Estimation

of Peak / Flood Discharge

Peak discharges occur in the rivers in the rainfall season. Estimation methods: 1) 2) 3) 4) Physical conditions of the past floods Flood discharge formulae Flood frequency studies Unit hydrograph

(1)

Physical Conditions of the Past Floods

To know the maximum water level attained in the past 35 years.

 Past flood marks on ancient monuments, etc., along river banks are located.
 Old persons in the villages situated on the bank of the river  The cross-section pertaining to the highest flood marks can be drawn.  Obtain from the cross-section: Water flow area (A) Wetted perimeter (P) Hydraulic mean depth / hydraulic radius (R)  By leveling to u/s and d/s of the cross-section site, S can be determined.  Using above parameters velocity of flow (V) is computed by Manning’s or Chezy's equation.

 Using Continuity Equation, flood discharge can be calculated.
 Procedure is repeated at several watermarks, to get consistent results.

(2) Flood Discharge Formulae

First Approach The general form of the empirical formulae

Q = CAn
where Q = flood discharge, A = catchment area, C = flood coefficient and n = flood index Both C and n depend upon various factors, like Size, Shape, Location and Topography of catchment Intensity, Duration and Distribution pattern of the storm
(continued)

Depending upon the above factors flood discharge formula for each region is developed. Following are few examples of regional based flood discharge formulae. Dicken’s Formula: Ryve’s Formula: Inglis formula: Nawab Jang Bahadur formula: Fanning’s formula: Creager formula: Mayer’s formula: For various parts of India. Madras (India) Former Bombay presidency (India) Hyderabad state (India) American catchments American catchments American catchments

Second Approach This includes formulae of the same form as the first approach, i.e. Q = CAn but here A refers to cross sectional area of the water way. Example: Talbot formula.

Third Approach
This includes the formulae of the type:
Q  Aci S A

where i = expected average rainfall S = average slope of the watershed Examples: Burkli-Ziegler formula and McMath formula

Fourth Approach: Fuller’s formula
p

QT  C f A0.8 1  0.8 logT 
p

where

QT  Peak 24-hr flood with a frequency of T years
A = Catchment area (km2) Cf = Fuller’s constant = 0.18 – 1.88 Derived for U.S.A catchments.

Fifth Approach: Rational Formula It is characterized by: consideration of the entire drainage area as a single unit, estimation of flow at the most downstream point only, the assumption that rainfall is uniformly distributed over the drainage area. The Rational Formula reads:

Q p  0.28 C I A
Where Qp= Peak runoff rate [m³/sec], C = Runoff coefficient I = Rainfall intensity [mm/hr], A = Drainage area [km²] The Rational Formula follows the assumption that: the predicted peak discharge has the same probability of occurrence (return period) as the used rainfall intensity (I), the runoff coefficient (C) is constant during the rain storm, and the recession time is equal to the time of rise.

Sixth Approach: Modified Rational Formula

In the modified version of the Rational Formula, a storage coefficient is included to account for a recession time larger than the time the hydrograph takes to rise. The Modified Rational Formula reads:

Q p  0.28 C s C I A
Where Cs= Storage coefficient The peak flood discharge in a catchment is reached when all parts of the watershed are contributing to the outflow, i.e. at the time of concentration: ……………… Kirpich/Ramser formula tc  0.0195 L0.77 S 0.385 Where tc= Time of concentration [min] L= Length of main river [m] S= Longitudinal or Distance weighted channel slope

(3) Flood Frequency Studies

Probability concepts are used to study the probable variations in flow so that the design can be completed based on a calculated risk.
Flood Frequency

Likelihood of flood being equaled or exceeded.
A 10% frequency means that the flood has 10 out of 100 chances of being equaled or exceeded.
Recurrence Interval (Tr)

Number of years in which a flood can be expected (equaled or exceeded) once.

Gumbel's Method
This method is useful for obtaining values of flood discharges for a high recurrence interval.
If Q1, Q2……… Qn comprise a series of extreme values of floods, the probability of occurrence of a value equal to or less than Q is given by

P  ez

(1)

z  e y
y  a(Q  Q f )
Q f  Qav  0.45 x

(2)
(3)

Qf = value of flood discharge having highest frequency, and is given as: (4) Qav = average value of discharge

x 

 (Q
x

1

 Qav ) 2  (Q2  Qav ) 2  ..........  (Qn  Qav ) 2 N

(5) (6)

a

1.28

The recurrence interval in years (Tr) for the discharge Q is given by

Tr =

1 1-P

(7)

Example # 1

[One Excel Sheet]

Example With the data given in following table estimate the probability that the annual maximum discharge Q on the Guadalupe River will exceed 50,000 cfs at least once during the next three years. Annual maximum discharges of the Guadalupe River near Victoria, Texas, 1935-1978, in cfs Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1930 1940
55900 58000 56000 7710 12300 38500 179000 17200 25400 4940 22000 17900 46000 6970 20600

1950
13300 12300 28400 11600 8560 4950 1730 25300 58300 10100

1960
23700 55800 10800 4100 5720 15000 9790 70000 44300 15200

1970
9190 9740 58500 33100 25200 30200 14100 54500 12700

Solution:
From 1935 to 1978 discharge of 50,000 cfs exceeds 9 times as shown in the table. First exceedence occurred in 1936 Last exceedence occurred in 1977 Difference b/w first and last exceedences = 1977-1936 = 41 years For 9 exceedences there will be 8 recurrence intervals. Therefore, Average Recurrence Interval, T = 41/8 = 5.125 years
Probability of occurrence of an event in any observation, p = 1/T Therefore, probability that discharge will equal or exceed 50,000 cfs, p ≈ 1/5.125 = 0.195 P(Qmax ≥ Q at least once in N years) = 1 - (1 - p)N Therefore, Probability that maximum discharge will equal or exceed 50,000 cfs at least once in 3 years = 1 - (1 - 0.195)3 = 0.48 = 48%

Exceeedence Year 1936

Reccurence Interval (years) 4

1940
1 1941 1 1942 16 1958

3
1961 6 1967 5 1972 5

1977

(4) Unit Hydrograph Method

Hydrograph
It is a graph showing variations of discharge with time at a particular point of a stream.

Rainfall Excess or Effective Rainfall
It is the rainfall that is neither retained on land surface nor filtered to the soil.

Unit Hydrograph
“It is a type of hydrograph that represents 1 cm or 1 inch of a runoff from rainfall of some unit duration”. e.g. if a unit hydrograph results from a 3 hour unit rainfall duration it is known as 3-hour unit hydrograph. In other words: “a hydrograph produced by surface runoff from a storm lasting for 3-hours and yielding a rainfall excess of 1 cm spread on the entire basin”.

Preparing a unit hydrograph from an isolated storm
First

of all, the runoff rates (in cm/hr) resulted from the given storm is plotted against time (in hours), so as to obtain Direct Runoff Hydrograph (DRH).
The

total area (D) contained within this hydrograph is calculated by a planimeter or by simpson‫׳‬s rule, etc. This will represent nothing but the volume of runoff in cm depth of water on the basin.
The

ordinates of this hydrograph (ABC) are divided by D so as to obtain the ordinates of a unit hydrograph AB’C.
For

example, suppose the area ABC is 3 cm depth of water, then the ordinates of unit hydrograph can be obtained by dividing the ordinates of storm hydrograph by 3.

The final step is to assign an effective storm duration from the study of the rainfall records. Periods of low rainfall at the beginning and end of storm are omitted if they do not contribute substantially to the RUNOFF.

In the fig. the duration of rainfall is 15 hours, but still it can be assumed to have an effective duration equal to 8 hours. In this way, the number of durations can be reduced, and the various storms of different durations can be assigned the same unit duration . Unit storms are therefore not the storms of same durations. But they are the storms of the like durations.

Problem
In a typical 4 hr. storm producing 5 cm of run off from a basin, the flow in the stream are as follow:

Time (hours)
0 2 4 6 8 12 16 20 (a) Plot the unit hydrograph of runoff for this storm.

Flow (cumecs)
0.000 1.200 4.050 6.750 5.670 3.375 1.350 0.000

(b) Estimate, as accurately as possible, the peak flow and the time of its occurrence, in a flood created by an 8 hours storm, which produces 2.5 cm of effective rainfall during the 1st four hours & 3.75 cm of effective rainfall during the 2nd four hours. Assume the base flow to be negligible.

Solution
T (hr) Ordinate of strom hydrograph of 5 cm (2) Ordinate of unit hydrograph of 1 cm Ordinate of 1st 4 hr hydrograph producing 2.5 cm rain (4) = (3) * 2.5 Ordinate of 2nd 4 hr hydrograph producing 3.75 cm rain (5) = (3) * 3.75 Total 8 hr hydrograph ordinates in Cumecs (6) = (4) + (5)

(1)

(3) = (2) / 5

0 2 4 6

0 1.22 4.05 6.75

0 0.24 0.81 1.35

0 0.61 2.02 3.37

--0 0.90

0 0.61 2.02 4.27

8 10
12 16 20 24

5.67 -3.375 1.35 0 --

1.15 -0.68 0.27 0 --

2.83 2.26
1.69 0.67 0 --

3.03
5.06

5.86 7.32
6.00 3.32 1.01 0

4.31 2.55 1.01
0

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful