
I ' m a b o u t t o b e snuffed out. R i g h t n o w m y c o n c e r n s a b o u t
whether I shall still be here by the w e e k e n d — or " z a p p e d to
z e r o " as y o u indelicately put it - s e e m real e n o u g h . A n d if I am
to be v a p o r i z e d , I ' m s u r e y o u ' l l h a v e no difficulty g i v i n g a d e t e r -
minate answer to the q u e s t i o n of whether I exist or n o t . '

'Well,' he s a i d , ' t h a t ' s not quite the p o i n t . '

I'd b e e n sitting o n the e d g e o f the b u n k , b u t s t o o d n o w a n d
m o v e d t o w a r d s h i m . B o t h o f m y fists, I n o t i c e d , w e r e tightly
clenched.
' D e r e k , ' I s a i d , ' y o u ' d better g o , ' at w h i c h he r a i s e d a p l a c a -
tory p a l m , a c k n o w l e d g e d m y d i s t r e s s , a n d said h e w a s here t o
help. In fact, h e ' d b e e n t h r o u g h s o m e t h i n g similar in the e a r l y
d a y s , since w h e n he h a d a c h i e v e d a kind of insight. H i s travels
in p h i l o s o p h y and daily e x p o s u r e to the plain facts of t e l e p o r t a -
tion had b r o u g h t him to a v i s i o n of the self, w h i c h , o n c e
a b s o r b e d , b e g a n a t o n c e t o d r a w the s t i n g o f death. T h i s m o s t
natural o f fears w a s r e v e a l e d a s synthetic. I t c o u l d b e d i s m a n -
tled. Intellectually.

H e had o n c e w a t c h e d h i m s e l f d i e , h e told m e . I t w a s o n e o f
the first interplanetary teleportations. H i s first, a n d only, visit to
M a r s . H e entered the b o o t h and f o l l o w e d the u s u a l p r o c e d u r e s
and, s u r e e n o u g h , s t e p p e d o u t into the reception z o n e at the
Martian b a s e a s i f h e w e r e s t e p p i n g o u t o f his front d o o r . I t w a s

213
PAUL B R O K S

a b i g e v e n t i n t h o s e d a y s . T h e y w e r e r e a d y with c h a m p a g n e and
s m o k e d s a l m o n to c e l e b r a t e . At first no o n e in the reception
p a r t y w a s a w a r e o f the malfunction b a c k o n Earth. B u t then the
m e s s a g e c a m e t h r o u g h . S c a n n i n g a n d t r a n s m i s s i o n had w o r k e d
a treat — of c o u r s e they h a d , there he w a s , s o a k i n g his reconsti-
tuted flesh in c h a m p a g n e — b u t the v a p o r i z a t i o n p h a s e had failed
to kick in.

D e r e k h a d arrived but, a t the s a m e time, h e h a d n ' t left. A n d

w a s it for better or w o r s e that the E a r t h b o u n d v e r s i o n of D e r e k
h a d suffered fatal injuries in the p r o c e s s ? T h e d i s c o r p o r a t i o n
m e c h a n i s m h a d stuttered and s t o p p e d . H i s w h o l e b o d y blinked
on the brink of extinction, f a d i n g then r e g a i n i n g its s h a p e , but
o n l y at the c o s t of significant d a m a g e to the c a r d i o v a s c u l a r
s y s t e m . H e w o u l d b e d e a d within a w e e k .

D e r e k 2 h a d returned at o n c e , not k n o w i n g what to expect.

'I tried to c o n s o l e h i m , ' he s a i d , 'I told him I l o v e d his wife;
I w o u l d care for his children; I w o u l d finish the b o o k he w a s
w r i t i n g . A n d , o f c o u r s e , from m y p e r s p e c t i v e , nothing had
c h a n g e d : they w e r e m y wife a n d children, i t w a s m y b o o k and
it w a s my intention that I s h o u l d finish it. S o , I told him:
" D o n ' t d e s p a i r ; n o t h i n g will really c h a n g e . " B u t h e wept. H e
s a i d that no d o u b t I w o u l d do all those things as well as he c o u l d ,
a n d it w a s s o m e c o n s o l a t i o n that his family w o u l d not suffer
the pain of b e r e a v e m e n t , b u t the fact r e m a i n e d that within a
few d a y s h e w o u l d l o s e c o n s c i o u s n e s s for ever. T h i s w o u l d b e
a terrible l o s s .

' H e h a d b e e n thinking o f a h o m e m o v i e , the o n e where his

s m i l i n g d a u g h t e r — my s m i l i n g d a u g h t e r — is s t a n d i n g in the
kitchen with a b a s k e t of s t r a w b e r r i e s . S h e ' s a b o u t three y e a r s

214
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

o l d . T h e r e i s sunlight s t r e a m i n g t h r o u g h the w i n d o w o n t o her

face. A n d she takes the fattest s t r a w b e r r y in the b a s k e t a n d
c r a m s it into her m o u t h ; i t ' s so b i g s h e h a s to p u s h it in w i t h the
p a l m o f her h a n d . H e r c h e e k s are b u l g i n g a s s h e s t r u g g l e s t o
chew. H e r e y e s are c l o s e d . S h e i s utterly a b s o r b e d , o v e r -
w h e l m e d , by the e x p e r i e n c e of the fruit. S h e e v e n s w a y s a little
from s i d e t o s i d e , a s v i r t u o s o violinists d o . " T h a t ' s w h a t i t ' s all
a b o u t , " he s a i d . " C o n s c i o u s e x p e r i e n c e . A n d that is w h a t I shall
l o s e ; that beautiful s m i l e , the taste o f s t r a w b e r r i e s , fond m e m o -
r i e s . " A n d t o that extent, h e w a s r i g h t , ' s a i d D e r e k . ' H i s
c o n s c i o u s n e s s w o u l d f a d e , b e y o n d d a r k n e s s a n d silence t o
oblivion. He would b e c o m e nothing.

' I w a s with him w h e n h e d i e d . T h e r e w a s n o o n e else a r o u n d .

We had a g r e e d that it w o u l d be in the b e s t interests of the f a m i l y
that they s h o u l d n e v e r k n o w o f o u r d u p l i c a t i o n . W h y s h o u l d
they b e t r o u b l e d ? T h e r e w a s n o n e e d . L e t life g o o n a s n o r m a l .
I a d m i r e d his r e s o l v e at the e n d . It m a d e me feel p r o u d . He so
w a n t e d t o s e e his l o v e d o n e s for o n e last t i m e , b u t u n d e r s t o o d
the distress and confusion i t w o u l d c a u s e . S o i t w a s j u s t m e
and h i m . I held his h a n d . A n d then life d i d go on as n o r m a l . I
went h o m e a n d h u g g e d m y wife a n d children, a n d e v e n t u a l l y
I finished my b o o k . '

' T h e n i t c a n ' t b e d e n i e d that p e r s o n a l identity really d o e s

matter,' I s a i d . ' Y o u r f o r m e r s e l f d i e d a l o n e l y death. H i s c o n -
s c i o u s n e s s switched o f f like a light. He lost e v e r y t h i n g :
beautiful m e m o r i e s , the l o v e of his family, h o p e s a n d p l a n s for a
future that he w o u l d n e v e r reach; life itself. T h o s e t h i n g s m a d e
u p his identity. N o t h i n g m o r e m a t t e r e d , a n d n o t h i n g m a t t e r e d
more.'

215
PAUL B R O K S

D e r e k l e a n e d f o r w a r d , e l b o w s o n k n e e s , t h u m b s t o cheek-
b o n e s , f i n g e r s t o f o r e h e a d . ' Y e s a n d no,' h e s a i d .

We talked for h o u r s , until the light of a g r e y d a w n conjured

s h a p e s i n the c o u r t y a r d a s i f from i m a g i n a t i o n . T h e c o p p e r
b e e c h s e e m e d reluctant t o a p p e a r . W a s this t o b e m y last d a y ?
D e r e k d i d m o s t o f the talking. H e m u s t h a v e t h o u g h t these
t h i n g s t h r o u g h a t h o u s a n d t i m e s b e f o r e , b u t still there w a s a note
of u r g e n c y in his v o i c e , as if he w e r e on the brink of a revela-
tion. I am not a p h i l o s o p h e r , a n d at times I found him hard to
follow, b u t I g o t the g i s t .

He e x p l a i n e d that there w e r e t w o w a y s of l o o k i n g at a p e r s o n
or, rather, t w o theories a b o u t w h a t p e r s o n s a r e , and what is
i n v o l v e d i n their c o n t i n u e d existence o v e r time. T h e f i r s t theory
h e called E g o T h e o r y . T h i s i s the intuitive, c o m m o n - s e n s e view,
b u t o n e that w a s held, a l s o , b y s o m e o f the g r e a t e s t p h i l o s o -
phers, m o s t famously R e n e Descartes. It m a d e sense to me, too:
I w a k e up in the m o r n i n g ; I go to w o r k ; I feel h a p p y w h e n things
go well a n d I feel frustrated w h e n they d o n ' t ; I hold certain
beliefs a b o u t the w o r l d a n d e x p r e s s v a r i o u s o p i n i o n s and prefer-
e n c e s : I u s e d to like B e e t h o v e n , but n o w I prefer Mozart; I like
c h o c o l a t e better than c h e e s e c a k e ; I enjoy w a l k s in the c o u n t r y -
s i d e ; I take the v i e w that p e o p l e s h o u l d be kind to o n e another,
a n d I feel b a d if I do the w r o n g thing. I act, I feel, I think, I
b e l i e v e , I g r o w older, a n d I c h a n g e in other w a y s . B u t 'I' am
a l w a y s there a t the centre o f t h i n g s a s time g o e s by.

W h a t i s this ' I ' ? W e o r d i n a r i l y c l a i m o w n e r s h i p o f our

a c t i o n s a n d t h o u g h t s a n d e x p e r i e n c e s : I d i d it; that's my idea; I
feel h u n g r y ; I intend to b u y a b i r t h d a y present for my d a u g h t e r

216
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

. . . So the 'I' is the experiencer of e x p e r i e n c e s , the thinker of

thoughts, and the d o e r o f d e e d s . E a c h d a y i s a blizzard o f s e n s -
ations and t h o u g h t p a t t e r n s , but I g i v e t h e m c o h e r e n c e a n d link
them to my m e m o r i e s a n d my p l a n s for the future.

I t ' s natural to think in this way. We a r e the p r o g e n i t o r s of

thoughts and actions and they a r e ours in the thinking a n d d o i n g .
A c c o r d i n g to E g o T h e o r y , it is this 'I' that constitutes the
e s s e n c e o f the p e r s o n and which p e r s i s t s o v e r t i m e . B u t , a g a i n ,
what is it? D e s c a r t e s b e l i e v e d that the e g o w a s a p u r e l y mental
thing, a soul or spiritual s u b s t a n c e , but y o u d o n ' t h a v e to go
a l o n g with that to a c c e p t the i d e a of the self, the e g o , as a kind of
hub a b o u t which the wheel of e x p e r i e n c e r e v o l v e s .

In this non-spiritual s e n s e the e g o is m e r e l y the subject of

experience, it is that which unifies s o m e o n e ' s c o n s c i o u s n e s s at
any g i v e n m o m e n t . I w a t c h the s k y lighten, I s e e the l e a v e s of
the c o p p e r b e e c h g a i n c o l o u r , a n d I hear b i r d s s i n g i n g . W h a t
g i v e s this scene its unity? W h a t p u l l s these d i s p a r a t e t h r e a d s o f
experience together? I do. T h e y are e x p e r i e n c e s h a d by m e , this
p e r s o n , at this time. A n d the wheel rolls on t h r o u g h the y e a r s ,
a c c o u n t i n g for the unity o f m y life.

T h e s e thoughts were running through my mind as D e r e k

s p o k e . I w a s thinking them. ' I can s e e i n g n o t h i n g t o d i s a g r e e
with there,' I told him.
D e r e k s t o p p e d talking a n d , for a m o m e n t , there w a s o n l y
b i r d s o n g ; then he t u r n e d to B u n d l e T h e o r y . He s a i d that like
m a n y styles in art — s u c h as G o t h i c , b a r o q u e , a n d r o c o c o —
B u n d l e T h e o r y o w e d its n a m e t o its critics. B u t the n a m e w a s
g o o d e n o u g h . T h i s t h e o r y rejects the i d e a that a c t i o n s a n d e x p e -
riences are o w n e d b y s o m e inner e s s e n c e , e g o o r ' I ' . T h e r e are

217
PAUL B R O K S

just s e q u e n c e s o f a c t i o n s and experiences. N o t h i n g m o r e . E a c h

life is a l o n g series — or b u n d l e — of mental states and events,
b o u n d t o g e t h e r b y v a r i o u s kinds o f causal relation, such a s
t h o s e linking the p e r c e p t i o n of a fierce-looking d o g with the
e m o t i o n of fear a n d the d i s p o s i t i o n to run away, or the different
c a u s a l relations that h o l d b e t w e e n e p i s o d e s o f experience and
e p i s o d e s o f m e m o r y . A n d t h a t ' s all. T h e idea o f a central e g o , o r
p e r s o n , contributes n o t h i n g t o o u r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f the unity
of c o n s c i o u s n e s s at a n y g i v e n time, nor d o e s it pull the g o l d e n
thread of e x p e r i e n c e t h r o u g h a lifetime.

' S o , ' s a i d D e r e k , ' f r o m this p e r s p e c t i v e the e g o is a hollow

fabrication, a n d y o u c o u l d even s a y that B u n d l e T h e o r i s t s d e n y
the existence o f p e o p l e . '
'But that's absurd.'
' Y e s , ' h e s a i d , ' a n d y o u are not the f i r s t t o s a y so. T h e
e i g h t e e n t h - c e n t u r y p h i l o s o p h e r , T h o m a s R e i d [he c a m e t o b e
k n o w n as 'the c o m m o n - s e n s e p h i l o s o p h e r ' ] m a d e a similar
o b j e c t i o n . "I am n o t t h o u g h t , " s a i d R e i d , "I am not action, I am
n o t feeling; I am s o m e t h i n g which thinks and acts and feels."
Y e s , of c o u r s e , t h a t ' s w h a t it s e e m s like for all of us, and it's
certainly the w a y w e are u s e d t o talking a b o u t o u r s e l v e s and
o t h e r s — as if there really w e r e s o m e central nucleus of a self, a
g h o s t l y pilot setting the c o u r s e and h a n d l i n g the controls.
" D o n ' t call me a s e q u e n c e of e v e n t s , " y o u say, "I am a p e r s o n , a
person, a P E R S O N ! ' " D e r e k b e a t his fists o n the a r m s o f the chair
for e m p h a s i s .

' F i n e , ' he s a i d . ' B u n d l e T h e o r i s t s a c c e p t this as a fact. But

they a c c e p t it o n l y as a fact of g r a m m a r . P e o p l e and subjects-of-
e x p e r i e n c e exist a s a feature o f the w a y w e u s e o u r l a n g u a g e , but

218
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

in no other way. If y o u s a y there is m o r e to it than this, if y o u s a y

there is s o m e t h i n g behind the chains of interacting mental
events and brain functions, s o m e t h i n g a b o v e a n d b e y o n d ,
o b s e r v i n g and c o n t r o l l i n g , b u n d l i n g it all together, h o l d i n g its
s h a p e from o n e d a y to the next, then the B u n d l e T h e o r i s t w o u l d
s a y that y o u w e r e p r o f o u n d l y m i s t a k e n . '

'I think y o u ' r e b e g i n n i n g to l o s e me n o w , ' I a d m i t t e d , 'I can

accept that there are m a n y p r o c e s s e s g o i n g o n i n m y b r a i n o f
which I am u n a w a r e , all s o r t s of h i d d e n m a c h i n e r i e s p r o d u c i n g
t h o u g h t s and p e r c e p t i o n s , s h a p i n g s p e e c h - p a t t e r n s , influenc-
i n g d e c i s i o n s and actions i n w a y s t o o r a p i d o r subtle t o b e p i c k e d
out b y the spotlight o f c o n s c i o u s n e s s . B u t , o n c e s u c h t h i n g s
are in the spotlight, w h o or what is h a v i n g the e x p e r i e n c e s , if
not I ? '

T h e s e n s e that I w a s a u t h o r o f m y o w n t h o u g h t s a n d a c t i o n s
felt like m o r e than a 'fact of g r a m m a r ' to m e . D e r e k m e r e l y
replied that y e s , it w a s i n d e e d difficult to a c c e p t the truth of the
matter. He said there w a s a conflict b e t w e e n scientific u n d e r -
s t a n d i n g and p e o p l e ' s o r d i n a r y intuitions a b o u t w h a t they
believe t h e m s e l v e s to b e , b e c a u s e there is n o t h i n g in the b r a i n
sciences t o s u p p o r t E g o T h e o r y .

Few, if any, neuroscientists b e l i e v e that there is a n y t h i n g c o r -

r e s p o n d i n g to a s e l f or e g o distinct from a multiplicity of mental
states and their a s s o c i a t e d p a t t e r n s o f b r a i n activity. F r o m the
p e r s p e c t i v e o f n e u r o s c i e n c e , B u n d l e T h e o r y i s o b v i o u s l y true.
But E g o T h e o r y w o n ' t g o away. W e c a n ' t s h a k e i t off. T h e
beliefs that m o s t o f u s hold a b o u t o u r c o n t i n u e d e x i s t e n c e o v e r
time are built u p o n a s s u m p t i o n s that E g o T h e o r y , o r s o m e t h i n g
v e r y like it, is true.

219
PAUL B R O K S

' T h a t ' s w h a t I m e a n t , ' s a i d D e r e k , ' w h e n I said that m o s t

p e o p l e h o l d false beliefs a b o u t t h e m s e l v e s . '
B u n d l e T h e o r y w a s n o t a n e w i d e a , he e x p l a i n e d , just a diffi-
cult o n e to c o m e to t e r m s with. Its r o o t s reached d o w n to the
sixth century B C a n d the t e a c h i n g s o f S i d d h a r t h a G o t a m a , the
B u d d h a , 'the enlightened o n e ' . Anattavada, the B u d d h i s t d o c -
trine o f ' n o s o u l ' o r ' n o s e l f ' , h o l d s that p e o p l e and selves have
o n l y n o m i n a l existence ( a s o p p o s e d t o actual e x i s t e n c e ) , m e a n -
i n g they a r e just c o m b i n a t i o n s o f other elements. T h e s e l f i s n o
m o r e than a b u n d l e of fleeting i m p r e s s i o n s .

D e r e k quoted from m e m o r y a segment of s o m e Buddhist

text: 'A sentient being does exist, you think, O Mara? You are
misled by a false conception. This bundle of elements is void of
Self. In it there is no sentient being. Just as a set of wooden parts
receives the name of carriage, so do we give to elements the name of
fancied being.'

' N o w , ' h e c o n t i n u e d , ' w h e n teleportation c a m e a l o n g m a n y

p e o p l e h a d g r a v e m i s g i v i n g s . T h e y s a w i t not a s the fastest
means of transport, but as a sure means of dying. True, if you
s u b m i t to the p r o c e s s , y o u r replica turns o u t perfect in every
w a y , with a n identical b o d y a n d b r a i n and identical patterns o f
mental activity, i n c l u d i n g m e m o r y s y s t e m s replete to the last
a t o m a n d iota of i n f o r m a t i o n . " B u t , " they s a i d , "don't be fooled.
T h o u g h it m i g h t r e s e m b l e y o u in e v e r y way, the replica will not
in fact be y o u . It will be s o m e o n e else. It can't p o s s i b l y be y o u
because your b o d y and brain have been destroyed.'"

' A n d they w e r e right,' I s a i d . ' M y present p r e d i c a m e n t

p r o v e s it.'
' P e r h a p s , ' s a i d D e r e k . ' I n a w a y . B u t not in a n y w a y that

220
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

really matters i n o r d i n a r y life. N o t i f B u n d l e T h e o r y i s true, a s

I b e l i e v e it to b e . T h e fact is that teleportation b e c a m e c o m m o n -
p l a c e . It b e c a m e a tried and trusted m o d e of t r a n s p o r t a n d no
o n e had a n y c o m p l a i n t s . P e o p l e w e n t into the b o o t h a n d they
c a m e out at the other e n d , intact in b o d y a n d m i n d . L i f e w e n t on
as usual. Y o u ' v e done it numerous times yourself and it's never
been a p r o b l e m , at least not until now. A n d I w a n t to p e r s u a d e
y o u that, e v e n now, e v e n if the S u b c o m m i t t e e c o m e s to the c o n -
clusion that y o u are to be v a p o r i z e d , it i s n ' t really as m u c h of a
p r o b l e m as y o u fear.

' L e t m e put i t this w a y . E v e n t h o u g h i t i n v o l v e s d e s t r u c t i o n o f

the b o d y a n d reconstruction u s i n g entirely n e w m a t e r i a l s , w e
should think o f travelling b y teleportation a s n o m o r e threaten-
ing o r p r o b l e m a t i c than travelling o n l i f e ' s j o u r n e y f r o m o n e
d a y to the next. W h a t m a t t e r s in b o t h c a s e s , in t e r m s of w h a t is
p r e s e r v e d , is precisely the s a m e : p s y c h o l o g i c a l continuity. We
are the s a m e from o n e d a y to the next o n l y in so far as the b u n d l e
of mental states, actual and potential, that o u r b r a i n takes with it
to sleep at night r e s e m b l e s the b u n d l e that it w a k e s up with in
the m o r n i n g . Y o u s u r v i v e from o n e d a y to the next b e c a u s e the
p s y c h o l o g i c a l links h a v e b e e n m a i n t a i n e d .

' O n T u e s d a y y o u h a v e a certain set o f m e m o r i e s a n d p l a n s ,

aptitudes and d i s p o s i t i o n s . T h e s e flow from the o n e s y o u h a d o n
M o n d a y a n d a r e , in turn, c a u s a l l y linked to the o n e s y o u will
h a v e o n W e d n e s d a y , T h u r s d a y , and Friday. A n d if, o n S a t u r d a y ,
y o u are teleported t o M a r s , y o u r replica e m e r g e s with the v e r y
s a m e pattern o f mental states, which will b e carried f o r w a r d t o
the next d a y and the next a n d the next t h r o u g h the u s u a l c a u s a l
links. T h e r e is no b r e a k in the continuity of mental life. Y o u a n d

221
PAUL B R O K S

y o u r replica a r e p s y c h o l o g i c a l l y c o n t i n u o u s at the d e e p e s t level.

A n d y o u m u s t realize that the m e c h a n i s m s o f mental survival
o v e r t i m e in o r d i n a r y life really are no different, and that there
is no other kind of continuity that really matters. T h e r e is no
point p e e r i n g into the b u n d l e , h o p i n g to catch a g l i m p s e of s o m e
e l u s i v e , o b s e r v i n g e g o . T h e r e isn't o n e . T h e b u n d l e i s all.'

I w a s b e g i n n i n g to u n d e r s t a n d , but it didn't help my c a s e . I

m i g h t still h a v e to f a c e the p r o s p e c t of an untimely death. I said
that B u n d l e T h e o r y m i g h t v e r y well b e true, a s D e r e k believed,
a n d my m i n d w o u l d live on in replicated f o r m — a n d , y e s , there
w a s s o m e c o n s o l a t i o n i n that. T h e replica m o v e s forward i n
time with m y s t o c k o f m e m o r i e s a n d d i s p o s i t i o n s . I t can g o o n
to fulfil my p l a n s and o b l i g a t i o n s . P e r h a p s it really w a s the case
that, by a n y m e a n i n g f u l a n a l y s i s of the n a t u r e of mental life, I
s t o o d in relation to my replica as I s t o o d in relation to the p e r s o n
I w a s y e s t e r d a y a n d the p e r s o n I m i g h t be t o m o r r o w . But, at the
s a m e t i m e , it w a s a l s o clear that a b r a n c h i n g h a d taken p l a c e .

W h i l e the r e p l i c a ' s m i n d h a d rolled out with perfect continu-

ity f r o m the m i n d I e m b o d i e d at the point w h e n D e r e k pushed
the g r e e n b u t t o n to initiate the s c a n n i n g p r o c e s s , our m i n d s had,
since then, b e g u n t o d i v e r g e a s , minute b y minute, w e a b s o r b e d
different e x p e r i e n c e s . We did not k n o w whether the replica had
e v e n b e e n i n f o r m e d o f the teleportation malfunction. I f not,
then it w o u l d be c a r r y i n g on as n o r m a l — as me — happily un-
a w a r e that a v e r s i o n of its f o r m e r s e l f w a s l a n g u i s h i n g
m i s e r a b l y on a truncated b r a n c h line.

Would it care? I w o n d e r e d . I liked to think that I (and there-

fore it) w o u l d feel c o m p a s s i o n . B u t really w h o k n o w s h o w o n e
m i g h t react i f s o m e b i z a r r e alternative v e r s i o n o f o n e ' s self

222
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

s h o w e d up like the s p e c t r e at the feast, t h r e a t e n i n g to w a r p the

status q u o ? It c o u l d p r o v e a dreadful e n c u m b r a n c e .
I put it to D e r e k that my replica a n d I m a y o n c e h a v e b e e n
identical, but w e w e r e g r o w i n g apart. W e w e r e d e v e l o p i n g
alternative p o i n t s o f view. W e h a d b e c o m e different p e o p l e i f
only in the restricted, l a n g u a g e - d e p e n d e n t s e n s e that B u n d l e
T h e o r i s t s a l l o w e d talk o f p e o p l e . A n d I , f r o m m y p e r s p e c t i v e ,
did not relish the p r o s p e c t of a p r e m a t u r e d e a t h , n o t w i t h s t a n d -
i n g the c o n s i d e r a b l e difficulties that future life with a d u p l i c a t e
w o u l d inevitably entail. ( A s the night w o r e on I h a d b e e n think-
i n g m o r e and m o r e a b o u t m y wife and w h a t her s t r a t e g y m i g h t
be for c o p i n g with a d u p l i c a t e d h u s b a n d . )

' I can u n d e r s t a n d , ' D e r e k s a i d , 'that y o u d o n ' t w a n t t o d i e .

E v e n B u n d l e T h e o r i s t s d o n ' t w a n t t o d i e . F o r m o s t p e o p l e the
truth o f B u n d l e T h e o r y d o e s not dispel the illusion o f the e g o .
T h e y cling to their false beliefs.' B u t he a l s o s a i d that a c c e p t a n c e
of that truth c o u l d h a v e a liberating effect. A m o n g other t h i n g s ,
it o p e n e d the p o s s i b i l i t y of l o o k i n g at d e a t h in a different w a y .
H e p e r s o n a l l y h a d found this t o b e the c a s e . I t w a s l i b e r a t i n g
and c o n s o l i n g . B e f o r e h e h a d fully a b s o r b e d the truth o f B u n d l e
T h e o r y he said that he h a d felt i m p r i s o n e d in himself. H i s life
s e e m e d like a g l a s s tunnel t h r o u g h w h i c h he w a s m o v i n g
faster and faster e v e r y y e a r a n d , at the end of w h i c h , there w a s
nothing but d a r k n e s s .

' N o w m y v i e w h a s c h a n g e d . T h e w a l l s o f the g l a s s tunnel

have d i s s o l v e d . I live in the o p e n air.' It h a d b r o u g h t h i m c l o s e r
t o p e o p l e . H e w a s l e s s c o n c e r n e d a b o u t his o w n life a n d m o r e
c o n c e r n e d with the lives o f others. H e c a r e d less a b o u t his o w n
inevitable death. Mental events and e x p e r i e n c e s w o u l d c o n t i n u e

223
PAUL B R O K S

to be a feature of the w o r l d after his death, he s a i d , and it w a s

true that n o n e of these w o u l d be linked to his present mental life
b y the sort o f direct e x p e r i e n c e - m e m o r y o r intention-action
c o n n e c t i o n s that s h a p e d the e x i s t i n g b u n d l e o f experiences.
T h e r e w o u l d b e s o m e indirect c o n n e c t i o n s , h o w e v e r — m e m o -
ries of him, thoughts influenced b y his thinking, advice
followed.

' W e all m a k e a m a r k , ' he s a i d . ' T h e s i m p l e facts of death are

this: that it will b r e a k the m o r e direct relations b e t w e e n my
p r e s e n t mental events and mental events a r i s i n g in the future,
a n d that certain other relations will not be b r o k e n . O n c e the e g o
is r e m o v e d from the s c e n e , that is all there is to it.'

I found this m o r e d e p r e s s i n g than uplifting. I told him that his

r e d e s c r i p t i o n of death s e e m e d to me to reflect an i m p o v e r i s h e d
v i e w of life. P e r h a p s it w a s better to anticipate l o s i n g the self in
d e a t h than to d e n y it in life, a denial that, surely, a m o u n t e d to a
f o r m o f nihilism. A n d , a n y w a y , e v e n i f B u n d l e T h e o r y w a s true
I c o u l d not b e l i e v e it. Intellectually, I c o u l d follow his a r g u -
m e n t s a n d a c c e p t the facts o f n e u r o s c i e n c e but, psychologically,
it w a s i m p o s s i b l e to identify with his theory. It ran counter to
o n e ' s e x p e r i e n c e o f the w o r l d .

D e r e k ' s r e s p o n s e , a g a i n , w a s that it w a s difficult to g r a s p

the truth, a n d if he w a s b e i n g c h a r g e d with nihilism then he
w o u l d accept that in so far as it a p p l i e d to his v i e w of the self.
T h e t e r m , he r e m i n d e d m e , is from the L a t i n nihil, m e a n i n g
' n o t h i n g ' . 'It i s perfectly true t o s a y that the s e l f i s N o T h i n g . '
O t h e r w i s e , he rejected the c h a r g e . He said that in a c c e p t i n g the
truth o f B u n d l e T h e o r y his a p p r e c i a t i o n o f the v a l u e o f life had
o n l y b e e n enriched.

224
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

Apparently, in finding Bundle Theory depressing and

unpalatable I w a s i n g o o d c o m p a n y . D e r e k s a i d that the p h i l o s o -
pher D a v i d H u m e , w h o h a d f o r m u l a t e d a n influential v e r s i o n o f
the theory in the eighteenth century, reflected on his o w n a r g u -
ments and w a s pitched into a d e e p d e p r e s s i o n , the c u r e for
which w a s to g e t out m o r e - d i n i n g a n d p l a y i n g b a c k g a m m o n
with friends. A n d i n the twentieth century, T h o m a s N a g e l a l s o
c a m e to the c o n c l u s i o n that, w h a t e v e r the truth of the theory, it
w a s i m p o s s i b l e for the h u m a n p s y c h e t o d i g e s t .

' D e r e k , ' I s a i d , ' p e r h a p s y o u s h o u l d g e t o u t m o r e , too. R e d i s -

c o v e r y o u r self.' H e r o s e f r o m his seat, g r i n n i n g b r o a d l y , a n d
c a m e a c r o s s and s l a p p e d m e o n the b a c k .

' M a y b e , ' h e s a i d . ' M a y b e not.' T h e n h e w i s h e d m e luck a n d

was gone.
I d o z e d off and d r e a m t I w a s in the beautiful city of V e n i c e ,
i n the P i a z z a S a n M a r c o . B e l l s w e r e r i n g i n g a n d p i g e o n s circled
and s w o o p e d . T h e r e w e r e n o p e o p l e . T h e n , a c r o s s the s q u a r e
from the direction of the B a s i l i c a , there a p p e a r e d a y o u n g
couple. T h e y walked towards me. T h e w o m a n I recognized as
my wife, a younger version, perhaps as she w o u l d have been
when we first visited the city. T h e m a n h a d no f a c e , just a
s m o o t h p l a n e o f skin w h e r e the u s u a l c o n t o u r s a n d orifices
should have been. T h e r e w a s no greeting.

I w o k e to find that a white e n v e l o p e h a d b e e n p u s h e d u n d e r

the d o o r . It contained an invitation to a p p e a r b e f o r e the S u b -
c o m m i t t e e o n P e r s o n a l Identity a t eleven o ' c l o c k that m o r n i n g .
It w a s n o w ten. I s h o w e r e d , b r e a k f a s t e d on b r e a d , c h e e s e , a n d
coffee, and p r e p a r e d t o m e e t m y fate.

225
 Gulls

' I ' v e g o t a l u m p , ' m y wife s a y s . ' F e e l . '

I ' m w a t c h i n g the S u n d a y a f t e r n o o n football and still h a v e an
e y e o n the g a m e a s s h e directs m y hand t o the outer c u r v e o f her
left b r e a s t . It is the s i x t y - s e v e n t h m i n u t e . T h e r e is a l u m p .
' W h a t d o e s it feel l i k e ? ' We are in the b e d r o o m now. S h e has
s t r i p p e d to the w a i s t . I p a l p a t e the b r e a s t as if I ' m an expert.
'What do you think?' she says.

' T h e r e ' s a b u m p . M o r e of a b u m p than a l u m p . '

T h e G P i s r e a s s u r i n g a t first, b u t d e v e l o p s d o u b t s , and o r g a n -
izes a referral to the b r e a s t clinic. K a t e returns tearful. We both
n e e d c h e e r i n g up, s o w e h e a d for the c o a s t , half-an-hour's drive,
s t o p p i n g to b u y s a n d w i c h e s on the w a y . I t ' s a fine day, as bright
as the c a l l i n g g u l l s . T h e tide is l o w and the s e a is a hard blue. It
feels g o o d t o b e a l i v e . B u t later, i n the p u b , i t ' s m y turn t o b e
tearful. T h e s e c o n d b e e r helps.

T h u r s d a y w e e k , the d a y o f the a p p o i n t m e n t . W e sit i n the

g r e y - b l u e w a i t i n g r o o m at the b r e a s t clinic. T h e r e is a TV in the

226
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

corner with the s o u n d m u t e d . S o m e T V c h e f i s b a k i n g a birth-

d a y cake. N o o n e i s interested.
O u r turn. T h r o u g h t o the e x a m i n a t i o n r o o m , m y s e m i - n a k e d
wife l o o k i n g fragile a s the s u r g e o n p r o d s a n d p a l p a t e s a n d g e t s
t o w o r k with his blue m a r k e r p e n . H e d o e s n ' t s a y m u c h . T h e
nurse d o e s m o s t o f the talking. S h e ' s lovely.
O u r turn a g a i n . Y e s , there i s s o m e t h i n g s u s p i c i o u s o n the X -
ray, the s u r g e o n s a y s . H e ' s g o i n g t o d o a c o r e b i o p s y . S e v e n
s l a m m i n g s h o t s o f the silver g u n , and each time h e h o l d s u p the
phial t o inspect the m a g g o t y p l u g s o f f l e s h . H e ' s not quite g e t -
ting what he w a n t s . W e ' l l h a v e the results in a few d a y s .

' B u t y o u d o n ' t like the l o o k of i t ? ' I a s k .

'No.'
' Y o u think i t ' s cancer.'
'Yes.'
T h e n u r s e specialist h a s j o i n e d u s : b a d n e w s personified. T h e
s u r g e o n leaves and it's the three o f u s i n the e x a m i n a t i o n r o o m ,
K a t e ' s tears hot o n m y shoulder. T h e n u r s e sits quietly. I h a v e
my b a c k to her, which feels like a d i s c o u r t e s y .
I t ' s a nasty, sticky w o r d , ' m a s t e c t o m y ' . I d o n ' t like the s o u n d
of it c o m i n g from the s u r g e o n ' s m o u t h . We are b a c k in the
consulting r o o m . H e ' s plotting the likely c o u r s e : s u r g e r y ,
chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, not n e c e s s a r i l y in that order.
W e d o n ' t g o straight h o m e . W e stop b y the r i v e r s i d e a n d w a l k i n
the w o o d s . I can't r e m e m b e r the last time I w e p t .

A w e e k o n . T h e y ' r e setting it up as a B a d N e w s C o n s u l t a t i o n .
T h e y h a v e g r a v e - j o l l y faces — p r o f e s s i o n a l wistfulness. B u t w e
k n o w already. T h e r e isn't m u c h b y w a y o f preliminary. T h e
s u r g e o n squints o v e r his s p e c t a c l e s .

227
PAUL B R O K S

' I t ' s a m a l i g n a n t , i n v a s i v e , ductal c a r c i n o m a , ' he s a y s , with a

t r a c e o f a p o l o g y . I s there a n y t h i n g else w e w a n t t o k n o w ? H e ' s
n o t g o i n g t o tell u s u n l e s s w e a s k .

' W h a t a b o u t the h i s t o l o g y ? A r e the cells well, o r poorly,

differentiated?'
' P o o r l y , ' h e s a y s , ' G r a d e 3.'
I t ' s a b a d o n e . He r e p l a y s the likely treatment s c e n a r i o : four
c y c l e s o f n e o a d j u v a n t c h e m o t h e r a p y o v e r three m o n t h s ; m a s -
tectomy, f o l l o w e d b y radiotherapy. T h e plan i s p r o v i s i o n a l ,
b e c a u s e if the c h e m o fails to shrink the t u m o u r they'll b r i n g the
s u r g e r y f o r w a r d . A r r a n g e m e n t s will b e m a d e for b o n e and liver
s c a n s . We c a n do b l o o d s and a chest X - r a y straight away. I keep
saying 'we'.

H o w o d d this is. T h e w o r s t n e w s , b u t a s e n s e of relief. I

h a v e a l r e a d y pictured the s u r g e o n slicing o f f m y w i f e ' s breast.
I h a v e i m a g i n e d it b e i n g t h r o w n to w a s t e . I h a v e seen it rising
in s m o k e t h r o u g h the incinerator chimney. Yet there is comfort
in the t h o u g h t of g e t t i n g on with treatment. W h a t e v e r it takes.
It a l m o s t feels r e l a x i n g to w a l k o u t a c r o s s the m a i n c o n c o u r s e
of the hospital — like a d e p a r t u r e l o u n g e with its cafe and s h o p s
- this p l a c e I k n o w in a parallel p r o f e s s i o n a l life, out into the
sunlight.

T h i s time w e d o n ' t w e e p b y the riverside o r w a l k i n the

w o o d s . We h e a d for the s u p e r m a r k e t . A f a m i l i a r - l o o k i n g m a n in
s h o r t s a n d T - s h i r t is l o a d i n g his s h o p p i n g into the b a c k of a
V o l v o . I t ' s a f a m o u s TV n e w s r e a d e r . I w a n t to tell him o u r
n e w s . B a c k h o m e w e drink b e e r a n d eat curry and watch
football.

We are h a n d e d o v e r to another s u r g e o n , a specialist in breast

228
 I N T O T H E S I L E N T L A N D

reconstruction. K a t e sits o n the e d g e o f the b e d . T h e s u r g e o n

stands s t r o k i n g his chin, o b s e r v i n g her b u s t with the e y e of a
sculptor. H e s t o o p s , p r e s s e s a n d p r o b e s the d i s e a s e d b r e a s t , then
stands b a c k for a fresh view. He takes o u t a little ruler a n d starts
m e a s u r i n g . H e ' s w e i g h i n g t h i n g s u p ; thinking o n his feet. Y e s ,
h e s a y s , w e c o u l d g o for a w i d e local e x c i s i o n instead o f m a s t e c -
tomy. A n d now, d e s p i t e myself, I find I ' m p l a y i n g D e v i l ' s
A d v o c a t e . I ' v e read the latest New England Journal of Medicine
and understand that, all things b e i n g e q u a l , less radical inter-
ventions are just as effective. B u t I n e e d to hear it f r o m the m a n
in the dark suit.

F i v e m o n t h s o n , p o s t - c h e m o , K a t e lies on a hospital b e d ,
d r a p e d in drips and d r a i n s , r e c o v e r i n g from her s e c o n d o p e r a -
tion i n a m o n t h . T h e f i r s t w a s t o r e m o v e the l u m p . T h i s o n e h a s
restored the b r e a s t to its o r i g i n a l s h a p e , t h o u g h we h a v e yet to
see the s c u l p t o r ' s h a n d i w o r k . S h e is s w a d d l e d in a ' b e a r h u g g e r '
blanket, filled with w a r m air to aid the p e r f u s i o n of b l o o d . W i t h
her hair just starting t o g r o w b a c k she l o o k s like the D a l a i L a m a ,
but m u c h prettier.

* * *

T h e year before last. E v e n i n g o n the terrace o f a F r e n c h s e a s i d e

hotel, late s u m m e r , the s e a as s m o o t h as m e r c u r y , the s k y n o t yet
drained o f its blue. T h e r e w o u l d b e s t a r s , b u t t i m e h a d s l o w e d .
E v e n the g u l l s s e e m e d s u s p e n d e d o n the c o o l i n g air, a n d m a d e
hardly a s o u n d . T h e y are m o r e s o f t - s p o k e n here. K a t e a n d I
w e r e drinking cold beer, r e c o v e r i n g f r o m the heat o f the day,
our skin feeling full of the s u n , o u r l i m b s a c h i n g f r o m a l o n g

229
PAUL B R O K S

s w i m . We s a i d little, but sat content w a t c h i n g the d a r k n e s s

gather. T h e c a n d l e o n the table r e m a i n e d unlit.
I b e c a m e a w a r e o f the m a n and w o m a n t w o tables a l o n g . S h e
h a d s a i d s o m e t h i n g i n a u d i b l e , to which he h a d replied 'Non,
merci,' b u t n o t h i n g else w a s s a i d .
T h e m a n , a b o u t forty, sat h u n c h e d with a r m s folded, a s i f
c o n s t r a i n e d by a straitjacket. H i s face h a d a d r a w n , intent l o o k .
H e c o u l d h a v e b e e n c o n c e n t r a t i n g h a r d . F r o m time t o time, his
lips p u r s e d a n d his right s h o u l d e r s e e m e d to jerk forward a little.
I w a t c h e d , discreetly. I noticed, t o o , the s q u i r m i n g m o v e m e n t of
his right h a n d . P r e s s e d b e t w e e n f o r e a r m and b i c e p s of the left
limb, it w a s t r y i n g to e s c a p e .

A w a i t e r a p p e a r e d f r o m n o w h e r e offering s o m e t h i n g , but
the w o m a n w a v e d him away. K a t e had her b a c k to all this and
couldn't see what w a s g o i n g on.
S o m e h o w , the m a n a n d w o m a n o n the terrace b r o u g h t t o
m i n d a s c e n e f r o m a novel I h a d b e e n r e a d i n g : K u n d e r a ' s Immor-
tality. O n e of the c h a r a c t e r s , A g n e s , is l y i n g in b e d next to her
h u s b a n d , P a u l . B o t h h a v e difficulty s l e e p i n g and A g n e s drifts
into a familiar fantasy a b o u t a kindly visitor from another
planet. T h e s t r a n g e r tells her that in the next life she will not be
r e t u r n i n g to E a r t h .

A n d P a u l ? ' s h e e n q u i r e s . N o , s h e i s told, Paul w o n ' t b e s t a y -

i n g either. W h a t the s t r a n g e r n e e d s t o k n o w is, d o they want t o
s t a y t o g e t h e r in the life to c o m e or never m e e t a g a i n ? In P a u l ' s
p r e s e n c e , A g n e s a l w a y s k n e w she w o u l d b e i n c a p a b l e o f s a y i n g
that s h e n o l o n g e r w a n t e d t o b e with him. H o w could she?
W o u l d n ' t that a m o u n t to s a y i n g that there h a d never b e e n any
l o v e b e t w e e n them, that their life h a d b e e n b a s e d on the illusion

230
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

o f l o v e ? A n d for this r e a s o n s h e w o u l d a l w a y s capitulate.

A g a i n s t her w i s h e s s h e w o u l d tell the s t r a n g e r that o f c o u r s e
they w a n t e d to r e m a i n together in the next life.
I put the s a m e q u e s t i o n to my w i f e . ' I m a g i n e , ' I s a i d , 'a v i s i -
tor from outer s p a c e j o i n s u s n o w a t this table. H e m a k e s his
offer o f another life b e y o n d d e a t h , a n d g i v e s y o u a c h o i c e . Y o u
can m a k e a r r a n g e m e n t s for m e t o join y o u o r y o u can d e c i d e
that, at the end of this life, we s h o u l d part c o m p a n y n e v e r to
meet again.'

T h e hand e s c a p e s . I t writhes f r o m u n d e r the left f o r e a r m a n d

p u s h e s f o r w a r d , p a l m f a c i n g o u t w a r d t o the s e a . T h e m a n ' s
e x p r e s s i o n d o e s not c h a n g e , he l o o k s straight a h e a d , b u t I s e e
that his k n e e s are n o w p r e s s e d tight t o g e t h e r a n d are e d g i n g t o
the left a s his u p p e r b o d y twists t o the right. T h e w o m a n takes
the errant hand and p u t s it b e t w e e n her p a l m s . S h e g u i d e s it b a c k
t o w a r d s the m a n ' s chest. S h e h o l d s it fast with her left h a n d a n d ,
at the s a m e time, reaches for his left with her right. Still he l o o k s
straight a h e a d , d o e s not s p e a k . I w a t c h as s h e refolds the a r m s ,
pulling them tight like a k n o t . T h e m a n g i v e s n o a c k n o w l e d g e -
ment. S h e returns to her seat.

K a t e w a s still thinking a b o u t the q u e s t i o n . T o o l o n g , I

thought. I w o u l d n ' t b e l i e v e her now. T h e n , straight out, s h e
said: ' I ' d g o i t a l o n e . W o u l d n ' t y o u ? ' S h e s a i d that o n e lifetime
was enough, however much you loved someone.

T w o m o r e c o u p l e s c a m e t o sit a t the table b e t w e e n u s a n d the

French c o u p l e . I'd seen t h e m f r o m a d i s t a n c e at the b e a c h that
afternoon. A t first I ' d a s s u m e d they w e r e F r e n c h , b u t there w a s
a s e l f - d e p r e c a t i n g j o k i n e s s a b o u t o n e o f the w o m e n a s s h e
s t r u g g l e d , inelegantly, to g e t into a wetsuit. I t h o u g h t it b e t r a y e d

231
PAUL B R O K S

her as E n g l i s h . I w a s right. T h e y o r d e r e d a r o u n d of drinks,

then another, a n d another. T h e i r c a n d l e w a s lit, and it lit the red-
d e n i n g f a c e s a r o u n d the table a n d g u t t e r e d in the g l a s s of the
accumulating bottles.

T h e F r e n c h c o u p l e w e r e a w a y i n the s h a d o w s . Y o u could
h a r d l y s e e t h e m now. B u t a s e c o n d a n d third time I noticed the
m a n ' s h a n d e s c a p e a n d , each t i m e , s a w the w o m a n retrieve it. H e
jerked a n d w r i t h e d as she tied the a r m s together, b e f o r e settling
b a c k into a b u n c h e d r e p o s e , set to unravel a g a i n at any m o m e n t .

It's Huntington's disease, I t h o u g h t . St Vitus's dance. Poor man.

Poor woman.
T h e involuntary, c h o r e i f o r m m o v e m e n t s are only the h a l f o f
it. T h e r e ' s the d e m e n t i a , t o o , a n d p e r h a p s p s y c h o s i s . T h e d i s -
e a s e is relentless a n d he will d a n c e like a p u p p e t to his death. H i s
fate w a s fixed at c o n c e p t i o n . A r o g u e g e n e , d o r m a n t for
d e c a d e s , h a d s t r u c k , a n d his b r a i n w a s c r u m b l i n g a t its c o r e ,
d e e p b e n e a t h the w r i n k l e d m a n t l e of the cortex, d o w n in the
d a r k interiors o f the b a s a l g a n g l i a , w h e r e actions are deciphered
f r o m the c o d e s o f intention. A n d n o w all i s confusion. T h e r e are
a c t i o n s a n d intentions, b u t they d o n ' t necessarily coincide.
M e a n w h i l e , they will do their b e s t , this c o u p l e , to d e n y the
terror a n d defy the p u p p e t e e r . T h e y will enjoy a s u m m e r ' s
e v e n i n g t o g e t h e r o u t o n the t e r r a c e .

I a b s o r b e d my w i f e ' s a n s w e r - I'd go it alone. Wouldn't you?-

a n d t o o k a n o t h e r sip o f beer.
' W o u l d y o u ? ' I a s k e d . S o m e o n e i n the E n g l i s h g r o u p
k n o c k e d an e m p t y b o t t l e o f f the table. It shattered on the
g r o u n d , b u r s t i n g s h a r d s in e v e r y direction. I noticed that the
French couple were gone.

232
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

' S o , ' I s a i d , ' i t ' s just the o n e l i f e t i m e ? '

'Afraid s o , ' she s a i d . ' B e t t e r m a k e the m o s t o f it.'
Remember me when I am gone away,

Gone far away into the silent land;

When you can no more hold me by the hand,

Nor I half turn to go yet turning stay.

Christina Rossetti, 'Remember'

FURTHER READING

Some of the following readings relate to particular chapters in

this book, others will illuminate its general themes. Still others are
recommended simply as sound introductions to neuroscience, neuro-
psychology, and philosophy of mind for those sufficiently motivated to
go beyond my case stories and other meanderings.
Recent years have seen the publication of several fine works of pop-
ular science devoted to neuropsychology, neuroscience, and related
topics. There are also some outstanding new textbooks. I can't think of
a better general introduction to brain science than Ian Glynn's An
Anatomy of Thought: the Origin and Machinery of the Mind (Weiden-
feld & Nicolson, 1999). Susan Greenfield's The Human Brain: A
Guided Tour (Phoenix, 1998) provides a useful brief survey; and for
those who prefer to be spoon-fed, Mind and Brain for Beginners by
Angus Gellatly and Oscar Zarate (Icon Books, 1998) is an entertaining
and informative cartoon book. Bruno Aldaris's Neuroscience for the
Brainless (Figment Books, 1994) which I quote in 'The Visible Man' is,
sadly, virtually unobtainable these days.
Also recommended is Phantoms in the Brain: Human Nature and the
Architecture of the Mind. (Fourth Estate, 1998) by V. S. Ramachandran
and Sandra Blakeslee. Ramachandran is a remarkably inventive neuro-
logical thinker and, among many other topics, this stimulating book

237
PAUL B R O K S

has some interesting things to say about phantom limbs and the neuro-
biological bases of the body schema, complementing the impression-
istic treatment I accord these topics in 'The Ghost Tree' chapters.
Todd E. Feinberg's Altered Egos: How the Brain Creates the Self
(Oxford University Press, 2001) is another excellent collection of case-
study vignettes and theoretical speculations. Among other fascinating
material, it contains a chapter on the important (but in research terms
relatively neglected) phenomenon of confabulation, which topic
forms one of the strands of 'Soul in a Bucket'. I was amused to discover
that we both appreciate the utility of the eye and pyramid symbol,
though use it to quite different ends.
As for basic textbooks, I list my recommendations below. There
may be other books of equal merit, but these are the ones with which I
am familiar and they are very good indeed:

Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B. and Mangun, G. R., Cognitive Neuro-

science: The Biology of the Mind, Second Edition (Norton & Co.,
2002).

Kolb, B. and Whishaw, I. Q., An Introduction to Brain and Behavior

(Worth Publishers, 2001).

Rosenzweig, M. R., Breedlove, S. M. and Leiman, A. L., Biological

Psychology: An Introduction to Behavioral, Cognitive, and Clinical
Neuroscience, Third Edition (Sinauer Associates, Inc., 2002).

It is important to note that there are different varieties of neuro-

psychology. One approach emphasizes functional anatomy and is con-
cerned with studying the neural bases of psychological functions.
Scientists working in this field are like mapmakers. Their mission is to
explore the neurobiological landscape, charting the relationship
between mental events and the structures and processes of the brain.
Localization and distribution of functions is the central concern. This
approach includes the classical method of examining the psychological
consequences of 'focal' (localized) brain damage as well as the newer
methods of cognitive neuroscience that use brain-scanning machines

238
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

to explore patterns of activity in the normal, intact brain. The above-

cited general texts are representative of this approach.
Other investigators—so-called cognitive neuropsychologists — have
relatively little interest in the details of brain function. They assume, of
course, that brain systems and mental life are intertwined, but their
primary concern is the structure of the mind, not the brain.
Cognitive neuropsychologists study the performance of the dam-
aged brain as a way of testing and refining theories of normal cognitive
function. They start with a theory of cognition — some model of short-
term memory, say, or of language production — and form hypotheses
as to how memory or speech might be affected by brain disorder.
The model gains support to the extent that patients' behaviour fits with
predictions. Alternatively, their test performance may challenge the
original model, leading to its modification or abandonment. What
matters is the robustness (or otherwise) of the theoretical models
rather than the precise nature of the underlying neurological disorder.
The best introduction to cognitive neuropsychology is Human
Cognitive Neuropsychology: A Textbook with Readings (Psychology
Press, 1996) by Andy Ellis and Andy Young. Alan Parkin's Explo-
rations in Cognitive Neuropsychology (Blackwell, 1996) is also excellent,
and The Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology (Psychology Press,
2000), edited by Brenda Rapp, is a useful source book.
The biological and psychological approaches are complementary.
Although considerations of anatomy and physiology may be second-
ary to their main enterprise, the fruits of the cognitive neuro-
psychologists' labours are directly relevant to an understanding of the
structure and functions of the brain. In order to know how psycholog-
ical functions are represented in neural systems the functions
themselves must be clearly delineated.
Modern clinical neuropsychology draws on both traditions, a fact
nicely illustrated in David Andrewes's comprehensive survey, Neuro-
psychology: From Theory to Practice (Psychology Press, 2001). I also
recommend The Blackwell Dictionary of Neuropsychology (Blackwell,
1996), edited by J. G. Beaumont, P. M. Kenealy and J. C. Rogers. Much

239
PAUL B R O K S

more than a dictionary, this is an excellent reference work containing

substantial entries on most aspects of clinical and experimental neuro-
psychology. The list of contributors is impressive.
For those specifically interested in psychiatric aspects of neurologi-
cal disorder the classic text is W. A. Lishman's Organic Psychiatry,
Third Edition (Blackwell Science, 1997). Although geared for a spe-
cialist readership, it is sufficiently lucid and digestible to be of interest
to the motivated lay reader.
The emerging discipline of cognitive neuropsychiatry puts the prin-
ciples and methods of cognitive neuropsychology to work in the field
of psychiatric research. Peter Halligan and John Marshall's Method in
Madness: Case Studies in Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (Psychology Press,
1996) provides a stimulating introduction. It includes a fine chapter on
Cotard's syndrome by Andy Young and Kate Leafhead ('Betwixt Life
and Death: Case Studies of the Cotard Delusion'), which helped shape
my thinking as I came to write 'I Think Therefore I Am Dead'.
Themes of consciousness, self, and personal identity thread right
through this book. I hope that professional philosophers will not find
my excursions into their territory too naive or superficial. If that is the
case I blame the following: David Chalmers, The Conscious Mind: In
Search of a Fundamental Theory (Oxford University Press, 1996);
Francis Crick, The Astonishing Hypothesis (Simon and Schuster, 1994);
Daniel Dennett, Consciousness Explained (Penguin Books, 1993);
Owen Flanagan, The Problem of the Soul: Two Visions of the Mind and
How to Reconcile Them (Basic Books, 2002); Gerald Edelman and
Giulio Tonini, Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination
(Penguin, 2001); Nicholas Humphrey, A History of the Mind (Chatto
and Windus, 1992); Colin McGinn, The Mysterious Flame: Conscious
Minds in a Material World (Basic Books, 1999); Thomas Nagel, The
View from Nowhere (Oxford University Press, 1986); John Searle, The
Mystery of Consciousness (Granta Books, 1997); and Max Velmans,
Understanding Consciousness (Routledge, 2000).

It would take another long chapter to summarize the range of ideas

represented in these works (materialism, dualism, neural Darwinism,

240
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

Mysterianism, and so on), and I have resisted the temptation to offer

such a summary — for one thing I don't feel qualified to undertake the
task. Searle's highly readable book summarizes the thinking of some of
the key figures in the current debate, as well as presenting the author's
own views. If nothing else, it is worth reading for the testy exchange
between Searle and Dennett in which each accuses the other of 'intel-
lectual pathology'. It took me straight back to the school playground
{Fight! Fight! Fight!).

I find Searle's 'biological naturalism' hard to fathom, but generally

have difficulties fixing my own co-ordinates when it comes to the prob-
lem of consciousness. In 'Right this way, Smiles a Mermaid' the narra-
tor stands accused of being a 'Mysterian'. Owen Flanagan, I believe,
originally coined the term in honour (not quite the right word) of
Colin McGinn for propounding the view that the mind-body problem
is insoluble, or at least that we feeble-minded humans are incapable of
solving it. I am much drawn to McGinn's deeply subversive position,
but also find Dennett persuasive (as should be apparent throughout the
book). That's my problem.
For an incisive analysis of the neuropsychological bases of con-
sciousness, see Larry Weiskrantz's Consciousness Lost and Found: A
Neuropsychological Exploration (Oxford University Press, 1997). The
work of the neurologist Antonio Damasio has also been influential in
shaping my thoughts on consciousness, self, and related matters. See,
in particular, Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain
(Picador, 1995), and The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and
the Making of Consciousness (Heinemann, 1999). Joseph LeDoux's
Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are (Macmillan, 2002)
also makes an important contribution to our understanding of the
neurobiological underpinnings of the self. Again, for those who prefer
cartoon books, David Papineau and Howard Selina's Introducing
Consciousness (Icon Books, 2000) is a sparky introduction to the field of
consciousness studies.
In a recent collection of essays, Consciousness and the Novel (Seeker
and Warburg, 2002), the novelist and critic David Lodge offers some

241
PAUL B R O K S

valuable insights concerning the representation of consciousness in

literature. Works of literature — in contradistinction to science -
describe 'the dense specificity of personal experience'. Science, from
its objective, third-person perspective, tries to formulate universally
applicable, general explanations. The subjective and the unique are
anathema to science. Lodge suggests that 'Lyric poetry is arguably
man's most successful effort to describe qualia' (the 'raw feels' of con-
scious awareness). 'The novel is arguably man's most successful effort
to describe the experience of individual human beings moving through
space and time.'
'To Be Two or Not to Be' draws heavily on the ideas of the philoso-
pher, Derek Parfit, and I took the liberty of using the name 'Derek' for
one of the central characters. Although most of what the fictional
Derek has to say is, I believe, representative of the real Derek Parfit's
ideas, there may be instances where the views of the two Dereks
diverge in more or less subtle ways. The best way to become
acquainted with Mr Parfit's thoughts on personal identity is to consult
his masterwork, Reasons and Persons (Oxford University Press, 1984).
Don't expect to read it in one sitting, however. A digestible account of
some of Parfit's ideas — and much else besides - can be found in
Jonathan Glover's I: The Philosophy and Psychology of Personal Identity
(Penguin Books, 1991).
I saw Parfit lecture on personal identity, around the time that
Reasons and Persons was published, in the Department of Physiology at
Oxford during a series of seminars on the science and philosophy of
mind. I thought at the time that he was saying something that was
either quite trivial (if entertaining) or extremely profound and not a
little disturbing. With the passage of the years I can see it was the latter.
I have to say that, like his fictional counterpart, he did have a slightly
wild look about him, and he was swigging water from a milk bottle
throughout his presentation.
The scientific paper to which I refer in 'The Ghost Tree (1)' was
co-authored with Andy Young and others and published in the journal
Neuropsychologia (P. Broks, A. W. Young, et al., 'Face processing

242
 INTO T H E S I L E N T L A N D

impairments after encephalitis: amygdala damage and the recognition

of fear', Neuropsychologia 36, pp.59-70, 1998). In 'The Ghost Tree (2)'
I refer to the concept 'the social brain' — the notion that the brain has
evolved systems dedicated to social perception and understanding. A
good general introduction to this way of thinking is Fridays Footprint:
How Society Shapes the Human Brain (Oxford University Press, 1997)
by Leslie Brothers. Simon Baron-Cohen makes a strong case for the
relevance of the social brain to an understanding of autism in Mind-
blindness (MIT Press, 1995).
'The Sword of the Sun' was inspired by a story of the same name in
Italo Calvino's Mr Palomar (Vintage, 1999), translated from the Italian
by William Feaver . In 'Vodka and Saliva' I quote from Paul Ekman's
Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics and Marriage
(Norton, 2001). 'The Dreams of Robert Louis Stevenson' was inspired
by 'A Chapter on Dreams', which can be found as an appendix to The
Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and Weir of Hermiston (Oxford
World's Classics, 1998). The introduction by Emma Letley was very
helpful, as was Robert Mighall's introduction to the Penguin Classics
edition of Jekyll and Hyde (Penguin, 2002). 'The Visible Man', of
course, pays homage to Kafka's classic allegorical tale 'Metamorphosis',
available in The Complete Short Stories of Fran\ Kafka (Vintage Clas-
sics, 1999). 'In the Theatre' takes as its focal point Dannie Abse's dis-
turbing poem, 'In the Theatre (A True Incident)', from his Collected
Poems, 1948- 76 (Hutchinson, 1977). I had already drafted 'The Story
of Einstein's Brain' when I came upon Driving Mr Albert: A Trip Across
America with Einstein's Brain (Abacus, 2002), Michael Paterniti's enter-
taining account of his quest for the great man's grey matter and subse-
quent journey through America with it stashed in the trunk of his
Buick. In 'Gulls' I refer to Milan Kundera's Immortality (Faber and
Faber, 1991), translated from the Czech by Peter Kussi. In 'Soul in a
Bucket' I mention Tom Wolfe's essay, 'Sorry, but Your Soul Just
Died', which appears in Hooking Up (Jonathan Cape, 2000).

The Working Brain by Alexander Romanovich Luria (Penguin,

1973) is out of date, hard to obtain, and difficult to read — at least I

243
PAUL B R O K S

found it so when I first came across it in my undergraduate days. I can't,

for these reasons, recommend the book as an introductory text, but I
cite it because its author has been a significant influence on my own
approach to clinical practice. Luria, to whom I refer more than once in
these pages, is one of the undisputed giants of neuropsychology, and
The Working Brain (published four years before he died) summarizes
his life's work. It presents a general theory of the organization of brain
function — the distillation of forty years' work by Luria and his collab-
orators — as well as a comprehensive survey of existing knowledge of
the classical domains of interest: the brain bases of perception, lan-
guage, memory, thought, and action. Anyone developing a serious
interest in the subject should at some stage track down, read, and
appreciate Luria for the breadth of his vision of brain science, his
recognition that the study of brain function is a multidisciplinary
enterprise, and his insight that, ultimately, it becomes necessary to con-
sider the brain in relation to other brains if one is to comprehend its
workings: neuropsychology has social dimensions as well as biological
and psychological. 'The eye of science,' he wrote, 'does not probe a
"thing", an event isolated from other things or events. Its real object is
to see and understand the way a thing or event relates to other things or
events.'

Luria should be read not least for his understanding that neuro-
psychology concerns individual human beings — patients — struggling
to make their way in a world rendered difficult and sometimes dis-
turbingly strange by their brain damage. As far as neuropsychology is
concerned, he was an advocate of 'romantic science' — recognizing the
importance of combining close observation of individual patients (and
understanding them as people) with a more systematic, 'classical'
understanding of the facts of neurological disorder derived through
conventional scientific method. This should be the aim of all clinicians
— not to lose sight of the unique in the context of the universal, and vice
versa.
Luria's scientific biography, The Making of Mind: A Personal
Account of Soviet Psychology (Harvard University Press, 1986), edited

244
 I N T O T H E S I L E N T L A N D

by Michael and Shelia Cole, is a fascinating fusion of the personal, the

political, and the scientific. But he is best known as a master of the
extended case history, classic examples of which are The Man with
a Shattered World (Penguin, 1975) and The Mind of a Mnemonist
(Harvard University Press, 1986).
Another master of that genre is, of course, Oliver Sacks, whose
works I have studiously avoided while writing this book. His influence
was strong enough. I especially recommend The Man Who Mistook his
Wife for a Hat (Picador, 1986) and An Anthropologist on Mars (Picador,
1995). These collections of neurological case histories, full of warmth
and insight, embody the spirit of Alexander Luria, whom Sacks
acknowledges as an important influence. Like Luria, he appreciates
the complementarity of 'classical' and 'romantic' modes of under-
standing.
In the mid-1980s I was, for reasons not worth going into, somewhat
disillusioned with clinical psychology. I thought about an academic
career as a possible alternative, but did not relish the uncertain prospect
of drifting on to the trail of short-term, post-doctoral research
appointments with no guarantee of a proper job at the end. I might
easily have given up neuropsychology altogether at that point. I might
have been happy enough doing other things. Then I got a call from
Merck Sharp and Dohme, the drug firm ( 'America's Most Admired
Company' according to Fortune Magazine — I still have the commemo-
rative mug). The unexpected call came from Susan Iversen, at that time
Director of Behavioural Pharmacology at the MSD Neuroscience
Research Centre. They were setting up a clinical research unit, she
said, and would I be interested in joining them? I told her I knew noth-
ing about psychopharmacology. 'Don't worry, love,' she said, 'you'll
soon pick it up.' The advice was sound, and it is my advice to anyone
interested in finding out more about neuropsychology, but wary of
what might appear to be a rather daunting academic discipline: Don't
worry, love, you '11 soon pick it up.

245
A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S

Thanks to the patients whose stories lie at the heart of this book and
from whom I have had the privilege of learning about the human
dimension of neuropsychology, as opposed to what the textbooks
teach. I hope I have given something in return.
It is a plain fact that this book would not have been written without
the vision of my editor and publisher, Toby Mundy. The project was
Toby's idea in the first place and he has seen it through with great elan.
Apart from anything else, I thank him for his patience. It has also been
a pleasure working with the impressive Bonnie Chiang, and, previ-
ously, Alice Hunt at Atlantic Books. I am grateful to Ian Pindar who
read the penultimate draft in full and made numerous fine adjustments.
Warm thanks also to my friends at Prospect, in particular David Good-
hart and Alex Linklater, for the opportunity to write a monthly column
for a very fine magazine.
From the bottom of my heart, I thank my entire family for their
unfailing support down the years, but most of all my wife, Sonja, and
sons Daniel and Jonathan, to whom I dedicate this book. You are more
precious to me than ever.

246