You are on page 1of 1

U.S.

Department of Transpor tation
Research and Innovative Technology Administration
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
Geospatial Infor mation Program

Structurally Deficient Bridges on the National Highway System
Florida - Congressional District 16
4
§
¦
¨ Q
509
R
Melbourne

75
§
¦
¨ .
!
Lak ela nd Q
500
R .!.! Palm Bay

98
¤
£ Q
R91

Q
618
R 95
§
¦
¨

Q
R60

Q
64
R
1
¤
£
Port Saint Lucie
.
!
Q
R70

There
¤ are no deficient bridges in this district.
Q
70
R
£ 17
Q
R
710

Q
29
R
Q
80
R 441
We st P alm Bea ch

Q80
¤
£ .
!
R Q
R80
98
¤
£
Cape Coral
Boynton Beach
.
!
Q
876
R .
!
27 Delray Be ach
¤
£ .
!
Boca Raton
Dee
! rfield Beach
.
Coral Springs
.
!
Q
869
R .!
.
!
Tam arac
.
!
Margate
§
¦
¨75
Q
93
R.! Pla nta tion Sunris e
.
! !.!
595
§
¦ ..!!
¨ .
Dav ie
Pembrok e P ines
Miramar
.
!
Hollyw ood
.
!
.
!

R Q
RQ 821 826
Q
997
R Hialeah
.
!
.
!
Consult your state DOT for the most up-to-date status of bridges. Area of Detail
Deficient Bridges
(
!


.
! City
Interstate Highway
Other NHS Highway
Body of Water
Urbanized Areas
110th Congressional District

Note: The bridges displa yed on this map represent the results of a combined BTS/FHWA e ffort to geocode bridges from the FHWA's National Bridge
Inventory (NBI) . With the exce ption of Kentucky and P ennsy lva nia, w hose most current data is 200 6, all data is from the 20 07 NBI. Of the 22 structura lly
def icient NHS bridges in Florida, 3 c ould not be geoloc ated bec ause of insufficient data . S tructurally deficie nt bridge s a re not nece ssarily unsa fe;
all public road bridges receive re gular saf ety inspections . The bridge s listed w ere c ategorize d as structurally deficient a t the time the m aps w ere deve loped.